Antiepileptic drugs in schizophrenia: a review

Convergent lines of evidence supporting involvement of NFKB1 in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES

NFKB1 was associated with treatment-refractory schizophrenia (SZ) and response to antipsychotics; however, the underlying mechanisms through which NFKB1 confers its risk for SZ are largely unknown. We aimed to investigate the potential role of NFKB1 in SZ.

METHODS

In the present study, we investigated the association of the risk SNP rs230529 of NFKB1 with gray matter density and with NFKB1 mRNA levels in various human brain regions. The spatiotemporal expression pattern of NFKB1 in human brains was explored. We constructed a miRNA-NFKB1-target gene regulatory network and analyzed its druggability through targeting NFKB1 for SZ treatment.

RESULTS

NFKB1 showed the highest expression levels in the cerebellum, in which these levels were stratified by genotypes of rs230529. Interestingly, the allelic state of rs230529 was significantly associated with regional gray matter density in multiple brain regions (including the cerebellum), which also differed between patients with schizophrenia and controls. Furthermore, regulatory targets of NFKB1 were enriched among SZ susceptibility genes. A substantial proportion of NFKB1 target genes were subject to combinatorial regulation by NFKB1 and miRNAs, constituting a hybrid NFKB1-miRNA-gene regulatory network. Some components of this network showed expression changes relevant to both the disease and the treatment. Finally, we detected the dynamic changes of NFKB1-miR-155-5p-GSK3B and NFKB1-miR-155-5p/let-7a-5p-IL6 networks in course of the treatment of SZ.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our findings support the involvement of NFKB1-mediated dysregulation in the development of SZ.

Non-antipsychotic medicines and modified electroconvulsive therapy are risk factors for hospital-acquired pneumonia in schizophrenia patients

BACKGROUND

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) has a significant and detrimental impact on schizophrenia patients. Non-antipsychotic medicines and modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT) are frequently used in conjunction with antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia. Whether non-antipsychotic medicines or MECT are risk factors for HAP in schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics is still unknown.

METHODS

Patients with schizophrenia who were admitted to the Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu between January 2015 and April 2022 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Individuals with HAP were 1:1 matched to individuals without HAP (non-HAP) using propensity score matching (PSM). The risk factors for HAP were analyzed by comparing the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 7,085 schizophrenia patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 39.77 ± 14.45 years. 193 patients developed HAP on an average of 22.26 ± 21.68 days after admission with an incidence of 2.73%. After 1:1 PSM, 192 patients from each group (HAP and non-HAP) were included. The HAP group had significantly more patients with MECT and taking benzodiazepines, antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and anti-parkinsonians both before and after PSM by Bonferroni correction (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that, combined with antipsychotics, non-antipsychotic medicines including benzodiazepines (OR = 3.13, 95%CI = 1.95-5.03, P < 0.001), mood stabilizers (OR =3.33, 95%CI =1.79-6.20, P < 0.001) and MECT (OR =2.58, 95%CI =1.49-4.46, P = 0.001) were associated with a significantly increased incidence of HAP.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of HAP in schizophrenia patients in our cohort was 2.73%. MECT and non-antipsychotic medicines, including benzodiazepines and mood stabilizers were risk factors for HAP in schizophrenia patients treated with antipsychotics.

Prevalence and predictors of treatment-resistant schizophrenia in a tertiary hospital in Northeast Brazil

OBJECTIVE

To investigate epidemiological factors related to treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) in Northeast Brazil, a region where data about mental health are still scarce.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study included all patients with schizophrenia currently receiving treatment at the outpatient psychiatric clinic of a tertiary hospital in Northeast Brazil. They were divided into TRS and treatment-responsive groups, and epidemiological characteristics of both groups were compared. A logistic regression model investigated factors related to treatment resistance.

RESULTS

Two hundred and five patients were included, 155 treatment-resistant and 50 treatment-responsive. The TRS group had higher use of benzodiazepines (36.1 vs. 18%, p = 0.017) and antiepileptics (36.8 vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001), antipsychotic polypharmacy (28.6 vs. 8%, p = 0.003) and suicide attempts (35.6 vs. 20%, p = 0.04). Age at onset was younger (19.7±7.3 vs. 24.6±8.6 years, p = 0.001) and CGI was higher in TRS (3.72±1.00 vs. 3.16±1.00, p = 0.001). In logistic regression, being married was a protector (odds ratio [OR] = 0.248, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.091-0.679, p = 0.007) and younger age at onset was a predictor (OR = 1.076, 95%CI 1.034-1.120, p < 0.001) of treatment resistance.

CONCLUSION

Early onset of disease was associated with more treatment resistance, while being married with less resistance. Clinicians should identify early predictors of resistance in order to reduce unfavorable outcomes.

Drug enrichment and discovery from schizophrenia genome-wide association results: an analysis and visualisation approach

Using successful genome-wide association results in psychiatry for drug repurposing is an ongoing challenge. Databases collecting drug targets and gene annotations are growing and can be harnessed to shed a new light on psychiatric disorders. We used genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genetics Consortium (PGC) Schizophrenia working group to build a drug repositioning model for schizophrenia. As sample size increases, schizophrenia GWAS results show increasing enrichment for known antipsychotic drugs, selective calcium channel blockers, and antiepileptics. Each of these therapeutical classes targets different gene subnetworks. We identify 123 Bonferroni-significant druggable genes outside the MHC, and 128 FDR-significant biological pathways related to neurons, synapses, genic intolerance, membrane transport, epilepsy, and mental disorders. These results suggest that, in schizophrenia, current well-powered GWAS results can reliably detect known schizophrenia drugs and thus may hold considerable potential for the identification of new therapeutic leads. Moreover, antiepileptics and calcium channel blockers may provide repurposing opportunities. This study also reveals significant pathways in schizophrenia that were not identified previously, and provides a workflow for pathway analysis and drug repurposing using GWAS results.

A Long-Term Treatment with Arachidonyl-2'-Chloroethylamide Combined with Valproate Increases Neurogenesis in a Mouse Pilocarpine Model of Epilepsy

Rational polytherapy in the treatment of refractory epilepsy has been the main therapeutic modality for several years. In treatment with two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), it is of particular importance that AEDs be selected based on their high anticonvulsant properties, minimal side effects, and impact on the formation of new neurons. The aim of the study was to conduct an in vivo evaluation of the relationship between treatments with synthetic cannabinoid arachidonyl-2′-chloroethylamide (ACEA) alone or in combination with valproic acid (VPA) and hippocampal neurogenesis in a mouse pilocarpine model of epilepsy. All studies were performed on adolescent male CB57/BL mice with using the following drugs: VPA (10 mg/kg), ACEA (10 mg/kg), phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF—a substance protecting ACEA against degradation by fatty acid hydrolase, 30 mg/kg), pilocarpine (PILO, a single dose of 290 mg/kg) and methylscopolamine (30 min before PILO to stop peripheral cholinergic effects of pilocarpine, 1 mg/kg). We evaluated the process of neurogenesis after a 10-day treatment with ACEA and VPA, alone and in combination. We observed a decrease of neurogenesis in the PILO control group as compared to the healthy control mice. Furthermore, ACEA + PMSF alone and in combination with VPA significantly increased neurogenesis compared to the PILO control group. In contrast, VPA 10-day treatment had no impact on the level of neurons in comparison to the PILO control group. The combination of ACEA, PMSF and VPA considerably stimulated the process of creating new cells, particularly neurons, while chronic administration of VPA itself had no influence on neurogenesis in the mouse pilocarpine model of epilepsy. The obtained results enabled an in vivo evaluation of neurogenesis after treatment with antiepileptic drugs in an experimental model of epilepsy.

