1
|
Portnoy A, Pedersen K, Sy S, Tropé A, Engesaeter B, Kim JJ, Burger EA. Cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus triage approaches among vaccinated women in Norway: A model-based analysis. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:1073-1081. [PMID: 38088449 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
As Norway considers revising triage approaches following their first adolescent cohort with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination entering the cervical cancer screening program, we analyzed the health impact and cost-effectiveness of alternative primary HPV triage approaches for women initiating cervical cancer screening in 2023. We used a multimodeling approach that captured HPV transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to evaluate the health benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of alternative extended genotyping and age-based triage strategies under five-yearly primary HPV testing (including the status-quo screening strategy in Norway) for women born in 1998 (ie, age 25 in 2023). We examined 35 strategies that varied alternative groupings of high-risk HPV genotypes ("high-risk" genotypes; "medium-risk" genotypes or "intermediate-risk" genotypes), number and types of HPV included in each group, management of HPV-positive women to direct colposcopy or active surveillance, wait time for re-testing and age at which the HPV triage algorithm switched from less to more intensive strategies. Given the range of benchmarks for severity-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds in Norway, we found that the preferred strategy for vaccinated women aged 25 years in 2023 involved an age-based switch from a less to more intensive follow-up algorithm at age 30 or 35 years with HPV-16/18 genotypes in the "high-risk" group. The two potentially cost-effective strategies could reduce the number of colposcopies compared to current guidelines and simultaneously improve health benefits. Using age to guide primary HPV triage, paired with selective HPV genotype and follow-up time for re-testing, could improve both the cervical cancer program effectiveness and efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Portnoy
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kine Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stephen Sy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ameli Tropé
- Section for Cervical Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Birgit Engesaeter
- Section for Cervical Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Emily A Burger
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Angulo D, Cortes MF, Mura I, Akhavan-Tabatabaei R. Fine-grained mathematical modeling for cost-effectiveness evaluation of public health policies for cervical cancer, with application to a Colombian case study. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1470. [PMID: 37533028 PMCID: PMC10394806 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16022-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer (CC) is globally ranked fourth in terms of incidence and mortality among women. Vaccination against Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and screening programs can significantly reduce CC mortality rates. Hence, executing cost-effective public health policies for prevention and surveillance is crucial. However, defining policies that make the best use of the available resources is not easy, as it requires predicting the long-term costs and results of interventions on a changing population. Since the simpler task of predicting the results of public health policies is difficult, devising those that make the best usage of available resources is an arduous challenge for decision-makers. METHODS This paper proposes a fine-grained epidemiological simulation model based on differential equations, to effectively predict the costs and effectiveness of CC public health policies that include vaccination and screening. The model represents population dynamics, HPV transmission within the population, likelihood of infection clearance, virus-induced appearance of precancerous lesions and eventually CC, as well as immunity gained with vaccination and early detection with screening. RESULTS We offer a compartmentalized modeling approach that separates population, epidemics, and intervention concerns. We instantiate models with actual data from a Colombian case study and analyze their results to show how our modeling approach can support CEA studies. Moreover, we implement models in an open-source software tool to simultaneously define and evaluate multiple policies. With the support of the tool, we analyze 54 policies within a 30-year time horizon and use as a comparator the CC policy that has been used until recently. We identify 8 dominant policies, the best one with an ICER of 6.3 million COP (Colombian Pesos) per averted DALY. We also validate the modeling approach against the available population and HPV epidemic data. The effects of uncertainty in the values of key parameters (discount rate, sensitivity of screening tests) is evaluated through one-way sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our modeling approach can provide valuable support for healthcare decision-makers. The implementation into an automated tool allows customizing the analysis with country-specific data, flexibly defining public health policies to be evaluated, and conducting disaggregate analyses of their cost and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Angulo
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
| | | | - Ivan Mura
- Institute of Applied Physical Sciences and Engineering, and Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Diakite I, Nguyen S, Sabale U, Pavelyev A, Saxena K, Tajik AA, Wang W, Palmer C. Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of switching from bivalent to nonavalent vaccine for human papillomavirus in Norway: incorporating the full health impact of all HPV-related diseases. J Med Econ 2023; 26:1085-1098. [PMID: 37608730 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2250194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
AIM The objective of this study was to estimate and compare the cost-effectiveness of switching from a bivalent to a nonavalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program in Norway, incorporating all nonavalent vaccine-preventable HPV-related diseases and in the context of the latest cervical cancer screening program. METHODS A well-established dynamic transmission model of the natural history of HPV infection and disease was adapted to the Norwegian population. We determined the number of cases of HPV-related diseases and subsequent number of deaths, and the economic burden of HPV-related disease under the current standard of care conditions of bivalent and nonavalent vaccinations of girls and boys aged 12 years. RESULTS Compared to bivalent vaccination, nonavalent vaccination averted an additional 4,357 cases of HPV-related cancers, 421,925 cases of genital warts, and 543 cases of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) over a 100-year time horizon. Nonavalent vaccination also averted an additional 1,044 deaths over the 100-year time horizon when compared with bivalent vaccination. Total costs were higher for the nonavalent strategy (10.5 billion NOK [€1.03 billion] vs. 9.3-9.4 billion NOK [€915-925 million] for bivalent vaccination). A switch to nonavalent vaccination had a higher vaccination cost (4.4 billion NOK [€433 million] vs. 2.7 billion NOK [€266 million] for bivalent vaccination) but resulted in a savings of 627-694 million NOK [€62-68 million] in treatment costs. A switch to nonavalent vaccination demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 102,500 NOK (€10,086) per QALY versus bivalent vaccination. CONCLUSIONS Using a model that incorporated the full range of HPV-related diseases, and the latest cervical cancer screening practices, we found that switching from bivalent to nonavalent vaccination would be considered cost-effective in Norway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Diakite
- Health Economic and Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | | | - Ugne Sabale
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, MSD, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andrew Pavelyev
- Health Economic and Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | - Kunal Saxena
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | | | - Wei Wang
- Health Economic and Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | - Cody Palmer
- Health Economic and Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen YC, Liang CN, Wang XF, Wang MF, Huang XN, Hu JD. Follow-up study on ThinPrep cytology test-positive patients in tropical regions. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:12543-12550. [PMID: 36579088 PMCID: PMC9791535 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i34.12543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Revised: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As shown in the statistics from the World Health Organization, it is estimated that approximately 75000 new cases of cervical cancer occur every year in China. In 2008, 33000 people died of cervical cancer in China. It is proven that most women are at risk of cervical cancer. The progression from human papillomavirus (HPV) infection to cervical cancer can be several years or decades, which offers a unique opportunity to prevent cancer.
AIM To observe the changes in ThinPrep cytology tests (TCT) and HPV infection in patients who were detected to be positive via TCT screening of cervical cancer and further explore the biopsy results.
METHODS This paper performed a follow-up study on 206 cervical cancer screening-positive patients of 12231 total cases from our previous research. We conducted an observational study on the TCT results based on the interpretation of The Bethesda System.
RESULTS Over a 5-year period, 10 cases received consistent follow-up. The proportions of cases in which glandular epithelial lesions were detected increased over the follow-up period. The differences between the years were statistically significant (P < 0.01). Over the 5 years, the proportion of patients whose squamous epithelial lesions transformed into glandular epithelial lesions increased yearly. Annual positive rates of HPV infection were: year 1, 73% (24/33); year 2, 43% (6/14); year 3, 36% (9/25); year 4, 50% (9/18); and year 5, 25% (6/24). The positive detection rate after biopsy over a 9-year period was 29%.
CONCLUSION The follow-up study for 5 years to 9 years revealed a tendency to change from squamous epithelial lesions to glandular epithelial lesions and an improvement of the disease (which had not been reported previously). The HPV test indicated a high negative conversion ratio of the viral infection. However, the follow-up cases were not found to have persistent infection of high-risk HPV. Therefore, early intervention of cervical cancer screening is necessary. Low re-examination compliance, patient education, and preventive measures should be enhanced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-Chun Chen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Haikou Branch of Yueyang Integrative Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Haikou 570216, Hainan Province, China
| | - Chong-Nan Liang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Haikou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Haikou 570216, Hainan Province, China
| | - Xiang-Feng Wang
- Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570311, Hainan Province, China
| | - Min-Fa Wang
- Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570311, Hainan Province, China
| | - Xu-Ning Huang
- Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570311, Hainan Province, China
| | - Jian-Dong Hu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haikou branch of Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Haikou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Haikou 570216, Hainan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Narasimhamurthy M, Kafle SU. Cervical cancer in Nepal: Current screening strategies and challenges. Front Public Health 2022; 10:980899. [PMID: 36466479 PMCID: PMC9713638 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.980899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Nepal has a high burden of cervical cancer primarily due to a limited screening program. Most present with advanced cervical disease. Despite no national cervical cancer control program, Nepal's Ministry of Health and Population has taken many initiatives with various international collaborations in screening, vaccination, and treating pre-invasive and invasive cancer. However, the existing prevention and treatment modalities are dismally inadequate to meet the targets of WHO's cervical cancer eliminative initiative by 2030. We provide an overview of the Ministry of Health and Population, Nepal's efforts to tackle the growing cervical cancer burden in the country. We discuss the challenges and potential solutions that could be practical and augment screening uptakes, such as single-dose vaccination and HPV DNA tests. The screen-and-treat approach on the same day could potentially address treatment delays and follow-up loss after testing positive. Our narrative summary highlights existing and innovative strategies, unmet needs, and collaborations required to achieve elimination across implementation contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohan Narasimhamurthy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, United States,*Correspondence: Mohan Narasimhamurthy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nygård M, Engesæter B, Castle PE, Berland JM, Eide ML, Iversen OE, Jonassen CM, Christiansen IK, Vintermyr OK, Tropé A. Randomized Implementation of a Primary Human Papillomavirus Testing-based Cervical Cancer Screening Protocol for Women 34 to 69 Years in Norway. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:1812-1822. [PMID: 35793700 PMCID: PMC9437559 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer screening programs are facing a programmatic shift where screening protocol based on human papillomavirus testing (HPV-Screening protocol) is replacing the liquid-based cytology (LBC-Screening protocol). For safe technology transfer within the nationwide screening programme in Norway, HPV-Screening protocol was implemented randomized to compare the real-world effectiveness of HPV-Screening protocol and LBC-Screening protocol at the first screening round. METHODS Among 302,295 women ages 34 to 69 years scheduled to attend screening from February 2015 to June 2017, 157,447 attended. A total of 77,207 were randomly allocated to the HPV-Screening protocol and 80,240 were allocated to the LBC-Screening protocol. All women were followed up for 18 months. RESULTS The HPV-Screening protocol resulted in a relative increase of 60% in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse [risk ratio (RR) = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5-1.7], 40% in CIN grade 3 or worse (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.3-1.6), 40% in cancer (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.0-2.1), and 60% in colposcopy referrals (RR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.5-1.6) compared with LBC-Screening. The performance of both protocols was age dependent, being more effective in women ages under 50 years. CONCLUSIONS The HPV-Screening protocol was well accepted by women in Norway and detected more CIN2, CIN3, and cancers compared with the LBC-Screening protocol. IMPACT A randomized implementation of the HPV-Screening protocol with real-world assessment enabled a gradual, quality assured, and safe technology transition. HPV-based screening protocol may further be improved by using HPV genotyping and age-specific referral algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Nygård
