Lysine 182 of endothelin B receptor modulates agonist selectivity and antagonist affinity: evidence for the overlap of peptide and non-peptide ligand binding sites

Activation mechanism of endothelin ETB receptor by endothelin-1

Endothelin, a 21-amino-acid peptide, participates in various physiological processes, such as regulation of vascular tone, humoral homeostasis, neural crest cell development and neurotransmission. Endothelin and its G-protein-coupled receptor are involved in the development of various diseases, such as pulmonary arterial hypertension, and thus are important therapeutic targets. Here we report crystal structures of human endothelin type B receptor in the ligand-free form and in complex with the endogenous agonist endothelin-1. The structures and mutation analysis reveal the mechanism for the isopeptide selectivity between endothelin-1 and -3. Transmembrane helices 1, 2, 6 and 7 move and envelop the entire endothelin peptide, in a virtually irreversible manner. The agonist-induced conformational changes are propagated to the receptor core and the cytoplasmic G-protein coupling interface, and probably induce conformational flexibility in TM6. A comparison with the M2 muscarinic receptor suggests a shared mechanism for signal transduction in class A G-protein-coupled receptors.

Electroporation-aided DNA immunization generates polyclonal antibodies against the native conformation of human endothelin B receptor

Endothelin B receptor (ET(B)R) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) specific for endothelin peptides (including endothelin-1, ET1), which mediates a variety of key physiological functions in normal tissues, such as modulation of vasomotor tone, tissue differentiation, or cell proliferation. Moreover, ET(B)R, overexpressed in various cancer cells including melanoma, has been implicated in the growth and progression of tumors, as well as in controlling T cell homing to tumors. To gather information on receptor structure and function, antibodies are generally considered choice molecular probes, but generation of such reagents against the native conformation of GPCRs is a real technical challenge. Here, we show that electroporation-aided genetic immunization, coupled to cardiotoxin pretreatment, is a simple and very efficient method to raise large amounts of polyclonal antibodies highly specific for native human ET(B)R (hET(B)R), as assessed by both flow cytometry analysis of different stably transfected cell lines and a new and rapid cell-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay that we also describe. The antibodies recognized two major epitopes on hET(B)R, mapped within the N-terminal extracellular domain. They were used to reveal hET(B)R on membranes of three different human melanoma cell lines, by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy, a method that we show is more relevant than mRNA polymerase chain reaction in assessing receptor expression. In addition, ET-1 partially competed with antibodies for receptor binding. The strategy described here, thus, efficiently generated new immunological tools to further analyze the role of ET(B)R under both normal and pathological conditions, including cancers. Above all, it can now be used to raise monoclonal antibodies against hET(B)R and, more generally, against GPCRs that constitute, by far, the largest reservoir of potential pharmacological targets.

Functional analysis of cell-free-produced human endothelin B receptor reveals transmembrane segment 1 as an essential area for ET-1 binding and homodimer formation

The functional and structural characterization of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) still suffers from tremendous difficulties during sample preparation. Cell-free expression has recently emerged as a promising alternative approach for the synthesis of polytopic integral membrane proteins and, in particular, for the production of G-protein-coupled receptors. We have now analyzed the quality and functional folding of cell-free produced human endothelin type B receptor samples as an example of the rhodopsin-type family of G-protein-coupled receptors in correlation with different cell-free expression modes. Human endothelin B receptor was cell-free produced as a precipitate and subsequently solubilized in detergent, or was directly synthesized in micelles of various supplied mild detergents. Purified cell-free-produced human endothelin B receptor samples were evaluated by single-particle analysis and by ligand-binding assays. The soluble human endothelin B receptor produced is predominantly present as dimeric complexes without detectable aggregation, and the quality of the sample is very similar to that of the related rhodopsin isolated from natural sources. The binding of human endothelin B receptor to its natural peptide ligand endothelin-1 is demonstrated by coelution, pull-down assays, and surface plasmon resonance assays. Systematic functional analysis of truncated human endothelin B receptor derivatives confined two key receptor functions to the membrane-localized part of human endothelin B receptor. A 39 amino acid fragment spanning residues 93-131 and including the proposed transmembrane segment 1 was identified as a central area involved in endothelin-1 binding as well as in human endothelin B receptor homo-oligomer formation. Our approach represents an efficient expression technique for G-protein-coupled receptors such as human endothelin B receptor, and might provide a valuable tool for fast structural and functional characterizations.

