Prevalence of recurrent oncogenic fusion in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal carcinoma with hypermethylated MLH1 and wild-type BRAF and KRAS

Elaboration of NTRK-rearranged colorectal cancer: Integration of immunoreactivity pattern, cytogenetic identity, and rearrangement variant

Fused information from protein status, DNA breakage, and transcripts are still limited because of the low rate of activated-NTRK in colorectal cancer (CRC). In total, 104 archived CRC tissue samples with dMMR were analyzed using immunohistochemistry (IHC), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and pyrosequencing to mine the NTRK-enriched CRC group, and then subjected to NTRK fusion detection using pan-tyrosine kinase IHC, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and DNA-/RNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS) assays. Of the 15 NTRK-enriched CRCs, eight NTRK fusions (53.3%, 8/15), including two TPM3(e7)-NTRK1(e10), one TPM3(e5)-NTRK1(e11), one LMNA(e10)-NTRK1(e10), two EML4(e2)-NTRK3(e14), and two ETV6(e5)-NTRK3(e15) fusions, were identified. There was no immunoreactivity for ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. In addition to cytoplasmic staining found in six specimens, membrane positive (TPM3-NTRK1 fusion) and nuclear positive (LMNA-NTRK1 fusion) were also observed in two of them. Atypical FISH-positive types were observed in four cases. Unlike IHC, NTRK-rearranged tumors appeared homogeneous on FISH. ETV6-NTRK3 may be missed in pan-TRK IHC screening for CRC. Regarding break-apart FISH, NTRK detection is difficult because of the diversity of signal patterns. Further research is warranted to identify the characteristics of NTRK-fusion CRCs.

RNA Sequencing Reveals Novel Oncogenic Fusions and Depicts Detailed Fusion Transcripts of FN1-FGFR1 in Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumors

Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors (PMTs) are rare neoplasms of soft tissue or bone. Although previous studies revealed that approximately 50% of PMTs harbor FN1::FGFR1 fusions, the molecular mechanisms in the remaining cases are largely unknown. In this study, fusion genes were investigated using RNA-based next-generation sequencing in 76 retrospectively collected PMTs. Novel fusions were validated with Sanger sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Fusion genes were detected in 52/76 (68.4%) PMTs, and 43/76 (56.6%) harbored FN1::FGFR1 fusions. Fusion transcripts and breakpoints of the FN1::FGFR1 fusions were diverse. The most common fusion transcript was between exon 20 of FN1 and exon 9 of FGFR1 (7/43, 16.3%). The most upstream breakpoint of the FN1 gene was located at the 3' end of exon 12, and the most downstream breakpoint of the FGFR1 gene was at the 5' end of exon 9, suggesting the inessential nature of the third fibronectin-type domain of FN1 and the necessity of the transmembrane domain of FGFR1 in the FN1::FGFR1 fusion protein, respectively. Moreover, the reciprocal FGFR1::FN1 fusions, which had not been identified in previous studies, were detected in 18.6% (8/43) of FN1::FGFR1 fusion-positive PMTs. Novel fusions were identified in 6/76 (7.9%) FN1::FGFR1 fusion-negative PMTs, including 2 involving FGFR: FGFR1::USP33 (1/76, 1.3%) and FGFR1::TLN1 (1/76, 1.3%). Other novel fusions identified were the PDGFRA::USP35 (1/76, 1.3%), SPTBN1::YWHAQ (1/76, 1.3%), GTF2I::RALGPS1 (1/76, 1.3%), and LTBP1::VWA8 (1/76, 1.3%) fusions. In addition to these novel fusions, FN1::FGFR2 (1/76, 1.3%), NIPBL::BEND2 (1/76, 1.3%), and KIAA1549::BRAF fusions (1/76, 1.3%) were also identified in FN1::FGFR1-negative cases arising from the thigh, ilium, and acetabulum, respectively. The frequency of oncogenic fusions was significantly higher (P = .012) in tumors derived from extremities (29/35, 82.9%) compared with other locations (23/41, 56.1%). No significant correlation was identified between fusions and recurrence (P = .786). In conclusion, we report fusion transcripts and breakpoints of FN1::FGFR1 in PMTs in detail, providing insights into fusion protein functions. We also revealed that a considerable proportion of PMTs without FN1::FGFR1 fusion carried novel fusions, providing further insight into the genetic basis of PMTs.

Molecular and cytogenetic features of NTRK fusions enriched in BRAF and RET double-negative papillary thyroid cancer

Rare NTRK-driven malignant neoplasms can be effectively inhibited by anti-TRK agents. The discovery of NTRK1/2/3-rich tumours in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) patients is a precondition for the rapid identification of NTRK fusion tumours. Knowledge of NTRK gene activation is critical to accurately detect NTRK status. A total of 229 BRAF V600E-negative samples from PTC patients were analysed in this study. Break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was performed to detect RET fusion. NTRK status was analysed using FISH, DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). In 128 BRAF and RET double-negative cases, 56 (43.8%, 56/128) NTRK rearrangement tumours were found, including 1 NTRK2, 16 NTRK1, and 39 NTRK3 fusions. Two novel NTRK fusions, EZR::NTRK1 and EML4::NTRK2, was found in the NTRK rearrangement tumors.Dominant break-apart and extra 3' signal patterns accounted for 89.3% (50/56) and 5.4% (3/56) of all NTRK-positive cases, respectively, as determined by FISH. In our cohort, there were 2.3% (3/128) FISH false-negative and 3.1% (4/128) FISH false-positive cases identified. NTRK fusions are highly recurrent in BRAF and RET double-negative PTCs. FISH or RNA-based NGS is a reliable detection approach. NTRK rearrangement can be precisely, rapidly, and economically detected based on the developed optimal algorithm.

Systematic review of NTRK 1/2/3 fusion prevalence pan-cancer and across solid tumours

NTRK gene fusions are rare somatic mutations found across cancer types with promising targeted therapies emerging. Healthcare systems face significant challenges in integrating these treatments, with uncertainty in prevalence and optimal testing methods to identify eligible patients. We performed a systematic review of NTRK fusion prevalence to inform efficient diagnostic screening and scale of therapeutic uptake. We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases on 31/03/2021. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting fusion rates in solid tumours, English language, post-2010 publication and minimum sample size. Critical appraisal was performed using a custom 11-item checklist. Rates were collated by cancer type and pooled if additional synthesis criteria were met. 160 studies were included, with estimates for 15 pan-cancer and 429 specific cancer types (63 paediatric). Adult pan-cancer estimates ranged 0.03-0.70%, with higher rates found in RNA-based assays. In common cancers, rates were consistently below 0.5%. Rare morphological subtypes, colorectal microsatellite instability, and driver mutation exclusion cancers had higher rates. Only 35.6% of extracted estimates used appropriate methods and sample size to identify NTRK fusions. NTRK fusion-positive cancers are rare and widely distributed across solid tumours. Small-scale, heterogeneous data confound prevalence prediction. Further large-scale, standardised genomic data are needed to characterise NTRK fusion epidemiology.