Glutamate and dopamine in schizophrenia: an update for the 21st century

The glutamate and dopamine hypotheses are leading theories of the pathoaetiology of schizophrenia. Both were initially based on indirect evidence from pharmacological studies supported by post-mortem findings, but have since been substantially advanced by new lines of evidence from in vivo imaging studies. This review provides an update on the latest findings on dopamine and glutamate abnormalities in schizophrenia, focusing on in vivo neuroimaging studies in patients and clinical high-risk groups, and considers their implications for understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenia. These findings have refined both the dopamine and glutamate hypotheses, enabling greater anatomical and functional specificity, and have been complemented by preclinical evidence showing how the risk factors for schizophrenia impact on the dopamine and glutamate systems. The implications of this new evidence for understanding the development and treatment of schizophrenia are considered, and the gaps in current knowledge highlighted. Finally, the evidence for an integrated model of the interactions between the glutamate and dopamine systems is reviewed, and future directions discussed.

Predictive validity of a MK-801-induced cognitive impairment model in mice: implications on the potential limitations and challenges of modeling cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia preclinically

Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) is a major and disabling symptom domain of the disease that is generally unresponsive to current pharmacotherapies. Critically important to the discovery of novel therapeutics for CIAS is the utilization of preclinical models with robust predictive validity. We investigated the predictive validity of MK-801-induced memory impairments in mouse inhibitory avoidance (MK-IA) as a preclinical model for CIAS by investigating compounds that have been tested in humans, including antipsychotics, sodium channel blocker mood stabilizers, and putative cognitive enhancers. The atypical antipsychotic clozapine, as well as risperidone and olanzapine (see Brown et al., 2013), had no effect on MK-801-induced memory impairments. For sodium channel blockers, carbamazepine significantly attenuated memory impairments induced by MK-801, whereas lamotrigine had no effect. Nicotine, donepezil, modafinil, and xanomeline all significantly attenuated MK-801-induced memory impairments, but the magnitude of effects and the dose-responses observed varied across compounds. Clinically, only acute administration of nicotine has demonstrated consistent positive effects on CIAS, while inconsistent results have been reported for lamotrigine, donepezil, and modafinil; atypical antipsychotics produce only moderate improvements at best. A positive clinical signal has been observed with xanomeline, but only in a small pilot trial. The results presented here suggest that the MK-IA model lacks robust predictive validity for CIAS as the model is likely permissive and may indicate false positive signals for compounds and mechanisms that lack clear clinical efficacy for CIAS. Our findings also highlight the potential limitations and challenges of using NMDA receptor antagonists in rodents to model CIAS.

Effect of combination of aripiprazole with carbamazepine and fluvoxamine on liver functions in experimental animals

Objectives:

Aripiprazole, a new atypical antipsychotic drug extensively metabolized by enzyme CYP3A4, is found to produce asymptomatic elevation of serum transaminase levels on long-term treatment. The present study aims to evaluate the hepatotoxic effect of aripiprazole when coprescribed with carbamazepine and fluvoxamine.

Materials and Methods:

The rats were subjected to chronic treatment with two different doses, therapeutic dose (TD) and maximum therapeutic dose (MTD), of aripiprazole in combination with carbamazepine and fluvoxamine. The changes in hepatic function was assessed by various biochemical liver enzyme markers like serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT), serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin, histological studies, and physical parameters (liver weight, liver volume, and body weight).

Results:

The combination of aripiprazole with fluvoxamine at both TD and MTD showed the hepatic damage and significant elevation in serum transaminase level which is supported by histological reports. The coadministration of aripiprazole with carbamazepine leads to significant decrease in blood concentration of aripiprazole possibly due to induction of enzyme CYP3A4 resulting in loss or reduction of clinical efficacy.

Conclusions:

There would be an accumulation of aripiprazole when coadministered with fluvoxamine, a known inhibitor of CYP3A4, leading to hepatic damage and reduction in aripiprazole when administered along with carbamazepine. Therefore, aripiprazole with fluvoxamine and carbamazepine should be coprescribed with caution. The patients should be monitored for signs of adverse effects like hepatic damage or decreased efficacy of these drugs.

Treatment-refractory schizophrenia

Between one-third and one-half of the individuals who meet diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia remain actively ill despite optimal pharmacological treatment. These individuals tend to progressively deteriorate in terms of social and vocational functioning despite major public and private investments in their rehabilitation. For patients who do not respond to the first prescribed antipsychotic drug, current clinical practice is to switch to a second and a third drug, and eventually to clozapine, the only antipsychotic drug proven to be effective in treatment-refractory schizophrenia (TRS). Occasionally, two antipsychotics are given concomitantly or psychotropic drugs are added to antipsychotic drugs; however, very few empirical data exist to support this practice. Although there are many exceptions, patients who do not benefit from the first prescribed drug will not benefit from any pharmacological intervention. Therefore, efforts are under way to determine the reason for lack of response to available treatments and devise novel, more effective treatments. To be successful these efforts must result in a more specific definition of TRS, as well as in a better understanding of the illness pathophysiology and the mechanism of action of the drugs.

The pharmacological management of violence in schizophrenia: a structured review

Although the increased risk of violent behavior in individuals with schizophrenia is now well-established, there is considerable uncertainty in pharmacological strategies to reduce this risk. In this review, we performed a systematic search of three electronic databases from January 2000 to March 2010 of treatment research on the management of violence in schizophrenia. We identified eight randomized controlled trials. The main findings included the association of nonadherence to antipsychotic medication to violent outcomes, a specific anti-aggressive effect of clozapine and short-term benefits of adjunctive β-blockers. There was little evidence on the efficacy of adjunctive mood stabilizers, depot medication or electroconvulsive therapy. Future research should use validated outcomes, longer follow-up periods and investigate patients with comorbid substance misuse.