A chemogenomic analysis of the transmembrane binding cavity of human G-protein-coupled receptors

The amino acid sequences of 369 human nonolfactory G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been aligned at the seven transmembrane domain (TM) and used to extract the nature of 30 critical residues supposed--from the X-ray structure of bovine rhodopsin bound to retinal--to line the TM binding cavity of ground-state receptors. Interestingly, the clustering of human GPCRs from these 30 residues mirrors the recently described phylogenetic tree of full-sequence human GPCRs (Fredriksson et al., Mol Pharmacol 2003;63:1256-1272) with few exceptions. A TM cavity could be found for all investigated GPCRs with physicochemical properties matching that of their cognate ligands. The current approach allows a very fast comparison of most human GPCRs from the focused perspective of the predicted TM cavity and permits to easily detect key residues that drive ligand selectivity or promiscuity.

Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function

The superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) could be subclassified into 7 families (A, B, large N-terminal family B-7 transmembrane helix, C, Frizzled/Smoothened, taste 2, and vomeronasal 1 receptors) among mammalian species. Cloning and functional studies of GPCRs have revealed that the superfamily of GPCRs comprises receptors for chemically diverse native ligands including (1) endogenous compounds like amines, peptides, and Wnt proteins (i.e., secreted proteins activating Frizzled receptors); (2) endogenous cell surface adhesion molecules; and (3) photons and exogenous compounds like odorants. The combined use of site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling approaches have provided detailed insight into molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, receptor folding, receptor activation, G-protein coupling, and regulation of GPCRs. The vast majority of family A, B, C, vomeronasal 1, and taste 2 receptors are able to transduce signals into cells through G-protein coupling. However, G-protein-independent signaling mechanisms have also been reported for many GPCRs. Specific interaction motifs in the intracellular parts of these receptors allow them to interact with scaffold proteins. Protein engineering techniques have provided information on molecular mechanisms of GPCR-accessory protein, GPCR-GPCR, and GPCR-scaffold protein interactions. Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations have revealed that the inactive state conformations are stabilized by specific interhelical and intrahelical salt bridge interactions and hydrophobic-type interactions. Constitutively activating mutations or agonist binding disrupts such constraining interactions leading to receptor conformations that associates with and activate G-proteins.

Molecular basis for selectivity of high affinity peptide antagonists for the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor

Few gastrointestinal hormones/neurotransmitters have high affinity peptide receptor antagonists, and little is known about the molecular basis of their selectivity or affinity. The receptor mediating the action of the mammalian bombesin (Bn) peptide, gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), is an exception, because numerous classes of peptide antagonists are described. To investigate the molecular basis for their high affinity for the GRPR, two classes of peptide antagonists, a statine analogue, JMV594 ([d-Phe(6),Stat(13)]Bn(6-14)), and a pseudopeptide analogue, JMV641 (d-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Leupsi(CHOH-CH(2))-(CH(2))(2)-CH(3)), were studied. Each had high affinity for the GRPR and >3,000-fold selectivity for GRPR over the closely related neuromedin B receptor (NMBR). To investigate the basis for this, we used a chimeric receptor approach to make both GRPR loss of affinity and NMBR gain of affinity chimeras and a site-directed mutagenesis approach. Chimeric or mutated receptors were transiently expressed in Balb/c 3T3. Only substitution of the fourth extracellular (EC) domain of the GRPR by the comparable NMBR domain markedly decreased the affinity for both antagonists. Substituting the fourth EC domain of NMBR into the GRPR resulted in a 300-fold gain in affinity for JMV594 and an 11-fold gain for JMV641. Each of the 11 amino acid differences between the GRPR and NMBR in this domain were exchanged. The substitutions of Thr(297) in GRPR by Pro from the comparable position in NMBR, Phe(302) by Met, and Ser(305) by Thr decreased the affinity of each antagonist. Simultaneous replacement of Thr(297), Phe(302), and Ser(305) in GRPR by the three comparable NMBR amino acids caused a 500-fold decrease in affinity for both antagonists. Replacing the comparable three amino acids in NMBR by those from GRPR caused a gain in affinity for each antagonist. Receptor modeling showed that each of these three amino acids faced inward and was within 5 A of the putative binding pocket. These results demonstrate that differences in the fourth EC domain of the mammalian Bn receptors are responsible for the selectivity of these two peptide antagonists. They demonstrate that Thr(297), Phe(302), and Ser(305) of the fourth EC domain of GRPR are the critical residues for determining GRPR selectivity and suggest that both receptor-ligand cation-pi interactions and hydrogen bonding are important for their high affinity interaction.

