The management of the obese diabetic patient

The role of Wnt pathway in obesity induced inflammation and diabetes: a review

Diabetes has become a major killer worldwide and at present, millions are affected by it. Being a chronic disease it increases the risk of other diseases ranging from pulmonary disorders to soft tissue infections. The loss of insulin-producing capacity of the pancreatic β-cells is the main reason for the development of the disease. Obesity is a major complication that can give rise to several other diseases such as cancer, diabetes, etc. Visceral adiposity is one of the major factors that play a role in the development of insulin resistance. Obesity causes a chronic low-grade inflammation in the tissues that further increases the chances of developing diabetes. Several pathways have been associated with the development of diabetes due to inflammation caused by obesity. The Wnt pathway is one such candidate pathway that is found to have a controlling effect on the development of insulin resistance. Moreover, the pathway has also been linked to obesity and inflammation. This review aims to find a connection between obesity, inflammation, and diabetes by taking the wnt pathway as the connecting link.

Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic childhood obesity is still an epidemic-spotlight on obesity's multifactorial determinants

PURPOSE

Childhood obesity is a global epidemic and a chronic disease. Multifactorial determinants have long been linked with childhood obesity. These have been challenged with the onset of COVID-19 and the associated mitigation measures. The study aimed to re-highlight these determinants while exploring the effects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on these pre-existing childhood obesity determinants, while providing evidence that may be beneficial for the post-COVID-19 recovery plan.

METHODS

A PubMed literature search (2016-2021) using the keywords, "childhood obesity", "gender", "sex", "obesity in youth", "obesity in adolescents", "COVID-19″ and "SARS-CoV2" was performed.

RESULTS

Genetic predisposition, biologically low leptin levels, certain cultural beliefs and socio-economic statuses, as well as exposure to an "obesogenic" environment were found to have a positive association with childhood obesity. Additionally, the onset of COVID-19 further aggravates the childhood obesity epidemic, increasing childrens' susceptibility to obesity and all associated consequential diseases.

DISCUSSION

A possible key to the control and prevention of the burden of childhood obesity, lies in dealing with its precursors and risk factors. Certain factors, including socio-cultural norms, cultural beliefs and geographical factors are amenable. COVID-19 further challenged these and it is evident that the childhood obesity epidemic is still a critical one. Encouraging preventative interventions, such as screening programs, public awareness and policies targeting the environment, amongst others, are recommended.

[Cardiovascular prevention in diabetes mellitus: A multifactorial challenge]

Patients with type2 diabetes mellitus have a high to very high cardiovascular risk, and often have other associated risk factors, such as hypertension, obesity and dyslipidaemia. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. An integrated control of all risk factors in patients with diabetes is essential for minimising the risk of macrovascular complications. Given the benefits of the multifactorial intervention strategies for cardiovascular prevention in diabetic patients, a review is presented on the therapeutic goals established for each risk factor in diabetes and the benefits of their control.

Pharmacological Management of the Obese Patient

Being obese goes beyond moral failure or a character flaw. Obesity has the defining characteristics of a chronic disease for which there is no cure. Treatment may require lifelong treatment which may include pharmacotherapy. Experience with long term use of obesity drugs is limited but evidence suggests that pharmacotherapy can improve patient outcomes and patient outlook. With current obesity drugs, weight loss is usually modest but clinically significant satisfying the FDA threshold for drug effectiveness. This weight loss is associated with clinically significant improvements in many obesity co morbidities and risk factors and could eliminate some risk factors with continued use. When used in conjunction with a comprehensive program for weight management, obesity drugs can reduce appetite or hunger, increase satiety, provide improved control over aberrant eating behaviors and modify food seeking behaviors. Pharmacotherapy can enhance weight loss and compliance during the periods of weight loss and in maintaining that weight loss, increasing physical activity and may enhance a focus on making life long changes.

This article will discuss mechanisms of action of obesity drugs, theories of altered body defense of body weight, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved obesity drugs, and off-label use of FDA approved drugs. The value of over-the counter (OTC) medications and diet supplements, as well as fat substitutes in the treatment of obesity drugs will be explored. Obesity drugs awaiting FDA approval and compounds under development will be reviewed. The section on approaches to drug management will include clinical considerations for; who should receive pharmacotherapy and when, length of treatment and drug discontinuation, weight regain and the role of pharmacotherapy.

A Randomized Trial of Step-up Treatment with Premixed Insulin Lispro-50/50 vs. Aspart-70/30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

INTRODUCTION

When insulin treatment is started in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), there are many regimens that control serum glucose levels to a normal range. Basal-bolus insulin therapy is one of the most effective treatments for improving glycemic control to prevent the progression of diabetic microvascular complications. This study was conducted to determine whether step-up insulin treatment with premixed insulin aspart-30/70 (BIAsp 30) or lispro-50/50 (Mix50) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus could achieve better glycemic control.

METHODS

In this open label study, 72 insulin-naïve patients with poorly controlled T2DM (HbA1c ≥8.4%), who had been taking oral antidiabetic drugs for at least 12 months, were randomized to receive BIAsp 30 or Mix50 therapy. Patients started treatment of a pre-dinner injection of each type of insulin (Step 1). At 16 ± 2 weeks, a pre-breakfast injection of each type of insulin was added if HbA1c exceeded 7.4% (step 2). If patients had still not achieved HbA1c <7.4% after an additional 16 ± 2 weeks, a pre-lunch insulin injection was added (step 3). Hypoglycemic episodes were also recorded.

