Evaluation of single-dose inhaled corticosteroid activity with an allergen challenge model

Impact of Ongoing Treatment With Inhaled Corticosteroids During Specific Inhalation Challenges for Diagnosing Occupational Asthma

BACKGROUND

Specific inhalation challenge (SIC) tests are still the reference test for diagnosing sensitizer-induced occupational asthma (SIOA). The European Respiratory Society recommends the cessation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) 72 hours before SIC.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of an ongoing ICS treatment during SIC on the maximum fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), the change in methacholine provocative concentration of methacholine inducing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), and sputum eosinophil counts after exposure to the suspected agent.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis using a database of cases referred to our center for suspected SIOA from 1999 to 2022. The results of the SIC were compared between subjects treated with ICS during SIC and steroid-naïve subjects.

RESULTS

Six hundred and seventy-one individuals underwent SIC in the laboratory. Three hundred and eighteen were treated with ICS, whereas 353 were steroid naïve. The proportion of subjects with a positive SIC was greater among ICS-treated subjects (39. 6%) compared with steroid-naïve subjects (27.5%, P < .001). A treatment with ICS did not influence the outcome of the SIC. There was no difference in the change in PC20 or the percentage of sputum eosinophils after SIC between steroid-treated and steroid-naïve subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

An ongoing ICS treatment during an SIC did not affect the occurrence of an asthmatic reaction, the change in airway responsiveness, or eosinophilic inflammation after exposure to the suspected agent in subjects who have been treated with ICS for a long period of time.

Direct and indirect bronchoprovocation tests in dose-response studies of inhaled corticosteroids: Past, present, and future directions

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are a mainstay of treatment in eosinophilic asthma. Many studies have explored the dose-response effect of different formulations of ICS through direct or indirect bronchoprovocation testing. Such studies are important for investigating efficacy and identifying the relative potency between formulations. However, lack of consistency in methods and designs has hindered the comparability of study findings. This review discusses current knowledge of the dose-response, or lack thereof, of different formulations of ICS through direct and indirect bronchoprovocation testing. The strengths and weaknesses of past studies inform recommendations for future methodological considerations in this field, such as utilizing a randomized double-blind crossover design, enrolling participants likely to respond to ICS therapy, and carefully selecting treatment durations and washout periods to assess incremental improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness while reducing the likelihood of a carryover effect.

Roflumilast for asthma: Efficacy findings in mechanism of action studies

BACKGROUND

The efficacy profile of roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor used for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is well known. In asthma treatment, much less is understood about the role of roflumilast, particularly its mechanism of action and potential bronchodilatory effects.

AIM

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and mechanism of action of roflumilast in patients with asthma using data from eight placebo-controlled, double-blind phase I-III studies.

METHODS

The studies were conducted at 14 sites in Europe, North America and South Africa from 1997 to 2005. The effect of treatment with 250 μg, 500 μg or 1000 μg roflumilast was compared with placebo in seven cross-over studies and one parallel-group study in 197 patients 18-70 years of age. Primary endpoints focused on the extent of the late allergic response after an allergen challenge, change in sputum cell eosinophil counts or exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Secondary endpoints included the extent of the early allergic response and measurements of tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα), sputum cells and inflammatory markers.

RESULTS

Roflumilast attenuated allergen-induced bronchoconstriction (FEV1) in patients with asthma. Significant reductions in allergen-induced airway inflammation, including a reduction in both eosinophil and neutrophil counts were also observed and physiologic responses to allergen-induced challenge were confirmed by a significant reduction in TNFα. Side effects were similar to COPD, but did not include weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from these studies indicate that the anti-inflammatory effects of roflumilast observed in COPD are also seen in asthma and advance our understanding of its mechanism of action. All studies were funded by Takeda. Trial registration numbers available on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01365533.

Allergen-induced airway responses

Environmental allergens are an important cause of asthma and can contribute to loss of asthma control and exacerbations. Allergen inhalation challenge has been a useful clinical model to examine the mechanisms of allergen-induced airway responses and inflammation. Allergen bronchoconstrictor responses are the early response, which reaches a maximum within 30 min and resolves by 1-3 h, and late responses, when bronchoconstriction recurs after 3-4 h and reaches a maximum over 6-12 h. Late responses are followed by an increase in airway hyperresponsiveness. These responses occur when IgE on mast cells is cross-linked by an allergen, causing degranulation and the release of histamine, neutral proteases and chemotactic factors, and the production of newly formed mediators, such as cysteinyl leukotrienes and prostaglandin D2. Allergen-induced airway inflammation consists of an increase in airway eosinophils, basophils and, less consistently, neutrophils. These responses are mediated by the trafficking and activation of myeloid dendritic cells into the airways, probably as a result of the release of epithelial cell-derived thymic stromal lymphopoietin, and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from type 2 helper T-cells. Allergen inhalation challenge has also been a widely used model to study potential new therapies for asthma and has an excellent negative predictive value for this purpose.

The effect of the novel phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor MEM 1414 on the allergen induced responses in mild asthma

Background

Inhaled allergen challenge is a standard method to study airway responses to inflammatory provocation and evaluate the therapeutic potential of novel anti-inflammatory compounds in asthma. MEM 1414 is a novel oral PDE4 inhibitor with high affinity and selectivity creating the potential for an improved side effect profile vs non-selective PDE inhibitors. We evaluated the tolerability and effect of MEM 1414 on airway responses in mild asthmatics.

