Lack of effect of dopamine receptor blockade on voluntary ethanol consumption in rats

Lesion of the rostromedial tegmental nucleus increases voluntary ethanol consumption and accelerates extinction of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion

RATIONALE

Ethanol has rewarding and aversive properties, and the balance of these properties influences voluntary ethanol consumption. Preclinical and clinical evidence show that the aversive properties of ethanol limit intake. The neural circuits underlying ethanol-induced aversion learning are not fully understood. We have previously shown that the lateral habenula (LHb), a region critical for aversive conditioning, plays an important role in ethanol-directed behaviors. However, the neurocircuitry through which LHb exerts its actions is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we investigate a role for the rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg), a major LHb projection target, in regulating ethanol-directed behaviors.

METHODS

Rats received either sham or RMTg lesions and were studied during voluntary ethanol consumption; operant ethanol self-administration, extinction, and yohimbine-induced reinstatement of ethanol-seeking; and ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA).

RESULTS

RMTg lesions increased voluntary ethanol consumption and accelerated extinction of ethanol-induced CTA.

CONCLUSIONS

The RMTg plays an important role in regulating voluntary ethanol consumption, possibly by mediating ethanol-induced aversive conditioning.

Dopamine receptor agonists modulate voluntary alcohol intake independently of individual levels of alcohol intake in rats

RATIONALE

Individual susceptibility to alcohol use disorder has been related to functional changes in dopaminergic neurotransmission.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current work was to assess the effects of selective dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonists and antagonists on alcohol consumption in rats that differ in individual levels of alcohol intake.

METHODS

The effects of the dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF 82958, the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390, the dopamine D2 receptor agonist sumanirole and the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist L741,626 on alcohol consumption and preference were assessed at different time points after treatment in subgroups of low and high alcohol drinking rats (LD and HD) using an intermittent alcohol access paradigm.

RESULTS

SKF 82958 decreased alcohol intake and alcohol preference throughout the 24-h session. Sumanirole decreased alcohol intake during the first 2 h, but increased alcohol intake during the remainder of the session. The effects of SKF 82958 and sumanirole on alcohol intake and alcohol preference were comparable in LD and HD. By contrast, the dopamine receptor antagonists SCH 23390 and L741,626 did not alter alcohol consumption in either group at any time point.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that stimulation of dopamine D1 receptors reduces alcohol intake, but that endogenous dopamine does not play a primary role in alcohol consumption. Moreover, the difference in alcohol consumption between LD and HD does not involve altered dopamine signaling.

Behavioral and neurotransmitter specific roles for the ventral tegmental area in reinforcer-seeking and intake

BACKGROUND

The ventral tegmental area (VTA) is a pivotal relay site within the reinforcement circuit that has been shown to play a role in ethanol (EtOH)-motivated behaviors. The primary dopamine projections within this system originate in the VTA and innervate several areas including the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and prefrontal cortex (PFC), and the PFC has afferent glutamate projections to the VTA and the NAc. The following studies utilized 2 different operant paradigms, one focusing on reinforcer-seeking and the other on reinforcer drinking (both with an EtOH and a sucrose reinforcer solution), to elucidate regulation of these behaviors by the posterior VTA, and the specific roles of dopamine and glutamate in this region.

METHODS

The present experiments assessed the effects of microinjections of the glutamate (AMPA/kainate) antagonist CNQX and the dopamine D1-like antagonist SCH23390 in the posterior VTA, as well as transient chemical inactivation of this region using tetrodotoxin (TTX). In 4 separate experiments (2 dopamine, 2 glutamate, both with TTX), male Long Evans rats were trained to complete a single response requirement that resulted in access to 10% EtOH or 2% sucrose for a 20-minute drinking period.

RESULTS

Prior to microinjections, EtOH-reinforced subjects were consuming approximately 0.45 to 0.65 g/kg EtOH and making approximately 50 responses during intermittent nonreinforced artificial cerebrospinal fluid sessions (Sucrose groups had similar baseline response levels). Overall, TTX inactivation of the VTA consistently decreased reinforcer-seeking but not intake in all experiments. CNQX also dose-dependently decreased EtOH-seeking, with no significant effect on sucrose-seeking or reinforcer intake. SCH23390 had no significant effects on reinforcer-seeking, and very moderately decreased intake of both EtOH and sucrose.

CONCLUSIONS

Inactivation of the posterior VTA implicated this region in reinforcer-seeking as opposed to reinforcer intake. Overall, the present findings provide support for the importance of posterior VTA glutamate activity specifically in EtOH-seeking behavior in animals consuming pharmacologically relevant amounts of EtOH.

Differences in aggressive behavior and in the mesocorticolimbic DA system between A/J and BALB/cJ mice

The neurotransmitters DA and serotonin are known to be important modulators of aggression, but endogenous differences in these systems between aggressive and nonaggressive animals are poorly understood. To examine this issue, the mesocorticolimbic DA and serotonin systems of two mouse strains that differ in aggressive behavior, BALB/cJ and A/J, were analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography and quantitative receptor autoradiography. Significant differences in both serotonergic and dopaminergic systems were found between aggressive and nonaggressive mice. The nonaggressive A/J mice exhibited higher DA utilization in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex, higher D1 receptor expression in the rostral pole of the accumbens, and lower D2 receptor expression throughout the accumbens, as compared with aggressive BALB/cJ mice. Although correlative in nature, these data suggest that differences in mesocorticolimbic DA and serotonin systems may contribute to endogenous differences in aggression.

Dopamine and benzodiazepine-dependent mechanisms regulate the EtOH-enhanced locomotor stimulation in the GABAA alpha1 subunit null mutant mice

The present study investigated the role of the alpha1-containing GABA(A) receptors in the neurobehavioral actions of alcohol. In Experiment 1, mice lacking the alpha1 subunit (alpha1 (-/-)) were tested for their capacity to initiate operant-lever press responding for alcohol or sucrose. Alcohol intake in the home cage was also measured. In Experiment 2, the alpha1 (-/-) mice were injected with a range of alcohol doses (0.875-4.0 g/kg; i.p.) to evaluate the significance of the alpha1 subunit in alcohol's stimulant actions. In Experiment 3, we determined if the alcohol-induced stimulant effects were regulated via dopaminergic (DA) or benzodiazepine (BDZ)-dependent mechanisms. To accomplish this, we investigated the capacity of DA (eticlopride, SCH 23390) and BDZ (flumazenil, betaCCt) receptor antagonists to attenuate the alcohol-induced stimulant actions. Compared with wild-type mice (alpha1 (+/+)), the null mutants showed marked reductions in both EtOH and sucrose-maintained responding, and home-cage alcohol drinking. The null mutants also showed significant increases in locomotor behaviors after injections of low-moderate alcohol doses (1.75-3.0 g/kg). betaCCt, flumazenil, eticlopride, and SCH 23390 were able to attenuate the alcohol-induced stimulation in mutant mice, in the absence of intrinsic effects. These data suggest the alpha1 receptor plays an important role in alcohol-motivated behaviors; however, it also appears crucial in regulating the reinforcing properties associated with normal ingestive behaviors. Deleting the alpha1 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor appears to unmask alcohol's stimulatory effects; these effects appear to be regulated via an interaction of both DA- and GABA(A) BDZ-dependent mechanisms.

Habituation to test procedure modulates the involvement of dopamine D2- but not D1-receptors in ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation in mice

RATIONALE

Novelty associated with behavioral testing has been shown to enhance psychostimulant- and morphine-induced locomotor stimulation. Evidence has demonstrated that novelty increases dopamine (DA) activity, and habituation to a novel environment reduces such activation. However, it is not clear whether novelty modulates ethanol-induced behavioral stimulation and whether DA plays a role in this effect.

OBJECTIVES

The present work sought to demonstrate a role of habituation to test procedure as a factor that could modulate the involvement of DA in ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation.

METHODS

Non-habituated (NH) and habituated (H) Swiss mice pretreated with DA D1- (SCH23390; 0-0.045 mg/kg) or D2-receptor (sulpiride; 0-50 mg/kg) antagonists were tested for ethanol (0-2.5 g/kg)-induced locomotor stimulation. Experiments with amphetamine (0-4 mg/kg), morphine (0-5 mg/kg) and caffeine (0-15 mg/kg)were designed to compare their results to those obtained with ethanol. The effect of the non-selective opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone (0-1.5 mg/kg) was also tested on ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation.

