Superantigens as virulence factors in autoimmunity and immunodeficiency diseases

Superantigens and SARS-CoV-2

It has been posited SARS-CoV-2 contains at least one unique superantigen-like motif not found in any other SARS or endemic coronaviruses. Superantigens are potent antigens that can send the immune system into overdrive. SARS-CoV-2 causes many of the biological and clinical consequences of a superantigen, and, in the context of reinfection and waning immunity, it is important to better understand the impact of a widely circulating, airborne pathogen that may be a superantigen, superantigen-like or trigger a superantigenic host response. Urgent research is needed to better understand the long-term risks being taken by governments whose policies enable widespread transmission of a potential superantigenic pathogen, and to more clearly define the vaccination and public health policies needed to protect against the consequences of repeat exposure to the pathogen.

Staphylococcal Enterotoxin Superantigens Induce Prophylactic Antiviral Activity Against Encephalomyocarditis Virus In Vivo and In Vitro

The staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) are classified as superantigens due to their potent stimulation of the immune system resulting in T cell activation and prodigious cytokine production and toxicity. This study examined the ability of superantigens to induce prophylactic antiviral activity in vivo and in vitro and evaluated potential superantigen mimetic peptides. Prophylactic treatment of mice in vivo with intraperitoneal injections of SE superantigens SEA and SEB (both at 20 μg/day for 3 days) prevented encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV)-induced lethality in 100% and 80% of mice, respectively, as compared with control saline-treated groups in which EMCV was lethal to all mice. Furthermore, SEA (2 μg/mL) and SEB (1 μg/mL) induced antiviral activity in mouse splenocytes to produce an antiviral factor since their supernatant prevented EMCV lysis of L929 cells in tissue culture. It was found that superantigens do not directly prevent EMCV infection, but rather indirectly through inducing interferon gamma (IFNγ) production in cells as the antiviral factor. Evaluation of various superantigen mimetic peptides showed that one peptide (SEA3) had superantigen-like activity by inducing IFNγ production in cells but without the cellular proliferation, as associated with superantigens. However, the induction of IFNγ activation by the SEA3 peptide was not as pronounced, and took a much higher peptide concentration, when compared with the parent superantigen. If the negative side effects of superantigens can be eliminated, their beneficial properties can be harnessed for prophylactic treatment of viral infections and other pathologies requiring a robust immune response.

Primary immunodeficiency and autoimmunity: A comprehensive review

The primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) include many genetic disorders that affect different components of the innate and adaptive responses. The number of distinct genetic PIDs has increased exponentially with improved methods of detection and advanced laboratory methodology. Patients with PIDs have an increased susceptibility to infectious diseases and non-infectious complications including allergies, malignancies and autoimmune diseases (ADs), the latter being the first manifestation of PIDs in several cases. There are two types of PIDS. Monogenic immunodeficiencies due to mutations in genes involved in immunological tolerance that increase the predisposition to develop autoimmunity including polyautoimmunity, and polygenic immunodeficiencies characterized by a heterogeneous clinical presentation that can be explained by a complex pathophysiology and which may have a multifactorial etiology. The high prevalence of ADs in PIDs demonstrates the intricate relationships between the mechanisms of these two conditions. Defects in central and peripheral tolerance, including mutations in AIRE and T regulatory cells respectively, are thought to be crucial in the development of ADs in these patients. In fact, pathology that leads to PID often also impacts the Treg/Th17 balance that may ease the appearance of a proinflammatory environment, increasing the odds for the development of autoimmunity. Furthermore, the influence of chronic and recurrent infections through molecular mimicry, bystander activation and super antigens activation are supposed to be pivotal for the development of autoimmunity. These multiple mechanisms are associated with diverse clinical subphenotypes that hinders an accurate diagnosis in clinical settings, and in some cases, may delay the selection of suitable pharmacological therapies. Herein, a comprehensively appraisal of the common mechanisms among these conditions, together with clinical pearls for treatment and diagnosis is presented.

Response of T-cell subpopulations to superantigen and recall antigen stimulation in systemic sclerosis

Background:

There is great disagreement regarding which effector T-cells are responsible for the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Further, the possible role of superantigens in modulating the T-cell phenotype responsible for the immunopathogenesis of this disease and the response of these patients to common recall antigens have not been adequately determined.

Aims:

To investigate the T-cell subsets and activation markers in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of systemic sclerosis patients before and after stimulation with different bacterial superantigens and common recall antigens to better understand the immunopathogenesis of this disease.

Materials and Methods:

T-cells (CD3⁺) from 20 systemic sclerosis patients and 17 age-matched healthy controls were studied using flow cytometry for the expression of CD4, CD8, CD45RA, and CD45RO at baseline and upon stimulation with different superantigens and recall antigens. Patients were also tested for skin delayed hypersensitivity to common recall antigens.

Results:

The proportions of CD45RA⁺ (naive) and CD45RO⁺ (memory) CD4⁺ T-cells were found to be significantly higher in patients than in controls upon stimulation with bacterial superantigens. However, T-cells from these patients responded weakly to recall antigen stimulation, indicating a loss of specific memory cells. This was further supported by the skin delayed hypersensitivity test in which 16 patients were found to be anergic.

