Chronic benzodiazepine treatment decreases postsynaptic GABA sensitivity

The unconditioned fear response in vertebrates deficient in dystrophin

Dystrophin loss due to mutations in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) gene is associated with a wide spectrum of neurocognitive comorbidities, including an aberrant unconditioned fear response to stressful/threat stimuli. Dystrophin-deficient animal models of DMD demonstrate enhanced stress reactivity that manifests as sustained periods of immobility. When the threat is repetitive or severe in nature, dystrophinopathy phenotypes can be exacerbated and even cause sudden death. Thus, it is apparent that enhanced sensitivity to stressful/threat stimuli in dystrophin-deficient vertebrates is a legitimate cause of concern for patients with DMD that could impact neurocognition and pathophysiology. This review discusses our current understanding of the mechanisms and consequences of the hypersensitive fear response in preclinical models of DMD and the potential challenges facing clinical translatability.

GABAergic signaling in alcohol use disorder and withdrawal: pathological involvement and therapeutic potential

Alcohol is one of the most widely used substances. Alcohol use accounts for 5.1% of the global disease burden, contributes substantially to societal and economic costs, and leads to approximately 3 million global deaths yearly. Alcohol use disorder (AUD) includes various drinking behavior patterns that lead to short-term or long-lasting effects on health. Ethanol, the main psychoactive molecule acting in alcoholic beverages, directly impacts the GABAergic system, contributing to GABAergic dysregulations that vary depending on the intensity and duration of alcohol consumption. A small number of interventions have been developed that target the GABAergic system, but there are promising future therapeutic avenues to explore. This review provides an overview of the impact of alcohol on the GABAergic system, the current interventions available for AUD that target the GABAergic system, and the novel interventions being explored that in the future could be included among first-line therapies for the treatment of AUD.

New GABA-Targeting Therapies for the Treatment of Seizures and Epilepsy: I. Role of GABA as a Modulator of Seizure Activity and Recently Approved Medications Acting on the GABA System

γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the most prevalent inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain and has been found to play an important role in the pathogenesis or the expression of many neurological diseases, including epilepsy. Although GABA can act on different receptor subtypes, the component of the GABA system that is most critical to modulation of seizure activity is the GABAA-receptor-chloride (Cl-) channel complex, which controls the movement of Cl- ions across the neuronal membrane. In the mature brain, binding of GABA to GABAA receptors evokes a hyperpolarising (anticonvulsant) response, which is mediated by influx of Cl- into the cell driven by its concentration gradient between extracellular and intracellular fluid. However, in the immature brain and under certain pathological conditions, GABA can exert a paradoxical depolarising (proconvulsant) effect as a result of an efflux of chloride from high intracellular to lower extracellular Cl- levels. Extensive preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that alterations in GABAergic inhibition caused by drugs, toxins, gene defects or other disease states (including seizures themselves) play a causative or contributing role in facilitating or maintaning seizure activity. Conversely, enhancement of GABAergic transmission through pharmacological modulation of the GABA system is a major mechanism by which different antiseizure medications exert their therapeutic effect. In this article, we review the pharmacology and function of the GABA system and its perturbation in seizure disorders, and highlight how improved understanding of this system offers opportunities to develop more efficacious and better tolerated antiseizure medications. We also review the available data for the two most recently approved antiseizure medications that act, at least in part, through GABAergic mechanisms, namely cenobamate and ganaxolone. Differences in the mode of drug discovery, pharmacological profile, pharmacokinetic properties, drug-drug interaction potential, and clinical efficacy and tolerability of these agents are discussed.

Remimazolam Tolerance in Long-term Benzodiazepine Users: A Case Report of 2 Cases

A 60-year-old woman with a 5-year history of anxiolytic use, a diazepam-equivalent daily dose of 15 mg, was scheduled for esophageal stent removal. She was given remimazolam (0.5 mg/kg) but remained fully alert. She only lost consciousness with propofol (40 mg). A 61-year-old man with a 1-year history of anxiolytic use, diazepam-equivalent daily dose of 20 mg, was scheduled for hand tumor resection. He was given remimazolam (0.3 mg/kg) but remained fully alert. He only lost consciousness after desflurane inhalation. In a patient with a history of long-term benzodiazepine use, anesthetic or sedative agents aside from remimazolam should be considered.

Looking for Novelty in an "Old" Receptor: Recent Advances Toward Our Understanding of GABAARs and Their Implications in Receptor Pharmacology

Diverse populations of GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs) throughout the brain mediate fast inhibitory transmission and are modulated by various endogenous ligands and therapeutic drugs. Deficits in GABA_AR signaling underlie the pathophysiology behind neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders such as epilepsy, anxiety, and depression. Pharmacological intervention for these disorders relies on several drug classes that target GABA_ARs, such as benzodiazepines and more recently neurosteroids. It has been widely demonstrated that subunit composition and receptor stoichiometry impact the biophysical and pharmacological properties of GABA_ARs. However, current GABA_AR-targeting drugs have limited subunit selectivity and produce their therapeutic effects concomitantly with undesired side effects. Therefore, there is still a need to develop more selective GABA_AR pharmaceuticals, as well as evaluate the potential for developing next-generation drugs that can target accessory proteins associated with native GABA_ARs. In this review, we briefly discuss the effects of benzodiazepines and neurosteroids on GABA_ARs, their use as therapeutics, and some of the pitfalls associated with their adverse side effects. We also discuss recent advances toward understanding the structure, function, and pharmacology of GABA_ARs with a focus on benzodiazepines and neurosteroids, as well as newly identified transmembrane proteins that modulate GABA_ARs.

A Rationale for Allopregnanolone Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorders: Basic and Clinical Studies

For many years, research from around the world has suggested that the neuroactive steroid (3α,5α)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one (allopregnanolone or 3α,5α-THP) may have therapeutic potential for treatment of various symptoms of alcohol use disorders (AUDs). In this critical review, we systematically address all the evidence that supports such a suggestion, delineate the etiologies of AUDs that are addressed by treatment with allopregnanolone or its precursor pregnenolone, and the rationale for treatment of various components of the disease based on basic science and clinical evidence. This review presents a theoretical framework for understanding how endogenous steroids that regulate the effects of stress, alcohol, and the innate immune system could play a key role in both the prevention and the treatment of AUDs. We further discuss cautions and limitations of allopregnanolone or pregnenolone therapy with suggestions regarding the management of risk and the potential for helping millions who suffer from AUDs.

Diazepam Accelerates GABAAR Synaptic Exchange and Alters Intracellular Trafficking

Despite 50+ years of clinical use as anxiolytics, anti-convulsants, and sedative/hypnotic agents, the mechanisms underlying benzodiazepine (BZD) tolerance are poorly understood. BZDs potentiate the actions of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter in the adult brain, through positive allosteric modulation of γ2 subunit containing GABA type A receptors (GABAARs). Here we define key molecular events impacting γ2 GABAAR and the inhibitory synapse gephyrin scaffold following initial sustained BZD exposure in vitro and in vivo. Using immunofluorescence and biochemical experiments, we found that cultured cortical neurons treated with the classical BZD, diazepam (DZP), presented no substantial change in surface or synaptic levels of γ2-GABAARs. In contrast, both γ2 and the postsynaptic scaffolding protein gephyrin showed diminished total protein levels following a single DZP treatment in vitro and in mouse cortical tissue. We further identified DZP treatment enhanced phosphorylation of gephyrin Ser270 and increased generation of gephyrin cleavage products. Selective immunoprecipitation of γ2 from cultured neurons revealed enhanced ubiquitination of this subunit following DZP exposure. To assess novel trafficking responses induced by DZP, we employed a γ2 subunit containing an N terminal fluorogen-activating peptide (FAP) and pH-sensitive green fluorescent protein (γ2pHFAP). Live-imaging experiments using γ2pHFAP GABAAR expressing neurons identified enhanced lysosomal targeting of surface GABAARs and increased overall accumulation in vesicular compartments in response to DZP. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements between α2 and γ2 subunits within a GABAAR in neurons, we identified reductions in synaptic clusters of this subpopulation of surface BZD sensitive receptor. Additional time-series experiments revealed the gephyrin regulating kinase ERK was inactivated by DZP at multiple time points. Moreover, we found DZP simultaneously enhanced synaptic exchange of both γ2-GABAARs and gephyrin using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) techniques. Finally we provide the first proteomic analysis of the BZD sensitive GABAAR interactome in DZP vs. vehicle treated mice. Collectively, our results indicate DZP exposure elicits down-regulation of gephyrin scaffolding and BZD sensitive GABAAR synaptic availability via multiple dynamic trafficking processes.