RESULTS

NH and H animals did not differ in their locomotor response to ethanol or caffeine; however, amphetamine- and morphine-induced stimulation was greater in NH than in H mice. SCH23390 only reduced ethanol-induced stimulation at doses that also reduced spontaneous activity in both NH and H mice. Sulpiride decreased ethanol-stimulated behavior only in the NH condition. Habituation did not modify the effect of sulpiride on amphetamine-, morphine- or caffeine-induced activation. Naltrexone (0-1.5 mg/kg) reduced ethanol-induced stimulation regardless of habituation.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data suggest that the participation of DA D2-receptors in ethanol-induced behavioral stimulation requires the presence of novelty. Results also support the involvement of neurotransmitter systems other than DA (i.e., endogenous opioid system) as important substrates mediating ethanol-induced locomotor activation.

Involvement of accumbal glycine receptors in the regulation of voluntary ethanol intake in the rat

BACKGROUND

Extracellular dopamine (DA) levels in the nucleus accumbens (nAc) increase after ethanol (EtOH) administration in the rat, a response that may be involved in the positive reinforcing effects of EtOH. The mechanisms underlying this DA activation and how they relate to EtOH reinforcement remain to be elucidated, but recent data indicate that glycine receptors (GlyRs) in the nAc may be involved. Here this hypothesis was further challenged by examining the influence of bilateral accumbal application of glycine (a GlyR agonist), strychnine (a GlyR competitive antagonist), or Ringer on EtOH intake and preference, as well as on the concomitant DA output in the nAc, in EtOH high-preferring male Wistar rats.

METHODS

EtOH high-preferring male Wistar rats [EtOH preference >60% during continuous access to a bottle of EtOH (6% v/v) and a bottle of water] were limited to drink 1 hr/day (limited access drinking). Thereafter, the animals were equipped bilaterally with microdialysis probes aimed at the mAc, and were subjected to in vivo microdialysis (coupled to high-pressure liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection) and reversed microdialysis (for drug application) during two experimental days (balanced study), during which the animals were allowed a choice between EtOH and water.

RESULTS

The EtOH consumption in rats that were perfused with Ringer in the nAc was approximately 0.9 g/kg/hr and associated with a significant increase in extracellular accumbal DA levels. In a subpopulation of rats, bilateral accumbal glycine (100 microM) perfusion produced a significant increase in accumbal DA output and a decrease in EtOH preference and intake. In these glycine responders, the EtOH consumed (approximately 0.7 g/kg/hr) did not produce a further increase of DA levels. In other rats, bilateral glycine perfusion did not change the accumbal DA output, and voluntary EtOH intake was not altered. In these glycine nonresponders, EtOH tended to increase accumbal DA levels. Bilateral accumbal strychnine (20 microM) perfusion significantly decreased DA output in the nAc, and the DA levels remained decreased despite a statistically significant increase of EtOH intake. Finally, the increase in accumbal DA levels observed after EtOH consumption in Ringer-treated rats was significantly larger in glycine responders than in glycine nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings suggest that glycine and strychnine alter extracellular DA levels in the nAc, probably via GlyR stimulation and blockade, respectively, and concomitantly glycine and strychnine reciprocally alter also EtOH consumption in EtOH high-preferring male Wistar rats. The possibility of developing selective GlyR agonists and/or antagonists should be explored. Such agents could prove of value in the treatment of alcoholism.

The role of mesolimbic dopamine in the development and maintenance of ethanol reinforcement

The neurobiological processes by which ethanol seeking and consumption are established and maintained are thought to involve areas of the brain that mediate motivated behavior, such as the mesolimbic dopamine system. The mesolimbic dopamine system is comprised of cells that originate in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and project to several forebrain regions, including a prominent terminal area, the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). The NAcc has been subdivided into core and shell subregions. Both areas receive converging excitatory input from the cortex and amygdala and dopamine input from the VTA, with the accumbal medium spiny neuron situated to integrate the signals. Although forced ethanol administration enhances dopamine activity in the NAcc, conclusions regarding the role of mesolimbic dopamine in ethanol reinforcement cannot be made from these experiments. Behavioral experiments consistently show that pharmacological manipulations of the dopamine transmission in the NAcc alter responding for ethanol, although ethanol reinforcement is maintained after lesions of the accumbal dopamine system. Additionally, extracellular dopamine increases in the NAcc during operant self-administration of ethanol, which is consistent with a role of dopamine in ethanol reinforcement. Behavioral studies that distinguish appetitive responding from ethanol consumption show that dopamine is important in ethanol-seeking behavior, whereas neurochemical studies suggest that accumbal dopamine is also important during ethanol consumption before pharmacological effects occur. Cellular studies suggest that ethanol alters synaptic plasticity in the mesolimbic system, possibly through dopaminergic mechanisms, and this may underlie the development of ethanol reinforcement. Thus, anatomical, pharmacological, neurochemical, cellular, and behavioral studies are more clearly defining the role of mesolimbic dopamine in ethanol reinforcement.

Clozapine reduces alcohol drinking in Syrian golden hamsters

Alcohol abuse contributes substantially to the overall morbidity of schizophrenia. While typical antipsychotic medications do not limit alcohol use in patients with schizophrenia, emerging data suggest that the atypical antipsychotic clozapine does. To further elucidate the effects of these antipsychotics on alcohol use, we initiated a study in alcohol-preferring rodents. Syrian golden hamsters were given free-choice, unlimited access to alcohol. Nine days of treatment (s.c. injection) with clozapine (2-4 mg/kg/day), but not haloperidol (0.2-0.4 mg/kg/day), reduced alcohol drinking. Clozapine reduced alcohol drinking by 88% (from 11.3+/-1.7 to 1.4+/-0.2 g/kg/day) while increasing both water and food intake. Alcohol drinking gradually (during 24 days) returned toward baseline in the clozapine-treated animals when vehicle was substituted for clozapine. Further increasing the doses of haloperidol (0.6-1.0 mg/kg/day) had no effect on alcohol drinking; moreover, very low doses of haloperidol (0.025-0.1 mg/kg/day) tested in separate groups of hamsters also had no effect on alcohol drinking. This study demonstrates that clozapine, but not haloperidol, can effectively and reversibly decrease alcohol consumption in alcohol-preferring hamsters. The results are compatible with the observations that clozapine, but not haloperidol, limits alcohol use in patients with schizophrenia. These data further suggest that clozapine may serve as a prototype for developing novel treatments for alcohol abuse.

Alcoholism and the dopaminergic system: a review

Alcohol as well as other substances of abuse are reinforcing substances which manifest their effects through activation of the mesolimbic dopaminergic reward pathways of the brain. In animal genetic models of alcoholism, reduced dopamine levels and D2 dopamine receptor (DRD2) numbers have been found in the brains of alcohol-preferring animals. Dopamine receptor agonists reduce alcohol consumption, whereas antagonists, in general, show the opposite effect. Moreover, quantitative trait loci studies in animals suggest the DRD2 gene and the region proximate to this locus is a chromosomal "hot spot" for alcohol-related behaviors. Human studies provide additional support for connection between alcohol dependence and CNS dopaminergic function. In endocrinological studies, using dopamine receptor agonists, reduced dopaminergic activity has been found in more severe and more genetic types of alcoholics. Brain imaging studies are similarly revealing a diminished dopaminergic tone in alcoholics. Treatment of alcoholics with dopamine receptor agonists shows reduced alcohol consumption and improvements in other outcome measures. Molecular genetic studies in humans have identified an association of the Al allele of the DRD2 gene with alcoholism. Moreover, a diminished central dopaminergic function has been found in DRD2 A1 allele subjects using pharmacological, electrophysiological and neuropsychological studies. Further, treatment of alcoholics with a dopamine receptor agonist showed more salutary effects on alcoholics who carry than those who do not carry the DRD2 A1 allele. The A1 allele has also been associated with substance use disorders other than alcoholism, including and cocaine and nicotine dependence and polysubstance abuse. The emerging evidence suggests that the DRD2 is a reinforcement or reward gene. It could represent one of the most prominent single-gene determinants of susceptibility to severe substance abuse. However, the environment and other genes, when combined, still play the larger role.

Nicotine increases alcohol self-administration and reinstates alcohol seeking in rats

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

Alcohol and tobacco are often co-abused in humans and previous studies found that nicotine increases alcohol consumption in rats. Here, we studied whether nicotine would reinstate alcohol-taking behavior in drug-free rats and whether this effect would be enhanced by prior exposure to nicotine during alcohol self-administration training.