In vitro transport profile of carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, eslicarbazepine acetate, and their active metabolites by human P-glycoprotein

PURPOSE

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are widely used not only in the treatment of epilepsy but also as treatments for psychiatric disorders. Pharmacoresistance of AEDs in the treatment of epilepsy and psychiatric disorders is a serious problem. Transport of antiepileptic drugs by P-glycoprotein (Pgp, ABCB1, or MDR1), which is overexpressed in the blood-brain barrier, may be a mechanism for resistance of AEDs. For most AEDs, conflicting evidence precludes consensus on whether they are substrates of Pgp. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether analogs and metabolites of the AED carbamazepine are substrates of human Pgp.

METHODS

Polarized cell lines MDCKII and LLC transfected with the human MDR1 gene were used in the bidirectional transport assay and concentration equilibrium transport assay. The expression of Pgp was detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunofluorescent staining. Rhodamine-123 uptake was also determined.

KEY FINDINGS

Pgp did not transport carbamazepine, but it did transport its active metabolite carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide. Pgp also pumped eslicarbazepine acetate and oxcarbazepine, as well as their active metabolite (S)-licarbazepine. Transport of the drugs was in the order of ESL>OXC>S-LC>CBZ-E in concentration equilibrium conditions. The transport of these drugs was blocked by Pgp inhibitors tariquidar and verapamil.

SIGNIFICANCE

All carbamazepine analogs or metabolites tested are Pgp substrates, except for carbamazepine. These data suggest that resistance to carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, or eslicarbazepine acetate may be attributed to increased efflux function of Pgp because they or their active metabolites are Pgp substrates.

Topiramate augmentation of clozapine in schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

The persistence of psychotic, affective, cognitive, and psychosocial symptoms despite medications is commonly observed in schizophrenic patients. The present study was a 24-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial aimed to explore the efficacy of topiramate add-on pharmacotherapy on clinical symptomatology and cognitive functioning in a sample of treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients receiving clozapine. After clinical and cognitive assessments were randomly allocated to receive either up to 200 mg/day of topiramate or a placebo. A final sample of 43 patients completed the study. The results obtained indicate that topiramate appeared to be scarcely effective for reducing clinical symptomatology in schizophrenic patients who have had an incomplete clinical response to clozapine. Regarding cognitive functioning, in our sample a trend to experience cognitive impairment in the examined domains was observed, as the patients included in the topiramate groups expressed cognitive complaints partially confirmed by a mild worsening of performances on certain cognitive tasks. Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous disorder with regard to pathophysiology; therefore, data reflecting the mean response of a sample of patients may fail to reveal therapeutic effects. More research is needed to better identify subgroups of patients with peculiar features which may account for responsivity to experimental medications and augmentation strategies.

Antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of psychiatric disorders

The clinical interface between psychiatry and neurology is epilepsy; the pharmacological expression of this interface is antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), as they are used to treat both epilepsy and psychiatric disorders, especially bipolar disorders. The prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity and the risk of suicidal behavior/ideation/suicide are markedly increased in patients with epilepsy (PWE). Though AEDs receive initial indications for the treatment of epilepsy, currently the majority of AEDs are used to treat pain and psychiatric disorders. Thus in selecting the appropriate AEDs for treatment of PWE, consideration should be given to which AEDs best treat the epileptic disorder and the psychiatric comorbidity. This review is an overview of 21 AEDs in which negative psychotropic properties, approved indications in psychiatry, off-label studied uses in psychiatry, and principal uses in psychiatry are presented with literature review. A total of 40 psychiatric uses have been identified. Of the 21 AEDs reviewed, only 5 have U.S. Food and Drug Administration and/or European Medicines Agency psychiatric approval for limited uses; the majority of AEDs are used off-label. Many of these off-label uses are based on case reports, open-label studies, and poorly controlled or small-sample-size studies. In some instances, off-label use persists in the face of negative pivotal trials. Further placebo-controlled (augmentation and monotherapy) parallel-arm research with active comparators is required in the complex field of AED treatment of psychiatric disorders to minimize the treatment gap not only for PWE with psychiatric disorders, but also for psychiatric patients who would benefit from properly studied AEDs while minimizing adverse effects.

Association study between Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia-1 (DISC1) and Japanese patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS)

Treating the 20-30% of patients with schizophrenia whose symptoms are resistant to antipsychotic treatment, a condition known as treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), can be problematic. Recently, an association between Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia-1 (DISC1), a candidate susceptibility gene for schizophrenia, and TRS was reported. Associations between three missense SNPs, rs3738401 (Q264R), rs6675281 (L607F), and rs821616 (S704C) in DISC1, especially rs3738401, showed strong significance. Thus, the main aim of our current study was to examine if the reported possible functional polymorphisms in DISC1 were related to Japanese TRS. First, DISC1 was re-investigated in 485 Japanese patients with schizophrenia and 660 healthy controls with a case-control study using four candidate SNPs, rs751229, rs3738401, rs821597, and rs821616. DISC1 was not associated with schizophrenia in the Japanese population. Second, we investigated whether these SNPs contributed to TRS in 127 inpatients with schizophrenia (35 patients; TRS and 92 patients; non-TRS). The genotypic distributions of these four SNPs were not significantly different between TRS and non-TRS in either genotypic or recessive models of minor alleles. In addition, clinical variables, such as improvement in clinical symptoms, duration of hospitalization, and total antipsychotics dose amounts, were not different among the genotypes of these SNPs. Taken together, results showed that DISC1 had no apparent degree of association with Japanese patients with schizophrenia as a candidate susceptibility gene for disease per se or TRS.

Glutamatergic antipsychotic drugs: a new dawn in the treatment of schizophrenia?

Growing evidence for glutamate abnormalities in schizophrenia support the development of novel antipsychotic agents targeting this system. Early studies investigating modulation of the glutamate system using glycine, D-serine and sarcosine in patients with schizophrenia have demonstrated significant effects, particularly on negative symptoms, conventionally thought to be refractory to antipsychotic drug treatment. Drugs targeting the glutamate system also have a completely different side-effect profile to dopamine D2 antagonists, with no propensity to extrapyramidal side effects, prolactinaemia or weight gain. It has been hypothesized that glutamatergic drugs may be of benefit to the 20-30% of individuals with schizophrenia who fail to show any response to dopaminergic agents, and may be particularly useful in the early stages of the illness, where they may be disease-modifying. A number of glutamatergic compounds have been reported as having promising results in phase II drug trials. If these reach the clinic, they will represent the first truly novel approach to pharmacotherapy in schizophrenia for more than 50 years.

