Rapid and Efficient Arsenic Removal by Iron Electrocoagulation Enabled with in Situ Generation of Hydrogen Peroxide

Importance of iron complexation and floc formation towards phosphonate removal with Fe-electrocoagulation

Phosphonates are widely used scale inhibitors, but the residual phosphonates in drainage are challenging to remove because of their chelating capacity and resistance to biodegradation. Here, we reported a highly efficient and robust Fe-electrocoagulation (Fe-EC) system for phosphonate removal. Surprisingly, we found for the first time that phosphonates like NTMP were more efficiently removed under anoxic conditions (80% of total soluble phosphorus (TSP) in 4 min) than oxic conditions (0% of TSP within 6 min) in NaCl solution. A similar phenomenon was observed when other phosphonates, such as EDTMP and DTPMP, were removed, highlighting the importance of iron complexation and floc formation toward phosphonate removal with Fe-EC. We also showed that the removal efficiency of NTMP by electrochemically in-situ formed flocs (97%) was much higher than post-adsorption systems (ex-situ, 40%), revealing that the growth of flocs consumed the active site for NTMP adsorption. Beyond the removal of TSP, 10 % of NTMP-P was also degraded after the electrolysis phase, evidenced by the evolution of phosphate-P. However, this did not happen in anoxic or chemical coagulation processes, which confirms the formation of reactive oxygen species via Fe(II) oxidation in the oxic Fe-EC system. The primary removal mechanism of phosphonates is due to their complexation with iron (hydr)oxide generated in the Fe-EC system by forming a Fe-O-P bond. Encouragingly, the Fe-EC system exhibits comparable or even better performance in treating phosphonate-laden wastewater (i.e., cooling water). Our preliminary cost calculation suggests the proposed system (€ 0.009/m3) has a much lower OPEX under oxic conditions than existing approaches. This study sheds light on the removal mechanism of phosphonate and the treatment of phosphonate-laden wastewater by playing with the iron complexion and flocs formation in classical Fe-EC systems.

Recent Advancements in the Field of Chitosan/Cellulose-Based Nanocomposites for Maximizing Arsenic Removal from Aqueous Environment

Water remediation, acknowledged as a significant scientific topic, guarantees the safety of drinking water, considering the diverse range of pollutants that can contaminate it. Among these pollutants, arsenic stands out as a particularly severe threat to human health, significantly compromising the overall quality of life. Despite widespread awareness of the harmful effects of arsenic poisoning, there remains a scarcity of literature on the utilization of biobased polymers as sustainable alternatives for comprehensive arsenic removal in practical concern. Cellulose and chitosan, two of the most prevalent biopolymers in nature, provide a wide range of potential benefits in cutting-edge industries, including water remediation. Nanocomposites derived from cellulose and chitosan offer numerous advantages over their larger equivalents, including high chelating properties, cost-effective production, strength, integrity during usage, and the potential to close the recycling loop. Within the sphere of arsenic remediation, this Review outlines the selection criteria for novel cellulose/chitosan-nanocomposites, such as scalability in synthesis, complete arsenic removal, and recyclability for technical significance. Especially, it aims to give an overview of the historical development of research in cellulose and chitosan, techniques for enhancing their performance, the current state of the art of the field, and the mechanisms underlying the adsorption of arsenic using cellulose/chitosan nanocomposites. Additionally, it extensively discusses the impact of shape and size on adsorbent efficiency, highlighting the crucial role of physical characteristics in optimizing performance for practical applications. Furthermore, this Review addresses regeneration, reuse, and future prospects for chitosan/cellulose-nanocomposites, which bear practical relevance. Therefore, this Review underscores the significant research gap and offers insights into refining the structural features of adsorbents to improve total inorganic arsenic removal, thereby facilitating the transition of green-material-based technology into operational use.