Methods

A randomised double blind placebo controlled cross over study in two centres, in which sixteen steroid naïve atopic asthmatics were challenged with inhaled allergen. Subjects were dosed with MEM 1414 (600 mg) or placebo, twice daily orally for 7 days. Allergen challenge was performed on day 6 (2 hours post-dose), and methacholine responsiveness was measured 24 hours post allergen (day 7). Biomarkers of drug effects using ex vivo LPS stimulation of whole blood production of interleukin (IL)-6 and leukotriene (LT)-B4 and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were measured on day 6 (0, 2 and 8 hours post-dose). Plasma pharmacokinetics were measured on days 1, 6 and 7. The primary endpoint was the effect on late asthmatic response to allergen.

Results

Treatment with MEM 1414 abrogated the late phase response with a mean difference in FEV₁ (LAR 3–10 hours) of 104 ml (25%) vs placebo (p < 0.005), with no effect on the early response. Biomarker responses were also attenuated with MEM 1414 treatment with reductions in LPS-stimulated whole blood assays for TNFα at 8 hours (p < 0.03) and LTB₄ at 24 hours (p = 0.0808) with no change in the IL-6 response. The MEM 1414 treatment phase was associated with higher incidence of nausea (6/16 MEM 1414 vs 2/16 placebo) and vomiting (3/16 vs 0/16 placebo).

Conclusions

Oral MEM 1414, a novel PDE4 inhibitor, significantly reduces the late response following inhaled allergen challenge. MEM 1414 also inhibited whole blood assays of cytokine production from inflammatory cells. MEM 1414 was associated with a typical adverse event profile of PDE4 inhibitors, namely nausea and vomiting although these were mild side effects.

Trial registration number

Current controlled trials ISRCTN48047493.

Inhaled allergen bronchoprovocation tests

The allergen bronchoprovocation test is a long-standing exacerbation model of allergic asthma that can induce several clinical and pathophysiologic features of asthma in sensitized subjects. Standardized allergen challenge is primarily a research tool, and when properly conducted by qualified and experienced investigators, it is safe and highly reproducible. In combination with validated airway sampling and sensitive detection techniques, allergen challenge allows the study of several features of the physiology of mainly TH2 cell-driven asthma in relation to the kinetics of the underlying airway pathology occurring during the allergen-induced late response. Furthermore, given the small within-subject variability in allergen-induced airway responses, allergen challenge offers an adequate disease model for the evaluation of new (targeted) controller therapies for asthma in a limited number of subjects. In proof-of-efficacy studies thus far, allergen challenge showed a fair positive predicted value and an excellent negative predictive value for the actual clinical efficacy of new antiasthma therapies, underscoring its important role in early drug development. In this review we provide recommendations on challenge methods, response measurements, sample size, safety, and harmonization for future applications.

Genomic and non-genomic actions of glucocorticoids in asthma

Glucocorticoids are the mainstay of asthma therapy. They are primarily used to suppress airway inflammation, which is the central pathological change in asthmatic patients’ airways. This is achieved by many different mechanisms. The classical mechanism is by suppression of the genetic transcription of many inflammatory cytokines that are key in asthma pathophysiology (transrepression). On the other hand, the transcription of certain inhibitory cytokines is activated by glucocorticoids (transactivation), a mechanism that also mediates many of the adverse effects of glucocorticoids. The onset of action through these mechanisms is often delayed (4-24 hours). Other mechanisms mediated through non-genomic pathways are increasingly appreciated. These are delivered in part by binding of glucocorticoids to nonclassical membrane-bound glucocorticoid receptors or by potentiating the α1-adrenergic action on the bronchial arterial smooth muscles, in addition to other mechanisms. These effects are characterized by their rapid onset and short duration of action. Understanding these different mechanisms will help in the development of new and better drugs to treat this common disease and to develop new improved strategies in our approach to its management. Here, the genomic and non-genomic mechanisms of actions of glucocorticoids in asthma are briefly reviewed, with special emphasis on the current updates of the non-genomic mechanisms.

Rapid onset of bronchodilation with formoterol/beclomethasone Modulite and formoterol/budesonide Turbuhaler as compared to formoterol alone in patients with COPD

In the present study, we examined whether there is a difference in the onset of bronchodilatation between formoterol/beclomethasone 12/200 μg Modulite and formoterol/budesonide 9/320 μg Turbuhaler in patients with COPD. We enrolled 28 patients with stable COPD. Both formoterol/beclomethasone and formoterol/budesonide elicited a larger mean FEV₁-AUC₀₋₁₅min than formoterol alone, whereas there was no significant difference between their FEV₁-AUC₀₋₁₅min. Also the change in FEV₁ 15 min after inhalation of formoterol/beclomethasone combination or formoterol/budesonide combination was greater than that induced by formoterol alone. This study confirms the rapid effect of the inhaled corticosteroid component when combined with formoterol and indicates that the onset of bronchodilation of formoterol/beclomethasone Modulite and formoterol/budesonide Turbuhaler are similar and greater than formoterol alone in patients with COPD.

Treatment with a peroxisomal proliferator activated receptor gamma agonist has a modest effect in the allergen challenge model in asthma: a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

A considerable body of non clinical evidence has accumulated to support peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists as candidate anti-inflammatory drugs in asthma. We utilized rosiglitazone as a tool compound in the inhaled allergen challenge model of asthma.