SWI/SNF complex gene variations are associated with a higher tumor mutational burden and a better response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: a pan-cancer analysis of next-generation sequencing data corresponding to 4591 cases

Background

Genes related to the SWItch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex are frequently mutated across cancers. SWI/SNF-mutant tumors are vulnerable to synthetic lethal inhibitors. However, the landscape of SWI/SNF mutations and their associations with tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have not been elucidated in large real-world Chinese patient cohorts.

Methods

The mutational rates and variation types of six SWI/SNF complex genes (ARID1A, ARID1B, ARID2, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, and PBRM1) were analyzed retrospectively by integrating next-generation sequencing data of 4591 cases covering 18 cancer types. Thereafter, characteristics of SWI/SNF mutations were depicted and the TMB and MSI status and therapeutic effects of ICIs in the SWI/SNF-mutant and SWI/SNF-non-mutant groups were compared.

Results

SWI/SNF mutations were observed in 21.8% of tumors. Endometrial (54.1%), gallbladder and biliary tract (43.4%), and gastric (33.9%) cancers exhibited remarkably higher SWI/SNF mutational rates than other malignancies. Further, ARID1A was the most frequently mutated SWI/SNF gene, and ARID1A D1850fs was identified as relatively crucial. The TMB value, TMB-high (TMB-H), and MSI-high (MSI-H) proportions corresponding to SWI/SNF-mutant cancers were significantly higher than those corresponding to SWI/SNF-non-mutant cancers (25.8 vs. 5.6 mutations/Mb, 44.3% vs. 10.3%, and 16.0% vs. 0.9%, respectively; all p  < 0.0001). Furthermore, these indices were even higher for tumors with co-mutations of SWI/SNF genes and MLL2/3. Regarding immunotherapeutic effects, patients with SWI/SNF variations showed significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) rates than their SWI/SNF-non-mutant counterparts (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.44–0.72]; p < 0.0001), and PBRM1 mutations were associated with relatively better ICI treatment outcomes than the other SWI/SNF gene mutations (HR, 0.21 [95% CI 0.12–0.37]; p = 0.0007). Additionally, patients in the SWI/SNF-mutant + TMB-H (HR, 0.48 [95% CI 0.37–0.54]; p  < 0.0001) cohorts had longer PFS rates than those in the SWI/SNF-non-mutant + TMB-low cohort.

Conclusions

SWI/SNF complex genes are frequently mutated and are closely associated with TMB-H status, MSI-H status, and superior ICI treatment response in several cancers, such as colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. These findings emphasize the necessity and importance of molecular-level detection and interpretation of SWI/SNF complex mutations.

Pan-tropomyosin receptor kinase immunohistochemistry is a feasible routine screening strategy for NTRK fusions in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal carcinomas

We have previously revealed the high enrichment of NTRK fusion in mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) CRCs. Optimized diagnostic approaches are urgently needed to identify dMMR CRCs that could benefit from TRK inhibitor therapy. A consecutive cohort of 240 surgically resected dMMR CRCs from 2015 to 2021 was collected for pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) using pan-TRK clone EPR17341 (VENTANA). We analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of pan-TRK IHC with sequential DNA/RNA-based Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) as the reference method and further explored IHC staining patterns and their correlation with fusion variants in dMMR CRCs. Of 240 dMMR CRCs, 15 (6.2%) were stained positive for pan-TRK IHC, and the sensitivity and specificity were both 100%. Five staining patterns were revealed, which correlated with fusion variants. Diffuse and strong positivity in membrane and cytoplasm were detected in all 6 cases with TPM3-NTRK1 fusions (6/15, 40%). Weak granular cytoplasmic staining, including diffuse or focal positivity, was found in 6 NTRK3 fusions (3 ETV6-NTRK3 and 3 EML4-NTRK3) (6/15, 40%). Diffuse and strong nuclear positivity was noticed in 2 LMNA-NTRK1 fusions (2/15, 13.3%). Intense granular cytoplasmic staining was observed in the only case with PLEKHA6-NTRK1 fusion (1/15, 6.7%). Interestingly, pan-TRK positivity was observed in one case with precursor lesions in both precancerous and cancerous regions, whereas MLH1 loss was restricted to the cancerous region. In summary, an optimized multi-step algorithm using pan-TRK IHC as a screening method was proposed to identify CRC patients harboring NTRK fusions.

Liquid biopsy using ascitic fluid and pleural effusion supernatants for genomic profiling in gastrointestinal and lung cancers

Background

Precision medicine highlights the importance of incorporating molecular genetic testing into standard clinical care. Next-generation sequencing can detect cancer-specific gene mutations, and molecular-targeted drugs can be designed to be effective for one or more specific gene mutations. For patients with special site metastases, it is particularly important to use appropriate samples for genetic profiling. This study aimed to determine whether genomic profiling using ASC and PE is effective in detecting genetic mutations.

Methods

Tissues, plasma, ascites (ASC) supernatants, and pleural effusion (PE) samples from gastrointestinal cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis and lung cancer patients with pleural metastasis were collected for comprehensive genomic profiling. The samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing using a panel of 59 or 1021 cancer-relevant genes panel.

Results

A total of 156 tissues, 188 plasma samples, 45 ASC supernatants, and 1 PE samples from 304 gastrointestinal cancer patients and 446 PE supernatants, 122 tissues, 389 plasma samples, and 45 PE sediments from 407 lung cancer patients were analyzed. The MSAF was significantly higher in ASC and PE supernatant than that in plasma ctDNA (50.00% vs. 3.00%, p < 0.0001 and 28.5% vs. 1.30%, p < 0.0001, respectively). The ASC supernatant had a higher actionable mutation rate and more actionable alterations than the plasma ctDNA in 26 paired samples. The PE supernatant had a higher total actionable mutation rate than plasma (80.3% vs. 48.4%, p < 0.05). The PE supernatant had a higher frequency of uncommon variations than the plasma regardless of distant organ metastasis.

Conclusion

ASC and PE supernatants could be better alternative samples when tumor tissues are not available, especially in patients with only peritoneal or pleural metastases.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09922-5.

