1
|
Hofvind S, Iqbal N, Thy JE, Mangerud G, Bhargava S, Zackrisson S, Berstad P. Effect of invitation letter in language of origin on screening attendance: randomised controlled trial in BreastScreen Norway. BMJ 2023; 382:e075465. [PMID: 37726122 PMCID: PMC10507477 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore attendance at organised mammographic screening among immigrant groups that received an invitation letter and information leaflet (invitation) in their language of origin and Norwegian compared with Norwegian only. DESIGN Randomised controlled trial. SETTING Population based screening programme for breast cancer in Norway (BreastScreen Norway), which invites women aged 50-69 to two-view mammographic screening biennially. PARTICIPANTS All women invited to BreastScreen Norway in the study period April 2021 to June 2022 whose language of origin was Arabic (women born in Algeria, Egypt, Lebanon, Iraq, Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, or Morocco), English (women born in the Philippines), Polish (women born in Poland), Somali (women born in Somalia), or Urdu (women born in Pakistan) (n=11 347). INTERVENTION The study group received an invitation to screening in their language of origin and in Norwegian, whereas the control group received an invitation in Norwegian only during the study period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Attendance at BreastScreen Norway during the study period. RESULTS Overall attendance was 46.5% (2642/5683) in the study group and 47.4% (2682/5664) in the control group. No statistical differences in attendance were observed after stratification by language of invitation, age at invitation, or years since immigration. CONCLUSIONS No difference in attendance was observed between immigrant women invited to BreastScreen Norway in their language of origin and in Norwegian compared with Norwegian only. Several barriers to cancer screening may exist among immigrants, and translating the invitation is probably only a part of a complex explanation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04672265. CLINICALTRIALS gov NCT04672265.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solveig Hofvind
- The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, The Arctic University of Norway - the University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Nadia Iqbal
- The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Cancer Registry of Norway and Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Sameer Bhargava
- The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Sophia Zackrisson
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sarang B, Bhandarkar P, Parsekar SS, Patil P, Venghateri JB, Ghoshal R, Veetil DK, Shah P, Gadgil A, Roy N. Concerns and coping mechanisms of breast cancer survivor women from Asia: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:528. [PMID: 37597043 PMCID: PMC10439845 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07996-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of breast cancer has increased significantly in Asia due to epidemiological transition and changes in human development indices. Advancement in medical technology has improved prognosis with a resultant increase in survivorship issues. The effects of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment are influenced by the patient's cultural beliefs and social systems. This scoping review aims to summarise concerns and coping mechanisms of women with breast cancer in Asia and understand gaps in the existing literature. METHODS We performed a scoping review using the population-concept-context strategy. A systematic search of MEDLINE (PubMed, Web of Science), CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Embase was conducted for studies conducted in Asia on women diagnosed with breast cancer, identifying their concerns and coping mechanisms, published between January 2011 and January 2021. Data from included studies were reported using frequencies and percentages. RESULTS We included 163 studies, of which most (81%) were conducted in hospital settings. Emotional and psychological concerns were reported in 80% of studies, followed by physical appearance and body-image concerns in 46%. Social support (59%), emotion-based coping (46%), spirituality, and problem-based coping (37%) were the major coping systems documented. CONCLUSION The mapped literature documented that anxiety, depression, and fear of cancer recurrence dominated women's emotional concerns. Women coped with the help of social support, positive reappraisal, and faith in God and religion. Sensitization of caregivers, including healthcare professionals and family members, to context-specific concerns and inquiry into the patients' available support systems is essential in strengthening breast cancer women's recovery and coping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhakti Sarang
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, India
- Department of Surgery, Terna Medical College & Hospital, New Mumbai, India
| | - Prashant Bhandarkar
- Department of Statistics, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research on Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, BARC Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India
| | - Shradha S Parsekar
- Public Health Evidence South Asia, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Priti Patil
- Department of Statistics, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research on Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, BARC Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Rakhi Ghoshal
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, India
- CARE India, Patna, Bihar, India
| | - Deepa Kizhakke Veetil
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, India
- Department of Surgery, Manipal Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Priyansh Shah
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, India
| | - Anita Gadgil
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, India
| | - Nobhojit Roy
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, Mumbai, India.
- Research Affiliate, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stanaway FF, Bhopal R. Linking census data to health records clarifies ethnic inequalities in health and care. BMJ 2023; 382:p1585. [PMID: 37433619 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.p1585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Raj Bhopal
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bolarinwa OA, Holt N. Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom: evidence from a mixed-methods systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:390. [PMID: 37087506 PMCID: PMC10122823 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09410-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is currently the leading cause of mortality globally, with new cancer cases estimated at 19.3 million and almost 10 million deaths in 2020. Specifically, breast and cervical cancer incidence and mortality prevalence among women of the minority group or marginalised populations in Europe have continued to be a public health concern due to the low uptake of cancer screening. Thus, this study utilised a mixed-method systematic review to identify barriers to breast and cervical screening uptake among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom. METHODS Databases including PubMed, CINAHL, British Nursing Index, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus databases, were systematically searched for studies on barriers to breast and cervical screening uptake among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom published in English between January 2010 to July 2022. This mixed-method systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in reporting the included studies' results. The cluster mapping approach was used to identify and classify the barriers into themes. RESULTS Thirteen eligible studies were included in this current review. Seven of the thirteen studies used quantitative cross-sectional research design, while six used qualitative cross-sectional research design. These studies were conducted across the United Kingdom. Five themes were developed from the cluster mapping, and thirty-four sub-theme barriers to the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom were identified. The developed themes in relation to the barriers include; socio-demographic characteristics, health service delivery, cultural, religious & language, the gap in knowledge & awareness, and emotional, sexual & family support. CONCLUSION The study concluded that barriers in socio-demographic characteristics, health service delivery, cultural, religious and language, the gap in knowledge & awareness, and emotional, sexual & family support were identified as non-uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom. Reducing or eliminating these barriers would improve the benefits of timely breast and cervical cancer screening in the United Kingdom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Obasanjo Afolabi Bolarinwa
- Department of Public Health & Well-Being, Faculty of Health & Social Care, University of Chester, Chester, UK.
- Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
- Discipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
- Department of Allied and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.
| | - Nicole Holt
- Department of Allied and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bright D, Hillier S, Song J, Huws DW, Greene G, Hodgson K, Akbari A, Griffiths R, Davies AR, Gjini A. Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening uptake in Wales: an examination of the impact of the temporary suspension of the screening programme during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:546. [PMID: 36949447 PMCID: PMC10031708 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15345-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Response to the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the temporary disruption of cancer screening in the UK, and strong public messaging to stay safe and to protect NHS capacity. Following reintroduction in services, we explored the impact on inequalities in uptake of the Bowel Screening Wales (BSW) programme to identify groups who may benefit from tailored interventions. METHODS Records within the BSW were linked to electronic health records (EHR) and administrative data within the Secured Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank. Ethnic group was obtained from a linked data method available within SAIL. We examined uptake for the first 3 months of invitations (August to October) following the reintroduction of BSW programme in 2020, compared to the same period in the preceding 3 years. Uptake was measured across a 6 month follow-up period. Logistic models were conducted to analyse variations in uptake by sex, age group, income deprivation quintile, urban/rural location, ethnic group, and clinically extremely vulnerable (CEV) status in each period; and to compare uptake within sociodemographic groups between different periods. RESULTS Uptake during August to October 2020 (period 2020/21; 60.4%) declined compared to the same period in 2019/20 (62.7%) but remained above the 60% Welsh standard. Variation by sex, age, income deprivation, and ethnic groups was observed in all periods studied. Compared to the pre-pandemic period in 2019/20, uptake declined for most demographic groups, except for older individuals (70-74 years) and those in the most income deprived group. Uptake continues to be lower in males, younger individuals, people living in the most income deprived areas and those of Asian and unknown ethnic backgrounds. CONCLUSION Our findings are encouraging with overall uptake achieving the 60% Welsh standard during the first three months after the programme restarted in 2020 despite the disruption. Inequalities did not worsen after the programme resumed activities but variations in CRC screening in Wales associated with sex, age, deprivation and ethnic group remain. This needs to be considered in targeting strategies to improve uptake and informed choice in CRC screening to avoid exacerbating disparities in CRC outcomes as screening services recover from the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Bright
- Research and Evaluation Division, Knowledge and Research Directorate, Public Health Data, Public Health Wales, Floor 5, Number 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, UK.
| | - Sharon Hillier
- Health Protection and Screening Services Directorate. Public Health Wales, Cardiff, Wales
| | - Jiao Song
- Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre. Public Health Wales, Cardiff, Wales
| | - Dyfed W Huws
- Research and Evaluation Division, Knowledge and Research Directorate, Public Health Data, Public Health Wales, Floor 5, Number 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, UK
- Population Data Science, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales
| | - Giles Greene
- Research and Evaluation Division, Knowledge and Research Directorate, Public Health Data, Public Health Wales, Floor 5, Number 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, UK
| | - Karen Hodgson
- Research and Evaluation Division, Knowledge and Research Directorate, Public Health Data, Public Health Wales, Floor 5, Number 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, UK
| | - Ashley Akbari
- Population Data Science, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales
| | - Rowena Griffiths
- Population Data Science, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales
| | - Alisha R Davies
- Research and Evaluation Division, Knowledge and Research Directorate, Public Health Data, Public Health Wales, Floor 5, Number 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, UK
| | - Ardiana Gjini
- Health Protection and Screening Services Directorate. Public Health Wales, Cardiff, Wales
- Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dawson S, Banister K, Biggs K, Cotton S, Devane D, Gardner H, Gillies K, Gopalakrishnan G, Isaacs T, Khunti K, Nichol A, Parker A, Russell AM, Shepherd V, Shiely F, Shorter G, Starling B, Williams H, Willis A, Witham MD, Treweek S. Trial Forge Guidance 3: randomised trials and how to recruit and retain individuals from ethnic minority groups-practical guidance to support better practice. Trials 2022; 23:672. [PMID: 35978338 PMCID: PMC9383663 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06553-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Randomised trials, especially those intended to directly inform clinical practice and policy, should be designed to reflect all those who could benefit from the intervention under test should it prove effective. This does not always happen. The UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) INCLUDE project identified many groups in the UK that are under-served by trials, including ethnic minorities.This guidance document presents four key recommendations for designing and running trials that include the ethnic groups needed by the trial. These are (1) ensure eligibility criteria and recruitment pathway do not limit participation in ways you do not intend, (2) ensure your trial materials are developed with inclusion in mind, (3) ensure staff are culturally competent and (4) build trusting partnerships with community organisations that work with ethnic minority groups. Each recommendation comes with best practice advice, public contributor testimonials, examples of the inclusion problem tackled by the recommendation, or strategies to mitigate the problem, as well as a collection of resources to support implementation of the recommendations.We encourage trial teams to follow the recommendations and, where possible, evaluate the strategies they use to implement them. Finally, while our primary audience is those designing, running and reporting trials, we hope funders, grant reviewers and approvals agencies may also find our guidance useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Dawson
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Katie Banister
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK
| | - Katie Biggs
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Seonaidh Cotton
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK
| | - Declane Devane
- Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network (HRB-TMRN), School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| | - Heidi Gardner
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK
| | | | - Talia Isaacs
- UCL Centre for Applied Linguistics, IOE, UCL’s Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, WC1H 0AL UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Diabetes Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, LE5 4PW UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) East Midlands, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Alistair Nichol
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Adwoa Parker
- York Clinical Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK
| | - Amy M. Russell
- WHO Disability Team, Geneva/ Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Victoria Shepherd
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Frances Shiely
- Health Research Board Clinical Research Facility and School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Gillian Shorter
- Drug and Alcohol Research Network, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- Centre for Improving Health Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Bella Starling
- Public Programmes Team (now Vocal), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Innovation Division, The Nowgen Centre, 29 Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9WU UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR Manchester Clinical Research Facility, Manchester, UK
| | - Hywel Williams
- Centre of Evidence-Based Dermatology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Andrew Willis
- NIHR ARC East Midlands, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Miles D. Witham
- NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University and Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Trust, Newcastle, NE4 5PL UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bhopal RS. New data strategy for England: Scotland provides an exemplar for achieving public trust. BMJ 2022; 378:o1786. [PMID: 35853643 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.o1786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Raj S Bhopal
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abraham S, Foreman N, Sidat Z, Sandhu P, Marrone D, Headley C, Akroyd C, Nicholson S, Brown K, Thomas A, Howells LM, Walter HS. Inequalities in cancer screening, prevention and service engagement between UK ethnic minority groups. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING (MARK ALLEN PUBLISHING) 2022; 31:S14-S24. [PMID: 35648663 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2022.31.10.s14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
More people in the UK are living with cancer than ever before. With an increasingly ethnically diverse population, greater emphasis must be placed on understanding factors influencing cancer outcomes. This review seeks to explore UK-specific variations in engagement with cancer services in minority ethnic groups and describe successful interventions. The authors wish to highlight that, despite improvement to engagement and education strategies, inequalities still persist and work to improve cancer outcomes across our communities still needs to be prioritised. There are many reasons why cancer healthcare inequities exist for minority communities, reported on a spectrum ranging from cultural beliefs and awareness, through to racism. Strategies that successfully enhanced engagement included language support; culturally-sensitive reminders; community-based health workers and targeted outreach. Focusing on the diverse city of Leicester the authors describe how healthcare providers, researchers and community champions have worked collectively, delivering targeted community-based strategies to improve awareness and access to cancer services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalin Abraham