METHODS

A single centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled, two period cross-over study. Subjects received rosiglitazone 4mg and placebo twice daily for 28 days in random order. On day 28, inhaled allergen challenge was performed 1 hour post-dose. A methacholine challenge was performed on day 29 and an adenosine monophosphate challenge on day 14. Exhaled nitric oxide was measured on days 1, 14, 28, 29. Blood was collected pre dose on days 1, 14 and 28 and analysed for markers associated with PPAR activity and systemic markers of inflammation.

RESULTS

The late asthmatic reaction (LAR) change from post saline FEV(1) from 4-10 hrs post allergen on day 28 was statistically significant for the weighted mean LAR. The difference in weighted mean was 0.06 L (95% CI 0.01 to 0.11) which equates to a 15% attenuation of the response during placebo treatment. This was accompanied by trends in other markers of efficacy and anti-inflammatory activity but none were considered major effects.

DISCUSSION

Treatment with a PPARgamma agonist (rosiglitazone) was associated with a modest (15%) reduction in the late asthmatic reaction in the allergen challenge model of asthma. Based on the results of this study, PPARgamma agonist monotherapy is unlikely to represent a clinically useful intervention in human asthma. Registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00318630).

Allergen-induced airway inflammation and its therapeutic intervention

Allergen inhalation challenge has been useful for examining the mechanisms of allergen-induced airway inflammation and the associated physiological changes and for documenting the efficacy of drugs to treat asthma. Allergen inhalation by a sensitized subject results in acute bronchoconstriction, beginning within 15-30 min and lasting 1-3 hr, which can be followed by the development of a late asthmatic response. Individuals who develop both an early and late response after allergen have more marked increases in airway hyperresponsiveness, and greater increases in allergen-induced airway inflammation, particularly in airway eosinophils and basophils. All of the currently available and effective treatments for asthma modify some aspects of allergen-induced responses. These medications include short-acting and long-acting inhaled β₂-agonists, inhaled corticosteroids, cromones, methylxanthines, leukotriene inhibitors, and anti-IgE monoclonal antibody. In addition, allergen inhalation challenge has become a useful method which can, in a very limited number of patients, provide key information on the therapeutic potential of new drugs being developed to treat asthma.

Allergen dose dependency of the early- and late-phase cutaneous response in the cynomolgus monkey

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous administration of allergen provides a means to confirm an allergic status, investigate the pathogenesis of allergic diseases, and/or provide a mechanism to evaluate the benefit of new potential therapeutics.

OBJECTIVE

Studies were performed to characterize the allergen-induced cutaneous early- and late-phase response (EPR and LPR) in the cynomolgus monkey.

METHODS

Following intradermal injections of Ascaris suum allergen, the cutaneous weal and flare EPR was measured 15 min post-injection, and skin biopsies were collected at 8-24 h to determine the optimal time of LPR occurrence. Biopsies were analysed for epidermal and dermal inflammatory changes.

RESULTS

The EPR was dose related with a reproducible, measurable response at 1 : 10 000 and maximal at a 1 : 100 allergen dilution. In contrast, the threshold dose required for a reproducible LPR was much greater requiring a dilution of 6 : 100, suggesting independent mechanisms for the EPR and LPR. The LPR 20 h post-allergen injection induced an inflammatory response in the upper and deep dermis. The response was characterized by a moderate perivascular to diffuse inflammation consisting of mononuclear cells, neutrophils and eosinophils. Dexamethasone, while having no effect on the EPR, reduced dermal inflammation (upper dermis, P=0.004; deep dermis, P=0.03). Similarly, dermal eosinophilia was also reduced (upper dermis, P<0.001; deep dermis, P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Collectively, the results indicate the dose dependency of the EPR and LPR. Furthermore, our observations indicate the value of the LPR response in the cynomolgus monkey to evaluate new therapeutics for the treatment of allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis.

Provoked models of asthma: what have we learnt?

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways characterized by physiological abnormalities of variable airflow obstruction and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to a wide variety of physical and inhaled chemical stimuli and the presence of symptoms. AHR is measured by challenging the airways with a variety of agonists and naturally occurring stimuli, which results in constriction of the airway smooth muscle, leading to airway narrowing and airflow limitation. There are two distinct mechanisms by which the airways can narrow to a constrictor stimulus and these are defined by the pathways they take to induce AHR. Direct stimuli are pharmacological agents administered exogenously (such as histamine or methacholine) that act 'directly' on specific receptors on the bronchial smooth muscle to cause constriction. The other mechanism by which the airway can narrow is via the inhalation of indirect stimuli, which include natural stimuli, such as allergen or exercise, and pharmacological agents such as adenosine monophosphate and hyper-osmotic agents (e.g. hypertonic saline or dry powder mannitol). These stimuli induce airway narrowing 'indirectly' by causing the endogenous release of mediators of bronchoconstriction from airway inflammatory cells. Provoked models of asthma have been extremely valuable in understanding the pathobiology of asthma, in aiding diagnosis, in helping to clarify the mechanisms of actions of effective drugs and in the development of new entities to treat asthma. Some provoked models are valuable clinically, particularly those that measure direct AHR, while others, particularly allergen challenge, have been used in animal models and in humans to study the mechanisms of allergen-induced airway inflammation and the associated physiological changes, as well in the development of new drugs for asthma. An emerging role for measurements of AHR is in the evaluation of the optimal treatment for patients with asthma.

Effects of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler once daily in the evening on nocturnal lung function and sleep parameters in patients with moderate persistent asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Nocturnal symptoms are common in asthma patients and have the potential for considerable clinical effects due to a lack of sleep and persistent daytime symptoms of somnolence and activity impairment. The primary objective of this investigation was to determine the effect of a 14-day course of once-daily evening administration of mometasone furoate 400 microg administered via a dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI 400 microg qd pm) on the overnight decline in pulmonary function observed in patients with nocturnal asthma.

