Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials

Research trends of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: A bibliometric analysis

The approach of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer, which involves administering systemic treatment prior to primary surgery, has undergone substantial advancements in recent decades. This strategy is intended to reduce tumor size, thereby enabling less invasive surgical procedures and enhancing patient outcomes. This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of research trends in neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer from 2009 to 2024. Using data extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection, a total of 3,674 articles were analyzed to map the research landscape in this field. The analysis reveals a steady increase in publication output, peaking in 2022, with the United States and China identified as the leading contributors. Key institutions, such as the University of Texas System and MD Anderson Cancer Center, have been instrumental in advancing the research on neoadjuvant therapy. The study also highlights the contributions of influential authors like Sibylle Loibl and Gunter von Minckwitz, as well as major journals such as the Journal of Clinical Oncology. Emerging research topics, including immunotherapy, liquid biopsy, and artificial intelligence, are gaining prominence and represent potential future directions for clinical applications. This bibliometric analysis provides critical insights into global research trends, key contributors, and future developments in the field of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer, offering a foundation for future research and clinical practice advancements.

Long-term outcomes of volume de-escalation for breast nodal irradiation

INTRODUCTION

NCCN recommendations suggest irradiating chest wall/breast only + regional node irradiation (RNI) of the undissected axillary levels for node-positive breast cancer (BC) patients. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of node-positive BC patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) with a volume de-escalation at the level of axillary nodes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of node-positive BC patients treated with adjuvant RT administered following a conventional fractionation schedule using a 3D-conformal technique to the chest wall or breast and only the IV axillary level. The primary endpoint of the study was disease free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included loco-regional control (LRC), and Overall Survival (OS). Toxicity was documented according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria.

RESULTS

A total cohort of 343 patients was analyzed. Loco-regional recurrence occurred in 100 (29.1%). The 5- and 10-year Kaplan-Meyer curves for DFS were 81.4% (95% CI: 79.3%-83.5%) and 60.9% (95% CI: 57.6%-64.5%), respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that lymph node ratio (HR = 9.76, 95% CI: 3.12-30.53, p = 0.0001), Luminal B subtype (HR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.26-3.29, p = 0.004), and triple-negative subtype (HR = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.22-5.99, p = 0.01) were significant predictors of poor DFS. Lymphedema in the ipsilateral arm was reported in 32 (9.3%) patients, primarily Grade 1 or 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved patients' selection and a broader use of systemic therapy could make de-escalation a feasible option. However, this approach should be avoided in patients with extensive nodal involvement, specific molecular subtypes, or comorbidities that prevent the use of chemotherapy.

Evaluating PREDICT and developing outcome prediction models in early-onset breast cancer using data from Alberta, Canada

INTRODUCTION

Outcome prediction research in early-onset breast cancer (EoBC) is limited. This study evaluated the predictive performance of NHS PREDICT v2.1 and developed two prediction models for 5-year and 10-year all-cause mortality in a cohort of EoBC patients in Alberta, Canada.

METHODS

Adults < 40 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in Alberta, Canada from 2004 to 2020 were included. Patient data were entered into PREDICT v2.1 and mortality estimates at 5 and 10 years were extracted. Two prediction models were developed for all-cause mortality: multivariable Cox regression with LASSO penalization (LASSO Cox) and random survival forests (RSF). Internal validation of the developed models was performed using nested tenfold cross-validation repeated 200 times. Model performance was assessed using receiver operator characteristic and calibration curves for mortality at 5 and 10 years.

RESULTS

In total, 1827 patients with EoBC were eligible for inclusion. At 5 years, PREDICT had an area under the curve of 0.78 (95%CI 0.74-0.82) and overestimated mortality by 2.4% (95%CI 0.70-4.33) in the overall cohort. No differences in observed and predicted mortality by PREDICT were observed at 10 years. The LASSO Cox model showed better discrimination at 5 and 10 years than the RSF model, but both had poor calibration and underestimated mortality.

CONCLUSION

PREDICT v2.1 tended to overestimate 5-year mortality in those with > 30% predicted risks and 10-year mortality in those with > 50% predicted risks for EoBC in Alberta, Canada. We did not identify additional models that would be clinically useful by applying machine learning. More follow-up data and emerging systemic treatment variables are required to study outcome prediction in modern cohorts.

Population-based analysis of breast cancer incidence and mortality: overall and age-specific temporal trends over 40-year period in Girona, Spain

PURPOSE

Breast cancer (BC) incidence and mortality in women have changed over time. This study aims to analyze population-level incidence and mortality trends over 40 years of observation.

METHODS

Population-based study of BC conducted by Girona Cancer Registry covering the period 1980-2019. Age-standardized incidence and mortality rates were calculated. Poisson change-point regression models were used to analyze trends, calculating the annual percentage change (APC).

RESULTS

A total of 12,283 diagnoses of invasive BC between 1980 and 2019. The overall age-standardized incidence rate was 109.9 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 104.4; 115.4) cases per 100,000 women-years. Trend analyses showed a statistically significant incidence increase of 4.2% per year from 1980 to 1994 (95%CI 3.3; 5.1), and a stabilization between 1994 and 2019, with an APC of 0.28% (95%CI - 0.04; 0.56). These trends were similar for the age groups 0-49 years and 50-69 years. In women over 69 years of age, an increase in incidence of 4.4% (95%CI 2.8; 6.0) per year was observed between 1980 and 1995 followed by a non-statistically significant decrease of - 0.35% (95%CI - 0.86; 0.15) between 1995 and 2019. The overall age-standardized mortality rate was 30.3 (95%CI 29.3; 31.3) cases per 100,000 women-years. Mortality rate trends showed a statistically significant decrease of - 1.87% (95%CI - 2.38; - 1.37) per year since 1992.

CONCLUSION

There has been a stabilization in the incidence of BC and a gradual decline in BC mortality in women. The introduction of mammography in the mid-1990s, alongside early detection and treatment due to screening programs may play a significant role in the reduction of BC burden in women of all ages.

Breast cancer-specific survival by molecular subtype in different age groups of women in Scotland

BACKGROUND

Age and molecular subtypes are important prognostic factors in breast cancer (BC). Here, we explore how age and molecular subtypes influence BC survival in Scotland.

METHODS

We analysed data from 71,784 women diagnosed with invasive BC in Scotland between 1997 and 2016, with follow-up until 31st December 2018 (median follow-up time = 5.5 years). Cox models estimated Hazard Ratios (HR) for BC-specific death by age group (with women of screening age, 50-69 years old, as the reference) within each molecular subtype, adjusting for prognostic factors. The cumulative incidence function was plotted to account for competing risks.

RESULTS

During the study period, 37% of women died, with 53% of deaths attributed to BC. Women aged 70 + years had increased BC-specific death compared to women aged 50 to 69 years with the same subtype. HRs (95% CI) were 1.49 (1.23-1.80) for luminal A, 1.39 (1.14 to 1.69) for luminal B tumours and 1.49 (1.15 to 1.94) for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Women aged < 50 years had lower risk of BC death in luminal A subtype only, with HR of 0.66 (0.51-0.86) compared to women aged 50 to 69 years. Competing risks analysis showed higher cumulative incidence of death from non-BC causes, particularly for women aged 70 + years with hormone positive subtypes. Stage, treatment, and molecular subtype were the strongest prognostic factors for BC-specific mortality across all ages.

CONCLUSIONS

Age influences BC-specific mortality particularly within luminal subtypes. In contrast, other tumour characteristics and treatment are key prognostic factors for non-luminal subtypes. Future studies should investigate other markers of BC mortality particularly among over 70-year-olds, who account for 60% of BC deaths in the UK.

Early Breast Cancer Treatment and Cardiac Events: A Systematic Review

Cancer-treatment induced cardiovascular diseases are a concern in early breast cancer, especially when radiation is involved and systemic treatments may contribute. Our primary objective was to estimate the frequency of cardiac adverse events after early breast cancer treatment. We performed a systematic review on cardiac events after early breast cancer treatment, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, by searching PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science and cross-checking references from international guidelines on breast cancer treatment and cardio-oncology. Eighty-one studies were selected. Reporting of cardiac events and dose parameters was heterogeneous among studies due to the variability of the events being considered, follow-up duration and patient's age (most reported less than 5% with some as high as 34% at a maximum follow-up of 28 years). The most frequent are ischemic and valvular heart disease. Radiation modalities (hypofractionation, boost, partial or nodal irradiation) do not seem to change the risk of cardiac events. Anthracycline and aromatase inhibitors increase long-term cardiac risk, whereas anti-HER2-related effects are mostly transient. Myocardites with immunotherapy are rare (<1%) but follow-up is short. Other chemotherapy agents and poly(adenosine-diphosphate-ribose)-polymerase inhibitors have not been shown to increase cardiac risks which is reduced with more recent treatments, and increased by young age at diagnosis and previous cardiac risk factors. Advances in treatment seem to lower cardiac events. Prospective studies with exhaustive reporting of toxicity and radiotherapy features are warranted as well as the help of a cardio-oncologist to manage risk factors.