RESULTS

The cumulative percentages of subjects who achieved HbA1c <7.4% were 36.1% (13/36) for both Mix50 and BIAsp 30 in step 1, 62.9% (23/36) for BIAsp 30 and 52.8% (19/36) for Mix50 in step 2, and 66.7% (24/36) in BIAsp 30 and 72.2% (26/36) in Mix50 in step 3. The achievement rates of HbA1c <7.4% were not statistically different between the two groups. A total of ten hypoglycemic episodes occurred in this study. However, there were no severe hypoglycemic episodes. All cases recovered by taking glucose and drinking juice.

CONCLUSION

Mix50 step-up treatment has a clinical effect in achieving good glycemic control equal to that of BIAsp 30 treatment.

Optimal diabetes management during medical weight loss for cardiovascular risk reduction

Obesity has long been recognized as a significant risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Both obesity and type 2 diabetes are associated with an increase in cardiovascular risk. As cardiovascular disease continues to be the number one killer in the USA and western adult populations, the rise in prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes is alarming. This is especially disturbing in the tripling of overweight children and adolescents, accompanied by the increase in prevalence of pediatric type 2 diabetes. Optimal strategies for long-term diabetes management aim at effectively controlling, reducing and ultimately preventing obesity. This review explores the clinical recommendations in place, new clinical investigations, diet therapy, medical nutrition therapy, meal replacements, behavior therapy, exercise therapy, pharmacotherapy and surgical therapy as strategies to achieve weight-loss success in diabetic patients and ultimately reduce cardiovascular disease.

Combination therapy with GLP-1 receptor agonists and basal insulin: a systematic review of the literature

Treatment algorithms for type 2 diabetes call for intensification of therapy over time as the disease progresses and glycaemic control worsens. If diet, exercise and oral antihyperglycaemic medications (OAMs) fail to maintain glycaemic control then basal insulin is added and ultimately prandial insulin may be required. However, such an intensification strategy carries risk of increased hypoglycaemia and weight gain, both of which are associated with worse long-term outcomes. An alternative strategy is to intensify therapy by the addition of a short-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) rather than prandial insulin. Short-acting GLP-1 RAs such as exenatide twice daily are particularly effective at reducing postprandial glucose while basal insulin has a greater effect on fasting glucose, providing a physiological rationale for this complementary approach. This review analyzes the latest randomized controlled clinical trials of insulin/GLP-1 RA combination therapy and examines results from 'real-world' use of the combinations as reported through observational and clinical practice studies. The most common finding across all types of studies was that combination therapy improved glycaemic control without weight gain or an increased risk of hypoglycaemia. Many studies reported weight loss and a reduction in insulin use when a GLP-1 RA was added to existing insulin therapy. Overall, the relative degree of benefit to glycaemic control and weight was influenced by the insulin titration employed in conjunction with the GLP-1 RA. The greatest glycaemic benefits were observed in studies with structured titration of insulin to glycaemic targets while the greatest weight benefits were observed in studies with a protocol-specified focus on insulin sparing. The adverse event profile of GLP-1 RAs in the reviewed trials was similar to that reported with GLP-1 RAs as monotherapy or in combination with OAMs with gastrointestinal events being the most commonly reported.

Energy loss via urine and faeces--a combustive analysis in diabetic rats and the impact of antidiabetic treatment on body weight

AIMS

Intensive glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes achieved by insulin is generally accompanied by body weight gain. This study was performed to emphasize the meaning of caloric analysis of urine and faeces for energy balance.

METHODS

We measured energetic loss via urine and faeces during antihyperglycaemic treatment in male obese Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats. Rats were treated for 10 days with the sodium-glucose-linked transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor AVE2268, with insulin glargine, with the GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide and with the combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide. Each study was accompanied by one lean (Fa/?) and one obese (fa/fa) untreated non-diabetic and diabetic control group, respectively. Blood glucose, body weight alterations and food assimilation efficiency were monitored.

RESULTS

In control ZDF rats, more than 12 g/day of pure glucose was urinarily excreted. In total, the energetic loss via urine exceeded 30% from total energy uptake. Insulin glargine treatment decreased urinary energetic loss, leading to a body weight gain of approximately 3 g/day. An almost body weight-neutral antihyperglycaemic treatment could be achieved with AVE2268 and lixisenatide. While lixisenatide reduced body weight gain via reduction of energy uptake, the SGLT2 inhibitor even increased urinary glucose and thus energy excretion. Combining insulin glargine with lixisenatide attenuated the anabolic effect of insulin resulting in weight neutrality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data clearly show renal contribution to the body's energy control by urinary glucose excretion (UGE) during antidiabetic treatment. The undesired retained energy could be reduced via additional UGE or via simultaneous reduction of energy uptake and/or energy retention.

Utilities and disutilities for attributes of injectable treatments for type 2 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Although cost-utility models are frequently used to estimate treatment outcomes for type 2 diabetes, utilities are not available for key attributes of injectable treatments. The purpose of this study was to identify the utility or disutility of three injection-related attributes (dose frequency, dose flexibility, injection site reaction) that may influence patient preference.

