1
|
Siermann M, Vermeesch JR, Raivio T, Tšuiko O, Borry P. Polygenic embryo screening: quo vadis? J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:1719-1726. [PMID: 38879662 PMCID: PMC11263429 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03169-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Recently, the use of polygenic risk scores in embryo screening (PGT-P) has been introduced on the premise of reducing polygenic disease risk through embryo selection. However, it has been met with extensive critique: considered "technology-driven" rather than "evidence-based", concerns exist about its validity, utility, ethics, and societal effects. Its scientific foundations and criticisms thus need to be carefully considered. However, seeing as PGT-P is already offered in some settings, further questions need to be addressed, in order to give due diligence to various aspects of PGT-P. By examining the complexities of clinical introduction of PGT-P, we discuss whether PGT-P could be responsibly implemented in the first place, what elements need to be addressed if PGT-P is clinically implemented, and subsequently how counselling and decision-making of its users could be envisaged. By dissecting these elements, we provide an overview of important practical questions of PGT-P and emphasize elements of PGT-P that we think have yet to be given sufficient attention. These questions and elements are for example related to the potential target group, scope, and decision-making possibilities of PGT-P. The aspects we raise are crucial to consider by the scientific community and policy makers for the development of guidelines and/or an ethical framework for PGT-P.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Siermann
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, P.O. Box 63, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
| | | | - Taneli Raivio
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, P.O. Box 63, 00014, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Center for Human Genetics, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Go M, Shim SH. Genomic aspects in reproductive medicine. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2024; 51:91-101. [PMID: 38263590 PMCID: PMC11140259 DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2023.06303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Infertility is a complex disease characterized by extreme genetic heterogeneity, compounded by various environmental factors. While there are exceptions, individual genetic and genomic variations related to infertility are typically rare, often family-specific, and may serve as susceptibility factors rather than direct causes of the disease. Consequently, identifying the cause of infertility and developing prevention and treatment strategies based on these factors remain challenging tasks, even in the modern genomic era. In this review, we first examine the genetic and genomic variations associated with infertility, and subsequently summarize the concepts and methods of preimplantation genetic testing in light of advances in genome analysis technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minyeon Go
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Life Science, CHA University, Pocheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Han Shim
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Life Science, CHA University, Pocheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fields D, Asbury K. Do Children Think it is Important to Predict Learning and Behaviour Problems, and Do They Think Genetic Screening Has a Role to Play in This? J Autism Dev Disord 2024; 54:2368-2385. [PMID: 37022575 PMCID: PMC11143042 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-023-05966-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
This study explores how capable young children are of thinking about a potential future that uses DNA screening to assess an individual's likelihood of experiencing learning or behaviour difficulties. Puppets and a scenario-based approach were used to ask children aged 4-10 (n = 165) whether they thought DNA screening might be helpful or harmful. A content analysis derived six categories: (1) 'Worried about being - and being seen as - different'; (2) 'Beliefs about the origins of learning and behaviour'; (3) 'Testing is harmful'; (4) 'Testing could help'; (5) 'How soon is too soon for testing?'; and (6) 'What's the point?'. Findings indicate young children, as key stakeholders, can make useful contributions to public debate in this important and controversial area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Fields
- Psychology in Education Research Centre, Department of Education, University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom.
| | - Kathryn Asbury
- Psychology in Education Research Centre, Department of Education, University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Capalbo A, de Wert G, Mertes H, Klausner L, Coonen E, Spinella F, Van de Velde H, Viville S, Sermon K, Vermeulen N, Lencz T, Carmi S. Screening embryos for polygenic disease risk: a review of epidemiological, clinical, and ethical considerations. Hum Reprod Update 2024:dmae012. [PMID: 38805697 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmae012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The genetic composition of embryos generated by in vitro fertilization (IVF) can be examined with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Until recently, PGT was limited to detecting single-gene, high-risk pathogenic variants, large structural variants, and aneuploidy. Recent advances have made genome-wide genotyping of IVF embryos feasible and affordable, raising the possibility of screening embryos for their risk of polygenic diseases such as breast cancer, hypertension, diabetes, or schizophrenia. Despite a heated debate around this new technology, called polygenic embryo screening (PES; also PGT-P), it is already available to IVF patients in some countries. Several articles have studied epidemiological, clinical, and ethical perspectives on PES; however, a comprehensive, principled review of this emerging field is missing. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE This review has four main goals. First, given the interdisciplinary nature of PES studies, we aim to provide a self-contained educational background about PES to reproductive specialists interested in the subject. Second, we provide a comprehensive and critical review of arguments for and against the introduction of PES, crystallizing and prioritizing the key issues. We also cover the attitudes of IVF patients, clinicians, and the public towards PES. Third, we distinguish between possible future groups of PES patients, highlighting the benefits and harms pertaining to each group. Finally, our review, which is supported by ESHRE, is intended to aid healthcare professionals and policymakers in decision-making regarding whether to introduce PES in the clinic, and if so, how, and to whom. SEARCH METHODS We searched for PubMed-indexed articles published between 1/1/2003 and 1/3/2024 using the terms 'polygenic embryo screening', 'polygenic preimplantation', and 'PGT-P'. We limited the review to primary research papers in English whose main focus was PES for medical conditions. We also included papers that did not appear in the search but were deemed relevant. OUTCOMES