Tyrosine 220 in the 5th transmembrane domain of the neuromedin B receptor is critical for the high selectivity of the peptoid antagonist PD168368

Peptoid antagonists are increasingly being described for G protein-coupled receptors; however, little is known about the molecular basis of their binding. Recently, the peptoid PD168368 was found to be a potent selective neuromedin B receptor (NMBR) antagonist. To investigate the molecular basis for its selectivity for the NMBR over the closely related receptor for gastrin-releasing peptide (GRPR), we used a chimeric receptor approach and a site-directed mutagenesis approach. Mutated receptors were transiently expressed in Balb 3T3. The extracellular domains of the NMBR were not important for the selectivity of PD168368. However, substitution of the 5th upper transmembrane domain (uTM5) of the NMBR by the comparable GRPR domains decreased the affinity 16-fold. When the reverse study was performed by substituting the uTM5 of NMBR into the GRPR, a 9-fold increase in affinity occurred. Each of the 4 amino acids that differed between NMBR and GRPR in the uTM5 region were exchanged, but only the substitution of Phe(220) for Tyr in the NMBR caused a decrease in affinity. When the reverse study was performed to attempt to demonstrate a gain of affinity in the GRPR, the substitution of Tyr(219) for Phe caused an increase in affinity. These results suggest that the hydroxyl group of Tyr(220) in uTM5 of NMBR plays a critical role for high selectivity of PD168368 for NMBR over GRPR. Receptor and ligand modeling suggests that the hydroxyl of the Tyr(220) interacts with nitrophenyl group of PD168368 likely primarily by hydrogen bonding. This result shows the selectivity of the peptoid PD168368, similar to that reported for numerous non-peptide analogues with other G protein-coupled receptors, is primarily dependent on interaction with transmembrane amino acids.

Functional coupling of G proteins to endothelin receptors is ligand and receptor subtype specific

1. The aims of the present study were (a) to determine the identity of the G proteins with which the endothelin receptor interacts and whether this interaction is subtype specific and (b) to determine whether agonist exposure can result in specific coupling between the endothelin receptor and G proteins. 2. Coupling between endothelin A (ET(A)) or endothelin B (ET(B)) receptors and G proteins was assessed in two fibroblast cell lines, each expressing one receptor subtype. Four ligands, ET-1, ET-3, SRTXb, and SRTXc, were used for receptor stimulation. The G protein alpha-subunit coupled to the receptor was identified by immunoprecipitation with an antibody against the endothelin receptor and immunoblotting with specific antibodies against different G protein alpha-subunits. 3. Unstimulated ET(A) and ET(B) receptors (ET(A)R and ET(B)R, respectively) were barely coupled to Go(alpha). The unstimulated ET(A)R coimmunoprecipitated with Gi3alpha, whereas the unstimulated ETBR was much less strongly coupled to Gi3alpha. The coupling of ETBR to Gi1Gi2 alpha-subunits was much stronger than the coupling of ET(A)R to these alpha-subunits. Stimulation with the different ET agonists also resulted in differential coupling of G proteins to the receptor subtypes. All four ligands caused a strong increase in coupling of the ET(B)R to Gi3alpha, whereas coupling of the ET(A)R to this subunit was not affected by ET-1 and was even decreased by SRTXc. On the other hand, all four ligands caused a much greater increase in the coupling of ET(A)R to G(q)alpha/G11alpha than in the coupling of ET(B)R to these alpha-subunits. Ligand-induced coupling between the receptors and the Gi1 and Gi2 alpha-subunits is similar for the two receptor subtypes. The same was true for ligand-induced coupling of the receptors to Go(alpha), except that ET-3 increased the coupling of this alpha-subunit to ET(B)R and decreased the coupling to ET(A)R. Taken together, the results of this study show that coupling between ET receptors and G proteins is ligand and receptor subtype specific. 4. It remains to be established whether this diversity of receptor-G protein coupling is of relevance for the various endothelin signaling pathways and/or pathological states.