Short-term mortality in older (≥70 years) patients with early breast cancer treated with neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy: A Swedish nationwide retrospective population-based study

INTRODUCTION

There are substantial differences in the utilization of chemotherapy between younger and older patients, mainly due to the higher risk for adverse events among older patients. Short-term mortality after chemotherapy could reveal fatal side effects of treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of treatment setting (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant) and different chemotherapeutic agents on short-term mortality among older patients with early breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The population-based, national, research database BCBaSe 3.0 was used as a data source to identify older (≥70 years old) patients with stage I-III breast cancer, diagnosed between 2008 and 2019, who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Primary outcome was short-term mortality defined as death due to any cause within one year after breast cancer diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate the impact of treatment setting and different chemotherapeutic agents (anthracycline-based vs. taxane-based vs. sequential anthracyclines and taxanes) on outcome, adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

In total, 4072 older patients were treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and median age was 73 years (quartile [Q]1-Q3; 71-75). The one-year mortality rate was 1.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-1.9 % [63 of 4072 patients]). Risk factors independently associated with one-year mortality were older age, larger tumor size, positive nodal status, presence of triple negative breast cancer, and use of neoadjuvant as compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR]: 2.00, 95 % CI: 1.04-3.84). No association was found between type of chemotherapeutic regimen and one-year mortality. Median time to death was 7 months (interquartile range: 5-9). The reason for death was mainly classified as breast cancer-related (neoadjuvant: 78 %, n = 14; adjuvant: 49 %, n = 22), followed by potential treatment-related deaths (neoadjuvant: 11 %, n = 2; adjuvant: 27 %, n = 12).

DISCUSSION

The short-term mortality rate at first year after diagnosis among older (≥70 years) patients with breast cancer was relatively low. The higher risk among patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be attributed to residual confounding and deserves further evaluation. The low risk of potential treatment-associated death suggests that chemotherapy in this respect is safe, and older patients should not be disqualified for this treatment.

Current controversies in the use of Oncotype DX in early breast cancer

Multigene prognostic genomic assays have become essential tools in the management of early breast cancer (BC), providing information that help in risk-stratification, to provide risk-adapted decision-making of adjuvant treatments. Clinical practice guidelines recommend refining the prognostic information provided by clinical and pathology features with the use of genomic tests, such as Oncotype DX®, to classify cancers into risk groups and inform adjuvant treatment strategies. However, the clinical value (i.e., prognostic and/or predictive) and applicability of these assays vary due to differences in the clinical setting, especially in those populations that were underrepresented in pivotal clinical trials. Oncotype DX® is a broadly utilized genomic test for breast cancer, having the highest level of supporting evidence to inform clinical practice. Our manuscript provides a comprehensive overview on this recurrence score assay, evaluates supporting evidence across patient populations, and discusses their impact on treatment decisions in those groups of patients underrepresented in pivotal clinical trials, where evidence is limited with the use of Oncotype DX.

Overall survival and disease-free survival prediction in Chinese women with breast cancer aged 70 years or older by using nomograms

PURPOSE

By analyzing the existing data of this study, a prediction tool for the overall breast cancer survival and disease-free survival (DFS) of elderly women was established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathologic data were collected from elderly women with BC who were admitted to the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from August 2014 to December 2017. Independent prognostic factors for BC in elderly patients were confirmed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Nomograms were developed with these factors for predicting the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) as well as DFS. The nomograms' discrimination ability and calibration were assessed through the area under the curve (AUC), concordance index (C-index), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration plots.

RESULTS

We enroled 889 elderly patients with BC, and the results showed that the 3-year OS rate was 93.4% (95%CI = 91.8%-95.1%), the 3-year DFS rate was 87.8% (95%CI = 85.7%-90.0%), the 5-year OS rate was 85.6% (95%CI = 83.3%-87.9%), and the 5-year DFS rate was 80.1%(95%CI = 77.5%-82.8%). The corrected C-indices of the OS and DFS nomograms were 0.799 and 0.667, respectively (95%CI = 0.767-0.830 and 0.632-0.702, respectively). Relatively high AUC values were shown by the nomograms for estimating OS and DFS. The DCA revealed that the constructed nomograms had net benefits for clinical application. The calibration curves demonstrated an excellent correspondence between the data predicted by the nomograms and the actual survival data. Survival curves indicated that risk stratification could differentiate OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed novel and practical nomograms for individual prediction of DFS and OS in elderly BC patients. These nomograms can predict 3- and 5-year OS as well as DFS in the elderly BC patient population, thereby enabling personalized risk assessment and risk-based therapy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Evidence from randomized trials regarding adjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on survival in older patients with resected breast cancer is limited. This study evaluates the current evidence on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and its effects on overall mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality in older patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with HER2-negative breast cancer. Searches in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library up to May 2024 included terms such as "breast cancer," "adjuvant," "chemotherapy," "elderly," and "HER2-negative." Eligible studies involved women aged 65 years or older with HER2-negative breast cancer, comparing those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy versus those who did not. Excluded were studies on neoadjuvant therapy, HER2-positive disease, or non-English publications. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Among 2345 articles, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 376,900 patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduced overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.68-0.78) and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.73-0.9), with the most pronounced benefit in triple-negative breast cancer (HR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.60-0.67). Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces overall mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality in older patients, particularly those with triple-negative breast cancer. However, the evidence is predominantly based on retrospective or observational studies, highlighting inherent limitations. Comprehensive geriatric evaluations are crucial for patient selection, and dedicated clinical trials focused on older populations are urgently needed.

First versus second-generation molecular profiling tests: How both can guide decision-making in early-stage hormone-receptor positive breast cancers?

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) tumors represent the most common types of early-stage breast cancer. However, their response to adjuvant systemic treatments varies widely due to tumor heterogeneity. Current decisions for adjuvant treatment rely heavily on clinical and pathological characteristics, which can sometimes lead to overtreatment. Accurately identifying patients who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy at an individual level remains a challenge. Multigene profiling assays are now widely used in clinics to better assess recurrence risk and chemotherapy response for HR+ disease. In this report, we examine the advantages and limitations of two widely used molecular profiling tests-Oncotype DX and Prosigna. Both Oncotype DX and Prosigna have been demonstrated to be effective prognostic tools in early breast cancer, with Oncotype DX also being validated as a predictive tool to guide chemotherapy decisions. We focus on studies that directly compare these molecular tests and discuss how their strengths can be leveraged to improve clinical decision-making for early-stage HR+ breast cancers. Finally, we highlight remaining knowledge gaps and propose directions for future research.

Treatment, toxicity, and mortality after subsequent breast cancer in female survivors of childhood cancer

Childhood cancer survivors, particularly those who received chest radiotherapy, are at high risk for developing subsequent breast cancer. Minimizing long-term toxicity risks associated with additional radiotherapy and chemotherapy is a priority, but therapeutic tradeoffs have not been comprehensively characterized and their impact on survival is unknown. In this study, 431 female childhood cancer survivors with subsequent breast cancer from a multicenter retrospective cohort study were evaluated. Compared with one-to-one matched females with first primary breast cancer, survivors are as likely to be prescribed guideline-concordant treatment (N = 344 pairs; survivors: 94%, controls: 93%), but more frequently undergo mastectomy (survivors: 81%, controls: 60%) and are less likely to be treated with anthracyclines (survivors: 47%, controls: 66%) or radiotherapy (survivors: 18%, controls: 61%). Despite this, survivors have nearly 3.5-fold (95% CI = 2.17-5.57) greater mortality risk. Here, we show survivors with subsequent breast cancer face excess mortality despite therapeutic tradeoffs and require specialized treatment guidelines.

Impact of endocrine therapy regimens for early-stage ER+/HER2-breast cancer on contralateral breast cancer risk

Endocrine therapy for breast cancer may reduce the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). However, there are no published estimates quantifying the lifetime outcomes by age at primary diagnosis, regimen, or duration. Here, we adapted an established Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Network (CISNET) model to simulate life histories of multiple US female birth-cohorts diagnosed with stage 0-III ER+/HER2- breast cancer receiving different durations (none, 2.5, 5, 10 years) of two endocrine therapy regimens (aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen; including ovarian-function suppression for premenopausal women). As expected, greater duration of endocrine therapy led to more avoided CBC cases, as did aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen, but the numbers varied greatly by the age of diagnosis. The maximum number of CBC were avoided using 10-year aromatase inhibitor regimens (6.0 vs. 11.2 for no adjuvant therapy, per 100 women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer). For the 5-year aromatase inhibitors therapy, women <45 years had the largest reduction in CBC cases (5.0/100), which dropped to 2.7/100 for women at 75+ years. Quantification of the lifetime risk of CBC for specific endocrine therapy types and duration is helpful for weighing therapeutic options. The risk of breast cancer death has a larger weight, but inclusion of the risk of CBC increases the separation between different therapy options.