The main theoretical benefit of PES is a reduction in lifetime polygenic disease risk for children born after screening. The magnitude of the risk reduction has been predicted based on statistical modelling, simulations, and sibling pair analyses. Results based on all methods suggest that under the best-case scenario, large relative risk reductions are possible for one or more diseases. However, as these models abstract several practical limitations, the realized benefits may be smaller, particularly due to a limited number of embryos and unclear future accuracy of the risk estimates. PES may negatively impact patients and their future children, as well as society. The main personal harms are an unindicated IVF treatment, a possible reduction in IVF success rates, and patient confusion, incomplete counselling, and choice overload. The main possible societal harms include discarded embryos, an increasing demand for 'designer babies', overemphasis of the genetic determinants of disease, unequal access, and lower utility in people of non-European ancestries. Benefits and harms will vary across the main potential patient groups, comprising patients already requiring IVF, fertile people with a history of a severe polygenic disease, and fertile healthy people. In the United States, the attitudes of IVF patients and the public towards PES seem positive, while healthcare professionals are cautious, sceptical about clinical utility, and concerned about patient counselling. WIDER IMPLICATIONS The theoretical potential of PES to reduce risk across multiple polygenic diseases requires further research into its benefits and harms. Given the large number of practical limitations and possible harms, particularly unnecessary IVF treatments and discarded viable embryos, PES should be offered only within a research context before further clarity is achieved regarding its balance of benefits and harms. The gap in attitudes between healthcare professionals and the public needs to be narrowed by expanding public and patient education and providing resources for informative and unbiased genetic counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Capalbo
- Juno Genetics, Department of Reproductive Genetics, Rome, Italy
- Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), Department of Medical Genetics, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Guido de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, CAPHRI-School for Public Health and Primary Care and GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Heidi Mertes
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Liraz Klausner
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Edith Coonen
- Departments of Clinical Genetics and Reproductive Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Francesca Spinella
- Eurofins GENOMA Group Srl, Molecular Genetics Laboratories, Department of Scientific Communication, Rome, Italy
| | - Hilde Van de Velde
- Research Group Genetics Reproduction and Development (GRAD), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- Brussels IVF, UZ Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Stephane Viville
- Laboratoire de Génétique Médicale LGM, Institut de Génétique Médicale d'Alsace IGMA, INSERM UMR 1112, Université de Strasbourg, France
- Laboratoire de Diagnostic Génétique, Unité de Génétique de l'infertilité (UF3472), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Karen Sermon
- Research Group Genetics Reproduction and Development (GRAD), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | | | - Todd Lencz
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Departments of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA
| | - Shai Carmi
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Siermann M, Vermeesch JR, Raivio T, Vanhie A, Peeraer K, Tšuiko O, Borry P. Perspectives of preimplantation genetic testing patients in Belgium on the ethics of polygenic embryo screening. Reprod Biomed Online 2024; 49:104294. [PMID: 39024927 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION What are the perspectives of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) patients in Belgium on the ethics of PGT for polygenic risk scoring (PGT-P)? DESIGN In-depth interviews (18 in total, 10 couples, 8 women, n = 28) were performed with patients who had undergone treatment with PGT for monogenic/single-gene defects (PGT-M) or chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) between 2017 and 2019 in Belgium. Participants were asked about their own experiences with PGT-M/SR and about their viewpoints on PGT-P, including their own interest and their ideas on its desirability, scope and consequences. Inductive content analysis was used to analyse the interviews. RESULTS Participants stated that their experiences with PGT-M/SR had been physically, psychologically and practically difficult. Most participants stated that, partly because of these difficulties, they did not see the added value of knowing the risk scores of embryos via PGT-P. Many participants worried that PGT-P could lead to additional anxieties, responsibilities and complex choices in reproduction and parenthood. They argued that not everything should be controlled and felt that PGT-P, especially non-medical and broad screening, was going too far. With regards to the clinical implementation of PGT-P, participants in general preferred PGT-P to be limited to people with a serious polygenic family history and wanted embryo selection decisions to be made by healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that individuals with experience of PGT-M/SR saw PGT-P as different from PGT-M/SR. They had various ethical concerns with regards to PGT-P, especially regarding broadly offering PGT-P. These stakeholder viewpoints need to be considered regarding potential PGT-P implementation and guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Siermann
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Joris R Vermeesch
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Taneli Raivio
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Arne Vanhie
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine (LEERM), Department of Development and Regeneration, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Leuven University Fertility Centre, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine (LEERM), Department of Development and Regeneration, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Reproductive Genetics Unit, Center for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chin AHB, Lim LW, Muhsin SM. Regulatory safeguards needed if preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic risk scores (PGT-P) is permitted in Singapore. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2024:jme-2023-109195. [PMID: 38744454 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Singapore, a highly affluent island city-state located in Southeast Asia, has increasingly leveraged new assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to overcome its dismal fertility rates in recent years. A new frontier in ART is preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for polygenic risk scores (PRS) to predict complex multifactorial traits in IVF (in vitro fertilisation) embryos, such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and various other characteristics like height, intelligence quotient (IQ), hair and eye colour. Unlike well-known safety risks with human genome editing, there are negligible risks with PGT-P, because there are no man-made genetic modifications that can be transmitted to future generations. Nevertheless, the current efficacy of using PGT-P to select IVF embryos for either increased or decreased probability of developing specific polygenic traits is still far from certain. Hence, the regulatory safeguards proposed here will be based on the assumption that the efficacy of this new technology platform has already been validated. These include: (1) restricting the application of PGT-P only for prevention of clinically relevant polygenic disease traits, (2) securely blocking patients' access to the raw genomic DNA sequencing data of their IVF embryos, (3) validating diagnosis of polygenic disease traits in the prospective parents/grandparents of IVF embryos, and restricting PGT-P only for preventing specifically diagnosed polygenic disease traits and (4) mandating rigorous and comprehensive genetic counselling for IVF patients considering PGT-P. There is an urgent and dire need to prevent abuse of the PGT-P technique, as well as protect the interests and welfare of patients if its clinical application is to be permitted in the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lee Wei Lim
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Sayyed Mohamed Muhsin
- Department of Fiqh and Usul al-Fiqh, International Islamic University Malaysia, Gombak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meyer MN, Papageorge NW, Parens E, Regenberg A, Sugarman J, Thom K. Potential corporate uses of polygenic indexes: Starting a conversation about the associated ethics and policy issues. Am J Hum Genet 2024; 111:833-840. [PMID: 38701744 PMCID: PMC11080274 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Some commercial firms currently sell polygenic indexes (PGIs) to individual consumers, despite their relatively low predictive power. It might be tempting to assume that because the predictive power of many PGIs is so modest, other sorts of firms-such as those selling insurance and financial services-will not be interested in using PGIs for their own purposes. We argue to the contrary. We build this argument in two ways. First, we offer a very simple model, rooted in economic theory, of a profit-maximizing firm that can gain information about a single consumer's genome. We use the model to show that, depending on the specific economic environment, a firm would be willing to pay for statistically noisy PGIs, even if they allow for only a small reduction in uncertainty. Second, we describe two plausible scenarios in which these different kinds of firms could conceivably use PGIs to maximize profits. Finally, we briefly discuss some of the associated ethics and policy issues. They deserve more attention, which is unlikely to be given until it is first recognized that firms whose services affect a large swath of the public will indeed have incentives to use PGIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle N Meyer
- Department of Bioethics and Decision Sciences, Geisinger College of Health Sciences, Danville, PA, USA.
| | | | | | - Alan Regenberg
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kevin Thom
- Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Siermann M, van der Schoot V, Bunnik EM, Borry P. Ready for polygenic risk scores? An analysis of regulation of preimplantation genetic testing in European countries. Hum Reprod 2024; 39:1117-1130. [PMID: 38514452 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Would the different regulatory approaches for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in Europe permit the implementation of preimplantation genetic testing using polygenic risk scores (PGT-P)? SUMMARY ANSWER While the regulatory approaches for PGT differ between countries, the space provided for potential implementation of PGT-P seems limited in all three regulatory models. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY PGT is a reproductive genetic technology that allows the testing for hereditary genetic disorders and chromosome abnormalities in embryos before implantation. Throughout its history, PGT has largely been regarded as an ethically sensitive technology. For example, ethical questions have been raised regarding the use of PGT for adult-onset conditions, non-medical sex selection, and human leukocyte antigen typing for the benefit of existing siblings. Countries in which PGT is offered each have their own approach of regulating the clinical application of PGT, and a clear overview of legal and practical regulation of PGT in Europe is lacking. An emerging development within the field of PGT, namely PGT-P, is currently bringing new ethical tensions to the forefront. It is unclear whether PGT-P may be applied within the current regulatory frameworks in Europe. Therefore, it is important to investigate current regulatory frameworks in Europe and determine whether PGT-P fits within these frameworks. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the legal and practical regulation of the use of PGT in seven selected European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and the UK) and critically analyse the different approaches with regards to regulatory possibilities for PGT-P. Between July and September 2023, we performed a thorough and extensive search of websites of governments and governmental agencies, websites of scientific and professional organizations, and academic articles in which laws and regulations are described. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We investigated the legal and regulatory aspects of PGT by analysing legal documents, regulatory frameworks, scientific articles, and guidelines from scientific organizations and regulatory bodies to gather relevant information about each included country. The main sources of information were national laws relating to PGT. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE We divided the PGT regulation approaches into three models. The regulation of PGT differs per country, with some countries requiring central approval of PGT for each new indication (the medical indication model: the UK, the Netherlands), other countries evaluating each individual PGT request at the local level (the individual requests model: France, Germany), and countries largely leaving decision-making about clinical application of PGT to healthcare professionals (the clinical assessment model: Belgium, Italy, Spain). In the countries surveyed that use the medical indication model and the individual requests model, current legal frameworks and PGT criteria seem to exclude PGT-P. In countries using the clinical assessment model, the fact that healthcare professionals and scientific organizations in Europe are generally negative about implementation of PGT-P due to scientific and socio-ethical concerns, implies that, even if it were legally possible, the chance that PGT-P would be offered in the near future might be low. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The results are based on our interpretation of publicly available written information and documents, therefore not all potential discrepancies between law and practice might have been identified. In addition, our analysis focuses on seven-and not all-European countries. However, since these countries are relevant players within PGT in Europe and since they have distinct PGT regulations, the insights gathered give relevant insights into diverse ways of PGT regulation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that provides a thorough overview of the legal and practical regulation of PGT in Europe. Our analysis of how PGT-P fits within current regulation models provides guidance for healthcare professionals and policymakers in navigating the possible future implementation of PGT-P within Europe. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 813707. The authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Siermann
