Prolonged desensitization of the human endothelin A receptor in Xenopus oocytes. Comparative studies with the human neurokinin A receptor

Endothelin-1, endothelin A and B receptor expression and their pharmacological properties in GFAP negative human lamina cribrosa cells

Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) is a progressive optic neuropathy, characterized, in part by extensive extra cellular matrix remodeling and collapse of the lamina cribrosa (LC). Endothelin-1 (ET-1), a potent vasoactive peptide and its receptors, endothelin receptor A (ET(A)) and endothelin receptor B (ET(B)), have been implicated in glaucomatous optic neuropathy. In this study we examined the expression of ET-1 and its receptors in GFAP negative LC cells. RT-PCR analysis revealed that LC cells express both ET(A), ET(B) receptors and prepro- ET-1, the primary gene transcript of ET-1. A dose-dependent increase in intra-cellular calcium concentrations was observed in the presence of 1, 10 and 100nM ET-1. Increased intracellular calcium concentrations were blocked by the ET(A) selective antagonist BQ610 but not by the ET(B) specific antagonist BQ788. Desensitization to ET(A)-mediated increase in intracellular calcium was observed in LC cells following pre-treatment with ET-1 for 24h. Western blot analysis of LC cells treated with ET-1 for 24h revealed a decreased expression of ET(A) receptor protein at 1, 10 and 100nM concentrations, while a dose dependent increase in the ET(B) receptor was observed with a significant increase at 100nM. Quantitative PCR showed a dose-dependent decrease in ET(A) receptor mRNA levels and an increase in the mRNA levels of ET(B) receptors. A Griess colorimetric assay was used to measure the NO released from LC cells and ET-1 induced a dose-dependent increase in NO release which was significant at 100nM concentration. ET-1 induced NO release was significantly blocked by BQ788, an ET(B) selective antagonist, and as well as BQ610, an ET(A) selective antagonist. These results suggested that human lamina cribrosa cells expressed functional ET(A) and ET(B) receptors and their expression and function was altered in response to prolong exposure to ET-1. This may have an implication in the normal physiology of LC cells and in POAG subjects where elevated levels of ET-1 could impact LC function.

Cloning and functional identification of novel endothelin receptor type A isoforms in pituitary

Mammalian endothelin (ET) receptors, termed ET(A)R and ET(B)R, are derived from two intron-containing genes and the functional splice variants of ET(B)R but not ET(A)R have been identified. Here, we report about the isolation of cDNAs of ET(A)R transcripts from rat anterior pituitary, which are generated by alternative RNA splicing. Deletion of exon 2 and insertion of fragments from intron 1 and 2 accounted for formation of three misplaced proteins, whereas the insertion of a fragment from intron 6 resulted in generation of a functional plasma membrane receptor, termed ET(A)R-C13. In this splice variant, the C-terminal 382S-426N sequence of ET(A)R was substituted with a shorter 382A-399L sequence, resulting in alteration of the putative domains responsible for coupling to G(q/11) and G(s) proteins and the endocytotic recycling, as well as in deletion of the predicted protein kinase C/casein kinase 2 phosphorylation sites. The mRNA transcripts for ET(A)R-C13 were identified in normal and immortalized pituitary cells and several other tissues. The pharmacological profiles of recombinant ET(A)R and ET(A)R-C13 were highly comparable, but the coupling of ET(A)R-C13 to the calcium-mobilizing signaling pathway was attenuated, causing a rightward shift in the potency for agonist. Furthermore, the efficacy of ET(A)R-C13 to stimulate adenylyl cyclase signaling pathway and to internalize was significantly reduced. These results indicate for the first time the presence of a novel ET(A) splice receptor, which could contribute to the functional heterogeneity among secretory pituitary cell types.

