Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial

Comparable results 5 years after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a propensity-score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies comparing one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are often limited by retrospective designs, or in randomized controlled trials, by small sample sizes or limited follow-up durations.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare OAGB and RYGB during 5years of follow-up in terms of weight loss, remission of comorbidities, and complications.

SETTING

This longitudinal prospective study includes all patients who underwent a primary OAGB or RYGB between 2015 and 2016 in the Netherlands, utilizing data from the nationwide registry, Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity.

METHODS

A 1:1 propensity-score matched (PSM) comparison between patients with OAGB and RYGB.

RESULTS

After 1:1 PSM, 2 nearly identical cohorts of 860 patients were obtained. OAGB was associated with more intraoperative complications (2.0% versus .6%; P = .031). Conversely, RYGB had a higher rate of short-term complications (7.6% versus 3.8%; P < .001). Five-year data were available from 40.7% of the patients with OAGB and 34.9% with RYGB. No significant differences were observed in percentage total weight loss after 5years (30.0% after OAGB and 28.8% after RYGB; P = .099). The total remission rate of diabetes mellitus was 60.5% for OAGB and 69.4% for RYGB (P = .656). However, OAGB resulted in a significantly higher remission rate of hypertension compared to RYGB (60.2% versus 45.5%; P = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

OAGB and RYGB yield comparable weight loss outcomes. However, OAGB had more intraoperative complications, while RYGB had more short-term complications. Both procedures show similar efficacy in diabetes mellitus remission, but OAGB is more effective in achieving hypertension remission.

Surgical Strategies for the Management of Obesity

Obesity is one of the most difficult medical conditions to treat in the United States (US) and requires multidisciplinary treatment. Bariatric surgery is one of the most effective treatment options for morbid obesity. In this review, we describe the most up-to-date information regarding the impact of obesity on cardiovascular disease and other comorbidities as well as the various surgical approaches for treatment.

Investigating the Results of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Primary Metabolic and Bariatric Restrictive Procedures

BACKGROUND

Previous studies showed a high conversion rate and failure of restrictive procedures, including sleeve gastrectomy (SG), adjustable gastric banding (AGB), gastric plication (GP), and vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) in a long-term follow-up. The current study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) for weight loss and treatment of obesity-related problems after primary metabolic and bariatric restrictive procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective study on prospectively collected data was conducted on a sample of 151 patients who experienced insufficient weight loss or weight regain after primary restrictive surgeries and underwent OAGB as a revisional procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients with a history of previous restrictive metabolic and bariatric surgery who underwent a revisional OAGB were included in this study. The restrictive procedures consisted of SG (n = 79), AGB (n = 45), GP (n = 15), and VBG (n = 12). Total weight loss percent (%TWL) after the revisional OAGB was 27.03 ± 9.12, 27.74 ± 10.05, 24.62 ± 9.87, and 24.34 ± 8.05 after 12, 24, 60, and 84 months, respectively. After 24 months of follow-up, TWL was significantly higher in the GP group compared to the AGB group. However, weight loss outcomes were not significantly different after 60 months of follow-up. The revisional OAGB was associated with a significant resolution of obesity-related problems, including type 2 diabetes (55.55%), hypertension (50%), dyslipidemia (77%), and obstructive sleep apnea (100%) after 2 years of follow-up. There was no serious complication after the revisional OAGB in the short- and long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

OAGB is an efficient and safe option as a conversion surgery after restrictive procedures.

Metabolic/bariatric surgery optimization: a position statement by Arabic association for the study of diabetes and metabolism (AASD)

For patients considering bariatric surgery, it is essential to have clear answers to common questions to ensure the success of the procedure. Patients should understand that surgery is not a quick fix but a tool that must be complemented by lifestyle changes, including dietary adjustments and regular physical activity. The procedure carries potential risks that should be weighed against the potential benefits. Health authorities play a critical role in ensuring that bariatric surgery is performed under the highest standards of care. Recommendations are provided to determine who is an appropriate candidate for surgery, what preoperative evaluations are necessary, and how to monitor patients postoperatively to maximize outcomes and minimize risks. Additionally, authorities are responsible for ensuring access to follow-up care, including nutritional support and psychological counseling, which are vital for the long-term success of bariatric surgery.Understanding these aspects by both patients and decision-makers is critical before proceeding with bariatric surgery. The following questions guide patients and healthcare professionals in making informed decisions about the procedure and managing the expectations and outcomes associated with bariatric surgery.

Optimal Bilio-Pancreatic Limb (BPL) Length in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Surgery

BACKGROUND

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) is a modification of Mason's loop bypass procedure, which has become a well-established procedure in the field of Bariatric and Metabolic surgery (BMS). However, the optimal length of Biliopancreatic Limb (BPL) in OAGB remains an ongoing debate.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to analyse the current trends and evidence regarding different BPL lengths in OAGB and their impact on outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search using search terms, 'One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass', 'Mini-Gastric Bypass', 'Biliopancreatic Limb', and 'Small bowel limb' was conducted. The articles were extracted and critically appraised for various outcomes including weight loss, comorbidities resolution, nutritional deficiencies, complications and quality of life.

RESULTS

There appears to be a direct relationship between length of the BPL and the incidence of malnutrition. Longer BPL lengths (> 200 cm) are associated with a higher risk of malnutrition. Shorter BPL lengths (150-200 cm), particularly 150 cm, have shown promising outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Shorter BPL lengths offer potential advantages by reducing nutritional risks associated with OAGB. Further research with long-term follow-up is needed to investigate the efficacy of even shorter BPL lengths (< 150 cm).

1- and 2-year outcomes and predictors of weight loss after gastric sleeve to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y bypass conversion is a commonly performed procedure, yet data are limited on outcomes and their predictors. The purpose of this study is to characterize the long-term outcomes of patients after sleeve-to-bypass conversion and identify predictors of post-conversion outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent sleeve-to-bypass conversion for obesity across four hospitals from 06/2017 to 04/2023. Predictors of the below-average percent excess weight loss (%EWL; relative to pre-conversion weight) at 1 and 2 years following conversion were identified using multivariate logistic regression models adjusting for comorbidities, demographics, and neighborhood socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

150 Patients undergoing sleeve-to-bypass conversion were identified. 99 had 1-year data and 63 had 2-year data. Mean %EWL at 1- and 2-years following conversion were 40.2% and 37.4%, respectively. EWL > 40% after sleeve gastrectomy was an independent predictor of the below-average %EWL 1-year post-conversion (OR 10.0, 95% CI 2.2-63.0, p < 0.01), and BMI > 40 kg/m2 at the time of conversion was an independent predictor of both 1- and 2-year below-average %EWL post-conversion (p = 0.01 and 0.05, respectively). Insignificant predictors of the below-average %EWL after conversion included: weight regain after sleeve, time between sleeve and conversion, alimentary limb length, and any bariatric surgery prior to sleeve gastrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Patients should be counseled that the typical expected %EWL for sleeve-to-bypass conversion is less than the 50% EWL benchmark of success for index bariatric operations. The main predictors of a suboptimal conversion outcome are > 40% EWL after sleeve or > 40 BMI kg/m2 at the time of conversion. Most variables in our analysis were not predictors of post-conversion %EWL, including weight regain between sleeve and conversion, alimentary limb length, and time interval between procedures, which suggests that these factors should not play a large role when considering sleeve-to-bypass conversion.