Molecular characterization of the ligand-receptor interaction of the neuropeptide Y family

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) belong to the NPY hormone family and activate a class of receptors called the Y-receptors, and also belong to the large superfamily of the G-protein coupled receptors. Structure-affinity and structure-activity relationship studies of peptide analogs, combined with studies based on site-directed mutagenesis and anti-receptor antibodies, have given insight into the individual characterization of each receptor subtype relative to its interaction with the ligand, as well as to its biological function. A number of selective antagonists at the Y1-receptor are available whose structures resemble that of the C-terminus of NPY. Some of these compounds, like BIBP3226, BIBO3304 and GW1229, have recently been used for in vivo investigations of the NPY-induced increase in food intake. Y2-receptor selective agonists are the analog cyclo-(28/32)-Ac-[Lys28-Glu32]-(25-36)-pNPY and the TASP molecule containing two units of the NPY segment 21-36. Now the first antagonist with nanomolar affinity for the Y2-receptor is also known, BIIE0246. So far, the native peptide PP has been shown to be the most potent ligand at the Y4-receptor. However, by the design of PP/NPY chimera, some analogs have been found that bind not only to the Y4-, but also to the Y5-receptor with subnanomolar affinities, and are as potent as NPY at the Y1-receptor. For the characterization of the Y5-receptor in vitro and in vivo, a new class of highly selective agonists is now available. This consists of analogs of NPY and of PP/NPY chimera which all contain the motif Ala31-Aib32. This motif has been shown to induce a 3(10)-helical turn in the region 28-31 of NPY and is suggested to be the key motif for high Y5-receptor selectivity. The results of feeding experiments in rats treated with the first highly specific Y5-receptor agonists support the hypothesis that this receptor plays a role in the NPY-induced stimulation of food intake. In conclusion, the selective compounds for the different Y receptor subtypes known so far are promising tools for a better understanding of the physiological properties of the hormones of the NPY family and related receptors.

Uncovering molecular mechanisms involved in activation of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled, seven-transmembrane segment receptors (GPCRs or 7TM receptors), with more than 1000 different members, comprise the largest superfamily of proteins in the body. Since the cloning of the first receptors more than a decade ago, extensive experimental work has uncovered multiple aspects of their function and challenged many traditional paradigms. However, it is only recently that we are beginning to gain insight into some of the most fundamental questions in the molecular function of this class of receptors. How can, for example, so many chemically diverse hormones, neurotransmitters, and other signaling molecules activate receptors believed to share a similar overall tertiary structure? What is the nature of the physical changes linking agonist binding to receptor activation and subsequent transduction of the signal to the associated G protein on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane and to other putative signaling pathways? The goal of the present review is to specifically address these questions as well as to depict the current awareness about GPCR structure-function relationships in general.

Characterization of endothelin-1 receptor subtypes in isolated human cardiomyocytes

On cardiac membranes and isolated cardiomyocytes from the human heart, cell-type distribution and functional activities of endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor subtypes were investigated by using binding methods and messenger RNA (mRNA) in situ hybridization. The ET-receptor antagonist BMS-182874 selectively and competitively inhibits ET(A) receptors both on isolated myocytes and ventricular membranes with approximately 1,300 times greater affinity for ET(A) than ET(B) subtypes. The [125I]-ET-1 specific binding revealed 42.851+/-2,546 receptors/myocyte with a prevalent proportion of ET(A)-receptor subtypes on both myocytes (84+/-2%) and ventricular membranes (66+/-3%). In situ hybridization studies revealed that mRNA for ET(A) receptors was expressed on both myocytes and nonmyocyte cells, whereas mRNA for ET(B) receptors was almost exclusively expressed on fibroblasts and endothelial cells. Specific binding of [125I]-ET-1 to both myocytes and ventricular membranes in the presence of specific ET(A) (BMS-182874) and ET(B) (BQ-788)-receptor antagonists showed a displacement of [125I]-ET-1 by unlabeled ET-1, which were significantly faster from ET(B) than from ET(A). This suggests a clearance function of ventricular ET(B) receptors.

