Deletion of the CD4 silencer element supports a stochastic mechanism of thymocyte lineage commitment

Immune System in Action

Tumor exists as a complex network of structures with an ability to evolve and evade the host immune surveillance mechanism. The immune milieu which includes macrophages, dendritic cells, natural killer cells, neutrophils, mast cells, B cells, and T cells is found in the core, the invasive margin, or the adjacent stromal or lymphoid component of the tumor. The immune infiltrate is heterogeneous and varies within a patient and between patients of the same tumor histology. The location, density, functionality, and the crosstalk between the immune cells in the tumor microenvironment influence the nature of immune response, prognosis, and treatment outcomes in cancer patients. Therefore, an understanding of the characteristics of the immune cells and their role in tumor immune surveillance is of paramount importance to identify immune targets and to develop novel immune therapeutics in the war against cancer. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the individual components of the human immune system and the translational relevance of predictive biomarkers.

A Review on Bovine Mastitis with Special Focus on CD4 as a Potential Candidate Gene for Mastitis Resistance – A Review

Mastitis is аn inflammation оf thе mammary gland, caused by the invasion and duplication оf Escherichia coli (E. coli), Staphylococcus uberis (S. uberis) аnd Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) аnd а wide variety оf оthеr microorganisms thrоugh teat оr damaged nipple, decreasing potential milk production іn thе affected quarter оf mammary gland. Economic, animal productivity, international trade and animal welfare issues associated with mastitis play an important role in the agricultural industry. Therefore, worldwide dairy cattle breeding programmes are trying to breed cows wіth improved resistance tо mastitis. Mastitis can’t be eliminated but can be reduced to a low level. It can be achieved by breeding strategies, reducing the exposure to pathogen and increasing the resistance to intramammary infection. Numerous therapeutic, prophylactic аnd management techniques аrе uѕеd аѕ control and reduce the mastitis. However, а widely proposed strategy marker assisted selection uѕіng candidate gene approach which іѕ based оn improving thе host genetics. One of them is cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) gene, which is а glycoprotein located оn receptors оf immune cells. CD4 exhibit аn essential role іn a variety of inflammation related conditions іn mаnу species. Therefore, CD4 as a candidate gene for resistance to mastitis has received considerable attention. The review is based on a study of CD4 in association with improving resistance to mastitis and it may be helpful in formulating breeding programmes and marker assisted selection to lower the mastitis.

Overview of Basic Immunology and Clinical Application

Tumor exists as a complex network of structures with an ability to evolve and evade the host immune surveillance mechanism. The immune milieu which includes macrophages, dendritic cells, natural killer cells, neutrophils, mast cells, B cells, and T cells are found in the core, the invasive margin, or the adjacent stromal or lymphoid component of the tumor. The immune infiltrate is heterogeneous and varies within a patient and between patients of the same tumor histology. The location, density, functionality, and cross-talk between the immune cells in the tumor microenvironment influence the nature of immune response, prognosis, and treatment outcomes in cancer patients. Therefore, an understanding of the characteristics of the immune cells and their role in tumor immune surveillance is of paramount importance to identify immune targets and to develop novel immune therapeutics in the war against cancer. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the individual components of the human immune system and the translational relevance of predictive biomarkers.

CD4 Helper and CD8 Cytotoxic T Cell Differentiation

A fundamental question in developmental immunology is how bipotential thymocyte precursors generate both CD4⁺ helper and CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cell lineages. The MHC specificity of αβ T cell receptors (TCRs) on precursors is closely correlated with cell fate-determining processes, prompting studies to characterize how variations in TCR signaling are linked with genetic programs establishing lineage-specific gene expression signatures, such as exclusive CD4 or CD8 expression. The key transcription factors ThPOK and Runx3 have been identified as mediating development of helper and cytotoxic T cell lineages, respectively. Together with increasing knowledge of epigenetic regulators, these findings have advanced our understanding of the transcription factor network regulating the CD4/CD8 dichotomy. It has also become apparent that CD4⁺ T cells retain developmental plasticity, allowing them to acquire cytotoxic activity in the periphery. Despite such advances, further studies are necessary to identify the molecular links between TCR signaling and the nuclear machinery regulating expression of ThPOK and Runx3.

Runx-dependent and silencer-independent repression of a maturation enhancer in the Cd4 gene

An intronic silencer, S4, in the Cd4 gene has been shown to be responsible for the helper-lineage-specific expression of CD4; S4 requires Runx complex binding to exert its silencer function against the enhancer-mediated Cd4 activation by modulating the epigenetic state of the Cd4 gene. Here we identify a late-acting maturation enhancer. Bcl11b plays essential roles for activation of both the early-acting proximal enhancer and maturation enhancer of Cd4. Notably, Runx complexes suppress these enhancers by distinct mechanisms. Whereas repression of the proximal enhancer depends on the S4 silencer, the maturation enhancer is repressed by Runx in the absence of S4. Moreover, ThPOK, known to antagonize S4-mediated Cd4 repression, assists Runx complexes to restrain maturation enhancer activation. Distinct modes of S4 silencer action upon distinct enhancers thus unravel a pathway that restricts CD4 expression to helper-lineage cells by silencer-independent and Runx-dependent repression of maturation enhancer activity in cytotoxic-lineage cells.

The commitment of helper and cytotoxic lineages for CD4 and CD8 T cells, respectively, is associated with the regulation of Cd4 gene expression. Here the authors show that an intronic silencer, S4, has differential effects and synergy with the RUNX complex to act on two enhancer elements of the CD4 gene to control T cell lineage commitment in the thymus.

What Happens in the Thymus Does Not Stay in the Thymus: How T Cells Recycle the CD4+-CD8+ Lineage Commitment Transcriptional Circuitry To Control Their Function

MHC-restricted CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells are at the core of most adaptive immune responses. Although these cells carry distinct functions, they arise from a common precursor during thymic differentiation, in a developmental sequence that matches CD4 and CD8 expression and functional potential with MHC restriction. Although the transcriptional control of CD4(+)-CD8(+) lineage choice in the thymus is now better understood, less was known about what maintains the CD4(+) and CD8(+) lineage integrity of mature T cells. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms that establish in the thymus, and maintain in postthymic cells, the separation of these lineages. We focus on recent studies that address the mechanisms of epigenetic control of Cd4 expression and emphasize how maintaining a transcriptional circuitry nucleated around Thpok and Runx proteins, the key architects of CD4(+)-CD8(+) lineage commitment in the thymus, is critical for CD4(+) T cell helper functions.

