1
|
Woolley MG, Klimczak KS, Davis CH, Levin ME. Predictors of adherence to a publicly available self-guided digital mental health intervention. Cogn Behav Ther 2024; 53:577-591. [PMID: 38619511 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2024.2341807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Low adherence to self-guided digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have raised concerns about their real-world effectiveness. Naturalistic data from self-guided DMHIs are often not available, hindering our ability to assess adherence among real-world users. This study aimed to analyze 3 years of user data from the public launch of an empirically supported 12-session self-guided DMHI, to assess overall program adherence rates and explore predictors of adherence. Data from 984 registered users were analyzed. Results showed that only 14.8% of users completed all 12 modules and 68.6% completed less than half of the modules. Users who were younger, had milder depression, had never seen a mental health provider, and who rejected signing-up for weekly program emails completed significantly more modules. Results add to concerns about the generalizability of controlled research on DMHIs due to lower adherence outside of research trials. This study highlights the potential of user data in identifying key factors that may be related to adherence. By examining adherence patterns among different sub-sets of users, we can pinpoint and focus on individuals who may adhere and benefit more from self-guided programs. Findings could also have implications for guiding intervention personalization for individuals who struggle to complete DMHIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carter H Davis
- Department of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Faisal MR, Salam FT, Vidyasagaran AL, Carswell C, Naseri MW, Shinwari Z, Fulbright H, Zavala GA, Gilbody S, Siddiqi N. Collaborative care for common mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2024; 363:595-608. [PMID: 39038620 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face high burden of common mental disorders (CMDs). Most of the evidence for the Collaborative Care (CC) model effectiveness comes from high-income countries (HICs) and may not generalise to LMICs. A systematic review was conducted to assess effectiveness of CC for CMDs in LMICs. METHODS We searched eight-databases, two trial registries (2011-November 2023). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults (≥18 years) with depression/anxiety diagnosis, reporting remission/change in symptom severity were eligible. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted for: short-(0-6 months), medium-(7-12 months), long-(13-24 months), and very long-term (≥25 months) follow-up. Quality was assessed with Cochrane RoB2 tool. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022380407. RESULTS Searches identified 7494 studies, 12 trials involving 13,531 participants were included; nine had low-risk of bias. CC was more effective than usual care for depression: dichotomous outcomes (short-term, 7 studies, relative risk (RR) 1.39, 95%CI 1.31, 1.48; medium-term, 6 studies, RR 1.35, 95%CI 1.28, 1.43); and continuous outcomes (short-term, 8 studies, standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.51, 95%CI -0.80, -0.23; medium-term, 8 studies, SMD -0.59, 95%CI -1.00, -0.17). CC was found to be effective at long-term (one study), but not at very long-term. Improvement in anxiety outcomes with CC (2 studies, 340 participants) reported up to 12-months; improvements in quality-of-life were not statistically significant (3 studies, 796 participants, SMD 0.62, 95%CI -0.10, 1.34). LIMITATIONS Pooled estimates showed high heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS In LMICs, CC was more effective than usual care for improving depression outcomes at short and medium-term follow-up. A similar improvement was found for anxiety outcomes, but evidence is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Helen Fulbright
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Hull York Medical School, York, UK; Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Hull York Medical School, York, UK; Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reback CJ, Cain D, Rusow JA, Benkeser D, Schader L, Gwiazdowski BA, Skeen SJ, Hannah M, Belzer M, Castillo M, Mayer KH, Paul ME, Hill-Rorie J, Johnson ND, McAvoy-Banerjea J, Sanchez T, Hightow-Weidman LB, Sullivan PS, Horvath KJ. Technology-Based Interventions, with a Stepped Care Approach, for Reducing Sexual Risk Behaviors and Increasing PrEP Initiation Among Transgender and Gender Expansive Youth and Young Adults. AIDS Behav 2024:10.1007/s10461-024-04513-w. [PMID: 39304589 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-024-04513-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
TechStep was a technology-based trial, with a stepped care approach, to reduce sexual risks and increase PrEP uptake among transgender and gender expansive youth and young adults (15-24 years old). From October 2019 to September 2021, 254 participants were randomized into: 1) Text (n = 82), or 2) Webapp (n = 87), or 3) Control (n = 85). At the 3-month follow-up assessment, those randomized to Text and Webapp and did not demonstrate improvement on primary outcomes were re-randomized to receive virtual eCoaching (Text + or Webapp +), or to remain in their initial condition without eCoaching. Results showed no effect on condomless encounters at 6-month, the primary endpoint, when comparing the Webapp + (0.33 decrease; 95%CI: -0.01, 0.67, p-value = 0.057) or the Text + (0.27 decrease; 95%CI: -0.13, 0.68, p-value = 0.181) conditions to the Control condition. However, in secondary analyses, condomless encounters were significantly reduced for Text compared to Control. The rate of PrEP uptake was low for all study arms.Trial registration: Clinical Trials # NCT04000724 (registered June 26, 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy J Reback
- Friends Research Institute, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Behavioral and Addiction Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for HIV Identification, Prevention and Treatment Services, Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Demetria Cain
- Department of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - David Benkeser
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lindsey Schader
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Bevin A Gwiazdowski
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Simone J Skeen
- Department of Social, Behavioral, and Population Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Marissa Hannah
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Marvin Belzer
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marne Castillo
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth H Mayer
- The Fenway Institute and Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary E Paul
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan Hill-Rorie
- The Fenway Institute and Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Travis Sanchez
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Patrick S Sullivan
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Keith J Horvath
- Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, 6363 Alvarado Rd, Suite 250, San Diego, CA, 92120, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lam RW, Kennedy SH, Adams C, Bahji A, Beaulieu S, Bhat V, Blier P, Blumberger DM, Brietzke E, Chakrabarty T, Do A, Frey BN, Giacobbe P, Gratzer D, Grigoriadis S, Habert J, Ishrat Husain M, Ismail Z, McGirr A, McIntyre RS, Michalak EE, Müller DJ, Parikh SV, Quilty LS, Ravindran AV, Ravindran N, Renaud J, Rosenblat JD, Samaan Z, Saraf G, Schade K, Schaffer A, Sinyor M, Soares CN, Swainson J, Taylor VH, Tourjman SV, Uher R, van Ameringen M, Vazquez G, Vigod S, Voineskos D, Yatham LN, Milev RV. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2023 Update on Clinical Guidelines for Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults: Réseau canadien pour les traitements de l'humeur et de l'anxiété (CANMAT) 2023 : Mise à jour des lignes directrices cliniques pour la prise en charge du trouble dépressif majeur chez les adultes. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2024; 69:641-687. [PMID: 38711351 PMCID: PMC11351064 DOI: 10.1177/07067437241245384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) last published clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder (MDD) in 2016. Owing to advances in the field, an update was needed to incorporate new evidence and provide new and revised recommendations for the assessment and management of MDD in adults. METHODS CANMAT convened a guidelines editorial group comprised of academic clinicians and patient partners. A systematic literature review was conducted, focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analyses published since the 2016 guidelines. Recommendations were organized by lines of treatment, which were informed by CANMAT-defined levels of evidence and supplemented by clinical support (consisting of expert consensus on safety, tolerability, and feasibility). Drafts were revised based on review by patient partners, expert peer review, and a defined expert consensus process. RESULTS The updated guidelines comprise eight primary topics, in a question-and-answer format, that map a patient care journey from assessment to selection of evidence-based treatments, prevention of recurrence, and strategies for inadequate response. The guidelines adopt a personalized care approach that emphasizes shared decision-making that reflects the values, preferences, and treatment history of the patient with MDD. Tables provide new and updated recommendations for psychological, pharmacological, lifestyle, complementary and alternative medicine, digital health, and neuromodulation treatments. Caveats and limitations of the evidence are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS The CANMAT 2023 updated guidelines provide evidence-informed recommendations for the management of MDD, in a clinician-friendly format. These updated guidelines emphasize a collaborative, personalized, and systematic management approach that will help optimize outcomes for adults with MDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond W. Lam
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sidney H. Kennedy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Camelia Adams
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Anees Bahji
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Serge Beaulieu
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Venkat Bhat
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pierre Blier
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Elisa Brietzke
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Trisha Chakrabarty
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - André Do
- Department of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Benicio N. Frey
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Giacobbe
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Gratzer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jeffrey Habert
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M. Ishrat Husain
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zahinoor Ismail
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Alexander McGirr
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Roger S. McIntyre
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Erin E. Michalak
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Daniel J. Müller
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sagar V. Parikh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbour, MI, USA
| | - Lena S. Quilty
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arun V. Ravindran
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nisha Ravindran
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Johanne Renaud
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Zainab Samaan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gayatri Saraf
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kathryn Schade
- Office of Research Services, Huron University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ayal Schaffer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Sinyor
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jennifer Swainson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Valerie H. Taylor
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Rudolf Uher
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Michael van Ameringen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gustavo Vazquez
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Simone Vigod
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daphne Voineskos
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lakshmi N. Yatham
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Roumen V. Milev
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Messer M, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Liu C, Anderson C, Linardon J. A randomized controlled trial of an online single session intervention for body image in individuals with recurrent binge eating. Int J Eat Disord 2024; 57:1668-1679. [PMID: 38619359 DOI: 10.1002/eat.24213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Theoretical models highlight body image disturbances as central to the maintenance of eating disorders, with empirical evidence finding negative body image to be a robust predictor of treatment nonresponse, relapse and symptom persistence. Accessible, scalable, and inexpensive interventions that can effectively target negative body image across the eating disorders are needed. We developed an online single session intervention (SSI) for negative body image and evaluated its acceptability and efficacy in a randomized controlled trial in individuals with recurrent binge eating. METHOD Participants with recurrent binge eating were randomly assigned to the SSI (n = 99) or a waitlist (n = 101). Assessments were conducted at baseline, 4 week follow-up, and 8 week follow-up. RESULTS 81% of participants accessed the SSI, demonstrating reasonable uptake. However, issues with attrition were apparent; a 32% study dropout rate was observed at posttest, while a 58% dropout rate was observed at follow-up. 87% of participants who completed satisfaction measures would recommend the SSI. SSI participants experienced greater improvements in negative body image at both 4 (d = -0.65) and 8 week (d = -0.74) follow-up. Significant between-group effects were also observed on most other secondary symptom measures, though no differences were found for motivations and help-seeking beliefs and intentions. CONCLUSION Body image-focused self-guided SSIs for recurrent binge are largely accepted by those who are retained in the trial, but are associated with significant attrition. Although SSIs are not intended to replace standard treatment, they may help with short-term symptom management and could play an important role in eating disorder care. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE Single session interventions (SSI) are a potentially accessible, scalable, and cost-effective way to deliver evidence-based treatment content to people with eating disorders. This study shows that an online (SSI) designed to target body image among people with recurrent binge eating is accepted and produced short-term symptom relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariel Messer
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Center for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Claudia Liu
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cleo Anderson
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jake Linardon
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Center for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chhun N, Oketch D, Agot K, Mangale DI, Badia J, Kibugi J, Jiang W, Kirk M, Richardson BA, Kohler PK, John‐Stewart G, Beima‐Sofie K. Using FRAME to characterize provider-identified adaptations to a stepped care intervention for adolescents and youth living with HIV in Kenya: a mixed methods approach. J Int AIDS Soc 2024; 27 Suppl 1:e26261. [PMID: 38965971 PMCID: PMC11224585 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Data-informed Stepped Care (DiSC) study is a cluster-randomized trial implemented in 24 HIV care clinics in Kenya, aimed at improving retention in care for adolescents and youth living with HIV (AYLHIV). DiSC is a multi-component intervention that assigns AYLHIV to different intensity (steps) of services according to risk. We used the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) to characterize provider-identified adaptations to the implementation of DiSC to optimize uptake and delivery, and determine the influence on implementation outcomes. METHODS Between May and December 2022, we conducted continuous quality improvement (CQI) meetings with providers to optimize DiSC implementation at 12 intervention sites. The meetings were guided by plan-do-study-act processes to identify challenges during early phase implementation and propose targeted adaptations. Meetings were audio-recorded and analysed using FRAME to categorize the level, context and content of planned adaptations and determine if adaptations were fidelity consistent. Providers completed surveys to quantify perceptions of DiSC acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to evaluate these implementation outcomes over time. RESULTS Providers participated in eight CQI meetings per facility over a 6-month period. A total of 65 adaptations were included in the analysis. The majority focused on optimizing the integration of DiSC within the clinic (83%, n = 54), and consisted of improving documentation, addressing scheduling challenges and improving clinic workflow. Primary reasons for adaptation were to align delivery with AYLHIV needs and preferences and to increase reach among AYLHIV: with reminder calls to AYLHIV, collaborating with schools to ensure AYLHIV attended clinic appointments and addressing transportation challenges. All adaptations to optimize DiSC implementation were fidelity-consistent. Provider perceptions of implementation were consistently high throughout the process, and on average, slightly improved each month for intervention acceptability (β = 0.011, 95% CI: 0.002, 0.020, p = 0.016), appropriateness (β = 0.012, 95% CI: 0.007, 0.027, p<0.001) and feasibility (β = 0.013, 95% CI: 0.004, 0.022, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS Provider-identified adaptations targeted improved integration into routine clinic practices and aimed to reduce barriers to service access unique to AYLHIV. Characterizing types of adaptations and adaptation rationale may enrich our understanding of the implementation context and improve abilities to tailor implementation strategies when scaling to new settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nok Chhun
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | | | - Kawango Agot
- Impact Research and Development OrganizationKisumuKenya
| | - Dorothy I. Mangale
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of OncologyWashington UniversitySt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Jacinta Badia
- Impact Research and Development OrganizationKisumuKenya
| | - James Kibugi
- Impact Research and Development OrganizationKisumuKenya
| | - Wenwen Jiang
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Mary Kirk
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Barbra A. Richardson
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Pamela K. Kohler
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of Child, Family, and Population Health NursingUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Grace John‐Stewart
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of PediatricsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mortier P, Vilagut G, García-Mieres H, Alayo I, Ferrer M, Amigo F, Aragonès E, Aragón-Peña A, Asúnsolo Del Barco Á, Campos M, Espuga M, González-Pinto A, Haro JM, López Fresneña N, Martínez de Salázar AD, Molina JD, Ortí-Lucas RM, Parellada M, Pelayo-Terán JM, Pérez-Gómez B, Pérez-Zapata A, Pijoan JI, Plana N, Polentinos-Castro E, Portillo-Van Diest A, Puig T, Rius C, Sanz F, Serra C, Urreta-Barallobre I, Kessler RC, Bruffaerts R, Vieta E, Pérez-Solá V, Alonso J. Health service and psychotropic medication use for mental health conditions among healthcare workers active during the Spain Covid-19 Pandemic - A prospective cohort study using web-based surveys. Psychiatry Res 2024; 334:115800. [PMID: 38387166 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
Little is known about healthcare workers' (HCW) use of healthcare services for mental disorders. This study presents data from a 16-month prospective cohort study of Spanish HCW (n = 4,809), recruited shortly after the COVID-19 pandemic onset, and assessed at four timepoints using web-based surveys. Use of health services among HCW with mental health conditions (i.e., those having a positive screen for mental disorders and/or suicidal thoughts and behaviours [STB]) was initially low (i.e., 18.2 %) but increased to 29.6 % at 16-month follow-up. Service use was positively associated with pre-pandemic mental health treatment (OR=1.99), a positive screen for major depressive disorder (OR=1.50), panic attacks (OR=1.74), suicidal thoughts and behaviours (OR=1.22), and experiencing severe role impairment (OR=1.33), and negatively associated with being female (OR = 0.69) and a higher daily number of work hours (OR=0.95). Around 30 % of HCW with mental health conditions used anxiolytics (benzodiazepines), especially medical doctors. Four out of ten HCW (39.0 %) with mental health conditions indicated a need for (additional) help, with most important barriers for service use being too ashamed, long waiting lists, and professional treatment not being available. Our findings delineate a clear mental health treatment gap among Spanish HCW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Mortier
- Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain.
