1
|
Gereis JM, Hetherington K, Robertson EG, Daly R, Donoghoe MW, Ziegler DS, Marshall GM, Lau LMS, Marron JM, Wakefield CE. Parents' and adolescents' perspectives and understanding of information about childhood cancer precision medicine. Cancer 2023; 129:3645-3655. [PMID: 37376781 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision medicine is projected to become integral to childhood cancer care. As such, it is essential to support families to understand what precision medicine entails. METHODS A total of 182 parents and 23 adolescent patients participating in Precision Medicine for Children with Cancer (PRISM), an Australian precision medicine clinical trial for high-risk childhood cancer, completed questionnaires after study enrollment (time 0 [T0]). Of the parents, 108 completed a questionnaire and 45 completed an interview following return of precision medicine results (time 1 [T1]). We analyzed the mixed-methods data comprising measures exploring families' perceptions and understanding of PRISM's participant information sheet and consent form (PISCF), and factors associated with understanding. RESULTS Most parents were satisfied with the PISCF, rating it as at least "somewhat" clearly presented (n = 160/175; 91%) and informative (n = 158/175; 90%). Many suggested improvements including the use of clearer language and a more visually engaging format. Parents' actual understanding of precision medicine was low on average, but scores improved between T0 and T1 (55.8/100-60.0/100; p = .012). Parents from culturally and/or linguistically diverse backgrounds (n = 42/177; 25%) had lower actual understanding scores than those from a Western/European background whose first language was English (p = .010). There was little correlation between parents' perceived and actual understanding scores (p = .794; Pearson correlation -0.020; 95% CI, -0.169 to 0.116). Most adolescent patients read the PISCF either "briefly" or "not at all" (70%) and had a perceived understanding score of 63.6/100 on average. CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed gaps in families' understanding of childhood cancer precision medicine. We highlighted areas for potential intervention such as through targeted information resources. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Precision medicine is projected to become part of the standard of care for children with cancer. Precision medicine aims to give the right treatment to the right patient and involves several complex techniques, many of which may be challenging to understand. Our study analyzed questionnaire and interview data from parents and adolescent patients enrolled in an Australian precision medicine trial. Findings revealed gaps in families' understanding of childhood cancer precision medicine. Drawing on parents' suggestions and the literature, we make brief recommendations about improving information provision to families, such as through targeted information resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Gereis
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kate Hetherington
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eden G Robertson
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Daly
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark W Donoghoe
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Stats Central, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David S Ziegler
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Glenn M Marshall
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Loretta M S Lau
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan M Marron
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fasola G, Barducci MC, Tozzi VD, Cavanna L, Cinieri S, Perrone F, Pinto C, Russo A, Sapino A, Grossi F, Aprile G. Implementation of Precision Oncology in the National Healthcare System: A Statement Proposal Endorsed by Italian Scientific Societies. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300166. [PMID: 37944071 PMCID: PMC10645411 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Precision oncology (PO) promises positive results for patients. To date, in Italy, the effort to implement PO has been made autonomously by regional health institutions in a top-down fashion. This approach is not very efficient and jeopardizes patients' equal access to PO. Similar outcomes have been recorded in other Western countries. We tested a method of collaboration among professionals, scientific societies, and government institutions to facilitate the delivery of PO innovation to patients' bedsides. METHOD We designed an organizational research project on the basis of a bottom-up approach. We started by observing PO-related activities in five health care authorities (HCAs) in one Italian region. We then compared the issues that emerged with those of three additional HCAs in other Italian regions. Using the results of the initial observation and adopting validated multiple-step consensus methods, we finally derived 14 statements that were approved by the four main scientific societies of oncology and pathology at the national level. RESULTS The 14 statements addressed the main issues linked to the implementation of PO in clinical practice. The strong professional consensus advocated for prompt adoption within the national healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS The consensus on the statements that were obtained shows the importance of a synergistic effort among professionals, scientific societies, and health care institutions in defining homogeneous solutions for innovation implementation within the health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianpiero Fasola
- Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, ASUFC, Udine, Italy
| | - Maria C. Barducci
- Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, ASUFC, Udine, Italy
| | - Valeria D. Tozzi
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Cavanna
- Piacenza General Hospital, AUSL Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy
- Collegio Italiano dei Primari Oncologi Medici Ospedalieri (CIPOMO), Genova, Italy