Potential role for histone deacetylation in chronic diazepam-induced downregulation of α1-GABAA receptor subunit expression

Corroborating evidence indicate that the downregulation of GABAA receptor subunit expression may underlie tolerance to the anticonvulsant and anxiolytic actions of benzodiazepine (BZ) ligands that act as full allosteric modulators (FAMs) of GABA actions at a variety of GABAA receptor subtypes. We and others have shown that 10-14 days treatment with increasing doses of diazepam (a FAM) resulted in anticonvulsant tolerance and decreased the expression of the α1 GABAA receptor subunit mRNA and protein in frontal cortex. In addition, we have also shown that long-term treatment with imidazenil, a partial allosteric modulator of GABA action at selective GABAA receptor subtypes, fail to change the expression of the α1 subunit mRNA or induce tolerance to its anticonvulsant or anxiolytic action. However, little is known regarding the potential role of epigenetic mechanisms on long-term BZ-induced downregulation of GABAA receptor subunit. Therefore, we examined the role of histone acetylation and DNA methylation mechanisms on long-term diazepam-induced downregulation of the α1 subunit mRNA expression in rat frontal cortex. We found that 10 days treatment with increasing doses of diazepam but not imidazenil decreased the expression of the α1 GABAA receptor subunit mRNA and promoter acetylation in frontal cortex. In addition, we also found that 10 days treatment with diazepam but not imidazenil increased the expression of histone deacetylase (HDAC) 1 and 2 in frontal cortex. Thus, the increased expression of HDAC1 and HDAC2 (class 1 HDACs) and consequently increased histone deacetylation mechanism of this class 1 HDACs, may underlie long-term diazepam-induced decreased expression of the α1 GABAA receptor subunit mRNA in frontal cortex.

GABAA Receptor Density Is Not Altered by a Novel Herbal Anxiolytic Treatment

Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and considered a major public health concern worldwide. Current anxiolytics are of limited efficacy and associated with various side effects. Our novel herbal treatment (NHT), composed of four constituents, was shown to reduce anxiety-like behavior while precluding a common side effect caused by current anxiolytics, i.e., sexual dysfunction. Nevertheless, NHT's mechanism of action is yet to be determined. There is evidence that some medicinal herbs interact with the GABAergic system. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether NHT's anxiolytic-like effect is exerted by alterations in GABA_A receptor density in the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and hypothalamus. The effects of 3-weeks treatment with NHT on anxiety-like behavior and locomotion were assessed using the elevated plus maze (EPM) and the open field test (OFT), respectively. Regional GABA_A receptor levels were analyzed using [³H] RO15-1788 high-affinity binding assays. In stressed mice, NHT reduced anxiety-like behavior similarly to the benzodiazepine, clonazepam, while locomotion remained intact. Lack of changes or minor changes in regional GABA_A receptor density in the brain were induced by NHT or clonazepam. In naive mice, performance in the EPM, locomotion and GABA_A receptor densities were not altered by treatment with NHT or clonazepam. These findings support NHT as an efficacious and safe anxiolytic, although the GABAergic involvement remains to be further elucidated.

Valium without dependence? Individual GABAA receptor subtype contribution toward benzodiazepine addiction, tolerance, and therapeutic effects

Benzodiazepines are one of the most prescribed medications as first-line treatment of anxiety, insomnia, and epilepsy around the world. Over the past two decades, advances in the neuropharmacological understanding of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)_A receptors revealed distinct contributions from each subtype and produced effects. Recent findings have highlighted the importance of α₁ containing GABA_A receptors in the mechanisms of addiction and tolerance in benzodiazepine treatments. This has shown promise in the development of tranquilizers with minimal side effects such as cognitive impairment, dependence, and tolerance. A valium-like drug without its side effects, as repeatedly demonstrated in animals, is achievable.

NMDA Receptors and NO:cGMP Signaling Pathway Mediate the Diazepam-Induced Sensitization to Withdrawal Signs in Mice

The goal of the present study was to examine the effects of N-methyl-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists-memantine and ketamine and the drugs modifying the NO:cGMP pathway-NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and 7-nitroindazole (7-NI), the endogenous precursor of NO-L-arginine, and the guanylyl cyclase inhibitor-methylene blue (MB) on the development of sensitization to withdrawal signs precipitated after chronic, interrupted treatment with diazepam, a benzodiazepine receptor agonist, in mice. To develop the sensitization, the mice were divided into groups: continuously and sporadically (with two diazepam-free periods) treated with diazepam (15 mg/kg, sc). To precipitate the withdrawal syndrome (clonic and tonic seizures, and death), pentylenetetrazole (55 mg/kg, sc) with the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, flumazenil (5.0 mg/kg, ip), were administered after the last injection of diazepam or saline. Memantine (2.5, 5.0 mg/kg), and ketamine (2.5, 5.0 mg/kg), L-NAME (100, 200 mg/kg) and 7-NI (20 and 40 mg/kg), L-arginine (250, 500 mg/kg) and MB (5 and 10 mg/kg) were administered ip in sporadically diazepam-treated mice during the diazepam-free periods. Our results indicated that both NMDA receptor antagonists and drugs that inhibit the NO:cGMP pathway, except L-arginine (the endogenous donor of NO), attenuated the diazepam-induced sensitization to withdrawal signs in mice. Thus, NMDA receptors and the NO:cGMP pathway are involved in the mechanisms of sensitization to benzodiazepine withdrawal.