Control of Regulatory T Cell Differentiation by the Transcription Factors Thpok and LRF

The CD4⁺ lineage-specific transcription factor Thpok is required for intrathymic CD4⁺ T cell differentiation and, together with its homolog LRF, supports CD4⁺ T cell helper effector responses. However, it is not known whether these factors are needed for the regulatory T cell (Treg) arm of MHC class II responses. In this study, by inactivating in mice the genes encoding both factors in differentiated Tregs, we show that Thpok and LRF are redundantly required to maintain the size and functions of the postthymic Treg pool. They support IL-2-mediated gene expression and the functions of the Treg-specific factor Foxp3. Accordingly, Treg-specific disruption of Thpok and Lrf causes a lethal inflammatory syndrome similar to that resulting from Treg deficiency. Unlike in conventional T cells, Thpok and LRF functions in Tregs are not mediated by their repression of the transcription factor Runx3. Additionally, we found that Thpok is needed for the differentiation of thymic Treg precursors, an observation in line with the fact that Foxp3⁺ Tregs are CD4⁺ cells. Thus, a common Thpok-LRF node supports both helper and regulatory arms of MHC class II responses.

Heritable Gene Regulation in the CD4:CD8 T Cell Lineage Choice

The adaptive immune system is dependent on functionally distinct lineages of T cell antigen receptor αβ-expressing T cells that differentiate from a common progenitor in the thymus. CD4⁺CD8⁺ progenitor thymocytes undergo selection following interaction with MHC class I and class II molecules bearing peptide self-antigens, giving rise to CD8⁺ cytotoxic and CD4⁺ helper or regulatory T cell lineages, respectively. The strict correspondence of CD4 and CD8 expression with distinct cellular phenotypes has made their genes useful surrogates for investigating molecular mechanisms of lineage commitment. Studies of Cd4 and Cd8 transcriptional regulation have uncovered cis-regulatory elements that are critical for mediating epigenetic modifications at distinct stages of development to establish heritable transcriptional programs. In this review, we examine the epigenetic mechanisms involved in Cd4 and Cd8 gene regulation during T cell lineage specification and highlight the features that make this an attractive system for uncovering molecular mechanisms of heritability.

Overview of Basic Immunology for Clinical Investigators

Tumor exists as a complex network of structures with an ability to evolve and evade the host immune surveillance mechanism. The immune milieu which includes macrophages, dendritic cells, natural killer cells, neutrophils, mast cells, B cells, and T cells are found in the core, the invasive margin, or the adjacent stromal or lymphoid component of the tumor. The immune infiltrate is heterogeneous and varies within a patient and between patients of the same tumor histology. The location, density, functionality, and the cross talk between the immune cells in the tumor microenvironment influence the nature of immune response, prognosis, and treatment outcomes in cancer patients. Therefore, an understanding of the characteristics of the immune cells and their role in tumor immune surveillance is of paramount importance to identify immune targets and to develop novel immune therapeutics in the war against cancer. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the individual components of the human immune system and the translational relevance of predictive biomarkers.

Views on helper/cytotoxic lineage choice from a bottom-up approach

There has been speculation as to how bi-potent CD4(+)  CD8(+) double-positive precursor thymocytes choose their distinct developmental fate, becoming either CD4(+) helper or CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells. Based on the clear correlation of αβT cell receptor (TCR) specificity to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) classes with this lineage choice, various studies have attempted to resolve this question by examining the cellular signaling events initiated by TCR engagements, a strategy referred to as a 'top-down' approach. On the other hand, based on the other correlation of CD4/CD8 co-receptor expression with its selected fate, other studies have addressed this question by gradually unraveling the sequential mechanisms that control the phenotypic outcome of this fate decision, a method known as the 'bottom-up' approach. Bridging these two approaches will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of how TCR signals are coupled with developmental programs in the nucleus. Advances made during the last two decades seemed to make these two approaches more closely linked. For instance, identification of two transcription factors, ThPOK and Runx3, which play central roles in the development of helper and cytotoxic lineages, respectively, provided significant insights into the transcriptional network that controls a CD4/CD8 lineage choice. This review summarizes achievements made using the 'bottom-up' approach, followed by a perspective on future pathways toward coupling TCR signaling with nuclear programs.

ThPOK represses CXXC5, which induces methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 in Cd40lg promoter by association with SUV39H1: implications in repression of CD40L expression in CD8+ cytotoxic T cells

CD40 ligand is induced in CD4(+) Th cells upon TCR stimulation and provides an activating signal to B cells, making CD40 ligand an important molecule for Th cell function. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms, whereby CD40 ligand becomes expressed on the cell surface in T cells remain unclear. Here, we showed that CD40 ligand expression in CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells was suppressed by combined epigenetic regulations in the promoter region of the Cd40lg gene, such as the methylation of CpG dinucleotides, histone H3 lysine 9, histone H3 lysine 27, and histone H4 lysine 20. As the transcription factor Th-inducing pox virus and zinc finger/Kruppel-like factor (encoded by the Zbtb7b gene) is critical in Th cell development, we focused on the role of Th-inducing pox virus and zinc finger/Kruppel-like factor in CD40 ligand expression. We found that CD40 ligand expression is moderately induced by retroviral Thpok transduction into CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells, which was accompanied by a reduction of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in the promoter region of the Cd40lg gene. Th-inducing pox virus and zinc finger/Kruppel-like factor directly inhibited the expression of murine CXXC5, a CXXC-type zinc finger protein that induced histone H3 lysine 9 methylation, in part, through an interaction with the histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SUV39H1. In addition, to inhibit CD40 ligand induction in activated CD4(+) T cells by the CXXC5 transgene, our findings indicate that CXXC5 was one of the key molecules contributing to repressing CD40 ligand expression in CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells.