METHODS

Patients with type 2 diabetes in Scotland completed standard gamble (SG) interviews to assess the utility of hypothetical health states and their own current health state. The EQ-5D, PGWB, IWQOL-Lite, and QIDS were also administered. Construct validity and differences among health states were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients completed interviews. Of the three injection-related attributes, dose frequency was the only attribute with a statistically significant impact on utility (in a multiple regression model, p = 0.01). Weekly injections were associated with an average added utility of 0.023 in comparison to everyday injections. Flexible dosing and injection site reactions resulted in somewhat smaller utility shifts that were in the expected directions (+0.006 and -0.011, respectively). SG utility of current health (mean = 0.897) demonstrated construct validity through statistically significant correlations with patient-reported outcome measures.

DISCUSSION

The three injection attributes were associated with small utility shifts in the expected directions. Dose frequency appears to be the most important of the three attributes from the patients' perspective. The vignette-based SG approach was feasible and useful for assessing added utility or disutility of injection-related attributes associated with treatments for type 2 diabetes.

Patient treatment satisfaction after switching to NovoMix® 30 (BIAsp 30) in the IMPROVE™ study: an analysis of the influence of prior and current treatment factors

Purpose

Understanding treatment satisfaction (TS) for diabetes is increasingly important as treatment options increase. This study examines treatment satisfaction with NovoMix^® 30 in an observational study in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

The DiabMedSat assesses Overall, Treatment Burden, Symptom and Efficacy Treatment Satisfaction. The impact of type of pretreatment variables on TS was examined by ANOVA at baseline and week 26. Satisfaction at week 26 was examined by t-test and effect size. Linear regression models examined impact of prior treatment factors (age, gender, duration of diabetes, type of prior treatment and diabetes-related comorbidities) and current treatment factors (weight gain, hypoglycemic events, reaching therapeutic goal) on TS.

Results

The data set comprised 17,488 persons. Prior treatment with insulin had a more positive impact on baseline satisfaction. At week 26, there were no differences between type of prior treatment groups in Overall, Symptoms and Burden TS. Current treatment with NovoMix 30 significantly improved TS. Regression analyses examining the combined effect of pretreatment factors and current treatment factors found that all factors except for age-impacted TS although the domains impacted varied.

Conclusions

Patients treated with NovoMix 30 reported improved treatment satisfaction, and the improvement is considered clinically meaningful to patients.

Diabetes and obesity: therapeutic targeting and risk reduction - a complex interplay

Obesity is a major risk factor for the development of diabetes and predisposes individuals to hypertension and dyslipidaemia. Together these pathologies increase the risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), the major cause of morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Worsening trends in obesity and T2DM raise a serious conundrum, namely, how to control blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipids when many antidiabetic agents cause weight gain and thereby exacerbate other cardiovascular risk factors associated with T2DM. Further, evidence suggests that some established antihypertensive agents may worsen glucose intolerance. Many patients who are obese, hypertensive, and/or hyperlipidaemic fail to achieve blood pressure, lipid and glycaemic goals, and this failure may in part be explained by physician reluctance to utilize complex combination regimens for fear of off-target effects. Thus, a clear need exists for clinicians to understand the risks and benefits of different pharmacologic, and indeed non-pharmacologic, options in order to maximize treatment outcomes. While intensive lifestyle modification remains an elusive gold standard, newer diabetes targets, including the incretin axis, may offer greater cardiovascular risk reduction than other antidiabetes therapies, although definitive clinical trial data are needed. The glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists exenatide and liraglutide and the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors sitagliptin and vildagliptin effectively lower HbA1c; exenatide and liraglutide reduce weight and blood pressure and improve lipid profiles. Sitagliptin and vildagliptin are weight neutral but also appear to improve lipid profiles. Integration of incretin therapies into the therapeutic armamentarium is a promising approach to improving outcomes in T2DM, and perhaps even in reducing complications of T2DM, such as co-morbid hypertension and dyslipidaemia. Additional long-term studies, including CVD end-point studies, will be necessary to determine the appropriate places for incretin-based therapies in treatment algorithms.

Insulin therapy and type 2 diabetes: management of weight gain

The potential for insulin-related weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes presents a therapeutic dilemma and frequently leads to delays in the initiation of insulin therapy. It also poses considerable challenges when treatment is intensified. Addressing insulin-related weight gain is highly relevant to the prevention of metabolic and cardiovascular consequences in this high-risk population with type 2 diabetes. In addition to lifestyle changes (eg, diet and exercise) and available medical interventions to minimize the risk of weight gain with insulin treatment, familiarity with the weight gain patterns of different insulins may help deal with this problem. The use of basal insulin analogs may offer advantages over conventional human insulin preparations in terms of more physiologic time-action profiles, reduced risk of hypoglycemia, and reduced weight gain.

Psychological insulin resistance: patient beliefs and implications for diabetes management

PURPOSE

To define and understand patient psychological insulin resistance (PIR) and its impact on diabetes management.

METHODS

Systematic literature review of peer-refereed journals using the MEDLINE database, including all articles in English from 1985 to 2007. The population included patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, insulin naïve, and those currently using insulin. A total of 116 articles were reviewed.