- The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Corresponding Author: Mari Nygård, Research Department, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Postbox 5313 Majorstuen, Oslo 0304, Norway. Phone: 47-9518-1886; E-mail:
| | | | - Philip E. Castle
- Division of Cancer Prevention, NCI, NIH, Rockville, Maryland.,Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, NCI, NIH, Rockville, Maryland
| | | | - Maj Liv Eide
- Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ole Erik Iversen
- Institute of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | - Olav Karsten Vintermyr
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,The Gades Laboratory for Pathology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sefuthi T, Nkonki L. A systematic review of economic evaluations of cervical cancer screening methods. Syst Rev 2022; 11:162. [PMID: 35945642 PMCID: PMC9361672 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02017-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aims of this systematic review were to (1) identify primary- and model-based economic evaluations of cervical cancer screening methods and to (2) provide a contextual summary of valuation outcomes associated with three types of cervical cancer screening tests: visual inspection with acetic acid, human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid, and Papanicolaou smear. INTRODUCTION Cervical cancer screening is an important public health priority with the potential to improve the detection of precancerous lesions in high-risk females for early intervention and disease prevention. Test performance and cost-effectiveness differ based on the specific screening method used across different platforms. There is a need to appraise existing economic evaluations of cervical cancer screening methods. METHODS This review considered primary-based and model-based full economic evaluations of cervical cancer screening methods. The evaluation methods of interest included cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, cost-minimization analysis, cost-benefit analysis, and cost-consequence analysis. We searched Scopus, PubMed, National Health Economic Evaluation Database (NH EED), Cochrane, and the Health Economic Evaluation Database for full economic evaluations of cancer screening methods. No formal date restrictions were applied. Model-based and primary-based full economic evaluations were included. A critical appraisal of included studies was performed by the main investigator, while a second independent reviewer assessed critical appraisal findings for any inconsistencies. Data were extracted using a standardised data extraction tool for economic evaluations. The ultimate outcomes of costs, effectiveness, benefits, and utilities of cervical cancer screening modalities were extracted from included studies, analysed, and summarised. RESULTS From a total of 671 screened studies, 44 studies met the study inclusion criteria. Forty-three studies were cost-effectiveness analyses, one study reported both cost-utility and cost-effectiveness outcomes, and another study reported cost utilities of cervical cancer screening methods only. Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing was reported as a dominant stand-alone screening test by 14 studies, while five studies reported visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) as a dominant stand-alone screening test. Primary HPV screening strategies were dominant in 21 studies, while three studies reported cytology-based screening strategies as the dominant screening method. CONCLUSIONS Existing evidence indicates that HPV-based and VIA testing strategies are cost-effective, but this is dependent on setting. Our review suggests the limited cost-effectiveness of cytology-based testing, which may be due in part to the need for specific infrastructures and human resources. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020212454 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thatohatsi Sefuthi
- Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Global Health Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
| | - Lungiswa Nkonki
- Health Economics, Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Global Health Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Portnoy A, Pedersen K, Nygård M, Trogstad L, Kim JJ, Burger EA. Identifying a Single Optimal Integrated Cervical Cancer Prevention Policy in Norway: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Med Decis Making 2022; 42:795-807. [PMID: 35255741 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x221082683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interventions targeting the same disease but at different points along the disease continuum (e.g., screening and vaccination to prevent cervical cancer [CC]) are often evaluated in isolation, which can affect cost-effectiveness profiles and policy conclusions. We evaluated nonavalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (9vHPV) compared with bivalent HPV vaccine (2vHPV) alongside deintensified screening intervals for a vaccinated birth cohort to inform a single optimal integrated CC prevention policy. METHODS Using a multimodeling approach, we evaluated the health and economic impacts of alternative CC screening strategies for a Norwegian birth cohort eligible for HPV vaccination in 2021 assuming they received 1) 2vHPV or 2) 9vHPV. We conducted 1) a restricted analysis that evaluated the optimal HPV vaccine under current screening guidelines; and 2) a comprehensive analysis including alternative screening and vaccination strategy combinations. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and evaluated them according to different cost-effectiveness thresholds. RESULTS Assuming a cost-effectiveness threshold of $40,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, we found that, while holding screening intensity fixed, switching the routine vaccination program in Norway from 2vHPV to 9vHPV would not be considered cost-effective (ICER of $132,700 per QALY gained). However, when allowing for varying intensities of CC screening, we found that switching to 9vHPV would be cost-effective compared with 2vHPV under an alternative threshold of $55,000 per QALY gained, if coupled with reductions in the number of lifetime screens. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis highlights the importance of evaluating the full potential policy landscape for country-level decision makers considering policy adoption, including nonindependent primary and secondary prevention efforts, to draw appropriate conclusions and avoid sub-optimal outcomes. HIGHLIGHTS Without evaluating the full potential policy landscape, including primary and secondary prevention efforts, country-level decision makers may not be able to draw appropriate policy conclusions, resulting in suboptimal outcomes.An applied example from cervical cancer prevention in Norway compared a restricted analysis of current screening guidelines to a comprehensive analysis including alternative screening and vaccination strategy combinations.We found that a switch from bivalent to nonavalent human papillomavirus vaccine would be considered cost-effective in Norway if coupled with reductions in the number of lifetime screens compared with the current screening strategy.A comprehensive analysis that considers how different types of interventions along the disease continuum affect each other will be critical for decision makers interpreting cost-effectiveness analysis results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Portnoy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kine Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mari Nygård
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lill Trogstad
- The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily A Burger
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Carvalho CF, Teixeira JC, Bragança JF, Derchain S, Zeferino LC, Vale DB. Cervical Cancer Screening with HPV Testing: Updates on the Recommendation. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRÍCIA 2022; 44:264-271. [PMID: 35170010 PMCID: PMC9948069 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The present update is a reassessment of the 2018 'Guidelines for HPV-DNA Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in Brazil' (Zeferino et al.)9, according to the changes observed in new international guidelines and knowledge updates. The most relevant and recent guidelines were assessed. Questions regarding the clinical practice were formulated, and the answers considered the perspective of the public and private sectors of the Brazilian health system. The review addressed risk-based strategies regarding age to start and stop screening, the use of cytology and colposcopy to support management decisions, treatment, follow-up strategies, and screening in specific groups, including vaccinated women. The update aims to improve the prevention of cervical cancer and to reduce overtreatment and the misuse of HPV testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Fabrine Carvalho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Julio Cesar Teixeira
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Joana Froes Bragança
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Sophie Derchain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Luiz Carlos Zeferino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Diama Bhadra Vale
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pedersen K, Portnoy A, Sy S, Hansen BT, Tropé A, Kim JJ, Burger EA. Switching clinic-based cervical cancer screening programs to human papillomavirus self-sampling: A cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccinated and unvaccinated Norwegian women. Int J Cancer 2022; 150:491-501. [PMID: 34664271 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Several countries have implemented primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical cancer screening. HPV testing enables home-based, self-collected sampling (self-sampling), which provides similar diagnostic accuracy as clinician-collected samples. We evaluated the impact and cost-effectiveness of switching an entire organized screening program to primary HPV self-sampling among cohorts of HPV vaccinated and unvaccinated Norwegian women. We conducted a model-based analysis to project long-term health and economic outcomes for birth cohorts with different HPV vaccine exposure, that is, preadolescent vaccination (2000- and 2008-cohorts), multiage cohort vaccination (1991-cohort) or no vaccination (1985-cohort). We compared the cost-effectiveness of switching current guidelines with clinician-collected HPV testing to HPV self-sampling for these cohorts and considered an additional 44 strategies involving either HPV self-sampling or clinician-collected HPV testing at different screening frequencies for the 2000- and 2008-cohorts. Given Norwegian benchmarks for cost-effectiveness, we considered a strategy with an additional cost per quality-adjusted life-year below $55 000 as cost-effective. HPV self-sampling strategies considerably reduced screening costs (ie, by 24%-40% across cohorts and alternative strategies) and were more cost-effective than clinician-collected HPV testing. For cohorts offered preadolescent vaccination, cost-effective strategies involved HPV self-sampling three times (2000-cohort) and twice (2008-cohort) per lifetime. In conclusion, we found that switching from clinician-collected to self-collected HPV testing in cervical screening may be cost-effective among both highly vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts of Norwegian women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kine Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Allison Portnoy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephen Sy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Emily A Burger
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Portnoy A, Nygård M, Trogstad L, Kim JJ, Burger EA. Impact of Delaying Effective and Cost-Effective Policy Decisions: An Example From Cervical Cancer Prevention in Norway. MDM Policy Pract 2022; 7:23814683211071093. [PMID: 35024449 PMCID: PMC8744166 DOI: 10.1177/23814683211071093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Delayed implementation of evidence-driven
interventions has consequences that can be formally evaluated. In Norway,
programs to prevent cervical cancer (CC)—screening and treatment of precancerous
lesions and prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV)
infection—have been implemented, but each encountered delays in policy
implementation. To examine the effect of these delays, we project the outcomes
that would have been achieved with timely implementation of two policy changes
compared with the de facto delays in implementation (in Norway).