Therapeutic advances in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a focus on targeted therapies

Mortality from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increasing worldwide and effective new treatments are urgently needed. The current treatment of metastatic PDAC in fit patients is based on two chemotherapy combinations (FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel) which were validated more than 8 years ago. Although almost all treatments targeting specific molecular alterations have failed so far when administered to unselected patients, encouraging results were observed in the small subpopulations of patients with germline BRCA 1/2 mutations, and somatic gene fusions (neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase, Neuregulin 1, which are enriched in KRAS wild-type PDAC), KRAS G12C mutations, or microsatellite instability. While targeted tumor metabolism therapies and immunotherapy have been disappointing, they are still under investigation in combination with other drugs. Optimizing pharmacokinetics and adapting available chemotherapies based on molecular signatures are other promising avenues of research. This review evaluates the current expectations and limits of available treatments and analyses the existing trials. A permanent search for actionable vulnerabilities in PDAC tumor cells and microenvironments will probably result in a more personalized therapeutic approach, keeping in mind that supportive care must also play a major role if real clinical efficacy is to be achieved in these patients.

A lung adenocarcinoma patient with co-mutations of MET and EGFR exon20 insertion responded to crizotinib

Background

Targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment of patients with malignancies harboring mutations in driver genes and has brought a favorable survival benefit to the population with actionable oncogenic mutations. In recent years, the MET exon14 skipping mutation has been recognized as a potentially promising therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These changes are mutually exclusive with molecular drivers such as EGFR, KRAS, HER-2, BRAF, ALK and ROS1. The prevalence rate of coexisting MET exon 14 mutations and EGFR sensitive mutations (L858R, exon 19 deletions) in Chinese population was reported to be 0.2% (3/1590). However, the coexistence of MET exon 14 mutations with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations has never been reported and the management of this subtype is not identified.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old male with a right lung adenocarcinoma (T4N2M0, IIIB) was confirmed to be positive for MET exon 14 skipping (c.3028_3028+1delGGinsTT, 44.4%), MET amplification (copy number 4.4), and EGFR exon 20 insertion (p. N771_H773dup, 22.1%) mutations. After the progression of one cycle of chemotherapy (Pemetrexed 0.8 g d1), the patient was subsequently accepted treatment with Crizotinib (250 mg twice a day) and achieved an important clinical remission for six months until the development of brain metastases. Then, he was submitted to a cycle of anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) therapy after failure of Crizotinib and eventually acquired resistance despite of the high expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) status.

Conclusion

This case report provides treatment strategies for epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs)-untreated lung adenocarcinoma patients simultaneously carrying MET alterations and EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations. In addition, the signatures of PD-L1 or TMB expression were not the candidate for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy in this context.

Somatic Genomic Testing in Patients With Metastatic or Advanced Cancer: ASCO Provisional Clinical Opinion

PURPOSE

An ASCO provisional clinical opinion offers timely clinical direction to ASCO's membership following publication or presentation of potentially practice-changing data from major studies. This provisional clinical opinion addresses the appropriate use of tumor genomic testing in patients with metastatic or advanced solid tumors.

CLINICAL CONTEXT

An increasing number of therapies are approved to treat cancers harboring specific genomic biomarkers. However, there is a lack of clarity as to when tumor genomic sequencing should be ordered, what type of assays should be performed, and how to interpret the results for treatment selection.

PROVISIONAL CLINICAL OPINION

Patients with metastatic or advanced cancer should undergo genomic sequencing in a certified laboratory if the presence of one or more specific genomic alterations has regulatory approval as biomarkers to guide the use of or exclusion from certain treatments for their disease. Multigene panel-based assays should be used if more than one biomarker-linked therapy is approved for the patient's disease. Site-agnostic approvals for any cancer with a high tumor mutation burden, mismatch repair deficiency, or neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions provide a rationale for genomic testing for all solid tumors. Multigene testing may also assist in treatment selection by identifying additional targets when there are few or no genotype-based therapy approvals for the patient's disease. For treatment planning, the clinician should consider the functional impact of the targeted alteration and expected efficacy of genomic biomarker-linked options relative to other approved or investigational treatments.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/assays-and-predictive-markers-guidelines.

NTRK Fusion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Diagnosis, Therapy, and TRK Inhibitor Resistance

Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusion has been identified as an oncogenic driver of various solid tumors, and it is rare in non-smalll cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a frequency of approximately less than 1%. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is of priority for detecting NTRK fusions, especially RNA-based NGS. Currently, the tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have shown promising efficacy and well tolerance in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors, regardless of tumor histology. The first-generation TRK inhibitors (larotrectinib and entrectinib) are recommended as the first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with positive NTRK fusion. However, TRK inhibitor resistance can eventually occur due to on-target or off-target mechanisms. Further studies are under investigation to overcome resistance and improve survival. Interestingly, NTRK fusion might be the mechanism of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. Regarding immunotherapy, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC patients harboring NTRK fusion has yet to be well described. In this review, we elucidate the function of NTRK genes, summarize the diagnostic techniques for NTRK fusions, and present clinical data for TRK inhibitors; we also discuss potential mechanisms of resistance to TRK inhibitors.

Gene Fusions in Gastrointestinal Tract cancers

Fusion genes have been identified a wide array of human neoplasms including hematologic and solid tumors, including gastrointestinal tract neoplasia. A fusion gene is the product of parts of two genes which are joined together following a deletion, translocation or chromosomal inversion. Together with single nucleotide variants, insertions, deletions, and amplification, fusion genes represent one of the key genomic mechanisms for tumor development. Detecting fusions in the clinic is accomplished by a variety of techniques including break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Some recurrent gene fusions have been successfully targeted by small molecule or monoclonal antibody therapies (i.e. targeted therapies), while others are used for as biomarkers for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The purpose of this review article is to discuss the clinical utility of detection of gene fusions in carcinomas and neoplasms arising primarily in the digestive system. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Gene fusions and oncogenic mutations in MLH1 deficient and BRAFV600E wild-type colorectal cancers

