Effect of hepatic insufficiency on pharmacokinetics and drug dosing

Reduced hepatic impairment study to evaluate pharmacokinetics and safety of zavegepant and to inform dosing recommendation for hepatic impairment

Zavegepant, a high-affinity, selective, small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, is approved in the United States for acute treatment of migraine in adults. The effects of moderate hepatic impairment (8 participants with Child-Pugh score 7-9 points) on the pharmacokinetics of a single 10-mg intranasal dose of zavegepant versus eight matched participants with normal hepatic function were evaluated in a phase I study. Pharmacokinetic sampling determined total and unbound plasma zavegepant concentrations. Moderate hepatic impairment increased the exposure of total zavegepant (~2-fold increase in AUC0-inf and 16% increase in Cmax) versus normal hepatic function, which is not considered clinically meaningful. The geometric least squares mean ratios (moderate impairment/normal) of plasma zavegepant AUC0-inf and Cmax were 193% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 112, 333; p = 0.051) and 116% (90% CI: 69, 195; p = 0.630), respectively. The geometric mean fraction unbound of zavegepant was similar for participants with moderate hepatic impairment (0.13; coefficient of variation [CV] 13.71%) versus those with normal hepatic function (0.11; CV 21.43%). Similar exposure findings were observed with unbound zavegepant versus normal hepatic function (~2.3-fold increase in AUC0-inf and 39% increase in Cmax). One treatment-emergent adverse event (mild, treatment-related headache) was reported in a participant with normal hepatic function. No dosage adjustment of intranasal zavegepant is required in adults with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Cotadutide: A Dual Agonist Peptide of Glucagon-Like Peptide and Glucagon Receptors Administered to Participants with Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease, Obesity and Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND

Cotadutide is a dual glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucagon (GCG) receptor agonist peptide. The objective of this analysis was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model of cotadutide, and to identify any potential effect on the PK from intrinsic and extrinsic covariates.

METHODS

The popPK analysis utilized a non-linear mixed-effects modeling approach using the data from 10 clinical studies in different participant categories following once-daily subcutaneous dose administration ranging from 20 to 600 μg. Additionally, the covariates affecting cotadutide exposure were quantified, and the model performance was evaluated through the prediction-corrected visual predictive checks.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately described the data as confirmed via visual predictive check plots and parameter plausibility. The mean values for cotadutide apparent clearance (CL/F), apparent volume of distribution (V/F), absorption rate constant (Ka), and half-life were 1.05 L/h, 20.0 L, 0.38 h-1, and 13.3 hours, respectively. Covariate modeling identified body weight, alanine transaminase, albumin, anti-drug antibody (ADA) titer values, formulation strength and injection device, and participant categories as significant covariates on PK parameters, where ADAs have been identified to decrease cotadutide clearance. The model demonstrated that a 150-kg participant was estimated to have 30% lower for both AUC and Cmax and a 66 kg participant was estimated to have 35% higher for both AUC and Cmax relative to a reference individual with a median weight of 96 kg.

CONCLUSIONS

A popPK model was developed for cotadutide with cotadutide clinical data, and the impact of the statistically significant covariates identified was not considered clinically meaningful. The popPK model will be used to evaluate exposure-response relationships for cotadutide clinical data.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety Evaluation of Single-Dose Saroglitazar Magnesium in Subjects with Hepatic Impairment

Saroglitazar magnesium, a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist, is under evaluation for treating various liver conditions. While the pharmacokinetics (PK) of saroglitazar have been extensively studied in diverse preclinical models and healthy subjects, a comprehensive assessment of its PK behavior under conditions of hepatic impairment is lacking. In this Phase 1, open-label, parallel-group study, the PK of a single dose of 4-mg saroglitazar magnesium was investigated in subjects having varying degrees of hepatic impairment with and without portal hypertension compared with appropriately matched individuals having normal hepatic function. Treatment-emergent adverse events for safety were also evaluated. Thirty-two subjects were enrolled in the hepatic-impaired groups and 23 subjects in the normal hepatic function group. Mild and moderate hepatic impairment did not significantly affect the PK of saroglitazar, compared with normal hepatic function. Although severe hepatic impairment did not alter maximum observed plasma concentration and half-life; saroglitazar exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity) increased 3-fold, while the clearance was 61% lower compared to the subjects with normal hepatic function. This may require close monitoring or dose adjustments in individuals with severe hepatic impairment. A single oral dose of saroglitazar magnesium 4 mg was found to be safe and well tolerated in subjects with varying degrees of hepatic function.

Knowledge and perception regarding adverse drug reactions among undergraduate medical students of Bihar, Eastern India

Background

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have national and international monitoring and are part of teaching-learning of undergraduate medical course and curriculum.

Objectives

To find the knowledge and perception of ADRs among undergraduate medical students in a tertiary care teaching institute in eastern India.

Materials and Methods

This was an observational cross-sectional study conducted among the MBBS medical students by administration of pre-designed, pre-tested, semi-structured questionnaires. The data on their knowledge and candid reflections on ADRs were analyzed question by question using software and compared with peers.

Results

The responses from the participants on knowledge and perception of ADRs varied widely. Final-year students had the most precise response on classification, filing an ADR report, national reporting centers, and the first step in monitoring ADRs; the majority accepted their first- hand experience and legal and professional responsibilities on ADRs. Third-year students responded well on objectives, methods, and scope of patients on direct reporting or drug overdose and monitoring; respect patient confidentiality while reporting; and expect feedback from monitoring centers, with special training on ADR. Second-year students responded well on definitions, pharmacovigilance programs in India, alertness of banned drugs because of ADR, and related capacity building.

Conclusions

The awareness and insight on ADRs of the undergraduate medical students were quite reasonable. However, further reinforcement is needed in future to be updated to relevant issues to their practice as primary care physicians.

Predicting disruptions to drug pharmacokinetics and the risk of adverse drug reactions in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis patients

The liver plays a central role in the pharmacokinetics of drugs through drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) causes disease-specific alterations to the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) processes, including a decrease in protein expression of basolateral uptake transporters, an increase in efflux transporters, and modifications to enzyme activity. This can result in increased drug exposure and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Our goal was to predict drugs that pose increased risks for ADRs in NASH patients. Bibliographic research identified 71 drugs with reported ADRs in patients with liver disease, mainly non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), 54 of which are known substrates of transporters and/or metabolizing enzymes. Since NASH is the progressive form of NAFLD but is most frequently undiagnosed, we identified other drugs at risk based on NASH-specific alterations to ADME processes. Here, we present another list of 71 drugs at risk of pharmacokinetic disruption in NASH, based on their transport and/or metabolism processes. It encompasses drugs from various pharmacological classes for which ADRs may occur when used in NASH patients, especially when eliminated through multiple pathways altered by the disease. Therefore, these results may inform clinicians regarding the selection of drugs for use in NASH patients.

