Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Therapeutic co-assemblies for synergistic NSCLC treatment through dual topoisomerase I and tubulin inhibitors

Camptothecin (CPT) and podophyllotoxin (PPT) function as topoisomerase (TOP) I and tubulin inhibitors, respectively, with potent anticancer effects in a variety of cancers. Despite its promise, the clinical applicability of the combination of CPT and PPT faces challenges, including potential side effect and limited therapeutic efficacy. In this study, we designed co-assembly nanomedicines with the different weight (w/w) ratios of amphiphilic Evans blue conjugated CPT prodrug (EB-ss-CPT) and PPT molecules, denoted as ECT Nano. The co-assembly of EB-ss-CPT and PPT without other excipients has nearly 100% drug loading efficiency and high drug loading content of PPT of up to 74.29 ± 0.90 wt%. Notably, the ECT Nano (1:2) equipped with the ability to inhibit TOP I activity and tubulin polymerization, which provided a highly efficient strategy to improve synergistic efficacy and decrease side toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer mouse model. This work represents a step forward to the development of practical applications for dual TOP I and tubulin inhibitors and especially hopeful to the rational design of combination nanomedicine for therapeutic purposes.

Prognostic Accuracy of ypTNM Stage in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer in the Era of Modern Neoadjuvant Therapy

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition TNM staging manual, which provided ypTNM for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), has not been comparatively assessed against pTNM for prognosis in pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to compare the prognosis between ypTNM and pTNM stages.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological data from 586 patients who underwent pancreatic cancer surgery at a tertiary center between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed to compare survival outcomes between ypTNM and pTNM stages and identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The analysis included 541 patients (100 ypTNM, 441 pTNM). Significant differences in overall survival (OS) were observed among patients stratified by TNM stage (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference in OS was found between the ypTNM and pTNM groups (2-year survival rate (YSR): 76.8% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.094). Subgroup analysis by stage I (82.4% vs. 76.2%, p = 0.577) and II (68.8% vs. 61.6%, p = 0.715), and III (53.0% vs. 49.8%, p = 0.596) revealed similar survival rates. Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with OS: age > 65 years (HR 1.763, p < 0.001), CA19-9 > 150 U/mL (HR 1.439, p = 0.014), preoperative biliary drainage (HR 1.405, p = 0.029), pathologic T2 stage (HR 1.961, p = 0.004) and T3/4 stage (HR 2.830, p < 0.001) versus T0/1 stage, lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.220, p < 0.001), and adjuvant treatment (HR 0.251, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms comparable survival outcomes between ypTNM and pTNM stages in surgically resected pancreatic cancer, affirming the applicability of the TNM staging system after NAT. The results highlight the utility of TNM staging in guiding therapeutic decisions for patients undergoing NAT.

Real-world clinical outcome of unresectable locally advanced & de-novo metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with limited treatment options yielding poor outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with locally advanced unresectable and de-novo metastatic PDAC in Saudi Arabia, providing regional data to compare with international benchmarks.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, multicentre study involving 350 patients diagnosed with unresectable locally advanced or de-novo metastatic PDAC between January 2015 and November 2023. Data were collected from 10 oncology centers across Saudi Arabia.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 60 years, with 63% of patients presenting with multiple metastatic sites, primarily in the liver (66.3%). FOLFIRINOX was the most common first-line treatment (55.1%), followed by gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (15.1%). The median PFS for first-line treatment was 5.3 months, with FOLFIRINOX achieving the longest PFS (6.5 months). The median OS was 10.34 months for the entire cohort, with better survival outcomes observed in patients receiving FOLFIRINOX (12.3 months). Independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS included performance status, first-line regimen, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Among patients tested, 7.1% had deficient mismatch repair (d-MMR), and 5.8% harbored BRCA mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study confirms that clinical outcomes for locally advanced unresectable and metastatic PDAC in Saudi Arabia are consistent with international data, with FOLFIRINOX showing superior outcomes over gemcitabine-based regimens. However, both treatments reflect the persistent poor prognosis of PDAC, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment selection and improve survival outcomes in this population.

Exosome applications for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: An update (Review)

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a malignant neoplasm that typically manifests with subtle clinical manifestations in its early stages and frequently eludes diagnosis until the advanced phases of the disease. The limited therapeutic options available for PDAC significantly contribute to its high mortality rate, highlighting the urgent need for novel biomarkers capable of effectively identifying early clinical manifestations and facilitating precise diagnosis. The pivotal role of cellular exosomes in both the pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions for PDAC has been underscored. Furthermore, researchers have acknowledged the potential of exosomes as targeted drug carriers against regulatory cells in treating PDAC. The present article aims to provide a comprehensive review encompassing recent advancements in utilizing exosomes for elucidating mechanisms underlying disease development, patterns of metastasis, diagnostic techniques and treatment strategies associated with PDAC.

Evaluating the impact of loperamide on irinotecan-induced adverse events: a disproportionality analysis of data from the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase)

PURPOSE

SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, may cause adverse events necessitating treatment discontinuation and management. Diarrhea, which is treated with loperamide, is one such event. However, loperamide may delay SN-38 elimination, causing more adverse events. Therefore, understanding the adverse events caused by symptomatic drugs is crucial for safe drug therapy. This study aimed to assess the association between loperamide and irinotecan-induced adverse events.

METHODS

We analyzed data up to December 2022 from VigiBase, the World Health Organization's adverse event database. The study used reporting odds ratios (RORs) to evaluate the associations between concomitant medications and irinotecan-induced adverse events. Fisher's exact probability test was used to analyze the adverse events. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associated adverse event signals.

RESULTS

Of the 32,520,983 cases analyzed, 57,454 involved the use of irinotecan. Among these, 1589 (2.8%) patients were co-treated with loperamide. Signals for neutropenia (ROR 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-1.57, p < 0.001), anemia (ROR 1.81, 95% CI 1.43-2.30, p < 0.001), and alopecia (ROR 1.89, 95% CI 1.30-2.74, p < 0.01) were detected with concomitant loperamide. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that concomitant loperamide use was associated with signals for neutropenia, anemia, and alopecia.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that loperamide increases the risk of irinotecan-induced adverse events and enhances irinotecan toxicity. The study methodology may be useful for predicting adverse event risk when choosing symptomatic therapy drugs during irinotecan use.

Are Probiotics Beneficial or Harmful for Pancreatic Cancer Outcomes?

Pancreatic cancer is influenced by interactions between cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME), including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Specifically, CD8 + T cells impact prognosis by eliminating cancer cells. Recent studies have revealed that microbiomes are present in pancreatic tissues and may affect tumor growth and immune responses. Additionally, recent studies revealed that the abundance of Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, and Peptoniphilus are associated with poor pancreatic cancer prognosis. This study investigates the role of oral probiotics in influencing pancreatic cancer outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed patients aged ≥ 18 years with pathologically confirmed pancreatic cancer from Seoul National University Hospital between January 2011 and January 2023. We investigated progression-free survival and overall survival between the control group and the probiotics group. Among pancreatic cancer patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy without radiotherapy and resection, there was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) when comparing the control group to the probiotics group (median: 10 months (9-11) vs. 12 months (9-19), p = 0.026). Regardless of the type of probiotics, oral probiotics may have a positive impact, but further research is still needed to understand the underlying immunological mechanisms.