Gene fusions can act as oncogenic drivers and offer targets for cancer therapy. Since fusions are rare in colorectal cancer (CRC), their universal screening seems impractical. Our aim was to investigate gene fusions in 62 CRC cases with deficient MLH1 (dMLH1) and BRAFV600E wild-type (wt) status from a consecutive real-life series of 2079 CRCs. First, gene fusions were analysed using a novel FusionPlex Lung v2 RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, and these results were compared to a novel Idylla GeneFusion assay and pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC). NGS detected seven (7/62, 11%) NTRK1 fusions (TPM3::NTRK1, PLEKHA6::NTRK1 and LMNA::NTRK1, each in two cases, and IRF2BP2::NTRK1 in one case). In addition, two ALK, four RET and seven BRAF fusions were identified. Idylla detected seven NTRK1 expression imbalances, in line with the NGS results (overall agreement 100%). Furthermore, Idylla detected the two NGS-identified ALK rearrangements as one specific ALK fusion and one ALK expression imbalance, whilst only two of the four RET fusions were discovered. However, Idylla detected several expression imbalances of ALK (n = 7) and RET (n = 1) that were found to be fusion negative with the NGS. Pan-TRK IHC showed clearly detectable, fusion partner-dependent staining patterns in the seven NTRK1 fusion cases. Overall agreement for pan-TRK antibody clone EPR17341 was 98% and for A7H6R 100% when compared to the NGS. Of the 62 CRCs, 43 were MLH1 promoter hypermethylated (MLH1ph) and 39 were RASwt. All fusion cases were both MLH1ph and RASwt. Our results show that kinase fusions (20/30, 67%) and most importantly targetable NTRK1 fusions (7/30, 23%) are frequent in CRCs with dMLH1/BRAFV600Ewt/MLH1ph/RASwt. NGS was the most comprehensive method in finding the fusions, of which a subset can be screened by Idylla or IHC, provided that the result is confirmed by NGS.

Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Genetic Differences Between High-grade and Low-grade Fetal Adenocarcinomas of the Lung

Fetal adenocarcinoma of the lung (FLAC) is a rare lung tumor classified into low-grade fetal adenocarcinoma of the lung (LG-FLAC) and high-grade fetal adenocarcinoma of the lung (HG-FLAC). It remains debatable whether HG-FLAC is a subset of FLAC or a distinct subtype of the conventional lung adenocarcinoma (CLA). In this study, samples of 4 LG-FLAC and 2 HG-FLAC cases were examined, and the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical (IHC), and mutational differences between the 2 subtypes were analyzed using literature review. Morphologically, LG-FLACs had a pure pattern with complex glandular architecture composed of cells with subnuclear and supranuclear vacuoles, mimicking a developing fetal lung. In contrast, HG-FLACs contained both fetal lung-like (FLL) and CLA components. With regard to IHC markers, β-catenin exhibited a nuclear/cytoplasmic staining pattern in LG-FLACs but a membranous staining pattern in HG-FLACs. Furthermore, p53 was expressed diffusely and strongly in HG-FLACs, whereas in LG-FLACs, p53 staining was completely absent. Using next-generation sequencing targeting a 1021-gene panel, mutations of CTNNB1 and DICER1 were detected in all 4 LG-FLAC samples, and a novel mutation, MYCN P44L, was discovered in 2 LG-FLAC samples. DNA samples of the FLL and CLA components of HG-FLACs were separately extracted and sequenced. The FLL component harbored no CTNNB1, DICER1, or MYCN mutations; moreover, the FLL genetic profile largely overlapped with that of the CLA component. The morphologic, IHC, and genetic features of HG-FLAC indicate that it is a variant of CLA rather than a subset of FLAC. Thus, HG-FLAC should be treated differently from LG-FLAC.

Comprehensive analysis of oncogenic fusions in mismatch repair deficient colorectal carcinomas by sequential DNA and RNA next generation sequencing

Background

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) harboring oncogenic fusions has been reported to be highly enriched in mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumors with MLH1 hypermethylation (MLH1^me+) and wild-type BRAF and RAS. In this study, dMMR CRCs were screened for oncogene fusions using sequential DNA and RNA next generation sequencing (NGS).

Results

Comprehensive analysis of fusion variants, genetic profiles and clinicopathological features in fusion-positive dMMR CRCs was performed. Among 193 consecutive dMMR CRCs, 39 cases were identified as MLH1^me+BRAF/RAS wild-type. Eighteen fusion-positive cases were detected by DNA NGS, all of which were MLH1^me+ and BRAF/RAS wild-type. RNA NGS was sequentially conducted in the remaining 21 MLH1^me+BRAF/RAS wild-type cases lacking oncogenic fusions by DNA NGS, and revealed four additional fusions, increasing the proportion of fusion-positive tumors from 46% (18/39) to 56% (22/39) in MLH1^me+BRAF/RAS wild-type dMMR cases. All 22 fusions were found to involve RTK-RAS pathway. Most fusions affected targetable receptor tyrosine kinases, including NTRK1(9/22, 41%), NTRK3(5/22, 23%), ALK(3/22, 14%), RET(2/22, 9%) and MET(1/22, 5%), whilst only two fusions affected mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade components BRAF and MAPK1, respectively. RNF43 was identified as the most frequently mutated genes, followed by APC, TGFBR2, ATM, BRCA2 and FBXW7. The vast majority (19/22, 86%) displayed alterations in key WNT pathway components, whereas none harbored additional mutations in RTK-RAS pathway. In addition, fusion-positive tumors were typically diagnosed in elder patients and predominantly right-sided, and showed a significantly higher preponderance of hepatic flexure localization (P < 0.001) and poor differentiation (P = 0.019), compared to fusion-negative MLH1^me+ CRCs.

Conclusions

We proved that sequential DNA and RNA NGS was highly effective for fusion detection in dMMR CRCs, and proposed an optimized practical fusion screening strategy. We further revealed that dMMR CRCs harboring oncogenic fusion was a genetically and clinicopathologically distinctive subgroup, and justified more precise molecular subtyping for personalized therapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-021-03108-6.

NTRK oncogenic fusions are exclusively associated with the serrated neoplasia pathway in the colorectum and begin to occur in sessile serrated lesions

Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are emerging tissue-agnostic drug targets in malignancies including colorectal carcinomas (CRCs), but their detailed landscape in the context of various colorectal carcinogenesis pathways remains to be investigated. In this study, pan-tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in retrospectively collected colorectal epithelial tumor tissues, including 441 CRCs [133 microsatellite instability-high (MSI-high) and 308 microsatellite stable (MSS)] and 595 premalignant colorectal lesions (330 serrated lesions and 265 conventional adenomas). TRK-positive cases were then subjected to next-generation sequencing and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization to confirm NTRK rearrangements. TRK IHC positivity was not observed in any of the MSS CRCs, conventional adenomas, traditional serrated adenomas, or hyperplastic polyps, whereas TRK positivity was observed in 11 of 58 (19%) MLH1-methylated MSI-high CRCs, 4 of 23 (17%) sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia (SSLDs), and 5 of 132 (4%) sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). The 11 TRK-positive MSI-high CRCs commonly harbored CpG island methylator phenotype-high (CIMP-high), MLH1 methylation, BRAF/KRAS wild-type, and NTRK1 or NTRK3 fusion (TPM3-NTRK1, TPR-NTRK1, LMNA-NTRK1, SFPQ-NTRK1, ETV6-NTRK3, or EML4-NTRK3). Both NTRK1 or NTRK3 rearrangement and BRAF/KRAS wild-type were detected in all nine TRK-positive SSL(D)s, seven of which demonstrated MSS and/or CIMP-low. TRK expression was selectively observed in distorted serrated crypts within SSLs and was occasionally localized at the base of serrated crypts. NTRK fusions were detected only in SSLs of patients aged ≥50 years, whereas BRAF mutation was found in younger age-onset SSLs. In conclusion, NTRK-rearranged colorectal tumors develop exclusively through the serrated neoplasia pathway and can be initiated from non-dysplastic SSLs without BRAF/KRAS mutations prior to full occurrence of MSI-high/CIMP-high. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