Arteries and veins desensitize differently to endothelin

Hypertension is accompanied by increased arterial endothelin-1 (ET-1) and decreased arterial contraction to ET-1. By contrast, veins remain responsive to ET-1 in hypertension. Isometric contraction was used to test the hypothesis that veins do not desensitize to ET-1 to the extent of arteries, possibly because of the presence of functional ETA and ETB receptors on veins and only functional ETA receptors on arteries. Contraction to ET-1 after exposure to ET-1 (100 nmol/L) was abolished in aortae, while in veins 36.3 +/- 0.2% of maximal contraction to ET-1 remained. Aortae were unresponsive to the ETA receptor agonist ET-1(1-31) (100 nmol/L) after ET-1 exposure, while 21.9 +/- 0.6% of maximum venous contraction to ET-1 (1-31) remained. In a similar manner, the venous ETB receptor did not lose responsiveness to the ETB receptor agonist sarafotoxin 6c (S6c, 100 nmol/L); aortae did not contract to S6c. In ET-1-desensitized veins, the ETB receptor antagonist BQ-788 (100 nmol/L) decreased maximum contraction to ET-1, but did not alter potency (-log EC50 control = 8.14 +/- 0.01 mol/L; BQ-788 = 8.13 +/- 0.04 mol/L). The ETA receptor antagonist atrasentan (100 nmol/L) blocked remaining venous contraction to ET-1 (control = 8.05 +/- 0.05 mol/L; atrasentan = unmeasurable). Maintained responsiveness to ET-1 in veins occurs primarily via the ETA receptor, while in arteries the ETA receptor is responsible for desensitization to ET-1.

Prevention of ginsenoside-induced desensitization of Ca2+-activated Cl- current by microinjection of inositol hexakisphosphate in Xenopus laevis oocytes: involvement of GRK2 and beta-arrestin I

We demonstrated that ginsenosides, the active ingredient of Panax ginseng, enhance endogenous Ca(2+)-activated Cl(-) currents via Galpha(q/11)-phospholipase C-beta3 pathway in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Moreover, prolonged treatment of ginsenosides induced Cl(-) channel desensitization. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in ginsenoside-induced Cl(-) channel desensitization have not yet been determined precisely. To provide answers to these questions, we investigated the changes in ginsenoside-induced Cl(-) channel desensitization after intraoocyte injection of inositol hexakisphosphate (InsP(6)), which is known to bind beta-arrestins and interfere with beta-arrestin-induced receptor down-regulation, and cRNAs coding beta-arrestin I/II and G-protein receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), which is known to phosphorylate G protein-coupled receptors and attenuate agonist stimulations. When control oocytes were stimulated with ginsenosides, the second, third, and fourth responses to ginsenosides were 69.6 +/- 4.1, 9.2 +/- 2.3, and 2.6 +/- 2.2% of the first responses, respectively. Preintraoocyte injection of InsP(6) before ginsenoside treatment restored ginsenoside effect to initial response levels in a concentration-, time-, and structurally specific manner, in that inositol hexasulfate had no effect. The EC(50) was 13.9 +/- 8.7 microM. Injection of cRNA coding beta-arrestin I but not beta-arrestin II blocked InsP(6) effect on prevention of ginsenoside-induced Cl(-) channel desensitization. Injection of cRNA coding GRK2 abolished ginsenoside effect enhancing Cl(-) current. However, the GRK2-caused loss of ginsenoside effect on Cl(-) current was prevented by coinjection of GRK2 with GRK2-K220R, a dominant-negative mutant of GRK. These results indicate that ginsenoside-induced Cl(-) channel desensitization is mediated via activation of GRK2 and beta-arrestin I.

Regulated interaction of endothelin B receptor with caveolin-1

The peptide hormone endothelin transmits various signals through G protein-coupled receptors, the endothelin type A (ETAR) and B (ETBR) receptors. Caveolae are specialized lipid rafts containing polymerized caveolins. We examined the interaction of ETBR with caveolin-1, expressed in Sf9, COS-1, and HEK293 cells, and its effects on the subcellular distribution and the signal transduction of ETBR. ETBR formed a complex with caveolin-1 in cells in which these two proteins were coexpressed and in the mixture after purification and reconstitution (as examined by immunoprecipitation) suggesting the direct binding of ETBR with caveolin-1. The complex formed efficiently only when the ETBR was ligand-free or bound to an antagonist, RES-701-1, whereas the addition of ET-1 or another antagonist, BQ788, dissociated the complex, suggesting the structural recognition of ETBR by caveolin-1. In contrast, the ETAR bound to caveolin-1 regardless of ligand binding. Caveolin-1 utilized its scaffolding domain (residues 82-101) and the C-terminal domain (residues 136-178) to bind to ETBR, as for other signalling molecules. Furthermore, the amount of ETBR localized in caveolae increased significantly with the expression of caveolin-1 and decreased with the addition of ET-1. The disruption of caveolae by filipin reduced the ET-1-derived phosphorylation of ERK1/2. These results suggest the possibility that the binding to caveolin-1 retains the ligand-free ETBR in caveolae and regulates the ET signal.

