1
|
Tamai R, Dawit L, Lee P, Simmons OL, Ding L, Yuan L. The Association of Metabolic Risk Factors with Advanced Adenomas in Hispanic Patients. Dig Dis Sci 2024; 69:1403-1410. [PMID: 38363522 PMCID: PMC11026227 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08323-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) have been implicated as rising risk factors for the development of colorectal cancers. A rapid increase in the prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among Hispanic patients in the United States may present substantially increased risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia in this population. Currently, there is very little research in this area. AIMS We sought to identify metabolic risk factors for advanced adenomas (AA) in Hispanic Americans. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from the Los Angeles General (LAG) Medical Center of asymptomatic Hispanic patients above 45 years of age who underwent their first colonoscopies following a positive screening FBT. Patient demographics, metabolic characteristics, as well as colon polyp size and histology were recorded. Polyps were classified as adenomas or AA (including both high-risk adenomas and high-risk serrated polyps). Relative risk for AA was assessed by multivariate logistical regression analyses. RESULTS Of the 672 patients in our study, 41.4% were male, 67% had adenomas, and 16% had AA. The mean BMI was 31.2 kg/m2. The mean HDL-C was 49.5 mg/dL (1.28 mmol/L) and the mean triglyceride level was 151 mg/dL. 44.6% had diabetes and 64.1% had hypertension. When comparing patients with AA to patients with no adenoma, male sex, BMI > 34.9 kg/m2, and elevated fasting triglyceride levels were associated with an increased risk of AA. FIB-4 ≥1.45 was also associated with an increased risk of AA in males. There was no significant difference in the risk of AA with diabetes, hypertension, FIB-4 score, LDL-C level, and HDL-C level. CONCLUSIONS Hispanic patients with a positive FBT were observed to have a high incidence of AA. Class II obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2), elevated triglyceride levels were identified as risk factors among males in our study. Early interventions to address these modifiable risk factors in at-risk populations, such as multi-disciplinary weight management programs for the treatment of obesity and related co-morbidities, could potentially lead to risk reduction and CRC prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Tamai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, HCC 261 1510 San Pablo Street, Health Sciences Campus, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Lillian Dawit
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, HCC 261 1510 San Pablo Street, Health Sciences Campus, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Patrick Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, HCC 261 1510 San Pablo Street, Health Sciences Campus, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Okeefe L Simmons
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, HCC 261 1510 San Pablo Street, Health Sciences Campus, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Li Ding
- Department of Preventative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Liyun Yuan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, HCC 261 1510 San Pablo Street, Health Sciences Campus, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ribbing Wilén H, Blom J. Interval cancer after two rounds of a Swedish population-based screening program using gender-specific cut-off levels in fecal immunochemical test. J Med Screen 2024; 31:8-14. [PMID: 37455444 PMCID: PMC10878001 DOI: 10.1177/09691413231185722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate interval cancer (IC) after two screening rounds of the Swedish population-based screening program of Stockholm-Gotland applying gender-specific cut-off levels in the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). METHODS All 60- to 69-year-olds invited to screening 2015-2019 were included. The cut-off level for a positive test was 40 µg/g in women and 80 µg/g in men. Screening-detected colorectal cancers (SD CRCs) and ICs were verified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register, and the follow-up time was two years from invitation. The test sensitivity, the IC rate (ICs per 10,000 screening negatives) and the IC incidence (ICs per 100,000 person-years) relative to the background CRC incidence were assessed by gender and age. The FIT levels were compared in men and women for CRCs diagnosed within one year of the sample. RESULTS In the second screening round, 229,187 were invited, and SD CRCs and ICs were diagnosed in 193 and 144, respectively. The IC rate was 8.9 (7.4-10.3) and test sensitivity 0.61 (0.55-0.66), and was similar in men and women. For two screening rounds, the IC rate was significantly higher in men than in women, but the IC incidence/ background CRC incidence was similar in both genders. The FIT levels in female participants with CRC were significantly lower overall, and in early-staged CRCs as compared to men, and proximal localization was more common in women. In multivariable analysis, FIT levels were significantly lower in proximal CRCs. CONCLUSION Over two rounds, the IC incidence relative to the background CRC incidence was similar in men and women supporting a gender-specific screening strategy. The results could be explained by lower FIT levels in women due to proximal CRC localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Ribbing Wilén
- Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset (KI SÖS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johannes Blom
- Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset (KI SÖS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li H, Jiang W, Liu S, Yang M, Chen S, Pan Y, Cui M. Connecting the mechanisms of tumor sex differences with cancer therapy. Mol Cell Biochem 2024; 479:213-231. [PMID: 37027097 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-023-04723-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Sex differences in cancer incidence and survival are constant and pronounced globally, across all races and all age groups of cancer types. In 2016, after the National Institutes of Health proposed a policy of utilizing sex as a biological variable, researchers started paying more attention to the molecular mechanisms behind gender variations in cancer. Historically, most previous studies investigating sex differences have been centered on gonadal sex hormones. Nevertheless, sex differences also involve genetic and molecular pathways that run throughout the entire process of cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, and treatment response, in addition to sex hormones. In particular, there is significant gender dimorphism in the efficacy and toxicity of oncology treatments, including conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as well as the emerging targeted therapies and immunotherapy. To be clear, not all mechanisms will exhibit gender bias, and not all gender bias will affect cancer risk. Our goal in this review is to discuss some of the significant sex-related changes in fundamental cancer pathways. To this purpose, we summarize the differential impact of gender on cancer development in three dimensions: sex hormones, genetics, and epigenetics, and focus on current hot subjects including tumor suppressor function, immunology, stem cell renewal, and non-coding RNAs. Clarifying the essential mechanisms of gender differences will help guide the clinical treatment of both sexes in tumor radiation and chemotherapy, medication therapy with various targets, immunotherapy, and even drug development. We anticipate that sex-differentiated research will help advance sex-based cancer personalized medicine models and encourage future basic scientific and clinical research to take sex into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Li
- The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China
| | - Weibo Jiang
- Department of Orthopaedic, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China
| | - Shui Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China
| | - Manshi Yang
- The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China
| | - Siyuan Chen
- The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China
| | - Yihan Pan
- The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China
| | - Mengying Cui
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130041, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Buja A, De Luca G, Zorzi M, Bovo E, Mocellin S, Trevisiol C, Bronte V, Guzzinati S, Rugge M. Thirty-two-year trends of cancer incidence by sex and cancer site in the Veneto Region from 1987 to 2019. Front Public Health 2024; 11:1267534. [PMID: 38259775 PMCID: PMC10800396 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1267534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This observational study considers the sex-specific incidence of the most incident cancers as recorded in the population-based Veneto Regional Cancer Registry over a period of more than 30 years (1987-2019). Methods The Veneto Regional Cancer Registry collected data for the time interval 1987-2019. Significant changes in incidence trends calculated on age-standardized incidence rates (Annual Percent Change-APC) were identified by join point regression analysis. Results Overall, the incidence trend for all cancers decreased in males and remained stable in females. In nine cancer sites, the incidence trends showed consistent differences by sex (oral cavity, esophagus, colon rectum and anus, liver, larynx, lung, cutaneous malignant melanoma, bladder, and thyroid gland). Other malignancies did not show significant sex-related differences (stomach, pancreas, biliary tract, kidney/urinary tract, central nervous system, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and leukemia). Conclusion In the period 1987-2019, this study revealed sex-related differences in cancer incidence trends. Over time, cancer incidence remained higher in males, with a decreasing epidemiological impact, plausibly resulting from prevention campaigns against environmental cancer risk factors, as tobacco and alcohol. Conversely, a significant decrease was not observed in the incidence trend in females. These findings contribute essential insights for profiling the epidemiological map of cancer in a large Italian population, allowing comparison with other European cancer epidemiology studies and providing updated data supporting sex-related primary and secondary cancer prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Buja
- Department of Cardiological, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Giuseppe De Luca
- Department of Cardiological, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Manuel Zorzi
- Veneto Tumour Registry, Azienda Zero, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Simone Mocellin
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum, and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology – DISCOG, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Chiara Trevisiol
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum, and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | | | - Massimo Rugge
- Veneto Tumour Registry, Azienda Zero, Padua, Italy
- Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ginsburg O, Vanderpuye V, Beddoe AM, Bhoo-Pathy N, Bray F, Caduff C, Florez N, Fadhil I, Hammad N, Heidari S, Kataria I, Kumar S, Liebermann E, Moodley J, Mutebi M, Mukherji D, Nugent R, So WKW, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Unger-Saldaña K, Allman G, Bhimani J, Bourlon MT, Eala MAB, Hovmand PS, Kong YC, Menon S, Taylor CD, Soerjomataram I. Women, power, and cancer: a Lancet Commission. Lancet 2023; 402:2113-2166. [PMID: 37774725 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01701-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ophira Ginsburg
- Centre for Global Health, US National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Freddie Bray
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Carlo Caduff
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Narjust Florez
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Nazik Hammad
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queens University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Shirin Heidari
- GENDRO, Geneva, Switzerland; Gender Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ishu Kataria
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, New Delhi, India
| | - Somesh Kumar
- Jhpiego India, Johns Hopkins University Affiliate, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Erica Liebermann
- University of Rhode Island College of Nursing, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jennifer Moodley
- Cancer Research Initiative, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, and SAMRC Gynaecology Cancer Research Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Miriam Mutebi
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Clemenceau Medical Center Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Rachel Nugent
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Winnie K W So
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Department of Geriatrics, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Gavin Allman
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jenna Bhimani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - María T Bourlon
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Michelle A B Eala
- College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Yek-Ching Kong
- Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Sonia Menon
- Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carragher R, Ings GR, Baker G, Rosborough J, Johnston DB, Shah R, Cameron I, O'Neill C, Kelly PJ, McVeigh G, Irwin S, Khosraviani K, Dickey W, Owen TA, McKee CF, Coleman HG, Loughrey MB. Trends in pathology diagnoses during 10 years of a colorectal cancer screening programme. Histopathology 2023; 83:756-770. [PMID: 37565291 DOI: 10.1111/his.15017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
AIMS We report pathology findings from the first 10 years of the faecal-occult blood-based Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, presenting summary data and trends in pathology diagnoses and clinicopathological features of screen-detected cancers. METHODS AND RESULTS Data were analysed from a comprehensive polyp-level pathology database representing all endoscopy specimens from programme inception in 2010 until 2021. A total of 9800 individuals underwent 13 472 endoscopy procedures, yielding 25 967 pathology specimens and 32 119 diagnoses. Index specimen diagnoses (4.1%) and index colonoscopies (10.4%) yielded a diagnosis of colorectal cancer, representing 1045 cancers from 1020 individuals (25 with synchronous cancers). A further 13 index cancers were identified via computed tomography colonography; 65.3% of cancer diagnoses were in males; 41.7% were stage I, 23.1% stage II, 25.8% stage III and 1.8% stage IV (7.6% unstaged). Of 233 pT1 cancers diagnosed within local excision specimens, 79 (33.9%) had completion surgery. Ten-year trends showed a steady decline in the proportion of index colonoscopies that yielded a diagnosis of cancer (14.7% in year 1; 4.8% in year 11) or advanced colorectal polyp. There was a strong upward trend in diagnoses of sessile serrated lesions, which overtook hyperplastic polyps in proportions of total index diagnoses by the end of the study time-frame (8.7% compared to 8.5%). CONCLUSIONS Over the first 10 years of a population colorectal cancer screening programme, 'real world' pathology data demonstrate success in the form of reduced diagnoses of cancer and advanced colorectal polyp with passage of successive screening rounds. Interesting trends with respect to serrated polyp diagnoses are also evident, probably related to pathologist and endoscopist behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Grace R Ings