MLH1/PMS2 Expression Could Tell Classical NTRK Fusion in Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Positive Colorectal Carcinomas

To gain insight into the clinicopathologic profile of colorectal carcinomas harboring oncogenic NTRK fusions based on eastern populations as well as make the best testing algorithm for the screen, we use pan-Trk immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) respectively to screen NTRK fusions in a large, unselected cohort of 819 colon cancers; either IHC or FISH positive cases were further detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS). IHC staining was observed in ten (1.22%) cases. FISH positive was observed in 13 (1.59%) cases, and finally, a total of 18 cases were under both a DNA-based and an RNA-based NGS assay. RNA-based NGS was positive in 13 of 18 cases, whereas DNA-based NGS was only positive in three of 18 cases. In total 13 RNA-based NGS NTRK fusion-positive cases, only six cases were pan-TRK IHC positive versus 12 were FISH positive. More important, in 13 RNA-based NGS cases only five cases contain the full length of NTRK tyrosine kinase (TK) domain and form the classical fusion chimeras, other six cases only maintain parts of the TK domain and form the sub-classical fusion chimeras, two cases totally miss the TK domain and form the non-classical fusions. For clinicopathologic characteristics, besides the MMR (mismatch repair) status (p = 0.001), there is no difference between the NTRK fusion-positive and negative cases. Nevertheless, classical fusion cases prefer low differentiation (p = 0.001) and different patterns of growth (p < 0.001). Besides, we found all five classical NTRK fusion cases, and only one sub-classical case was harboring MLH1/PMS2 deficiency. When combining FISH and MMR (Mismatch Repair) status, besides one sub-classical case, all five classical fusions were detected, which means MLH1/PMS2 expression could further narrow the classical fusions in FISH NTRK fusion positive cases. Given the low sensitivity and specificity of the pan-Trk antibody, it would be useless to use IHC to screen NTRK fusion-positive CRCs. Combining FISH and MLH1/PMS2 IHC would be a good testing algorithm for the screen effective NTRK fusions. Finally, if patients are going to undergo TRK-based targeted therapy, only RNA-based NGS for detection of the specific fusion could tell the precise rearrangement information.

Inverse correlation between PD-L1 expression and LGR5 expression in tumor budding of stage II/III colorectal cancer

We investigated the expression of LGR5, the most robust and reliable known cancer stem cell (CSC) marker of colorectal cancer, and PD-L1 in tumor budding (TB), as well as clinicopathological features. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were generated from TB samples from 32 stage II/III colorectal adenocarcinoma patients, and LGR5 expression in TMAs was evaluated by RNAscope, an extremely sensitive RNA in situ hybridization technique. LGR5 expression was significantly lower in the PD-L1-positive group than in the PD-L1-negative group (P = 0.0256). In the PD-L1-positive group, the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) score tended to be higher while the TNM stage was lower compared with the PD-L1 negative group (P = 0.0822 and P = 0.0765, respectively). There was no significant difference in Overall Survival between the PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative groups (log-rank test, P = 0.8218). This study showed that PD-L1-positive patients are a unique population with low LGR5 expression, and that LGR5-positive cells may be a promising therapeutic target in PD-L1-negative patients.

NTRK fusion-positive colorectal cancer in Japanese population

ALK, ROS1 and NTRK fusions are involved in the tumorigenesis of various organs, including colorectal cancer. This study aims to clarify the prevalence of these fusions in colorectal cancer in the Japanese population. Immunohistochemical analysis of 1012 specimens of colorectal cancer revealed two NTRK-positive cases (0.2%) whereas no ALK- or ROS1-positive cases were identified. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detected an LMNA-NTRK1 fusion in a case of adenosquamous carcinoma and a TPM3-NTRK1 fusion in a case of tubular adenocarcinoma. Both NTRK1 fusion-positive cases lacked activating mutations in KRAS and BRAF and were mismatch repair-deficient with loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression and MLH1 promoter methylation. Our results show that receptor tyrosine kinase fusions are rare but present in colorectal cancers in Japanese patients, with a prevalence similar to that reported in other countries.

Evaluating larotrectinib for the treatment of advanced solid tumors harboring an NTRK gene fusion

Introduction: Characteristic of some rare pediatric and adult malignancies, addiction to the NTRK oncogene family is also observed in a small fraction of common cancers. Inhibition of their protein products, the Trk kinases, proved a successful treatment strategy for these tumors.Areas covered: The current paper reviews the clinical development of larotrectinib, a selective inhibitor of the Trk kinase family, for the treatment of NTRK fusion-positive cancers. The manuscript includes an overview of the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The authors sum up by providing the reader with their expert opinion on larotrectinib and its potential future use.Expert opinion: Larotrectinib showed tolerability and high efficacy, regardless of the primary site. In 2018, larotrectinib was granted by the Food and Drug Administration a tissue-agnostic approval for the treatment of solid tumors harboring an NTRK fusion. The major challenges will be the implementation of the screening for NTRK fusions in the general oncologic population, and the incorporation of larotrectinib into the therapeutic algorithms.

Canadian Consensus for Biomarker Testing and Treatment of TRK Fusion Cancer in Adults

The tyrosine receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib were recently approved in Canada for the treatment of solid tumours harbouring neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions. These NTRK gene fusions are oncogenic drivers found in most tumour types at a low frequency (<5%), and at a higher frequency (>80%) in a small number of rare tumours (e.g., secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland and of the breast). They are generally mutually exclusive of other common oncogenic drivers. Larotrectinib and entrectinib have demonstrated impressive overall response rates and tolerability in Phase I/II trials in patients with TRK fusion cancer with no other effective treatment options. Given the low frequency of TRK fusion cancer and the heterogeneous molecular testing landscape in Canada, identifying and optimally managing such patients represents a new challenge. We provide a Canadian consensus on when and how to test for NTRK gene fusions and when to consider treatment with a TRK inhibitor. We focus on five tumour types: thyroid carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and salivary gland carcinoma. Based on the probability of the tumour harbouring an NTRK gene fusion, we also suggest a tumour-agnostic consensus for NTRK gene fusion testing and treatment. We recommend considering a TRK inhibitor in all patients with TRK fusion cancer with no other effective treatment options.