Significance of NMDA receptor-related glutamatergic amino acid levels in peripheral blood of patients with schizophrenia

Hypo-function of N-methyl d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors is strongly involved in the brain pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Several excitatory amino acids, such as endogenous glutamate, glycine, serine and alanine, which are involved in glutamate neurotransmission via NMDA receptors, were studied to further understand the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and to find a biological marker for this disease, particularly in peripheral blood. In this literature review, we connect several earlier clinical studies and several studies of excitatory amino acid levels in peripheral blood in a historical context. Finally, we join these results and our previous studies, the Juntendo University Schizophrenia Projects (JUSP), which investigated plasma glutamatergic amino acid levels in detail, and considered whether these amino acid levels may be diagnostic, therapeutic, or symptomatic biological markers. This review concludes that peripheral blood levels of endogenous glycine and alanine could be a symptomatic marker in schizophrenia, while peripheral blood levels of exogenous glycine and alanine in augmentation therapies could be therapeutic markers. Noteworthy peripheral blood levels of endogenous d-serine could reflect its brain levels, and may prove to be a useful diagnostic and therapeutic marker in schizophrenia. In addition, measurements of new endogenous molecules, such as glutathione, are promising. Finally, for future therapies with glutamatergic agents still being examined in animal studies, the results of these biological marker studies may lay the foundation for the development of next-generation antipsychotics.

Gabapentin adjunctive to risperidone or olanzapine in partially responsive schizophrenia: an open-label pilot study

BACKGROUND

There is a great need in the treatment of schizophrenia for a drug, or drug combinations, to improve clinical response with fewer serious side effects. The objective of this study was to explore the therapeutic effects and tolerability of the anticonvulsant gabapentin as an adjunctive in the treatment of patients with partially responsive schizophrenia.

METHODS

Ten consenting patients with a confirmed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision diagnosis of schizophrenia were identified. All patients failed at least one 12-week treatment trial with risperidone or olanzapine. Gabapentin was added to ongoing antipsychotic treatment with olanzapine or risperidone for eight weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Other scales included the Calgary Depression Scale (CDSS) and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). Repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance was utilized to examine changes in outcome measures over time with adjunctive treatment with gabapentin.

RESULTS

There was a significant drop in the PANSS and CDSS scores at endpoint (week 8). There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups with regard to changes in all outcome measures or in AIMS score. The adjunctive treatments were well tolerated and side effects were transient.

CONCLUSION

Gabapentin could be used successfully as an adjunct to novel antipsychotics in partially responsive schizophrenia. However, large controlled studies are needed to examine the effectiveness of gabapentin in psychotic disorders.

Investigation of clinical factors influencing cognitive function in Japanese schizophrenia

Several investigators have reported cognitive dysfunction in chronic schizophrenia that was associated with insight and social skills. Such cognitive dysfunction seriously hinders an immediate return to normal life. Recently, Kaneda et al. reported that the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, Japanese-language version (BACS-J) was superior in the evaluation of the cognitive function. We investigated which clinical factors (age, sex, duration of illness, level of education, smoking status, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score and medication dosage) affected cognitive dysfunction in 115 Japanese schizophrenic patients, with the use of multiple regression analysis. We detected an association between composite score, verbal memory, working memory and executive function and PANSS total score. Moreover, most cognitive tasks were associated with a negative PANSS score but not a positive PANSS score or general score. We also showed an association between age and verbal fluency and attention in schizophrenia. In addition, anxiolytics/hypnotics (diazepam-equivalent) were associated with composite score, working memory and motor speed. In conclusion, cognitive function was associated with PANSS score, especially negative PANSS score. Because anxiolytics/hypnotics might have a detrimental influence on cognitive function, we strongly suggest that the use of anxiolytics/hypnotics be reduced in schizophrenics as much as possible.

Dopamine and psychosis: theory, pathomechanisms and intermediate phenotypes

Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe, and disabling brain disorder arising from the adverse interaction of predisposing risk genes and environmental factors. The psychopathology is characterized by a wide array of disturbing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral symptoms that interfere with the individual's capacity to function in society. Contemporary pathophysiological models assume that psychotic symptoms are triggered by a dysregulation of dopaminergic activity in the brain, a theory that is tightly linked to the serendipitous discovery of the first effective antipsychotic agents in the early 1950s. In recent years, the availability of modern neuroimaging techniques has significantly expanded our understanding of the key mediator circuits that bridge the gap between genetic susceptibility and clinical phenotype. This paper discusses the pathophysiological concepts, molecular mechanisms and neuroimaging evidence that link psychosis to disturbances in dopamine neurotransmission.

An analysis of the high psychotropic off-label use in psychiatric disorders The majority of psychiatric diagnoses have no approved drug

OBJECTIVE

The authors' goals were to determine the extent of unapproved indications in the DSM-IV-TR, to highlight common off-label uses of psychotropic medications and offer insights into the rationale of the widespread off-label prescribing in psychiatry.

METHOD

Indications for approved psychotropic agents, obtained from the Physicians Desk Reference and the Drug Information Handbook, Clinical Handbook of Psychotropic Drugs, 15th edition, and the Drugs@FDA online database were analyzed in the context of the DSM-IV-TR to determine the percent of DSM-IV-TR disorders that are indications for psychotropic agents. A literature search was performed to determine common off-label uses of major classes of psychotropic medications.

RESULTS

88.5% of all DSM-IV-TR categorized disorders lack an approved medication for their treatment. Atypical Antipsychotics had the most extensive off-label use for DSM-IV-TR categorized disorder, whereas Mood Stabilizers showed the greatest off-label use with regards to disorders and symptoms that are not DSM-IV classified. For each class of medications, more off-label uses exist than FDA-approved uses.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of DSM-IV-TR categorized disorders lack approved medications for their treatment. The large unmet need for approved psychiatric indications may explain the widespread off-label use of psychotropic medications in clinical practice.

BL-1020: a novel antipsychotic drug with GABAergic activity and low catalepsy, is efficacious in a rat model of schizophrenia

Reduced brain gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA) participates in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. GABA scarcely penetrates the brain. We evaluated the pharmacological properties of BL-1020, a novel GABA ester of perphenazine. Oral BL-1020 or perphenazine were assessed in acute and subchronic schizophrenia rat models. Catalepsy, serum prolactin, receptor binding profile and cortical (PFC), hippocampal (Hip) and dopamine (DA) levels were determined. Radioactive [14C] labeled BL-1020 was used for pharmacokinetics (PK). Acute and subchronic treatment with BL-1020 antagonized amphetamine-induced hyperactivity, with significantly lower catalepsy and sedation compared to equimolar perphenazine. At the same time, BL-1020 increased DA release in the PFC and Hip. BL-1020 and perphenazine stimulated prolactin secretion equally. BL-1020 displayed strong DA and serotonin (5HT) receptor inhibition (D(2L)K(iz)=0.066 nM, D(2S)K(i)=0.062 nM, 5-HT(2A)K(i)=0.21 nM). PK data revealed that BL-1020 penetrated the brain.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of BL-1020 for treatment of schizophrenia stem from its being a DA/5HT antagonist and a GABAergic agonist that releases cortical DA and antagonizes amphetamine-induced hyperactivity with reduced catalepsy and sedation.