Clinician's guide: expert insights on the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with early breast cancer

The introduction of the cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors abemaciclib and ribociclib to the adjuvant setting marks a significant advancement in the treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer (HR+, HER2- EBC). Despite significant strides in early detection and treatment, many patients continue to face the risk of disease recurrence, highlighting the need for more effective adjuvant therapies. These CDK4/6 inhibitors, combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy, have shown promising efficacy in reducing recurrence rates while maintaining a manageable safety profile, as evidenced by the monarchE and NATALEE trials. This paper explores the integration of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors into clinical practice, focusing on disease-free survival and safety outcomes. Key considerations in selecting between abemaciclib and ribociclib are discussed, including patient risk profiles, efficacy and safety profiles, treatment duration, and individual patient preferences. In addition, we discuss managing adverse events to prevent premature discontinuation, with strategies that include dose holds, dose reductions, proactive symptom management, and patient education. The paper also highlights strategies to enhance patient medication adherence and the involvement of multidisciplinary care teams to support treatment delivery. As research continues to evolve, additional follow-ups of the monarchE and NATALEE trials and future trials will further refine patient selection and treatment sequencing, ultimately improving outcomes and enhancing the quality of life for patients with HR+, HER2- EBC.

The necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy in young patients with T1N0M0 breast cancer: a population-based study

Chemotherapy clearly adversely affects fertility in women of childbearing age. But it is not yet clear whether chemotherapy at the expense of fertility can benefit younger patients with early-stage breast cancer. We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Breast Cancer Data Base spanning from 2010 to 2020 to investigate early-stage breast malignant carcinoma in patients aged between 20 and 39 years. To address covariate imbalance, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed with a ratio of 1:1 and caliper set at 0.02 standard deviation of propensity score. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy on both breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS). We identified a total of 6265 patients with complete information about breast cancer. Among them, 3855 patients received chemotherapy. Following successful PSM, we obtained a matched cohort comprising 3038 patients where the characteristics between the two groups were balanced except for race. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant differences in BCSS (P = 0.183) and OS (P = 0.295) between the chemotherapy group and no-chemotherapy group. Similarly, in matched dataset. multivariate COX analysis revealed that chemotherapy did not significantly reduce the risk of BCSS (HR 1.332; 95% CI [0.865-2.051], P = 0.193) and OS (HR 1.225; 95% CI [0.818-1.833], P = 0.324). The chemotherapy group did not demonstrate a superior benefit in any of the subgroups when stratified analyses were conducted based on molecular subtype, tumor size, age, and ethnicity. Chemotherapy fails to significantly improve prognostic outcomes in young patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. With the help of genetic testing, these patients can expect further step-down therapy in the future.

Mathematical Modeling to Address Questions in Breast Cancer Screening: An Overview of the Breast Cancer Models of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network

The National Cancer Institute-funded Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) breast cancer mathematical models have been increasingly utilized by policymakers to address breast cancer screening policy decisions and influence clinical practice. These well-established and validated models have a successful track record of use in collaborations spanning over 2 decades. While mathematical modeling is a valuable approach to translate short-term screening performance data into long-term breast cancer outcomes, it is inherently complex and requires numerous inputs to approximate the impacts of breast cancer screening. This review article describes the 6 independently developed CISNET breast cancer models, with a particular focus on how they represent breast cancer screening and estimate the contribution of screening to breast cancer mortality reduction and improvements in life expectancy. We also describe differences in structures and assumptions across the models and how variation in model results can highlight areas of uncertainty. Finally, we offer insight into how the results generated by the models can be used to aid decision-making regarding breast cancer screening policy.

Prosigna Risk of Recurrence score and intrinsic subtypes are associated with adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy benefit in high-risk breast cancer

NCIC-CTG MA.5 and DBCG 89D are symmetrically designed randomized trials comparing adjuvant cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in high-risk breast cancer patients. In a joint analysis we evaluate the predictive value in terms of anthracycline benefit of molecular subtyping by PAM50. A statistically significant interaction (P = 0.008) between continuous Risk of Recurrence (ROR) score and treatment regimen is evident, translating into a clear distinct treatment effect according to ROR score category with HR 0.51 for ROR score ≥ 72 and HR 1.10 for ROR score < 52 (Pinteraction = 0.004). The analysis provides evidence of the benefit from anthracycline in HER2-enriched subtype; for patients with discordance of HER2 subtype and clinical HER2 status, HER2-enriched subtype was predictive of anthracycline benefit whereas clinical HER2 positive status was not. Anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy may safely be withheld for patients with a low ROR score while the benefit increases with increasing ROR score.

Development and Validation of Data-Driven Estimates of Recurrence Risk and Treatment Benefit in Early Breast Cancer

In the article that accompanies this editorial, Pusztai et al describe the development and validation of a new decision aide called “RSClinN+ ” for women with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with 1–3 positive axillary nodes and an Oncotype 21-gene Recurrence Score of 0 to 25; the tool provides prognostic information for 5-year invasive disease free survival, and predictive information for chemotherapy benefit, based largely on the RxPONDER trial for development, and an independent real world cohort for validation. This new tool integrates prognostic information for recurrence (ie, age, tumor size, grade, number of positive axillary node, and 21-gene Recurrence Score), and predictive information for chemotherapy benefit provides by the Recurrence Score, facilitating individualized estimates of recurrence risk and chemotherapy benefit.

Development and Validation of the RSClinN+ Tool to Predict Prognosis and Chemotherapy Benefit for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Clinicopathological factors and the 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score (RS) test both influence prognosis. Our goal was to develop a new tool, RSClinN+, to individualize recurrence risk and chemotherapy benefit predictions by menopausal status for patients with HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, lymph node-positive breast cancer by integrating the RS result with clinicopathological factors (grade, tumor size, age).

METHODS

We used patient-level data from 5,283 patients treated with chemoendocrine therapy (CET) versus endocrine therapy alone (ET) in the S1007 (N = 4,916) and S8814 (N = 367) trials to develop the tool. Cox proportional hazards regression models stratified by trial were used to estimate 5-year invasive disease-free survival for pre- and postmenopausal woman, respectively. The integrated RSClinN+ model was compared with RS alone and clinicopathological models using likelihood ratio tests. Absolute CET benefit was estimated as the difference between ET and CET risk estimates. Validation of RSClinN+ was performed in 592 patients with node-positive disease in the Clalit Health Services registry.

RESULTS

RSClinN+ provides better prognostic information than RS model alone (premenopausal P = .034; postmenopausal P < .001) or clinicopathological model alone (premenopausal P = .002; postmenopausal, P < .001). In postmenopausal women, RS showed interaction with CET benefit (P = .016), with RSClinN+ absolute CET benefit ranging from <0.1% to 21.5% over RS ranges 0-50. In premenopausal patients with RS ≤25, there was no significant interaction between RS and CET benefit. In external validation, RSClinN+ risk estimates were prognostic (hazard ratio, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.38 to 2.20]) and concordant with observed risk (Lin's concordance, 0.92).

CONCLUSION

RSClinN+ provides improved estimates of prognosis and absolute CET benefit for individual patients compared with RS or with clinical data alone and could be used in patient counseling.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Multigene Assays to Guide Treatment Decisions for Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Clinicopathologic and patient factors, such as tumor grade, size, age, and menopausal status, provide limited prognostic and predictive information in hormone receptor positive (HR +), human epidermal growth receptor 2 negative (HER2-), node-negative early-stage breast cancer, leading to potential over- or under-treatment. Multigene expression profile tests used in clinical practice in the USA, including the 21-gene assay, 70-gene assay, 12-gene assay, and 50-gene assay, offer prognostic information beyond traditional clinicopathologic features to improve treatment decisions. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of these four multigene assays compared with clinicopathologic risk assessment alone.

METHODS

A decision tree categorized hypothetical patients with HR + /HER2- early-stage invasive breast cancer according to clinical and genomic risk, and integrated clinical expert insights for chemotherapy allocation with literature inputs. A Markov model simulated lifetime costs and outcomes of chemotherapy decisions over a patient's lifetime. The probability of distant breast cancer recurrence was derived from TAILORx (21-gene assay), MINDACT (70-gene assay), and TransATAC (12-gene assay, 50-gene assay) studies. Costs were calculated from a US societal perspective in 2021 US dollars, considering healthcare costs, lost productivity, and patient out-of-pocket expenses.

