Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:880-890. [PMID: 21865084 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70188-7]

High-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in Uganda: Considering potential harms and benefits in a low-resource setting

OBJECTIVES

The World Health Organization supports both the screen-and-treat (ST) approach and the screen, triage and treat (STT) approach to cervical cancer screening using high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing. For Uganda, the sequence of hrHPV-ST and hrHPV-STT could be similar, with visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) after positive hrHPV tests in both. To consider potential tradeoffs (overtreatment in ST versus missed cancer cases in STT), we compared hrHPV-STT with VIA triage (STT-VIA), and STT with HPV 16/18 genotyping risk stratification, to hrHPV-ST for Uganda, in terms of overtreatment, cervical cancer incidence, and life years, for the general female population of Uganda.

METHODS

A microsimulation model of cervical cancer was adapted. Incremental benefit-harm ratios of STT were calculated as ratios of prevented overtreatment to reduced life years, and to increased cancer cases. Additional scenarios with 20% difference in intra- and inter-screening follow-up between ST and STT were modeled.

RESULTS

Both STT strategies resulted in life year losses on average compared to ST. STT-VIA prevented more overtreatment but led to increased cervical cancer incidence and life year losses. STT-G-VIA resulted in better harm-benefit ratios and additional costs. With better follow-up, STT prevented overtreatment and improved outcomes.

DISCUSSION

For Uganda, the STT approach appears preferrable, if the screening sequences of hrHPV-based ST and STT are similar in practice. While VIA triage alone would reduce overtreatment the most, it could also result in more cancer cases. Risk stratification via genotyping could improve STT. Potential follow-up differences and resource availability should be considered by decision-makers when planning Uganda's hrHPV-based screening strategy.

PAX1/SOX1 DNA Methylation Versus Cytology and HPV16/18 Genotyping for the Triage of High-Risk HPV-Positive Women in Cervical Cancer Screening: Retrospective Analysis of Archival Samples

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of cytology, HPV16/18 genotyping and PAX1/SOX1 methylation for the triage of high-risk HPV-positive cervical samples.

DESIGN

Retrospective analyses of archival samples collected from a large-scale prospective randomised controlled trial.

SETTING/SAMPLE

HPV-positive women recruited from the general cervical screening population.

METHODS

403 HPV-positive samples including 113 normal, 173 low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (LG-CIN), 114 HG-CIN and three cervical cancers. All samples were assessed by liquid-based cytology, HPV genotyping and PAX1/SOX1 methylation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

AUC (area under the curve), sensitivity and specificity for cytology, HPV16/18 genotyping and PAX1/SOX1 methylation for high-grade (HG) premalignant cervical lesions.

RESULTS

PAX1 was more sensitive than cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping in detecting a HG lesion (CIN2+). The sensitivity for PAX1, SOX1, cytology and HPV16/18 were 73.5% (95% CI: 65.5-81.5), 41.9% (95% CI: 32.9-50.8), 48.7% (95% CI: 39.7-57.8) and 36.8% (95% CI: 28.0-45.5), respectively, and their respective specificities were 70.3% (95% CI: 65.0-75.6), 83.6% (95% CI: 79.3-87.9), 77.6% (95% CI: 72.8-82.5) and 67.1% (95% CI: 61.7-72.6), respectively. Overall, PAX1 gave the best AUC at 0.72. Adding SOX1 to PAX1 did not improve the AUC (0.68). Three hundred and twenty-two women who did not have a HG lesion at baseline were followed up for two rounds of screening. Fewer women developed a HG lesion with a normal baseline PAX1 compared to women with a normal baseline cytology or negative HPV16/18 (8.4% vs. 14.5% and 17.5%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

PAX1 triage for referral to colposcopy in HPV-positive women may be superior to cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping.

[High-grade lesions probability in ASCUS HPV positive patient according to HPV type]

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to assess the proportion of high-grade histological lesions, according to HPV type, in patients referred for colposcopy involving a positive HPV-HR test and ASC-US cytology.

METHODS

This is a retrospective descriptive study of asymptomatic patients aged 25 to 65 with a positive HPV-HR test and ASC-US cytology. Data were collected at the Nord Franche-Comté Hospital from September 2019 to February 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of high-grade histological lesions in patients with ASC-US cytology combined to HPV 16 or 18 (associated or not with other HPV type), compared with HPV no 16 no 18.

RESULTS

Among the 298 patients included, 67% were HPV no 16 no 18, 22% HPV 16 associated or not with others and 11% HPV 18 associated or not with others. We found significantly fewer high-grade lesions in patients with ASC-US cytology and HPV no 16 no 18 than in patients with HPV 16 or 18 (8.5% versus 22.7%, P<0.01). In patients presenting an ASC-US cytology with HPV no 16, no 18: 53% of the biopsies found no histological lesion compared with 30% for the other HPVs (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We have highlighted the reality of colposcopists: a high ratio of normal coloscopy associated with normal or low-grade biopsies, in patients with a positive HPV-HR test no 16, no 18 and ASC-US cytology.

Primary Human Papillomavirus Screening: Women's Perceptions of New Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations

Background: Current clinical guidelines recommended primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening for cervical cancer testing. Previous studies reported patient-level barriers (e.g., limited knowledge and attachment to Pap test) that may hinder wide adoption of primary HPV screening. We assessed these women-level factors following the implementation of primary HPV screening (July 2020) at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). Methods: We administered a patient survey (mail and on-line) to female KPSC members aged 30-65 years who received primary HPV screening between October and December 2020. Those who preferred English vs. Spanish language were sampled separately. The survey included domains on knowledge about HPV and HPV screening, awareness of screening guidelines, and attitudes about HPV testing. Demographic data were collected using electronic health records. We used weighted multivariable logistic and modified Poisson regressions for associations between language preference and survey responses. Results: In total, 3,009 surveys were returned (38.0% response rate). Few women (7.0%) found HPV testing as an acceptable screening method. The majority of women (92.2%) remained unaware that HPV testing can replace Pap test for screening. The Pap test was the most preferred screening approach for 33.2% Spanish-speaking women vs. 19.9% English-speaking women. Only 20.6% knew that women aged 30-65 years can be screened every 5 years with cotest or primary HPV screening. Most women (96.4%) did not perceive stigma about taking the HPV test. Conclusion: Proactive patient education will help improve women's knowledge about primary HPV screening, which may facilitate its implementation in additional health care settings.

HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein detection as a promising triage strategy for HPV 16/18-positive patients: A prospective multicenter study with a 2-year follow up

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effectiveness of HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and predicting disease outcomes in HPV 16/18-positive patients.

METHODS

The present study was a cross-sectional study with a 2-year follow up. We collected 915 cervical exfoliated cell samples from patients who tested positive for HPV 16/18 in gynecologic clinics of three tertiary hospitals in Beijing from March 2021 to October 2022 for HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein testing. Subsequently, 2-year follow up of 408 patients with baseline histologic CIN1 or below were used to investigate the predictive role of HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein in determining HPV persistent infection and disease progression.

RESULTS

The positivity rate of the HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein assay was 42.06% (249/592) in the inflammation/CIN 1 group and 85.45% (277/324) in the CIN2+ group. For CIN2+ detection, using the HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein assay combined with HPV 16/18 testing, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 85.45%, 57.94%, 52.57%, and 87.95%, respectively. During the 2-year follow up, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for predicting persistent HPV infection were 48.44%, 58.21%, 34.64%, and 71.18% in the baseline inflammation and CIN1 group.

CONCLUSIONS

As a triage method for high-grade CIN screening in HPV 16/18-positive patients, HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein demonstrated a relatively high NPV, making it suitable for clinical use in triaging HPV 16/18-positive cases and potentially reducing the colposcopic referral rate. HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein exhibited a preferably predictive value in determining HPV infection outcomes and disease progression.

Comparison of cervical cancer screening models based on Pap and HPV tests in Tbilisi, Georgia

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of human papillomavirus HPV test with HPV16/18 genotyping and liquid-based cytology (LBC) triage as a primary screening method for cervical cancer compared to conventional Pap test in women undergoing routine cervical cancer screening in Tbilisi.

METHODS

Cross-sectional, prospective study was conducted, where 1,000 enrolled women aged 30-60 years during one visit underwent conventional Pap smear and Hr-HPV testing (Roche Cobas system). Women with any positive screening results were referred for further evaluation and remaining cells from the Cell Collection Medium vial were used for LBC. The study calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for each screening method and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the accuracy of each diagnostic method in identifying people with CIN2+ diseases.

RESULTS

The HPV test with HPV16/18 genotyping and LBC triage demonstrated higher sensitivity (76.9%), specificity (71.6%), and PPV (34.5%) compared to conventional Pap tests (p < 0.05). NPV was also high with the HPV test (94.1%). The HPV test alone had the highest sensitivity (92.3%) and NPV (96.7%), but lower specificity (41.4%) and PPV (22.6%) than the HPV test with HPV16/18 genotyping and LBC triage (p < 0.05). Comparing the areas under the curve (AUCs), only the HPV with HPV16/18 genotyping and LBC triage showed a statistically significant difference when compared to conventional Pap (0.71 vs. 0.55, p = 0.03) and high figures of AUC 0.71 (95% CI: 0.58-0.85) suggesting that HPV test with HPV16/18 genotyping and LBC triage is a more reliable screening method for detecting CIN2+ disease and preventing cervical cancer, than other screening modality.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the HPV test with HPV16/18 genotyping and LBC triage is a more effective primary screening method compared to conventional Pap tests. This information should be the basis for transition from cytological screening to HPV testing in Georgia.