The Impact of Cholecystectomy on Bile Reflux After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Bile reflux (BR) is an issue after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Cholecystectomy can increase BR in patients without a history of metabolic and bariatric surgery. We aimed to evaluate the effect of cholecystectomy on BR after OAGB.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted between March 2017 and December 2022 including 34 matched adult individuals with a body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2 or ≥ 35 in the presence of comorbidities and gallstone disease in preop evaluations who underwent primary OAGB including 17 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy simultaneously or after OAGB (OAGB + LC) and 17 patients without cholecystectomy (OAGB). All patients underwent evaluations for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and bile reflux (BR) using various methods including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), the GERD-Q questionnaire, and a hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included in this study. BR into the esophagus was not detected in both groups. BR to the gastric pouch was observed in 4 patients (23.5%) of the OAGB group and 6 patients (35.3%) of the OAGB + LC group (P = 0.452). BR to gastric remnant was observed in 6 patients (one and five patients in OAGB and OAGB + LC groups respectively) (P = 0.072). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, although it was clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

Cholecystectomy after OAGB is not associated with a change in the rate of BR in the gastric pouch but increases the incidence of BR into gastric remnant that may be harmful in the long term.

Bariatric surgery for treatment of morbid obesity in adults

Morbid obesity requires active intervention, with treatment options including lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy, and surgery. As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise in Korea, it is crucial for specialists and general practitioners to have a comprehensive understanding of obesity and its management. Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment modality for obesity, leading to significant weight loss and metabolic benefits. It involves surgical alterations of normal anatomical structures to improve overall health. Therefore, selecting the appropriate procedure based on the individual characteristics of patients is crucial. This review highlights the two most commonly performed bariatric procedures worldwide, including in Korea: sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Furthermore, it provides a comprehensive overview of the surgical techniques involved in SG and RYGB, addresses potential complications, and presents findings from key studies on the weight loss and metabolic outcomes of these surgeries. Additionally, to support clinical application, the review provides outcome data for these procedures based on studies conducted in Korean populations. In addition to SG and RYGB, this review briefly introduces other surgical and endoscopic options, as well as pharmacological treatments that are currently available or may become viable options in the near future.

Long-Term Follow-Up After Bariatric Surgery: Key to Successful Outcomes in Obesity Management

Background/Objectives: Bariatric surgery (BS) is considered one of the most effective interventions for the treatment of obesity. To achieve optimal long-term results, continuous follow-up (FU) within a multidisciplinary treatment team is essential to ensure patient compliance and maximize the benefits of BS. However, many patients find it difficult to maintain regular FU, which can affect the quality of care and lead to postoperative complications. This review aims to highlight factors that may hinder compliance with FU after BS, examine potential causes and consequences of inadequate FU, and identify strategies to improve patient participation in long-term FU. Methods: The literature search was conducted between October 2023 and June 2024 in Medline (PubMed) and the Cochrane Library datasets. Studies were selected for their relevance to adherence to FU, multidisciplinary approaches, and long-term bariatric outcomes. Results: The pre- and postoperative period is critical for educating patients and healthcare team members about the importance of FU, addressing potential barriers (e.g., logistical, psychological, and social challenges), and highlighting the risk of relapse to obesity after surgery. The lack of a standardized FU protocol leads to differences between medical centers, further impacting patient adherence. Conclusions: Tailored and regularly updated strategies are essential to address individual patient needs and improve adherence to FU. Further research is needed to identify the specific factors that influence variability in long-term BS outcomes, highlighting the need for a patient-centered approach to obesity treatment.

Fewer patients with insufficient weight loss after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after 5 years of follow-up

This study aims to give a comprehensive overview of the one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) during 5 years of follow-up in terms of weight loss, the remission of obesity-associated diseases and complications. We performed a retrospective cohort study, with a 1:1 propensity-score matched (PSM) comparison between all adult patients who underwent a primary OAGB or RYGB in 2016. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥50 kg/m2 were excluded. In total, 372 patients underwent OAGB and 113 patients RYGB. After performing a 1:1 PSM, we obtained two nearly identical cohorts of 113 patients. After OAGB, the percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) was significantly higher during 5 years of follow-up. Also, more patients after OAGB had a successful weight loss (TWL > 20%) after 5 years (86% vs. 72%; p = .019). The remission of obesity-associated diseases and short-term complications did not differ between both procedures. Persistent reflux was the reason for conversion to RYGB in 11.3% of the patients after OAGB. More internal herniations were seen after RYGB (10.4% vs. 1.9%; p = .010). Overall, the proportion of patients with major mid-term complications did not differ between both procedures. In conclusion, OAGB resulted in more weight reduction and especially fewer patients with insufficient weight loss during 5 years of follow-up, while remission of obesity-associated diseases remained the same.

Efficacy of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) compared with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in patients with obesity. Three databases (Medline, Cochrane Central, and Scopus) were searched for relevant articles published until August 12, 2024. A total of nine randomized controlled trials, including 643 patients, were selected. OAGB was statistically significantly associated with a higher risk of GERD than RYGB (OR = 3.14, 95% CI 1.23-8.03, p < 0.05). The odds for de novo GERD after OAGB are almost six times higher than after RYGB (OR = 5.65, 95% CI 1.53-20.82, p < 0.05). RYGB has a lower incidence of de novo GERD cases and is more effective than OAGB in reducing GERD.

Metabolic and bariatric surgery in vegetarians and vegans

BACKGROUND

Vegetarianism is constantly increasing worldwide. However, the role of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) in vegetarians/vegans is unclear as there is very limited data on this topic. The aim of this study was to evaluate MBS outcomes in vegetarians or vegans.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of a single-bariatric surgeon was carried out. All patients with a vegetarian or vegan lifestyle undergoing MBS were included.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were included; none were lost to follow-up. Ten patients were women, the mean age and Body Mass Index (BMI) were 40.8±14 years and 43.5±4.9 kg/m2, respectively. Five patients (45%) were lacto-ovo-vegetarians, one (9%) was ovo-vegetarian, two (18%) were lacto-ovo-pesco-vegetarians, and three (27%) were vegans. Eight patients consumed vitamin supplements preoperatively, the mean albumin level was 4.1±0.2, 3/11 patients had vitamin D deficiency, 2/11 patients had vitamin-B12 deficiency, and 2/11 patients had iron deficiency. Eight patients (73%) underwent one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), 2/11 patients (18%) underwent single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy, and one patient (9%) underwent sleeve gastrectomy, the mean biliopancreatic limb length in OAGB was 225 cm. The median follow-up time was 17 months, the mean BMI and percentage of total weight loss during follow-up were 28.2±5 kg/m2 and 35.3±10.7%, respectively. The mean albumin level was 3.82±0.27, 3/11 patients had vitamin D deficiency, and 3/11 patients had iron deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports preliminary data on MBS outcomes in vegetarian/vegan patients. It was shown to be safe, effective, and an acceptable rate of nutritional deficiencies during follow-up. Further large cohort studies are required to clarify this data.

Efficacy of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

The worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing in parallel with obesity. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is considered effective to treat both T2DM and obesity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of OAGB versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for treatment of T2DM, analyzing data exclusively from randomized control trials (RCTs). Α systematic review of published RCTs comparing OAGB versus RYGB or SG (control groups) in T2DM patients regarding diabetes remission and weight loss was performed. Primary endpoints were T2DM remission rate and 1-year and 5-year % weight loss postoperatively. Initial search identified 39 references, of which 8 RCTs were considered eligible for meta-analysis inclusion, comprising 636 patients (311 OAGB, 122 RYGB, 203 SG patients). Main meta-analysis findings were: i) higher 1-year %EWL for OAGB than control group (p = 0.04); ii) higher 5-year %EWL for OAGB than control group (p < 0.01); iii) no difference in 1-year remission rate of T2DM between OAGB and control group (p = 0.14); iv) 28% higher 5-year remission rate of T2DM for OAGB than control group (p < 0.01). OAGB had statistically significant better outcomes compared to RYGB and SG regarding T2DM remission and %EWL at 5 years. Further pathophysiologic studies are needed to indicate the most potent bariatric procedure in patients with T2DM and obesity.

Comparison of calcium citrate and calcium carbonate absorption in patients with a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a double-blind, randomized cross-over trial

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy of calcium (Ca) citrate and Ca carbonate supplementation on Ca absorption following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) surgeries.