Next-generation sequencing reveals heterogeneous genetic alterations in key signaling pathways of mismatch repair deficient colorectal carcinomas

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) is an etiologically heterogeneous molecular entity. We investigated the genetic profile, focusing on key signaling pathways and molecular diversity of dMMR CRCs. In this study, next-generation sequencing was applied to 156 consecutive dMMR CRCs and 225 randomly selected proficient MMR (pMMR) CRCs diagnosed between July 2015 and December 2019 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Genetic alterations and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (MLH1^me+) were analyzed. Among the most frequently mutated genes, RNF43, ARID1A, PIK3CA, ATM, and BRCA2 mutants were enriched in dMMR CRCs, whereas APC and TP53 mutations were enriched in pMMR CRCs. In dMMR group, RNF43, APC, ARID1A, and BRCA2 mutations were largely microsatellite instability events. WNT pathway was commonly altered regardless of MMR status. Compared to pMMR CRCs, dMMR CRCs had remarkably more prevalent PI3K, RTK-RAS, TGFβ, and DNA damage repair pathway alterations and more multiple mutations in WNT and PI3K pathways. Within dMMR tumors, mutual exclusivity occurred between CTNNB1 mutation and APC or RNF43 mutation, while coexistence existed between BRAF and RNF43 mutation, as well as RAS and APC mutation. MLH1^me+ dMMR CRCs had significantly more frequent RNF43 mutations but less frequent KRAS, APC, and CTNNB1 mutations comparing to MLH1-unmethylated dMMR CRCs. RNF43/BRAF comutations were detected in MLH1^me+ dMMR CRCs, whereas RAS/APC comutations were largely detected in Lynch syndrome-associated cases. RNF43 mutation was independently associated with MLH1^me+ rather than BRAF mutations. dMMR CRCs bearing receptor tyrosine kinase fusion demonstrated no additional RTK-RAS mutations, significantly fewer PI3K alterations and more TGFBR2 mutations than other dMMR tumors. Our study revealed that dMMR CRCs had distinctive gene mutation spectra and signaling pathway interaction patterns compared to proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) CRCs, and molecular heterogeneity was evident for these divergent oncogenic pathways. These findings justify the use of individualized therapy targeted to dMMR CRC subgroups.

Colorectal Adenocarcinomas Harboring ALK Fusion Genes: A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Genetic Study of 12 Cases and Review of the Literature

This study determined the frequency and the clinicopathologic and genetic features of colorectal carcinomas driven by oncogenic fusions of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK). Of the 8150 screened tumors, 12 (0.15%) were immunohistochemically ALK-positive with D5F3 antibody. These cancers harbored CAD-ALK (n=1), DIAPH2-ALK (n=2), EML4-ALK (n=2), LOC101929227-ALK (n=1), SLMAP-ALK (n=1), SPTBN1-ALK (n=4), and STRN-ALK (n=1) fusions, as detected by an RNA-based next-generation sequencing assay. ALK fusion carcinomas were diagnosed mostly in older patients with a 9:3 female predominance (median age: 72 y). All tumors, except a rectal one, occurred in the right colon. Most tumors were stage T3 (n=7) or T4 (n=3). Local lymph node and distant metastases were seen at presentation in 9 and 2 patients. These tumors showed moderate (n=6) or poor (n=3) glandular differentiation, solid medullary growth pattern (n=2), and pure mucinous morphology (n=1). DNA mismatch repair-deficient phenotype was identified in 10 cases. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were prominent in 9 carcinomas. In 4 carcinomas, tumor cells showed strong, focal (n=3), or diffuse programmed death-ligand 1 immunoreactivity. CDX2 expression and loss of CK20 and MUC2 expression were frequent. CK7 was expressed in 5 tumors. Four patients died of disease within 3 years, and 7 were alive with follow-up ranging from 1 to 8 years. No mutations in BRAF, RAS, and in genes encoding components of PI3K-AKT/MTOR pathway were identified. However, 1 tumor had a loss-of-function PTEN mutation. Aberration of p53 signaling, TP53 mutations, and/or nuclear accumulation of p53 protein was seen in 9 cases. ALK fusion colorectal carcinomas are a distinct and rare subtype of colorectal cancers displaying some features of mismatch repair-deficient tumors.

Targeted next generation sequencing of MLH1-deficient, MLH1 promoter hypermethylated, and BRAF/RAS-wild-type colorectal adenocarcinomas is effective in detecting tumors with actionable oncogenic gene fusions

Oncogenic gene fusions represent attractive targets for therapy of cancer. However, the frequency of actionable genomic rearrangements in colorectal cancer (CRC) is very low, and universal screening for these alterations seems to be impractical and costly. To address this problem, several large scale studies retrospectivelly showed that CRC with gene fusions are highly enriched in groups of tumors defined by MLH1 DNA mismatch repair protein deficiency (MLH1d), and hypermethylation of MLH1 promoter (MLH1ph), and/or the presence of microsatellite instability, and BRAF/KRAS wild-type status (BRAFwt/KRASwt). In this study, we used targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) to explore the occurence of potentially therapeutically targetable gene fusions in an unselected series of BRAFwt/KRASwt CRC cases that displayed MLH1d/MLH1ph. From the initially identified group of 173 MLH1d CRC cases, 141 cases (81.5%) displayed MLH1ph. BRAFwt/RASwt genotype was confirmed in 23 of 141 (~16%) of MLH1d/MLH1ph cases. Targeted NGS of these 23 cases identified oncogenic gene fusions in nine patients (39.1%; CI95: 20.5%-61.2%). Detected fusions involved NTRK (four cases), ALK (two cases), and BRAF genes (three cases). As a secondary outcome of NGS testing, we identified PIK3K-AKT-mTOR pathway alterations in two CRC cases, which displayed PIK3CA mutation. Altogether, 11 of 23 (~48%) MLH1d/MLH1ph/BRAFwt/RASwt tumors showed genetic alterations that could induce resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. Our study confirms that targeted NGS of MLH1d/MLH1ph and BRAFwt/RASwt CRCs could be a cost-effective strategy in detecting patients with potentially druggable oncogenic kinase fusions.