Role of GABAA receptors in alcohol use disorders suggested by chronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) rodent model

GABAergic inhibitory transmission is involved in the acute and chronic effects of ethanol on the brain and behavior. One-dose ethanol exposure induces transient plastic changes in GABAA receptor subunit levels, composition, and regional and subcellular localization. Rapid down-regulation of early responder δ subunit-containing GABAA receptor subtypes mediating ethanol-sensitive tonic inhibitory currents in critical neuronal circuits corresponds to rapid tolerance to ethanol's behavioral responses. Slightly slower, α1 subunit-containing GABAA receptor subtypes mediating ethanol-insensitive synaptic inhibition are down-regulated, corresponding to tolerance to additional ethanol behaviors plus cross-tolerance to other GABAergic drugs including benzodiazepines, anesthetics, and neurosteroids, especially sedative-hypnotic effects. Compensatory up-regulation of synaptically localized α4 and α2 subunit-containing GABAA receptor subtypes, mediating ethanol-sensitive synaptic inhibitory currents follow, but exhibit altered physio-pharmacology, seizure susceptibility, hyperexcitability, anxiety, and tolerance to GABAergic positive allosteric modulators, corresponding to heightened alcohol withdrawal syndrome. All these changes (behavioral, physiological, and biochemical) induced by ethanol administration are transient and return to normal in a few days. After chronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) treatment the same changes are observed but they become persistent after 30 or more doses, lasting for at least 120 days in the rat, and probably for life. We conclude that the ethanol-induced changes in GABAA receptors represent aberrant plasticity contributing critically to ethanol dependence and increased voluntary consumption. We suggest that the craving, drug-seeking, and increased consumption in the rat model are tied to ethanol-induced plastic changes in GABAA receptors, importantly the development of ethanol-sensitive synaptic GABAA receptor-mediating inhibitory currents that participate in maintained positive reward actions of ethanol on critical neuronal circuits. These probably disinhibit nerve endings of inhibitory GABAergic neurons on dopamine reward circuit cells, and limbic system circuits mediating anxiolysis in hippocampus and amygdala. We further suggest that the GABAA receptors contributing to alcohol dependence in the rat and presumably in human alcohol use disorders (AUD) are the ethanol-induced up-regulated subtypes containing α4 and most importantly α2 subunits. These mediate critical aspects of the positive reinforcement of ethanol in the dependent chronic user while alleviating heightened withdrawal symptoms experienced whenever ethanol is absent. The speculative conclusions based on firm observations are readily testable.

Activation-induced regulation of GABAA receptors: Is there a link with the molecular basis of benzodiazepine tolerance?

Benzodiazepines have been used clinically for more than 50 years to treat disorders such as insomnia, anxiety, and epilepsy, as well as to aid muscle relaxation and anesthesia. The therapeutic index for benzodiazepines if very high and the toxicity is low. However, their usefulness is limited by the development of either or both tolerance to most of their pharmacological actions and dependence. Tolerance develops at different rates depending on the pharmacological action, suggesting the existence of distinct mechanisms for each behavioral parameter. Alternatively, multiple mechanisms could coexist depending on the subtype of GABAA receptor expressed and the brain region involved. Because most of the pharmacological actions of benzodiazepines are mediated through GABAA receptor binding, adaptive alterations in the number, structure, and/or functions of these receptors may play an important role in the development of tolerance. This review is focused on the regulation of GABAA receptors induced by long-term benzodiazepine exposure and its relationship with the development of tolerance. Understanding the mechanisms behind benzodiazepine tolerance is critical for designing drugs that could maintain their efficacy during long-term treatments.

Correlates of benzodiazepine use in major depressive disorder: The effect of anhedonia

BACKGROUND

Current treatment guidelines emphasize the limited role of benzodiazepines in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), mainly due to the absence of long-term data, risk of abuse and potential adverse effects. However, benzodiazepines continue to be prescribed for long-term use in a significant number of patients. This study sought to evaluate benzodiazepine use in a large sample of MDD patients seen at a tertiary care clinic, and determine whether use is related to illness severity or complexity, as well as to identify the clinical predictors of benzodiazepine use.

METHODS

This was a naturalistic cross-sectional study conducted in MDD patients seen at the Mood Disorders Pyschopharmacology Unit at the University Health Network (N=326). Detailed information on current medication regimens was collected. A structured diagnostic interview, in addition to measures of symptom severity, quality of life, and personality were administered. Participants were grouped according to the presence or absence of prescribed benzodiazepines for daily use.

RESULTS

The prevalence of regular benzodiazepine use was 25%. Benzodiazepine users were more likely to be female, unemployed, have a history of child abuse, and have comorbid panic disorder. Depression and anxiety scores were not significantly different between groups, although anhedonia was greater in the benzodiazepine group. A logistic regression revealed anhedonia was the strongest predictor of regular benzodiazepine use.

CONCLUSION

The groups were similar in clinical profile suggesting benzodiazepine use is not necessarily linked to greater illness complexity or severity. Benzodiazepine use appears to be associated with specific diagnostic and symptom characteristics, possibly providing insight into the potential pharmacodynamic and neurobiological effects of frequent use.

Effects of chronic flunitrazepam treatment schedule on therapy-induced sedation and motor impairment in mice

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to examine whether different treatment schedules could be associated with tolerance development to the ataxic and sedative effects of flunitrazepam in mice.

METHODS

Effects of repeated flunitrazepam administration were studied in the rotarod and the chimney test for motor coordination and in a photocell apparatus for locomotor activity in mice. Flunitrazepam doses varied in particular types of injections or in different experiment duration periods.

RESULTS

Repeated flunitrazepam administration (1 mg/kg, sc and 2 mg/kg, ip) for 8 consecutive days induced tolerance to the motor impairing effects of flunitrazepam in mice, both in the rotarod and the chimney test. In turn, no tolerance developed to sedative flunitrazepam effects, regarding either dose level, injection type or treatment duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Those findings confirmed the previous observations that tolerance to benzodiazepines was not simultaneous for each pharmacological property of the drugs. Interestingly enough, an acute dose of flunitrazepam (1 mg/kg, sc) in our study enhanced locomotor activity of mice.

Ethanol promotes clathrin adaptor-mediated endocytosis via the intracellular domain of δ-containing GABAA receptors

Pharmacological and genetic evidence reveals that GABA(A) receptor (GABA(A)-R) expression and localization are modulated in response to acute and chronic ethanol (EtOH) exposure. To determine molecular mechanisms of GABA(A)-R plasticity in response to in vivo acute EtOH, we measured early time changes in GABA(A)-R subunit localization. Single doses of EtOH (3 g/kg via i.p. injection in rats) produced decreases in surface levels of GABA(A)-R α4 and δ subunits at 5-15 min post-EtOH in hippocampus CA1 and dentate gyrus, verifying our earlier report (Liang et al., 2007). Here we also examined the β3 subunit and its phosphorylation state during internalization. β3 also was internalized during 5-15 min after EtOH exposure, while phosphorylation of β3 was increased, then decreased at later times, ruling out β3 dephosphorylation-dependent endocytosis. As early as 5 min post-EtOH, there is an initial increase in association between the δ subunits with clathrin adaptor proteins AP2-μ2 revealed by coimmunoprecipitation, followed by a decrease in association 15 min post-EtOH. In vitro studies using glutathione S-transferase fused to the δ subunit intracellular domain (ICD) show that two regions, one containing a classical YxxΦ motif and the other an atypical R/K-rich motif, directly and differentially bind to AP2-μ2, with the former YRSV exhibiting higher affinity. Mutating both regions in the δ-ICD abolishes μ2 binding, providing a possible mechanism that can explain the rapid downregulation of extrasynaptic α4βδ-GABA(A)-R following in vivo EtOH administration, in which the δ-ICD increases in affinity for clathrin AP2-μ2 leading to endocytosis.

Differential effects of short- and long-term zolpidem treatment on recombinant α1β2γ2s subtype of GABA(A) receptors in vitro

AIM

Zolpidem is a non-benzodiazepine agonist at benzodiazepine binding site in GABA(A) receptors, which is increasingly prescribed. Recent studies suggest that prolonged zolpidem treatment induces tolerance. The aim of this study was to explore the adaptive changes in GABA(A) receptors following short and long-term exposure to zolpidem in vitro.

METHODS

Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells stably expressing recombinant α1β2γ2s GABA(A) receptors were exposed to zolpidem (1 and 10 μmol/L) for short-term (2 h daily for 1, 2, or 3 consecutive days) or long-term (continuously for 48 h). Radioligand binding studies were used to determine the parameters of [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding sites.