SETTING

A single specialized bariatric center.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blinded, crossover study between October 2023 and February 2024. One hundred fifty participants 6 months postmetabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) were randomly selected from the electronic patient record system to create a pool of patients to randomize for the study. The intestinal absorption of Ca carbonate and Ca citrate among groups divided by surgical procedure was compared over 8 hours of testing. Measurements included serum and urine Ca concentrations for peak values (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC0-8h), along with parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels to calculate minimum PTH (PTHmin) and cumulative PTH decline (AUC0-8h).

RESULTS

In total, 50 per each surgery group were included with an average age of 40.5 ± 7.6 years, of whom 128 (85.3%) were female. The participants' average BMI was 30.3 ± 2.0 kg/m2. The average time elapsed after MBS was 9.8 ± 1.0 months. Ca citrate intake significantly lowered PTH levels and showed enhanced relative Ca bioavailability compared to Ca carbonate. Specifically, PTH levels were notably reduced from 3 to 6 hours postadministration with Ca citrate, with significant differences (P < .001). Ca citrate also demonstrated superior relative bioavailability, as evidenced by a higher AUC0-8h of 76.1 mg/dL·h versus 74.7 mg/dL·h for carbonate (P = .001) and a Cmax of 9.8 mg/dL compared to 9.5 mg/dL for carbonate (P < .001). Additionally, urinary Ca excretion over 9 hours was significantly greater in the citrate group at 83.7 mg/dL compared to 68.6 mg/dL for carbonate (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that Ca citrate was significantly better than carbonate in reducing PTH levels, enhancing relative Ca bioavailability, and increasing urinary Ca excretion. Additionally, Ca citrate resulted in higher cumulative urinary Ca excretion, indicating better Ca absorption.

Short-term gut microbiota's shift after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs one anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a multicenter randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) represent two of the most used bariatric/metabolic surgery (BMS) procedures. Gut microbiota (GM) shift after bypass surgeries, currently understated, may be a possible key driver for the short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter study enrolling patients with severe obesity, randomized between OAGB or RYGB. Fecal and blood samples were collected, pre- (T0) and 24 months postoperatively (T1). GM was determined by V3-V4 16S rRNA regions sequencing and home-made bioinformatic pipeline based on Qiime2 plugin and R packages.

OBJECTS

To compare OAGB vs RYGB microbiota profile at T1 and its impact on metabolic and nutritional status.

RESULTS

54 patients completed the study, 27 for each procedure. An overall significant variation was detected in anthropometric and serum nutritional parameters at T1, with a significant, similar decrease in overall microbial alpha and beta diversity observed in both groups. An increase in relative abundances of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria and a reduction of Bacteroidetes, no significant changes in Firmicutes and Verrucomicrobia, with an increase of the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

BMS promotes a dramatic change in GM composition. This is the first multicenter, RCT evaluating the impact of OAGB vs Roux-en-Y bypass on GM profile. The bypass technique per se did not impact differently on GM or other examined metabolic parameters. The emergence of slightly different GM profile postoperatively may be related to clinical conditions or may influence medium or long-term outcomes and as such GM profile may represent a biomarker for bariatric surgery's outcomes.

Gastric Cancer in One-Anastomosis Mini-gastric Bypass: Case Report and Systematic Review

In the last years, one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has been proposed more frequently as obesity surgery technique. Several trials have demonstrated that the easier technical feasibility does not affect the long-term surgical result. However, concern about increased risk of gastric and esophageal cancers has been expressed by several bariatric surgeons. The present study reports the 2nd case of cancer of the gastrointestinal-jejunal anastomosis in a OAGB patient focusing the attention on some technical issues correlated and offering a systematic review of the literature.

SICOB Italian clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of obesity and associated diseases using GRADE methodology on bariatric and metabolic surgery

Obesity is a chronic disease associated with increased morbidity and mortality and reduced quality of life. Pharmacotherapy can be associated with life style changes in increasing and maintaining weight loss and ameliorating obesity-related complications and comorbidities. In patients affected by obesity and uncontrolled obesity-associated complications or high degrees of BMI (> 40 Kg/m2), metabolic bariatric surgery can be a valid therapeutic option. Many different types of surgical procedures have been developed in last decades, mainly performed via laparoscopic approaches. However, clinical indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) and the choice of the most appropriate type of procedure have not been clarified so far.The Italian Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery for Obesity (Società Italiana di Chirurgia dell'Obesità e delle Malattie Metaboliche-SICOB) decided to design and develop the updated version of the Italian guidelines aimed at assisting healthcare professionals in the choice of the surgical option for the treatment of obesity and related conditions. Between June and October 2022, a panel of 24 experts and an evidence review team (ERT, 10 members), participated in the definition of clinical questions, outcomes, and recommendations and collected and analyzed all the available evidence on the basis of pre-specified search strategies. GRADE methodology and PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) conceptual framework have been adopted for the development of the present guidelines. Aim of the present guideline is to verify indications to surgery with respect to the presence of comorbid conditions, evaluate the different types of surgical approaches and endoscopic bariatric procedure and revise indication to revision surgery and postoperative procedures.

Comparison of Micronutrient Deficiencies Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a chronic disease that can be effectively managed with bariatric surgery, such as gastric bypass. Both Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) surgeries are associated with malnutrition. OAGB is associated with higher weight loss and remission of diabetes. However, it is also associated with a significantly greater incidence of malnutrition than RYGB. We conducted this study to assess the association of both procedures with different micronutrient deficiencies.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted. Patients undergoing RYGB and OAGB between January 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023, were included. Micronutrient deficiencies following RYGB and OAGB were compared. Vitamin B12, vitamin D, ferritin, and folate levels were assessed preoperatively and between six months to one year after the surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients underwent gastric bypass surgery, from which 50 (43.1%) patients were excluded due to loss of follow-up, and 66 (56.9%) were included. There were 50 (75.8%) RYGB cases and 16 (24.2%) OAGB cases. There were 24 (36.0%) males. The mean age was 46.2 ± 9.6 years, and the mean preoperative body weight was 131.8 ± 27.9 kg. The mean height was 165.8 ± 9.9 cm, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 47.7 ± 7.6 kg/m2. Both groups were comparable in age, gender distribution, and height. However, patients' mean weight in the OAGB group was higher than in the RYGB group, with a correspondingly higher BMI. Folate deficiency was more common following OAGB (30.8%; N = 4) than RYGB (8.0%; N = 4) (p = 0.028). A fall in folate levels from the initial value was found in the OAGB group, while a rise was found in the RYGB group. However, the two groups had no statistically significant differences in vitamin B12, vitamin D, and ferritin deficiencies (or fall from the initial values).

CONCLUSION

Both RYGB and OAGB are associated with micronutrient deficiencies. However, OAGB is associated with an increased incidence of micronutrient deficiencies compared to RYGB after six months to one year following the surgery, especially folate deficiency (p = 0.028). Larger, prospective studies and randomized controlled trials are needed, with standardization of the BP limb, the inclusion of multiple ethnicities, and longer follow-up periods.

Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Obesity has become a global epidemic, affecting both developed and developing nations. Despite extensive efforts, historical outcomes of medical interventions for obesity have been unsatisfactory. Bariatric surgeries, including sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), are now recognized as the primary treatment for severe obesity. However, laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has emerged as a promising alternative, offering simplified procedures compared to RYGB. While OAGB's initial outcomes are optimistic, concerns about biliary reflux persist. Our systematic review aims to compare the safety and efficacy outcomes of RYGB and OAGB to inform clinical decision-making in managing obesity. We searched five databases up to February 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RYGB and OAGB in obese patients, focusing on safety and efficacy outcomes. Data extraction covered study details, participant demographics, interventions, and outcomes related to operative details, complications, follow-up results, and weight changes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. The analysis involved risk ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data, using fixed or random effects models based on heterogeneity. Analyses were performed with Review Manager software v5.4. A total of 1057 patients were included in the analysis, sourced from 12 distinct RCTs. The analysis indicated OAGB outperformed RYGB in BMI reduction (MD = -0.69, p = 0.005), whereas RYGB was more effective in excess weight loss (MD = 6.51, p < 0.0001) and excess BMI loss (MD = 3.91, p < 0.0001). OAGB led to shorter operation times (MD = -34.89 minutes, p < 0.0001) and shorter periods of hospital stays (MD = -0.27 days, p = 0.01), along with fewer overall complications (RR = 0.58, p = 0.02) and lower incidence of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy complications (RR = 2.98, p = 0.0001). On the other hand, RYGB showed higher remission rates for dyslipidemia (RR = 0.60, p = 0.0003) and higher remissions of hypertension (RR = 0.83, p = 0.04). The majority of results were homogenous. Both OAGB and RYGB have their respective advantages and limitations. OAGB appears to offer benefits in terms of operation efficiency and early postoperative recovery, making it a potentially preferable option for patients and surgeons focused on these aspects. On the other hand, RYGB might be more suitable for patients prioritizing long-term weight loss and remission of certain comorbidities like hypertension. Ultimately, the choice between OAGB and RYGB should be made on an individual basis, considering the specific needs, conditions, and goals of each patient.

Comparative Study for Safety and Efficacy of OAGB and SADJB-SG: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Obesity and related complications are managed by One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) and Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Jejunal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADJB-SG), both of which are adapted from traditional gastric bypass procedures. However, there are no current comparative studies on the safety and efficacy of these two surgical procedures.

Patients and Methods

Preoperative baseline data of patients who had undergone OAGB and SADJB-SG surgeries from June 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed at our bariatric facility. Postoperative data, including weight changes, improvement in type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and complication rates were collected over 2 years. This was followed by a comprehensive evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the two surgical procedures.

Results

A total of 63 patients completed the follow-up in this study. At the 24-month follow-up, excess weight loss percentage (EWL%) for the OAGB and SADJB-SG was 73.970±5.005 and 75.652±7.953, respectively (P-value = 0.310); total weight loss percentage (TWL%) was 24.006±8.231 and 23.171±6.600, respectively (P-value = 0.665). The diabetes remission rates for the two groups were 71.429% and 69.048%, respectively (P-value = 0.846). The cost for OAGB was 55088.208±1508.220 yuan, which was significantly lower than the 57538.195±1374.994 yuan for SADJB-SG (P-value< 0.001).

Conclusion

The two surgical procedures are reliable in terms of safety and efficacy, and each has distinct advantages. While OAGB has reduced operational expenses, SADJB-SG offers a broader range of applicability.

Novel Surgical Interventions for the Treatment of Obesity

Metabolic and bariatric surgery is widely recognized as the most effective and durable treatment for the disease of obesity and its associated comorbidities. In recent years, the field has seen significant advancements, introducing numerous innovative surgical options. This review aims to comprehensively examine these emerging surgical techniques, which have recently received endorsement from the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS). Additionally, we will explore new technologies and methodologies supported by the latest scientific evidence. Our analysis will include a critical evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of these novel approaches, providing a detailed update on the current state of metabolic and bariatric surgery, highlighting key developments and their potential implications for clinical practice.

Changes in serum ghrelin and resistin levels after sleeve gastrectomy versus one anastomosis gastric bypass: prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Humoral factors and neural mechanisms play a central role in the pathogenesis of obesity and in weight loss following bariatric surgery. Although various hormones and adipokines, including ghrelin and resistin, are linked to obesity, studies analyzing the changes in fasting ghrelin and resistin levels in patients following one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are lacking.

AIM

The authors aimed to investigate resistin and ghrelin levels before and after two commonly used bariatric procedures with different mechanisms of action: sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and OAGB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fasting serum ghrelin and resistin levels were evaluated by using ELISA in a nonrandomized, prospective cohort study for the pattern of changes in the preoperative period and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and, 12 months after surgery in age and sex-matched patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m 2 undergoing either SG ( n =40) or OAGB ( n =40). Their relationships with demographic parameters such as body weight, BMI, presence of T2DM, HbA 1 C, and Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) index were also evaluated.

RESULTS

OAGB was superior in weight control compared to the SG group. There were significant differences in resistin and ghrelin levels between the OAGB and SG groups. Ghrelin decreased more in the SG group than the preoperative values. This change in ghrelin levels was more significant at 1 year after SG [preoperative mean (range) level of 334.2 (36.6-972.1) pg/ml decreased to 84 (9.1-227) pg/ml at 1 year] whereas in the OAGB group no significant change was observed [preoperative mean (range) level of 310 (146-548) pg/ml decreased to 264 (112-418) pg/ml at 1 year]. Resistin levels decreased in both groups, especially after 3 months and onward following both operations [the mean (range) resistin levels were 2.6 (0.87-5.4) ng/ml and decreased to 1.1 (0.5-2.4) ng/ml in the SG group vs 2.48 (0.89-6.43) ng/ml decreased to 0.72 (0.35-1.8) ng/ml in OAGB group at 1 year], which was in parallel with changes in HOMA-IR index, body weight, and BMI changes at 1st year. HOMA-IR index changes were similar, but more prominent after OAGB. OAGB was als3 three months and onward), and HOMA-IR changes.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to compare fasting ghrelin and resistin levels after OAGB and SG. Although similar changes were observed, ghrelin changes were more prominent after SG, whereas resistin were observed after OAGB. OAGB was superior in T2DM control, which was in parallel with weight loss, fasting resistin levels, and HOMA-IR changes suggesting a possible effect of resistin after OAGB in glucose metabolism and insulin resistance.

Effect of tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on total small bowel length versus standard limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year outcomes of the TAILOR randomized clinical superiority trial

BACKGROUND

Tailoring the biliopancreatic limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass is proposed as beneficial in retrospective studies, yet randomized trials are lacking. The aim of this double-blind, single-centre RCT was to ascertain whether tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on total small bowel length (TSBL) results in superior outcomes after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared with a fixed 150 cm biliopancreatic limb length.

METHODS

Eligible patients, meeting International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) criteria for metabolic bariatric surgery, scheduled for primary one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery, and willing to be randomized, underwent TSBL measurement during surgery. When TSBL measurement was feasible, patients were randomly assigned to a standard 150 cm biliopancreatic limb length or a tailored biliopancreatic limb based on TSBL: TSBL less than 500 cm, biliopancreatic limb 150 cm; TSBL 500-700 cm, biliopancreatic limb 180 cm; and TSBL greater than 700 cm, biliopancreatic limb 210 cm. The primary outcome was percentage total weight loss at 5 years.

RESULTS

Between September 2020 and August 2022, 212 patients were randomized into the standard biliopancreatic limb group (105 patients) or the tailored biliopancreatic limb group (107 patients). The mean(s.d.) TSBL was 657(128) cm (range 295-1020 cm). In the tailored group, 150, 180, and 210 cm biliopancreatic limb lengths were applied to 8.4%, 53.3%, and 38.3% of patients respectively. The mean(s.d.) 1-year percentage total weight loss was 32.8(6.9)% in the standard group and 33.1(6.2)% in the tailored group (P = 0.787). Nutritional deficiencies and short-term complications showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on TSBL is safe and feasible. One year after surgery, it is not superior to a standard biliopancreatic limb length of 150 cm in terms of percentage total weight loss.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

Dutch Trial Register, NL7945.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF OBESITY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has gained prominence in the search for better results in bariatric surgery. However, its efficacy and safety compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) remain ill-defined.

