The generation and interpretation of positional information within the vertebrate myotome

Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of the Patterning of Arabidopsis Flower Meristem

The qualitative model presented in this work recovers the onset of the four fields that correspond to those of each floral organ whorl of Arabidopsis flower, suggesting a mechanism for the generation of the positional information required for the differential expression of the A, B, and C identity genes according to the ABC model for organ determination during early stages of flower development. Our model integrates a previous model for the emergence of WUS pattern in the floral meristem, and shows that this pre-pattern is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the posterior information of the four fields predicted by the ABC model. Furthermore, our model predicts that LFY diffusion along the L1 layer of cells is not a necessary condition for the patterning of the floral meristem.

Zebrafish Embryonic Slow Muscle Is a Rapid System for Genetic Analysis of Sarcomere Organization by CRISPR/Cas9, but Not NgAgo

Zebrafish embryonic slow muscle cells, with their superficial localization and clear sarcomere organization, provide a useful model system for genetic analysis of muscle cell differentiation and sarcomere assembly. To develop a quick assay for testing CRISPR-mediated gene editing in slow muscles of zebrafish embryos, we targeted a red fluorescence protein (RFP) reporter gene specifically expressed in slow muscles of myomesin-3-RFP (Myom3-RFP) zebrafish embryos. We demonstrated that microinjection of RFP-sgRNA with Cas9 protein or Cas9 mRNA resulted in a mosaic pattern in loss of RFP expression in slow muscle fibers of the injected zebrafish embryos. To uncover gene functions in sarcomere organization, we targeted two endogenous genes, slow myosin heavy chain-1 (smyhc1) and heat shock protein 90 α1 (hsp90α1), which are specifically expressed in zebrafish muscle cells. We demonstrated that injection of Cas9 protein or mRNA with respective sgRNAs targeted to smyhc1 or hsp90a1 resulted in a mosaic pattern of myosin thick filament disruption in slow myofibers of the injected zebrafish embryos. Moreover, Myom3-RFP expression and M-line localization were also abolished in these defective myofibers. Given that zebrafish embryonic slow muscles are a rapid in vivo system for testing genome editing and uncovering gene functions in muscle cell differentiation, we investigated whether microinjection of Natronobacterium gregoryi Argonaute (NgAgo) system could induce genetic mutations and muscle defects in zebrafish embryos. Single-strand guide DNAs targeted to RFP, Smyhc1, or Hsp90α1 were injected with NgAgo mRNA into Myom3-RFP zebrafish embryos. Myom3-RFP expression was analyzed in the injected embryos. The results showed that, in contrast to the CRISPR/Cas9 system, injection of the NgAgo-gDNA system did not affect Myom3-RFP expression and sarcomere organization in myofibers of the injected embryos. Sequence analysis failed to detect genetic mutations at the target genes. Together, our studies demonstrate that zebrafish embryonic slow muscle is a rapid model for testing gene editing technologies in vivo and uncovering gene functions in muscle cell differentiation.

Regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis in eukaryotic cells

Mitochondria amount within a cell is modulated in response to energy demand. This involves a tight regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and the coordinated expression of hundreds of genes, both at the nuclear and at the mitochondrial level. This review will focus on two aspects of mitochondrial biogenesis regulation: (i) In mammalian cells, physiological effectors, and the regulatory proteins that control the expression of the respiratory apparatus, will be considered, and different kinds of tissue will be addressed. (ii) In yeast, the regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis in response to growth conditions as well as the signaling pathway involved will be considered.

N-cadherin and M-cadherin are sequentially expressed in myoblast populations contributing to the first and second waves of myogenesis in the trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

The objective of this study was to investigate the expression of two promyogenic cell surface adhesion receptors, N- and M-cadherin, in developing trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) somite, taking account of the recent identification of a dermomyotome-like epithelium in teleosts. In situ hybridization showed that N-cadherin was expressed throughout the paraxial mesoderm and nascent somite. As the somite matured, N-cadherin expression disappeared ventrally from the sclerotome, and then mediolaterally from the differentiating slow and fast muscle cells of the embryonic myotome, to become finally restricted to the undifferentiated myogenic precursors forming the dermomyotome-like epithelium that surrounds the embryonic myotome. By contrast, M-cadherin, which was transcribed in the differentiating embryonic myotome, was never expressed in the dermomyotome-like epithelium. In late-stage trout embryos, M-cadherin transcript was only detected at the periphery of the expanding myotome, where muscle cells stemming from the N-cadherin positive dermomyotome-like epithelium differentiate. Collectively, our results support the view that, in trout embryo, N-cadherin is associated with muscle cell immaturity while M-cadherin is associated with muscle cell maturation and differentiation and this during the two successive phases of myogenesis.

Jamb and jamc are essential for vertebrate myocyte fusion

Jamb and Jamc are an essential cell surface receptor pair that interact to drive fusion between muscle precursor cells during zebrafish development.

Cellular fusion is required in the development of several tissues, including skeletal muscle. In vertebrates, this process is poorly understood and lacks an in vivo-validated cell surface heterophilic receptor pair that is necessary for fusion. Identification of essential cell surface interactions between fusing cells is an important step in elucidating the molecular mechanism of cellular fusion. We show here that the zebrafish orthologues of JAM-B and JAM-C receptors are essential for fusion of myocyte precursors to form syncytial muscle fibres. Both jamb and jamc are dynamically co-expressed in developing muscles and encode receptors that physically interact. Heritable mutations in either gene prevent myocyte fusion in vivo, resulting in an overabundance of mononuclear, but otherwise overtly normal, functional fast-twitch muscle fibres. Transplantation experiments show that the Jamb and Jamc receptors must interact between neighbouring cells (in trans) for fusion to occur. We also show that jamc is ectopically expressed in prdm1a mutant slow muscle precursors, which inappropriately fuse with other myocytes, suggesting that control of myocyte fusion through regulation of jamc expression has important implications for the growth and patterning of muscles. Our discovery of a receptor-ligand pair critical for fusion in vivo has important implications for understanding the molecular mechanisms responsible for myocyte fusion and its regulation in vertebrate myogenesis.

The fusion of precursor cells is a crucial step in many biological processes, one of which is the development of skeletal muscle. The molecular and cell biology of fusion of muscle precursors has been well described in Drosophila melanogaster larvae, leading to insights into the process in vertebrates. However, the identity and mechanism of action of essential cell surface proteins for fusion between vertebrate muscle precursors has previously been lacking. Here, we describe a vertebrate-specific cell surface receptor pair that is essential for fusion in zebrafish: Jamb and Jamc. Loss of function of either receptor causes a near-complete block in fusion, resulting in an overabundance of mononucleate muscle fibres that are otherwise overtly normal. We demonstrate that Jamb and Jamc physically interact and are co-expressed by muscle precursors. Moreover, we show that the interaction between them is essential for fusion between neighbouring precursors in an embryo. We hypothesise that binding of Jamb to Jamc is a necessary recognition and adhesion step permissive for, but not sufficient to cause, myocyte fusion. Knowledge of these molecular components in vertebrates will lead to better understanding of how fusion is controlled to pattern skeletal muscle tissue.