Methods. We used a multimodeling approach that combined HPV
transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to estimate the health outcomes and
timeline for CC elimination associated with the implementation of two CC
prevention policy decisions: a multicohort vaccination program of women up to
age 26 years with bivalent vaccine in 2009 compared with actual “delayed”
implementation in 2016, and a switch from cytology to primary HPV-based testing
in 2015 compared with “delayed” rollout in 2020. Results. Timely
implementation of two policy changes compared with current Norwegian prevention
policy timeline could have averted approximately 970 additional cases (range of
top 10 sets: 830–1060) and accelerated the CC elimination timeline by around 4
years (from 2039 to 2035). Conclusions. If delaying implementation
of effective and cost-effective interventions is being considered, the
decision-making process should include quantitative analyses on the effects of
delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Portnoy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mari Nygård
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lill Trogstad
- The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emily A Burger
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smith MA, Burger EA, Castanon A, de Kok IMCM, Hanley SJB, Rebolj M, Hall MT, Jansen EEL, Killen J, O'Farrell X, Kim JJ, Canfell K. Impact of disruptions and recovery for established cervical screening programs across a range of high-income country program designs, using COVID-19 as an example: A modelled analysis. Prev Med 2021; 151:106623. [PMID: 34029578 PMCID: PMC9433770 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
COVID-19 has disrupted cervical screening in several countries, due to a range of policy-, health-service and participant-related factors. Using three well-established models of cervical cancer natural history adapted to simulate screening across four countries, we compared the impact of a range of standardised screening disruption scenarios in four countries that vary in their cervical cancer prevention programs. All scenarios assumed a 6- or 12-month disruption followed by a rapid catch-up of missed screens. Cervical screening disruptions could increase cervical cancer cases by up to 5-6%. In all settings, more than 60% of the excess cancer burden due to disruptions are likely to have occurred in women aged less than 50 years in 2020, including settings where women in their 30s have previously been offered HPV vaccination. Approximately 15-30% of cancers predicted to result from disruptions could be prevented by maintaining colposcopy and precancer treatment services during any disruption period. Disruptions to primary screening had greater adverse effects in situations where women due to attend for screening in 2020 had cytology (vs. HPV) as their previous primary test. Rapid catch-up would dramatically increase demand for HPV tests in 2021, which it may not be feasible to meet because of competing demands on the testing machines and reagents due to COVID tests. These findings can inform future prioritisation strategies for catch-up that balance potential constraints on resourcing with clinical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A Smith
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Emily A Burger
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Alejandra Castanon
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Inge M C M de Kok
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sharon J B Hanley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
| | - Matejka Rebolj
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Michaela T Hall
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia; School of Mathematics and Statistics, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Erik E L Jansen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - James Killen
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Xavier O'Farrell
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Jane J Kim
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Karen Canfell
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Spencer JC, Brewer NT, Coyne-Beasley T, Trogdon JG, Weinberger M, Wheeler SB. Reducing Poverty-Related Disparities in Cervical Cancer: The Role of HPV Vaccination. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:1895-1903. [PMID: 34503948 PMCID: PMC8492489 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Near elimination of cervical cancer in the United States is possible in coming decades, yet inequities will delay this achievement for some populations. We sought to explore the effects of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on disparities in cervical cancer incidence between high- and low-poverty U.S. counties. METHODS We calibrated a dynamic simulation model of HPV infection to reflect average counties in the highest and lowest quartile of poverty (percent of population below federal poverty level), incorporating data on HPV prevalence, cervical cancer screening, and HPV vaccination. We projected cervical cancer incidence through 2070, estimated absolute and relative disparities in incident cervical cancer for high- versus low-poverty counties, and compared incidence with the near-elimination target (4 cases/100,000 women annually). RESULTS We estimated that, on average, low-poverty counties will achieve near-elimination targets 14 years earlier than high-poverty counties (2029 vs. 2043). Absolute disparities by county poverty will decrease, but relative differences are estimated to increase. We estimate 21,604 cumulative excess cervical cancer cases in high-poverty counties over the next 50 years. Increasing HPV vaccine coverage nationally to the Healthy People 2020 goal (80%) would reduce excess cancer cases, but not alter estimated time to reach the near-elimination threshold. CONCLUSIONS High-poverty U.S. counties will likely be delayed in achieving near-elimination targets for cervical cancer and as a result will experience thousands of potentially preventable cancers. IMPACT Alongside vaccination efforts, it is important to address the role of social determinants and health care access in driving persistent inequities by area poverty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C Spencer
- Center for Health Decision Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Noel T Brewer
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Tamera Coyne-Beasley
- Departments of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, Division of Adolescent Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Justin G Trogdon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Morris Weinberger
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Muhimpundu MA, Ngabo F, Sayinzoga F, Balinda JP, Rusine J, Harward S, Eagan A, Krivacsy S, Bayingana A, Uwimbabazi JC, Makuza JD, Ngirabega JDD, Binagwaho A. Screen, Notify, See, and Treat: Initial Results of Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in Rwanda. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7:632-638. [PMID: 33929873 PMCID: PMC8162968 DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the first year results of Rwanda's Screen, Notify, See, and Treat cervical cancer screening program, including challenges encountered and revisions made to improve service delivery. METHODS Through public radio broadcasts, meetings of local leaders, church networks, and local women's groups, public awareness of cervical cancer screening opportunities was increased and community health workers were enlisted to recruit and inform eligible women of the locations and dates on which services would be available. Screening was performed using human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing technology, followed by visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), and cryotherapy, biopsy, and surgical treatment for those who tested HPV-positive. These services were provided by five district hospitals and 15 health centers to HIV-negative women of age 35-45 and HIV-positive women of age 30-50. Service utilization data were collected from the program's initiation in September 2013 to October 2014. RESULTS Of 7,520 cervical samples tested, 874 (11.6%) screened HPV-positive, leading 780 (89%) patients to undergo VIA. Cervical lesions were found in 204 patients (26.2%) during VIA; of these, 151 were treated with cryoablation and 15 were referred for biopsies. Eight patients underwent complete hysterectomy to treat advanced cervical cancer. Challenges to service delivery included recruitment of eligible patients, patient loss to follow-up, maintaining HIV status confidentiality, and efficient use of consumable resources. CONCLUSION Providing cervical cancer screening services through public health facilities is a feasible and valuable component of comprehensive women's health care in resource-limited settings. Special caution is warranted in ensuring proper adherence to follow-up and maintaining patient confidentiality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - John Rusine
- National Reference Laboratory, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Sardis Harward
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH
| | - Arielle Eagan
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH
| | | | | | - Jean Claude Uwimbabazi
- National Reference Laboratory, Kigali, Rwanda.,Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, CHU de Liège, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | | | | | - Agnes Binagwaho
- University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cuzick J, Du R, Adcock R, Kinney W, Joste N, McDonald RM, English K, Torres SM, Saslow D, Wheeler CM. Uptake of co-testing with HPV and cytology for cervical screening: A population-based evaluation in the United States. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:555-559. [PMID: 34253387 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical screening has been shown to increase the yield of precancerous disease and reduce the incidence of cervical cancer more than cytology alone. Here we document the state-wide uptake of co-testing with HPV and cytology in women aged 30-64 years as recommended by national and international bodies. METHODS Registry-based study of all screening cytology and HPV tests in New Mexico from 2008 to 2019 among women aged 21-64 years, with a focus on cytology negative tests to distinguish co-testing from reflex HPV testing to triage equivocal or mildly abnormal cytology. RESULTS A total of 1,704,055 cervical screening tests from 681,440 women aged 21-64 years in the state of New Mexico were identified. The proportion of screening tests which were co-tests rose from 5.6% in 2008 to 84.3% in 2019 among women aged 30-64 years with a marked change from the near exclusive use of the Hybrid Capture II HPV test, (a signal amplified test method) to the use of target amplified HPV tests. The largest increases were seen between 2013 and 2015, reflecting the introduction and adoption of new clinical guidelines. Increases in co-testing were also seen in younger women. CONCLUSIONS Co-testing is now well established in women aged 30-64 years, but smaller increases have also been seen at younger ages, although this is not currently recommended. The impact of co-testing on cervical disease outcomes and number of colposcopies and biopsies in routine population settings remain important, especially in young women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ruofei Du
- University of New Mexico (UNM) Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Molecular Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Rachael Adcock
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Nancy Joste
- UNM Health Sciences Center (HSC), Department of Pathology, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Ruth M McDonald
- UNM Health Sciences Center (HSC), Department of Pathology, Albuquerque, NM, USA; UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Center for HPV Prevention, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Kevin English
- Albuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | | | | | - Cosette M Wheeler
- UNM Health Sciences Center (HSC), Department of Pathology, Albuquerque, NM, USA; UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Center for HPV Prevention, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vale DB, Silva MT, Discacciati MG, Polegatto I, Teixeira JC, Zeferino LC. Is the HPV-test more cost-effective than cytology in cervical cancer screening? An economic analysis from a middle-income country. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251688. [PMID: 33989331 PMCID: PMC8121350 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report a modelling study using local health care costs and epidemiological inputs from a population-based program to access the cost-effectiveness of adopting hrHPV test. METHODS A cost-effectiveness analysis based on a microsimulation dynamic Markov model. Data and costs were based on data from the local setting and literature review. The setting was Indaiatuba, Brazil, that has adopted the hrHPV test in place of cytology since 2017. After calibrating the model, one million women were simulated in hypothetical cohorts. Three strategies were tested: cytology to women aged 25 to 64 every three years; hrHPV test to women 25-64 every five years; cytology to women 25-29 years every three years and hrHPV test to women 30-64 every five years (hybrid strategy). Outcomes were Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). RESULTS The hrHPV testing and the hybrid strategy were the dominant strategies. Costs were lower and provided a more effective option at a negative incremental ratio of US$ 37.87 for the hybrid strategy, and negative US$ 6.16 for the HPV strategy per QALY gained. Reduction on treatment costs would influence a decrease in ICER, and an increase in the costs of the hrHPV test would increase ICER. CONCLUSIONS Using population-based data, the switch from cytology to hrHPV testing in the cervical cancer screening program of Indaiatuba is less costly and cost-effective than the old cytology program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diama Bhadra Vale
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
- * E-mail:
| | | | | | - Ilana Polegatto
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Julio Cesar Teixeira
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Luiz Carlos Zeferino
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cromwell I, Smith LW, van der Hoek K, Hedden L, Coldman AJ, Cook D, Franco EL, Krajden M, Martin R, Lee MH, Stuart G, van Niekerk D, Ogilvie G, Peacock S. Cost-effectiveness analysis of primary human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: Results from the HPV FOCAL Trial. Cancer Med 2021; 10:2996-3003. [PMID: 33811457 PMCID: PMC8085916 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The Human Papillomavirus FOr CervicAL cancer (HPV FOCAL) trial is a large randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of primary HPV testing to cytology among women in the population-based Cervix Screening Program in British Columbia, Canada. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis based on the HPV FOCAL trial to estimate the incremental cost per detected high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse lesions (CIN2+). A total of 19,009 women aged 25 to 65 were randomized to one of two study groups. Women in the intervention group received primary HPV testing with reflex liquid-based cytology (LBC) upon a positive finding with a screening interval of 48 months. Women in the control group received primary LBC testing, and those negative returned at 24 months for LBC and again at 48 months for exit screening. Both groups received HPV and LBC co-testing at the 48-month exit. Incremental costs during the course of the trial were comparable between the intervention and control groups. The intervention group had lower overall costs and detected a larger number of CIN2+ lesions, resulting in a lower mean cost per CIN2+ detected ($7551) than the control group ($8325), a difference of -$773 [all costs in 2018 USD]. Cost per detected lesion was sensitive to the costs of sample collection, HPV testing, and LBC testing. The HPV FOCAL Trial results suggest that primary HPV testing every 4 years produces similar outcomes to LBC-based testing every 2 years for cervical cancer screening at a lower cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Cromwell
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer ControlBC Cancer Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia Cancer AgencyCancer Control ResearchBC Cancer Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthOttawaONCanada
| | - Laurie W. Smith
- British Columbia Cancer AgencyCancer Control ResearchBC Cancer Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
| | - Kim van der Hoek
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer ControlBC Cancer Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia Cancer AgencyCancer Control ResearchBC Cancer Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
| | - Lindsay Hedden
- Faculty of Health SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyBCCanada
- BC Academic Health Sciences NetworkVancouverBCCanada
| | - Andrew J. Coldman
- British Columbia Cancer AgencyCancer Control ResearchBC Cancer Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
| | - Darrel Cook
- British Columbia Centre for Disease ControlVancouverBCCanada
| | | | - Mel Krajden
- British Columbia Centre for Disease ControlVancouverBCCanada
| | - Ruth Martin
- British Columbia Cancer AgencyCervical Cancer Screening ProgramVancouverBCCanada
| | - Marette H. Lee
- British Columbia Cancer AgencyCervical Cancer Screening ProgramVancouverBCCanada
- Vancouver General HospitalGynecologic OncologyVancouverBCCanada
| | - Gavin Stuart
- Faculty of MedicineThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Dirk van Niekerk
- British Columbia Cancer AgencyCervical Cancer Screening ProgramVancouverBCCanada
| | - Gina Ogilvie
- British Columbia Centre for Disease ControlVancouverBCCanada
- Faculty of MedicineThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- Women’s Health Research InstituteBC Women’s HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Stuart Peacock
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer ControlBC Cancer Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia Cancer AgencyCancer Control ResearchBC Cancer Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
- Faculty of Health SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyBCCanada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Portnoy A, Pedersen K, Trogstad L, Hansen BT, Feiring B, Laake I, Smith MA, Sy S, Nygård M, Kim JJ, Burger EA. Impact and cost-effectiveness of strategies to accelerate cervical cancer elimination: A model-based analysis. Prev Med 2021; 144:106276. [PMID: 33678239 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Following the global call for action by the World Health Organization to eliminate cervical cancer (CC), we evaluated how each CC policy decision in Norway influenced the timing of CC elimination, and whether introducing nonavalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine would accelerate elimination timing and be cost-effective. We used a multi-modeling approach that captured HPV transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to estimate the CC incidence associated with six past and future CC prevention policy decisions compared with a pre-vaccination scenario involving 3-yearly cytology-based screening. Scenarios examined the introduction of routine HPV vaccination of 12-year-old girls with quadrivalent vaccine in 2009, a temporary catch-up program for females aged up to 26 years in 2016-2018 with bivalent vaccine, the universal switch to bivalent vaccine in 2017, expansion to include 12-year-old boys in 2018, the switch from cytology- to HPV-based screening for women aged 34-69 in 2020, and the potential switch to nonavalent vaccine in 2021. Introducing routine female vaccination in 2009 enabled elimination to be achieved by 2056 and prevented 17,300 cases. Cumulatively, subsequent policy decisions accelerated elimination to 2039. According to our modeling assumptions, switching to the nonavalent vaccine would not be considered 'good value for money' at relevant cost-effectiveness thresholds in Norway unless the incremental cost was $19 per dose or less (range: $17-24) compared to the bivalent vaccine. CC control policies implemented over the last decade in Norway may have accelerated the timeframe to elimination by more than 17 years and prevented over 23,800 cases by 2110.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Portnoy
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Kine Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lill Trogstad
- The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Berit Feiring
- The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ida Laake
- The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Megan A Smith
- Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephen Sy
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jane J Kim
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily A Burger
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Inturrisi F, Lissenberg‐Witte BI, Veldhuijzen NJ, Bogaards JA, Ronco G, Meijer CJLM, Berkhof J. Estimating the direct effect of human papillomavirus vaccination on the lifetime risk of screen-detected cervical precancer. Int J Cancer 2021; 148:320-328. [PMID: 32663316 PMCID: PMC7754437 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Birth cohorts vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) are now entering cervical cancer screening. Assessment of (pre)cancer (CIN3+) risk is needed to assess the residual screening need in vaccinated women. We estimated the lifetime (screen-detected) CIN3+ risk under five-yearly primary HPV screening between age 30 and 60, using HPV genotyping and histology data of 21,287 women participating in a screening trial with two HPV-based screening rounds, 5 years apart. The maximum follow-up after an HPV-positive test was 9 years. We re-estimated the CIN3+ risk after projecting direct vaccine efficacy for the bivalent and the nonavalent HPV vaccines, assuming life-long protection. The lifetime CIN3+ risk was 4.1% (95% confidence interval 3.5-4.9) and declined by 53.5% and 70.5% after bivalent vaccination without and with cross-protection, respectively, translating into a residual lifetime CIN3+ risk of 1.9% (1.4-2.4) and 1.2% (0.9-1.5). The CIN3+ risk declined by 88.5% after nonavalent vaccination, translating into a residual lifetime CIN3+ risk of 0.5% (0.2-0.7). The latter risk increased to 1.6% when vaccine protection only lasted until the first screening round at age 30. Among HPV-positive women with abnormal adjunct cytology, the nine-year CIN3+ risk was 16.9% (8.7-32.4) after nonavalent vaccination. In conclusion, HPV vaccination will lead to a strong decline in the lifetime CIN3+ risk and the remaining absolute CIN3+ risk will be very low. Primary HPV testing combined with adjunct cytology at five-year intervals still seems feasible even after nonavalent vaccination, although unlikely to be cost-effective. Our results support a de-intensification of screening programs in settings with high vaccination coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Inturrisi
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public HealthAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Birgit I. Lissenberg‐Witte
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public HealthAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Nienke J. Veldhuijzen
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public HealthAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- The Leprosy Research InitiativeAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Johannes A. Bogaards
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public HealthAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Centre for Infectious Disease ControlNational Institute for Public Health and the EnvironmentBilthovenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Chris J. L. M. Meijer
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Johannes Berkhof
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public HealthAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fogelberg S, Clements MS, Pedersen K, Sy S, Sparén P, Kim JJ, Burger EA. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary HPV testing for unvaccinated women in Sweden. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0239611. [PMID: 32997696 PMCID: PMC7526933 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sweden revised their cervical cancer screening program in 2017 to include cytology-based screening for women aged 23-29 years and primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for women aged 30-64 years; however, alternative strategies may be preferred. To inform cervical cancer prevention policies for unvaccinated women, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of alternative screening strategies, including the current Swedish guidelines. METHODS We adapted a mathematical simulation model of HPV and cervical cancer to the Swedish context using primary epidemiologic data. We compared the cost-effectiveness of alternative screening strategies that varied by the age to start screening, the age to switch from cytology to HPV testing, HPV strategies not preceded by cytology, screening frequency, and management of HPV-positive/cytology-negative women. RESULTS We found that the current Swedish guidelines were more costly and less effective than alternative primary HPV-based strategies. All cost-efficient strategies involved primary HPV testing not preceded by cytology for younger women. Given a cost-effectiveness threshold of €85,619 per quality-adjusted life year gained, the optimal strategy involved 5-yearly primary HPV-based screening for women aged 23-50 years and 10-yearly HPV-based screening for women older than age 50 years. CONCLUSIONS Primary screening based on HPV alone may be considered for unvaccinated women for those countries with similar HPV burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Fogelberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mark S. Clements
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kine Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stephen Sy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Pär Sparén
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jane J. Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Emily A. Burger
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jansen E, Naber SK, Aitken CA, de Koning HJ, van Ballegooijen M, de Kok I. Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical screening based on first year results in the Netherlands: a modelling study. BJOG 2020; 128:573-582. [PMID: 32638462 PMCID: PMC7818441 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective We aim to compare the cost‐effectiveness of the old cytology programme with the new high‐risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) screening programme, using performance indicators from the new Dutch hrHPV screening programme. Design Model‐based cost‐effectiveness analysis. Setting The Netherlands. Population Dutch 30‐year‐old unvaccinated females followed up lifelong. Methods We updated the microsimulation screening analysis (MISCAN) model using the most recent epidemiological and screening data from the Netherlands. We simulated both screening programmes, using the screening behaviour and costs observed in each programme. Sensitivity analyses were performed on screening behaviour, utility losses and discount rates. Main outcome measures Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates, number of screening tests and repeat tests, colposcopy referrals by lesion grade, costs from a societal perspective, quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and cost‐effectiveness. Results The new Dutch cervical cancer screening programme decreased the cervical cancer mortality by 4% and the incidence by 1% compared with the old programme. Colposcopy referrals of women without cervical intra‐epithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse, increased by 172%, but 13% more QALYs were still achieved. Total costs were reduced by 21%, mainly due to fewer screening tests. Per QALY gained, the hrHPV programme cost 46% less (€12,225) than the cytology programme (€22,678), and hrHPV‐based screening remained more cost‐effective in all sensitivity analyses. Conclusions The hrHPV‐based screening programme was found to be more effective and cost‐effective than the cytology programme. Alternatives for the current triage strategy should be considered to lower the number of unnecessary referrals. Tweetable abstract First results after implementation confirm that HPV screening is more cost‐effective than cytology screening. First results after implementation confirm that HPV screening is more cost‐effective than cytology screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eel Jansen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S K Naber
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C A Aitken
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M van Ballegooijen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Imcm de Kok
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Affordable human papillomavirus screening needed to eradicate cervical cancer for all. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH 2020; 7:e1605-e1606. [PMID: 31708136 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30423-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
23
|
Hylin H, Thrane H, Pedersen K, Kristiansen IS, Burger EA. The healthcare costs of treating human papillomavirus-related cancers in Norway. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:426. [PMID: 31064346 PMCID: PMC6505196 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5596-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Public health efforts to prevent human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers include HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening. We quantified the annual healthcare cost of six HPV-related cancers in order to provide inputs in cost-effectiveness analyses and quantify the potential economic savings from prevention of HPV-related cancers in Norway. Methods Using individual patient-level data from three unlinked population-based registries, we estimated the mean healthcare costs 1) annually across all phases of disease, 2) during the first 3 years of care following diagnosis, and 3) for the last 12 months of life for patients diagnosed with an HPV-related cancer. We included episodes of care related to primary care physicians, specialist care (private specialists and hospital-based care and prescriptions), and prescription drugs redeemed at pharmacies outside hospitals between 2012 and 2014. We valued costs (2014 €1.00 = NOK 8.357) based on diagnosis-related groups (DRG), patient copayments, reimbursement fees and pharmacy retail prices. Results In 2014, the total healthcare cost of HPV-related cancers amounted to €39.8 million, of which specialist care accounted for more than 99% of the total cost. The annual maximum economic burden potentially averted due to HPV vaccination will be lower for vulvar, penile and vaginal cancer (i.e., €984,620, €762,964 and €374,857, respectively) than for cervical, anal and oropharyngeal cancers (i.e., €17.2 million, €6.7 million and €4.6 million, respectively). Over the first three years of treatment following cancer diagnosis, patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer incurred the highest total cost per patient (i.e. €49,774), while penile cancer had the lowest total cost per patient (i.e. €18,350). In general, costs were highest the first year following diagnosis and then declined; however, costs increased rapidly again towards end of life for patients who did not survive. Conclusion HPV-related cancers constitute a considerable economic burden to the Norwegian healthcare system. As the proportion of HPV-vaccinated individuals increase and secondary prevention approaches advance, this study highlights the potential economic burden avoided by preventing these cancers. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5596-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
24
|
How does information on the harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening alter the intention to be screened?: a randomized survey of Norwegian women. Eur J Cancer Prev 2019; 28:87-95. [PMID: 29595751 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer (CC) is the 13th most frequent cancer among women in Norway, but the third most common among women aged 25-49 years. The national screening program sends information letters to promote screening participation. We aimed to evaluate how women's stated intention to participate in screening and pursue treatment changed with the provision of additional information on harms associated with screening, and to assess women's preferences on the timing and source of such information. We administered a web-based questionnaire to a panel of Norwegian women aged 25-69 years and randomized into three groups on the basis of when in the screening process additional information was introduced: (i) invited for routine screening, (ii) recommended an additional test following detection of cellular abnormalities, and (iii) recommended precancer treatment. A fourth (control) group did not receive any additional information. Results show that among 1060 respondents, additional information did not significantly alter women's stated intentions to screen. However, it created decision uncertainty on when treatment was recommended (8.76-9.09 vs. 9.40; 10-point Likert scale; P=0.004). Over 80% of women favored receiving information on harms and 59% preferred that information come from a qualified public health authority. Nearly 90% of women in all groups overestimated women's lifetime risk of CC. In conclusion, additional information on harms did not alter Norwegian women's stated intention to screen for CC; yet, it resulted in greater decision uncertainty to undergo precancer treatment. Incorporating information on harms into invitation letters is warranted as it would increase women's ability to make informed choices.