| | - Gemma Vilagut
- Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
| | - Helena García-Mieres
- Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
| | - Itxaso Alayo
- Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Biosistemak Institute for Health Systems Research, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Montse Ferrer
- Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Franco Amigo
- Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
| | - Enric Aragonès
- Institut d'Investigació en Atenció Primària IDIAP Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain; Atenció Primària Camp de Tarragona, Institut Català de la Salut, Spain
| | - Andrés Aragón-Peña
- Epidemiology Unit, Regional Ministry of Health, Community of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Fundación Investigación e Innovación Biosanitaria de AP, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ángel Asúnsolo Del Barco
- Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcala, Alcalá de Henares, Spain; Ramón y Cajal Institute of Sanitary Research (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, The City University of New York, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mireia Campos
- Service of Prevention of Labor Risks, Medical Emergencies System, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain
| | - Meritxell Espuga
- Occupational Health Service. Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana González-Pinto
- BIOARABA, Hospital Universitario Araba-Santiago, UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; CIBER Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Josep M Haro
- CIBER Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain; Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Juan D Molina
- CIBER Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain; Villaverde Mental Health Center, Clinical Management Area of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychiatric Service, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rafael M Ortí-Lucas
- Service of Preventive Medicine and Quality of Attention, University Clinical Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mara Parellada
- CIBER Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Maria Pelayo-Terán
- CIBER Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental. Hospital el Bierzo, Gerencia de Asistencia Sanitaria del Bierzo (GASBI). Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y Leon (SACYL). Ponferrada, León, Spain; Area de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública. Universidad de León, León, Spain
| | - Beatriz Pérez-Gómez
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; National Center of Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - José Ignasio Pijoan
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Clinical Epidemiology Unit-Hospital Universitario Cruces/ OSI EEC, Bilbao, Spain/ Biocruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Spain
| | - Nieves Plana
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Polentinos-Castro
- Research Unit Primary Care Management, Madrid Health Service, Madrid, Spain; Department of Medical Specialities and Public Health. King Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain; Red de Investigación en Cronicidad, Atención Primaria y Promoción de la Salud RICAPPS-(RICORS). Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Portillo-Van Diest
- Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
| | - Teresa Puig
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Rius
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Sanz
- Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain; Research Progamme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Hospital del Mar Research Institute, MELIS, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; Instituto Nacional de Bioinformatica - ELIXIR-ES, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Consol Serra
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain; CiSAL-Centro de Investigación en Salud Laboral, Hospital del Mar Research Institute/UPF, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Iratxe Urreta-Barallobre
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Donostialdea Integrated Health Organisation, Donostia University Hospital, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, San Sebastián, Spain; Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Ronald C Kessler
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ronny Bruffaerts
- Center for Public Health Psychiatry, Universitair Psychiatrisch Centrum, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eduard Vieta
- CIBER Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain; Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Víctor Pérez-Solá
- CIBER Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Alonso
- Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fatori D, Passos IC, Brunoni AR. Is internet-based psychological therapy effective for treating major depressive disorder? Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:227-229. [PMID: 38112346 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2295417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Fatori
- Laboratório de Psicopatologia e Terapêutica Psiquiátrica (LIM-23), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Ives C Passos
- Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental (CPE) and Centro de Pesquisa Clínica (CPC), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, School of Medicine, Graduate Program In Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - André R Brunoni
- Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Keyan D, Habashneh R, Akhtar A, El-Dardery H, Faroun M, Abualhaija A, Aqel IS, Dardas LA, Bryant R. Evaluating a stepped care model of psychological support for adults affected by adversity: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Jordan. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078091. [PMID: 38413156 PMCID: PMC10900353 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden of common mental disorders in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is growing with little known about how to allocate limited resources to reach the greatest number of people undergoing instances of significant psychological distress. We present a study protocol for a multicentre, parallel-group, superiority, randomised controlled trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Adults with significant psychological distress (K10 score ≥20) will be randomised to receive a stepped care programme involving a self-guided course (Doing What Matters) followed by a more intensive group programme (Problem Management Plus) or the self-guided course alone, both of which will take place in addition to enhanced treatment as usual comprising of a follow-up referral session to available services within the community. We will include 800 participants. An intent-to-treat and completer analysis will explore the impact of the stepped model of care on anxiety and depression symptoms (as measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist; HSCL-25) at 24 weeks from baseline. Secondary outcomes include positive psychological well-being, agency, changes in patient-identified problems, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Linear mixed models will be used to assess the differential impact of the conditions over time. Analyses will focus on the primary outcome (HSCL-25) and secondary outcomes (agency subscale, WHO Well-Being Index, WHO Disability Assessment Schedule V.2.0, EQ-5D, Psychological Outcomes Profiles Scale) for both conditions, with the main outcome time point being the 3-month follow-up, relative to baseline. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This will be the first randomised controlled trial to assess the benefits of a stepped model of care to addressing psychological distress in a LMIC setting. Results will provide important insights for managing limited resources to mental healthcare in these settings and will be accordingly disseminated to service providers and organisations via professional training and meetings, and via publication in relevant journals and conference presentations. We will also present these findings to the Jordanian Ministry of Health, where this institute will guide us on the most appropriate format for communication of findings, including written reports, verbal presentations and/or brochures. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Jordan School of Nursing Research Ethics Committee (number: PF.22.10). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12621000189820p; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dharani Keyan
- School of Psychology, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Richard Bryant
- School of Psychology, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Linardon J, Messer M, Goldberg SB, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M. The efficacy of mindfulness apps on symptoms of depression and anxiety: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev 2024; 107:102370. [PMID: 38056219 PMCID: PMC10872959 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Mindfulness apps have become popular tools for addressing symptoms of depression and anxiety. Since the publication of earlier meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy of mindfulness apps for depression and anxiety symptoms, over 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted. There is a need for an updated meta-analysis that quantifies the effects of mindfulness apps on these symptoms and tests for potential moderators.. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted on 45 RCTs. Small, significant effect sizes were found for symptoms of depression (Ncomp = 46, N = 5852, g = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.17, 0.31, NNT = 13.57) and anxiety (Ncomp = 48, N = 6082, g = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.21, 0.35, NNT = 11.47) in favour of mindfulness apps over control groups. This effect was not explained by symptom deterioration in participants allocated to control groups. Effects remained stable when restricting analyses to lower risk of bias and larger sample trials. No significant moderators were observed, except trials that offered monetary compensation produced larger effects on depression. Non-significant effects were observed when comparing mindfulness apps to active therapeutic comparisons (g = -0.15 depression, g = 0.10 anxiety), though the number of studies was low. Growing evidence indicates that mindfulness apps can acutely reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety, although higher quality studies with longer follow-ups are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake Linardon
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Center for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Mariel Messer
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simon B Goldberg
- Department of Counselling Psychology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Centre for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Center for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Linardon J, Torous J, Firth J, Cuijpers P, Messer M, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M. Current evidence on the efficacy of mental health smartphone apps for symptoms of depression and anxiety. A meta-analysis of 176 randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry 2024; 23:139-149. [PMID: 38214614 PMCID: PMC10785982 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
The mental health care available for depression and anxiety has recently undergone a major technological revolution, with growing interest towards the potential of smartphone apps as a scalable tool to treat these conditions. Since the last comprehensive meta-analysis in 2019 established positive yet variable effects of apps on depressive and anxiety symptoms, more than 100 new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been carried out. We conducted an updated meta-analysis with the objectives of providing more precise estimates of effects, quantifying generalizability from this evidence base, and understanding whether major app and trial characteristics moderate effect sizes. We included 176 RCTs that aimed to treat depressive or anxiety symptoms. Apps had overall significant although small effects on symptoms of depression (N=33,567, g=0.28, p<0.001; number needed to treat, NNT=11.5) and generalized anxiety (N=22,394, g=0.26, p<0.001, NNT=12.4) as compared to control groups. These effects were robust at different follow-ups and after removing small sample and higher risk of bias trials. There was less variability in outcome scores at post-test in app compared to control conditions (ratio of variance, RoV=-0.14, 95% CI: -0.24 to -0.05 for depressive symptoms; RoV=-0.21, 95% CI: -0.31 to -0.12 for generalized anxiety symptoms). Effect sizes for depression were significantly larger when apps incorporated cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) features or included chatbot technology. Effect sizes for anxiety were significantly larger when trials had generalized anxiety as a primary target and administered a CBT app or an app with mood monitoring features. We found evidence of moderate effects of apps on social anxiety (g=0.52) and obsessive-compulsive (g=0.51) symptoms, a small effect on post-traumatic stress symptoms (g=0.12), a large effect on acrophobia symptoms (g=0.90), and a non-significant negative effect on panic symptoms (g=-0.12), although these results should be considered with caution, because most trials had high risk of bias and were based on small sample sizes. We conclude that apps have overall small but significant effects on symptoms of depression and generalized anxiety, and that specific features of apps - such as CBT or mood monitoring features and chatbot technology - are associated with larger effect sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake Linardon
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Center for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
| | - John Torous
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph Firth
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- International Institute for Psychotherapy, Babes¸-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Mariel Messer
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Center for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Davis CH, Donahue ML, Gaudiano BA, Uebelacker LA, Twohig MP, Levin ME. Adding online storytelling-based acceptance and commitment therapy to antidepressant treatment for primary care patients: a randomized clinical trial. Cogn Behav Ther 2024; 53:48-69. [PMID: 37855277 PMCID: PMC10841889 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2023.2265560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Depression is most often treated in primary care, where the prevailing treatment is antidepressant medication. Primary care patients with depression are less likely to be exposed to psychosocial interventions, despite evidence suggesting many of these treatments are effective. An example is acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), a behavioral treatment for depression with a growing evidence base. A self-guided ACT intervention with a peer narrative (i.e. storytelling) format was developed with the intention of creating a treatment option for primary care patients that was more accessible than traditional psychotherapy. Titled LifeStories, the online program features videos of real individuals sharing coping skills for depression based on lived experiences and key ACT principles. A total of 93 primary care patients taking antidepressants were randomized to either continued antidepressant treatment alone or antidepressant treatment plus LifeStories for 4 weeks. There were no differences over time on depression severity and psychological inflexibility. However, LifeStories led to greater improvements in quality of life and increased patients' interest in additional treatment compared to antidepressant medication alone.Clinical trial pre-registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04757961).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Brandon A. Gaudiano
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
- Butler Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Lisa A. Uebelacker
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
- Butler Hospital, Providence, RI
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