Fine-tuning of Hh signaling by the RNA-binding protein Quaking to control muscle development

The development of the different muscles within the somite is a complex process that involves the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway. To specify the proper number of muscle cells and organize them spatially and temporally, the Hh signaling pathway needs to be precisely regulated at different levels, but only a few factors external to the pathway have been described. Here, we report for the first time the role of the STAR family RNA-binding protein Quaking A (QkA) in somite muscle development. We show in zebrafish that the loss of QkA function affects fast muscle fiber maturation as well as Hh-induced muscle derivative specification and/or morphogenesis. Mosaic analysis reveals that fast fiber maturation depends on the activity of QkA in the environment of fast fiber progenitors. We further show that Hh signaling requires QkA activity for muscle development. By an in silico approach, we screened the 3'UTRs of known Hh signaling component mRNAs for the Quaking response element and found the transcription factor Gli2a, a known regulator of muscle fate development. Using destabilized GFP as a reporter, we show that the gli2a mRNA 3'UTR is a functional QkA target. Consistent with this notion, the loss of QkA function rescued slow muscle fibers in yot mutant embryos, which express a dominant-negative Gli2a isoform. Thus, our results reveal a new mechanism to ensure muscle cell fate diversity by fine-tuning of the Hh signaling pathway via RNA-binding proteins.

Early development of medaka Oryzias latipes muscles as revealed by transgenic approaches using embryonic and larval types of myosin heavy chain genes

We cloned three full-length cDNAs encoding myosin heavy chains (MYHs) previously found to be expressed in embryos or larvae of medaka Oryzias latipes. Based on cDNA sequence information, the three medaka MYH genes, mMYH(emb1), mMYH(L1) and mMYH(L2), were localized on the chromosomes. In vivo promoter assay using the gene encoding green or red fluorescent protein and linked to the 5'-flanking region of mMYH demonstrated that the transcripts of fast-type mMYH(emb1), first expressed in embryos but belonging to the adult type in phylogenetic analysis, were located in the horizontal myoseptum. On the other hand, embryonic fast-type mMYH(L1) and mMYH(L2) were expressed in the whole myotomes. Interestingly, cells expressing mMYH(emb1) were localized together with engrailed, and cyclopamine, which blocks hedgehog signaling, inhibited mMYH(emb1) expression as well as the formation of the horizontal myoseptum, suggesting that muscle pioneer cells express mMYH(emb1) as a key protein in the formation of the horizontal myoseptum.

Protein kinase A represses skeletal myogenesis by targeting myocyte enhancer factor 2D

Activation of protein kinase A (PKA) by elevation of the intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) level inhibits skeletal myogenesis. Previously, an indirect modulation of the myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) was implicated as the mechanism. Because myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) proteins are key regulators of myogenesis and obligatory partners for the MRFs, here we assessed whether these proteins could be involved in PKA-mediated myogenic repression. Initially, in silico analysis revealed several consensus PKA phosphoacceptor sites on MEF2, and subsequent analysis by in vitro kinase assays indicated that PKA directly and efficiently phosphorylates MEF2D. Using mass spectrometric determination of phosphorylated residues, we document that MEF2D serine 121 and serine 190 are targeted by PKA. Transcriptional reporter gene assays to assess MEF2D function revealed that PKA potently represses the transactivation properties of MEF2D. Furthermore, engineered mutation of MEF2D PKA phosphoacceptor sites (serines 121 and 190 to alanine) rendered a PKA-resistant MEF2D protein, which efficiently rescues myogenesis from PKA-mediated repression. Concomitantly, increased intracellular cAMP-mediated PKA activation also resulted in an enhanced nuclear accumulation of histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) and a subsequent increase in the MEF2D-HDAC4 repressor complex. Collectively, these data identify MEF2D as a primary target of PKA signaling in myoblasts that leads to inhibition of the skeletal muscle differentiation program.

A role for the Myoblast city homologues Dock1 and Dock5 and the adaptor proteins Crk and Crk-like in zebrafish myoblast fusion

Myoblast fusion follows a defined sequence of events that is strikingly similar in vertebrates and invertebrates. Genetic analysis in Drosophila has identified many of the molecules that mediate the different steps in the fusion process; by contrast, the molecular basis of myoblast fusion during vertebrate embryogenesis remains poorly characterised. A key component of the intracellular fusion pathway in Drosophila is the protein encoded by the myoblast city (mbc) gene, a close homologue of the vertebrate protein dedicator of cytokinesis 1 (DOCK1,formerly DOCK180). Using morpholino antisense-oligonucleotide-mediated knockdown of gene activity in the zebrafish embryo, we show that the fusion of embryonic fast-twitch myoblasts requires the activities of Dock1 and the closely related Dock5 protein. In addition, we show that the adaptor proteins Crk and Crk-like (Crkl), with which Dock proteins are known to interact physically, are also required for myoblast fusion.

The chemokine Sdf-1 and its receptor Cxcr4 are required for formation of muscle in zebrafish

BACKGROUND

During development cell migration takes place prior to differentiation of many cell types. The chemokine receptor Cxcr4 and its ligand Sdf1 are implicated in migration of several cell lineages, including appendicular muscles.

RESULTS

We dissected the role of sdf1-cxcr4 during skeletal myogenesis. We demonstrated that the receptor cxcr4a is expressed in the medial-anterior part of somites, suggesting that chemokine signaling plays a role in this region of the somite. Previous reports emphasized co-operation of Sdf1a and Cxcr4b. We found that during early myogenesis Sdf1a co-operates with the second Cxcr4 of zebrafish - Cxcr4a resulting in the commitment of myoblast to form fast muscle. Disrupting this chemokine signal caused a reduction in myoD and myf5 expression and fast fiber formation. In addition, we showed that a dimerization partner of MyoD and Myf5, E12, positively regulates transcription of cxcr4a and sdf1a in contrast to that of Sonic hedgehog, which inhibited these genes through induction of expression of id2.

CONCLUSION

We revealed a regulatory feedback mechanism between cxcr4a-sdf1a and genes encoding myogenic regulatory factors, which is involved in differentiation of fast myofibers. This demonstrated a role of chemokine signaling during development of skeletal muscles.

A NLRR-1 gene is expressed in migrating slow muscle cells of the trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) embryo

NLRR-l (neuronal leucine-rich repeat-l) is a transmembrane protein that functions as a cell adhesion molecule regulating morphogenesis. A previous study in the mouse reported that the somitic expression of NLRR-1 is restricted to the dorsal lip of the dermomyotome that gives rise to the epaxial muscle. In this study, we report the expression of a NLRR-1 gene in the trout-developing somite. Whole mount in situ hybridization showed that NLRR-l transcript accumulated in a rostro-caudal wave in the adaxial slow muscle cells, which are initially found deep in the somite, immediately adjacent to the notochord. No labelling was observed in the segmental plate from which somites form. As somites mature along an anteroposterior axis, the NLRR-l-positive adaxial cells exhibited an apparent migration radially to the lateral surface of the myotome where they ultimately form the peripheral slow muscle fibres. These observations show that a NLRR-1 gene is expressed in a subpopulation of myogenic cells of the trout embryo, but the anatomical location and the fate of this subpopulation are distinct from those of the NLRR-1 positive myogenic cells in amniotes. NLRR-l was also transcribed in distinct areas of the developing nervous system including the telencephalon, the optic tectum, the cerebellum, the neural tube, the retina, and the branchial arches.

