GABA interacts with photic signaling in the suprachiasmatic nucleus to regulate circadian phase shifts

GABAA receptors in epilepsy: Elucidating phenotypic divergence through functional analysis of genetic variants

Normal brain function requires a tightly regulated balance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmissions. γ-Aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors represent the major class of inhibitory ion channels in the mammalian brain. Dysregulation of these receptors and/or their associated pathways is strongly implicated in the pathophysiology of epilepsy. To date, hundreds of different GABAA receptor subunit variants have been associated with epilepsy, making them a prominent cause of genetically linked epilepsy. While identifying these genetic variants is crucial for accurate diagnosis and effective genetic counselling, it does not necessarily lead to improved personalised treatment options. This is because the identification of a variant does not reveal how the function of GABAA receptors is affected. Genetic variants in GABAA receptor subunits can cause complex changes to receptor properties resulting in various degrees of gain-of-function, loss-of-function or a combination of both. Understanding how variants affect the function of GABAA receptors therefore represents an important first step in the ongoing development of precision therapies. Furthermore, it is important to ensure that functional data are produced using methodologies that allow genetic variants to be classified using clinical guidelines such as those developed by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. This article will review the current knowledge in the field and provide recommendations for future functional analysis of genetic GABAA receptor variants.

Circadian neurogenetics and its implications in neurophysiology, behavior, and chronomedicine

The circadian rhythm affects multiple physiological processes, and disruption of the circadian system can be involved in a range of disease-related pathways. The genetic underpinnings of the circadian rhythm have been well-studied in model organisms. Significant progress has been made in understanding how clock genes affect the physiological functions of the nervous system. In addition, circadian timing is becoming a key factor in improving drug efficacy and reducing drug toxicity. The circadian biology of the target cell determines how the organ responds to the drug at a specific time of day, thus regulating pharmacodynamics. The current review brings together recent advances that have begun to unravel the molecular mechanisms of how the circadian clock affects neurophysiological and behavioral processes associated with human brain diseases. We start with a brief description of how the ubiquitous circadian rhythms are regulated at the genetic, cellular, and neural circuit levels, based on knowledge derived from extensive research on model organisms. We then summarize the latest findings from genetic studies of human brain disorders, focusing on the role of human clock gene variants in these diseases. Lastly, we discuss the impact of common dietary factors and medications on human circadian rhythms and advocate for a broader application of the concept of chronomedicine.

Misalignment of Circadian Rhythms in Diet-Induced Obesity

The biological clocks of the circadian timing system coordinate cellular and physiological processes and synchronize them with daily cycles. While the central clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is mainly synchronized by the light/dark cycles, the peripheral clocks react to other stimuli, including the feeding/fasting state, nutrients, sleep-wake cycles, and physical activity. During the disruption of circadian rhythms due to genetic mutations or social and occupational obligations, incorrect arrangement between the internal clock system and environmental rhythms leads to the development of obesity. Desynchronization between the central and peripheral clocks by altered timing of food intake and diet composition leads to uncoupling of the peripheral clocks from the central pacemaker and to the development of metabolic disorders. The strong coupling of the SCN to the light-dark cycle creates a situation of misalignment when food is ingested during the "wrong" time of day. Food-anticipatory activity is mediated by a self-sustained circadian timing, and its principal component is a food-entrainable oscillator. Modifying the time of feeding alone greatly affects body weight, whereas ketogenic diet (KD) influences circadian biology, through the modulation of clock gene expression. Night-eating behavior is one of the causes of circadian disruption, and night eaters have compulsive and uncontrolled eating with severe obesity. By contrast, time-restricted eating (TRE) restores circadian rhythms through maintaining an appropriate daily rhythm of the eating-fasting cycle. The hypothalamus has a crucial role in the regulation of energy balance rather than food intake. While circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK) expression levels increase with high-fat diet-induced obesity, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARα) increases the transcriptional level of brain and muscle aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT)-like 1 (BMAL1) in obese subjects. In this context, effective timing of chronotherapies aiming to correct SCN-driven rhythms depends on an accurate assessment of the SCN phase. In fact, in a multi-oscillator system, local rhythmicity and its disruption reflects the disruption of either local clocks or central clocks, thus imposing rhythmicity on those local tissues, whereas misalignment of peripheral oscillators is due to exosome-based intercellular communication.Consequently, disruption of clock genes results in dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and obesity, while light exposure during the daytime, food intake during the daytime, and sleeping during the biological night promote circadian alignment between the central and peripheral clocks. Thus, shift work is associated with an increased risk of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases because of unusual eating times as well as unusual light exposure and disruption of the circadian rhythm.

Systematic review of drugs that modify the circadian system's phase-shifting responses to light exposure

We searched PubMed for primary research quantifying drug modification of light-induced circadian phase-shifting in rodents. This search, conducted for work published between 1960 and 2018, yielded a total of 146 papers reporting results from 901 studies. Relevant articles were those with any extractable data on phase resetting in wildtype (non-trait selected) rodents administered a drug, alongside a vehicle/control group, near or at the time of exposure. Most circadian pharmacology experiments were done using drugs thought to act directly on either the brain's central pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the SCN's primary relay, the retinohypothalamic tract, secondary pathways originating from the medial/dorsal raphe nuclei and intergeniculate leaflet, or the brain's sleep-arousal centers. While the neurotransmitter systems underlying these circuits were of particular interest, including those involving glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, serotonin, and acetylcholine, other signaling modalities have also been assessed, including agonists and antagonists of receptors linked to dopamine, histamine, endocannabinoids, adenosine, opioids, and second-messenger pathways downstream of glutamate receptor activation. In an effort to identify drugs that unduly influence circadian responses to light, we quantified the net effects of each drug class by ratioing the size of the phase-shift observed after administration to that observed with vehicle in a given experiment. This allowed us to organize data across the literature, compare the relative efficacy of one mechanism versus another, and clarify which drugs might best suppress or potentiate phase resetting. Aggregation of the available data in this manner suggested that several candidates might be clinically relevant as auxiliary treatments to suppress ectopic light responses during shiftwork or amplify the circadian effects of timed bright light therapy. Future empirical research will be necessary to validate these possibilities.