Regulation of CD4 and CD8 coreceptor expression and CD4 versus CD8 lineage decisions

During blood cell development, hematopoietic stem cells generate diverse mature populations via several rounds of binary fate decisions. At each bifurcation, precursors adopt one fate and inactivate the alternative fate either stochastically or in response to extrinsic stimuli and stably maintain the selected fates. Studying of these processes would contribute to better understanding of etiology of immunodeficiency and leukemia, which are caused by abnormal gene regulation during the development of hematopoietic cells. The CD4(+) helper versus CD8(+) cytotoxic T-cell fate decision serves as an excellent model to study binary fate decision processes. These two cell types are derived from common precursors in the thymus. Positive selection of their TCRs by self-peptide presented on either MHC class I or class II triggers their fate decisions along with mutually exclusive retention and silencing of two coreceptors, CD4 and CD8. In the past few decades, extensive effort has been made to understand the T-cell fate decision processes by studying regulation of genes encoding the coreceptors and selection processes. These studies have identified several key transcription factors and gene regulatory networks. In this chapter, I will discuss recent advances in our understanding of the binary cell fate decision processes of T cells.

A silencer-proximal intronic region is required for sustained CD4 expression in postselection thymocytes

It has been proposed that differential kinetics of CD4/CD8 coreceptors regulate fate choice of selected thymocytes. Sustained signals by interaction between MHC class II and TCR/CD4 is required for commitment to the CD4 helper lineage. Although prematurely terminated MHC-TCR/CD4 interaction in transgenic mouse models results in lineage redirection, it is unclear whether CD4 expression is actively maintained by endogenous cis-elements to facilitate prolonged signaling under physiological conditions. In this article, we show that sustained CD4 expression in postselection thymocytes requires an intronic sequence containing an uncharacterized DNase I hypersensitivity (DHS) site located 3' to the silencer. Despite normal CD4 expression before selection, thymocytes lacking a 1.5-kb sequence in intron 1 including the 0.4-kb silencer and the DHS, but not the 0.4-kb silencer alone, failed to maintain CD4 expression upon positive selection and are redirected to the CD8 lineage after MHC class II-restricted selection. Furthermore, CpG dinucleotides adjacent to the DHS are hypermethylated in CD8(+) T cells. These results indicate that the 1.5-kb cis-element is required in postselection thymocytes for helper lineage commitment, presumably mediating the maintenance of CD4 expression, and suggest that inactivation of the cis-element by DNA methylation may contribute to epigenetic Cd4 silencing.

Stage-specific epigenetic gene silencing during thymocyte lineage commitment

During lineage commitment, precursor cells must establish their signature gene expression programs to endow them with the requisite set of cellular functions. To maintain cellular identity, the gene expression program must be inherited stably by progeny of lineage-committed cells. Epigenetic regulation serves as a central mechanism to maintain such cellular memory. Although a lot of progress has been made in the last decade towards defining the spectrum of epigenetic modifications on histones and DNA, as well as the relevant enzymatic machinery, the mechanisms by which these modifiers are controlled during development remain poorly understood. Gene regulation at the Cd4 and Thpok loci provides ideal models for developmentally regulated gene silencing. A single transcriptional silencer at each locus establishes heritable, irreversible epigenetic silencing only in lineage-committed cells, whereas the same silencer elements establish a reversible repressive state in precursor cells. The dynamic versus permanent silencing of developmentally regulated loci by the stage-specific functions of silencers will be discussed in the context of cell lineage commitment.

Transcriptional control of CD4 and CD8 coreceptor expression during T cell development

The differentiation and function of peripheral helper and cytotoxic T cell lineages is coupled with the expression of CD4 and CD8 coreceptor molecules, respectively. This indicates that the control of coreceptor gene expression is closely linked with the regulation of CD4/CD8 lineage decision of DP thymocytes. Research performed during the last two decades revealed comprehensive mechanistic insight into the developmental stage- and subset/lineage-specific regulation of Cd4, Cd8a and Cd8b1 (Cd8) gene expression. These studies provided important insight into transcriptional control mechanisms during T cell development and into the regulation of cis-regulatory networks in general. Moreover, the identification of transcription factors involved in the regulation of CD4 and CD8 significantly advanced the knowledge of the transcription factor network regulating CD4/CD8 cell-fate choice of DP thymocytes. In this review, we provide an overview of the identification and characterization of CD4/CD8 cis-regulatory elements and present recent progress in our understanding of how these cis-regulatory elements control CD4/CD8 expression during T cell development and in peripheral T cells. In addition, we describe the transcription factors implicated in the regulation of coreceptor gene expression and discuss how these factors are integrated into the transcription factor network that regulates CD4/CD8 cell-fate choice of DP thymocytes.

Maintaining CD4-CD8 lineage integrity in T cells: where plasticity serves versatility

The divergence of the two αβ T cell subsets defined by the mutually exclusive expression of CD4 and CD8 glycoproteins is an important event during the intrathymic differentiation of T lymphocytes. This reviews briefly summarizes the mechanisms that promote commitment to the CD4 or CD8 lineage in the thymus, and discusses the transcription factor circuits and epigenetic mechanisms that concur to maintain lineage integrity in post-thymic cells and yet allow effector cell differentiation.

RUNX transcription factor-mediated association of Cd4 and Cd8 enables coordinate gene regulation

T cell fate is associated with mutually exclusive expression of CD4 or CD8 in helper and cytotoxic T cells, respectively. How expression of one locus is temporally coordinated with repression of the other has been a long-standing enigma, though we know RUNX transcription factors activate the Cd8 locus, silence the Cd4 locus, and repress the Zbtb7b locus (encoding the transcription factor ThPOK), which is required for CD4 expression. Here we found that nuclear organization was altered by interplay among members of this transcription factor circuitry: RUNX binding mediated association of Cd4 and Cd8 whereas ThPOK binding kept the loci apart. Moreover, targeted deletions within Cd4 modulated CD8 expression and pericentromeric repositioning of Cd8. Communication between Cd4 and Cd8 thus appears to enable long-range epigenetic regulation to ensure that expression of one excludes the other in mature CD4 or CD8 single-positive (SP) cells.