Molecular cloning and characterization of the Myf5 gene in sea perch (Lateolabrax japonicus)

The cDNA of myogenic factor (Myf5) was isolated from sea perch (Lateolabrax japonicus) using Reverse-transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). The 5' flanking sequence of the cDNA contains a TATA box, GC box, CAAT box, several E box sites and muscle-specific regulatory elements determined by genome walking. The Myf5 gene consists of 3 exons and 2 introns. The open reading frame was found to code a protein with 238 amino-acid residues, containing the conserved basic helix-loop-helix domain (bHLH). RT-PCR indicated the Myf5 was highly expressed in muscle, and weakly expressed in brain, eyes, spleen, gill, liver, kidney, intestine and heart. In early embryonic stages, Myf5 mRNA transcripts are highly detectable in the early gastrula stage while decreasing up to a low level at the late gastrula stage, subsequently greatly increased up to the highest level in the somites stage, then gradually decreases from the tail-bud stage to 15 d larvae after hatching, but they are still detectable. Further, Myf5 mRNA was expressed in several sea perch cell lines such as LJES1, LJHK, LJH-1, LJH-2, LJS, LJL, although its expression level varied greatly among different cell lines.

Identification of secreted proteins during skeletal muscle development

The differentiation program of skeletal muscle cells is exquisitely sensitive to secreted proteins. We developed a strategy to maximize the discovery of secreted proteins, using mass spectrometry-based proteomics, from cultured muscle cells, C2C12, grown in a serum-free medium. This strategy led to the identification of 80 nonredundant proteins, of which 27 were secretory proteins that were identified with a minimum of two tryptic peptides. A number of the identified secretory proteins are involved in extracellular matrix remodeling, cellular proliferation, migration, and signaling. A putative network of proteins involving matrix metalloproteinase 2, SPARC, and cystatin C that all interact with TGFbeta signaling has been postulated to contribute toward a functional role in the myogenic differentiation program.

β-catenin relieves I-mfa-mediated suppression of LEF-1 in mammalian cells

We have previously shown that β-catenin interacts with a transcription suppressor I-mfa and, through this interaction, canonical Wnt signaling could relieve I-mfa-mediated suppression of myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs). In this study, we found that, based on this interaction, I-mfa-mediated suppression of the Wnt transcription factor T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancing factor-1 (TCF/LEF-1) can also be relieved. Our work showed that knocking down endogenous I-mfa expression mimics canonical Wnt treatment by inducing myogenesis and increasing Wnt reporter gene activity, endogenous Wnt target gene expression and expression of MRFs in P19 cells. More importantly, these I-mfa small interfering RNA (siRNA)-induced effects could be blocked by a dominant-negative mutant of LEF-1, confirming the involvement of the TCF/LEF-1 pathway. In addition, we found that β-catenin could compete with I-mfa for binding to LEF-1 and relieve the inhibitory effects of I-mfa in overexpression systems. Furthermore, canonical Wnt was able to reduce the levels of endogenous I-mfa associated with LEF-1, while increasing that of I-mfa associated with β-catenin. All of the evidence supports a conclusion that I-mfa can suppress myogenesis by inhibiting TCF/LEF-1 and that canonical Wnt signaling may relieve the suppression through elevating β-catenin levels, which in turn relieve I-mfa-mediated suppression.

Long-term culture of muscle explants from Sparus aurata

Although there are mammalian myoblast cell lines, no fish myoblast cell line has been developed so far. The aim of this study was to develop a culture system of muscle explants for fish, as explants provide an approximation of the in vivo conditions for cell proliferation and differentiation, and enable a close comparison with events in muscle regenerating in vivo. Here we describe the main features of a long-term in vitro culture system for muscle explants from Sparus aurata fry. At the time of sampling, the original fibres were damaged and subsequently degenerated as shown by the loss of parvalbumin (PV) and presence of apoptotic nuclei. This mechanical damage provoked a myogenic response by activation of myogenic precursor cells. After a few days, new mononucleate cells aligned with the original fibres were seen in the explants, some with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA-) and Myf-5-positive nuclei, indicating proliferation and their myogenic fate. By 1 week, multinucleate cells with desmin immunoreactivity but PCNA- and Myf5-negative nuclei were present, equivalent to differentiated, postmitotic myotubes. Some of these myotubes were also immunoreactive for PV and insulin-like growth factors (IGFs). By 11 days, many of the myotubes were also immunoreactive for myostatin (MSTN). By 23 days, many of the myotubes had increased in diameter, were packed with myofibrils, and were strongly PV-positive and immunoreactive for MSTN, IGF-I and IGF-I receptor. This study shows that a proliferative process occurs in the explants despite the death of the original muscle fibres, and new muscle fibres expressing growth regulators are formed by regeneration from myogenic precursors present in the explants at the time of sampling.

Integrin α6β1-laminin interactions regulate early myotome formation in the mouse embryo

We addressed the potential role of cell-laminin interactions during epaxial myotome formation in the mouse embryo. Assembly of the myotomal laminin matrix occurs as epaxial myogenic precursor cells enter the myotome. Most Myf5-positive and myogenin-negative myogenic precursor cells localise near assembled laminin, while myogenin-expressing cells are located either away from this matrix or in areas where it is being assembled. In Myf5nlacZ/nlacZ (Myf5-null) embryos, laminin,collagen type IV and perlecan are present extracellularly near myogenic precursor cells, but do not form a basement membrane and cells are not contained in the myotomal compartment. Unlike wild-type myogenic precursor cells, Myf5-null cells do not express the α6β1 integrin, a laminin receptor, suggesting that integrin α6β1-laminin interactions are required for myotomal laminin matrix assembly. Blockingα6β1-laminin binding in cultured wild-type mouse embryo explants resulted in dispersion of Myf5-positive cells, a phenotype also seen in Myf5nlacZ/nlacZ embryos. Furthermore, inhibition ofα6β1 resulted in an increase in Myf5 protein and ectopic myogenin expression in dermomyotomal cells, suggesting that α6β1-laminin interactions normally repress myogenesis in the dermomyotome. We conclude that Myf5 is required for maintaining α6β1 expression on myogenic precursor cells, and that α6β1 is necessary for myotomal laminin matrix assembly and cell guidance into the myotome. Engagement of laminin byα6β1 also plays a role in maintaining the undifferentiated state of cells in the dermomyotome prior to their entry into the myotome.

Mohawkis a novel homeobox gene expressed in the developing mouse embryo

Homeodomain-containing proteins comprise a superfamily of transcription factors that participate in the regulation of almost all aspects of embryonic development. Here, we describe the mouse embryonic expression pattern of Mohawk, a new member of the TALE superclass of atypical homeobox genes that is most-closely related to the Iroquois class. During mouse development, Mohawk was transcribed in cell lineages derived from the somites. As early as embryonic day 9.0, Mohawk was expressed in an anterior to posterior gradient in the dorsomedial and ventrolateral lips of the dermomyotome of the somites that normally give rise to skeletal muscle. Mohawk transcription in the dorsomedial region required the expression of the transcription factor paraxis. As somites matured, Mohawk transcription was observed in the tendon-specific syndetome and the sclerotome-derived condensing mesenchyme that prefigures the proximal ribs and vertebral bodies. In the limbs, Mohawk was expressed in a pattern consistent with the developing tendons that form along the dorsal and ventral aspect of the phalanges. Finally, Mohawk was detectable in the tips of the ureteric buds in the metanephric kidneys and the testis cords of the male gonad. Together, these observations suggest that Mohawk is an important regulator of vertebrate development.