King A, Harris-Lane LM, Bérubé S, Burke K, Churchill A, Cornish P, Goguen B, Jaouich A, Rash JA. Provider perceptions of the anticipated benefits, barriers, and facilitators associated with implementing a stepped care model for the delivery of addiction and mental health services in New Brunswick: a mixed-methods observational implementation study. Int J Ment Health Syst 2023; 17:40. [PMID: 37968746 PMCID: PMC10647026 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-023-00611-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Providers who work within addiction and mental health (A&MH) services in New Brunswick (NB), Canada completed training in Stepped Care 2.0 and One-at-a-Time (OAAT) therapy as part of a provincial practice change initiative to implement a provincial stepped care model. The present study aimed to identify: (1) the perceived acceptability and feasibility of the SC2.0 model; (2) the perceived benefits, barriers, and facilitators to implement SC2.0 in practice; and (3) perceived impacts on clinical practice. METHODS This is a mixed-methods observational implementation study. Quantitative surveys were completed after training courses. Open-ended responses were collected after completion of SC2.0 training. A subset of providers who completed surveys were asked to participate in semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to describe results from surveys. Open-ended responses and semi-structured interviews were compiled and thematically synthesized in an iterative process using a grounded theory framework. Quantitative and qualitative data were triangulated to build an in-depth understanding of provider perceptions. RESULTS 316 providers completed surveys and responded to open-ended prompts. Interviews were completed with 28 of those providers. SC2.0 was deemed to be acceptable, a suitable fit, and feasible to implement. Perceived benefits included: (1) timely access to services; (2) increased practice efficiency; and (3) increased availability of services. Perceived barriers included: (1) insufficient availability of resources to populate a SC2.0 continuum of care; (2) provider complacency with their current practice; and (3) difficulty for clients to accept and adjust to change. CONCLUSIONS Identifying the perceived benefits, facilitators, and barriers to adopting stepped care in practice can lead to targeted implementation strategies and the collection of data that can inform continuous improvement cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alesha King
- Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 230 Elizabeth Ave, St. John's, NL, A1B 3X9, Canada
| | - Laura M Harris-Lane
- Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 230 Elizabeth Ave, St. John's, NL, A1B 3X9, Canada
| | - Stéphane Bérubé
- Addiction & Mental Health Services, Department of Health, , Government of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada
| | - Katie Burke
- Addiction & Mental Health Services, Department of Health, , Government of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada
| | - AnnMarie Churchill
- Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 230 Elizabeth Ave, St. John's, NL, A1B 3X9, Canada
- Stepped Care Solutions, Mount Pearl, Canada
| | - Peter Cornish
- Stepped Care Solutions, Mount Pearl, Canada
- Counseling and Psychological Services, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
| | - Bernard Goguen
- Addiction & Mental Health Services, Department of Health, , Government of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada
| | | | - Joshua A Rash
- Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 230 Elizabeth Ave, St. John's, NL, A1B 3X9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cederberg M, Barenfeld E, Ali L, Ekman I, Goulding A, Fors A. A lowered threshold to partnerships: a mixed methods process evaluation of participants' experiences of a person-centred eHealth intervention. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1193. [PMID: 37919705 PMCID: PMC10621160 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10190-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In order to understand pathways of complex interventions, the Medical Research Council has suggested that process evaluations should be conducted alongside randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This paper presents a mixed methods process evaluation of a complex, person-centred eHealth intervention for persons on sick leave with common mental disorders. AIM The aim of the study was to explore participants' experiences of a person-centred eHealth intervention and illuminate meaningful activities and processes. METHODS Participants were recruited from the intervention arm of an RCT (n = 102). Questionnaires on perceived meaningfulness of the overall intervention and intervention activities were sent to participants on two occasions, after 3 and 6 months, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 15 participants in the intervention group. Questionnaire data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and interview data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The quantitative and qualitative data strands were integrated at interpretation. RESULTS At both follow-ups, a majority of participants reported that the intervention was fully or partly meaningful and that the most meaningful activity was the phone calls with health care professionals working in the intervention. In the qualitative analysis, three categories describing participants' experiences of the intervention were formed: Acknowledgment in a disconcerting situation, Finding ways forward and Unmet expectations. A synthesis of quantitative and qualitative findings resulted in the overarching theme of meaningfulness as constituted by a lowered threshold to partnerships: support within reach, when needed. CONCLUSION Experiences of meaningfulness of the intervention were constituted by a lowered threshold to forming care partnerships, in which support was within reach, when needed. If the content of the intervention was not in accordance with individuals' needs or expectations, access alone did not suffice to constitute meaningfulness. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03404583; 19/01/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matilda Cederberg
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden.
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Psychosis Clinic, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Emmelie Barenfeld
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Section of Health and Rehabilitation, Occupational therapy, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lilas Ali
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Inger Ekman
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anneli Goulding
- Psychosis Clinic, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Andreas Fors
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Education, Development and Innovation, Region Västra Götaland, Primary Health Care, Research, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Roos R, Witteveen AB, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Barbui C, Bryant RA, Felez-Nobrega M, Figueiredo N, Kalisch R, Haro JM, McDaid D, Mediavilla R, Melchior M, Nicaise P, Park AL, Petri-Romão P, Purgato M, van Straten A, Tedeschi F, Underhill J, Sijbrandij M. Effectiveness of a scalable, remotely delivered stepped-care intervention to reduce symptoms of psychological distress among Polish migrant workers in the Netherlands: study protocol for the RESPOND randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:801. [PMID: 37919694 PMCID: PMC10623706 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05288-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected the mental health of international migrant workers (IMWs). IMWs experience multiple barriers to accessing mental health care. Two scalable interventions developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) were adapted to address some of these barriers: Doing What Matters in times of stress (DWM), a guided self-help web application, and Problem Management Plus (PM +), a brief facilitator-led program to enhance coping skills. This study examines whether DWM and PM + remotely delivered as a stepped-care programme (DWM/PM +) is effective and cost-effective in reducing psychological distress, among Polish migrant workers with psychological distress living in the Netherlands. METHODS The stepped-care DWM/PM + intervention will be tested in a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (RCT) among adult Polish migrant workers with self-reported psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; K10 > 15.9). Participants (n = 212) will be randomized into either the intervention group that receives DWM/PM + with psychological first aid (PFA) and care-as-usual (enhanced care-as-usual or eCAU), or into the control group that receives PFA and eCAU-only (1:1 allocation ratio). Baseline, 1-week post-DWM (week 7), 1-week post-PM + (week 13), and follow-up (week 21) self-reported assessments will be conducted. The primary outcome is psychological distress, assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS). Secondary outcomes are self-reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), resilience, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. In a process evaluation, stakeholders' views on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of DWM/PM + will be evaluated. DISCUSSION To our knowledge, this is one of the first RCTs that combines two scalable, psychosocial WHO interventions into a stepped-care programme for migrant populations. If proven to be effective, this may bridge the mental health treatment gap IMWs experience. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch trial register NL9630, 20/07/2021, https://www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/27052.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rinske Roos
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology and WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Anke B Witteveen
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology and WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - José Luis Ayuso-Mateos
- Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Psychiatry, La Princesa University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
| | - Corrado Barbui
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Richard A Bryant
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mireia Felez-Nobrega
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Natasha Figueiredo
- Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Sociale (ERES), Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Faculté de Médecine St Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Raffael Kalisch
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Josep Maria Haro
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David McDaid
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Roberto Mediavilla
- Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Psychiatry, La Princesa University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Melchior
- Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Sociale (ERES), Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Faculté de Médecine St Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Pablo Nicaise
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A-La Park
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Marianna Purgato
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Annemieke van Straten
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology and WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Federico Tedeschi
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology and WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Borrayo EA, Juarez-Colunga E, Kilbourn K, Waxmonsky J, Jacobson M, Okuyama S, Swaney R, Wamboldt FS, Karam S, Lopez Alvarez S, Jin X, Nguyen J. Stepped-care to improve mental health outcomes among underserved patients with lung and head and neck cancer. Psychooncology 2023; 32:1718-1726. [PMID: 37772984 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The comparative effectiveness study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03016403) assessed the effects of a stepped-care intervention versus usual care on mental health outcomes, including anxiety, depression, coping self-efficacy, emotional distress (anxiety and depression combined), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and perceived stress among underserved patients (i.e., low-income, uninsured, underinsured) with lung cancer (LC) and head-and-neck cancer (HNC). METHODS In a randomized controlled trial, we investigated if 147 patients who received the stepped-care intervention had better mental health outcomes compared to 139 patients who received usual care. Using an intent-to-treat approach, we analyzed outcomes with linear mixed models. RESULTS For the primary outcomes estimated mean differences (denoted by "Δ"), depression (Δ = 1.75, 95% CI = 0.52, 2.98, p = 0.01) and coping self-efficacy (Δ = -15.24, 95% CI = -26.12, -4.36, p = 0.01) were better for patients who received the intervention compared to patients who received usual care, but anxiety outcomes were not different. For secondary outcomes, emotional distress (Δ = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.68, 3.54, p =< 0.01) and HRQoL (Δ = -4.16 95% CI: -7.45, -0.87, p = 0.01) were better for patients who received the intervention compared to usual care patients, while perceived stress was not different across groups. CONCLUSIONS The stepped-care intervention influenced depression and coping self-efficacy, important outcomes for patients with acute illnesses like LC and HNC. Although differences in emotional distress met the minimally important differences (MID) previously reported, depression and HRQoL were not above the MID threshold. Our study is among a few to report differences in mental health outcomes for underserved LC and HNC patients after receiving a psychological intervention. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER NCT03016403.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelinn A Borrayo
- Department of Community & Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Latino Research and Policy Center, Colorado School of Public Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga
- Department of Biostatistics & Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Kristin Kilbourn
- Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Jeanette Waxmonsky
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Marty Jacobson
- Veterans Administration Medical Center, Grand Junction, Colorado, USA
| | - Sonia Okuyama
- Hematology-Oncology, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Robert Swaney
- Medical Oncology, Ascension St. Vincent Evansville Cancer Center, Newburgh, IN, USA
| | | | - Sana Karam
- Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Samantha Lopez Alvarez
- Latino Research and Policy Center, Colorado School of Public Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Xin Jin
- Department of Biostatistics & Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jennifer Nguyen
- Latino Research and Policy Center, Colorado School of Public Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Scodari BT, Chacko S, Matsumura R, Jacobson NC. Using machine learning to forecast symptom changes among subclinical depression patients receiving stepped care or usual care. J Affect Disord 2023; 340:213-220. [PMID: 37541599 PMCID: PMC10548339 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subclinical depression (SD) is a mental health disorder characterized by minor depressive symptoms. Most SD patients are treated in the primary practice, but many respond poorly to treatment at the expense of provider resources. Stepped care approaches are appealing for tiering SD care to efficiently allocate scarce resources while jointly optimizing patient outcomes. However, stepped care can be time inefficient, as some persons may respond poorly and be forced to suffer with their symptoms for prolonged periods. Machine learning can offer insight into optimal treatment paths and inform clinical recommendations for incident patients. METHODS As part of the Step-Dep trial, participants with SD were randomized to receive stepped care (N=96) or usual care (N=140). Machine learning was used to predict changes in depressive symptoms every three months over a year for each treatment group. RESULTS Tree-based models were effective in predicting PHQ-9 changes among patients who received stepped care (r=0.35-0.46, MAE=0.14-0.17) and usual care (r=0.34-0.49, MAE=0.15-0.18). Patients who received stepped care were more likely to reduce PHQ-9 scores if they had high PHQ-9 but low HADS-A scores at baseline, a low number of chronic illnesses, and an internal locus of control. LIMITATIONS Models may suffer from potential overfitting due to sample size limitations. CONCLUSION Our findings demonstrate the promise of machine learning for predicting changes in depressive symptoms for SD patients receiving different treatments. Trained models can intake incident patient information and predict outcomes to inform personalized care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno T Scodari
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA.