METHODS

Rats were trained to press a lever for alcohol (12% w/v, 1 h/day), and following stable alcohol intake groups of rats ( n=11-12) were given daily vehicle or nicotine (0.2, 0.4 or 0.8 mg/kg, SC) injections just prior to the self-administration sessions for 10 days. Rats were then given 6 days of alcohol self-administration in the absence of nicotine and an additional 5-10 drug-free days during which lever presses were not reinforced (extinction). Subsequently, rats were tested for reinstatement of alcohol seeking following exposure to priming injections of vehicle or nicotine (0.4 mg/kg, SC).

RESULTS

Nicotine increased alcohol self-administration in a dose- and time-dependent manner over the 10-day period. Nicotine also reinstated alcohol seeking after extinction of the alcohol-reinforced behavior, and this effect was strongly enhanced by prior nicotine exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data extend previous studies on the effect of nicotine on alcohol self-administration, and further indicate that nicotine is an effective stimulus for reinstatement of alcohol seeking during drug-free periods.

Separate measures of ethanol seeking and drinking in the rat: effects of remoxipride

Remoxipride, a dopamine D(2) antagonist, decreases responding that results in the presentation of small amounts (approximately 0.1 ml) of ethanol in limited-access paradigms. This type of operant response is a combined appetitive/consummatory response that is differentially affected by changing stimulus properties of consumed ethanol (i.e., taste, pharmacology) over the course of the session. In the present experimental design, ethanol-directed appetitive and consummatory responses were procedurally separated to investigate the specific effects of remoxipride on these distinct behaviors. Male Long-Evans rats were trained to make a series of lever-press responses once each day that resulted in access to a sipper tube spout containing 10% ethanol for 20 min. Three doses of remoxipride were tested: 5.0, 10.0, and 15.0 mg/kg (-30 min, i.p.). In Experiment 1, a response requirement of 20 was used, and both reinforced and nonreinforced sessions were examined. In nonreinforced sessions, subjects were permitted to lever press for 20 min, after which the session ended without sipper tube presentation. These sessions were conducted to remove the possibility that limiting responding might obscure a drug effect on the seeking response. In Experiment 2, a low response requirement (4) was used to investigate the effects of remoxipride on ethanol intake. Average baseline ethanol intake (Experiment 1) was 0.69 g/kg, with blood ethanol concentrations at the end of the session at 64 mg%. At all doses tested, remoxipride had no effect on the measures of ethanol consumption (e.g., total intake, lick latency, lick rate) in either experiment. However, remoxipride dose dependently decreased the number of appetitive responses made, while having no effect on response latency or rate, during both reinforced and nonreinforced sessions in Experiment 1. In these experiments, the systemic antagonism of the dopamine D(2) receptor decreased ethanol seeking without causing a general impairment of motor function. The procedural separation of seeking and intake responses revealed that appetitive responding was more sensitive than consummatory responding to remoxipride treatment.

A relation between maze performance and increased ethanol intake in Long-Evans rats

In addition to the neurochemical and genetic basis of high ethanol consumption, there has been renewed interest in studying the role of behavioral variables and their relation to ethanol consumption. The present study was designed to assess whether a relation exists between a behavioral variable such as maze learning ability and ethanol consumption. Sixty, male, Long-Evans rats, exposed to food and water ad libitum, were given a daily trial in a complex, 16-arm T-maze for 19 consecutive days. The number of errors and time to complete the maze were monitored. Individual maze variable scores were transformed and then combined to allot each animal with an index of overall maze performance, with a smaller maze index score denoting good performance. After completion of maze testing, animals were given alternate-day, free-choice presentations of water and ascending doses of ethanol solutions (2%-10%), followed by a 10-day maintenance period with 10% ethanol. Animals were subsequently separated into two groups of high and low drinkers to examine any relation between differential ethanol intake and maze performance. A significant negative correlation between maze index and ethanol intake for the high drinkers group indicated that a smaller maze index was related to increased ethanol intake. No significant correlation was obtained for the low drinkers group. These results seem to indicate that individual variation in learning ability seems to be related to increased ethanol intake. Thus, innate learning processes may be a relevant trait when one attempts to understand the behaviors related to ethanol intake and preference.

Microinjections of dopaminergic agents in the nucleus accumbens affect ethanol consumption but not palatability

It was determined whether ethanol palatability in rats could be changed by manipulating the reinforcement experienced during limited access consumption. During the first 3 days of the experiment, initial taste reactivity (TR) testing to distilled water (1 day) and 10% alcohol (2 days) was performed. Following the establishment of baseline TR, separate groups of animals received bilateral microinjections (0.5 microl/side) into the nucleus accumbens of either the nonspecific dopamine agonist d-amphetamine sulfate (20 microg, n = 10), the D(2) antagonist raclopride (1.0 microg, n = 8), or physiological saline (n = 5). The injections occurred at the same time each day for 5 consecutive days. Five minutes after the microinjection, the fluid-deprived rats were given 30-min access to 10% ethanol. Over the 3 days following drug administration, TR to distilled water and 10% alcohol was repeated. After this, the rats were once again given 30 min of access to 10% ethanol for 5 consecutive days, but without drug microinjection prior to alcohol access. A final TR exposure (the same as the others) was performed over the final 3 days of the study. Both raclopride and d-amphetamine administration produced reductions in ethanol consumption (in comparison to saline treatment). However, treatment with d-amphetamine and raclopride during ethanol consumption did not cause significant, conditioned changes in palatability as measured by the taste reactivity procedure. These results suggest that dopamine plays a role in the motivation to consume ethanol but this neurotransmitter is not involved in evaluating its incentive value.

Haloperidol administered subchronically reduces the alcohol-deprivation effect in mice

During the pre-experimental phase, hybrid (CBA x C57BL) male mice having had 16 weeks free access to food, water and flavored 30% alcohol were deprived of alcohol for 3 days. The next day they were given free choice between similarly flavored water and 30% alcohol. The mice were divided into two subgroups having (HD) or lacking (LD) the deprivation-induced elevation in alcohol intake during the first 1.5 h of renewed access compared with their intake during the last 22.5 h of first postdeprivation day. In Experiment 1, alcohol naive, LD, and HD mice received daily injections of haloperidol (Haldol; 1 mg/kg) or vehicle during 14 days of abstinence. The behavior of the mice was evaluated in an exploratory cross-maze and inescapable slip funnel test a day after the 13th injection (before the 14th injection). On the first postinjection day, the mice were again given a free choice between flavored water and alcohol. In Experiment 2, all the mice were administered with vehicle during the first 13 days of abstinence. On 14th day, they received an injection of haloperidol (1 mg/kg) or vehicle and a day later were given choice between flavored water and alcohol. Unlike a single injection, the subchronic administration of haloperidol lowered the alcohol intake by HD mice with a more prominent decrease seen during the first 1.5 h than during the last 22.5 h of first postdeprivation day. The alcohol-deprivation effect in HD mice decreased by 79% after subchronic haloperidol. No significant change in alcohol intake was found in alcohol-naive and LD mice. Water intake did not vary systematically. Among the groups, the effect of subchronic haloperidol on the alcohol-deprivation effect did not parallel changes in most of the measures of exploratory or avoidance behavior. It is proposed that haloperidol administered subchronically may attenuate motivation for alcohol.