Foxd3 mediates zebrafish myf5 expression during early somitogenesis

Myf5, one of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors, controls muscle differentiation and is expressed in somites during early embryogenesis. However, the transcription factors bound to the cis-elements of myf5 are poorly understood. In this study, we used the yeast one-hybrid assay and found that Forkhead box d3 (Foxd3) interacted specifically with the -82/-62 cassette, a key element directing somite-specific expression of myf5. The dual-luciferase assay revealed that the expression of Foxd3 potently transactivated the myf5 promoter. Knocking down foxd3 with morpholino oligonucleotide (MO) resulted in a dramatic down-regulation of myf5 in somites and adaxial cells but not in the presomitic mesoderm. On the other hand, myod expression remained unchanged in foxd3 morphants. Foxd3 mediation of myf5 expression is stage-dependent, maintaining myf5 expression in the somites and adaxial cells during the 7- to 18-somite stage. Furthermore, in the pax3 morphant, the expression of foxd3 was down-regulated greatly and the expression of myf5 was similar to that of the foxd3 morphant. Co-injection of foxd3 mRNA and pax3-MO1 greatly restored the expression of myf5 in the somites and adaxial cells, suggesting that pax3 induces foxd3 expression, which then induces the expression of myf5. This report is the first study to show that Foxd3, a well-known regulator in neural crest development, is also involved in myf5 regulation.

Beta-catenin regulates myogenesis by relieving I-mfa-mediated suppression of myogenic regulatory factors in P19 cells

Wnt/beta-catenin signaling plays a critical role in embryonic myogenesis. Here we show that, in P19 embryonic carcinoma stem cells, Wnt/beta-catenin signaling initiates the myogenic process depends on beta-catenin-mediated relief of I-mfa (inhibitor of MyoD Family a) suppression of myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs). We found that beta-catenin interacted with I-mfa and that the interaction was enhanced by Wnt3a. In addition, we found that the interaction between beta-catenin and I-mfa was able to attenuate the interaction of I-mfa with MRFs, relieve I-mfa-mediated suppression of the transcriptional activity and cytosolic sequestration of MRFs, and initiate myogenesis in a P19 myogenic model system that expresses exogenous myogenin. This work reveals a mechanism for the regulation of MRFs during myogenesis by elucidating a beta-catenin-mediated, but lymphoid enhancing factor-1/T cell factor independent, mechanism in regulation of myogenic fate specification and differentiation of P19 mouse stem cells.

Interactions between muscle fibers and segment boundaries in zebrafish

The most obvious segmental structures in the vertebrate embryo are somites: transient structures that give rise to vertebrae and much of the musculature. In zebrafish, most somitic cells give rise to long muscle fibers that are anchored to intersegmental boundaries. Therefore, this boundary is analogous to the mammalian tendon in that it transduces muscle-generated force to the skeletal system. We have investigated interactions between somite boundaries and muscle fibers. We define three stages of segment boundary formation. The first stage is the formation of the initial epithelial somite boundary. The second "transition" stage involves both the elongation of initially round muscle precursor cells and somite boundary maturation. The third stage is myotome boundary formation, where the boundary becomes rich in extracellular matrix and all muscle precursor cells have elongated to form long muscle fibers. It is known that formation of the initial epithelial somite boundary requires Notch signaling; vertebrate Notch pathway mutants show severe defects in somitogenesis. However, many zebrafish Notch pathway mutants are homozygous viable suggesting that segmentation of their larval and adult body plans at least partially recovers. We show that epithelial somite boundary formation and slow-twitch muscle morphogenesis are initially disrupted in after eight (aei) mutant embryos (which lack function of the Notch ligand, DeltaD); however, myotome boundaries form later ("recover") in a Hedgehog-dependent fashion. Inhibition of Hedgehog-induced slow muscle induction in aei/deltaD and deadly seven (des)/notch1a mutant embryos suggests that slow muscle is necessary for myotome boundary recovery in the absence of initial epithelial somite boundary formation. Because we have previously demonstrated that slow muscle migration triggers fast muscle cell elongation in zebrafish, we hypothesize that migrating slow muscle facilitates myotome boundary formation in aei/deltaD mutant embryos by patterning coordinated fast muscle cell elongation. In addition, we utilized genetic mosaic analysis to show that somite boundaries also function to limit the extent to which fast muscle cells can elongate. Combined, our results indicate that multiple interactions between somite boundaries and muscle fibers mediate zebrafish segmentation.

Expression patterns of collagen I (alpha1) encoding gene and muscle-specific genes reveal that the lateral domain of the fish somite forms a connective tissue surrounding the myotome

Somites are repeated, epithelial structures that are derived from the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm located lateral to the notochord. In higher vertebrates, somites differentiate into a sclerotome that subsequently forms the vertebrae and the ribs and into a dermomyotome that gives rise to a myotome, from which arises the skeletal muscle, and to a dermatome, from which arises the dermis. Fish somites have been shown to produce a sclerotome and a myotome, but very little is known regarding their participation in the formation of connective tissues, especially at the junction between the epidermis and the myotome. To investigate the formation of connective tissues in fish somites, we have examined the expression pattern of the collagen I (alpha1) chain. As somitogenesis proceeds rostrocaudally, collagen I (alpha1) expression marks the sclerotomal cells and delineates the formation of the vertebrae. Surprisingly, after the completion of the segmentation, transcript for the collagen I (alpha1) chain appeared in a distinct epithelial-like monolayer situated at the periphery of the developing somite facing the surface epidermis. This epithelial monolayer of somitic cells that covered the superficial slow muscle cells, did not express the myogenic transcriptional regulator myogenin and was devoid of contractile filament. As the somite increased in size, these collagen-expressing epithelial cells flattened, forming a thin cellular layer underlying the epidermis and recovering the lateral surface of the myotome. In conclusion, the lateral domain of the fish somite forms a distinct epithelial cell layer sharing many characteristics with amniote dermatome.

Muscle growth patterns and regulation during fish ontogeny

In fish, the skeletal muscle of the trunk and the tail derives from the somites which form in the paraxial mesoderm in a rostro-caudal sequence. The development of the fish myotome begins with the onset of myogenic regulatory factors expression and continues with the formation of a distinct superficial layer of slow muscle fibres that covers a bulk of fast muscle fibres located in the deep portion of the myotome. Muscle fibres of the slow-twitch lineage originate in fish embryos from adaxial cells, a distinct subpopulation of the paraxial mesoderm that flanks the notochord. During the early maturation of the somite these adaxial cells migrate away from the notochord towards the lateral part of the somite where they form the superficial slow fibres. Lateral presomitic cells that remain deep in the myotome differentiate into fast muscle fibres. Morphogens of the hedgehog family secreted by the notochord have a pivotal role in inducing the slow-twitch lineage. In late embryos, additional fibres are added from discrete germinal zones situated at the ventral and dorsal extremes of the developing myotome. This regionalised process has been termed "stratified hyperplasia." In fish which grow to a large final size this is followed by a mosaic hyperplastic process that leads to the formation of new fibres throughout the whole myotome. Current knowledge about the endocrine and autocrine factors that potentially regulate the proliferation and the differentiation of muscle cells within the embryonic and larval fish myotome is reviewed.

Zebrafish slow muscle cell migration induces a wave of fast muscle morphogenesis

The specification and morphogenesis of slow and fast twitch muscle fibers are crucial for muscle development. In zebrafish, Hedgehog is required for slow muscle fiber specification. However, less is known about signals that promote development of fast muscle fibers, which constitute the majority of somitic cells. We show that when Hedgehog signaling is blocked, fast muscle cell elongation is disrupted. Using genetic mosaics, we show that Hedgehog signal perception is required by slow muscle cells but not by fast muscle cells for fast muscle cell elongation. Furthermore, we show that slow muscle cells are sufficient to pattern the medial to lateral wave of fast muscle fiber morphogenesis even when fast muscle cells cannot perceive the Hedgehog signal. Thus, the medial to lateral migration of slow muscle fibers through the somite creates a morphogenetic signal that patterns fast muscle fiber elongation in its wake.

