Chronic viral hepatitis and the management of chronic renal failure

Effects of Iron Status on Adaptive Immunity and Vaccine Efficacy: A Review

Vaccines can prevent infectious diseases, but their efficacy varies, and factors impacting vaccine effectiveness remain unclear. Iron deficiency is the most common nutrient deficiency, affecting >2 billion individuals. It is particularly common in areas with high infectious disease burden and in groups that are routinely vaccinated, such as infants, pregnant women, and the elderly. Recent evidence suggests that iron deficiency and low serum iron (hypoferremia) not only cause anemia but also may impair adaptive immunity and vaccine efficacy. A report of human immunodeficiency caused by defective iron transport underscored the necessity of iron for adaptive immune responses and spurred research in this area. Sufficient iron is essential for optimal production of plasmablasts and IgG responses by human B-cells in vitro and in vivo. The increased metabolism of activated lymphocytes depends on the high-iron acquisition, and hypoferremia, especially when occurring during lymphocyte expansion, adversely affects multiple facets of adaptive immunity, and may lead to prolonged inhibition of T-cell memory. In mice, hypoferremia suppresses the adaptive immune response to influenza infection, resulting in more severe pulmonary disease. In African infants, anemia and/or iron deficiency at the time of vaccination predict decreased response to diphtheria, pertussis, and pneumococcal vaccines, and response to measles vaccine may be increased by iron supplementation. In this review, we examine the emerging evidence that iron deficiency may limit adaptive immunity and vaccine responses. We discuss the molecular mechanisms and evidence from animal and human studies, highlight important unknowns, and propose a framework of key research questions to better understand iron-vaccine interactions.

Seroconversion following Heplisav-B, hepatitis B vaccine (recombinant), adjuvanted, in patients with end-stage renal disease at an urban safety net hospital

PURPOSE

Heplisav-B is a novel recombinant adjuvanted vaccine for hepatitis B virus (HBV) that has been approved as a 2-dose regimen and shown to have similar seroconversion rates in healthy adults as single-antigen HBV vaccines. More data are needed to determine whether similarly high rates of seroconversion and immunity are observed in immunocompromised patient populations such as in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis.

METHODS

Patients with ESRD who presented for emergency-only hemodialysis and either were HBV vaccine naive or had a hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) titer of less than 10 IU/mL received 3 standard 20-μg doses of Heplisav-B at week 0, week 4 (±2 weeks), and week 24 (±2 weeks), with anti-HBs titer measured at week 28 (±2 weeks).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients received at least one dose in the study timeframe, with 24 patients completing the vaccine series and measurement of anti-HBs titer. The mean age of the patients was 46 years, and 58% of patients were male. Of the 24 patients who completed the vaccine series, 20 (83%) seroconverted after the third dose. Three of the 4 patients who did not seroconvert after 3 doses were revaccinated with an additional 20-μg dose, and 2 of the 3 patients had an anti-HBs titer of greater than 10 IU/mL 4 weeks after this dose.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ESRD who received three 20-μg doses of recombinant HBV vaccine had a seroconversion rate of 83%, representing a similar seroconversion rate and fewer doses of vaccine as compared to the standard HBV vaccine regimen for patients with ESRD.

Hybrid large hepatitis B surface protein composed of two viral genotypes C and D induces strongly cross-neutralizing antibodies

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination is known to effectively decrease the risk of HBV infection. However, several issues need to be addressed in order to develop an improved HBV vaccine. Although the HBV vaccine has been shown to be effective, this vaccine needs to be more efficacious in defined groups, including non-responders (i.e., individuals who do not develop a protective response even after vaccination) and in health care workers and travelers who require rapid protection. Furthermore, it has been reported that universal HBV vaccination has accelerated the appearance of vaccine-escape mutants resulting from the accumulation of mutations altering the "a" determinant of the hepatitis B surface (HBs) protein. To address these problems, we have been focusing on the large HBs (LHBs) protein, which consists of three domains: pre-S1, pre-S2, and S (in N- to C-terminal order). To enhance the immunogenicity of LHBs, we developed a yeast-derived hybrid LHBs (hy-LHBs) antigen composed of the LHBs proteins from two distinct genotypes (Genotypes C and D). The levels of antibodies induced by hy-LHBs immunization were high not only against S, but also against the pre-S1 and pre-S2 domains. Additionally, hy-LHBs immunization induced significantly more strongly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies than did small HBs (SHBs) or LHBs of any genotype alone. These findings suggested that hy-LHBs might serve as a candidate antigen for use in an improved prophylactic HBV vaccine.