RESULTS

A single (2 h) or repeated (2 h daily for 2 or 3 d) short-term exposure to zolpidem affected neither the maximum number of [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding sites nor the affinity. In both control and short-term zolpidem treated groups, addition of GABA (1 nmol/L-1 mmol/L) enhanced [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding in a concentration-dependent manner. The maximum enhancement of [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding in short-term zolpidem treated group was not significantly different from that in the control group. In contrast, long-term exposure to zolpidem resulted in significantly increase in the maximum number of [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding sites without changing the affinity. Furthermore, long-term exposure to zolpidem significantly decreased the ability of GABA to stimulate [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that continuous, but not intermittent and short-term, zolpidem-exposure is able to induce adaptive changes in GABA(A) receptors that could be related to the development of tolerance and dependence.

βCCT, an antagonist selective for α(1)GABA(A) receptors, reverses diazepam withdrawal-induced anxiety in rats

The abrupt discontinuation of prolonged benzodiazepine treatment elicits a withdrawal syndrome with increased anxiety as a major symptom. The neural mechanisms underlying benzodiazepine physical dependence are still insufficiently understood. Flumazenil, the non-selective antagonist of the benzodiazepine binding site of GABA(A) receptors was capable of preventing and reversing the increased anxiety during benzodiazepine withdrawal in animals and humans in some, but not all studies. On the other hand, a number of data suggest that GABA(A) receptors containing α(1) subunits are critically involved in processes developing during prolonged use of benzodiazepines, such are tolerance to sedative effects, liability to physical dependence and addiction. Hence, we investigated in the elevated plus maze the level of anxiety 24 h following 21 days of diazepam treatment and the influence of flumazenil or a preferential α(1)-subunit selective antagonist βCCt on diazepam withdrawal syndrome in rats. Abrupt cessation of protracted once-daily intraperitoneal administration of 2 mg/kg diazepam induced a withdrawal syndrome, measured by increased anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze 24 h after treatment cessation. Acute challenge with either flumazenil (10mg/kg) or βCCt (1.25, 5 and 20 mg/kg) alleviated the diazepam withdrawal-induced anxiety. Moreover, both antagonists induced an anxiolytic-like response close, though not identical, to that seen with acute administration of diazepam. These findings imply that the mechanism by which antagonism at GABA(A) receptors may reverse the withdrawal-induced anxiety involves the α(1) subunit and prompt further studies aimed at linking the changes in behavior with possible adaptive changes in subunit expression and function of GABA(A) receptors.

Benzodiazepine treatment induces subtype-specific changes in GABA(A) receptor trafficking and decreases synaptic inhibition

Benzodiazepines potentiate γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABA(A)R) activity and are widely prescribed to treat anxiety, insomnia, and seizure disorders. Unfortunately, clinical use of benzodiazepines (BZs) is severely limited by tolerance. The mechanisms leading to BZ tolerance are unknown. BZs bind at the interface between an α and γ subunit of GABA(A)Rs, preferentially enhancing synaptic receptors largely composed of α(1-3, 5), β3, and γ2 subunits. Using confocal imaging and patch-clamp approaches, we show that treatment with the BZ flurazepam decreases GABA(A)R surface levels and the efficacy of neuronal inhibition in hippocampal neurons. A dramatic decrease in surface and total levels of α2 subunit-containing GABA(A)Rs occurred within 24 h of flurazepam treatment, whereas GABA(A)Rs incorporating α1 subunits showed little alteration. The GABA(A)R surface depletion could be reversed by treatment with the BZ antagonist Ro 15-1788. Coincident with decreased GABA(A)R surface levels, flurazepam treatment reduced miniature inhibitory postsynaptic current amplitude, which returned to control levels with acute Ro 15-1788 treatment. GABA(A)R endocytosis and insertion rates were unchanged by flurazepam treatment. Treatment with leupeptin restored flurazepam lowered receptor surface levels, strongly suggesting that flurazepam increases lysosomal degradation of GABA(A)Rs. Together, these data suggest that flurazepam exposure enhances degradation of α2 subunit-containing GABA(A)Rs after their removal from the plasma membrane, leading to a reduction in inhibitory synapse size and number along with a decrease in the efficacy of synaptic inhibition. These reported subtype-specific changes in GABA(A)R trafficking provide significant mechanistic insight into the initial neuroadaptive responses occurring with BZ treatment.

The effects of zolpidem treatment on GABA(A) receptors in cultured cerebellar granule cells: changes in functional coupling

AIMS

Hypnotic zolpidem is a positive allosteric modulator of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) action, with preferential although not exclusive binding for α1 subunit-containing GABA(A) receptors. The pharmacological profile of this drug is different from that of classical benzodiazepines, although it acts through benzodiazepine binding sites at GABA(A) receptors. The aim of this study was to further explore the molecular mechanisms of GABA(A) receptor induction by zolpidem.

MAIN METHODS

In the present study, we explored the effects of two-day zolpidem (10 μM) treatment on GABA(A) receptors on the membranes of rat cerebellar granule cells (CGCs) using [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding and semi-quantitative PCR analysis.

KEY FINDINGS

Two-day zolpidem treatment of CGCs did not significantly affect the maximum number (B(max)) of [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding sites or the expression of α1 subunit mRNA. However, as shown by decreased GABA [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding, two-day exposure of CGCs to zolpidem caused functional uncoupling of GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites at GABA(A) receptor complexes.

SIGNIFICANCE

If functional uncoupling of GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites at GABA(A) receptors is the mechanism responsible for the development of tolerance following long-term administration of classical benzodiazepines, chronic zolpidem treatment may induce tolerance.

Mechanisms Underlying Tolerance after Long-Term Benzodiazepine Use: A Future for Subtype-Selective GABA(A) Receptor Modulators?

Despite decades of basic and clinical research, our understanding of how benzodiazepines tend to lose their efficacy over time (tolerance) is at least incomplete. In appears that tolerance develops relatively quickly for the sedative and anticonvulsant actions of benzodiazepines, whereas tolerance to anxiolytic and amnesic effects probably does not develop at all. In light of this evidence, we review the current evidence for the neuroadaptive mechanisms underlying benzodiazepine tolerance, including changes of (i) the GABA(A) receptor (subunit expression and receptor coupling), (ii) intracellular changes stemming from transcriptional and neurotrophic factors, (iii) ionotropic glutamate receptors, (iv) other neurotransmitters (serotonin, dopamine, and acetylcholine systems), and (v) the neurosteroid system. From the large variance in the studies, it appears that either different (simultaneous) tolerance mechanisms occur depending on the benzodiazepine effect, or that the tolerance-inducing mechanism depends on the activated GABA(A) receptor subtypes. Importantly, there is no convincing evidence that tolerance occurs with α subunit subtype-selective compounds acting at the benzodiazepine site.

Effects of sildenafil treatment on the development of tolerance to diazepam-induced motor impairment and sedation in mice

We studied the effects of sildenafil, a selective inhibitor of PDE5, on the development and the expression of tolerance to diazepam (DZ)-induced motor impairment and sedation in mice. DZ-induced motor incoordination was assessed by the rotarod and chimney tests, and DZ-induced sedation was examined using a photocell apparatus. Sildenafil treatment enhanced the development of tolerance to the motor impairing effects, but not to the sedative effects, of DZ. Sildenafil treatment did not affect the expression of tolerance to DZ-induced motor impairment and sedation in mice. Our results suggest that sildenafil treatment, at least in part, affects the development of DZ tolerance.