- F2 Academic Foundation Doctor, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Nalini Foreman
- Quality Assistant, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Zahirah Sidat
- Senior Research Practitioner, Hope Clinical Trials Facility, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Pavandeep Sandhu
- Research Technician, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Domenic Marrone
- Research Technician, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Catherine Headley
- Senior Cancer Services Manager, Leicester City Clinical Commissioning Group, Leicester
| | - Carol Akroyd
- Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Equality and Diversity Theme Manager, Centre for Ethnic Health Research, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Sarah Nicholson
- Hope Clinical Trials Facility Manager/Cancer, Haematology, Urology, Gastroenterology, General Surgery Research Lead, Hope Clinical Trials Facility, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Karen Brown
- Professor in Translational Cancer Research, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Anne Thomas
- Professor of Cancer Therapeutics, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Lynne M Howells
- Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre Translational Research Manager, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Harriet S Walter
- Associate Professor of Medical Oncology, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gruer LD, Cézard GI, Wallace LA, Hutchinson SJ, Douglas AF, Buchanan D, Katikireddi SV, Millard AD, Goldberg DJ, Sheikh A, Bhopal RS. Complex differences in infection rates between ethnic groups in Scotland: a retrospective, national census-linked cohort study of 1.65 million cases. J Public Health (Oxf) 2022; 44:60-69. [PMID: 33480434 PMCID: PMC7928762 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ethnicity can influence susceptibility to infection, as COVID-19 has shown. Few countries have systematically investigated ethnic variations in infection. METHODS We linked the Scotland 2001 Census, including ethnic group, to national databases of hospitalizations/deaths and serological diagnoses of bloodborne viruses for 2001-2013. We calculated age-adjusted rate ratios (RRs) in 12 ethnic groups for all infections combined, 15 infection categories, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) viruses. RESULTS We analysed over 1.65 million infection-related hospitalisations/deaths. Compared with White Scottish, RRs for all infections combined were 0.8 or lower for Other White British, Other White and Chinese males and females, and 1.2-1.4 for Pakistani and African males and females. Adjustment for socioeconomic status or birthplace had little effect. RRs for specific infection categories followed similar patterns with striking exceptions. For HIV, RRs were 136 in African females and 14 in males; for HBV, 125 in Chinese females and 59 in males, 55 in African females and 24 in males; and for HCV, 2.3-3.1 in Pakistanis and Africans. CONCLUSIONS Ethnic differences were found in overall rates and many infection categories, suggesting multiple causative pathways. We recommend census linkage as a powerful method for studying the disproportionate impact of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L D Gruer
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
| | - G I Cézard
- Population and Health Research Group, School of Geography and Sustainable development, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9AL, UK
| | - L A Wallace
- Health Protection Scotland, NHS National Services Scotland, Glasgow G2 6QE, UK
| | - S J Hutchinson
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK
| | - A F Douglas
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
| | - D Buchanan
- Information Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, UK
| | - S V Katikireddi
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G2 3AX, UK
| | - A D Millard
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G2 3AX, UK
| | - D J Goldberg
- Health Protection Scotland, NHS National Services Scotland, Glasgow G2 6QE, UK
| | - A Sheikh
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
| | - R S Bhopal
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Young B, Robb KA. Understanding patient factors to increase uptake of cancer screening: a review. Future Oncol 2021; 17:3757-3775. [PMID: 34378403 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-1078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Early detection of cancer through organized screening is a central component of population-level strategies to reduce cancer mortality. For screening programs to be effective, it is important that those invited to screening participate. However, uptake rates are suboptimal in many populations and vary between screening programs, indicating a complex combination of patient factors that require elucidation to develop evidence-based strategies to increase participation. In this review, the authors summarize individual-level (sociodemographic and psychosocial) factors associated with cancer screening uptake and evidence for the effectiveness of behavioral interventions to increase uptake. The authors reflect on current trends and future directions for behavioral cancer screening research to overcome challenges and address unmet needs in reducing cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Young
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 0XH, UK
| | - Kathryn A Robb
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 0XH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Scott SE, Rauf B, Waller J. "Whilst you are here…" Acceptability of providing advice about screening and early detection of other cancers as part of the breast cancer screening programme. Health Expect 2021; 24:1868-1878. [PMID: 34369071 PMCID: PMC8483189 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This research aimed to assess women's willingness to receive advice about cervical and bowel cancer screening participation and advice on cancer symptom awareness when attending breast cancer screening. Methods Women (n = 322) aged 60–64 years, living in the United Kingdom, who had previously taken part in breast cancer screening were recruited via a market research panel. They completed an online survey assessing willingness to receive advice, the potential impact of advice on breast screening participation, prospective acceptability and preferences for mode and timing of advice. Results Most women would be willing to receive information about cervical (86%) and bowel cancer screening (90%) and early symptoms of other cancers (92%) at a breast cancer screening appointment. Those who were not up to date with cervical cancer screening were less willing. Prospective acceptability was high for all three forms of advice and was associated with willingness to receive advice. Women would prefer to receive advice through a leaflet (41%) or discussion with the mammographer (30%) either before the appointment (27%), at the appointment (44%) or with their results (22%). Conclusions While there is high willingness and high acceptability towards using breast cancer screening as a teachable moment for advice about prevention and early detection of other cancers, some women find it unacceptable and this may reduce their likelihood of attending a breast screening appointment. Patient or Public Contribution This study focused on gaining women's insights into potential future initiatives to encourage screening and early diagnosis of cancer. Members of the public were also involved in piloting the questionnaire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne E Scott
- Centre for Oral, Clinical and Translational Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Betul Rauf
- Centre for Oral, Clinical and Translational Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cancer Prevention Group, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Anderson M, Pitchforth E, Asaria M, Brayne C, Casadei B, Charlesworth A, Coulter A, Franklin BD, Donaldson C, Drummond M, Dunnell K, Foster M, Hussey R, Johnson P, Johnston-Webber C, Knapp M, Lavery G, Longley M, Clark JM, Majeed A, McKee M, Newton JN, O'Neill C, Raine R, Richards M, Sheikh A, Smith P, Street A, Taylor D, Watt RG, Whyte M, Woods M, McGuire A, Mossialos E. LSE-Lancet Commission on the future of the NHS: re-laying the foundations for an equitable and efficient health and care service after COVID-19. Lancet 2021; 397:1915-1978. [PMID: 33965070 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00232-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Anderson
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Emma Pitchforth
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Miqdad Asaria
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Carol Brayne
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Barbara Casadei
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, BHF Centre of Research Excellence, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anita Charlesworth
- The Health Foundation, London, UK; College of Social Sciences, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Angela Coulter
- Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bryony Dean Franklin
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK; NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Cam Donaldson
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - Margaret Foster
- National Health Service Wales Shared Services Partnership, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | | | - Martin Knapp
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Gavin Lavery
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Marcus Longley
- Welsh Institute for Health and Social Care, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
| | | | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Martin McKee
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Ciaran O'Neill
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Rosalind Raine
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mike Richards
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; The Health Foundation, London, UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter Smith
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK; Centre for Health Economics and Policy Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Street