Lamivudine in the Treatment of HBV-related Liver Disease after Renal Transplantation: An Update

Diminished survival due to hepatitis B has been observed after renal transplantation (RT). Lamivudine, a second-generation nucleoside analogue, has been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with normal renal function. Numerous clinical experiences with lamivudine after RT have been recently published. Despite numerous shortcomings, all of these reports have shown encouraging results. The rate of clearance of HBV viremia ranged between 67% and 100%, and the frequency of ALT normalization was between 50% and 100% with lamivudine use. Even patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, a serious form of HBV-related liver disease with ominous course, have been successfully treated with lamivudine. Lamivudine therapy significantly improved the survival of HBsAg positive renal allograft recipients. However, numerous issues concerning the treatment of hepatitis B after RT remain unclear: the optimal time to initiate lamivudine, the appropriate duration of antiviral therapy after RT, and the role for pre-transplantation liver biopsy. Also, the management of lamivudine resistance remains a concern for physicians. Clinical trials are under way.

The relationship between human leukocyte antigen-DP/DQ gene polymorphisms and the outcomes of HCV infection in a Chinese population

Background

Recently, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class-II gene polymorphisms have been reported to be related to Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and chronicity. The objective of this study was to explore the relationship of HLA-DP rs9277535 and HLA-DQ rs7453920 with the outcomes of HCV infection.

Methods

The rs9277535 and rs7453920 were genotyped in 370 subjects with chronic HCV infection, 194 subjects with spontaneous HCV clearance, and 973 subjects with non-HCV infection from the Chinese population using the ABI TaqMan allelic discrimination assay.

Results

Logistic regression analyses showed that the minor allele A of rs7453920 significantly increased the susceptibility of HCV infection in dominant model (adjusted OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04–1.71, P = 0.026) and additive models (adjusted OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06–1.60, P = 0.012). Rs9277535 A allele significantly increased the risk of chronic HCV infection in dominant model (adjusted OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.01–2.28, P = 0.046). Haplotype AA showed a higher risk of HCV infection than the most frequent haplotype GG (adjusted OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05–1.78, P = 0.018).

Conclusion

The HLA-DQ rs7453920 and -DP rs9277535 mutations were significantly associated with HCV infection susceptibility and chronicity, respectively.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12985-017-0901-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Immunogenicity and immunization costs of adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine in chronic kidney disease patients

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination is recommended for all susceptible chronic pre-hemodialysis and hemodialysis patients. This study assessed the immunogenicity of HBV vaccines (adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted) in chronic kidney disease patients vaccinated at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Spain) between January 2007 and July 2012. In addition, the costs for the health system were evaluated accor-ding to the proportion of vaccine responders after receiving either vaccine. Patients receiving 3 doses of hepatitis B adjuvanted vaccine were 3 times more likely to seroconvert than patients immunized with non-adjuvanted vaccines, OR 3.56 (95% CI 1.84-6.85). This resulted in fewer patients requiring a second course of HBV vaccination and fewer outpatient visits, saving more than €9,500 per 100 patients. The higher immunogenicity of the adjuvanted HBV vaccine would counterbalance the lower costs associated with the non-adjuvanted vaccine.

End stage renal disease patients have a skewed T cell receptor Vβ repertoire

BACKGROUND

End stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with defective T-cell mediated immunity. A diverse T-cell receptor (TCR) Vβ repertoire is central to effective T-cell mediated immune responses to foreign antigens. In this study, the effect of ESRD on TCR Vβ repertoire was assessed.

RESULTS

A higher proportion of ESRD patients (68.9 %) had a skewed TCR Vβ repertoire compared to age and cytomegalovirus (CMV) - IgG serostatus matched healthy individuals (31.4 %, P < 0.001). Age, CMV serostatus and ESRD were independently associated with an increase in shifting of the TCR Vβ repertoire. More differentiated CD8(+) T cells were observed in young ESRD patients with a shifted TCR Vβ repertoire. CD31-expressing naive T cells and relative telomere length of T cells were not significantly related to TCR Vβ skewing.

CONCLUSIONS

ESRD significantly skewed the TCR Vβ repertoire particularly in the elderly population, which may contribute to the uremia-associated defect in T-cell mediated immunity.

Immune response to hepatitis B vaccine among patients on hemodialysis

Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) poses a major health threat worldwide, where the magnitude and overburden of chronic carrier state approaches 150 million chronic carriers. The prevalence of HBV is greater among dialyzed patients compared to the general population owing to their increased vulnerability to blood and its products, along with hazards posed by contaminated hemodialysis tools and devices. An electronic systematic search of the published literature was carried and data on the immunological riposte to hepatitis B vaccination among hemodialysis patients was extracted from relevant studies. End stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis have a lower or an absolutely negative riposte to HBV vaccine. Several means have been tried to improve this response with some success, nevertheless none have been universally adopted. Genetic investigations are foreseen to make a break through concerning HBV vaccination.

Improving hepatitis B vaccine efficacy in end-stage renal diseases patients and role of adjuvants

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a serious global health problem.The prevalence of viral hepatitis is higher in dialysis patients than in the general population because of the opportunity for exposure during the dialysis procedure. Immunization is the most effective way to prevent transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hence the development of acute or chronic hepatitis B. It is well established that patients with end-stage renal disease including dialysis-dependent patients, have an impaired immune response to hepatitis B vaccine. End stage renal diseases (ESRD) patients have lower seroconversion rates compared with the subjects with intact renal function. Moreover, even after the completion of vaccination schedule anti-hepatitis B (anti-HBs) titers of responder dialysis, patients are low and decline logarithmically with time. The impaired efficacy of HBV vaccine in patients with ESRD has been attributed to numerous factors such as immune compromise because of uremia and some other factors. One approach to improve the immunogenicity of existing HBV vaccines is adjuvantation, and it's very important to find more effective adjutants for improving HBV vaccine efficacy. In this paper we have a brief review on recently known new ways for improving HBV vaccine efficacy.