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - V van der Schoot
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M Bunnik
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Borry
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Furrer RA, Barlevy D, Pereira S, Carmi S, Lencz T, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Public Attitudes, Interests, and Concerns Regarding Polygenic Embryo Screening. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2410832. [PMID: 38743425 PMCID: PMC11094562 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.10832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Polygenic embryo screening (PES) is a novel technology that estimates the likelihood of developing future conditions (eg, diabetes or depression) and traits (eg, height or cognitive ability) in human embryos, with the goal of selecting which embryos to use. Given its commercial availability and concerns raised by researchers, clinicians, bioethicists, and professional organizations, it is essential to inform key stakeholders and relevant policymakers about the public's perspectives on this technology. Objective To survey US adults to examine general attitudes, interests, and concerns regarding PES use. Design, Setting, and Participants For this survey study, data were collected from 1 stratified sample and 1 nonprobability sample (samples 1 and 2, respectively) between March and July 2023. The surveys measured approval, interest, and concerns regarding various applications of PES. In the second sample, presentation of a list of potential concerns was randomized (presented at survey onset vs survey end). The survey was designed using Qualtrics and distributed to participants through Prolific, an online sampling firm. Sample 1 was nationally representative with respect to gender, age, and race and ethnicity; sample 2 was recruited without specific demographic criteria. Analyses were conducted between March 2023 and February 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures Participants reported their approval, interest, and concerns regarding various applications of PES and outcomes screened (eg, traits and conditions). Statistical analysis was conducted using independent samples t tests and repeated-measures analyses of variance. Results Of the 1435 respondents in sample 1, demographic data were available for 1427 (mean [SD] age, 45.8 [16.0] years; 724 women [50.7%]). Among these 1427 sample 1 respondents, 1027 (72.0%) expressed approval for PES and 1169 (81.9%) expressed some interest in using PES if already undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Approval among these respondents for using PES for embryo selection was notably high for physical health conditions (1109 [77.7%]) and psychiatric health conditions (1028 [72.0%]). In contrast, there was minority approval for embryo selection based on PES for behavioral traits (514 [36.0%]) and physical traits (432 [30.3%]). Nevertheless, concerns about PES leading to false expectations and promoting eugenic practices were pronounced, with 787 of 1422 (55.3%) and 780 of 1423 (54.8%) respondents finding them very to extremely concerning, respectively. Sample 2 included 192 respondents (mean [SD] age 37.7 [12.2] years; 110 men [57.3%]). These respondents were presented concerns at survey onset (n = 95) vs survey end (n = 97), which was associated with less approval (28-percentage point decrease) and more uncertainty (24 percentage-point increase) but with only slightly higher disapproval (4 percentage-point increase). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that it is critical for health care professionals and medical societies to consider and understand the perspectives of diverse stakeholders (eg, patients undergoing IVF, clinicians, and the general public), given the absence of regulation and the recent commercial availability of PES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémy A. Furrer
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dorit Barlevy
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Shai Carmi
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Todd Lencz
- Institute of Behavioral Science, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
- Departments of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
- Division of Research, Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital Division of Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York
| | - Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Barlevy D, Cenolli I, Campbell T, Furrer R, Mukherjee M, Kostick-Quenet K, Carmi S, Lencz T, Lázaro-Muñoz G, Pereira S. Patient interest in and clinician reservations on polygenic embryo screening: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:1221-1231. [PMID: 38470550 PMCID: PMC11143162 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03074-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We explored and compared perspectives of reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists (REIs) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients regarding polygenic embryo screening (PES), a new type of preimplantation screening that estimates the genetic chances of developing polygenic conditions and traits in the future. METHODS Qualitative thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with US-based REIs and IVF patients. RESULTS Clinicians and patients often held favorable views of screening embryos for physical or psychiatric conditions, though clinicians tended to temper their positive attitudes with specific caveats. Clinicians also expressed negative views about screening embryos for traits more frequently than patients, who generally held more positive views. Most clinicians were either unwilling to discuss or offer PES to patients or were willing to do so only under certain circumstances, while many patients expressed interest in PES. Both stakeholder groups envisioned multiple potential benefits or uses of PES and raised multiple potential, interrelated concerns about PES. CONCLUSION A gap exists between clinician and patient attitudes toward PES; clinicians generally maintained reservations about such screening and patients indicated interest in it. Clinicians and patients sometimes imagined using PES to prepare for the birth of a predisposed or "affected" individual-a rationale that is often associated with prenatal testing. Many clinicians and patients held different attitudes depending on what is specifically screened, despite the sometimes blurry distinction between conditions and traits. Considerations raised by clinicians and patients may help guide professional societies in developing guidelines to navigate the uncertain terrain of PES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Barlevy