Clinical and biomarker analyses of SHR-1701 combined with famitinib in patients with previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a phase II trial

Advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have poor prognoses and limited treatment options. Here, we conducted this first-in-class phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SHR-1701, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), combined with famitinib, a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced BTC or PDAC who failed previous standard treatment (trial registration: ChiCTR2000037927). Among 51 enrolled patients, the BTC cohort showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 28% (including 2 complete responses) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 80%, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.1 months and a median overall survival (mOS) of 16.0 months. In the PDAC cohort, the ORR was 15% (2 complete responses), with a DCR of 60%, and the mPFS and mOS were 2.1 months and 5.3 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 29.4% of patients, with no grade 5 TRAEs reported. Exploratory analyses revealed that primary tumor resection history, peripheral blood immunophenotype changes, and distinct immune-metabolic profiles were associated with treatment benefits. An immune/metabolism score integrating the features of six genes was developed as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in multiple cohorts, allowing for the selection of patients most likely to experience positive outcomes from this therapy regimen. In conclusion, our study provides proof-of-concept data supporting the potential of SHR-1701 plus famitinib as an effective and safe subsequent-line therapy for refractory BTC and PDAC, highlighting the promise of targeting PD-L1, TGF-β, and angiogenesis pathways simultaneously.

Pathophysiology-Driven Approaches for Overcoming Nanomedicine Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer

Tumor heterogeneity poses a significant challenge in cancer therapy. To address this, we analyze pharmacotherapeutic challenges by categorizing them into static and dynamic barriers, reframing these challenges to improve drug delivery, efficacy, and the development of controlled-release nanomedicines (CRNMs). This pathophysiology-driven approach facilitates the design of novel therapeutics tailored to overcome obstacles in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using nanotechnology. Advanced biomaterials in nanodrug delivery systems offer innovative solutions by combining controlled release, stimuli sensitivity, and smart design strategies. CRNMs are engineered to modulate spatiotemporal signaling and control drug release in PDAC, where resistance to conventional therapies is particularly high. This review explores pharmacokinetic considerations for nanomedicine design, RNA interference (RNAi) for stromal modulation, and the development of targeted nanomedicine strategies. Additionally, we highlight the limitations of current animal models in capturing the complexities of PDAC and discuss notable clinical failures, such as PEGylated hyaluronidase (Phase III HALO 109-301 trial) and evofosfamide (TH-302) with gemcitabine (MAESTRO trial), underscoring the need for improved models and treatment strategies. By targeting pathways like Notch and Hedgehog and incorporating stimuli-sensitive and pathway-modulating agents, CRNMs offer a promising avenue to enhance drug penetration and efficacy, reshaping the paradigm of pancreatic cancer treatment.

Role of Interleukins in Pancreatic Cancer: A Literature Review

PURPOSE

This review article summarizes the pathophysiological aspects of interleukins (ILs) including IL-1, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, and IL-10 in pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar were used for the literature review. The search was conducted until August 12, 2024, and particular keywords such as "Pancreatic Cancer," "Interleukins," "Pathophysiological Aspects," "Immunosuppression," "Invasiveness," and "Metastasis" were used. Focusing on interleukins related to pancreatic cancer, 61 original studies were included: 32 studies for human patients, 16 studies for animal models, and 13 studies for both animal models and human patients. All types of PC were considered. The timeframe of 1991 to 2024 was chosen for clinical studies.

RESULTS

In epithelial pancreatic tumors, IL-1 is a major inflammation factor. Serum concentrations of soluble interleukin-2-receptor were considerably greater in patients with PC and chronic pancreatitis than in healthy individuals. In comparison to controls, pancreatic cancer patients had considerably greater levels of macrophage colony-stimulating factor and significantly lower levels of stem cell factor and IL-3. The tissues and cells of pancreatic cancer have higher concentrations of IL-4 receptors. IL-5 has a role in the accumulation of pancreatic fibrosis. For individuals with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a high serum level of IL-6 may be a separate risk factor for the development of widespread liver metastases. PDAC patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells exhibit a substantial upregulation of IL-7 receptor. The role of IL-8 in the growth and spread of PC in humans. The miR-200a/β-catenin axis may be the mechanism by which IL-9 stimulates the proliferation and metastasis of PC cells. Blocking IL-10 in the local microenvironment appears to result in a significant reversal of tumor-induced immunosuppression.

CONCLUSION

The article concludes that interleukins 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 played significant roles in the pathogenesis of PC.

The journey of nanoparticles in the abdominal cavity: Exploring their in vivo fate and impact factors

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is caused by metastasis of primary tumor cells from intra-abdominal organs to the peritoneal surface. Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy allows close contact of high concentrations of therapeutic agents with cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity to prolong patient survival. However, conventional IP chemotherapy is prone to rapid elimination from the peritoneal cavity and lacks specificity towards cancer cells. To address these challenges, there is an imperative demand for exploiting novel drug delivery systems to enhance drug retention in the peritoneal cavity and target PC cells. Therefore, in this review, we first recapitulate the physiological structures and barriers associated with IP drug delivery, highlighting the in vivo fate of nanoparticles (NPs) after IP administration. Furthermore, the influence of physicochemical properties (particle size, charge, surface modification, and carrier composition) on the in vivo fate of NPs is discussed. Perspectives on the rational design of NPs for IP therapy and recent clinical progress are also provided.

Establishment of a semi-continuous nano-production line using the Microfluidizer® technology for the fabrication of lipid-based nanoparticles part 1: Screening of critical parameters and design of experiment optimization studies

A variety of strategies for producing high-quality nanoparticles have been reported in recent years. Batch-based bottom-up and top-down technologies are generally the most efficient methods, but present a number of challenges, particularly in terms of variability, safety, sustainability and large-scale production. In this study, a scalable, semi-continuous production line was built by connecting individual processing units, including a high shear mixing device, the Microfluidizer® technology and a cooling system. Each unit was equipped with an adequate temperature control to allow solvent-free production of solid lipid nanoparticles (consisting of Precirol® ATO 5 or Gelucire® 43/01) and nanostructured lipid carriers (additionally comprising Labrafac™ lipophile WL 1349). Subsequently, critical formulation parameters and critical process parameters (CPPs) of the individual processing units and their effects on particle size (i.e., critical quality attribute (CQA)) were investigated to identify appropriate input parameters for the subsequent Design of Experiment (DoE) studies conducted after linking the process units to a semi-continuous production line. For particle size monitoring, spatially resolved dynamic light scattering (SR-DLS) measurements were conducted and compared to standard DLS measurements to evaluate the applicability of SR-DLS as an inline monitoring tool. It was found that matrix composition, emulsifier concentration, pressure and number of cycles when processing through Microfluidizer® processor were the most influencing parameters. By optimizing these parameters, five-times higher throughputs could be achieved by the semi-continuous manufacturing line. In addition, the particle size measurements with SR-DLS confirmed the feasibility of implementing this technology for real-time particle size monitoring as an important safety factor in quality control.

Comparison of first-line chemotherapy regimens in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), first-line chemotherapy is the standard of care. Due to the absence of head-to-head comparisons in clinical trials, we performed this systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare treatment options for PDAC in terms of their efficacy and toxicity.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and oncological meetings websites were searched until Nov 15, 2023. We included phase 2-3 randomised controlled trials published after Jan 1, 2000, evaluating first-line treatments in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic PDAC. Primary endpoints assessed were progression-free survival and overall survival. Summary data were extracted from published reports. The deviance information criterion was used to choose between a random-effects or fixed-effects model. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% credible intervals were estimated using a Bayesian approach. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool and studies were graded as low, some concerns, or high risk of bias. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. This systematic review and network meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023450330.