Human substance P receptor lacking the C-terminal domain remains competent to desensitize and internalize

Substance P receptor (SPR) and its naturally occurring splice-variant, lacking the C-terminal tail, are found in brain and spinal cord. Whether C-terminally truncated SPR desensitizes like full-length SPR is controversial. We used a multivaried approach to determine whether human SPR (hSPR) and a C-terminally truncated mutant, hSPRDelta325, differ in their desensitization and internalization. In HEK-293 cells expressing either hSPRDelta325 or hSPR, SP-induced desensitization of the two receptors was similar when measured by inositol triphosphate accumulation or by transient translocation of coexpressed PKCbetaII-GFP to the plasma membrane. Moreover, translocation of beta-arrestin 1 or 2-GFP (betaarr1-GFP or betaarr2-GFP) to the plasma membrane, and receptor internalization were also similar. However, hSPR and hSPRDelta325 differ in their phosphorylation and in their ability to form beta-arrestin-containing endocytic vesicles. Unlike hSPR, hSPRDelta325 is not phosphorylated to a detectable level in intact HEK293 cells, and whereas hSPR forms vesicles containing either betaarr1-GFP or betaarr2-GFP, hSPRDelta325 does not form any vesicles with betaarr1-GFP, and forms fewer vesicles with betaarr2-GFP. We conclude that truncated hSPR undergoes agonist-dependent desensitization and internalization without detectable receptor phosphorylation.

Electrophysiological analysis of the negative chronotropic effect of endothelin-1 in rabbit sinoatrial node cells

1. Electrophysiological effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) were studied in rabbit sinoatrial node (SAN) using conventional microelectrode and whole-cell voltage and current recordings. 2. In rabbit SAN, RT-PCR detected ET(A) endothelin receptor mRNA. ET-1 (100 nM) increased the cycle length of action potentials (APs) from 305 +/- 15 to 388 +/- 25 ms; this effect was antagonised by the ET(A) receptor-selective antagonist BQ-123 (1 microM). ET-1 increased AP duration (APD50) by 22%, depolarised the maximum diastolic potential (MDP) from -59 +/- 1 to -53 +/- 2 mV, shifted the take-off potential by +5 mV and decreased the pacemaker potential (PMP) slope by 15%. Under exactly the same experimental conditions, ET-1 caused a positive chronotropic effect in guinea-pig SAN with a decrease of 13% in APD50, a shift of -4 mV in the take-off potential and an increase of 8% in the PMP slope. 3. Rabbit SAN exhibited two major cell types, distinguished both by their appearances and by their electrophysiological responses to ET-1. Whereas the spontaneous pacing rate and the PMP slope were similarly decreased by ET-1 (10 nM) in both cell types, ET-1 depolarised MDP from -67 +/- 1 to -62 +/- 4 mV in spindle-shaped cells but hyperpolarised it from -73 +/- 1 to -81 +/- 3 mV in rod-shaped cells. ET-1 decreased APD50 by 8 and 52% and shifted the take-off potential by +5 and -9 mV in spindle- and rod-shaped cells, respectively. 4. ET-1 decreased the high-threshold calcium current (I(CaL)) by about 50% in both cell types, without affecting its voltage dependence, and decreased the delayed rectifier K+ current (I(K)) with significant shifts (of +4.7 and +14.0 mV in spindle- and rod-shaped cells, respectively) in its voltage dependence. It was exclusively in rod-shaped cells that ET-1 activated a sizeable amount of time-independent inward-rectifying current. 5. The hyperpolarisation-activated current (I(f)), observed exclusively in spindle-shaped cells, was significantly increased by ET-1 at membrane potentials between -74.7 and -84.7 mV whereas it was significantly decreased at more negative potentials. ET-1 significantly decreased the slope of the current-voltage (I-V) relation of the I(f) tail without changing its half-maximum voltage. 6. The overall negative chronotropic influence of ET-1 on the whole rabbit SAN is interpreted as resulting from the integration of its different actions on spindle- and rod-shaped SAN cells through electrotonic interaction.