Looking Back, Moving Forward: Challenges and Opportunities for Global Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control

Despite the introduction of Pap testing for screening to prevent cervical cancer in the mid-20th century, cervical cancer remains a common cause of cancer-related mortality and morbidity globally. This is primarily due to differences in access to screening and care between low-income and high-income resource settings, resulting in cervical cancer being one of the cancers with the greatest health disparity. The discovery of human papillomavirus (HPV) as the near-obligate viral cause of cervical cancer can revolutionize how it can be prevented: HPV vaccination against infection for prophylaxis and HPV testing-based screening for the detection and treatment of cervical pre-cancers for interception. As a result of this progress, the World Health Organization has championed the elimination of cervical cancer as a global health problem. However, unless research, investments, and actions are taken to ensure equitable global access to these highly effective preventive interventions, there is a real threat to exacerbating the current health inequities in cervical cancer. In this review, the progress to date and the challenges and opportunities for fulfilling the potential of HPV-targeted prevention for global cervical cancer control are discussed.

Clinical evaluation of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with extended HPV genotyping triage for cervical cancer screening: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from nine population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical values of extended human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping in triage of high-risk HPV-positive women, focusing on the trade-off between cervical precancer detections and colposcopy referrals.

METHODS

A bivariate random-effects model was used to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of primary HPV screening with following triage strategies to detect cervical precancers: (i) partial genotyping for HPV16/18 combined with cytological testing at atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance threshold (used as the comparator), (ii) genotyping for HPV16/18/58/52, (iii) genotyping for HPV16/18/58/52/33, (iv) genotyping for HPV16/18/58/33/31, (v) genotyping for HPV16/18/58/52/33/31, and (vi) genotyping for HPV16/18/58/52/33/31/39/51. Internal risk benchmarks for clinical management were used to evaluate the risk stratification of each triage strategy.

RESULTS

A total of 16,982 women (mean age 46.1 years, range 17-69) were included in this analysis. For CIN3+ detection, triage with HPV16/18/58/33/31 genotyping achieved lower positivity (6.85% vs. 7.35%, p = 0.001), while maintaining similar sensitivity (91.35% vs. 96.42%, p = 0.32) and specificity (94.09% vs. 93.67%, p = 0.56) compared with the comparator strategy. Similar patterns were observed for CIN2+ detection. Women with a positive HPV16/18/58/33/31 genotyping test had high enough risk for CIN3+ for colposcopy referral, while the risk for women with a negative test was below the 1-year return decision threshold according to internal benchmarks.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested extended HPV genotyping is of potential to be used as a triage technique integrated into HPV-based cervical cancer screening, leading to reduced need for colposcopy referral while maintaining similar disease detection and efficient risk stratification.

The performance of single and combination test strategies using visual inspection, cytology, high-risk HPV DNA and HPV16/18 to screen South African women with and without HIV-infection

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer screening strategies should ideally be informed by population-specific data. Strategies recommended for secondary prevention, are often inadequately studied in populations with high cervical disease burdens. This report describes the test performance measured against CIN2 + /CIN3 + histology in HIV-positive women (HPW) and HIV-negative women (HNW) with the aim to determine the most effective strategies to identify South African women at risk.

METHODS

Primary screening using visual inspection, cytology and HPV DNA (cobas®) was performed in two South African provinces on 456 HPW and 639 HNW participating in the multicentric DiaVACCS trial. Histology was obtained for 91.7% screen-positive and 42.7% screen-negative participants, and unavailable histology was determined by multiple imputation to adjust for verification bias. Cross-sectional test performance was calculated for single and combination test strategies with and without intermediate risk categories using different cut-offs. Minimum acceptability for sensitivity and specificity, treatment and follow-up numbers were considered to evaluate strategies.

RESULTS

The only single test to reach acceptability in HPW was cytology (LSIL) [sensitivity 71.2%; specificity 90.5%; treatment 33.4%]; in HNW only HPV (hr) qualified [sensitivity 68.2%; specificity 85.2%; treatment 23.5%]. The universally best performing strategy which also resulted in smaller treatment numbers without intermediate risk group was primary HPV(hr), with treatment of both HPV(16/18) and cytology (ASCUS +) [HPW: sensitivity 73.6%; specificity 89.7%; treatment 34.7%. HNW: sensitivity 59.1%; specificity 93.6%; treatment 13.9%]. DNA testing for hrHPV (any) and hrHPV (16/18) was the best universally acceptable strategy with an intermediate risk category (early follow-up) in HPW [sensitivity 82.1%; specificity 96.4%; treatment 17.1%; follow-up 31.4%] and HNW [sensitivity 68.2%; specificity 96.7%; treatment 7.6%; follow-up 15.9%]. In comparison, using both HPV (16/18) and cytology (ASCUS +) as secondary tests in hrHPV positive women, decreased follow-up [HPW 13.8%, HNW 9.6%], but increased treatment [HPW 34.7%, HNW 13.9%].

CONCLUSION

Using hrHPV (any) as primary and both HPV16/18 and cytology as secondary tests, was universally acceptable without an intermediate risk group. Strategies with follow-up groups improved screening performance with smaller treatment numbers, but with effective management of the intermediate risk group as prerequisite.

Clinical Validation of the Vitro HPV Screening Assay for Its Use in Primary Cervical Cancer Screening

Many scientific societies have issued guidelines to introduce population-based cervical cancer screening with HPV testing. The Vitro HPV Screening assay is a fully automatic multiplex real-time PCR test targeting the L1 GP5+/GP6+ region of HPV genome. The assay detects 14 high risk (HR) HPV genotypes, identifying individual HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes, and the HPV-positive samples for the other 12 HR HPV types are subsequently genotyped with the HPV Direct Flow Chip test. Following international guidelines, the aim of this study was to validate the clinical accuracy of the Vitro HPV Screening test on ThinPrep-collected samples for its use as primary cervical cancer screening, using as comparator the validated cobas® 4800 HPV test. The non-inferiority analysis showed that the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the Vitro HPV Screening assay for a diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) were not inferior to those of cobas® 4800 HPV (p = 0.0049 and p < 0.001 respectively). The assay has demonstrated a high intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility, also among the individual genotypes. The Vitro HPV Screening assay is valid for cervical cancer screening and it provides genotyping information on HPV-positive samples without further sample processing in a fully automated workflow.

Should we use risk selection tests for HPV 16 and/or 18 positive cases: Comparison of p16/Ki67 and cytology

Major screening abnormalities in precolposcopic stage are tests results that imply direct referral to colposcopy (and/or expedited treatment) without performing additional high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+) risk selection testing. Currently, both clinically validated HSIL+ risk selection tests, reflex cytology and reflex p16/Ki67 dual staining (DS), are being compared for use in primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening to avoid possible overtreatment, but there is still no sufficient data available for their performance. Among 30 066 liquid-based cervical cancer screening tests results, a group of 332 women was selected with available high-risk types of HPV tests results with 16/18 limited genotyping, liquid-based cytology, DS, and histology results from standardized colposcopy with biopsy. In HPV 16/18+ cases, three triage approaches were retrospectively analyzed. Predictive values for detection of HSIL+ were calculated and number of colposcopies required in each strategy. Both triage models with DS used (reflex cytology followed by DS, and reflex DS alone in all cases) had significantly higher positive predictive value for HSIL+ than strategy with reflex cytology alone (44.2%/45.7% vs. 28.3%; p < 0.0001). In models with DS, less colposcopies were required (95/92 vs. 152) and less colposcopies were needed per HSIL+ detection (2.26/2.19 vs. 3.54). Only one HSIL+ case was missed in both triage models with DS incorporation. p16/Ki67 dual-stain may be an effective, alone or combined with cytology, triage test to detect HSIL+ in patients with major screening abnormalities in primary HPV-based cervical cancer screening. Performing cytology as the first triage test improves the strategy by enabling referrals to expedited treatment in selected cases.

Potential diagnostic value of miRNAs in sexually transmitted infections

MiRNAs are small endogenous non-coding RNAs that have been demonstrated to be involved in post-transcriptional gene silencing, regulating a number of metabolic functions in the human body, including immune response, cellular physiology, organ development, angiogenesis, signaling, and other aspects. As popular molecules that have been studied in previous years, given their extensive regulatory functions, miRNAs hold considerable promise as non-invasive biomarkers. Sexually transmitted infections(STIs) are still widespread and have an adverse effect on individuals, communities, and society worldwide. miRNAs in the regulatory networks are generally involved in their molecular processes of formation and development. In this review, we discuss the value of miRNAs for the diagnosis of STIs.

Are HPV-negative lesions concerned for the introduction of primary HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in Japan?

AIM

In Japan, primary human papilloma virus (HPV) testing has not been introduced for cervical cancer screening due to concerns that HPV-negative lesions may be missed and a lack of Japanese data. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of primary HPV testing in Japan by analyzing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2) or more/high-risk HPV- (CIN2+/hrHPV-) cases in cervical cancer screening.

METHODS

Data from 35 525 cervical cancer screenings with HPV testing and cervical cytology from 2011 to 2019 in Saga City, Japan, were reviewed. The cases with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL+)/hrHPV- were analyzed in detail.

RESULTS

The results of the 35 525 examinees were as follows: 31 123 were negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM)/hrHPV-, 2612 were NILM/hrHPV+, 262 were atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US)/hrHPV-, 213 were ASC-US/hrHPV+, 291 were LSIL+/hrHPV-, and 1024 were LSIL+/hrHPV+. Of the 256 LSIL+/hrHPV- examinees for whom histology was available, CIN2+ were CIN2 9.4% (24/256), CIN3 3.9% (10/256), cervical adenocarcinoma 0.4% (1/256), uterine corpus cancer 1.2% (3/256), and uterine sarcoma 0.4% (1/256). Overall, the rate of LSIL+/hrHPV- was 0.82% (291/35.525), 0.1% (36/35525) of which were cervical lesions with CIN2+. Only one cervical adenocarcinoma was detected, but gastric-type adenocarcinoma was not included.