| | - Saverio Cinieri
- Complex Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Brindisi Senatore Antonio Perrino Hospital, Brindisi, Italy
- Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM), Milano, Italy
| | - Francesco Perrone
- Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM), Milano, Italy
- Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Carmine Pinto
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- Collegio degli Oncologi Medici Universitari (COMU), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Anna Sapino
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Società Italiana di Anatomia Patologica e Citologia Diagnostica (SIAPeC), Milano, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Aprile
- Department of Oncology, San Bortolo General Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vaughan R, Romanick M, Brassil D, Kost R, Neville-Williams M, Gottesman R, Devine R, Manukonda P, Ronning A, O’Sullivan B, Capili B, Macarthur R, Tobin JN, Johnson T, Shapiro ED, Meagher E, Krueger J, Schlesinger S, Coller BS. The Rockefeller Team Science Leadership training program: Curriculum, standardized assessment of competencies, and impact of returning assessments. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5:e165. [PMID: 34733542 PMCID: PMC8532180 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability to effectively lead an interdisciplinary translational team is a crucial component of team science success. Most KL2 Clinical Scholars have been members of scientific teams, but few have been team science leaders. There is a dearth of literature and outcome measures of effective Team Science Leadership in clinical and translational research. We focused our curriculum to emphasize Team Science Leadership, developed a list of Team Science Leadership competencies for translational investigators using a modified Delphi method, and incorporated the competencies into a quantitative evaluation survey. The survey is completed on entry and annually thereafter by the Scholar; the Scholar's primary mentor and senior staff who educate and interact with the Scholar rate the Scholar at the end of each year. The program leaders and mentor review the results with each Scholar. The survey scales had high internal consistency and good factor structure. Overall ratings by mentors and senior staff were generally high, but ratings by Scholars tended to be lower, offering opportunities for discussion and career planning. Scholars rated the process favorably. A Team Science Leadership curriculum and periodic survey of attained competencies can inform individual career development and guide team science curriculum development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Vaughan
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michelle Romanick
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donna Brassil
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rhonda Kost
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maija Neville-Williams
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Riva Gottesman
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rita Devine
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Prasanth Manukonda
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Ronning
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Barbara O’Sullivan
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bernadette Capili
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert Macarthur
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan N. Tobin
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
- Clinical Directors Network, Inc. (CDN), New York, NY, USA
| | - Tesheia Johnson
- Yale Center for Clinical Investigation, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Eugene D. Shapiro
- Yale Center for Clinical Investigation, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Emma Meagher
- Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James Krueger
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah Schlesinger
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Barry S. Coller
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Downes K, Borry P, Ericson K, Gomez K, Greinacher A, Lambert M, Leinoe E, Noris P, Van Geet C, Freson K. Clinical management, ethics and informed consent related to multi-gene panel-based high throughput sequencing testing for platelet disorders: Communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18:2751-2758. [PMID: 33079472 PMCID: PMC7589386 DOI: 10.1111/jth.14993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Molecular diagnostics of inherited platelet disorders (IPD) has been revolutionized by the implementation of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) approaches. A conclusive diagnosis using HTS tests can be obtained quickly and cost-effectively in many, but not all patients. The expanding use of HTS tests has raised concerns regarding complex variant interpretation and the ethical implications of detecting unsolicited findings such as variants in IPD genes RUNX1, ETV6, and ANKRD26, which are associated with increased leukemic risk. This guidance document has been developed and written by a multidisciplinary team of researchers and clinicians, with expertise in hematology, clinical and molecular genetics, and bioethics, alongside a RUNX1 patient advocacy representative. We recommend that for clinical diagnostics, HTS for IPD should use a multigene panel of curated diagnostic-grade genes. Critically, we advise that an HTS test for clinical diagnostics should only be ordered by a clinical expert that is: (a) fully aware of the complexity of genotype-phenotype correlations for IPD; (b) able to discuss these complexities with a patient and family members before the test is initiated; and (c) able to interpret and appropriately communicate the results of a HTS diagnostic report, including the implication of variants of uncertain clinical significance. Each patient should know what an HTS test could mean for his or her clinical management before initiating a test. We hereby propose an exemplified informed consent document that includes information on these ethical concerns and can be used by the community for implementation of HTS of IPD in a clinical diagnostic setting. This paper does not include recommendations for HTS of IPD in a research setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Downes