- Public Health Agency, Linum Chambers, Belfast, UK
| | - Gavin Baker
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | - Rajeev Shah
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Southern Health and Social Care Trust, Craigavon, UK
| | - Iain Cameron
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Londonderry, UK
| | - Ciaran O'Neill
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim, UK
| | - Paul J Kelly
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Gerard McVeigh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Steve Irwin
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - William Dickey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Londonderry, UK
| | - Tracy A Owen
- Public Health Agency, Linum Chambers, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Helen G Coleman
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Maurice B Loughrey
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sapir-Pichhadze R, Oertelt-Prigione S. P3 2: a sex- and gender-sensitive model for evidence-based precision medicine: from knowledge generation to implementation in the field of kidney transplantation. Kidney Int 2023; 103:674-685. [PMID: 36731608 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Precision medicine emerged as a promising approach to identify suitable interventions for individual patients with a particular health concern and at various time points. Technology can enable the acquisition of increasing volumes of clinical and "omics" data at the individual and population levels and support advanced clinical decision making. However, to keep pace with evolving societal realities and developments, it is important to systematically include sex- and gender-specific considerations in the research process, from the acquisition of knowledge to implementation. Building on the foundations of evidence-based medicine and existing precision medicine frameworks, we propose a novel evidence-based precision medicine framework in the form of the P32model, which considers individual sex-related (predictive [P1], preventive [P2], and personalized [P3] medicine) and gender-related (participatory [P4], psychosocial [P5], and percipient [P6] medicine) domains and their intersection with ethnicity, geography, and other demographic and social variables, in addition to population, community, and public dimensions (population-informed [P7], partnered with community [P8], and public-engaging [P9] medicine, respectively). Through its ability to contextualize and reflect on societal realities and developments, our model is expected to promote consideration of diversity, equity, and inclusion principles and, thus, enrich science, increase reproducibility of research, and ensure its social impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Sabine Oertelt-Prigione
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; AG10 Sex- and Gender-Sensitive Medicine, Medical Faculty OWL, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giacobbe G, Granata V, Trovato P, Fusco R, Simonetti I, De Muzio F, Cutolo C, Palumbo P, Borgheresi A, Flammia F, Cozzi D, Gabelloni M, Grassi F, Miele V, Barile A, Giovagnoni A, Gandolfo N. Gender Medicine in Clinical Radiology Practice. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020223. [PMID: 36836457 PMCID: PMC9966684 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Gender Medicine is rapidly emerging as a branch of medicine that studies how many diseases common to men and women differ in terms of prevention, clinical manifestations, diagnostic-therapeutic approach, prognosis, and psychological and social impact. Nowadays, the presentation and identification of many pathological conditions pose unique diagnostic challenges. However, women have always been paradoxically underestimated in epidemiological studies, drug trials, as well as clinical trials, so many clinical conditions affecting the female population are often underestimated and/or delayed and may result in inadequate clinical management. Knowing and valuing these differences in healthcare, thus taking into account individual variability, will make it possible to ensure that each individual receives the best care through the personalization of therapies, the guarantee of diagnostic-therapeutic pathways declined according to gender, as well as through the promotion of gender-specific prevention initiatives. This article aims to assess potential gender differences in clinical-radiological practice extracted from the literature and their impact on health and healthcare. Indeed, in this context, radiomics and radiogenomics are rapidly emerging as new frontiers of imaging in precision medicine. The development of clinical practice support tools supported by artificial intelligence allows through quantitative analysis to characterize tissues noninvasively with the ultimate goal of extracting directly from images indications of disease aggressiveness, prognosis, and therapeutic response. The integration of quantitative data with gene expression and patient clinical data, with the help of structured reporting as well, will in the near future give rise to decision support models for clinical practice that will hopefully improve diagnostic accuracy and prognostic power as well as ensure a more advanced level of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuliana Giacobbe
- General and Emergency Radiology Department, “Antonio Cardarelli” Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Piero Trovato
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Federica Flammia
- Department of Emergency Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Diletta Cozzi
- Department of Emergency Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Michela Gabelloni
- Department of Translational Research, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Gandolfo
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, Corso Scassi 1, 16149 Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Toledo DEFWM, Breekveldt ECH, IJspeert JEG, van Vuuren AJ, van Kemenade FJ, Ramakers C, Nagtegaal ID, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MCW, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Dekker E. Advanced serrated polyps as a target of screening: detection rate and positive predictive value within a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening population. Endoscopy 2023; 55:526-534. [PMID: 36323332 DOI: 10.1055/a-1971-3488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Advanced serrated polyps (ASPs) have a comparable risk to advanced adenomas for progression to colorectal cancer (CRC). The yield of most CRC screening programs, however, is based on advanced adenomas and CRC only. We assessed the ASP detection rate, and positive predictive value (PPV) including ASPs in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening program. METHODS : We analyzed the findings of follow-up colonoscopies of FIT-positive screenees in the Dutch CRC screening program from 2014 until 2020. Data were retrieved from the national screening and pathology database. An ASP was defined as any serrated polyp of ≥ 10 mm, sessile serrated lesion with dysplasia, or traditional serrated adenoma. The ASP detection rate was defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with ≥ 1 ASP. PPV was originally defined as the proportion of individuals with a CRC or advanced adenoma. The updated PPV definition included CRCs, advanced adenomas, and/or ASPs. RESULTS : 322 882 colonoscopies were included in the analyses. The overall detection rate of ASPs was 5.9 %. ASPs were detected more often in women than men (6.3 % vs. 5.6 %; P < 0.001). ASP detection rates in individuals aged 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, and 70 + were 5.2 %, 6.1 %, 6.1 %, and 5.9 %, respectively (P < 0.001). The PPV for CRCs and advanced adenomas was 41.1 % and increased to 43.8 % when including ASPs. The PPV increase was larger in women than in men (3.2 vs. 2.4 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS : 5.9 % of FIT-positive screenees had ASPs, but half of these were detected in combination with a CRC or advanced adenoma. Therefore, including ASPs results in a small increase in the yield of FIT-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E F W M van Toledo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emilie C H Breekveldt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joep E G IJspeert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert J van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gini A, Selby K. Fecal Immunochemical Tests: The Right Colorectal Cancer Screening Test for the Average-Risk Population? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:2216-2217. [PMID: 35390510 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gini
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Kevin Selby
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Grobbee EJ, Wisse PHA, Schreuders EH, van Roon A, van Dam L, Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Bramer W, Berhane S, Deeks JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MC, Kuipers EJ. Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 6:CD009276. [PMID: 35665911 PMCID: PMC9169237 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009276.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide, many countries have adopted colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes, often based on faecal occult blood tests (FOBTs). CRC screening aims to detect advanced neoplasia (AN), which is defined as CRC or advanced adenomas. FOBTs fall into two categories based on detection technique and the detected blood component: qualitative guaiac-based FOBTs (gFOBTs) and faecal immunochemical tests (FITs), which can be qualitative and quantitative. Screening with gFOBTs reduces CRC-related mortality. OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic test accuracy of gFOBT and FIT screening for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia in average-risk individuals. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Google Scholar. We searched the reference lists and PubMed-related articles of included studies to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included prospective and retrospective studies that provided the number of true positives, false positives, false negatives, and true negatives for gFOBTs, FITs, or both, with colonoscopy as reference standard. We excluded case-control studies. We included studies in which all participants underwent both index test and reference standard ("reference standard: all"), and studies in which only participants with a positive index test underwent the reference standard while participants with a negative test were followed for at least one year for development of interval carcinomas ("reference standard: positive"). The target population consisted of asymptomatic, average-risk individuals undergoing CRC screening. The target conditions were CRC and advanced neoplasia (advanced adenomas and CRC combined). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. In case of disagreement, a third review author made the final decision. We used the Rutter and Gatsonis hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model to explore differences between tests and identify potential sources of heterogeneity, and the bivariate hierarchical model to estimate sensitivity and specificity at common thresholds: 10 µg haemoglobin (Hb)/g faeces and 20 µg Hb/g faeces. We performed indirect comparisons of the accuracy of the two tests and direct comparisons when both index tests were evaluated in the same population. MAIN RESULTS We ran the initial search on 25 June 2019, which yielded 63 studies for inclusion. We ran a top-up search on 14 September 2021, which yielded one potentially eligible study, currently awaiting classification. We included a total of 33 "reference standard: all" published articles involving 104,640 participants. Six studies evaluated only gFOBTs, 23 studies evaluated only FITs, and four studies included both gFOBTs and FITs. The cut-off for positivity of FITs varied between 2.4 μg and 50 µg Hb/g faeces. For each Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 domain, we assessed risk of bias as high in less than 20% of studies. The summary curve showed that FITs had a higher discriminative ability than gFOBTs for AN (P < 0.001) and CRC (P = 0.004). For the detection of AN, the summary sensitivity of gFOBTs was 15% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12% to 20%), which was significantly lower than FITs at both 10 μg and 20 μg Hb/g cut-offs with summary sensitivities of 33% (95% CI 27% to 40%; P < 0.001) and 26% (95% CI 21% to 31%, P = 0.002), respectively. Results were simulated in a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 screening participants with 1% CRC prevalence and 10% AN prevalence. Out of 1000 participants with AN, gFOBTs missed 850, while FITs missed 670 (10 μg Hb/g cut-off) and 740 (20 μg Hb/g cut-off). No significant differences in summary specificity for AN detection were found between gFOBTs (94%; 95% CI 92% to 96%), and FITs at 10 μg Hb/g cut-off (93%; 95% CI 90% to 95%) and at 20 μg Hb/g cut-off (97%; 95% CI 95% to 98%). So, among 9000 participants without AN, 540 were offered (unnecessary) colonoscopy with gFOBTs compared to 630 (10 μg Hb/g) and 270 (20 μg Hb/g) with FITs. Similarly, for the detection of CRC, the summary sensitivity of gFOBTs, 39% (95% CI 25% to 55%), was significantly lower than FITs at 10 μg and 20 μg Hb/g cut-offs: 76% (95% CI 57% to 88%: P = 0.001) and 65% (95% CI 46% to 80%; P = 0.035), respectively. So, out of 100 participants with CRC, gFOBTs missed 61, and FITs missed 24 (10 μg Hb/g) and 35 (20 μg Hb/g). No significant differences in summary specificity for CRC were found between gFOBTs (94%; 95% CI 91% to 96%), and FITs at the 10 μg Hb/g cut-off (94%; 95% CI 87% to 97%) and 20 μg Hb/g cut-off (96%; 95% CI 91% to 98%). So, out of 9900 participants without CRC, 594 were offered (unnecessary) colonoscopy with gFOBTs versus 594 (10 μg Hb/g) and 396 (20 μg Hb/g) with FITs. In five studies that compared FITs and gFOBTs in the same population, FITs showed a higher discriminative ability for AN than gFOBTs (P = 0.003). We included a total of 30 "reference standard: positive" studies involving 3,664,934 participants. Of these, eight were gFOBT-only studies, 18 were FIT-only studies, and four studies combined both gFOBTs and FITs. The cut-off for positivity of FITs varied between 5 µg to 250 µg Hb/g faeces. For each QUADAS-2 domain, we assessed risk of bias as high in less than 20% of studies. The summary curve showed that FITs had a higher discriminative ability for detecting CRC than gFOBTs (P < 0.001). The summary sensitivity for CRC of gFOBTs, 59% (95% CI 55% to 64%), was significantly lower than FITs at the 10 μg Hb/g cut-off, 89% (95% CI 80% to 95%; P < 0.001) and the 20 μg Hb/g cut-off, 89% (95% CI 85% to 92%; P < 0.001). So, in the hypothetical cohort with 100 participants with CRC, gFOBTs missed 41, while FITs missed 11 (10 μg Hb/g) and 11 (20 μg Hb/g). The summary specificity of gFOBTs was 98% (95% CI 98% to 99%), which was higher than FITs at both 10 μg and 20 μg Hb/g cut-offs: 94% (95% CI 92% to 95%; P < 0.001) and 95% (95% CI 94% to 96%; P < 0.001), respectively. So, out of 9900 participants without CRC, 198 were offered (unnecessary) colonoscopy with gFOBTs compared to 594 (10 μg Hb/g) and 495 (20 μg Hb/g) with FITs. At a specificity of 90% and 95%, FITs had a higher sensitivity than gFOBTs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS FITs are superior to gFOBTs in detecting AN and CRC in average-risk individuals. Specificity of both tests was similar in "reference standard: all" studies, whereas specificity was significantly higher for gFOBTs than FITs in "reference standard: positive" studies. However, at pre-specified specificities, the sensitivity of FITs was significantly higher than gFOBTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmée J Grobbee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pieter HA Wisse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eline H Schreuders