Modelling the functional roles of synaptic and extra-synaptic γ-aminobutyric acid receptor dynamics in circadian timekeeping

In the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a primary neurotransmitter. GABA can signal through two types of GABAA receptor subunits, often referred to as synaptic GABAA (gamma subunit) and extra-synaptic GABAA (delta subunit). To test the functional roles of these distinct GABAA in regulating circadian rhythms, we developed a multicellular SCN model where we could separately compare the effects of manipulating GABA neurotransmitter or receptor dynamics. Our model predicted that blocking GABA signalling modestly increased synchrony among circadian cells, consistent with published SCN pharmacology. Conversely, the model predicted that lowering GABAA receptor density reduced firing rate, circadian cell fraction, amplitude and synchrony among individual neurons. When we tested these predictions, we found that the knockdown of delta GABAA reduced the amplitude and synchrony of clock gene expression among cells in SCN explants. The model further predicted that increasing gamma GABAA densities could enhance synchrony, as opposed to increasing delta GABAA densities. Overall, our model reveals how blocking GABAA receptors can modestly increase synchrony, while increasing the relative density of gamma over delta subunits can dramatically increase synchrony. We hypothesize that increased gamma GABAA density in the winter could underlie the tighter phase relationships among SCN cells.

Distinct feedback actions of behavioural arousal to the master circadian clock in nocturnal and diurnal mammals

The master clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus provides a temporal pattern of sleep and wake that - like many other behavioural and physiological rhythms - is oppositely phased in nocturnal and diurnal animals. The SCN primarily uses environmental light, perceived through the retina, to synchronize its endogenous circadian rhythms with the exact 24 h light/dark cycle of the outside world. The light responsiveness of the SCN is maximal during the night in both nocturnal and diurnal species. Behavioural arousal during the resting period not only perturbs sleep homeostasis, but also acts as a potent non-photic synchronizing cue. The feedback action of arousal on the SCN is mediated by processes involving several brain nuclei and neurotransmitters, which ultimately change the molecular functions of SCN pacemaker cells. Arousing stimuli during the sleeping period differentially affect the circadian system of nocturnal and diurnal species, as evidenced by the different circadian windows of sensitivity to behavioural arousal. In addition, arousing stimuli reduce and increase light resetting in nocturnal and diurnal species, respectively. It is important to address further question of circadian impairments associated with shift work and trans-meridian travel not only in the standard nocturnal laboratory animals but also in diurnal animal models.

The Therapeutic Potential of Neuronal K-Cl Co-Transporter KCC2 in Huntington's Disease and Its Comorbidities

Intracellular chloride levels in the brain are regulated primarily through the opposing effects of two cation-chloride co-transporters (CCCs), namely K+-Cl- co-transporter-2 (KCC2) and Na+-K+-Cl- co-transporter-1 (NKCC1). These CCCs are differentially expressed throughout the course of development, thereby determining the excitatory-to-inhibitory γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) switch. GABAergic excitation (depolarisation) is important in controlling the healthy development of the nervous system; as the brain matures, GABAergic inhibition (hyperpolarisation) prevails. This developmental switch in excitability is important, as uncontrolled regulation of neuronal excitability can have implications for health. Huntington's disease (HD) is an example of a genetic disorder whereby the expression levels of KCC2 are abnormal due to mutant protein interactions. Although HD is primarily considered a motor disease, many other clinical manifestations exist; these often present in advance of any movement abnormalities. Cognitive change, in addition to sleep disorders, is prevalent in the HD population; the effect of uncontrolled KCC2 function on cognition and sleep has also been explored. Several mechanisms by which KCC2 expression is reduced have been proposed recently, thereby suggesting extensive investigation of KCC2 as a possible therapeutic target for the development of pharmacological compounds that can effectively treat HD co-morbidities. Hence, this review summarizes the role of KCC2 in the healthy and HD brain, and highlights recent advances that attest to KCC2 as a strong research and therapeutic target candidate.

Seasonality and light phase-resetting in the mammalian circadian rhythm

We study the impact of light on the mammalian circadian system using the theory of phase response curves. Using a recently developed ansatz we derive a low-dimensional macroscopic model for the core circadian clock in mammals. Significantly, the variables and parameters in our model have physiological interpretations and may be compared with experimental results. We focus on the effect of four key factors which help shape the mammalian phase response to light: heterogeneity in the population of oscillators, the structure of the typical light phase response curve, the fraction of oscillators which receive direct light input and changes in the coupling strengths associated with seasonal day-lengths. We find these factors can explain several experimental results and provide insight into the processing of light information in the mammalian circadian system. In particular, we find that the sensitivity of the circadian system to light may be modulated by changes in the relative coupling forces between the light sensing and non-sensing populations. Finally, we show how seasonal day-length, after-effects to light entrainment and seasonal variations in light sensitivity in the mammalian circadian clock are interrelated.

Ion Channels Controlling Circadian Rhythms in Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Excitability

Animals synchronize to the environmental day-night cycle by means of an internal circadian clock in the brain. In mammals, this timekeeping mechanism is housed in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus and is entrained by light input from the retina. One output of the SCN is a neural code for circadian time, which arises from the collective activity of neurons within the SCN circuit and comprises two fundamental components: 1) periodic alterations in the spontaneous excitability of individual neurons that result in higher firing rates during the day and lower firing rates at night, and 2) synchronization of these cellular oscillations throughout the SCN. In this review, we summarize current evidence for the identity of ion channels in SCN neurons and the mechanisms by which they set the rhythmic parameters of the time code. During the day, voltage-dependent and independent Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ currents, as well as several K⁺ currents, contribute to increased membrane excitability and therefore higher firing frequency. At night, an increase in different K⁺ currents, including Ca²⁺-activated BK currents, contribute to membrane hyperpolarization and decreased firing. Layered on top of these intrinsically regulated changes in membrane excitability, more than a dozen neuromodulators influence action potential activity and rhythmicity in SCN neurons, facilitating both synchronization and plasticity of the neural code.

A Symphony of Signals: Intercellular and Intracellular Signaling Mechanisms Underlying Circadian Timekeeping in Mice and Flies

The central pacemakers of circadian timekeeping systems are highly robust yet adaptable, providing the temporal coordination of rhythms in behavior and physiological processes in accordance with the demands imposed by environmental cycles. These features of the central pacemaker are achieved by a multi-oscillator network in which individual cellular oscillators are tightly coupled to the environmental day-night cycle, and to one another via intercellular coupling. In this review, we will summarize the roles of various neurotransmitters and neuropeptides in the regulation of circadian entrainment and synchrony within the mammalian and Drosophila central pacemakers. We will also describe the diverse functions of protein kinases in the relay of input signals to the core oscillator or the direct regulation of the molecular clock machinery.