Mmu and D2 receptor antisense oligonucleotides injected in nucleus accumbens suppress high alcohol intake in genetic drinking HEP rats

Numerous pharmacological and other studies have implicated both Mmu and dopamine receptor subtypes in alcohol consumption. In the genetic drinking rat as well as those chemically induced to drink, evidence has accrued that the abnormal intake of alcohol is underpined by these receptors in the brain. The purpose of this investigation was to demonstrate unequivocally that a biological impairment by antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) targeted specifically to these two receptor subtypes would disrupt ongoing alcohol drinking. In this project, a new strain of female and male high-ethanol preferring (HEP) rats was used that had free access to preferred concentrations of alcohol over water in a two choice paradigm. A guide cannula for a microinjection needle was first implanted bilaterally above the nucleus accumbens (NAC) of each rat. Following recovery, a dose of either 250 or 500 ng of the Mmu ODN or 500 ng D2ODN was microinjected into the NAC of the rat in a volume of 0.8-1.0 microl. A standard temporal sequence was used in which microinjections were given four times at successive 12-h intervals over a 2-day interval. The control mismatch ODNs corresponding to both the Mmu or D2 receptor antisense were microinjected identically at homologous sites in the NAC. Following the experiments, the brain of each rat was removed and sectioned in the coronal plane for histological analysis so that each microinjection site was identified. The results showed that the Mmu receptor antisense caused a significant dose dependent fall in free access alcohol drinking within 12 to 24 h following the initial microinjection. This decline often persisted for 1 to 2 days in terms of both g/kg intake and proportion of alcohol to water consumed. Similarly, the D2 receptor ODN likewise induced an intense and significant decline in both g/kg and proportion measures of alcohol intake. Since the corresponding mismatch ODN for both Mmu and D2 receptors exerted no effect on either of these measures of alcohol consumption, the specificity of molecular action of the respective antisense molecules on drinking behavior of the HEP rats was confirmed. Thus, these results provide the first unequivocal evidence that the genes for D2 and Mmu receptors are fundamentally involved in abnormal alcohol drinking in the genetically predisposed individual. Finally, important new anatomical evidence is introduced for the critical role of the NAC in the genetic basis of aberrant drinking of alcohol.

Voluntary ethanol intake in the rat and the associated accumbal dopamine overflow are blocked by ventral tegmental mecamylamine

The mesocorticolimbic dopamine system is believed to be involved in mediating the positive reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse, including ethanol. The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist mecamylamine perfused via reversed microdialysis in the ventral tegmental area antagonizes the increase of accumbal extracellular dopamine levels after systemic ethanol, and, after systemic injection, lowers ethanol intake in the rat. In the present study the effect of ventral tegmental mecamylamine on ethanol intake and preference, as well as on extracellular accumbal dopamine levels, was investigated in the same animal. To this end, in vivo microdialysis using a double probe approach (one in the nucleus accumbens and one in the ventral tegmental area) was combined with an ethanol preference model invoking a free choice between a bottle of water and a bottle of ethanol 6% (v/v) solution. Wistar rats drinking more than 60% of their total daily fluid intake from the ethanol solution (ethanol high-preferring animals) were selected during a screening period and used for the experiments. The animals received vehicle or mecamylamine (100 microM) in the ventral tegmental area and were then presented with a choice between water and ethanol in a limited access paradigm to which they previously had been adapted. On the next day the rats that received vehicle day 1 now received mecamylamine, and vice versa. When treated with vehicle, ethanol intake and preference were unaltered, as compared to baseline behavior, and accumbal dopamine levels increased significantly to approximately 130% of the pre-drug baseline level. When receiving mecamylamine, ethanol intake and preference were reduced markedly and dopamine levels were unaltered, as compared to pre-drug baseline levels. The present results further indicate that nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the ventral tegmental area are involved in the positive reinforcing effects of ethanol. Thus, mecamylamine or other antagonists specifically aimed at ventral tegmental nicotinic acetylcholine receptors could represent a new pharmacological treatment principle against alcohol abuse, the efficacy of which should be explored in high-scale alcohol consumers or alcoholics.

Disruption of dopamine D1 receptor gene expression attenuates alcohol-seeking behavior

The role of the dopamine D1 receptor subtype in alcohol-seeking behaviors was studied in mice genetically deficient in dopamine D1 receptors (D1 -/-). In two-tube free choice limited (1-5 h) and continuous (24 h) access paradigms, mice were exposed to water and increasing concentrations of ethanol (3%, 6% and 12% w/v). Voluntary ethanol consumption and preference over water were markedly reduced in D1 -/- mice as compared to heterozygous (D1 +/-) and wild-type (D1 +/+) controls, whereas overall fluid consumption was comparable. When offered a single drinking tube containing alcohol as their only source of fluid for 24 h, D1 -/- mice continued to drink significantly less alcohol than D1 +/+ and D1 +/- mice. Dopamine D2 receptor blockade with sulpiride caused a small but significant reduction in alcohol intake and preference in D1 +/+ mice and attenuated residual alcohol drinking in D1 -/- mice. Dopamine D1 receptor blockade with SCH-23390 very effectively reduced alcohol intake in D1 +/+ and D1 +/- mice to the level seen in untreated D1 -/- mice. These findings suggest involvement of both dopamine D1 and D2 receptor mechanisms in alcohol-seeking behavior in mice; however, these implicate D1 receptors as having a more important role in the motivation for alcohol consumption.

Alcohol self-administration: further examination of the role of dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens

One of the functions of the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system is to regulate the process of reinforcement, a process that is thought to influence drug self-administration. This study tested the effects of centrally administered DA receptor ligands on ethanol self-administration behavior. Long-Evans rats were trained to lever press on a fixed-ratio 4 schedule of ethanol (10% v/v) reinforcement. DA agonists and antagonists were then bilaterally microinjected (0.5 microliter/side) into the nucleus accumbens (N Acc) 10-min before sessions to test for effects on the onset, maintenance, and termination of ethanol self-administration. Infusions of the D1-like agonist SKF 38393 (0.03 to 3.0 micrograms) produced no effect on ethanol self-administration. The D1-like antagonist SCH 23390 (0.5 to 2.0 micrograms) reduced total responding by decreasing the time course of self-administration without altering response rate. The D2-like agonist quinpirole produced a biphasic effect on self-administration. Quinpirole (1.0 microgram) increased total responses and response rate, whereas higher doses (4.0 to 10.0 micrograms) decreased total responding as a result of early termination. The D2-like antagonist raclopride (0.1 to 1.0 microgram) reduced total responding by decreasing time course and response rate. Co-administration of either SKF 38393 or SCH 23390 with quinpirole prevented the behavioral effects observed with the low doses of quinpirole. Thus, in the N Acc either increased activation of D1-like receptors or their blockade can affect the expression of the behavioral effects of the D2-like agonist. This suggests that some intermediate level of D1 activation is required to observe the D2 effect. The decreases in total responding produced by raclopride were enhanced by co-administration of SKF 38393, but not altered by SCH 23390, thus suggesting that D1-like and D2-like receptors in the N Acc interact in the regulation of ethanol self-administration in a manner similar to their interactive regulation of other behaviors.

Dopamine receptors in the medial prefrontal cortex influence ethanol and sucrose-reinforced responding

This study tested the role of dopamine receptors in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in the onset, maintenance, and termination of ethanol and sucrose-reinforced responding. Two groups of Long Evans rats were trained to lever press on a fixed-ratio 4 schedule of reinforcement with 10% ethanol (n = 10) or 5% sucrose (n = 5) presented as the reinforcer. After implantation of injector guide cannulae, the D2/3 agonist quinpirole and the D2 antagonist raclopride were administered bilaterally into the mPFC before behavioral sessions. During control conditions, sucrose reinforcement maintained a 2-fold greater number of responses per session than did ethanol reinforcement. Quinpirole (10.0 micrograms/microliter) reduced total ethanol-reinforced responses by delaying response onset and decreasing the duration of responding, but had no effect on response maintenance (i.e., response rate). A higher dose of quinpirole (20.0 micrograms/microliter) decreased total sucrose responses by simultaneously decreasing duration and response rate, without altering response latency. Thus, the effects of quinpirole on ethanol and sucrose-reinforced responding were similar on response total and duration, but differential on response latency and rate. Raclopride (0.05 and 1.0 microgram/microliter) decreased total ethanol responding and rate, but doses as much as 400-fold greater (20.0 micrograms/microliter) did not alter sucrose response totals. Raclopride alone had no effect on response latency or duration measures in either reinforcement condition. Coadministration of raclopride blocked the quinpirole-induced increase in response latency (ethanol reinforcement) and decrease in response rate (sucrose reinforcement), but had no effect on other response measures. These data are consistent with the interpretation that D2 and D3 receptors in the mPFC are differentially involved in ethanol and sucrose response onset and maintenance, but similarly involved in response termination. However, differences in baseline response parameters and group size may have contributed to the observed effects.