The epigenetic landscape of lineage choice: lessons from the heritability of CD4 and CD8 expression

Developing αβ T cells choose between the helper and cytotoxic lineages, depending upon the specificity of their T cell receptors for MHC molecules. The expression of the CD4 co-receptor on helper cells and the CD8 co-receptor on cytotoxic cells is intimately linked to this decision, and their regulation at the transcriptional level has been the subject of intense study to better understand lineage choice. Indeed, as the fate of developing T cells is decided, the expression status of these genes is accordingly locked. Genetic models have revealed important transcriptional elements and the ability to manipulate these elements in the framework of development has added a new perspective on the temporal nature of their function and the epigenetic maintenance of gene expression. We examine here novel insights into epigenetic mechanisms that have arisen through the study of these genes.

Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of CD4/CD8 lineage choice

The helper versus cytotoxic-lineage choice of CD4(+)CD8(+) DP thymocytes correlates with MHC restriction of their T cell receptors and the termination of either CD8 or CD4 coreceptor expression. It has been hypothesized that transcription factors regulating the expression of the Cd4/Cd8 coreceptor genes must play a role in regulating the lineage decision of DP thymocytes. Indeed, progress made during the past decade led to the identification of several transcription factors that regulate CD4/CD8 expression that are as well important regulators of helper/cytotoxic cell fate choice. These studies provided insight into the molecular link between the regulation of coreceptor expression and lineage decision. However, studies initiated by the identification of ThPOK, a central transcription factor for helper T cell development, have offered another perspective on the cross-regulation between these two processes. Here, we review advances in our understanding of regulatory circuits composed of transcription factors and their link to epigenetic mechanisms, which play essential roles in specifying and sealing cell lineage identity during the CD4/CD8 commitment process of DP thymocytes.

The zinc-finger protein MAZR is part of the transcription factor network that controls the CD4 versus CD8 lineage fate of double-positive thymocytes

The CD4 versus CD8 lineage specification of thymocytes is linked to coreceptor expression. The transcription factor MAZR has been identified as an important regulator of Cd8 expression. Here we show that variegated CD8 expression by loss of Cd8 enhancers was reverted in MAZR-deficient mice, which confirms that MAZR negatively regulates the Cd8 loci during the transition to the double-positive (DP) stage. Moreover, loss of MAZR led to partial redirection of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-restricted thymocytes into CD4(+) helper-like T cells, which correlated with derepression of Th-POK, a central transcription factor for helper-lineage development. MAZR bound the silencer of the gene encoding Th-POK, which indicated direct regulation of this locus by MAZR. Thus, MAZR is part of the transcription factor network that regulates the CD8 lineage differentiation of DP thymocytes.

Upregulation of CD4 expression during MHC class II-specific positive selection is essential for error-free lineage choice

The lineage fate of developing thymocytes is determined by the persistence or cessation of T cell receptor (TCR) signaling during positive selection, with persistent TCR signaling required for CD4 lineage choice. We show here that transcriptional upregulation of CD4 expression is essential for error-free lineage choice during major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II)-specific positive selection and is critical for error-free lineage choice in TCR-transgenic mice whose thymocytes compete for the identical selecting ligand. CD4 upregulation occurred for endogenously encoded CD4 coreceptors, but CD4 transgenes were downregulated during positive selection, disrupting MHC II-specific TCR signaling and causing lineage errors regardless of the absolute number or signaling strength of transgenic CD4 proteins. Thus, the kinetics of CD4 coreceptor expression during MHC II-specific positive selection determines the integrity of CD4 lineage choice, revealing an elegant symmetry between coreceptor kinetics and lineage choice.

RUNX proteins in transcription factor networks that regulate T-cell lineage choice

Recent research has uncovered complex transcription factor networks that control the processes of T-cell development and differentiation. RUNX (runt-related transcription factor) proteins are among the many factors that have crucial roles in these networks. In this Review, we examine the mechanisms by which RUNX complexes act together with other transcription factors, such as Th-POK (T-helper-inducing POZ/Kruppel-like factor) and GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) in determining the CD4/CD8 lineage choice of developing thymocytes. In addition, we discuss evidence indicating that RUNX complexes are also involved in the differentiation of effector T-cell subsets and that the molecular mechanisms by which RUNX proteins regulate T-cell fate decisions are conserved between the thymus and periphery.

Targeting CD4 coreceptor expression to postselection thymocytes reveals that CD4/CD8 lineage choice is neither error-prone nor stochastic

The mechanism by which CD4/CD8 lineage choice is coordinated with TCR specificity during positive selection remains an unresolved problem in immunology. The stochastic/selection model proposes that CD4/CD8 lineage choice in TCR-signaled CD4(+)CD8(+) thymocytes occurs randomly and therefore is highly error-prone. This perspective is strongly supported by "coreceptor rescue" experiments in which transgenic CD4 coreceptors were ectopically expressed on thymocytes throughout their development and caused significant numbers of cells bearing MHC-II-specific TCR to differentiate into mature, CD8 lineage T cells. However, it is not known if forced coreceptor expression actually rescued positively selected thymocytes making an incorrect lineage choice or if it influenced developing thymocytes into making an incorrect lineage choice. We have now reassessed coreceptor rescue and the concept that lineage choice is highly error-prone with a novel CD4 transgene (referred to as E8(I)-CD4) that targets expression of transgenic CD4 coreceptors specifically to thymocytes that have already undergone positive selection and adopted a CD8 lineage fate. Unlike previous CD4 transgenes, the E8(I)-CD4 transgene has no effect on early thymocyte development and cannot itself influence CD4/CD8 lineage choice. We report that the E8(I)-CD4 transgene did in fact induce expression of functional CD4 coreceptor proteins on newly arising CD8 lineage thymocytes precisely at the point in thymic development that transgenic CD4 coreceptors would putatively rescue MHC-II-specific thymocytes that incorrectly adopted the CD8 lineage. However, the E8(I)-CD4 transgene did not reveal any MHC-II-selected thymocytes that adopted the CD8 lineage fate. These results demonstrate that CD4/CD8 lineage choice is neither error-prone nor stochastic.