Synergistic inhibition of green rust crystallization by co-existing arsenic and silica

Arsenic and silica are known inhibitors of the crystallization of iron minerals from poorly ordered precursor phases. However, little is known about the effects of co-existing As and Si on the crystallization and long-term stability of mixed-valence Fe minerals such as green rust (GR). GR usually forms in anoxic, Fe2+-rich, near-neutral pH environments, where they influence the speciation and mobility of trace elements, nutrients and contaminants. In this work, the Fe2+-induced transformation of As- and/or Si-bearing ferrihydrite (FHY) was monitored at pH 8 ([As]initial = 100 μM, Si/As = 10) over 720 h. Our results showed that in the presence of As(III) + Si or As(V) + Si, GR sulfate (GRSO4) formation from FHY was up to four times slower compared to single species system containing only As(III), As(V) or Si. Co-existing As(III) + Si and As(V) + Si also inhibited GRSO4 transformation to magnetite, contrary to systems with only Si or As(V). Overall, our findings demonstrate the synergistic inhibitory effect of co-existing Si on the crystallization and solid-phase stability of As-bearing GRSO4, establishing an inhibitory effect ladder: As(III) + Si > As(V) + Si > As(III) > Si > As(V). This further highlights the importance of GR in potentially controlling the fate and mobility of As in ferruginous, Si-rich groundwater and sediments such as those in South and Southeast Asia.

Deep-dive into iron-based co-precipitation of arsenic: A review of mechanisms derived from synchrotron techniques and implications for groundwater treatment

The co-precipitation of Fe(III) (oxyhydr)oxides with arsenic (As) is one of the most widespread approaches to treat As-contaminated groundwater in both low- and high-income settings. Fe-based co-precipitation of As occurs in a variety of conventional and decentralized treatment schemes, including aeration and sand filtration, ferric chloride addition and technologies based on controlled corrosion of Fe(0) (i.e., electrocoagulation). Despite its ease of deployment, Fe-based co-precipitation of As entails a complex series of chemical reactions that often occur simultaneously, including electron-transfer reactions, mineral nucleation, crystal growth, and As sorption. In recent years, the growing use of sophisticated synchrotron-based characterization techniques in water treatment research has generated new detailed and mechanistic insights into the reactions that govern As removal efficiency. The purpose of this critical review is to synthesize the current understanding of the molecular-scale reaction pathways of As co-precipitation with Fe(III), where the source of Fe(III) can be ferric chloride solutions or oxidized Fe(II) sourced from natural Fe(II) in groundwater, ferrous salts or controlled Fe(0) corrosion. We draw primarily on the mechanistic knowledge gained from spectroscopic and nano-scale investigations. We begin by describing the least complex reactions relevant in these conditions (Fe(II) oxidation, Fe(III) polymerization, As sorption in single-solute systems) and build to multi-solute systems containing common groundwater ions that can alter the pathways of As uptake during Fe(III) co-precipitation (Ca, Mg bivalent cations; P, Si oxyanions). We conclude the review by providing a perspective on critical knowledge gaps remaining in this field and new research directions that can further improve the understanding of As removal via Fe(III) co-precipitation.

Molecular-scale characterization of groundwater treatment sludge from around the world: Implications for potential arsenic recovery

Iron (Fe)-based treatment methods are widely applied to remove carcinogenic arsenic (As) from drinking water, but generate toxic As-laden Fe (oxyhydr)oxide waste that has traditionally been ignored for resource recovery by the water sector. However, the European Commission recently classified As as a Critical Raw Material (CRM), thus providing new incentives to re-think As-laden groundwater treatment sludge. Before As recovery techniques can be developed for groundwater treatment waste, detailed information on its structure and composition is essential. To this end, we comprehensively characterized sludge generated from a variety of As-rich groundwater treatment plants in different geographic regions by combining a suite of macroscopic measurements, such as total digestions, leaching tests and BET surface area with molecular-scale solid-phase analysis by Fe and As K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). We found that the As mass fraction of all samples ranged from ∼200-1200 mg As/kg (dry weight) and the phosphorous (P) content reached ∼0.5-2 mass%. Notably, our results indicated that the influent As level was a poor predictor of the As sludge content, with the highest As mass fractions (940-1200 mg As/kg) measured in sludge generated from treating low groundwater As levels (1.1-22 µg/L). The Fe K-edge XAS data revealed that all samples consisted of nanoscale Fe(III) precipitates with less structural order than ferrihydrite, which is consistent with their high BET surface area (up to >250 m2/g) and large As and P mass fractions. The As K-edge XAS data indicated As was present in all samples predominantly as As(V) bound to Fe(III) precipitates in the binuclear-corner sharing (2C) geometry. Overall, the similar structure and composition of all samples implies that As recovery methods optimized for one type of Fe-based treatment sludge can be applied to many groundwater treatment sludges. Our work provides a critical foundation for further research to develop resource recovery methods for As-rich waste.