CONCLUSION

HPV-negative CIN2+ or cervical adenocarcinoma is not a concern for the introduction of primary HPV screening in Japan. Primary HPV testing in cervical cancer screening is considered a feasible method that can be used in Japan, although an algorithm suitable for Japan and a national-level management system need to be established.

Recent advancement of nanomedicine-based targeted delivery for cervical cancer treatment

Cervical cancer is a huge worldwide health burden, impacting women in impoverished nations in particular. Traditional therapeutic approaches, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, frequently result in systemic toxicity and ineffectiveness. Nanomedicine has emerged as a viable strategy for targeted delivery of therapeutic drugs to cancer cells while decreasing off-target effects and increasing treatment success in recent years. Nanomedicine for cervical cancer introduces several novel aspects that distinguish it from previous treatment options such as tailored delivery system, precision targeting, combination therapies, real-time monitoring and diverse nanocarriers to overcome the limitations of one another. This abstract presents recent advances in nanomedicine-based tailored delivery systems for the treatment of cervical cancer. Liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, and carbon nanotubes have all been intensively studied for their ability to transport chemotherapeutic medicines, nucleic acids, and imaging agents to cervical cancer cells. Because of the way these nanocarriers are designed, they may cross biological barriers and preferentially aggregate at the tumor site, boosting medicine concentration and lowering negative effects on healthy tissues. Surface modification of nanocarriers with targeting ligands like antibodies, peptides, or aptamers improves specificity for cancer cells by identifying overexpressed receptors or antigens on the tumor surface. Furthermore, nanomedicine-based techniques have made it possible to co-deliver numerous therapeutic drugs, allowing for synergistic effects and overcoming drug resistance. In preclinical and clinical investigations, combination treatments comprising chemotherapeutic medicines, gene therapy, immunotherapy, and photodynamic therapy have showed encouraging results, opening up new avenues for individualized and multimodal treatment regimens. Furthermore, the inclusion of contrast agents and imaging probes into nanocarrier systems has enabled real-time monitoring and imaging of treatment response. This enables the assessment of therapy efficacy, the early diagnosis of recurrence, and the optimization of treatment regimens.

Associations of multi-human papillomavirus infections with expression of p16 in a cohort of women who underwent colposcopy: a retrospective study of 5165 patients

Objective

Investigate HPV types in cervical specimens, their correlation with p16 expression in lesions, and diagnostic value for cervical lesions. Enhance clinical diagnosis reliability.

Methods

Retrospective cross-sectional study at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital's Cervical Disease Center (Jun 2019-Dec 2021). Patients with abnormal cervical screening underwent colposcopy and conization. Pathological diagnosis based on colposcopy, cervical biopsy, ECC, and conization. Analyzed HPV genotyping (18 HR-HPV, 5 LR-HPV) and p16 expression correlation. Statistical analysis used R software.

Results

he expression of p16 is significantly associated with the infection of high-risk HPV types, such as 16, 33, 52, and 58, with an increased risk of 1.4 times or higher (OR=1.91, 3.14, 1.40, and 1.78, respectively). The risk of p16 expression increased 4-fold for multiple high-risk HPV types [adjusted OR (95% CI) = 4 (2.92~5.5), P-value <0.001]. Compared to the p16(-) group, the p16(+) group had a higher association with cervical lesions worse than HSIL (High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions).In the group with multiple Human Papillomavirus Infections with types 16, 33, 52, and 58, the risk of cervical lesions worse than HSIL increased by up to 660-fold compared to the negative group (adjusted OR=660.62, 95% CI: 91.39~4775.53, P<0.001), indicating that this combination of HPV types posed the greatest risk for cervical lesions above HSIL.

Conclusions

p16 plays a crucial role in cervical lesion progression, linked to high-risk HPV. Combining p16 with HPV screening improves cervical cancer detection. Studying multiple HPV infections will enhance prevention and management.

The Role of p16/Ki67 Dual Staining in Cervical Cancer Screening

Cervical cancer screening has enabled a decrease in the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. Various screening modalities have been studied to date. In many countries, screening is still based on cervical cytology, where cervical cells obtained either on glass or in a liquid medium are examined under a microscope. However, the fact that the vast majority of cervical cancers are a result of persistent infection with high-risk human papillomaviruses (hr-HPV) has led to the implementation of primary HPV screening in many countries. Taking into consideration the fact that the majority of HPV infections are transient and do not cause cervical precancer, effective triage methods are needed to prevent an increase in colposcopy referrals. Among these, the most extensively investigated are HPV genotyping, HPV methylation, and p16/Ki67 dual staining. In this manuscript, we briefly summarize the current knowledge regarding different screening strategies for the prevention of cervical cancer, with a focus on p16/Ki67 dual staining. In addition, we provide an explanation regarding the rationale for the use of various screening modalities based on the molecular biology of cervical cancer and cervical precancerous lesions.

The Triaging Effect of the Human Papillomavirus 16/18 E7 Oncoprotein Assay in HPV 16/18-Positive Patients for High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study

Objective: To investigate the triaging efficacy of the human papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18 E7 oncoprotein assay for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) screening in HPV 16/18-positive patients in a tertiary hospital in China. Methods: We collected 476 cervical cell samples from women who tested positive for HPV 16/18 in the gynecological clinic of Peking Union Medical College Hospital between September 2018 and September 2022 and analyzed them by the HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein assay before colposcopy and biopsy. The study assessed the triaging efficacy of the HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein assay in HPV 16/18-positive patients by analyzing its performance against the gold standard of histologically confirmed CIN2+. Results: The positive rate of the HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein assay was 41.0% (114/278) in the negative for intraepithelial lesions and malignancy/CIN1 group and 80.3% (159/198) in the CIN2+ group. For triage of women with a positive HPV 16/18 test for CIN2+ detection, the HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein assay had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 80.3%, 59.4%, 58.5%, and 80.9%, respectively. Furthermore, longitudinal follow-up of five patients showed a good correlation between the expression of the HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein and cervical lesion grades. Conclusions: As a triage method for HPV 16/18-positive patients, the HPV 16/18 E7 oncoprotein assay improves the specificity, reduces the colposcopy referral rate, and has the potential for long-term monitoring of high-grade CIN.

Prevalence and characteristics of cervical human papillomavirus genotypes and cervical lesions among 58630 women from Guangzhou, China

BACKGROUND

To assess the prevalence and characteristics of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes and its associated cervical lesions in Guangzhou, China, which may be useful for adjusting area-specific cervical cancer prevention and control strategies.

METHODS

A total of 58630 women were enrolled. Cervical specimens were collected for HPV DNA testing and/or cervical cytology. Patients with visible cervical lesions or abnormal screening results underwent further cervical biopsies.

RESULT

The overall HPV positive rate was 14.07%. The top five genotypes in Guangzhou were HPV 52 (3.06%), HPV 16 (2.28%), HPV 58 (1.80%), HPV 51 (1.32%), and HPV 39 (1.15%). The prevalence of overall HPV and vaccine-targeted HPV genotypes showed a significantly decreasing trend from 2016 to 2019 (P < 0.05). While, the infection rate of HPV 35 increased significantly during this time (P = 0.015). The age-specific prevalence of any HPV genotypes showed a bimodal curve, which peaked firstly among the < 20 y age group, and then peaked secondly among the > 59 y age group. Among HPV-positive women, the proportions of HSIL and cervical cancer increased significantly with age (P < 0.05). Among > 59 y age group, 9.35% HPV-positive cases were diagnosed as cervical cancer. HPV 16/18 was the most common cause of cervical cancer. While, the percentage of non-HPV 16/18 infection among cervical cancer patients increased over time, from 15.21% in 2015 to 26.32% in 2019 (P = 0.010). Besides that, the prevalence of non-HPV 16/18 genotypes among cervical cancer patients significantly increased with age, which peaked at the > 59 y age group (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Although the prevalence of any HPV and vaccine-targeted HPV genotypes decreased significantly with time, it is still important to follow the HPV genotypes and their associated cancer risk after the large-scale popularization of HPV vaccine. And age should be taken into consideration in screening strategies and risk-based management of cervical cancer in Guangzhou.

Clinical and epidemiological features of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in patients with cervical intraepithelial lesions

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we analyzed the clinical and epidemiological features of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection in patients with cervical intraepithelial lesions.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 240 cases of histologically confirmed cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions to determine any correlation between HPV infection characteristics, age distribution, and cervical epithelial lesions.

RESULTS

Patients between the ages of 31 and 40 with cervical intraepithelial lesions were more likely to have high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL; 40.7%) than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL; 31.3%) (P < 0.05). In patients with HSIL, HR-HPV16, HR-HPV33, and HR-HPV52 were the most common types of HPV infection, while in patients with LSIL, HR-HPV16, HR-HPV52, and HR-HPV58 were the most common types of HPV infection. The highest percentage of single infections occurred in the HSIL group (69.6%), followed by the LSIL group (68.8%). HSIL was present in a significant number of patients (28.6%) aged 30 years and above who tested positive for 12 HPV types but negative for TCT.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of HSIL is greatest in younger patients. Patients with cervical epithelial lesions typically have a single infection of a high-risk HPV genotype-HR-HPV16, HR-HPV33, HR-HPV52, or HR-HPV58. Patients aged 30 years and above who test positive for one of 12 types of HPV but negative for TCT are at increased risk for developing HSIL. In order to detect cervical lesions early and begin treatment without delay, colposcopy should be performed regardless of whether or not a high-risk HPV infection is present.