RESULTS

The 21-gene assay and 50-gene assay were less costly ( -$12,189 and  -$2410, respectively) and more effective [0.23 and 0.07 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively] compared with clinicopathologic risk alone. Similarly, the 70-gene assay and 12-gene assay are also cost-effective alternatives [incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER): 27,760 and 7942, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

All four multigene assays were cost-effective from a societal perspective, offering low net lifetime costs or savings with improved outcomes compared with clinicopathologic risk assessment alone. These assays can help refine treatment decisions by providing prognostic risk estimates. In the case of the 21-gene assay, it can also predict chemotherapy benefit leading to the highest lifetime cost savings and greatest QALY gain.

Adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy treatment in older patients with early breast cancer: A pooled analysis of five phase III trials from the Hellenic Oncology Research Group

INTRODUCTION

The use of taxanes in the adjuvant setting of early breast cancer (BC) confers survival benefits, however, their role in older patients merits further study. This retrospective pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials conducted by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG) aims to assess the efficacy and safety of taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with BC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five phase III trials containing a taxane, conducted by HORG between 1995 and 2013, were included in a patient-data pooled analysis. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) at three years, whereas secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) at five years and toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 3,026 randomized patients, of whom 701 (23 %) were ≥ 65 years old (median age 69 years; range 65-80), were included in the analysis. No statistically significant heterogeneity in survival was observed between older and younger patients. Within the cohort of older patients, taxane-based regimens were superior to 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FE75C) regimen in terms of three-year DFS (92.02 % vs 77.17 %; p < 0.001) and five-year OS (94.38 % vs 72.64 %; p < 0.001), respectively. A higher number of older patients discontinued treatment compared to younger patients (5.7 % vs 2.9 %; p < 0.001), mainly due to toxicity (3.4 % vs 1.8 %; p = 0.01). The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia (35.4 % vs 29.8 %; p = 0.006) and thrombocytopenia (0.8 % vs 0.3 %; p = 0.049) was higher for patients aged ≥65 years compared to those aged <65 years; however, there was no difference in terms of febrile neutropenia and non-hematologic toxicity.

DISCUSSION

Taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy offers significant survival benefits in older patients with BC, similar to younger patients, yet with increased toxicity.

TNBC response to paclitaxel phenocopies interferon response which reveals cell cycle-associated resistance mechanisms

Paclitaxel is a standard of care neoadjuvant therapy for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC); however, it shows limited benefit for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Here we used a coordinated experimental-computational approach to explore the influence of paclitaxel on the cellular and molecular responses of TNBC cells. We found that escalating doses of paclitaxel resulted in multinucleation, promotion of senescence, and initiation of DNA damage induced apoptosis. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of TNBC cells after paclitaxel treatment revealed upregulation of innate immune programs canonically associated with interferon response and downregulation of cell cycle progression programs. Systematic exploration of transcriptional responses to paclitaxel and cancer-associated microenvironmental factors revealed common gene programs induced by paclitaxel, IFNB, and IFNG. Transcription factor (TF) enrichment analysis identified 13 TFs that were both enriched based on activity of downstream targets and also significantly upregulated after paclitaxel treatment. Functional assessment with siRNA knockdown confirmed that the TFs FOSL1, NFE2L2 and ELF3 mediate cellular proliferation and also regulate nuclear structure. We further explored the influence of these TFs on paclitaxel-induced cell cycle behavior via live cell imaging, which revealed altered progression rates through G1, S/G2 and M phases. We found that ELF3 knockdown synergized with paclitaxel treatment to lock cells in a G1 state and prevent cell cycle progression. Analysis of publicly available breast cancer patient data showed that high ELF3 expression was associated with poor prognosis and enrichment in programs associated with cell cycle progression. Together these analyses disentangle the diverse aspects of paclitaxel response and identify ELF3 upregulation as a putative biomarker of paclitaxel resistance in TNBC.

Internal mammary node irradiation in 4541 node-positive breast cancer patients treated with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based radiotherapy (DBCG IMN2): a prospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study

Background

Internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) improves overall survival (OS) in node-positive breast cancer patients. However, the effect is not documented in breast cancer patients treated with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based radiotherapy (RT). Therefore, the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) IMN2 study aimed to investigate the effect of IMNI in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based RT.

Methods

DBCG IMN2 was a nationwide population-based cohort study prospectively allocating node-positive breast cancer patients with right-sided tumours to IMNI and patients with left-sided tumours to no IMNI in six RT centres. Exclusion criteria were prior malignancies, bilateral breast cancer, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, recurrence before RT, or non-standard RT. Systemic treatment included taxane-based chemotherapy, aromatase inhibitors, and trastuzumab. The primary end-point was OS. Secondary endpoints were breast cancer mortality and distant metastasis. Cox regression analyses were used for adjusted hazard ratios (HR). Clinicaltrial.gov ID: NCT06549920.

Findings

In the period January 2007-May 2014, a total of 4541 patients were included. Patient characteristics were distributed evenly between right- and left-sided patients. Median follow-up was 13.7 years for OS. Survival rates at 15 years were 65.0% in patients with IMNI and 60.8% without leading to an adjusted HR of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76-0.94; p = 0.0016) for OS. Corresponding HRs were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74-0.95; p = 0.0077) for breast cancer mortality and HR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98; p = 0.026) for distant metastasis. No subgroups were identified for the omission of IMNI. The 15-year cumulative incidence of death from ischemic or valvular heart disease was 0.2% (95% CI, 0.0-0.5) in right-sided and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.4-1.2) in left-sided patients.

Interpretation

IMNI reduced distant metastasis and breast cancer mortality and improved OS in node-positive breast cancer patients, despite treatment with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based RT.

Funding

This work was supported by the Danish Cancer Society and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.

The association of ABC proteins with multidrug resistance in cancer

Multidrug resistance (MDR) poses one of the primary challenges for cancer treatment, especially in cases of metastatic disease. Various mechanisms contribute to MDR, including the overexpression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) proteins. In this context, we reviewed the literature to establish a correlation between the overexpression of ABC proteins and MDR in cancer, considering both in vitro and clinical studies. Initially, we presented an overview of the seven subfamilies of ABC proteins, along with the subcellular localization of each protein. Subsequently, we identified a panel of 20 ABC proteins (ABCA1-3, ABCA7, ABCB1-2, ABCB4-6, ABCC1-5, ABCC10-11, ABCE1, ABCF2, ABCG1, and ABCG2) associated with MDR. We also emphasize the significance of drug sequestration by certain ABC proteins into intracellular compartments. Among the anticancer drugs linked to MDR, 29 were definitively identified as substrates for at least one of the three most crucial ABC transporters: ABCB1, ABCC1, and ABCG2. We further discussed that the most commonly used drugs in standard regimens for mainly breast cancer, lung cancer, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia could be subject to MDR mediated by ABC transporters. Collectively, these insights will aid in conducting new studies aimed at a deeper understanding of the clinical MDR mediated by ABC proteins and in designing more effective pharmacological treatments to enhance the objective response rate in cancer patients.

Taxane/anthracycline combinations reduced incidence of breast cancer recurrence in young women across molecular subtypes: a real-world evidence of Taiwan from 2011 to 2019

PURPOSE

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with breast cancer generally have poor prognoses and a higher risk of secondary cancers compared to those at the same cancer stage. Notably, AYA patients in Asia exhibit a higher incidence rate of breast cancer, with Luminal A as the predominant molecular subtype, which contrasts with the trends observed in Western countries. This study aims to compare the efficacy of Taxane/Anthracycline combination-based regimens (TACB) versus Anthracycline-based regimens (AB) in AYA patients with stage I-II breast cancer, focusing on different molecular subtypes.

METHODS

This study utilized data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) and the Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR) from 2011 to 2019. The study cohort included patients aged 15 to 39 years who were diagnosed with stage I-II breast cancer and received either TACB or AB regimens. Propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HR) for recurrence.

RESULTS

The results showed that TACB regimens significantly reduced the risk of recurrence compared to AB regimens across all patients (aHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97). Specifically, for low/middle-recurrence risk groups, the aHR was 0.68 (95% CI 0.49-0.96), and for high-recurrence risk groups, it was 0.43 (95% CI 0.21-0.87). The analysis further indicated no significant differences in recurrence risk between AYA and non-AYA patients using TACB regimens.

CONCLUSION

The TACB regimens showed a more favorable prognosis than AB regimens across all molecular subtypes. Furthermore, TACB regimens not only outperformed AB treatments but also closed the gap in prognostic outcomes between AYA and non-AYA patients. We believe the findings of this study are highly reliable and can provide valuable guidance for physicians in choosing the most appropriate treatment strategies for AYA patients with stage I-II breast cancer.