[Olanzapine--high potency antipsychotic drug inducing significant weight gain: a case report]

INTRODUCTION

Olanzapine is a second generation antipsychotic (SGA) with a high level of therapeutic effectiveness in schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Along with the positive therapeutic effects, an increase of the body weight frequently occurs. According to the literature, the average weight gain is about 6-7 kg during several months of treatment. This could be valued as a moderate weight increase.

CASE OUTLINE

This article presents a case of a young female with schizophrenia, without clinical improvement with several antipsychotics (clozapine, risperidone, haloperidol) and with the occurrence of significant neurological side effects. The treatment started with olanzapine (baseline) was associated with good initial response (PANSS reduction 20% in the first two weeks) and the improvement was maintained further on (PANSS reduction 50% after 16 weeks). Significant increase (20 kg, 40%) in weight appeared during the following 16 weeks (BMI at baseline 17.9 kg/m2; BMI 16 weeks later 25.1 kg/m2).

CONCLUSION

High effectiveness of olanzapine in schizophrenia symptoms reduction was accompanied by a significant weight gain. However, this drug leads to impaired glucoregulation, dyslipidaemia etc. It also increases the risk of diabetes and cardio-vascular diseases, i.e. the main causes of mortality in schizophrenia after a suicide. Therefore, clinicians are suggested to focus on possible predictors of weight gain during olanzapine therapy, and act accordingly in order to prevent serious health consequences.

Antiepileptic drugs in non-epilepsy disorders: relations between mechanisms of action and clinical efficacy

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are used extensively to treat multiple non-epilepsy disorders, both in neurology and psychiatry. This article provides a review of the clinical efficacy of AEDs in non-epilepsy disorders based on recently published preclinical and clinical studies, and attempts to relate this efficacy to the mechanism of action of AEDs and pathophysiological processes associated with the disorders. Some newer indications for AEDs have been established, while others are under investigation. The disorders where AEDs have been demonstrated to be of clinical importance include neurological disorders, such as essential tremor, neuropathic pain and migraine, and psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Many of the AEDs have various targets of action in the synapse and have several proposed relevant mechanisms of action in epilepsy and in other disorders. Pathophysiological processes disturb neuronal excitability by modulating ion channels, receptors and intracellular signalling pathways, and these are targets for the pharmacological action of various AEDs. Attention is focused on the glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses. In psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, AEDs such as valproate, carbamazepine and lamotrigine appear to have clear roles based on their effect on intracellular pathways. On the other hand, some AEDs, e.g. topiramate, have efficacy for nonpsychiatric disorders including migraine, possibly by enhancing GABAergic and reducing glutamatergic neurotransmission. AEDs that seem to enhance GABAergic neurotransmission, e.g. tiagabine, valproate, gabapentin and possibly levetiracetam, may have a role in treating neurological disorders such as essential tremor, or anxiety disorders. AEDs with effects on voltage-gated sodium or calcium channels may be advantageous in treating neuropathic pain, e.g. gabapentin, pregabalin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine and valproate. Co-morbid conditions associated with epilepsy, such as mood disorders and migraine, may often respond to treatment with AEDs. Other possible disorders where AEDs may be of clinical importance include cancer, HIV infection, drug and alcohol abuse, and also in neuroprotection. A future challenge is to evaluate the second-generation AEDs in non-epilepsy disorders and to design clinical trials to study their effects in such disorders in paediatric patients. Differentiation between the main mechanisms of action of the AEDs needs more consideration in drug selection for tailored treatment of the various non-epilepsy disorders.

Systematic study of association of four GABAergic genes: glutamic acid decarboxylase 1 gene, glutamic acid decarboxylase 2 gene, GABA(B) receptor 1 gene and GABA(A) receptor subunit beta2 gene, with schizophrenia using a universal DNA microarray

Several studies have suggested the dysfunction of the GABAergic system as a risk factor in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. In the present study, case-control association analysis was conducted in four GABAergic genes: two glutamic acid decarboxylase genes (GAD1 and GAD2), a GABA(A) receptor subunit beta2 gene (GABRB2) and a GABA(B) receptor 1 gene (GABBR1). Using a universal DNA microarray procedure we genotyped a total of 20 SNPs on the above four genes in a study involving 292 patients and 286 controls of Chinese descent. Statistically significant differences were observed in the allelic frequencies of the rs187269C/T polymorphism in the GABRB2 gene (P=0.0450, chi(2)=12.40, OR=1.65) and the -292A/C polymorphism in the GAD1 gene (P=0.0450, chi(2)=14.64 OR=1.77). In addition, using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA), we discovered differences in the U251 nuclear protein binding to oligonucleotides representing the -292 SNP on the GAD1 gene, which suggests that the -292C allele has reduced transcription factor binding efficiency compared with the 292A allele. Using the multifactor-dimensionality reduction method (MDR), we found that the interactions among the rs187269C/T polymorphism in the GABRB2 gene, the -243A/G polymorphism in the GAD2 gene and the 27379C/T and 661C/T polymorphisms in the GAD1 gene revealed a significant association with schizophrenia (P<0.001). These findings suggest that the GABRB2 and GAD1 genes alone and the combined effects of the polymorphisms in the four GABAergic system genes may confer susceptibility to the development of schizophrenia in the Chinese population.

Glutamate and dopamine dysregulation in schizophrenia--a synthesis and selective review

The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia is the principal explanatory model of antipsychotic drug action. Recent discoveries extend our understanding of the neurochemistry of schizophrenia, with increasing evidence of dysfunction in glutamate and GABA as well as dopamine systems. In this review, we study the evidence for dopaminergic dysfunction in schizophrenia, drawing data from neurochemical imaging studies. We also review the NMDA receptor hypofunction hypothesis of schizophrenia as a supplementary explanatory model for the illness. We examine predictions made by the NMDA receptor hypofunction hypothesis and consider how they fit with current neurochemical findings in patients and animal models. We consider the case for glutamatergic excitotoxicity as a key process in the development and progression of schizophrenia, and suggest ways in which glutamate and dopamine dysregulation may interact in the condition.

The effect of adjunctive mood stabilizers on antipsychotic utilization pattern and health resource utilization for Medicaid enrollees with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Prescribing adjunctive mood stabilizers to manage schizophrenia is prevalent, despite the lack of substantial evidence to support the long-term use of this treatment regimen.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of using adjunctive mood stabilizers on antipsychotic utilization, total health expenditures, inpatient hospitalizations, long-term care stays, and emergency room (ER) visits for patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

Georgia Medicaid claims from 1999 through 2001 were analyzed to identify recipients diagnosed with schizophrenia (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM]: 295. XX). The treatment groups consisted of subjects who received combination therapy of mood stabilizers and antipsychotics (including both atypical and typical medications), while the comparison group consisted of subjects who were on antipsychotic medications without exposure to the mood stabilizers under investigation. Four treatment groups (valproate, lithium, carbamazepine, and combination mood stabilizer therapy) were formed based on the mood stabilizers patient received. Differences in annual health care use and expenditures were estimated between propensity score matched treatment and comparison groups controlling for comorbidity, prior utilization, demographic, and health provider specialty.