Non-uniformity of Changes in Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters in Liver Cirrhosis: Implications for Drug Dosage Adjustment

Liver cirrhosis is a chronic disease that affects the liver structure, protein expression, and overall metabolic function. Abundance data for drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters (DMET) across all stages of disease severity are scarce. Levels of these proteins are crucial for the accurate prediction of drug clearance in hepatically impaired patients using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, which can be used to guide the selection of more precise dosing. This study aimed to experimentally quantify these proteins in human liver samples and assess how they can impact the predictive performance of the PBPK models. We determined the absolute abundance of 51 DMET proteins in human liver microsomes across the three degrees of cirrhosis severity (n = 32; 6 mild, 13 moderate, and 13 severe), compared to histologically normal controls (n = 14), using QconCAT-based targeted proteomics. The results revealed a significant but non-uniform reduction in the abundance of enzymes and transporters, from control, by 30–50% in mild, 40–70% in moderate, and 50–90% in severe cirrhosis groups. Cancer and/or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related cirrhosis showed larger deterioration in levels of CYP3A4, 2C8, 2E1, 1A6, UGT2B4/7, CES1, FMO3/5, EPHX1, MGST1/3, BSEP, and OATP2B1 than the cholestasis set. Drug-specific pathways together with non-uniform changes of abundance across the enzymes and transporters under various degrees of cirrhosis necessitate the use of PBPK models. As case examples, such models for repaglinide, dabigatran, and zidovudine were successful in recovering disease-related alterations in drug exposure. In conclusion, the current study provides the biological rationale behind the absence of a single dose adjustment formula for all drugs in cirrhosis and demonstrates the utility of proteomics-informed PBPK modeling for drug-specific dose adjustment in liver cirrhosis.

Apixaban Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Subjects with Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment

Background

Hepatic impairment can impact apixaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics by decreasing cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism and factor X production.

Objective

This study evaluated the effect of mild or moderate (Child–Pugh A and B) hepatic impairment on apixaban pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety.

Methods

This open-label, parallel-group, single-dose study included eight mildly and eight moderately hepatically impaired subjects, and 16 healthy subjects. Subjects received a single oral apixaban 5-mg dose (day 1). Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety assessments were completed at prespecified time points. Apixaban maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration–time curve to infinity were compared between subjects with hepatic impairment and healthy subjects.

Results

Apixaban area under the concentration–time curve to infinity point estimates and 90% confidence intervals were 1.03 (0.80–1.32) and 1.09 (0.85–1.41) for subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment vs healthy subjects. Maximum plasma concentration results were similar. Mean (standard deviation) apixaban unbound fraction was 6.8% (1.4), 7.9% (1.8), and 7.1% (1.3) in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment and in healthy subjects. Mean change from baseline in international normalized ratio (3 h post-dose) was 14.7%, 12.7%, and 10.7% for subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects, respectively. A direct relationship was observed between apixaban anti-factor Xa activity and plasma concentration across groups. No serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events occurred.

Conclusions

Mild or moderate hepatic impairment had no clinically relevant impact on apixaban pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic measures, suggesting that dose adjustment may not be required.

Review article: time to revisit Child-Pugh score as the basis for predicting drug clearance in hepatic impairment

BACKGROUND

Prescription information for many drugs entering the market lacks dosage guidance for hepatic impairment. Dedicated studies for assessing the fate of drugs in hepatic impairment commonly stratify patients using Child-Pugh score. Child-Pugh is a prognostic clinical score with limitations in reflecting the liver's metabolic capacity.

AIMS

To demonstrate the need for better drug dosing approaches in hepatic impairment, summarise the current status, identify knowledge gaps related to drug kinetic parameters in hepatic impairment, propose solutions for predicting the liver disease impact on drug exposure and discuss barriers to dosing guidance in those patients.

METHODS

Relevant reports on dosage adjustment in hepatic impairment were analysed concerning the prediction of the impairment impact on drug kinetics using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling.

RESULTS

PBPK models are suggested as a potential framework to understand drug clearance changes in hepatic impairment. Quantifying changes in abundance and activity of drug-metabolising enzymes and transporters, understanding the impact of shunting, and accounting for interindividual variations in drug absorption could help in extending the success of these models in hepatically-impaired populations. These variables might not correlate with Child-Pugh score as a whole. Therefore, new metabolic activity markers, imaging techniques and other scoring systems are proposed to either support or substitute Child-Pugh score.

CONCLUSIONS

Many physiological changes in hepatic impairment determining the fate of drugs do not necessarily correlate with Child-Pugh score. Quantifying these changes in individual patients is essential in future hepatic impairment studies. Further studies assessing Child-Pugh alternatives are recommended to allow better prediction of drug exposure.

Enabling modular dosage form concepts for individualized multidrug therapy: Expanding the design window for poorly water-soluble drugs

Multidrug dosage forms (aka combination dosage forms, polypills, etc.) create value for patients through reduced pill burdens and simplified administration to improve adherence to therapy. Enhanced flexibility of multidrug dosage forms would provide further opportunities to better match emerging needs for individualized therapy. Through modular dosage form concepts, one approach to satisfy these needs is to adapt multidrug dosage forms to a wider variety of drugs, each with a variety of doses and release profiles. This study investigates and technically explores design requirements for extending the capability of modular multidrug dosage form concepts towards individualization. This builds on our recent demonstration of independent tailoring of dose and drug release, which is here extended towards poorly water-soluble drugs. The challenging design requirement of carrying higher drug loads in smaller volumes to accommodate multiple drugs at their clinical dose is here met regarding dose and release performance. With a modular concept, we demonstrate high precision (<5% RSD) in dose and release performance of individual modules containing felodipine or naproxen in Kollidon VA64 at both a wide drug loading range (5% w/w and 50% w/w drug) and a small module size (3.6 mg). In a forward-looking design-based discussion, further requirements are addressed, emphasizing that reproducible individual module performance is predictive of dosage form performance, provided the modules are designed to act independently. Therefore, efforts to incorporate progressively higher drug loads within progressively smaller module volumes will be crucial to extend the design window further towards full flexibility of future dosage forms for individualized multidrug therapy.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fedratinib, an oral, selective Janus kinase 2 inhibitor, in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment

PURPOSE

Fedratinib is an oral, selective Janus kinase 2 inhibitor that is approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fedratinib in subjects with renal impairment (RI) and hepatic impairment (HI) were evaluated in two separate studies.

METHODS

In the renal study, male and female subjects with stable, chronic mild, moderate, and severe RI, as well as those with end-stage renal disease, were included. The hepatic study included subjects with stable, chronic mild HI. Both were phase 1, multicenter, open-label, single-dose studies, and included matched healthy subjects. Subjects received a single oral dose of fedratinib 300 mg on day 1, were discharged on day 4, returned for clinical visits on days 5-12, and had their end-of-study visit between days 14 and 16.