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - I Cenolli
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - T Campbell
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - R Furrer
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - M Mukherjee
- Sociology Department, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - K Kostick-Quenet
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - S Carmi
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9112102, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - T Lencz
- Institute of Behavioral Science, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA
- Departments of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, 11549, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital Division of Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, 11004, USA
| | - G Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - S Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ginod P, Dahan MH. Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Polygenetic Conditions: A Legal, Ethical, and Scientific Challenge. Semin Reprod Med 2024; 42:60-68. [PMID: 38519038 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
The recent commercialization of the Embryo Health Score (EHS), determined through preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic conditions, offers the potential to select embryos with lower disease risk, thus potentially enhancing offspring longevity and health. Lately, Orchid Health company increased testing from less than 20 diseases to more than 900+ conditions for birth defects. However, the "geneticization" of phenotype estimates to a health state erases the environmental part, including the in vitro fertilization potential risks, questioning its scientific usefulness. EHS is utilized in countries with minimal regulatory oversight and will likely expand, while it remains illegal in other countries due to ethical and legal dilemmas it raises about reproductive autonomy, discrimination, impacts on family dynamics, and genetic diversity. The shift toward commercialized polygenic embryo screening (PES) redefines healthcare relationships, turning prospective parents into consumers and altering the physician's role. Moreover, PES could increase social inequalities, stigmatize those not born following PES, and encourage "desirable" phenotypic or behavioral traits selection, leading to ethical drift. Addressing these issues is essential before further implementation and requires a collaborative approach involving political, governmental, and public health, alongside geneticists, ethicists, and fertility specialists, focusing on the societal implications and acceptability of testing for polygenic traits for embryo selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perrine Ginod
- MUHC Reproductive Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique et Assistance Médicale à la Procréation, Dijon, France
| | - Michael H Dahan
- MUHC Reproductive Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Siermann M, Valcke O, Vermeesch JR, Raivio T, Tšuiko O, Borry P. "Are we not going too far?": Socio-ethical considerations of preimplantation genetic testing using polygenic risk scores according to healthcare professionals. Soc Sci Med 2024; 343:116599. [PMID: 38244362 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
The recent introduction of polygenic risk scores within preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-P) has been met with many concerns. To get more insights into the perspectives of relevant stakeholders on the socio-ethical aspects of PGT-P, an interview study with 31 healthcare professionals involved in reproductive medicine and genetics in Europe and North-America was performed. Healthcare professionals in our study were concerned that PGT-P was going too far in terms of selection, with regards to both medical conditions and non-medical traits. Healthcare professionals were worried about the ethical 'slippery slope' of PGT-P, the increasing medicalization of reproductive health, the commercial context of PGT-P, and potential stigmatization and discrimination. There were also concerns that the availability and the 'technological imperative' of PGT-P could lead to pressure and a sense of responsibility for parents to use PGT-P. Additionally, it could cause new anxieties about the child's health before the child has even been born. Since PGT-P provides polygenic risk scores before birth, the autonomy of the child has to be considered. These socio-ethical concerns heighten existing debates regarding reproductive genetic technologies and show that the specifics of PGT-P make this screening option especially ethically controversial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Siermann
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 - Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8 (P.O. Box 63), 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Ophelia Valcke
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 - Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, ON1 Herestraat 49 - Bus 606, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Taneli Raivio
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8 (P.O. Box 63), 00014, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, ON1 Herestraat 49 - Bus 606, 3000, Leuven, Belgium; Reproductive Genetics Unit, Center for Human Genetics, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 - Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wu X, Pan J, Zhu Y, Huang H. Research progress and challenges of preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic diseases. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2023:1-8. [PMID: 37987034 DOI: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2023-0440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing is an important part in assisted reproductive technology, which can block the intergenerational inheritance of single gene or chromosomal diseases. Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disease risk (PGT-P) is the latest development in the field. It is known that polygenic diseases usually have the characteristics of high incidence, late onset, affecting the quality of life and mental health of patients. On the basis of the development of artificial intelligence and genetic detection technology, PGT-P can analyze genetic material, calculate polygenic risk score turning into incidence probability. Embryos with relatively low incidence probability can be screened for transfer, so as to reduce the possibility of offspring suffering from the disease in the future, which has significant clinical and social significance. At present, PGT-P has been applied clinically and made phased progress at home and abroad. At the same time, as a developing technology, PGT-P still has some technical defects, unstable results, environmental influences and racial differences cannot be ruled out. From the perspective of ethics, if the screening indications are not strictly regulated, it is likely to cause new social problems. In this paper, we review the technical composition and recent progress of PGT-P, and put forward the prospect of its future development, especially how to establish a complete and suitable screening model for Chinese population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojing Wu
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310030, China.
- Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, China.
| | - Jiexue Pan
- Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yimin Zhu
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310030, China.
- Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, China.
| | - Hefeng Huang
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310030, China.
- Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, China.
- Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
- International Peace Maternal and Child Health Hospital of China Welfare Society, Shanghai 200030, China.
- Research Units of Embryo Original Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Barlevy D, Cenolli I, Campbell T, Furrer R, Mukherjee M, Kostick-Quenet K, Carmi S, Lencz T, Lazaro-Munoz G, Pereira S. Divergence Between Clinician and Patient Perspectives on Polygenic Embryo Screening: A Qualitative Study. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.10.12.23296961. [PMID: 37873214 PMCID: PMC10592985 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.12.23296961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Objective To explore and compare the perspectives of clinicians and patients on polygenic embryo screening. Design Qualitative. Subjects Fifty-three participants: 27 reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists and 26 patients currently undergoing in vitro fertilization or had done so within the last five years. Main Outcome Measures Qualitative thematic analysis of interview transcripts. Results Both clinicians and patients often held favorable views of screening embryos for physical or psychiatric conditions, though clinicians tended to temper their positive attitudes with specific caveats. Clinicians also expressed negative views about screening embryos for traits more often than patients, who generally held more positive views. Most clinicians were either unwilling to discuss or offer polygenic embryo screening to patients or were willing to do so only under certain circumstances, while many patients expressed interest in polygenic embryo screening. Both sets of stakeholders envisioned multiple potential benefits or uses of polygenic embryo screening; the most common included selection and/or prioritization of embryos, receipt of more information about embryos, and preparation for the birth of a predisposed or "affected" child. Both sets of stakeholders also raised multiple potential, interrelated concerns about polygenic embryo screening. The most common concerns among both sets of stakeholders included the potential for different types of "biases" - most often in relation to selection of embryos with preferred genetic chances of traits -, the probabilistic nature of polygenic embryo screening that can complicate patient counseling and/or lead to excessive cycles of in vitro fertilization, and a lack of data from long-term prospective studies supporting the clinical use of polygenic embryo screening. Conclusion Despite patients' interest in polygenic embryo screening, clinicians feel such screening is premature for clinical application. Though now embryos can be screened for their genetic chances of developing polygenic conditions and traits, many clinicians and patients maintain different attitudes depending on what is specifically screened, despite the blurry distinction between conditions and traits. Considerations raised by these stakeholders may help guide professional societies as they consider developing guidelines to navigate the uncertain terrain of polygenic embryo screening, which is already commercially available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorit Barlevy
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Ilona Cenolli
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Remy Furrer
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Meghna Mukherjee
- Sociology Department, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
| | | | - Shai Carmi
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Todd Lencz
- Institute of Behavioral Science, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY
- Departments of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital Division of Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY
| | - Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Siermann M, Valcke O, Vermeesch JR, Raivio T, Tšuiko O, Borry P. Limitations, concerns and potential: attitudes of healthcare professionals toward preimplantation genetic testing using polygenic risk scores. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:1133-1138. [PMID: 36935419 PMCID: PMC10545753 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01333-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing using polygenic risk scores (PGT-P) has recently been introduced. However, PGT-P has been met with many ethical concerns. It is therefore important to get insights into the perspectives of stakeholders regarding PGT-P. We performed a qualitative interview study on the views of healthcare professionals toward PGT-P. We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 31 healthcare professionals working in the field of preimplantation genetic testing. The interviews explored the attitudes of healthcare professionals toward the technology of PGT-P, e.g., the validity, utility, limitations and potential benefits of PGT-P. We found that most healthcare professionals were concerned about the prematurity of introducing PGT-P into clinical practice. They had various ethical considerations, such as concerns related to validity and utility of PGT-P, limited embryos and options, and difficulties for prospective parents regarding comprehension and informed decision-making. Positive aspects were also identified, e.g., regarding reproductive autonomy and potential health benefits. Overall, most healthcare professionals considered that clinical implementation of PGT-P is premature. More comprehensive, longitudinal and inclusive studies are needed first, though these might not improve PGT-P enough to responsibly implement it. Healthcare professionals were also concerned that PGT-P could cause anxiety and create difficult choices for prospective parents. These perspectives and ethical considerations are crucial to consider for future guidelines and recommendations regarding PGT-P.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Siermann
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Ophelia Valcke
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Taneli Raivio