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - David Taylor
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard G Watt
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Moira Whyte
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Michael Woods
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Alistair McGuire
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Elias Mossialos
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affar S, Morrison DS, Campbell C. Cervical cancer incidence by ethnic group in Scotland from 2008 to 2017: A population-based study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 30:e13441. [PMID: 33715256 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited information on cervical cancer incidence among different ethnic groups. This study used a name classification system to describe recent patterns of cervical cancer by ethnic group in Scotland. METHODS Data on incident cases of cancer of the cervix and carcinoma in situ diagnosed in Scotland from 2008 to 2017 were extracted from the Scottish Cancer Registry. Onomap was applied to ascribe ethnicity to each patient. Ethnic groups were categorised as White, Black, South-Asian, Chinese and Other. Age-standardised rates (ASRs) were calculated for each year, as well as cumulatively for the 10-year time period. RESULTS The Cumulative Age-standardised rate (CASR) of invasive cancer was 2.45 times higher in the White ethnic group (CASR 125.45 (95% CI 121.2-129.8) per 1,00,000) compared to the non-white ethnic groups combined (CASR 51.16 (95% CI 31.05-77.36) per 1,00,000). The highest age-specific rates within the White patients were in the 30-34 age group (18.34 per 1,00,000), whereas the highest age specific rates for the non-white patients were in the 60-64 age group (9.59 per 1,00,000). CONCLUSION Ethnic minority populations in Scotland had lower incidence of cervical cancer compared to the White population between 2008 and 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saba Affar
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.,ARHAI, NHS National Services Scotland, Meridian Court, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - David S Morrison
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.,Public Health Scotland, Meridian Court, Glasgow, Scotland
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nagar A, Myers S, Kozareva D, Simcoe M, Hammond C. Cascade screening for glaucoma in high-risk family members of African-Caribbean glaucoma patients in an urban population in London. Br J Ophthalmol 2020; 106:376-380. [PMID: 33303425 PMCID: PMC8867287 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Background/aims Cascade screening has been used successfully in relatives of patients with inherited cancers and other genetic diseases to identify presymptomatic disease. This study was designed to examine if this approach would be successful in a high-risk group: first-degree relatives (FDR) of African-Caribbean glaucoma patients resident in London. Methods African-Caribbean patients (probands) with glaucoma from an inner London hospital setting in a deprived area were asked to disseminate personalised information to their FDR over the age of 30 and to arrange a free hospital-based screening. Data collected, including optical coherence tomography imaging, were reviewed by a glaucoma specialist and if glaucoma was diagnosed or suspected, local specialist referral via family doctor was made. Results 203 probands were recruited from glaucoma clinics. 248 suitable FDR were identified as potentially eligible to attend screening. 57 (23%) FDR made contact with the research team of whom 18 (7%) attended a subsequent screening visit. No patients were diagnosed with glaucoma; one participant was diagnosed as glaucoma suspect. Reasons for poor uptake included reluctance by probands to involve their family members, and retirees spending significant time abroad. Conclusion Cascade screening of FDR of African-Caribbean glaucoma patients in inner city London was unsuccessful. Research confidentiality guidance prohibiting research teams directly contacting family members was a barrier. Greater community engagement, community-based screening and permission to contact FDR directly might have improved uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anindyt Nagar
- Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sam Myers
- Academic Section of Ophthalmology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Diana Kozareva
- Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Simcoe
- Academic Section of Ophthalmology, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Christopher Hammond
- Academic Section of Ophthalmology, King's College London, London, UK .,Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Campbell C, Douglas A, Williams L, Cezard G, Brewster DH, Buchanan D, Robb K, Stanners G, Weller D, Steele RJ, Steiner M, Bhopal R. Are there ethnic and religious variations in uptake of bowel cancer screening? A retrospective cohort study among 1.7 million people in Scotland. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e037011. [PMID: 33033017 PMCID: PMC7542953 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cancer screening should be equitably accessed by all populations. Uptake of colorectal cancer screening was examined using the Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage Study that links the Scottish Census 2001 to health data by individual-level self-reported ethnicity and religion. SETTING Data on 1.7 million individuals in two rounds of the Scottish Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (2007-2013) were linked to the 2001 Census using the Scottish Community Health Index number. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Uptake of colorectal cancer screening, reported as age-adjusted risk ratios (RRs) by ethnic group and religion were calculated for men and women with 95% CI. RESULTS In the first, incidence screening round, compared with white Scottish men, Other White British (RR 109.6, 95% CI 108.8 to 110.3) and Chinese (107.2, 95% CI 102.8 to 111.8) men had higher uptake. In contrast, men of all South Asian groups had lower uptake (Indian RR 80.5, 95% CI 76.1 to 85.1; Pakistani RR 65.9, 95% CI 62.7 to 69.3; Bangladeshi RR 76.6, 95% CI 63.9 to 91.9; Other South Asian RR 88.6, 95% CI 81.8 to 96.1). Comparable patterns were seen among women in all ethnic groups, for example, Pakistani (RR 55.5, 95% CI 52.5 to 58.8). Variation in uptake was also observed by religion, with lower rates among Hindu (RR (95%CI): 78.4 (71.8 to 85.6)), Muslim (69.5 (66.7 to 72.3)) and Sikh (73.4 (67.1 to 80.3)) men compared with the reference population (Church of Scotland), with similar variation among women: lower rates were also seen among those who reported being Jewish, Roman Catholic or with no religion. CONCLUSIONS There are important variations in uptake of bowel cancer screening by ethnic group and religion in Scotland, for both sexes, that require further research and targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne Douglas
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Linda Williams
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Geneviève Cezard
- Population and Health research group, School of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK
| | | | | | - Kathryn Robb
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - David Weller
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert Jc Steele
- Surgery and Molecular Oncology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Markus Steiner
- School of Medicine, Department of Child Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Raj Bhopal
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ross E, Maguire A, Donnelly M, Mairs A, Hall C, O'Reilly D. Does poor mental health explain socio-demographic gradients in breast cancer screening uptake? A population-based study. Eur J Public Health 2020; 30:396-401. [PMID: 31834366 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research from the USA indicates disparities in breast cancer screening uptake for women with poor mental health. However, no attempt has been made to examine the contribution of poor mental health to socio-demographic variations in breast screening uptake. The current study aims to examine the impact of self-reported chronic poor mental health on attendance at breast screening in the UK, and to what extent this explains socio-demographic inequalities in screening uptake. METHODS Breast screening records were linked to 2011 Census records within the Northern Ireland Longitudinal Study. This identified a cohort of 57 328 women who were followed through one 3-year screening cycle of the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme. Information on mental health status, in addition to other individual and household-level attributes, was derived from the 2011 Census. Logistic regression was employed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of attendance at screening. RESULTS 10.7% of women in the cohort reported poor mental health, and in fully adjusted analyses, these individuals were 23% less likely to attend breast screening (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.73-0.82). Although poor mental health was a strong predictor of screening uptake, it did not explain the observed inequalities in uptake by socio-economic status, marital status, or area of residence. CONCLUSIONS This study provides novel evidence of inequalities in breast screening uptake for women with chronic poor mental health in the UK. Targeted interventions are necessary to ensure equitable screening access and to enhance overall mortality benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Ross
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Aideen Maguire
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Adrian Mairs
- Quality Assurance Reference Centre, Public Health Agency, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Clare Hall
- Quality Assurance Reference Centre, Public Health Agency, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Dermot O'Reilly
