Apolipoprotein E genotypes and response of plasma lipids and progression-regression of coronary atherosclerosis to lipid-lowering drug therapy

Associations between SLCO1B1, APOE and CYP2C9 and lipid-lowering efficacy and pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin: a meta-analysis

Objective: This meta-analysis was designed to investigate the associations between SLCO1B1, APOE and CYP2C9 and the lipid-lowering effects and pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin. Methods: Studies were searched from inception to March 2023, including three SNPs related to fluvastatin, SLCO1B1, CYP2C9 and APOE. Weighted mean differences and corresponding 95% CIs were analyzed to evaluate the associations between SNPs and outcomes. Results: SLCO1B1 521T>C was associated with lower total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein reduction. Patients carrying 521CC or total cholesterol had a significantly higher area under the curve than those carrying 521TT, but no significant difference existed. Conclusion: CYP2C9 and SLCO1B1 may be associated with the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin.

Residual Risk of Coronary Atherosclerotic Heart Disease and Severity of Coronary Atherosclerosis Assessed by ApoB and LDL-C in Participants With Statin Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary target of lipid-lowering therapy on the management of hypercholesterolemia in the United States and European guidelines, while apolipoprotein B (apoB) is the secondary target. The objective was to determine if elevated levels of apoB is superior to LDL-C in assessing residual risk of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease and severity of coronary atherosclerosis in participants with statin treatment.

METHODS

This study included 131 participants with statin treatment. The generalized linear model and relative risk regression (generalized linear Poisson model with robust error variance) were used to analyze the association of the levels of apoB and LDL-C with the severity of coronary atherosclerosis and residual risk of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease.

RESULTS

Categorizing apoB and LDL-C based on tertiles, higher levels of apoB were significantly associated with the severity of coronary atherosclerosis (P_trend = 0.012), whereas no such associations were found for elevated levels of LDL-C (P_trend = 0.585). After multivariate adjustment, higher levels of apoB were significantly associated with residual risk of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. When compared with low-level apoB (≤0.66 g/L), the multivariate adjusted RR and 95% CI of intermediate-level apoB (0.67-0.89 g/L) and high-level apoB (≥0.90 g/L) were 1.16 (1.01, 1.33) and 1.31 (1.08, 1.60), respectively (P_trend = 0.011). There was a 45% increased residual risk of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease per unit increment in natural log-transformed apoB (P_trend <0.05). However, higher levels of LDL-C were not significantly associated with residual risk of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. When compared with low-level LDL-C (≤1.56 mmol/L), the multivariate adjusted RR and 95% CI of intermediate-level LDL-C (1.57-2.30 mmol/L) and high-level LDL-C (≥2.31 mmol/L) were 0.99 (0.84, 1.15) and 1.10 (0.86, 1.42), respectively (P_trend = 0.437). Similar results were observed in the stratified analyses and sensitivity analyses. No significant interactions were detected for both apoB and LDL-C (all P_interaction>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated apoB are superior in assessing the residual risk of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease and severity of coronary atherosclerosis in participants with statin treatment.

The Association between Apolipoprotein E Polymorphism and Response to Statins in Group of Hyperlipidemic Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

APOE has an important role in lipids metabolism, and in the variability in low density lipoprotein (LDL) response to statins treatment between individuals. In this study, we aim to investigate the association between APOE polymorphism and response to statins in Jordanian hyperlipidemic patients at the diabetic clinic of Jordan University Hospital.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty two Jordanian Hyperlipidemic patients (52 males and 100 females) aged between 35-75 years were enrolled in this study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Jordan University Hospital. The genotypes of the patients were identified by polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism assay method (PCRRFLP).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The study showed that there is an association between APOE polymorphism and response to statin therapy. Patients who were APOE ε4 carriers had lower response to statins compared to ε3 and ε2 carriers (p=0.002). In addition, we found that there was no significant association between APOE polymorphism and LDL baseline (p=0.214). No significant differences were found in APOE genotypes distribution between males and females (p=0.06). No significant association was found between age and APOE genotypes (p=0.347). A genotype screening test for dyslipidemic Jordanian patients is recommended to choose the appropriate treatment decisions, dosage, and to recognize the potential side effects of statin therapy.

Quantile-specific heritability of high-density lipoproteins with implications for precision medicine

BACKGROUND

We have previously shown that the effect of a high-density lipoprotein (HDL) genetic risk score depends on whether the phenotype (HDL cholesterol) is high or low relative to its distribution (quantile-dependent expressivity).

OBJECTIVE

Evidence for quantile-dependent expressivity was sought using a more inclusive genetic measure (quantile-specific heritability, h²) in a larger population (Framingham cohort).

METHODS

Quantile regression was used to test whether the offspring-parent (β_OP) and full-sib (β_FS) regression slopes increased with the percentiles of the offspring's HDL distribution in 10,650 parent-offspring pairs and 2130 sibships. Quantile-specific heritability was estimated by 2β_OP/(1 + r_spouse) and [(8β_FSr_spouse + 1)^0.5-1]/(2r_spouse), where r_spouse is the spouse correlation.

RESULTS

HDL cholesterol heritability estimated from β_OP increased significantly (P = 4.2 × 10^-5) from the 10^th (h² ± SE: 0.44 ± 0.03), 25^th (0.45 ± 0.03), 50^th (0.47 ± 0.03), and 75^th (0.56 ± 0.04) to the 90^th percentiles (0.65 ± 0.06) of the offspring's age- and sex-adjusted HDL cholesterol distribution. Heritability estimated from β_FS also increased significantly with the percentiles of the offspring's HDL cholesterol (P = .002), apo A1 (P = .006), HDL2 cholesterol (P = .003), and HDL3 cholesterol distribution (P = .02). Consistent with quantile-dependent expressivity, published pharmacologic and nutritional interventions that raised (eg, statin, fibrates, estrogen replacement therapy, efavirenz, and dietary fat) or lowered HDL cholesterol concentrations (tamoxifen, dietary carbohydrate) correspondingly increased and decreased genetic effects.

CONCLUSION

HDL cholesterol heritability increased with increasing percentile of the offspring's HDL distribution. Whereas precision medicine is based on the premise that genetic markers identify patients most likely to benefit from drugs and diet, quantile-dependent expressivity postulates that the strong signals from these genetic markers simply trace the heritability increase with increasing plasma HDL concentrations. Thus, quantile-dependent expressivity provides an alternative interpretation to these genotype-specific effects.

The association between the SLCO1B1, apolipoprotein E, and CYP2C9 genes and lipid response to fluvastatin: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the SLCO1B1, apolipoprotein E (ApoE), and CYP2C9 genotypes on the lipid-lowering efficacy of fluvastatin.