Sequence, conservation, and quantitative expression of rainbow trout Myf5

The success of rainbow trout as an aquaculture species is dependent on the ability to produce fish with large amounts of high-quality lean muscle. It is therefore important to understand not only the best conditions under which to raise the fish but also the molecular control of muscle growth. Vertebrate muscle growth is initiated by the specification of myogenic precursor cells into myoblasts. The myoblasts proliferate and fuse to form multinucleated myotubes, which mature into myofibers. A family of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors, the Myogenic Regulatory Factors (MRFs), controls these events. In trout, two MRF-encoding genes, TMyoD (of which there are two) and Tmyogenin, have been identified. However, the primary MRF-encoding Myf5 is not yet sequenced. Here, using degenerate PCR and 5' and 3' RACE, the cDNA sequence of trout Myf5 (TMyf5) is identified. Translation of the cDNA reveals that TMyf5 is a bHLH protein with homology to Myf5 and MRFs in other organisms. It is expressed mainly in red and white muscle, suggesting that it shares functional homology to Myf5 in other species. The molecular control of muscle growth has been well-characterized in mammals, but there are differences in the growth of fish muscle, highlighting the need for characterization of MRFs in fish species, particularly those in which understanding muscle growth will have a positive impact on the economic potential of the species.

Integrins in the mouse myotome: Developmental changes and differences between the epaxial and hypaxial lineage

Integrins are cellular adhesion receptors that mediate signaling and play key roles in the development of multicellular organisms. However, their role in the cellular events leading to myotome formation is completely unknown. Here, we describe the expression patterns of the alpha1, alpha4, alpha5, alpha6, and alpha7 integrin subunits in the mouse myotome and correlate them with the expression of several differentiation markers. Our results indicate that these integrin subunits may be differentially involved in the various phases of myogenic determination and differentiation. A detailed characterization of the myogenic cell types expressing the alpha4 and alpha6 subunits showed a regionalization of the myotome and dermomyotome based on cell-adhesion properties. We conclude that alpha6beta1 may be an early marker of epaxial myogenic progenitor cells. In contrast, alpha4beta1 is up-regulated in the intercalated myotome after myocyte differentiation. Furthermore, alpha4beta1 is expressed in the hypaxial dermomyotome and is maintained by early hypaxial myogenic progenitor cells colonizing the myotome.

Expression and neural control of follistatin versus myostatin genes during regeneration of mouse soleus

Follistatin and myostatin are two secreted proteins involved in the control of muscle mass during development. These two proteins have opposite effects on muscle growth, as documented by genetic models. The aims of this work were to analyze in mouse, by using in situ hybridization, the spatial and temporal expression patterns of follistatin and myostatin mRNAs during soleus regeneration after cardiotoxin injury, and to investigate the influence of innervation on the accumulation of these two transcripts. Follistatin transcripts could be detected in activated satellite cells as early as the first stages of regeneration and were transiently expressed in forming myotubes. In contrast, myostatin mRNAs accumulated persistently throughout the regeneration process as well as in adult control soleus. Denervation significantly affected both follistatin and myostatin transcript accumulation, but in opposite ways. Muscle denervation persistently reduced the levels of myostatin transcripts as early as the young myotube stage, whereas the levels of follistatin mRNA were strongly increased in the small myotubes in the late stages of regeneration. These results are discussed with regard to the potential functions of both follistatin, as a positive regulator of muscle differentiation, and myostatin, as a negative regulator of skeletal muscle growth. We suggest that the belated up-regulation of the follistatin mRNA level in the small myotubes of the regenerating soleus as well as the down-regulation of the myostatin transcript level after denervation contribute to the differentiation process in denervated regenerating muscle.

Skeletal muscle fibre type specification during embryonic development

In the last 10 years an increasing number of studies have provided an insight in the signalling mechanisms underlying myogenesis and fibre type specification during embryonic development: this paper aims to review the most relevant findings. In vertebrates a central role in muscle differentiation is played by the MyoD family, a group of transcription factors which activate transcription of muscle specific genes. In turn MyoD family is expressed in response to inductive signals coming from tissues adjacent to somites, in the first place the notochord and the neural tube. Hedgehog and Wnt are among these inductive signals and they find in the future myoblasts a response pathway which includes Ptc, Smu and Gli. The signalling mechanisms have been analysed in model organisms: mouse, chick. zebrafish and Drosophila. For some factors the orthologs in different species have been found to accomplish similar function, but for some other factors important differences are present: for example in Drosophila twist codes for a transcription factor which promotes myogenesis, whereas its ortholog in mouse tends to prevent or inhibit myogenesis. Conversely, nautilus which is the orholog of MyoD in Drosophila does not have a general function in muscle differentiation, but is required for the differentiation of a limited group of muscle fibres.

Xenopus bagpipe-related gene, koza, may play a role in regulation of cell proliferation

The homeobox gene koza is a new member of the vertebrate bagpipe-related gene family. Embryonic expression of koza is observed at highest levels in the muscle layer of the somites and, during later development, is restricted to the lateral somitic cells, which correspond to slow twitch muscle tissue. Expression of koza is also observed in the myocardial layer of the heart and in the cement gland. In each of these tissues, koza transcription commences only after the expression of terminal differentiation markers. By injection of synthetic mRNA, we show that overexpression of koza leads to an apparent decrease in the number of cells in the somites. No reduction in cell number is observed when koza is present in neural tissues, suggesting that koza exhibits some tissue specificity in regulation of cell proliferation. Embryonic manipulations show that restriction of koza expression to the slow twitch muscle layer is independent of axial structures but is, at least partly, regulated by signals arising in ectodermal tissue. Finally, in Drosophila, bagpipe expression is regulated by the hedgehog signaling pathway. By using ectopic expression, we show that koza transcription is positively regulated by banded hedgehog. This result indicates that regulation of bagpipe expression by hedgehog signaling is evolutionarily conserved.

The roles of cell migration and myofiber intercalation in patterning formation of the postmitotic myotome

We have previously found that the postmitotic myotome is formed by two successive waves of myoblasts. A first wave of pioneer cells is generated from the dorsomedial region of epithelial somites. A second wave originates from all four edges of the dermomyotome but cells enter the myotome only from the rostral and caudal lips. We provide new evidence for the existence of these distinctive waves. We show for the first time that when the somite dissociates, pioneer myotomal progenitors migrate as mesenchymal cells from the medial side towards the rostral edge of the segment. Subsequently, they generate myofibers that elongate caudally. Pioneer myofiber differentiation then progresses in a medial-to-lateral direction with fibers reaching the lateralmost region of each segment. At later stages, pioneers participate in the formation of multinucleated fibers during secondary myogenesis by fusing with younger cells. We also demonstrate that subsequent to primary myotome formation by pioneers, growth occurs by uniform cell addition along the dorsoventral myotome. At this stage, the contributing cells arise from multiple sources as the myotome keeps growing even in the absence of the dorsomedial lip. Moreover, as opposed to suggestions that myotome growth is driven primarily and directly by the medial and lateral edges, we demonstrate that there is no direct fiber generation from the dorsomedial lip. Instead, we find that added fibers elongate from the extreme edges. Altogether, the integration between both myogenic waves results in an even pattern of dorsoventral growth of the myotome which is accounted for by progressive cell intercalation of second wave cells between preexisting pioneer fibers.