ASP147 in the third transmembrane helix of the rat mu opioid receptor forms ion-pairing with morphine and naltrexone

We tested the hypotheses that the carboxylate side chain of Asp147 of the mu opioid receptor interacts with the protonated nitrogen of naltrexone and morphine and that this interaction is important for pharmacological properties of the two compounds. Mutation of Asp147 to Ala or Asn substantially reduced the affinity of naltrexone and the affinity, potency and efficacy of morphine, while the Glu mutant had similar properties as the wildtype, indicating the significant role of the carboxylate group of Asp147 in receptor binding and activation. This role could be due to its direct interaction with ligands or involvement in interhelical interactions. The unprotonated analogs of naltrexone and morphine, cyclopropylcarbonyl noroxymorphone (CPCNOM) and N-formylnormorphine (NFNM), respectively, were used to discriminate between these mechanisms. CPCNOM was much less potent as an antagonist and had substantially lower affinity for the mu receptor than naltrexone. Similarly, NFNM was unable to activate the mu receptor and had much lower affinity than morphine. These results indicate the importance of the protonated nitrogen. Notably, the D147A and D147N mutations did not appreciably affect the binding affinities of CPCNOM and NFNM. In addition, the D147E mutant had similar affinities for CPCNOM and NFNM as the D147A and D147N mu receptors. Thus, the carboxylate group of Asp147 is not important for binding of the two unprotonated compounds. These results indicate that the carboxylate group of Asp147 of the mu receptor interacts directly with the protonated nitrogen of naltrexone and morphine and this interaction is important for binding and receptor activation.

A single position in the third transmembrane domains of the human B1 and B2 bradykinin receptors is adjacent to and discriminates between the C-terminal residues of subtype-selective ligands

In order to identify agonist- and antagonist-binding epitopes in the human B1 and B2 bradykinin (BK) receptors, we exploited the ability of these receptors to discriminate between peptide ligands that differ only by the absence (B1) and presence (B2) of a C-terminal Arg. This was done by constructing chimeric proteins in which specific domains were exchanged between these receptors as recently described by us (Leeb, T., Mathis, S. A., and Leeb-Lundberg, L. M. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 311-317). The constructs were then expressed in HEK293 and A10 cells and assayed by radioligand binding and by agonist-stimulated inositol phospholipid hydrolysis and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization. Substitution of the third transmembrane domain (TM-III) of the B1 receptor in the B2 receptor (B2(B1III)) dramatically reduced the affinities of B2-selective peptide ligands including both the agonist BK and the antagonist NPC17731. High affinity binding of both ligands to B2(B1III) was fully regained when one residue, Lys111, in TM-III of this chimera was replaced with the corresponding wild-type (WT) B2 receptor residue, Ser (B2(B1IIIS111)). Replacement of Ser111 with Lys in the WT B2 receptor decreased the affinities of BK and NPC17731 and increased the affinity of the B1-selective des-Arg10 analog of NPC17731, NPC18565. The results show that the C-terminal residue of peptide agonists and antagonists when bound to the B2 receptor is adjacent to Ser111 in the receptor. A Lys at this position, as is the case in the WT B1 receptor, provides a positive charge that repels the C-terminal Arg in B2-selective peptides and attracts the negative charge of the C terminus of B1-selective peptides, which lack the C-terminal Arg. Therefore, the residues at this one single position are crucial in determining the peptide selectivity of B1 and B2 BK receptors.