FINDINGS

6050 records were screened and 79 randomised controlled trials (22 168 patients) were included in the analysis. Gemcitabine was the most frequent comparator (in 50 [63%] of 79 trials) and was considered as the reference treatment. A fixed-effect model was used to analyse the primary outcomes. Regarding progression-free survival (71 trials, 19 479 patients), the most effective treatments were gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel alternating folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin ([FOLFOX] HR 0·32, 95% credible interval 0·22-0·47), cisplatin, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, and gemcitabine ([PAXG] 0·35, 0·22-0·55), and liposomal irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin ([NALIRIFOX] 0·43, 0·34-0·54), followed by fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin ([FOLFIRINOX] 0·55, 0·47-0·65) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (0·62, 0·54-0·72). Similar results were observed for overall survival (79 trials, 22 104 patients): PAXG (HR 0·40, 95% credible interval 0·25-0·65), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel alternating FOLFOX (0·46, 0·32-0·66), and NALIRIFOX (0·56, 0·45-0·70) had the highest benefit, followed by FOLFIRINOX (0·66, 0·56-0·78) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (0·67, 0·59-0·77). The overall risk of bias was low to some concerns. Certainty of evidence was low.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that NALIRIFOX and FOLFIRINOX should be the preferred options for patients who can tolerate these regimens, with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel remaining a viable alternative, particularly in patients unfit for triplet therapy. Phase 3 randomised controlled trials investigating concomitant or sequential quadruplets are warranted.

FUNDING

None.

Efficacy of liposomal irinotecan + 5-FU/LV vs. S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: a real-world study using inverse probability of treatment weighting

BACKGROUND

S-1 monotherapy had previously been widely used as a second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy mainly in Japan. Based on the results of the NAPOLI-1 trial, the recommended second-line therapy is now liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV). However, there have been no studies comparing nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV therapy with S-1 monotherapy.

METHODS

The main objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV and those treated with S-1 monotherapy as second-line treatments, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. This study was conducted in 31 institutions participating in Japan Oncology Network in Hepatobiliary and Pancreas. To minimize potential biases due to the retrospective design, IPTW analysis was performed with multiple imputation, and imputed IPTW-adjusted hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model and combined into pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 463 metastatic PC patients were enrolled in this study (257 in the S-1 monotherapy group and 206 in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group). The median OS was 7.50 months (95% CI 4.18-12.69 months) in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group and 5.72 months (95% CI 2.76-10.79 months) in the S-1 monotherapy group. In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV was associated with a significant OS benefit (pooled IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.779; 95% CI 0.399-0.941; p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

These findings support the use of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV as standard second-line treatment for PC patients after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Breakthroughs in nanoparticle-based strategies for pancreatic cancer therapy

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide, mainly due to its high heterogeneity, resistance to therapy and late diagnosis, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%. This dismal prognosis has promoted strategies to develop more effective treatments. Nanoparticle-based strategies have emerged, in the last decades, as a great opportunity because they can enhance drug delivery and promote controlled release, presenting lower side effects than conventional therapeutic regimens. Moreover, nanoparticles can often be modified to target specific cells or to achieve a sustained release of the drugs into the tumor. However, very few nanoparticle-based therapies are clinically approved. Concretely for pancreatic cancer treatment only two nanoformulations have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) so far. Clinical translation of nanoparticles remains a challenge for modern medicine, and in particular for pancreatic cancer therapy, because of the complexity of the disease, and a lack of studies been performed in clinically relevant in vitro and in vivo models. In this review, we have summarized the most recent clinical trials using nanoparticle-based formulations in PDAC, giving a small context of the diverse types of nanoparticles employed and the most recent advancements in the field.

Nano-enabled pharmacogenomics: revolutionizing personalized drug therapy

The combination of pharmacogenomics and nanotechnology science of pharmacogenomics into a highly advanced single entity has given birth to personalized medicine known as nano-enabled pharmacogenomics. This review article covers all aspects starting from pharmacogenomics to gene editing tools, how these have evolved or are likely to be evolved for pharmacogenomic application, and how these can be delivered using nanoparticle delivery systems. In this prior work, we explore the evolution of pharmacogenomics over the years, as well as new achievements in the field of genomic sciences, the challenges in drug creation, and application of the strategy of personalized medicine. Particular attention is paid to how nanotechnology helps avoid the problems that accompanied the development of pharmacogenomics earlier, for example, the question of drug resistance and targeted delivery. We also review the latest developments in nano-enabled pharmacogenomics, such as the coupling with other nanobio-technologies, artificial intelligence, and machine learning in pharmacogenomics, and the ethical and regulatory aspects of these developing technologies. The possible uses of nanotechnology in improving the chances of pated and treating drug-resistant cancers are exemplified by case studies together with the current clinical uses of nanotechnology. In the last section, we discuss the future trends and research prospects in this dynamically growing area, stressing the importance of further advancements and collaborations which will advance the nano-enabled pharmacogenomics to their maximum potential.

Head-to-head comparison of treatment sequences in advanced pancreatic cancer-Real-world data from the prospective German TPK clinical cohort study

There are no clear guidelines regarding the optimal treatment sequence for advanced pancreatic cancer, as head-to-head phase III randomised trials are missing. We assess real-world effectiveness of three common sequential treatment strategies by emulating a hypothetical randomised trial. This analysis included 1551 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer from the prospective, clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Pancreatic Cancer receiving FOLFIRINOX (n = 613) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GEMNAB; n = 938) as palliative first-line treatment. We used marginal structural modelling to compare overall survival (OS) and time to deterioration (TTD) of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between three common first- to second-line treatment sequences, adjusting for time-varying potential confounding. The sequences were: FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF and GEMNAB→nanoliposomal irinotecan (NALIRI) + 5-fluorouracil. Outcome was also calculated stratified by patients' prognostic risk according to the Pancreatic Cancer Score. Median OS and TTD of HRQoL independent of risk were 10.7 [8.9, 11.9] and 6.4 [4.8, 7.7] months for FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, 8.4 [7.4, 9.7] and 5.8 [4.6, 7.1] months for GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF and 8.9 [7.8, 10.4] and 4.6 [4.1, 6.1] months for GEMNAB→NALIRI+5-fluorouracil. Compared to FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, OS and TTD were worse for poor-risk patients with GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF (OS: HR 2.09 [1.47, 2.98]; TTD: HR 1.97 [1.19, 3.27]) and those with GEMNAB→NALIRI+5-fluorouracil (OS: HR 1.35, [0.76, 2.39]; TTD: HR 2.62 [1.56, 4.42]). Brackets denote 95%-confidence intervals. The estimated real-world effectiveness of the three treatment sequences evaluated were largely comparable. Poor-risk patients might benefit from intensified treatment with FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB in terms of clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Future randomised trials on sequential treatments in advanced pancreatic cancer are warranted.

Liposomes and Their Therapeutic Applications in Enhancing Psoriasis and Breast Cancer Treatments

Psoriasis and breast cancer are two examples of diseases where associated inflammatory pathways within the body's immune system are implicated. Psoriasis is a complex, chronic and incurable inflammatory skin disorder that is primarily recognized by thick, scaly plaques on the skin. The most noticeable pathophysiological effect of psoriasis is the abnormal proliferation of keratinocytes. Breast cancer is currently the most diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women globally. While treatments targeting the primary tumor have significantly improved, preventing metastasis with systemic treatments is less effective. Nanocarriers such as liposomes and lipid nanoparticles have emerged as promising drug delivery systems for drug targeting and specificity. Advances in technologies and drug combinations have emerged to develop more efficient lipid nanocarriers to include more than one drug in combinational therapy to enhance treatment outcomes and/or relief symptoms for better patients' quality of life. Although there are FDA-approved liposomes with anti-cancer drugs for breast cancer, there are still unmet clinical needs to reduce the side effects associated with those nanomedicines. Hence, combinational nano-therapy may eliminate some of the issues and challenges. Furthermore, there are no nanomedicines yet clinically available for psoriasis. Hence, this review will focus on liposomes encapsulated single and/or combinational therapy to augment treatment outcomes with an emphasis on the effectiveness of combinational therapy within liposomal-based nanoparticulate drug delivery systems to tackle psoriasis and breast cancer. This review will also include an overview of both diseases, challenges in delivering drug therapy and the roles of nanomedicines as well as psoriasis and breast cancer models used for testing therapeutic interventions to pave the way for effective in vivo testing prior to the clinical trials.