| | - Sarah Chacko
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Rina Matsumura
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Nicholas C Jacobson
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA; Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA; Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Barakat S, Burton AL, Cunich M, Hay P, Hazelton JL, Kim M, Lymer S, Madden S, Maloney D, Miskovic-Wheatley J, Rogers D, Russell J, Sidari M, Touyz S, Maguire S. A randomised controlled trial of clinician supported vs self-help delivery of online cognitive behaviour therapy for Bulimia Nervosa. Psychiatry Res 2023; 329:115534. [PMID: 37844353 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
High dropout rates and poor adherence associated with digital interventions have prompted research into modifications of these treatments to improve engagement and completion rates. This trial aimed to investigate the added benefit of clinician support when paired alongside a ten-session, online cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) self-help intervention for bulimia nervosa (BN). As part of a three-arm, phase II randomised controlled trial, 114 participants (16 years or over) with full or subthreshold BN were randomly assigned to complete the intervention in a self-help mode (with administrative researcher contact; n = 38), with adjunct clinician support (weekly 30-minute videoconferencing sessions; n = 37), or a no-treatment waitlist control (WLC; n = 39). Baseline to post-treatment (12-weeks) decreases in objective binge episode frequency were significantly greater for clinician-supported participants as compared to WLC, but not for self-help when compared to WLC. However, due to continued improvements for self-help across follow-up (24-weeks), both arms outperformed WLC when analysed as an overall rate of change across three timepoints. Clinician-supported participants outperformed self-help in regards to laxative use and dietary restraint. Our results demonstrate that good clinical outcomes can be achieved with a relatively brief online CBT-based program even in the absence of structured clinical support, indicating a possible overreliance upon clinician support as a primary adherence-facilitating mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Barakat
- InsideOut Institute for Eating Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Amy L Burton
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney NSW, Australia
| | - Michelle Cunich
- Sydney Health Economics Collaborative, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Boden Initiative, Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health (Central Clinical School), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Co-Lead, Implementation and Policy, Cardiovascular Initiative, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Phillipa Hay
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Mental Health Services South Western Sydney Local Health District, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
| | - Jessica L Hazelton
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marcellinus Kim
- Sydney Local Health District Mental Health Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sharyn Lymer
- Boden Initiative, Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health (Central Clinical School), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sloane Madden
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Danielle Maloney
- InsideOut Institute for Eating Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Jane Miskovic-Wheatley
- InsideOut Institute for Eating Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Daniel Rogers
- InsideOut Institute for Eating Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Janice Russell
- InsideOut Institute for Eating Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Sydney Local Health District Mental Health Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Morgan Sidari
- InsideOut Institute for Eating Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Queensland Eating Disorder Service, Metro North Hospital and Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Stephen Touyz
- InsideOut Institute for Eating Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Sarah Maguire
- InsideOut Institute for Eating Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wen A, Wolitzky-Taylor K, Gibbons RD, Craske M. A randomized controlled trial on using predictive algorithm to adapt level of psychological care for community college students: STAND triaging and adapting to level of care study protocol. Trials 2023; 24:508. [PMID: 37553688 PMCID: PMC10410881 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07441-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing interest in using personalized mental health care to treat disorders like depression and anxiety to improve treatment engagement and efficacy. This randomized controlled trial will compare a traditional symptom severity decision-making algorithm to a novel multivariate decision-making algorithm for triage to and adaptation of mental health care. The stratified levels of care include a self-guided online wellness program, coach-guided online cognitive behavioral therapy, and clinician-delivered psychotherapy with or without pharmacotherapy. The novel multivariate algorithm will be comprised of baseline (for triage and adaptation) and time-varying variables (for adaptation) in four areas: social determinants of mental health, early adversity and life stressors, predisposing, enabling, and need influences on health service use, and comprehensive mental health status. The overarching goal is to evaluate whether the multivariate algorithm improves adherence to treatment, symptoms, and functioning above and beyond the symptom-based algorithm. METHODS/DESIGN This trial will recruit a total of 1000 participants over the course of 5 years in the greater Los Angeles Metropolitan Area. Participants will be recruited from a highly diverse sample of community college students. For the symptom severity approach, initial triaging to level of care will be based on symptom severity, whereas for the multivariate approach, the triaging will be based on a comprehensive set of baseline measures. After the initial triaging, level of care will be adapted throughout the duration of the treatment, utilizing either symptom severity or multivariate statistical approaches. Participants will complete computerized assessments and self-report questionnaires at baseline and up to 40 weeks. The multivariate decision-making algorithm will be updated annually to improve predictive outcomes. DISCUSSION Results will provide a comparison on the traditional symptom severity decision-making and the novel multivariate decision-making with respect to treatment adherence, symptom improvement, and functional recovery. Moreover, the developed multivariate decision-making algorithms may be used as a template in other community college settings. Ultimately, findings will inform the practice of level of care triage and adaptation in psychological treatments, as well as the use of personalized mental health care broadly. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05591937, submitted August 2022, published October 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alainna Wen
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 28-216, CA, 90024, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Kate Wolitzky-Taylor
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 28-216, CA, 90024, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Robert D Gibbons
- Center for Health Statistics, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue MC 2007, Office W260, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Michelle Craske
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 28-216, CA, 90024, Los Angeles, USA.
- Department of Psychology, University of California - Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wolitzky-Taylor K, LeBeau R, Arnaudova I, Barnes-Horowitz N, Gong-Guy E, Fears S, Congdon E, Freimer N, Craske M. A Novel and Integrated Digitally Supported System of Care for Depression and Anxiety: Findings From an Open Trial. JMIR Ment Health 2023; 10:e46200. [PMID: 37486735 PMCID: PMC10407647 DOI: 10.2196/46200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global burden of anxiety and depression has created an urgent need for scalable approaches to increase access to evidence-based mental health care. The Screening and Treatment for Anxiety and Depression (STAND) system of care was developed to meet this need through the use of internet-connected devices for assessment and provision of treatment. STAND triages to level of care (monitoring only, digital therapy with coaches, digital therapy assisted by clinicians in training, and clinical care) and then continuously monitors symptoms to adapt level of care. Triaging and adaptation are based on symptom severity and suicide risk scores obtained from computerized adaptive testing administered remotely. OBJECTIVE This article discusses how the STAND system of care improves upon current clinical paradigms, and presents preliminary data on feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of STAND in a sample of US-based university students. METHODS US-based university students were recruited and enrolled in an open trial of the STAND system of care. Participants were triaged based on initial symptom severity derived from a computerized adaptive test and monitored over 40 weeks on anxiety, depression, and suicide risk to inform treatment adaptation and evaluate preliminary effectiveness. RESULTS Nearly 5000 students were screened and 516 received care. Depression and anxiety severity scores improved across all tiers (P<.001 in all cases). Suicide risk severity improved in the highest tier (ie, clinical care; P<.001). Acceptability and feasibility were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS STAND is a feasible and acceptable model of care that can reach large numbers of individuals. STAND showed preliminary effectiveness on all primary outcome measures. Current directions to improve STAND are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Wolitzky-Taylor
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Richard LeBeau
- Department of Psychology, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Inna Arnaudova
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Nora Barnes-Horowitz
- Department of Psychology, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Elizabeth Gong-Guy
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Scott Fears
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Greater Los Angeles Veterans Administration, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Eliza Congdon
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Nelson Freimer
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Michelle Craske
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Psychology, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cole R, Kynn M, Carberry A, Jones R, Parekh S, Whitehead E, Taylor J, Merollini K. Examining service utilisation and impact among consumers of a national mental health stepped care programme in Australia: a protocol using linked administrative data. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072404. [PMID: 37419645 PMCID: PMC10335474 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mental well-being is a global public health priority with increasing mental health conditions having substantial burden on individuals, health systems and society. 'Stepped care', where services are provided at an intensity to meet the changing needs of the consumer, is the chosen approach to mental health service delivery in primary healthcare in Australia for its efficiencies and patient outcomes; yet limited evidence exists on how the programme is being rolled out and its impact in practice. This protocol outlines a data linkage project to characterise and quantify healthcare service utilisation and impacts among a cohort of consumers of a national mental health stepped care programme in one region of Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Data linkage will be used to establish a retrospective cohort of consumers of mental health stepped care services between 1 July 2020 and 31 December 2021 in one primary healthcare region in Australia (n=approx. 12 710). These data will be linked with records from other healthcare service data sets (eg, hospitalisations, emergency department presentations, community-based state government-delivered mental healthcare, hospital costs). Four areas for analysis will include: (1) characterising the nature of mental health stepped care service use; (2) describing the cohort's sociodemographic and health characteristics; (3) quantifying broader service utilisation and associated economic costs; and (4) assessing the impact of mental health stepped care service utilisation on health and service outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approval from the Darling Downs Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREA/2020/QTDD/65518) has been granted. All data will be non-identifiable, and research findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and industry meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Cole
- School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
- Sunshine Coast Health Network, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mary Kynn
- School of Electrical Engineering, Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Angela Carberry
- Sunshine Coast Health Network, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rhian Jones
- Sunshine Coast Health Network, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Emma Whitehead
- Sunshine Coast Health Network, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jane Taylor
- School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Katharina Merollini
- School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mediavilla R, Felez-Nobrega M, McGreevy KR, Monistrol-Mula A, Bravo-Ortiz MF, Bayón C, Giné-Vázquez I, Villaescusa R, Muñoz-Sanjosé A, Aguilar-Ortiz S, Figueiredo N, Nicaise P, Park AL, Petri-Romão P, Purgato M, Witteveen AB, Underhill J, Barbui C, Bryant R, Kalisch R, Lorant V, McDaid D, Melchior M, Sijbrandij M, Haro JM, Ayuso-Mateos JL. Effectiveness of a mental health stepped-care programme for healthcare workers with psychological distress in crisis settings: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ MENTAL HEALTH 2023; 26:e300697. [PMID: 37263708 PMCID: PMC10254812 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based mental health interventions to support healthcare workers (HCWs) in crisis settings are scarce. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the capacity of a mental health intervention in reducing anxiety and depression symptoms in HCWs, relative to enhanced care as usual (eCAU), amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS We conducted an analyst-blind, parallel, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. We recruited HCWs with psychological distress from Madrid and Catalonia (Spain). The intervention arm received a stepped-care programme consisting of two WHO-developed interventions adapted for HCWs: Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (DWM) and Problem Management Plus (PM+). Each intervention lasted 5 weeks and was delivered remotely by non-specialist mental health providers. HCWs reporting psychological distress after DWM completion were invited to continue to PM+. The primary endpoint was self-reported anxiety/depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-Anxiety and Depression Scale) at week 21. FINDINGS Between 3 November 2021 and 31 March 2022, 115 participants were randomised to stepped care and 117 to eCAU (86% women, mean age 37.5). The intervention showed a greater decrease in anxiety/depression symptoms compared with eCAU at the primary endpoint (baseline-adjusted difference 4.4, 95% CI 2.1 to 6.7; standardised effect size 0.8, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS Brief stepped-care psychological interventions reduce anxiety and depression during a period of stress among HCWs. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Our results can inform policies and actions to protect the mental health of HCWs during major health crises and are potentially rapidly replicable in other settings where workers are affected by global emergencies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04980326.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Mediavilla
- Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mireia Felez-Nobrega
- Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Kerry R McGreevy
- Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Monistrol-Mula
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María-Fe Bravo-Ortiz
- Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario La Paz - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Bayón
- Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario La Paz - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Iago Giné-Vázquez
- Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rut Villaescusa
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ainoa Muñoz-Sanjosé
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario La Paz - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Natasha Figueiredo
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), Paris, France
| | - Pablo Nicaise
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A-La Park
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Marianna Purgato
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation - Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Anke B Witteveen
- Department of Clinical Neuro- and Developmental Psychology - WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - James Underhill
- Department of Clinical Neuro- and Developmental Psychology - WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Corrado Barbui
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation - Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Richard Bryant
- School of Psychology, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Raffael Kalisch
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC) - Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Vincent Lorant
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David McDaid
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Maria Melchior
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), Paris, France
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical Neuro- and Developmental Psychology - WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Josep Maria Haro
- Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Ayuso-Mateos
- Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mak WWS, Ng SM, Leung FHT. A Web-Based Stratified Stepped Care Platform for Mental Well-being (TourHeart+): User-Centered Research and Design. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e38504. [PMID: 36947112 PMCID: PMC10131708 DOI: 10.2196/38504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internet-based mental health interventions have been demonstrated to be effective in alleviating psychological distress and promoting mental well-being. However, real-world uptake and engagement of such interventions have been low. Rather than being stand-alone interventions, situating internet-based interventions under a stratified stepped care system can support users to continue with mental health practice and monitor their mental health status for timely services that are commensurate with their needs. A user-centered approach should be used in the development of such web-based platforms to understand the facilitators and barriers in user engagement to enhance platform uptake, usability, and adherence so it can support the users' continued adoption and practice of self-care for their mental health. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe the design process taken to develop a web-based stratified stepped care mental health platform, TourHeart+, using a user-centered approach that gathers target users' perceptions on mental self-care and feedback on the platform design and incorporates them into the design. METHODS The process involved a design workshop with the interdisciplinary development team, user interviews, and 2 usability testing sessions on the flow of registration and mental health assessment and the web-based self-help interventions of the platform. The data collected were summarized as descriptive statistics if appropriate and insights are extracted inductively. Qualitative data were extracted using a thematic coding approach. RESULTS In the design workshop, the team generated empathy maps and point-of-view statements related to the possible mental health needs of target users. Four user personas and related processes in the mental health self-care journey were developed based on user interviews. Design considerations were derived based on the insights drawn from the personas and mental health self-care journey. Survey results from 104 users during usability testing showed that the overall experience during registration and mental health assessment was friendly, and they felt cared for, although no statistically significant differences on preference ratings were found between using a web-based questionnaire tool and through an interactive chatbot, except that chatbot format was deemed more interesting. Facilitators of and barriers to registering the platform and completing the mental health assessment were identified through user feedback during simulation with mock-ups. In the usability testing for guided self-help interventions, users expressed pain points in course adherence, and corresponding amendments were made in the flow and design of the web-based courses. CONCLUSIONS The design process and findings presented in the study are important in developing a user-centric platform to optimize users' acceptance and usability of a web-based stratified stepped care platform with guided self-help interventions for mental well-being. Accounting for users' perceptions and needs toward mental health self-care and their experiences in the design process can enhance the usability of an evidence-based mental health platform on the web.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winnie W S Mak
- Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Sin Man Ng
- Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Florence H T Leung
- Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Biagianti B, Foti G, Di Liberto A, Bressi C, Brambilla P. CBT-informed psychological interventions for adult patients with anxiety and depression symptoms: A narrative review of digital treatment options. J Affect Disord 2023; 325:682-694. [PMID: 36690081 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Across a range of age, educational and clinical characteristics, adults experiencing depression and anxiety already use digital technology to manage their symptoms. Although several reviews and meta-analyses indicated feasibility and efficacy for adults with depression and anxiety, digital treatments are poorly accessed and disseminated. This review illustrates potentials and limitations of interventions that specifically leveraged unique features of digital technology and were grounded in the principles of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). METHODS This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. An electronic database search was conducted in October 2021. Peer-reviewed, English-language studies were included if i) they reported data from RCTs for adults aged 18+ who engaged with CBT-informed digital interventions targeting primarily depression and anxiety; ii) they used at least PHQ-9 or GAD-7 as standardized and validated assessment self-report measures for depression and anxiety. RESULTS Findings from 35 RCTs examining 33 interventions (25 internet-based, 6 mobile-based, a2 mobile/web) are discussed. The quality of the evidence differed widely as many small-scale RCTs reported only short-term feasibility and preliminary efficacy. Effects of CBT-informed digital interventions were substantially larger when compared to waitlist than active control conditions. Greater therapeutic benefits were observed for interventions that offered clinical assistance or were used in combination with other treatments. CONCLUSIONS CBT-informed digital interventions have accumulated enough scientific evidence to be positioned today as: i) a low-intensity tool for those with subclinical levels of symptoms; ii) a first step in a stepped-care approach to service delivery iii) a low-cost, easily accessible option for targeted preventive programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Biagianti
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | - Cinzia Bressi
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Paolo Brambilla
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Herbert KL, Brennan JMM. Use of Mobile Apps & Stepped-Care Model for Treating Depression in Primary Care. Prim Care 2023; 50:11-19. [PMID: 36822721 DOI: 10.1016/j.pop.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Stepped-care (SC) models have been adopted in primary care settings as a method for treating mental health conditions within primary care. In a SC model, a patient's symptoms are assessed, and an intervention is prescribed that matches the severity of symptoms. Thus, the SC model offers a variety of steps and levels of treatment that range from low to high intensity. Progression in treatment is monitored on a weekly basis and patients are stepped up or down in level of care depending on their clinical response to the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista L Herbert
- VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 Southwest US Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Moskowitz JT, Jackson K, Freedman ME, Grote VE, Kwok I, Schuette SA, Cheung EO, Addington EL. Positive Psychological Intervention Effects on Depression: Positive Emotion Does Not Mediate Intervention Impact in a Sample with Elevated Depressive Symptoms. AFFECTIVE SCIENCE 2023; 4:163-173. [PMID: 37070017 PMCID: PMC10104977 DOI: 10.1007/s42761-022-00140-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Positive psychological interventions (PPIs), programs that specifically target positive emotions, cognitions, and behaviors, have been shown to reduce depression and improve other aspects of psychological well-being. However, potential pathways linking PPIs to better outcomes have been under-explored. In this paper, we report the results of a randomized trial of a self-guided online delivered PPI called MARIGOLD (Mobile Affect Regulation Intervention with the Goal of Lowering Depression). Participants with elevated depression were randomized to receive MARIGOLD (n = 539) or an emotion reporting control condition (n = 63). In addition to testing direct effects of the intervention on depressive symptoms, we explored whether positive or negative emotion-operationalized as past day, past week, reactivity, or flexibility-mediated the intervention impact on depression. Results demonstrated that participants in the MARIGOLD condition had reduced depressive symptoms compared to controls and, although the effect did not reach statistical significance, reductions in past day negative emotion appeared to mediate this effect. Contrary to hypotheses, the intervention did not increase positive emotion compared to the control condition. Discussion focuses on the need for future studies to continue investigating the mechanisms of action for PPIs with emphasis on theoretically-based measurement and operationalization of emotion and other potential mediators to maximize the ultimate impact of PPIs on psychological well-being. Clinical Trials registration #NCT02861755.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith T. Moskowitz
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, School of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg, Chicago, IL USA
| | - K. Jackson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, School of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg, Chicago, IL USA
| | - M. E. Freedman
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg, Chicago, IL USA
| | - V. E. Grote
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, School of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg, Chicago, IL USA
| | - I. Kwok
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg, Chicago, IL USA
| | - S. A. Schuette
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC USA
| | - E. O. Cheung
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, School of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg, Chicago, IL USA
| | - E. L. Addington
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, School of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg, Chicago, IL USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kim HK, Banik S, Husain MI, Tang V, Levitan R, Daskalakis ZJ, Kloiber S. Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:85. [PMID: 36732746 PMCID: PMC9893602 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04379-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Structured care pathways (SCPs) consist of treatment algorithms that patients advance through with the goal of achieving remission or response. These SCPs facilitate the application of current evidence and adequate treatment, which potentially benefit patients with mood disorders. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an updated synthesis of SCPs for the treatment of depressive disorders and bipolar disorder (BD). METHOD PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase were searched through June 2022 for peer-reviewed studies examining outcomes of SCPs. Eligibility criteria included being published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language, reporting of intervention used in the SCP, and having quantitative outcomes. Studies Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess quality of RCTs. RESULTS Thirty-six studies including 15,032 patients were identified for qualitative synthesis. Six studies included patients with BD. The studies were highly heterogeneous in design, outcome measures, and algorithms. More than half of the studies reported superiority of SCPs over treatment as usual, suggesting that the standardized structure and consistent monitoring inherent in SCPs may be contributing to their effectiveness. We also found accumulating evidence supporting feasibility of SCPs in different settings, although dropout rates were generally higher in SCPs. The studies included were limited to being published in peer-reviewed journals in English language. The heterogeneity of studies did not allow quantitative evaluation. CONCLUSIONS The findings of our study suggest that SCPs are equally or more effective than treatment as usual in depression and BD. Further studies are required to ascertain their effectiveness, particularly for BD, and to identify factors that influence their feasibility and success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Kyunghee Kim
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Suman Banik
- grid.440972.c0000 0004 0415 1244Yorkville University, Fredericton, NB Canada
| | - Muhammad Ishrat Husain
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada ,grid.155956.b0000 0000 8793 5925Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, 100 Stokes Street, Toronto, ON M6H 1J4 Canada
| | - Victor Tang
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Robert Levitan
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada ,grid.155956.b0000 0000 8793 5925Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, 100 Stokes Street, Toronto, ON M6H 1J4 Canada
| | - Zafiris J. Daskalakis
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada ,grid.155956.b0000 0000 8793 5925Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, 100 Stokes Street, Toronto, ON M6H 1J4 Canada ,grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
| | - Stefan Kloiber
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, 100 Stokes Street, Toronto, ON, M6H 1J4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sung ML, Viera A, Esserman D, Tong G, Davidson D, Aiudi S, Bailey GL, Buchanan AL, Buchelli M, Jenkins M, John B, Kolakowski J, Lame A, Murphy SM, Porter E, Simone L, Paris M, Rash CJ, Edelman EJ. Contingency Management and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Support Services (CoMPASS): A hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study to promote HIV risk reduction among people who inject drugs. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 125:107037. [PMID: 36460267 PMCID: PMC9918697 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HIV disproportionally affects persons who inject drugs (PWID), but engagement with HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is low. We describe the rationale and study design for a new study, "Contingency Management and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Adherence Support Services (CoMPASS)," a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial to promote HIV risk reduction among PWID. METHODS In four community-based programs in the northeastern United States, PrEP-eligible PWID (target n = 526) are randomized to treatment as usual or Contingency Management (CM) and, as indicated, stepped up to PrEP Adherence Support Services (CoMPASS) over 24 weeks. During CM sessions, participants receive timely tangible rewards for verifiable activities demonstrating 1) PrEP initiation and adherence, and 2) engagement with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and other OUD-related care. Participants who do not have high levels of biomarker-confirmed PrEP adherence at week 12 will be stepped up to receive PrEP Adherence Support Services (PASS) consisting of strengths-based case management over 12 weeks. Interventions are delivered by trained PrEP navigators, staff embedded within the respective sites. The primary outcome is sustained PrEP adherence by dried blood spot testing at 24 weeks. To inform future implementation, we are conducting implementation-focused process evaluations throughout the clinical trial. CONCLUSIONS Results from this protocol are anticipated to yield novel findings regarding the impact and scalability of CoMPASS to promote HIV prevention among PWID in partnership with community-based organizations. http://ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04738825.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minhee L Sung
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA; Yale Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Adam Viera
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA; Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Denise Esserman
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Guangyu Tong
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Daniel Davidson
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sherry Aiudi
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Genie L Bailey
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Stanley Street Treatment and Resources (SSTAR) Inc., Fall River, MA, USA
| | - Ashley L Buchanan
- College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice University of Rhode Island, South Kingston, RI, USA
| | | | - Mark Jenkins
- Connecticut Harm Reduction Alliance, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Betsey John
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Sean M Murphy
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Porter
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Laura Simone
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Manuel Paris
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Carla J Rash
- UConn Health School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - E Jennifer Edelman
- Yale Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA; Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Morse AK, Sercombe J, Askovic M, Fisher A, Marel C, Chatterton ML, Kay-Lambkin F, Barrett E, Sunderland M, Harvey L, Peach N, Teesson M, Mills KL. Systematic review of the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of stepped-care interventions for the prevention and treatment of problematic substance use. J Subst Abuse Treat 2023; 144:108928. [PMID: 36370469 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stepped-care is a commonly recommended and implemented care model across health care domains, including substance use. Despite their presumed efficient allocation of treatment resources, a current and robust evidence synthesis is needed on the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stepped-care for substance use. METHODS This systematic review analyzed articles describing evaluations of stepped-care models that measured the use of acutely psychoactive substances (i.e., alcohol, cannabis, hallucinogens, inhalants, opioids, sedatives, hypnotics, anxiolytics, and stimulants) as a primary or secondary outcome, in participants over 18 years old. The analysis investigated model and participant characteristics associated with treatment outcomes. RESULTS The study team conducted a search of five databases of literature (PsychINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus) published between January 1, 2010, and November 1, 2020. The search yielded 1051 unique articles, 19 of which were included in the analysis. The studies had considerable variability in sample sizes (n = 18-2310), time to follow-up (4.5 months to 3 years), and retention rates (35.1-100 %). Studies examined outcomes for either alcohol alone (n = 9), alcohol and other drug use (n = 9), or drug use alone (n = 1). Most studies (n = 13;) were rated as good quality. Three (15.8 %) were rated as fair and three (15.8 %) were rated as poor quality. The evidence regarding the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stepped-care approaches is limited, but four of seven studies found that adaptive-care interventions delivered in the context of other systemic interventions produced greater benefit than control conditions in relation to at least one alcohol-related outcome. We have insufficient evidence to determine whether the modes or intensity of interventions included in the models, or decision rules used to step people up or down to differing levels of care, have an impact on outcome. CONCLUSION Heterogeneity between studies with regard to model and evaluation design limited the degree to which the analysis could draw robust conclusions. Sample recruitment and statistical power are particular challenges, and the field needs more innovative evaluation designs to assess the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of stepped-care models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashleigh K Morse
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Level 6 Jane Foss Russell Building, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Jayden Sercombe
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Level 6 Jane Foss Russell Building, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Mina Askovic
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Level 6 Jane Foss Russell Building, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Alana Fisher
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Level 6 Jane Foss Russell Building, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Christina Marel
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Level 6 Jane Foss Russell Building, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Mary-Lou Chatterton
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong Waterfront Campus, Locked Bag 20001, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - Frances Kay-Lambkin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Newcastle Callaghan NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Emma Barrett
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Level 6 Jane Foss Russell Building, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Matthew Sunderland
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Level 6 Jane Foss Russell Building, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Logan Harvey
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Level 6 Jane Foss Russell Building, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Natalie Peach
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Level 6 Jane Foss Russell Building, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Maree Teesson
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Level 6 Jane Foss Russell Building, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Katherine L Mills
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Level 6 Jane Foss Russell Building, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Balcombe L, De Leo D. Evaluation of the Use of Digital Mental Health Platforms and Interventions: Scoping Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 20:ijerph20010362. [PMID: 36612685 PMCID: PMC9819791 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing use of digital mental health (DMH) platforms and digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) is hindered by uncertainty over effectiveness, quality and usability. There is a need to identify the types of available evidence in this domain. AIM This study is a scoping review identifying evaluation of the (1) DMH platform/s used; and (2) DMHI/s applied on the DMH platform/s. METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guided the review process. Empirical studies that focused on evaluation of the use and application of DMH platforms were included from journal articles (published 2012-2022). A literature search was conducted using four electronic databases (Scopus, ScienceDirect, Sage and ACM Digital Library) and two search engines (PubMed and Google Scholar). RESULTS A total of 6874 nonduplicate records were identified, of which 144 were analyzed and 22 met the inclusion criteria. The review included general/unspecified mental health and/or suicidality indications (n = 9, 40.9%), followed by depression (n = 5, 22.7%), psychosis (n = 3, 13.6%), anxiety and depression (n = 2, 9.1%), as well as anxiety, depression and suicidality (n = 1, 4.5%), loneliness (n = 1, 4.5%), and addiction (n = 1, 4.5%). There were 11 qualitative studies (50%), 8 quantitative studies (36.4%), and 3 mixed-methods studies (n = 3, 13.6%). The results contained 11 studies that evaluated the DMH platform/s and 11 studies that evaluated the DMHI/s. The studies focused on feasibility, usability, engagement, acceptability and effectiveness. There was a small amount of significant evidence (1 in each 11), notably the (cost-)effectiveness of a DMHI with significant long-term impact on anxiety and depression in adults. CONCLUSION The empirical research demonstrates the feasibility of DMH platforms and DMHIs. To date, there is mostly heterogeneous, preliminary evidence for their effectiveness, quality and usability. However, a scalable DMHI reported effectiveness in treating adults' anxiety and depression. The scope of effectiveness may be widened through targeted strategies, for example by engaging independent young people.