METHODS

We performed electronic searches on the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies published through October 2017. Studies that reported the effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein were included so that the different genotype categories could be compared. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to summarize the effect estimates.

RESULTS

Six studies, involving a total of 1171 individuals, were included in the final analysis. We noted that the patient carrier SLCO1B1 521TT was associated with greater change in TC (WMD: -2.98; 95% CI: -5.12 to -0.84; P=0.006) and LDL (WMD: -5.58; 95% CI: -10.64 to -0.52; P=0.031) compared with 521TC or CC. Furthermore, the patient carrier ApoE*2/*3 showed more change in high-density lipoprotein compared with ApoE*3/*3 (WMD: 18.76; 95% CI: 8.97-28.55; P<0.001) and ApoE*3/*4 or *4/*4 (WMD: 22.51; 95% CI: 0.98-44.04; P=0.040). Finally, the CYP2C9 genotypes showed no correlation with the effects of fluvastatin on TC, triglyceride, and LDL.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggested that the SLCO1B1 and ApoE polymorphisms could influence the lipid-lowering effect of fluvastatin, whereas the CYP2C9 genotypes were not associated with the therapeutic effects of fluvastatin.

Apolipoprotein E in Cardiovascular Diseases: Novel Aspects of an Old-fashioned Enigma

The presence of different APOE isoforms represents a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Besides the pleiotropic effects of APOE polymorphism on heart and neurological diseases, this review summarizes the less-known functions of APOE and the possible implications for cardiovascular disorders. Beyond the role as lipid transporting protein, its involvement in lipid membrane homeostasis and signaling, as well as its nuclear transcriptional effects suggests a more complex role of APOE, receiving great interest from researchers and physicians from all medical fields. Due to the presence of different APOE isoforms in human population, understanding APOE's role in pathological processes represents not only a challenge, but a demand for further development of therapeutic strategies for cardiovascular diseases.

Should apolipoprotein B replace LDL cholesterol as therapeutic targets are lowered?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The success of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) as a predictor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and a therapeutic target is indisputable. Apolipoprotein B (apoB) is a more contemporary and physiologically relevant measure of atherogenic lipoproteins. This report summarizes recent comparisons of apoB and LDL-C as biomarkers of cardiovascular risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple recent reports have found that LDL-C methods perform poorly at low concentrations (<70 mg/dl). Several meta-analyses from randomized controlled trials and large prospective observational studies have found that apoB and LDL-C provide equivalent information on risk of cardiovascular disease. More innovative analyses have asserted that apoB is a superior indicator of actual risk when apoB and LDL-C disagree.

SUMMARY

ApoB is more analytically robust and standardized biomarker than LDL-C. Large population studies have found that apoB is at worst clinically equivalent to LDL-C and likely superior when disagreement exists. Realistically, many obstacles prevent the wide spread adoption of apoB and for now providers and their patients must weigh the costs and benefits of apoB.

Fuzzy set analyses of genetic determinants of health and disability status

Analyses of complex genotype-phenotype relations require new statistical procedures because of the potentially high dimensionability of those relations which are expressed with both measurement error and stochasticity in the correlation function. We propose modifying a multivariate procedure called grade of membership (GoM) analysis to deal with the special problems of such analyses. In doing so, we make clear some special features of the GoM model for multivariate analysis of high dimensional, discrete data. This is illustrated for apolipoprotein E (APOE) assessments made on 1805 people in the 1999 National Long Term Care Survey. A number of interesting relations with APOE polymorphism were found where disability profiles were more predictive than specific diagnoses because they implicitly contained information on chronicity and severity of disease processes.

The potential applications of Apolipoprotein E in personalized medicine

Personalized medicine uses various individual characteristics to guide medical decisions. Apolipoprotein (ApoE), the most studied polymorphism in humans, has been associated with several diseases. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the potential role of ApoE polymorphisms in personalized medicine, with a specific focus on neurodegenerative diseases, by giving an overview of its influence on disease risk assessment, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. This review is not a systematic inventory of the literature, but rather a summary and discussion of novel, influential and promising works in the field of ApoE research that could be valuable for personalized medicine. Empirical evidence suggests that ApoE genotype informs pre-symptomatic risk for a wide variety of diseases, is valuable for the diagnosis of type III dysbetalipoproteinemia, increases risk of dementia in neurodegenerative diseases, and is associated with a poor prognosis following acute brain damage. ApoE status appears to influence the efficacy of certain drugs, outcome of clinical trials, and might also give insight into disease prevention. Assessing ApoE genotype might therefore help to guide medical decisions in clinical practice.

Statin myotoxicity: a review of genetic susceptibility factors

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMGCoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) are among the most common medications prescribed worldwide, but their efficacy and toxicity vary between individuals. One of the major factors contributing to intolerance and non-compliance are the muscle side-effects, which range from mild myalgia through to severe life-threatening rhabdomyolysis. One way to address this is pharmacogenomic screening, which aims to individualize therapy to maximize efficacy whilst avoiding toxicity. Genes encoding proteins involved in the metabolism of statins as well as genes known to cause inherited muscle disorders have been investigated. To-date only polymorphisms in the SLCO1B1 gene, which encodes the protein responsible for hepatic uptake of statins, and the COQ2 gene, important in the synthesis of coenzyme Q10, have been validated as being strongly associated with statin-induced myopathy. The aim of this review is to summarize studies investigating genetic factors predisposing to statin myopathy and myalgia, as the first step towards pharmacogenomic screening to identify at risk individuals.

Effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on statin-induced decreases in plasma lipids and cardiovascular events

Hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and statins (inhibitors of a key enzyme of cholesterol synthesis, 3-hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase) are the drugs of choice for decreasing plasma cholesterol. It has been estimated that genetic factors can explain 40%-60% of final cholesterol concentrations and approximately 70% of the efficacy of statin treatment. The gene most often analyzed in the context of statin efficacy is the gene for apolipoprotein E (APOE). This review summarizes evidence of the association between variations in the APOE gene locus and the response of plasma lipids to statin therapy. Although the results are not consistent, carriers of the APOE4 allele seems to be less responsive to statins than carriers of APOE2 and APOE3 alleles. This effect is partially context-dependent (gene-gender interactions; gene-nutrition and gene-smoking interactions have not yet been studied) and the absolute differences vary between different population groups.