A Twist in fate: evolutionary comparison of Twist structure and function

The general requirement to induce mesoderm and allocate cells into different mesodermal tissues such as body muscle or heart is common in many animal embryos. Since the discovery of the twist gene, there has been great progress toward unraveling the molecular mechanisms that control mesoderm specification and differentiation. Twist was first identified in Drosophila as a gene crucial for proper gastrulation and mesoderm formation. In the fly embryo, Twist continues to play additional roles, allocating mesodermal cells into the body wall muscle fate and patterning a subset of these muscles. Twist is also required for proper differentiation of the adult musculature. Twist homologues have been identified in a great variety of organisms, which span the phylogenetic tree. These organisms include other invertebrates such as jellyfish, nematode, leech and lancelet as well as vertebrates such as frog, chick, fish, mouse and human. The Twist family shares both homology in structure across the basic helix-loop-helix domain and in expression during mesoderm and muscle development in most species. Here we review the current state of knowledge of the Twist family and consider how Twist functions during development. Moreover, we highlight experimental evidence that shows common themes that Twist employs during specification and patterning of the mesoderm among evolutionarily distant organisms. Conserved principles and the molecular mechanisms underlying them are discussed.

Embryonic temperature and the relative timing of muscle-specific genes during development in herring (Clupea harengus L.)

Temperature influences many aspects of muscle development in herring (Clupea harengus). In Clyde herring, myofibril synthesis occurred later with respect to somite stage in embryos reared at 5°C compared with 12°C. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the relative timing of expression of myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) and myosin heavy chain (MyHC) transcripts changes with developmental temperature. Reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to clone partial coding regions of MyoD, myogenin and MyHC from juvenile Clyde herring. Embryos were reared at 5, 8 and 12°C, and the spatial and temporal expression patterns of transcripts were investigated using cRNA probes and in situ hybridisation. Antisense probes revealed a rostral–caudal progression of all three transcripts. MyoD transcription initially took place in the adaxial cells of the unsegmented, presomitic mesoderm, whereas myogenin transcription first occurred in newly formed somites. The MyHC gene transcript was not detected until approximately nine somites had formed. Since the somite stage at which the MRFs and MyHC were first expressed was independent of temperature, the hypothesis was rejected. We suggest that the effects of temperature on myofibril synthesis must occur downstream from MyHC transcription either at the level of translation or at the assembly stage.

Distinct mechanisms regulate slow-muscle development

Vertebrate muscle development begins with the patterning of the paraxial mesoderm by inductive signals from midline tissues [1, 2]. Subsequent myotome growth occurs by the addition of new muscle fibers. We show that in zebrafish new slow-muscle fibers are first added at the end of the segmentation period in growth zones near the dorsal and ventral extremes of the myotome, and this muscle growth continues into larval life. In marine teleosts, this mechanism of growth has been termed stratified hyperplasia [3]. We have tested whether these added fibers require an embryonic architecture of muscle fibers to support their development and whether their fate is regulated by the same mechanisms that regulate embryonic muscle fates. Although Hedgehog signaling is required for the specification of adaxial-derived slow-muscle fibers in the embryo [4, 5], we show that in the absence of Hh signaling, stratified hyperplastic growth of slow muscle occurs at the correct time and place, despite the complete absence of embryonic slow-muscle fibers to serve as a scaffold for addition of these new slow-muscle fibers. We conclude that slow-muscle-stratified hyperplasia begins after the segmentation period during embryonic development and continues during the larval period. Furthermore, the mechanisms specifying the identity of these new slow-muscle fibers are different from those specifying the identity of adaxial-derived embryonic slow-muscle fibers. We propose that the independence of early, embryonic patterning mechanisms from later patterning mechanisms may be necessary for growth.

Lower environmental temperature delays and prolongs myogenic regulatory factor expression and muscle differentiation in rainbow trout (Onchrhynchus mykiss) embryos

The effect of different temperatures (4 degrees C and 12 degrees C) on myogenic regulatory factors (MyoD and myogenin) and myosin heavy chain (MyHC) expression was investigated in rainbow trout (Onchrhynchus mykiss) during early development. MyoD is first switched on at stage 14 [about 5 somites are formed (1/2 epiboly)] while myogenin mRNA is expressed at stage 15 [around 15 somites are visible (2/3 epiboly)] at both temperatures. Subsequently (up to at least stage 20), the most caudal somites exhibit less myogenin mRNA at 4 degrees C compared to 12 degrees C. At the eyed stage (stage 23-24), both myogenin mRNA and protein are present in greater amounts throughout all myotomes at the lower temperature, with mRNA levels in warmer (12 degrees C) embryos at 83% for MyoD and 72% for myogenin of the levels seen in 4 degrees C embryos. Conversely, however, at this same stage, fast-MyHC mRNA and protein are more abundant in 12 degrees C than in 4 degrees C embryos. This indicates relatively advanced muscle differentiation at the warmer temperature. At hatching, myogenin-positive cells are concentrated within the myosepta at both temperatures and they are also sparsely distributed in the myotome at 4 degrees C, but not at 12 degrees C. MyoD, myogenin, and MyHC levels provide an indication of differentiation of muscle cells. These findings suggest that myogenic regulatory factor expression is delayed but prolonged by the lowering of temperature.

Invertebrate myogenesis: looking back to the future of muscle development

Recent studies in invertebrates have provided important mechanistic insights into several general aspects of muscle development. Two new genes have been identified that are involved in muscle fusion in Drosophila and a novel maternal component was shown to be responsible for myogenic determination in an ascidian. In addition, genetic analyses of nematode and Drosophila homologues of factors known to be myogenic regulators in other species yielded surprising findings about both the evolutionary conservation and divergence of these functions. Drosophila myogenesis has become a highly informative model for understanding the interplay between the signaling and transcriptional networks that underlie cell-fate specification during embryonic development.

Regulation and functions of myogenic regulatory factors in lower vertebrates

The transcription factors of the MyoD family have essential functions in myogenic lineage determination and muscle differentiation. These myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) activate muscle-specific transcription through binding to a DNA consensus sequence known as the E-box present in the promoter of numerous muscle genes. Four members, MyoD, myogenin, myf5 and MRF4/herculin/myf6, have been identified in higher vertebrates and have been shown to exhibit distinct but overlapping functions. Homologues of these four MRFs have also been isolated in a variety of lower vertebrates, including amphibians and fish. Differences have been observed, however, in both the expression patterns of MRFs during muscle development and the function of individual MRFs between lower and higher vertebrates. These differences reflect the variety of body muscle formation patterns among vertebrates. Furthermore, as a result of an additional polyploidy that occurred during the evolution of some amphibians and fish, MyoD, myogenin, myf5 and MRF4 may exist in lower vertebrates in two distinct copies that have evolved separately, acquiring specific roles and resulting in increased complexity of the myogenic regulatory network. Evidence is now accumulating that many of the co-factors (E12, Id, MEF2 and CRP proteins) that regulate MRF activity in mammals are also present in lower vertebrates. The inductive signals controlling the initial expression of MRFs within the developing somite of lower vertebrate proteins are currently being elucidated.