METHODS

Eligible enrollees were between the ages of 18 and 60 years and had established mild to moderate asthma, with an improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of >15% after administration of inhaled salbutamol (albuterol) 200 microg. All enrolled patients had a history of nocturnal asthma. Enrollees were randomized to receive MF-DPI 400 microg qd pm or placebo administered between 6 pm and 8 pm for 14 days. The primary outcome evaluated in the study was reduction in nocturnal decline in evening (8 pm) to morning (6 am) FEV(1) values. Secondary outcomes included reduction in nocturnal decline in evening to morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), polysomnographic indices of sleep, and psychometric indices (Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire [NRQLQ], 36-item Short Form of the Medical Outcomes Survey [SF-36], and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [AQLQ]).

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were randomized and completed all phases of the study. No significant differences were observed between treatment groups in the primary outcome of nocturnal decline in FEV(1) from pretreatment to end of treatment. Likewise, there was no significant difference between treatment groups in polysomnographic indices of sleep or quality-of-life assessments. However, there was a trend toward improvement in the activity scale of the AQLQ assessment in the MF-DPI 400 microg qd pm treatment group.

CONCLUSION

No significant treatment effect on nocturnal pulmonary function, sleep indices or quality of life was observed with 14-day administration of MF-DPI 400 microg qd pm. These findings are limited by the small sample size and the short treatment period evaluated. Future studies are warranted to study the effects of MF-DPI therapy in patients with nocturnal asthma.

Understanding allergic asthma from allergen inhalation tests

The allergen challenge has evolved, in less than 150 years, from a crude tool used to document the etiology of allergen-induced disease to a well-controlled tool used today to investigate the pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy of asthma. Highlights of the authors' involvement with the allergen challenge include confirmation of the immunoglobulin E-dependence of the late asthmatic response, importance of (nonallergic) airway hyper-responsiveness as a determinant of the airway response to allergen, identification of allergen-induced increase in airway hyper-responsiveness, documentation of beta(2)-agonist-induced increase in airway response to allergen (including eosinophilic inflammation), advances in understanding the pathophysiology and kinetics of allergen-induced airway responses, and development of a multicentre clinical trial group devoted to using the allergen challenge for investigating promising new therapeutic strategies for asthma.

The allergen bronchoprovocation model: an important tool for the investigation of new asthma anti-inflammatory therapies

Allergen bronchoprovocation tests have been used for more than two decades in the investigation of respiratory allergic diseases such as asthma and rhinitis. These bronchial challenges are now well standardized and can offer key information on the therapeutic potential of new agents and on their anti-inflammatory effects on the airways. Both standard and low-dose allergen provocations are safe when performed by experienced investigators and do not lead to persistent worsening of asthma or change in airway function. The evaluation of new therapeutic agents by these methods can also provide important information on the mechanisms of development and persistence of airway diseases.

Selective inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibition has no effect on allergen challenge in asthma

RATIONALE

Exhaled breath nitric oxide (Fe(NO)) is increased in asthma. NO is produced predominantly by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS).

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the selective and potent iNOS inhibitor GW274150 in asthma.

METHODS

Twenty-eight steroid-naive patients with asthma participated in a double-blind, randomized, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, three-period cross-over study. Subjects received GW274150 (90 mg), montelukast (10 mg), or placebo once daily for 14 days. Fe(NO) was assessed predose on Days 1, 7, 10, and 14. Adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) challenge was performed on Day 10, allergen challenge on Day 14 followed by methacholine challenge (MCh) 24 hours later, and then bronchoscopy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

GW274150 reduced predose Fe(NO) by 73, 75, and 71% on Days 7, 10, and 14, respectively, compared with placebo. Montelukast did not reduce Fe(NO). GW274150 did not inhibit AMP reactivity whereas for montelukast there was a trend toward inhibition: the mean doubling dose difference versus placebo was 0.64 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0 to 1.28). GW274150 did not inhibit early (EAR) and late (LAR) asthmatic responses to allergen, or MCh reactivity, despite reduced Fe(NO) levels. Montelukast inhibited EAR and LAR FEV1; the mean difference versus placebo for minimal FEV1 was 0.37 L (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.55) and 0.18 L (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.32), respectively. MCh reactivity was inhibited by montelukast (mean doubling dose difference vs. placebo, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.02 to 1.01). GW271540 also had no effect on inflammatory cell numbers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after allergen challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective iNOS inhibition effectively reduces Fe(NO) but does not affect airway hyperreactivity or airway inflammatory cell numbers after allergen challenge in subjects with asthma. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00273013).

The effects of inhaled budesonide and formoterol in combination and alone when given directly after allergen challenge

BACKGROUND

The use of combination inhaled budesonide and formoterol as maintenance and reliever therapy significantly improves the risk and the time to exacerbations in asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the mechanisms underlying the effect of the reliever dose on exacerbations by examining the effect of combination therapy on the allergen challenge model when given after allergen exposure.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind crossover study, single doses of budesonide/formoterol (400/12 mug), formoterol (12 mug), budesonide (400 mug), or placebo were administered during the acute bronchoconstriction response (early airway response) immediately after allergen inhalation in 15 patients with mild asthma. Allergen-induced late airway response (LAR), sputum inflammatory markers, airway hyperresponsiveness, and exhaled nitric oxide were measured.