Voluntary ethanol intake in the rat: effects of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor blockade or subchronic nicotine treatment

It has been suggested that the mesolimbic dopamine activating and the reinforcing properties of ethanol involve activation of central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. To test this hypothesis, the effects of two nicotinic receptor antagonists and of subchronic nicotine treatment on voluntary ethanol consumption (ethanol 6% v/v or water) were studied in ethanol low-, medium- or high-preferring Wistar rats. After systemic mecamylamine (2 mg/kg) but not hexamethonium (0 mg/kg) high- but not low-preferring rats decreased their ethanol intake but, however, not their ethanol preference. When subchronically exposed to nicotine (0.35 mg/kg, s.c. daily) medium-preferring rats markedly increased their ethanol intake and preference. This effect lasted for more than 1 week after interrupting nicotine administration. Ethanol intake levels did not correlate with locomotor activity scores after nicotine challenge (0.35 mg/kg, s.c.) or with exploratory locomotor activity. However, exploratory locomotor activity correlated with locomotor activity scores both after nicotine (0.35 mg/kg, s.c.) and ethanol (0.125 g/kg i.p.) challenge. Dopamine release, as indicated by accumulation of 3-methoxytyramine after monoamine oxidase inhibition, was increased in the limbic forebrain (including the nucleus accumbens, the olfactory tubercles, the amygdala and the septum) after acute nicotine (0.35 mg/kg s.c.) or ethanol (2.5 g/kg i.p.) in animals subchronically exposed to nicotine compared to subchronically vehicle-treated controls. The present results further implicate central nicotinic receptors in the molecular events mediating the reinforcing properties of ethanol, and suggest that subchronic nicotine enhances the responsiveness of mesolimbic dopamine neurons both to nicotine and to ethanol. Clinical implications are discussed.

An animal model for type 2 alcoholism? Alcohol consumption and aggressive behavior following lesions in the raphe nuclei, medial hypothalamus, or ventral striatum-septal area

Given the conspicuous association between aggressive antisocial traits and alcoholism in men, we investigated whether or not a link between defensive aggressive behavior and homecage alcohol consumption could be demonstrated in the laboratory rat. This was accomplished by observing ethanol intake and hyperreactivity towards the experimenter in rats made hyperdefensive by brain lesions. Rats with medial hypothalamic electrocoagulations showed a remarkable degree of hyperdefensiveness, lasting throughout the entire 6-week postoperative period. Alcohol intake, on the other hand, was not different from sham-operated controls when the beverage was offered as a plain 6% solution or in a 0.2% saccharin vehicle. When subjected to the stress of food restriction, which enhances ethanol intake in normal rats, medial hypothalamic subjects actually decreased their alcohol consumption. Electrolytic lesions in the dorsal and median raphe brought about a transient increase in defensive aggression, but no alteration in ethanol drinking. Animals with ibotenic acid-induced extensive lesions to the ventral striatum and septal area were not only viciously aggressive, but also drank considerably more alcohol than controls. Ibotenic acid-lesioned rats did not respond to the saccharin or food-restriction conditions by increasing their alcohol intake further, perhaps because they drank at a maximal rate already during the plain ethanol-phase of the experiment. These observations show that basal forebrain dysfunction in the rat can give rise to excessive alcohol intake and heightened aggression, a constellation of behavioral symptoms observed in male type 2 alcoholics.

Apomorphine and 7-OH DPAT reduce ethanol intake of P and HAD rats

Adult male rats of the alcohol-preferring (P) line (N = 10) and high alcohol drinking (HAD) line (N = 12) were used to study the effects of IP administration of 0.125-0.50 mg/kg 7-OH DPAT (a putative D agonist) and 0.25-1.0 mg/kg apomorphine (a dopamine agonist with 50-fold higher affinities for the D1 and D2 receptors than for the D3 receptor) on the concurrent intakes of 10% (v/v) ethanol and 0.0125% (g/v) saccharin during a daily 4-h scheduled access period. Control intakes by the P rats for the 4-h period were 17.9 +/- 0.5 and 7.2 +/- 0.4 ml for the ethanol and saccharin solutions, respectively. For the HAD line, ethanol consumption was 18.7 +/- 0.2 ml and saccharin intake was 8.7 +/- 1.6 ml for the 4-h period. In terms of grams ethanol/kg body wt, the 4-h intakes were 2.2 +/- 0.2 for the P line and 3.0 +/- 0.3 for the HAD rats. Both P and HAD rats consumed approximately 40% of their total ethanol intake in the first 15 min of access while consuming only about 15% of their total saccharin intake during this 15-min period. The putative D3 agonist 7-OH DPAT produced a decrease in ethanol intake in the first h to 45-55% of control levels for the P rat (p < 0.01) and to 25-70% of control values in the HAD line (p < 0.001). Apomorphine caused a dose-dependent decrease in ethanol intake in the first hour to 15-70% of control values in the P rat (p < 0.001) and to 25-60% of control levels in the HAD line (p < 0.001). Saccharin and 4-h food intakes for both lines were not altered by either 7-OH DPAT or apomorphine. Overall, these results suggest that D2 and D3 dopamine receptors may play a role in mediating alcohol drinking behavior of the selectively bred HAD and P lines of rats.

Lack of effect of dopamine D2 blockade on ethanol intake in selected and unselected strains of rats

Previous research has suggested that brain catecholamines may be involved in regulating ethanol intake. This study was designed to look more specifically at dopamine (DA) and whether DA D2 receptor blockade with the antagonist pimozide would alter ethanol consumption in rats. Subjects were male Maudsley Reactive and Wistar rats, the former previously shown to consume larger amounts of ethanol than the latter. Both strains were screened for ethanol intake by presentation of ethanol solutions (free choice with water) in increasing steps from 2% to 10% (v/v) on an alternate-day schedule. Following the screening period, animals were switched to a schedule of everyday presentation of the 10% (v/v) ethanol solution (free choice with water) for 10 baseline days. Animals were then divided into high and low drinking levels according to whether their mean baseline ethanol intake (g/kg) fell within +/- 0.5 SD of the mean intake of their group (Maudsley Reactives: mean = 2.55 g/kg, low drinkers < 1.63, high drinkers > 3.47; Wistars: mean = 2.17 g/kg, low drinkers < 1.53, high drinkers > 2.82). The animals were assigned to one of five treatment groups for 5 subsequent days where they received IP injections of pimozide (0.08, 0.24, or 0.48 mg/kg), tartaric acid, or saline. Following the treatment period, ethanol consumption was recorded for 5 posttreatment days. No significant differences due to treatment were observed for either intake or preference of ethanol across treatments, drinking groups, or strains. The results obtained in the present study suggested that interference in DA neurotransmission through administration of the D2 antagonist pimozide does not significantly alter ethanol consumption in either MR or Wistar animals.

Effects of ibotenic acid lesions of the ventral striatum and the medial prefrontal cortex on ethanol consumption in the rat

The purpose of this study was to to assess the effect on ethanol drinking of ibotenic acid lesions in the medial prefrontal cortex and the ventral striatum of female rats with continuous access to water and a 6% ethanol solution. Ibotenic acid infusions in the prefrontal cortex did not affect ethanol intake at any time, but a significant increase in water intake was observed on the third postoperative week. Ventral striatal lesions significantly increased ethanol intake during the first 2 postoperative weeks. On the third week consumption was not significantly different from vehicle-infused controls. Apparently, then, severe excitoxic injury to the ventral striatum is compatible with normal, or increased, intake of ethanol; in contrast, similar lesions reduce the intake of other drugs of abuse such as psychostimulants and opioids.

The role of dopamine in drug abuse viewed from the perspective of its role in motivation

Drugs of abuse share with conventional reinforcers the activation of specific neural pathways in the CNS that are the substrate of their motivational properties. Dopamine is recognized as the transmitter of one such neural pathway, being involved in at least three major aspects of motivation: modulation of motivational state, acquisition (incentive learning) and expression of incentive properties by motivational stimuli. Drugs of abuse of different pharmacological classes stimulate in the low dose range dopamine transmission particularly in the ventral striatum. Apart from psychostimulants, the evidence that stimulation of dopamine transmission by drugs of abuse provides the primary motivational stimulus for drug self-administration is either unconvincing or negative. However, stimulation of dopamine transmission is essential for the activational properties of drugs of abuse and might be instrumental for the acquisition of responding to drug-related incentive stimuli (incentive learning). Dopamine is involved in the induction and in the expression of behavioural sensitization by repeated exposure to various drugs of abuse. Sensitization to the dopamine-stimulant properties of specific drug classes leading to facilitation of incentive learning of drug-related stimuli might account for the strong control over behaviour exerted by these stimuli in the addiction state. Withdrawal from drugs of abuse results in a reduction in basal dopamine transmission in vivo and in reduced responding for conventional reinforcers. Although these changes are likely to be the expression of a state of dependence of the dopamine system their contribution to the motivational state of drug addiction is unclear.