Recent advancements in peroxicoagulation process: An updated review

The present article describes the recent advancements (since 2018) in peroxicoagulation (PC) process, which was introduced by Professor Enric Brillas and his group in 1997. Instead of checking the efficiency of PC process to degrade a targeted pollutant in synthetic wastewater, researchers started testing its efficacy for the treatment of complex real wastewater. Applications like disinfection and removal of heavy metals as well as oxidative removal of arsenite from water were tested recently. To improve the efficiency of PC process, modifications were made for electrode materials (both anode and cathode) and electrolytic cells. Performance of PC process in combination with other treatment technologies is also discussed.

Effective reduction and recovery of As(III) and As(V) from alkaline wastewater by thiourea dioxide: Efficiency and mechanism

For alkaline wastewater with high arsenic concentration, the traditional lime precipitation inevitably produces large amounts of hazardous waste. Herein, a heat-activated reduction method employing thiourea dioxide (TDO) as the reductant was proposed to efficiently remove and recover As(III)/As(V) from alkaline wastewater in the form of valuable As(0). More than 99.9% of As(III)/As(V) (2-400 mM) were reduced to As(0) with a high purity of more than 99.5 wt% by TDO within 30 min. The highly reductive eaq- and SO2- radical generated during TDO decomposition contribute to the arsenic reduction, and the contribution ratios of eaq- and SO2- radical were estimated to be approximately 57.6% and 42.4% for As(III) removal and 62.2% and 37.8% for As(V) removal, respectively. The arsenic reduction was greatly improved by increasing pH and temperature, which could accelerate the cleavage of C-S bond in TDO for the eaq- and SO2- formation. The presence of dissolved oxygen, which can not only scavenge eaq-/SO2- but also directly oxidize SO22-, had a negative effect on the arsenic removal. The presence of CO32- slightly suppressed the arsenic removal due to the eaq- scavenging effect while SiO32-, PO43-, Cl-, SO42- and NH4+ had negligible effects. The proposed method was a potential technology for the efficient removal and reduction of arsenic in alkaline wastewater.

A mini-review on arsenic remediation techniques from water and future trends

Arsenic contamination is a severe issue because of its toxicity and related health risks. This review article presents an overview of the sources, health hazards, and treatment options for arsenic pollution. Conventional approaches to achieving the permitted level of 10 ppb set by the WHO, such as chemical oxidation, biological oxidation, and coagulation-flocculation, are ineffective and time-consuming. The paper analyses the advantages and disadvantages of various advanced treatment technologies, including membrane filtration, ion exchange, advanced oxidation, phytoremediation, and adsorption. This paper summarized the effectiveness of hybrid arsenic remediation techniques in removing arsenic and its operating conditions. This study is a helpful tool for putting remediation strategies into practice. This article describes arsenic pollution's damaging effects on human health, underscoring the necessity for careful treatment. The article addresses numerous treatment technologies, each with advantages and disadvantages preventing widespread use. Due to these limitations, deciding the best technique for arsenic remediation is difficult. As a result, hybrid treatment systems are urgently needed, with photocatalysis-adsorption being the most popular approach. The relevance of adaptable, user-friendly, low-maintenance hybrid technologies that are versatile, easy to use, and provide affordable arsenic removal options, especially for poor populations, is highlighted by prospects.

Arsenic Contamination in Groundwater: Geochemical Basis of Treatment Technologies

Arsenic (As) is abundant in the environment and can be found in both organic (e.g., methylated) and inorganic (e.g., arsenate and arsenite) forms. The source of As in the environment is attributed to both natural reactions and anthropogenic activities. As can also be released naturally to groundwater through As-bearing minerals including arsenopyrites, realgar, and orpiment. Similarly, agricultural and industrial activities have elevated As levels in groundwater. High levels of As in groundwater pose serious health risks and have been regulated in many developed and developing countries. In particular, the presence of inorganic forms of As in drinking water sources gained widespread attention due to their cellular and enzyme disruption activities. The research community has primarily focused on reviewing the natural occurrence and mobilization of As. Yet, As originating from anthropogenic activities, its mobility, and potential treatment techniques have not been covered. This review summarizes the origin, geochemistry, occurrence, mobilization, microbial interaction of natural and anthropogenic-As, and common remediation technologies for As removal from groundwater. In addition, As remediation methods are critically evaluated in terms of practical applicability at drinking water treatment plants, knowledge gaps, and future research needs. Finally, perspectives on As removal technologies and associated implementation limitations in developing countries and small communities are discussed.