Post-translational modifications of endothelin receptor B from bovine lungs analyzed by mass spectrometry

A new mild experimental approach for isolation of peptide membrane receptors and subsequent analysis of post-translational modifications is described. Endothelin receptors A and B were isolated on oligo(dT)-cellulose using N-(epsilon-maleimidocaproyloxy)succinimide endothelin coupled to a protected (dA)-30-mer. This allowed a one-step isolation of the receptor from oligo(dT)-cellulose via variation solely of salt concentration. The identity of the receptor was confirmed by direct amino acid sequencing of electroblotted samples or by using antibodies against ETA and ETB receptors. The method used here is very fast, requires only very mild elution conditions and, for the first time, gave both ETA and ETB receptors concurrently in very good yield. Following enzymatic in-gel digestion, MALDI, and electrospray ion trap mass spectrometric analysis of the isolated endothelin B receptor showed phosphorylation at Ser-304, -418, -438, -439, -440, and -441. Further phosphorylation at either Ser-434 or -435 was observed. The endothelin B receptor is also palmitoylated at Cys residues 402 and 404. Phosphorylation of Ser304 may play a role in Hirschsprung's disease.

Activation of multiple mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways by the endothelin B receptor requires the cytoplasmic tail

Endothelin is a 21-amino acid peptide with remarkably diverse biological properties, including potent vasoconstriction, induction of mitogenesis, and a role in the development of blood vessels. In the present study, stimulation of the endothelin B receptor was found to activate three distinct mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways, the extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) 2, c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 (JNK), and p38 kinase. These mitogen-activated protein kinase isozymes are thought to mediate very different biological outcomes, suggesting that the observed pattern of kinases activation may be important for the diverse biological properties of endothelin. The cytoplasmic tail of the endothelin B receptor was found to be required for activation of all three mitogen-activated protein kinases and stimulation of intracellular calcium levels. An endothelin B receptor truncated at the C-terminal tail was not able to stimulate the mitogen-activated protein kinases or increase cytosolic free calcium. Furthermore, ectopic expression of the cytoplasmic tail attenuated signaling through the wild type receptor. The observed ERK activation appeared to be mediated by heterotrimeric G proteins, since ectopic expression of a transducin alpha-subunit inhibited endothelin-stimulated ERK activation. The data suggest that the cytosolic tail of the endothelin B receptor is involved in calcium mobilization and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation via a G protein-dependent mechanism.

Genetic transfer of a nonpeptide antagonist binding site to a previously unresponsive angiotensin receptor

Mutational analysis based on the pharmacological differences between mammalian and amphibian angiotensin II receptors (AT receptors) previously identified 7 aa residues located in transmembrane domains (TMs) III (Val-108), IV (Ala-163), V (Pro-192, Thr-198), VI (Ser-252), and VII (Leu-300, Phe-301) of the rat AT receptor type 1b (rAT1b receptor) that significantly influenced binding of the nonpeptide antagonist Losartan. Further studies have shown that an additional 6 residues in the rAT1b receptor TMs II (Ala-73), III (Ser-109, Ala-114, Ser-115), VI (Phe-248), and VII (Asn-295) are important in Losartan binding. The 13 residues required for Losartan binding in the mammalian receptor were exchanged for the corresponding amino acids in the Xenopus AT receptor type a (xATa receptor) to generate a mutant amphibian receptor that bound Losartan with the same affinity as the rAT1b receptor (Losartan IC50 values: rAT1b, 2.2 +/- 0.2 nM: xATa, > 50 microM; mutant, 2.0 +/- 0.1 nM). To our knowledge, this is the first report of a gain-of-function mutant in which the residues crucial to formation of a ligand binding site in a mammalian peptide hormone receptor were transferred to a previously unresponsive receptor by site-directed mutagenesis. Ala substitutions and comparison of mammalian and amphibian combinatorial mutants indicated that TM III in the rAT1b receptor plays a key role in Losartan binding. Identification of residues involved in nonpeptide ligand binding will facilitate studies aimed at elucidating the chemical basis for ligand recognition in the AT receptor and peptide hormone receptors in general.

Locating ligand-binding sites in 7TM receptors by protein engineering

Over the past year, mutational analysis of peptide receptors has started to change our understanding of the interaction between G protein coupled receptors and their ligands, an area previously almost totally dominated by results from studies of monoamine receptors. A picture is currently emerging, in which small ligands appear to bind in three (more or less) overlapping ligand-binding pockets in between the transmembrane segments. In contrast, contact residues for peptide and protein ligands have mainly been found in exterior regions of peptide and protein receptors. It is also becoming increasingly clear that agonists and antagonists may interact in vastly different manners, even though they are competitive ligands for a common receptor.