RESULTS

During the 1-year observation period, subjects in treatment groups filled an average of 200-days supply of adjunctive mood stabilizers. These adjunctive mood stabilizer recipients had significantly longer antipsychotic treatment durations than the subjects who did not have exposure to mood stabilizers (valproate + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: 56.47 days, p < 0.0001; lithium + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: 90.25 days, p < 0.0001; carbamazepine + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: 41.27 days, p = 0.0439; multiple mood stabilizers + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: 83.14 days, p < 0.0001). The intensive pharmacotherapy associated with treatment groups resulted in $900-$1300 higher pharmacy costs than the comparison groups (valproate + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: $1218.43, p < 0.0001; lithium + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: $985.79, p = 0.0015; carbamazepine + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: $911.63, p = 0.0497; multiple mood stabilizers + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: $1281.91, p < 0.0047). However, there were no statistically significant differences for total health expenditures, hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and nursing home admissions between propensity-matched treatment and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in health care costs or utilization of ER, long-term care, and inpatient services between schizophrenia patients who did and did not receive adjunctive mood stabilizer; however, longer antipsychotic treatment durations were observed in patients receiving adjunctive mood stabilizers. Interpretation of these results is limited by the unknown selection bias between the treatment and the comparison groups and the relatively small number of patients in some treatment groups. The development of a better-controlled study to further evaluate this treatment regimen is warranted.

Neuregulin-1 Enhances Depolarization-Induced GABA Release

Neuregulin-1 (NRG1), a regulator of neural development, has been shown to regulate neurotransmission at excitatory synapses. Although ErbB4, a key NRG1 receptor, is expressed in glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)-positive neurons, little is known about its role in GABAergic transmission. We show that ErbB4 is localized at GABAergic terminals of the prefrontal cortex. Our data indicate a role of NRG1, both endogenous and exogenous, in regulation of GABAergic transmission. This effect was blocked by inhibition or mutation of ErbB4, suggesting the involvement of ErbB4. Together, these results indicate that NRG1 regulates GABAergic transmission via presynaptic ErbB4 receptors, identifying a novel function of NRG1. Because both NRG1 and ErbB4 have emerged as susceptibility genes of schizophrenia, these observations may suggest a mechanism for abnormal GABAergic neurotransmission in this disorder.

No evidence for an association between variants at the γ-amino-n-butyric acid type A receptor β2 locus and schizophrenia

The alpha1/beta2/gamma2-containing heteropentamer is the most abundant gamma-amino-n-butyric acid type A receptor subtype in mammalian brains and the corresponding genes, the GABRA1, GABRB2, and GABRG2 genes, are located in chromosomal region 5q34 that several genome wide scans have implicated as a susceptibility region for schizophrenia. Given this positional and functional evidence, Lo et al. (Mol Psychiatry 2004; 9: 603-608) performed systematic linkage disequilibrium mapping of the GABAAR gene cluster on 5q34 in 130 schizophrenic patients and 170 controls, all of Chinese Han origin. In the single locus and haplotype analyses, single nucleotide polymorphisms in the GABRB2 gene showed highly significant association. The estimated effect caused by GABRB2 varied between odds ratios of 2.27 and 5.12. In order to re-examine their findings, we analyzed the most significantly associated single nucleotide polymorphism in the GABRB2 gene in a sample of 367 patients with schizophrenia and 360 controls, all of German descent. Our sample had a sufficient power to detect the effects described. Neither single marker nor haplotype analysis revealed a significant association with the disease status. Thus, our results do not support the hypothesis that genetic variation at the GABRB2 locus plays a major role in schizophrenic patients of European descent and that such variation would explain the previously observed linkage findings at this chromosomal region.

Aripiprazole in the Treatment??of Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is generally a chronic and disabling mental illness. Pharmacological therapy, which is used for relief of acute psychotic episodes and prevention of subsequent relapse, is essential for the effective management of schizophrenia. In order to alleviate the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, all antipsychotic agents act on the dopaminergic system. However, strong, high-affinity dopamine D(2)-receptor blockade may also be responsible for debilitating extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and hyperprolactinaemia. Unlike conventional antipsychotic agents, atypical antipsychotics also exert activity at other receptors, and it is generally acknowledged that, compared with conventional antipsychotics, atypical agents are associated with a broader spectrum of clinical efficacy and are better tolerated. However, other adverse effects such as weight gain and metabolic changes are cause for concern with some atypical antipsychotics. The novel atypical antipsychotic agent aripiprazole is a partial agonist at D(2) receptors that has been shown in clinical trials to be effective in treating both the positive and the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and to be well tolerated, with a low propensity for EPS and no clinically significant weight gain, hyperprolactinaemia or corrected QT-interval prolongation. Aripiprazole thus provides clinicians with another treatment option, and in October 2005, schizophrenia experts participated in an expert consensus meeting that aimed to agree on a set of guidelines for best-practice use of aripiprazole in the acute and long-term management of schizophrenia in Italy. This report describes the outcome of the meeting. Our recommendations for dosage and administration of aripiprazole are in agreement with the manufacturer's prescribing information. Ideally, optimal dosing should be evaluated on an individual basis, taking into account patients' characteristics such as the presence or absence of agitation. Overall, in our experience, aripiprazole is generally a well accepted, well tolerated, safe and broadly effective first-line antipsychotic agent. Switching to aripiprazole from maintenance therapy with another antipsychotic also works well, provided the change is made gradually, involving tapering of the original medication.

Neuroprotective agents in schizophrenia and affective disorders

With the exception of dementia, the use of neuroprotective agents in psychiatric disorders is not yet well established. However, recent data from brain imaging studies and clinical trials support the view that neurodegenerative mechanisms may play a role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and affective disorders. Further evidence for the use of neuroprotective agents can be drawn from the findings that second-generation antipsychotics, mood stabilizers and antidepressants have been shown to have neuroprotective effects in vitro and in vivo. Neuroprotective agents as add-on therapies (e.g., modafinil, erythropoietin, glycine, D-serine, memantine and celecoxib) are currently being evaluated in schizophrenia and related disorders. This paper reviews the current options for neuroprotective treatment approaches focusing on schizophrenia and affective disorders.