Collapse
|
31
|
Schwartz H, McCusker J, Da Costa D, Singh S, Baskaran S, Belzile E, Van Roost K. A pilot randomized controlled trial of a lay telephone coaching and web-based intervention for postpartum depression and anxiety: The MPOWER study. Internet Interv 2022; 31:100597. [PMID: 36698424 PMCID: PMC9867972 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health problems are frequent in the postpartum period, but accessible treatment options are lacking. The MPOWER study investigated whether the use of trained lay coaches could increase the uptake and effectiveness of a web-based intervention (WBI) for women with postpartum depression and/or anxiety. OBJECTIVES First, to compare the feasibility and acceptability of a WBI for women with postpartum depression and anxiety, with and without the addition of telephone coaching calls. Second, to estimate the effectiveness of the WBI at decreasing symptoms of depression and anxiety at 6 months, with and without coaching calls. METHODS We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) that enrolled women who had recently given birth and had mild to moderate postpartum depression and/or anxiety. Study participants were provided access to the WBI. Women randomized to the intervention group also received up to 7 telephone coaching calls during the 6 months of follow up. We evaluated the feasibility of the intervention through participants' usage of the WBI, as well as the completion and fidelity of planned coach calls. We measured acceptability via two questionnaires on the usability of the WBI and participant satisfaction with the intervention. To determine the potential effectiveness of the intervention, the primary outcomes were defined as symptoms of depression and anxiety at 6 months and adjusted mean differences between groups for these outcomes were estimated using linear regression models. RESULTS We recruited 52 participants (25 intervention; 27 control). At 6 months, 88 % (22/25) of participants randomized to the intervention arm and 59 % (16/27) of participants randomized to the control arm remained in the study. The intervention group had an average of 11 (95 % CI: [5, 18]) more website logins than the control group. Intervention group participants completed a mean of 6.2 coaching calls with high fidelity. The estimates of the effect of the intervention on mental health outcomes at 6-months were imprecise but point estimates and confidence intervals were consistent with a moderate beneficial effect of the intervention on both symptoms of depression and anxiety (fully adjusted effects sizes: 0.51 (95 % CI: [-0.14, 1.17]) and 0.56 (95 % CI: [-0.09, 1.22]), respectively). CONCLUSIONS WBIs with coaching are feasible, acceptable, and potentially effective treatment options for women with mild to moderate postpartum depression and/or anxiety. The addition of coaching calls markedly increased engagement with the WBI, but a larger RCT is needed to determine the effectiveness of such an intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Schwartz
- St. Mary's Hospital Center, Montréal, QC, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada,Corresponding author at: St. Mary's Hospital Center, Department of Psychiatry, 3830 Avenue Lacombe, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1M5, Canada.
| | - Jane McCusker
- St. Mary's Research Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Santokh Singh
- St. Mary's Hospital Center, Montréal, QC, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Eric Belzile
- St. Mary's Research Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Kaya Van Roost
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Barakat S, Maguire S. Accessibility of Psychological Treatments for Bulimia Nervosa: A Review of Efficacy and Engagement in Online Self-Help Treatments. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 20:ijerph20010119. [PMID: 36612445 PMCID: PMC9819826 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Bulimia nervosa is an eating disorder characterised by marked impairment to one's physical health and social functioning, as well as high rates of chronicity and comorbidity. This literature review aims to summarise existing academic research related to the symptom profile of BN, the costs and burden imposed by the illness, barriers to the receipt of care, and the evidence base for available psychological treatments. As a consequence of well-documented difficulties in accessing evidence-based treatments for eating disorders, efforts have been made towards developing innovative, diverse channels to deliver treatment, with several of these attempting to harness the potential of digital platforms. In response to the increasing number of trials investigating the utility of online treatments, this paper provides a critical review of previous attempts to examine digital interventions in the treatment of eating disorders. The results of a focused literature review are presented, including a detailed synthesis of a knowledgeable selection of high-quality articles with the aim of providing an update on the current state of research in the field. The results of the review highlight the potential for online self-help treatments to produce moderately sized reductions in core behavioural and cognitive symptoms of eating disorders. However, concern is raised regarding the methodological limitations of previous research in the field, as well as the high rates of dropout and poor adherence reported across most studies. The review suggests directions for future research, including the need to replicate previous findings using rigorous study design and methodology, as well as further investigation regarding the utility of clinician support and interactive digital features as potential mechanisms for offsetting low rates of engagement with online treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Barakat
- InsideOut Institute for Eating Disorders, University of Sydney, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown 2050, Australia
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, Australia
| | - Sarah Maguire
- InsideOut Institute for Eating Disorders, University of Sydney, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sheppler CR, Edelmann AC, Firemark AJ, Sugar CA, Lynch FL, Dickerson JF, Miranda JM, Clarke GN, Asarnow JR. Stepped care for suicide prevention in teens and young adults: Design and methods of a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 123:106959. [PMID: 36228984 PMCID: PMC10832890 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suicide is the second‑leading cause of death among adolescents and young adults in the United States, with rates rising over much of the last decade. The design, testing, and implementation of interventions to prevent suicide in this population is a public health priority. This manuscript outlines the design and methods for a research study that compares two interventions aimed at reducing suicide and suicide attempts in youth. METHODS We will enroll 300 youth aged 12-24 at high risk for suicide in this randomized controlled parallel group superiority trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two study arms: (1) Zero Suicide Quality Improvement (ZSQI) implemented within the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) health system, or (2) ZSQI plus a stepped care intervention for suicide prevention (SC-SP), where the services offered (including care management and dialectical behavior therapy [DBT]) increase based on risk level. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, as well as 3-, 6-, and 12-months post randomization. The study was conceptualized and designed collaboratively by investigators at UCLA and KPNW. RESULTS To be reported in future manuscripts. CONCLUSION The main objective of the study is to determine whether the SC-SP intervention is superior to ZSQI with regard to lowering rates of fatal and nonfatal suicide attempts. Interventions that incorporate the latest research need to be designed and tested under controlled conditions to make progress toward the goal of achieving zero suicide. The results from this trial will directly inform those efforts. TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS gov, NCT03092271, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03092271https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01379027.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina R Sheppler
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, United States of America.
| | - Anna C Edelmann
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, United States of America.
| | - Alison J Firemark
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, United States of America.
| | - Catherine A Sugar
- University of California, Los Angeles, Departments of Biostatistics, Statistics, and Psychiatry, United States of America.
| | - Frances L Lynch
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, United States of America.
| | - John F Dickerson
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, United States of America.
| | - Jeanne M Miranda
- University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, United States of America.
| | - Gregory N Clarke
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, United States of America.
| | - Joan R Asarnow
- University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kohler P, Agot K, Njuguna IN, Dyer J, Badia J, Jiang W, Beima-Sofie K, Chhun N, Inwani I, Shah SK, Richardson BA, Chaktoura N, John-Stewart G. Data-informed stepped care to improve youth engagement in HIV care in Kenya: a protocol for a cluster randomised trial of a health service intervention. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062134. [PMID: 36316073 PMCID: PMC9628651 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adolescents and youth living with HIV (AYLHIV) have lower retention in care, adherence to treatment, and viral suppression compared with adults. Stepped care is a process by which clients are assigned to increasingly intensive services or 'steps' according to level of need. Differentiated care, in which stable clients access less frequent services, can be combined with stepped care to align needs and preferences of youth to promote optimal engagement in care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This hybrid type I effectiveness implementation cluster randomised trial aims to evaluate a data-informed stepped care (DiSC) intervention for AYLHIV. AYLHIV ages 10-24 receiving care at 24 HIV treatment facilities in Kisumu, Homabay and Migori counties in Kenya will be enrolled. Twelve facilities will be randomised to the DiSC intervention, and 12 will provide standard care. A clinical assignment tool developed by the study team will be used at intervention sites to assign AYLHIV to one of four steps based on risk for loss to follow-up: differentiated care, standard care, counselling services or intensive support services. The primary clinical outcome is retention in care, specifically missed visits (failure to return within 30 days for any visit) and 12-month loss to follow-up. Implementation outcomes are based on the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework. Proportions of missed visits will be compared using mixed effect models clustered by facility and participant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by the University of Washington Institutional Review Board (STUDY00011096), Maseno University Ethical Review Committee (MUERC/00917/20) and the Kenya National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (444824). AYLHIV provide written informed consent when legally permitted, or assent with caregiver permission for minors. Study staff will work with a Community Advisory Board, including youth members, to disseminate results via discussions, presentations, journal publications and local or international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05007717.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Kohler
- Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kawango Agot
- Impact Research and Development Organisation, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Irene N Njuguna
- Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jessica Dyer
- Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jacinta Badia
- Impact Research and Development Organisation, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Wenwen Jiang
- Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Nok Chhun
- Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Irene Inwani
- Pediatrics, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Seema K Shah
- Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Barbra A Richardson
- Global Health, Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nahida Chaktoura
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Grace John-Stewart
- Global Health, Epidemiology, Pediatrics, Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sohal A, Murphy D. A longitudinal analysis of person‐centred therapy with suicidal clients. COUNSELLING & PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/capr.12588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amrita Sohal
- School of EducationUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - David Murphy
- School of EducationUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Aurizki GE, Wilson I. Nurse-led task-shifting strategies to substitute for mental health specialists in primary care: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Pract 2022; 28:e13046. [PMID: 35285121 PMCID: PMC9786659 DOI: 10.1111/ijn.13046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM The study aimed to synthesize evidence comparing task-shifting interventions led by general practice nurses and mental health specialists in improving mental health outcomes of adults in primary care. DESIGN This study used a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. DATA SOURCES Articles from the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane EBM Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection, and ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis published between 2000 and 2020 were included. REVIEW METHODS The review was arranged based on the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). RESULTS Twelve articles met the eligibility criteria. Eight studies revealed that nurse-led intervention was significantly superior to its comparator. The review identified three major themes: training and supervision, single and collaborative care and psychosocial treatments. CONCLUSION Nurses could be temporarily employed to provide mental health services in the absence of mental health specialists as long as appropriate training and supervision was provided. This finding should be interpreted with caution due to the high risk of bias in the studies reviewed and the limited generalisability of their findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gading Ekapuja Aurizki
- Faculty of NursingUniversitas AirlanggaSurabayaEast JavaIndonesia
- Advanced Leadership for Professional Practice (Nursing) ProgrammeThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Ian Wilson
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health SciencesThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chatterton ML, Harris M, Burgess P, Fletcher S, Spittal MJ, Faller J, Palmer VJ, Chondros P, Bassilios B, Pirkis J, Gunn J, Mihalopoulos C. Economic evaluation of a Decision Support Tool to guide intensity of mental health care in general practice: the Link-me pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:236. [PMID: 36109694 PMCID: PMC9479277 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01839-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This paper reports on the cost-effectiveness evaluation of Link-me – a digitally supported, systematic approach to triaging care for depression and anxiety in primary care that uses a patient-completed Decision Support Tool (DST).