Hepatitis B virus vaccine in chronic kidney disease: improved immunogenicity by adjuvants? A meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease typically show an impaired immune response to hepatitis B virus vaccine compared with healthy individuals. A variety of inherited or acquired factors have been implicated in this diminished response. Some authors suggested a benefit with adjuvantation to improve the immunogenicity of existing HBV vaccines.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvantation for hepatitis B virus vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

Only prospective, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird with heterogeneity and subgroups analyses. The primary end-point of interest was the seroprotection rate after HBV vaccination with recombinant vaccine plus adjuvants (study group) versus recombinant vaccine alone (control group).

RESULTS

We identified ten studies involving 1228 unique patients with chronic kidney disease. Pooling of study results did not show a significant increase in seroprotection rate among study (HBV recombinant vaccine plus adjuvants) versus control (HBV recombinant alone) patients; the pooled odds ratio of seroprotection rate was 1.47 (95% CI: 0.88; 2.46, NS). The pooled OR for seroresponse rate after HBV vaccine (adjuvanted recombinant vaccine versus recombinant vaccine alone) did not change in the subgroup of studies based on novel adjuvant systems (i.e., HBV-AS04 or HBV-AS02), the pooled OR was 2.22 (95% CI, 0.72; 6.78), NS. Q-test for heterogeneity being 10.819 (P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine did not significantly improve the seroprotection rate in patients with renal insufficiency. These results do not support adjuvantation as an approach to increase the immunogenicity of existing recombinant vaccines towards HBV in this high-risk population.

Good response to HBsAg vaccine in dialysis patients is associated with high CD4+/CD8+ ratio

OBJECTIVE

Chronic renal failure is accompanied by various abnormalities of innate and acquired, cellular and humoral immunity. We aimed to investigate whether positive Candida skin test results, CD4+ and CD8+, before the first dose of vaccination could be a predictor for antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination and the relation of these parameters with hepatitis B antibody levels 1 month after the last dose of vaccination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was carried out in 57 dialysis patients. All patients received recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (40 μg) given intramuscularly in the deltoid muscle in a four-dose schedule at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months. Candida skin test and lymphocyte subsets (CD4+ and CD8+) were determined before the first dose of vaccination and 1 month after the fourth inoculation of hepatitis B vaccine.

RESULTS

Ten patients (17.5%) were non-responders (HBsAb < 10 IU/L), while 47 patients (82.5%) were responders (HBsAb ≥ 10 IU/L). However, 29 patients (50.9%) were weak responders (HBsAb:10-100 IU/L), 18 patients (31.6%) good responders (HBsAb > 100 IU/L), which was determined 1 month after the fourth dose of vaccination. Thirty-nine patients (68.4%) and 44 patients (77.2%) were anergic to Candida skin test before the first dose and 1 month after fourth inoculation of hepatitis B vaccine, respectively. There was no relationship between Candida skin test and response to hepatitis B vaccination. Mean age was lower, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio measured both before and after vaccination was higher in good responders compared with that of weak responders and that of non-responders. Females were better responders than males.

CONCLUSION

High skin test anergy rate and low seroconversion rate after hepatitis B vaccination are important problems in patients on dialysis. Females, younger patients, and patients with higher CD4+/CD8+ ratio have better HBsAb antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination.

Meta-analysis: levamisole improves the immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing maintenance dialysis often fail to mount protective antibodies to hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) following vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV). Some authors have suggested that levamisole improves immune response to HBV vaccine in dialysis population. However, consistent information on this issue does not exist.

AIM

To evaluate efficacy and safety of levamisole as adjuvant to hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine in dialysis patients by performing a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

METHODS

We used the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. Only trials comparing the seroresponse rate in study subjects (levamisole plus HBV vaccine) vs. controls (HBV vaccine alone) were included. The end point of interest was the rate of patients showing seroprotective anti-hepatitis B titres at completion of HBV vaccine schedule in study vs. control groups.

RESULTS

We identified four studies involving 328 unique patients on regular dialysis. Only prospective, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. Pooling of study results showed a significant increase in response rates among study (levamisole plus HBV vaccine) vs. control (HBV vaccine alone) patients; the pooled Odds Ratio was 2.432 (95% Confidence Intervals, 1.34; 4.403), P = 0.002. No study heterogeneity was found. These results did not change in various subgroups of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that levamisole significantly improves immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in dialysis population. The limited number of patients precluded more conclusions.