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Woof VG, Ruane H, Ulph F, French DP, Qureshi N, Khan N, Evans DG, Donnelly LS. Engagement barriers and service inequities in the NHS Breast Screening Programme: Views from British-Pakistani women. J Med Screen 2019; 27:130-137. [PMID: 31791172 PMCID: PMC7645618 DOI: 10.1177/0969141319887405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Previous research has largely attempted to explore breast screening experiences of South Asian women by combining opinions from Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and Indian women. This research often fails to reach the most underserved sub-groups of this population, with socioeconomic status not routinely reported, and English fluency being a participation requirement. With uptake low amongst British-Pakistani women, this study explores the experiences these women encounter when accessing the NHS Breast Screening Programme. Methods 19 one-to-one semi-structured interviews were carried out with British-Pakistani women from East Lancashire, UK. 14 interviews were conducted via an interpreter. Results Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Three themes were identified: ‘Absence of autonomy in screening and healthcare access’ describes how currently the screening service does not facilitate confidentiality or independence. Access requires third-party intervention, with language barriers preventing self-expression. ‘Appraisal of information sources’ makes distinctions between community and NHS communication. Whereas community communication was invaluable, NHS materials were deemed inaccessible due to translation incongruences and incomprehensible terminology. ‘Personal suppositions of breast screening’ explores the subjective issues associated with disengagement, including, the cultural misalignment of the service, and perceiving screening as a symptomatic service. Conclusions British-Pakistani women face some unique challenges when accessing breast screening. To promote uptake, the service needs to address the translation of screening materials and optimize upon community networks to disseminate knowledge, including knowledge of the screening environment within the context of culture to promote informed choice about attendance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria G Woof
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Ruane
- Nightingale & Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT), Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Ulph
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David P French
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nadeem Qureshi
- NIHR School of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University Park, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nasaim Khan
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, MAHSC, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Nightingale & Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT), Manchester, UK.,Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, MAHSC, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise S Donnelly
- Nightingale & Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT), Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ross E, Maguire A, Donnelly M, Mairs A, Hall C, O'Reilly D. Disability as a predictor of breast cancer screening uptake: A population-based study of 57,328 women. J Med Screen 2019; 27:194-200. [PMID: 31752592 DOI: 10.1177/0969141319888553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite a growing body of evidence suggesting inequalities in breast cancer screening uptake in the United States for women with disabilities, few attempts have been made to examine whether this association applies to the United Kingdom. We conducted the first population-wide study investigating the impact of disability on uptake of breast cancer screening in Northern Ireland. METHODS Breast screening records extracted from the National Breast Screening System were linked to the Northern Ireland Longitudinal Study. This identified a cohort of 57,328 women who were followed through one complete three-year screening cycle of the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme in Northern Ireland. The presence of disability was identified from responses to the 2011 Census. RESULTS Within this cohort, 35.8% of women reported having at least one chronic disability, and these individuals were 7% less likely to attend compared with those with no disability (odds ratio 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.98). Variation in the degree of disparity observed was evident according to the type and number of comorbid disabilities examined. CONCLUSION This is the first population-wide study in Northern Ireland to identify disparities in breast screening uptake for women with chronic disabilities, in particular, those with multimorbidity. This is of particular concern, given the projected rise in the prevalence of disability associated with the ageing population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Ross
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Aideen Maguire
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | | | - Clare Hall
- Public Health Agency, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Dermot O'Reilly
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Briggs S, Slade I. Evaluating the Integration of Genomics into Cancer Screening Programmes: Challenges and Opportunities. CURRENT GENETIC MEDICINE REPORTS 2019; 7:63-74. [PMID: 32117599 PMCID: PMC7019642 DOI: 10.1007/s40142-019-00162-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW As the costs of genomic testing have fallen, and our understanding of genetic susceptibility to cancers has grown, there has been increasing interest in incorporating testing for cancer susceptibility genes, and polygenic risk estimates, into population cancer screening. A growing body of evidence suggests that this would be both clinically and cost-effective. In this article, we aim to explore the frameworks used to evaluate screening programmes, evaluate whether population screening for cancer susceptibility can be assessed using these standards, and consider additional issues and outcomes of importance in this context. RECENT FINDINGS There are tensions between traditional approaches of genetic testing (utilising tests with high sensitivity and specificity) and the principles of population screening (in which the screening test typically has low specificity), as well as the frameworks used to evaluate the two. Despite the existence of many screening guidelines, including consensus papers, these often do not align fully with broader considerations of genetic test evaluation. Population screening for genetic risk in cancer shifts the focus from diagnostics to prognostication and has wider implications for personal and familial health than existing screening programmes. In addition, understanding of the prevalence and penetrance of cancer susceptibility genes, required by many screening guidelines, may only be obtainable through population-level testing; prospective multi-disciplinary research alongside implementation will be essential. SUMMARY Appropriate evaluation of genetic screening for cancer risk will require modification of existing screening frameworks to incorporate additional complexity of outcomes and population values. As evidence supporting population screening for cancer susceptibility mounts, development of an appropriate evaluative framework, and expansion of public dialogue will be key to informing policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Briggs
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN UK
| | - Ingrid Slade
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities and Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sarma EA, Silver MI, Kobrin SC, Marcus PM, Ferrer RA. Cancer screening: health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions. Psychol Health 2019; 34:1036-1072. [DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1584673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A. Sarma
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Michelle I. Silver
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah C. Kobrin
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Pamela M. Marcus
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Rebecca A. Ferrer
- Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Influences on Polish migrants' breast screening uptake in Lothian, Scotland. Public Health 2018; 158:86-92. [DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
22
|
Assessment of health care, hospital admissions, and mortality by ethnicity: population-based cohort study of health-system performance in Scotland. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 3:e226-e236. [PMID: 29685729 PMCID: PMC5937910 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30068-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Revised: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Ethnic minorities often experience barriers to health care. We studied six established quality indicators of health-system performance across ethnic groups in Scotland. Methods In this population-based cohort study, we linked ethnicity from Scotland's Census 2001 (April 29, 2001) to hospital admissions and mortality records, with follow-up until April 30, 2013. Indicators of health-system performance included amenable deaths (ie, deaths avertable by effective treatment), preventable deaths (ie, deaths avertable by public health policy), avoidable deaths (combined amenable and preventable deaths), avoidable hospital admissions, unplanned readmissions, and length of stay. We calculated rate ratios and odds ratios (with 95% CIs) using Poisson and logistic regression, which we multiplied by 100, adjusting first for age-related covariates and then for socioeconomic-related and birthplace-related covariates. The white Scottish population was the reference (rate ratio [RR] 100). Findings The results are based on 4·61 million people. During the 50·5 million person-years of study, 1·17 million avoidable hospital admissions, 587 740 unplanned readmissions, and 166 245 avoidable deaths occurred. South Asian groups had higher avoidable hospital admissions than the white Scottish group, with the highest reported RRs in Pakistani groups (RR 140·6 [95% CI 131·9–150·0] in men; RR 141·0 [129·0–154·1] in women). There was little variation between ethnic groups in length of stay or unplanned readmission. Preventable and amenable mortality were higher in the white Scottish group than several ethnic minorities including other white British, other white, Indian, and Chinese groups. Such differences were partly diminished by adjustment for socioeconomic status, whereas adjustment for country of birth had little additional effect. Interpretation These data suggest concerns about the access to and quality of primary care to prevent avoidable hospital admissions, especially for south Asians. Relatively high preventable and amenable deaths in white Scottish people, compared with several ethnic minority populations, were unexpected. Future studies should both corroborate and examine explanations for these patterns. Studies using several indicators simultaneously are also required internationally. Funding Chief Scientist's Office, Medical Research Council, NHS Research Scotland, Farr Institute.