AIMS

To compare the efficacy and safety of OAGB relative to RYGB and SG in the treatment of obesity.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Lilacs, and Google Scholar databases for randomized controlled trials comparing OAGB with RYGB or SG in the surgical approach to obesity. We pooled outcomes for body mass index, percentage of excess weight loss, type-2 diabetes mellitus remission, complications, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Statistical analyses were performed with R software (version 4.2.3).

RESULTS

Data on 854 patients were extracted from 11 randomized controlled trials, of which 422 (49.4%) were submitted to OAGB with mean follow-up ranging from six months to five years. The meta-analysis revealed a significantly higher percentage of excess weight loss at 1-year follow-up and a significantly lower body mass index at 5-year follow-up in OAGB patients. Conversely, rates of type-2 diabetes mellitus remission, complications, and gastroesophageal reflux disease were not significantly different between groups. The overall quality of evidence was considered very low.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results corroborate the comparable efficacy of OAGB in relation to RYGB and SG in the treatment of obesity, maintaining no significant differences in type-2 diabetes mellitus remission, complications, and gastroesophageal reflux disease rates.

Validation of the Individualized Metabolic Surgery score in predicting long-term remission of diabetes after duodenal switch-type procedures

AIM

To validate the Individualized Metabolic Surgery (IMS) score and assess long-term remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) after duodenal switch (DS)-type procedures in patients with obesity. In addition, to help guide metabolic procedure selection for those patients categorized as having severe T2D.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective single cohort study of all patients with T2D and severe obesity, who underwent DS-type procedures at a single institution from December 2010 to December 2018. Study endpoints included validating the IMS score in our cohort and evaluating the impact of DS-type procedures on long-term (≥ 5 years) remission of T2D, especially in patients with severe disease. A receiver operator characteristic curve was used to assess the accuracy of the IMS score using the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The study cohort included 30 patients with complete baseline and long-term glycaemic data after their index DS-type surgery. Twelve patients (40%) were classified with severe T2D, and the distribution of IMS-based severity groups was similar between our cohort and the original IMS study (P = .42). IMS scores predicted long-term T2D remission with AUC = 0.77. Patients with IMS-based severe diabetes achieved significantly higher long-term remission after DS-type procedures compared with gastric bypass and/or sleeve gastrectomy from the original IMS study (42% vs. 12%; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The IMS score properly classifies the severity of T2D in our study cohort and adequately predicts its long-term remission after DS-type procedures. While T2D remission decreases with more severe IMS scores, long-term remission remains high after DS-type procedures among patients with severe disease.

Pathological and immunohistochemical analysis of gastric mucosa after one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is now the third most common bariatric surgery worldwide. This procedure is garnering increasing attention, but its complication of bile reflux and the associated risk of gastric carcinogenesis remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to assess the impact of bile reflux on the gastric mucosa by comparing pathological and immunohistochemical results of gastric mucosa before and 2 years after OAGB surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed gastric lesions observed in gastroscopy before and after OAGB surgery. Pathological examinations were conducted on mucosal samples from proximal, middle and distal part of stomach, with a particular focus on the expression of Ki-67, P53, and CDX2 in immunohistochemistry. Ki-67 indicates cellular proliferation, P53 is a tumor suppressor protein, and CDX2 is a marker for intestinal differentiation.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients completed the follow-up. Regarding gastritis, presurgery nonerosive gastritis was found in two cases (12.5%), and postsurgery in six cases (37.5%). Erosive gastritis increased from one case (6.2%) presurgery to three cases (18.7%) postsurgery, totaling an increase from three to nine cases (p = .028). Bile reflux in the stomach increased from one case (6.2%) presurgery to three cases (18.7%) postsurgery. Most lesions in the proximal, middle, and distal part of stomach were relatively mild, with normal tissue states being predominant. Mild inflammation was found in all three areas, whereas moderate inflammation, intestinal metaplasia, and glandular atrophy were less common. No cases of severe inflammation were noted. The expression of gastric biomarkers CDX-2, Ki67, and P53 showed no significant statistical variation in different areas.

CONCLUSION

Bile reflux does occur after OAGB, but its incidence is not high. Based on the immunohistochemical and pathological results of the gastric mucosa 2 years post-OAGB, there seems to be no significant causal relationship between OAGB and oncogenic inflammation around the gastric tube.

Laparoscopic Roux-Y-gastric bypass versus laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass for obesity: clinical & metabolic results of a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has been proposed as an effective alternative to the current standard procedure in Switzerland, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Prospective data comparing both procedures are scarce. Therefore, we performed a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness and safety of these 2 operative techniques.

METHOD

Eighty patients were randomized 1:1. OAGB consisted of a very long gastric pouch with a 200 cm biliopancreatic limb, RYGB of a 150 cm ante-colic alimentary and a 60 cm biliopancreatic limb, respectively. Primary endpoint was the percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Mean %EWL at 12 months was 87.9% (SD24.4) in the RYGB group and 104.1% (SD24.6) in the OAGB group (p = 0.006). There was no mortality. The rate of marginal ulcers was higher in patients with OAGB compared to those with RYGB (p = 0.011), while the total number of late complications did not statistically differ between the two groups. Except for the remission of GERD, which was higher in the RYGB group compared to OAGB, there was no difference between the groups regarding the remission of comorbidities. OAGB showed improved glucose control compared to the RYGB after 1 year (p = 0.001). Furthermore, glucagon-like peptide-1 increase was significantly higher in OAGB at 6 weeks (p = 0.041) and 1 year after surgery (p = 0.029). Quality of life improved after both surgeries, without differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

%EWL 1 year after surgery was higher in OAGB than in RYGB. A better glycemic control with a higher increase in GLP-1 was observed after OAGB compared to RYGB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT02601092.

Comparison of Sleeve Gastrectomy with Loop Duodenojejunal Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Type 2 Diabetes: The Role of Pylorus Preservation

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is recognized as a standard procedure in metabolic surgery. However, concerns about postoperative bile reflux and nutritional risks are prevalent. Comparatively, sleeve gastrectomy with loop duodenojejunal bypass (SG + LoopDJB) bypasses an equivalent length of the foregut as OAGB while maintaining pyloric function. The role of pylorus function remains to be further elucidated regarding these metabolic procedures' therapeutic outcomes and side effects.

METHOD

A retrospective study was conducted in our center to compare the surgical safety and 1-year outcomes of OAGB and SG + LoopDJB regarding type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission, weight loss, gastrointestinal disorders, and nutritional status in T2DM patients matched by gender, age, and BMI.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Compared with OAGB, SG + LoopDJB had longer operative time and length of stay (LOS) but similar major postoperative complications. At 1-year follow-up, OAGB has similar diabetes remission (both 91.9%), weight loss effect (28.1 ± 7.1% vs. 30.2 ± 7.0% for %TWL), and lipidemia improvement to SG + LoopDJB (P > 0.05). However, OAGB presented a higher incidence of hypoalbuminemia (11.9% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.026) but a low incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (9.5% vs. 26.2%, P = 0.046) than SG + LoopDJB. There was no statistical difference regarding other gastrointestinal disorders and nutritional deficiencies between groups.

CONCLUSION

Both OAGB and SG + LoopDJB show comparable, favorable outcomes in weight loss, T2DM remission, and lipidemia improvement at the 1-year follow-up. Pylorus preservation, while increasing surgical difficulty and the risk of de novo GERD, may reduce the risk of postoperative hypoalbuminemia.

Revision/Conversion Surgeries After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-An Experts' Modified Delphi Consensus

PURPOSE

There is a lack of evidence for treatment of some conditions including complication management, suboptimal initial weight loss, recurrent weight gain, or worsening of a significant obesity complication after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). This study was designed to respond to the existing lack of agreement and to provide a valuable resource for clinicians by employing an expert-modified Delphi consensus method.

METHODS

Forty-eight recognized bariatric surgeons from 28 countries participated in the modified Delphi consensus to vote on 64 statements in two rounds. An agreement/disagreement among ≥ 70.0% of the experts was regarded to indicate a consensus.