Mechanisms of endothelin receptor subtype-specific targeting to distinct intracellular trafficking pathways

We recently reported that the endothelin (ET) receptor subtypes ET(A) and ET(B) are targeted to distinct intracellular destinations upon agonist stimulation (Bremnes, T., Paasche, J. D., Mehlum, A., Sandberg, C., Bremnes, B., and Attramadal, H. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17596-17604). The ET(A) receptor was shown to follow the recycling route of transferrin, whereas ET(B) is targeted to lysosomes for degradation. In the present study we have investigated the mechanisms of ET receptor subtype-specific targeting to distinct intracellular trafficking pathways. Truncation mutants of the ET(A) and ET(B) receptors with deletions of the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tail distal to the palmitoylation site were found to mediate inositol phosphate accumulation and to internalize upon agonist stimulation, although internalization occurred at a slower rate as compared with the wild-type receptors. However, the truncated ET(A) receptor was no longer able to undergo recycling. Rather, both truncation mutants were recognized by beta-arrestin for recruitment to endocytosis and were sorted to lysosomes by a dynamin-dependent internalization pathway. Furthermore, studies of chimeric ET(A) and ET(B) receptors where the cytoplasmic tail of ET(A) was swapped with the corresponding domain of ET(B), and vice versa, revealed that the cytoplasmic tail of ET(B) is required for efficient lysosomal sorting and that signals for targeting to recycling reside in the cytoplasmic tail of the ET(A) receptor.

Regulation and intracellular trafficking pathways of the endothelin receptors

The effects of endothelin (ET) are mediated via the G protein-coupled receptors ET(A) and ET(B). However, the mechanisms of ET receptor desensitization, internalization, and intracellular trafficking are poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to investigate the molecular mechanisms of ET receptor regulation and to characterize the intracellular pathways of ET-stimulated ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. By analysis of ET(A) and ET(B) receptor internalization in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells in the presence of overexpressed betaARK, beta-arrestin-1, beta-arrestin-2, or dynamin as well as dominant negative mutants of these regulators, we have demonstrated that both ET receptor subtypes follow an arrestin- and dynamin/clathrin-dependent mechanism of internalization. Fluorescence microscopy of Chinese hamster ovary and COS cells expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged ET receptors revealed that the ET(A) and ET(B) subtypes were targeted to different intracellular routes after ET stimulation. While ET(A)-GFP followed a recycling pathway and colocalized with transferrin in the pericentriolar recycling compartment, ET(B)-GFP was targeted to lysosomes after ET-induced internalization. Both receptor subtypes colocalized with Rab5 in classical early endosomes, indicating that this compartment is a common early intermediate for the two ET receptors during intracellular transport. The distinct intracellular routes of ET-stimulated ET(A) and ET(B) receptors may explain the persistent signal response through the ET(A) receptor and the transient response through the ET(B) receptor. Furthermore, lysosomal targeting of the ET(B) receptor could serve as a biochemical mechanism for clearance of plasma endothelin via this subtype.