RESULTS

PIR is impacted by patients' beliefs and knowledge about diabetes and insulin, negative self-perceptions and attitudinal barriers, the fear of side effects and complications from insulin use, as well as lifestyle adaptations, restrictions required by insulin use, and social stigma. These etiological influences, both independently and in combination, constitute a patient's PIR and may result in the reluctance of patients to both initiate and intensify treatment, leading to delayed treatment initiation and compromised glucose control.

CONCLUSIONS

PIR is complex and multifaceted. It plays an important, although often ignored, role in diabetes management. Assisting health care professionals in better understanding PIR from the patient's perspective should result in improved treatment outcomes. By tailoring treatments to patients' PIR, clinicians may be better able to help their patients begin insulin treatment sooner and improve compliance, thus facilitating target glycemic control.

Glucose tolerance in the proximal versus the distal small bowel in Wistar rats

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is an epidemic and insulin resistance is the central etiology of this disease. Obesity increases insulin resistance and glucose intolerance and also exacerbates metabolic abnormalities present in type 2 diabetes. Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity. Most reported series show that return to euglycemia and normal insulin levels occur days after gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion, long before major weight loss has taken place. The mechanisms underlying this dramatic reversal of type 2 diabetes following these bariatric procedures are not well understood.

METHODS

Twelve Wistar rats were fed with a palatable hyperlipidic diet for 12 weeks. Body weight, glucose, and intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test were measured regularly. On day 91, they were randomized in two groups (hindgut and controls) and operated. Twenty-one days later, the tests were done again and the hindgut group re-operated. A duodenal exclusion was done. The results of an intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test were compared after the procedures.

RESULTS

Body weight increased regularly in all the rats. Some rats developed hyperglycemia 28 days after beginning hyperlipidic diet, but these levels returned to baseline on days 56 and 84. The glucose tolerance test showed an improvement in glycemic levels in the hindgut group 21 days after the first operation (151 +/- 21mg/dl). After the second operation, despite weight loss, the glucose tolerance test of the foregut group worsened again (267 +/- 53 mg/dl) (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Comparing the "hindgut hypothesis" and the "foregut hypothesis", our data show an improvement in the 30 min glucose tolerance test in the hindgut group.

Management of type 2 diabetes in the obese patient: current concerns and emerging therapies

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this review are (1) to examine the pathophysiologic relationship between type 2 diabetes and obesity, (2) to provide an overview of current and emerging treatments for type 2 diabetes and their effects on body weight.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed for literature published in the English language from 1966 to 2006. Abstracts and presentations from the American Diabetes Association Scientific Sessions (2002-2006) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes Annual Meetings (1998-2006) were also searched for relevant studies. Preclinical and clinical data were selected for inclusion based on novelty and pertinence to treatment of the obese patient.

FINDINGS

Recent guidelines suggest that all patients with type 2 diabetes should initially receive metformin as well as lifestyle intervention, followed by rapid administration of other oral anti-diabetic agents or insulin if glycemic goals are not met or maintained. Many oral anti-diabetic drugs, and insulin, are associated with weight gain. New agents with anti-diabetic activity that may be advantageous in obese patients with type 2 diabetes have recently become available. These include injectable incretin mimetics, which reduce blood glucose while reducing body weight but commonly cause nausea and vomiting. A new class of oral agents, the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, is weight-neutral and largely devoid of gastrointestinal side-effects. The cannabinoid receptor antagonist rimonabant is the first of a new class of anti-obesity agents that reduces central obesity and improves multiple aspects of vascular risk.

CONCLUSION

New agents offer the prospect of improved glycemic control without weight gain. However, the ultimate roles of these agents in the treatment of obese patients with type 2 diabetes remain to be established.

Cost effectiveness of duloxetine in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain in the UK

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of duloxetine when considered as an additional treatment option for UK-based patients suffering from diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A decision-analytic model was used to represent the sequential management of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. The standard UK treatment strategy was defined as first-line tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline), second-line anticonvulsants (gabapentin) and lastly an opioid-related treatment. The cost-effectiveness of duloxetine was evaluated as an additional first, second, third or fourth-line therapy over a 6-month treatment period for a cohort of 1000 patients. Treatment response was modelled based on changes from baseline pain severity using a standard 11-point pain scale (0-10); full response (>or= 50% change), partial response (30-49%) and no response (< 30%). The model was populated with efficacy and discontinuation data using indirect comparisons of treatment efficacy based on relative effects to a common placebo comparator.

RESULTS

The second-line use of duloxetine resulted in cost savings of pound 77,071 for every 1000 treated patients, with an additional 29 patients achieving a full pain response when compared to standard UK treatment. Additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were achieved at 1.88 QALYs per 1000 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This UK-based economic model suggests that second-line use of duloxetine is a beneficial and cost-effective treatment strategy for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.

Obese versus non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes: patient-reported outcomes and utility of weight change

INTRODUCTION

This study (1) used patient-reported outcome measures to assess and compare the health status of type 2 diabetes patients with and without obesity and (2) assessed the value of weight change among obese and non-obese subgroups, using standard gamble (SG) utility methodology.