The neuroleptic drug, fluphenazine, blocks neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels

Fluphenazine (Prolixin(R)) is a potent phenothiazine-based dopamine receptor antagonist, first introduced into clinical practice in the late 1950s as a novel antipsychotic. The drug emerged as a 'hit' during a routine ion channel screening assay, the present studies describe our electrophysiological examination of fluphenazine at tetrodotoxin-sensitive (TTX-S) and resistant (TTX-R) voltage-gated sodium channel variants expressed in three different cell populations. Constitutively expressed TTX-S conductances were studied in ND7/23 cells (a dorsal root ganglion-derived clonal cell line) and rat primary cerebrocortical neurons. Recombinant rat Na(V)1.8 currents were studied using ND7/23 cells as a host line for heterologous expression. Sodium currents were examined using standard whole-cell voltage-clamp electrophysiology. Current-voltage relationships for either ND7/23 cell or Na(V)1.8 currents revealed a prominent fluphenazine block of sodium channel activity. Steady-state inactivation curves were shifted by approximately 10 mV in the hyperpolarizing direction by fluphenazine (3 microM for ND7/23 currents and 10 microM for Na(V)1.8), suggesting that the drug stabilizes the inactivated channel state. Fluphenazine's apparent potency for blocking either ND7/23 or Na(V)1.8 sodium channels was increased by membrane depolarization, corresponding IC(50) values for the ND7/23 cell conductances were 18 microM and 960 nM at holding potentials of -120 mV and -50 mV, respectively. Frequency-dependent channel block was evident for each of the cell/channel variants, again suggesting a preferential binding to inactivated channel state(s). These experiments show fluphenazine to be capable of blocking neuronal sodium channels. Several unusual pharmacokinetic features of this drug suggest that sodium channel block may contribute to the overall clinical profile of this classical neuroleptic agent.

Topiramate augments the antipsychotic-like effect and cortical dopamine output of raclopride

Recent clinical studies have shown that the anticonvulsant drug topiramate may improve negative symptoms in schizophrenia when added to a stable regimen of neuroleptic medication. It has also been shown that addition of topiramate to neuroleptics might be beneficial in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Clinically effective doses of antipsychotic drugs (APDs) have been found to suppress conditioned avoidance response behavior (CAR), a preclinical test of antipsychotic activity with high predictive validity, in rats. Therefore, we investigated the putative antipsychotic-like activity of topiramate when added to the selective dopamine (DA) D2 receptor antagonist raclopride, using the CAR model in the rat. Extrapyramidal side effect liability of the drug combination was evaluated in parallel by means of the catalepsy test. We also examined the effect of this drug treatment on DA release in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the nucleus accumbens (NAC), using in vivo microdialysis in freely moving animals. Topiramate (40 mg/kg), while ineffective when given alone, significantly augmented the antipsychotic-like effect of raclopride (0.075 mg/kg) on CAR without any concomitant catalepsy. Addition of topiramate to rats treated with raclopride generated a large increase in DA output in the mPFC, whereas no additional effect on the raclopride-induced DA release in the NAC was obtained. These data support the adjunctive use of topiramate in schizophrenia to ameliorate negative symptoms and suggest that this treatment may increase the efficacy, but not the extrapyramidal side effect liability, of the APDs used.

Analytical performance evaluation of a new turbidimetric immunoassay for valproic acid on the ADVIA 1650 analyzer: effect of gross hemolysis and high bilirubin

Valproic acid is an anticonvulsant that requires careful therapeutic drug monitoring. Valproic acid is also used in psychiatric patients. Bayer Diagnostics (Tarrytown, NY) recently marketed a turbidimetric immunoassay for monitoring valproic acid concentrations in serum or plasma using the ADVIA 1650 analyzer. We evaluated the performance of this new assay by comparing it with a widely used fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) on the AxSYM analyzer (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL). The total coefficient of variation (CV) for the low control of this new assay was 6.8% (mean = 30.7, SD = 2.1 microg/mL, n = 44) while the corresponding CVs for the medium and high controls were 3.3% (mean = 81.0, SD = 2.7 microg/mL, n = 44) and 5.9% (mean = 142.9, SD = 8.4 microg/mL, n = 44), respectively. The assay is linear up to a serum valproic acid concentration of 170 microg/mL, and the detection limit is 4.4 microg/mL. We observed an excellent correlation between the FPIA of valproic acid and the turbidimetric assay using specimens from 52 different patients who were receiving valproic acid. Using the valproic acid concentrations obtained by the FPIA as the x-axis, and the corresponding valproic acid concentrations obtained by the turbidimetric assay as the y-axis, we developed the following regression equation: y = 1.03 x+1.55 (r = 0.98). With this new assay, high concentrations of bilirubin (unconjugated 30 mg/dL and conjugated 30 mg/dL) and gross hemolysis (4+, hemoglobin: 1,500 mg/dL) have no effect on measurements of valproic acid concentration. We conclude that the new turbidimetric assay for valproic acid can be used for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of valproic acid in clinical laboratories.

Use of concomitant medication with antipsychotic treatment in outpatients with schizophrenia: results from the European Schizophrenia Outpatients Health Outcomes (SOHO) study

Use of concomitant medications with antipsychotic agents in the treatment of schizophrenia is common but lacks a clear scientific rationale. We evaluated concomitant medication usage during the first 6 months of the prospective, observational, European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study, examining its frequency, variation according to type of antipsychotic drug used, and impact on treatment tolerability. We also determined factors that were associated with concomitant medication use. The use of concomitant medications differed greatly among the countries participating in the SOHO study. The presence of depressive symptoms and being female were associated with the use of concomitant antidepressants. Certain antipsychotics were associated with less use of concomitant medications: significantly fewer olanzapine-, quetiapine- and clozapine-treated patients used concomitant anticholinergics or anxiolytics/hypnotics. Patients using concomitant medications had an increased incidence of sexually related side effects and extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) at 6 months follow-up compared with patients not using concomitant medications. The results should be interpreted conservatively due to the observational design of SOHO.

N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptors as a target for improved antipsychotic agents: novel insights and clinical perspectives

RATIONALE

Activation of "co-agonist" N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and Glycine(B) sites is mandatory for the operation of NMDA receptors, which play an important role in the control of mood, cognition and motor function.

OBJECTIVES

This article outlines the complex regulation of activity at Glycine(B)/NMDA receptors by multiple classes of endogenous ligand. It also summarizes the evidence that a hypoactivity of Glycine(B)/NMDA receptors contributes to the pathogenesis of psychotic states, and that drugs which enhance activity at these sites may possess antipsychotic properties.

RESULTS

Polymorphisms in several genes known to interact with NMDA receptors are related to an altered risk for schizophrenia, and psychotic patients display changes in levels of mRNA encoding NMDA receptors, including the NR1 subunit on which Glycine(B) sites are located. Schizophrenia is also associated with an overall decrease in activity of endogenous agonists at Glycine(B)/NMDA sites, whereas levels of endogenous antagonists are elevated. NMDA receptor "open channel blockers," such as phencyclidine, are psychotomimetic in man and in rodents, and antipsychotic agents attenuate certain of their effects. Moreover, mice with genetically invalidated Glycine(B)/NMDA receptors reveal similar changes in behaviour. Finally, in initial clinical studies, Glycine(B) agonists and inhibitors of glycine reuptake have been found to potentiate the ability of "conventional" antipsychotics to improve negative and, albeit modestly, cognitive and positive symptoms. In contrast, therapeutic effects of clozapine are not reinforced, likely since clozapine itself enhances activity at NMDA receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced activity at NMDA receptors is implicated in the aetiology of schizophrenia. Correspondingly, drugs that (directly or indirectly) increase activity at Glycine(B) sites may be of use as adjuncts to other classes of antipsychotic agent. However, there is an urgent need for broader clinical evaluation of this possibility, and, to date, there is no evidence that stimulation of Glycine(B) sites alone improves psychotic states.