RESULTS

A consensus was achieved for 46 statements. For recurrent weight gain or worsening of a significant obesity complication after OAGB, more than 85% of experts reached a consensus that elongation of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) is an acceptable option and the total bowel length measurement is mandatory during BPL elongation to preserve at least 300-400 cm of common channel limb length to avoid nutritional deficiencies. Also, more than 85% of experts reached a consensus on conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with or without pouch downsizing as an acceptable option for the treatment of persistent bile reflux after OAGB and recommend detecting and repairing any size of hiatal hernia during conversion to RYGB.

CONCLUSION

While the experts reached a consensus on several aspects regarding revision/conversion surgeries after OAGB, there are still lingering areas of disagreement. This highlights the importance of conducting further studies in the future to address these unresolved issues.

Similar Rates of Symptomatic Marginal Ulcers After One-Anastomosis-Gastric Bypass Compared to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

PURPOSE

One-anastomosis-gastric-bypass (OAGB) has become a common bariatric procedure worldwide. Marginal ulcers (MU) are a significant non-immediate complication of gastric bypass surgeries. There seems to be concern among surgeons that MU are more common after OAGB compared with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to the constant and extensive exposure of the anastomosis to bile. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence, presentation, and management of MU between the two surgeries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of prospectively collected data was performed to include all consecutive patients between 2010 and 2020, who underwent elective OAGB or RYGB at our institution. Patients diagnosed with symptomatic MU were identified. Factors associated with this complication were assessed and compared between the two surgeries.

RESULTS

Symptomatic MU were identified in 23/372 OAGB patients (6.2%) and 35/491 RYGB patients (7.1%) (p = 0.58). Time to ulcer diagnosis was shorter in OAGB patients (12 ± 11 vs. 22 ± 17 months, p < 0.01). Epigastric pain was the common symptom (78% OAGB vs. 88.5% RYGB, p = 0.7) and approximately 15% of ulcers presented with perforation upon admission (17% vs.11.4%, p = 0.7). Re-operation was required in 5/23 OAGB (21.7%) and 6/36 RYGB (17%) patients (p = 0.11) while the rest of the patients were managed non-operatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of developing a marginal ulcer is similar between patients who underwent OAGB and RYGB. Patients diagnosed with MU following OAGB tend to present earlier; however, the clinical presentation is similar to RYGB patients. The management of this serious complication seems to be associated with acceptable outcomes with comparable operative and non-operative approaches.

Purse-string suture with nylon cords and metal clips for the treatment of duodenal fistulae under the endoscope: a case report

Purse-string suture with nylon cords and metal clips under the endoscope is a novel therapeutic technique which is minimally invasive and it is particularly indicated for the closure and repair of gastrointestinal fistula or perforations such as duodenal fistulae. Duodenal fistulae are often caused by medical manipulation, disease progression or trauma. Once this occurs, it leads to a series of pathophysiologic changes and a variety of complications. In most cases, these complications will exacerbate the damage to the organism, and the complications are difficult to treat and can lead to infections, nutrient loss, multi-organ dysfunction and many other adverse effects. In this case report, the use of endoscopic nylon cords combined with purse-string suture and metal clips in the treatment of duodenal fistula is presented and discussed. The patient was treated with endoscopic purse-string suture and the duodenal fistula was significantly improved. The results indicate that endoscopic purse-string suture is an effective strategy for the treatment of duodenal fistulae.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Versus Mini-Gastric Bypass on Liver Function at 6 Months in Morbid Obesity Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Various weight loss surgeries exist, with no absolute superiority; each has pros and cons. Due to rising bariatric surgeries globally, it's vital to investigate comparisons between two-mini gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), especially regarding their impact on liver function. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to "draw comparisons between the effects of mini gastric bypass and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on liver function at 6 months among patients with morbid obesity." Methods: This cross-sectional study included 90 bariatric surgery candidates (Body Mass Index (BMI) 35 - 50) from 2018 - 2021. Forty-five had laparoscopic mini gastric bypass surgery, while 45 had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Demographic, anthropometric, lab, and sonographic tests were conducted at baseline, 3-, and 6-months post-surgery. Data was analyzed using SPSS. Results: In a study of 90 patients (75.6% female, mean age 38.6 ± 10.4 years), both surgeries (Mini gastric bypass (MGB) and RYGB) effectively reduced body weight, BMI, and waist circumference at 3- and 6-months post-surgery. However, MGB showed significantly higher BMI and weight loss compared to RYGB (P = 0.003). In 90 patients, both surgeries reduced weight and BMI. However, MGB showed better BMI/weight loss. LFTs (ALT, AST, ALP) remained stable after MGB but worsened at 3 months after RYGB before recovering by 6 months. Mini gastric bypass also showed better GGT improvement. Both procedures improved fatty liver grading, FBS, and HbA1C levels equally. No significant differences were observed in blood pressure, platelet count, hemoglobin, or MCV. Ferritin levels increased in both groups but were higher in RYGB. CRP was higher in RYGB at 3 months. Conclusions: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass temporarily exacerbated liver enzymes and inflammation, but MGB resulted with more weight reduction. In comparison to RYGB, MGB improved LFTs more consistently.

Metabolic outcomes in obese mice undergoing one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with a long or a short biliopancreatic limb

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has gained importance as a simple, safe, and effective operation to treat morbid obesity. We previously found that Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery with a long compared with a short biliopancreatic limb (BPL) leads to improved weight loss and glucose tolerance in obese mice. However, it is not known whether a long BPL in OAGB surgery also results in beneficial metabolic outcomes. Five-week-old male C57BL/6J mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) for 8 weeks underwent OAGB surgery with defined BPL lengths (5.5 cm distally of the duodenojejunal junction for short and 9.5 cm for long BPL), or sham surgery combined with caloric restriction. Weight loss, glucose tolerance, obesity-related comorbidities, endocrine effects, gut microbiota, and bile acids were assessed. Total weight loss was independent of the length of the BPL after OAGB surgery. However, a long BPL was associated with lower glucose-stimulated insulin on day 14, and an improved glucose tolerance on day 35 after surgery. Moreover, a long BPL resulted in reduced total cholesterol, while there were no differences in the resolution of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and adipose tissue inflammation. Tendencies of an attenuated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and aldosterone were present in the long BPL group. With both the short and long BPL, we found an increase in primary conjugated bile acids (pronounced in long BPL) along with a loss in bacterial Desulfovibrionaceae and Erysipelotrichaceae and simultaneous increase in Akkermansiaceae, Sutterellaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae. In summary, OAGB surgery with a long compared with a short BPL led to similar weight loss, but improved glucose metabolism, lipid, and endocrine outcomes in obese mice, potentially mediated through changes in gut microbiota and related bile acids. Tailoring the BPL length in humans might help to optimize metabolic outcomes after bariatric surgery.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Weight loss following OAGB surgery in obese mice was not influenced by BPL length, but a longer BPL was associated with improved metabolic outcomes, including glucose and lipid homeostasis. These changes could be mediated by bile acids upon altered gut microbiota. Further validation of these findings is required through a randomized human study.

Effects of bariatric surgery on renal function: a retrospective cohort study comparing one-year outcomes between one-anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the effect of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) on renal function is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the evolution of estimated renal function observed 1 year after OAGB and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in individuals with obesity.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Observational, analytical, and retrospective cohort study. Tertiary-level university hospital.

METHODS

This study used a prospectively collected database of individuals who consecutively underwent bariatric surgery. Renal function was assessed by calculating the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. The one-year variation in the eGFR was compared between the procedures.