Clinical response to statins: mechanism(s) of variable activity and adverse effects

Statins represent a major advance in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, a significant risk factor for atherosclerosis. There is, however, notable interindividual variation in the cholesterolemic response to statins, and the origin of this variability is poorly understood; pharmacogenetics has attempted to determine the role of genetic factors. Myopathy, further, has been reported in a considerable percentage of patients, but the mechanisms underlying muscle injury have yet to be fully characterized. Most statins are the substrates of several cytochrome P450s (CYP). CYP polymorphisms may be responsible for variations in hypolipidemic activity; inhibitors of CYPs, e.g. of CYP3A4, can significantly raise plasma concentrations of several statins, but consequences in terms of clinical efficacy are not uniform. Pravastatin and rosuvastatin are not susceptible to CYP inhibition but are substrates of the organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, encoded by the SLCO1B1 gene. Essentially all statins are, in fact, substrates of membrane transporters: SLCO1B1 polymorphisms can decrease the liver uptake, as well as the therapeutic potential of these agents, and may be linked to their muscular side-effects. A better understanding of the mechanisms of statin handling will help to minimize adverse effects and interactions, as well as to improve their lipid-lowering efficiency.

Statins personalized

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor medications, commonly referred to as statins, are among the most widely prescribed medications. Variation in individual response to statins concerning low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction, clinical event benefit, and side effects has been observed. Some of this variability is attributed to demographic and environmental issues, chief of which is compliance. A large portion of the individual response to statin therapy is attributed to single nucleotide polymorphisms that have recently been elucidated, several of which seem to have clinical utility.

The association of apolipoprotein E polymorphism and lipid levels in children with a family history of premature coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Polymorphisms in the apolipoprotein E (apoE) gene may modulate lipoprotein metabolism and influence plasma lipid levels. Thus, they have been associated with relative risk of coronary artery disease (CAD).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of apolipoprotein E polymorphism and lipid levels in children with family history of premature coronary artery disease.

METHODS

The apoE genotypes, allele frequencie,s and plasma lipid levels were analyzed in 137 children. Among these children, 70 (study group) had and 67 (control group) did not have a parental history of premature CAD RESULTS: Total cholesterol (Tc) levels were greater in the study group (P = .04). The frequencies of ɛ3ɛ4 genotype and ɛ4 allele were significantly greater in the study group (P = 005 for both), Thɛ ɛ2 allele correlated negatively with Tc and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and ɛ4 had a positive correlation with Tc and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Tc levels are influenced by apoE genotypes in childhood. Also, the frequency of the ɛ4 allele is greater in children with family history of premature CAD. The ɛ4 allele may be associated with an increased risk for development of atherosclerosis by elevated levels of Tc in children with family history of CAD. The evaluation of apoE gene polymorhisms may contribute to the assessment of cardiovascular risk in children with a family history of CAD.

Apolipoprotein E epsilon-4 polymorphism is associated with younger age at referral to a lipidology clinic and a poorer response to lipid-lowering therapy

Background

The risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) is related to environmental factors and genetic variants. Apolipoprotein E (apoE) polymorphisms are heritable determinants of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, with some authors suggesting an association between the ε4 allele and CHD. We investigated the relationship between apoE genotype and age at referral to a specialized lipid clinic by the primary care physician and whether the benefits of treatment with statin differed between genotypes.

Methods

We assessed individual apoE genotypes and lipid blood profile in a total of 463 patients followed at a specialized lipid clinic due to dyslipidemia, with a 3-year median follow-up time. The primary care physician at the time of the referral had no access to the apoE genotyping results. Carriers of apoE ε4/ε2 genotype were excluded.

Results

The frequencies of ε2, ε3 and ε4 alleles were 7.8, 78.9 and 13.3%, respectively. There were no significant differences between genders. Although with similar lipid profiles and antidyslipidemic drug usage at baseline, ε4-carriers were referred to the clinic at a younger age (44.2 ± 14.7 years) compared with non-ε4 carriers (50.6 ± 13.8 years) (p < 0.001), with a substantially younger age of referral for homozygous E4/4 and for all genotypes with at least one copy of the ε4 allele (p < 0.001 for trend). Although both ε4 and non-ε4 carriers achieved significant reductions in total cholesterol during follow-up (p < 0.001 vs. baseline), the mean relative decrease in total cholesterol levels was higher in non-ε4 carriers (-19.9 ± 2.3%) compared with ε4 carriers (-11.8 ± 2.3%), p = 0.003.

Conclusion

Our findings support the concept that there is a reduced response to anti-dyslipidemic treatment in ε4 carriers; this can be a contributing factor for the earlier referral of these patients to our specialized lipid clinic and reinforces the usefulness of apoE genotyping in predicting patients response to lipid lowering therapies.

Clinical implications of pharmacogenetic variation on the effects of statins

The last decade has seen an increase in the trend of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) usage in the Western world, which does not come as a surprise noting that the latest American Heart Association heart and stroke statistics indicate an alarming prevalence of 80  million Americans (one in three) with one or more forms of diagnosed cardiovascular disease (CVD). Meta-analysis of several large-scale, randomized clinical trials has demonstrated statins to be efficacious in significantly reducing CVD-associated mortality in both primary and secondary prevention. Despite their proven efficacy, statins have also gained attention with respect to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of muscle myopathy, derangements in hepatic function and even ADRs classified as psychiatric in nature. The depletion of cholesterol within the myocyte cell wall and/or the depletion of key intermediates within the cholesterol synthesis pathway are hypothesized as possible mechanisms of statin-associated ADRs. However, pharmacogenetic variability may also be a risk factor for ADRs and can include, for example, enzymes, transporters, cell membrane receptors, intracellular receptors or components of ion channels that contribute to the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of response to a particular drug. The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymatic pathways that comprise the polymorphic genes, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, and also a hepatic transporter, solute carrier organic anion transporter (SLCO1B1), which is a single nucleotide polymorphism discovered to be associated with statin-induced myopathy through a genome-wide association study, are discussed with respect to their effect on altering the pharmacokinetic profile of statin metabolism. Variants of the Apolipoprotein E (APO-E) gene, polymorphisms in the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) gene, the HMG-CoA reductase gene and other proteins are discussed with respect to altering the pharmacodynamic profile of statins. Pharmacogenetics and its application in medicine to individualize drug therapy has been previously shown to be clinically and economically beneficial through quality-adjusted life-year assessment. Therefore, polymorphisms affecting the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of statins, which are widely used in therapy, with their potential application in the personalized prescribing of statin therapy, need further research. In this review, we update the recent literature with respect to genetic polymorphisms that may influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of statin therapy, and consider the relevance of these findings to the efficacy of treatment, prevention of ADRs and what this may mean for patient tolerance and compliance.