Collapse
|
25
|
The health impact of human papillomavirus vaccination in the situation of primary human papillomavirus screening: A mathematical modeling study. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0202924. [PMID: 30180203 PMCID: PMC6122803 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and the implementation of primary HPV screening in the Netherlands will lead to a lower cervical disease burden. For evaluation and further improvement of prevention, it is important to estimate the magnitude and timing of health benefits of current and alternative vaccination strategies such as vaccination of boys or adults. METHODS AND FINDINGS We evaluated the impact of the current girls-only vaccination program and alternative strategies on cervical disease burden among the first four vaccinated five-year birth cohorts, given the context of primary HPV screening. We integrated the existing microsimulation models STDSIM (HPV transmission model) and MISCAN-Cervix (cervical cancer screening model). Alternative vaccination strategies include: improved vaccination uptake, including routine boys vaccination, and offering adult vaccination at sexual health clinics. Our models show that the current vaccination program is estimated to reduce cervical cancers and cancer deaths by about 35% compared to primary HPV screening in the absence of vaccination. The number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to gain 1 life year is 45. The most efficient alternative vaccination strategies are: 1) improving coverage of girls to 80% (NNV = 42); and 2) routine vaccination for girls and boys at 80% coverage (incremental NNV = 155), with cervical cancer mortality reductions estimated at 50% and 60% respectively. CONCLUSIONS While the current program already substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality, prevention can be further improved by increasing vaccination uptake and extending vaccination to boys. As not all cervical cancer deaths will be prevented, screening participation should still be encouraged.
Collapse
|
26
|
Pedersen K, Fogelberg S, Thamsborg LH, Clements M, Nygård M, Kristiansen IS, Lynge E, Sparén P, Kim JJ, Burger EA. An overview of cervical cancer epidemiology and prevention in Scandinavia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018; 97:795-807. [PMID: 29388202 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
New technologies such as human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and vaccination necessitate comprehensive policy analyses to optimize cervical cancer prevention. To inform future Scandinavian-specific policy analyses, we aimed to provide an overview of cervical cancer epidemiology and existing prevention efforts in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. We compiled and summarized data on current prevention strategies, population demography and epidemiology (for example, age-specific HPV prevalence and cervical cancer incidence over time) for each Scandinavian country by reviewing published literature and official guidelines, performing registry-based analyses using primary data and having discussions with experts in each country. In Scandinavia, opportunistic screening occurred as early as the 1950s and by 1996, all countries had implemented nationwide organized cytology-based screening. Prior to implementation of widespread screening and during 1960-66, cervical cancer incidence was considerably higher in Denmark than in Norway and Sweden. Decades of cytology-based screening later (i.e. 2010-2014), cervical cancer incidence has been considerably reduced and has converged across the countries since the 1960s, although it still remains lowest in Sweden. Generally, Scandinavian countries face similar cervical cancer burdens and utilize similar prevention approaches; however, important differences remain. Future policy analyses will need to evaluate whether these differences warrant differential prevention policies or whether efforts can be streamlined across Scandinavia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kine Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sara Fogelberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lise H Thamsborg
- Department of Public Health, Center for Epidemiology & Screening, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mark Clements
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mari Nygård
- Research Department, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ivar S Kristiansen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elsebeth Lynge
- Department of Public Health, Center for Epidemiology & Screening, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pär Sparén
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily A Burger
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Burger EA, Kim JJ, Sy S, Castle PE. Age of Acquiring Causal Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infections: Leveraging Simulation Models to Explore the Natural History of HPV-induced Cervical Cancer. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 65:893-899. [PMID: 28531261 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2017] [Accepted: 05/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although new human papillomavirus (HPV) infections can occur at all ages, the age at which women acquire their "causal" HPV infection that develops into cervical cancer is poorly understood and practically unobservable. We aimed to estimate the age distribution at which individuals acquired their causal HPV infection in the absence of HPV vaccination or screening to help guide the optimal use of both. Methods Using an empirically calibrated mathematical model that simulates the natural history of cervical cancer, we estimated the cumulative number of causal HPV infections by age, stratified by HPV genotype (HPV16 vs. other HPV genotypes), and the direct age-specific reduction in cancer incidence for alternative vaccination initiation scenarios (i.e., age 9-45 years). Results Our model projected that among all cervical cancers, 50% and 75% of women acquired their causal HPV infection by ages 20.6 (range: 20.1-21.1) and 30.6 (range: 29.6-31.6) years, respectively. HPV16 infections were acquired at an earlier age. Assuming 95% efficacy against HPV16 and HPV18 infections, the direct reduction in lifetime risk of cervical cancer varied from 55% (53-56%) among women vaccinated at age 9 years to 6% (range: 6-7%) among women vaccinated at age 45 years. Similar patterns were observed for the second-generation vaccine. Conclusions Although new HPV infections and precancers can occur throughout a woman's lifetime, only a small proportion are acquired in mid-adult women and are vaccine-preventable. Our simulations highlight the potential limitations of using surrogate endpoints for vaccine efficacy studies of mid-adult women to guide policy decisions for implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Burger
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, Massachusetts.,University of Oslo, Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jane J Kim
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen Sy
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Philip E Castle
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Bronx, New York.,Global Coalition Against Cervical Cancer, Arlington, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Present and future of cervical cancer prevention in Spain: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Cancer Prev 2018; 25:430-9. [PMID: 26375246 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination within a nonorganized setting creates a poor cost-effectiveness scenario. However, framed within an organized screening including primary HPV DNA testing with lengthening intervals may provide the best health value for invested money. To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different cervical cancer (CC) prevention strategies, including current status and new proposed screening practices, to inform health decision-makers in Spain, a Markov model was developed to simulate the natural history of HPV and CC. Outcomes included cases averted, life expectancy, reduction in the lifetime risk of CC, life years saved, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), net health benefits, lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The willingness-to-pay threshold is defined at 20 000&OV0556;/QALY. Both costs and health outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. A strategy of 5-year organized HPV testing has similar effectiveness, but higher efficiency than 3-year cytology. Screening alone and vaccination combined with cytology are dominated by vaccination followed by 5-year HPV testing with cytology triage (12 214&OV0556;/QALY). The optimal age for both ending screening and switching age from cytology to HPV testing in older women is 5 years later for unvaccinated than for vaccinated women. Net health benefits decrease faster with diminishing vaccination coverage than screening coverage. Primary HPV DNA testing is more effective and cost-effective than current cytological screening. Vaccination uptake improvements and a gradual change toward an organized screening practice are critical components for achieving higher effectiveness and efficiency in the prevention of CC in Spain.