RESULTS

Thirty-six and 17 subjects were included in the renal and hepatic studies, respectively. In the renal study, fedratinib area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_inf) was 1.9- and 1.5-fold higher in subjects with severe and moderate RI, respectively, than in matched healthy subjects. In the hepatic study, fedratinib AUC_inf did not appreciably differ between subjects with mild HI and matched healthy subjects. Overall, most treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal and mild.

CONCLUSION

Mild RI and HI do not necessitate fedratinib dosage adjustments. Subjects with moderate RI should be monitored (with dosage adjustments made as necessary), whereas those with severe RI should receive a daily dose of 200 mg, reduced from the indicated dose of 400 mg.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of revefenacin in subjects with impaired renal or hepatic function

Purpose

Revefenacin, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist for nebulization, has been shown to improve lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Here we report pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety results from two multicenter, open-label, single-dose trials evaluating revefenacin in subjects with severe renal impairment (NCT02578082) and moderate hepatic impairment (NCT02581592).

Subjects and methods

The renal impairment trial enrolled subjects with normal renal function and severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m²). The hepatic impairment trial enrolled subjects with normal hepatic function and moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B). Subjects received a single 175-µg dose of revefenacin through nebulization. PK plasma samples and urine collections were obtained at multiple time points for 5 days following treatment; all subjects were monitored for adverse events.

Results

In the renal impairment study, the maximum observed plasma revefenacin concentration (C_max) was up to 2.3-fold higher and area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_inf) was up to 2.4-fold higher in subjects with severe renal impairment compared with those with normal renal function. For THRX-195518, the major metabolite of revefenacin, the corresponding changes in C_max and AUC_inf were 1.8- and 2.7-fold higher, respectively. In the hepatic impairment study, revefenacin C_max and AUC_inf were 1.03- and 1.18-fold higher, respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with those with normal hepatic function. The corresponding changes in THRX-195518 C_max and AUC_inf were 1.5- and 2.8-fold higher, respectively.

Conclusion

Systemic exposure to revefenacin increased modestly in subjects with severe renal impairment but was similar between subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and normal hepatic function. The increase in plasma exposure to THRX-195518 in subjects with severe renal or moderate hepatic impairment is unlikely to be of clinical consequence given its low antimuscarinic potency, low systemic levels after inhaled revefenacin administration, and favorable safety profile.

Mechanisms of Arrhythmia and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With HIV Infection

Long-term survival of HIV-infected patients has significantly improved with the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART). As a consequence, cardiovascular diseases are now emerging as an important clinical problem in this population. Sudden cardiac death is the third leading cause of mortality in HIV patients. Twenty percent of patients with HIV who died of sudden cardiac death had previous cardiac arrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and other unspecified rhythm disorders. This review presents a summary of HIV-related arrhythmias, associated risk factors specific to the HIV population, and underlying mechanisms. Compared with the general population, patients with HIV have several cardiac conditions and electrophysiological abnormalities. As a result, they have an increased risk of developing severe arrhythmias, that can lead to sudden cardiac death. Possible explanations may be related to non-ART polypharmacy, electrolyte imbalances, and use of substances observed in HIV-infected patients; many of these conditions are associated with alterations in cardiac electrical activity, increasing the risk of arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. However, clinical and experimental evidence has also revealed that cardiac arrhythmias occur in HIV-infected patients, even in the absence of drugs. This indicates that HIV itself can change the electrophysiological properties of the heart profoundly and cause cardiac arrhythmias and related sudden cardiac death. The current knowledge of the underlying mechanisms, as well as the emerging role of inflammation in these arrhythmias, are discussed here.

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with liver cirrhosis: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Anticoagulant treatment in patients with liver cirrhosis is challenging. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate clinical outcomes of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy in cirrhosis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and conference proceedings up to November 7th, 2017, for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of DOACs in cirrhosis patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), or atrial fibrillation (AF). Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles, and assessed risk of bias. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to heterogeneity of the included studies.

RESULTS

Of the 2927 articles assessed, five retrospective cohort studies were included (n = 239, including 20 patients overlap). All studies had fair methodological quality. Two studies evaluated DOAC treatment only, and three also evaluated vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). Recurrent VTE (DOAC n = 12, LMWH/VKA n = 8) or ischemic stroke (DOAC n = 37, LMWH/VKA n = 9) occurred in none of the patients. Progression of VTE was 8% with DOACs (n = 12) and 13% with VKAs and LWWH (n = 8). Recurrent SVT occurred in 0 to 4% with DOACs (n = 31). Progression of SVT was 0 to 5% with DOACs (n = 24) and 0 to 47% with VKAs and LMWH (n = 33). Major bleeding risk ranged from 4 to 15% with DOACs (n = 172) and from 7 to 28% with VKAs and LMWH (n = 67). All-cause mortality risk was 6% with DOACs (n = 36).

CONCLUSIONS

There is paucity of data on the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with cirrhosis. This analysis suggests that DOACs may be effective and safe for treatment of VTE, SVT, and AF in these patients.

The pharmacotherapy of cirrhosis: concerns and proposed investigations and solutions

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The presence of cirrhosis has a multifaceted impact on hepatic drug metabolism. An area of concern and uncertainty in the care of patients with cirrhosis is the safe use of both prescription and over-the-counter medications.

COMMENT

Retrospective studies indicate a high incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among patients with cirrhosis related to use of certain medication classes including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Conversely, use of appropriate medications, such as statins, may be decreased in this population due to fear of precipitating hepatotoxicity.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Pharmacotherapy in cirrhosis is an area of uncertainty and heterogeneity in clinical practice. Prescribing and dosing guidelines are needed to decrease the risk of serious ADRs in this high-risk patient population.

Dosing of Target-Specific Oral Anticoagulants in Special Populations

OBJECTIVE

To review current literature for target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) and provide critical analysis for dosing recommendations in special population groups.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted in Medline (1996 to April week 2 2015) and Embase (1980 to 2015 week 16) using key terms dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, kidney diseases, liver diseases, elderly, obesity, and special populations.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Randomized controlled trials in English assessing efficacy and safety of TSOACs in healthy adults and special populations were selected for analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Phase 3 trials for TSOACs predominately excluded patients with severe renal impairment or active liver disease. There were no exclusion criteria based on age, body weight or body mass index. Additional conclusions were made in special populations, including those with renal or liver impairment and obese and elderly patients, based on secondary analyses, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes associated special populations may alter clinical decision with regard to drug selection and dosing. It is valuable to understand the rationale for labeled dosing recommendations in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention, particularly in patients that fall into special population groups. Furthermore, the use of TSOACs is likely to increase as clinicians gain experience with these agents and additional TSOACs and indications are approved.

Serum alanine transaminase total bilirubin concentrations predict CYP3A activity as measured by midazolam and 1'-hydroxylation

Background

Microsomal enzyme P450 (CYP450) plays an important role in metabolism of most xenobiotics. The activity of CYP3A decreases in patients with liver dysfunction. However, whether serum concentrations of liver enzymes reflect the activity of CYP3A is unclear. We aimed to search for a new clue to predict the activity of CYP3A and guide clinical medication.