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Aafke van Roon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leonie van Dam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ann G Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wichor Bramer
- Medical Library , Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sarah Berhane
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jonathan J Deeks
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Manon Cw Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ribbing Wilén H, Saraste D, Blom J. Interval cancers in a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer with gender-specific cut-off levels for fecal immunochemical test. J Med Screen 2022; 29:156-165. [PMID: 35257615 PMCID: PMC9381686 DOI: 10.1177/09691413221085218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate interval cancers (IC) in the population-based Swedish regional colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program of Stockholm-Gotland, which uses gender-specific cut-off levels for the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Methods All individuals aged 60–69 in Stockholm-Gotland invited to the screening program in October 2015 to September 2017 were followed up 2 years after invitation. Cut-off level for a positive FIT was 40 µg/g in women and 80 µg/g in men. Those with a positive FIT were referred to colonoscopy. Screening-detected CRC (SD-CRC) and IC after negative FIT (FIT-IC) or negative screening colonoscopy (Colonoscopy-IC) were identified in the Swedish colorectal cancer register. The IC rate was calculated as IC/(FIT negatives + negative screening colonoscopies). The IC incidence rate (ICs among negatives per 100,000 person-years) in different sex and age groups was compared to the mean CRC incidence before regional screening implementation. Test sensitivity was defined as SD-CRC/(SD-CRC + FIT-IC). Results Approximately 214,400 individuals were invited, and in 3521 screening colonoscopies 257(6.3%) SD-CRCs were detected. During follow-up, 124 FIT-IC and 7 Colonoscopy-IC were diagnosed, yielding an IC rate of 12.6 and 6.0 per 10,000 negatives (p = 0.00005) and a test sensitivity of 62% and 75% (p = 0.01) in men and women respectively. The IC incidence rate compared to CRC incidence was non-significantly lower in women. Conclusion In the population-based screening program of Stockholm-Gotland with a cut-off of 40 µg/g in women and 80 µg/g in men, the test sensitivity was higher and the IC rate was lower in women, which might imply lowering the cut-off level in men. However, the IC incidence rate relative to the CRC incidence was similar in both genders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Ribbing Wilén
- Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset (KI SÖS), 27106Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li JB, Qiu ZY, Deng YX, Li Y, Lin ZC, Wu YP, Weng F, Tian H, Ou QJ, Gong CH, Pan ZZ, Wan DS, Peng JH, Fang YJ. Factors associated with positive predictive value of preliminary screening in a two-step screening strategy for colorectal neoplasms in China. Discov Oncol 2022; 13:4. [PMID: 35201502 PMCID: PMC8777551 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-022-00463-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The positive predictive value (PPV) of high risk factor questionnaire (HRFQ) plus fecal immunochemical test (FIT) as preliminary screening strategy for colorectal-related neoplasia is relatively low. We aim to explore independent factors associated with PPVs of HRFQ combined FIT for selecting high risk individuals for colonoscopy. METHODS A total of 6971 residents were enrolled in a community-based screening program. Participants who had positive results of HRFQ and/or FIT and subsequently received colonoscopy were involved. The associations of socio-demographic factors, lifestyle behaviors, and high risk factors of colorectal cancer with PPVs of HRFQ, FIT, and their combination were evaluated by multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS Among 572 involved cases, 249 (43.5%) colorectal neoplasms were detected by colonoscopy, including 71 advanced adenoma (12.4%) and 9 colorectal cancer (CRC) (1.6%). The PPVs of preliminary screening were 43.5% for total colorectal neoplasms, 14.0% for advanced neoplasm, and 1.6% for CRC. Adding positive HRFQ to FIT could improve the PPV from 3.5 to 8.0% for detecting CRC. Preliminarily screened positive individuals who were males [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.95, 95% CI 1.31, 2.90; p < 0.001], elders (> 60 years) (AOR: 1.70, 95% CI 1.17, 2.46; p = 0.005), or ex-/current smokers (AOR: 3.04, 95% CI 1.31, 7.09; p = 0.10) had higher odds of PPVs of detecting colorectal neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS Combining HRFQ and FIT could largely improve PPVs for screening advanced neoplasm and CRC. Gender and age-specific FIT cut-off values as well as initiating ages for CRC screening might be recommended to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of current screening algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Bin Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Yu Qiu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Xiang Deng
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yin Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhuo-Chen Lin
- Department of Medical Records, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan-Ping Wu
- Yuexiu District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, 510055, People's Republic of China
| | - Fan Weng
- Yuexiu District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, 510055, People's Republic of China
| | - Huan Tian
- Dadong Street Community Health Service Center, Guangzhou, 510000, People's Republic of China
| | - Qing-Jian Ou
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Cheng-Hua Gong
- Yuexiu District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, 510055, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Zhong Pan
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - De-Sen Wan
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian-Hong Peng
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yu-Jing Fang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cui CL, Dornisch AM, Umlauf AE, Cuomo RE, Murphy JD, Lopez NE. International Socioeconomic Predictors of Colon and Rectal Cancer Mortality: Is Colorectal Cancer a First World Problem? JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7:1659-1667. [PMID: 34910590 PMCID: PMC8691512 DOI: 10.1200/go.21.00307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of international morbidity and is the second highest cause of cancer-related mortality in the world. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between international health care spending on CRC mortality over time. METHODS This is a retrospective study using a publicly available data from the WHO Global Health Observatory database. General estimating equations were used to analyze the relationship between total health care expenditure per capita (THEpc) and CRC mortality at the country level. The primary predictors of interest were quartiles of THEpc. Other exposure variables included gross domestic product per capita (GDPpc), smoking (% of adult population smoking), physician density (per 10,000), and time. RESULTS Mortality decreased significantly from 2000 to 2016 (coefficient [95% CI], −2.2 [−3.3 to −1.1]; P < .001). THEpc, GDPpc, time, and percentage of adult population smoking were significant predictors of CRC mortality. Patients in the top two quartiles of THEpc had 3% higher rates of CRC mortality compared with countries in Q1 THEpc (Q3: 3.4 [1.9-4.8], P < .001; Q4: 3.2 [1.4-5.0], P = .001). Similar trends were seen in GDPpc (Q4: 3.2 [1.4-5.0], P = .001; Q3: 3.4 [1.9-4.8], P < .001; Q2: 1.7 [0.7-2.6], P < .001; Q1: reference). CONCLUSION Overall, mortality decreased significantly over the study period. Countries with higher health expenditures and higher gross domestic products experienced higher rates of CRC mortality. Further research will be necessary to determine the cause for this, but we postulate that it may be a result of more robust diagnostic and follow-up methods in countries with more resources. Colorectal Cancer mortality decreased between 2000-2016 but only among developed nations.![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna M Dornisch
- University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA
| | - Anya E Umlauf
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Raphael E Cuomo
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Nicole E Lopez
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Clark GR, Digby J, Fraser CG, Strachan JA, Steele RJ. Faecal haemoglobin concentrations in women and men diagnosed with colorectal cancer in a national screening programme. J Med Screen 2021; 29:26-31. [PMID: 34806935 PMCID: PMC8892068 DOI: 10.1177/09691413211056970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective There is evidence that colorectal cancer screening using faecal haemoglobin is less effective in women than men. The faecal haemoglobin concentrations were therefore examined in women and men with screen-detected colorectal cancer. Setting Scottish Bowel Screening Programme, following the introduction of a faecal immunochemical test from November 2017, to March 2020. Methods Data were collated on faecal haemoglobin concentrations, pathological stage and anatomical site of the main lesion in participants who had colorectal cancer detected. The data in women and men were compared. Results For the faecal haemoglobin concentrations studied (>80 µg Hb/g faeces), the distributions indicated lower concentrations in women. Marked differences were found between women and men diagnosed with colorectal cancer. The median faecal haemoglobin concentration for women (n = 720) was 408 µg Hb/g faeces compared to 473 µg Hb/g faeces for men (n = 959) (p = 0.004) and 50.6% of the results were >400 µg Hb/g faeces in women; in men, this was 57.8%. The difference in faecal haemoglobin concentrations in women and men became less statistically significant as stage advanced from stages I–IV. For right-sided, left-sided and rectal colorectal cancer, a similar gender difference persisted in all sites. Differences in faecal haemoglobin between the genders were significant for left-sided cancers and stage I and approached significance for rectal cancers and stage II, but all sites and stages showed lower median faecal haemoglobin concentrations for women. Conclusions To minimise gender inequalities, faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening programmes should evaluate a strategy of using different faecal haemoglobin concentration thresholds in women and men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jayne Digby
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, 85326University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Callum G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, 85326University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Judith A Strachan
- Blood Sciences and Scottish Bowel Screening Laboratory, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Robert Jc Steele
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, 85326University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
A sex-specific propensity-adjusted analysis of colonic adenoma detection rates in a screening cohort. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17785. [PMID: 34493755 PMCID: PMC8423798 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97163-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of colorectal adenoma and advanced adenoma (AA) differs between sexes. Also, the optimal age for the first screening colonoscopy is under debate. We, therefore, performed a sex-specific and age-adjusted comparison of adenoma, AA and advanced neoplasia (AN) rates in a real-world screening cohort. In total, 2824 asymptomatic participants between 45- and 60-years undergoing screening colonoscopy at a single-centre in Austria were evaluated. 46% were females and mean age was 53 ± 4 years. A propensity score for being female was calculated, and adenoma, AA and AN detection rates evaluated using uni- and multivariable logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses for three age groups (group 1: 45 to 49 years, n = 521, 41% females, mean age 47 ± 1 years; group 2: 50 to 54 years, n = 1164, 47% females, mean age 52 ± 1 years; group 3: 55 to 60 years, n = 1139, 46% females, mean age 57 ± 2 years) were performed. The prevalence of any adenoma was lower in females (17% vs. 30%; OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.38–0.55; p < 0.001) and remained so after propensity score adjustment for baseline characteristics and lifestyle factors (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41–0.66; p < 0.001). The same trend was seen for AA with a significantly lower prevalence in females (3% vs. 7%; OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.26–0.55; p < 0.001) that persisted after propensity score adjustment (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34–0.86; p = 0.01). Also, all age-group sensitivity analyses showed lower adenoma, AA and AN rates in females. Similar numbers needed to screen to detect an adenoma, an AA or AN were found in female age group 3 and male age group 1. Colorectal adenoma, AA and AN were consistently lower in females even after propensity score adjustment and in all age-adjusted sensitivity analyses. Our study may add to the discussion of the optimal age for initial screening colonoscopy which may differ between the sexes.