High prevalence of HPV16 and high-grade cytology in women undergoing active surveillance for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2

INTRODUCTION

Many countries have adopted active surveillance in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2), leaving the lesion untreated. However, there is a lack of consensus on the eligibility criteria for active surveillance across countries, with some abstaining from active surveillance in women with human papilloma virus 16 (HPV16) or a high-grade cytology. Here, we aimed to describe the distribution of HPV genotypes, age, and cytology in women undergoing active surveillance for CIN2.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center cross-sectional study on women aged 23-40 undergoing active surveillance for CIN2 during 2000-2010. Women were identified through the Danish Pathology Data Bank (DPDB) at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. We collected information on basic characteristics and results of histopathological examinations via DPDB. Women were deemed eligible for inclusion if they had a subsequent biopsy after index CIN2, and had no prior record of CIN2+, hysterectomy, or cone biopsy. Archived biopsies underwent HPV genotyping using the HPV SPF10 - DEIA-LiPA25 system, and the diagnosis was re-evaluated by three expert pathologists. We used the Chi squared-test (p-value) for comparison across groups.

RESULTS

We identified 3623 women with CIN2 of whom 455 (12.6%) were included. Most women were 30 years or younger (73.8%), and half (48.8%) had a high-grade index cytology. The prevalence of any high-risk HPV was 87.0%, with HPV16 being the most prevalent genotype (35.6%). The prevalence of HPV16 was significantly higher in women aged 30 or younger (39.3%) compared to women older than 30 years (25.2%) (p = 0.006). Upon expert review, 261 (57.4%) had CIN2 confirmed, whereas 56 (12.3%) were upgraded to CIN3 and 121 (26.6%) were downgraded to CIN1/normal. While the HPV16 prevalence was similar between community and expert confirmed CIN2, the prevalence of HPV16 was significantly higher in women with expert CIN3 compared to women with expert CIN1/normal (64.3% vs. 19.0%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The high prevalence of HPV16 and high-grade cytology imply that these women may be perceived as a high-risk population and non-eligible for active surveillance in countries outside Denmark. Future studies should investigate the importance of HPV, age, cytology, and expert review on risk of progression to help refine criteria for active surveillance.

HPV Testing and its Role in Cervical Cancer Screening

The recognition that persistent infection with carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical precancer and cancer has led to the introduction of HPV testing into cervical cancer screening, either as a primary screening test or in conjunction with cervical cytology (i.e., co-testing). HPV testing has much higher sensitivity for detection of cervical precancer and provides greater long-term reassurance if negative compared to cytology. However, most HPV infections are transient, and do not progress to invasive cancer, thus triage tests are required to identify individuals who should be referred to colposcopy for diagnostic evaluation. This chapter begins with a description of the biology, natural history, and epidemiology of HPV as a foundation for understanding the role of HPV in cervical carcinogenesis. This section is followed by a detailed discussion regarding the introduction of HPV-based testing and triage into cervical cancer screening and management. Summarized triage tests include cervical cytology, HPV genotyping, p16/Ki-67 dual stain, and HPV and cellular methylation markers. The final section of this chapter includes an important discussion on cervical cancer disparities, particularly within the United States, followed by concluding remarks.

Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Genotypes among Women During 2015-2020 in Mashhad, Iran

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women, and human papillomavirus (HPV) is the leading cause of cervical cancer. Cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination are important in the incidence of cervical cancer.

METHODS

This study was performed on Liquid Base Cytology (LBC) samples of 1214 women in Mashhad who were referred for cervical cancer screening in 2015-2020. Samples were examined by Single-Step PCR and Reverse Line Blot for HPV genotyping.

RESULTS

386 women (31.8%) were HPV PCR positive. HPV genotyping of 277 samples showed that HPV 31 (3%), 16 (2.5%), 51 (2.2%), 18 (2%), and 66 (1.8%) were the most prevalent high-risk HPV (hrHPV) genotypes. Among low-risk HPV (lrHPV) genotypes, HPV 6 (9.2%), 53 (4.7%), and 42 (2.8%) were the most common genotypes. The range of multiple infections varied between two to eight genotypes and the prevalence of multiple HPV infections (12.4%) was higher than single infections (10.4%). For women with single HPV infections, HPV 31 and 66 were equally the most common hrHPV genotypes, followed by HPV 16 and 39. In women with multiple HPV infections, HPV 31 was the most common hrHPV genotype, followed by HPV 51 and 16. For both the single and multiple HPV infections, HPV 6 was the most common lrHPV genotype, followed by HPV 53 and 42.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, due to the high prevalence of HPV single and multiple infections, the need for governmentally supported HPV vaccination and through cervical cancer screening should be emphasized to prevent cervical cancer.

Risk stratification of HPV-positive results using extended genotyping and cytology: Data from the baseline phase of the Onclarity trial

BACKGROUND

Optimizing the balance between colposcopy referrals and the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) during cervical cancer screening requires robust triage strategies. We evaluated the performance of extended HPV genotyping (xGT), in combination with cytology triage, and compared it to previously published performance data for high-grade CIN detection by HPV16/18 primary screening in combination with p16/Ki-67 dual staining (DS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The baseline phase of the Onclarity trial enrolled 33,858 individuals, yielding 2978 HPV-positive participants. Risk values for ≥CIN3 were determined for Onclarity result groupings corresponding to HPV16, not HPV16 but HPV18 or 31, not HPV16/18/31 but HPV33/58 or 52, not HPV16/18/31/33/58/52 but HPV35/39/68 or 45 or 51 or 56/59/66 across all cytology categories. Published data from the IMPACT trial for HPV16/18 plus DS was utilized as a comparator during ROC analyses.

RESULTS

There were 163 ≥ CIN3 cases detected. The ≥CIN3 risk stratum hierarchy (% risk of ≥CIN3) that resulted from this analysis included: >LSIL (39.4%); HPV16, ≤LSIL (13.3%); HPV18/31, ≤LSIL (5.9%); HPV33/58/52/45, ASC-US/LSIL (2.4%); HPV33/58/52, NILM (2.1%); HPV35/39/68/51/56/59/66, ASC-US/LSIL (0.9%); and HPV45/35/39/68/51/56/59/66, NILM (0.6%). For ≥CIN3 ROC analysis, the optimal cutoff for sensitivity versus specificity was approximated between not HPV16 but HPV18 or 31, any cytology (≥CIN3 sensitivity = 85.9% and colposcopy-to- ≥ CIN3 = 7.4) and not HPV16/18/31 but HPV33/58/52, NILM (≥CIN3 sensitivity = 94.5% and colposcopy-to- ≥CIN3 = 10.8). HPV16/18 with DS triage showed a sensitivity of 94.3%, with a colposcopy-to- ≥ CIN3 ratio of 11.4.

CONCLUSIONS

xGT performed similarly compared to HPV primary screening plus DS for detection of high-grade CIN. xGT provides results that stratify risk in a flexible and reliable manner for colposcopy risk thresholds set by different guidelines or organizations.

Risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse in women aged ≥ 69 referred to colposcopy due to an HPV-positive screening test

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates are high in older women in many developed countries, including Denmark. Therefore, Danish women aged 69 and older were invited for one additional human papilloma virus (HPV) based screening test in 2017. Here, we describe the clinical management and detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2 +) in screen-positive women referred for colposcopy.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study in public gynecology departments in Central Denmark Region, Denmark. Women were eligible for enrolment if they were aged 69 + in 2017, HPV positive on a screening test taken between April 20^th, 2017, and December 31^st, 2017, and had been referred for direct colposcopy. Data on participants' characteristics, colposcopic findings, and histological outcomes were collected from medical records and the Danish Pathology Databank. We estimated the proportion of women with CIN2 + at the first colposcopy visit and at end of follow up including 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 191 women were included with a median age of 74 years (IQR: 71-78). Most women (74.9%) did not have a fully visible transformation zone at colposcopy. At the first visit 170 women (89.0%) had a histological sample collected, 34 of whom (20.0%, 95% CI 14.3-26.8%) had CIN2 + diagnosed, 19 had CIN3 + , and two had cervical cancer). During follow-up additional CIN2 + were detected resulting in a total of 42 women (24.4%, 95% CI: 18.2-31.5%) being diagnosed with CIN2 + , 25 with CIN3 + , and three with cervical cancer. When restricting to women with paired histologic results (i.e., biopsies and a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimen), we found that CIN2 + was missed in 17.9% (95% CI 8.9-30.4%) of biopsies compared to the LEEP.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a potential risk of underdiagnosis in older postmenopausal women referred to colposcopy. Future studies should explore potential risk-markers for discrimination of women at increased risk of CIN2 + from those at low risk, as this would reduce risk of underdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Comparative pilot study about HPV test with partial genotyping in primary screening versus other strategies for cervical cancer population screening, CRYGEN 16/18 study

INTRODUCTION

The early detection of cervical cancer requires the implementation of molecular screening programmes for human papillomavirus (HPV). However, there are discrepancies in the optimization of screening protocols. The performance of 10 primary screening strategies based on molecular, cytological or combined techniques is now evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A blind, prospective, and interventional study was designed in 1.977 35-year-old women. The molecular determination was carried out by the Cobas 4800 HPV platform. Cytological analysis were performed on the same samples without knowledge of the result of the molecular assay. All women in whom HPV-16/HPV-18 was detected or presented cytological alteration together with detection of other high-risk genotypes (HPVhr) were referred to colposcopy.

RESULTS

The molecular assay detected the presence of HPVhr genotypes in 12.5% of the women, while only 8.1% of the cytologies were pathological. Among the patients referred to colposcopy, in 19.5% high-grade lesions were observed, being HPV-16 present in 65.3% of them. In six of these high-grade lesions (associated with HPV-16 in all cases), cytology was reported as normal. The follow-up one year later, of women with normal cytology and HPVhr detection a HSIL/CIN2+ lesion was detected (associated to HPV-33). In the comparative study with other strategies, the protocol called CRYGEN 16/18 yielded the best balance of sensitivity and specificity with the least referral to colposcopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing molecular detection of HPVhr with partial first-line genotyping of at least HPV-16, with direct referral to colposcopy, increases the detection rate of HSIL/CIN2+ lesions.