Ethanol, monoamines, and affect

Evidence suggests that ethanol self-administration is directly related to central norepinephrine (NE) activity and inversely related to central serotonin (5-HT) activity. Normal male volunteers participated in a placebo controlled crossover design to assess the effects of 1-tyrosine (TY) and 1-tryptophan (TP) (precursors of catecholamines and 5-HT, respectively) in combination with ethanol, on several neurobehavioral measures. Ethanol by itself produced negative effects on several dimensions of mood. Dysphoria was potentiated by TP in combination with ethanol and either unchanged or attenuated by the combination of TY and ethanol. Ethanol impaired verbal recall, and neither TP nor TY in combination with ethanol altered that impairment. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that 5-HT mediates some of the negative mood effects produced by ethanol or antagonizes some of its positive effects, while NE at least partly mediates ethanol's positive effects on mood. Ethanol's impairment of verbal memory appears to be mediated by mechanisms outside the monoamine systems.

The benzodiazepine inverse agonist RO19-4603 exerts prolonged and selective suppression of ethanol intake in alcohol-preferring (P) rats

The time course of the benzodiazepine (BDZ) inverse agonist RO19-4603 in antagonizing ethanol (EtOH) intake was investigated in alcohol-preferring (P) rats (n = 7) maintained on 24-h continuous free-choice access to EtOH (10% v/v), water, and food. After fluid intakes had stabilized over several weeks, animals were injected with Tween-80 vehicle solution or RO19-4603 (0.075, 0.150, and 0.30 mg/kg). EtOH and water intakes were determined at 8- and 24-h intervals. RO19-4603 caused a marked attenuation of EtOH drinking with each of the doses tested. EtOH intake during the 8-h following 0.075, 0.150, and 0.30 mg/kg RO19-4603 was decreased by approximately 36, 74, and 57%, respectively. Intakes during the 24-h interval were similar to the vehicle control condition. However, 32 h post-drug administration, EtOH intakes were reduced to approximately 27, 31, and 29% following the 0.075, 0.150 and 0.30 mg/kg doses, respectively. To further confirm the reliability of the RO19-4603 dose-response effect, and its selectivity for EtOH, the highest dose condition (0.30 mg/kg) was tested twice. The second 0.30 mg/kg dose condition exerted a profile of effects similar to the initial treatment; 8 h following administration, intake was decreased to 60% of the control level, and 32 h post-drug administration intake was decreased to approximately 46% of the controls. These decreases were evidently selective in comparison with water, since water drinking showed compensatory increases which paralleled the decreased EtOH consumption. Dose-response comparisons indicated that 0.150 mg/kg approaches the maximum effective dose, since the 0.30 mg/kg dose of RO19-4603 did not produce an additional decrease in EtOH intake.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ethanol self-administration in freely feeding and drinking rats: effects of Ro15-4513 alone, and in combination with Ro15-1788 (flumazenil)

Recent work in our laboratory demonstrated that Ro15-4513, a partial inverse benzodiazepine (BDZ) agonist, decreases ethanol (ETOH) self-administration in rodents under fluid deprivation conditions. The present study further examined the effects of Ro15-4513 (2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg) alone and in combination with Ro15-1788, (flumazenil) (8.0 and 16.0 mg/kg), a BDZ receptor antagonist on ETOH self-administration in freely feeding and drinking rats. Animals were trained to consume ETOH (11% v/v) using a limited access procedure. Measurements were taken at 10- and 60-min intervals. Ro15-4513 (2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg) markedly attenuated ETOH consumption at both intervals. The antagonistic actions of Ro15-4513 were completely blocked by the higher dose of flumazenil at both intervals; the lower dose failed to antagonize the Ro15-4513-induced reduction of ETOH intake. When flumazenil was given alone, both doses reduced ETOH self-administration at 60 min; although the magnitude of the antagonism was comparable to that of Ro15-4513 only with the highest does of flumazenil (16.0 mg/kg). Neither Ro15-4513 nor flumazenil alone or in combination significantly altered water intake at any of the tested doses. Rats pretreated with Ro15-4513 showed a substantial reduction in blood ethanol concentration (BEC) compared with the Tween-80 vehicle condition at the 10-min interval. However, the BEC of animals given Ro15-4513 in combination with flumazenil were similar to rats given Tween-80 vehicle. The present study extends our previous research by demonstrating that Ro15-4513 and flumazenil attenuate ETOH self-administration in non-food or water deprived rats.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of ventral striatal 6-OHDA lesions or amphetamine sensitization on ethanol consumption in the rat

Female rats with continuous access to water and 6% ethanol were given bilateral ventral striatal 6-OHDA infusions, which induced pronounced striatal depletions of dopamine. The postoperative ethanol consumption of these rats was not significantly affected in comparison to vehicle-infused controls. In a second experiment, female rats received escalating doses of d-amphetamine over a 5-week period (from 1 to 9 mg/kg/injection). Control females were given saline injections. Following a 3-month drug-free interval, the females were given access to ethanol, the concentration of which was gradually increased from 2% to 12% with weekly intervals. Amphetamine-sensitized rats consumed significantly more alcohol than the saline-treated controls. Taken together, these results suggest that striatal dopaminergic mechanisms, while not necessary for basal ethanol drinking, can facilitate alcohol drinking.

The effects of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens and the mesolimbic dopamine system on oral self-administration of ethanol in the rat

Rats readily learn to self-administer ethanol using a procedure where ethanol is introduced in the presence of a sweetener. After gradual removal of the sweetener, sufficient quantities of ethanol are self-administered in non fluid-, non food-deprived rats to produce reliable blood ethanol concentrations. Previous studies using this self-administration model have shown that dopamine receptor antagonists injected systemically or directly into the terminal regions of the mesolimbic dopamine system decrease lever pressing for ethanol, suggesting an important role for dopamine in ethanol reinforcement. The purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the mesolimbic dopamine system is a critical substrate for ethanol reinforcement. Results of this study show that 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced lesions of the mesolimbic dopamine system, sufficient to produce a 93% depletion of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, an 85% depletion in the olfactory tubercle, an 82% depletion in the frontal cortex and a 78% depletion in the amygdala, failed to alter ethanol self-administration as measured by the total lever presses. However, the 6-OHDA lesion rats showed an altered pattern of responding for ethanol: an increase in the slope of the regression line of cumulative responses vs. time and an increase in the frequency of responding at inter-response intervals of 4-6 and 6-8 s post 6-OHDA lesion; suggesting that this lesion produced a subtle change in motor or attentional function. The results of this study indicate that while the mesolimbic dopamine system may contribute to the reinforcing actions of ethanol, it is not critical for maintaining ethanol reinforcement.

Effects of D1 and D2 dopamine receptor agents on ethanol consumption in the high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) line of rats

Dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists were tested for effects on alcohol drinking in female HAD rats (n = 10) given limited access (4 h/day) to a 10% (v/v) ethanol solution. Food and water were available ad libitum. Subcutaneous drug injections were given 30-60 min before the ethanol access periods. The D2 agonist quinpirole (0.04-2.0 mg/kg) caused a dose-dependent decrease in alcohol drinking throughout the 4-h period. Spiperone, a D2 antagonist, had no effect during the initial part of the session, but by the fourth hour, the 10 micrograms/kg dose tended to increase alcohol intake and the 30 micrograms/kg dose reduced intake. The D1 antagonist SCH-23390 (3-30 micrograms/kg) dose-dependently decreased ethanol drinking during the first hour of access. The D1 agonist SKF-38393 (2-6 mg/kg) also decreased alcohol intake, but it was less effective than SCH-23390. The findings implicate both D1 and D2 receptors in the reinforcing effects of alcohol drinking by the HAD line of rats.

SDZ-205,152, a novel dopamine receptor agonist, reduces oral ethanol self-administration in rats

The effects of SDZ-205,152, a synthetic mixed D1/D2 dopamine receptor agonist, was investigated in rats trained to orally self-administer ethanol (10% w/v) in a free-choice, two-lever operant task. Pretreatment with SDZ-205,152, at doses of 0.5-5.0 mg/kg subcutaneously 30 min prior to limited access to 10% ethanol and water, selectively reduced ethanol-reinforced responding without affecting responses for water. These results demonstrate that ethanol-reinforced responding was attenuated by SDZ-205,152 and suggests that dopamine neural systems may mediate, in part, the reinforcing properties associated with voluntary ethanol self-administration.