METHODS

Among a sample with type 2 diabetes in the United Kingdom, individuals with obesity (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2) were identified and compared to non-obese patients. Patients completed the EQ-5D, Psychological General Well-Being Index, Appraisal of Diabetes Symptoms, and Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R). SG interviews assessed the utility of the 'basic' type 2 diabetes health state anchored to respondents' body weight, as well as health states with altered weight.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients (74 obese; 55 non-obese) completed interviews (mean age 55.9 years; 64.3% male). Obese patients reported lower health status (EQ-5D VAS; between-group difference: p < 0.001) and greater symptom impact (several DSC-R scales, p < 0.05). Utilities of the basic health state were 0.86 (obese) and 0.91 (non-obese; p = 0.02). Hypothetical health states with higher weight received lower utilities, whereas reduced weight was associated with increased utility. There was a between-group difference in the disutility associated with 5% higher weight (obese 0.068; non-obese 0.051; p = 0.03).

DISCUSSION

Compared with non-obese patients, the obese group reported lower health status and greater symptom impact. SG interviews found an inverse relationship between weight and utility. Furthermore, obese patients with type 2 diabetes may value weight change differently than non-obese patients. Study limitations include the sample size and the use of a patient sample, rather than a sample selected from the general population. Overall, the results demonstrate that utilities can differ by patient subgroups, even among patients with the same diagnosis.

Validation of two generic patient-reported outcome measures in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Prior to using a generic patient-reported outcome measure (PRO), the measure should be validated within the target population. The purpose of the current study was to validate two generic measures in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Patients with type 2 diabetes in Scotland and England completed two generic measures: EQ-5D and Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB). Two diabetes-specific measures were administered: ADS and DSC-R. Analyses assessed reliability and validity.

RESULTS

There were 130 participants (53 Scotland; 77 England; 64% male; mean age = 55.7 years). Responses on the EQ-5D and PGWB reflected moderate impairment consistent with previous diabetes samples: mean EQ-5D Index score, 0.75; EQ-5D VAS, 68.8; PGWB global score, 67.9. All scales of the PGWB demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.77 to 0.97). The EQ-5D and PGWB demonstrated convergent validity through significant correlations with the ADS (r = 0.48 to 0.61), DSC-R scales (r = 0.33 to 0.81 except ophthalmology subscale), and Body Mass Index (r = 0.15 to 0.38). The EQ-5D and PGWB discriminated between groups of patients known to differ in diabetes-related characteristics (e.g., history of hypoglycemia).

CONCLUSION

Results support the use of the EQ-5D and PGWB among patients with type 2 diabetes, possibly in combination with condition-specific measures.

Utilities and disutilities for type 2 diabetes treatment-related attributes

INTRODUCTION

Although cost-utility analyses are frequently used to estimate treatment outcomes for type 2 diabetes, utilities are not available for key medication-related attributes. The purpose of this study was to identify the utility or disutility of diabetes medication-related attributes (weight change, gastrointestinal side effects, fear of hypoglycemia) that may influence patient preference.

METHODS

Patients with type 2 diabetes in Scotland and England completed standard gamble (SG) interviews to assess utility of hypothetical health states and their own current health state. The EQ-5D, PGWB, and Appraisal of Diabetes Symptoms were administered. Construct validity and differences among health states were examined with correlations, t-tests, and ANOVAs.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients (51 Scotland; 78 England) completed interviews. Mean utility of diabetes without complications was 0.89. Greater body weight was associated with disutility, and lower body weight with added utility (e.g., 3% higher = -0.04; 3% lower = +0.02). Gastrointestinal side effects and fear of hypoglycemia were associated with significant disutility (p < 0.001). SG utility of current health (mean = 0.87) demonstrated construct validity through correlations with patient-reported outcome measures (r = 0.08-0.31).

DISCUSSION

The vignette-based approach was feasible and useful for assessing added utility or disutility of medication-related attributes.

Insulin treatment and the problem of weight gain in type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE

Insulin therapy has been shown to benefit the prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes, but its initiation and intensification is often delayed through concerns about hypoglycemia and weight gain. In addition, weight gain is linked to the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and contributes to the overall risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This article attempts to summarize this issue and examine the options available for weight management.

METHODS

A broad range of literature has been reviewed to distill important, consistent facts about insulin and weight gain and the options available for limiting the problem.

RESULTS

Unfortunately, the great benefits of insulin therapy may be potentially undermined by weight gain. Weight gain is physiologically and psychologically undesirable, especially in patients with diabetes who are already overweight. The fear of weight gain with some medications contributes to psychological insulin resistance, which may discourage patients from commencing or following insulin regimens. However, new diabetes treatments and lifestyle interventions can be used to mitigate these problems.

CONCLUSIONS

The exact choice of insulin and oral medications and weight loss interventions are important considerations in the overall management of patients with type 2 diabetes. Changes in a patient's lifestyle, such as modifications to diet and implementing an exercise program, are first-line treatments for type 2 diabetes and can also counteract insulin-induced weight gain.

Patient-reported outcomes in a trial of exenatide and insulin glargine for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Background

Patient-reported measures can be used to examine whether drug differences other than clinical efficacy have an impact on outcomes that may be important to patients. Although exenatide and insulin glargine appear to have similar efficacy for treatment of type 2 diabetes, there are several differences between the two treatments that could influence outcomes from the patient's perspective. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether the two drugs were comparable as assessed by patient-reported outcomes using data from a clinical trial in which these injectable medications were added to pre-existing oral treatment regimens.