Colonic Adenocarcinomas Harboring NTRK Fusion Genes: A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Genetic Study of 16 Cases and Review of the Literature

This study was undertaken to determine the frequency, and the clinicopathologic and genetic features, of colon cancers driven by neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) gene fusions. Of the 7008 tumors screened for NTRK expression using a pan-Trk antibody, 16 (0.23%) had Trk immunoreactivity. ArcherDx assay detected TPM3-NTRK1 (n=9), LMNA-NTRK1 (n=3), TPR-NTRK1 (n=2) and EML4-NTRK3 (n=1) fusion transcripts in 15 cases with sufficient RNA quality. Patients were predominantly women (median age: 63 y). The tumors involved the right (n=12) and left colon unequally and were either stage T3 (n=12) or T4. Local lymph node and distant metastases were seen at presentation in 6 and 1 patients, respectively. Lymphovascular invasion was present in all cases. Histologically, tumors showed moderate to poor (n=11) differentiation with a partly or entirely solid pattern (n=5) and mucinous component (n=10), including 1 case with sheets of signet ring cells. DNA mismatch repair-deficient phenotype was seen in 13 cases. Tumor-infiltrating CD4/CD8 lymphocytes were prominent in 9 cases. Programmed death-ligand 1 positive tumor-infiltrating immune cells and focal tumor cell positivity were seen in the majority of cases. CDX2 expression and loss of CK20 and MUC2 expression were frequent. CK7 was expressed in 5 cases. No mutations in BRAF, RAS, and PIK3CA were identified. However, other genes of the PI3K-AKT/MTOR pathway were mutated. In several cases, components of Wnt/β-catenin (APC, AMER1, CTNNB1), p53, and TGFβ (ACVR2A, TGFBR2) pathways were mutated. However, no SMAD4 mutations were found. Two tumors harbored FBXW7 tumor suppressor gene mutations. NTRK fusion tumors constitute a distinct but rare subgroup of colorectal carcinomas.

ALK detection in lung cancer: identification of atypical and cryptic ALK rearrangements using an optimal algorithm

PURPOSE

IHC, FISH, and NGS are common methods of ALK evaluation in NSCLC. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether ALK false positives or false negatives occurred more often in daily routines. An approach to identify ALK fusion was then proposed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 1815 cases of NSCLC, including 83 (4.6%) ALK IHC positives. Total 182 samples (62 ALK+ and 120 ALK-) were examined via FISH, RT-ddPCR, NGS, RT-qPCR and RNAscope to confirm ALK status.

RESULTS

One ALK FISH false negative was found, which harbored two genomic rearrangements involved in EML4-ALK (exon 13:exon 20) fusion. One ALK IHC false negative was confirmed depending on a rare ALK FISH-positive pattern and ALK RNAscope positive but ALK fusion was not found via NGS. In addition, an atypical ALK FISH-positive pattern was observed in an IHC-positive case with chromosome 2 inversion leading to EML4-ALK (exon 6:exon 20) fusion. EML4-ALK fusion was determined in one case with an atypical FISH patterns by RT-qPCR. Rare complicated genomic rearrangements involved in a novel ALK fusion of EML4-ALK (exon 7:exon 14) were distinguished in an ALK IHC and FISH double-positive case.

CONCLUSION

False negative of ALK IHC, FISH and NGS results were found in our cohort, but none was false ALK positive. False ALK negatives should be more concerned than false positives. ALK rearrangements with cryptic ALK fusion patterns could be identified using our algorithm. Non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer was recommended for priority detection.

Distinct clinical phenotype and genetic testing strategy for Lynch syndrome in China based on a large colorectal cancer cohort

Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) predisposition syndrome. We performed a large-scale study to assess a screening strategy for identifying LS in Chinese CRC patients in routine clinical testing. A total of 4,195 eligible CRCs were universally screened. Then, 8.7% of CRCs were detected with dMMR. The incidence of LS was 2.7% (115 of 4,195) in this cohort; among patients over 70 years of age, only 0.3% (2 of 678) were diagnosed as LS. Then, 17.4% of LS cases showed large genomic deletions/duplications. LS probands developed CRCs predominantly at proximal colon location. The frequency of BRAF V600E mutation among Chinese CRCs was significantly lower than that among Western populations, and MLH1 promoter methylation significantly improved the efficiency of genetic screening for LS among MLH1-deficient patients. A comprehensive molecular testing strategy that includes detection of large genomic rearrangements is imperative for the diagnosis of LS. Among CRC patients aged 70 years or younger, a selective strategy for LS screening might be considered for routine clinical testing.

[NTRK Fusions: A new way of treatment for gastro-intestinal tumor?]

The advent of molecular biology resulted in the discovery of new oncogenes that have led to the development of targeted therapies for the management of cancer patients. The development of these therapies has improved the prognosis of patients in various tumour localizations. The TRK receptor (tropomyosin receptor kinase) is a transmembrane receptor with a tyrosine kinase activity that plays a role in both cell proliferation and the physiology of the nervous system. Fusions involving the NTRK gene, which codes for this receptor, have been found in different types of solid tumours and lead to its constitutional activation. These fusions, however uncommon, are mainly found in rare pediatric tumours but can also be encountered in digestive cancers with high prevalence (such as colorectal cancer, especially in case of microsatellite instability, with a frequency of 2.5 to 38.5 %) or in aggressive cancers (such as pancreatic cancer). Therapies targeting TRK, such as larotrectinib or entrectinib, have shown significant response rates, usually greater than 6 months, for tumours from various primary sites presenting NTRK fusions and refractory to standard therapies. These fusions can be detected by different methods: immunohistochemistry, FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) as well as NGS (next generation sequencing). The intent of this review is to report on current knowledge on NTRK fusions in oncology and to discuss the role of these fusions in digestive cancers and potential therapeutic implications.

DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency Detection in Colorectal Cancer by a New Microsatellite Instability Analysis System

Background

Although microsatellite instability (MSI) is most commonly detected in colorectal cancer (CRC), improvement in MSI analysis method can always help us better assessing MSI phenotypes and gaining useful information in challenging cases. The purpose of current study is to explore whether the ProDx® MSI analysis System (ProDx® MSI) can improve MSI classification in CRC.

Methods

We compared the MSI profiles of 97 FFPE samples from CRC patients by ProDx® MSI with Promega MSI analysis System 1.2 and NCI panel. The result is then confirmed by IHC test, which evaluate MMR protein expression. Furthermore, next generation sequencing was performed to double confirm the specimens with discordant results.

Results

Among the total 97 CRC cases, 35 were scored as MSI-High by ProDx® MSI, Promega MSI analysis System 1.2, and NCI panel simultaneously. Three extra MSI-High cases were identified by ProDx® MSI. These three cases were classified as MSI-Low by NCI panel, while two of these as MSI-Low, and 1 as MSS by Promega MSI analysis System 1.2. ProDx® MSI had higher concordance with IHC detection compared with Promega MSI Analysis System 1.2 and NCI panel at 99.0%, 96.9%, and 95.9%, respectively. The ProDx® MSI distinguished MSI status with 100% sensitivity and 98.4% specificity. Our data showed that MSI-High phenotype occurred most frequently in tumor development stage I and stage II.