Subtype-specific trafficking of endothelin receptors

We investigated the subcellular localization of two endothelin receptors (ET(A)R and ET(B)R). To visualize these receptors directly, the C terminus of each receptor was fused to the N terminus of enhanced green fluorescent protein (designated as ETR-EGFP). When transiently expressed in various mammalian cell lines, ET(A)R-EGFP was predominantly localized on the plasma membrane. By contrast, ET(B)R-EGFP was, independent of ligand stimulation, predominantly localized on the intracellular vesicular structures containing Lamp-1. Immunoblot analyses revealed that at steady state ET(B)R-EGFP was highly degraded, and its degradation was inhibited by bafilomycin A(1). Antibody uptake experiments suggested that the ET(B)R-EGFP molecules were internalized from the plasma membrane. It is therefore likely that ET(B)R is first transported to the plasma membrane and then internalized, irrespective of ligand stimulation, to lysosomes where it undergoes proteolytic degradation. Exchanging the C-terminal cytoplasmic tails of the two ETRs revealed that the cytoplasmic tail is responsible for both the intracellular localization and the degradation of the receptors. Deletion of the extreme C-terminal 35 amino acids from both receptors allowed the receptor proteins to localize predominantly in the intracellular vesicles and to degrade. These observations indicate that the cytoplasmic tail of ET(A)R determines its plasma membrane localization. Stimulation with endothelin-1 increased the amount of intact ETR-EGFP fusion proteins without increasing their de novo synthesis, suggesting that binding of endothelin-1 stabilizes the ETRs.

Role of the carboxyl-terminal region, di-leucine motif and cysteine residues in signalling and internalization of vasopressin V1a receptor

The structural requirements for internalization and signalling of the vasopressin V1a receptor were investigated in stably transfected HEK-293 cells. Removal of the 51 C-terminal amino acids did not affect vasopressin binding, calcium signalling, heterologous desensitization or internalization of the receptor. Deletion of 14 additional amino acids reduced vasopressin-dependent calcium increase and impaired receptor internalization. Substitution of cysteines 371-372 did not affect intracellular signalling, but decreased endocytosis by 26%. Substitution of the 361-362 leucine by alanine residues reduced by 56% V1a receptor sequestration without affecting calcium signalling. These results indicate that di-cysteine and mostly di-leucine motifs present in the C-terminal region of the V1a receptor are involved in its internalization.

Activation of the endothelin receptor inhibits the G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channel by a phospholipase A2-mediated mechanism

To develop a malleable system to model the well-described, physiological interactions between Gq/11 - coupled receptor and Gi/o-coupled receptor signaling, we coexpressed the endothelin A receptor, the mu-opioid receptor, and the G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channel (Kir 3) heteromultimers in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Activation of the Gi/o-coupled mu-opioid receptor strongly increased Kir 3 channel current, whereas activation of the Gq/11-coupled endothelin A receptor inhibited the Kir 3 response evoked by mu-opioid receptor activation. The magnitude of the inhibition of Kir 3 was channel subtype specific; heteromultimers composed of Kir 3.1 and Kir 3.2 or Kir 3.1 and Kir 3.4 were significantly more sensitive to the effects of endothelin-1 than heteromultimers composed of Kir 3.1 and Kir 3.5. The difference in sensitivity of the heteromultimers suggests that the endothelin-induced inhibition of the opioid- activated current was caused by an effect at the channel rather than at the opioid receptor. The endothelin-1-mediated inhibition was mimicked by arachidonic acid and blocked by the phospholipase A2 inhibitor arachidonoyl trifluoromethyl ketone. Consistent with a possible phospholipase A2-mediated mechanism, the endothelin-1 effect was blocked by calcium chelation with BAPTA-AM and was not affected by kinase inhibition by either staurosporine or genistein. The data suggest the hypothesis that Gq/11-coupled receptor activation may interfere with Gi/o-coupled receptor signaling by the activation of phospholipase A2 and subsequent inhibition of effector function by a direct effect of an eicosanoid on the channel.

Transcriptional down-regulation of the rabbit pulmonary artery endothelin B receptor during phenotypic modulation