Prevalence of higher-grade dysplasia in persistently high-risk human papillomavirus positive, cytology negative women after introduction of the new cervical cancer screening in Germany

PURPOSE

According to the recently implemented organized cervical cancer screening program in Germany, women older than 35 years with negative cytology but persistent high-risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV) infection > 12 months should be referred to colposcopy for further evaluation. This study aimed to present and dissect colposcopic and histopathological findings with particular focus on associated hrHPV genotypes.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 89 hrHPV positive patients with normal cytology who underwent colposcopic examination at a certified dysplasia outpatient clinic in Germany in 2021.

RESULTS

While 38 (43%) women had a normal colposcopic finding, 45 (51%) had minor and 6 (7%) major changes. Thirty-one (35%) of the women were HPV 16 and/or HPV 18 positive and 58 (65%) women were positive for other hrHPV only. Among patients who underwent colposcopy with biopsies (in case of an abnormal finding or type 3 transformation zone, n = 68), eight (12%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 and six (9%) had CIN 2. The proportion of women diagnosed with CIN 3 varied among different hrHPV genotypes (HPV 16: 11%, HPV 18: 33%, HPV 31: 27%, HPV 33: 33%, HPV 52: 33%).

CONCLUSION

Persistently hrHPV positive women with negative cytology are at increased risk of being diagnosed with CIN 3. As CIN 3 prevalence seems to differ with regard to hrHPV strain, immediate HPV genotyping for risk stratification and subsequent early referral for colposcopy might constitute a feasible strategy.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of miRNAs for the detection of cervical cancer

Aim: This study aimed to critically appraise the evidence of the diagnostic effectiveness of miRNAs for the detection of cervical cancer. Methods & materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed, searching PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. An umbrella meta-analysis of meta-analyses of individual biomarkers was performed. A Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) assessment of evidence was also performed. Results: A total of 52 miRNAs were included. Umbrella meta-analysis revealed significant heterogeneity in terms of sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), positive predictive value and/or negative predictive value. Umbrella effects were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73-0.78), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.75-0.81), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.75-0.80), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.74-0.79), respectively. Conclusion: Moderate quality evidence suggested miR199a-5p, miR21-5p and miR-141a had excellent diagnostic performance.

Could HPV Type 33 Be More Risky Than We Thought?

Objective: The distribution of human papilloma virus (HPV) genotypes varies by country and region. HPV is the most important risk factor for cervical cancer and HPV 16/18 is the most common genotype. Other high risk HPVs (hrHPVs) other than HPV 16 and 18 contribute significantly to invasive disease. In this study, we aimed to reveal the frequency of association of HPV 16, 18 and other high-risk-HPV types with CIN 2 + (CIN 2 and above) cervical lesions in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and to support the literature especially on the management of high-risk-HPV types other than 16 and 18. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study, which was conducted on 264 patients and 202 patients after the exclusion criteria, was conducted in the gynecology oncology outpatient clinic of the tertiary care hospital between March 2020 and May 2022. HPV 16, HPV 18 and other high-risk-HPV types with negative cytology between the ages of 25-65 were compared by taking a biopsy accompanied by colposcopy performed by the same gynecologist. As a result of colposcopy, CIN2 + patients who underwent excisional procedure were distributed according to HPV type. During this procedure, the patients who were positive for more than one HPV type were considered positive for the group with all subtypes (For example, if the patient was type 31 and 33 positive, they were included in both the 31 and 33 positive groups). The genotype distribution in the high-risk-HPV group was examined. Results: Colposcopy results showed HPV 16 positivity in 43.3%, HPV 33 positivity in 30% and HPV 18 positivity in 10% of the patients with CIN2 + and above lesions. It was observed that the incidence of CIN2 + lesions in the patients with HPV 33 positive was higher than the incidence of a lower-grade lesion (such as CIN1, chronic cervicitis) (p < 0.05). While HPV 33 (r = 0.290, p < 0.000) results were positively correlated with CIN2 + and above lesions, there was a negative correlation with HPV 45 (r = - 0.172, p < 0.015) results (p < 0.05). It was observed that HPV 33 and HPV 45 positivity was a statistically significant variable in predicting the probability of CIN2 + lesions in colposcopy results. It was determined that a HPV 33 positive patient increased the probability of having a CIN2 + lesion by 4.999 times (p < 0.000). Conclusion: In the literature, the role of high-risk -HPV types other than HPV 16 and HPV 18 with negative cytology in the women at risk of cervical preinvasive lesions has still not been fully determined. According to the results of the stuy, especially in women infected with high-risk -HPV types other than HPV 16/18, the relationship between HPV 33 type and CIN 2 + lesions was found to be high, and it was seen that colposcopic biopsy should be performed immediately instead of follow-up after 1 year.

Diagnostic comparison of electrical impedance spectroscopy with colposcopy and HPV mRNA-testing in the prediction of CIN2+ women in Greece

AIM

To compare the diagnostic parameters of electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) via ZedScan, a device that measures spectra to differentiate between normal and abnormal cervical tissues, when used as an adjunct to colposcopies in the diagnosis of HSILs/CIN2+ in Greek women with abnormal referral cytology toward colposcopy alone and HPV mRNA-testing.

METHODS

This study analyzed 86 women, patients of the Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Clinic of 2nd Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki at Hippokration General Hospital, between January 2022 and September 2022. During the visits, women were subjected to cytology, colposcopy alone and then with EIS/ZedScan and histological sampling.

RESULTS

Common use of colposcopies and EIS/ZedScan allowed detecting an additional 14 cases of CIN2+ (16.2%) that colposcopy alone failed to report. EIS enhanced the sensitivity of colposcopy from 80.65% to 100% equal with that of HPV-mRNA test while retaining a high specificity (94.74%) which is much higher than specificity of HPV mRNA-testing (65.45%). EIS-assisted colposcopy had the highest value combination of positive and negative predictive values (96.15% and 100%) compared to colposcopy alone (100% and 75%) and HPV mRNA-testing (72.46% and 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Colposcopies performed with EIS/ZedScan demonstrated effectiveness in the diagnosing of CIN2+ leading to a significant increase in the number of CIN2+ that would have been missed if only colposcopy was applied especially in women with LSIL referral cytology. EIS/ZedScan seems to possess the ideal diagnostic threshold for sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for CIN2+ compared to colposcopy alone and HPV mRNA-testing.

Utility of extended HPV genotyping for the triage of self-sampled HPV-positive women in a screen-and-treat strategy for cervical cancer prevention in Cameroon: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy

OBJECTIVE

To explore the utility of extended Human Papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more (CIN2+) in a 'screen-and-treat' strategy for HPV-positive women in low-resource settings.

DESIGN

Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.

SETTING

The study took place in West Cameroon between September 2018 and March 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

2014 women were recruited. Asymptomatic, non-pregnant women aged 30-49 years without history of CIN treatment, anogenital cancer or hysterectomy were eligible.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants performed self-sampling for HPV testing with GeneXpert followed by visual inspection with acetic acid and Lugol's iodine (VIA) triage before treatment if required.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Liquid-based cytology, biopsies and endocervical brushing were performed in HPV-positive women as quality control. We assessed the detection rate of CIN2+ by HPV genotyping (two pools of genotypes obtained from the Xpert system, pool_1 (HPV 16, 18, 45) and pool_2 (HPV 16, 18, 45, 31, 33, 35, 52, 58)), VIA and cytology.

RESULTS

382 (18.2%) women were HPV-positive among which 11.5% (n=44) were CIN2+. Of those 44 participants, 41 were triaged positive by extended genotyping, versus 35 by VIA and 33 by cytology. Overall, triage positivity was of 68.4% for extended genotyping, 59.3% for VIA and 14.8% for cytology, with false positive rates of 83.4%, 84.1% and 37.7%, respectively. Extended genotyping had a higher sensitivity for CIN2+ detection (93.2%, CI: 81.3 to 98.6) than VIA (79.5%, CI: 64.7 to 90.2, p=0.034) and cytology (75.0%, CI: 59.7 to 86.8, p=0.005). No significant difference was observed in the overtreatment rate in triaged women by extended genotyping or VIA (9.9%, CI: 8.6 to 11.3, and 8.8%, CI: 7.7 to 10.1), with a ratio of 6.0 and 6.3 women treated per CIN2+ diagnosed.

CONCLUSION

Triage of HPV-positive women with extended HPV genotyping improves CIN2+ detection compared with VIA with a minor loss of specificity and could be used to optimize the management of HPV-positive women.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03757299.

High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Detection via Cobas® 4800 and REBA HPV-ID® Assays

Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomaviruses (HR-HPVs), particularly HPV16 and 18, has long been known to induce cervical cancer progression. However, given that a minority of HPV-infected women develop cancer, analysis of HR-HPV-infected women could help to predict who is at risk of acquiring cervical cancer. Therefore, to improve HR-HPVs detection, we used the FDA-approved cobas^® 4800 HPV and REBA HPV-ID^® HPV assays to detect HR-HPVs in colposcopy-derived cervical cells from 303 patients, detecting 72.28% (219) and 71.62% (217) of HR-HPVs positive cases, with HPV16 detection rates of 35.64% (108) and 30.69% (93), respectively. Of the HPV16-positive cases, cobas^® 4800 and REBA HPV-ID^® identified 28.81% (51) and 25.42% (45) of the CIN1 cases, and 55% (33) and 50% (30) of the 60 CIN2/3 cases, respectively. HPV-diagnostic concordance was 82.17% overall (kappa = 0.488), 87.45% for HR-HPVs (kappa = 0.689), and 88.33% for CIN2/3 (kappa = 0.51). The HR-HPVs detection rates of these assays were comparable. Our findings reveal that the FDA-approved HR-HPVs detection assay is appropriate for screening women with HR-HPVs infection, and for predicting increased risk of cervical cancer progression. REBA HPV-ID^® can be used to detect low risk-HPV types in high-grade cervical lesions that are HR-HPV negative as well as in the distribution of HPV types.