Conclusions

The colorectal cancer can be classified according to MSI status accurately by ProDx® MSI. More cases with MSI-High feature may be revealed by ProDx® MSI than by previous test systems in colorectal cancer.

Biomarker-guided therapy for colorectal cancer: strength in complexity

The number of molecularly stratified treatment options available to patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing, with a parallel rise in the use of biomarkers to guide prognostication and treatment decision-making. The increase in both the number of biomarkers and their use has resulted in a progressively complex situation, evident both from the extensive interactions between biomarkers and from their sometimes complex associations with patient prognosis and treatment benefit. Current and emerging biomarkers also reflect the genomic complexity of CRC, and include a wide range of aberrations such as point mutations, amplifications, fusions and hypermutator phenotypes, in addition to global gene expression subtypes. In this Review, we provide an overview of current and emerging clinically relevant biomarkers and their role in the management of patients with CRC, illustrating the intricacies of biomarker interactions and the growing treatment opportunities created by the availability of comprehensive molecular profiling.

TRK Fusions Are Enriched in Cancers with Uncommon Histologies and the Absence of Canonical Driver Mutations

PURPOSE

TRK inhibitors achieve marked tumor-agnostic efficacy in TRK fusion-positive cancers and consequently are now an established standard of care. Little is known, however, about the demographics, outcomes, response to alternative standard therapies, or genomic characteristics of TRK fusion-positive cancers.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Utilizing a center-wide screening program involving more than 26,000 prospectively sequenced patients, genomic and clinical data from all cases with TRK fusions were extracted. An integrated analysis was performed of genomic, therapeutic, and phenomic outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 76 cases with confirmed TRK fusions (0.28% overall prevalence) involving 48 unique rearrangements and 17 cancer types. The presence of a TRK fusion was associated with depletion of concurrent oncogenic drivers (P < 0.001) and lower tumor mutation burden (P < 0.001), with the exception of colorectal cancer where TRK fusions cooccur with microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Longitudinal profiling in a subset of patients indicated that TRK fusions were present in all sampled timepoints in 82% (14/17) of cases. Progression-free survival on first-line therapy, excluding TRK inhibitors, administered for advanced disease was 9.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.8-13.2]. The best overall response rate achieved with chemotherapy containing-regimens across all lines of therapy was 63% (95% CI, 41-81). Among 12 patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors, a patient with MSI-H colorectal cancer had the only observed response.

CONCLUSIONS

TRK fusion-positive cancers can respond to alternative standards of care, although efficacy of immunotherapy in the absence of other predictive biomarkers (MSI-H) appears limited. TRK fusions are present in tumors with simple genomes lacking in concurrent drivers that may partially explain the tumor-agnostic efficacy of TRK inhibitors.

Identification of Actionable Fusions as an Anti-EGFR Resistance Mechanism Using a Circulating Tumor DNA Assay

PURPOSE

Gene fusions are established oncogenic drivers and emerging therapeutic targets in advanced colorectal cancer. This study aimed to detail the frequencies and clinicopathological features of gene fusions in colorectal cancer using a circulating tumor DNA assay.

METHODS

Circulating tumor DNA samples in patients with advanced colorectal cancer were analyzed at 4,581 unique time points using a validated plasma-based multigene assay that includes assessment of fusions in FGFR2, FGFR3, RET, ALK, NTRK1, and ROS1. Associations between fusions and clinicopathological features were measured using Fisher's exact test. Relative frequencies of genomic alterations were compared between fusion-present and fusion-absent cases using an unpaired t test.

RESULTS

Forty-four unique fusions were identified in 40 (1.1%) of the 3,808 patients with circulating tumor DNA detected: RET (n = 6; 36% of all fusions detected), FGFR3 (n = 2; 27%), ALK (n = 10, 23%), NTRK1 (n = 3; 7%), ROS1 (n = 2; 5%), and FGFR2 (n = 1; 2%). Relative to nonfusion variants detected, fusions were more likely to be subclonal (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% CI, 2.94 to 23.00; P < .001). Mutations associated with a previously reported anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapy resistance signature (subclonal RAS and EGFR mutations) were found with fusions in FGFR3 (10 of 12 patients), RET (nine of 16 patients), and ALK (seven of 10 patients). For the 27 patients with available clinical histories, 21 (78%) had EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment before fusion detection.

CONCLUSION

Diverse and potentially actionable fusions can be detected using a circulating tumor DNA assay in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Distribution of coexisting subclonal mutations in EGFR, KRAS, and NRAS in a subset of the patients with fusion-present colorectal cancer suggests that these fusions may arise as a novel mechanism of resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Identification of Germline Mismatch Repair Gene Mutations in Lung Cancer Patients With Paired Tumor-Normal Next Generation Sequencing: A Retrospective Study

Background: Paired tumor-normal targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) is primarily used to identify actionable somatic mutations, but can also detect germline variants including pathogenic germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes that underlie Lynch syndrome. In the present study we examined paired NGS data from lung cancer patients to identify germline mutations in MMR genes. As lung cancer is not one of the recognized Lynch syndrome-associated neoplasms, we also investigated whether these lung cancer cases are due to Lynch syndrome or are instead sporadic cancers occurring in Lynch syndrome patients. Methods: A retrospective study of 1,179 lung cancer patients with available paired NGS data was performed to identify germline mutations in the MMR genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, and evaluate tumor mutation burden (TMB). Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing was done on select cases with MMR gene mutations by either NGS or PCR/capillary electrophoresis approach. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MMR proteins was performed in select patients. Results: Pathogenic or likely-pathogenic germline mutations in PMS2, MSH2, or MSH6 were detected in 0.5% (6/1,179) of lung cancer patients; three of the patients had a family history of colon or gastric cancer. The median age at diagnosis of these cases was 68.5 years old. None of these six patients exhibited MSI or loss of MMR protein expression. Among them, no second hit somatic mutations in MMR genes (including single-nucleotide variants, small insertions or deletions and copy number alterations) were detected, and the median TMB was 4.5 muts/MB. Subsequent genetic testing of family members identified new Lynch syndrome cases in two first-degree relatives. Conclusion: These data imply that lung cancers in Lynch syndrome patients are unrelated to the underlying Lynch syndrome diagnosis and occur spontaneously. Nonetheless, paired tumor-normal NGS can identify germline mutations to help reveal Lynch syndrome in cancer patients. This has important implications for cancer screening and risk reduction in these patients and their families.