Conclusions:

Our findings suggest that both naïve (CD45RA⁺) and memory (CD45RO⁺) CD4⁺ superantigen-reactive T-cells are effector T-cells that may modulate the pathogenic autoantibody response in systemic sclerosis. Accumulation of these cells in these patients may result in increased risk of relapses and resistance to therapy.

Superantigens: structure-function relationships

Superantigens are a class of highly potent immuno-stimulatory molecules produced by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. These toxins possess the unique ability to interact simultaneously with MHC class II molecules and T-cell receptors, forming a trimolecular complex that induces profound T-cell proliferation. The resultant massive cytokine release causes epithelial damage and leads to capillary leak and hypotension. The staphylococcal superantigens are designated staphylococcal enterotoxins A, B, C (and antigenic variants), D, E, and the recently discovered enterotoxins G to Q, and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1. The streptococcal superantigens include the pyrogenic exotoxins A (and antigenic variants), C, G-J, SMEZ, and SSA. Superantigens are implicated in several diseases including toxic shock syndrome, scarlet fever and food poisoning; and their function appears primarily to debilitate the host sufficiently to permit the causation of disease. Structural studies over the last 10 years have provided a great deal of information regarding the complex interactions of these molecules with their receptors. This, combined with the wealth of new information from genomics initiatives, have shown that, despite their common molecular architecture, superantigens are able to crosslink MHC class II molecules and T-cell receptors by a variety of subtly different ways through the use of various structural regions within each toxin.

Examination of the oral mucosa and peripheral blood cells of patients with recurrent aphthous ulceration for human herpesvirus DNA

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to exam the oral mucosa and peripheral blood cells of patients with recurrent aph-thous ulceration (RAU) for the presence of the following human herpesviruses: herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2, varicella zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, human herpesvirus-6, and human herpesvirus-7.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty-eight subjects with RAU and 10 control subjects were recruited at an academic referral center and enrolled in this prospective, nonrandomized, case-controlled study. Each of the subjects with RAU was seen during an acute episode, and swab specimens from lesional (RAU-acute/lesion) and clinically normal (RAU-acute/normal) oral mucosa were obtained. Each of 2 subjects with RAU was evaluated during more than one acute episode. Three subjects with RAU were seen between active episodes, and swab specimens were taken from clinically normal (RAU-convalescent) oral mucosa. Swab specimens from clinically normal (control/normal) oral mucosa were obtained from the control subjects. Peripheral blood specimens were obtained from subjects with RAU and control subjects at the time the swab specimens were performed. Through use of polymerase chain reaction, all swab and peripheral blood specimens were examined for the presence of human herpesvirus DNA. Statistical significance was determined by means of chi(2) analysis.

RESULTS

Herpes simplex virus and human herpesvirus-6 were found in a higher percentage of mucosal specimens from the control subjects (herpes simplex virus, 4/10; human herpesvirus-6, 5/9) than from the subjects with RAU (RAU-acute/lesion: 3/45 herpes simplex virus, 13/53 human herpesvirus-6; RAU-acute/normal: 7/48 herpes simplex virus, 9/53 human herpesvirus-6). No difference was demonstrated between RAU-acute/lesion, RAU-acute/normal, and RAU-convalescent mucosal specimens for any of the human herpesviruses. Different human herpesviruses were identified from individual subjects with RAU during subsequent episodes of disease. Epstein-Barr virus (6/35), human herpesvirus-6 (3/40), and human herpesvirus-7 (7/43) were detected in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells during acute RAU but not in RAU-convalescent or control peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of human herpesvirus DNA from the oral mucosa and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with RAU appears to represent normal viral shedding rather than a direct causal mechanism in this disorder.

Molecular mimicry and immune-mediated diseases

Molecular mimicry has been proposed as a pathogenetic mechanism for autoimmune disease, as well as a probe useful in uncovering its etiologic agents. The hypothesis is based in part on the abundant epidemiological, clinical, and experimental evidence of an association of infectious agents with autoimmune disease and observed cross-reactivity of immune reagents with host 'self' antigens and microbial determinants. For our purpose, molecular mimicry is defined as similar structures shared by molecules from dissimilar genes or by their protein products. Either the molecules' linear amino acid sequences or their conformational fits may be shared, even though their origins are as separate as, for example, a virus and a normal host self determinant. An immune response against the determinant shared by the host and virus can evoke a tissue-specific immune response that is presumably capable of eliciting cell and tissue destruction. The probable mechanism is generation of cytotoxic cross-reactive effector lymphocytes or antibodies that recognize specific determinants on target cells. The induction of cross-reactivity does not require a replicating agent, and immune-mediated injury can occur after the immunogen has been removed a hit-and-run event. Hence, the viral or microbial infection that initiates the autoimmune phenomenon may not be present by the time overt disease develops. By a complementary mechanism, the microbe can induce cellular injury and release self antigens, which generate immune responses that cross-react with additional but genetically distinct self antigens. In both scenarios, analysis of the T cells or antibodies specifically engaged in the autoimmune response and disease provides a fingerprint for uncovering the initiating infectious agent.