The effects of zolpidem treatment and withdrawal on the in vitro expression of recombinant alpha1beta2gamma2s GABA(A) receptors expressed in HEK 293 cells

Zolpidem, a widely used hypnotic drug which acts through benzodiazepine binding sites, is a positive allosteric modulator of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) action with preferential affinity for GABA(A) receptors containing alpha1 subunit. The pharmacological profile of zolpidem is different from that of classical benzodiazepines. The aim of this study was to find out whether zolpidem treatment triggers adaptive changes in the recombinant alpha1 subunit-containing GABA(A) receptors other than those observed following treatment with classical benzodiazepine-diazepam. Radioligand binding studies showed that 2-day exposure of human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells stably expressing recombinant alpha1beta2gamma2s GABA(A) receptors to zolpidem (10 muM) up-regulated the maximum number (B (max)) of [(3)H]flunitrazepam, [(3)H]muscimol, and [(3)H]t-butylbicycloorthobenzoate ([(3)H]TBOB) binding sites without changing their affinity (K (d)), suggesting an increase in total GABA(A) receptor number. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis demonstrated increased levels of alpha1 subunit mRNA, while Western blot demonstrated up-regulated gamma2 subunit proteins, suggesting that zolpidem induced de novo synthesis of receptors proteins, at both the transcriptional and translational levels. GABA-induced potentiation of [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding to membranes obtained from zolpidem-treated cells was markedly reduced, indicating allosteric uncoupling between GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites. The number of benzodiazepine and convulsant binding sites as well as the functional coupling between GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites normalized in 24 h following discontinuation of zolpidem treatment. The results of our in vitro studies suggest that a 2-day exposure of recombinant alpha1 subunit-containing GABA(A) receptors stably transfected in HEK 293 cells to zolpidem induces adaptive changes in this selective GABA(A) receptor subtype, which are not substantially different from those obtained after prolonged exposure of cells to high concentrations of diazepam.

Regulation of GABA(A) receptor subunit expression by pharmacological agents

The gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptor system, the main fast-acting inhibitory neurotransmitter system in the brain, is the pharmacological target for many drugs used clinically to treat, for example, anxiety disorders and epilepsy, and to induce and maintain sedation, sleep, and anesthesia. These drugs facilitate the function of pentameric GABA(A) receptors that exhibit widespread expression in all brain regions and large structural and pharmacological heterogeneity as a result of composition from a repertoire of 19 subunit variants. One of the main problems in clinical use of GABA(A) receptor agonists is the development of tolerance. Most drugs, in long-term use and during withdrawal, have been associated with important modulations of the receptor subunit expression in brain-region-specific manner, participating in the mechanisms of tolerance and dependence. In most cases, the molecular mechanisms of regulation of subunit expression are poorly known, partly as a result of neurobiological adaptation to altered neuronal function. More knowledge has been obtained on the mechanisms of GABA(A) receptor trafficking and cell surface expression and the processes that may contribute to tolerance, although their possible pharmacological regulation is not known. Drug development for neuropsychiatric disorders, including epilepsy, alcoholism, schizophrenia, and anxiety, has been ongoing for several years. One key step to extend drug development related to GABA(A) receptors is likely to require deeper understanding of the adaptational mechanisms of neurons, receptors themselves with interacting proteins, and finally receptor subunits during drug action and in neuropsychiatric disease processes.

Differential effects of diazepam treatment and withdrawal on recombinant GABAA receptor expression and functional coupling

Prolonged exposure to benzodiazepines, drugs known to produce tolerance and dependence and also to be abused, leads to adaptive changes in GABA(A) receptors. To further explore the mechanisms responsible for these phenomena, we studied the effects of prolonged diazepam treatment on the recombinant alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S) GABA(A) receptors, stably expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. The results demonstrating that long-term (48 and 72 h) exposure of cells to a high concentration of diazepam (50 microM) enhanced the maximum number (B(max)) of [(3)H]flunitrazepam, [(3)H]muscimol and [(3)H]t-butylbicycloorthobenzoate ([(3)H]TBOB) binding sites, without changing their affinity (K(d)), suggested the up-regulation of GABA(A) receptors. As demonstrated by cell counting and WST-1 proliferation assay, the observed increase in receptor expression was not a consequence of stimulated growth of cells exposed to diazepam. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot analysis, showing elevated levels of alpha(1) subunit mRNA as well as beta(2) and gamma(2) subunit proteins, respectively, suggested that prolonged high dose diazepam treatment induced de novo receptor synthesis by acting at both transcriptional and translational levels. The finding that the number of GABA(A) receptor binding sites returned to control value 24 h following diazepam withdrawal, makes this process less likely to account for the development of benzodiazepine tolerance and dependence. On the other hand, the results demonstrating that observed functional uncoupling between GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites persisted after the termination of diazepam treatment supported the hypothesis of its possible role in these phenomena.

Subchronic treatment with antiepileptic drugs modifies pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures in mice: Its correlation with benzodiazepine receptor binding

Experiments using male CD1 mice were carried out to investigate the effects of subchronic (daily administration for 8 days) pretreatments with drugs enhancing GABAergic transmission (diazepam, 10 mg/kg, ip; gabapentin, 100 mg/kg, po; or vigabatrin, 500 mg/kg, po) on pentylenetetrazol (PTZ)-induced seizures, 24 h after the last injection. Subchronic administration of diazepam reduced latencies to clonus, tonic extension and death induced by PTZ. Subchronic vigabatrin produced enhanced latency to the first clonus but faster occurrence of tonic extension and death induced by PTZ. Subchronic gabapentin did not modify PTZ-induced seizures. Autoradiography experiments revealed reduced benzodiazepine receptor binding in several brain areas after subchronic treatment with diazepam or gabapentin, whereas subchronic vigabatrin did not induce significant receptor changes. The present results indicate differential effects induced by the subchronic administration of diazepam, vigabatrin, and gabapentin on the susceptibility to PTZ-induced seizures, benzodiazepine receptor binding, or both.

Imidazenil: a low efficacy agonist at alpha1- but high efficacy at alpha5-GABAA receptors fail to show anticonvulsant cross tolerance to diazepam or zolpidem

Whereas advances in the molecular biology of GABA(A) receptor complex using knock-out and knock-in mice have been valuable in unveiling the structure, composition, receptor assembly, and several functions of different GABA(A) receptor subtypes, the mechanism(s) underlying benzodiazepine (BZ) tolerance and withdrawal remain poorly understood. Studies using specific GABA(A) receptor subunit knock-in mice suggest that tolerance to sedative action of diazepam requires long-term activation of alpha1 and alpha5 GABA(A) receptor subunits. We investigated the role of long-term activation of these GABA(A) receptor subunits during anticonvulsant tolerance using high affinity and high intrinsic efficacy ligands for GABA(A) receptors expressing the alpha5 subunit (imidazenil) or alpha1 subunit (zolpidem), and a non-selective BZ recognition site ligand (diazepam). We report here that long-term activation of GABA(A) receptors by zolpidem and diazepam but not by imidazenil elicits anticonvulsant tolerance. Although anticonvulsant cross-tolerance occurs between diazepam and zolpidem, there is no cross-tolerance between imidazenil and diazepam or zolpidem. Furthermore, diazepam or zolpidem long-term treatment decreased the expression of mRNA encoding the alpha1 GABA(A) receptor subunit in prefrontal cortex by 43% and 20% respectively. In addition, diazepam but not zolpidem long-term treatment produced a 30% increase in the expression of the alpha5 GABA(A) receptor subunit mRNA in prefrontal cortex. In contrast, imidazenil which is devoid of anticonvulsant tolerance does not elicit significant changes in the expression of alpha1 or alpha5 GABA(A) receptor subunit. These findings suggest that long-term activation of GABA(A) receptors containing the alpha1 or other subunits but not the alpha5 receptor subunit is essential for the induction of anticonvulsant tolerance.