Material/Methods

Forty-five patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study, including 15 cases with normal liver function (Group N), 15 cases with moderate fatty liver according to both the results of ultrasonic diagnosis of moderate fatty liver and the laboratory results of elevated alanine transaminase less than 3 times the normal (Group M), and 15 cases with end-stage liver disease (Group S). Each patient received a single dose of 5 mg midazolam intravenously. CYP3A activity was measured by plasma 1′hydroxymidsazolam/midazolam (1′-OH-MDZ/MDZ) ratio at 2 h after administration of midazolam.

Results

They was no significant difference in CYP3A activity between the patients with normal liver function and moderate fatty liver (P=0.332). The activity of CYP3A in Group S was lower than in Group N and Group M (P=0.000). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant linear relationship between the activity of CYP3A and alanine transaminase (ALT, R²=0.682, P=0.000), and total bilirubin (TB, R²=0.519, P=0.002). There were no other factors, including albumin (ALB, P=0.881) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP, P=0.497), correlated with the activity of CYP3A.

Conclusions

We conclude that the activity of CYP3A in patients with end-stage liver disease decreased. The decrease in the activity of CYP3A was determined by the increase in the serum concentration of ALT and TB and not by patient’s age or body weight. ALT and TB therefore might have predictive value for the activity of CYP3A. An abnormal liver function test likely gives the clinician a hint about dosage adjustment.

Review article: depression and the use of antidepressants in patients with chronic liver disease or liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The scale of depression in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and those who have received orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is poorly characterised. Clinicians are uncertain of how best to manage depression within these patients.

AIMS

To review the literature evaluating both the prevalence and impact of depression in patients with CLD and post-OLT, and to assess the safety and efficacy of antidepressant use within this context.

METHODS

A PubMed search using the phrases 'chronic liver disease', 'cirrhosis', 'liver transplantation', 'depression', 'antidepressant' and the names of specific causes of liver disease and individual antidepressants.

RESULTS

Over 30% of cirrhotic patients have depressive features, and they experience worse clinical outcomes than nondepressed cirrhotic patients. CLD patients with chronic hepatitis C are particularly prone to depression, partly related to the use of interferon therapy. OLT patients with depression have higher mortality rates than nondepressed patients; appropriate antidepressant use reverses this effect. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are effective and generally safe in both CLD and OLT patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression is much more prevalent in CLD or OLT patients than is generally recognised, and it adversely affects clinical outcomes. The reasons for this relationship are complex and multifactorial. Antidepressants are effective in both CLD and post-OLT, although lower doses or a reduced dosing frequency may be required to minimise side effects, e.g. exacerbation of hepatic encephalopathy. Further research is needed to establish optimal management of depression in these patients, including the potential role of nonpharmacological treatments.

Relevance of Liver Failure for Anti-Infective Agents: From Pharmacokinetic Alterations to Dosage Adjustments

The liver is a complex organ with great ability to influence drug pharmacokinetics. Due to its wide array of function, its impairment has the potential to affect bioavailability, enterohepatic circulation, drug distribution, metabolism, clearance, and biliary elimination. These alterations differ widely depending on the cause of the liver failure, if it is acute or chronic in nature, the extent of impairment, and comorbid conditions. In addition, effects on liver functions do not occur in a proportional or predictable manner for escalating degrees of liver impairment. The ability of hepatic alterations to influence PK is also dependent on drug characteristics, such as administration route, chemical properties, protein binding, and extraction ratio, among others. This complexity makes it difficult to predict what these effects have on drugs. Unlike certain classes of agents, efficacy of anti-infectives is most often dependent on fulfilling pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets, such as C_max/MIC, AUC/MIC, T_>MIC, IC₅₀/EC₅₀, or T>EC₉₅. Loss of efficacy, or conversely, increased risk of toxicity may occur in certain circumstances of liver injury. Although important to consider these potential alterations and their effects on specific anti-infectives, many lack data to constitute specific dosing adjustments, making it important to monitor patients for effectiveness and toxicities of therapy.

Use of hepatotoxic drugs in chronic liver disease

Cirrhosis and chronic liver disease are common illnesses that cause high mortality and require treatment. Medication use in these patients may be challenging because of idiosyncratic or dose-dependent drug toxicity. Therefore, drug choice and drug dose adaptations play an important role. The objective of this clinical review is to discuss the literature about and challenges in drug use in patients with chronic liver disease. To make good decisions regarding drug choice and dose adjustments in these patients, well-defined clinical information about diagnoses and laboratory results (creatinine, international normalized ratio, bilirubin, and serologies) as well as in some instances, pathological findings like liver biopsies are needed. In a second step, these data should be organized in electronically supported clinical decision systems, which can then assist providers in making choices about medication selection and dosage. In summary, although substantial research has been done in the field of drug use in patients with liver dysfunction, a great deal also remains to be learned. Although many of these patients can now be identified, it is still very difficult to assess their individual level of hepatic function. The degree of risk associated with drug use and how best to use medications in these patients represents an important area for further study. In the future, pharmacogenomics and electronic linking of clinical data may well prove helpful for making decisions about optimal drug choices in this complex group of patients.

How to manage medications in the setting of liver disease with the application of six questions

OBJECTIVE

Reviewing the current literature to guide clinicians managing medications in the setting of liver disease.

LITERATURE SOURCES

Using the terms liver disease, medication management, and therapeutic monitoring, a literature review was conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles in MEDLINE (1966-April 2009). Reference citations were reviewed as an additional resource. Published English-language literatures, articles and trials were reviewed. Emphasis was placed on prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

QUESTION SYNTHESIS

An informed decision on how to manage medications in the setting of liver disease should account for changes that transpire in a medication's first-pass metabolism, protein binding, volume of distribution, clearance and pharmacodynamic interactions. To incorporate these issues within one's thought process, clinicians can utilise the following six questions to evaluate a medication use: (i) Is the patient experiencing acute or chronic liver failure? (ii) Does the drug have high hepatic first-pass metabolism? (iii) Is the medication highly protein-bound? (iv) Is there a change in the volume of distribution for the medication? (v) Is the clearance of the medication significantly altered? and (vi) Is there a pharmacodynamic interaction with the medication?

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction and use of six clinically relevant questions in the setting of liver disease can serve as a guide to clinicians who manage patients with liver disease.

Effect of dimethylnitrosamine-induced liver dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil after administration of S-1, an antitumour drug, to rats

OBJECTIVES

The anti-tumour agent S-1 comprises tegafur (a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil; 5-FU), gimeracil (2-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP); a competitive inhibitor of 5-FU metabolism) and oteracil potassium. The effect of hepatic dysfunction induced by dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) on the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU after administration of S-1 to rats was investigated.

METHODS

S-1 (5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously and orally to rats with DMN-induced liver dysfunction. Plasma concentrations of S-1 components and 5-FU were measured by HPLC and LC/MS-MS. Blood tests and in-vitro enzymatic investigations were also conducted.