Lineage fate and intense debate: myths, models and mechanisms of CD4- versus CD8-lineage choice

Following successful gene rearrangement at alphabeta T-cell receptor (TCR) loci, developing thymocytes express both CD4 and CD8 co-receptors and undergo a life-or-death selection event, which is known as positive selection, to identify cells that express TCRs with potentially useful ligand specificities. Positively selected thymocytes must then differentiate into either CD4(+) helper T cells or CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells, a crucial decision known as CD4/CD8-lineage choice. In this Review, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the cellular and molecular events involved in lineage-fate decision and discuss them in the context of the major models of CD4/CD8-lineage choice.

Cascading suppression of transcriptional silencers by ThPOK seals helper T cell fate

CD4 and the transcription factor ThPOK are essential for the differentiation of major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted thymocytes into the helper T cell lineage; their genes (Cd4 and Zbtb7b (called 'ThPOK' here)) are repressed by transcriptional silencer elements in cytotoxic T cells. The molecular mechanisms regulating expression of these genes during helper T cell lineage differentiation remain unknown. Here we showed that inefficient upregulation of ThPOK, induced by removal of the proximal enhancer from the ThPOK locus, resulted in the transdifferentiation of helper lineage-specified cells into the cytotoxic T cell lineage. Furthermore, direct antagonism by ThPOK of the Cd4 and ThPOK silencers generated two regulatory loops that initially inhibited Cd4 downregulation and later stabilized ThPOK expression. Our results show how an initial lineage-specification signal can be amplified and stabilized during the lineage-commitment process.

The transcription factor Zbtb7b promotes CD4 expression by antagonizing Runx-mediated activation of the CD4 silencer

The persistence of CD4 expression is a key event distinguishing the differentiation of MHC class II-restricted thymocytes into CD4 T cells from that of MHC class I-restricted thymocytes into CD8 T cells. The zinc finger transcription factor Zbtb7b (or cKrox or Thpok) is normally expressed in MHC class II-restricted thymocytes and promotes CD4 lineage choice. When expressed in MHC class I-restricted cells, Zbtb7b redirects these cells from their normal CD8 fate to CD4 differentiation, implying that it promotes, directly or not, sustained CD4 expression; the present study has investigated the mechanism of this effect. We demonstrate that, although Zbtb7b does not enhance CD4 expression on its own, it antagonizes the CD4 repression mediated by the transcription factor Runx3, which is normally up-regulated during CD8 differentiation and promotes CD4 silencing. Zbtb7b also antagonizes CD4 repression by the related protein Runx1, which is expressed in CD4 lineage cells. This antagonism is observed both in vitro and in vivo, is transcriptional, and requires domains of Zbtb7b that are essential to its ability to promote CD4 differentiation in vivo. Furthermore, Zbtb7b fails to antagonize Runx in cells treated with histone deacetylase inhibitors, suggesting that Zbtb7b acts by reducing the expression of thus far unknown factors that cooperate with Runx molecules to repress CD4. These findings demonstrate that the transcription factor Zbtb7b promotes CD4 expression by antagonizing Runx-mediated CD4 repression.

Decision‐making by the immune response

Decisions by uncommitted cells to differentiate down one lineage pathway or another is fundamental to developmental biology. In the immune system, lymphocyte precursors commit to T- or B-cell lineages and T-cell precursors to CD4 or CD8 independently of foreign antigen. T and B cells must also decide whether or not to respond to antigen and when a response is initiated, what sort of response to make such as the type of antibody, CD4 or CD8, and CD4 Th1 or Th2. The two basic mechanisms for these decision-making processes are selection and instruction. Selection depends on prior stochastic production of precommitted cells, which are then selected to respond by an appropriate signal; for example, CD8 and CD4 responses selected by peptide presented in association with major histocompatibility complex class I or II. In contrast, instruction occurs when an uncommitted precursor embarks upon a differentiation pathway in response to a particular set of signals; for example, Th1 and Th2 lineage commitment. In this paper, the signals that determine Th1 and Th2 differentiation are examined with a mathematical model and shown to act as a bistable switch permitting either Tbet or Gata3 to be expressed in an individual cell but not both. The model is used to show how the Tbet Gata3 network within an individual cell interacts with cytokine signals between cells and suggests how Th1 and Th2 lineage commitment can become irreversible. These considerations provide an example of how mathematical models can be used to gain a better understanding of lymphocyte differentiation in an immune response.

CD4 regulation in human lymphoid non-T-cells: A role for the silencer element

In humans, the CD4 molecule is expressed on a subset of T-cells and at various levels on myeloid and lymphoid cells. The mechanisms regulating human CD4 gene expression are yet poorly understood. We speculated that the CD4 silencer, which operates in CD8+ T-cells to repress CD4 expression, could be responsible for CD4 repression in human lymphoid non-T-cells. To test this possibility, we used lentiviral vectors carrying CD4 regulatory sequences, with or without the silencer element, to express an eGFP reporter gene. We observed that (i) in the absence of the silencer element, eGFP expression was detected in CD34+-derived B- and NK-cells that otherwise lacked endogenous CD4 mRNA, indicating active repression of the CD4 regulatory sequences and (ii) the addition of the CD4 silencer could repress eGFP expression in these same cells, as well as in human B-cells generated in vivo in NOD/SCID mice. Collectively, our results suggest that beyond its well-characterized function in T-cells, the CD4 silencer also regulates CD4 gene expression in human lymphoid non-T-cells.

Slow, stochastic transgene repression with properties of a timer

The dynamics of retroviral transgene repression were analyzed in several clones; repression was found to be slow and different genomic positions showed different dynamics.

Background

When gene expression varies unpredictably between genetically identical organisms, this is sometimes ascribed as stochastic. With the prevalence of retroviral vectors, stochastic repression is often observed and can complicate the interpretation of outcomes. But it may also faithfully reflect characteristics of sites in the genome.