The u-boot mutation identifies a Hedgehog-regulated myogenic switch for fiber-type diversification in the zebrafish embryo

Developmental programs that govern the embryonic diversification of distinct kinds of muscles in vertebrates remain obscure. For instance, the most widely recognized attribute of early diversity among skeletal myoblasts is their ability to differentiate exclusively into fibers with slow or fast contractile properties. However, we know little about the developmental basis and genetic regulation of this seminal event in vertebrate myogenesis. Here we show that in the zebrafish, the u-boot gene acts as a myogenic switch that regulates the choice of myoblasts to adopt slow versus fast fiber developmental pathways. In u-boot mutant embryos, slow muscle precursors abort their developmental program, failing to activate expression of the homeobox gene prox1 and transfating into muscle cells with fast fiber properties. Using oligonucleotide-mediated translational inhibition, we have investigated the role of prox1 in this program. We find that it functions in the terminal step of the u-boot controlled slow fiber developmental pathway in the regulation of slow myofibril assembly. Our findings provide new insight into the genetic control of slow versus fast fiber specification and differentiation and indicate that dedicated developmental pathways exist in vertebrates for the elaboration of distinct elements of embryonic muscle pattern.

Pax3 is essential for skeletal myogenesis and the expression of Six1 and Eya2

Pax3 is a paired box transcription factor expressed during somitogenesis that has been implicated in initiating the expression of the myogenic regulatory factors during myogenesis. We find that Pax3 is necessary and sufficient to induce myogenesis in pluripotent stem cells. Pax3 induced the expression of the transcription factor Six1, its cofactor Eya2, and the transcription factor Mox1 prior to inducing the expression of MyoD and myogenin. Overexpression of a dominant negative Pax3, engineered by fusing the active transcriptional repression domain of mouse EN-2 in place of the Pax3 transcriptional activation domain, completely abolished skeletal myogenesis without inhibiting cardiogenesis. Expression of the dominant negative Pax3 resulted in a loss of expression of Six1, Eya2, and endogenous Pax3 as well as a down-regulation in the expression of Mox1. No effect was found on the expression of Gli2. These results indicate that Pax3 activity is essential for skeletal muscle development, the expression of Six1 and Eya2, and is involved in regulating its own expression. In summary, the combined approach of expressing both a wild type and dominant negative transcription factor in stem cells has identified a cascade of transcriptional events controlled by Pax3 that are necessary and sufficient for skeletal myogenesis.

Pax3acts cell autonomously in the neural tube and somites by controlling cell surface properties

Pax3 is a member of the paired-box-containing transcription factors. It is expressed in the developing somites, dorsal spinal cord, mesencephalon and neural crest derivatives. Several loss-of-function mutations are correlated with the Splotch phenotype in mice and Waardenburg syndrome in humans. Malformations include a lack of muscle in the limb, a failure of neural tube closure and dysgenesis of numerous neural crest derivatives. In this study we have used embryonic stem (ES) cells to generate a lacZ knock-in into the Pax3 locus. The Pax3 knock-in Splotch allele (Sp2G) was used to generate Pax3-deficient ES cells in order to investigate whether, in chimeric embryos, Pax3 is acting cell autonomously in the somites and the neural tube. We found that while Pax3 function is essential for the neuroepithelium and somites, a wild-type environment rescues mutant neural crest cells. In the two affected embryonic tissues, mutant and wild-type cells undergo segregation and do not intermingle.

The contribution of mutant cells to the neural tube and the somites displayed temporal differences. All chimeric embryos showed a remarkable contribution of blue cells to the neural tube at all stages analyzed, indicating that the Pax3-deficient cells are not excluded from the neural epithelium while development proceeds. In contrast, this is not true for the paraxial mesoderm. The somite contribution of Pax3−/− ES cells becomes less frequent in older embryos as compared to controls with Pax3+/− ES cells. We propose that although Pax3 function is related to cell surface properties, its role may differ in various tissues. In fact, apoptosis was found in Pax3-deficient cells of the lateral dermomyotome but not in the neural tube.

The sub-lip domain--a distinct pathway for myotome precursors that demonstrate rostral-caudal migration

We have previously reported that the myotome is formed by a first wave of pioneer cells generated from all along the dorsomedial portion of the epithelial somite and a second wave of cells issued from all four edges of the dermomyotome. Cells from the extreme rostral and caudal edges directly generate myofibers that elongate towards the opposite pole of each segment and along the pre-existing myotomal scaffold. In contrast, cells from the dorsomedial and ventrolateral lips first reach the extreme edges and then contribute to myofiber formation. The mechanism by which these epithelial cells translocate remained unknown and was the goal of the present study. We have found that epithelial cells along the dorsomedial and ventrolateral lips of the dermomyotome first delaminate into the immediate underlayer of the corresponding lips, the sub-lip domain, then migrate longitudinally along this pathway until reaching the extreme edges from which they differentiate into myofibers. Cells of the sub-lip domain are negative for Pax3 and desmin but express MyoD, Myf5 and FREK, suggesting that they are specific myogenic progenitors.

Wnt signaling regulates the function of MyoD and myogenin

The myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs), MyoD and myogenin, can induce myogenesis in a variety of cell lines but not efficiently in monolayer cultures of P19 embryonal carcinoma stem cells. Aggregation of cells expressing MRFs, termed P19[MRF] cells, results in an approximately 30-fold enhancement of myogenesis. Here we examine molecular events occurring during P19 cell aggregation to identify potential mechanisms regulating MRF activity. Although myogenin protein was continually present in the nuclei of >90% of P19[myogenin] cells, only a fraction of these cells differentiated. Consequently, it appears that post-translational regulation controls myogenin activity in a cell lineage-specific manner. A correlation was obtained between the expression of factors involved in somite patterning, including Wnt3a, Wnt5b, BMP-2/4, and Pax3, and the induction of myogenesis. Co-culturing P19[Wnt3a] cells with P19[MRF] cells in monolayer resulted in a 5- to 8-fold increase in myogenesis. Neither BMP-4 nor Pax3 was efficient in enhancing MRF activity in unaggregated P19 cultures. Furthermore, BMP-4 abrogated the enhanced myogenesis induced by Wnt signaling. Consequently, signaling events resulting from Wnt3a expression but not BMP-4 signaling or Pax3 expression, regulate MRF function. Therefore, the P19 cell culture system can be used to study the link between somite patterning events and myogenesis.

Modular long-range regulation of Myf5 reveals unexpected heterogeneity between skeletal muscles in the mouse embryo

The myogenic factor Myf5 plays a key role in muscle cell determination, in response to signalling cascades that lead to the specification of muscle progenitor cells. We have adopted a YAC transgenic approach to identify regulatory sequences that direct the complex spatiotemporal expression of this gene during myogenesis in the mouse embryo. Important regulatory regions with distinct properties are distributed over 96 kb upstream of the Myf5 gene. The proximal 23 kb region directs early expression in the branchial arches, epaxial dermomyotome and in a central part of the myotome, the epaxial intercalated domain. Robust expression at most sites in the embryo where skeletal muscle forms depends on an enhancer-like sequence located between −58 and −48 kb from the Myf5 gene. This element is active in the epaxial and hypaxial myotome, in limb muscles, in the hypoglossal chord and also at the sites of Myf5 transcription in prosomeres p1 and p4 of the brain. However later expression of Myf5 depends on a more distal region between −96 and −63 kb, which does not behave as an enhancer. This element is necessary for expression in head muscles but strikingly only plays a role in a subset of trunk muscles, notably the hypaxially derived ventral body muscles and also those of the diaphragm and tongue. Transgene expression in limb muscle masses is not affected by removal of the −96/-63 region. Epaxially derived muscles and some hypaxial muscles, such as the intercostals and those of the limb girdles, are also unaffected. This region therefore reveals unexpected heterogeneity between muscle masses, which may be related to different facets of myogenesis at these sites. Such regulatory heterogeneity may underlie the observed restriction of myopathies to particular muscle subgroups.