Collapse
|
17
|
Thomas C, Mandrik O, Whyte S, Saunders CL, Griffin SJ, Usher‐Smith JA. Should colorectal cancer screening start at different ages for men and women? Cost-effectiveness analysis for a resource-constrained service. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2021; 4:e1344. [PMID: 33533190 PMCID: PMC8388164 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Men have a greater risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) than women, but population screening currently starts at the same age for both sexes. AIM This analysis investigates whether, in a resource-constrained setting, it would be more effective and cost-effective for men and women to start screening for CRC at different ages. METHODS AND RESULTS An economic modeling analysis was carried out using the Microsimulation Model in Cancer of the Bowel to compare sex-stratification against screening everyone from the same age, taking an English National Health Service perspective. Screening men from age 56 and women from age 60, rather than screening everyone from age 58 using a Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) threshold of 120 μg/g is expected to produce an additional 0.0004 QALYs for a cost of £0.55 per person at model start (Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio = £1392), and to reduce CRC cases and mortality by 25 and 19 per 100 000 people respectively, while using a similar amount of screening resources. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicates a 61% probability that sex-stratification is more cost-effective than screening everyone at age 58. Similar benefits of sex-stratification are found at other FIT thresholds, but become negligible if mean screening start age is reduced to 50. CONCLUSION Where resources are constrained and it is not feasible to screen everyone from the age of 50, starting screening earlier in men than women is likely to be more cost-effective and gain more health benefits overall than strategies where men and women start screening at the same age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Thomas
- School of Health and Related ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Olena Mandrik
- School of Health and Related ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Sophie Whyte
- School of Health and Related ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Catherine L. Saunders
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of Cambridge, School of Clinical MedicineCambridgeUK
| | - Simon J. Griffin
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of Cambridge, School of Clinical MedicineCambridgeUK
| | - Juliet A. Usher‐Smith
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of Cambridge, School of Clinical MedicineCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gies A, Niedermaier T, Alwers E, Hielscher T, Weigl K, Heisser T, Schrotz-King P, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. Consistent Major Differences in Sex- and Age-Specific Diagnostic Performance among Nine Faecal Immunochemical Tests Used for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143574. [PMID: 34298786 PMCID: PMC8306133 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence on diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) by sex and age is scarce. We aimed to evaluate FIT performance for detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (AN) by sex and age across nine different FIT brands in a colonoscopy-controlled setting. The faecal samples were obtained from 2042 participants of colonoscopy screening. All eligible cases with AN (n = 216) and 300 randomly selected participants without AN were included. Diagnostic performance for detection of AN was assessed by sex and age (50-64 vs. 65-79 years for each of the nine FITs individually and for all FITs combined. Sensitivity was consistently lower, and specificity was consistently higher for females as compared with males (pooled values at original FIT cutoffs, 25.7% vs. 34.6%, p = 0.12 and 96.2% vs. 90.8%, p < 0.01, respectively). Positive predictive values (PPVs) were similar between both sexes, but negative predictive values (NPVs) were consistently higher for females (pooled values, 91.8% vs. 86.6%, p < 0.01). Sex-specific cutoffs attenuated differences in sensitivities but increased differences in predictive values. According to age, sensitivities and specificities were similar, whereas PPVs were consistently lower and NPVs were consistently higher for the younger participants. A negative FIT is less reliable in ruling out AN among men than among women and among older than among younger participants. Comparisons of measures of diagnostic performance among studies with different sex or age distributions should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Gies
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Division of Preventive Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.G.); (P.S.-K.); (H.B.)
| | - Tobias Niedermaier
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.A.); (K.W.); (T.H.); (M.H.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Elizabeth Alwers
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.A.); (K.W.); (T.H.); (M.H.)
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Biostatistics, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Korbinian Weigl
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.A.); (K.W.); (T.H.); (M.H.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Heisser
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.A.); (K.W.); (T.H.); (M.H.)
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Petra Schrotz-King
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Division of Preventive Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.G.); (P.S.-K.); (H.B.)
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.A.); (K.W.); (T.H.); (M.H.)
| | - Hermann Brenner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Division of Preventive Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.G.); (P.S.-K.); (H.B.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (E.A.); (K.W.); (T.H.); (M.H.)
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Community Health Behaviors and Geographic Variation in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Survival Among Women. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2021; 11:e00266. [PMID: 33512797 PMCID: PMC7678794 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite overall reductions in colorectal cancer (CRC) morbidity and mortality, survival disparities by sex persist among young patients (age <50 years). Our study sought to quantify variance in early-onset CRC survival accounted for by individual/community-level characteristics among a population-based cohort of US women. METHODS: Geographic hot spots—counties with high early-onset CRC mortality rates among women—were derived using 3 geospatial autocorrelation approaches with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention national mortality data. We identified women (age: 15–49 years) diagnosed with CRC from 1999 to 2016 in the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Patterns of community health behaviors by hot spot classification were assessed by Spearman correlation (ρ). Generalized R2 values were used to evaluate variance in survival attributed to individual/community-level features. RESULTS: Approximately 1 in every 16 contiguous US counties identified as hot spots (191 of 3,108), and 52.9% of hot spot counties (n = 101) were located in the South. Among 28,790 women with early-onset CRC, 13.7% of cases (n = 3,954) resided in hot spot counties. Physical inactivity and fertility were community health behaviors that modestly correlated with hot spot residence among women with early-onset CRC (ρ = 0.21 and ρ = −0.23, respectively; P < 0.01). Together, individual/community-level features accounted for distinct variance patterns in early-onset CRC survival among women (hot spot counties: 33.8%; non–hot spot counties: 34.1%). DISCUSSION: Individual/community-level features accounted for approximately one-third of variation in early-onset CRC survival among women and differed between hot spot vs non–hot spot counties. Understanding the impact of community health behaviors—particularly in regions with high early-onset CRC mortality rates—is critical for tailoring strategies to reduce early-onset CRC disparities.
Collapse
|
20
|
Clark GRC, Strachan JA, McPherson A, Digby J, Mowat C, Steele RJC, Fraser CG. Faecal haemoglobin distributions by sex, age, deprivation and geographical region: consequences for colorectal cancer screening strategies. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021; 58:2073-2080. [PMID: 32324157 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin (FIT) are becoming widely used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and assessment of symptomatic patients. Faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) thresholds are used to guide subsequent investigation. We established the distributions of f-Hb in a large screening population by sex, age, deprivation and geography. Methods Single estimates of f-Hb were documented for all individuals participating in the first 18 months of the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (SBoSP). The distributions of f-Hb were generated for all participants, all men and women, and men and women by age quintile and deprivation quintile. Distributions were also generated by geographical region for all participants, men and women, and by deprivation. Comparisons of f-Hb distributions with those found in a pilot evaluation of FIT and three other countries were performed. Results f-Hb was documented for 887,248 screening participants, 422,385 men and 464,863 women. f-Hb varied by sex, age, deprivation quintile and geographical region. The f-Hb distributions by sex and age differed between the SBoSP and the pilot evaluation and the three other countries. Conclusions f-Hb is higher in men than in women and increases with age and deprivation in both sexes. f-Hb also varies by geographical region, independently of deprivation, and by country. The f-Hb distribution estimated by pilot evaluation may not represent the population distribution. Decision limits have advantages over reference intervals. Use of partitioned f-Hb thresholds for further investigation, based on the data generated, has advantages and disadvantages, as do risk scores based on a spectrum of influencing variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin R C Clark
- Information Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.,Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Judith A Strachan
- Department of Blood Sciences and Scottish Bowel Screening Laboratory, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Alisson McPherson
- Scottish Bowel Screening Laboratory, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Jayne Digby
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Craig Mowat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Robert J C Steele
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Callum G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ribbing Wilén H, Saraste D, Blom J. Gender-specific cut-off levels in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: A population-based study of colonoscopy findings and costs. J Med Screen 2021; 28:439-447. [PMID: 34106777 DOI: 10.1177/09691413211020035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the population-based Swedish regional colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program of Stockholm-Gotland using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), gender-specific cut-off levels of fecal hemoglobin are applied, since previous studies have indicated a lower sensitivity of FIT for CRC in women. The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the screening costs overall and per detected CRC of this strategy. METHODS All individuals aged 60-69 invited to screening in 2015-2017 were included. Cut-off level for positive FIT was 40 µg/g in women and 80 µg/g in men. Those with a positive FIT were referred to colonoscopy. The yield of CRC and screening cost for the study period were assessed and compared to cut-off levels of 80 µg/g in both genders. RESULTS Approximately 230,000 individuals were invited. Overall participation rates were 72% in women and 65% in men (p < 0.05). FIT was positive in 4256 individuals (2.7% in both genders). In 3758 colonoscopies, 258 (6.9%) CRCs were detected. The positive predictive value for CRC was significantly higher in men (8.3% vs. 5.8%). In 120 women with CRC, 28 (23%) had FIT < 80 µg/g. Negative colonoscopies were more common in women (24% vs. 17%, p < 0.05). Total costs for the study period were 52,000,000SEK (≈5,200,000€), i.e. 16% higher compared to using cut-off levels of 80 µg/g in both genders, and corresponding to a 3% increment in cost per detected CRC. CONCLUSION The high rate of CRC detected in women in the lowest FIT category outweighs the minor reduction in screening costs if the same cut-off level was used as for men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Ribbing Wilén
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset (KI SÖS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.,Trauma & Reparative Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Deborah Saraste
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johannes Blom
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset (KI SÖS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Keys MT, Serra-Burriel M, Martínez-Lizaga N, Pellisé M, Balaguer F, Sánchez A, Bernal-Delgado E, Castells A. Population-based organized screening by faecal immunochemical testing and colorectal cancer mortality: a natural experiment. Int J Epidemiol 2021; 50:143-155. [PMID: 33211822 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population-based organized screening programmes for colorectal cancer (CRC) are underway worldwide, with many based on the faecal immunochemical test (FIT). No clinical trials assessing FIT compared with no screening are planned, and few studies have assessed the population impact of such programmes. METHODS Before 2010, 11 out of 50 Spanish provinces initiated population-based organized screening programmes with FIT for an average-risk population aged 50-69 years. We used a quasi-experimental design across Spanish provinces between 1999 and 2016 to evaluate their impact on population age-standardized mortality and incidence rates due to CRC. Difference-in-differences and synthetic control analyses were performed to test for validation of statistical assumptions and to assess the dynamics of screening-associated changes in outcomes over time. RESULTS No differences in outcome trends between exposed (n = 11) and control (n = 36) provinces were observed for up to 7 years preceding the implementation of screening. Relative to controls, exposed provinces experienced a mean increase in age-standardized incidence of 10.08% [95% confidence interval (CI) (5.09, 15.07)] 2 years after implementation, followed by a reduction in age-standardized mortality rates due to CRC of 8.82% [95% CI (3.77, 13.86)] after 7 years. Results were similar for both women and men. No associated changes were observed in adjacent age bands not targeted by screening, nor for 10 other major causes of death in the exposed provinces. CONCLUSIONS FIT-based organized screening in Spain was associated with reductions in population colorectal cancer mortality. Further research is warranted in order to assess the replicability and external validity of our findings, and on gender-specific use of FIT in organized screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T Keys
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Biodemography, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Economics, Center for Research in Health and Economics (CRES), Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miquel Serra-Burriel
- Department of Economics, Center for Research in Health and Economics (CRES), Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Natalia Martínez-Lizaga
- Data Science in Health Services and Policy Research, Institute for Health Sciences in Aragón (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain.,Spanish Health Services Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Balaguer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ariadna Sánchez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Bernal-Delgado
- Data Science in Health Services and Policy Research, Institute for Health Sciences in Aragón (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain.,Spanish Health Services Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Antoni Castells
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Head-to-head comparison of the test performance of self-administered qualitative vs. laboratory-based quantitative fecal immunochemical tests in detecting colorectal neoplasm. Chin Med J (Engl) 2021; 134:1335-1344. [PMID: 34039863 PMCID: PMC8183845 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are the most widely used non-invasive tests in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, evidence about the direct comparison of the test performance of the self-administered qualitative a laboratory-based quantitative FITs in a CRC screening setting is sparse. Methods: Based on a CRC screening trial (TARGET-C), we included 3144 pre-colonoscopy fecal samples, including 24 CRCs, 230 advanced adenomas, 622 non-advanced adenomas, and 2268 participants without significant findings at colonoscopy. Three self-administered qualitative FITs (Pupu tube) with positivity thresholds of 8.0, 14.4, or 20.8 μg hemoglobin (Hb)/g preset by the manufacturer and one laboratory-based quantitative FIT (OC-Sensor) with a positivity threshold of 20 μg Hb/g recommended by the manufacturer were tested by trained staff in the central laboratory. The diagnostic performance of the FITs for detecting colorectal neoplasms was compared in the different scenarios using the preset and adjusted thresholds (for the quantitative FIT). Results: At the thresholds preset by the manufacturers, apart from the qualitative FIT-3, significantly higher sensitivities for detecting advanced adenoma were observed for the qualitative FIT-1 (33.9% [95% CI: 28.7–39.4%]) and qualitative FIT-2 (22.2% [95% CI: 17.7–27.2%]) compared to the quantitative FIT (11.7% [95% CI: 8.4–15.8%]), while at a cost of significantly lower specificities. However, such difference was not observed for detecting CRC. For scenarios of adjusting the positivity thresholds of the quantitative FIT to yield comparable specificity or comparable positivity rate to the three qualitative FITs accordingly, there were no significant differences in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values and positive/negative likelihood ratios for detecting CRC or advanced adenoma between the two types of FITs, which was further evidenced in ROC analysis. Conclusions: Although the self-administered qualitative and the laboratory-based quantitative FITs had varied test performance at the positivity thresholds preset by the manufacturer, such heterogeneity could be overcome by adjusting thresholds to yield comparable specificities or positivity rates. Future CRC screening programs should select appropriate types of FITs and define the thresholds based on the targeted specificities and manageable positivity rates.