Genetic determinants of response to statins

In developed countries, cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death. Statins are abundantly prescribed to reduce the risk of coronary artery disease by lowering cholesterol. Genetic factors are thought to be partly responsible for the interindividual variation in the response to statins. This article reviews the most important studies conducted on pharmacogenetics of statins. Currently, there is no evidence to advocate pharmacogenetic testing before initiating therapy.

Identification of genetic variants associated with response to statin therapy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to test the association between polymorphisms in genes involved in either LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) metabolism or statin pharmacokinetics and LDL-C reduction with statins.

METHODS AND RESULTS

49 tagging and candidate polymorphisms in 9 genes were genotyped in 1507 post-ACS subjects randomized to atorvastatin or pravastatin. Two polymorphisms (rs7412, rs429358) that define the epsilon2, epsilon3, and epsilon4 isoforms of apolipoprotein E were significantly associated with percent reduction in LDL-C with atorvastatin (epsilon2 carriers 53.8%, epsilon3/epsilon3 48.1%, and epsilon4 carriers 46.4%, respectively, P=0.00039) and replicated in the pravastatin arm (epsilon2 carriers 22.1%, epsilon3/epsilon3 21.8%, and epsilon4 carriers 16.6%, respectively, P=0.00038). The proportion of subjects achieving an LDL-C < or =70 mg/dL at day 30 was higher for epsilon2 than epsilon4 carriers (P=1.3 x 10(-5)). In the pravastatin group, the triallelic rs2032582 variant (G2677T/A) in ABCB1 was associated with the percent reduction in LDL-C (GG 23.3%, non-G heterozygote 20.3%, and non-G homozygote 17.4%, P=0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Carriers of APOE epsilon2 versus epsilon4 had significantly greater LDL-C reduction with atorvastatin and with pravastatin, and more frequently achieved a guideline-recommended LDL-C < or =70 mg/dL. Polymorphisms in triallelic G2677T/A variant in ABCB1 were associated with the degree of LDL-C lowering with pravastatin.

Improvement of myocardial blood flow by lipid‐lowering therapy with pravastatin is modulated by apolipoprotein E genotype

OBJECTIVE

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) polymorphism affects the risk of advanced coronary artery disease, but its role in early atherosclerosis remains unknown. We used positron emission tomography (PET) to study whether coronary reactivity or its response to pravastatin is related to the apoE genotype.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Samples from 44 mildly hypercholesterolaemic men (aged 35 +/- 4 years) of an earlier trial were re-analysed according to apoE genotype. Subjects were randomized to receive either 40 mg/day pravastatin or placebo for 6 months. To assess coronary reactivity, myocardial blood flow was measured by PET at rest and during adenosine infusion. PET studies and lipid analyses were done at baseline and after 6 months of therapy.

RESULTS

There were no differences between apoE epsilon3/3 and epsilon4/3 genotypes in basal or adenosine-stimulated flow or in coronary flow reserve (CFR) at baseline. There was a significant apoE genotype-by-treatment group interaction regarding the change in adenosine-stimulated flow (ANCOVA; p = 0.018) and CFR (p = 0.020) at the end of the study. In the pravastatin group, the adenosine-stimulated flow increased by 32.5 % in subjects with epsilon3/3 (n = 9), but decreased non-significantly (-14.4 %) in subjects with epsilon4/3 (n = 9) (p = 0.0009). The corresponding changes in CFR were +17.8 % for epsilon3/3 and (-11.9 % for epsilon4/3 (p = 0.05). There were no significant changes from the baseline values in placebo recipients. After pravastatin treatment, both genotype groups showed a similar decrease in serum total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p<0.0001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary function improves by 6 months of pravastatin in subjects with the apoE epsilon3/3 genotype, but not in those with the epsilon4/3.

APOE gene polymorphisms and response to statin therapy

Published studies investigating the role of APOE gene on lipid response (total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides) to statin treatment have reported inconsistent results. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the lipid response to statin treatment among APOE genetic variants (e2 carriers, e3e3 homozygotes and e4 carriers). Twenty-four studies were included in the meta-analyses. The pooled mean reduction (Delta mu) in TC from baseline was significant for all variants (e2 carriers: Delta mu=-27.7% (-32.5 to -22.8%), e3e3: Delta mu=-25.3% (-28.0 to -22.6%) and e4 carriers: Delta mu=-25.1% (-29.3 to -21.0%)). Significant changes in LDL-C, HDL-C and triglyceride levels were also noted for all genotypes, although these changes did not differ significantly among genotypic groups. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies. Given these non-significant effects of APOE genotypes on lipid responses, there is little reason to consider the use of APOE genetic testing for guiding treatment with statins.

A paucimorphic variant in the HMG-CoA reductase gene is associated with lipid-lowering response to statin treatment in diabetes: a GoDARTS study

BACKGROUND

Considerable interindividual variation exists in cholesterol-lowering response to 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) inhibitors (statins). HMGCR catalyzes the rate-limiting step in cholesterol biosynthesis, and also plays a significant role in cholesterol homeostasis. We evaluated the association of a single nucleotide polymorphism (rs17238540) in the HMGCR gene with lipid-lowering response to statins in a large population-based cohort of patients with diabetes.

METHODS

One thousand six hundred and one patients commencing statins between 1993 and 2006 were identified from the Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland database. Statin response was determined by both percentage change in lipids, and whether patients failed to reach a total cholesterol target of less than or equal to 4 mmol/l. Covariates included HMGCR genotype, baseline lipids, age, sex, adherence and statin dose. All patients were genotyped for rs17238540 using a TAQMAN-based allelic discrimination assay.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight percent of individuals homozygous for the more frequent T allele failed to reach target compared with 51% of the individuals with a single copy of the minor G allele (carrier frequency 3.3%), with an adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for failure of 2.93 (1.61-5.34) mmol/l, P = 0.0005. In addition, we found that the heterozygotes had a 13% smaller reduction in total cholesterol (-32.3 vs. -37.1%, P = 0.0081) and a 27% smaller reduction in triglycerides (-27.5 vs. -37.6%, P = 0.0046).

CONCLUSION

Individuals heterozygous for the G allele of rs17238540 in the HMGCR gene may respond less well to statin therapy in terms of total cholesterol and triglyceride lowering.