Community Perceptions of Arsenic Contaminated Drinking Water and Preferences for Risk Communication in California's San Joaquin Valley

Due to chronic exposure to elevated levels of arsenic in drinking water, thousands of Californians have increased risk for internal cancers and other adverse health effects. The mortality risk of cancer is 1 in 400 people exposed to above 10 μg/L of arsenic in their drinking water. The purpose of this community assessment was to understand the perceptions and awareness of the residents and public water representatives in rural, unincorporated farming communities of color in San Joaquin Valley, California. In our research, we asked 27 community informants about their (1) available water sources, (2) knowledge about the health impacts of arsenic, and (3) preferences for risk communication and education regarding the health impacts of arsenic-contaminated drinking water. Through our qualitative coding and analysis, we found that most community informants indicated that there was limited community awareness about the health effects of drinking water with elevated arsenic levels. Preferences for risk communication included using in-language, culturally relevant, and health literate health promotion strategies and teaching these topics through the local K-8 schools' science curriculum with a language brokerage approach to transfer student knowledge to family members. Key recommendations include implementing these communication preferences to increase community-wide knowledge about safe drinking water.

Recent advances in bioremediation of heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants: A review

Heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants are causing detrimental effects on the environment. The seepage of heavy metals through untreated industrial waste destroys the crops and lands. Moreover, incineration and combustion of several products are responsible for primary and secondary emissions of pollutants. This review has gathered the remediation strategies, current bioremediation technologies, and their primary use in both in situ and ex situ methods, followed by a detailed explanation for bioremediation over other techniques. However, an amalgam of bioremediation techniques and nanotechnology could be a breakthrough in cleaning the environment by degrading heavy metals and persistant organic pollutants.

Boosting the oxidative capacity of the Fe(0)/O2 system via an air-breathing cathode

The corrosion of Fe(0) in the presence of O₂ in nature can lead to the oxidation of organic compounds, but the efficiency is very limited. Herein, attempts were made to establish a galvanic system that separates the anodic Fe(0) oxidation reaction and the cathodic O₂ reduction reaction using an air-breathing cathode. Compared with the chemical Fe(0)/O₂ system, it exhibited a substantially higher capability of destroying a variety of pollutants, such as organic dyes (12 types), phenol, nitrobenzene, acetaminophen, phenol, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. The degradation rate constant of a model dye (i.e., Rhodamine B) increased from 0.047 min^-1 (chemical) to 1.412 min^-1 (galvanic) under the passive air-breathing condition. The electric circuit design promoted Fe(0) dissolution to Fe(II) and triggered electron transfer that drives O₂ reduction to H₂O₂, two important species responsible for the generation of HO^• at high abundance. In addition, the galvanic Fe(0)/O₂ system produces electricity while destroying pollutants. Tests with real Ni plating wastewater further demonstrated the capability of the system to oxidize complexed organics and phosphite. This study provides a new strategy for boosting the oxidative capacity of the Fe(0)/O₂ system, which shows promise for acid wastewater treatment.