Effect of dopamine agonists and antagonists on ethanol-reinforced behavior: the involvement of the nucleus accumbens

Rats initiated to self-administer 10% ethanol (v/v) in an operant situation using the sucrose-substitution technique received bilateral n. accumbens or caudate nucleus microinjections of d-amphetamine (4, 10, and 20 micrograms/brain), quinpirole (4 micrograms/brain), and/or raclopride (0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 micrograms/brain). Only microinjections into the n. accumbens produced changes in rate and pattern of responding. With d-amphetamine, an increase in total responding and a slowing of initial response rate was seen, whereas with raclopride administration a dose-related decrease in total responding was observed with no alteration in momentary response rates. Drug-dependent behavioral rate and pattern differences suggest that DA activity in the n. accumbens influences ethanol reinforced behavior.

Alcohol Self-Administration: Role of Mesolimbic Dopamine

It appears clear that ethanol reinforcement, like that of many abused drugs, utilizes the mesolimbic DA pathways. From the data presented on microinjection of DA agonists and antagonists, it would seem that only part of the regulatory process controlling ethanol drinking is directly involved with this pathway. Once drinking has begun, the DA antagonist raclopride results in a rapid termination of drinking. This appears to be a blocking effect of what may be conditioned reinforcement resulting from prior ethanol reinforcement initiation procedures. Microinjection of the DA agonists d-amphetamine and quinpirole prolonged drinking, with little signs of normal termination apparent in the 30-min session in many animals. This appeared to be the result of interference with normal termination processes. While it remains to be demonstrated that oral ethanol consumption results in the release of DA in the nucleus accumbens, evidence from prior work and the present studies support a role for the mesolimbic DA system in ethanol reinforcement.

Oral ethanol self-administration in rats is reduced by the administration of dopamine and glutamate receptor antagonists into the nucleus accumbens

The purpose of this study was to assess the role of endogenous dopamine and glutamate systems within the nucleus accumbens in modulating responses for oral ethanol reinforcements (10% w/v) in a free-choice operant task. Pretreatment with both systemic (100 micrograms/kg) and intra-nucleus accumbens microinjection of fluphenazine (2 and 4 micrograms), a dopamine receptor antagonist, significantly decreased responding for ethanol, without significantly affecting responses for water. Ethanol self-administration was also attenuated by microinjection into the nucleus accumbens of 2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acid (AP-5, 3 and 6 micrograms), a competitive NMDA receptor antagonist. These results suggest that dopamine and glutamate neurotransmission in the nucleus accumbens may regulate ethanol self-administration and its reinforcing effects.

Opioidergic, serotonergic, and dopaminergic manipulations and rats' intake of a sweetened alcoholic beverage

Groups of rats were maintained on a daily regimen of 22 h of water deprivation followed by a 2-h opportunity to take either water or a sweetened ethanol solution (ES). In one experiment, it was shown that previous morphine (M) dependence had no effect on initial daily intakes of fluids. After stable ES intakes were achieved, a variety of pharmacological manipulations were assessed for their effects on intake of the ES. Nalmefene, an opioid antagonist, dose-relatedly decreased intakes of ES, and was effective across days of injections. Fluoxetine (FX), a serotonergic reuptake inhibitor, also reduced ES intakes dose relatedly, and across days of injections, but the reduction was not as great as that seen with opioid antagonists. A small dose of M increased ES intakes when given in combination with an ineffective dose of FX, just as it does by itself. However, M had no effect on ES intakes in combination with an effective dose of FX. Pimozide (PIM), a dopaminergic antagonist, dose-relatedly decreased intakes of ES and water, and responding for positively reinforcing intracranial stimulation (ICS). When given in combination, M blunted PIM's reduction of ES intake, but had no effect on PIM's ability to decrease either intake of water or responding for ICS. Amphetamine did not reliably affect rats' intakes of ES across a range of doses. The data, in addition to previous work, lead to the idea that endogenous opioid systems are more salient, with respect to intake of alcoholic beverages, than the other tested neurotransmitter systems. Furthermore, the collective data suggest that a long-lasting opioid antagonist may be an effective pharmacological adjunct to other treatments for alcohol abuse and alcoholism.

Tests of opioid deficiency hypotheses of alcoholism

Eighty-three male rats were maintained on a daily regimen involving 22 h of deprivation of fluids followed by 2 h of access to water and a sweetened alcoholic beverage (12% ethanol, 5% sucrose). After about 3 weeks of such a regimen, rats eventually take considerable amounts of ethanol daily. In the present study, a series of injections of opioids was given subsequent to establishing stable daily intakes of ethanol. Specifically, before a day's opportunity to take fluids, some rats were given a small dose of morphine (2.0 mg/kg), while others were given a dose of naloxone (4.0 mg/kg). When morphine was given 0.5 h before the opportunity to drink, intake of ethanol was increased. However, when morphine was given 4.0 h before the opportunity, intake of ethanol was decreased. Nearly opposite effects were observed when naloxone was given. Other experiments tested the effects of giving morphine 4.0 h before the opportunity to drink plus the effects of a small dose of naloxone or plus the effects of a small dose of morphine. Morphine given 4.0 h before potentiated the effects of a small dose of naloxone and attenuated the effects of another dose of morphine. The effects of morphine were also shown to be similar among rats taking a solution of ethanol and water rather than a sweetened solution. These data provide support for the idea that surfeits, not deficits, in opioidergic activity increase propensity to take alcoholic beverages.

Free-choice responding for ethanol versus water in alcohol preferring (P) and unselected Wistar rats is differentially modified by naloxone, bromocriptine, and methysergide

The role of opioids, dopamine and serotonin in ethanol (EtOH) reward and preference was investigated in non-deprived, Alcohol-Preferring (P), and genetically heterogenous Wistar rats. Operant responding for ethanol was initiated using sweet-solution substitution procedures. The rats were then trained in 30-min daily sessions to respond for ethanol (10% v/v) versus water under a two-lever, free-choice contingency. All testing was conducted in the absence of water and food deprivation or addition of sweeteners to the ethanol drinking solution. Rats of both strains developed stable preferences in responding for ethanol over water and consumed ethanol at quantities sufficient to produce pharmacologically relevant mean blood alcohol concentrations (P-Rats: 98 +/- 19.6 mg%; unselected Wistars: 41.7 +/- 8.5 mg%). In P-rats, systemic naloxone (NAL; 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) pretreatments resulted in a dose-dependent suppression in responding for both ethanol and water, but did not alter ethanol preference (expressed as percent ethanol of total intake). In contrast, bromocriptine (BRO; 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg) produced a significant, dose-dependent shift in preference from ethanol toward water by inhibiting responding for ethanol while enhancing water consumption. In unselected Wistar rats, NAL and BRO treatments produced changes in ethanol preference patterns similar to those observed in P-rats. However, compared to P-rats, these changes were smaller and not consistently dose dependent. No changes in ethanol preference and water or ethanol intake were observed with methysergide (MET; 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 mg/kg) in either strain of rat. Together, the results suggest a possible involvement of dopaminergic mechanisms in the reinforcing properties of ethanol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of dopaminergic agents on alcohol consumption by rats in a limited access paradigm

The effects of several dopaminergic drugs on alcohol consumption were studied in free-feeding rats using a limited access paradigm. Ascending doses of amphetamine (0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg), SKF 38393 (a D1 receptor agonist - 0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg), quinpirole (LY 171555, a D2 receptor agonist - 0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg), SCH 23,390 (a D1 receptor blocker, 0.003, 0.01, 0.03 and 0.1 mg/kg) and spiperone (a D2 receptor blocker, 0.003, 0.01, 0.03 and 0.1 mg/kg) were administered IP to rats approximately 30 min prior to their 1-h per day access to alcohol. Each dose was administered for 5 successive days, and the effects of the drugs were compared to those of respective saline or 0.4% lactic acid solution controls. Although there was an overall significant dose effect of amphetamine on alcohol consumption, no single dose altered alcohol consumption significantly from baseline. SKF 38,393 specifically decreased alcohol consumption at the highest dose of 3 mg/kg. Quinpirole significantly increased water consumption at the highest dose but had no effect on alcohol consumption. The antagonist haloperidol decreased alcohol consumption but only at doses that also reduced water consumption. The specific antagonists SCH 23,390 and spiperone decreased water consumption at the highest doses tested without modifying alcohol consumption. Taken together, these data suggest that dopamine does not play as critical a role in mediating the reinforcing effects of alcohol (insofar as they are reflected by alcohol consumption) as it does in relation to other psychoactive drugs, particularly the psychomotor stimulants.