Collapse
|
23
|
Vass CM, Rigby D, Payne K. Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter? VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018; 21:219-228. [PMID: 29477404 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2017] [Revised: 07/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relative benefits and risks of screening programs for breast cancer have been extensively debated. OBJECTIVES To quantify and investigate heterogeneity in women's preferences for the benefits and risks of a national breast screening program (NBSP) and to understand the effect of risk communication format on these preferences. METHODS An online discrete choice experiment survey was designed to elicit preferences from female members of the public for an NBSP described by three attributes (probability of detecting a cancer, risk of unnecessary follow-up, and out-of-pocket screening costs). Survey respondents were randomized to one of two surveys, presenting risk either as percentages only or as icon arrays and percentages. Respondents were required to choose between two hypothetical NBSPs or no screening in 11 choice sets generated using a Bayesian D-efficient design. The trade-offs women made were analyzed using heteroskedastic conditional logit and scale-adjusted latent class models. RESULTS A total of 1018 women completed the discrete choice experiment (percentages-only version = 507; icon arrays and percentages version = 511). The results of the heteroskedastic conditional logit model suggested that, on average, women were willing-to-accept 1.72 (confidence interval 1.47-1.97) additional unnecessary follow-ups and willing-to-pay £79.17 (confidence interval £66.98-£91.35) for an additional cancer detected per 100 women screened. Latent class analysis indicated substantial heterogeneity in preferences with six latent classes and three scale classes providing the best fit. The risk communication format received was not a predictor of scale class or preference class membership. CONCLUSIONS Most women were willing to trade-off the benefits and risks of screening, but decision makers seeking to improve uptake should consider the disparate needs of women when configuring services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline M Vass
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Dan Rigby
- Department of Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Evans DG, Brentnall AR, Harvie M, Astley S, Harkness EF, Stavrinos P, Donnelly LS, Sampson S, Idries F, Watterson D, Cuzick J, Wilson M, Jain A, Harrison F, Maxwell AJ, Howell A. Breast cancer risk in a screening cohort of Asian and white British/Irish women from Manchester UK. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:178. [PMID: 29370783 PMCID: PMC5784727 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5090-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The differences between breast cancer risk factors in white British/Irish and Asian women attending screening in the UK are not well documented. METHODS Between 2009-15 ethnicity and traditional breast cancer risk factors were self-identified by a screening cohort from Greater Manchester, with follow up to 2016. Risk factors and incidence rates were compared using age-standardised statistics (European standard population). RESULTS Eight hundred and seventy-nine Asian women and 51,779 unaffected white British/Irish women aged 46-73 years were recruited. Asian women were at lower predicted breast cancer risk from hormonal and reproductive risk factors than white British/Irish women (mean 10 year risk 2.6% vs 3.1%, difference 0.4%, 95%CI 0.3-0.5%). White British/Irish women were more likely to have had a younger age at menarche, be overweight or obese, taller, used hormone replacement therapy and not to have had children.. However, despite being less overweight Asian women had gained more weight from age 20 years and were less likely to undertake moderate physical activity. Asian women also had a slightly higher mammographic density. Asian age-standardised incidence was 3.2 (95%CI 1.6-5.2, 18 cancers) per thousand women/year vs 4.5 (95%CI 4.2-4.8, 1076 cancers) for white British/Irish women. CONCLUSIONS Asian women attending screening in Greater Manchester are likely to have a lower risk of breast cancer than white British/Irish women, but they undertake less physical activity and have more adult weight gain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Gareth Evans
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, MAHSC, University of Manchester, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Genomic Medicine, MAHSC, St Mary’s Hospital, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL UK
| | - Adam R. Brentnall
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Michelle Harvie
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Susan Astley
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Elaine F. Harkness
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Paula Stavrinos
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise S. Donnelly
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Sampson
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Faiza Idries
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Donna Watterson
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mary Wilson
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Anil Jain
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Harrison
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony J. Maxwell
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
- Nightingale & Prevention Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The Christie, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Crawford J, Ahmad F, Beaton D, Bierman AS. Cancer screening behaviours among South Asian immigrants in the UK, US and Canada: a scoping study. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2016; 24:123-153. [PMID: 25721339 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
South Asian (SA) immigrants settled in the United Kingdom (UK) and North America [United States (US) and Canada] have low screening rates for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers. Incidence rates of these cancers increase among SA immigrants after migration, becoming similar to rates in non-Asian native populations. However, there are disparities in cancer screening, with low cancer screening uptake in this population. We conducted a scoping study using Arksey & O'Malley's framework to examine cancer screening literature on SA immigrants residing in the UK, US and Canada. Eight electronic databases, key journals and reference lists were searched for English language studies and reports. Of 1465 identified references, 70 studies from 1994 to November 2014 were included: 63% on breast or cervical cancer screening or both; 10% examined colorectal cancer screening only; 16% explored health promotion/service provision; 8% studied breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening; and 3% examined breast and colorectal cancer screening. A thematic analysis uncovered four dominant themes: (i) beliefs and attitudes towards cancer and screening included centrality of family, holistic healthcare, fatalism, screening as unnecessary and emotion-laden perceptions; (ii) lack of knowledge of cancer and screening related to not having heard about cancer and its causes, or lack of awareness of screening, its rationale and/or how to access services; (iii) barriers to access including individual and structural barriers; and (iv) gender differences in screening uptake and their associated factors. Findings offer insights that can be used to develop culturally sensitive interventions to minimise barriers and increase cancer screening uptake in these communities, while recognising the diversity within the SA culture. Further research is required to address the gap in colorectal cancer screening literature to more fully understand SA immigrants' perspectives, as well as research to better understand gender-specific factors that influence screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Crawford
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Nursing, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farah Ahmad
- School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dorcas Beaton
- Musculoskeletal Health and Outcomes Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute and the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Measurement Stream, Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arlene S Bierman
- Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Department of Medicine and Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Social Cultural Influences on Breast Cancer Views and Breast Health Practices Among Chinese Women in the United Kingdom. Cancer Nurs 2015; 38:343-50. [DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
27
|
Sweeney L, Owiti JA, Beharry A, Bhui K, Gomes J, Foster GR, Greenhalgh T. Informing the design of a national screening and treatment programme for chronic viral hepatitis in primary care: qualitative study of at-risk immigrant communities and healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15:97. [PMID: 25890125 PMCID: PMC4372168 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0746-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 02/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Effective strategies are needed to provide screening and treatment for hepatitis B and C to immigrant groups in the UK at high risk of chronic infection. This study aimed to build an understanding of the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards these conditions and their management in a range of high-risk minority ethnic communities and health professionals, in order to inform the design of a screening and treatment programme in primary care. Methods Qualitative data collection consisted of three sequential phases- (i) semi-structured interviews with key informants (n = 17), (ii) focus groups with people from Chinese, Pakistani, Roma, Somali, and French- and English-speaking African communities (n = 95), and (iii) semi-structured interviews with general practitioners (n = 6). Datasets from each phase were analysed using the Framework method. Results Key informants and general practitioners perceived that there was limited knowledge and understanding about hepatitis B and C within high-risk immigrant communities, and that chronic viral hepatitis did not typically feature in community discourses about serious illness. Many focus group participants were confused about the differences between types of viral hepatitis, held misconceptions regarding transmission, and were unaware of the asymptomatic nature of chronic infection. Most welcomed the idea of a screening programme, but key informants and focus group participants also identified numerous practical barriers to engagement with primary care-based screening and treatment; including language and communication difficulties, limited time (due to long working hours), and (for some) low levels of trust and confidence in general practice-based care. General practitioners expressed concerns about the workload implications and sustainability of screening and treating immigrant patients for chronic viral hepatitis in primary care. Conclusions Strategies to reduce the burden of chronic viral hepatitis in immigrant communities will need to consider how levels of understanding about hepatitis B and C within these communities, and barriers to accessing healthcare, may affect capacity to engage with screening and treatment. Services may need to work with community groups and language support services to provide information and wider encouragement for screening. Primary care services will need ongoing consultation regarding their support needs to deliver hepatitis screening and treatment programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna Sweeney
- Institute for Health and Human Development, University of East London, UH250, Stratford Campus, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK.