The general picture of uremia

The clinical presentation and manifestations of uremia that constitute the uremic syndrome are presented. The first descriptions of patients with advanced or "terminal" renal failure who were treated with hemodialysis are evoked to illustrate the wide range of signs and symptoms that are associated even to a moderate decrease in renal function, presently referred to as chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-4. The kidney is a central organ guaranteeing the maintenance of the "milieu intérieur," where all the cells of the body are generated, develop, proliferate, and die. Chronic kidney disease, by altering the "milieu intérieur," may alter the metabolism of every type of cell or organ, leading to a wide scope of symptoms. The most frequently observed signs in daily clinical practice are summarized and put into the perspective of the renal physician. Disturbances of ion and water metabolism, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, anemia, mineral and bone disorders, endocrine, inmmunologic and neurologic syndromes are described. The addition of these clinical manifestations defines and describes each uremic patient as a specific individual. The pathophysiologic mechanisms by which each of these signs and symptoms appears and the particular compounds responsible for their occurrence, are described in depth in subsequent chapters of this issue.

KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients

The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially on the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.

A new adjuvant improves the immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in hemodialysis patients

Prehemodialysis and hemodialysis patients are at an increased risk of hepatitis B infection and have an impaired immune response to hepatitis B vaccines. We evaluated the immune response to the new adjuvant of hepatitis B vaccine AS04 (HBV-AS04) in this population. We measured antibody persistence for up to 42 months, and the anamnestic response and safety of booster doses in patients who were no longer seroprotected. The primary vaccination study showed that HBV-AS04 elicited an earlier antibody response and higher antibody titers than four double doses of standard hepatitis B vaccine. Seroprotection rates were significantly higher in HBV-AS04 recipients throughout the study. The decline in seroprotection over time was significantly less in the HBV-AS04 group with significantly fewer primed patients requiring a booster dose over the follow-up period. Solicited/unsolicited adverse events were rare following booster administration. Fifty-seven patients experienced a serious adverse event during the follow-up; none of which was vaccine related. When HBV-AS04 was used as the priming immunogen, the need for a booster dose occurred at a longer time compared to double doses of standard hepatitis B vaccine. Hence, in this population, the HBV-AS04 was immunogenic, safe, and well-tolerated both as a booster dose after HBV-AS04 or standard hepatitis B vaccine priming.

Percutaneous liver biopsy is safe in chronic hepatitis C patients with end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver biopsy is useful for staging fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) to determine renal transplant eligibility and to make CHC treatment decisions. There is concern about an increased risk associated with percutaneous liver biopsy (PCNB) in ESRD patients. We compared the safety of PCNB in CHC patients with and without ESRD.

METHODS

We reviewed PCNBs performed between 1996 and 2004 for technique, histology, and complications in 78 ESRD patients with CHC and in 241 control patients with CHC and no renal failure, randomly matched for age, sex, and race. Platelet counts, prothrombin, and partial thromboplastin times, but not bleeding times, were checked before biopsy. Deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin was not given before the biopsy.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 50 years; 72% were male, 97% were African American, and 3% were Caucasian. The control group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with advanced fibrosis (P < .04). Only 1 patient with ESRD (1.3%) developed a moderate complication. Five controls (2.1%) developed complications, 3 of which were severe.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe complications after PCNB are uncommon, and patients with ESRD and CHC are at no increased risk. Testing for bleeding time and the routine use of deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin are not necessary before PCNB in patients with ESRD.

Meta-analysis: the adjuvant role of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor on immunological response to hepatitis B virus vaccine in end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic dialysis patients often fail to produce protective antibodies to hepatitis B virus surface antigen after vaccination towards hepatitis B virus (HBV). Several authors suggested a benefit for granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as an adjuvant to HBV vaccination in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, consistent information is still lacking.

AIMS

To evaluate efficacy and safety of GM-CSF as adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccine in patients with ESRD by performing a systematic review with a meta-analysis of prospective controlled clinical trials (CCTs).

METHODS

Only trials comparing the seroresponse rate in study (GM-CSF plus HBV vaccine) versus control (HBV vaccine alone) patients were included. We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. The end-point of interest was the rate of patients showing seroprotective anti-hepatitis B titers at completion of HBV vaccine schedule in study versus control groups.

RESULTS

We identified seven studies involving 187 unique patients with ESRD. Only prospective CCTs were included. Pooling of study results showed a significant increase in response rates among study (GM-CSF plus HBV vaccine) versus control (HBV vaccine alone) patients (pooled Odds Ratio, 4.63 [95% Confidence Intervals, 1.42; 15.14]). The P-value was 0.02 for our test of study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed improved seroprotection rates with HBV vaccine after GM-CSF administration.