The role of transcriptional and translational mechanisms in flumazenil-induced up-regulation of recombinant GABA(A) receptors

The aim of this study was to further elucidate the mechanisms involved in adaptive changes of GABA(A) receptors following prolonged exposure to flumazenil, the antagonist of benzodiazepine binding sites on GABA(A) receptors. The effects of prolonged flumazenil treatment were studied on recombinant alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S) GABA(A) receptors stably expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells. Using radioligand binding experiments we found enhancement in the maximum number of [(3)H]muscimol labeled binding sites in different preparations of HEK 293 cells. The parallel increase of [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding sites in the membranes was reduced in the presence of actinomycin D and cycloheximide, inhibitors of RNA and protein synthesis, respectively. Chronic flumazenil also raised the steady-state level of mRNA encoding alpha(1) receptor subunit. The results suggest that the up-regulation of GABA(A) receptors, observed after prolonged flumazenil treatment is at least partly due to increased de novo synthesis of receptor proteins at both transcriptional and translational level.

Abuse and dependence liability of benzodiazepine-type drugs: GABA(A) receptor modulation and beyond

Over the past several decades, benzodiazepines and the newer non-benzodiazepines have become the anxiolytic/hypnotics of choice over the more readily abused barbiturates. While all drugs from this class act at the GABA(A) receptor, benzodiazepine-type drugs offer the clear advantage of being safer and better tolerated. However, there is still potential for these drugs to be abused, and significant evidence exists to suggest that this is a growing problem. This review examines the behavioral determinants of the abuse and dependence liability of benzodiazepine-type drugs. Moreover, the pharmacological and putative biochemical basis of the abuse-related behavior is discussed.

Allosteric uncoupling and up-regulation of benzodiazepine and GABA recognition sites following chronic diazepam treatment of HEK 293 cells stably transfected with alpha1beta2gamma2S subunits of GABA (A) receptors

Benzodiazepines are drugs known to produce tolerance and dependence and also to be abused and co-abused. The aim of this study was to further explore the mechanisms that underlie adaptive changes in GABA(A) receptors following prolonged exposure to these drugs. Human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells stably expressing recombinant alpha1beta2gamma2s GABA(A) receptors were exposed for 72 h to a high concentration of diazepam (50 microM) in the absence or presence of other drugs. Radioligand binding studies were used to determine the parameters of [(3)H]flunitrazepam and [(3)H]muscimol binding sites and allosteric interactions between these sites. Prolonged treatment with diazepam increased the maximum number (B (max)) of [(3)H]flunitrazepam and [(3)H]muscimol binding sites in the membranes, and of [(3)H]muscimol binding sites on the surface of HEK 293 cells. There was no change in the affinity (K (d)) of binding sites. The diazepam-induced increase in the B (max) value of [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding sites was reduced by two GABA(A) receptor antagonists, gabazine (1 and 10 microM) and picrotoxin (100 microM). In addition, it was reduced by cycloheximide (5 microg/ml), a protein synthesis inhibitor, and actinomycin D (7.5 microg/ml), an RNA synthesis inhibitor. Flumazenil (5 microM), the antagonist of benzodiazepine binding sites, also up-regulated [(3)H]flunitrazepam recognition sites. Simultaneous treatment with diazepam and flumazenil failed to produce an additive up-regulation. GABA (1 nM - 1 mM)-induced potentiation of [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding to membranes obtained from diazepam (50 microM)-pretreated cells was markedly reduced, suggesting functional uncoupling between GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites. The results suggest that diazepam up-regulated benzodiazepine binding sites on stably expressed GABA(A) receptors by stimulating their synthesis at both the transcriptional and translational levels. A comparable increase of [(3)H]muscimol binding sites expressed on the surface of intact HEK 293 cells suggests that internalisation of surface receptors presumably can not explain the uncoupling.

Experimental and clinical evidence for loss of effect (tolerance) during prolonged treatment with antiepileptic drugs

Development of tolerance (i.e., the reduction in response to a drug after repeated administration) is an adaptive response of the body to prolonged exposure to the drug, and tolerance to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is no exception. Tolerance develops to some drug effects much more rapidly than to others. The extent of tolerance depends on the drug and individual (genetic?) factors. Tolerance may lead to attenuation of side effects but also to loss of efficacy of AEDs and is reversible after discontinuation of drug treatment. Different experimental approaches are used to study tolerance in laboratory animals. Development of tolerance depends on the experimental model, drug, drug dosage, and duration of treatment, so that a battery of experimental protocols is needed to evaluate fully whether tolerance to effect occurs. Two major types of tolerance are known. Pharmacokinetic (metabolic) tolerance, due to induction of AED-metabolizing enzymes has been shown for most first-generation AEDs, and is easy to overcome by increasing dosage. Pharmacodynamic (functional) tolerance is due to "adaptation" of AED targets (e.g., by loss of receptor sensitivity) and has been shown experimentally for all AEDs that lose activity during prolonged treatment. Functional tolerance may lead to complete loss of AED activity and cross-tolerance to other AEDs. Convincing experimental evidence indicates that almost all first-, second-, and third-generation AEDs lose their antiepileptic activity during prolonged treatment, although to a different extent. Because of diverse confounding factors, detecting tolerance in patients with epilepsy is more difficult but can be done with careful assessment of decline during long-term individual patient response. After excluding confounding factors, tolerance to antiepileptic effect for most modern and old AEDs can be shown in small subgroups of responders by assessing individual or group response. Development of tolerance to the antiepileptic activity of an AED may be an important reason for failure of drug treatment. Knowledge of tolerance to AED effects as a mechanism of drug resistance in previous responders is important for patients, physicians, and scientists.

Chronic treatment with flumazenil enhances binding sites for convulsants at recombinant alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S) GABA(A) receptors

GABA(A) receptors mediate most of the fast inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain. Prolonged occupancy of these receptors by ligands leads to regulatory changes often resulting in reduction of receptor function. The mechanism of these changes is still unknown. In this study, stably transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells were used as a model to study the effects of prolonged flumazenil (antagonist of benzodiazepine binding sites at GABA(A) receptors) exposure on the recombinant alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S) GABA(A) receptors, the most common type of GABA(A) receptors found in the brain. Exposure (48 h) of HEK 293 cells stably expressing recombinant alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S) GABA(A) receptors to flumazenil (1 or 5 microM) in the presence of GABA (1 microM), enhanced the maximum number (B(max)) without affecting the affinity (K(d)) of [(3)H]TBOB labeled binding sites for convulsants. Diazepam (1 nM-1 mM) in the presence of GABA (1 microM) modulated [(3)H]TBOB binding to control and flumazenil pretreated cells according to a two-site model. No significant differences between the groups were observed in either the potency or efficacy of diazepam to modulate [(3)H]TBOB binding, as evidenced by a lack of significant changes between their IC(50) and I(max) values. The results suggest that chronic exposure of HEK 293 cells stably expressing recombinant alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S) GABA(A) receptors to flumazenil up-regulates the binding sites for convulsants, but it does not appear to affect the functional coupling between these sites and benzodiazepine binding sites. Along with our recent data, these results suggest that chronic treatment with flumazenil enhances the number of GABA(A) receptors.