A pilot study of chlorambucil in pre-treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients bearing germline BRCA or other DNA damage repair system variants

BACKGORUND

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains a malignancy with a grim prognosis and scarce personalized treatment options. Pathogenic variants of DNA damage repair (DDR) genes are emerging as molecular targets, as they confer a higher sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. This study aimed at assessing the activity of chlorambucil as salvage therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients bearing a germline pathogenetic variant or variant of uncertain significance on a DDR-related gene.

METHODS

Platinum-pretreated metastatic pancreatic cancer patients harbouring a germline variant on a DDR gene received chlorambucil at a daily oral dose of 6 mg/m2 for 42 every 56 days for the first cycle and for 14 every 28 days for the following cycles, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS-6). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondarily described.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled between December 2020 and September 2022. PFS-6 was 5%, median PFS and OS were 1.6 months and 3.0 months, respectively. Grade-3 adverse events were observed in 25% of patients, while no Grade-4 toxicity was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Single agent chlorambucil did not show sufficient signal of activity to warrant its further investigation in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients bearing a DDR-related germline alteration.

Current status and prospect of gut and oral microbiome in pancreatic cancer: Clinical and translational perspectives

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal malignancy, and its diagnosis and treatment continue to pose significant challenges. Despite advancements in surgical and comprehensive treatment methods, the five-year survival rate remains below 12 %. With the rapid development of microbiome science, the gut and oral microbiota, which are readily accessible and can be sampled non-invasively, have emerged as a novel area of interest in pancreatic cancer research. Dysbiosis in these microbial communities can induce persistent inflammatory responses and affect the host's immune system, promoting cancer development and impacting the efficacy of treatments like chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This review provides an up-to-date overview of the roles of both gut and oral microbiota in the onset, progression, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic cancer. It analyzes the potential of utilizing these microbiomes as biomarkers and therapeutic targets from a clinical application perspective. Furthermore, it discusses future research directions aimed at harnessing these insights to advance the diagnosis and treatment strategies for pancreatic cancer. By focusing on the microbiome's role in clinical and translational medicine, this review offers insights into improving pancreatic cancer diagnosis and treatment outcomes.

Second-line treatment of PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade combined with liposomal irinotecan plus leucovorin and fluorouracil for advanced cholangiocarcinoma: study protocol of a single-arm, prospective phase II trial

Background

Cholangiocarcinoma is a kind of malignant tumor that originates in the epithelium of the biliary tract. Although there are several options for second-line treatment for patients without specific genetic mutations, the overall treatment efficacy is disappointing. Second-line treatment which is composed of liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin significantly improved the treatment efficacy for advanced biliary tract cancer and extended patient survival. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of cadonilimab with liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced biliary tract cancer.

Objectives

The primary objective of this study is to determine the objective response rate. The second objectives of this study are overall survival, progression-free survival, disease control rate, and adverse event incidence rate.

Design

The study is a single-arm, prospective phase II clinical trial. In all, 51 patients who are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic bile tract cancer will be enrolled.

Methods and analysis

Eligible participants will receive cadonilimab at a dosage of 6 mg/kg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle combined with intravenous liposomal irinotecan at a dosage of 70 mg/m2 for 90 min on day 1 plus leucovorin at a dosage of 400 mg/m2 for 30 min on day 1 and fluorouracil at a dosage of 400 mg/m2 for 46 h every 2 weeks.

Discussion

Previous studies have suggested that there is a synergistic effect between the two treatment modalities. However, the potential of cadonilimab in bile tract cancer has not been explored. Hence, this trial is the first to investigate its efficacy and toxicity. In addition, the trial is also willing to explore potential biomarkers in patients with locally advanced and metastatic bile tract cancer.

Trial registration

This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with NCT06438822.

Ethics

This study protocol and amendments have been approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital (2024(791)).

All-trans retinoic acid-mediated ADAR1 degradation synergizes with PD-1 blockade to suppress pancreatic cancer

As a double-stranded RNA-editing enzyme and an interferon-stimulated gene, double-stranded RNA-specific adenosine deaminase (ADAR1) suppresses interferon signaling and contributes to immunotherapy resistance. Suppression of ADAR1 overcomes immunotherapy resistance in preclinical models, but has not yet been translated to clinical settings. By conducting a screening of a subset of the FDA-approved drugs, we found that all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA, also known as tretinoin) caused ADAR1 protein degradation through ubiquitin-proteasome pathways and concomitantly increased PD-L1 expression in pancreatic and breast cancers. In addition, the combination of ATRA and PD-1 blockade reprogrammed the tumor microenvironment and unleashed antitumor immunity and thereby impeded tumor growth in pancreatic cancer mouse models. In a pilot clinical trial, a higher dose of ATRA plus the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab prolonged median overall survival in patients with chemotherapy-resistant pancreatic cancer compared to a lower dose of the same regimen. In this study, ATRA was the first drug to be found to cause ADAR1 degradation. We propose translation of a promising 2-pronged antitumor strategy using ATRA and nivolumab to convert immunologically "cold" into "hot" tumors susceptible to immune checkpoint blockade.

Real-World Analysis of the Correlation between Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Results of NAPOLEON-1 and 2 Studies

INTRODUCTION

Fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) improve overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with pancreatic cancer, compared with gemcitabine (GEM). However, whether PFS is a surrogate marker of OS in pancreatic cancer chemotherapy focusing on FOLFIRINOX or GEM plus nab-paclitaxel remains unknown. We aimed to verify whether PFS can be a surrogate marker of OS in prognosis prediction.

METHODS

This was an integrated analysis of the NAPOLEON study and retrospective cohort of the NAPOLEON-2 study - a multicenter observational study conducted in Japan, using real-world data. The primary and secondary endpoints were OS and PFS, respectively. The correlation between OS and PFS in first- and second-line treatments was assessed using Method of Moments estimation. An analysis was performed in patients with confirmed OS at the end of follow-up. The NAPOLEON-2 cohort included only patients who received 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and nanoliposomal irinotecan (NFF) as second-line treatment.

RESULTS

Among 479 patients, the correlation between PFS and OS from first- and second-line chemotherapies was calculated in 310 and 225 patients, respectively. The R-squared values for the correlation between PFS and OS from first- and second-line chemotherapies were 0.74 and 0.76, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in first-line treatment between the FOLFIRINOX and GEM plus nab-paclitaxel groups (p = 0.92). Therefore, the FOLFIRINOX group may not have shown a stronger correlation than the NFF group.

CONCLUSION

PFS can be a surrogate marker of OS in first- and second-line therapies. Appropriate prognostic estimation might contribute to proper treatment selection.

Consensus, debate, and prospective on pancreatic cancer treatments

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most aggressive solid tumors. As a systemic disease, despite the improvement of multi-modality treatment strategies, the prognosis of pancreatic cancer was not improved dramatically. For resectable or borderline resectable patients, the surgical strategy centered on improving R0 resection rate is consensus; however, the role of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable patients and the optimal neoadjuvant therapy of chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in borderline resectable patients were debated. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of gemcitabine/capecitabine or mFOLFIRINOX is recommended regardless of the margin status. Chemotherapy as the first-line treatment strategy for advanced or metastatic patients included FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, or NALIRIFOX regimens whereas 5-FU plus liposomal irinotecan was the only standard of care second-line therapy. Immunotherapy is an innovative therapy although anti-PD-1 antibody is currently the only agent approved by for MSI-H, dMMR, or TMB-high solid tumors, which represent a very small subset of pancreatic cancers. Combination strategies to increase the immunogenicity and to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment may sensitize pancreatic cancer to immunotherapy. Targeted therapies represented by PARP and KRAS inhibitors are also under investigation, showing benefits in improving progression-free survival and objective response rate. This review discusses the current treatment modalities and highlights innovative therapies for pancreatic cancer.