Pharmacogenetics of apolipoprotein E gene during lipid-lowering therapy: lipid levels and prevention of coronary heart disease

A non-optimal plasma concentration of lipids is among the major modifiable risk factors of atherosclerosis. Therefore, the prevention of cardiovascular disease by means of lipid-lowering therapy with statins and other agents is of great importance for patient groups where a lifestyle change, for example, diet modification, does not lead to adequately reduced lipid levels. The response of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to statin therapy is highly variable. This is partly attributed to hereditary variation in genes involved in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and lipid metabolism. The pharmacogenetics of lipid-lowering therapy have been investigated for more than 40 different genes. The gene for apolipoprotein E (APOE) has been the most frequently studied, particularly regarding the epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 polymorphism. Those with the epsilon4 allele seem to have the poorest and those with the epsilon2 allele the strongest response to statins with regards to LDL-C levels. In addition, the epsilon2 carriers may reach the LDL-C treatment goals more frequently than epsilon4 carriers. Few studies have investigated the interaction of the APOE epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 polymorphism and lipid-lowering therapy in relation to the course of coronary heart disease; the results are contradictory and so far inconclusive. This review summarizes the pharmacogenetic findings related to the influence of APOE gene variation on lipid responses and the prevention of coronary heart disease during lipid-lowering therapy.

Impact of genetic polymorphisms on the efficacy of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors

Although pharmacologic treatment for cholesterol reduction represents an advance in cardiovascular and atherosclerosis treatment, the benefits of such therapy are still limited because of interindividual variability in the response to these drugs. Disease severity, treatment adherence, physiologic conditions, biologic conditions, and the patient's genetic profile could be cited as important factors in the evaluation of interindividual variability. In regard to the latter consideration, three large groups of genes could be investigated: (i) genes that code for proteins involved in metabolism and/or drug transport, thereby influencing the pharmacokinetics of these compounds; (ii) genes that code for proteins involved in the mechanism of action and/or in the metabolic pathway of drug action, and which therefore influence pharmacodynamics; and (iii) genes that code for proteins involved in direct development of the disease or in intermediate phenotypes. In this review we discuss pharmacogenetic studies of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and the implications of pharmacogenetic considerations for predicting treatment efficacy and reducing the adverse effects of these drugs. Once new studies have been performed and most of the genetic variability associated with drug action has been revealed, the great challenge will be to apply this knowledge in clinical medicine.

Apolipoprotein E genotypes are associated with lipid-lowering responses to statin treatment in diabetes: a Go-DARTS study

BACKGROUND

Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes have been associated with variations in plasma-lipid levels and with response to statins, although the influence of APOE on the response to statins remains controversial, especially in patients with diabetes. We sought to evaluate the association of the APOE genotype with the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc)-lowering response to statins, in a large population-based cohort of patients with diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1383 patients, commencing statins between 1990 and 2006, were identified from the Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland database. Statin response was determined both by the minimum LDLc achieved, and by the failure of the patients to reach a clinical target LDLc (< or =2 mmol/l). APOE genotype and potential confounding covariates were entered into the linear and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

We found an association of APOE genotypes with both baseline and treatment responses. E2 homozygotes achieved lower LDLc levels (mean 0.6; confidence interval: 0.1-1.1 mmol/l) than E4 homozygotes (mean 1.7; confidence interval: 1.4-1.9 mmol/l; P=2.96 x 10). Minimum LDLc was associated by a linear trend with genotype. This relationship remained statistically significant after adjustment for baseline LDLc, adherence, duration, dose, smoking, and age. None of the E2 homozygotes failed to reach the target LDLc, compared with 32% of the E4 homozygotes (P=5.3 x 10).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the potential clinical value of the APOE genotype as a robust marker for LDLc responses to statin drugs, which might contribute to the identification of a particularly drug-resistant subgroup of patients. This marker provides information over and above baseline lipid levels.

Pharmacogenetics of response to statins

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) are among the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide. On average, statins improve lipid profiles and have been shown to have ancillary beneficial effects on inflammation, platelet activity, and endothelial function. However, variability in drug response exists regardless of the measured phenotype, and genetic variability may be a contributing factor. Recently, there has been an interesting shift in statin pharmacogenetic studies. Novel study designs have been employed and nontraditional candidate genes have been investigated in relation to both lipid and nonlipid responses to statins. This review outlines earlier pharmacogenetic studies and highlights newly published findings that expand on previous work. Furthermore, a framework is provided in which the necessary next steps in research are described, with the ultimate goal of translating pharmacogenetic findings into clinically meaningful changes in patient care.

Effects of ezetimibe on lipids and lipoproteins in patients with hypercholesterolemia and different apolipoprotein E genotypes

BACKGROUND

The epsilon4 allele of the gene encoding apolipoprotein E (apoE) is associated with elevated serum levels of total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), as well as an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), greater disease severity, and higher CHD mortality. ApoE epsilon4 allele carriers have also shown reduced lipid and lipoprotein responses to lipid-modifying pharmacotherapy and lifestyle modifications.

OBJECTIVE

To provide preliminary descriptive data on the effects of apoE genotype on lipid and lipoprotein responses to the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe (Ezetrol/Zetia) in Hungarian subjects not at cholesterol goals at baseline.

METHODS

This prospective open-label study compared the effects of the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe 10 mg/day for up to 6 weeks added to existing therapies on the lipid profiles of 14 epsilon4 allele carriers and 14 age- and gender-matched APOE3/APOE3 homozygotes.

RESULTS

Treatment with ezetimibe reduced TC, LDL-, and triglycerides, and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-) significantly from baseline, and to similar extents, in both groups, lowering TC from baseline by 13.7% in APOE3/APOE3 homozygotes compared with 12.1% in epsilon4 allele carriers (p = 0.139); LDL-C by 22.8% (vs. 19.6%; p = 0.081); and triglycerides by 9.2% (vs. 9.1%; p = 0.120). Ezetimibe also increased HDL-C by 8.0% in subjects with the epsilon3/epsilon3 genotype compared with 8.9% in epsilon4 allele carriers (p = 0.263).

CONCLUSIONS

Ezetimibe significantly improved lipid and lipoprotein profiles from baseline irrespective of apoE epsilon3/epsilon3 or epsilon4 genotype in Hungarian subjects not at cholesterol goals. Limitations of our study include its open-label nature and small sample population, as well as the facts that patients with the epsilon4 allele were not included and data were not collected on initial cholesterol levels, initial statin doses, cholesterol responses to statins, and the safety and tolerability of ezetimibe. Further randomized controlled studies in larger numbers of people followed for longer intervals are warranted to confirm these findings.