RESULTS

All active treatments significantly attenuated the LAR, with budesonide/formoterol significantly better than its monocomponents (maximum FEV(1) fall: placebo, [mean +/- SEM] 21.2% +/- 3.1%; budesonide/formoterol, 4.2% +/- 1.4%; formoterol, 7.5% +/- 1.7%; budesonide, 10.4% +/- 1.6%). Allergen-induced change in methacholine PC(20) was significantly attenuated by budesonide/formoterol, but not by its monocomponents. Sputum cell counts and exhaled nitric oxide increased significantly after all allergen challenges, with no significant attenuation by any of the treatments. Therapy with combination and formoterol alone, but not budesonide, significantly reduced the early airway response.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of budesonide/formoterol was superior to its monocomponents in attenuating the allergen-induced LAR and airway hyperresponsiveness. These effects may represent the contribution of the reliever dose to the budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever regimen.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The protective effect against allergic airway responses with a single reliever dose of budesonide/formoterol is predominantly related to greater functional antagonism of airway smooth muscles.

The effect of a single inhaled dose of a VLA-4 antagonist on allergen-induced airway responses and airway inflammation in patients with asthma

Adhesion molecule very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) is implicated in the recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells in asthma, including eosinophils, T cells and mast cells. VLA-4 antagonists have been proposed as a new anti-inflammatory treatment modality for asthma. Therefore, we investigated whether a single inhaled dose of VLA-4 antagonist GW559090X could protect against allergen-induced changes in airway responses and airway inflammation in patients with asthma. We performed a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover study with single inhaled doses of 3 mg of GW559090X, 500 microg of fluticasone propionate (FP) or placebo in 15 patients with mild intermittent asthma, controlled with short-acting beta(2)-agonists only. All patients developed a late asthmatic response (LAR) after allergen inhalation during screening. Study medication was administered 30 min prior to allergen challenge. Pre-dose and 24 h post-dose PC20 methacholine and levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) were determined. At the given dose, VLA-4 antagonist GW559090X did not attenuate the early asthmatic response (EAR) when compared with placebo: mean AUC0-2 h(+/-SEM) (%fall h): 27.2+/-3.7 and 21.9+/-3.0 respectively (P=0.33); nor the LAR: mean AUC3-8 h(+/-SEM) (%fall h): 98.8+/-12.9 and 94.8+/-6.8 respectively (P=0.84). However, pretreatment with FP did attenuate both EAR and LAR when compared with placebo: mean AUC0-2 h11.6+/-3.3 (P=0.024) and mean AUC3-8 h 6.3+/-7.6 (P<0.001). None of these treatments had an effect on allergen-induced changes in airway hyper-responsiveness or eNO levels. These findings suggest that VLA-4 may not play a major role in allergen-induced airway responses and inflammation in asthma.

Neural circuitry underlying the interaction between emotion and asthma symptom exacerbation

Asthma, like many inflammatory disorders, is affected by psychological stress, suggesting that reciprocal modulation may occur between peripheral factors regulating inflammation and central neural circuitry underlying emotion and stress reactivity. Despite suggestions that emotional factors may modulate processes of inflammation in asthma and, conversely, that peripheral inflammatory signals influence the brain, the neural circuitry involved remains elusive. Here we show, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, that activity in the anterior cingulate cortex and insula to asthma-relevant emotional, compared with valence-neutral stimuli, is associated with markers of inflammation and airway obstruction in asthmatic subjects exposed to antigen. This activation accounts for > or =40% of the variance in the peripheral markers and suggests a neural basis for emotion-induced modulation of airway disease in asthma. The anterior cingulate cortex and insula have been implicated in the affective evaluation of sensory stimulation, regulation of homeostatic responses, and visceral perception. In individuals with asthma and other stress-related conditions, these brain regions may be hyperresponsive to disease-specific emotional and afferent physiological signals, which may contribute to the dysregulation of peripheral processes, such as inflammation.

Bimosiamose, an inhaled small-molecule pan-selectin antagonist, attenuates late asthmatic reactions following allergen challenge in mild asthmatics: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical cross-over-trial

BACKGROUND

Asthma is characterized by increased recruitment of inflammatory cells from the circulation into the airways. As selectins mediate tethering and rolling of leukocytes on the vascular endothelium, they constitute a promising target for the therapeutic modulation of inflammation. We evaluated the effect of inhaled bimosiamose (TBC1269), a synthetic pan-selectin antagonist, on allergen-induced late asthmatic reactions (LAR) in mild asthmatics.

METHODS

Twelve male subjects with mild allergic asthma (only beta-agonists prn) with demonstrable LAR (fall of FEV1 3-8h after allergen inhalation >15% of baseline) at screening completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical cross-over-trial. Subjects were treated with inhaled bimosiamose 70 mg bid or matching placebo on days 1-3 and 70 mg once on the morning of day 4. On day 4 following the last inhalation of study drug, an allergen challenge was performed. The primary endpoint was the maximum fall in FEV1 between 3 and 8h after allergen inhalation on active treatment vs. placebo. Secondary endpoints included early asthmatic response, exhaled nitric oxide, and airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine 24h post allergen.

RESULTS

Bimosiamose significantly attenuated the maximum LAR compared to placebo by 50.2% (placebo mean+/-SEM fall -13.10+/-2.30%, bimosiamose -6.52+/-3.86%, treatment effect p=0.045; linear mixed-effects model). There was no effect of active treatment on early asthmatic response, post allergen airway hyperresponsiveness or exhaled nitric oxide, and peripheral blood cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of the pan-selectin antagonist bimosiamose is effective in a human allergen challenge model of asthma. The result of this proof-of-concept exploratory trial is the first study that demonstrates clinical efficacy of selectin-antagonists as novel therapeutic strategy in asthma.