Modeling Overall Survival in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer From a Pooled Analysis of Phase II Trials

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the validity of surrogacy of progression-free survival (PFS) or time-to-progression (TTP) and overall response rate (ORR) in phase II trials of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In addition, we explored the impact of predictive variables on overall survival (OS) and developed an optimal OS model.

METHODS

We analyzed 1867 clinical endpoint from 619 phase II PDAC trials with a systematic search from PubMed. Endpoint correlations were determined by Spearman's rank correlation. The assessed predictive factors included PFS/TTP, treatment size, therapy type, stage, and previous treatment. The relationship between predictors and OS was explored by a gamma generalized linear model (GLM) with a log-link function and compared with linear models.

RESULTS

The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between PFS/TTP and OS was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.89; p < 0.0001; n = 610) and between ORR and OS was 0.58 (0.52-0.64; p < 0.0001; n = 514). Model comparison favored the GLM model over the linear model, offering more accurate predictions for higher OS values. Consequently, PFS/TTP was the strongest predictor (pseudo-R2 = 0.75), with 1 added median PFS/TTP month associated with 13% (95% CI 13%-14%) increase in median OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that chemotherapy conferred significantly longer OS compared to targeted therapy in 1-Agent and 2-Agent trials, exhibiting a "very large" and "medium" effect size, respectively (rank biserial, rrb = 0.40 [95% CI 0.22-0.56] and rrb = 0.29 [0.16-0.41], both p < 0.0001), although inconsistent efficacy in 3-Agent trials (rrb = 0.12 [-0.07-0.30], p = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

PFS/TTP is a more reliable surrogate than ORR and a strong predictor of OS in phase II trials of pancreatic cancer. Moreover, gamma GLM (log-link function) is a robust tool for modeling positively skewed survival data with non-constant variance, thus can be applied to other cancers' OS data of such nature.

Synergistic effects of calcium channel blockers and renin-angiotensin inhibitors with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy on the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Pancreatic cancer remains a significant public health challenge, with poor long-term outcomes due to the lack of effective treatment options. Repurposing commonly used clinical drugs, such as ACE inhibitors, ARBs, CCBs, and metformin, may enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy and offer a promising therapeutic strategy for improving patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of concomitant treatment with ACE-Is, ARBs, CCBs, and metformin alongside gemcitabine chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer was conducted. Treatment responses were evaluated, with overall survival (OS) estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, the Cox proportional hazards model was employed to assess the impact of these specific agents on patient survival.

RESULTS

4628 patients with various stages of pancreatic cancer were identified in the database between 2007 and 2016. The estimated overall survival (OS) in the analyzed group was 6.9 months (95% CI 6.4-7). The use of any of the analyzed drugs was associated with a significant improvement in mOS of 7.5 months (95% CI 6.8-7.8) vs. 6.7 months (95% CI 6.4-7.0) for patients who did not have additional treatment (p < 0.0001). ARBs, ACE-Is, CCBs, and metformin varied in their effectiveness in prolonging mOS among patients. The longest mOS of 8.9 months (95% CI 7.7-11.6) was observed in patients receiving additional therapy with ARBs, while the shortest mOS of 7.7 months (95% CI 6.5-8.9) was achieved by patients receiving metformin. In the adjusted Cox analysis, metformin was associated with a significantly weaker effect on mOS (p = 0.029). A particularly interesting trend in prolonging 5-year survival was demonstrated by ARBs and CCBs with 14.1% (95% CI 9-22%) and 14.8% (95% CI 11.1-19.6%), respectively, compared to patients not taking these drugs, who achieved a 5-year OS of 3.8% (95% CI 3.2-4.4%).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate a significant positive impact of ARBs, ACE inhibitors, and CCBs on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine. The addition of these inexpensive and relatively safe drugs in patients with additional comorbidities may represent a potential therapeutic option in this indication. However, prospective clinical trials to evaluate the optimal patient population and further studies to determine the potential impact of these agents on chemotherapy are necessary.

Survival predictors in patients with pancreatic cancer on liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin: a multicenter observational study

Background

Approximately half of the patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) receive subsequent lines of chemotherapy. Recently, the liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) regimen is recommended as subsequent lines of chemotherapy. However, little is known about the predictive factors for the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen, especially in patients with previous irinotecan (IRI) exposure.

Objectives

We investigated the predictive factors associated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment in patients with PDAC.

Design

Multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

Methods

This study included patients with advanced PDAC who received the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen for palliative purposes.

Results

Overall, 268 patients were treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.0-8.8), while the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.9-3.2). An albumin level of<4.0 g/dL, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of ⩾3.5, liver or peritoneal metastasis, and a history of >3 lines of palliative chemotherapy were associated with worse OS. An NLR of ⩾3.5 and liver metastasis were significant predictive factors for worse PFS. Previous exposure to IRI was not a significant predictor. Patients without prior IRI (no-IRI) treatment showed relatively longer OS and PFS compared to IRI responders and nonresponders, but these differences were not significant when compared specifically to the responders (OS: 8.8 vs 8.1 months, p = 0.388; PFS: 3.6 vs 2.6 months, p = 0.126).

Conclusion

An NLR of ⩾3.5 and liver metastasis were associated with worse PFS. Prior IRI exposure was not a significant predictive factor for OS and PFS, especially in IRI responders.

Irinotecan hydrochloride liposome HR070803 in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following prior gemcitabine-based therapy (PAN-HEROIC-1): a phase 3 trial

Liposomal irinotecan has shown promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who have undergone prior gemcitabine-based therapies. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled, multicenter phase 3 study (NCT05074589) assessed the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan HR070803 combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in this patient population. Patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic PDAC who had previously received gemcitabine-based therapies were randomized 1:1 to receive either HR070803 (60 mg/m2 anhydrous irinotecan hydrochloride, equal to 56.5 mg/m2 free base) or placebo, both in combination with 5-FU (2000 mg/m2) and LV (200 mg/m2), all given intravenously every two weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS). A total of 298 patients were enrolled and received HR070803 plus 5-FU/LV (HR070803 group, n = 149) or placebo plus 5-FU/LV (placebo group, n = 149). Median OS was significantly improved in the HR070803 group compared to the placebo group (7.4 months [95% CI 6.1-8.4] versus 5.0 months [95% CI 4.3-6.0]; HR 0.63 [95% CI 0.48-0.84]; two-sided p = 0.0019). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events in the HR070803 group were increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (19.0% versus 11.6% in placebo group) and decreased neutrophil count (12.9% versus 0 in placebo group). No treatment-related deaths occurred in the HR070803 group, while the placebo group reported one treatment-related death (abdominal infection). HR070803 in combination with 5-FU/LV has shown promising efficacy and manageable safety in advanced or metastatic PDAC in the second-line setting, representing a potential option in this patient population.

Nanoliposomal Irinotecan With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin or Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A Phase II Study of the AIO Hepatobiliary-YMO Cancer Groups (NIFE-AIO-YMO HEP-0315)

PURPOSE

First-line therapy options in advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are based on the ABC-02 trial regimen (gemcitabine/cisplatin [G/C]). The NIFE trial examined nanoliposomal irinotecan/fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI/FU/LV) as alternative first-line therapy in advanced CCA.