Methods

Patients were randomized to either twice daily exenatide or once daily insulin glargine during a 26-week international trial. At baseline and endpoint, five patient-reported outcome measures were administered: the Vitality Scale of the SF-36, The Diabetes Symptom Checklist – Revised (DSC-R), the EuroQol EQ-5D, the Treatment Flexibility Scale (TFS), and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Change from baseline to endpoint was analyzed within each treatment group. Group differences were examined with General linear models (GLMs), controlling for country and baseline scores.

Results

A total of 549 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the trial, and current analyses were conducted with data from the 455 per protocol patients (228 exenatide and 227 insulin glargine). The sample was primarily Caucasian (79.6%), with slightly more men (55.2%) than women, and with a mean age of 58.5 years. Paired t-tests found that both treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant baseline to endpoint change on several of the health outcomes instruments including the DSC-R, DTSQ, and the SF-36 Vitality subscale. GLMs found no statistically significant differences between groups in change on the health outcomes instruments.

Conclusion

This analysis found that both exenatide and insulin glargine were associated with significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes when added to oral medications among patients with type 2 diabetes. Despite an additional daily injection and a higher rate of gastrointestinal adverse events, treatment satisfaction in the exenatide group was comparable to that of the glargine group, possibly because of weight reduction observed in patients treated with exenatide.

Current and novel approaches to the drug therapy of obesity

INTRODUCTION

Obesity has been described as the greatest current threat to human health. Although diet and lifestyle changes remain the cornerstones of therapy for obesity, weight losses are often small, and long-term success is disappointing.

DISCUSSION

When these lifestyle-modifying attempts fail, the use of anti-obesity drugs is warranted. Drug treatment is often indicated, but is somewhat limited by the minimal number of well-tolerated drugs that have proven to have long-term efficacy in maintaining body weight loss. The currently available drugs, sibutramine and orlistat, appear modestly effective in promoting weight loss. However, pharmacological therapy for obesity is in transition; expanding knowledge of the physiological mechanisms of body weight regulation has revealed new molecular targets, and more than 150 novel agents are under active development.

CONCLUSIONS

Because weight regulation is complex, and redundant systems protect against perceived starvation, optimal treatment of obesity will likely require combinations of therapies. In addition, a better comprehension of the problem prior to its treatment would be preferable before targeting homeostatic pathways which could be irrelevant.

Modifications of coronary risk factors

In addition to the revascularization and glycemic management interventions assigned at random, the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) design includes the uniform control of major coronary artery disease risk factors, including dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, central obesity, and sedentary lifestyle. Target levels for risk factors were adjusted throughout the trial to comply with changes in recommended clinical practice guidelines. At present, the goals are low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <2.59 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) with an optional goal of <1.81 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL); plasma triglyceride level <1.70 mmol/L (<150 mg/dL); blood pressure level <130 mm Hg systolic and <80 mm Hg diastolic; and smoking cessation treatment for all active smokers. Algorithms were developed for the pharmacologic management of dyslipidemia and hypertension. Dietary prescriptions for the management of glycemia, plasma lipid profiles, and blood pressure levels were adapted from existing clinical practice guidelines. Patients with a body mass index >25 were prescribed moderate caloric restriction; after the trial was under way, a lifestyle weight-management program was instituted. All patients were formally prescribed both endurance and resistance/flexibility exercises, individually adapted to their level of disability and fitness. Pedometers were distributed as a biofeedback strategy. Strategies to achieve the goals for risk factors were designed by BARI 2D working groups (lipid, cardiovascular and hypertension, and nonpharmacologic intervention) and the ongoing implementation of the strategies is monitored by lipid, hypertension, and lifestyle intervention management centers.

The effect of pioglitazone on glycemic and lipid parameters and adverse events in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A post hoc analysis of four randomized trials

OBJECTIVE

This analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of pioglitazone (PIO), both as monotherapy and as part of combination therapy, on glycemic and lipid parameters and adverse events in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data, truncated at 1 year, from patients aged > or =65 years with type 2 diabetes in 4 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trials. For inclusion in these trials, patients were required to be between the ages of 35 and 75 years and to have had poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) value between 7.5% and 11.0%, and stable or worsening glycemic control for at least 3 months. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and every 4 to 10 weeks thereafter for determination of HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and lipid parameters (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], triglycerides [TG], total cholesterol [TC], TC:HDL-C ratio, and free fatty acids).