Methods
The economic evaluation was conducted alongside a parallel, stratified individually randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing prognosis-matched care to usual care at six- and 12-month follow-up. Twenty-three general practices in three Australian Primary Health Networks recruited 1,671 adults (aged 18 – 75 years), predicted by the DST to have minimal/mild or severe depressive or anxiety symptoms in three months. The minimal/mild prognostic group was referred to low intensity services. Participants screened in the severe prognostic group were offered high intensity care navigation, a model of care coordination. The outcome measures included in this evaluation were health sector costs (including development and delivery of the DST, care navigation and other healthcare services used) and societal costs (health sector costs plus lost productivity), psychological distress [Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)] and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EuroQol 5-dimension quality of life questionnaire with Australian general population preference weights applied. Costs were valued in 2018–19 Australian dollars (A$).
Results
Across all participants, the health sector incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of Link-me per point decrease in K10 at six months was estimated at $1,082 (95% CI $391 to $6,204) increasing to $2,371 (95% CI $191 to Dominated) at 12 months. From a societal perspective, the ICER was estimated at $1,257/K10 point decrease (95% CI Dominant to Dominated) at six months, decreasing to $1,217 (95% CI Dominant to Dominated) at 12 months. No significant differences in QALYs were detected between trial arms and the intervention was dominated (less effective, more costly) based on the cost/QALY ICER.
Conclusions
The Link-me approach to stepped mental health care would not be considered cost-effective utilising a cost/QALY outcome metric commonly adopted by health technology assessment agencies. Rather, Link-me showed a trend toward cost-effectiveness by providing improvement in mental health symptoms, measured by the K10, at an additional cost.
Trial registration
Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ANZCTRN 12617001333303.
Collapse
|
38
|
Taylor AK, Palmer VJ, Davidson S, Fletcher S, Gunn J. Patient reported self-help strategies and the perceived benefits for managing sub-threshold depressive symptoms: A nested qualitative study of Australian primary care attendees. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e2097-e2108. [PMID: 34766664 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthreshold depression is common in primary care, but there is little information about the self-help strategies that patients use and the perceived benefits of these. AIM This study sought to elicit the self-help strategies that primary care attendees identified as beneficial for the self-management of subthreshold depressive symptoms and the implications for general practitioners. METHOD Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 14 people (April-May 2017) from the Target-D randomised controlled trial (RCT). Target-D investigated whether using a patient-centred clinical prediction tool and an e-health platform to match mental health management options to prognosis was beneficial for improving depressive symptoms at 3 months compared to usual care. Interviews were thematically analysed to identify self-help strategies and their perceived benefits. RESULTS Four overarching domains for the self-management strategies were identified: social, cognitive, behavioural and restorative. Interviewees reported using strategies across multiple domains, which included undertaking enjoyable, immersive activities, that provided relief from automatic negative thoughts and had a perceived cognitive benefit. Differences in the perceived sense of agency were noted around the self-regulation of mood, which indicated more explicit direction to patient-identified self-help management strategies by general practitioners for some may be of benefit in routine care. CONCLUSION Some of the reported self-management strategies aligned with evidence-based approaches such as physical activity and mindfulness for mental health symptom management. These findings can inform low-intensity interventions within stepped care models for mental health in primary care, social prescribing models and, help to guide the management of patients by GPs for subthreshold depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Kathryn Taylor
- School of Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Victoria J Palmer
- The ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation, The Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sandra Davidson
- The Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan Fletcher
- The Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane Gunn
- The ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation, The Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Real world effectiveness of digital mental health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272162. [PMID: 35980879 PMCID: PMC9387818 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented need for mental health services that can be remotely delivered. Digital mental health services that offer personalized care recommendations hold promise to efficiently expand service, but evidence of the effectiveness of digitally delivered mental health care in real-world settings remains limited.
Methods
A retrospective cohort of adults (N = 1,852) receiving care through a digital mental health platform with elevated depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic was analyzed to estimate changes in subjective well-being and clinical improvement in depressive symptoms (using the World Health Organization-Five [WHO-5] Well-Being Index), as well as compare the relative effectiveness and cost of different care utilization patterns.
Results
The average improvement in WHO-5 score was 10.1 points (CI: 9.3–10.9, p<0.001) at follow-up, which constituted a medium effect size (d = 0.73). The odds of clinical improvement in depressive symptoms were significantly greater among those who utilized telecoaching (aOR = 2.45, 95%CI: 1.91–3.15, p < .001), teletherapy (aOR = 2.01, 95%CI: 1.57–2.57, p < .001), and both services (aOR = 2.28, 95%CI: 1.67–3.11, p < .001) compared to those who only utilized assessments, adjusting for baseline WHO-5 score, age, sex, and number of days between baseline and follow-up assessments. The average estimated cost of care for telecoaching was $124 per individual, which was significantly less than teletherapy ($413) or both services ($559).
Conclusion
Digitally delivered care with a therapist and/or coach was effective in improving subjective well-being and clinical improvement in depressive symptoms. Although clinical outcomes were similar across utilization patterns, the cost of care was lowest among those utilizing telecoaching.
Collapse
|
40
|
McCusker J, Lambert SD, Ciampi A, Jones JM, Li M, Yaffe MJ, Pelland ME, Belzile E, de Raad M. Trained lay coaches and self-care cognitive-behavioral tools improve depression outcomes. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2747-2756. [PMID: 35397942 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Identify the key effective components of a depression self-care intervention. METHODS Secondary analysis of data from 3 studies that demonstrated effectiveness of a similar depression self-care intervention (n = 275): 2 studies among patients with chronic physical conditions and 1 among cancer survivors. The studies used similar tools, and telephone-based lay coaching. Depression remission and reduction at 6 months were assessed with either PHQ-9 (chronic condition cohorts) or CES-D (cancer survivor cohort). Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze data when the interaction p-value with cohort was < 0.10. RESULTS The 3 coached cohorts achieved better depression outcomes than usual care. The combination of coaching and joint use of 2 tools based on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) was associated with depression remission and reduction among chronic condition cohorts but not among cancer survivors. Neither the number nor the length of coach calls were associated with outcomes in pooled data. CONCLUSIONS Trained lay coaching and use of CBT-based self-care tools were associated with improved depression outcomes in patients with chronic conditions but not among cancer survivors. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Trained lay coaching and CBT tools are key components of depression self-care interventions. Further research is needed on the effective components in cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane McCusker
- St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Lacombe Ave., Hayes Pavilion, Suite 4720, Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada; Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, 3830 Lacombe Ave., Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, 1020 Pine Ave, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A2, Canada.
| | - Sylvie D Lambert
- St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Lacombe Ave., Hayes Pavilion, Suite 4720, Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada; Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, 3830 Lacombe Ave., Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada; Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, 80 Sherbrooke St W, Suite1800, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2M7, Canada.
| | - Antonio Ciampi
- St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Lacombe Ave., Hayes Pavilion, Suite 4720, Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada; Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, 3830 Lacombe Ave., Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, 1020 Pine Ave, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A2, Canada.
| | - Jennifer M Jones
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada; Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Toronto M5G 2C1, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Madeline Li
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada; Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, Toronto M5G 2C1, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Mark J Yaffe
- St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Lacombe Ave., Hayes Pavilion, Suite 4720, Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada; Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, 3830 Lacombe Ave., Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Ch. de la Côte-des-Neiges, Montréal, Quebec H3S 1Z1, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital Center, 3830 Lacombe Ave, Hayes Pavilion, Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Marie-Eve Pelland
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1000, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec H2X 0C1, Canada.
| | - Eric Belzile
- St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Lacombe Ave., Hayes Pavilion, Suite 4720, Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada; Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, 3830 Lacombe Ave., Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Manon de Raad
- St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Lacombe Ave., Hayes Pavilion, Suite 4720, Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada; Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre, 3830 Lacombe Ave., Montreal H3T 1M5, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
"Not shifting, but sharing": stakeholders' perspectives on mental health task-shifting in Indonesia. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:165. [PMID: 35751061 PMCID: PMC9229425 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00945-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Task-shifting, the distribution of tasks among health workers to address health workforce shortage, has been widely used to tackle mental health treatment gaps. However, its implementation in Indonesia has still been rarely explored. This study aimed to explore stakeholders’ perspectives on the implementation of mental health task-shifting to nurses in Indonesia's primary health care. Methods An exploratory descriptive approach using in-depth interviews and focused group discussions (FGDs) was used. The study involved 19 stakeholders from the government's ministry directorates, professional organisations, and mental health practitioners. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results Three themes emerged namely, task-shifting feasibility and acceptability, shared task implementation, and nurse role enhancement issues, with 14 sub-themes. Conclusions Task-shifting on mental health issues in the eye of Indonesian stakeholders is viewed as a matter of sharing and collaboration. Implementation of task-shifting in Indonesia may require policies in place and political will across stakeholders. Further scrutiny on task-shifting implementation is needed by considering the local context and national environment.
Collapse
|
42
|
Development and application of criteria to evaluate written CBT self-help interventions adopted by Improving Access to Psychological Therapies services. COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPIST 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s1754470x22000241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Guided CBT self-help represents a low-intensity intervention to deliver evidence-based psychological therapy within the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme. Best practice guidance highlighting characteristics associated with CBT self-help is available to help services reach decisions regarding which interventions to adopt. However, at present a single process to evaluate written CBT self-help interventions informed by guidance is lacking. This study reports on the development of a standardised criteria-driven process that can be used to determine the extent written CBT self-help interventions are consistent with guidance regarding the fundamental characteristics of low-intensity CBT and high-quality written patient information. Following development, the process was piloted on 51 IAPT services, with 23 interventions identified as representing free-to-use written CBT self-help interventions. Overall, inter-rater reliability was acceptable. Following application of the criteria framework, 14 (61%) were considered suitable to be recommended for use within the IAPT programme. This pilot supports the development and potential utility of an independent criteria-driven process to appraise the suitability of written workbook-based CBT self-help interventions for use within the IAPT programme.
Key learning aims
(1)
To recognise the range of written low-intensity CBT self-help interventions currently used within IAPT services.
(2)
To identify separate criteria associated with high-quality written CBT self-help interventions.
(3)
To use identified criteria to develop a framework to evaluate written workbook based low-intensity CBT self-help interventions for use within the IAPT programme.
(4)
To evaluate inter-rater reliability of the criteria framework to evaluate the quality and appropriateness of written workbook based low-intensity CBT self-help interventions used within IAPT services.
Collapse
|
43
|
Wolf RT, Puggaard LB, Pedersen MMA, Pagsberg AK, Silverman WK, Correll CU, Plessen KJ, Neumer SP, Gyrd-Hansen D, Thastum M, Bilenberg N, Thomsen PH, Jeppesen P. Systematic identification and stratification of help-seeking school-aged youth with mental health problems: a novel approach to stage-based stepped-care. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2022; 31:781-793. [PMID: 33459884 PMCID: PMC9142415 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-021-01718-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We investigated whether a novel visitation model for school-aged youth with mental health problems based on a stage-based stepped-care approach facilitated a systematic identification and stratification process without problems with equity in access. The visitation model was developed within the context of evaluating a new transdiagnostic early treatment for youth with anxiety, depressive symptoms, and/or behavioural problems. The model aimed to identify youth with mental health problems requiring an intervention, and to stratify the youth into three groups with increasing severity of problems. This was accomplished using a two-phase stratification process involving a web-based assessment and a semi-structured psychopathological interview of the youth and parents. To assess problems with inequity in access, individual-level socioeconomic data were obtained from national registers with data on both the youth participating in the visitation and the background population. Altogether, 573 youth and their parents took part in the visitation process. Seventy-five (13%) youth had mental health problems below the intervention threshold, 396 (69%) were deemed eligible for the early treatment, and 52 (9%) had symptoms of severe mental health problems. Fifty (9%) youth were excluded for other reasons. Eighty percent of the 396 youth eligible for early treatment fulfilled criteria of a mental disorder. The severity of mental health problems highlights the urgent need for a systematic approach. Potential problems in reaching youth of less resourceful parents, and older youth were identified. These findings can help ensure that actions are taken to avoid equity problems in future mental health care implementations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasmus Trap Wolf
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Services - Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Danish Centre for Health Economics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Louise Berg Puggaard
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Services - Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Maria Agner Pedersen
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Services - Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Katrine Pagsberg
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Services - Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Wendy K Silverman
- Anxiety and Mood Disorders Program, Yale Child Study Center, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Christoph U Correll
- Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine At Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
- Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kerstin Jessica Plessen
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Services - Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Simon-Peter Neumer
- Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, The Arctic University of Norway, North Norway (RKBU North), Tromsø, Norway
| | - Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
- Danish Centre for Health Economics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mikael Thastum
- Centre for the Psychological Treatment of Children and Adolescents, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Niels Bilenberg
- Department for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
- University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Hove Thomsen
- Research Center At Department for Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Pia Jeppesen
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Services - Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Liu T, Leung DKY, Lu S, Kwok WW, Sze LCY, Tse SSK, Ng SM, Wong PWC, Lou VWQ, Tang JYM, Wong DFK, Chan WC, Kwok RYK, Lum TYS, Wong GHY. Collaborative community mental health and aged care services with peer support to prevent late-life depression: study protocol for a non-randomised controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:280. [PMID: 35410292 PMCID: PMC8996671 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06122-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Late-life depression is common, modifiable, yet under-treated. Service silos and human resources shortage contribute to insufficient prevention and intervention. We describe an implementation research protocol of collaborative stepped care and peer support model that integrates community mental health and aged care services to address service fragmentation, using productive ageing and recovery principles to involve older people as peer supporters to address human resource issue.