KEY FINDINGS

DMN treatment induced hepatic dysfunction and decreased the conversion of tegafur to 5-FU in the liver without altering renal function or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity. Following intravenous administration of S-1, the blood concentration-time profiles of CDHP were similar between control rats and rats with hepatic dysfunction, but the half-life of tegafur was significantly prolonged. The maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of 5-FU was significantly reduced and the area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) was reduced by 22%. Following oral administration, the C(max) of tegafur, 5-FU and CDHP were significantly decreased and half-lives significantly increased. Hepatic dysfunction had a less pronounced effect on the AUC of 5-FU (13.6% reduction).

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic profiles of tegafur, 5-FU and CDHP were altered by changes in the elimination rate of tegafur induced by a decrease in the conversion of tegafur to 5-FU. However, hepatic dysfunction had less of an effect on the AUC of 5-FU, which correlates with anti-tumour effect, after the oral administration of S-1.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibacterial agents

This article reviews pharmacodynamics of antibacterial drugs, which can be used to optimize treatment strategies, prevent emergence of resistance and rationalize the determination of antimicrobial susceptibility. Important pharmacodynamic concepts include the requirements for bactericidal therapy for endocarditis and meningitis, for synergistic combinations to treat enterococcal endocarditis or to shorten the course of antimicrobial therapy, for obtaining maximal plasma concentration/minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratios that are greater than 10 or 24 hour-area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC)/MIC ratios that are greater than 100-125 for concentration-dependent agents against gram-negative bacilli and 25-35 against Streptococcus pneumoniae, and for obtaining percent of time that drug levels are greater than the MIC that is at least 40% to 50% of the dosing interval for time-dependent agents.

Drug-Induced Liver Disease and Drug Use Considerations in Liver Disease

Chronic liver disease encompasses a large number of hepatic disorders. One of the most important etiologies of liver disease is drug-induced liver disease, which is the leading cause of liver failure in patients referred for liver transplantation in the United States. Drug-induced liver disease can present in all forms of acute and chronic liver disease with highly variable clinical presentations. There is no effective treatment for most drug-induced liver disease and the recognition and prevention of drug-induced liver disease remain the most important management strategy. Drug dosing in patients with liver disease represents an even more challenging task to clinicians, as there is only scant information on biomarkers that can be used to predict the pharmacokinetic changes of drugs in patients with underlying liver disease. Several factors contribute to alterations in drugs metabolism and clearance in cirrhotic patients, including the severity of the liver disease and the metabolic pathways of each individual drug. Only general guidelines on dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic impairment are available. When drugs with extensive hepatic metabolism are required in patients with preexisting liver disease, benefit of therapeutic effect must be evaluated against the risk of toxicity, and the drugs must be initiated with extreme caution with appropriate dosage reduction.

Review article: The use of potentially hepatotoxic drugs in patients with liver disease

BACKGROUND

Misconceptions surround the use of hepatotoxic drugs in chronic liver disease. While many prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) agents can be used safely, this often runs counter to labelled warnings/contraindications, especially for the statins and other commonly used agents.

AIM

To evaluate published data on the use of hepatotoxic drugs in chronic liver disease including pharmacokinetic changes in cirrhosis and drug interactions, where available, to formulate recommendations on their use.

METHODS

Using a combination of PubMed searches, review texts, the Physicians' Desk Reference and expert opinion, drugs considered at higher risk of hepatotoxicity in chronic liver disease were evaluated.

RESULTS

Most drugs and OTC products including herbals have not been formally studied in chronic liver disease, but available data suggest that several of the most commonly used agents, especially the statins, can be used safely. While there is an increased risk of drug-induced liver injury for drugs used in the treatment of tuberculosis and HIV patients with hepatitis B or C, recommendations for their safe use are emerging.

CONCLUSIONS

Although many clinicians remain hesitant to use hepatotoxic drugs in chronic liver disease, the database supporting this view is limited to just a few agents. Most medications can be used safely in patients with chronic liver disease with appropriate monitoring.

Antiarrhythmics: elimination and dosage considerations in hepatic impairment

Many drugs, including most antiarrhythmics (some of which are now of limited clinical use) are eliminated by the hepatic route. If liver function is impaired, it can be anticipated that hepatic clearance will be delayed, which can lead to more pronounced drug accumulation with multiple dosing. Consequently, the potential risks of adverse events could be increased, especially as antiarrhythmics have a narrow therapeutic index. The present review summarises the available pharmacokinetic data on the most popular antiarrhythmic drugs to identify the enzymes involved in the metabolism of the various agents and confirm whether liver disease affects their elimination. Despite long usage of some of these drugs (e.g. amiodarone, diltiazem, disopyramide, procainamide and quinidine), surprisingly few data are available in patients with liver disease, making it difficult to give recommendations for dosage adjustment. In contrast, for carvedilol, lidocaine (lignocaine), propafenone and verapamil, sufficient clinical studies have been performed. For these drugs, a marked decrease in systemic and/or oral clearance and significant prolongation of the elimination half-life have been documented, which should be counteracted by a 2- to 3-fold reduction of the dosage in patients with moderate to severe liver cirrhosis. For sotalol, disopyramide and procainamide, renal clearance contributes considerably to overall elimination, suggesting that dosage reductions are probably unnecessary in patients with liver disease as long as renal function is normal. The hepatically eliminated antiarrhythmics are metabolised mainly by different cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes (e.g. CYP3A4, CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6) and partly also by conjugations. As the extent of impairment in clearance is in the same range for all of these agents, it could be assumed that they have a common vulnerability and that, consequently, hepatic dysfunction will affect CYP-mediated phase I pathways in a similar fashion. The severity of liver disease has been estimated clinically by the validated Pugh score, and functionally by calculation of the clearance of probe drugs (e.g. antipyrine). Both approaches can be helpful in estimating/predicting impairments in drug metabolism, including antiarrhythmics. In conclusion, hepatic impairment decreases the elimination of many antiarrhythmics to such an extent that dosage reductions are highly recommended in such populations, especially in patients with cirrhosis.

Pharmacokinetics of diclofenac in rats intoxicated with CCL4, and in the regenerating liver

The pharmacokinetics of an intravenous and oral diclofenac dose of 3.2 mg/kg was studied in male Wistar rats under control conditions, 1 and 3 days after liver damage and regeneration induced by an oral injection of CCl(4). One day after CCl(4) administration, indicators of necrosis (alanine aminotransferase), cholestasis (gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase) and regeneration (alpha-fetoprotein) were significantly increased; these effects were reversed after 3 days. In nonintoxicated rats, t(1/2) was 43.83 +/- 4.95 min, V(d) was 0.37 +/- 0.04 l/kg, Cl was 129.21 +/- 9.20 ml/min kg, AUC(i.v.) was 25.62 +/- 1.45 microg/min ml, and AUC(p.o.) was 20.21 +/- 1.03. One day after intoxication, when the liver was damaged and regenerating, the metabolism was decreased: diclofenac t(1/2) was increased to 258.21 +/- 30.80 min but V(d) did not change significantly, therefore Cl was reduced to 32.81 +/- 3.38 ml/min kg. By day 3 after intoxication, liver function, regeneration and pharmacokinetics returned to normal. The results show that liver damage and regeneration increases the bioavailability by decreasing elimination. The present observations suggest that reduction of the pharmacokinetic parameters may lead to drug accumulation in the regenerating-damaged liver with an attendant possible increase in toxic effects. The results in rats, also suggest that once hepatic injury is finished and regeneration is complete, diclofenac can be administered normally.