METHODS

NIFE is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter phase II study that aimed at detecting efficacy comparable with the standard treatment. Patients with advanced CCA were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive nal-IRI/FU/LV (arm A) or G/C (arm B). Stratification parameters were intrahepatic versus extrahepatic CCA, sex, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG; 0/1). Arm A was designed as a Simon's optimal two-stage design and arm B served as a randomized control group. The primary goal was to exclude an inferior progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months of only 40%, while assuming a rate of 60% on G/C population.

RESULTS

Between 2018 and 2020, overall 91 patients were randomly assigned to receive nal-IRI/FU/LV (n = 49) or G/C (n = 42). The NIFE trial formally met its primary end point with a 4-month PFS rate of 51% in patients receiving nal-IRI/FU/LV. The median PFS was 6 months (2.4-9.6) in arm A and 6.9 months (2.5-7.9) in arm B. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.9 months (10.6-20.3) in arm A and 13.6 months (6.5-17.7) in arm B. The exploratory comparison of study arms suggested a numerical but statistically not significant advantage for nal-IRI/FU/LV (hazard ratio for PFS, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.38] and for OS, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.58 to 1.50]). Analysis for stratification parameters revealed no differences for sex and ECOG, but for tumor localization. The objective response rate was 24.5% with nal-IRI/FU/LV and 11.9% with G/C. No unexpected toxicities occurred. AEs related to nal-IRI/FU/LV were mainly GI and to G/C hematologic.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of advanced CCA with nal-IRI/FU/LV demonstrated efficacy in first-line therapy without new safety findings and merits further validation.

Adding-on nivolumab to chemotherapy-stabilized patients is associated with improved survival in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are rarely used to treat advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) due to marginal efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 92 consecutive patients diagnosed with advanced or recurrent PDAC who received nivolumab-based treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors. A control group of 301 patients with PDAC who achieved disease control with palliative chemotherapy but without ICIs was selected for comparison using propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) since nivolumab treatment was 15.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.5-19.0), 2.4 (95% CI 1.2-3.6), and 1.1 (95% CI 1.0-1.2) months in patients who received add-on nivolumab after achieving disease control with chemotherapy, in those who received concomitant nivolumab and chemotherapy without prerequisite confirmation of disease control, and in those who received nivolumab without concomitant chemotherapy, respectively (P < 0.001). After PSM, the median overall survival (OS) since initiation of the concomitant chemotherapy that achieved disease control was significantly longer (P = 0.026) in patients who received add-on nivolumab (19.8 months; 95% CI 14.5-25.1) than in those who received chemotherapy alone (13.8 months; 95% CI 10.8-16.9). The immune profiling of the tumors in resected patients revealed higher scores of CD8+ T cells to Tregs in patients with add-on nivolumab comparing to those who received chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

Adding-on nivolumab was associated with improved OS in patients with advanced PDAC who achieved disease control following chemotherapy.

Rational formulation and industrial manufacturing of lipid-based complex injectables: Landmarks and trends

Lipid-based complex injectables are renowned for their effectiveness in delivering drugs, with many approved products. While significant strides have been made in formulating nanosystems for small molecular weight drugs, a pivotal breakthrough emerged with the recognition of lipid nanoparticles as a promising platform for delivering nucleic acids. This finding has paved the way for tackling long-standing challenges in molecular and delivery aspects (e.g., mRNA stability, intracellular delivery) that have impeded the clinical translation of gene therapy, especially in the realm of immunotherapy. Nonetheless, developing and implementing new lipid-based delivery systems pose significant challenges, as industrial manufacturing of these formulations often involves complex, multi-batch processes, giving rise to issues related to scalability, stability, sterility, and regulatory compliance. To overcome these obstacles, embracing the principles of quality-by-design (QbD) is imperative. Furthermore, adopting cutting-edge manufacturing and process analytical tools (PAT) that facilitate the transition from batch to continuous production is essential. Herein, the key milestones and insights derived from the development of currently approved lipid- nanosystems will be explored. Additionally, a comprehensive and critical overview of the latest technologies and regulatory guidelines that underpin the creation of more efficient, scalable, and flexible manufacturing processes for complex lipid-based nanoformulations will be provided.

Liposomal irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and S-1 as first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NASOX): A multicenter phase I/IIa study

INTRODUCTION

This multicenter phase I/IIa study aimed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI), oxaliplatin, and S-1 (NASOX) as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma without prior systemic treatment for advanced disease, aged ≥ 19 years, with measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible. The primary endpoints were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the phase I cohort and overall response rate (ORR) in the phase IIa cohort. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included patients who received the RP2D.

RESULTS

In phase I, seven patients were screened, and six were assessed for DLT. None experienced DLT during the first cycle. The RP2D was determined as nal-IRI 50 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-7 every 14 days. For the ITT (N = 41; 7, and 34 from phases I and IIa, respectively), the most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (31.7 %), enterocolitis (9.8 %), anorexia (7.3 %), and diarrhea (2.4 %). The ORR was 58.5 % (1 complete, and 23 partial responses). Two underwent conversion surgery; both achieved R0 resection. With median follow-up of 17.5 months, median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 5.0-8.1) and median overall survival was 11.4 months (95 % CI, 9.8-15.5).

CONCLUSION

NASOX exhibited a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy outcomes consistent with NALIRIFOX, showing potential to replace infusional 5-fluorouracil with oral S-1 in the triplet regimen.

Safety and efficacy of liposomal irinotecan as the second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) is a novel regimen for pancreatic cancer, featuring a longer half-life and an increased area under the concentration-time curve. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of nal-IRI as a second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A systemic literature search was conducted based on articles published before September 26th, 2023 in databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science. The fixed effects model was used to calculate the pooled mean difference for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as the pooled odds ratio for the overall response rate (ORR) and the risk of adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies, including 3044 patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancers, were considered eligible. The use of nal-IRI, combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, resulted in significantly improved PFS (pooled mean difference=1.01 months, 95 % confidence interval [CI]=0.97-1.05, p<0.01) and OS (pooled mean difference=0.29 months, 95 %CI=0.18-0.39, p<0.01), as well as significantly better ORR (pooled odds ratio=2.06, 95 %CI=1.30-3.27, p=0.002) compared to other second-line regimens. Nonetheless, an increased risk of grade 3 or greater neutropenia, anemia, hypokalemia, diarrhea, and vomiting was also noted.

CONCLUSION

Second-line treatments based on nal-IRI exhibited significantly improved PFS, OS, and ORR compared to other available treatments in advanced pancreatic cancer. Further research is necessary to corroborate these findings and define the role of nal-IRI in both first and later lines of therapy.

Outcomes After Multimodality Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer in an Unselected Single-Center Cohort

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a lethal and rarely resectable malignancy. Here we explore the outcomes of surgery, as compared to definitive radiotherapy (dRT) or systemic therapy only in PDAC.

Methods

Pancreatic surgery and radiotherapy in Southwest Finland have been centralized to Turku University Hospital. Previously validated population-based electronic health records database was searched for all unselected PDAC patients from the years 2009-2019. Main outcome was median overall survival (mOS). Demographics, pathology, surgery, and oncological treatment data were collected.

Results

We identified 1006 patients with PDAC, 49% male, median age 71 years and 77% presenting with metastatic disease. In total, 405 patients were treated; 92 resected, 26 dRT without resection and 287 systemic therapy only. mOS was 34.6 months for resected, 26.7 months for dRT, and 7.5 months for systemic therapy patients. Among the 88 patients with locally advanced inoperable PDAC, dRT was independently associated with longer mOS (26.7 months) as compared to systemic therapy only (mOS 10.6 months). Among the 287 patients treated with systemic therapy only, combination chemotherapy was independently associated with longer mOS (11.6 months) as compared to gemcitabine-monotherapy (6.8 months). In patients progressing to second-line systemic treatment after gemcitabine failure, mOS was the same (5.0 months) with single or combination regimens.