Collapse
|
24
|
Lin JS, Perdue LA, Henrikson NB, Bean SI, Blasi PR. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2021; 325:1978-1998. [PMID: 34003220 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 217] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the US. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the effectiveness, test accuracy, and harms of screening for CRC to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies published from January 1, 2015, to December 4, 2019; surveillance through March 26, 2021. STUDY SELECTION English-language studies conducted in asymptomatic populations at general risk of CRC. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two reviewers independently appraised the articles and extracted relevant study data from fair- or good-quality studies. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, test accuracy in detecting cancers or adenomas, and serious adverse events. RESULTS The review included 33 studies (n = 10 776 276) on the effectiveness of screening, 59 (n = 3 491 045) on the test performance of screening tests, and 131 (n = 26 987 366) on the harms of screening. In randomized clinical trials (4 trials, n = 458 002), intention to screen with 1- or 2-time flexible sigmoidoscopy vs no screening was associated with a decrease in CRC-specific mortality (incidence rate ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.68-0.80]). Annual or biennial guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) vs no screening (5 trials, n = 419 966) was associated with a reduction of CRC-specific mortality after 2 to 9 rounds of screening (relative risk at 19.5 years, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84-0.98]; relative risk at 30 years, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65-0.93]). In observational studies, receipt of screening colonoscopy (2 studies, n = 436 927) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) (1 study, n = 5.4 million) vs no screening was associated with lower risk of CRC incidence or mortality. Nine studies (n = 6497) evaluated the test accuracy of screening computed tomography (CT) colonography, 4 of which also reported the test accuracy of colonoscopy; pooled sensitivity to detect adenomas 6 mm or larger was similar between CT colonography with bowel prep (0.86) and colonoscopy (0.89). In pooled values, commonly evaluated FITs (14 studies, n = 45 403) (sensitivity, 0.74; specificity, 0.94) and stool DNA with FIT (4 studies, n = 12 424) (sensitivity, 0.93; specificity, 0.85) performed better than high-sensitivity gFOBT (2 studies, n = 3503) (sensitivity, 0.50-0.75; specificity, 0.96-0.98) to detect cancers. Serious harms of screening colonoscopy included perforations (3.1/10 000 procedures) and major bleeding (14.6/10 000 procedures). CT colonography may have harms resulting from low-dose ionizing radiation. It is unclear if detection of extracolonic findings on CT colonography is a net benefit or harm. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE There are several options to screen for colorectal cancer, each with a different level of evidence demonstrating its ability to reduce cancer mortality, its ability to detect cancer or precursor lesions, and its risk of harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Lin
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Leslie A Perdue
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Nora B Henrikson
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Sarah I Bean
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Paula R Blasi
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hultcrantz R. Aspects of colorectal cancer screening, methods, age and gender. J Intern Med 2021; 289:493-507. [PMID: 32929813 PMCID: PMC8048936 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is, besides breast, prostate, lung and skin cancers, the most common cancer worldwide and is suitable for screening. The incidence of CRC varies considerably in different parts of the world: in well-developed countries, the incidence is between 30 and 70 per 100 000 inhabitants, whereas in less-developed countries such as sub-Saharan Africa, it is 10-20/100 000 inhabitants. Women have a lower incidence of CRC, which is usually one-third of total incidence. Several studies have shown that it is possible to decrease mortality from CRC with about 20%, which is evidenced through the data from countries with screening programmes. Though the method of choice to identify blood samples in faecal matter is under debate, the most feasible way is to perform colonoscopy. Other methods include more advanced faecal analyses, testing for mutations from CRC, sigmoidoscopy, CT colonoscopy or optical colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is in most countries not available in sufficient amount and has to be carried out with great accuracy; otherwise, lesions will be missed to identify, thus leading to complications. Gender is an issue in CRC screening, as women have about 20% fewer colorectal adenomas and CRCs, but they also have more right-sided lesions, which are more difficult to detect with tests for faecal blood since they create less blood in faeces. Thus, other strategies may have to be developed for women in order for screening to have the same effect. It is essential to introduce colorectal cancer screening in all countries together with other clinical pieces of advice such as information on smoking, obesity and exercise in order to reduce one of the most dangerous cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Hultcrantz
- From the, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ibáñez-Sanz G, Sanz-Pamplona R, Garcia M. Future Prospects of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Characterizing Interval Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061328. [PMID: 33809520 PMCID: PMC8001713 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumors that are not detected by screening tests are known as interval cancers and are diagnosed clinically after a negative result in the screening episode but before the next screening invitation. Clinical characteristics associated with interval colorectal cancers have been studied, but few molecular data are available that describe interval colorectal cancers. A better understanding of the clinical and biological characteristics associated with interval colorectal cancer may provide new insights into how to prevent this disease more effectively. This review aimed to summarize the current literature concerning interval colorectal cancer and its epidemiological, clinical, and molecular features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Ibáñez-Sanz
- Oncology Data Analytics Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain;
- Gastroenterology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
- Colorectal Cancer Research Group, ONCOBELL Programme, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebeca Sanz-Pamplona
- Oncology Data Analytics Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain;
- Colorectal Cancer Research Group, ONCOBELL Programme, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Correspondence: (R.S.-P.); (M.G.); Tel.: +349-32-607-186 (R.S.-P. & M.G.)
| | - Montse Garcia
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Cancer Screening Unit, Prevention and Control Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
- Early Detection of Cancer Research Group, EPIBELL Programme, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
- Correspondence: (R.S.-P.); (M.G.); Tel.: +349-32-607-186 (R.S.-P. & M.G.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sarkeala T, Färkkilä M, Anttila A, Hyöty M, Kairaluoma M, Rautio T, Voutilainen M, Helander S, Jäntti M, Lehtinen M, Patrikka L, Malila N, Heinävaara S. Piloting gender-oriented colorectal cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: population-based registry study from Finland. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046667. [PMID: 33558363 PMCID: PMC7871693 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility and evaluate the performance of a relaunched colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme with different cut-offs for men and women. DESIGN Population-based registry study. SETTING Nine municipalities in Finland which started CRC screening with faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in April 2019 with cut-off levels 70 µg Hg/g faeces for men and 25 µg Hg/g faeces for women. PARTICIPANTS Men (n=13 059) and women (n=14 669) aged 60-66 years invited to screening during the first programme year. OUTCOME MEASURES Participation rates, positivity rates, detection rates of CRC and advanced adenoma (AA), and positive predictive values (PPV) of FIT for CRC and AA. RESULTS Altogether 21 993 invitees returned stool samples. The participation rate of women (83.4%; 95% CI 82.8 to 84.0) was significantly higher than that of men (74.7%; 95% CI 73.9 to 75.4). The positivity rates were 2.4% (2.2 to 2.7) and 2.8% (2.5 to 3.1), respectively. In total, 37 CRCs and 116 AAs were detected. The detection rates of CRC and AA per 1000 participants were 1.8 (1.1 to 2.9) and 7.2 (5.6 to 9.1) for men and 1.6 (0.9 to 2.4) and 3.8 (2.8 to 5.0) for women. The PPVs per 100 positive tests were 6.6 (4.0 to 10.3) and 25.7 (20.6 to 31.4) for men and 6.4 (3.9 to 9.8) and 15.5 (11.6 to 20.2) for women. CONCLUSIONS The chosen FIT strategy narrowed the gap in the diagnostic performance between men and women especially in the detection of CRC. The participation rates were excellent. The levels of positivity and detection rates were moderate and need further action. The results indicate that gender-specific protocols can be introduced to organised CRC screening. It is yet to be seen whether they are more effective than a uniform screening protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tytti Sarkeala
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Cancer Society of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Martti Färkkilä
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ahti Anttila
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Cancer Society of Finland Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marja Hyöty
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Tero Rautio
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | | | - Sanni Helander
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Cancer Society of Finland Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maija Jäntti
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Cancer Society of Finland Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Milla Lehtinen
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Cancer Society of Finland Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lotta Patrikka
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Cancer Society of Finland Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Nea Malila
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Cancer Society of Finland Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sirpa Heinävaara
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Cancer Society of Finland Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fecal Immunochemical Tests Detect Screening Participants with Multiple Advanced Adenomas Better than T1 Colorectal Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040644. [PMID: 33562775 PMCID: PMC7914536 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are widely used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The detection of early-stage cancer and advanced adenoma (AA), the most important premalignant lesion, is highly relevant to reducing CRC-related deaths. We aimed to assess sensitivity for the detection of CRC and AA stratified by tumor stage; number; size; histology of AA; and by location, age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). METHODS Participants of screening colonoscopy (n = 2043) and newly diagnosed CRC patients (n = 184) provided a stool sample before bowel preparation or CRC surgery. Fecal hemoglobin concentration was determined in parallel by nine different quantitative FITs among 94 CRC patients, 200 AA cases, and 300 participants free of advanced neoplasm. Sensitivities were calculated at original cutoffs and at adjusted cutoffs, yielding 93% specificity among all FITs. RESULTS At adjusted cutoffs, UICC stage I cancers yielded consistently lower sensitivities (range: 62-68%) compared to stage II-IV cancers (range: 73-89%). An even stronger gradient was observed according to T status, with substantially lower sensitivities for T1 (range: 39-57%) than for T2-T4 cancers (range: 71-100%). Sensitivities for the detection of participants with multiple AAs ranged from 55% to 64% and were by up to 25% points higher than sensitivities for T1 cancers. CONCLUSIONS FITs detect stage I cancers and especially T1 cancers at substantially lower sensitivities than more advanced cancer stages. Participants with multiple AAs were detected with slightly lower sensitivities than stage I cancers and with even higher sensitivities than T1 cancers. Further research should focus on improving the detection of early-stage cancers.
Collapse
|
29
|
Impact of antithrombotics on the fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening : a multi-center Belgian experience. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2021; 84:19-24. [PMID: 33639689 DOI: 10.51821/84.1.349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Impact of antithrombotics on the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains unclear. Methods Patients undergoing colonoscopy for positive FIT in 2015 were assessed at 3 Belgian centers. Significant findings were advanced polyps (AP) (sessile serrated, tubular or villous adenomas >1cm or high-grade dysplasia) and CRC. False positive FIT and detection of AP/CRC with antithrombotics were calculated. Results 510 patients (64% male, median (IQR) age 63.2 (60.2 - 66.4) years) were included. Colorectal pathology in 371/510 (73%) was associated with male gender (70% vs. 48% ; p= .0001) and family history (16% vs. 8% ; p= .02). Antithrombotics in 125/510 (25%) were associated with male gender (78% vs. 59% ; p= .0001), older age (65.2 (62.2-70.3) vs. 62.3 (58.7-66.3) years ; p= .0001) and GI-symptoms (18% vs. 11% ; p= .04). False positive FIT (25% vs. 28% ; p= .52) and detection of AP (42% vs. 36% ; p=.27) or CRC (6% vs. 5% ; p= .69) were similar in patients with vs. no antithrombotics. Use of antithrombotics did not predict a higher chance of colorectal pathology after adjusting for confounders. Conclusion Although antithrombotics were prescribed more frequently in male and older patients, detection of AP/CRC was similar. Despite increased GI symptoms, false positive FIT was similar with antithrombotics.