Distribution of HCV genotypes in patients with end-stage renal disease according to type of dialysis treatment

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of types of dialysis treatments on hepatitis C virus infection and the epidemiologic properties of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection at three Baskent University hospitals, in Ankara, Adana, and Izmir, Turkey, in 655, 326, and 118 patients with end-stage renal disease, respectively. One hundred thirty patients with HCV viremia among 271 patients with end-stage renal disease seropositive for HCV were included in this cross-sectional study. HCV RNA-positive patients were classified according to the renal replacement therapies (hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis), and viral load, transaminase levels, and distribution of genotypes were compared between these subgroups. In the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis group, 26 of 165 patients (16%) were serum anti-HCV positive, and 11 of 26 patients (42%) were serum HCV RNA positive. Twenty-six percent of the patients undergoing hemodialysis were anti-HCV positive, and 49% were HCV RNA positive. The prevalence of genotype 1b was 68% and 73% for patients in the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis groups, respectively. No significant differences were found between the genotype 1b and the non-1b groups or between different dialysis types with regard to age and sex and serum aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase, and HCV RNA levels. We conclude that HCV seropositivity may differ between different types of dialysis treatments, although viral load and genotypes may be similar in persons with end-stage renal disease and those without.

Meta-analysis: intradermal vs. intramuscular vaccination against hepatitis B virus in patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Dialysis patients have suboptimal response towards hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine and intradermal hepatitis B virus vaccination has been used to improve the response rate; however, its efficacy remains unclear.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of controlled trials comparing intradermal vs. intramuscular vaccine against HBV among chronic kidney disease patients.

IDENTIFICATION

Twelve studies involving 640 unique patients were included if they had controlled design, intervention and control group patients received intradermal or intramuscular vaccine against HBV, respectively. Patients were followed for a minimum of 7 months after the first vaccine dose.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The odds ratio of failure to respond to HBV vaccine among patients who received vaccine by intradermal vs. intramuscular route was the end point of interest. It was calculated at completion of HBV vaccination and over follow-up.

RESULTS

Pooling of study results demonstrated a decreased risk of failure to respond to HBV vaccine among patients who were vaccinated by intradermal vs. intramuscular route (pooled odds ratio at completion of vaccine protocol: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.21-0.62; test of study heterogeneity, P = 0.089). This difference did not occur over follow-up (6-60 months after completing vaccine schedule; pooled odds ratio: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.47-2.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Dialysis patients show higher seroprotection after intradermal than intramuscular vaccination schedules; this was not apparent over follow-up. Further studies are warranted to assess if the higher seroprotection rates obtained by intradermal route translates into reduced incidence of de novo HBV virus among chronic kidney disease patients.

Meta-analysis: the adjuvant role of thymopentin on immunological response to hepatitis B virus vaccine in end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

It has been calculated that 30-40% of dialysis patients fail to produce antibodies to HBsAg antigen after vaccination towards hepatitis B virus. Several authors have reported on the benefit of thymopentin (TP5) as adjuvant to vaccine against hepatitis B virus in patients receiving regular dialysis. However, consistent information on this issue is still lacking.

AIMS

To evaluate efficacy and safety of thymopentin as adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccine in dialysis patients by performing a systematic review with a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

METHODS

We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 11 studies involving 272 unique patients with end-stage renal disease. Only prospective, controlled trials were included. Pooling of study results did not show a significant increase in seroresponse rate among study (thymopentin plus hepatitis B virus vaccine) vs. control (hepatitis B virus vaccine alone) patients; the pooled odds ratio of failure to respond to hepatitis B virus vaccine was 0.677 (95% confidence intervals: 0.285-1.605); no heterogeneity was found (P = 0.0001). Thymopentin significantly improved the seroresponse rate in the subgroup of trials based on greater thymopentin doses (OR: 0.184; 95% CI: 0.085-0.398).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that thymopentin significantly improved the seroresponse rate towards hepatitis B vaccine only in dialysis patients treated with higher thymopentin doses. The limited number of patients precluded definitive conclusions.

Meta-analysis: the dialysis mode and immunological response to hepatitis B virus vaccine in dialysis population

BACKGROUND

Patients on maintenance dialysis typically show a suboptimal immune response to hepatitis B virus vaccine compared with the non-uraemic population. Some authors have claimed that dialysis mode has an impact on the immune response to hepatitis B virus vaccine but consistent information is lacking on this issue.

AIM

To evaluate the relationship between dialysis mode and immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in dialysis population by performing a systematic review with a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

METHOD

We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird; sources of heterogeneity in effect estimates were explored by performing sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The relative risk of failure to respond to hepatitis B vaccine among patients who underwent maintenance haemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis was the end point of interest. We identified 14 clinical trials involving 1211 unique patients on maintenance dialysis. Pooling of study results did not show a significant decreased risk of response to hepatitis B vaccine among haemodialysis patients (overall risk ratio: 1.0, 95% confidence intervals: 0.92-1.1). The P-value was 0.13 for our test of study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant link between dialysis mode and seroresponse to hepatitis B virus vaccine in dialysis population.