Conclusion

Surgery remains the only curative approach for PDAC. In locally advanced PDAC, dRT was associated with longer survival as compared to systemic therapy only. Concerning first-line systemic therapy, our results support the use of combination chemotherapy over single-agent therapy.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy plus PD-1 antibody and SOX chemotherapy as second-line therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a single-arm, phase II clinical trial

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of concurrent hypofractionated radiotherapy plus anti-PD-1 antibody and SOX chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) after failure of first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with pathologically confirmed mPC who failed standard first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. The patients were treated with a regimen of hypofractionated radiotherapy, SOX chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors at our institution. We collected the patients' clinical information and outcome measurements. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was the primary endpoint of the study, followed by disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (mOS) and safety. Exploratory analyses included biomarkers related to the benefits.

RESULTS

Between February 24, 2021, and August 30, 2023, twenty-five patients were enrolled in the study, and twenty-three patients who received at least one dose of the study agent had objective efficacy evaluation. The mPFS was 5.48 months, the mOS was 6.57 months, and the DCR and ORR were 69.5% and 30.4%, respectively. Among the seven patients who achieved a PR, the median duration of the response was 7.41 months. On-treatment decreased serum CA19-9 levels were associated with better overall survival. Besides, pretreatment inflammatory markers were associated with tumor response and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically meaningful antitumor activity and favorable safety profiles were demonstrated after treatment with these combination therapies in patients with refractory mPC. On-treatment decreased serum CA19-9 levels and pretreatment inflammatory markers platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) might be biomarkers related to clinical benefits.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=130211 , identifier: ChiCTR2100049799, date of registration: 2021-08-09.

Liposomal irinotecan (HR070803) in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase 1b dose-escalation and expansion study

This phase 1b study aimed to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of HR070803, a novel nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan, in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with pretreated advanced solid tumors. This study consisted of dose-escalation and expansion stages. Dose escalation was performed with a traditional 3 + 3 design; patients received intravenous infusion of HR070803 from 60 to 80 mg/m2, followed by leucovorin (200 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (2000 mg/m2) every 2 weeks. In the expansion stage, patients received treatments at selected tolerable dose. Fifteen patients received treatments at 60 mg/m2 (n = 12) and 80 mg/m2 (n = 3). DLTs occurred in 2 patients at 80 mg/m2 (grade 2 neutropenia that resulted in a dose delay of ≥ 7 days, n = 1; grade 3 febrile neutropenia, n = 1). The MTD was determined to be 60 mg/m2. The most frequent HR070803related adverse events included anorexia, leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, exhibited lower maximum plasma concentrations and a prolonged terminal half-life when irinotecan was administered via nanoliposome compared to conventional injection. Overall, 4 patients achieved a partial response (confirmed, n = 2), and 9 had stable disease. The MTD of HR070803 was 60 mg/m2 when infused with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. Nanoliposomal encapsulation modified the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and SN-38. HR070803 with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor efficacy in advanced solid tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05086848. Retrospectively registered on Oct. 12, 2021.

Claudin18.2-specific CAR T cells in gastrointestinal cancers: phase 1 trial final results

Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2) is highly expressed with the development of various malignant tumors, especially gastrointestinal cancers, and is emerging as a new target for cancer treatment. Satricabtagene autoleucel (satri-cel)/CT041 is an autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell targeting CLDN18.2, and the interim results of the CT041-CG4006 trial were reported in June 2022. Here we present the final results of this single-arm, open-label, phase 1 trial, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of satri-cel in patients with CLDN18.2-positive advanced gastrointestinal cancers. This trial included a dose-escalation stage (n = 15) and a dose-expansion stage in four different cohorts (total n = 83): cohort 1, satri-cel monotherapy in 61 patients with standard chemotherapy-refractory gastrointestinal cancers; cohort 2, satri-cel plus anti-PD-1 therapy in 15 patients with standard chemotherapy-refractory gastrointestinal cancers; cohort 3, satri-cel as sequential treatment after first-line therapy in five patients with gastrointestinal cancers; and cohort 4, satri-cel monotherapy in two patients with anti-CLDN18.2 monoclonal antibody-refractory gastric cancer. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included efficacy, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. A total of 98 patients received satri-cel infusion, among whom 89 were dosed with 2.5 × 108, six with 3.75 × 108 and three with 5.0 × 108 CAR T cells. Median follow-up was 32.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 27.3, 36.5) since apheresis. No dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-related deaths or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were reported. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 96.9% of patients, all classified as grade 1-2. Gastric mucosal injuries were identified in eight (8.2%) patients. The overall response rate and disease control rate in all 98 patients were 38.8% and 91.8%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.4 months (95% CI: 3.7, 6.6) and 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.1, 10.2), respectively. Satri-cel demonstrates therapeutic potential with a manageable safety profile in patients with CLDN18.2-positive advanced gastrointestinal cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03874897 .

Biopolymer-Based Nanomedicine for Cancer Therapy: Opportunities and Challenges

Cancer, as the foremost challenge among human diseases, has plagued medical professionals for many years. While there have been numerous treatment approaches in clinical practice, they often cause additional harm to patients. The emergence of nanotechnology has brought new directions for cancer treatment, which can deliver anticancer drugs specifically to tumor areas. This article first introduces the application scenarios of nanotherapies and treatment strategies of nanomedicine. Then, the noteworthy characteristics exhibited by biopolymer materials were described, which make biopolymers stand out in polymeric nanomedicine delivery. Next, we focus on summarizing the state-of-art studies of five categories of proteins (Albumin, Gelatin, Silk fibroin, Zein, Ferritin), nine varieties of polysaccharides (Chitosan, Starch, Hyaluronic acid, Dextran, cellulose, Fucoidan, Carrageenan, Lignin, Pectin) and liposomes in the field of anticancer drug delivery. Finally, we also provide a summary of the advantages and limitations of these biopolymers, discuss the prevailing impediments to their application, and discuss in detail the prospective research directions. This review not only helps readers understand the current development status of nano anticancer drug delivery systems based on biopolymers, but also is helpful for readers to understand the properties of various biopolymers and find suitable solutions in this field through comparative reading.

Safety and Efficacy of CT041 in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Two Early-Phase Trials

PURPOSE

CT041 is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T-cell therapy that specifically targets claudin18.2 in solid tumors. Here, we report the pooled analysis results of two exploratory clinical trials to evaluate CT041 in patients with previously treated pancreatic cancer (PC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

These two multicenter, open-label phase I/Ib trials (CT041-CG4006, CT041-ST-01) have a similar target population and evaluation schedule. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of CT041, whereas secondary objectives included efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity.

RESULTS

The combined cohort comprised 24 patients with advanced PC. Among them, five patients (20.8%) had previously received one line of therapy, whereas 19 (79.2%) received ≥2 lines of therapy. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or more were preconditioning-related hematologic toxicities. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and GI disorders were most reported grade 1 or 2 adverse events. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 16.7% and 70.8%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) after infusion was 3.3 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 6.2), and the median overall survival (mOS) was 10.0 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 17.6). The median duration of response (mDoR)was 9.5 months (95% CI, 2.6 to Not reached), with a DoR rate at 12 months of 50% (95% CI, 5.8 to 84.5). The mPFS (6.0 v 1.0 months, P < .001) and mOS (17.6 v 4.0 months, P < .001) were prolonged in patients achieving partial response/stable disease than the progressive disease group. CA19-9 levels had reduced by at least 30% in 17 (70.8%) patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients with metastatic PC after progression on previous therapy, CT041 demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and encouraging anticancer efficacy signals. Response benefit observed here needs to be ascertained in the future.