Collapse
|
30
|
Sarasqueta C, Zunzunegui MV, Enríquez Navascues JM, Querejeta A, Placer C, Perales A, Gonzalez N, Aguirre U, Baré M, Escobar A, Quintana JM. Gender differences in stage at diagnosis and preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:759. [PMID: 32795358 PMCID: PMC7427942 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07195-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Few studies have examined gender differences in the clinical management of rectal cancer. We examine differences in stage at diagnosis and preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted in 22 hospitals in Spain including 770 patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. Study outcomes were disseminated disease at diagnosis and receiving preoperative radiotherapy. Age, comorbidity, referral from a screening program, diagnostic delay, distance from the anal verge, and tumor depth were considered as factors that might explain gender differences in these outcomes. Results Women were more likely to be diagnosed with disseminated disease among those referred from screening (odds ratio, confidence interval 95% (OR, CI = 7.2, 0.9–55.8) and among those with a diagnostic delay greater than 3 months (OR, CI = 5.1, 1.2–21.6). Women were less likely to receive preoperative radiotherapy if they were younger than 65 years of age (OR, CI = 0.6, 0.3–1.0) and if their tumors were cT3 or cT4 (OR, CI = 0.5, 0.4–0.7). Conclusions The gender-specific sensitivity of rectal cancer screening tests, gender differences in referrals and clinical reasons for not prescribing preoperative radiotherapy in women should be further examined. If these gender differences are not clinically justifiable, their elimination might enhance survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Sarasqueta
- Biodonostia Health Research Institute - Donostia University Hospital, Paseo Dr. Beguiristain s/n (Gipuzkoa), 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain. .,Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.
| | - Mª Victoria Zunzunegui
- Professeure honoraire. École de santé publique (ESPUM) Departement de médecine sociale et préventive, Université de Montréal, Pavillon 7101, salle 3111 7101, Avenue du Parc Montréal, Québec, H3N 1X9, Canada
| | - José María Enríquez Navascues
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Donostia University Hospital, Paseo Dr. Beguiristain 109 (Gipuzkoa), 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Arrate Querejeta
- Radiotherapic Oncology, Donostia University Hospital, Paseo Dr. Beguiristain 109 (Gipuzkoa), 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Carlos Placer
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Donostia University Hospital, Paseo Dr. Beguiristain 109 (Gipuzkoa), 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Amaia Perales
- Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Paseo Dr. Beguiristain s/n (Gipuzkoa), 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Nerea Gonzalez
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.,Research Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Labeaga Auzoa, 48960, Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Urko Aguirre
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.,Research Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Labeaga Auzoa, 48960, Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Marisa Baré
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.,Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Screening, Corporació Sanitaria Parc Taulí, Parc Taulí 1, 08208 Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Escobar
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.,Research Unit, Hospital Basurto, Avda Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - José María Quintana
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain.,Research Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Labeaga Auzoa, 48960, Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Peng L, Balavarca Y, Niedermaier T, Weigl K, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. Risk-Adapted Cutoffs in Colorectal Cancer Screening by Fecal Immunochemical Tests. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115:1110-1116. [PMID: 32618662 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin are increasingly used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The use of uniform positivity thresholds (cutoffs) within screening populations is expected to imply lower positive predictive values (PPVs) and higher numbers of colonoscopies needed (numbers needed to scope [NNSs]) to detect advanced neoplasms among screening participants at lower risk compared with those at higher risk. We aimed to assess such variation and its potential implications in a large screening cohort. METHODS A quantitative FIT (FOB Gold; Sentinel Diagnostics, Milan, Italy) was conducted in fecal samples collected by 4,332 participants of screening colonoscopy before bowel preparation. Participants were classified into 3 risk groups (low, medium, and high) by tertiles of a previously derived risk-factor-based risk score. We determined the variation of PPVs and NNSs for detecting advanced neoplasms (i.e., CRC or advanced adenoma) when using the same FIT cutoffs and variation of FIT cutoffs that would yield uniform PPVs across risk groups. RESULTS When a fixed FIT cutoff of 10 μg/g was used, the PPV increased from 23.3% to 41.8% from the low- to the high-risk group, with NNS decreasing from 4.3 to 2.4 (P < 0.001). Similar variations of PPVs and NNSs across risk groups were observed at higher FIT cutoffs. When risk group-specific cutoffs were defined to achieve fixed PPVs of 25%, 30%, and 35% across all risk groups, cutoffs varied from 5.3 to 11.4, 6.5 to 18.7, and 7.5 to 31.0 μg hemoglobin/g feces, respectively, between high- and low-risk groups (P < 0.05 for all differences). DISCUSSION Using risk-adapted cutoffs may help to achieve target levels of PPV and NNS and might be an option to consider for personalized FIT-based CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Le Peng
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yesilda Balavarca
- Division of Preventive Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Niedermaier
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Korbinian Weigl
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Barbirou M, Sghaier I, Bedoui S, Ben Abderrazek R, Kraiem H, Farah A, Hassiki R, Mokrani A, Mezlini A, Almawi WY, Loueslati-Yacoubi B, Bouhaouala-Zahar B. KCNB1 gene polymorphisms and related indel as predictor biomarkers of treatment response for colorectal cancer - toward a personalized medicine. Tumour Biol 2020; 42:1010428320925237. [PMID: 32484056 DOI: 10.1177/1010428320925237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The KCNB1 gene variants were differentially associated with cancers. However, their association with colorectal cancer has not yet been explored. We investigated the contribution of the KCNB1 gene variants rs3331, rs1051295, and indel (insertion/deletion) rs11468831 Polymorphism as predictors of the treatment response in colorectal cancer patients. A retrospective study, which involved 291 Tunisian colorectal cancer patients (aged 60.0 ± 13.1 years), who were stratified into responder and non-responder groups, according to TNM stages and their responsiveness to chemotherapy based on fluorouracil. KCNB1 genotyping was performed with amplification-refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction, and was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Sex-specific response was found and colorectal cancer females are less likely to achieve a positive response during the chemotherapy strategy, compared to males. Weight and body mass index, tumor size, and tumor localization are considered as predictive factors to treatment responsiveness. Carriage of rs11468831 Ins allele was significantly associated with successful therapy achievement (p adjusted < 0.001). Stratification of colorectal cancer patients' response according to tumor localization and TNM stages reveals negative association of rs3331 Major allele to treatment response among the patients with advanced cancer stages (subgroup G2). The presence of rs3331 (homozygous minor) C/C genotype was positively associated with decline in carcino-embryonic antigen (p = 0.043) and CA19-9 (p = 0.014) serum levels. On the other hand, the presence of rs1051295 (homozygous minor) A/A genotype was correlated with marked decline in CA19-9 serum levels. KCNB1 haplotype did not reveal any association between haplotypes and treatment response. The results obtained suggest that gender-specific strategies for screening treatment and prevention protocols as well as KCNB1 variants may constitute an effective model for ongoing personalization medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mouadh Barbirou
- Laboratory of Venoms and Therapeutic Molecules, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis Belvédère- University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.,Department of Health Management and Informatics, Center for Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Ikram Sghaier
- Department of Health Management and Informatics, Center for Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.,Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Sinda Bedoui
- Laboratory of Mycology, Pathologies and Biomarkers, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Rahma Ben Abderrazek
- Laboratory of Venoms and Therapeutic Molecules, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis Belvédère- University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Hazar Kraiem
- Laboratory of Venoms and Therapeutic Molecules, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis Belvédère- University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Azer Farah
- Laboratory of Venoms and Therapeutic Molecules, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis Belvédère- University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Rym Hassiki
- Laboratory of Venoms and Therapeutic Molecules, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis Belvédère- University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | | | | | - Wassim Y Almawi
- Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.,School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan
| | - Besma Loueslati-Yacoubi
- Laboratory of Mycology, Pathologies and Biomarkers, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Balkiss Bouhaouala-Zahar
- Laboratory of Venoms and Therapeutic Molecules, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis Belvédère- University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.,Medicine School of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Faecal occult blood testing is widely used in colorectal cancer screening. However, there is little empirical long-term evidence on the accumulation of false-positive test results over several screening rounds. We aimed to systematically explore and quantify the cumulative false-positive rate for various scenarios of colorectal cancer screening. METHODS Using a Markov analysis, we estimated the lifetime cumulative number of false-positive test results (cumFP) per 100 000 50-year-old persons. We varied the screening interval and the specificity of a single screening test and the starting age of screening. RESULTS For a test with a specificity of 98% used from 50 to 74 years, the cumFP at age 74 was 26 260 (1-year interval), 15 102 (2-year interval), and 10 819 (3-year interval), respectively. For a test with a specificity of, respectively, 95 and 92% used at a 2-year interval, the cumFP at age 74 was 2.2 times and 3.0 times higher as compared to a test with a specificity of 98%. The cumFP at age 74 was 18% lower for screening persons aged 54-74 years vs. 50-74 years. CONCLUSION Our findings quantitatively illustrate the large variation of the cumFP in colorectal cancer screening between screening strategies, which is relevant to informed decision making and adequate resource planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Haug
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS,Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Veerle M.H. Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wong MCS, Huang J, Huang JLW, Pang TWY, Choi P, Wang J, Chiang JI, Jiang JY. Global Prevalence of Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:553-561.e10. [PMID: 31323383 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Most colorectal cancers (CRC) arise from colorectal adenomas, yet there is not enough information on global prevalence to inform health care policy. We examined the prevalence of any type of adenomas, advanced adenomas (AADs), and CRC according to age, sex, ethnicity, geographic regions, and anatomic location (proximal vs distal). METHODS MEDLINE and Embase were searched from their inception through May 1, 2018, to identify population-based, observational studies that reported the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia. Studies on participants 15 years or older, with a sample size of 500 persons or more, were included. Metaprop (College Station, TX) was used to model within-study variability by binomial distribution and Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation to stabilize the variances. The prevalence figures were presented by proportions and their 95% CIs using random-effects models. RESULTS Our meta-analysis included 70 studies involving 637,414 individuals. The overall prevalence rates of adenoma (23.9%; 95% CI, 22.2%-25.8%), AAD (4.6%; 95% CI, 3.8%-5.5%), and CRC (0.4%, 95% CI, 0.3%-0.5%) were calculated. Subgroup analysis indicated that prevalence values (adenomas, AADs, and CRCs) were higher among men (29.7%, 6.5%, and 0.8%, respectively) than women (19.3%, 3.8% and 0.4%, respectively), among older adults (25.9%, 5.2%, and 0.6%, respectively) than younger adults (14.6%, 1.6%, and 0.1%, respectively), among Caucasians (23.7%, 6.6%, and 0.5%, respectively) than other ethnicities, in European countries (25.9%, 8.4%, and 0.8%, respectively) than other countries, and among patients with proximal (25.9%, 5.3%, and 0.1%, respectively) vs distal neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found a high prevalence of colorectal neoplasia among some populations. This indicates a need to expand CRC screening programs for these groups. The pooled prevalence estimates can be used as quality indicators for established CRC screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin C S Wong
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China; Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
| | - Junjie Huang
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
| | - Jason L W Huang
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
| | - Tiffany W Y Pang
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
| | - Peter Choi
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
| | - Jingxuan Wang
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
| | - Jason I Chiang
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Johnny Yu Jiang