1. We confirmed that endothelium-independent contraction of the rabbit pulmonary artery (RPA) is mediated through both an endothelin A (ET(A)R) and endothelin B (ET(B2)R) receptor. 2. The response of endothelium-denuded RPA rings to endothelin-1 (ET-1, pD2 = 7.84 +/- 0.03) was only partially inhibited by BQ123 (10 microM), an ET(A)R antagonist. 3. Pretreatment with 1 nM sarafotoxin S6c (S6c), an ET(B)R agonist, desensitized the ET(B2)R and significantly attenuated the response to ET-3 (pD2 = 7.40 +/- 0.02 before, <6.50 after S6c). 4. Pretreatment with S6c had little effect on the response to ET-1, but BQ123 (10 microM) caused a parallel shift to the right of the residual ETAR-mediated response to ET-1 (pD2 = 7.84 +/- 0.03 before S6c, 7.93 +/- 0.03 after S6c, 6.81 +/- 0.05 after BQ123). 5. Binding of radiolabelled ET-1 to early passage cultures of RPA vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) displayed two patterns of competitive displacement characteristic of the ET(A)R (BQ123 pIC50 = 8.73 +/- 0.05) or ET(B2)R (S6c pIC50 = 10.15). 6. Competitive displacement experiments using membranes from late passage VSMC confirmed only the presence of the ET(A)R (ET-1 pIC50 = 9.3, BQ123 pIC50 = 8.0, S6c pIC50 < 6.0). 7. The ET(A)R was functionally active and coupled to rises in intracellular calcium which exhibited prolonged homologous desensitization. 8. Using a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for the rabbit ET(B2)R, we demonstrated the absence of mRNA expression in phenotypically modified VSMC. 9. We conclude that the ET(B2)R expressed by VSMC which mediates contraction of RPA is rapidly down-regulated at the transcriptional level during phenotypic modulation in vitro.

Desensitization of ET(A) endothelin receptor-mediated negative chronotropic response in right atria--species difference and intracellular mechanisms

1. Desensitization of ET(A) endothelin receptor (ET(A)R) was compared between the rat and guinea-pig with regard to negative chronotropic response (NC) in the right atria (RA). 2. ET-1 (100 nM) produced distinct NC in the presence of BQ788 (300 nM), and positive chronotropic response (PC) in the presence of BQ123 (1 microM) in both species, showing that ETAR and ET(B) endothelin receptor (ET(B)R) mediate NC and PC, respectively. 3. Repetitive applications of ET-1 (50 nM) desensitized PC, and the second application only induced a strong NC in both species. Later applications of ET-1 produced virtually no response in the rat RA, whereas they produced BQ123-sensitive NCs repetitively in guinea-pig RA, exhibiting marked species difference in desensitization of ETAR-mediated NC. 4. Pretreatment with staurosporine (100 nM) prevented desensitization of ET(A)R in the rat RA altogether. However, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, 300 nM) failed to induce, but rather hampered, desensitization of ET(A)R. 5. Partial amino acid sequencing of ET(A)Rs, spanning from the 2nd through the 4th intracellular loops, revealed that all the potential Ser/Thr phosphorylation sites, including a protein kinase C (PKC) site, are conserved among guinea-pigs, rats, rabbits, bovines and humans. 6. In guinea pig RA, pretreatment with okadaic acid (1 microg ml(-1)) and PMA did not facilitate desensitization of ET(A)R whereas these agents successfully desensitized ETAR during combined stimulation of beta-adrenoceptor and ET(A)R by isoproterenol (300 nM) and ET-1 (100 nM). 7. These results suggest that species differences in desensitization of ET(A)R are not caused by differences in the site(s) of, but caused by differences in the environment for phosphorylation of the receptor. Desensitization of ET(A)R appears to require phosphorylation of the receptor by PKC as well as a kinase stimulated by beta-adrenoceptor activation.

Folding and cell surface expression of the vasopressin V2 receptor: requirement of the intracellular C-terminus

We characterized truncations of the human vasopressin V2 receptor to determine the role of the intracellular C-terminus (comprising about 44 amino acids) in receptor function and cell surface expression. In contrast to the wild-type receptor, the naturally occurring mutant R337X failed to confer specific [3H]AVP binding to transfected cells. In addition, no vasopressin-sensitive adenylyl cyclase was detectable in membrane preparations of these cells. Laser scanning microscopy revealed that c-myc epitope- or green fluorescent protein-tagged R337X mutant receptors were retained within the endoplasmic reticulum. Increasing the number of C-terminal residues (truncations after codons 348, 354 and 356) restored G protein coupling, but revealed a length-dependent reduction of cell surface expression. Replacement of positively charged residues within the C-terminus by glutamine residues also decreased cell surface expression. A chimeric V2 receptor with the C-terminus replaced by that of the beta2-adrenergic receptor did not bind [3H]AVP and was retained within the cell. These data suggest that residues in the N-terminal part of the C-terminus are necessary for correct folding and that C-terminal residues are important for efficient cell surface expression.