Cholestasis and endogenous opioids: liver disease and exogenous opioid pharmacokinetics

A class of endogenous opioids is upregulated in liver disease particular to cholestasis, which contributes to symptoms in liver disease such as pruritus, hypotension and encephalopathy. Symptoms associated with cholestasis are reversed or at least ameliorated by mu opioid receptor antagonists. Palliation of symptoms related to cholestatic liver disease also involves bile acid binding agents. Opioid receptor antagonists, unlike bile acid binding agents, have been reported to relieve multiple symptoms, except for pruritus, and improve liver function as demonstrated in experimental cholestasis. Exogenous opioid pharmacology is altered by liver disease. Dose reduction or prolongation of dose intervals is necessary depending on the severity of liver disease.

Effects of liver fibrosis on verapamil pharmacokinetics in rats

1. Liver fibrosis is the compensatory state of cirrhosis. In the long asymptomatic period, it is imperative to select a proper dosing regimen for drugs that are applicable to hepatic fibrosis owing to altered pharmacokinetics and bioavailability. The present study was designed to observe the changes in verapamil pharmacokinetics in rats with early liver fibrosis with respect to alterations in cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp). 2. A rat liver fibrosis model was successfully established using several inducers, including a high-fat diet, alcohol and carbon tetrachloride. After rats received a single intravenous or oral dose of verapamil (5 mg/kg), the plasma concentrations of verapamil were determined at scheduled time-points using HPLC. The activity of hepatic and small intestinal microsomal erythromycin N-demethylase (a marker for CYP3A) and the expression of small intestinal cyp3a and multidrug resistance (mdr) mRNA were compared between normal rats and rats with liver fibrosis. 3. The results showed that when verapamil was administered intravenously, the area under the curve (AUC), elimination half-life (T((1/2)(K10))) and mean residence time (MRT) increased significantly, whereas clearance (Cl) decreased, in rats with liver fibrosis compared with normal rats. After oral administration of verapamil, the AUC, (T((1/2)(K10))) and maximum concentration (C(max)) increased, Cl decreased and the absorption half-life (T((1/2)(K01))) and time to peak concentration (T(max)) were unchanged compared with normal rats. The oral bioavailability of verapamil was 32.9% in normal rats and 34.4% in rats with liver fibrosis. Furthermore, decreased CYP3A activity in the liver was accompanied by upregulated cyp3a9/18 and unchanged mdr mRNA in the small intestine compared with normal rats. Expression of cyp3a9/18 and mdr mRNA in the intestine was significantly inhibited by verapamil. 4. The results suggest that the lowered Cl and increased AUC of verapamil after intravenous and oral administration in rats with liver fibrosis were due to downregulation of CYP3A in the liver. The absorption rate of verapamil in rats with liver fibrosis was unchanged because mdr was unchanged and cyp3a was inhibited in the intestine by verapamil itself. There was no notable difference in oral bioavailability between normal rats and rats with liver fibrosis.

Dose adaptation of antineoplastic drugs in patients with liver disease

Dose adaptation for liver disease is important in patients treated with antineoplastic drugs because of the high prevalence of impaired liver function in this population and the dose-dependent, frequently serious adverse effects of these drugs. We classified the antineoplastic drugs marketed in Switzerland at the end of 2004 according to their bioavailability and/or hepatic extraction to predict their kinetic behaviour in patients with decreased liver function. This prediction was compared with kinetic studies carried out with these drugs in patients with liver disease. The studies were identified by a structured, computer-based literature search. Of the 69 drugs identified, 52 had a predominant extrarenal (in most cases hepatic) metabolism and/or excretion. For 49 drugs, hepatic extraction could be calculated and/or bioavailability data were available, allowing classification according to hepatic extraction. For 18 drugs, kinetic studies have been reported in patients with impaired liver function, with the findings generally resulting in quantitative recommendations for adaptation of the dosage. In particular, recommendations are precise for 16 drugs excreted by the bile (e.g. doxorubicin and derivatives and vinca alkaloids). Validation studies comparing such recommendations with kinetics and/or dynamics of antineoplastic drugs in patients with decreased liver function have not been published. We conclude that there are currently not enough data for safe use of cyctostatics in patients with liver disease. Pharmaceutical companies should be urged to provide kinetic data (especially hepatic extraction data) for the classification of such drugs and to conduct kinetic studies for drugs with primarily hepatic metabolism in patients with impaired liver function to allow quantitative advice to be given for dose adaptation.

Clinical and Pharmacologic Study of the Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor Tipifarnib in Cancer Patients With Normal or Mildly or Moderately Impaired Hepatic Function

Purpose

This study explored the feasibility of treating patients with impaired hepatic function with tipifarnib. The safety profile, pharmacokinetics, and relationship between the pharmacokinetics and toxicities were evaluated.

Patients and Methods

Patients with mildly or moderately impaired hepatic function (Child-Pugh classification) were treated with tipifarnib bid on days 1 to 5 of cycle 1. Further dosing was based on the individual day 5 pharmacokinetic data and absolute neutrophil count. For patients with normal hepatic function, tipifarnib was dosed on days 1 to 14, followed by 1 week of rest. For all patients, in subsequent cycles, tipifarnib was administered for 21 consecutive days out of every 28 days.

Results

Twenty-eight patients were included in the normal (n = 16), mild (n = 9), and moderate (n = 3) impairment groups. The most important grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity was leukocytopenia/neutropenia, which was mostly observed in patients with moderate impairment. Common nonhematologic toxicities were fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. The pharmacokinetic data showed higher plasma concentrations of tipifarnib in patients with liver impairment compared with patients with normal hepatic function.

Conclusion

In patients with mildly impaired hepatic function, tipifarnib can be administered safely at a starting dose of 200 mg bid, but it is not safe to treat patients with moderate hepatic impairment.