HBsAg seropositive status and survival after renal transplantation: meta-analysis of observational studies

The natural history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after renal transplantation (RT) remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review of the published medical literature on the impact of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) seropositivity on survival of RT recipients. We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to generate a summary estimate of the relative risk for mortality and graft loss in HBsAg positive RT recipients across the published studies. We identified six observational studies (6050 unique patients); all of them being cohort, retrospective studies. Pooling of study results demonstrated that HBsAg in serum was an independent and significant risk factor for death after RT; the summary estimate for relative risk was 2.49 with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 1.64-3.78. A test for homogeneity of the relative risk across the studies gave a p-value of <0.0001. HBsAg seropositivity was an independent and significant risk factor for graft failure after RT; the summary estimate was 1.44 with a 95% CI of 1.02-2.04 (homogeneity test, p <0.0001). This meta-analysis shows that HBsAg positive RT recipients have an increased risk for mortality and graft failure compared to seronegative patients.

Should patients with chronic hepatitis C infection be transplanted?

Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection affects more than 170 million people throughout the world and 2 to 3 million Americans. End-stage liver disease secondary to chronic HCV infection is the most frequent indication for liver transplantation in this country. Currently, the gold standard for treatment for immunocompetent patients is a combination of peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin for 6 to 12 months depending on the genotype. This treatment achieves a sustained virological response (SVR) in 54% to 61% of patients overall. Almost 50% of patients do not respond or have recurrences posttreatment and progress in over 10 to 20 years into chronic liver disease and its complications. Liver transplantation is the only therapeutic modality that impacts on quality of life and survival of these patients. However, recurrence of HCV in the new allograft is universal with accelerated progression to cirrhosis in 5 to 10 years. Response to treatment is usually low (20% to 30%), and associated with significant side effects and depression. A significant percentage of patients with recurrent HCV after transplantation require retransplantation to control the complications of end-stage liver disease. Other solid organ transplants recipients already HCV-positive, or infected at the time of transplantation from blood transfusions or an infected graft, develop accelerated, progressive liver disease facilitated by the adverse effects of immunosuppression in addition to HCV replication. To prevent morbidity, mortality, and high costs related to the consequences of HCV infection, all solid organ transplant candidates should be tested for HCV infection and treated appropriately with PEG-IFN and ribavirin prior to transplantation.

Meta-analysis: the effect of age on immunological response to hepatitis B vaccine in end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

Patients on maintenance dialysis typically show a suboptimal immune response to hepatitis B virus vaccine compared with the non-uraemic population. A variety of inherited or acquired factors have been implicated in this diminished response. Age-associated changes in immune status may contribute to decreased vaccine efficacy in older individuals although contradictory results have been reported in individuals with normal kidney function.

AIMS

To evaluate the relationship between age and immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in patients with end-stage renal disease by performing a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

METHOD

We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird; sources of heterogeneity in effect estimates were explored by performing sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 17 clinical trials (1800 unique patients); six (35%) were controlled studies. Pooling of study results demonstrated a significantly decreased risk of response to hepatitis B vaccine among older dialysis patients (overall risk ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence intervals: 0.70-0.79). The P-value was 0.0139 for our test of study heterogeneity. A lowered risk of response to hepatitis B vaccine persisted after exclusion of trials based on plasma-derived vaccines; it was present even when 'older' individuals were defined as being as 50 years (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.96) or more (cut-off 60 years RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.85). An effect of age on seroprotection rate was present in all clinical reports, irrespective of the geographic origin of the study group: Europe (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.70-0.83) North America (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.60-0.74) or other countries (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.97). Additional doses of vaccine did not appear to have an impact on RR of response by age.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed a clear association between older age and impaired response to hepatitis B virus vaccine in end-stage renal disease patients. Such a relationship is biologically plausible. Vaccination schedules with adapted vaccine doses and frequent serum testing for loss of immunity against hepatitis B virus are recommended in elderly patients on maintenance dialysis.

Preemptive lamivudine therapy based on HBV DNA level in HBsAg-positive kidney allograft recipients

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive kidney transplant recipients have increased liver-related mortality. The impact of lamivudine treatment on patient survival, the optimal time to start treatment, and the feasibility of discontinuing treatment have not been determined. This study examined these issues with a novel management protocol. Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were measured serially in HBsAg-positive kidney transplant recipients, and lamivudine was administered preemptively to patients with increasing HBV DNA levels with or without elevation of aminotransferase levels. Outcomes of patients who underwent transplantation before or after institution of this preemptive management strategy (in January 1996) were compared. Eleven de novo patients (91.7%) who underwent transplantation between 1996 and 2000 and 15 existing patients (39.5%) who underwent transplantation between 1983 and 1995 received preemptive lamivudine therapy for 32.6 +/- 13.3 months. The treatment criteria were met by de novo patients at 8.4 +/- 6.2 months (range, 1-18 months) after transplantation. Suppression of HBV DNA and normalization of aminotransferase levels were achieved in all treated patients, and 21.4% had hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion. The survival of preemptively managed de novo transplant patients was similar to that of HBsAg-negative controls, whereas HBsAg-positive patients who underwent transplantation before January 1996 had inferior survival (relative risk of death, 9.7 [P <.001]; relative risk of liver-related mortality, 68.0 [P <.0001]). Eleven patients (40.7%) developed lamivudine resistance. Discontinuation of lamivudine was attempted in 12 low-risk patients after stabilization and was successful in 5 (41.7%). In conclusion, preemptive lamivudine therapy based on serial HBV DNA levels and clinical monitoring improved the survival of HBsAg-positive renal allograft recipients. Treatment can be discontinued safely in selected patients after stabilization to minimize the selection of drug-resistant HBV mutants.