Groundwater-native Fe(II) oxidation prior to aeration with H2O2 to enhance As(III) removal

Groundwater contaminated with arsenic (As) must be treated prior to drinking, as human exposure to As at toxic levels can cause various diseases including cancer. Conventional aeration-filtration applied to anaerobic arsenite (As(III)) contaminated groundwater can remove As(III) by co-oxidizing native iron (Fe(II)) and As(III) with oxygen (O₂). However, the As(III) removal efficiency of conventional aeration can be low, in part, because of incomplete As(III) oxidation to readily-sorbed arsenate (As(V)). In this work, we investigated a new approach to enhance As(III) co-removal with native Fe(II) by the anaerobic addition of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) prior to aeration. Experiments were performed to co-oxidize Fe(II) and As(III) with H₂O₂ (anaerobically), O₂ (aerobically), and by sequentially adding of H₂O₂ and O₂. Aqueous As(III) and As(V) measurements after the reaction were coupled with solid-phase speciation by Fe and As K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). We found that complete anaerobic oxidation of 100 µM Fe(II) with 100 µM H₂O₂ resulted in co-removal of 95% of 7 µM As(III) compared to 44% with 8.0-9.0 mg/L dissolved O₂. Furthermore, we found that with 100 µM Fe(II), the initial Fe(II):H₂O₂ ratio was a critical parameter to remove 7 µM As(III) to below the 10 µg/L (0.13 µM) WHO guideline, where ratios of 1:4 (mol:mol) Fe(II):H₂O₂ led to As(III) removal matching that of 7 µM As(V). The improved As(III) removal with H₂O₂ was found to occur partly because of the well-established enhanced efficiency of As(III) oxidation in Fe(II)+H₂O₂ systems relatively to Fe(II)+O₂ systems. However, the XAS results unambiguously demonstrated that a large factor in the improved As(III) removal was also due to a systematic decrease in crystallinity, and thus increase in specific surface area, of the generated Fe(III) (oxyhydr)oxides from lepidocrocite in the Fe(II)+O₂ system to poorly-ordered Fe(III) precipitates in the Fe(II)+H₂O₂ system. The combined roles of H₂O₂ (enhanced As(III) oxidation and structural modification) can be easily overlooked when only aqueous species are measured, but this dual impact must be considered for accurate predictions of As removal in groundwater treatment.

Arsenic Oxidation and Removal from Water via Core-Shell MnO2@La(OH)3 Nanocomposite Adsorption

Arsenic (As(III)), more toxic and with less affinity than arsenate (As(V)), is hard to remove from the aqueous phase due to the lack of efficient adsorbents. In this study, a core-shell structured MnO₂@La(OH)₃ nanocomposite was synthesized via a facile two-step precipitation method. Its removal performance and mechanisms for As(V) and As(III) were investigated through batch adsorption experiments and a series of analysis methods including the transformation kinetics of arsenic species in As(III) removal, FTIR, XRD and XPS. Solution pH could significantly influence the removal efficiencies of arsenic. The adsorption process of As(V) occurred rapidly in the first 5 h and then gradually decreased, whereas the As(III) removal rate was relatively slower. The maximum adsorption capacities of As(V) and As(III) were up to 138.9 and 139.9 mg/g at pH 4.0, respectively. For As(V) removal, the inner-sphere complexes of lanthanum arsenate were formed through the ligand exchange reactions and coprecipitation. The oxidation of As(III) to the less toxic As(V) by δ-MnO₂ and subsequently the synergistic adsorption process by the lanthanum hydroxide on the MnO₂@La(OH)₃ nanocomposite to form lanthanum arsenate were the dominant mechanisms of As(III) removal. XPS analysis indicated that approximately 20.6% of Mn in the nanocomposite after As(III) removal were Mn(II). Furthermore, a small amount of Mn(II) and La(III) were released into solution during the process of As(III) removal. These results confirm its efficient performance in the arsenic-containing water treatment, such as As(III)-contaminated groundwater used for irrigation and As(V)-contaminated industrial wastewater.

Electrochemical Methods for Water Purification, Ion Separations, and Energy Conversion

Agricultural development, extensive industrialization, and rapid growth of the global population have inadvertently been accompanied by environmental pollution. Water pollution is exacerbated by the decreasing ability of traditional treatment methods to comply with tightening environmental standards. This review provides a comprehensive description of the principles and applications of electrochemical methods for water purification, ion separations, and energy conversion. Electrochemical methods have attractive features such as compact size, chemical selectivity, broad applicability, and reduced generation of secondary waste. Perhaps the greatest advantage of electrochemical methods, however, is that they remove contaminants directly from the water, while other technologies extract the water from the contaminants, which enables efficient removal of trace pollutants. The review begins with an overview of conventional electrochemical methods, which drive chemical or physical transformations via Faradaic reactions at electrodes, and proceeds to a detailed examination of the two primary mechanisms by which contaminants are separated in nondestructive electrochemical processes, namely electrokinetics and electrosorption. In these sections, special attention is given to emerging methods, such as shock electrodialysis and Faradaic electrosorption. Given the importance of generating clean, renewable energy, which may sometimes be combined with water purification, the review also discusses inverse methods of electrochemical energy conversion based on reverse electrosorption, electrowetting, and electrokinetic phenomena. The review concludes with a discussion of technology comparisons, remaining challenges, and potential innovations for the field such as process intensification and technoeconomic optimization.