A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in women. In fact, CVD is responsible for a third of all deaths of women worldwide and half of all deaths of women over 50 years of age in developing countries. The prevalence of CVD risk factor precursors is increasing in children. Retrospective analyses suggest that there are some clinically relevant differences between women and men in terms of prevalence, presentation, management and outcomes of the disease, but little is known about why CVD affects women and men differently. For instance, women with diabetes have a significantly higher CVD mortality rate than men with diabetes. Similarly, women with atrial fibrillation are at greater risk of stroke than men with atrial fibrillation. Historically, women have been underrepresented in clinical trials. The lack of good trial evidence concerning sex-specific outcomes has led to assumptions about CVD treatment in women, which in turn may have resulted in inadequate diagnoses and suboptimal management, greatly affecting outcomes. This knowledge gap may also explain why cardiovascular health in women is not improving as fast as that of men. Over the last decades, mortality rates in men have steadily declined, while those in women remained stable. It is also becoming increasingly evident that gender differences in cultural, behavioural, psychosocial and socioeconomic status are responsible, to various degrees, for the observed differences between women and men. However, the interaction between sex-and gender-related factors and CVD outcomes in women remains largely unknown.

The effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on the response to lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin or fenofibrate

Although the effect of apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism on the response to treatment with statins has been studied, the results are conflicting. Moreover, little is known about the possible effect of apolipoprotein E alleles on the response to treatment with fibrates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on lipid-lowering response to treatment with atorvastatin and fenofibrate in patients with different types of dyslipidemia. The study population included 136 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (type IIA dyslipidemia) treated with atorvastatin (20 mg/day) and 136 patients with either primary hypertriglyceridemia (type IV dyslipidemia) or mixed hyperlipidemia (type IIB dyslipidemia) treated with micronized fenofibrate (200 mg/day). Overall, no significant associations were detected between apolipoprotein E genotype and response to treatment with atorvastatin. In patients treated with fenofibrate, significant associations were noted between apolipoprotein E genotype and changes in apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein E and triglyceride levels. Specifically, in apolipoprotein E2, apolipoprotein E3, and apolipoprotein E4 individuals, apolipoprotein B reductions were 22%, 17%, and 8%, respectively (P = .003); apolipoprotein E reductions were 45%, 20%, and 15%, respectively (P = .006); whereas triglyceride reductions reached 53%, 36%, and 33%, respectively (P = .033). In conclusion, apolipoprotein E genotype had no significant effect on the response to treatment with atorvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, but in patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia or mixed hyperlipidemia, there was a clear association between apolipoprotein E genotype and response to treatment with fenofibrate.

Apolipoprotein E genotype affects the response to lipid-lowering therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of apolipoprotein E (apoE) genotype on baseline lipid levels and the response to hydroxy-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We consecutively recruited Chinese patients with type 2 DM requiring lipid-lowering therapy according to current guidelines. Patients were started on either simvastatin 10 mg daily or given an equivalent dose of lovastatin 20 mg. After 12 weeks of statin therapy, patients had fasting lipid profiles repeated. ApoE genotyping was performed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients were studied. The epsilon3/epsilon3 genotype was in 62.5%, epsilon2/epsilon3 and epsilon3/epsilon4, 16.7 and 20.8%, respectively. After adjusting for confounding variables, baseline total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were significantly higher in those with epsilon3/epsilon4 compared with epsilon2/epsilon3 genotype (6.7 vs. 5.5 mm for TC, 4.5 vs. 3.6 mm for LDL-C; p = 0.015 and p = 0.025, respectively). With statin therapy, epsilon3/epsilon4 patients had significantly greater LDL-C lowering compared with epsilon2/epsilon3 patients (48 vs. 27.7%; p = 0.04). There was no gender difference in baseline lipid parameters or response to statin therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

ApoE genotype accounts for interindividual variability of baseline cholesterol levels, and response to statin therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 DM.

Pharmacogenetics of chronic cardiovascular drugs: applications and implications

Cardiovascular disease continues to be a tremendous worldwide problem, and drug therapy is a major modality to attenuate its burden. At present, conditions such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia and heart failure are pharmacologically managed with an empirical trial-and-error approach. However, it has been suggested that this approach fails to adequately address the therapeutic needs of many patients, and pharmacogenetics has been offered as a tool to enhance patient-specific drug therapy. This review outlines pharmacogenetic studies of common cardiovascular drugs, such as diuretics, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, statins and warfarin, ultimately highlighting considerations for future research and practice.

Pharmacogenomics of cholesterol-lowering therapy

The prevention of cardiovascular disease is critically dependent on lipid-lowering therapy, including 3-hydroxymethyl-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), cholesterol absorption inhibitors, bile acid resins, fibrates, and nicotinic acid. Although these drugs are generally well tolerated, severe adverse effects can occur in a minority of patients. Furthermore, a subset of patients does not respond to cholesterol-lowering therapy with a reduction in coronary heart disease progression. Significant progress has been made in the identification of common DNA sequence variations in genes influencing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of statins and in disease-modifying genes relevant for coronary heart disease (CHD). Among the most promising candidate genes for pharmacogenomic analysis of statin therapy are HMG-CoA reductase as a direct target gene and other genes modulating lipid and lipoprotein homeostasis. Based on data from pharmacogenetic trials, a combined analysis of multiple genetic variants in several genes is more likely to give significant results than single gene studies in small cohorts. In the future, pharmacogenomic testing may allow risk stratification of patients to avoid serious side effects and enable clinicians to select lipid-lowering drugs with the highest efficacy resulting in the best response to therapy.

Pharmacogenetic study of apolipoprotein E, cholesteryl ester transfer protein and hepatic lipase genes and simvastatin therapy in Brazilian subjects

BACKGROUND

In recent years, one of the focuses of genetic investigation in cardiology has been to identify the genetic factors associated with variable response to statin treatment. Polymorphisms in apolipoprotein E (APOE), cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and hepatic lipase (LIPC), proteins with major roles in lipid metabolism and homeostasis have been shown associated with lipid-lowering drugs response.

METHODS

One hundred forty-six hypercholesterolemic patients of European descent were prospectively enrolled and treated with simvastatin 20 mg per day for over 6 months. Ninety-nine subjects completed the 6-month follow-up. Plasma lipids and lipoproteins were measured before and throughout the study. APOE (E*2, E*3 and E*4), LIPC-250A > G and CETP TaqIB genotypes were determined by PCR and restriction mapping.

RESULTS

After a 6-month follow-up, no differences among genotypes in the percentage variation in lipid and lipoprotein concentrations for APOE and LIPC SNPs were observed. After adjustment for covariates, CETP B2B2 homozygotes showed a greater HDL-cholesterol increase compared to B1B2 and B1B1 subjects (14.1% vs. 1.7% and 1.3%, P < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that individual plasma HDL-cholesterol response to simvastatin is mediated, in part, by the CETP gene locus, with the B2 homozygotes having more benefit in HDL-C improvement than carriers of B1 allele.