Hepatitis C infection and the patient with end-stage renal disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and is an important cause of liver disease in this population. Acquisition of HCV infection continues to occur in dialysis patients because of nosocomial spread. The natural history of HCV in dialysis patients remains controversial because the course of HCV typically extends over decades, whereas dialysis patients have higher morbidity and mortality rates than those of the general population limiting long-term follow-up. However, recent reports suggest that HCV infection affects the survival of chronic dialysis patients as well as renal transplant (RT) recipients. The severity of preexisting liver disease on pretransplantation liver biopsy may provide useful prognostic information about clinical outcome after RT; liver biopsy should be incorporated in the evaluation and management of RT candidates with HCV. Recent surveys with long-term follow-up have documented adverse effects of HCV on patient and graft survival. Use of renal grafts from HCV-infected donors in recipients with HCV does not appear to result in a greater burden of liver disease albeit with short-term follow-up. There is only limited data about interferon (IFN) therapy in chronic dialysis patients, although sustained responses are reported. Preliminary data on IFN plus ribavirin therapy in dialysis patients with hepatitis C have given encouraging results, but randomized trials are needed. Interferon remains contraindicated post-RT because of concern about precipitating graft dysfunction.

Twelve months of lamivudine treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection increases morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Lamivudine has shown promising results in patients with chronic hepatitis B, but experience with its use in RTR is limited.

METHODS

In a prospective, open labeled, uncontrolled trial, 19 HBsAg(+) RTR were treated with lamivudine for 12 months. HBV-serologic analysis, HBV-DNA quantitation, and HBV genome sequence analysis were performed every 3 months.

RESULTS

At baseline 16 patients were HBV DNA(+), 12 patients were HBeAg(+)/Ab (-). After 3 months HBV DNA was negative in 80% of patients. In the 3 patients with elevated liver enzymes, normal values were achieved within 12 weeks. At 12 months 4 of 8 HBeAg(+)/Ab(-) patients on treatment showed HBeAb, two of them with loss of HBeAg. Three patients developed mutations of the HBV polymerase gene associated with lamivudine resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamivudine is safe and effective in HB-sAg(+) RTR, the rate of HBe-seroconversion and of lamivudine-resistance is comparable to that of nonimmunosuppressed patients.

Role of haemodialysis and hepatitis c virus infection in spontaneous and induced cytokine production of patients with chronic renal disease

Cytokines modulate general and virus infection-related host immune responses. We have investigated cytokine responses in chronic renal disease patients with regard to haemodialysis and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Compared with healthy subjects with normal renal function (n=15), non-dialyzed/renal disease individuals without HCV infection (n=11) showed increased production of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL-)6, IL-10, interferon (IFN-)gamma and IL-12 by blood mononuclear cells (P<0.05). These inflammatory cytokine responses were abolished in haemodialysis patients (n=37;P<0.05), except for IL-12. This hyporesponsiveness in haemodialysis patients was more evident in stimulatory conditions, as shown by the consistent inhibition of IFN-gamma production, and the failure of exogenous IFN-gamma to prime for IL-12 inducibility (P<0.01). The disturbed cytokine response appeared to focus in the T-helper lymphocyte phenotype 1 (Th(1)) because the stimulation of IL-6 and IL-10 (Th(2)phenotype cytokines) was not impaired. The pattern of response was similar among haemodialysis patients with (n=24) or without (n=13) HCV infection. However, HCV-positive haemodialysis patients had a blunted TNF-alpha response (P<0.05) and failed to increase the stimulated IFN-gamma and IL-12 production (P<0.01) compared with chronic hepatitis C patients without renal disease (n=25). On the contrary, IL-10 stimulation was higher in HCV-positive haemodialysis patients (P<0.01). These results disclose the presence in haemodialysis patients of markedly abnormal general and HCV infection-related cytokine responses; the inhibitory alterations appear to affect predominantly the stimulated responses via the Th(1)subset and its relationship with monocyte response with possible pathogenic and therapeutic implications.

Chronic hepatitis C infection in patients with end stage renal disease: characterization of liver histology and viral load in patients awaiting renal transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is common in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) awaiting renal transplantation (RT). However, few data are available on the liver histology and viral titer in these patients relative to patients with HCV and normal renal function. The aims of this study were to assess liver histology, quantitative HCV-RNA titer, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in patients with ESRD awaiting RT, and to identify clinical predictors of histological progression to advanced bridging fibrosis and/or cirrhosis.