Electrochemical activation of hydrogen peroxide, persulfate, and free chlorine using sacrificial iron anodes for decentralized wastewater treatment

Increasing contamination of groundwater by heavy metals could potentially hamper the basic sanitation based on septic system in developing countries. Therefore, this paper evaluated wastewater treatment by electrochemical activation of hydrogen peroxide (EAHP), persulfate (EAP), and free chlorine (EAFC) to simultaneously eliminate aqueous organic matter and heavy metals. Sacrificial iron anodes under galvanostatic regime activated the batch-injected oxidants under uncontrolled pH, to avoid extra cost of control in decentralized processes (e.g., household use) to treat domestic wastewater. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to determine the optimized conditions for EAP ([persulfate]₀ = 25 mM, 24.4 mA/cm²), EAFC ([free chlorine]₀ = 35.5 mM, 44.4 mA/cm²), and EAHP ([H₂O₂]₀ = 91.1 mM, 45 mA/cm²) towards total organic carbon (TOC) removal. Treatment of real wastewater under optimum conditions significantly reduced chemical oxygen demand (COD) and TOC in all treatments, complying with lenient effluent standards as well as the added benefit of complete As(V) and Cr(VI) removal. Although EAP and EAFC provided superior removal of TOC (70-75%) and COD (73-100%) within 3 h, respectively, effluent toxicity and operation cost (76-85 USD/m³) were relatively high. EAHP was the best available option to secure non-toxic effluent with the least cost (63 USD/m³).

Effects of anode/cathode electroactive microorganisms on arsenic removal with organic/inorganic carbon supplied

This study reports the effects of an external voltage (0 V, 0.4 V and 0.9 V) on soil arsenic (As) release and sequestration when amended with organic carbon (NaAc) and inorganic carbon (NaHCO₃), respectively, in a soil bioelectrochemistry system (BES). The results demonstrated that although an external voltage had no effect on the As removal capacity in an oligotrophic environment fueled with NaHCO_3, 93.6% of As(III) in the supernatant was removed at 0.9 V with an NaAc amendment. Interestingly, the content of As detected on the electrodes was higher than that removed from the supernatant, implying a continuous release of soil As under external voltages and rapid adsorption onto the electrodes, especially the cathode. In addition, the species of As on the cathode were similar to those in the supernatant (the As(III)/As(V) ratio was approximately 3:1), indicating that the removal capacity was independent of preoxidation. From the viewpoint of electroactive microorganisms (EABs), the relative abundances of the arrA gene and Geobacter genus were specifically enriched at the anode, thus signifying stimulation of the reduction and release of soil As in the anode region. By comparison, Bacillus was particularly abundant at the cathode, which could contribute to the oxidation and sequestration of As in the cathode region. Additionally, specific extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) secreted by EABs could combine with As, which was followed by electrostatic attraction to the cathode under the effect of an electric field. Furthermore, the formation of secondary minerals and coprecipitation in the presence of iron (Fe) may have also contributed to As removal from solution. The insights from this study will enable us to further understand the biogeochemical cycle of soil As and to explore the feasibility of in situ As bioremediation techniques, combining the aspects of microbial and physicochemical processes in soil bioelectrochemical systems.