Functional Significance of the Excitatory Effects of GABA in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus

Over 90% of neurons within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) express γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Although GABA is primarily an inhibitory neurotransmitter, in vitro studies suggest that the activation of GABA_A receptors (GABA_AR) elicits excitation in the adult SCN. The ratio of excitatory to inhibitory responses to GABA depends on the balance of chloride influx by Na⁺-K⁺-Cl^- cotransporter 1 (NKCC1) and chloride efflux by K⁺-Cl^- cotransporters (KCCs). Excitatory responses to GABA can be blocked by inhibition of the inward chloride cotransporter, NKCC1, with the loop diuretic bumetanide. Here we investigated the role of NKCC1 activity in phase shifting the circadian pacemaker in response to photic and nonphotic signals in male Syrian hamsters housed in constant darkness. In the early subjective night (CT 13.5), injection of bumetanide into the SCN reduced light-induced phase delays. However, during the late subjective night (CT 19), bumetanide administration did not alter light-induced phase advances. Injection of bumetanide during the subjective day (CT 6) did not alter the phase of free-running circadian rhythms but attenuated phase advances induced by injection of the GABA_AR agonist muscimol into the SCN. These data support the hypothesis that the excitatory effects of endogenously released GABA contribute to the ability of light to induce phase delays, thereby contributing to the most important function of the circadian system, its entrainment with the day-night cycle. Further, the finding that bumetanide inhibits the phase-advancing effects of muscimol during the subjective day supports the hypothesis that the excitatory responses to GABA also contribute to the ability of nonphotic stimuli to phase shift the circadian pacemaker.

Temporal Regulation of GABAA Receptor Subunit Expression: Role in Synaptic and Extrasynaptic Communication in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus

Recent molecular studies suggest that the expression levels of δ and γ2 GABA_A receptor (GABA_AR) subunits regulate the balance between synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA neurotransmission in multiple brain regions. We investigated the expression of GABA_Aδ and GABA_Aγ2 and the functional significance of a change in balance between these subunits in a robust local GABA network contained within the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus (SCN). Muscimol, which can activate both synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA_ARs, injected into the SCN during the day phase advanced the circadian pacemaker, whereas injection of the extrasynaptic GABA_A superagonist 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo(5,4-c)pyridin-3-ol (THIP) had no effect on circadian phase. In contrast, injection of either THIP or muscimol during the night was sufficient to block the phase shifting effects of light. Gene expression analysis of the whole SCN revealed different temporal patterns in GABA_Aδ and GABA_Aγ2 mRNA expression. When examined across all subregions of the SCN, quantitative immunohistochemical analysis found no significant variations in GABA_Aδ protein immunoreactivity (IR) but did find significant variations in GABA_Aγ2 protein-IR in hamsters housed in either LD cycles or in constant darkness. Remarkably, significant interactions in the ratio of GABA_Aδ:GABA_Aγ2 subunits between lighting condition and circadian phase occurred only within one highly discrete anatomical area of the SCN; a region that functions as the input for lighting information from the retina. Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that the balance between synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA_ARs determines the functional response to GABA, and that this balance is differentially regulated in a region-specific manner.

Circadian Rhythms in Diet-Induced Obesity

The biological clocks of the circadian timing system coordinate cellular and physiological processes and synchronizes these with daily cycles, feeding patterns also regulates circadian clocks. The clock genes and adipocytokines show circadian rhythmicity. Dysfunction of these genes are involved in the alteration of these adipokines during the development of obesity. Food availability promotes the stimuli associated with food intake which is a circadian oscillator outside of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Its circadian rhythm is arranged with the predictable daily mealtimes. Food anticipatory activity is mediated by a self-sustained circadian timing and its principal component is food entrained oscillator. However, the hypothalamus has a crucial role in the regulation of energy balance rather than food intake. Fatty acids or their metabolites can modulate neuronal activity by brain nutrient-sensing neurons involved in the regulation of energy and glucose homeostasis. The timing of three-meal schedules indicates close association with the plasma levels of insulin and preceding food availability. Desynchronization between the central and peripheral clocks by altered timing of food intake and diet composition can lead to uncoupling of peripheral clocks from the central pacemaker and to the development of metabolic disorders. Metabolic dysfunction is associated with circadian disturbances at both central and peripheral levels and, eventual disruption of circadian clock functioning can lead to obesity. While CLOCK expression levels are increased with high fat diet-induced obesity, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha increases the transcriptional level of brain and muscle ARNT-like 1 (BMAL1) in obese subjects. Consequently, disruption of clock genes results in dyslipidemia, insulin resistance and obesity. Modifying the time of feeding alone can greatly affect body weight. Changes in the circadian clock are associated with temporal alterations in feeding behavior and increased weight gain. Thus, shift work is associated with increased risk for obesity, diabetes and cardio-vascular diseases as a result of unusual eating time and disruption of circadian rhythm.

The dynamics of GABA signaling: Revelations from the circadian pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

Virtually every neuron within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) communicates via GABAergic signaling. The extracellular levels of GABA within the SCN are determined by a complex interaction of synthesis and transport, as well as synaptic and non-synaptic release. The response to GABA is mediated by GABA_A receptors that respond to both phasic and tonic GABA release and that can produce excitatory as well as inhibitory cellular responses. GABA also influences circadian control through the exclusively inhibitory effects of GABA_B receptors. Both GABA and neuropeptide signaling occur within the SCN, although the functional consequences of the interactions of these signals are not well understood. This review considers the role of GABA in the circadian pacemaker, in the mechanisms responsible for the generation of circadian rhythms, in the ability of non-photic stimuli to reset the phase of the pacemaker, and in the ability of the day-night cycle to entrain the pacemaker.

Collective timekeeping among cells of the master circadian clock

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the anterior hypothalamus is the master circadian clock that coordinates daily rhythms in behavior and physiology in mammals. Like other hypothalamic nuclei, the SCN displays an impressive array of distinct cell types characterized by differences in neurotransmitter and neuropeptide expression. Individual SCN neurons and glia are able to display self-sustained circadian rhythms in cellular function that are regulated at the molecular level by a 24h transcriptional-translational feedback loop. Remarkably, SCN cells are able to harmonize with one another to sustain coherent rhythms at the tissue level. Mechanisms of cellular communication in the SCN network are not completely understood, but recent progress has provided insight into the functional roles of several SCN signaling factors. This review discusses SCN organization, how intercellular communication is critical for maintaining network function, and the signaling mechanisms that play a role in this process. Despite recent progress, our understanding of SCN circuitry and coupling is far from complete. Further work is needed to map SCN circuitry fully and define the signaling mechanisms that allow for collective timekeeping in the SCN network.