METHODS

A total of 50 consecutive patients (mean age 42 yr, 62% male) with ESRD and HCV, who were awaiting RT, underwent liver biopsy. Two HCV populations, one with persistently normal ALT and another with elevated ALT, both with normal renal function, served as controls. HCV-RNA titer was assessed by quantitative PCR.

RESULTS

Of the patients with ESRD, 94% had normal ALT. Log HCV RNA titer was significantly higher in patients with ESRD (5.8+/-0.3) than in either normal ALT (5.4+/-0.1) or elevated ALT (5.3+/-0.1) controls (p < 0.05). Knodell Histological Activity Index (HAI) in patients with ESRD was similar to that observed in control patients with normal ALT (4.8+/-0.4 vs 4.9+/-0.4) but significantly less (p < 0.05) than that observed in control patients with elevated ALT (8.4+/-0.5). The percentage of patients with bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis was similar in patients with ESRD and controls with persistently normal ALT (22% vs 13%) but significantly less (p < 0.001) than that observed in control patients with elevated ALT (48%). No significant differences in ALT, HCV-RNA titer, duration on hemodialysis, or time from first possible exposure was observed between ESRD patients with advance fibrosis (n = 11) and those with mild disease (n = 39).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that liver biopsy is necessary to exclude significant liver pathology in patients with HCV and ESRD, and to help define those patients in whom interferon treatment might be helpful.

Persistence of infectious hepadnavirus in the offspring of woodchuck mothers recovered from viral hepatitis

Mother-to-child transmission is an important route for hepatitis B virus (HBV) dissemination. It has been established that HBV traces persist for years after complete clinical recovery from hepatitis B. Similarly, resolution of hepatitis caused by HBV-related woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV) is followed by occult lifelong carriage of pathogenic virus. In this study, we documented that WHV persisting after termination of acute hepatitis is transmittable to newborns as an asymptomatic long-term infection. All 11 offspring from 4 dams studied carried transcriptionally active WHV genomes for 3.5 years after birth without immunovirological markers of infection. WHV genomes and mRNA were detected both in the liver and lymphoid tissue in the majority of offspring; WHV covalently closed circular DNA was detected in some samples. In 4 offspring, however, the virus was restricted to the lymphatic system. In the circulation, WHV DNA-reactive particles were DNase resistant and of comparable size and density to complete virions. Importantly, the virus in offspring with or without hepatic WHV DNA expression was infectious to WHV-naive woodchucks. Finally, offspring challenged with WHV were not protected against reinfection. These findings show that mothers with occult hepadnaviral carriage transmit pathogenic virus to their offspring, inducing a persistent infection invariably within the lymphatic system but not always in the liver.

Universal precautions prevent hepatitis C virus transmission: a 54 month follow-up of the Belgian Multicenter Study. The Universitaires Cliniques St-Luc (UCL) Collaborative Group

The isolation of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) in hemodialyzed (HD) patients has been repeatedly advocated to prevent nosocomial HCV transmission. We evaluated the incidence of seroconversion for HCV in Belgian HD patients, and demonstrate the complete prevention of HCV transmission by adherence to the universal precautions advocated by the Centers for Disease Control (Atlanta, GA, USA). All (N = 963) HD patients from 15 units, none of which isolates anti-HCV positive patients, were tested by a second or third generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (with confirmation by a second- or third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay or the polymerase chain reaction) every 18 months from May 1991 to November 1995. Follow-up was available in 488 patients (drop-outs resulting from death or transplantation mainly). The yearly incidence of seroconversion for HCV over the initial 18 months was 1.41%, with evidence suggestive of nosocomial HCV transmission. Universal precautions were therefore reinforced. The incidence of seroconversion subsequently fell to 0.56% and 0%, respectively (P = 0.014), despite the facts that the average transfusion load and the proportion of patients with dialyzer reuse or with monitors disinfected after each session did not change significantly. We conclude that the strict enforcement of universal precautions fully prevents HCV transmission to HD patients. The isolation of anti-HCV positive patients is not warranted.

Hepatitis C virus and organ transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is both the leading cause of cirrhosis and hepatic failure leading to liver transplantation and a cause of chronic hepatitis in approximately 10% of all transplant recipients. Beginning 5-10 years or more posttransplant, HCV causes progressive liver disease in a significant fraction of infected individuals and contributes to an increased incidence of opportunistic infection and hepatocellular carcinoma. The existence of multiple genotypes of HCV with differing biologic behaviors and the generation of antigenic diversity of the virus (quasispecies) during the course of infection, limit the capacity of the immune system to generate protective immunity. Antiviral therapy with interferon-alpha is effective in only a minority of transplant patients, and since allografts from HCV infected donors are quite efficient in transmitting the virus, great attention is paid to the appropriate use of organs from HCV-positive donors. At present, these organs should be particularly targeted for patients in emergent need of lifesaving heart, liver, or lung transplants. Issues requiring further investigation include the impact of viral superinfection on HCV-infected recipients of organs from HCV-infected donors and the use of such organs in seronegative patients who are older, diabetic, or highly sensitized, for whom quality of life issues may outweigh the long-term impact of HCV infection.