Long-term effects of antilipidaemic therapy on left ventricular function in patients with dyslipidaemia: multigated radionuclide ventriculography study

AIM

It has been reported that dyslipidaemia impairs left ventricular systolic (LVs) and diastolic (LVd) functions, irrespective of atherogenic effects, in the setting of coronary artery disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of anti-lipidaemic therapy on LVs and LVd functions by means of multigated radionuclide ventriculography (RNV) in subjects with signs of dyslipidaemia and with preserved left ventricular function.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with dyslipidaemia (eight men, 10 women, mean age 50+/-10 years) were included in the study. While the clinical examination and treadmill exercise test results were normal in all patients, low-density lipoprotein levels exceeded 160 mg . dl. Patients with medical conditions including coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes, cardiomyopathy and valvular heart disease which would influence left ventricular function were excluded from the study. RNV was performed in all subjects, taking into account the best septal position to differentiate the left ventricle from the right ventricle. The following parameters were calculated: ejection fraction, peak ejection rate (PER), time to peak ejection (TPER), a ejection rate (aER), a ejection fraction (aEF), Peak filling rate (PFR), time to peak filling rate (TPFR), a filling rate (aFR), a filling fraction (aFF).

RESULTS

The low-density lipoprotein value decreased and the high-density lipoprotein value increased after statin therapy (P<0.001 and P<0.003, respectively). PER, aER and aFF significantly increased and TPER decreased as a consequence of statin therapy (respectively, P<0.05, P<0.05, P<0.05 P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Anti-lipidaemic therapy is effective in dyslipidaemic patients. RNV is a useful and non-invasive method for monitoring changes in ventricular function following anti-lipidaemic treatment strategies.

Response to micronized fenofibrate treatment is associated with the peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptors alpha G/C intron7 polymorphism in subjects with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The association between polymorphisms in candidate genes related to lipoprotein metabolism and the reduction in plasma triglyceride (TG) in response to fenofibrate treatment was evaluated in subjects with type 2 diabetes treated with micronized fenofibrate (200 mg/day) for at least 3 years in the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study.

METHODS

The cholesteryl ester transfer protein Taq1B, LPL S447X, hepatic lipase -514 C-->T, peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptors alpha (PPARA) L162V and G/C intron 7 polymorphisms and the apolipoprotein E2/E3/E4 alleles were genotyped using PCR and restriction enzyme digestion. Subjects were divided into high TG-responders (with > 30% TG relative reduction after treatment) and low TG-responders.

RESULTS

The frequency of the PPARA intron 7 G/G genotype was higher in high TG-responders than in low TG-responders (85% vs. 69%, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the percentage of high TG-responders and low TG-responders for any of the other genetic polymorphisms examined. In stepwise logistic regression, baseline TG and only the PPARA intron 7 polymorphism among the others were selected in the model as significant predictors of TG-response (odds ratio: 3.10, 95% CI: 1.28-7.52, P = 0.012 for PPARA polymorphism). With age, gender, body mass index, smoking status and HbA1c as additional factors, baseline TG (P< 0.0001), intron 7 (P = 0.013), body mass index (P = 0.040) and LPL-S447X (P = 0.084) were significant predictors of TG-response.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that elevated baseline TG levels and PPARA gene intron 7 G/G genotype were associated with TG reduction > 30% after fenofibrate treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Lipid homeostasis and apolipoprotein E in the development and progression of Alzheimer's disease

Extracellular amyloid plaques, intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, and loss of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons in the brains of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients may be the end result of abnormalities in lipid metabolism and peroxidation that may be caused, or exacerbated, by beta-amyloid peptide (Abeta). Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is a major apolipoprotein in the brain, mediating the transport and clearance of lipids and Abeta. ApoE-dependent dendritic and synaptic regeneration may be less efficient with apoE4, and this may result in, or unmask, age-related neurodegenerative changes. The increased risk of AD associated with apoE4 may be modulated by diet, vascular risk factors, and genetic polymorphisms that affect the function of other transporter proteins and enzymes involved in brain lipid homeostasis. Diet and apoE lipoproteins influence membrane lipid raft composition and the properties of enzymes, transporter proteins, and receptors mediating Abeta production and degradation, tau phosphorylation, glutamate and glucose uptake, and neuronal signal transduction. The level and isoform of apoE may influence whether Abeta is likely to be metabolized or deposited. This review examines the current evidence for diet, lipid homeostasis, and apoE in the pathogenesis of AD. Effects on the cholinergic system and response to cholinesterase inhibitors by APOE allele carrier status are discussed briefly.

Pharmacogenetics of response to statins: Where do we stand?

Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death, especially in developed countries. Blood cholesterol lowering by way of statin therapy is a common risk-lowering therapy. The risk reduction for coronary artery disease for patients using statins is 27%. These reductions, however, are average effects for all patients included in the trials. There is notable interindividual variation in response to statins, and the origins of this variation are poorly understood. Pharmacogenetics seeks to determine the role of genetic factors in variation of drug response. In patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, 23 studies have examined the effects of genetic polymorphisms at 20 different loci on the lipid response to statin treatment, and 18 studies examined genetic polymorphisms involved in the benefits of statin therapy in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Even though many studies have been performed, few results have been replicated. It is our contention that larger sample sizes and consideration of multiple genes are needed in the field of pharmacogenetics of statin response.

A common PCSK9 haplotype, encompassing the E670G coding single nucleotide polymorphism, is a novel genetic marker for plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and severity of coronary atherosclerosis

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the effects of PCSK9 variants on plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, severity of coronary atherosclerosis, and response to statin therapy in the Lipoprotein Coronary Atherosclerosis Study (LCAS) population.

BACKGROUND

Mutations in PCSK9 cause autosomal-dominant hypercholesterolemia. We hypothesized that PCSK9 variants could affect plasma LDL-C in individuals with polygenic hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS

We sequenced all 12 exons and boundaries to detect novel polymorphisms, and genotyped 372 subjects in LCAS and 319 subjects in a second independent population for six polymorphisms, including novel leucine repeats, by fluorescently tagged markers. We reconstructed haplotypes using a Bayesian algorithm.

RESULTS

Permutation test results showed statistically significant differences in global haplotype distribution among the tertiles of LDL-C (odds ratio [OR]: 2.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.90 to 4.32, p = 0.005) and minimum lumen diameter of coronary lesions (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.01 to 3.55, p = 0.045). Regression analysis identified haplotype 3 as an independent determinant of LDL-C levels (adjusted R2 = 2.2%, F = 9.37, p = 0.002). Haplotype structure analysis identified E670G as the determinant variant, exerting a dose effect (GG > EG > EE) and accounting for 3.5% of plasma LDL-C variability (F = 14.6, p < 0.001). Plasma total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein (a) levels were also associated with the E670G variant. Distributions of the E670G genotypes in an independent normolipidemic and the hyperlipidemic LCAS populations were significantly different (F = 7.2, p = 0.027). No significant treatment-by-genotype interactions were detected. The false positive report probability was between 2% and 8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Haplotype 3 encompassing the E670G variant is an independent determinant of plasma LDL-C levels and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis.