Results

We created and identified several cell clones in which, within a given cell, retroviral transcription of a transgene was repressed heritably and essentially irreversibly. This repression was relatively slow; total repression in all cells took months. We observed the dynamics of repression and found that they were ergodic, that is, tending with a probability to a final state independent of previous conditions. Different positions of the transgene in the genome demonstrated different dynamics. At a position on mouse chromosome 9, repression abided by near perfect first-order kinetics and was highly reproducible, even under conditions where the number of cell generations per day varied.

Conclusion

We propose that such a cell division independent 'off' mechanism could play a role in endogenous gene expression, potentially providing an epigenetically based timer for extended periods.

Groucho/transducin-like Enhancer-of-split (TLE)-dependent and -independent transcriptional regulation by Runx3

Regulation of gene expression by tissue-specific transcription factors involves both turning on and turning off transcription of target genes. Runx3, a runt-domain transcription factor, regulates cell-intrinsic functions by activating and repressing gene expression in sensory neurons, dendritic cells (DC), and T cells. To investigate the mechanism of Runx3-mediated repression in an in vivo context, we generated mice expressing a mutant Runx3 lacking the C-terminal VWRPY, a motif required for Runx3 interaction with the corepressor Groucho/transducin-like Enhancer-of-split (TLE). In contrast with Runx3(-/-) mice, which displayed ataxia due to the death of dorsal root ganglia TrkC neurons, Runx3(VWRPY-/-) mice were not ataxic and had intact dorsal root ganglia neurons, indicating that ability of Runx3 to tether Groucho/TLE is not essential for neurogenesis. In the DC compartment, the mutant protein Runx3(VWRPY-) promoted normally developed skin Langerhans cells but failed to restrain DC spontaneous maturation, indicating that this latter process involves Runx3-mediated repression through recruitment of Groucho/TLE. Moreover, in CD8(+) thymocytes, Runx3(VWRPY-) up-regulated alphaE/CD103-like WT Runx3, whereas unlike wild type, it failed to repress alphaE/CD103 in CD8(+) splenocytes. Thus, in CD8-lineage T cells, Runx3 regulates alphaE/CD103 in opposing regulatory modes and recruits Groucho/TLE to facilitate the transition from activation to repression. Runx3(VWRPY-) also failed to mediate the epigenetic silencing of CD4 gene in CD8(+) T cells, but normally regulated other pan-CD8(+) T cell genes. These data provide evidence for the requirement of Groucho/TLE for Runx3-mediated epigenetic silencing of CD4 and pertain to the mechanism through which other Runx3-regulated genes are epigenetically silenced.

Negative regulation of CD8 expression via Cd8 enhancer-mediated recruitment of the zinc finger protein MAZR

Coreceptor expression is tightly regulated during thymocyte development. Deletion of specific Cd8 enhancers leads to variegated expression of CD8alphabeta heterodimers in double-positive thymocytes. Here we show CD8 variegation is correlated with an epigenetic 'off' state, linking Cd8 enhancer function with chromatin remodeling of the adjacent genes Cd8a and Cd8b1 (Cd8). The zinc finger protein MAZR bound the Cd8 enhancer and interacted with the nuclear receptor corepressor N-CoR complex in double-negative thymocytes. MAZR was downregulated in double-positive and CD8 single-positive thymocytes. 'Enforced' expression of MAZR led to impaired Cd8 activation and variegated CD8 expression. Our results demonstrate epigenetic control of the Cd8 loci and identify MAZR as an important regulator of Cd8 expression.

Analyzing expression of perforin, Runx3, and Thpok genes during positive selection reveals activation of CD8-differentiation programs by MHC II-signaled thymocytes

Intrathymic positive selection matches CD4-CD8 lineage differentiation to MHC specificity. However, it is unclear whether MHC signals induce lineage choice or simply select thymocytes of the appropriate lineage. To investigate this issue, we assessed thymocytes undergoing positive selection for expression of the CD8 lineage markers perforin and Runx3. Using both population-based and single-cell RT-PCR analyses, we found large subsets of MHC class II (MHC-II)-signaled thymocytes expressing these genes within the CD4+ 8+ and CD4+ 8(int), but not the CD4+ 8- populations of signaling competent mice. This indicates that MHC-II signals normally fail to impose CD4 differentiation and further implies that the number of mature CD8 single-positive (SP) thymocytes greatly underestimates CD8 lineage choice. We next examined whether MHC-II-restricted CD4+ 8- thymocytes remain competent to initiate CD8 lineage gene expression. In mice in which expression of the tyrosine kinase Zap70 and thereby TCR signaling were impaired selectively in SP thymocytes, MHC-II-signaled CD4+ 8- thymocytes expressed perforin and Runx3 and failed to up-regulate the CD4 marker Thpok. This indicated that impairing TCR signals at the CD4 SP stage switched gene expression patterns from CD4- to CD8-lineage specific. We conclude from these findings that MHC-II-signaled thymocytes remain competent to initiate CD8-specific gene expression even after CD8 down-regulation and that CD4 lineage differentiation is not fixed before the CD4 SP stage.

The role of erk1 and erk2 in multiple stages of T cell development

Activation of extracellular-signal-regulated protein kinase (Erk) is central to growth-factor-receptor-mediated signaling including that originating from the T cell antigen receptor. It integrates cytoplasmic signals to effect changes in transcription associated with differentiation, proliferation, and survival. In this report, we present an analysis of mice with targeted deletions in Erk1 and Erk2 to assess the relationship between Erk activity and cell-cycle progression, thymocyte development, and lineage commitment. These studies show that Erk is selectively retained during beta selection-driven proliferation, and yet Erk1/2 are not required to complete differentiation to CD4+CD8+ preselection stage of development. Erk activity is essential for the process of positive selection, and it differentially affects CD4 and CD8 T cell maturation; yet, diminished expression itself is not sufficient to alter lineage commitment.