| | - John A Owiti
- Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
| | - Andrew Beharry
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, San Fernando General Hospital, Independence Avenue, San Fernando, Trinidad and Tobago.
| | - Kamaldeep Bhui
- Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
| | - Jessica Gomes
- The Liver Unit, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK.
| | - Graham R Foster
- The Liver Unit, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK.
| | - Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
A Peer Health Educator Program for Breast Cancer Screening Promotion: Arabic, Chinese, South Asian, and Vietnamese Immigrant Women's Perspectives. Nurs Res Pract 2015; 2015:947245. [PMID: 25810922 PMCID: PMC4355115 DOI: 10.1155/2015/947245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2014] [Accepted: 01/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This study explored Arabic, Chinese, South Asian, and Vietnamese immigrant women's experiences with a peer health educator program, a public health program that facilitated access to breast health information and mammography screening. Framed within critical social theory, this participatory action research project took place from July 2009 to January 2011. Ten focus groups and 14 individual interviews were conducted with 82 immigrant women 40 years of age and older. Qualitative methods were utilized. Thematic content analysis derived from grounded theory and other qualitative literature was employed to analyze data. Four dominant themes emerged: Breast Cancer Prevention focused on learning within the program, Social Support provided by the peer health educator and other women, Screening Services Access for Women centered on service provision, and Program Enhancements related to specific modifications required to meet the needs of immigrant women accessing the program. The findings provide insights into strategies used to promote breast health, mammography screening, and the improvement of public health programming. Perceived barriers that continue to persist are structural barriers, such as the provision of information on breast cancer and screening by family physicians. A future goal is to improve collaborations between public health and primary care to minimize this barrier.
Collapse
|
29
|
Epidemiology Data from the Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage Study (SHELS). OPEN HEALTH DATA 2014. [DOI: 10.5334/ohd.an] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
30
|
Jack RH, Møller H, Robson T, Davies EA. Breast cancer screening uptake among women from different ethnic groups in London: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e005586. [PMID: 25324320 PMCID: PMC4202018 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To use newly available self-assigned ethnicity information to investigate variation in breast cancer screening uptake for women from the 16 specific ethnic groups within the broad Asian, Black and White groups that previous studies report. SETTING National cancer screening programme services within London. PARTICIPANTS 655,516 female residents aged 50-69, invited for screening between March 2006 and December 2009. Ethnicity information was available for 475,478 (72.5%). White British women were the largest group (306,689, 46.8%), followed by Indian (34,687, 5.3%), White Other (30,053, 4.6%), Black Caribbean (25,607, 3.9%), White Irish (17,271, 2.6%), Black African (17,071, 2.6%) and Asian Other (10,579, 1.6%). OUTCOME MEASURES Uptake for women in different ethnic groups aged 50-52 for a first call invitation to the programme, and for women aged 50-69 for a routine recall invitation after a previous mammography. Uptake is reported (1) for London overall, adjusted using logistic regression, for age at invitation, socioeconomic deprivation and geographical screening area, and (2) for individual areas, adjusted for age and deprivation. RESULTS White British women attended their first call (67%) and routine recall (78%) invitations most often. Indian women were more likely to attend their first (61%) or routine recall (74%) than Bangladeshi women (43% and 61%, respectively), and Black Caribbean women were more likely than Black African women to attend first call (63% vs 49%, respectively) and routine recall (74% vs 64%, respectively). There was less variation between ethnic groups in some screening areas. CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer screening uptake in London varies by specific ethnic group for first and subsequent invitations, with White British women being more likely to attend. The variation in the uptake for women from the same ethnic groups in different geographical areas suggests that collaboration about the successful engagement of services with different communities could improve uptake for all women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth H Jack
- Public Health England, Knowledge and Intelligence Team, London, UK
- King's College London, Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK
| | - Henrik Møller
- King's College London, Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK
| | - Tony Robson
- London Quality Assurance Reference Centre, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth A Davies
- Public Health England, Knowledge and Intelligence Team, London, UK
- King's College London, Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Beeken RJ, Wilson R, McDonald L, Wardle J. Body mass index and cancer screening: Findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. J Med Screen 2014; 21:76-81. [DOI: 10.1177/0969141314531409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Obesity is associated with an increased cancer incidence and mortality and therefore cancer screening is particularly important for obese individuals. However, some US studies find lower screening uptake in this group. This study explored whether rates of breast and colorectal screening in England are lower for obese than healthy weight individuals. Setting Data were from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Methods We analysed data from adults who were eligible to have been invited to the UK national screening programmes for breast or colorectal cancer (CRC) in the last five years, and had been given the screening module in Wave 5 of ELSA (N = 1804 for CRC screening, N = 2401 for breast cancer screening). Weight and height were measured by a nurse at Wave 4 (two years earlier). Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds of breast and CRC screening (ever) for participants in higher weight categories (Body Mass Index [BMI] ≥ 25) compared with healthy weight individuals (BMI <25), controlling for socio-demographic variables. Results Of ELSA participants, 63% reported CRC screening, and 92% of the women reported breast cancer screening. Obesity was associated with lower CRC screening, but effects were strongest for class III obesity (BMI ≥40) (45% screened; OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.32–0.93, P = .029). There was no association between weight status and breast cancer screening. Conclusion Severe obesity appears to be a deterrent to CRC screening but not breast cancer screening. Targeted interventions may be required to promote CRC screening uptake in this group, which already has a heightened risk as a consequence of weight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Beeken
- Health Behaviour Research Centre Department of Epidemiology and Public Health University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT
| | - Rose Wilson
- Health Behaviour Research Centre Department of Epidemiology and Public Health University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT
| | - Laura McDonald
- Health Behaviour Research Centre Department of Epidemiology and Public Health University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT
| | - Jane Wardle