Dose adjustment in patients with liver disease

Unfortunately, there is no endogenous marker for hepatic clearance that can be used as a guide for drug dosing. In order to predict the kinetic behaviour of drugs in cirrhotic patients, agents can be grouped according to their extent of hepatic extraction. For drugs with a high hepatic extraction (low bioavailability in healthy subjects), bioavailability increases and hepatic clearance decreases in cirrhotic patients. If such drugs are administered orally to cirrhotic patients, their initial dose has to be reduced according to hepatic extraction. Furthermore, their maintenance dose has to be adapted irrespective of the route of administration, if possible, according to kinetic studies in cirrhotic patients. For drugs with a low hepatic extraction, bioavailability is not affected by liver disease, but hepatic clearance may be affected. For such drugs, only the maintenance dose has to be reduced, according to the estimated decrease in hepatic drug metabolism. For drugs with an intermediate hepatic extraction, initial oral doses should be chosen in the low range of normal in cirrhotic patients and maintenance doses should be reduced as for high extraction drugs. In cholestatic patients, the clearance of drugs with predominant biliary elimination may be impaired. Guidelines for dose reduction in cholestasis exist for many antineoplastic drugs, but are mostly lacking for other drugs with biliary elimination. Dose adaptation of such drugs in cholestatic patients is, therefore, difficult and has to be performed according to pharmacological effect and/or toxicity. Importantly, the dose of drugs with predominant renal elimination may also have to be adapted in patients with liver disease. Cirrhotic patients often have impaired renal function, despite a normal serum creatinine level. In cirrhotic patients, creatinine clearance should, therefore, be measured or estimated to gain a guideline for the dosing of drugs with predominant renal elimination. Since the creatinine clearance tends to overestimate glomerular filtration in cirrhotic patients, the dose of a given drug may still be too high after adaptation to creatinine clearance. Therefore, the clinical monitoring of pharmacological effects and toxicity of such drugs is important. Besides the mentioned kinetic changes, the dynamics of some drugs is also altered in cirrhotic patients. Examples include opiates, benzodiazepines, NSAIDs and diuretics. Such drugs may exhibit unusual adverse effects that clinicians should be aware of for their safe use. However, it is important to realise that the recommendations for dose adaptation remain general and cannot replace accurate clinical monitoring of patients with liver disease treated with critical drugs.

Pharmacokinetics of telbivudine in subjects with various degrees of hepatic impairment

This study evaluated the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of telbivudine, an investigational nucleoside antiviral for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Twenty-four subjects were assigned to four hepatic function groups (normal function and mild, moderate, and severe impairment, with six subjects in each group) on the basis of Child-Pugh scores. The subjects were administered a single oral dose of 600 mg telbivudine, and blood samples were collected over a 48-h interval for pharmacokinetic analyses. Telbivudine was well tolerated by all subjects. Telbivudine plasma concentration-time profiles were similar across the four hepatic function groups. The principal pharmacokinetic parameters of drug exposure, i.e., the maximum plasma concentration and area under the drug concentration-time curve, were comparable between subjects with various degrees of hepatic impairment and those with normal hepatic function. Results from this single-dose pharmacokinetic assessment therefore provide a pharmacologic rationale for further evaluation of the safety and efficacy of telbivudine in hepatitis B virus-infected patients with decompensated liver diseases.

Principles of use of antibacterial agents

The selection of an antimicrobial regimen is based on a number of factors, including the nature of the infection, the identity and susceptibility of the pathogens, host characteristics, and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial agents. This article provides a comprehensive overview of these factors, with particular attention to pharmacokinetics and monitoring for efficacy and toxicity. A brief summary is also provided of some other topics discussed in detail elsewhere in this issue, such as susceptibility testing, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics parameters.

Differential Expression of Mouse Hepatic Transporter Genes in Response to Acetaminophen and Carbon Tetrachloride

Drug-metabolizing enzymes and membrane transporters are responsible for the detoxication and elimination of xenobiotics from the body. The goal of this study was to identify alterations in mRNA expression of various transport and detoxication proteins in mouse liver after administration of the hepatotoxicants, acetaminophen or carbon tetrachloride. Therefore, male C57BL/6 J mice received acetaminophen (APAP, 200, 300, or 400 mg/kg, ip) or carbon tetrachloride (CCl4, 10 or 25 microl/kg, ip). Plasma and liver samples were collected at 6, 24, and 48 h for assessment of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity, total RNA isolation, and histopathological analysis of injury. Heme oxygenase-1 (Ho-1), NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase-1 (Nqo1), organic anion-transporting polypeptides (Oatp1a1, 1a4 and 1b2), sodium/taurocholate-cotransporting polypeptide (Ntcp), and multidrug resistance-associated protein (Mrp 1-6) mRNA levels in liver were determined using the branched DNA signal amplification assay. Hepatotoxic doses of APAP and CCl4 increased Ho-1 and Nqo1 mRNA levels by 22- and 2.5-fold, respectively, and reduced Oatp1a1, 1a4, and Ntcp mRNA levels in liver. By contrast, expression of Mrps 1-4 was increased after treatment with APAP and CCl4. Notably, a marked elevation of Mrp4 mRNA expression was observed 24 h after APAP 400 mg/kg (5-fold) and CCl4 25 microl/kg (37-fold). Collectively, these expression patterns suggest a coordinated regulation of both transport and detoxification genes during liver injury. This reduction in expression of uptake transporters, as well as enhanced transcription of detoxication enzymes and export transporters may limit the accumulation of potentially toxic products in hepatocytes.

No influence of mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

BACKGROUND

The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran is a new class of anticoagulant currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to its active form melagatran.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ximelagatran.

STUDY DESIGN

Nonblinded, nonrandomised study.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve volunteers with mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment (classified as Child-Pugh A or B) and 12 age-, weight-, and sex-matched control volunteers with normal hepatic function.

METHODS

Volunteers received a single oral dose of ximelagatran 24mg. Plasma and urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses.

RESULTS

The absorption and bioconversion of ximelagatran to melagatran were rapid in both groups. The maximum plasma concentration of melagatran (Cmax) was achieved 2-3 hours after administration; the mean elimination half-life (t1/2z) was 3.6 hours for hepatically impaired volunteers and 3.1 hours for the control volunteers. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and Cmax of melagatran in volunteers with hepatic impairment were 11 and 25% lower than in control volunteers, respectively. However, after correcting for the higher renal function (i.e. higher calculated creatinine clearance) in the hepatically impaired volunteers, the ratio of melagatran AUC for hepatically impaired/control volunteers was 0.98 (90% CI 0.80, 1.22), suggesting that mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of ximelagatran. Melagatran was the predominant compound in urine, accounting for 13-14% of the ximelagatran dose. Renal clearance of melagatran was 13% higher in hepatically impaired than in control volunteers. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the concentration-response relationship between plasma melagatran concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Baseline prothrombin time (PT) was slightly longer in the hepatically impaired patients than in the control volunteers, probably reflecting a slight decrease in the activity of coagulation factors. However, when concentrations of melagatran were at their peak, the increase in PT from baseline values was the same in both groups. Capillary bleeding time was measured in the hepatically impaired patients only, and was not increased by ximelagatran. Ximelagatran was well tolerated in both groups.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran between the hepatically impaired and control volunteers. These findings suggest that dose adjustment for patients with mild-to-moderate impairment of hepatic function is not necessary.