Role of protein kinase C and carboxyl-terminal region in acute desensitization of vasopressin V1a receptor

The role of protein kinase C activation and carboxyl-terminal region in rapid desensitization of the vasopressin V1a receptor was investigated in Xenopus oocytes. Preincubation of the oocytes with vasopressin or with the diacylglycerol analog 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG), or direct injection of active protein kinase C, all blunted the calcium response of the V1a receptor. Truncation of the 51 terminal amino acids (S374STOP) modified neither the intracellular calcium response to vasopressin nor its desensitization by vasopressin or OAG. These data suggest that desensitization of the V1a receptor is mediated by PKC activation and that its carboxyl-terminal domain is not required for signal transduction and rapid desensitization.

Phosphorylation and desensitization of human endothelin A and B receptors. Evidence for G protein-coupled receptor kinase specificity

Although endothelin-1 can elicit prolonged physiologic responses, accumulating evidence suggests that rapid desensitization affects the primary G protein-coupled receptors mediating these responses, the endothelin A and B receptors (ETA-R and ETB-R). The mechanisms by which this desensitization proceeds remain obscure, however. Because some intracellular domain sequences of the ETA-R and ETB-R differ substantially, we tested the possibility that these receptor subtypes might be differentially regulated by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). Homologous, or receptor-specific, desensitization occurred within 4 min both in the ETA-R-expressing A10 cells and in 293 cells transfected with either the human ETA-R or ETB-R. In 293 cells, this desensitization corresponded temporally with agonist-induced phosphorylation of each receptor, assessed by receptor immunoprecipitation from 32Pi-labeled cells. Agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation was not substantially affected by PKC inhibition but was reduced 40% (p << 0.03) by GRK inhibition, effected by a dominant negative GRK2 mutant. Inhibition of agonist-induced phosphorylation abrogated agonist-induced ETA-R desensitization. Overexpression of GRK2, -5, or -6 in 293 cells augmented agonist-induced ET-R phosphorylation approximately 2-fold (p << 0.02), but each kinase reduced receptor-promoted phosphoinositide hydrolysis differently. While GRK5 inhibited ET-R signaling by only approximately 25%, GRK2 inhibited ET-R signaling by 80% (p << 0.01). Congruent with its superior efficacy in suppressing ET-R signaling, GRK2, but not GRK5, co-immunoprecipitated with the ET-Rs in an agonist-dependent manner. We conclude that both the ETA-R and ETB-R can be regulated indistinguishably by GRK-initiated desensitization. We propose that because of its affinity for ET-Rs demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation, GRK2 is the most likely of the GRKs to initiate ET-R desensitization.

C-terminal truncation of the neurokinin-2 receptor causes enhanced and sustained agonist-induced signaling. Role of receptor phosphorylation in signal attenuation

The G protein-linked receptor for neurokinin A (NKA) couples to stimulation of phospholipase C and, in some cells, adenylyl cyclase. We have examined the function of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain in receptor signaling and desensitization. We constructed C-terminal deletion mutants of the human NK-2 receptor (epitope tagged) to remove potential Ser/Thr phosphorylation sites, and expressed them in both mammalian and insect cells. When activated, truncated receptors mediate stronger and more prolonged phosphoinositide hydrolysis than wild-type receptor; however, the amplitude and kinetics of the NKA-induced rise in cytosolic Ca2+ remain unaltered. Protein kinase C (PKC)-activating phorbol ester abolishes wild-type receptor signaling but not mutant receptor signaling. Mutant receptors also mediate enhanced and prolonged cAMP generation, at least in part via PKC activation. When expressed in COS cells or Sf9 insect cells, the wild-type receptor is phosphorylated; receptor phosphorylation increases after addition of either NKA or phorbol ester. In contrast, mutant receptors are not phosphorylated by either treatment. Our results suggest that C-terminal Ser/Thr phosphorylation sites in the NK-2 receptor have a critical role in both homologous and heterologous desensitization. Removal of these phosphorylation sites results in a receptor that mediates sustained activation of signaling pathways and is insensitive to inhibition by PKC.