RESULTS

Data from 891 elderly patients (age range, 69.1-69.8 years) were included: 282 who received PIO, 123 metformin (MET), 142 sulfonylurea (SU), 105 SU + PIO, 107 SU + MET, 63 MET + PIO, and 69 MET + SU. With a few exceptions, all treatment groups were similar at baseline. From baseline to week 52, none of the changes in HbA(1c) and FPG between each treatment group and its comparator were significant. The adjusted mean (SE) percent changes in HDL-C for the monotherapies were 17.95% (1.11) for PIO, 10.71% (1.70) for MET, and 5.17% (1.51) for SU (both comparisons, P < 0.05). For the combination therapies, the adjusted mean percent changes in HDL-C were 16.77% (1.84) for SUPIO versus 7.87% (1.75) for SUMET (P < 0.05), and 16.34% (2.34) for MET + PIO versus 0.11% (2.19) for METSU (P < 0.05). The adjusted mean percent changes in LDL-C for the monotherapies were 7.00% (1.28) for PIO, -0.68% (1.91) for MET, and -6.77% (1.73) for SU (both comparisons, P < 0.05). For the combination therapies, the adjusted mean percent change in LDL-C was significant for METPIO compared with METSU (13.62% [2.69] vs -4.32% [2.58], respectively; P < 0.05). The adjusted mean percent change in TG was significant for MET + PIO compared with MET + SU (-10.93% [4.44] vs 8.37% [4.15], respectively; P < 0.05). The adjusted mean percent changes in TC for the monotherapies were 6.16% (0.88) for PIO, -1.77% (1.35) for MET, and -6.90% (1.19) for SU (both comparisons, P < 0.05). For the combination therapies, the adjusted mean percent changes in TC were 2.67% (1.45) for SUPIO versus -1.40% (1.39) for SUMET (P < 0.05) and 7.89% (1.85) for METPIO compared with -1.19% (1.73) for METSU (P < 0.05). The differences in change in the TC:HDL-C ratio were not significant between groups. The adjusted mean changes in free fatty acids for the monotherapies were -0.14 (0.02) mmol/L for PIO, -0.001 (0.03) mmol/L for MET, and -0.07 (0.02) mmol/L for SU (both comparisons, P < 0.05). For the combination therapies, the adjusted mean change in free fatty acids was significant for SU + PIO compared with SUMET (-0.12 [0.03] vs 0.06 [0.03] mmol/L, respectively; P < 0.05). PIO monotherapy was associated with the lowest incidence of hypoglycemia (1.4%) among the 7 treatment groups. The SUPIO group had the highest incidence of weight gain (4.8%). The rate of deaths was <2% in all the treatment groups; no adverse event associated with death was considered related to study medication.

CONCLUSIONS

In this post hoc analysis of data from elderly patients participating in 4 randomized clinical trials, PIO effectively controlled glycemic and lipid parameters over 52 weeks and was well tolerated. The effects seen in this analysis were comparable to those in the overall study populations.

Use of an electronic medical record to detect patients at high risk of metformin-induced lactic acidosis

The Notes section welcomes the following types of contributions: (1) practical innovations or solutions to everyday practice problems, (2) substantial updates or elaborations on work previously published by the same authors, (3) important confirmations of research findings previously published by others, and (4) short research reports, including practice surveys, of modest scope or interest. Notes should be submitted with AJHP's manuscript checklist. The text should be concise, and the number of references, tables, and figures should be limited.

The evolution of human fatness and susceptibility to obesity: an ethological approach

Human susceptibility to obesity is an unusual phenomenon amongst animals. An evolutionary analysis, identifying factors favouring the capacity for fat deposition, may aid in the development of preventive public health strategies. This article considers the proximate causes, ontogeny, fitness value and evolutionary history of human fat deposition. Proximate causes include diet composition, physical activity level, feeding behaviour, endocrine and genetic factors, psychological traits, and exposure to broader environmental factors. Fat deposition peaks during late gestation and early infancy, and again during adolescence in females. As in other species, human fat stores not only buffer malnutrition, but also regulate reproduction and immune function, and are subject to sexual selection. Nevertheless, our characteristic ontogenetic pattern of fat deposition, along with relatively high fatness in adulthood, contrasts with the phenotype of other mammals occupying the tropical savannah environment in which hominids evolved. The increased value of energy stores in our species can be attributed to factors increasing either uncertainty in energy availability, or vulnerability to that uncertainty. Early hominid evolution was characterised by adaptation to a more seasonal environment, when selection would have favoured general thriftiness. The evolution of the large expensive brain in the genus Homo then favoured increased energy stores in the reproducing female, and in the offspring in early life. More recently, the introduction of agriculture has had three significant effects: exposure to regular famine; adaptation to a variety of local niches favouring population-specific adaptations; and the development of social hierarchies which predispose to differential exposure to environmental pressures. Thus, humans have persistently encountered greater energy stress than that experienced by their closest living relatives during recent evolution. The capacity to accumulate fat has therefore been a major adaptive feature of our species, but is now increasingly maladaptive in the modern environment where fluctuations in energy supply have been minimised, and productivity is dependent on mechanisation rather than physical effort. Alterations to the obesogenic environment are predicted to play a key role in reducing the prevalence of obesity.

Orlistat in responding obese type 2 diabetic patients: meta-analysis findings and cost-effectiveness as rationales for reimbursement in Sweden and Switzerland

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to review the clinical and economic rationale for the reimbursement of orlistat in responding obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Data from seven randomized controlled clinical trials of orlistat in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes were pooled. A subgroup analysis involving patients who achieved a response (defined as a weight loss of >/=5% after 12 weeks of treatment) was conducted. The outcomes of the pooled analysis were then used to construct a Markov health economic model covering an 11-y period. The incidences of diabetes-related micro- and macrovascular complications were derived from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. The effects of changes in body mass index, and the impact of micro- and macrovascular complications on utilities were derived from published sources. Publicly available cost data were used and are presented here in 2001 Euros. Discounting of 3% was applied. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the robustness of results.