Methods/design
This is a non-randomised controlled trial examining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the “Jockey Club Holistic Support Project for Elderly Mental Wellness” (JC JoyAge) model versus care as usual (CAU) in community aged care and community mental health service units in 12 months. Older people aged 60 years and over with mild to moderate depressive symptoms or risk factors for developing depression will be included. JoyAge service users will receive group-based activities and psychoeducation, low-intensity psychotherapy, or high-intensity psychotherapy according to the stepped care protocol in addition to usual community mental health or aged care, with support from an older peer supporter. The primary clinical outcome, depressive symptoms, and secondary outcomes, self-harm risk, anxiety symptoms, and loneliness, will be measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Self-Harm Inventory, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), and UCLA Loneliness 3-item scale (UCLA-3) respectively. Cost-effectiveness analysis will assess health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L and service utilisation using the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI). We use multilevel linear mixed models to compare outcomes change between groups and calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in terms of quality-adjusted life years.
Discussion
This study will provide evidence about outcomes for older persons with mental health needs receiving collaborative stepped care service without silos and with trained young-old volunteers to support engagement, treatment, and transitions. Cost-effectiveness findings from this study will inform resource allocation in this under-treated population.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03593889. Registered on 20 July 2018.
Collapse
|
45
|
Berger M, Fernando S, Churchill A, Cornish P, Henderson J, Shah J, Tee K, Salmon A. Scoping review of stepped care interventions for mental health and substance use service delivery to youth and young adults. Early Interv Psychiatry 2022; 16:327-341. [PMID: 34018335 PMCID: PMC9292436 DOI: 10.1111/eip.13180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Many young people with mental health and/or substance use concerns do not have access to timely, appropriate, and effective services. Within this context, stepped care models (SCMs) have emerged as a guiding framework for care delivery, inspiring service innovations across the globe. However, substantial gaps remain in the evidence for SCMs as a strategy to address the current systemic challenges in delivering services for young people. This scoping review aims to identify where these gaps in evidence exist, and the next steps for addressing them. METHODS A scoping review was conducted involving both peer-reviewed and grey literature. Eligible studies explored SCMs implemented in the various health care settings accessed by young people aged 12-24 seeking treatment for mental health and substance use challenges. After screening titles and abstracts, two reviewers examined full-text articles and extracted data to create a descriptive summary of the models. RESULTS Of the 656 studies that were retrieved, 51 studies were included and grouped by study team for a final yield of 43 studies. Almost half of the studies were focused on the adult population (i.e., 18 and over), and most did not specify interventions for young people. Among the SCMs, substantial variability was found in almost every aspect of the models. CONCLUSIONS Considering the current body of evidence, there is an urgent need for a consensus position on the definition, implementation, and outcome measures required for rigorously assessing the utility of SCMs for young people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Berger
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Saranee Fernando
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - AnnMarie Churchill
- Student Wellness and Counseling Centre, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Peter Cornish
- Director of Counseling and Psychological Services, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.,Honorary Research Professor, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Joanna Henderson
- Margaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth and Family Mental Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jai Shah
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montreal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,ACCESS Open Minds, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Karen Tee
- Foundry, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amy Salmon
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Fuhr K, Werle D, Batra A. How does early symptom change predict subsequent course of depressive symptoms during psychotherapy? Psychol Psychother 2022; 95:137-154. [PMID: 34676660 DOI: 10.1111/papt.12370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Previous studies reported about the influence of early changes on treatment response. However, the question of whether early changes can predict the subsequent course of depressive symptoms during treatment with psychotherapy has not yet been clearly answered. We aimed to investigate whether symptom course in the first weeks at the level of individual session can predict the further symptom progression on a session to session level during psychotherapy treatment in patients with Major Depression (MD). DESIGN Monocentric randomized controlled trial with psychotherapeutic treatment either with cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) or hypnotherapy (HT). The longitudinal course of weekly depressive symptoms during the six months treatment period was examined. METHODS In this RCT with 152 randomized patients suffering from current mild-to-moderate MD, depressive symptoms were assessed on a weekly basis during the 20 sessions' treatment with individual psychotherapy. We only included patients for which sufficient data for our analysis were available. Three different linear and quadratic mixed model analyses with random effects for each patient were tested: Early change was defined as the individual percentage symptom change during the first two, three, four and five weeks. Symptoms from session four, five, six and seven onward were predicted using different models, with early change added to the model in a final step. Calculating all models separately for CBT and HT lead to comparable results. RESULT A slow symptom decrease after session four, five, six, seven onward to the end of the treatment was found. However, adding early change to the model, had no effect on the further symptom course in all models. CONCLUSION Symptom changes at early stages of psychotherapy should not be considered as being predictive for further symptom course. PRACTITIONER POINTS The individual early symptom change in a treatment with psychotherapy in the first two, three, four, or five weeks of treatment does not predict the subsequent symptom course from session four, five, six, or seven onward at a session to session level. Symptom changes at early stages of psychotherapy should not be considered as being predictive for further symptom course. We found a symptom reduction ranging from 3% to 16% in the first two, three, four, or five weeks. Treatment response between the first and last therapy session was found in 54.5%, the number of remitted patients (with PHQ-9 scores < 5) was 44.7%. A small symptom improvement of between 0.21 and 0.42 points in the PHQ-9 scores per week in later stages of psychotherapy is likely in all patients (with and without early symptom improvement).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Fuhr
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Dustin Werle
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Anil Batra
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Post KE, Heuer LB, Kamal AH, Kumar P, Elyze M, Griffith S, Han J, Friedman F, Jackson A, Trotter C, Plotke R, Vyas C, Jackson V, Rabideau DJ, Greer JA, Temel JS. Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the non-inferiority of stepped palliative care versus early integrated palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057591. [PMID: 35144954 PMCID: PMC8845218 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Integrating palliative care (PC) early in the illness course for patients with serious cancers improves their outcomes and is recommended by national organisations such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology. However, monthly visits with PC clinicians from the time of diagnosis can be challenging to implement due to the lack of specialty-trained PC clinicians and resources. Therefore, we developed a stepped care model to triage PC service based on patients' needs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We are conducting a non-blinded, randomised trial to evaluate the non-inferiority of a stepped PC model compared with an early integrated PC model for improving patients' quality of life (QOL) at 24 weeks (primary outcome). Patients assigned to early integrated PC meet with PC every 4 weeks throughout their illness. Patients assigned to stepped PC have PC visits only at clinically significant points in their illness (eg, cancer progression) unless their QOL decreases, at which time they are 'stepped up' and meet with PC every 4 weeks throughout the remainder of their illness. Secondary aims include assessing whether stepped PC is non-inferior to early integrated PC regarding patient-clinician communication about end of life care and length of stay on hospice as well as comparing resource utilisation. Patients are recruited from the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Duke Cancer Center, Durham, North Carolina and University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The target sample size is 510 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study is funded by the National Cancer Institute, approved by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Institutional Review Board and will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. We will disseminate results through professional society meetings, peer-reviewed publications and presentations to patient organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03337399.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn E Post
- Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lauren B Heuer
- Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Arif H Kamal
- Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Pallavi Kumar
- Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Madeleine Elyze
- Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sarah Griffith
- Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jacqueline Han
- Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Fred Friedman
- Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashley Jackson
- Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chardria Trotter
- Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rachel Plotke
- Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Charu Vyas
- Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vicki Jackson
- Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dustin J Rabideau
- Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joseph A Greer
- Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bradley DF, Ching TH, Languido L, Brady RE. Application of a Quality Improvement Process to Evaluate Self-Directed Therapy for Patients on a Waitlist in an Outpatient Anxiety Disorders Specialty Clinic. COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
49
|
Delgadillo J, Ali S, Fleck K, Agnew C, Southgate A, Parkhouse L, Cohen ZD, DeRubeis RJ, Barkham M. Stratified Care vs Stepped Care for Depression: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2022; 79:101-108. [PMID: 34878526 PMCID: PMC8655665 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.3539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Depression is a major cause of disability worldwide. Although empirically supported treatments are available, there is scarce evidence on how to effectively personalize psychological treatment selection. OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 2 treatment selection strategies: stepped care and stratified care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multisite, cluster randomized clinical trial recruited participants from the English National Health Service from July 5, 2018, to February 1, 2019. Thirty clinicians working across 4 psychological therapy services were randomly assigned to provide stratified (n = 15) or stepped (n = 15) care. In stepped care, patients sequentially access low-intensity guided self-help followed by high-intensity psychotherapy. In stratified care, patients are matched with either low- or high-intensity treatments at initial assessment. Data were analyzed from May 18, 2020, to October 13, 2021, using intention-to-treat principles. INTERVENTIONS All clinicians used the same interview schedule to conduct initial assessments with patients seeking psychological treatment for common mental disorders, but those in the stratified care group received a personalized treatment recommendation for each patient generated by a machine learning algorithm. Eligible patients received either stratified or stepped care (ie, treatment as usual). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The preregistered outcome was posttreatment reliable and clinically significant improvement (RCSI) of depression symptoms (measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire). The RCSI outcome was compared between groups using logistic regression adjusted for baseline severity. Cost-effectiveness analyses compared incremental costs and health outcomes of the 2 treatment pathways. RESULTS A total of 951 patients were included (618 women among 950 with data available [65.1%]; mean [SD] age, 38.27 [14.53] years). The proportion of cases of RCSI was significantly higher in the stratified care arm compared with the stepped care arm (264 of 505 [52.3%] vs 134 of 297 [45.1%]; odds ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.04-1.87]; P = .03). Stratified care was associated with a higher mean additional cost per patient (£104.5 [95% CI, £67.5-£141.6] [$139.83 (95% CI, $90.32-$189.48)]; P < .001) because more patients accessed high-intensity treatments (332 of 583 [56.9%] vs 107 of 368 [29.1%]; χ2 = 70.51; P < .001), but this additional cost resulted in an approximately 7% increase in the probability of RCSI. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cluster randomized clinical trial of adults with common mental disorders, stratified care was efficacious and cost-effective for the treatment of depression symptoms compared with stepped care. Stratified care can improve depression treatment outcomes at a modest additional cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN11106183.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Delgadillo
- Clinical and Applied Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom,Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, United Kingdom
| | - Shehzad Ali
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada,Institute of Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addictions and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Mental Health and Addictions Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom,Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kieran Fleck
- Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Agnew
- Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Southgate
- Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Parkhouse
- Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Michael Barkham
- Clinical and Applied Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Grimmett C, Heneka N, Chambers S. Psychological Interventions Prior to Cancer Surgery: a Review of Reviews. CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS 2022; 12:78-87. [PMID: 35125973 PMCID: PMC8801554 DOI: 10.1007/s40140-021-00505-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Patients with cancer who have high levels of psychological distress have poor treatment compliance and worse outcomes. This “review of reviews” provides a narrative synthesis of the impact of psychological prehabilitation interventions on individuals awaiting cancer surgery. Recent Findings Twenty reviews of prehabilitation with psychological interventions were identified. There is a trend towards improved psychological outcomes following intervention, particularly when psychologist-led. However, there was considerable heterogeneity within interventions, outcome measures, and timing of assessment precluding numeric synthesis. Methodological limitations including non-blinding, absence of stratification, and underpowered studies were also pervasive. Summary Providing psychological support early in the cancer pathway and prior to surgery has the potential to improve psychological health and outcomes. The application of existing knowledge in psycho-oncology, including distress screening, is needed in the prehabilitation setting. Consistent outcome assessments, accurate reporting of intervention components and delivery methods, and a consideration of effective systems and economical implementation strategies would facilitate advancements in this field. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40140-021-00505-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Grimmett
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nicole Heneka
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Suzanne Chambers
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|