Runx3 regulates integrin alpha E/CD103 and CD4 expression during development of CD4-/CD8+ T cells

During thymic T cell development, immature CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) thymocytes develop either into CD4+CD8- Th cells or CD4-CD8+ CTLs. Differentially expressed primary factors inducing the fate of these cell types are still poorly described. The transcription factor Runx3/AML-2 Runx, runt [corrected] dominant factor; AML, acute myeloid leukemia is expressed specifically during the development of CD8 single-positive (SP) thymocytes, where it silences CD4 expression. Deletion of murine Runx3 results in a reduction of CD8 SP T cells and concomitant accumulation of CD4+CD8+ T cells, which cannot down-regulate CD4 expression in the thymus and periphery. In this study we have investigated the role of Runx3 during thymocyte development and CD4 silencing and have identified integrin alpha(E)/CD103 on CD8 SP T cells as a new potential target gene of Runx3. We demonstrate that Runx3 is necessary not only to repress CD4, but also to induce CD103 expression during development of CD8 SP T cells. In addition, transgenic overexpression of Runx3 reduced CD4 expression during development of DP thymocytes, leading to a reduced number of CD4 SP thymocytes and an increased number of CD8 SP thymocytes. This reversal is not caused by redirection of specific MHC class II-restricted cells to the CD8 lineage. Overexpression of Runx3 also up-regulated CD103 expression on a subpopulation of CD4 SP T cells with characteristics of regulatory T cells. Thus, Runx3 is a main regulator of CD4 silencing and CD103 induction and thus contributes to the phenotype of CD8 SP T cells during thymocyte development.

Assembly of silent chromatin during thymocyte development

Epigenetic events that contribute to the assembly and maintenance of silent chromatin structures have been defined through genetic, molecular, and cytological studies in a variety of eukaryotic model organisms. However, the precise cascade of events responsible for converting a developmentally regulated gene from an active euchromatic state to a heritably silent heterochromatic state remains to be elucidated. To establish a molecular framework for studying this cascade, we examined the temporal order of events associated with silencing of the murine terminal transferase (Dntt) gene during thymocyte maturation. This article describes our findings in the context of current knowledge of gene silencing mechanisms.

Modulation of Coreceptor Transcription during Positive Selection Dictates Lineage Fate Independently of TCR/Coreceptor Specificity

For developing T cells, coreceptor choice is matched to T cell antigen receptor (TCR) MHC specificity during positive selection in the thymus, but the mechanism remains uncertain. Here, we document that TCR-mediated positive selection signals inactivate the immature CD8(III) enhancer in double positive (DP) thymocytes, explaining in part the cessation of CD8 coreceptor transcription that occurs during positive selection. More importantly, by placing CD4 protein expression under the control of CD8 transcriptional regulatory elements, we demonstrate that cessation of CD4 coreceptor transcription during positive selection results in precisely the same lineage fate as cessation of CD8 coreceptor transcription. That is, MHC-II-signaled DP thymocytes differentiated into CD8-lineage cytotoxic T cells, despite the MHC-II specificity and CD4 dependence of their TCRs. This study demonstrates that termination of coreceptor transcription during positive selection promotes CD8-lineage fate, regardless of TCR specificity or coreceptor protein identity.

A Role for SATB1, a Nuclear Matrix Association Region-Binding Protein, in the Development of CD8SP Thymocytes and Peripheral T Lymphocytes

Studies have suggested that binding of the SATB1 protein to L2a, a matrix association region located 4.5 kb 5' to the mouse CD8alpha gene, positively affects CD8 expression in T cells. Therefore, experiments were performed to determine the effect on T cell development of reduced expression of SATB1. Because homozygous SATB1-null mice do not survive to adulthood due to non-thymus autonomous defects, mice were produced that were homozygous for a T cell-specific SATB1-antisense transgene and heterozygous for a SATB1-null allele. Thymic SATB1 protein was reduced significantly in these mice, and the major cellular phenotype observed was a significant reduction in the percentage of CD8SP T cells in thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes. Mice were smaller than wild type but generally healthy, and besides a general reduction in cellularity and a slight increase in surface CD3 expression on CD8SP thymocytes, the composition of the thymus was similar to wild type. The reduction in thymic SATB1 does not lead to the variegated expression of CD8-negative single positive thymocytes seen upon deletion of several regulatory elements and suggested by others to reflect failure to activate the CD8 locus. Thus, the present results point to an essential role for SATB1 late in the development and maturation of CD8SP T cells.

Dual Functions of Runx Proteins for Reactivating CD8 and Silencing CD4 at the Commitment Process into CD8 Thymocytes

To understand how CD8 expression is regulated during the transition process from CD4+8+ (CD4 and CD8 double positive, DP) to CD4-8+ (CD8 single positive, CD8SP) cells in the thymus, the involvement of Runx proteins in the alteration of chromatin configuration was investigated. Using the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we first demonstrated that Runx proteins bind to the stage-specific CD8 enhancer, as well as the CD4 silencer, in CD8SP thymocytes. Among Runx family members, Runx3 expression was initiated in DP thymocytes receiving a positive selection signal and increased in concert with differentiation to the CD8SP stage. Furthermore, reactivation of the CD8 gene, as well as CD4 silencing, was suppressed in positively selected thymocytes of Runx dominant-negative transgenic mice. These results suggest that Runx proteins, especially Runx3, are involved in lineage specification of CD8 T cells and provide important information for understanding the mechanism for the mutually exclusive expression of coreceptors in mature thymocytes.

Dynamic repositioning of CD4 and CD8 genes during T cell development

Although stable repression of CD4 and CD8 genes is a central feature of T cell lineage commitment, we lack detailed information about the timing and mechanism of this repression. Stable gene repression has been linked to the position of genes within the nucleus. Therefore, information about the nuclear position of CD4 and CD8 genes during T cell development could provide insights into both the mechanism of regulation of CD4 and CD8 genes, and the process of lineage commitment. Here, we report that lineage-specific repression of CD4 and CD8 genes is associated with the repositioning of alleles close to heterochromatin. We also provide evidence that the relocalization of CD4 and CD8 genes to heterochromatin can occur as an early response to positive selection signals. We discuss our results in terms of our current knowledge of CD4 and CD8 gene regulation and CD4 versus CD8 lineage commitment.