Collapse
|
29
|
Pedersen K, Burger EA, Nygård M, Kristiansen IS, Kim JJ. Adapting cervical cancer screening for women vaccinated against human papillomavirus infections: The value of stratifying guidelines. Eur J Cancer 2018; 91:68-75. [PMID: 29335156 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Revised: 12/06/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several countries have implemented vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) for adolescent girls and must decide whether and how to adapt cervical cancer (CC) screening for these low-risk women. We aimed to identify the optimal screening strategies for women vaccinated against HPV infections and quantify the amount that could be spent to identify vaccination status among women and stratify CC screening guidelines accordingly. METHODS We used a mathematical model reflecting HPV-induced CC in Norway to project the long-term health benefits, resources and costs associated with 74 candidate-screening strategies that varied by screening test, start age and frequency. Strategies were considered separately for women vaccinated with the bivalent/quadrivalent (2/4vHPV) and nonavalent (9vHPV) vaccines. We used a cost-effectiveness framework (i.e. incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and net monetary benefit) and a commonly-cited Norwegian willingness-to-pay threshold of €75,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. RESULTS The most cost-effective screening strategy for 9vHPV- and 2/4vHPV-vaccinated women involved HPV testing once and twice per lifetime, respectively. The value of stratifying guidelines by vaccination status was €599 (2/4vHPV) and €725 (9vHPV) per vaccinated woman. Consequently, for the first birth cohort of ∼22,000 women who were vaccinated in adolescence in Norway, between €10.5-13.2 million over their lifetime could be spent on identifying individual vaccination status and stratify screening while remaining cost-effective. CONCLUSION Less intensive strategies are required for CC screening to remain cost-effective in HPV-vaccinated women. Moreover, screening can remain cost-effective even if large investments are made to identify individual vaccination status and stratify screening guidelines accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kine Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Emily A Burger
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway; Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Mari Nygård
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313 Majorstuen, 0304, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ivar S Kristiansen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Burger EA, Pedersen K, Sy S, Kristiansen IS, Kim JJ. Choosing wisely: a model-based analysis evaluating the trade-offs in cancer benefit and diagnostic referrals among alternative HPV testing strategies in Norway. Br J Cancer 2017; 117:783-790. [PMID: 28772279 PMCID: PMC5589995 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Revised: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Forthcoming cervical cancer screening strategies involving human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for women not vaccinated against HPV infections may increase colposcopy referral rates. We quantified health and resource trade-offs associated with alternative HPV-based algorithms to inform decision-makers when choosing between candidate algorithms. Methods: We used a mathematical simulation model of HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis in Norway. We compared the current cytology-based strategy to alternative strategies that varied by the switching age to primary HPV testing (ages 25–34 years), the routine screening frequency (every 3–10 years), and management of HPV-positive, cytology-negative women. Model outcomes included reductions in lifetime cervical cancer risk, relative colposcopy rates, and colposcopy rates per cervical cancer prevented. Results: The age of switching to primary HPV testing and the screening frequency had the largest impacts on cancer risk reductions, which ranged from 90.9% to 96.3% compared to no screening. In contrast, increasing the follow-up intensity of HPV-positive, cytology-negative women provided only minor improvements in cancer benefits, but generally required considerably higher rates of colposcopy referrals compared to current levels, resulting in less efficient cervical cancer prevention. Conclusions: We found that in order to maximise cancer benefits HPV-based screening among unvaccinated women should not be delayed: rather, policy makers should utilise the triage mechanism to control colposcopy referrals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Burger
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, 718 Huntington Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Kine Pedersen
- University of Oslo, Department of Health Management and Health Economics, PO BOX 1089 Blindern, Oslo 0317, Norway
| | - Stephen Sy
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, 718 Huntington Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen
- University of Oslo, Department of Health Management and Health Economics, PO BOX 1089 Blindern, Oslo 0317, Norway
| | - Jane J Kim
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, 718 Huntington Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tota JE, Bentley J, Blake J, Coutlée F, Duggan MA, Ferenczy A, Franco EL, Fung-Kee-Fung M, Gotlieb W, Mayrand MH, McLachlin M, Murphy J, Ogilvie G, Ratnam S. Introduction of molecular HPV testing as the primary technology in cervical cancer screening: Acting on evidence to change the current paradigm. Prev Med 2017; 98:5-14. [PMID: 28279264 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Since being introduced in the 1940s, cervical cytology - despite its limitations - has had unequivocal success in reducing cervical cancer burden in many countries. However, we now know that infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer and there is overwhelming evidence from large-scale clinical trials, feasibility studies and real-world experience that supports the introduction of molecular testing for HPV as the primary technology in cervical cancer screening (i.e., "HPV primary screening"). While questions remain about the most appropriate age groups for screening, screening interval and triage approach, these should not be considered barriers to implementation. Many countries are in various stages of adopting HPV primary screening, whereas others have not taken any major steps towards introduction of this approach. As a group of clinical experts and researchers in cervical cancer prevention from across Canada, we have jointly authored this comprehensive examination of the evidence to implement HPV primary screening. Our intention is to create a common understanding among policy makers, agencies, clinicians, researchers and other stakeholders about the evidence concerning HPV primary screening to catalyze the adoption of this improved approach to cervical cancer prevention. With the first cohort of vaccinated girls now turning 21, the age when routine screening typically begins, there is increased urgency to introduce HPV primary screening, whose performance may be less adversely affected compared with cervical cytology as a consequence of reduced lesion prevalence post-vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph E Tota
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, US National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - James Bentley
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Jennifer Blake
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - François Coutlée
- Département de microbiologie et infectiologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Máire A Duggan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alex Ferenczy
- Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Eduardo L Franco
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Michael Fung-Kee-Fung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Walter Gotlieb
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Marie-Hélène Mayrand
- Département d'obstétrique-gynécologie et Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Meg McLachlin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joan Murphy
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gina Ogilvie
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sam Ratnam
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gervais F, Dunton K, Jiang Y, Largeron N. Systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses for combinations of prevention strategies against human papillomavirus (HPV) infection: a general trend. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:283. [PMID: 28351348 PMCID: PMC5371248 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4076-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/26/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the arrival of multi-valent HPV vaccines, it is more and more important to have a better understanding of the relationship between vaccination and screening programmes. This review aimed to: (1) collect published evidence on the cost-effectiveness profile of different HPV prevention strategies and, in particular, those combining vaccination with changes in screening practices; (2) explore the cost-effectiveness of alternative preventive strategies based on screening and vaccination. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted in order to identify the relevant studies regarding the cost-effectiveness of prevention strategies against HPV infection. Analysis comparing the modelling approaches between studies was made along with an assessment of the magnitude of impact of several factors on the cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies. RESULTS A total of 18 papers were quantitatively summarised within the narrative. A high degree of heterogeneity was found in terms of how HPV prevention strategies have been assessed in terms of their economic and epidemiological impact, with variation in screening practice and valence of HPV vaccination found to have large implications in terms of cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS This review demonstrated synergies between screening and vaccination. New prevention strategies involving multi-valence vaccination, HPV DNA test screening, delayed commencement and frequency of screening could be implemented in the future. Strategies implemented in the future should be chosen with care, and informed knowledge of the potential impact of all possible prevention strategies. Highlighted in this review is the difficulty in assessing multiple strategies. Appropriate modelling techniques will need to be utilised to assess the most cost-effective strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Gervais
- Amaris, The Fitzpatrick Building, 188 York Way, London, N7 9AS, UK
| | - Kyle Dunton
- Amaris, The Fitzpatrick Building, 188 York Way, London, N7 9AS, UK.
| | - Yiling Jiang
- Amaris, The Fitzpatrick Building, 188 York Way, London, N7 9AS, UK
| | - Nathalie Largeron
- Sanofi Pasteur MSD, 162 avenue Jean Jaurès, CS 50712, 69367, Lyon, Cedex 07, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lew JB, Simms KT, Smith MA, Hall M, Kang YJ, Xu XM, Caruana M, Velentzis LS, Bessell T, Saville M, Hammond I, Canfell K. Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH 2017; 2:e96-e107. [DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30007-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2016] [Revised: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 12/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
34
|
Burger EA, Sy S, Nygård M, Kim JJ. The Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Self-Sampling to Improve Routine Cervical Cancer Screening: The Importance of Respondent Screening History and Compliance. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016; 26:95-103. [PMID: 27624639 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2016] [Revised: 08/12/2016] [Accepted: 09/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing allows women to self-collect cervico-vaginal cells at home (i.e., self-sampling). Using primary data from a randomized pilot study, we evaluated the long-term consequences and cost-effectiveness of using self-sampling to improve participation to routine cervical cancer screening in Norway. METHODS We compared a strategy reflecting screening participation (using reminder letters) to strategies that involved mailing self-sampling device kits to women noncompliant to screening within a 5- or 10-year period under two scenarios: (A) self-sampling respondents had moderate under-screening histories, or (B) respondents to self-sampling had moderate and severe under-screening histories. Model outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and lifetime costs. The "most cost-effective" strategy was identified as the strategy just below $100,000 per QALY gained. RESULTS Mailing self-sampling device kits to all women noncompliant to screening within a 5- or 10-year period can be more effective and less costly than the current reminder letter policy; however, the optimal self-sampling strategy was dependent on the profile of self-sampling respondents. For example, "10-yearly self-sampling" is preferred ($95,500 per QALY gained) if "5-yearly self-sampling" could only attract moderate under-screeners; however, "5-yearly self-sampling" is preferred if this strategy could additionally attract severe under-screeners. CONCLUSIONS Targeted self-sampling of noncompliers likely represents good value-for-money; however, the preferred strategy is contingent on the screening histories and compliance of respondents. IMPACT The magnitude of the health benefit and optimal self-sampling strategy is dependent on the profile and behavior of respondents. Health authorities should understand these factors prior to selecting and implementing a self-sampling policy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(1); 95-103. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Burger
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stephen Sy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pedersen K, Burger EA, Sy S, Kristiansen IS, Kim JJ. Cost-effective management of women with minor cervical lesions: Revisiting the application of HPV DNA testing. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 143:326-333. [PMID: 27542966 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2016] [Revised: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lack of consensus in management guidelines for women with minor cervical lesions, coupled with novel screening approaches, such as human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping, necessitate revisiting prevention policies. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness and resource trade-offs of alternative triage strategies to inform cervical cancer prevention in Norway. METHODS We used a decision-analytic model to compare the lifetime health and economic consequences associated with ten novel candidate approaches to triage women with minor cervical lesions. Candidate strategies varied by: 1) the triage test(s): HPV testing in combination with cytology, HPV testing alone with or without genotyping for HPV-16 and -18, and immediate colposcopy, and 2) the length of time between index and triage testing (i.e., 6, 12 or 18months). Model outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime societal costs, and resource use (e.g., colposcopy referrals). RESULTS The current Norwegian guidelines were less effective and more costly than candidate strategies. Given a commonly-cited willingness-to-pay threshold in Norway of $100,000 per QALY gained, the preferred strategy involved HPV genotyping with immediate colposcopy referral for HPV-16 or -18 positive and repeat HPV testing at 12months for non-HPV-16 or -18 positive ($78,010 per QALY gained). Differences in health benefits among candidate strategies were small, while resource use varied substantially. More effective strategies required a moderate increase in colposcopy referrals (e.g., a 9% increase for the preferred strategy) compared with current levels. CONCLUSION New applications of HPV testing may improve management of women with minor cervical lesions, yet are accompanied by a trade-off of increased follow-up procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kine Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway
| | - Emily A Burger