Protection by budesonide and fluticasone on allergen-induced airway responses after discontinuation of therapy

BACKGROUND

Treatment with inhaled steroids is an effective method of reducing bronchoconstriction and airway inflammation after allergen challenge. However, the duration of the protective effects of inhaled steroids after discontinuation of therapy has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the protective effect of 1 week of inhaled steroid therapy against inhaled allergen challenge 12 hours after discontinuation of therapy.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, 26 asthmatic subjects (>18 years old) not using inhaled steroids were administered 200 microg of budesonide twice daily, 200 microg of fluticasone twice daily, or placebo twice daily for 1 week. Twelve hours after discontinuation of therapy, subjects were administered an inhaled allergen challenge. Each treatment period was separated by a 3-week washout period.

RESULTS

When compared with placebo (26% +/- 14%), there was a slight but significant protection against the allergen-induced early response after fluticasone treatment (19% +/- 10%, P = .001) but not after budesonide treatment (23% +/- 13%, P = .08). However, when the area under the curve for the early airway response was examined, there was no difference between the 2 drugs in the amount of protection ( P = .62). Partial protection was demonstrated against the late-response allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia with both treatments ( P = .001). By contrast, no protection was observed against allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness for either treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The protective effects of inhaled steroids against allergen-induced early responses, airway eosinophilia, and allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness are partially or completely lost as early as 12 hours after discontinuation of therapy.

Rapid effect of inhaled steroids on nocturnal worsening of asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled steroids are the most commonly used anti-inflammatory agents for asthma and are increasingly recognised as having a more rapid onset of action than was previously thought. We have investigated the effect of a single dose of inhaled steroid on nocturnal worsening of asthma.

METHODS

Ten patients with steroid naive moderate asthma and nocturnal asthma participated in a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial. Participants spent three nights in the laboratory, one week apart. On each night they underwent spirometric testing at 16.00 hours and received one of the three treatments (placebo, beclomethasone 1000 micro g, or fluticasone 1000 micro g) delivered by metered dose inhaler. Spirometric tests were repeated at 04.00 hours the following morning.

RESULTS

Following placebo administration the mean (SE) overnight fall in FEV(1) was 0.65 (0.27) l compared with -0.02 (0.13) l following fluticasone (p=0.019) and 0.23 (0.12) l following beclomethasone (p=0.048 v placebo).

CONCLUSION

A single dose of inhaled steroid (within the therapeutic range) reduced the fall in FEV(1) in patients with nocturnal asthma when administered at 16.00 hours. Nocturnal worsening of asthma is a useful model for testing inhaled steroid activity in a single night study.

Effect of ciclesonide on allergen challenge in subjects with bronchial asthma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this clinical trial was to investigate whether repeated inhalation of the new inhaled steroid ciclesonide reduces the early-phase (EAR) and late-phase (LAR) reactions after allergen challenge in patients with mild allergic asthma. Also, this study provides further data on safety and tolerance of ciclesonide.

METHODS

The study was designed as a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized crossover trial. Following a baseline period, patients were randomized to either of two treatment sequences (ciclesonide/placebo, placebo/ciclesonide) each of which lasted for one week and were separated by 3-5 weeks from the alternate treatment sequence. Patients received 800 micro g ciclesonide twice daily by means of a Cyclohaler. At the end of each treatment patients were subjected to an allergen challenge.

RESULTS

Thirteen asthmatic patients (mean FEV1 of 91% predicted) who experienced an EAR and LAR after allergen challenge participated in the study. The time-average FEV1 decreases 0-2 h (2-12 h) after allergen challenge as measure of the EAR (LAR) were significantly reduced (P < 0.05, one-sided) from 0.426 L to 0.233 L (EAR) and from 0.443 L to 0.213 L (LAR), respectively. Thus, the study results suggest that ciclesonide significantly lowered the extent of EAR and LAR compared to placebo. Ciclesonide was well tolerated and no drug-related adverse events were reported. Cortisol excretion in 24-h urine showed no significant difference between ciclesonide and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The study supports the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide.

Association between IL-1beta/TNF-alpha-induced glucocorticoid-sensitive changes in multiple gene expression and altered responsiveness in airway smooth muscle

The pleiotropic cytokines interleukin (IL)-1beta and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha have been implicated in the pathophysiology of asthma. To elucidate the role of these cytokines in the pro-asthmatic state, the effects of IL-1beta and TNF-alpha on airway smooth muscle (ASM) responsiveness and ASM expression of multiple genes, assessed by high-density oligonucleotide array analysis, were examined in the absence and presence of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX). Administration of IL-1beta/TNF-alpha increased ASM contractility to acetylcholine and impaired ASM relaxation to isoproterenol. These pro-asthmatic- like changes in ASM responsiveness were associated with IL-1beta/ TNF-alpha-induced mRNA expression of a host of proinflammatory genes that regulate transcription, cytokines and chemokines, cellular adhesion molecules, and various signal transduction molecules that regulate ASM responsiveness. In the presence of DEX, the changes induced in ASM responsiveness were abrogated, and most of the IL-1beta/TNF-alpha-mediated changes in proinflammatory gene expression were repressed, although mRNA expression of a small number of genes was enhanced by DEX. Collectively, the observations support the concept that, together with its role as a regulator of airway tone, in response to IL-1beta/TNF-alpha, the ASM expresses a host of glucocorticoid-sensitive genes that contribute to the altered structure and function of the airways in the pro-asthmatic state. We speculate that glucocorticoid-sensitive, cytokine-induced pathways involved in ASM cell signaling represent important targets for new therapeutic interventions.