- East Genomic Laboratory HubCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUK
- Department of HaematologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridge Biomedical CampusCambridgeUK
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary CareKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | | | - Keith Gomez
- Haemophilia Centre and Thrombosis UnitRoyal Free London NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Andreas Greinacher
- Institut für Immunologie und TransfusionsmedizinUniversitätsmedizin GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
| | - Michele Lambert
- Division of HematologyThe Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
- Department of PediatricsPerelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Eva Leinoe
- Department of HaematologyRigshospitaletNational University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Patrizia Noris
- IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation and University of PaviaPaviaItaly
| | - Chris Van Geet
- Department of Cardiovascular SciencesCenter or Molecular and Vascular BiologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Kathleen Freson
- Department of Cardiovascular SciencesCenter or Molecular and Vascular BiologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hitchcock EC, Study C, Elliott AM. Shortened consent forms for genome-wide sequencing: Parent and provider perspectives. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2020; 8:e1254. [PMID: 32383361 PMCID: PMC7336726 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consent forms for exome and/or genome sequencing, collectively called genome-wide sequencing (GWS), frequently contain detailed information on complex topics such as sequencing analysis and incidental findings. Considering recent endeavors by the health care community to simplify GWS consent forms, it is important to gain stakeholders' perspectives on the content, length, and use of consent forms. METHODS Thematic analysis was conducted on data obtained from focus groups with two participant cohorts: parents who previously provided consent for trio-based GWS as part of the translational pediatric GWS CAUSES Study, and genetic health care providers (HCP) who provide pre-test counseling for GWS. RESULTS Genetic HCP indicated that consent forms cannot replace pre-test counseling, and as such, a simplified consent form focusing on the implications of GWS would be beneficial to both patients and HCP. Although parents' primary concerns varied when considering GWS, they all highly valued information. Parents also indicated the need for community and support after the return of GWS results. Both participant cohorts recommended that consent forms be available online and include an appendix for supplementary information. CONCLUSION It is important to include both parents and HCP in the design of GWS consent forms, and also, to help connect families who have a shared diagnosis after the post-test counseling session.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C Hitchcock
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Causes Study
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martinez-Martin N, Magnus D. Privacy and ethical challenges in next-generation sequencing. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2019; 4:95-104. [PMID: 32775691 PMCID: PMC7413244 DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2019.1599685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is expected to revolutionize health care. NGS allows for sequencing of the whole genome more cheaply and quickly than previous techniques. NGS offers opportunities to advance medical diagnostics and treatments, but also raises complicated ethical questions that need to be addressed. AREAS CONSIDERED This article draws from the literature on research and clinical ethics, as well as next-generation sequencing, in order to provide an overview of the ethical challenges involved in next-generation sequencing. This article includes a discussion of the ethics of NGS in research and clinical contexts. EXPERT OPINION The use of NGS in clinical and research contexts has features that pose challenges for traditional ethical frameworks for protecting research participants and patients. NGS generates massive amounts of data and results that vary in terms of known clinical relevance. It is important to determine appropriate processes for protecting, managing and communicating the data. The use of machine learning for sequencing and interpretation of genomic data also raises concerns in terms of the potential for bias and potential implications for fiduciary obligations. NGS poses particular challenges in three main ethical areas: privacy, informed consent, and return of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Magnus
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang X, Liang Z, Wang S, Lu S, Song Y, Cheng Y, Ying J, Liu W, Hou Y, Li Y, Liu Y, Hou J, Liu X, Shao J, Tai Y, Wang Z, Fu L, Li H, Zhou X, Bai H, Wang M, Lu Y, Yang J, Zhong W, Zhou Q, Yang X, Wang J, Huang C, Liu X, Zhou X, Zhang S, Tian H, Chen Y, Ren R, Liao N, Wu C, Zhu Z, Pan H, Gu Y, Wang L, Liu Y, Zhang S, Liu T, Chen G, Shao Z, Xu B, Zhang Q, Xu R, Shen L, Wu Y, Tumor Biomarker Committee OBOCSOCO(CSCO. Application of next-generation sequencing technology to precision medicine in cancer: joint consensus of the Tumor Biomarker Committee of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. Cancer Biol Med 2019; 16:189-204. [PMID: 31119060 PMCID: PMC6528448 DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology is capable of sequencing millions or billions of DNA molecules simultaneously. Therefore, it represents a promising tool for the analysis of molecular targets