Sustained activation of GABAA receptors in the suprachiasmatic nucleus mediates light-induced phase delays of the circadian clock: a novel function of ionotropic receptors

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) contains a circadian clock that generates endogenous rhythmicity and entrains that rhythmicity with the day-night cycle. The neurochemical events that transduce photic input within the SCN and mediate entrainment by resetting the molecular clock have yet to be defined. Because GABA is contained in nearly all SCN neurons we tested the hypothesis that GABA serves as this signal in studies employing Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Activation of GABAA receptors was found to be necessary and sufficient for light to induce phase delays of the clock. Remarkably, the sustained activation of GABAA receptors for more than three consecutive hours was necessary to phase-delay the clock. The duration of GABAA receptor activation required to induce phase delays would not have been predicted by either the prevalent theory of circadian entrainment or by expectations regarding the duration of ionotropic receptor activation necessary to produce functional responses. Taken together, these data identify a novel neurochemical mechanism essential for phase-delaying the 'master' circadian clock within the SCN as well as identifying an unprecedented action of an amino acid neurotransmitter involving the sustained activation of ionotropic receptors.

Circadian modulation of the Cl(-) equilibrium potential in the rat suprachiasmatic nuclei

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) constitute a circadian clock in mammals, where γ-amino-butyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission prevails and participates in different aspects of circadian regulation. Evidence suggests that GABA has an excitatory function in the SCN in addition to its typical inhibitory role. To examine this possibility further, we determined the equilibrium potential of GABAergic postsynaptic currents (E(GABA)) at different times of the day and in different regions of the SCN, using either perforated or whole cell patch clamp. Our results indicate that during the day most neurons in the dorsal SCN have an E(GABA) close to -30 mV while in the ventral SCN they have an E(GABA) close to -60 mV; this difference reverses during the night, in the dorsal SCN neurons have an E(GABA) of -60 mV and in the ventral SCN they have an E(GABA) of -30 mV. The depolarized equilibrium potential can be attributed to the activity of the Na(+)-K(+)-2Cl(-) (NKCC) cotransporter since the equilibrium potential becomes more negative following addition of the NKCC blocker bumetanide. Our results suggest an excitatory role for GABA in the SCN and further indicate both time (day versus night) and regional (dorsal versus ventral) modulation of E(GABA) in the SCN.

Integration of the circadian and stress systems: influence of neuropeptides and implications for alcohol consumption

Disruptions in circadian rhythm and stress reactivity are associated with risks of developing neuropsychiatric disorders. The circadian system is organised in a hierarchical manner, whereby the master clock is located at the suprachiasmatic nucleus, a highly conserved brain region that coordinates the oscillations of peripheral clocks. Exposure to psychological stress leads to activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. There is growing evidence supporting the interactions between the circadian and stress systems. Anatomically, the circadian and stress signals converge at the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) in the hypothalamus. Genes that are involved in the operation of the circadian and stress systems, including Clock, Period and CRH are expressed in the PVN. In addition, several neuropeptides, including arginin-vasopressin, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide and the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid, are present in the PVN. In this review, we will discuss the interaction of circadian genes and stress-response genes at the molecular, neurotransmission and behavioural levels. We will place particular emphasis on the role of neuropeptides in mediating this interaction.

RNA editing of the IQ domain in Ca(v)1.3 channels modulates their Ca²⁺-dependent inactivation

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing is crucial for generating molecular diversity, and serves to regulate protein function through recoding of genomic information. Here, we discover editing within Ca(v)1.3 Ca²⁺ channels, renown for low-voltage Ca²⁺-influx and neuronal pacemaking. Significantly, editing occurs within the channel's IQ domain, a calmodulin-binding site mediating inhibitory Ca²⁺-feedback (CDI) on channels. The editing turns out to require RNA adenosine deaminase ADAR2, whose variable activity could underlie a spatially diverse pattern of Ca(v)1.3 editing seen across the brain. Edited Ca(v)1.3 protein is detected both in brain tissue and within the surface membrane of primary neurons. Functionally, edited Ca(v)1.3 channels exhibit strong reduction of CDI; in particular, neurons within the suprachiasmatic nucleus show diminished CDI, with higher frequencies of repetitive action-potential and calcium-spike activity, in wild-type versus ADAR2 knockout mice. Our study reveals a mechanism for fine-tuning Ca(v)1.3 channel properties in CNS, which likely impacts a broad spectrum of neurobiological functions.

Physiological responses of the circadian clock to acute light exposure at night

Circadian rhythms in physiological, endocrine and metabolic functioning are controlled by a neural clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). This structure is endogenously rhythmic and the phase of this rhythm can be reset by light information from the eye. A key feature of the SCN is that while it is a small structure containing on the order of about 20,000 cells, it is amazingly heterogeneous. It is likely that anatomical heterogeneity reflects an underlying functional heterogeneity. In this review, we examine the physiological responses of cells in the SCN to light stimuli that reset the phase of the circadian clock, highlighting where possible the spatial pattern of such responses. Increases in intracellular calcium are an important signal in response to light, and this increase triggers many biochemical cascades that mediate responses to light. Furthermore, only some cells in the SCN are actually endogenously rhythmic, and these cells likely do not receive strong direct input from the retina. Therefore, this review also considers how light information is conveyed from the retinorecipient cells to the endogenously rhythmic cells that track circadian phase. A number of neuropeptides, including vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, gastrin-releasing peptide and substance P, may be particularly important in relaying such signals, but other neurochemicals such as GABA and nitric oxide may participate as well. A thorough understanding of the intracellular and intercellular responses to light, as well as the spatial arrangements of such responses may help identify important pharmacological targets for therapeutic interventions to treat sleep and circadian disorders.

The mammalian circadian clock exhibits acute tolerance to ethanol

BACKGROUND

Tolerance to ethanol is observed over a variety of time courses, from minutes to days. Acute tolerance, which develops over 5 to 60 minutes, has been observed for both behavioral and neurophysiological variables and may involve changes in signaling through NMDA, GABA, or other receptors. Previous work has shown that both acute and chronic ethanol treatments modulate photic and nonphotic phase resetting of the mammalian circadian clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Although not specifically tested, the data thus far do not point to the development of chronic tolerance to the modulatory effects of ethanol. Here we investigated whether acute tolerance the ethanol occurs with respect to in vitro phase modulation of the SCN clock.

METHODS

Mouse brain slices containing the SCN were pretreated with ethanol for varying lengths of time, followed by treatment concurrent with either glutamate or the serotonin agonist, 8-hydroxy-DPAT (DPAT). The phase of the SCN circadian clock was assessed the following day through extracellular recordings of SCN neuronal activity. SCN neuronal activity normally peaks during mid-day, and this rhythm can be shifted by treatment with either glutamate or DPAT.