- Health Behaviour Research Centre Department of Epidemiology and Public Health University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cadman L, Ashdown-Barr L, Waller J, Szarewski A. Attitudes towards cytology and human papillomavirus self-sample collection for cervical screening among Hindu women in London, UK: a mixed methods study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 41:38-47. [PMID: 24521934 PMCID: PMC4514978 DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To explore the attitudes, views and understanding of women attending a Hindu temple in London, UK towards cervical screening, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and two HPV self-sample collection devices: the Dacron swab and Evalyn® brush. Methods A mixed methods design comprising a survey and four focus groups was adopted. Focus group discussions were recorded and transcribed verbatim and explored using thematic framework analysis. Results A total of 185 Hindu women completed surveys and 23 attended focus groups. Of the respondents 75% aged 25–64 years reported having cervical screening within the last 5 years; 85% had attended college or university. Familiar barriers to attendance for screening were identified: fear of pain and the test result, embarrassment, screener's attitude, inconvenient appointment times and difficulty with child care. Additional barriers cited included age and country of birth, with older and Indian-born women thought to be less likely to attend for screening. Self-collected sampling had a mixed reception. Women were not confident that their sample would be as good as a clinician sample and expressed concern about the impact that a positive HPV result might have on their relationships. Conclusions Screening attendance in this highly educated group of Hindu women was slightly lower than in the general population (75% of women aged 25–64 years had been screened in the last 5 years compared with 79% in England as a whole). Familiar barriers to screening were identified. Women felt able to collect their own sample for HPV testing with a Dacron swab but lacked confidence that it would be as good as that obtained by a clinician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Cadman
- Research Nurse Consultant, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Lesley Ashdown-Barr
- Research Nurse, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Senior Research Associate, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anne Szarewski
- Clinical Senior Lecturer, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK Deceased
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Eadie L, Enfield L, Taylor P, Michell M, Gibson A. Breast cancer risk scores in a standard screening population. BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT 2013. [DOI: 10.2217/bmt.13.52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY Aim: Information regarding the characteristics and breast cancer risk factors of British women in the standard population attending breast cancer screening is limited. Such information could be useful in personalizing screening and care, and informing and educating women about their risk. Materials & methods: Information about various breast cancer risk factors was obtained from 355 women aged between 46 and 74 years at a UK inner-city breast cancer screening clinic using questionnaires. The risk of breast cancer was calculated using the modified Gail model and analyzed using descriptive and regression statistics. Results: There were 26 women recalled for further assessment and two cases confirmed as invasive breast cancer. Forty-seven women reported first-degree relatives with breast cancer. A total of 58% of our sample was overweight or obese, although 84% reported meeting the recommended target of ≥150 min of exercise per week. A total of 44% were smokers and 23% reported consuming alcohol on a regular basis. The mean lifetime risk score was 9.0% and the mean 5-year risk score was 1.5%. Various non-Gail model risk factors were found to be correlated with risk scores, but the only factor that was significantly different between women recalled for further assessment and those who were not was age of menarche. Conclusion: The results suggest that determining risk factor data in a standard screening population could be useful both to the women, who may have modifiable lifestyle factors that can be changed to improve their risk, and to the clinics, which can identify women at a higher risk who may be unaware and not present themselves as candidates for risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Eadie
- Centre for Rural Health, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Louise Enfield
- Department of Medical Physics & Bioengineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Paul Taylor
- Centre for Health Informatics & Multiprofessional Education, University College London, London, N19 5LW, UK
| | - Michael Michell
- South East London Breast Screening Programme, Breast Radiology, King’s College Hospital London, SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Adam Gibson
- Department of Medical Physics & Bioengineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Baker J, Mitchell R, Lawson K, Pell J. Ethnic differences in the cost-effectiveness of targeted and mass screening for high cardiovascular risk in the UK: cross-sectional study. Heart 2013; 99:1766-71. [DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
|
35
|
Bhopal RS, Bansal N, Steiner M, Brewster DH. Does the 'Scottish effect' apply to all ethnic groups? All-cancer, lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancer in the Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage Cohort Study. BMJ Open 2012; 2:bmjopen-2012-001957. [PMID: 23012329 PMCID: PMC3467629 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Although ethnic group variations in cancer exist, no multiethnic, population-based, longitudinal studies are available in Europe. Our objectives were to examine ethnic variation in all-cancer, and lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancers. DESIGN, SETTING, POPULATION, MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: This retrospective cohort study of 4.65 million people linked the 2001 Scottish Census (providing ethnic group) to cancer databases. With the White Scottish population as reference (value 100), directly age standardised rates and ratios (DASR and DASRR), and risk ratios, by sex and ethnic group with 95% CI were calculated for first cancers. In the results below, 95% CI around the DASRR excludes 100. Eight indicators of socio-economic position were assessed as potential confounders across all groups. RESULTS For all cancers the White Scottish population (100) had the highest DASRRs, Indians the lowest (men 45.9 and women 41.2) and White British (men 87.6 and women 87.3) and other groups were intermediate (eg, Chinese men 57.6). For lung cancer the DASRRs for Pakistani men (45.0), and women (53.5), were low and for any mixed background men high (174.5). For colorectal cancer the DASRRs were lowest in Pakistanis (men 32.9 and women 68.9), White British (men 82.4 and women 83.7), other White (men 77.2 and women 74.9) and Chinese men (42.6). Breast cancer in women was low in Pakistanis (62.2), Chinese (63.0) and White Irish (84.0). Prostate cancer was lowest in Pakistanis (38.7), Indian (62.6) and White Irish (85.4). No socio-economic indicator was a valid confounding variable across ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS The 'Scottish effect' does not apply across ethnic groups for cancer. The findings have implications for clinical care, prevention and screening, for example, responding appropriately to the known low uptake among South Asian populations of bowel screening might benefit from modelling of cost-effectiveness of screening, given comparatively low cancer rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raj S Bhopal
- Edinburgh Ethnicity and Health Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Narinder Bansal
- Edinburgh Ethnicity and Health Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Markus Steiner
- Edinburgh Ethnicity and Health Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Environmental & Occupational Medicine, Section of Population Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - David H Brewster
- Edinburgh Ethnicity and Health Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Information Services Division, NHS Scotland National Services, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|