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Reproductive Genetics Unit, Center for Human Genetics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chapman CR. Ethical, legal, and social implications of genetic risk prediction for multifactorial disease: a narrative review identifying concerns about interpretation and use of polygenic scores. J Community Genet 2023; 14:441-452. [PMID: 36529843 PMCID: PMC10576696 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00625-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in genomics have enabled the development of polygenic scores (PGS), sometimes called polygenic risk scores, in the context of multifactorial diseases and disorders such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, and schizophrenia. PGS estimate an individual's genetic predisposition, as compared to other members of a population, for conditions which are influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. There is significant interest in using genetic risk prediction afforded through PGS in public health, clinical care, and research settings, yet many acknowledge the need to thoughtfully consider and address ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI). To contribute to this effort, this paper reports on a narrative review of the literature, with the aim of identifying and categorizing ELSI relating to genetic risk prediction in the context of multifactorial disease, which have been raised by scholars in the field. Ninety-two articles, spanning from 1977 to 2021, met the inclusion criteria for this study. Identified ELSI included potential benefits, challenges and risks that focused on concerns about interpretation and use, and ethical obligations to maximize benefits, minimize risks, promote justice, and support autonomy. This research will support geneticists, clinicians, genetic counselors, patients, patient advocates, and policymakers in recognizing and addressing ethical concerns associated with PGS; it will also guide future empirical and normative research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Riley Chapman
- Department of Population Health (Division of Medical Ethics), NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- Center for Human Genetics and Genomics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Science Building, 435 E. 30th St, 8th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Horer S, Feichtinger M, Rosner M, Hengstschläger M. Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived In Vitro Gametogenesis and Synthetic Embryos-It Is Never Too Early for an Ethical Debate. Stem Cells Transl Med 2023; 12:569-575. [PMID: 37471266 PMCID: PMC10502567 DOI: 10.1093/stcltm/szad042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, 2 branches of the wide area of synthetic biology-in vitro gametogenesis and synthetic embryo development-have gained considerable attention. Rodent induced pluripotent stem cells derived via reprogramming of somatic cells can in vitro be differentiated into gametes to produce fertile offspring. And even synthetic embryos with organ progenitors were generated ex utero entirely from murine pluripotent stem cells. The use of these approaches in basic research, which is rightfully accompanied by an ethical discussion, will allow hitherto unattainable insights into the processes of the beginning of life. There is a broad international consensus that currently the application of these technologies in human-assisted reproduction must be considered to be unsafe and unethical. However, newspaper headlines also addressed the putatively resulting paradigm shift in human reproduction and thereby raised expectations in patients. Due to unsolved biological and technological obstacles, most scientists do not anticipate translation of any of these approaches into human reproductive medicine, if ever, for the next 10 years. Still, whereas the usage of synthetic embryos for reproductive purposes should be banned, in the context of in vitro-derived human gametes it is not too early to initiate the evaluation of the ethical implications, which could still remain assuming all technological hurdles can ever be cleared.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Horer
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Center of Pathobiochemistry and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Margit Rosner
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Center of Pathobiochemistry and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Hengstschläger
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Center of Pathobiochemistry and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
de Hemptinne MC, Posthuma D. Addressing the ethical and societal challenges posed by genome-wide association studies of behavioral and brain-related traits. Nat Neurosci 2023:10.1038/s41593-023-01333-4. [PMID: 37217727 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-023-01333-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies have led to the identification of robust statistical associations of genetic variants with numerous brain-related traits, including neurological and psychiatric conditions, and psychological and behavioral measures. These results may provide insight into the biology underlying these traits and may facilitate clinically useful predictions. However, these results also carry the risk of harm, including possible negative effects of inaccurate predictions, violations of privacy, stigma and genomic discrimination, raising serious ethical and legal implications. Here, we discuss ethical concerns surrounding the results of genome-wide association studies for individuals, society and researchers. Given the success of genome-wide association studies and the increasing availability of nonclinical genomic prediction technologies, better laws and guidelines are urgently needed to regulate the storage, processing and responsible use of genetic data. Also, researchers should be aware of possible misuse of their results, and we provide guidance to help avoid such negative impacts on individuals and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu C de Hemptinne
- Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Danielle Posthuma
- Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gordon RL, Martschenko DO, Nayak S, Niarchou M, Morrison MD, Bell E, Jacoby N, Davis LK. Confronting ethical and social issues related to the genetics of musicality. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2023; 1522:5-14. [PMID: 36851882 PMCID: PMC10613828 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
New interdisciplinary research into genetic influences on musicality raises a number of ethical and social issues for future avenues of research and public engagement. The historical intersection of music cognition and eugenics heightens the need to vigilantly weigh the potential risks and benefits of these studies and the use of their outcomes. Here, we bring together diverse disciplinary expertise (complex trait genetics, music cognition, musicology, bioethics, developmental psychology, and neuroscience) to interpret and guide the ethical use of findings from recent and future studies. We discuss a framework for incorporating principles of ethically and socially responsible conduct of musicality genetics research into each stage of the research lifecycle: study design, study implementation, potential applications, and communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reyna L. Gordon
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, TN, USA
| | | | - Srishti Nayak
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, TN, USA
| | - Maria Niarchou
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, TN, USA
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, TN, USA
| | - Matthew D. Morrison
- Clive Davis Institute of Recorded Music, Tisch School of the Arts, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eamonn Bell