Circulating Tumor DNA: A Pan-Cancer Biomarker in Solid Tumors with Prognostic and Predictive Value

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), often referred to as a liquid biopsy, represents a promising biomarker in the management of both localized and advanced solid tumors. It has garnered significant attention due to its potential to inform prognosis and guide therapeutic decisions. The clinical utility of ctDNA spans early cancer detection, minimal residual disease identification, recurrence surveillance, treatment monitoring, and precision oncology treatment decision-making in the advanced setting. Unlike conventional radiological assessments, the short half-life of ctDNA allows for more timely insights into disease dynamics. Several technological approaches are available to measure ctDNA, including next-generation sequencing and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, although their clinical accuracy depends on multiple biological and technical factors. This review evaluates current evidence surrounding ctDNA's utility in early and advanced solid tumors.

70-Gene signature-guided adjuvant systemic treatment adjustments in early-stage ER+ breast cancer patients: 7-year follow-up of a prospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

A previous prospective multicenter study revealed the change of the oncologists' chemotherapy advice due to the 70-Gene signature (GS) test result in half of the estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) invasive early-stage breast cancer patients with disputable chemotherapy indication. This resulted in less patients receiving chemotherapy. This study aims to complement these results by the 7-year oncological outcomes according to the 70-GS test result and the oncologists' pre-test advice.

METHODS

Patients operated for early-stage ER+ breast cancer with disputable chemotherapy indication, had been prospectively included between 2013 and 2015. Oncologists were asked whether they intended to administer adjuvant chemotherapy before deployment of the 70-GS test. Information on adjuvant systemic treatment and oncological outcome was obtained through active follow-up by data managers of the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary endpoint of this study was distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) according to the genomic risk. Exploratory analyses were done to evaluate DMFS in relation to the oncologists' pre-test advice.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 7 years, distant metastases were diagnosed in 23 of the 606 patients (3.8%) and 36 (5.9%) patients had died. The DMFS rate for the 357 70-GS genomic low-risk patients was 94.2% (95% CI 91.2-96.2) and 89.1% for the 249 genomic high-risk patients (95% CI 84.3-92.4). Of the low-risk patients 3% had received chemotherapy compared to 80% of the high-risk patients. For the subgroups based on the pre-test oncologists' advice (no chemotherapy/chemotherapy/unsure) there were no clinically relevant differences in DMFS (89.8, 93.2 and 92.0%, respectively), while comparable proportions of patients had received chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with early-stage ER+ breast cancer with a disputable chemotherapy indication it is sensible to deploy the 70-GS to better select patients for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Irish national real-world analysis of the clinical and economic impact of 21-gene oncotype DX® testing in early-stage, 1-3 lymph node-positive, oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, breast cancer

PURPOSE

The treatment landscape of Oestrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) breast cancer is evolving, with declining chemotherapy use as a result of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® testing. Results from the SWOG S1007 RxPONDER trial suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy may benefit some premenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative disease with 1-3 positive lymph nodes (N1), and a Recurrence Score® (RS) of ≤ 25. Postmenopausal women with similar characteristics did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. We examine the clinical and economic impact of Oncotype DX® testing on treatment decisions in patients with N1 disease in Ireland using real world data.

METHODS

From March 2011 to October 2022, a retrospective, cross-sectional observational study was performed of patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative N1 breast cancer, who had Oncotype DX testing across 5 of Ireland's largest cancer centres. Patients were classified into low risk (RS 0-13), intermediate risk (RS 14-25) and high risk (RS > 25). Data were collected via electronic patient records. Information regarding costing was provided primarily by pre-published sources.

RESULTS

A total of 828 N1 patients were included in this study. Post Oncotype DX testing, 480 patients (58%) were spared chemotherapy. Of the patients who had a change in chemotherapy recommendation based on Oncotype DX testing, 271 (56%), 205 (43%), 4 (1%) had a RS result of 0-13, 14-25 and > 25 respectively. Use of Oncotype DX testing was associated with a 58% reduction in chemotherapy administration overall. This resulted in estimated savings of over €6 million in treatment costs. Deducting the assay cost, estimated net savings of over €3.3 million were achieved. Changes in the ordering demographics of Oncotype DX tests were identified after RxPONDER data were presented, with increased testing in women ≥ 50 years and a reduction in proportion of tests ordered for women < 50 years.

CONCLUSION

Between 2011 and 2022, assay use resulted in a 58% reduction in chemotherapy administration and net savings of over €3.3 million.

How We Monitor Cardiac Health in Breast Cancer Survivors

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

MRI biomarkers and their correlation with the Oncotype DX test

Breast cancer (BC) has high rates of incidence and prevalence, causing significant impact in our society. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a crucial role in its detection and staging. The Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score (ODXRS) test can be used to guide decision making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in early-stage luminal BC to allow for more tailored cancer treatment. The aim of this article is to review knowledge regarding MRI biomarkers to date according to the BI-RADS® classification and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in this imaging technique to establish its correlation with the ODXRS test. The latest studies published on AI and MRI present promising findings, and their standardisation could mark a turning point in breast radiology.

DNA Methylation-Based Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer

DNA methylation is a key epigenetic modifier involved in tumor formation, invasion, and metastasis. The development of breast cancer is a complex process, and many studies have now confirmed the involvement of DNA methylation in breast cancer. Moreover, the number of genes identified as aberrantly methylated in breast cancer is rapidly increasing, and the accumulation of epigenetic alterations becomes a chronic factor in the development of breast cancer. The combined effects of external environmental factors and the internal tumor microenvironment promote epigenetic alterations that drive tumorigenesis. This article focuses on the relevance of DNA methylation to breast cancer, describing the role of detecting DNA methylation in the early diagnosis, prediction, progression, metastasis, treatment, and prognosis of breast cancer, as well as recent advances. The reversibility of DNA methylation is utilized to target specific methylation aberrant promoters as well as related enzymes, from early prevention to late targeted therapy, to understand the journey of DNA methylation in breast cancer with a more comprehensive perspective. Meanwhile, methylation inhibitors in combination with other therapies have a wide range of prospects, providing hope to drug-resistant breast cancer patients.

Navigating precision: the crucial role of next-generation sequencing recurrence risk assessment in tailoring adjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor Receptor2-negative early breast cancer

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer is the most common subtype, representing over two-thirds of new diagnoses. Adjuvant therapy, which encompasses various medications and treatment durations, is the standard approach for managing early stage HR+ HER2- breast cancer. Optimizing treatment is essential to minimize unnecessary side effects while addressing the biological variability inherent in HR+/HER2- breast cancers. Incorporating biological biomarkers into treatment decisions, alongside traditional clinical factors, is vital. Gene expression assays can identify patients unlikely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, thereby refining treatment strategies and improving risk assessment. This paper reviews evidence for several genomic tests, including Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, Breast Cancer Index, RucurIndex, and EndoPredict, which assist in tailoring adjuvant therapy. Additionally, we explore the role of liquid biopsies in personalizing treatment, emphasizing the importance of considering late relapse risks and potential benefits of extended systemic therapy for HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients.

Surgical delay-associated mortality risk varies by subtype in loco-regional breast cancer patients in SEER-Medicare

Substantial evidence supports that delay of surgery after breast cancer diagnosis is associated with increased mortality risk, leading to the introduction of a new Commission on Cancer quality measure for receipt of surgery within 60 days of diagnosis for non-neoadjuvant patients. Breast cancer subtype is a critical prognostic factor and determines treatment options; however, it remains unknown whether surgical delay-associated breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) risk differs by subtype. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether the impact of delayed surgery on survival varies by subtype (hormone [HR] + /HER2 -, HR -/HER2 -, and HER2 +) in patients with loco-regional breast cancer who received surgery as their first treatment between 2010 and 2017 using the SEER-Medicare database. Exposure of this study was continuous time to surgery from diagnostic biopsy (TTS; days) in reference to TTS = 30 days. BCSM were evaluated as flexibly dependent on continuous time (days) to surgery from diagnosis (TTS) using Fine and Gray competing-risk regression models, respectively, by HR status. Inverse propensity score-weighting was adjusted for demographic, clinical, and treatment variables impacting TTS. Adjusted BCSM risk grew with increasing TTS across all subtypes; however, the pattern and extent of the association varied. HR + /HER2 - patients exhibited the most pronounced increase in BCSM risk associated with TTS, with approximately exponential growth after 42 days, with adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR) of 1.21 (95% CI: 1.06-1.37) at TTS = 60 days, 1.79 (95% CI: 1.40-2.29) at TTS = 90 days, and 2.83 (95% CI: 1.76-4.55) at TTS = 120 days. In contrast, both HER2 + and HR -/HER2 - patients showed slower, approximately linear growth in sHR, although non-significant in HR -HER2 -.