RESULTS

While concurrent treatment of SCN-containing brain slices with ethanol and glutamate blocks glutamate-induced phase delays of the SCN clock, pretreating the slices with ethanol for > or =15 minutes prevents this inhibition. Likewise, while concurrent treatment with ethanol and DPAT enhances DPAT-induced phase advances of the SCN clock, pretreating the slices with ethanol for > or =30 minutes prevents this enhancement.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the inhibiting and enhancing effects of ethanol on in vitro SCN clock phase resetting show acute tolerance. Additional experiments are needed to determine whether more slowly developing forms of tolerance also occur with respect to the SCN circadian clock.

Ethanol modulates mammalian circadian clock phase resetting through extrasynaptic GABA receptor activation

Ethanol modulates the actions of multiple neurotransmitter systems, including GABA. However, its enhancing effects on GABA signaling typically are seen only at high concentrations. In contrast, although GABA is a prominent neurotransmitter in the circadian clock of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), we see ethanol modulation of clock phase resetting at low concentrations (<50 mM). A possible explanation is that ethanol enhances GABAergic signaling in the SCN through activating GABA(A) receptors that contain the delta subunit (GABA(Adelta) receptors), which are sensitive to low ethanol concentrations. Therefore, we investigated whether ethanol acts on GABA(Adelta) receptors in the SCN. Here we show that acute application of the GABA(Adelta) receptor antagonist, RO15-4513, to mouse hypothalamic slices containing the SCN prevents ethanol inhibition of nighttime glutamate-induced (photic-like) phase delays of the circadian clock. Diazepam, which enhances activity of GABA(A) receptors containing the gamma subunit (GABA(Agamma) receptors), does not modulate these phase shifts. Moreover, we find that RO15-4513 prevents ethanol enhancement of daytime serotonergic (non-photic) phase advances of the circadian clock. Furthermore, diazepam phase-advances the SCN circadian clock when applied alone in the daytime, while ethanol has no effect by itself at that time. These data support the hypothesis that ethanol acts on GABA(Adelta) receptors in the SCN to modulate photic and non-photic circadian clock phase resetting. They also reveal distinct modulatory roles of different GABA(A) receptor subtypes in circadian clock phase regulation.

Functional neuroanatomy of sleep and circadian rhythms

The daily sleep-wake cycle is perhaps the most dramatic overt manifestation of the circadian timing system, and this is especially true for the monophasic sleep-wake cycle of humans. Considerable recent progress has been made in elucidating the neurobiological mechanisms underlying sleep and arousal, and more generally, of circadian rhythmicity in behavioral and physiological systems. This paper broadly reviews these mechanisms from a functional neuroanatomical and neurochemical perspective, highlighting both historical and recent advances. In particular, I focus on the neural pathways underlying reciprocal interactions between the sleep-regulatory and circadian timing systems, and the functional implications of these interactions. While these two regulatory systems have often been considered in isolation, sleep-wake and circadian regulation are closely intertwined processes controlled by extensively integrated neurobiological mechanisms.

Investigating the role of substance P in photic responses of the circadian system: individual and combined actions with gastrin-releasing peptide

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) contains the master mammalian circadian pacemaker. It is comprised of several phenotypically distinct cell groups, some of which are situated in the weakly rhythmic retinoresponsive ventrolateral region while others are found in the rhythmic, non-retinoresponsive dorsomedial region. The mechanism by which retinorecipient cells convey photic information to the dorsomedial clock cells is unclear. The ventrolateral SCN core contains a variety of cell phenotypes. Two neuropeptides, namely substance P (SP) and gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) extensively colocalize with calbindin D28K, a marker for SCN cells that are strongly light-responsive. Previous studies have implicated these neuropeptides in photic phase shifting of the circadian system. The present study examines how these peptides interact to regulate photic responses of the circadian system. It was observed that 55.5 +/- 9.1% of SP cells colocalized GRP. SP did not enhance GRP-induced phase shifts in the early-subjective night, while it significantly attenuated GRP-induced phase shifts during the late-subjective night. SP induced significant phase shifts that did not resemble light in the early-subjective night, but was not necessary for light-induced phase shifts and Fos expression at this time. SP induced significant Fos expression only in the late subjective night. SP may not be a necessary component in the pathway(s) involved in photic phase shifting during the early-subjective night, but may modulate phase shifts during the late-subjective night. Distinct biochemical mechanisms that underlie behavioral phase shifts may account for the differences observed in the early- vs. late-subjective night.

Interactions of GABA A receptor activation and light on period mRNA expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

Activation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptors in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) resets the circadian clock during the day and inhibits the ability of light to reset the clock at night. Light in turn acts during the day to inhibit the phase-resetting effects of GABA. Some evidence suggests that Period mRNA changes in the SCN are responsible for these interactions between light and GABA. Here, the hypothesis that light and the GABA A receptor interact by altering the expression of Period 1 and/or Period 2 mRNA in the SCN is tested. The GABA A agonist muscimol was injected near the SCN just prior to a light pulse, during the mid-subjective day and the early and late subjective night. Changes in Period 1 and Period 2 mRNA were measured in the SCN by in situ hybridization. Light-induced Period 1 mRNA was inhibited by GABA A receptor activation in the early and late subjective night, while Period 2 mRNA was only inhibited during the late night. During the subjective day, light had no effect on the ability of muscimol to suppress Period 1 mRNA hybridization signal. Thus, light and GABA A receptor activation inhibit each other's ability to induce behavioral phase shifts throughout the subjective day and night. However, only in the late night are these behavioral effects correlated with changes in Period gene expression. Together, our data support the hypothesis that the interacting effects of light and GABA are the result of the opposing actions of these stimuli on Period mRNA, but only during the subjective night.