Combining cytokine signalling with T-bet and GATA-3 regulation in Th1 and Th2 differentiation: a model for cellular decision-making

Differentiation of uncommitted T cells into Th1 and Th2 subpopulations depends on both intracellular events controlling expression of transcription factors T-bet and GATA-3 and interactions between cells mediated by cytokines, particularly IL4 and IFNgamma. A great deal is known about the intracellular and extracellular events involved in Th1 and Th2 (Th) differentiation, but how these are integrated in T-cell populations or indeed why extracellular cytokine control is required after a decision has been made at a transcriptional level is not at all understood. We present a mathematical model of CD4+ T-cell differentiation that describes both intracellular and extracellular processes and the interactions between them. It shows how antigen stimulation in conjunction with cytokines and other extracellular signals gives rise to rapid, reversible and mutually exclusive expression of T-bet or GATA-3 due to feedback between the transcription factors and their signalling pathways. After transient signalling by APC, continued Th1 and Th2 differentiation is shown to require cytokine production by the proliferating T cells. Moreover, intercellular communication by T-cell-derived cytokines lowers the threshold of APC signals required for Th differentiation. This provides an explanation for enhanced Th differentiation by pre-existing memory T cells. The model also predicts that Th differentiation can be reversed at the single cell level before commitment by manipulating the cytokine environment. It suggests a mechanism for switching between Th1 and Th2 in the so-called irreversible state that may be developed as a novel therapeutic means of manipulating Th1 and Th2 responses.

Localization of the domains in Runx transcription factors required for the repression of CD4 in thymocytes

The runt family transcription factors Runx1 and Runx3 are expressed in developing murine thymocytes. We show that enforced expression of full-length Runx1 in CD4(-)CD8(-) thymocytes results in a profound suppression of immature CD4/CD8 double-positive thymocytes and mature CD4 single-positive thymocytes compared with controls. This effect arises from Runx1- or Runx3-mediated repression of CD4 expression, and is independent of positively selecting signals. Runx1 is able to repress CD4 in CD4/CD8 double-positive thymocytes, but not in mature splenic T cells. Runx-mediated CD4 repression is independent of association with the corepressors Groucho/TLE or Sin3. Two domains are required for complete Runx-mediated CD4 repression. These are contained within Runx1 aa 212-262 and 263-360. The latter region contains the nuclear matrix targeting sequence, which is highly conserved among runt family transcription factors across species. The presence of the nuclear matrix targeting sequence is required for Runx-mediated CD4 repression, suggesting that Runx transcription factors are stabilized on the CD4 silencer via association with the nuclear matrix.

Epigenetic gene silencing by Runx proteins

Runx family proteins have the potential for either activating or suppressing gene expression in a context-dependent manner. There are several mechanisms by which transcriptional repression can occur. A wide range of locus inactivation, that is often called gene silencing, is thought to be achieved by chromatin modifications. Recently, Runx family proteins were found to have an essential role in either temporal transcriptional repression or irreversible epigenetic silencing at the CD4 locus through binding to a CD4 silencer at different stages of development. These findings link Runx function to epigenetic gene regulation, and shed new light on the mechanisms by which Runx represses target gene expression.

Duration of TCR signaling controls CD4-CD8 lineage differentiation in vivo

The duration of T cell receptor (TCR) signaling is thought to be important for thymocyte differentiation into the CD4 or CD8 lineage. However, the in vivo relevance of this hypothesis is unclear. Here we divided T cell positive selection into genetically separable developmental steps by confining TCR signal transduction to discrete thymocyte developmental windows. TCR signals confined to the double-positive thymocyte stage promoted CD8, but not CD4, lineage differentiation. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-restricted thymocytes were, instead, redirected into the CD8 lineage. These findings support the hypothesis that distinct kinetics of MHC class I- and MHC class II-induced TCR signals direct intrathymic developmental decisions.

Biology of T lymphocytes

T cells constitute one arm of the adaptive immune system. The accumulating information on various aspects of T-cell biology shows the intricacies in the regulation of immune responses. How we translate the cellular and molecular details of this regulation into innovation and development of therapies for disease management remains a fundamental, but exciting, challenge.

Morpholino antisense oligonucleotide-mediated gene knockdown during thymocyte development reveals role for Runx3 transcription factor in CD4 silencing during development of CD4-/CD8+ thymocytes

During thymic T cell development, immature CD4(+)/CD8(+) thymocytes develop into either CD4(+)/CD8(-) helper or CD4(-)/CD8(+) CTLs. The molecular mechanisms governing the complex selection and differentiation steps during thymic T cell development are not well understood. Here we developed a novel approach to investigate gene function during thymocyte development. We transfected ex vivo isolated immature thymocytes with gene-specific morpholino antisense oligonucleotides and induced differentiation in cell or organ cultures. A morpholino oligonucleotide specific for CD8alpha strongly reduces CD8 expression. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstrated gene knockdown by morpholino oligonucleotides in primary lymphocytes. Using this approach, we show here that the transcription factor Runx3 is involved in silencing of CD4 expression during CD8 T cell differentiation. Runx3 protein expression appears late in thymocyte differentiation and is confined to mature CD8 single-positive thymocytes, whereas Runx3 mRNA is transcribed in mature CD4 and CD8 thymocytes. Therefore, Runx3 protein expression is regulated at a post-transcriptional level. The knockdown of Runx3 protein expression through morpholino oligonucleotides inhibited the development of CD4(-)/CD8(+) T cells. Instead, mature cells with a CD4(+)/CD8(+) phenotype accumulated. Potential Runx binding sites were identified in the CD4 gene silencer element, which are bound by Runx protein in EMSAs. Mutagenesis of potential Runx binding sites in the CD4 gene silencer abolished silencing activity in a reporter gene assay, indicating that Runx3 is involved in CD4 gene silencing. The experimental approach developed here should be valuable for the functional analysis of other candidate genes in T cell differentiation.