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway; Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Stephen Sy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Ivar S Kristiansen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Nahvijou A, Daroudi R, Tahmasebi M, Amouzegar Hashemi F, Rezaei Hemami M, Akbari Sari A, Barati Marenani A, Zendehdel K. Cost-Effectiveness of Different Cervical Screening Strategies in Islamic Republic of Iran: A Middle-Income Country with a Low Incidence Rate of Cervical Cancer. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0156705. [PMID: 27276093 PMCID: PMC4898767 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Accepted: 05/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Invasive cervical cancer (ICC) is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. Cervical screening programs have reduced the incidence and mortality rates of ICC. We studied the cost-effectiveness of different cervical screening strategies in the Islamic Republic of Iran, a Muslim country with a low incidence rate of ICC. METHODS We constructed an 11-state Markov model, in which the parameters included regression and progression probabilities, test characteristics, costs, and utilities; these were extracted from primary data and the literature. Our strategies included Pap smear screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing plus Pap smear triaging with different starting ages and screening intervals. Model outcomes included lifetime costs, life years gained, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the stability of the results. RESULTS We found that the prevented mortalities for the 11 strategies compared with no screening varied from 26% to 64%. The most cost-effective strategy was HPV screening, starting at age 35 years and repeated every 10 years. The ICER of this strategy was $8,875 per QALY compared with no screening. We found that screening at 5-year intervals was also cost-effective based on GDP per capita in Iran. CONCLUSION We recommend organized cervical screening with HPV DNA testing for women in Iran, beginning at age 35 and repeated every 10 or 5 years. The results of this study could be generalized to other countries with low incidence rates of cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azin Nahvijou
- Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I. R. Iran
| | - Rajabali Daroudi
- Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I. R. Iran
| | - Mamak Tahmasebi
- Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I. R. Iran
| | - Farnaz Amouzegar Hashemi
- Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I. R. Iran
| | - Mohsen Rezaei Hemami
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing Health Economics & Health Technology Assessment University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Ali Akbari Sari
- Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I. R. Iran
| | - Ahmad Barati Marenani
- Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I. R. Iran
| | - Kazem Zendehdel
- Cancer Model Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I. R. Iran
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pedersen K, Sørbye SW, Kristiansen IS, Burger EA. Using novel biomarkers to triage young adult women with minor cervical lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis. BJOG 2016; 124:474-484. [PMID: 27264207 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the short-term consequences and cost-effectiveness associated with the use of novel biomarkers to triage young adult women with minor cervical cytological lesions. DESIGN Model-based economic evaluation using primary epidemiological data from Norway, supplemented with data from European and American clinical trials. SETTING Organised cervical cancer screening in Norway. POPULATION Women aged 25-33 years with minor cervical cytological lesions detected at their primary screening test. METHODS We expanded an existing simulation model to compare 12 triage strategies involving alternative biomarkers (i.e. reflex human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA/mRNA testing, genotyping, and dual staining) with the current Norwegian triage guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The number of high-grade precancers detected and resource use (e.g. monetary costs and colposcopy referrals) for a single screening round (3 years) for each triage strategy. Cost-efficiency, defined as the additional cost per additional precancer detected of each strategy compared with the next most costly strategy. RESULTS Five strategies were identified as cost-efficient, and are projected to increase the precancer detection rate between 18 and 57%, compared with current guidelines; however, the strategies did not uniformly require additional resources. Strategies involving HPV mRNA testing required fewer resources, whereas HPV DNA-based strategies detected >50% more precancers, but were more costly and required twice as many colposcopy referrals compared with the current guidelines. CONCLUSION Strategies involving biomarkers to triage younger women with minor cervical cytological lesions have the potential to detect additional precancers, yet the optimal strategy depends on the resources available as well as decision-makers' and women's acceptance of additional screening procedures. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Women with minor cervical lesions may be triaged more accurately and effectively using novel biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S W Sørbye
- Department of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - I S Kristiansen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - E A Burger
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lew JB, Simms K, Smith M, Lewis H, Neal H, Canfell K. Effectiveness Modelling and Economic Evaluation of Primary HPV Screening for Cervical Cancer Prevention in New Zealand. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0151619. [PMID: 27187495 PMCID: PMC4871332 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2015] [Accepted: 05/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background New Zealand (NZ) is considering transitioning from 3-yearly cervical cytology screening in women 20–69 years (current practice) to primary HPV screening. We evaluated HPV-based screening in both HPV-unvaccinated women and cohorts offered HPV vaccination in New Zealand (vaccination coverage ~50%). Methods A complex model of HPV transmission, vaccination, cervical screening, and invasive cervical cancer was extensively validated against national population-based datasets. Sixteen potential strategies for HPV screening were considered. Results Most primary HPV strategies were more effective than current practice, for both unvaccinated women and cohorts offered vaccination. The optimal strategy for both groups was 5-yearly HPV screening in women aged 25–69 years with partial genotyping for HPV 16/18 and referral to colposcopy, and cytological triage of other oncogenic types. This is predicted to reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality by a further 12–16% and to save 4–13% annually in program costs (excluding overheads). The findings are sensitive to assumptions about future adherence to initiating screening at 25 years. Conclusion Primary HPV screening with partial genotyping would be more effective and less costly than the current cytology-based screening program, in both unvaccinated women and cohorts offered vaccination. These findings have been considered in a review of cervical screening in NZ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie-Bin Lew
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Kate Simms
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Megan Smith
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hazel Lewis
- Public Health Physician, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Harold Neal
- National Screening Unit, Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Karen Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sander B, Wong WWL, Yeung MW, Ormanidhi O, Atkin K, Murphy J, Krahn M, Deeks SL. The cost-utility of integrated cervical cancer prevention strategies in the Ontario setting - Can we do better? Vaccine 2016; 34:1936-44. [PMID: 26892739 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2015] [Revised: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A universal, publicly funded, school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program in grade eight girls was initiated in Ontario in 2007. We present a cost-utility analysis of integrated cervical cancer prevention programs from the healthcare payer perspective. METHODS Our analysis was based on linked HPV transmission and disease history models. We obtained data from the literature, provincial surveys and Ontario population-based linked health administrative datasets. We modeled combinations of vaccination and screening strategies. We considered vaccination based on the Ontario experience, as well as conservative and optimistic scenarios, varying coverage, vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection. We considered 900 screening scenarios (screening start age: 21-70 years, screening interval: 3-20 years; 1-year time steps). The current schedule screens every 3 years starting at age 21 years. We examined (1) first vaccinated cohort (low herd-immunity), and (2) steady state, i.e. all cohorts were vaccinated (high herd-immunity). RESULTS Adding vaccination to the current screening schedule was cost-effective (<C$10,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY)) across all scenarios. Delaying screening start and/or extending screening intervals increased both expected QALYs and cost, and increased overall NHB for screening schedules with a start age of 25-35 years and 3-10-year intervals for most scenarios. CONCLUSION Delaying screening start age and/or extending screening intervals in vaccinated cohorts is likely to be cost-effective. Consideration should be given to both the short- and long-term implications of health policy decisions, particularly for infectious disease interventions that require long time intervals to reach steady state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beate Sander
- Public Health Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Canada.
| | - William W L Wong
- University of Toronto, Canada; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Canada
| | | | - Orges Ormanidhi
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Canada
| | | | - Joan Murphy
- University of Toronto, Canada; Cancer Care Ontario, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Murray Krahn
- University of Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Shelley L Deeks
- Public Health Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Khodakarami N, Farzaneh F, Yavari P, Akbari ME. Cervical Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Muslim Societies. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016; 17:239-47. [PMID: 26838217 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.1.239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The overall cervical cancer incidence rate is low in Iran; however, because of a higher risk of death for cervical cancer, a disease that kills women in middle age, a cervical cancer control program is needed. The aim of this study was to provide consensus recommendation for cervical cancer prevention in Iran and other Muslim societies with low incidences of cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Through a practical guideline development cycle, we developed six questions that were relevant to produce the recommendation. We reviewed 190 full text records of cervical cancer in Iran (1971 to 2013) of which 13 articles were related to the data needed to answer the recommendation questions. We also reviewed World Health Organization, IARC, GLOBOCAN report, Iran Ministry of Health cancer registry report and 8 available foreign countries guidelines. Lastly, we also evaluated the Pap smear results of 825 women who participated in the Iranian HPV survey, of whom 328 were followed-up after a 5-year interval. RESULTS The obtained data highlighted the burden of HPV and cervical cancer situation in Iran. Experts emphasized the necessity of a cervical cancer screening program for Iranian women, and recommended an organized screening program with a cytological evaluation (Pap smear) that would start at the age of 30 years, repeated every 5 years, and end at the age of 69 years. Meanwhile, there is no need for screening among women with a hysterectomy, and screening should be postponed to post-partum among pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS An organized cervical cancer screening is a necessity for Iran as more than 500-900 women in middle age diagnosed with an invasive cervical cancer every year cannot be ignored. This recommendation should be taken into account by the National Health System of Iran and Muslim countries with shared culture and behavior patterns. CUBA HPV test could be consideration in countries Muslim country with appropriate budget, resources and facility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nahid Khodakarami
- Cancer Research Center Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran E-mail :
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Naber SK, Matthijsse SM, Rozemeijer K, Penning C, de Kok IMCM, van Ballegooijen M. Cervical Cancer Screening in Partly HPV Vaccinated Cohorts - A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0145548. [PMID: 26824771 PMCID: PMC4732771 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Accepted: 12/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccination against the oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 will reduce the prevalence of these types, thereby also reducing cervical cancer risk in unvaccinated women. This (measurable) herd effect will be limited at first, but is expected to increase over time. At a certain herd immunity level, tailoring screening to vaccination status may no longer be worth the additional effort. Moreover, uniform screening may be the only viable option. We therefore investigated at what level of herd immunity it is cost-effective to also reduce screening intensity in unvaccinated women. Methods We used the MISCAN-Cervix model to determine the optimal screening strategy for a pre-vaccination population and for vaccinated women (~80% decreased risk), assuming a willingness-to-pay of €50,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained. We considered HPV testing, cytology testing and co-testing and varied the start age of screening, the screening interval and the number of lifetime screens. We then calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of screening unvaccinated women with the strategy optimized to the pre-vaccination population as compared to with the strategy optimized to vaccinated women, assuming different herd immunity levels. Results Primary HPV screening with cytology triage was the optimal strategy, with 8 lifetime screens for the pre-vaccination population and 3 for vaccinated women. The ICER of screening unvaccinated women 8 times instead of 3 was €28,085 in the absence of herd immunity. At around 50% herd immunity, the ICER reached €50,000. Conclusion From a herd immunity level of 50% onwards, screening intensity based on the pre-vaccination risk level becomes cost-ineffective for unvaccinated women. Reducing the screening intensity of uniform screening may then be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffie K. Naber
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Suzette M. Matthijsse
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kirsten Rozemeijer
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Corine Penning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Inge M. C. M. de Kok