- School of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Selby K, Levine EH, Doan C, Gies A, Brenner H, Quesenberry C, Lee JK, Corley DA. Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2019; 157:1494-1505. [PMID: 31472152 PMCID: PMC6878177 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin are commonly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to quantify the change in CRC and advanced adenoma detection and number of positive test results at different positivity thresholds and by sex and age. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE, selecting articles of FIT for CRC detection in asymptomatic adults undergoing screening. We calculated sensitivity and specificity, as well as detected number of cancers, advanced adenomas, and positive test results at positivity thresholds ≤10 μg hemoglobin/g feces, 10 to ≤20 μg/g, 20 to ≤30 μg/g, and >30 μg/g. We also analyzed results from stratified by patient sex, age, and reference standard. RESULTS Our meta-analysis comprised 46 studies with 2.4 million participants and 6478 detected cancers. Sensitivity for detection of CRC increased from 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63%-75%) at thresholds >10 μg/g and ≤20 μg/g to 80% (95% CI, 76%-83%) at thresholds ≤10 μg/g. At these threshold values, sensitivity for detection of advanced adenomas increased from 21% (95% CI, 18%-25%) to 31% (95% CI, 27%-35%), whereas specificity decreased from 94% (95% CI, 93%-96%) to 91% (95% CI, 89%-93%). In 3 studies stratified by sex, sensitivity of CRC detection was 77% in men (95% CI, 75%-79%) and 81% in women (95% CI, 60%-100%) (P = .68). In 3 studies stratified by age groups, sensitivity of CRC detection was 85% for ages 50-59 years (95% CI, 71%-99%) and 73% for ages 60-69 years (95% CI, 71%-75%) (P = .10). All studies with colonoscopy follow-up had similar sensitivity levels for detection of CRC to studies that analyzed 2-year registry follow-up data (74%; 95% CI, 68%-78% vs 75%; 95% CI, 73%-77%). CONCLUSIONS In a meta-analysis of studies that analyzed detection of CRC and advanced adenomas at different FIT positivity thresholds, we found the sensitivity and specificity of detection to vary with positive cutoff value. It might be possible to decrease positive threshold values for centers with sufficient follow-up colonoscopy resources. More research is needed to precisely establish FIT thresholds for each sex and age subgroup. PROTOCOL PROSPERO CRD42017068760.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Selby
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | | | - Cecilia Doan
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, California
| | - Anton Gies
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany,Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jeffrey K. Lee
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, California
| | - Douglas A. Corley
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hissong E, Pittman ME. Colorectal carcinoma screening: Established methods and emerging technology. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2019; 57:22-36. [PMID: 31603697 DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2019.1670614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal carcinoma screening programs have shown success in lowering both the incidence and mortality rate of colorectal carcinoma at a population level, in part because this carcinoma is relatively slow growing and has an identifiable premalignant lesion. Still, many patients do not undergo the recommended screening for colorectal carcinoma, and of those who do, a subset may be over- or under-diagnosed by the currently available testing methods. The primary purpose of this article is to review the data regarding currently available colorectal cancer screening modalities, which include fecal occult blood testing, direct colonic visualization, and noninvasive imaging techniques. In addition, readers will be introduced to a variety of biomarkers that may serve as stand-alone or adjunct tests in the future. Finally, there is a brief discussion of the current epidemiologic considerations that public health officials must address as they create population screening guidelines. The data we provide as laboratory physicians and scientists are critical to the construction of appropriate recommendations that ultimately decrease the burden of disease from colorectal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Hissong
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Meredith E Pittman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hoff G, Ursin G, Løberg M, de Lange T, Skovlund E, Holme Ø. Continuous development of colorectal cancer screening programs. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:822-823. [PMID: 30939973 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1588475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs are far from perfect. Many crucial questions remain, yet expensive CRC screening services are implemented throughout the world without a plan on how to evaluate and improve the service. The time is ripe for improving the design of CRC screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geir Hoff
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | - Giske Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eva Skovlund
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Portillo I, Arana-Arri E, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Bilbao I, Luis Hurtado J, Sarasqueta C, Idigoras I, Bujanda L. Factors related to the participation and detection of lesions in colorectal cancer screening programme-based faecal immunochemical test. Eur J Public Health 2019; 28:1143-1148. [PMID: 29982586 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The overall aim of this study was to describe trends in participation rates and detection of lesions in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme, during three rounds, using faecal immunochemical test (FIT). Methods National registers were used to collect data on invitations for CRC screening in the Basque Country (Spain) from 2009 to 2014. Information about participation, age, gender and lesions in each round were collected. Results A total of 961.533 individuals were included in the analysis; respectively, 584.950, 298.143 and 78.440 in the first, second and third rounds. The average participation rate was 68.4% (66.8, 70.4 and 72.3%, respectively by round; P < 0.001) and the positivity rate was 6.3% (7, 5.5 and 5.4%, respectively by round; P < 0.001). The participation rate increased significantly with age and was found to be higher in women versus men. A total of 15.144 advanced adenomas and 2.131 CRCs were diagnosed, leading to a detection rate of 23.9 and 3.4‰, respectively. Regarding gender, men had the highest rates in all periods and rounds. The detection rate of advanced neoplasia was lower in the regular when compared with irregular paricipants. Conclusions In a CRC screening, this organization obtained high FIT participation rates. Older participants and women were associated with a higher participation. The detection rate of lesions was higher in men, independent on age and round.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Portillo
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Coordination Center, Bilbao, Spain
| | | | | | - Isabel Bilbao
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Coordination Center, Bilbao, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Sarasqueta
- Hospital Universitario Donostia/Instituto Biodonostia, Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Isabel Idigoras
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Coordination Center, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Luis Bujanda
- Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Biodonostia, University of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), San Sebastián, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Randel KR, Botteri E, Romstad KMK, Frigstad SO, Bretthauer M, Hoff G, de Lange T, Holme Ø. Effects of Oral Anticoagulants and Aspirin on Performance of Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology 2019; 156:1642-1649.e1. [PMID: 30689972 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is the tool most frequently used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening worldwide. It is unclear how the use of aspirin and oral anticoagulants in the screening population affects the diagnostic performance of FIT. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional study in an ongoing CRC screening trial in Norway. Participants aged 50-74 years with a positive result from an FIT (>15 μg hemoglobin/g feces) and subsequent colonoscopy (reference standard) were included. Those who used regular aspirin, warfarin, or direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were defined as users. Non-users were matched according to age, sex, screening center, and screening round. The primary outcomes were the positive predictive value (PPV) for CRC and advanced adenoma. RESULTS Among 4908 eligible participants, 1008 used aspirin, 147 used warfarin, 212 used DOACs, and 3541 were non-users. CRCs were found in 234 individuals and advanced adenomas in 1305 individuals. The PPV for CRC was 3.8% for aspirin users vs 6.4% for matched non-users (P = .006), The PPV for advanced adenoma in aspirin users was 27.2% vs 32.6% for matched non-users (P = .011). For DOAC, the PPV for CRC was 0.9% in users vs 6.8% in matched non-users (P = .001). The PPV for advanced adenoma in DOAC users was 20.5% vs 32.4% in matched non-users (P = .002). There was no significant difference in PPV for CRC or advanced adenoma in warfarin users compared to non-users. CONCLUSIONS In a large screening cohort in Norway, regular use of aspirin and particularly DOACs, were associated with lower PPV of FIT for detection of CRCs and advanced adenomas. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01538550.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Ranheim Randel
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway; Department of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, Ostfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Department of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Norwegian National Advisory Unit for Women's Health, Women's Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Svein Oskar Frigstad
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Bærum Hospital, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Norway; Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway; Department of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ribbing Wilén H, Blom J, Höijer J, Andersson G, Löwbeer C, Hultcrantz R. Fecal immunochemical test in cancer screening - colonoscopy outcome in FIT positives and negatives. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; 54:303-310. [PMID: 30907196 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1585569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but evaluations of multiple sample strategies in colonoscopy screening cohorts are rare. The aim of this study was to assess accuracy of FIT for advanced neoplasia (AN) with two fecal samples in a colonoscopy screening cohort. Materials and methods: The study comprised 1155 participants of the colonoscopy arm in SCREESCO (Screening of Swedish Colons, NCT02078804), a randomized controlled study on CRC screening of 60-year-olds from the Swedish average-risk population. Participants provided two FIT samples prior to colonoscopy. First sample, mean of two, and any of the two samples above cut off level were assessed. Colonoscopy findings (CRC, advanced adenoma (AA), AN (CRC + AA) and adenoma characteristics) were evaluated in uni- and multivariable analysis in relation to FIT positivity (at ≥10 µg hemoglobin (Hb)/g). Results: Of 1155 invited, 806 (416 women, 390 men) participated. CRC, AA and non-AA were found in one (0.1%), 80 (9.9%) and 145 (18%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for AN were 20%/93%, 25%/92% and 26%/89% for first, mean of two and any of the two samples respectively at cut off level 10 µg/g, corresponding to 60 (74%)-65 (80%) participants with missed AN. The difference in sensitivity between screening strategies was non-significant. The specificity for first sample was significantly higher than for any of the two samples at cut off 10 µg/g (p = .02) and 20 µg/g (p = .04). FIT positivity in participants with adenoma was associated with pedunculated shape (p = .007) and high-risk dysplasia (p = .009). Conclusions: In an average-risk colonoscopy screening cohort of 60-year-olds, sensitivity for AN was modest and did not increase when using two samples instead of one. FIT predominantly detected adenomas with pedunculated shape and high-risk dysplasia, and participants with flat or broad based adenomas may thus be missed in screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Ribbing Wilén
- a Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.,b Trauma and Reparative Medicine, Division of Emergency Surgery , Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Johannes Blom
- c Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery , Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Jonas Höijer
- d Unit of Biostatistics Institute of Environmental Medicine , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Gaya Andersson
- e Department of Clinical Chemistry , Aleris Medilab , Täby , Sweden
| | - Christian Löwbeer
- e Department of Clinical Chemistry , Aleris Medilab , Täby , Sweden.,f Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Chemistry , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Rolf Hultcrantz
- g Department of Medicine , Solna Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Estrogen enhances female small intestine epithelial organoid regeneration. JOURNAL OF BIO-X RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.1097/jbr.0000000000000029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
42
|
Combination of Different Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Any Gain in Diagnostic Performance? Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11010120. [PMID: 30669538 PMCID: PMC6356298 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11010120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
A variety of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are used for colorectal cancer screening. FIT performance could be improved further. It is unclear, whether the combination of different FITs with different analytical characteristics (such as, different antibodies for the detection of fecal hemoglobin) can yield a better diagnostic performance. Fecal samples were obtained from 2042 participants of screening colonoscopy. All participants with advanced neoplasm (AN, colorectal cancer (n = 16) or advanced adenoma (n = 200)) and 300 randomly selected participants without AN were included. Nine quantitative FITs were evaluated simultaneously. Sensitivity and specificity was calculated for single tests (n = 9) and for their pairwise test combinations (n = 36) (requiring either both FITs (P++) or at least one FIT (P+) to be positive for defining a positive test result). Mean age of the participants (n = 516) was 63 (range: 50–79) years and 56% were men. At cutoffs yielding a specificity of 96.7% for single FITs, the median gain in specificity by P++ combination was +1.0%, whereas the median loss in sensitivity for AN was −4.2%. For P+ combination the median gain in sensitivity for AN was +2.8%, at a prize of median loss of −1.0% of specificity. Combinations of different FITs do not yield any relevant gain in diagnostic performance.