Low tolerance and dependence liabilities of etizolam: Molecular, functional, and pharmacological correlates

The effects of prolonged exposure to and subsequent withdrawal of the thienotriazolobenzodiazepine etizolam on gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptor gene expression and function were compared with those of the benzodiazepine lorazepam. Exposure of rat hippocampal neurons in culture to 10 microM etizolam for 5 days reduced the amounts of alpha5 and gamma2S receptor subunit mRNAs, whereas etizolam withdrawal was associated with a persistent reduction in gamma2S mRNA and an increase in alpha2 and alpha3 mRNAs. Neither chronic exposure to nor withdrawal of etizolam affected the acute modulatory effects of etizolam or lorazepam on GABA-evoked Cl- current. Treatment with 10 microM lorazepam for 5 days reduced the amounts of alpha1 and gamma2S subunit mRNAs and increased that of alpha3 mRNA, whereas lorazepam withdrawal was associated with persistence of the changes in alpha3 and gamma2S mRNAs and an increase in alpha2 and alpha4 mRNAs. Parallel changes in the abundance of alpha1 and alpha4 subunit proteins induced by chronic exposure to and withdrawal of lorazepam, but not etizolam, were detected by immunocytofluorescence analysis. Chronic lorazepam treatment resulted in a reversible reduction in the modulatory efficacy of this drug and conferred on flumazenil the ability to potentiate GABA-evoked Cl- current. The anticonvulsant action of etizolam was not altered in mice chronically treated with this drug, whereas lorazepam-treated animals became tolerant to the acute anticonvulsant effect of this benzodiazepine. These data suggest that etizolam is endowed with a reduced liability to induce tolerance and dependence compared with classical benzodiazepines.

GABA induces activity dependent delayed-onset uncoupling of GABA/benzodiazepine site interactions in neocortical neurons

Changes in the function of type A gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors (GABA(A)Rs) are associated with neuronal development and tolerance to the sedative-hypnotic effects of GABA(A)R positive modulators. Persistent activation of GABA(A)Rs by millimolar concentrations of GABA occurs under physiological conditions as GABAergic fast-spiking neurons in neocortex and cerebellum exhibit basal firing rates of 5 to 50 Hz and intermittent rates up to 250 Hz, leaving a substantial fraction of synaptic receptors occupied persistently by GABA. Persistent exposure of neurons to GABA has been shown to cause a down-regulation of receptor number and an uncoupling of GABA/benzodiazepine (BZD) site interactions with a half-life of approximately 24 h. Here, we report that a single brief exposure of neocortical neurons in primary culture to GABA for 5-10 min (t(1/2) = 3.2 +/- 0.2 min) initiates a process that results in uncoupling hours later (t(1/2) = 12.1 +/- 2.2 h). Initiation of delayed-onset uncoupling is blocked by co-incubation with picrotoxin or alpha-amanitin but is insensitive to nifedipine, indicating that uncoupling is contingent upon receptor activation and transcription but is not dependent on voltage-gated Ca2+ influx. Delayed-onset uncoupling occurs without a change in receptor number or a change in the proportion of alpha1 subunit pharmacology, as zolpidem binding affinity is unaltered. Such activity dependent latent modulation of GABA(A)R function that manifests as delayed-onset uncoupling may be relevant to physiological, pathophysiological, and pharmacological conditions where synaptic receptors are transiently exposed to GABA agonists for several minutes.

Enhancement of benzodiazepine binding sites following chronic treatment with flumazenil

The aim of this study was to improve our knowledge of the mechanisms leading to adaptive changes in gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptors following chronic drug treatment. Exposure (48 h) of human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells stably expressing recombinant alpha1beta2gamma2S GABA(A) receptors to the antagonist of benzodiazepine binding sites, flumazenil (5 microM), enhanced the maximum number (B(max)) and the equilibrium dissociation constant (K(d)) of [3H]flunitrazepam binding sites. The flumazenil-induced enhancement in B(max) was potentiated by GABA (50 microM) and reduced by the GABA(A) receptor antagonist, bicuculline (100 microM). Flumazenil-induced enhancement in K(d) was affected by neither of these treatments. GABA (50 microM) enhanced the density of [3H]flunitrazepam binding sites, and this enhancement was greater in the presence of diazepam (1 microM). The results suggest that chronic flumazenil treatment up-regulates in a bicuculline-sensitive manner benzodiazepine binding sites at stably expressed GABA(A) receptors.

Chronic exposure of cells expressing recombinant GABAA receptors to benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil enhances the maximum number of benzodiazepine binding sites

The aim of this study was to better understand the mechanisms that underlie adaptive changes in GABAA receptors following their prolonged exposure to drugs. Exposure (48 h) of human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells stably expressing recombinant alpha1beta2gamma2S GABAA receptors to flumazenil (1 or 5 microM) in the presence of GABA (1 microM) enhanced the maximum number (Bmax) of [3H]flunitrazepam binding sites without affecting their affinity (Kd). The flumazenil-induced enhancement in Bmax was not counteracted by diazepam (1 microM). GABA (1 nM-1 mM) enhanced [3H]flunitrazepam binding to membranes obtained from control and flumazenil-pretreated cells in a concentration-dependent manner. No significant differences were observed in either the potency (EC50) or efficacy (Emax) of GABA to potentiate [3H]flunitrazepam binding. However, in flumazenil pretreated cells the basal [3H]flunitrazepam and [3H]TBOB binding were markedly enhanced. GABA produced almost complete inhibition of [3H]TBOB binding to membranes obtained from control and flumazenil treated cells. The potencies of GABA to inhibit this binding, as shown by a lack of significant changes in the IC50 values, were not different between vehicle and drug treated cells. The results suggest that chronic exposure of HEK 293 cells stably expressing recombinant alpha1beta2gamma2S GABAA receptors to flumazenil (in the presence of GABA) up-regulates benzodiazepine and convulsant binding sites, but it does not affect the allosteric interactions between these sites and the GABA binding site. Further studies are needed to elucidate these phenomena.

Regulation of GABAA receptor trafficking, channel activity, and functional plasticity of inhibitory synapses

Neural inhibition in the brain is mainly mediated by ionotropic gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptors. Different subtypes of these receptors, distinguished by their subunit composition, are either concentrated at postsynaptic sites where they mediate phasic inhibition or found at perisynaptic and extrasynaptic locations where they prolong phasic inhibition and mediate tonic inhibition, respectively. Of special interest are mechanisms that modulate the stability and function of postsynaptic GABA(A) receptor subtypes and that are implicated in functional plasticity of inhibitory transmission in the brain. We will summarize recent progress on the classification of synaptic versus extrasynaptic receptors, the molecular composition of the postsynaptic cytoskeleton, the function of receptor-associated proteins in trafficking of GABA(A) receptors to and from synapses, and their role in post-translational signaling mechanisms that modulate the stability, density, and function of GABA(A) receptors in the postsynaptic membrane.

Diazepam-induced adaptive plasticity revealed by α1 GABAA receptor-specific expression profiling

Benzodiazepines are in wide clinical use for their sedative and tranquilizing actions, the former being mediated via alpha1-containing GABAA receptors. The signal transduction pathways elicited beyond the receptor are only poorly understood. Changes of transcript levels in cerebral cortex induced by acute diazepam administration were therefore compared by microarray analysis between wild-type and point mutated alpha1(H101R) mice, in which the alpha1 GABAA receptor subunit had been rendered insensitive to diazepam. In wild-type animals, diazepam reduced the expression levels of the alpha subunit of the calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, as well as brain-derived neurotrophic factor, MAP kinase phosphatase, transcription factor GIF, c-fos and nerve growth factor induced gene-A. None of these transcripts was changed in the alpha1(H101R) mice after treatment with diazepam. Thus, the sedative action of diazepam is correlated with a selective down-regulation of transcripts involved in the regulation of neuronal plasticity and neurotrophic responses. Most transcript changes were transient except for the decrease of the CaMKIIalpha transcript which persisted even 40 h after the single dose of diazepam. This long-term alteration is likely to contribute to the resetting of the neuronal responsiveness, which may be involved in rebound phenomena and, under chronic treatment, in the development of tolerance and dependence.