for the initial diagnosis of disease, monitoring of disease progression, and identifying the mechanism of drug resistance. On behalf of the Tumor Biomarker Committee of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) and the China Actionable Genome Consortium (CAGC), the present expert group hereby proposes advisory guidelines on clinical applications of NGS technology for the analysis of cancer driver genes for precision cancer therapy. This group comprises an assembly of laboratory cancer geneticists, clinical oncologists, bioinformaticians, pathologists, and other professionals. After multiple rounds of discussions and revisions, the expert group has reached a preliminary consensus on the need of NGS in clinical diagnosis, its regulation, and compliance standards in clinical sample collection. Moreover, it has prepared NGS criteria, the sequencing standard operation procedure (SOP), data analysis, report, and NGS platform certification and validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuchao Zhang
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Medical Research Center, Cancer Center of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Affiliated Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Zhiyong Liang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100006, China
| | - Shengyue Wang
- National Research Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai, RuiJin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Shun Lu
- Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Yong Song
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Ying Cheng
- Department of Oncology, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun 132002, China
| | - Jianming Ying
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100006, China
| | - Weiping Liu
- Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
| | - Yingyong Hou
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Yangqiu Li
- Department of Hematology, First Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Hematology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 519000, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Laboratory of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100071, China
| | - Jun Hou
- Department of Oncology, First Clinical College of South China University of Technology/Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Xiufeng Liu
- People's Liberation Army Cancer Center of Bayi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China
| | - Jianyong Shao
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 519000, China
| | - Yanhong Tai
- Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100071, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100071, China
| | - Li Fu
- Department of Breast Cancer Pathology and Research Laboratory of Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Oncology, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun 132002, China
| | - Xiaojun Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Jinling Hospital Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Hua Bai
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100006, China
| | - Mengzhao Wang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100006, China
| | - You Lu
- Department of Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
| | - Jinji Yang
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincical Prople's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Wenzhao Zhong
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincical Prople's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Qing Zhou
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincical Prople's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Xuening Yang
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincical Prople's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100006, China
| | - Cheng Huang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China
| | - Xiaoqing Liu
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100071, China
| | - Xiaoyan Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Shirong Zhang
- Center for Translational Medicine, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Hongxia Tian
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Medical Research Center, Cancer Center of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Affiliated Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Yu Chen
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Medical Research Center, Cancer Center of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Affiliated Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Ruibao Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Shanghai Institute of Hematology, RuiJin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Ning Liao
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Chunyan Wu
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Zhongzheng Zhu
- Department of Oncology, No. 113 Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Ningbo 315040, China
| | - Hongming Pan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310020, China
| | - Yanhong Gu
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Liwei Wang
- Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Yunpeng Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Suzhan Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310020, China
| | - Tianshu Liu
- Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Gong Chen
- Department of Colorectal, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 519000, China
| | - Zhimin Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100006, China
| | - Qingyuan Zhang
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150030, China
| | - Ruihua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 519000, China
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yilong Wu
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Medical Research Center, Cancer Center of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Affiliated Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | | |
Collapse
|