Collapse
|
43
|
Kautzky-Willer A, von Euler M, Oertelt-Prigione S. Editorial: Sex and Gender Aspects in Diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019; 10:813. [PMID: 32010058 PMCID: PMC6977595 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Kautzky-Willer
- Gender Medicine Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- *Correspondence: Alexandra Kautzky-Willer
| | - Mia von Euler
- Departments of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset and Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Sabine Oertelt-Prigione
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Institute of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ribbing Wilén H, Blom J, Höijer J, Hultcrantz R. Fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: Colonoscopy findings by different cut-off levels. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34:103-112. [PMID: 29968937 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Revised: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 06/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but number of tests and cut-off level differ by program. The aim was to evaluate CRC screening with two FIT samples in average-risk 60-year-old men and women and to investigate hemoglobin (Hb) level in correlation to adenoma characteristics. METHODS We analyzed a cohort from Screening of Swedish Colons trial where participants with at least one of two FIT samples ≥10 μg Hb/g are offered colonoscopy. FIT levels and colonoscopy findings were assessed in multivariable analyses. Cut-off levels 10-80 μg Hb/g for one and two samples were assessed. FIT levels and advanced neoplasia (AN) were investigated by gender. RESULTS A total of 12 383 participated and 1182 positives (551 women) completed colonoscopy diagnosing 27 (2.3%) CRC and 269 (23%) advanced adenomas (AA). Median FIT level was 241.0 and 23.8 for CRC and AA compared with 13.4-15.8 in other subgroups (P = 0.002) correlating with adenoma size (P = 0.038). CRC was detected in 22 and 19 subjects for the first sample at cut-off 20 and 40 μg Hb/g, compared with 20 and 17 for the mean of two samples at cut-off 40 and 80 μg Hb/g (P < 0.05). Men had more AN (CRC + AA), (P = 0.003). In women, similar number of AN would be detected with cut-off lowered from 40 to 20 or from 80 to 40 μg Hb/g, requiring additional 26-34% colonoscopies. CONCLUSION In average-risk 60-year-olds, FIT was higher in participants with AN and correlated with adenoma size. FIT screening with one sample at low cut-off detected more CRC than two samples at higher cut-off. Applying lower cut-off in women to equalize gender differences in AN would result in considerable increase in colonoscopy workload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Ribbing Wilén
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Trauma and Reparative Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johannes Blom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonas Höijer
- Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rolf Hultcrantz
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Participant-Related Risk Factors for False-Positive and False-Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113:1778-1787. [PMID: 30158713 PMCID: PMC6768609 DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0212-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) may reduce CRC-related mortality but its effectiveness is influenced by the limited accuracy of FIT. Identifying individuals at increased risk of a false FIT result could improve screening, but the available evidence is conflicting. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on risk factors for false-positive and false-negative FIT results in CRC screening. METHODS A systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library identified publications (before 29 January 2017) on risk factors (known at time of FIT invitation) associated with false FIT results (presence/absence of advanced neoplasia) in a CRC screening setting. Risk of bias was assessed using QUIPS. In meta-analysis, summary relative risk ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each risk factor. RESULTS Of 518 records identified, 14 studies with 54,499 participants in total were included for analysis. In meta-analysis, male sex was associated with a significantly lower risk of false-positivity (RR 0.84, CI 0.74-0.94), whereas participants using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) had a higher risk (RR 1.16, CI 1.06-1.27). The use of anticoagulants was most frequently studied, without a significant effect on FIT positivity. Males (RR 1.83, CI 1.53-2.19), participants with a family history for CRC (RR 1.61, CI 1.19-2.15), hyperglycemia (RR 1.29, CI 1.02-1.65), hypertension (RR 1.50, CI 1.14-1.98), obesity (RR 1.38, CI 1.11-1.71), and (former) smokers (RR 1.93, CI 1.52-2.45) were all at significantly higher risk for false-negative results. Age was not found to have a systematic effect on either FIT false-positivity or false-negativity in meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS Multiple risk factors, known at time of FIT invitation, are associated with false FIT results in CRC screening. This information can be used to identify populations risking false reassurance after a negative result or unnecessary colonoscopy after a positive result, and to further optimize CRC screening effectiveness.
Collapse
|
46
|
Auge JM, Rodriguez C, Espanyol O, Rivero L, Sandalinas S, Grau J, Jimenez W, Castells A. An evaluation of the SENTiFIT 270 analyser for quantitation of faecal haemoglobin in the investigation of patients with suspected colorectal cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018; 56:625-633. [PMID: 29150989 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2017] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An evaluation of SENTiFIT® 270 (Sentinel Diagnostics, Italy; Sysmex, Spain) analyser for the quantitation of faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) was performed. METHODS The analytical imprecision, linearity, carry over and f-Hb stability were determined. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy was performed on 487 patients. RESULTS Within-run and between-run imprecision ranged 1.7%-5.1% and 3.8%-6.2%, respectively. Linearity studies revealed a mean recovery of 101.1% (standard deviation, 6.7%) for all dilutions. No carry over was detected below 7650 μg Hb/g faeces. Decay of f-Hb in refrigerated samples ranged 0.2%-0.5% per day. f-Hb in patients with advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN) (colorectal cancer [CRC] plus advanced adenoma [AA]) were significantly higher than from those with a normal colonoscopy. Sensitivity for ACRN at f-Hb cutoffs from 10 to 60 μg Hb/g faeces ranged from 28.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.7%-37.2%) to 46.5% (95% CI, 38.1%-55%), the specificity ranged from 85% (95% CI, 82.3%-87.3%) to 93.2% (95% CI, 91.2%-94.8%), positive predictive values for detecting CRC and AA ranged from 11.6% (95% CI, 7.6%-17.2%) to 20.6% (95% CI, 13.3%-30.3%) and from 34.7% (95% CI, 28.1%-42%) to 42.3% (95% CI, 32.4%-52.7%), respectively, and the negative predictive value for ACRN ranged from 90.2% (95% CI, 87.9%-92.2%) to 88.4% (95% CI, 86%-90.4%). Using two samples per patient sensitivity increased with a slight decrease in specificity. CONCLUSIONS The analytical and clinical performances of SENTiFIT assay demonstrate a specific and accurate test for detecting ACRN in symptomatic patients and those undergoing surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep M Auge
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic, C/Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Rodriguez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; and IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oihana Espanyol
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Liseth Rivero
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; and IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Sandalinas
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume Grau
- Unit of Evaluation, Support and Prevention, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Wladimiro Jimenez
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antoni Castells
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; and IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Blom J, Löwbeer C, Elfström KM, Sventelius M, Öhman D, Saraste D, Törnberg S. Gender-specific cut-offs in colorectal cancer screening with FIT: Increased compliance and equal positivity rate. J Med Screen 2018; 26:92-97. [PMID: 30336730 DOI: 10.1177/0969141318804843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Using quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) in colorectal cancer screening enables adjustment of the cut-off for a positive test. As men have higher stool blood levels and higher prevalence of colorectal neoplasia, different cut-off levels can be chosen for men and women. We evaluated participation and positivity rates switching from guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) (Hemoccult®) to FIT (OC-Sensor), using gender-specific cut-offs. METHODS The colorectal cancer screening programme of Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden, started in 2008 and invited individuals aged 60-69 to biennial testing using gFOBT. From 1 October 2015 the test was switched to FIT, with positivity cut-offs of 40 (200) and 80 (400) µg Hb/g (ng/mL) faeces for women and men, respectively. The first year was evaluated for compliance and positivity, number of reminders and incorrect/inadequate tests, compared with gFOBT in the preceding 12-month period. RESULTS There were 127,030 and 87,269 individuals invited to screening with gFOBT and FIT, respectively. The change of test increased overall participation by 11.9% (95% confidence interval 11.5%-12.3%) from 56.5% to 68.4% ( p < 0.001). The increase was larger in men (14.3%) than women (9.7%), and in those aged 60-64 (14.2%) than those aged 65-69 (8.7%). The positivity rate was 2.6% in women and 2.5% in men. There was a lower rate of reminders and incorrect/inadequate tests with FIT. CONCLUSIONS Within a well-organised colorectal cancer screening programme, changing the test from gFOBT to FIT markedly increased participation, especially among men, and in the younger age group. With a lower cut-off in women than men, the positivity rate was similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Blom
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,2 Regional Cancer Centre, Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden
| | - Christian Löwbeer
- 3 Division of Clinical Chemistry, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,4 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Aleris Medilab, Täby, Sweden
| | - K Miriam Elfström
- 2 Regional Cancer Centre, Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden.,5 Division of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Daniel Öhman
- 2 Regional Cancer Centre, Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden
| | - Deborah Saraste
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sven Törnberg
- 2 Regional Cancer Centre, Stockholm-Gotland, Sweden.,6 Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Selby K, Jensen CD, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Schottinger JE, Zhao WK, Chubak J, Halm E, Ghai NR, Contreras R, Skinner C, Kamineni A, Levin TR, Corley DA. Influence of Varying Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Positivity Thresholds on Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Community-Based Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169:439-447. [PMID: 30242328 PMCID: PMC6433467 DOI: 10.7326/m18-0244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is commonly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Despite demographic variations in stool hemoglobin concentrations, few data exist regarding optimal positivity thresholds by age and sex. Objective To identify programmatic (multitest) FIT performance characteristics and optimal FIT quantitative hemoglobin positivity thresholds in a large, population-based, screening program. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California. Participants Adults aged 50 to 75 years who were eligible for screening and had baseline quantitative FIT results (2013 to 2014) and 2 years of follow-up. Nearly two thirds (411 241) had FIT screening in the previous 2 years. Measurements FIT programmatic sensitivity for CRC and number of positive test results per cancer case detected, overall and by age and sex. Results Of 640 859 persons who completed a baseline FIT and were followed for 2 years, 481 817 (75%) had at least 1 additional FIT and 1245 (0.19%) received a CRC diagnosis. Cancer detection (programmatic sensitivity) increased at lower positivity thresholds, from 822 in 1245 (66.0%) at 30 µg/g to 925 (74.3%) at 20 µg/g and 987 (79.3%) at 10 µg/g; the number of positive test results per cancer case detected increased from 43 at 30 µg/g to 52 at 20 µg/g and 85 at 10 µg/g. Reducing the positivity threshold from 20 to 15 µg/g would detect 3% more cancer cases and require 23% more colonoscopies. At the conventional FIT threshold of 20 µg/g, programmatic sensitivity decreased with increasing age (79.0%, 73.4%, and 68.9% for ages 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 to 75 years, respectively; P = 0.009) and was higher in men than women (77.0% vs. 70.6%; P = 0.011). Limitation Information on advanced adenoma was lacking. Conclusion Increased cancer detection at lower positivity thresholds is counterbalanced by substantial increases in positive tests. Tailored thresholds may provide screening benefits that are more equal among different demographic groups, depending on local resources. Primary Funding Source National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Selby
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
- Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Jeffrey K. Lee
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Chyke A. Doubeni
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joanne E. Schottinger
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Wei K. Zhao
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ethan Halm
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas TX
| | - Nirupa R. Ghai
- Department of Regional Clinical Effectiveness, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Richard Contreras
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | | | - Aruna Kamineni
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Douglas A. Corley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Diagnostic Performance of One-off Flexible Sigmoidoscopy with Fecal Immunochemical Testing in a Large Screening Population. Epidemiology 2018; 29:397-406. [DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000000795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
50
|
Brenner H, Qian J, Werner S. Variation of diagnostic performance of fecal immunochemical testing for hemoglobin by sex and age: results from a large screening cohort. Clin Epidemiol 2018; 10:381-389. [PMID: 29670403 PMCID: PMC5896664 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s155548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin in stool are increasingly used for colorectal cancer screening. Reported sensitivities and specificities have strongly varied between studies, but it is unclear to what extent such variation reflects differences between tests or between study population characteristics. We aimed to evaluate the key parameters of FIT performance for detecting advanced neoplasia (AN) according to sex and age. Methods Sex- and age-specific sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) for detecting AN of a quantitative FIT (FOB Gold®) were evaluated among 3211 men and women aged 50–79 years who underwent screening colonoscopy in Germany. Results At the cutoff recommended by the manufacturer (17 µg hemoglobin/g feces), sensitivity was higher (51.2% versus 34.7%, p=0.004) and specificity was lower (91.0% versus 94.8%, p<0.001) among 65–79 year-old participants compared with 50–64 year-old participants. PPVs and NPVs did not differ significantly between age groups. However, higher NPVs were observed among women compared with men (94.7% versus 92.5%, p=0.015). Specificity was also higher among women compared with men (94.7% versus 92.3%, p=0.007), while there was only a little variation in sensitivity (40.3% versus 41.8%, p=0.789) according to sex. In joint stratification by both factors, sensitivity ranged from 34.1% (95% CI 24.2%–45.2%) in 50–64 year-old women to 51.4% (95% CI 39.3%–63.3%) in 65–79 year-old men (p=0.029). The observed age and sex differences were highly consistent across a wide range of alternative cutoffs from 10 to 50 µg hemoglobin/g feces. Conclusion There are major differences in diagnostic performance parameters according to sex and age, which should receive careful attention in the interpretation and comparison of results of FIT-based colorectal cancer screening studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jing Qian
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simone Werner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|