A Real-World Comparison Between Adjuvant Docetaxel with Cyclophosphamide (TC) and Anthracycline-Taxane Chemotherapy in Early HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy is the gold standard in high-risk breast cancer (BC), despite the potential risk of congestive heart failure (CHF). A suitable alternative for anthracycline-sparing chemotherapy is through the combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC).

METHODS

Through a retrospective study of stage I-III HER2-negative BC, using administrative databases, we analyzed a total of 10,634 women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy in Ontario, Canada, between 2009 and 2017. We compared TC versus standardized anthracycline-taxane chemotherapies (ACT and FEC-D). We investigated the overall survival (OS), and explored the incidence of CHF, emergency department (ED) visits and febrile neutropenia.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 5.5 years, the 5-year analysis showed an increased OS in patients treated with TC, versus those treated with ACT, HR 0.77 (0.63-0.95, p = 0.015). Among ER+ BC, there was an increased OS in patients treated with ACT and FEC-D, versus those treated with TC, HR 0.70 (0.52-0.95, p = 0.021) and HR 0.71 (0.56-0.91, p = 0.007), respectively. There were no substantial differences in CHF, between TC and anthracycline-based treatments. Patients treated with TC and FEC-D had more ED visits, compared to those treated with ACT.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that anthracycline-taxane regimens were the most commonly prescribed adjuvant chemotherapy options in HER2-negative BC. Women who received ACT had the lowest OS, likely due to their unfavorable pathology.

Identifying subgroups deriving the most benefit from PD-1 checkpoint inhibition plus chemotherapy in advanced metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy has demonstrated an enhancement in progression-free survival (PFS) for individuals with advanced and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) when compared to the use of chemotherapy alone. Nevertheless, the extent to which different subgroups of metastatic TNBC patients experience this benefit remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to conduct subgroup analyses to more precisely identify the factors influencing these outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed database was searched until Dec 2023 for studies that compared PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy (ICT) with chemotherapy (CT) alone. The primary outcome of interest was progression-free survival (PFS). Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4. was used for the data analysis.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 2468 advanced and metastatic TNBC were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. PFS surge with combined therapy was observed in White (HR 0.80 [0.70, 0.91], p = 0.0007) and Asian ethnicities (HR 0.73 [0.58, 0.93], p = 0.01) but not in Blacks (HR 0.72 [0.42, 1.24], p = 0.24). Overall, patients with distant metastasis demonstrated to derive the PFS benefit from additional immunotherapy (HR 0.87 [0.77, 0.99], p = 0.03); however, metastasis to individual distant site was associated with failure to achieve any treatment difference (Bone: HR 0.79 [0.41, 1.52], p = 0.49; Lung: HR 0.85 [0.70, 1.04], p = 0.11; Liver: HR 0.80 [0.64, 1.01], p = 0.06). While number of metastases > 3 also showed to impact the PFS advantage (HR 0.89 [0.69, 1.16], p = 0.39). While patients, regardless of prior chemotherapy, experienced a notable enhancement in PFS with ICT (Overall: HR 0.79 [0.71, 0.88], p < 0.0001; Yes: HR 0.87 [0.76, 1.00], p = 0.05; No: HR 0.67 [0.56, 0.80], p < 0.00001), those previously exposed to chemotherapy exhibited a significantly smaller PFS advantage compared to those without prior chemotherapy, as evidenced by a significant subgroup difference (Test for subgroup difference: P = 0.02, I2 = 82.2%). Patients lacking PD-L1 expression also failed to achieve any additional benefit from immunotherapy (PD-L1-: HR 0.95 [0.81, 1.12]; p = 0.54; PD-L1+: HR 0.73 [0.64, 0.85], p < 0.0001). Age, ECOG status, and presentation with de novo metastasis/recurrent shown no impact on IT-associated PFS advantage.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient- and treatment- related factors such as ethnicity, distant metastases, number of metastases (> 3), previous exposure to chemotherapy and PD-L1 expression, seem to influence or restrict the advantage in progression-free survival associated with the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy, as opposed to chemotherapy alone, in patients with advanced and metastatic TNBC. Larger studies are warranted to validate these outcomes.

Excessive glutathione intake contributes to chemotherapy resistance in breast cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

We aim to explore the impact of excessive glutathione (GSH) intake on chemotherapy sensitivity in breast cancer.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data were collected from 460 breast cancer patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy from January 2016 to December 2019 from Zhengzhou University People's Hospital. The clinicopathological characteristics following GSH treatment were collected and compared with those in Non-GSH group after 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM). Intracellular GSH levels and the expression of antioxidant enzymes (NRF2, GPX4 and SOD1) were evaluated in tumor tissues in 51 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate after adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly higher in the GSH group (n = 28, 31.8%) than that in the Non-GSH group (n = 39, 22.2%; P = 0.010). Additionally, patients in the HGSH group (high GSH intake, ≥ 16 days) exhibited an elevated recurrence rate compared to that in the LGSH group (low GSH intake, < 16 days) (n = 15 (46.8%) vs. n = 52 (22.4%); P = 0.003). Cox regression revealed that High GSH intake, Ki67 ≥ 30%, Triple negative and Lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors of progression after adjuvant chemotherapy. Among patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, intracellular GSH levels and the expression levels of antioxidant enzymes (NRF2, GPX4 and SOD1) in the resistant patients were substantially higher (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive GSH intake may contribute to chemotherapy resistance in breast cancer, and the levels of intracellular GSH and antioxidant enzymes are elevated in resistant patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, indicating that the standardization of GSH intake may assist in reducing chemotherapy resistance.

SENP1 promotes deacetylation of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 to inhibit ferroptosis of breast cancer via enhancing SIRT3 stability

Breast cancer, one of the most prevalent malignant tumors in women worldwide, is characterized by a poor prognosis and high susceptibility to recurrence and metastasis. Ferroptosis, a lipid peroxide-dependent programed cell death pathway, holds significant potential for breast cancer treatment. Therefore, investigating the regulatory targets and associated mechanisms of ferroptosis is crucial. In this study, we conducted proteomic screening and identified isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) as an important player in breast cancer progression. Our findings were further supported by CCK-8 assays, transwell experiments, and scratch assays, which demonstrated that the elevated expression of IDH2 promotes breast cancer progression. Through both in vitro and in vivo experiments along with the erastin treatment, we discovered that increased expression of IDH2 confers resistance to ferroptosis in breast cancer cells. By employing Western blot analysis, Co-IP techniques, and immunofluorescence staining methods, we elucidated the upstream molecular mechanism involving SENP1-mediated SIRT3 de-SUMOylatase, which enhances IDH2 enzyme activity through deacetylation, thereby regulating cell ferroptosis. In conclusion, our study highlights the role of the SENP1-SIRT3 axis in modulating ferroptosis via IDH2 in breast cancer cells, providing valuable insights for developing targeted therapies aimed at enhancing ferroptosis for improved management of breast cancer.

Recent advancements in biomarkers and molecular diagnostics in hormonal receptor-positive breast cancer

Molecular applications have limited use in breast cancer compared to other cancer types. In recent years, with an improving appreciation of the molecular genetics of breast cancer and innovative novel targeted and immune-mediated therapeutics, opportunities have arisen for more biomarker analysis and molecular applications in the diagnosis and treatment of both locally advanced and metastatic breast cancers. In hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers, a growing number of revolutionized personalized therapies are in clinical use or on trials, such as CDK4/6 inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, and PIK3CA inhibitors in metastatic disease. In this review, we focus on biomarkers associated with those new therapeutic targets and molecular applications for genetic alterations associated with drug resistance or interaction from a pathology perspective for selecting and optimizing breast cancer treatment.

Chemotherapy in older patients with early breast cancer

The incidence of breast cancer increases with age. Particularly in ageing societies, breast cancer has a significant impact on both the older patient and the healthcare system. In older patients with early breast cancer, there is a complex interplay between (i) tumor biology, (ii) risk of recurrence, (iii) comorbidities, (iv) frailty, (v) life expectancy and (vi) patient expectations and preferences. Our treatment guidelines are often based on large meta-analyses that have shown that (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy improves the survival rate in early breast cancer in general. This is particularly important in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer, but hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative patients with a higher risk of recurrence also benefit from chemotherapy. However, most studies included younger and carefully selected patients. Since there is a positive correlation between age and estrogen receptor status, as well as between age and the number of concomitant diseases and the tolerability of chemotherapy, it is of great importance to evaluate the effects of additional (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, especially in older patients with early-stage breast cancer. There are only a few studies in which only older patients with early breast cancer were included. On the whole, they show that older patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative tumors hardly benefit from chemotherapy in addition to endocrine therapy. In these patients, additional chemotherapy should be considered critically when weighing up the potential benefits and harms. However, this critical evaluation should not be confused with abandoning standard chemotherapy when it is feasible and clinically indicated based on geriatric assessment, risk assessment, and patient preference. The aim of our narrative review is to provide a concise overview of the evidence on chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer and place it in the context of geriatric assessment and risk evaluation in older HR-positive, HER2-negative patients with early breast cancer. This in turn should help to critically weigh up the risks and benefits of chemotherapy for the individual older patient with early-stage breast cancer, which should ultimately lead to more individualized and at the same time more evidence-based treatment recommendations that take into account the complex interplay of different and sometimes contradictory patient- and tumor-specific factors.