Acute ethanol modulates glutamatergic and serotonergic phase shifts of the mouse circadian clock in vitro

Alcohol abuse is associated with sleep problems, which are often linked to circadian rhythm disturbances. However, there is no information on the direct effects of ethanol on the mammalian circadian clock. Acute ethanol inhibits glutamate signaling, which is the primary mechanism through which light resets the mammalian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Glutamate and light also inhibit circadian clock resetting induced by nonphotic signals, including 5-HT. Thus, we investigated the effects of acute ethanol on both glutamatergic and serotoninergic resetting of the mouse SCN clock in vitro. We show that ethanol dose-dependently inhibits glutamate-induced phase shifts and enhances serotonergic phase shifts. The inhibition of glutamate-induced phase shifts is not affected by excess glutamate, glycine or d-serine, but is prevented by excess brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). BDNF is known to augment glutamate signaling in the SCN and to be necessary for glutamate/light-induced phase shifts. Thus, ethanol may inhibit glutamate-induced clock resetting at least in part by blocking BDNF enhancement of glutamate signaling. Ethanol enhancement of serotonergic phase shifts is mimicked by treatments that suppress glutamate signaling in the SCN, including antagonists of glutamate receptors, BDNF signaling and nitric oxide synthase. The combined effect of ethanol with these treatments is not additive, suggesting they act through a common pathway. Our data indicate further that the interaction between 5-HT and glutamate in the SCN may occur downstream from nitric oxide synthase activation. Thus, acute ethanol disrupts normal circadian clock phase regulation, which could contribute to the physiological and psychological problems associated with alcohol abuse.

Chronic ethanol intake modulates photic and non-photic circadian phase responses in the Syrian hamster

Chronic alcohol intake disrupts sleep and other circadian biological rhythms in both human alcoholics and in experimental animals. Recent studies from our laboratory indicate that these effects may be due, in part, to ethanol-induced alterations in fundamental properties of the circadian pacemaker. The present study explored the effects of chronic voluntary ethanol intake (25% v/v) on circadian phase responses to both photic and non-photic stimuli in Syrian hamsters. Hamsters were used in these experiments because they are a popular model organism in behavioral chronobiology research, and are characterized by unusually high levels of voluntary ethanol intake. Relative to controls, ethanol-exposed animals showed attenuation of circadian phase responses and wheel running activity following acute administration of the benzodiazepine, triazolam, a non-photic phase-shifting stimulus. In addition, ethanol-exposed animals displayed reduced phase advances, but normal phase delays, in response to brief light pulses. While the mechanisms underlying these effects remain to be elucidated, we hypothesize that ionotropic GABA and glutamate receptors may be involved, since these proteins serve as important targets for the neurobiological effects of ethanol, and are also known to be critically involved in the modulation of photic and non-photic circadian phase responses.

Modulation of photic response by the metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist t-ACPD

Glutamate is the primary excitatory transmitter in the hypothalamus. It conveys photic information to the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, thereby entraining the circadian clock to environmental light cycles. While ionotropic glutamate receptors have been implicated in the transduction of photic information in suprachiasmatic nucleus cells, there is evidence that metabotropic glutamate receptors play a significant modulatory role. We investigated the effects of the metabotropic glutamate agonist (+/-)-1-aminocyclopentane-trans-1,3-dicarboxylic acid (ACPD) on light-evoked phase responses in Syrian hamsters at three phase points: circadian time 6, a time when light has no effect on the circadian timing system; circadian time 13.5, when light evokes the maximum phase delay; circadian time 19, the maximum phase advance. We found that ACPD significantly increased the light-evoked phase shift at circadian time 13.5, and had no effect at other phase points tested. These data support a role for metabotropic glutamate receptors in the circadian photic signal transduction system.

The circadian visual system, 2005

The primary mammalian circadian clock resides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), a recipient of dense retinohypothalamic innervation. In its most basic form, the circadian rhythm system is part of the greater visual system. A secondary component of the circadian visual system is the retinorecipient intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) which has connections to many parts of the brain, including efferents converging on targets of the SCN. The IGL also provides a major input to the SCN, with a third major SCN afferent projection arriving from the median raphe nucleus. The last decade has seen a blossoming of research into the anatomy and function of the visual, geniculohypothalamic and midbrain serotonergic systems modulating circadian rhythmicity in a variety of species. There has also been a substantial and simultaneous elaboration of knowledge about the intrinsic structure of the SCN. Many of the developments have been driven by molecular biological investigation of the circadian clock and the molecular tools are enabling novel understanding of regional function within the SCN. The present discussion is an extension of the material covered by the 1994 review, "The Circadian Visual System."

GABA modulates day–night variation in melatonin levels in the cerebral ganglia of the damselfly Ischnura graellsii and the grasshopper Oedipoda caerulescens

The relationship between daily rhythms in GABA content and melatonin (MEL) content, as well as the effect of GABA treatment during either the day time and night time phases on MEL levels and N-acetyltransferase (NAT) activity, were studied in the brains of two insect species, the grasshopper Oedipoda caerulescens and the damselfly Ischnura graellsii. In O. caerulescens, levels of GABA in the optic lobes showed significant daily variation, with a marked increase during the light-to-dark transition period. In contrast, in the brain of I. graellssi, two daily peaks in GABA levels were observed, during the light-to-dark and the dark-to-light transition periods. In both insects the maximal levels of GABA occurred 4-6 h in advance of the nocturnal MEL peak, which was associated with a reduction in GABA levels. In both insects, treatment with GABA (1 microg/microl, intracranial injection) during the night was followed by a significant reduction in melatonin levels and NAT activity. In contrast, GABA administered during the day time increased brain MEL levels and synthesis. These data suggest that GABA acts as a modulator of light/dark-dependent melatonin synthesis in the insect brain.

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) inhibits excitatory and inhibitory synaptic signaling in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN)

Environmental synchronization of the endogenous mammalian circadian rhythm involves glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission within the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). The neuropeptide nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) inhibits light-induced phase shifts, evokes K(+)-currents and reduces the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration in SCN neurons. Since these effects are consistent with a modulatory role for N/OFQ on synaptic transmission in the SCN, we examined the effects of N/OFQ on evoked and spontaneous excitatory and inhibitory currents in the SCN. N/OFQ produced a consistent concentration-dependent inhibition of glutamate-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSC) evoked by optic nerve stimulation. N/OFQ did not alter the amplitude of currents induced by application of (RS)-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) or N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) nor the amplitude of miniature EPSC (mEPSC) consistent with a lack of N/OFQ effect on postsynaptic AMPA or NMDA receptors. N/OFQ significantly reduced the mEPSC frequency. The inhibitory actions of N/OFQ were blocked by omega-conotoxin GVIA, an N-type Ca(2+)channel antagonist and partially blocked by omega-agatoxin TK, a P/Q type Ca(2+) channel blocker. These data indicate that N/OFQ reduces evoked EPSC, in part, by inhibiting the activity of N- and P/Q-type Ca(2+) channels. In addition, N/OFQ produced a consistent reduction in baseline Ca(2+) levels in presynaptic retinohypothalamic tract terminals. N/OFQ also inhibited evoked GABA(A) receptor-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSC) in a concentration dependent manner. However, N/OFQ had no effect on currents activated by muscimol application or on the amplitude of miniature IPSC (mIPSC) and significantly reduced the mIPSC frequency consistent with an inhibition of GABA release downstream from Ca(2+) entry. Finally, N/OFQ inhibited the paired-pulse depression observed in SCN GABAergic synapses consistent with a presynaptic mechanism of action. Together these results suggest a widespread modulatory role for N/OFQ on the synaptic transmission in the SCN.