Stable expression of a truncated AT1A receptor in CHO-K1 cells. The carboxyl-terminal region directs agonist-induced internalization but not receptor signaling or desensitization

Phosphorylation of serine and threonine residues in the carboxyl-terminal region of many G-protein-coupled receptors directs the rapid uncoupling from signal transduction pathways. In Chinese hamster ovary cells, we have stably expressed a truncated mutant of the angiotensin II (AT1A) receptor devoid of the carboxyl-terminal 45 amino acids, encompassing 13 serine/threonine residues. One clone, designated TL314 to indicate truncation after leucine 314, expressed a single class of angiotensin II receptors with a dissociation constant of 1.08 nM and a receptor density of 560 fmol/mg of protein (approximately 75,000 receptors/cell). A nonhydrolyzable analog of GTP accelerated the angiotensin II-induced dissociation of [125I]angiotensin II from TL314 plasma membranes 3.6-fold, indicating G-protein coupling. In TL314 cells, angiotensin II stimulated the release of intracellular calcium and the induction of mitogen-activated protein kinase activity, the level of which were comparable with the full-length AT1A receptor. The AII-stimulated calcium response was rapidly desensitized in both full-length and truncated AT1A receptors. Interestingly, angiotensin II-induced endocytosis of the truncated receptor was almost completely inhibited, suggesting that a recognition motif within the carboxyl-terminal 45 amino acids of the AT1A receptor promotes sequestration. Thus, truncation of the AT1A receptor after leucine 314 inhibits agonist-induced internalization without affecting the capacity of the expressed protein to adopt the correct conformation necessary for high affinity binding of angiotensin II, coupling to G-proteins, and activation of signal transduction pathways. The rapid desensitization and refractoriness of the angiotensin II-induced calcium transient in the TL314 cell line, in which putative carboxyl-terminal phosphorylation sites are absent, suggests that the mechanism of AT1A receptor desensitization differs from that of other prototypical G-protein-coupled receptors.

Endothelin receptor antagonism

Following the original report by Yanagisawa et al. (1988) more than 7 years ago, compelling evidence that ET plays an important role in the local regulation of smooth muscle tone and cell growth has been reported. In addition, many studies point to a significant role for endothelin in nonvascular function. The investigation of the endothelin system has been greatly advanced in the last 2 to 3 years through significant advances in the development of potent and selective ET receptor antagonists. These agents have proven to be essential tools for elucidating the biological significance of the ET system, leading to the realization that antagonism of the ET system may have significant therapeutic potential. As emphasized in this review, the importance of chronic blockade of the ET system may be a critical aspect of future research in this exciting area. Confounding issues remain the lack of information about the role of the ETB receptor, the apparent pharmacological evidence for additional ET receptor subtypes, and species variation in the tissue distribution of ET isoforms and receptor subtypes. Along with the greater ability to understand the endothelin system provided by potent and selective pharmacological agents, is the important contribution of modern molecular biology techniques, highlighted by the insights gained from recent reports of results from ET gene disruption studies. Kurihara et al. (1994) found that ET-1-deficient homozygous mice die at birth of apparent respiratory failure secondary to severe craniofacial abnormalities. Subsequently, Yanagisawa's laboratory has presented and published a series of complementary gene disruption studies. First, Hosoda et al. (1994) demonstrated remarkably, that ETA receptor knockout mice bear morphological abnormalities nearly identical to ET-1 knockout mice. Second, they found that disruption of the ET-3 peptide and ETB receptor genes result in homozygous mice that share identical phenotypic traits (i.e., coloration changes and aganglionic megacolon) which are similar to a previously known natural mutation, the Piebald-Lethal mouse (Hosoda et al., 1994; Baynash et al., 1994). This phenotype has a human corollary known as Hirschsprung's Disease and it is now known that the disease, though multigenic, results from a missense mutation of the ETB receptor gene in some individuals (Puffenberger et al., 1994). Taken together these data indicate that the endothelin system is essential to correct embryonic neural crest development, a completely novel finding within the superfamily of guanine-protein-linked receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)