Mechanisms and emerging strategies for irinotecan-induced diarrhea

Irinotecan (also known as CPT-11) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor first approved for clinical use as an anticancer agent in 1996. Over the past more than two decades, it has been widely used for combination regimens to treat various malignancies, especially in gastrointestinal and lung cancers. However, severe dose-limiting toxicities, especially gastrointestinal toxicity such as late-onset diarrhea, were frequently observed in irinotecan-based therapy, thus largely limiting the clinical application of this agent. Current knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of irinotecan-induced diarrhea is characterized by the complicated metabolism of irinotecan to its active metabolite SN-38 and inactive metabolite SN-38G. A series of enzymes and transporters were involved in these metabolic processes, including UGT1A1 and CYP3A4. Genetic polymorphisms of these metabolizing enzymes were significantly associated with the occurrence of irinotecan-induced diarrhea. Recent discoveries and progress made on the detailed mechanisms enable the identification of potential biomarkers for predicting diarrhea and as such guiding the proper patient selection with a better range of tolerant dosages. In this review, we introduce the metabolic process of irinotecan and describe the pathogenic mechanisms underlying irinotecan-induced diarrhea. Based on the mechanisms, we further outline the potential biomarkers for predicting the severity of diarrhea. Finally, based on the current experimental evidence in preclinical and clinical studies, we discuss and prospect the current and emerging strategies for the prevention of irinotecan-induced diarrhea.

A phase-I study of second-line S-IROX for unresectable pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel failure

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX are widely used as first-line regimens for unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). When GnP therapy is selected, considering patient age or condition, second-line FOLFIRINOX is sometimes difficult to administer owing to its toxicity. This study aimed to determine the recommended dose (RD) of S-IROX (S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan combination) regimens in patients with unresectable PC after first-line GnP failure. This phase-I study used the "3 + 3" dose-escalation design with two dose levels. Patients who failed first-line GnP therapy for unresectable PC were enrolled. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan were administered on day 1, and S-1 was administered orally twice daily on days 1-7, followed by 7 days of rest. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and determination of RD. The secondary endpoint was the evaluation of potential antitumor activity. Nine patients received the second-line S-IROX regimen. In level-0 (S-1, 80 mg/m2; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2; and irinotecan, 120 mg/m2), no patient experienced DLT; however, one patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia. At level-1 (irinotecan increased to 150 mg/m2), one of six patients experienced DLTs, including G3 diarrhea. The RD was confirmed at the level-1 dose. The response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 33.3%, 77.8%, 172 (range:77-422) days, and 414 (101-685) days, respectively. One patient underwent surgery after the second-line S-IROX therapy. Second-line S-IROX treatment was deemed acceptable. The RD was set at level-1 dose (S-1, 80 mg/m2; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2; and irinotecan, 150 mg/m2).

Sequential therapy of refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer with 5-FU/LV/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) vs. 5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin (OFF). The PANTHEON trial (AIO PAK 0116)

PURPOSE

In patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, after failure of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, this trial compares the efficacy of second-line therapy with FOLFIRI vs. OFF (1:1 randomisation) with cross-over to the vice-versa regimen as third-line therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary endpoint was PFS (progression-free survival: time from randomization until progression or death) of second-line therapy. The trial aimed to demonstrate non-inferiority of FOLFIRI vs OFF (non-inferiority margin of a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.5, power of 80% and a significance level of 5%, 196 events needed). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival of third-line therapy and safety. The trial is registered with EudraCT Nr. 2016-004640-11.

RESULTS

The trial was terminated with 60 evaluable (37 with FOLFIRI, 23 with OFF) patients due to insufficient recruitment. PFS of second-line therapy was 2.4 (95% CI 2.3-2.6) months with FOLFIRI vs 2.4 (95% CI 2.2-2.7) months with OFF (HR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.45-1.42, P = 0.43). OS was comparable between the arms (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.54-1.66), P = 0.84). Only 4 out of 28 (14%) patients receiving third-line therapy achieved a disease control (partial remission or stable disease). Both second-line regimens were well tolerated without new or unexpected safety signals being observed.

CONCLUSION

The exploratory analysis of this early terminated trial suggests that FOLFIRI and OFF have similar efficacy ant toxicity as second-line therapy of PDAC after failure of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Third-line therapy regardless of regimen does not provide satisfactory efficacy in this sequential treatment algorithm.

Update on the management of older patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a perspective from medical oncology

In the context of pancreatic cancer, surgical intervention is typically recommended for localized tumours, whereas chemotherapy is the preferred approach in the advanced and/or metastatic setting. However, pancreatic cancer is closely linked to ageing, with an average diagnosis at 72 years. Paradoxically, despite its increased occurrence among older individuals, this population is often underrepresented in clinical studies, complicating the decision-making process. Age alone should not determine the therapeutic strategy but, given the high comorbidity and mortality of this disease, a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is necessary to define the best treatment, prevent toxicity, and optimize older patient care. In this review, a group of experts from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica, SEOM), the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (Grupo Español de Tratamiento de los Tumores Digestivos, TTD), and the Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Cáncer Digestivo, GEMCAD) have assessed the available scientific evidence and propose a series of recommendations on the management and treatment of the older population with pancreatic cancer.

New Frontiers in Pancreatic Cancer Management: Current Treatment Options and the Emerging Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) ranks among the 15 most prevalent cancers globally, characterized by aggressive growth and late-stage diagnosis. Advances in imaging and surgical techniques have redefined the classification of pancreatic PDAC into resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. While surgery remains the most effective treatment, only 20% of patients are eligible at diagnosis, necessitating innovative strategies to improve outcomes. Therefore, traditional treatment paradigms, primarily surgical resection for eligible patients, are increasingly supplemented by neoadjuvant therapies (NAT), which include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination of both. By administering systemic therapy prior to surgery, NAT aims to reduce tumor size and increase the feasibility of complete surgical resection, thus enhancing overall survival rates and potentially allowing more patients to undergo curative surgeries. Recent advances in treatment protocols, such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel, now integral to NAT strategies, have shown promising results in increasing the proportion of patients eligible for surgery by effectively reducing tumor size and addressing micrometastatic disease. Additionally, they offer improved response rates and survival benefits compared to traditional regimes. Despite these advancements, the role of NAT continues to evolve, necessitating ongoing research to optimize treatment regimens, minimize adverse effects, and identify patient populations that would benefit most from these approaches. Through a detailed analysis of current literature and recent clinical trials, this review highlights the transformative potential of NAT in managing PDAC, especially in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced stages, promising a shift towards more personalized and effective management strategies for PDAC.

Study Protocol of a Randomized, Two-Arm, Phase I/II Trial Investigating the Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Local Treatment with US-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Combination with Palliative Chemotherapy in Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PaC) still has a dismal prognosis, and despite medical advances, a bleak 5-year survival rate of only 8%, largely due to late diagnosis and limited curative surgical options for most patients. Frontline palliative treatment shows some survival advantages. However, the high disease mortality is accompanied by high morbidity including cancer-related pain and additional symptoms, which strongly impair patients' quality of life (QOL). At present, there is no established strategy for local therapy for PaC primarily aiming to manage local tumor growth and alleviate associated symptoms, particularly pain. In recent years, non-invasive high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has shown promising results in reducing cancer pain and tumor mass, improving patients' QOL with few side effects.

STUDY DESIGN

This is the first randomized controlled trial worldwide including 40 patients with inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma randomized into two groups: group A undergoing standard chemotherapy; and group B undergoing standard chemotherapy plus local HIFU treatment. This study aims to establish a robust evidence base by examining the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of US-guided HIFU in combination with standard palliative systemic therapy for unresectable PaC. Primary endpoint assessments will focus on parameters including safety issues (phase I), and local response rates (phase II).