GABA(B) receptor activation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of diurnal and nocturnal rodents

Diurnal (day-active) and nocturnal (night-active) animals have very different daily activity patterns. We recently demonstrated that the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) responds to GABAergic stimulation differently in diurnal and nocturnal animals. Specifically, GABAA receptor activation with muscimol during the subjective day causes phase delays in diurnal grass rats while producing phase advances in nocturnal hamsters. The aim of the following experiments was to determine if diurnal and nocturnal animals differ in their response to GABAB receptor activation in the SCN. Baclofen, a GABAB receptor agonist, was microinjected into the SCN region of grass rats or hamsters under free-running conditions and phase alterations were analyzed. Changes in phase were not detected after baclofen treatment during the subjective day in either grass rats or hamsters. During the night, however, GABAB receptor activation significantly decreased the ability of light to induce phase delays in grass rats. Taken together with previous data from our laboratory, these results demonstrate that, in both hamsters and grass rats, GABAB receptor activation in the SCN significantly affects circadian phase during the night, but not during the day.

Let there be “more” light: enhancement of light actions on the circadian system through non-photic pathways

Circadian rhythms are internally generated circa 24 h rhythms. The phase of the circadian pacemaker in mammals can be adjusted by external stimuli such as the daily cycle of light, as well as by internal stimuli such as information related to the physiological and behavioral status of the organism, collectively called "non-photic stimuli". We review a large number of studies regarding photic-non-photic interactions on the circadian system, with special focus on two widely described neurotransmitters associated with non-photic input pathways: neuropeptide Y (NPY) and serotonin 5-HT. Both neurotransmitters are capable of phase advancing the master pacemaker oscillation when applied during the subjective day, as do several behavioral manipulations. Also, both are capable of inhibiting light-induced phase shifts during the subjective night, suggesting a dynamic interaction between photic and non-photic stimuli in the fine-tuning of the pacemaker function. Suppression of the NPYergic and/or serotonergic non-photic input pathways can in turn potentiate the phase-shifting effects of light. These findings pose new questions about the possibility of a physiological role for the dynamic interaction between photic and non-photic inputs. This might be particularly important in the case of circadian system adjustments under certain conditions, such as depression, shift work or jet lag.

Blockade of GABAA receptors disrupts isoperiodic neuronal oscillations in the intergeniculate leaflet of the rat

The intergeniculate leaflet of the thalamus is, besides the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, the other important neuronal element of the mammalian biological clock. The extracellularly recorded activity of neurons constituting the intergeniculate leaflet, recorded in vivo, is characterized by distinct, very regular ultradian oscillations. The majority of neurons in the circadian timing system are GABAergic. Many, if not all, neurons of the suprachiasmatic nucleus and intergeniculate leaflet contain GABA. In the present study we examined the effects of the GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline and the chloride channel blocker picrotoxin on isoperiodic neuronal oscillations in the intergeniculate leaflet of rats. We recorded extracellular multiple-unit neuronal activity from the intergeniculate leaflet of anesthetized rats. During the recording of isoperiodic oscillations, bicuculline or picrotoxin were stereotaxically injected at different concentrations into the lateral ventricle of rat brain. In all the experiments, injection of GABA(A) receptor antagonists transiently disrupted the isoperiodic phasic discharge recorded from the intergeniculate leaflet. These data suggest that GABA(A) receptors are involved in the generation of ultradian rhythmical neuronal oscillations in rat intergeniculate leaflet.

Potential pathways for intercellular communication within the calbindin subnucleus of the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus

In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the master circadian pacemaker. Within the caudal hamster SCN, a cluster of neurons containing the calcium binding protein, calbindin-D28K (CB), has been implicated in circadian locomotion. However, calbindin-immunoreactive (CB+) neurons in the calbindin subnucleus (CBsn) do not display a circadian rhythm in spontaneous firing [Eur J Neurosci 16 (2002) 2469]. Previously, we proposed that intercellular communication might be essential in integrating outputs from rhythmic (CB-) neurons and nonrhythmic (CB+) neurons to produce a circadian output in the intact animal. The primary aim of this study is to provide a neuroanatomical framework to better understand intercellular communication within the CBsn. Using reconstructions of previously recorded neurons, we demonstrate that CB+ neurons have significantly more dendrites than CB- neurons. In addition, CBsn neurons have dorsally oriented dendritic arbors. Using double-label confocal microscopy, we show that GABA colocalizes with CB+ neurons and GABA(A) receptor subunits make intimate contacts with neurons in the CBsn. Transforming growth factor alpha (TGFalpha), a substance shown to inhibit locomotion [Science 294 (2001) 2511], is present within the CBsn. In addition, neurons in this region express the epidermal growth factor receptor, the only receptor for TGFalpha. Lastly, we show that CB+ neurons are coupled to CB+ and CB- neurons by gap junctions. The current study provides a structural framework for synaptic communication, electrical coupling, and signaling via a growth factor within the CBsn of the hamster SCN. Our results reveal connections that have the potential for integrating cellular communication within a subregion of the SCN that is critically involved in circadian locomotion.

Circadian rhythm in inhibitory synaptic transmission in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus

It is widely accepted that most suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) neurons express the neurotransmitter GABA and are likely to use this neurotransmitter to regulate excitability within the SCN. To evaluate the possibility that inhibitory synaptic transmission varies with a circadian rhythm within the mouse SCN, we used whole cell patch-clamp recording in an acute brain slice preparation to record GABA-mediated spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs). We found that the sIPSC frequency in the dorsal SCN (dSCN) exhibited a TTX-sensitive daily rhythm that peaked during the late day and early night in mice held in a light:dark cycle. We next evaluated whether vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) was responsible for the observed rhythm in IPSC frequency. Pretreatment of SCN slices with VPAC(1)/VPAC(2)- or VPAC(2)-specific receptor antagonists prevented the increase in sIPSC frequency in the dSCN. The rhythm in sIPSC frequency was absent in VIP/peptide histidine isoleucine (PHI)-deficient mice. Finally, we were able to detect a rhythm in the frequency of inhibitory synaptic transmission in mice held in constant darkness that was also dependent on VIP and the VPAC(2) receptor. Overall, these data demonstrate that there is a circadian rhythm in GABAergic transmission in the dorsal region of the mouse SCN and that the VIP is required for expression of this rhythm.