Prevalence of multiple human papillomavirus infections and association with cervical lesions among outpatients in Fujian, China: A cross-sectional study

Multiple human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are common, but their impact on cervical lesions remains controversial. A total of 6225 female patients who underwent colposcopies/conization following abnormal cervical cancer screening results were included in the study. The final pathological diagnosis was determined by the most severe pathological grade among the cervical biopsy, endocervical curettage, and conization. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the association between multiple HPV infections and cervical lesions, adjusting for age, HPV genotype, gravidity and parity. In total, 33.3% (n = 2076) of the study population was infected with multiple HPV genotypes. Multiple HPV infections were more prevalent in patients younger than 25 years and older than 55 years, with the rate of multiple HPV infections at 52.8% and 44.3%, respectively. HPV16\52\18\58 are the most common HPV genotypes and usually appear as a single infection. Compared to single HR-HPV infection, multiple HR-HPV infections do not increase the risk of HSIL+, while single HR-HPV coinfected with LR-HPV seems to reduce the risk of HSIL+ (odds ratio = 0.515, confidence interval: 0.370-0.719, p < 0.001). Multiple HR-HPV infections cannot be risk-stratified for triage of HR-HPV-positive women.

Comparison of the performance of HPV DNA chip test and HPV PCR test in cervical cancer screening in rural China

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of two different principles of HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening and ASC-US triage in rural areas.

METHODS

3,328 and 3,913 women were enrolled in Shanxi, China in 2017 and 2018, respectively, and screened using liquid-based cytology and different HPV tests with a 4-year follow-up. Different screening methods commonly used in clinical practice were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the HPV PCR test cohort, the prevalence of HPV infection was 14.90%. A total of 38 cases of CIN2+ were identified at baseline, 2 of which were in the HPV-negative cohort and the rest in the HPV-positive cohort (2 = 186.85, p < 0.001). Fifty-three cases of CIN2+ were accumulated over 4 years. The HPV infection rate in the HPV DNA chip test cohort was 21.10%. A total of 26 CIN2+ cases were identified at baseline, all in the HPV-positive population (2 = 92.96, p < 0.001). 54 CIN2+ cases were cumulative over 4 years. At 4-year follow-up, HPV-negative results were significantly more protective against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) than normal cytologic results at baseline. HPV screening was more sensitive and specific than cytologic screening (using ASC-US as the threshold) and performed better on the HPV DNA microarray test. In addition, compared with HPV 16/18 testing, sensitivity increases and specificity decreases when using HPV testing for cytologic ASC-US triage, regardless of which HPV test is used.

CONCLUSION

In the rural areas where we implemented the study, HPV tests performed well for screening than LBC and HPV DNA chip testing performed better than HPV PCR testing in the screening cohort. Optimal screening was achieved technically when used in combination with LBC for ASC-US population triage, without thinking the feasibility for resource availability.

Evaluation of triage strategies for high-risk human papillomavirus-positive women in cervical cancer screening: A multicenter randomized controlled trial in different resource settings in China

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different triage strategies for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive women in primary healthcare settings in China.

METHODS

This study was undertaken in 11 rural and 9 urban sites. Women aged 35-64 years old were enrolled. HrHPV-positive women were randomly allocated to liquid-based cytology (LBC), visual inspection with acetic acid and Lugol's iodine (VIA/VILI) (rural only) triage, or directly referred to colposcopy (direct COLP). At 24 months, hrHPV testing, LBC and VIA/VILI were conducted for combined screening.

RESULTS

In rural sites, 1,949 hrHPV-positive women were analyzed. A total of 852, 218 and 480 women were randomly assigned to direct COLP, LBC and VIA/VILI. At baseline, colposcopy referral rates of LBC or VIA/VILI triage could be reduced by 70%-80%. LBC (n=3 and n=7) or VIA/VILI (n=8 and n=26) could significantly decrease the number of colposcopies needed to detect one cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or worse and CIN3+ compared with direct COLP (n=14 and n=23). For the 24-month cumulative detection rate of CIN2+, VIA/VILI triage was 0.50-fold compared with LBC triage and 0.46-fold with the direct COLP. When stratified by age, baseline LBC triage+ performed best (P<0.001), peaking among women aged 35-44 years (Ptrend=0.002). In urban sites, 1,728 women were hrHPV genotyping test positive. A total of 408, 571 and 568 women were randomly assigned to direct COLP for HPV16/18+, direct COLP for other hrHPV subtypes+, and LBC triage for other hrHPV subtypes+. LBC (n=12 and n=31) significantly decreased the number of colposcopies needed to detect one CIN2+ and CIN3+ compared with direct COLP (n=14 and n=44). HPV16/18+ increased the 24-month cumulative detection rate of CIN2+ (17.89%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LBC triage for hrHPV-positive women in rural settings and direct COLP for HPV16/18+ women and LBC triage for other hrHPV subtype+ women in urban settings might be feasible strategies.

Genotyping and Cytology Triage of High-Risk HPV DNA Positive Women for Detection of Cervical High-Grade Lesions

OBJECTIVE

A demonstration project of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was initiated in 2011 among more than 23,000 women attending routine cervical cancer screening. We examined the additional diagnostic performance of HPV genotyping for detecting disease in women with abnormal cytology.

METHODS

Women aged 30 to 65 years were originally screened for HPV using Hybrid Capture II test. Women with positive results were triaged using conventional cytology, and those with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (≥ASC-US) were referred to colposcopy. We retrospectively genotyped (Roche cobas 4800 HPV system [Roche Molecular Systems Inc, Pleasanton, CA]) cervical specimens that were HPV+ with Hybrid Capture II test and extracted women's medical history postbaseline screening. We calculated positive predictive values (PPVs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of triage tests to detect histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) within the first year of follow-up among women positive for HPV16, HPV18, and HPV16 and/or HPV18 as well as among those negative for HPVs 16 and 18.

RESULTS

Of 1,396 HPV-positive women, 1,092 (78%) were classified as normal, 136 (10%) had CIN1, 80 (6%) had CIN2, 81 (6%) had CIN3, and 7 women had cancer throughout the entire follow-up period. Seventy CIN2+ cases were detected within the first year of follow-up. The PPV for detecting CIN2+ was 20.9% (63/239; 95% CI = 16.4-25.9) for ASC-US+ cytology. In women with ASC-US+, PPVs were 31.2% (24/77; 95% CI = 21.1-42.7) for HPV16+, 27.8% (5/18; 95% CI = 9.7-53.5) for HPV18+, 30.8% (28/91; 95% CI = 21.5-41.3) for HPV16+ and/or HPV18+ women, and 16.6% (35/211; 95% CI = 11.8-22.3) in women testing negative for HPVs 16 and 18.

CONCLUSION

Partial genotyping as an additional triage strategy to cytology can markedly improve clinical diagnostic performance.

Clinical performance of the Roche Cobas 4800 HPV test for primary cervical cancer screening in a Chinese population

High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing has become an increasing important strategy in primary cervical cancer screening in recent years. It warrants the evaluation of molecular-based HPV tests for accuracy and efficacy of screening. The performance of Roche Cobas 4800 HPV test was validated and compared with Digene Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) high-risk HPV DNA test for primary screening in a large Chinese screening cohort. Of 6345 women screened, overall agreement between Cobas and HC2 was 92.23% (95% CI: 91.57–92.89). The inter-assay agreement was correlated with the severity of underlying biology, with an increasing concordance found in samples with more severe abnormalities. Most of the discordant samples had the test signal strength closer to the test limits of the detection than concordant samples, reflecting a low viral load and infection of a cluster of low-risk HPV in these samples. The Cobas test demonstrated significantly higher specificity in identifying CIN2+/CIN3+ cases than HC2 test (66.46% vs 43.67% and 65.42% vs 42.86%, p<0.001), with comparable sensitivity in clinical evaluation. Increased specificity of Cobas test would accent women having the highest risk of developing CIN2+, with the potential to reduce unnecessary colposcopy referral in a screening population.

Extended HPV Genotyping for Risk Assessment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2/3 or Worse in a Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

We sought to identify the absolute risk of specific HPV genotype for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or worse (CIN2+/3+) and to develop a risk-based management strategy in an HPV-positive population.

METHODS

HPV genotyping was performed based on a 3-year cervical cancer screening cohort. The study endpoints were histologic CIN2+/3+. The prevalence of specific HPV genotype was calculated by minimum, any type, and hierarchical attribution estimate. The absolute CIN2+/3+ risks of specific HPV genotype were estimated and risk-based management strategy was established according to the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guideline. The efficacy of conventional and risk-based management strategies for non-16/18 HPVs were further evaluated.

RESULTS

Eligible data were available for 8,370 women with a median age of 48 years (interquartile range, 42-53 years). At baseline, there were 1,062 women with HPV-positive disease, including 424 with multiple and 639 with single infections. CIN2+/3+ cases represented 113/74, 23/8, 20/7, and 52/31 patients at baseline and first-, second-, and third-year visits, respectively. Women with multiple HPV infections at baseline were more prone to persistent infection than those with single infection (P<.0001). HPV16 and HPV52 were the top 2 ranking among baseline and 3-year cumulative CIN2+/3+ cases. Based on the absolute risk of specific HPV genotype combined with cytology for CIN2+/3+, all non-16/18 HPVs were divided into 4 risk-stratified groups. Compared with conventional strategy, the risk-based strategy had higher specificity (P=.0000) and positive predictive value (P=.0322) to detect CIN3+ and needed fewer colposcopies for each CIN3+ case.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our study findings, we propose a new extended HPV genotyping protocol, which would provide a better strategy for achieving precise risk-based management of HPV-positive populations.