The role of reward pathways in the development of drug dependence

In commenting on the discovery of "opiate" receptors, Goldstein (1976) said: "It seemed unlikely, a priori, that such highly stereospecific receptors should have been developed by nature to interact with alkaloids from the opium poppy" (p. 1081). Endogenous opioid peptides and opioid receptor systems have now been identified in invertebrates that are unlikely to have had ancestors exposed to opium poppies (Kavaliers et al., 1983; Kream et al., 1980; Leung and Stefano, 1984; Stefano et al., 1980). Moreover, endogenous opioids play a role in stress-induced feeding in the slug (Kavaliers and Hirst, 1986) just as they play a role in stress-induced feeding in rodents (Lowy et al., 1980; Morley and Levine, 1980). If we are to understand the actions of opiates and other drugs of abuse we must understand them in terms of their abilities to interact with neural systems that evolved in the service of primitive biological functions, long before any serious incidence of addiction itself. The most primitive axes of the biological substrates of behavior are the axes of approach and withdrawal. Addictive drugs appear to be able to activate the mechanisms of approach, which is termed "positive reinforcement" and to inhibit the mechanisms of withdrawal, which is termed "negative reinforcement." Anatomically distinct sets of pathways have evolved to serve these two forms of reward. Activation of the medial forebrain bundle and associated structures serves positive reinforcement and induces forward locomotion. Approach and forward locomotion are the unconditioned responses to positive reinforcing stimuli such as food and sex partners, and approach to environmental objects and positive reinforcement is induced by electrical stimulation of this structure. The locomotor stimulating effects and the positive reinforcing effects of opiates and psychomotor stimulants result from their activation of this mechanism; stimulants activate the mechanism at the level of dopaminergic synapses of the nucleus accumbens, frontal cortex, and perhaps other forebrain structures, while opiates activate the system at two points: at the level of the dopaminergic synapse and at the level of the afferents to the dopaminergic cell bodies. Ethanol, nicotine, caffeine and phencyclidine stimulate both locomotor activity and dopamine turnover, but their sites of interaction with reward pathways have not yet been identified. Benzodiazepines and barbiturates stimulate locomotor activity without stimulating dopamine turnover; they may interact with reward pathways at a synapse efferent to the dopaminergic link in the pathways.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Methadone, pentobarbital, pimozide and ethanol-intake

For 28 days, water-deprived rats were given a daily, 1-hr opportunity to take a sweetened ethanol solution (ES) or water. Across days under this regimen, rats gained weight normally and increased intake of ES until they were taking considerable amounts. Across the next 13 days of the regimen, selected groups were given, before the opportunity to drink, one of five doses of methadone (from 0.5 to 8.0 mg/kg), pentobarbital (from 5 to 30 mg/kg), or their vehicles. Large doses of both agents increased intakes, with methadone (1 and 2 mg/kg) increasing only ES-intake. Subsequently, while the daily regimen continued, rats were given pimozide (0.2, 0.4, or 0.6 mg/kg) at either 1 or 4 hr before the opportunity to drink. Pimozide did not reduce ES-intake. Next, they were given a dose of pentobarbital (5.0 mg/kg) with challenge doses of naloxone (0.3, 1.0, 3.0 mg/kg). Naloxone dose-relatedly antagonized pentobarbital's potential to increase intakes.

Effect of pimozide on home cage ethanol drinking in the rat: dependence on drinking session length

A stimulus-fading procedure was used to initiate ethanol drinking in free-feeding Long Evans rats. During daily half-hour drinking sessions in the home cage, a combination of sucrose and ethanol was first presented to the rats; gradually the sucrose concentration was reduced and the ethanol concentration increased until after 7 weeks the rats were drinking 10% ethanol with no sucrose. After stabilization of intake, either pimozide (PIM, 0.25, 0.50 and 1.00 mg/kg) was injected 4 h before drinking sessions or (d)-amphetamine (DEX, 0.25 and 0.50 mg/kg) was injected 15 min before sessions. The 0.50 and 1.00 mg/kg PIM doses and the 0.50 DEX dose significantly reduced intake compared to vehicle injections. In the second part of the experiment, the rats were given 24-h access to 10% ethanol and water in a two-bottle choice procedure. In this condition, 0.50 mg/kg PIM failed to reduce intake compared to vehicle. The critical difference between the two procedures seems to be that with the 30-min sessions, PIM injections were timed to have their maximal effect during testing. With 24-h sessions, decreases in intake produced by PIM could have been compensated for by increases after the drug had worn off. The hypothesis that dopamine is necessary for ethanol reinforcement receives support from the PIM effect on the 30-min sessions. The DEX effect extends the generality of our previous finding that DEX reduces ethanol-reinforced lever pressing in free-feeding rats.

Striatal dopamine does not appear involved in the voluntary intake of ethanol by rats

Ethanol preferring and non preferring rats were selected. Ethanol preferring rats showed a constant voluntary intake of a 12% ethanol solution during 14 days (about 5 g/kg body weight daily) while the non preferring rats drank less than 1 g/kg body weight daily. Preferring rats were daily IP injected with 5 or 10 mg/kg of nomifensine, an inhibitor of dopamine uptake. Their intake of ethanol solution remained constant during the 14 days of treatment. Dopamine uptake into striatal synaptosomes was identical in ethanol preferring and non preferring rats. These data, as others, led us to suppose that striatal dopamine is not involved in the voluntary intake of ethanol by rats.

Oral ethanol reinforcement in the rat: effects of acute amphetamine

Six male Long Evans rats, reduced to 80% body weight by food restriction, were trained to lever press using 5% ethanol and water reinforcement on a concurrent FR8 FR8 schedule. After responding had stabilized, d-amphetamine (0.25 mg/kg, 0.50 mg/kg, and 1.00 mg/kg) or drug vehicle was injected 15 minutes before the 30-minute sessions. In comparison with the vehicle injections, the 0.25 mg/kg amphetamine dose was followed by a nonsignificant trend towards increased ethanol responding, the 0.50 mg/kg dose produced no trend, and the 1.00 mg/kg dose significantly decreased ethanol responding. These effects resemble those of amphetamine on food responding by food-deprived rats. Since both ethanol and amphetamine act upon brain catecholamine systems, possible involvement of catecholamines in reinforcement and arousal was discussed in relation to these results.

The influence of haloperidol and aminooxyacetic acid on etonitazene, alcohol, diazepam and barbital consumption

Four groups of rats were given free choice between water and solutions of either 3 micrograms/ml etonitazene, 5% ethanol (v/v), 0.1 mg/ml diazepam or 3 mg/ml barbital for 10-14 days. With the exception of barbital, some rats spontaneously preferred the drug solutions to water. This preference was reduced by addition of 7 micrograms/ml haolperidol. In a forced drug fluid consumption procedure, the daily administration of 15 mg/kg i.p. of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-transaminase blocker aminooxyacetic acid (AOAA) led to a reduction of ethanol and diazepam intake, but not of etonitazene and barbital. It is suggested that the diminished consumption of ethanol and diazepam as caused by GABA-T-inhibition may also be mediated by dopamine which seems to act indirectly, via benzodiazepine receptors and GABA neurons.

Attenuation by antidepressant drugs of alcohol intake in rats

Ethanol preferring rats were selected and showed a constant voluntary intake of a 12% ethanol solution during 14 days (about 5 g/kg body weight daily). These alcohol preferring rats were daily IP injected during two weeks with different antidepressant drugs, according to their specificity of action: nomifensine (5 and 10 mg/kg) and maprotiline (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) (dopamine uptake inhibitors), desipramine and metapramine (5 and 10 mg/kg) (noradrenaline uptake inhibitors) clomipramine and doxepin (5 and 10 mg/kg) (serotonin uptake inhibitors). Only desipramine, 5 and 10 mg/kg, metapramine, 10 mg/kg, clomipramine, 5 and 10 mg/kg and doxepin, 10 mg/kg, were able to reduce significantly the ethanol intake. These drugs specifically inhibit noradrenaline or serotonin uptake. These data lead us to think that norepinephrine and/or serotonin, but not dopamine, are involved in the voluntary intake of alcohol.