Review on heterogeneous oxidation and adsorption for arsenic removal from drinking water

The long term exposure of arsenic via drinking water has resulted in wide occurrence of arsenisim globally, and the oxidation of the non-ionic arsenite (As(III)) to negatively-charged arsenate (As(V)) is of crucial importance for the promising removal of arsenic. The chemical oxidants of ozone, chlorine, chlorine dioxide, and potassium permanganate may achieve this goal; however, their application in developing countries is sometimes restricted by the complicate operation and high cost. This review paper focuses on the heterogeneous oxidation of As(III) by solid oxidants such as manganese oxide, and the adsorption of As(V) accordingly. Manganese oxide may be prepared by both chemical and biological methods to achieve good oxidation performance towards As(III). Additionally, manganese oxide may be combined with other metal oxides, e.g., iron oxide, to improve the adsorption capability towards As(V). Furthermore, manganese oxide may be coated onto porous materials of metal organic frameworks to develop novel adsorbents for arsenic removal. To achieve the application in engineering works, the adsorbents granulation may be achieved by drying and calcination, agglomeration, and the active components may also be in situ coated onto the porous materials to maintain the oxidation and adsorption activities as much as possible. The novel adsorbents with heterogeneous oxidation and adsorption capability may be carefully designed for the removal of arsenic in household purifiers, community-level decentralized small systems, and the large-scale drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs). This review provides insight into the fundamental studies on novel adsorbents, the development of innovative technologies, and the demonstration engineering works involved in the heterogeneous oxidation and adsorption, and may be practically valuable for the arsenic pollution control globally.

Highly Sensitive and Stable Determination of As(III) under Near-Neutral Conditions: Benefit from the Synergetic Catalysis of Pt Single Atoms and Active S Atoms over Pt1/MoS2

Designing new catalysts with high activity and stability is crucial for the effective analysis of environmental pollutants under mild conditions. Here, we developed a superior catalyst of Pt single atoms anchored on MoS₂ (Pt₁/MoS₂) to catalyze the determination of As(III). A detection sensitivity of 3.31 μA ppb^-1 was obtained in acetate buffer solution at pH 6.0, which is the highest compared with those obtained by other Pt-based nanomaterials currently reported. Pt₁/MoS₂ exhibited excellent electrochemical stability during the detection process of As(III), even in the coexistence of Cu(II), Pb(II), and Hg(II). X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy and theoretical calculations revealed that Pt single atoms were stably fixed by four S atoms and activated the adjacent S atoms. Then, Pt and S atoms synergistically interacted with O and As atoms, respectively, and transferred some electrons to H₃AsO₃, which change the rate-determining step of H₃AsO₃ reduction and reduce reaction energy barriers, thereby promoting rapid and efficient accumulation for As(0). Compared with Pt nanoparticles, the weaker interaction between arsenic species and Pt₁/MoS₂ enabled the effortless regeneration and cyclic utilization of active centers, which is more favorable for the oxidation of As(0). This work provides inspiration for developing highly efficient sensing platforms from the perspective of atomic-level catalysis and affords references to explore the detection mechanism of such contaminants.

Electrocoagulation technology for water purification: An update review on reactor design and some newly concerned pollutants removal

Water shortage and quality deterioration are plaguing people all over the world. Providing sustainable and affordable treatment solutions to these problems is a need of the hour. Electrocoagulation (EC) technology is a burgeoning alternative for effective water treatment, which offers the virtues such as compact equipment, easy operation, and low sludge production. Compared to other water purification technologies, EC shows excellent removal efficacy for a wide range of contaminants in water and has great potential for addressing limitations of conventional water purification technologies. This review summarizes the latest development of principle, characteristics, and reactor design of EC. The design of key parameters including reactor shape, power supply type, current density, as well as electrode configuration is further elaborated. In particular, typical water treatment systems powered by renewable energy (solar photovoltaic and wind turbine systems) are proposed. Further, this review provides an overview on expanded application of EC in the removal of some newly concerned pollutants in recent years, including arsenite, perfluorinated compounds, pharmaceuticals, oil, bacteria, and viruses. The removal efficiency and mechanisms of these pollutants are also discussed. Finally, future research trend and focus are further recommended. This review can bridge the large knowledge gap for the EC application that is beneficial for environmental researchers and engineers.