Comparison of Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 assay with BD Onclarity HPV assay for human papillomavirus genotyping

Presently, human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening is commonly used and is replacing conventional cytology screening tests. The HPV genotyping assay is useful for triage in cervical cancer screening and the evaluation of HPV vaccination effects. In this study, we evaluated the clinical performance of two HPV genotyping assays, BD Onclarity HPV (Onclarity) and Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 (Anyplex) in the detection of relevant cervical lesions and for HPV genotyping concordance. Anyplex and Onclarity assays were performed on 920 consecutive liquid-based specimens. Anyplex, sensitivity, specificity, and genotyping concordance with Onclarity were optimal when restricted to ≥2+ (medium) viral loads. HPV genotyping agreement between the two assays ranged between 0.75 and 0.9 (excellent), except for HPV 33/58, which was 0.73 (good). With Onclarity as a reference, the relative sensitivity of Anyplex for the detection of ≥CIN 2 was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.99–1.1) and the relative specificity for detection of negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy (NILM) was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85–0.93). For most ≥CIN 2 lesions, high-risk HPV was detected by Onclarity (66/72) and Anyplex (69/72) assays. For high-risk HPV negative ≥CIN 2 lesions, possible high-risk HPV genotypes were detected by Anyplex. In conclusion, the genotyping agreement between the tests was good to excellent. Full genotyping with Anyplex might confer additional benefits to patients with ≥CIN 2, although the difference is small. We also suggest an optimal cutoff value when reporting HPV infections using the Anyplex assay (≥2+; medium viral loads).

Detection of Host Cell Gene/HPV DNA Methylation Markers: A Promising Triage Approach for Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer is the most prevalent gynecologic malignancy, especially in women of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). With a better understanding of the etiology and pathogenesis of cervical cancer, it has been well accepted that this type of cancer can be prevented and treated via early screening. Due to its higher sensitivity than cytology to identify precursor lesions of cervical cancer, detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA has been implemented as the primary screening approach. However, a high referral rate for colposcopy after HR-HPV DNA detection due to its low specificity in HR-HPV screening often leads to overtreatment and thus increases the healthcare burden. Emerging evidence has demonstrated that detection of host cell gene and/or HPV DNA methylation represents a promising approach for the early triage of cervical cancer in HR-HPV-positive women owing to its convenience and comparable performance to cytology, particularly in LMICs with limited healthcare resources. While numerous potential markers involving DNA methylation of host cell genes and the HPV genome have been identified thus far, it is crucial to define which genes or panels involving host and/or HPV are feasible and appropriate for large-scale screening and triage. An ideal approach for screening and triage of CIN/ICC requires high sensitivity and adequate specificity and is suitable for self-sampling and inexpensive to allow population-based screening, particularly in LMICs. In this review, we summarize the markers of host cell gene/HR-HPV DNA methylation and discuss their triage performance and feasibility for high-grade precancerous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN2+ and CIN3+) in HR-HPV-positive women.

National experience in the first two years of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical screening in an HPV vaccinated population in Australia: observational study

OBJECTIVE

To review the first two years of the primary human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical screening programme in an HPV vaccinated population.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

3 745 318 women with a primary HPV test between 1 December 2017 and 31 December 2019; most women aged <40 years had previously been offered vaccination against HPV16 and HPV18.

INTERVENTIONS

Primary HPV screening with referral if HPV16 or HPV18 (HPV16/18) positive and triage with liquid based cytology testing (threshold atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) for women who were positive for high risk HPV types other than 16/18. A 12 month follow-up HPV test was recommended in triaged women with a negative or low grade cytology result, with referral if they tested positive for any high risk HPV type at follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of women who had attended for their first HPV screening test, tested positive, and were referred for colposcopy; and short term risk of detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse, CIN grade 3 or worse, or cancer.

RESULTS

54.6% (n=3 507 281) of an estimated 6 428 677 eligible women aged 25-69 had undergone their first HPV test by the end of 2019. Among those attending for routine screening, positivity for HPV16/18 and for HPV types not 16/18 was, respectively, 2.0% and 6.6% in women aged 25-69 (n=3 045 844) and 2.2% and 13.3% in highly vaccinated cohorts of women aged 25-34 (n=768 362). Colposcopy referral (ages 25-69 years) was 3.5%, increasing to an estimated 6.2% after accounting for women who had not yet had a 12 month repeat test. Cervical cancer was detected in 0.98% (456/46 330) of women positive for HPV16/18 at baseline, including 0.32% (89/28 003) of women with HPV16/18 and negative cytology. Women with HPV types not 16/18 and negative or low grade cytology at both baseline and 12 months were at low risk of serious disease (3.4% CIN grade 3 or worse; 0.02% cancer; n=20 019) but estimated to account for 62.0% of referrals for this screening algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

Colposcopy referral thresholds need to consider underlying cancer risk; on this basis, women with HPV16/18 in the first round of HPV screening were found to be at higher risk regardless of cytology result, even in a previously well screened population. Women with HPV types not 16/18 and negative or low grade cytology showed a low risk of serious abnormalities but constitute most referrals and could be managed safely with two rounds of repeat HPV testing rather than one. HPV16/18 driven referrals were low in HPV vaccinated cohorts.

Diagnostic value of colposcopy in patients with cytology-negative and HR-HPV-positive cervical lesions

PURPOSE

High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)-positive but cytology-negative cervical cancer screening results are not uncommon. This study aimed to investigate colposcopy's accuracy and diagnostic value in patients with cytology-negative HR-HPV-positive screening results.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with HR-HPV-positive cytology-negative screening results who underwent electronic colposcopy with acetic acid and multi-point cervical biopsy, HPV typing (24 HPV subtypes), and quantitative HPV detection.

RESULTS

Among 229 patients, 130 had chronic cervicitis, and 99 had cervical lesions (CIN1, n = 37; CIN2/3, n = 55; invasive carcinoma, n = 7). Using colposcopy as a reference, the cervical cytology false-negative rate was 43.2% (99/229). Colposcopy was more accurate in patients with HR-HPV16/18 or high viral loads. Multivariable analyses showed HPV viral load and childbearing history were the independent factors affecting the accuracy of colposcopy (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Colposcopy in HR-HPV-positive cytology-negative patients has a moderate diagnostic accuracy. The type of cervical transformation zone and HPV viral load are independent factors affecting the accuracy of colposcopy-based diagnosis.

Significant Growth Inhibition by a Bispecific Affibody Targeting Oncoprotein E7 in both HPV16 and 18 Positive Cervical Cancer in vitro and in vivo

The infection with HPV 16 and 18 high-risk types account for more than 80 % of cervical cancer incidence, but there is still no targeted agent against HPV for cervical cancer therapy. Our previous study constructed a bispecific affibody Z_16-18 targeting HPV16 and 18 early antigen 7 (E7, responsible for the infected cell malignant transformation). In the present study, we prepared Z_16-18 in prokaryotic expression system and confirmed its significant growth inhibition both on SiHa (HPV16 positive) and HeLa (HPV18 positive) cervical cancer cells by arresting cell cycle at G₀/G₁ phase. The IC₅₀ of Z_16-18 on SiHa and HeLa were close in value. Z_16-18 could specifically target E7 in both SiHa and HeLa, and exhibited prominent targeted enrichment on tumor tissues derived from SiHa or HeLa, resulting in the inhibition of tumourigenesis and tumour growth in vivo. Furthermore, Z_16-18 could inhibit the interaction between E7 and pRb to block the E7-pRb carcinogenic pathway, resulting in the decreased release of E2F and the cell growth inhibition characterized by the decrease of CDK6 and Cyclin D1. This study provides a new strategy for targeted therapy based on affibody, and Z_16-18 has great potential for utilisation and development as an agent targeting HPV16 and HPV18 related cervical cancer.

Limitations and opportunities of technologies for the analysis of cell-free DNA in cancer diagnostics

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the circulating blood plasma of patients with cancer contains tumour-derived DNA sequences that can serve as biomarkers for guiding therapy, for the monitoring of drug resistance, and for the early detection of cancers. However, the analysis of cfDNA for clinical diagnostic applications remains challenging because of the low concentrations of cfDNA, and because cfDNA is fragmented into short lengths and is susceptible to chemical damage. Barcodes of unique molecular identifiers have been implemented to overcome the intrinsic errors of next-generation sequencing, which is the prevailing method for highly multiplexed cfDNA analysis. However, a number of methodological and pre-analytical factors limit the clinical sensitivity of the cfDNA-based detection of cancers from liquid biopsies. In this Review, we describe the state-of-the-art technologies for cfDNA analysis, with emphasis on multiplexing strategies, and discuss outstanding biological and technical challenges that, if addressed, would substantially improve cancer diagnostics and patient care.

Comparison of cytopathologic findings in patients with negative Pap test and positive high-risk HPV infection among three groups

PURPOSE

Comparison of colposcopy-guided biopsy and endocervical cytologic (ECC) results in patients with negative Papanicolaou (Pap) and positive high-risk (HR) HPV tests in the three groups of HPV 16/18, non-16/18 HR-HPV (other HR-HPV), and concurrent infection of either HPV 16/18 and at least one subtype of other HR-HPVs.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted among women aged 30-65 who had negative Pap and positive HR-HPV DNA tests. Pap test was performed using liquid cytology. For HPV DNA testing, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was used.

RESULTS

Among 394 participants, 111 (28.2%) were in the HPV 16/18, 226 (57.4%) in the Other HR-HPV, and 57 (14.4%) in the concurrent group. The mean age of participants was 35.71 ± 7.1 years. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2/3 were seen in 29 (26.1%) patients of HPV 16/18, 60 (26.5%) of other HR-HPV, and 18 (31.6%) of concurrent infection group (P = 0.593). HPV 52 was the most common subtype in the other HR-HPV group (15%).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of high-grade CIN lesions in patients with negative Pap test and positive other HR-HPV was not significantly less than patients with positive HPV 16/18. Besides, the risk of losing the patients to 1-year follow-up seems high.

Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data

The authors compared the clinical performance of DH3 human papillomavirus (HPV) assay, which detects 14 high-risk HPVs with 16/18 genotyping based on hybrid capture technique, and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test for women undergoing cervical cancer screening. A total of 7, 263 residual cytology specimens from an adjudicated cohort with 3-year follow-up were tested by the DH3 assay and the HC2 test. Assay results were compared with each other and to histology review. The overall agreement between the DH3 assay and the HC2 test was 99.2% (κ = 0.938). At baseline, DH3 had the equal sensitivity to that of HC2 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or higher (CIN2+, n = 75) and CIN grade 3 or higher (CIN3+, n = 45), 98.67% and 97.78%, respectively. After 3 years of follow-up, the sensitivity for CIN2+ (n = 133) and CIN3+ (n = 74) were both similar between DH3 and HC2 (95.49% vs 94.74%, 95.95% vs 95.95%, respectively, all P > 0.05). The respective specificity for CIN2+ or CIN3+ did not differ between the two tests. A noninferiority test showed that both sensitivity and specificity of DH3 for CIN2+ and CIN3+ were noninferior to those of HC2 at baseline and after 3-year follow-up, respectively (all P < 0.001). When used in primary screening strategy, the DH3 assay would yield an immediate sensitivity of 92% for CIN2+. DH3 HPV performs equally to HC2 for the detection of high-grade lesions in cervical cancer screening and has a potential advantage in primary screening strategy due to HPV16/18 genotyping. IMPORTANCE The benefits of testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) in cervical cancer screening have already been demonstrated. Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) is the best validated HPV assay and has been considered the gold standard for hrHPV testing. However, HC2 cannot discriminate HPV16 and 18 from the other hrHPV types, which greatly limited the application of HC2 in cervical cancer screening. The DH3 human papillomavirus (HPV) is a recently developed assay based on hybrid capture technique like to HC2, which can specifically identify HPV 16/18 on the basis of detecting the 13 hrHPV types targeted by HC2 as well as HPV66. This comparative study of the two assays for detection of hrHPV infection in residual cytology samples from cervical cancer screening setting reveals that DH3 HPV provides a perfect alternative to HC2 in detecting hrHPV infection and identifying cervical precancer, while allowing concurrent HPV 16/18 genotyping.

Comparative accuracy of cervical cancer screening strategies in healthy asymptomatic women: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

To compare all available accuracy data on screening strategies for identifying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade ≥ 2 in healthy asymptomatic women, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up to October 2020 for paired-design studies of cytology and testing for high-risk genotypes of human papillomavirus (hrHPV). The methods used included a duplicate assessment of eligibility, double extraction of quantitative data, validity assessment, random-effects network meta-analysis of test accuracy, and GRADE rating. Twenty-seven prospective studies (185,269 subjects) were included. The combination of cytology (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or higher grades) and hrHPV testing (excepting genotyping for HPV 16 or 18 [HPV16/18]) with the either-positive criterion (OR rule) was the most sensitive/least specific, whereas the same combination with the both-positive criterion (AND rule) was the most specific/least sensitive. Compared with standalone cytology, non-HPV16/18 hrHPV assays were more sensitive/less specific. Two algorithms proposed for primary cytological testing or primary hrHPV testing were ranked in the middle as more sensitive/less specific than standalone cytology and the AND rule combinations but more specific/less sensitive than standalone hrHPV testing and the OR rule combination. Further research is needed to assess these results in population-relevant outcomes at the program level.

Prevalence of genotype-specific human papillomavirus in cytology specimens and cervical biopsies, and its implication in cervical cancer risk stratification: a retrospective study of 10647 cases

Objective: This study aimed to describe the risk stratification of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and its precursor lesions based on HPV E6/E7 mRNA genotyping.

Methods: 10647 hrHPV+ women (mean age 40.8 years), who had concurrent cytology and follow-up biopsy results available between September 2016 and May 2020, met the inclusion criteria and were selected for immediate risk analysis.

Results: In this cohort, HPV-16 or 18/45+ women had significantly higher immediate risk of cervical cancer and precancer compared with other genotypes+ women. The relative immediate risk (RIR) of ASC-H+ was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.9-2.4) and SCC was 9.4 (95% CI: 5.5-15.6) for HPV-16 or 18/45+ women when compared with women positive for other 11 genotypes. Among follow-up biopsy cases, the RIR of CIN2+ was 2.7 (95% CI: 3.0-3.7) and SCC was 10.8 (95% CI: 7.2-17.4) for HPV-16 or 18/45+ women than women positive for other genotypes. Similarly, when compared with women positive for other genotypes, the RIR of CIN2+ was 2.9 (95% CI: 2.7-4.6) and SCC was 13.8 (95% CI: 3.0-66.2) for HPV-16 or 18/45+ women with ASC-US, and RIR of CIN2+ was 3.3 (95% CI: 3.1-4.6) and SCC was 22.3 (95% CI: 2.8-176.8) for HPV-16 or 18/45+ women with NILM.

Conclusions: This study supports that hrHPV mRNA genotyping can be an effective risk stratification tool to identify individual at higher risk for cervical cancer or precancer, and provides important evidences for the future modifications for current China cervical cancer screening guidelines.

Cervical cancer prevention and control in women living with human immunodeficiency virus

Despite being highly preventable, cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer and cause of cancer death in women globally. In low-income countries, cervical cancer is often the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome are at a particularly high risk of cervical cancer because of an impaired immune response to human papillomavirus, the obligate cause of virtually all cervical cancers. Globally, approximately 1 in 20 cervical cancers is attributable to HIV; in sub-Saharan Africa, approximately 1 in 5 cervical cancers is due to HIV. Here, the authors provide a critical appraisal of the evidence to date on the impact of HIV disease on cervical cancer risk, describe key methodologic issues, and frame the key outstanding research questions, especially as they apply to ongoing global efforts for prevention and control of cervical cancer. Expanded efforts to integrate HIV care with cervical cancer prevention and control, and vice versa, could assist the global effort to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem.

Comparative performance of various human papillomavirus assays available in Korea for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or higher lesions among available human papillomavirus infection (HPV) genotyping tests in Korea.

METHODS

Eligible patients visited 13 tertiary hospitals for colposcopic biopsy following cervical cytology and HPV genotyping test between January and December 2018. Baseline characteristics including age, body mass index (BMI), and parity were collected from 3798 patients. The performance of the Roche Cobas HPV 4800 was evaluated against other domestic HPV assays to detect CIN2 or higher.

RESULTS

A total of seven types of HPV genotyping tests were analyzed in the research institutes. A total of 1358 patients (35.8%) tested Anyplex II HPV 28 and 701 patients (18.5%) tested Cobas 4800 HPV. The overall sensitivity in the detection of CIN2 or higher was 41.5% (38.9-44.1) in patients positive for HPV 16/18. The Cobas test for HPV 16/18 was concordant with other assays evaluated for detection of CIN2 or higher and showed sensitivity of 46.6%, which was not significantly different from other assays. Although Anyplex II HPV28 (Seegene) showed slightly decreased sensitivity for detecting CIN2 or higher lesion with HPV 16/18 positive (39.8%, p < 0.05) compared to Cobas 4800, in aspect of high-risk HPV positive, Anyplex II HPV28 showed increased sensitivity (96.9%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The performance of the HPV genotype test that were commonly used in Korea was concordant with Cobas HPV test. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of the various commercially available domestic HPV assays.

Clinical validation of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology triage of HPV-positive women: Results from the IMPACT trial

Triage strategies are needed for primary human papillomavirus (HPV)‐based cervical cancer screening to identify women requiring colposcopy/biopsy. We assessed the performance of p16/Ki‐67 dual‐stained (DS) immunocytochemistry to triage HPV‐positive women and compared it to cytology, with or without HPV16/18 genotyping. A prospective observational screening study enrolled 35 263 women aged 25 to 65 years at 32 U.S. sites. Cervical samples had HPV and cytology testing, with colposcopy/biopsy for women with positive tests. Women without cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Grade 2 or worse (≥CIN2) at baseline (n = 3876) were retested after 1 year. In all, 4927 HPV‐positive women with valid DS results were included in this analysis. DS sensitivity for ≥CIN2 and ≥CIN3 at baseline was 91.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.8%‐94.2%) and 91.9% (95% CI: 86.1%‐95.4%), respectively, in HPV16/18‐positive women and 83.0% (95% CI: 78.4%‐86.8%) and 86.0% (95% CI: 77.5%‐91.6%) in women with 12 “other” genotypes. Using DS alone to triage HPV‐positive women showed significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than HPV16/18 genotyping with cytology triage of 12 “other” genotypes, and substantially higher sensitivity but lower specificity than using cytology alone. The risk of ≥CIN2 was significantly lower in HPV‐positive, DS‐negative women (3.6%; 95% CI: 2.9%‐4.4%), compared to triage‐negative women using HPV16/18 genotyping with cytology for 12 “other” genotypes (7.4%; 95% CI: 6.4%‐8.5%; P < .0001) or cytology alone (7.5%; 95% CI: 6.7%‐8.4%; P < .0001). DS showed better risk stratification than cytology‐based strategies and provided high reassurance against pre‐cancers both at baseline and at 1‐year follow‐up, irrespective of the HPV genotype. DS allows for the safe triage of primary screening HPV‐positive women.

What's new?

Primary screening for human papillomavirus (HPV) requires efficient triage of HPV‐positive women to colposcopy and biopsy. In this prospective observational trial in the United States, with 1‐year longitudinal follow‐up, the authors investigated the performance of p16/Ki‐67 dual‐stain cytology for the triage of women identified as HPV‐positive during primary screening. Compared to HPV16/18 genotyping combined with cytological triage of other HPV genotypes, dual‐stain cytology was significantly more sensitive for predicting risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or worse. The findings indicate that dual‐stain cytology is effective for triage of HPV‐positive women, either alone or when combined with partial HPV genotyping.