Circadian Phase Alteration by GABA and Light Differs in Diurnal and Nocturnal Rodents During the Day

These studies investigated the circadian effects of light and gamma aminobutyric acid-A (GABAA) receptor activation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the diurnal unstriped Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus). Microinjection of the GABAA agonist muscimol into the SCN during the day produced phase shifts that were opposite in direction to those previously reported in nocturnal rodents. In addition, light had no significant effect on the magnitude of muscimol-induced phase delays during the daytime. Injection of muscimol during the night, however, significantly inhibited light-induced phase delays and advances in a manner similar to that previously reported in nocturnal rodents. Therefore, the circadian effects of GABAA receptor activation are similar in diurnal and nocturnal species during the night but differ significantly during the day.

Neuropeptide y and n-methyl-d-aspartic acid interact within the suprachiasmatic nuclei to alter circadian phase

Circadian rhythms are reset by exposure to photic stimuli and nonphotic stimuli. Glutamate appears to be the primary neurotransmitter that communicates photic stimuli to the circadian clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. There is also substantial evidence that neuropeptide Y (NPY) mediates the effects of at least some nonphotic stimuli on the circadian clock. The purpose of this study was to investigate how NPY and glutamate receptor activation interact to reset the phase of the circadian clock. Microinjection of the glutamate agonist N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) during the subjective day significantly decreased NPY-induced phase advances. During the late subjective night, NMDA induced light-like phase advances, which were significantly reduced by microinjection of NPY. Microinjection of NPY inhibited NMDA-induced phase advances during the late subjective night, even when sodium-dependent action potentials were inhibited by tetrodotoxin. These data support the hypothesis that, during the subjective night, NPY and NMDA act on the same clock cells or on cells that communicate with clock cells by mechanisms not requiring action potentials. Although NPY and NMDA appear to be mutually inhibitory during both the day and the night, the mechanisms of this inhibition appear to be different during the day versus the night.

Novel phase-shifting effects of GABAA receptor activation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of a diurnal rodent

The vast majority of neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the primary circadian pacemaker in mammals, contain the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. Most studies investigating the role of GABA in the SCN have been performed using nocturnal rodents. Activation of GABA(A) receptors by microinjection of muscimol into the SCN phase advances the circadian activity rhythm of nocturnal rodents, but only during the subjective day. Nonphotic stimuli that reset the circadian pacemaker of nocturnal rodents also produce phase advances during the subjective day. The role of GABA in the SCN of diurnal animals and how it may differ from nocturnal animals is not known. In the studies described here, the GABA(A) agonist muscimol was microinjected directly into the SCN region of diurnal unstriped Nile grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus) at various times in their circadian cycle. The results demonstrate that GABA(A) receptor activation produces large phase delays during the subjective day in grass rats. Treatment with TTX did not affect the ability of muscimol to induce phase delays, suggesting that muscimol acts directly on pacemaker cells within the SCN. These data suggest that the circadian pacemakers of nocturnal and diurnal animals respond to the most abundant neurochemical signal found in SCN neurons in opposite ways. These findings are the first to demonstrate a fundamental difference in the functioning of circadian pacemaker cells in diurnal and nocturnal animals.

GABA receptor-mediated inhibition of neuronal activity in rat SCN in vitro: pharmacology and influence of circadian phase

The effect of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on neuronal firing rate in rat suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) slices was examined using continuous recording methods. GABA inhibited neuronal discharge during both the subjective day and the subjective night in a concentration-dependent manner characterized by two apparent affinity states. The GABAA receptor agonist muscimol caused potent inhibition regardless of circadian time; repeated applications of the agonist did not reverse the direction of effect. The GABAA receptor antagonists bicuculline and picrotoxin increased excitability when applied during either subjective day or subjective night. A significant increase in GABAA receptor- mediated inhibition, as well as endogenous GABAergic tone, was observed on the second day after slice preparation. The GABAB receptor agonist baclofen inhibited cell firing during subjective day and night, but the GABAB antagonist phaclofen had no significant effect. These data provide additional strong support for a predominantly inhibitory role of GABA in the rat SCN, regardless of the time of application in relation to the circadian rhythm, and demonstrate an important level of plasticity of this system in vitro.

Regulation of inhibitory synaptic transmission by vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus

Circadian rhythmicity in mammals is generated by a pair of nuclei in the anterior hypothalamus known as the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), whose neurons express a variety of neuropeptides that are thought to play an important role in the circadian timing system. To evaluate the influence of VIP on inhibitory synaptic transmission between SCN neurons, we used whole cell patch-clamp recording in an acute brain slice preparation of mouse SCN. Baseline spontaneous GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) varied significantly between regions and across phases, with a greater frequency of IPSCs observed in the dorsomedial region during the early night. Bath-applied VIP caused a significant increase in the frequency of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSC) in a reversible and dose-dependent manner with no effect on the mean amplitude or kinetic parameters. The effect of VIP was widespread throughout the SCN and observed in both ventrolateral (VL) and dorsomedial (DM) regions. In the presence of tetrodotoxin, VIP increased the frequency of miniature IPSCs without affecting the mean magnitude or kinetic parameters. The magnitude of the enhancement by VIP was significantly larger during the day than during the night. Pretreatment with the VIP-PACAP receptor antagonist [Ac-Tyr1, D-Phe2]-GHRF 1-29 or the selective VPAC2 receptor antagonist PG 99-465 completely blocked the VIP-induced enhancement. The effect of VIP appears to be mediated by a cAMP/PKA-dependent mechanism as forskolin mimics, while the PKA antagonist H-89 blocks the observed enhancement of GABA currents. Our data suggest that VIP activates presynaptic VPAC2 receptors to regulate inhibitory synaptic transmission within the SCN and that this effect varies from day to night.

Tetrodotoxin blocks the circadian effects of NMDA during the day but not at night

Light resets the circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) during the night and inhibits the ability of non-photic stimuli, such as injection of muscimol, to reset the clock during the day. Since activation of NMDA receptors appears to mediate the effects of light in the SCN, we investigated whether there are day-night differences in the SCN responses to NMDA. During the night, microinjection of NMDA mimicked the ability of light to induce phase delays, and these effects were not inhibited by blocking Na+-dependent action potentials with tetrodotoxin (TTX). During the day, NMDA mimicked the ability of light to inhibit muscimol-induced phase advances; however, this was inhibited by TTX. These data suggest that Na+-dependent action potentials within the SCN are required for NMDA to mimic the effects of light during the day but not during the night.