Budesonide for chronic asthma in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Inhaled budesonide is a widely used inhaled corticosteroid for asthma.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review was to compare the efficacy of budesonide with placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group Trial Register and reference lists of articles was searched. We contacted trialists for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-1999).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing budesonide to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. One reviewer extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

43 studies met the inclusion criteria (2801 subjects). In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics, budesonide led to significant improvements in a number of measures of airway function. These included FEV1, Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 3.7% predicted (95% CI 0.1, 7.2%); improvement in morning peak flow (PEF) from baseline WMD 29 L/min (95% CI 22, 36 L/min); improvement in evening PEF from baseline WMD 21 L/min (95% CI 13, 29 L/min). Varying methods of reporting symptoms limited the pooling of studies but all high methodological quality studies demonstrated significant improvements compared to placebo. Health status was not reported. Risk of trial withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation was lower with budesonide compared to placebo, relative risk 0.17 (95% CI 0.09, 0.33). Doses of 500-800 mcg/d appeared to have slightly larger effect sizes than lower doses, but no advantage for high doses were apparent. A single high quality RCT reported significant reductions in daily prednisolone requirement and the number of patients able to discontinue prednisolone completely in budesonide treated subjects compared to placebo. No difference in risk of oropharyngeal soreness/hoarseness or oral Candidiasis was apparent for budesonide compared to placebo. Long-term risk of adrenal insufficiency was not reported.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This review strongly supports use of budesonide in chronic asthma. Consensus guidelines for chronic asthma suggest titrating inhaled steroid dose to individual requirements. Evidence from this review of trials does not present a case for routine dose titration above 800 mcg/d.

Budesonide inhalation suspension: a review of its use in infants, children and adults with inflammatory respiratory disorders

Budesonide, a topically active corticosteroid, has a broad spectrum of clinically significant local anti-inflammatory effects in patients with inflammatory lung diseases including persistent asthma. In infants and young children with persistent asthma, day- and night-time symptom scores, and the number of days in which beta2-agonist bronchodilators were required, were significantly lower during randomised, double-blind treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 to 2 mg/day than placebo in 3 multicentre trials. Significantly fewer children discontinued therapy with budesonide inhalation suspension than with placebo because of worsening asthma symptoms in a study that included children who were receiving inhaled corticosteroids at baseline. Recent evidence indicates that budesonide inhalation suspension is significantly more effective than nebulised sodium cromoglycate in improving control of asthma in young children with persistent asthma. At a dosage of 2 mg/day, budesonide inhalation suspension significantly reduced the number of asthma exacerbations and requirements for systemic corticosteroids in preschool children with severe persistent asthma. In children with acute asthma or wheezing, the preparation was as effective as, or more effective than oral prednisolone in improving symptoms. In children with croup, single 2 or 4mg dosages of budesonide inhalation suspension were significantly more effective than placebo and as effective as oral dexamethasone 0.6 mg/kg or nebulised L-epinephrine (adrenaline) 4mg in alleviating croup symptoms and preventing or reducing the duration of hospitalisation. Early initiation of therapy with budesonide inhalation suspension 1 mg/day appears to reduce the need for mechanical ventilation and decrease overall corticosteroid usage in preterm very low birthweight infants at risk for chronic lung disease. In adults with persistent asthma, budesonide inhalation suspension < or =8 mg/day has been compared with inhaled budesonide 1.6 mg/day and fluticasone propionate 2 mg/day administered by metered dose inhaler. Greater improvements in asthma control occurred in patients during treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension than with budesonide via metered dose inhaler, whereas fluticasone propionate produced greater increases in morning peak expiratory flow rates than nebulised budesonide. Several small studies suggest that the preparation has an oral corticosteroid-sparing effect in adults with persistent asthma and that it may be as effective as oral corticosteroids during acute exacerbations of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The frequency of adverse events was similar in children receiving budesonide inhalation suspension 0.25 to 2 mg/day or placebo in 12-week studies. During treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 to 1 mg/day in 3 nonblind 52-week studies, growth velocity in children was generally unaffected; however, a small but statistically significant decrease in growth velocity was detected in children who were not using inhaled corticosteroids prior to the introduction of budesonide inhalation suspension. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function was not affected by short (12 weeks) or long (52 weeks) term treatment with nebulised budesonide. In conclusion, budesonide inhalation suspension is the most widely available nebulised corticosteroid, and in the US is the only inhaled corticosteroid indicated in children aged > or =1 year with persistent asthma. The preparation is suitable for use in infants, children and adults with persistent asthma and in infants and children with croup.