Adapting a drinking water treatment technology for arsenic removal to the context of a small, low-income California community

Small, low-income, and rural communities across the United States are disproportionately exposed to arsenic contaminated drinking water because existing treatment solutions are too expensive and difficult to operate. This paper describes efforts to overcome some barriers and limitations of conventional iron electrocoagulation (Fe-EC) to enable its use in the rural Californian (U.S.) context. Barriers and limitations of Fe-EC's application in rural California considered in this work include: 1) Frequent labor intensive electrode cleaning is required to overcome rust accumulation, 2) Electrolysis durations are long, reducing throughput for a given system size, and 3) Waste needs compliance with California standards. We report results from an investigation for overcoming these limitations via a field trial on a farm in Allensworth, a small, low-income, rural community in California. Our strategies to overcome each of the above barriers and limitations are respectively, 1) operating the Fe-EC reactor at high current density to result in sustained Fe production, 2) operating at high charge dosage rate with external H₂O₂, and 3) characterization of the arsenic-laden waste, and are discussed further in the paper. Main findings are: (1) Fe-EC removed arsenic consistently below the federal (and state) standard of 10 µg/L, (2) high current density failed to sustain Fe production whereas low current density did not, (3) electrolysis time decreased from > 1 hour to < 2 min with H₂O₂ dosing of 5 mg/L at higher charge dosage rates, (4) dilution of As-sludge is required to comply with State's non-hazardous waste status, and (5) discrepancies were observed between lab and field results in using current density to overcome labor-intensive electrode cleanings. Finally, implications of overcoming limitations to scale-up of Fe-EC in relevant California communities are discussed.

Enhanced removal of arsenic from water by using sub-10 nm hydrated zirconium oxides confined inside gel-type anion exchanger

Given high selectivity and excellent stability, zirconium oxides are very promising in selective removal of arsenic, fluorine, and phosphorus from water. Nevertheless, it remains challenging to prepare sub-10 nm zirconium oxides of ultra-high adsorptive reactivity. Herein, we prepared hydrated zirconium oxides (HZO) of 4.88 ± 1.02 nm by conducting in-situ precipitation of nanoparticles (NPs) inside the gel-type anion exchanger (GAE). GAE was swollen in water and contained lots of < 10 nm swollen pores, restricting excess growth of HZO NPs. In comparison, the NPs formed inside the macroporous anion exchanger (MAE) possessed an average diameter of 30.91 ± 8.98 nm. XPS O1s analysis indicated that the oxygen sites in the gel-type nanocomposite (HZO@GAE) possessed a much higher proportion (48.9%) of reactive terminal oxygen (-OH) than the macroporous nanocomposite (HZO@MAE, 21.2%). Thus, HZO@GAE exhibited significantly enhanced adsorption reactivity toward As(V)/As(III) than HZO@MAE. The exhausted HZO@GAE could be fully regenerated by alkali treatment for repeated use without any loss in decontamination efficiency. In column assays, the HZO@GAE column successively produced ~2400 bed volume (BV) clean water ([As]<10 μg/L) from synthetic groundwater, exceeding twice the amount produced by the HZO@MAE column. This study may shed new light on developing highly efficient nanocomposites for water decontamination.

Magnetic zeolitic imidazolate frameworks composite as an efficient adsorbent for arsenic removal from aqueous solution

In this study, magnetic zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-8) was prepared by a one-step method, where its evolution involved the coprecipitation reactions concomitant with the self-assembly reactions. Structural characterizations indicated that magnetic ZIF-8 showed irregular polyhedral morphology with a large specific surface area (696.5 m²/g) and saturation magnetization (4.31 emu/g). The as-prepared magnetic ZIF-8 enhanced the adsorption performance of As(III) and As(V), compared with bare Fe₃O₄. The pseudo second-order kinetic model (R² = 0.9627 and 0.9893 for As(III) and As(V), respectively) and the Langmuir model (R² = 0.9441 for As(III) and 0.9851 for As(V)) can fit the adsorption process well, confirming the nature of single-layer homogeneous chemisorption. The adsorption capacity was 30.87 and 17.51 mg/g, and their corresponding values of PC were 2.664 and 1.286 L/g, for As(III) and As(V), respectively. Solution pH showed an adverse effect on As(V) adsorption whereas no obvious effect on As(III). The ionic strength and coexisting ions had not obvious influence on adsorption of As(III) and As(V). The adsorption mechanism was explored and discussed based on the detailed spectroscopy analysis. This adsorbent can be recovered magnetically after use, which is promising for the practical application.