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein van Ballegooijen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pedersen K, Sørbye SW, Burger EA, Lönnberg S, Kristiansen IS. Using Decision-Analytic Modeling to Isolate Interventions That Are Feasible, Efficient and Optimal: An Application from the Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Program. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2015; 18:1088-1097. [PMID: 26686795 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2014] [Revised: 07/10/2015] [Accepted: 08/03/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision makers often need to simultaneously consider multiple criteria or outcomes when deciding whether to adopt new health interventions. OBJECTIVES Using decision analysis within the context of cervical cancer screening in Norway, we aimed to aid decision makers in identifying a subset of relevant strategies that are simultaneously efficient, feasible, and optimal. METHODS We developed an age-stratified probabilistic decision tree model following a cohort of women attending primary screening through one screening round. We enumerated detected precancers (i.e., cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or more severe (CIN2+)), colposcopies performed, and monetary costs associated with 10 alternative triage algorithms for women with abnormal cytology results. As efficiency metrics, we calculated incremental cost-effectiveness, and harm-benefit, ratios, defined as the additional costs, or the additional number of colposcopies, per additional CIN2+ detected. We estimated capacity requirements and uncertainty surrounding which strategy is optimal according to the decision rule, involving willingness to pay (monetary or resources consumed per added benefit). RESULTS For ages 25 to 33 years, we eliminated four strategies that did not fall on either efficiency frontier, while one strategy was efficient with respect to both efficiency metrics. Compared with current practice in Norway, two strategies detected more precancers at lower monetary costs, but some required more colposcopies. Similar results were found for women aged 34 to 69 years. CONCLUSIONS Improving the effectiveness and efficiency of cervical cancer screening may necessitate additional resources. Although efficient and feasible, both society and individuals must specify their willingness to accept the additional resources and perceived harms required to increase effectiveness before a strategy can be considered optimal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kine Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | | | - Emily Annika Burger
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stefan Lönnberg
- The Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Program, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
O'Mahony JF, Naber SK, Normand C, Sharp L, O'Leary JJ, de Kok IMCM. Beware of Kinked Frontiers: A Systematic Review of the Choice of Comparator Strategies in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Human Papillomavirus Testing in Cervical Screening. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2015; 18:1138-1151. [PMID: 26686801 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2014] [Revised: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 09/30/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review the choice of comparator strategies in cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of human papillomavirus testing in cervical screening. METHODS The PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Scopus databases were searched to identify eligible model-based CEAs of cervical screening programs using human papillomavirus testing. The eligible CEAs were reviewed to investigate what screening strategies were chosen for analysis and how this choice might have influenced estimates of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Selected examples from the reviewed studies are presented to illustrate how the omission of relevant comparators might influence estimates of screening cost-effectiveness. RESULTS The search identified 30 eligible CEAs. The omission of relevant comparator strategies appears likely in 18 studies. The ICER estimates in these cases are probably lower than would be estimated had more comparators been included. Five of the 30 studies restricted relevant comparator strategies to sensitivity analyses or other subanalyses not part of the principal base-case analysis. Such exclusion of relevant strategies from the base-case analysis can result in cost-ineffective strategies being identified as cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS Many of the CEAs reviewed appear to include insufficient comparator strategies. In particular, they omit strategies with relatively long screening intervals. Omitting relevant comparators matters particularly if it leads to the underestimation of ICERs for strategies around the cost-effectiveness threshold because these strategies are the most policy relevant from the CEA perspective. Consequently, such CEAs may not be providing the best possible policy guidance and lead to the mistaken adoption of cost-ineffective screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James F O'Mahony
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Steffie K Naber
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charles Normand
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Linda Sharp
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John J O'Leary
- Department of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Pathology, Coombe Women's and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Inge M C M de Kok
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Racey CS, Gesink DC, Burchell AN, Trivers S, Wong T, Rebbapragada A. Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2015; 25:489-97. [PMID: 26598955 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our aim was to determine if cervical cancer screening uptake would increase among under-screened women living in rural Ontario, Canada, if at-home self-collected sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was offered as a primary cervical cancer screening modality, compared to invited papanicolaou (Pap) testing or routine opportunistic screening. METHODS Women 30-70 years of age who were overdue for cervical cancer screening were randomized to receive (1) an at-home self-collected HPV kit, (2) a reminder invitation for Pap testing, or (3) standard of care opportunistic screening. The first two arms were also asked demographic and screening history questions. Women randomized to arm 1 were asked about acceptability. RESULTS In total, 818 eligible women were identified in a small rural community in Southwestern Ontario: 335 received a self-collected HPV testing kit, 331 received a reminder letter, and 152 received standard of care. In the HPV self-collection arm, 21% (70/335) returned the sample and questionnaire and 11% (37/335) opted to undergo Pap testing. In total, 32% from the HPV self-collection arm, 15% (51/331) from the Pap invitation arm, and 8.5% (13/152) with standard of care were screened. Women receiving the self-collected HPV kit were 3.7 (95% confidence interval 2.2-6.4) times more likely to undergo screening compared to the standard of care arm. In the HPV self-sampling arm, 80% (56/70) said they would be very likely to choose self-collected sampling in the future. CONCLUSIONS Providing self-collected sampling for HPV testing was more effective than sending reminder letters to increase screening coverage in under-screened women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Sarai Racey
- 1 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada
| | - Dionne C Gesink
- 1 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada
| | - Ann N Burchell
- 1 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada
- 2 Department of Community and Family Medicine, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute , St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Tom Wong
- 1 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada
- 4 Health Canada , Ottawa, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pedersen K. Kostnad-nytte-avveininger i screening mot livmorhalskreft. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2015; 135:1022-3. [DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.0468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
46
|
Nahvijou A, Hadji M, BaratiMarnani A, Tourang F, NedaBayat N, Weiderpass E, Daroudi R, AkbariSari A, Zendehdel K. A Systematic Review of Economic Aspects of Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies Worldwide: Discrepancy between Economic Analysis and Policymaking. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014. [DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.19.8229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
47
|
Burger EA, Sy S, Nygård M, Kristiansen IS, Kim JJ. Too late to vaccinate? The incremental benefits and cost-effectiveness of a delayed catch-up program using the 4-valent human papillomavirus vaccine in Norway. J Infect Dis 2014; 211:206-15. [PMID: 25057044 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiu413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are ideally administered before HPV exposure; therefore, catch-up programs for girls past adolescence have not been readily funded. We evaluated the benefits and cost-effectiveness of a delayed, 1-year female catch-up vaccination program in Norway. METHODS We calibrated a dynamic HPV transmission model to Norwegian data and projected the costs and benefits associated with 8 HPV-related conditions while varying the upper vaccination age limit to 20, 22, 24, or 26 years. We explored the impact of vaccine protection in women with prior vaccine-targeted HPV infections, vaccine cost, coverage, and natural- and vaccine-induced immunity. RESULTS The incremental benefits and cost-effectiveness decreased as the upper age limit for catch-up increased. Assuming a vaccine cost of $150/dose, vaccination up to age 20 years remained below Norway's willingness-to-pay threshold (approximately $83 000/quality-adjusted life year gained); extension to age 22 years was cost-effective at a lower cost per dose ($50-$75). At high levels of vaccine protection in women with prior HPV exposure, vaccinating up to age 26 years was cost-effective. Results were stable with lower coverage. CONCLUSIONS HPV vaccination catch-up programs, 5 years after routine implementation, may be warranted; however, even at low vaccine cost per dose, the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating beyond age 22 years remains uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Burger
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen Sy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mari Nygård
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Department of Research, Oslo
| | - Ivar S Kristiansen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Burger EA, Nygård M, Gyrd-Hansen D, Moger TA, Kristiansen IS. Does the primary screening test influence women's anxiety and intention to screen for cervical cancer? A randomized survey of Norwegian women. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:360. [PMID: 24735469 PMCID: PMC4021156 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2013] [Accepted: 04/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Countries must decide whether or not to replace primary cytology-based screening with primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening. We aimed to assess how primary screening for an HPV infection, a sexually transmitted infection (STI), and the type of information included in the invitation letter, will affect screening intention. METHODS We randomized a representative sample of Norwegian women to one of three invitation letters: 1) Pap smear, 2) HPV testing or 3) HPV testing with additional information about the nature of the infection. Intention to participate, anxiety level and whether women intend to follow-up abnormal results were measured between groups using chi-squared and nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests. Determinants of intention were explored using logistic regression. RESULTS Responses from 3540 women were representative of the Norwegian population with respect to age, civil status and geographic location. No significant difference across invitation letters was found in women's stated intention to participate (range: 91.8-92.3%), anxiety (39-42% were either quite or very worried) or to follow-up after an abnormal result (range: 97.1-97.6%). Strength of intention to participate was only marginally lower for HPV-based invitation letters, albeit significant (p-value = 0.008), when measured on a scale. Only 36-40% of respondents given the HPV invitations correctly understood that they likely had an STI. CONCLUSIONS We found that switching to primary HPV screening, independent of additional information about HPV infections, is not likely to reduce screening participation rates or increase anxiety; however, women lacked the ability to interpret the meaning of an HPV-test result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Burger
- University of Oslo, Department of Health Management and Health Economics, PO BOX 1089, Blindern, Oslo 0137, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Burger EA, Kim JJ. The value of improving failures within a cervical cancer screening program: an example from Norway. Int J Cancer 2014; 135:1931-9. [PMID: 24615416 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2013] [Revised: 02/14/2014] [Accepted: 02/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Failures in cervical cancer (CC) screening include nonparticipation, underscreening and loss to follow-up of abnormal results. We estimated the long-term health benefits from and maximum investments in interventions targeted to improving compliance to guidelines while remaining cost-effective. We used a mathematical model empirically calibrated to simulate the natural history of CC in Norway. A baseline scenario reflecting current practice using cytology-based screening was compared to scenarios that target different sources of noncompliance: (i) failure to follow-up women with abnormal results, (ii) screening less frequently than recommended (i.e., underscreening) and (iii) absence of screening. A secondary analysis included human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening as the primary test. Model outcomes included reductions in lifetime cancer risk and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) resulting from improvements with compliance. Compared to the status quo, improving all sources of noncompliance leads to important health gains and produced positive INMBs across a range of developed-country willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. For example, a 2% increase in compliance could reduce lifetime cancer risk by 1-3%, depending on the targeted source of noncompliance and primary screening method. Assuming a WTP threshold of $83,000 per year of life saved and cytology-based screening, interventions that increase follow-up of abnormal results yielded the highest INMB per 2% increase in coverage [$19 ($10-21)]. With HPV-based screening, recruiting nonscreeners resulted in the largest INMB [$23 ($18-32)]. Considerable funds could be allocated toward policies that improve compliance with screening under the current cytology-based program or toward adoption of primary HPV-based screening while remaining cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Burger
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Prevention of HPV-related cancers in Norway: cost-effectiveness of expanding the HPV vaccination program to include pre-adolescent boys. PLoS One 2014; 9:e89974. [PMID: 24651645 PMCID: PMC3961226 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2013] [Accepted: 01/25/2014] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Increasingly, countries have introduced female vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV), causally linked to several cancers and genital warts, but few have recommended vaccination of boys. Declining vaccine prices and strong evidence of vaccine impact on reducing HPV-related conditions in both women and men prompt countries to reevaluate whether HPV vaccination of boys is warranted. Methods A previously-published dynamic model of HPV transmission was empirically calibrated to Norway. Reductions in the incidence of HPV, including both direct and indirect benefits, were applied to a natural history model of cervical cancer, and to incidence-based models for other non-cervical HPV-related diseases. We calculated the health outcomes and costs of the different HPV-related conditions under a gender-neutral vaccination program compared to a female-only program. Results Vaccine price had a decisive impact on results. For example, assuming 71% coverage, high vaccine efficacy and a reasonable vaccine tender price of $75 per dose, we found vaccinating both girls and boys fell below a commonly cited cost-effectiveness threshold in Norway ($83,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained) when including vaccine benefit for all HPV-related diseases. However, at the current market price, including boys would not be considered ‘good value for money.’ For settings with a lower cost-effectiveness threshold ($30,000/QALY), it would not be considered cost-effective to expand the current program to include boys, unless the vaccine price was less than $36/dose. Increasing vaccination coverage to 90% among girls was more effective and less costly than the benefits achieved by vaccinating both genders with 71% coverage. Conclusions At the anticipated tender price, expanding the HPV vaccination program to boys may be cost-effective and may warrant a change in the current female-only vaccination policy in Norway. However, increasing coverage in girls is uniformly more effective and cost-effective than expanding vaccination coverage to boys and should be considered a priority.
Collapse
|