Pharmacological and biochemical aspects of GABAergic neurotransmission: pathological and neuropsychobiological relationships

1. The GABAergic neurotransmission has been implicated in the modulation of many neural networks in forebrain, midbrain and hindbrain, as well as, in several neurological disorders. 2. The complete comprehension of GABA system neurochemical properties and the search for approaches in identifying new targets for the treatment of neural diseases related to GABAergic pathway are of the extreme relevance. 3. The present review will be focused on the pharmacology and biochemistry of the GABA metabolism, GABA receptors and transporters. In addition, the pathological and psychobiological implications related to GABAergic neurotransmission will be considered.

Epilepsy and psychiatry: Automatic psychic paroxysms

This study analyzes diverse psychic phenomena which, although always occurring with very characteristic clinical features, are sometimes diagnosed as epilepsy and sometimes as symptoms of different psychiatric disorders depending on the availability of an electroencephalogram. It is posited that these phenomena, whenever they are accompanied by the features characteristic of an epileptic consciousness (suddenness, automatic nature, great intensity and a strong sensation of strangeness) should be diagnosed as partial seizures with a psychic content, regardless of the availability of an EEG. The co-occurrence of these four clinical signs, which are relatively simple to objectivize, is a more reliable clinical criterion for diagnosis than a transcraneal electroencephalogram, which, as is known, is of little value in measuring the electrical activity of partial seizures. Moreover, an interpretation of this type makes it possible to reconcile scientific data from various neurosciences which thus far have seemed contradictory.

The neurobiology of antiepileptic drugs for the treatment of nonepileptic conditions

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly prescribed for nonepileptic conditions, including migraine headache, chronic neuropathic pain, mood disorders, schizophrenia and various neuromuscular syndromes. In many of these conditions, as in epilepsy, the drugs act by modifying the excitability of nerve (or muscle) through effects on voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels or by promoting inhibition mediated by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptors. In neuropathic pain, chronic nerve injury is associated with the redistribution and altered subunit compositions of sodium and calcium channels that predispose neurons in sensory pathways to fire spontaneously or at inappropriately high frequencies, often from ectopic sites. AEDs may counteract this abnormal activity by selectively affecting pain-specific firing; for example, many AEDs suppress high-frequency action potentials by blocking voltage-activated sodium channels in a use-dependent fashion. Alternatively, AEDs may specifically target pathological channels; for example, gabapentin is a ligand of alpha2delta voltage-activated calcium channel subunits that are overexpressed in sensory neurons after nerve injury. Emerging evidence suggests that effects on signaling pathways that regulate neuronal plasticity and survival may be a factor in the delayed clinical efficacy of AEDs in some neuropsychiatric conditions, including bipolar affective disorder.

Treatment of alcohol withdrawal: chlormethiazole vs. carbamazepine and the effect on memory performance--a pilot study

Although relatively little attention has been paid to the question how acute alcohol withdrawal might affect cognitive functions, this factor remains of particular interest because it influences psychotherapeutic treatment during detoxification. The clinical outcome and neuropsychological state of 37 inpatients with alcohol withdrawal was investigated in a randomized single-blind approach. Two different medical strategies [chlormethiazole (CMZ) vs. carbamazepine (CBZ)] in the treatment of inpatients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome were compared. Among comparable groups (related to gender, age, initial alcohol level, severity of abuses, severity of initial withdrawal symptoms such as tremor, perspiration, psychomotor agitation, hallucinations, orientation, intelligence, patient demographics), CBZ is just as potent as CMZ in therapy of withdrawal symptoms (circulatory function, vegetative function, psychomotor activity). Patients in both groups showed initial impairments in some neuropsychological tests (d2, Zahlen-Verbundings test, Beck Depression Inventory, Anxiety Sensitivity Index) with significant improvement during detoxification. Additionally, CBZ-treated patients showed significantly better verbal memory performance during the first days of treatment. Without any addictive potential, CBZ therapy could be very supportive in alcohol detoxification. In addition a higher verbal memory performance state could be favourable for a psychotherapeutic approach.

GABA, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, and neurological disease

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. GABA is converted from glutamic acid by the action of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) of which two isoforms exist GAD65 and GAD67. GABA then is broken down, both within the cell and in the synaptic cleft by GABA transaminase to form succinic semialdehyde. In turn, succinic semialdehyde is converted either to succinic acid by succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase or into gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) by succinic semialdehyde reductase. Because GABA modulates the majority of inhibition that is ongoing in the brain, perturbations in GABAergic inhibition have the potential to result in seizures. Therefore, the most common disorder in which GABA is targeted as a treatment is epilepsy. However, other disorders such as psychiatric disease, spasticity, and stiff-person syndrome all have been related to disorders of GABAergic function in the brain. This review covers the roles of GABAergic neurotransmission in epilepsy, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, stiff-person syndrome, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. In the final section of this review, the GABA metabolite GHB is discussed in terms of its physiological significance and its role in epilepsy, sleep disorders, drug and alcohol addiction, and an inborn error of GABA metabolism, succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency.

The science of antipsychotics: mechanistic insight

With the introduction of conventional antipsychotics in the 1950s, clinicians began to expect effective treatment of positive symptoms of schizophrenia. However, these drugs do not resolve negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia and are also associated with serious side effects, including extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) and tardive dyskinesia. In 1989, clozapine was introduced and labeled the first new antipsychotic owing to its improved efficacy and side-effect profile. Clozapine proved effective in alleviating many of the positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia, without causing inevitable EPS or tardive dyskinesia. Over the past decade, a number of different new antipsychotics have been developed. These drugs have an affinity for multiple dopamine-receptor subtypes as well as serotonin, norepinephrine, and glutamate receptors, allowing for better treatment outcomes. The antagonism of the 5-HT2A receptor may be responsible for improvement in negative symptoms and decrease in EPS. In addition to providing enhanced efficacy, the affinity of the new drugs for multiple receptors introduces new side effects not seen with the conventional agents, including weight gain. Each new antipsychotic has a unique receptor-binding profile that corresponds to its pharmacologic and side-effect profile. Understanding the differences in mechanisms of action of new antipsychotics will allow physicians to better choose treatment that meets the needs of each individual patient.