Treatment of Anxiety and Depression in Transplant Patients

Depressive and anxiety disorders appear during the transplant process due to psychological stressors, medications and physiological disturbances. Treatment is necessary to prevent impact on patient compliance, morbidity and mortality. Psychotropic medications provide an effective option, although most are only available as oral formulations. Because of this, they are more susceptible to alterations in pharmacokinetic behaviour arising from organ dysfunction in the pretransplant period. Kinetics are also an issue when considering potential drug-drug interactions before and after transplantation. Prior to transplant, organ dysfunction can change the pharmacokinetic behaviour of some psychotropic agents, requiring adjustment of dosage and schedules. Thoracic or abdominal organ failure may reduce drug absorption through disturbances in intestinal motility, perfusion and function. Cirrhotic patients experience increased drug bioavailability due to portosystemic shunting, and thus dosage is adjusted downward. In contrast, dosage needs to be raised when peripheral oedema expands the drug distribution volume for hydrophilic and protein-bound agents. Drug clearance for most psychotropic medications is dependent upon hepatic metabolism, which is often disrupted by endstage organ disease. Selection of drugs or their dosage may need to be adjusted to lower the risk of drug accumulation. Further adjustments in dosage may be called for when renal failure accompanies thoracic or abdominal organ failure, resulting in further impairment of clearance. Studies regarding the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in the medically ill are limited in number, but recommendations are possible by review of clinical and pharmacokinetic data. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are well tolerated and efficacious for depression, panic disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Adjustments in dosage are required when renal or hepatic impairment is present. Among them, citalopram and escitalopram appear to have the least risk of drug-drug interactions. Paroxetine has demonstrated evidence supporting its use with generalised anxiety disorder. Venlafaxine is an alternative option, beneficial in depression, post-traumatic stress and generalised anxiety disorders. Nefazodone may also be considered, but there is some risk of hepatotoxicity and interactions with immunosuppressant drugs. Mirtazapine still needs to be studied further in anxiety disorders, but can be helpful for depression accompanied by anorexia and insomnia. Bupropion is effective in the treatment of depression, but data are sparse about its use in anxiety disorders. Psychostimulants are a unique approach if rapid onset of antidepressant action is desired. Acute or short-term anxiolysis is obtained with benzodiazepines, and selection of particular agents entails consideration of distribution rate, half-life and metabolic route.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations when treating patients with sepsis and septic shock

Sepsis and septic shock are accompanied by profound changes in the organism that may alter both the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of drugs. This review elaborates on the mechanisms by which sepsis-induced pathophysiological changes may influence pharmacological processes. Drug absorption following intramuscular, subcutaneous, transdermal and oral administration may be reduced due to a decreased perfusion of muscles, skin and splanchnic organs. Compromised tissue perfusion may also affect drug distribution, resulting in a decrease of distribution volume. On the other hand, the increase in capillary permeability and interstitial oedema during sepsis and septic shock may enhance drug distribution. Changes in plasma protein binding, body water, tissue mass and pH may also affect drug distribution. For basic drugs that are bound to the acute phase reactant alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein, the increase in plasma concentration of this protein will result in a decreased distribution volume. The opposite may be observed for drugs that are extensively bound to albumin, as the latter protein decreases during septic conditions. For many drugs, the liver is the main organ for metabolism. The determinants of hepatic clearance of drugs are liver blood flow, drug binding in plasma and the activity of the metabolic enzymes; each of these may be influenced by sepsis and septic shock. For high extraction drugs, clearance is mainly flow-dependent, and sepsis-induced liver hypoperfusion may result in a decreased clearance. For low extraction drugs, clearance is determined by the degree of plasma binding and the activity of the metabolic enzymes. Oxidative metabolism via the cytochrome P450 enzyme system is an important clearance mechanism for many drugs, and has been shown to be markedly affected in septic conditions, resulting in decreased drug clearance. The kidneys are an important excretion pathway for many drugs. Renal failure, which often accompanies sepsis and septic shock, will result in accumulation of both parent drug and its metabolites. Changes in drug effect during septic conditions may theoretically result from changes in pharmacodynamics due to changes in the affinity of the receptor for the drug or alterations in the intrinsic activity at the receptor. The lack of valid pharmacological studies in patients with sepsis and septic shock makes drug administration in these patients a difficult challenge. The patient's underlying pathophysiological condition may guide individual dosage selection, which may be guided by measuring plasma concentration or drug effect.

Protein drug oral delivery: the recent progress

Rapid development in molecular biology and recent advancement in recombinant technology increase identification and commercialization of potential protein drugs. Traditional forms of administrations for the peptide and protein drugs often rely on their parenteral injection, since the bioavailability of these therapeutic agents is poor when administered nonparenterally. Tremendous efforts by numerous investigators in the world have been put to improve protein formulations and as a result, a few successful formulations have been developed including sustained-release human growth hormone. For a promising protein delivery technology, efficacy and safety are the first requirement to meet. However, these systems still require periodic injection and increase the incidence of patient compliance. The development of an oral dosage form that improves the absorption of peptide and especially protein drugs is the most desirable formulation but one of the greatest challenges in the pharmaceutical field. The major barriers to developing oral formulations for peptides and proteins are metabolic enzymes and impermeable mucosal tissues in the intestine. Furthermore, chemical and conformational instability of protein drugs is not a small issue in protein pharmaceuticals. Conventional pharmaceutical approaches to address these barriers, which have been successful with traditional organic drug molecules, have not been effective for peptide and protein formulations. It is likely that effective oral formulations for peptides and proteins will remain highly compound specific. A number of innovative oral drug delivery approaches have been recently developed, including the drug entrapment within small vesicles or their passage through the intestinal paracellular pathway. This review provides a summary of the novel approaches currently in progress in the protein oral delivery followed by factors affecting protein oral absorption.

Influence of hepatic regeneration after partial hepatectomy on theophylline pharmacokinetics in rats

The influence of hepatic regeneration after partial hepatectomy on theophylline pharmacokinetics has been studied on the rat. At different times after partial hepatectomy, theophylline was administered intravenously as a single dose of 6 mg/Kg. Drug plasma levels were determined by HPLC and pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained. Physiological parameters were also measured. Following hepatectomy, an increase in mass liver was observed and 15 days after surgery, liver mass was 78% of nonhepatectomized rats. Initial theophylline concentrations varied during the regeneration period, as well as the distribution volume at steady-estate (Vss). Elimination half-life (t 1/2), notably increased after hepatectomy (7.27+/-1.38 h), decreased with time (6.70+/-1.18 h, 6.47+/-0.69 and 5.17+/-0.87 h after 24 h, 3 days and 15 days post-hepatectomy, respectively) to reach a value close to that of the control group (4.30+/-1.37 h). The increase in elimination half-life led to a decrease in the mean residence time during the period of liver regeneration. However, the intrinsic clearance hardly varied during regeneration period. We could establish the following relationship between liver weight (LW) and the elimination half-life: t 1/2 (h)=-0.358*LW (g)+8.6168 (R2=0.9906). For the mean residence time (MRT) this relationship was: MRT (h) =-0.5173*LW (g)+12.433 (R2=0.991).