The EORTC 22922/10925 trial investigating regional nodal irradiation in stage I-III breast cancer: Outcomes according to locoregional and systemic therapies

The EORTC 22922/10925 trial aimed to investigate the impact on overall survival (OS) of elective internal mammary and medial supraclavicular (IM-MS) radiation therapy (RT) in breast cancer stage I-III. Surgery for the primary tumour and axillary lymph nodes, chest wall RT, boost RT after whole breast RT in breast conserving therapy (BCT), RT to operated axilla, and systemic therapy were per physician's preference. The aim of the current analysis is to assess breast cancer outcomes according to different locoregional and systemic therapy used in the trial.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Data with a median follow-up of 15.7 years were extracted from the trial's case report forms. Kaplan-Meier curves of disease-free and OS and cumulative incidence curves of breast cancer events were produced. An exploratory analysis of the effect of the type of locoregional and systemic therapy on breast cancer outcomes was conducted using the Cox model or the Fine & Gray model accounting for competing risks, both models being adjusted for baseline patient and disease characteristics and treatment. The significance level was set at 5 %, 2-sided.

RESULTS

Of the 4,004 patients included, 625 (16%) did not receive any postoperative systemic therapy, 1,185 (30%) received endocrine therapy only, 994 (25%) chemotherapy only, and 1,200 (30%) both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, without differences between the randomisation arms. Administration and type of therapy was associated with age, menopausal status, clinical T- and N-stage and ER status (p < 0.0001). Local control was better with mastectomy (with/without postmastectomy RT) as compared to BCT, but mastectomy was associated with more distant metastasis (DM) as first event. Similarly, DM as first event occurred more in the BCT group that received a boost as compared to no boost and in those who received RT to the lower axillary level. IM-MS RT reduced significantly regional recurrences and improved disease-free survival in a sensitivity stratified analysis. OS was worse with mastectomy as compared to BCT and with irradiation of the axilla but better with sentinel node dissection and adjuvant combined chemo and hormonal therapy.

CONCLUSION

Different components of therapy influenced the site of first event. IM-MS RT improved outcomes in different breast cancer outcomes were most probably related that the group were balanced due to the trial arms and stratification methods.

Anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with early breast cancer carrying germline BRCA1/2 mutation: the BRCAN study

BACKGROUND

BRCA1/2 genes play a critical role in genome stability and DNA repair. In animal models, loss of cardiomyocyte-specific BRCA1/2 is associated with DNA damage, apoptosis, cardiac dysfunction, and mortality following anthracycline exposure. However, whether these preclinical findings translate to humans remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the impact of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) status on anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC) in patients with early breast cancer and no prior anti-HER2 therapy.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective/prospective cohort study focused on early breast cancer patients, treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the neo/adjuvant setting, no prior anti-HER2 therapy, and known gBRCA1/2 status, normal baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and no previous cardiovascular disease. Follow-up assessments involved myocardial dysfunction blood biomarkers (MDBB), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires. The primary objective was LVEF changes comparing BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (gBRCA1/2m) vs non-carriers (gBRCA1/2wt). Secondary objectives included differences in MDBB and QoL.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients were included (103 gBRCA1/2wt and 34 gBRCA1/2m). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Compared to baseline, LVEF% reduction was -4.7[-12.0, 0.0] vs -9.5[-18.0, -5.0] in gBRCA1/2wt vs gBRCA1/2m, (P = .027). After adjusting for confounders, the difference in reduction in LVEF remained statistically significant at -4.5 [95%CI, -8.6, -0.4; P = .032]. No differences between MDBB (C-reactive protein, hsTnI, NT-proBNP, D-Dimer, ST-2, or Galectine-3) or QoL (MLHFQ and EQ5-D index) were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

gBRCA1/2m patients could represent a higher-risk population for AIC. gBRCA1/2 status should be one of the factors to consider in deciding on adjuvant anthracycline necessity. This population could benefit from a cardio-oncology closer follow-up and cardioprotective strategies.

Unfavorable Prognostic Impact of HER2 2+/FISH-Negativity in Older Patients with HER2-Negative and High-Risk Breast Cancer

Purpose

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer, consisted of carcinomas with HER2 protein 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification, has been considered a biologically heterogeneous disease. Limited research separately investigated the prognostic significance of HER2 2+ without gene amplification, and no evidence can be identified in older patients. In this dedicated cohort of older patients with HER2-negative and high-risk breast cancer, we analyzed the real-world prognosis after standard adjuvant chemotherapy, and investigated the associations of survival with HER2 2+ without gene amplification.

Patients and Methods

From January 2016 to December 2021, older patients (≥65 years) with breast cancer were reviewed, and HER2-negative/high-risk disease receiving standard adjuvant chemotherapy was included. HER2-negativity was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 0, 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to assess the associations of HER2 2+/FISH-negativity with disease-free survival (DFS), which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the Log rank test.

Results

This cohort consisted of 121 consecutive older patients. With a median follow-up of 46 months, 12 patients had a DFS event. By univariate and multivariate analyses, HER2 2+/FISH-negativity was the only independent predictor for worse DFS (hazard ratio 5.56; P=0.046). Patients with HER2 2+/FISH-negativity had significantly poorer DFS compared with those with HER2 0 or 1+ (Log rank test, P=0.029). In both hormone receptor (HR)-positive (Log rank test, P=0.052) and HR-negative (Log rank test, P=0.125) subgroups, HER2 2+/FISH-negativity showed a marginally significant adverse influence on DFS.

Conclusion

In older patients with HER2-negative/high-risk breast cancer undergoing standard adjuvant chemotherapy, our findings suggest that HER2 2+/FISH-negativity has an independent negative impact on prognosis.

A 14-Year Analysis of Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Its Determinants of Mortality in Rural Southwestern Nigeria

Background

Research on breast cancer risk factors and mortality is gaining recognition and attention globally; there is need to add more information on its determinants among patients admitted in hospital. Some studies on risk factors and mortality of breast cancer in Nigeria hospitals conducted in the urban and suburban areas have been documented. Therefore, an addition of a study conducted in the setting of a rural health institution is necessary. This study assessed the risk factors and determinants of mortality among patients admitted for breast cancer in rural Southwestern Nigeria.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted on 260 patients who were admitted for breast cancer between January 2010 and December 2023 using a data form and a standardized information form. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0. The risk factors and the determinants of mortality of patients with breast cancer were identified using multivariate regression model.

Results

The breast cancer risk factors were old age, family history, tobacco smoking, combined oral contraceptives, and hormonal therapy use. The case fatality rate was 38.1%, and its determinants of mortality were patients who were older (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.956; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.341-4.333), obese (AOR, 2.635; 95% CI: 1.485-6.778), stage IV (AOR, 1.895; 95% CI: 1.146-8.9742), mastectomy (AOR, 2.512; 95% CI: 1.003-6.569), discontinued adjuvant chemotherapy (AOR, 1.785; 95% CI: 1.092-4.6311), and yet to commence adjuvant chemotherapy (AOR, 2.568; 95% CI: 1.367-5.002).

Conclusion

The study revealed that patients with breast cancer were associated with high mortality. Sustained health education to promote early diagnosis, managed co-morbidities, and access to treatment may contribute to reduction in breast cancer mortality in rural Nigeria.

Controversies on chemotherapy for early HR+/HER2- breast cancer: the role of anthracyclines and dose intensification

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Use of adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduces the risk of recurrence and improves overall survival (OS) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, few data are available on the efficacy of different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and schedules in patients with hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. We aim to summarize the available evidence on the efficacy of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy and of the dose-dense schedule in this specific patient population. Moreover, current controversies in the management of patients with early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patient-level meta-analysis evaluating the role of the addition of an anthracycline to taxane-based chemotherapy showed that recurrence rate was lower among patients receiving anthracycline-based treatment.Patient-level meta-analysis evaluating the role of different schedules of chemotherapy administration showed that the use of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy is associated with significant reduction in breast cancer recurrences and breast cancer mortality. Less evidence is available in the neoadjuvant setting.