RESULTS

A total of 1249 patients treated with orlistat and 1230 given placebo were eligible for the intent-to-treat analysis. At the end of the study period, 23% of orlistat patients achieved a weight reduction of >/=5%. These patients showed a mean decrease in HbA1C of 1.16%, a weight reduction of 8.6 kg, a reduction in total cholesterol of 5.3% and a reduction in systolic blood pressure of 5.2 mmHg. The base-case economic analysis revealed costs per quality-adjusted life year gained of euro14 000 in Sweden and euro13 600 in Switzerland.

CONCLUSION

The data presented here support the utilization and reimbursement of orlistat in overweight and obese diabetic patients who respond to the treatment.

Current concepts and future directions in the battle against obesity

Obesity is a significant unsolved public health problem. Future treatments of obesity will involve application of neuroendocrine concepts that are reviewed in this paper.

Diabesity

Weight reduction has been shown to improve glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors associated with insulin resistance in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Therapeutic options for these patients include promoting weight loss (non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment) and improving glycemic control, as well as treating common associated risk factors such as arterial hypertension and dyslipidemias. This article provides an overview of anti-obesity drugs used in the treatment of obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. The most widely investigated drugs, sibutramine and orlistat, result in modest, clinically worthwhile weight loss, with demonstrable improvements in many co-morbidities, among them, type 2 diabetes. Clinical trials with these anti-obesity medications in cohorts of obese diabetic patients have been reviewed as well as cathecolaminergic agents (diethylpropion [amfepramone], fenproporex, mazindol, ephedrine-caffeine combination), serotoninergic drugs (fenfluramine, dexfenfluramine, fluoxetine), and other drugs that have some action on weight loss (the antidiabetic agent metformin, anti-epileptic agents topiramate and zonisamide, and the antidepressive bupropion [amfebutamone]). These trials show variable benefits in terms of effects on glucose profiles.

Current and investigational antiobesity agents and obesity therapeutic treatment targets

Public health efforts and current antiobesity agents have not controlled the increasing epidemic of obesity. Investigational antiobesity agents consist of 1) central nervous system agents that affect neurotransmitters or neural ion channels, including antidepressants (bupropion), selective serotonin 2c receptor agonists, antiseizure agents (topiramate, zonisamide), some dopamine antagonists, and cannabinoid-1 receptor antagonists (rimonabant); 2) leptin/insulin/central nervous system pathway agents, including leptin analogues, leptin transport and/or leptin receptor promoters, ciliary neurotrophic factor (Axokine), neuropeptide Y and agouti-related peptide antagonists, proopiomelanocortin and cocaine and amphetamine regulated transcript promoters, alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone analogues, melanocortin-4 receptor agonists, and agents that affect insulin metabolism/activity, which include protein-tyrosine phosphatase-1B inhibitors, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma receptor antagonists, short-acting bromocriptine (ergoset), somatostatin agonists (octreotide), and adiponectin; 3) gastrointestinal-neural pathway agents, including those that increase cholecystokinin activity, increase glucagon-like peptide-1 activity (extendin 4, liraglutide, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors), and increase protein YY3-36 activity and those that decrease ghrelin activity, as well as amylin analogues (pramlintide); 4) agents that may increase resting metabolic rate ("selective" beta-3 stimulators/agonist, uncoupling protein homologues, and thyroid receptor agonists); and 5) other more diverse agents, including melanin concentrating hormone antagonists, phytostanol analogues, functional oils, P57, amylase inhibitors, growth hormone fragments, synthetic analogues of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, antagonists of adipocyte 11B-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity, corticotropin-releasing hormone agonists, inhibitors of fatty acid synthesis, carboxypeptidase inhibitors, indanones/indanols, aminosterols, and other gastrointestinal lipase inhibitors (ATL962). Finally, an emerging concept is that the development of antiobesity agents must not only reduce fat mass (adiposity) but must also correct fat dysfunction (adiposopathy).

Weight gain during insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

In patients with diabetes, the benefits of tight glycemic control are unequivocal--delayed onset and progression of complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. However, intensive therapy with insulin and some oral antidiabetic agents come at the price of weight gain, a condition that can prevent attainment of tight glycemic goals and probably limits success of treatment. Insulin-related weight gain has been attributed to anabolic effects of insulin, appetite increases, and reduction of glycosuria. Use of metformin in combination with insulin is commonly recommended as a way to limit weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes, and other new oral therapies and insulin analogs may also provide weight-control advantages. Lifestyle interventions (patient education about diet and exercise) promote weight loss in the short-term, but have not sustained weight control over long-term intervals. For lasting weight control, such interventions may need to continue throughout the course of treatment. Likewise, weight-loss agents, such as sibutramine and orlistat promote short-term weight loss, but no follow-up studies have yet demonstrated that this loss can be maintained for 5 years or longer. Bariatric surgery is the only treatment recognized to have lasting effects on weight control, but its use is limited at present to those who are morbidly obese.

Obesity and type 2 diabetes

The increasing prevalence of obesity is accompanied by an increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes. Obesity not only increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes but also compounds its health risks and complicates its management. The health benefits of weight loss and the efficacy of current weight loss strategies in obese persons with type 2 diabetes are evaluated. In addition, the article reviews the results of lifestyle intervention trials designed to reduce conversion to type 2 diabetes in at-risk individuals.