Immediate effect of topical budesonide on allergen challenge-induced nasal mucosal fluid levels of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-5

The nasal antiinflammatory effects produced by maintenance treatment with topical steroids include reduced production of cytokines. The present study explored nasal mucosal effects induced during the first 9 h after a single dose of topical budesonide. Nine subjects with allergic rhinitis due to birch or timothy pollen were given budesonide (256 microg; Rhinocort Aqua) or placebo in a double-blind, randomized, crossover (4 wk washout) manner. Nasal allergen challenges were performed 30 min after the steroid/placebo pretreatment. Before and 30 min, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 h after challenge, filter paper strips were placed on the nasal septum and inferior turbinates for 10 min to sample undiluted mucosal fluids. Strips were then extracted in 1 ml buffer for cytokine analysis (ELISA). Allergen challenge produced acute nasal symptoms that peaked at 30 min and then tapered off. Conversely, both GM-CSF and IL-5 were increased only at 3, 5, 7 and 9 h (p < 0.05 compared with baseline). Budesonide did not affect the nasal symptoms but inhibited (p < 0. 05; compared with placebo treatment) the allergen challenge-induced mucosal output of GM-CSF and IL-5. These data demonstrate that GM-CSF and IL-5 are induced in a nonsymptomatic, late phase response to nasal allergen challenge, and that this cytokine response is prevented by single dose budesonide pretreatment.

Effects of once daily dosing with inhaled budesonide on airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation following repeated low-dose allergen challenge in atopic asthmatics

BACKGROUND

Repeated low-dose allergen challenge increases airway hyperresponsiveness and sputum eosinophils in atopic asthmatics. Inhaled corticosteroids attenuate the airway responses to high-dose allergen challenge, but have not been evaluated against repeated low dose challenge.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the effects of once daily treatments of two doses of inhaled budesonide on airway responses to repeated low-dose allergen challenge.

METHODS

Eight atopic asthmatics with a dual airway responses to inhaled allergen were recruited into a randomized, double-blind crossover, placebo-controlled study. In the mornings of four consecutive days (day 1-day 4), subjects inhaled budesonide 100 microg, 400 microg, or placebo, 30 min before inhaling a concentration of allergen causing a 5% early fall in FEV1. Airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and sputum eosinophils were measured at baseline, on the afternoon of day 2, day 4, and 24 h after the last challenge. There was a 1-week washout between each of the three treatment periods.

RESULTS

The repeated low-dose allergen challenge induced increases in the percentage sputum eosinophils from 2.0 +/- 0.7% at baseline to 16.6 +/- 7.1% on day 4 (P = 0.002), and this effect was reduced by once daily budesonide 100 microg to 5.6 +/- 1.8% (P = 0. 01) and by once daily budesonide 400 microg to 3.1 +/- 0.9% (P = 0. 004). Also, the allergen-induced methacholine airway hyperresponsiveness which occurred by day 4 (P = 0.03) of the repeated low dose challenge was inhibited by budesonide 400 microg (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Both budesonide 100 microg and 400 microg inhaled once daily significantly reduces allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia after repeated low dose challenge; however, only the higher dose also attenuates the allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness.

Role of bronchoscopy in asthma research

Over the past 15 years, much has been learned about the presence of airway inflammation in asthma through the use of investigative bronchoscopy. It has become quite clear that inflammation is present even in mild asthma. In addition to the eosinophils, T-lymphocytes and a variety of cytokines have been identified to play a prominent role in asthmatic inflammation. The concept of delayed asthmatic response after allergen exposure and its relationship to cellular inflammation and airway hyper-reactivity has become more clearly established. Our understanding of asthmatic airway inflammation, however, is incomplete. As interesting as the database has been so far, investigative FB has not defined a unique profile for patients with asthma. Specifically, lavage or endobronchial biopsy has not identified parameters that help in the diagnosis, assessment of disease severity, prognosis, or likelihood to respond to specific therapies. Also, the exact relationship between parameters in lavage compared with mucosal biopsy and how these are related to airway hyper-reactivity and the clinical syndrome of asthma remains poorly understood. In this regard, it must be confessed that currently FB with lavage and biopsy in asthmatics needs to be considered as a research tool for specimen retrieval to help characterize and express inflammation. Although these techniques have contributed immensely to our understanding of asthma pathogenesis, presently these techniques do not have any practical role or clinical usefulness.

Comparison of 3 different doses of budesonide and placebo on the early asthmatic response to inhaled allergen

BACKGROUND

A simple laboratory method to evaluate relative potency of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma would be valuable. Single-dose studies with the allergen-induced late asthmatic response have failed to show a useful dose-response relationship. Treatment for several days with inhaled corticosteroids will also inhibit the allergen-induced early asthmatic response.

METHODS

Twelve atopic asthmatic subjects were studied during a season when no medications were required except ipratropium bromide as needed. These subjects had positive allergen and methacholine inhalation tests and FEV1 greater than 70% of predicted value. A double-blind, randomized, cross-over study compared placebo and budesonide 100, 200, and 400 microg administered by means of Turbuhaler twice daily for 7 days with 6-day washout periods. Methacholine PC20 was measured before and after 6 days of treatment, and allergen PC15 was measured after 7 days of treatment.

RESULTS

The allergen PC15 (n = 11) was significantly larger (P = .0001) for all doses of budesonide compared with placebo, but there was no significant difference between the 3 doses of budesonide, and no dose response was demonstrated. The methacholine PC20 was significantly larger after all budesonide treatments compared with placebo (P = .024), but there was no difference between the 3 doses. There was a progressive increase in the allergen PC15 chronologically (sequence effect) that was not explained by improvement in FEV1 or airway responsiveness; sequence effects were not seen for FEV1 or for pretreatment or posttreatment methacholine PC20. Statistical adjustment for sequence effect did not alter allergen PC15 statistics.

CONCLUSION

A 7-day course of budesonide administered by means of Turbuhaler at 200, 400, or 800 microg per day provided marked and significant inhibition of the allergen-induced early asthmatic response compared with placebo. There was, however, no difference between the 3 doses. Therefore this method with these doses is not useful for providing assessment of relative potency.