RESULTS

No significant differences in age, sex, obesity-associated conditions, or body mass index were observed among individuals who underwent either OAGB or RYGB. OAGB led to a significantly higher percentage of total (P = 0.007) and excess weight loss (P = 0.026). Both OAGB and RYGB led to significantly higher values of eGFR (103.9 ± 22 versus 116.1 ± 13.3; P = 0.007, and 102.4 ± 19 versus 113.2 ± 13.3; P < 0.001, respectively). The one-year variation in eGFR was 11 ± 16.2% after OAGB and 16.7 ± 26.3% after RYGB (P = 0.3). Younger age and lower baseline eGFR were independently associated with greater postoperative improvement in renal function (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with RYGB, OAGB led to an equivalent improvement in renal function 1 year after the procedure, along with greater weight loss.

Establishment of a novel weight reduction model after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy based on abdominal fat area

In light of ongoing research elucidating the intricacies of obesity and metabolic syndrome, the role of abdominal fat (especially visceral fat) has been particularly prominent. Studies have revealed that visceral adipose tissue can accelerate the development of metabolic syndrome by releasing various bioactive compounds and hormones, such as lipocalin, leptin and interleukin. A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 167 patients with obesity. Among them, 105 patients who satisfied predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. The parameters evaluated included total abdominal fat area (TAFA), laboratory indicators and anthropometric measurements. Weight reduction was quantified through percent total weight loss (%TWL) and percent excess weight loss (%EWL) postoperatively. Binary logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were employed to identify predictors of weight loss. Binary logistic regression analysis emphasized that total abdominal fat area was an independent predictor of %EWL ≥75% (p < 0.001). Total abdominal fat area (p = 0.033) and BMI (p = 0.003) were independent predictors of %TWL ≥30%. In our cohort, %TWL ≥30% at 1 year after surgery was closely related to the abdominal fat area and BMI. Based on these results, we formulated a novel model based on these factors, exhibiting superior predictive value for excellent weight loss.

The Therapeutic Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Among Individuals with Low BMI Obesity (30-35 Kg/m2) and the Relationship of BMI to Weight Loss

Purpose

Investigating the therapeutic efficacy of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) in low BMI (30-35 kg/m2) patients with obesity, and exploring the correlation between patients' preoperative BMI and postoperative weight loss.

Methods

Comparing the weight loss, remission of comorbidities, occurrence of complications, and quality of life among the different BMI patients who underwent LSG. Analyzing the relationship between BMI and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) by using Spearman correlation analysis and linear regression analysis.

Results

The %EWL at 12 months after the surgical procedure was (104.26±16.41)%, (90.36±9.98)%, and (78.30±14.64)% for patients with Class I, II, and III obesity, respectively, P<0.05. Spearman correlation coefficients between %EWL and BMI at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were R=-0.334 (P<0.001), R=-0.389 (P<0.001), and R=-0.442 (P<0.001), R=-0.641 (P<0.001), respectively. The remission of hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia did not differ significantly between groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Individuals with obesity for varying BMI can experience favorable outcomes following LSG surgery. It is advisable to consider LSG treatment for patients with Class I obesity.

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery position statement on one-anastomosis gastric bypass

The following position statement is issued by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in response to inquiries made to the society by patients, physicians, society members, hospitals, health insurance payors, and others regarding one-anastomosis gastric bypass as a treatment for obesity and metabolic disease. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence available at this time. The statement may be revised in the future as more information becomes available.

Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at 5 years (YOMEGA): a prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised extension study

BACKGROUND

The multicentre randomised trial YOMEGA (NCT02139813) comparing the one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) confirmed the non-inferiority of OAGB on weight loss outcomes at 24 months. We aimed to report weight loss, metabolic, and safety outcomes at 5 years.

METHODS

YOMEGA is a prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial conducted at nine centres in France. Inclusion criteria were BMI of 40 kg/m2 or more, or 35 kg/m2 or more with comorbidities. Key exclusion criteria were severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or Barrett's oesophagus and previous bariatric surgery. Patients were randomly assigned (1 :1) to OAGB (one gastrojejunal anastomosis with a 200 cm biliopancreatic limb) or RYGB (with a 150 cm alimentary limb and a 50 cm biliary limb), stratified by centre, with blocks of variable size. The primary endpoint of this extension study was percentage excess BMI loss and was analysed in the per-protocol population, including patients with data who were operated on with the technique randomly assigned to them and excluding patients with major deviations from the protocol during the follow-up (change of surgical technique, death, or withdrawal of consent). Non-inferiority was concluded for the primary endpoint if the upper bound of the CI was less than the non-inferiority limit (7 percentage points). YOMEGA is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02139813, and the 5-year follow-up of YOMEGA is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05549271.

FINDINGS

Between May 13, 2014, and March 2, 2016, 253 patients were randomly assigned to OAGB (n=129) or RYGB (n=124), and from these patients 114 in the OAGB group and 118 in the RYGB group were included in the per-protocol analysis. In the per-protocol population, at baseline, mean age was 43·0 years (SD 10·8), mean BMI was 44·0 kg/m2 (5·6), 54 (23%) patients were male and 178 (77%) were female; 55 (27%) of 207 patients had type 2 diabetes. After 5 years, mean percentage excess BMI loss was -75·6% (SD 28·1) in the OAGB group versus -71·4% (SD 29·8) in the RYGB group, confirming non-inferiority (mean difference -4·1% [90% CI -12·0 to 3·7], p=0·0099). Remission of type 2 diabetes was similar in both groups. Nutritional status did not differ; the most common adverse event was clinical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, occurring in 27 (41%) of 66 patients in the OAGB group versus 14 (18%) of 76 patients in the RYGB group (p=0·0030). Among serious adverse events, ten (8%) of 127 patients converted from OAGB to RYGB. 171 (68%) of 253 patients were followed up.

INTERPRETATION

OAGB was not inferior to RYGB regarding percentage excess BMI loss at 5 years with similar metabolic outcomes. The high rate of clinical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease after OAGB raises questions about its long-term consequences, which need to be further investigated.

FUNDING

Medtronic.

GERD after Bariatric Surgery: A Review of the Underlying Causes and Recommendations for Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

GERD after bariatric surgery is an ongoing concern for bariatric surgeons and their patients. This paper reviews the association of persistent or de novo GERD after multiple types of bariatric surgery, and focuses on the work up and management of GERD after SG.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two recent large, multicenter randomized clinical trials have shown stronger associations between SG and GERD compared to RYGB. A large group of internationally recognized bariatric surgeons collaborated on 72 consensus statements to help guide the bariatric community on the subject of redo surgeries after SG, including as it pertains to GERD. We present an algorithm that consolidates the best-practices recommendations of the work-up and management of GERD after sleeve gastrectomy, and mention areas of persistent controversy where future research is warranted.

Biliopancreatic diversion for severe obesity: long-term weight maintenance and occurrence of nutritional complications are two facets of the same coin

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread clinical use of hypoabsorptive metabolic bariatric surgery, very long-term outcomes are still lacking. The aim of the study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of biliopancreatic diversion at 30 years in patients with class 3 obesity (BMI over 40 kg/m2).

METHODS

This retrospective single-centre study used data from a prospectively collected database on a sample of consecutive patients submitted to biliopancreatic diversion with a minimum follow-up of 30 years. Outcomes assessed included overall survival, long-term weight loss and weight maintenance, remission of obesity-related co-morbidities, and short- and long-term surgical and/or nutritional or metabolic complications.

RESULTS

Among 199 consecutive patients (136 female, 63 male) who had surgery between November 1992 and April 1994, the mean age at operation was 38 (range 14-69) years and mean preoperative BMI was 48.7 (32.0-74.3) kg/m2. At baseline, 91 of 199 patients (45.7%) had type 2 diabetes. At 20 and 30 years, 122 (61%) and 38 (19%) of the 199 patients respectively were available for follow-up. At 30 years, the overall mortality rate was 12% (23 of 199). Surgical complications were concentrated in the short-term follow-up, whereas nutritional or metabolic complications increased progressively over time. A nutritional complication was diagnosed in 73 of 122 patients (60%) at 20 years and 28 of 38 (74%) at 30 years. Weight loss and glycaemic control were maintained throughout the follow-up; mean % total weight loss was 32.8 (range 14.1-50.0) at 1 year and 37.7 (range 16.7-64.8) at 30 years. One patient presented with recurrence of type 2 diabetes at 20 and 30 years; there were no patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Biliopancreatic diversion leads to good and sustained weight maintenance up to 30 years with low perioperative risk, but at the cost of a high long-term prevalence of nutritional complications.