Prolonged exposure to γ-aminobutyric acid up-regulates stably expressed recombinant α1β2γ2s GABAA receptors

The aim of this study was to better understand the mechanisms that underlie adaptive changes in GABA(A) receptors following their prolonged exposure to drugs. Exposure (48 and/or 96 h) of human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells stably expressing recombinant alpha1beta2gamma2s GABA(A) receptors for gamma-aminobutyric (GABA, 1 mM) and muscimol (100 microM), but not for diazepam (1 microM), enhanced the maximum number (B(max)) of [3H]flunitrazepam binding sites without affecting their affinity (K(d)). The GABA-induced enhancement in B(max) was reduced by the GABA receptor antagonist, bicuculline (100 microM), and by cycloheximide (10 microl/ml), a protein synthesis inhibitor. GABA (100 microM) enhanced the affinity of [3H]flunitrazepam binding to vehicle- and GABA-pretreated, but not to diazepam-pretreated, HEK 293 cells. The results suggest that chronic GABA treatment up-regulates stably expressed GABA(A) receptors, presumably by stimulating their synthesis. Unlike chronic diazepam, which produced functional uncoupling of GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites, chronic GABA failed to produce this effect.

Molecular mechanisms of tolerance to and withdrawal of GABA(A) receptor modulators

Here, we summarize recent data pertaining to the effects of GABA(A) receptor modulators on the receptor gene expression in order to elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind tolerance and dependence induced by these drugs. Drug selectivity and intrinsic activity seems to be important to evidence at the molecular level the GABA(A) receptor tolerance. On the contrary, we suggested that all drug tested are equally potentially prone to induce dependence. Our results demonstrate that long-lasting exposure of GABA(A) receptors to endogenous steroids, benzodiazepines and ethanol, as well as their withdrawal, induce marked effects on receptor structure and function. These results suggest the possible synergic action between endogenous steroids and these drugs in modulating the functional activity of specific neuronal populations. We report here that endogenous steroids may play a crucial role in the action of ethanol on dopaminergic neurons.

Rapid critical period induction by tonic inhibition in visual cortex

Mice lacking a synaptic isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) do not exhibit ocular dominance plasticity unless an appropriate level of GABAergic transmission is restored by direct infusion of benzodiazepines into the brain. To better understand how intracortical inhibition triggers experience-dependent changes, we dissected the precise timing requirement for GABA function in the monocular deprivation (MD) paradigm. Diazepam (DZ) or vehicle solution was infused daily before and/or during 4 d of MD in GAD65 knock-out mice. Extracellular single-unit recordings from the binocular zone of visual cortex were performed at the end of deprivation. We found that a minimum treatment of 2 d near the beginning of MD was sufficient to fully activate plasticity but did not need to overlap the deprivation per se. Extended delay after DZ infusion eventually led to loss of plasticity accompanied by improved intrinsic inhibitory circuit function. Two day DZ treatment just after eye opening similarly closed the critical period prematurely in wild-type mice. Raising wild-type mice in complete darkness from birth delayed the peak sensitivity to MD as in other mammals. Interestingly, 2 d DZ infusion in the dark also closed the critical period, whereas equally brief light exposure during dark-rearing had no such effect. Thus, enhanced tonic signaling through GABA(A) receptors rapidly creates a milieu for plasticity within neocortex capable of triggering a critical period for ocular dominance independent of visual experience itself.

Neuroadaptive processes in GABAergic and glutamatergic systems in benzodiazepine dependence

Knowledge of the neural mechanisms underlying the development of benzodiazepine (BZ) dependence remains incomplete. The gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptor, being the main locus of BZ action, has been the main focus to date in studies performed to elucidate the neuroadaptive processes underlying BZ tolerance and withdrawal in preclinical studies. Despite this intensive effort, however, no clear consensus has been reached on the exact contribution of neuroadaptive processes at the level of the GABA(A) receptor to the development of BZ tolerance and withdrawal. It is likely that changes at the level of this receptor are inadequate in themselves as an explanation of these neuroadaptive processes and that neuroadaptations in other receptor systems are important in the development of BZ dependence. In particular, it has been hypothesised that as part of compensatory mechanisms to diazepam-induced chronic enhancement of GABAergic inhibition, excitatory mechanisms (including the glutamatergic system) become more sensitive [Behav. Pharmacol. 6 (1995) 425], conceivably contributing to BZ tolerance development and/or expression of withdrawal symptoms on cessation of treatment, including increased anxiety and seizure activity. Glutamate is a key candidate for changes in excitatory transmission mechanisms and BZ dependence, (1) since there are defined neuroanatomical relationships between glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in the CNS and (2) because of the pivotal role of glutamatergic neurotransmission in mediating many forms of synaptic plasticity in the CNS, such as long-term potentiation and kindling events. Thus, it is highly possible that glutamatergic processes are also involved in the neuroadaptive processes in drug dependence, which can conceivably be considered as a form of synaptic plasticity. This review provides an overview of studies investigating changes in the GABAergic and glutamatergic systems in the brain associated with BZ dependence, with particular attention to the possible differential involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptors in these processes.

Tolerance to diazepam-induced motor impairment: a study with GABAA receptor alpha6 subunit knockout mice

Development of tolerance to motor-impairing effects of repeated administration of moderate diazepam doses (5.0-7.5 mg/kg; three times daily PO 3 weeks) was compared between mice deficient in the cerebellar granule cell-restricted GABAA receptor alpha6 subunit and their wild-type controls. The alpha6 -/- mice were more impaired by the initial challenge doses of diazepam (5 or 10 mg/kg) than their controls, but acquired partial tolerance by the second tests with the same doses 4-7 days later. Chronic treatment produced complete tolerance in both mouse lines. Ligand autoradiography revealed a significant reduction in baseline benzodiazepine and chloride channel site-bindings in various regions of the alpha6 -/- brains, but the chronic diazepam treatment did not consistently alter baseline or benzodiazepine site agonist and inverse agonist-modulated binding in the alpha6 -/- and wildtype mice. The results indicate that tolerance to motor-impairing actions of diazepam is independent of the diazepam-insensitive alpha6 subunit-containing receptors, which rules out the possibility that tolerance emerges as an increase in structurally benzodiazepine-insensitive receptor population.

Influence of benzodiazepines on auditory perception

The aim of this study was to test for an influence of benzodiazepine (BZD) on various perceptual and/or cognitive auditory processes. Loudness, auditory selective attention, and the ability of subjects to form perceptual streams out of alternating tone sequences were tested. Nine subjects were tested before, 1, 3, 7, and 24 h after a single-dose oxazepam vs placebo administration in a crossover design. A sample of blood allows us to measure plasma oxazepam concentration. The results revealed a significant reduction in stream segregation expressed as d' scores 1 h after oxazepam intake in the test subjects. No significant change occurred across time in the same subjects when they were administrated a placebo in another session. Furthermore, oxazepam had no substantial and systematic influence either on auditory selective attention or on loudness perception. Altogether, these results suggest that the perceptual organization of sound sequences involves inhibitory neural mechanisms, which can be affected by BZDs. This outcome is consistent with existing models of auditory stream segregation and may be paralleled with earlier findings on the effect of BZDs on perceptual binding in the visual modality.