Slow muscle induction by Hedgehog signalling in vitro

Muscles are composed of several fibre types, the precise combination of which determines muscle function. Whereas neonatal and adult fibre type is influenced by a number of extrinsic factors, such as neural input and muscle load, there is little knowledge of how muscle cells are initially determined in the early embryo. In the zebrafish, fibres of the slow twitch class arise from precociously specified myoblasts that lie close to the midline whereas the remainder of the myotome differentiates as fast myosin expressing muscle. In vivo evidence has suggested the Sonic Hedgehog glycoprotein, secreted from the notochord, controls the formation of slow twitch and fast twitch muscle fates. Here we describe an in vitro culture system that we have developed to test directly the ability of zebrafish myoblasts to respond to exogenous Sonic Hedgehog peptide. We find that Sonic Hedgehog peptide can control the binary cell fate choice of embryonic zebrafish myoblasts in vitro. We have also used this culture system to assay the relative activities of different Hedgehog-family proteins and to investigate the possible involvement of heterotrimeric G-proteins in Hedgehog signal transduction.

The zebrafish slow-muscle-omitted gene product is required for Hedgehog signal transduction and the development of slow muscle identity

Hedgehog proteins mediate many of the inductive interactions that determine cell fate during embryonic development. Hedgehog signaling has been shown to regulate slow muscle fiber type development. We report here that mutations in the zebrafish slow-muscle-omitted (smu) gene disrupt many developmental processes involving Hedgehog signaling. smu(−/−) embryos have a 99% reduction in the number of slow muscle fibers and a complete loss of Engrailed-expressing muscle pioneers. In addition, mutant embryos have partial cyclopia, and defects in jaw cartilage, circulation and fin growth. The smu(−/−) phenotype is phenocopied by treatment of wild-type embryos with forskolin, which inhibits the response of cells to Hedgehog signaling by indirect activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). Overexpression of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) or dominant negative PKA (dnPKA) in wild-type embryos causes all somitic cells to develop into slow muscle fibers. Overexpression of Shh does not rescue slow muscle fiber development in smu(−/−) embryos, whereas overexpression of dnPKA does. Cell transplantation experiments confirm that smu function is required cell-autonomously within the muscle precursors: wild-type muscle cells rescue slow muscle fiber development in smu(−/−) embryos, whereas mutant muscle cells cannot develop into slow muscle fibers in wild-type embryos. Slow muscle fiber development in smu mutant embryos is also rescued by expression of rat Smoothened. Therefore, Hedgehog signaling through Slow-muscle-omitted is necessary for slow muscle fiber type development. We propose that smu encodes a vital component in the Hedgehog response pathway.

Zebrafish Mesp family genes, mesp-a and mesp-b are segmentally expressed in the presomitic mesoderm, and Mesp-b confers the anterior identity to the developing somites

Segmentation of a vertebrate embryo begins with the subdivision of the paraxial mesoderm into somites through a not-well-understood process. Recent studies provided evidence that the Notch-Delta and the FGFR (fibroblast growth factor receptor) signalling pathways are required for segmentation. In addition, the Mesp family of bHLH transcription factors have been implicated in establishing a segmental prepattern in the presomitic mesoderm. In this study, we have characterized zebrafish mesp-a and mesp-b genes that are closely related to Mesp family genes in other vertebrates. During gastrulation, only mesp-a is expressed in the paraxial mesoderm at the blastoderm margin. During the segmentation period, both genes are segmentally expressed in one to three stripes in the anterior parts of somite primordia. In fused somites (fss) embryos, in which all early somite boundary formation is blocked, initial mesp-a expression at the gastrula stage remains intact, but the expression of mesp-a and mesp-b is not detected during the segmentation period. This suggests that these genes are downstream targets of fss at the segmentation stage. Comparison with her1 expression (Muller, M., von Weizsacker, E. and Campos-Ortega, J. A. (1996) Development 122, 2071–2078) suggests that, like her1, mesp genes are not expressed in primordia of the first several somites. Furthermore, we found that zebrafish her1 expression oscillates in the presomitic mesoderm. The her1 stripe, which first appears in the tailbud region, moves in a caudal to rostral direction, and it finally overlaps the most rostral mesp stripe. Thus, in the trunk region, both her1 and mesp transcripts are detected in every somite primordium posterior to the forming somites. Ectopic expression of Mesp-b in embryos causes a loss of the posterior identity within the somite primordium, leading to a segmentation defect. These embryos show a reduction in expression of the posterior genes, myoD and notch5, with uniform expression of the anterior genes, FGFR1, papc and notch6. These observations suggest that zebrafish mesp genes are involved in anteroposterior specification within the presumptive somites, by regulating the essential signalling pathways mediated by Notch-Delta and FGFR.

The growth of the dermomyotome and formation of early myotome lineages in thoracolumbar somites of chicken embryos

Myotome formation in the epaxial and hypaxial domains of thoraco-lumbar somites was analyzed using fluorescent vital dye labeling of dermomyotome cells and cell-fate assessment by confocal microscopy. Muscle precursor cells for the epaxial and hypaxial myotomes are predominantly located in the dorsomedial and ventrolateral dermomyotome lips, respectively, and expansion of the dermomyotome is greatest along its mediolateral axis coincident with the dorsalward and ventralward growth directions of the epaxial and hypaxial myotomes. Measurements of the dermomyotome at different stages of development shows that myotome growth begins earlier in the epaxial than in the hypaxial domain, but that after an initial lag phase, both progress at the same rate. A combination of dye injection and/or antibody labeling of early and late-expressed muscle contractile proteins confirms the myotome mediolateral growth directions, and shows that the myotome thickness increases in a superficial (near dermis) to deep (near sclerotome) growth direction. These findings also provide a basis for predicting the following gene expression sequence program for the earliest muscle precursor lineages in mouse embryos: Pax-3 (stem cells), myf-5 (myoblast cells) and myoD (myocytes). The movements and mitotic activity of early muscle precursor cells lead to the conclusion that patterning and growth in the myotome specifically, and in the epaxial and hypaxial domains of the body generally, are governed by morphogenetic cell movements.

Control of muscle cell-type specification in the zebrafish embryo by Hedgehog signalling

The specification of different muscle cell types in the zebrafish embryo requires signals that emanate from the axial mesoderm. In previous studies we and others have shown that overexpression of different members of the Hedgehog protein family can induce the differentiation of two types of slow-twitch muscles, the superficially located slow-twitch fibres and the medially located muscle pioneer cells. Here we have investigated the requirement for Hedgehog signalling in the specification of these distinct muscle cell types in two ways: first, by characterising the effects on target gene expression and muscle cell differentiation of the u-type mutants, members of a phenotypic group previously implicated in Hedgehog signalling, and second, by analysing the effects of overexpression of the Patched1 protein, a negative regulator of Hedgehog signalling. Our results support the idea that most u-type genes are required for Hedgehog signalling and indicate that while such signalling is essential for slow myocyte differentiation, the loss of activity of one signal, Sonic hedgehog, can be partially compensated for by other Hedgehog family proteins.