Outcomes of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Conversion to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Severe Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is an effective procedure to treat severe obesity. However, conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is increasing. We therefore conducted a systematic review to determine the safety and efficacy associated with OAGB-RYGB conversion. A systematic search was conducted by three independent reviewers using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library following PRISMA guidelines. Six studies including 134 patients were selected who were undergoing OAGB-RYGB conversion. The most common indications were reflux (47.8%), malnutrition (31.3%), and inadequate weight loss (8.2%). Study outcomes demonstrated 100% resolution of bile reflux. Overall, there was medium-term weight gain of 0.61 BMI. OAGB to RYGB conversion leads to resolution of reflux symptoms. However, it is associated with weight regain, albeit this may be acceptable to patients to treat biliary reflux.

Comparison of revisional surgeries after OAGB versus RYGB: Results from the multicenter Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS)

<br><b>Introduction:</b> Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a leading bariatric surgery globally. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), a modification of RYGB, ranks as the third most common bariatric procedure in Poland. While clinical trials show that OAGB outcomes are comparable to those of RYGB regarding weight loss, remission of comorbidities, and hormonal impact, there is limited data on long-term outcomes and complications.</br><br><b>Aim:</b> The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of revisional surgeries conducted after OAGB <i>versus</i> RYGB.</br> <br><b>Material and methods:</b> This retrospective study analyzed patients undergoing revisional bariatric surgeries from January 2010 to January 2020 across 12 Polish centers. The inclusion criteria were an age of at least 18 years and prior OAGB or RYGB surgery. Those with incomplete primary surgery data and follow-up post-revision were excluded. Data were collected regarding parameters for anthropometrics, comorbidities, and perioperative details. The patients were categorized based on their initial surgery: OAGB or RYGB. The primary endpoints were the reasons for and types of revisional surgery and weight changes; the secondary endpoints were postoperative complications and length of hospital stay (LOS).</br> <br><b>Results:</b> In total, 27 patients participated, with a mean age of 38.18 7 years. Differences between the OAGB (13 patients) and RYGB (14 patients) groups included median initial body weight (100 kg <i>vs.</i> 126 kg, p<0.016), number of postoperative complications (9 <i>vs.</i> 3, p = 0.021), and median LOS (3 <i>vs.</i> 4.5 days, p = 0.03). GERD was the primary reason for OAGB revisions (69.2%), whereas insufficient weight loss led to the most RYGB revisions (42.9%).</br><br><b>Conclusions:</b> The RYGB patients commonly needed revisions due to weight issues, whereas reoperations in the OAGB patients were conducted due to postoperative complications. The postoperative complications and LOS were similar between the groups.</br> <br><b>The importance of research for the development of the field:</b> The results may influence clinical surgeons' choice of surgical technique.</br>.

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most performed metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) worldwide, some patients require conversional procedures due to weight recurrence or late complications. Recently, one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) gained popularity as a viable option to address those problems. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the safety and efficacy of conversional OAGB after primary SG in the management of patients with obesity.

METHODS

Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for articles from their inception to February 2023 by two independent reviewers using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) system. The review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42023403528).

RESULTS

From 1,117 studies screened, twenty studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 1,057 patients with obesity undergoing conversional OAGB after primary SG. The mean age ranged from 28.2 to 49.5 years, and 744 patients (75.2%) were women. At one year after revisional OAGB, the pooled mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was 65.2% (95%CI: 56.9, 73.4, I2 = 97%). The pooled mean %EWL after conversional OAGB was 71.1% (95%CI: 62.2, 80.0, I2 = 90%) at two years and 71.6% (95%CI: 61.0, 82.2, I2 = 50%) at five years. Additionally, resolution rates of diabetes and hypertension were 65.4% (95%CI: 0.522, 0.785, I2 = 65%) and 58.9% (95%CI: 0.415, 0.762, I2 = 89%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrated OAGB as an effective conversional procedure after primary SG in terms of weight loss and obesity-associated medical problems for selected patients. Despite the promising results, further randomized controlled studies with larger sample sizes and more extended follow-up periods are necessary to determine if the OAGB is the best conversional surgery after SG.

ReSleeve or revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass for failed primary sleeve gastrectomy with dilated gastric tube: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) has been increasingly performed due to weight loss failure (WLF). Many revisional procedures have been proposed after primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (pLSG) failure, including ReSleeve gastrectomy (ReLSG), and laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB). Choosing the RBS post-pLSG failure represents a challenge. WLF without gastric tube (GT) dilation is undoubtedly converted to a malabsorptive procedure, but the presence of GT dilation makes it more difficult to select a RBS. This study aimed to compare two relatively simple revisional procedures after pLSG failure with dilated GT to help decision making on which procedure better done to which patient.

METHODS

Data of 52 patients who completed one year follow-up (FU) after their RBS (ReLSG: 27 or LOAGB: 25) for their failed pLSG were collected, assessed, correlated to weight loss (WL) and compared.

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 97 ± 18.4 min. with revisional LOAGB (RLOAGB) and 62 ± 11 min. with ReLSG. Six patients (11.5%) had seven postoperative procedure-specific complications. Significant hemorrhage occurred in three patients. Two cases of leakage were encountered with each procedure. LOAGB Patients had lower mean final weight (76.2 ± 10.5 vs 85.3 ± 13), lower mean Final BMI (26.4 ± 2.5 vs 29.7 ± 2.9) and higher mean percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%) (83.6 ± 13.5% vs 60.29 ± 14.6%). All RLOAGB patients and 77.8% of ReLSG patients had EWL% > 50%. RLOAGB patients had higher EWL% compared to ReLSG (p < 0.001). Insufficient WL (IWL) patients had higher EWL% compared to weight regain (WR) patients (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Both procedures (RLOAGB and ReLSG) were relatively safe and effective in terms of WL. RLOAGB led to higher WL compared to ReLSG in all types of patients despite higher Caloric intake. IWL patients had more WL compared to WR patients. WL was not related to GT dilation type. Large-scale longer-FU studies are still needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PACTR202310644487566 (retrospectively registered).

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Prospective Trial

Background and Objectives: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgeries are effective methods used in bariatric surgery. There are limited randomized studies comparing these procedures over more than 2 years. Here, we aimed to compare the 3-year results of two bariatric procedures. Materials and Methods: Patients included in this randomized prospective study were compared in OAGB and RYGB groups. A total of 55 patients, aged between 18 and 65, were eligible for the study. Thirteen patients who did not accept randomization were excluded. Patients were evaluated at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. Results: Three patients were excluded from the study due to loss of communication during the clinical follow-up and one due to death by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, which started in the eighth month after surgery. The study was completed with a total of 38 patients (OAGB; n = 20, RYGB; n = 18). Patients in the two groups were similar in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and obesity-related comorbidities. At the end of 3-year follow-up, BMI in the OAGB and RYGB groups was 28.80 ± 4.53 kg/m2 and 29.17 ± 5.36 kg/m2, respectively (p = 0.822). Percentage total weight loss (TWL%) was similar. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding percentage excess weight loss (EWL%). Remission of comorbidities was similar. De novo refluxes developed in four OAGB patients; there were no occurrences of these in RYGB patients (p = 0.066). Conclusions: Both OAGB and RYGB are effective in the treatment of morbid obesity. The two procedures are similarly successful in terms of obesity-related comorbidities.