Pharmacogenetics of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: exploring the potential for genotype-based individualization of coronary heart disease management

Despite the benefit of statin therapy in the prevention of coronary heart disease, a considerable inter-individual variation exists in its response. It is well recognized that genetic variation can contribute to differences in drug disposition and, consequently, clinical efficacy at the population level. Pharmacogenetics, exploring genetic polymorphisms that influence response to drug therapy, may one day allow the clinician to customize treatment strategies for patients in order to improve the success rate of drug therapies. To date, 41 studies have investigated the relationships between common genetic variants and response to statin therapy in terms of lipid effects and clinical outcomes; 16 candidate genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism and 3 in pharmacokinetics. APOE is the most extensively studied locus, and absolute difference in LDL cholesterol reduction across genotypes remained 3-6%. Moreover, none of the associations was striking enough to justify genetic analysis in clinical practice. Reported data have suggested that larger studies (>1000 participants) or combination analyses with >2 different polymorphisms would enable us to find clinically or biologically meaningful difference, which could be assumed as >10% absolute difference, and that genes influencing cholesterol biosynthesis in the liver, such as ABCG5/G8, CYP7A1, HMGCR, would be good candidates for future studies.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor pharmacogenomics: overview and implications for practice

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are widely prescribed and recommended as first-line therapy for most patients with hypercholesterolemia or established coronary heart disease. However, there is interpatient variability in lipid-lowering response to statins that is not explained by initial cholesterol levels and inadequate dosing alone. Genetic polymorphisms may contribute. This review discusses the potential contribution of polymorphisms in genes encoding proteins involved in drug metabolism and transport, cholesterol biosynthesis, lipid metabolism and others to lipid responses to statins.

Pharmacogenetics of lipid diseases

The genetic basis for most of the rare lipid monogenic disorders have been elucidated, but the challenge remains in determining the combination of genes that contribute to the genetic variability in lipid levels in the general population; this has been estimated to be in the range of 40-60 per cent of the total variability. Therefore, the effect of common polymorphisms on lipid phenotypes will be greatly modulated by gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. This approach can also be used to characterise the individuality of the response to lipid-lowering therapies, whether using drugs (pharmacogenetics) or dietary interventions (nutrigenetics). In this regard, multiple studies have already described significant interactions between candidate genes for lipid and drug metabolism that modulate therapeutic response--although the outcomes of these studies have been controversial and call for more rigorous experimental design and analytical approaches. Once solid evidence about the predictive value of genetic panels is obtained, risk and therapeutic algorithms can begin to be generated that should provide an accurate measure of genetic predisposition, as well as targeted behavioural modifications or drugs of choice and personalised dosages of these drugs.

Harmful effects of increased LDLR expression in mice with human APOE*4 but not APOE*3

OBJECTIVE

Increased expression of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) is generally considered beneficial for reducing plasma cholesterol and atherosclerosis, and its downregulation has been thought to explain the association between apolipoprotein (apo) E4 and increased risk of coronary heart disease in humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Contrary to this hypothesis, doubling Ldlr expression caused severe atherosclerosis with marked accumulation of cholesterol-rich, apoE-poor remnants in mice with human apoE4, but not apoE3, when the animals were fed a Western-type diet. The increased Ldlr expression enhanced in vivo clearance of exogenously introduced remnants in mice with apoE4 only when the remnants were already enriched with apoE4. The rates of nascent lipoprotein production were the same. The adverse effects of increased LDLR suggest a possibility that the receptor can trap apoE4, reducing its availability for the transfer to nascent lipoproteins needed for their rapid clearance, thereby increasing the production of apoE-poor remnants that are slowly cleared. The lower affinity for the LDLR of apoE3 compared with apoE4 could then explain why increased receptor expression had no adverse effects with apoE3.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results emphasize the occurrence of important and unexpected interactions between APOE genotype, LDLR expression, and diet.

Effect of apolipoprotein E alleles and angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphisms on lipid and lipoprotein markers in middle-aged men and in patients with stable angina pectoris or healed myocardial infarction

The effects of the apolipoprotein E epsilon and angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion alleles on lipid levels and hypolipidemic drug treatment was assessed in 400 men with stable angina pectoris or healed myocardial infarction and 338 healthy controls. The data indicate that epsilon4 carriers have increased total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, that the epsilon4 allele unfavorably decreases the efficiency of statin treatment, and that the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism exerts no significant effect, with the exception of an increase in apolipoprotein E levels.

Pharmacogenomic profiling in postmarketing surveillance: prospects and challenges

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a major public health and economic global problem. Growing evidence suggests that pharmacogenomics may potentially play a role in reducing drug-induced adverse events. Research efforts are increasingly directed towards this goal. However, knowledge about whether or not pharmacogenomics may be useful as a novel approach in postmarketing surveillance programs is at present rather limited. A critical analysis of some of the methodological design and ethical issues generated by the potential incorporation of pharmacogenomic profiling into pharmacosurveillance programs is presented.

Adherence to and dosing of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in the general population differs according to apolipoprotein E-genotypes

Discontinuation and poor adherence to therapy are major problems during long-term treatment, particularly with cholesterol lowering drugs. Several studies have indicated that the cholesterol lowering effect of statins differs according to apolipoprotein (apo)E genotypes. Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol lowering capacity appears to be smaller in subjects with the epsilon(4) allele. To assess whether the use of statins in daily practice differs according to apoE genotypes, we used data from the Rotterdam Study, a population-based prospective cohort study in the Netherlands, which started in 1990 and included 7983 subjects aged 55 years or more. During follow-up, there were 798 subjects who started to use statins. We used a Cox proportional hazard model to determine the rate of discontinuation in the first 3 years of statin use. Subjects on statin therapy with epsilon(2)epsilon(2) and epsilon(4)epsilon(4) genotypes showed a trend towards higher dosages than subjects with the other genotypes. Relative to subjects with the epsilon(2)epsilon(3) genotype, those with the epsilon(4)epsilon(4) genotype had a risk of 2.28 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-5.12] to discontinue statins within 3 years. In women, this relative risk was 1.70 (CI 0.53-5.42) versus 3.18 (CI 1.01-10.03) in men. The apoE genotype is associated with discontinuation of statins. This suggests that subjects who are genetically prone to develop hypercholesterolemia show the highest risk of discontinuation of treatment.