SUMMARY

For patients with high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer, (neo) adjuvant anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy, and a dose-dense regimen should still be considered the standard of care. However, in patients with intermediate risk breast cancer candidates to chemotherapy, anthracycline-free regimens could be considered the preferred treatment option.

Prevalence, Dynamics, and Prognostic Role of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential in Patients With Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is frequent in patients with solid tumors. Prospective data about CHIP prevalence at breast cancer diagnosis and its dynamic evolution under treatment selective pressure are limited.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed targeted error-corrected sequencing on 614 samples from 380 patients with breast cancer. We investigated the dynamics of CHIP on prospectively collected paired samples from patients with early breast cancer (eBC) receiving chemotherapy (CT) or endocrine therapy (ET). We assessed the correlation of CHIP with survival in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We estimated the risk of progression to treatment-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) according to the clonal hematopoiesis risk score (CHRS). In exploratory analyses, we considered clonal hematopoiesis (CH) with variant allele fraction (VAF) ≥0.005.

RESULTS

CHIP was identified in 15% of patients before treatment. Few CHIP emerged after treatment, and the risk of developing new mutations was similar for patients receiving CT versus ET (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; P = .820). However, CT increased the risk of developing new CH with VAF ≥0.005 (OR, 3.45; P = .002). Five TP53-mutant CH with VAF ≥0.005 emerged among patients receiving CT. Most patients had low risk of t-MN according to the CHRS score. CHIP did not correlate with survival in mTNBC.

CONCLUSION

CHIP is frequent in patients with breast cancer. In this study, CT did not lead to emergence of new CHIP, and most patients had low risk of developing t-MN. This finding is reassuring, given long life expectancy of patients with eBC and the association of CHIP with morbidity and mortality. However, TP53-mutant CH with VAF ≥0.005 emerged with CT, which carries high risk of t-MN. Evolution of these small clones and their clinical significance warrant further investigation.

The utility of the 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® assay in node-negative breast cancer patients - the final analysis of the Polish real-life survey PONDx

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is among the most frequently diagnosed malignant tumours in females. The optimal treatment of early HR+, HER2-, and lymph node-negative (N0) BC remains challenging. Since individual assessment of recurrence risk and expected benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) based on clinicopathological features alone appear inadequate, gene expression profiling tests have been developed. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® (Oncotype DX Breast RS) test results on physicians' decisions concerning adjuvant CT in the Polish population.

Material and methods

The PONDx survey investigated the real-life use of Oncotype DX Breast RS in 204 pa- tients with HR+, HER2-, N0 BC in 8 clinical reference centres in Poland. Data on clinicopathological features and changes in treatment based on the Oncotype DX Breast RS test were collected.

Results

Chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy (ET) was initially recommended in 44.8% and ET alone in 55.2% of patients. After the introduction of recurrence score results, the recommendation for CT decreased significantly: relative reduction of 25.5% (95% CI: 11.7-52.3) and absolute reduction of 11.4% (95% CI: 1.9-21.0). Among patients initially recommended for CT, treatment was de-escalated in 62.2%; conversely, among patients initially recommended for ET alone, 29.7% were escalated to CT after testing. The relative reduction was especially pronounced in post-menopausal patients (29.6%) and in those with lobular BC (42.9%).

Conclusions

The Oncotype DX Breast RS result significantly influenced treatment decisions, with 44.3% of patients changing treatment, thus avoiding overtreatment or undertreatment. The Oncotype DX Breast RS test improves patient management and increases physician confidence in treatment recommendations.

Clinical efficacy of combined goserelin and anastrozole in neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of combining goserelin with anastrozole in neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) for patients diagnosed with premenopausal breast cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinicopathological data of 34 patients diagnosed with premenopausal breast cancer who underwent NET in the Department of Breast Surgery at Baotou Cancer Hospital between March 2016 and December 2019. Additionally, the feasibility of using goserelin combined with anastrozole for premenopausal endocrine therapy was assessed.

RESULTS

The duration of NET ranged from 6 to 72 months, with a mean of 22.5 months and a median of 18 months. In patients with progressive disease, endocrine therapy was assessed over a period of 6 to 18 months, with a mean of 13.1 months and a median of 13 months. Among the 28 patients assessed, 12 (42.86%) were found to have stable disease, subsequently receiving chemotherapy. Of these, seven patients demonstrated good compliance, and 5 achieved a pathological complete response. Including the 2 patients who responded favorably to NET alone, a total of 7 patients attained a pathological complete response. Additionally, 16 patients achieved complete cell cycle arrest following treatment. A significant correlation was observed between the clinical efficacy assessment and the pathological assessment of NET (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although NET was safe for patients diagnosed with premenopausal breast cancer, it should not be considered in isolation from chemotherapy. Transitioning to chemotherapy in a timely manner can significantly enhance treatment outcomes. The duration of NET should be guided by clinical assessment rather than being constrained by a predetermined time frame.

Dose delay, dose reduction, and early treatment discontinuation in Black and White women receiving chemotherapy for nonmetastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

To describe reasons for deviations from planned chemotherapy treatments in women with nonmetastatic breast cancer that contribute to less-than-planned receipt of chemotherapy.

METHODS

Electronic medical records for patients receiving chemotherapy were reviewed for adverse events and treatment modifications. Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs to examine associations between chemotherapy modifications, patient characteristics, and treatment modalities.

RESULTS

Delays in chemotherapy initiation (7%) were for surgical complications (58%), personal reasons (16%), and other (26%; port malfunction, infections, and obtaining extra imaging). Delays during chemotherapy (38%) were for infections (20%), neutropenia (13%), and personal reasons (13%). Dose reductions (38%) were for neuropathy (36%), unknown causes (9%), anemia (9%), and neutropenia (8%). Early treatment discontinuations (23%) were for neuropathy (29%). Patients receiving paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel (RR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.47-2.87) and an anthracycline (RR 1.89; 95% CI, 1.39-2.57) reported more dose delays during chemotherapy. Black race (RR 1.46; 95% CI, 1.07-2.00), stage 3 (RR 1.79; 95% CI, 1.09-2.93), and paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel receipt (RR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.02-1.90) increased the likelihood of dose reduction. Both Black race (RR 2.06; 95% CI, 1.35-3.15) and receipt of paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel (RR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.19-3.13) increased the likelihood of early discontinuation. Patients receiving anthracyclines had higher rates of hospitalizations during chemotherapy (RR: 1.79; 95% CI, 1.11-2.89).

CONCLUSION

Toxicities are the most common reason for treatment modifications and need close monitoring in high-risk groups for timely intervention. Dose reductions and early treatment discontinuations occurred more for Black patients and need further study.

Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Breast Density

Importance

Information on long-term benefits and harms of screening with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with or without supplemental breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is needed for clinical and policy discussions, particularly for patients with dense breasts.

Objective

To project long-term population-based outcomes for breast cancer mammography screening strategies (DBT or digital mammography) with or without supplemental MRI by breast density.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Collaborative modeling using 3 Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) breast cancer simulation models informed by US Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium data. Simulated women born in 1980 with average breast cancer risk were included. Modeling analyses were conducted from January 2020 to December 2023.

Intervention

Annual or biennial mammography screening with or without supplemental MRI by breast density starting at ages 40, 45, or 50 years through age 74 years.

Main outcomes and Measures

Lifetime breast cancer deaths averted, false-positive recall and false-positive biopsy recommendations per 1000 simulated women followed-up from age 40 years to death summarized as means and ranges across models.

Results

Biennial DBT screening for all simulated women started at age 50 vs 40 years averted 7.4 vs 8.5 breast cancer deaths, respectively, and led to 884 vs 1392 false-positive recalls and 151 vs 221 false-positive biopsy recommendations, respectively. Biennial digital mammography had similar deaths averted and slightly more false-positive test results than DBT screening. Adding MRI for women with extremely dense breasts to biennial DBT screening for women aged 50 to 74 years increased deaths averted (7.6 vs 7.4), false-positive recalls (919 vs 884), and false-positive biopsy recommendations (180 vs 151). Extending supplemental MRI to women with heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts further increased deaths averted (8.0 vs 7.4), false-positive recalls (1088 vs 884), and false-positive biopsy recommendations (343 vs 151). The same strategy for women aged 40 to 74 years averted 9.5 deaths but led to 1850 false-positive recalls and 628 false-positive biopsy recommendations. Annual screening modestly increased estimated deaths averted but markedly increased estimated false-positive results.

Conclusions and relevance

In this model-based comparative effectiveness analysis, supplemental MRI for women with dense breasts added to DBT screening led to greater benefits and increased harms. The balance of this trade-off for supplemental MRI use was more favorable when MRI was targeted to women with extremely dense breasts who comprise approximately 10% of the population.