- Department of Music/Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
| | - Nori Jacoby
- Computational Auditory Perception Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Lea K. Davis
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, TN, USA
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Miner SA, Pereira S. The Need for Diverse Empirical Data to Inform the Use of Polygenic Risk Scores in Prenatal Screening. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:39-41. [PMID: 36919541 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2169396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
|
21
|
Abstract
Understanding moral acceptability and willingness to use is crucial for informing policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle N Meyer
- Department of Bioethics and Decision Sciences, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA 17822, USA
- Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA 18510, USA
| | - Tammy Tan
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Daniel J Benjamin
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
- Anderson School of Management, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - David Laibson
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
- Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Patrick Turley
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
- Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
- Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Young MA, Yanes T, Cust AE, Dunlop K, Limb S, Newson AJ, Purvis R, Thiyagarajan L, Scott RJ, Verma K, James PA, Steinberg J. Human Genetics Society of Australasia Position Statement: Use of Polygenic Scores in Clinical Practice and Population Health. Twin Res Hum Genet 2023; 26:40-48. [PMID: 36950972 DOI: 10.1017/thg.2023.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
Considerable progress continues to be made with regards to the value and use of disease associated polygenic scores (PGS). PGS aim to capture a person's genetic liability to a condition, disease, or a trait, combining information across many risk variants and incorporating their effect sizes. They are already available for clinicians and consumers to order in Australasia. However, debate is ongoing over the readiness of this information for integration into clinical practice and population health. This position statement provides the viewpoint of the Human Genetics Society of Australasia (HGSA) regarding the clinical application of disease-associated PGS in both individual patients and population health. The statement details how PGS are calculated, highlights their breadth of possible application, and examines their current challenges and limitations. We consider fundamental lessons from Mendelian genetics and their continuing relevance to PGS, while also acknowledging the distinct elements of PGS. Use of PGS in practice should be evidence based, and the evidence for the associated benefit, while rapidly emerging, remains limited. Given that clinicians and consumers can already order PGS, their current limitations and key issues warrant consideration. PGS can be developed for most complex conditions and traits and can be used across multiple clinical settings and for population health. The HGSA's view is that further evaluation, including regulatory, implementation and health system evaluation are required before PGS can be routinely implemented in the Australasian healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Anne Young
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tatiane Yanes
- Dermatology Research Centre, Frazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- The Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate Dunlop
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sharne Limb
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospitals, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Purvis
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospitals, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lavvina Thiyagarajan
- The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rodney J Scott
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Division of Molecular Medicine, NSW Health Pathology North, New Lambton, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kunal Verma
- Monash Genetics, Monash Health, Melbourn, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Heart, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul A James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospitals, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julia Steinberg
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ogbunugafor CB, Edge MD. Gattaca as a lens on contemporary genetics: marking 25 years into the film's "not-too-distant" future. Genetics 2022; 222:iyac142. [PMID: 36218390 PMCID: PMC9713434 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The 1997 film Gattaca has emerged as a canonical pop culture reference used to discuss modern controversies in genetics and bioethics. It appeared in theaters a few years prior to the announcement of the "completion" of the human genome (2000), as the science of human genetics was developing a renewed sense of its social implications. The story is set in a near-future world in which parents can, with technological assistance, influence the genetic composition of their offspring on the basis of predicted life outcomes. The current moment-25 years after the film's release-offers an opportunity to reflect on where society currently stands with respect to the ideas explored in Gattaca. Here, we review and discuss several active areas of genetic research-genetic prediction, embryo selection, forensic genetics, and others-that interface directly with scenes and concepts in the film. On its silver anniversary, we argue that Gattaca remains an important reflection of society's expectations and fears with respect to the ways that genetic science has manifested in the real world. In accompanying supplemental material, we offer some thought questions to guide group discussions inside and outside of the classroom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Brandon Ogbunugafor
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
- Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA
- Vermont Complex Systems Center, Burlington, VT 05401, USA
| | - Michael D Edge
- Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pereira S, Muñoz KA, Small BJ, Soda T, Torgerson LN, Sanchez CE, Austin J, Storch EA, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Psychiatric polygenic risk scores: Child and adolescent psychiatrists' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2022; 189:293-302. [PMID: 35792502 PMCID: PMC9444963 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Psychiatric polygenic risk scores (PRS) have potential utility in psychiatric care and prevention, but there are concerns about their implementation. We surveyed 960 US-based practicing child and adolescent psychiatrists' (CAP) about their experiences, perspectives, and potential uses of psychiatric PRS. While 23% of CAP reported that they had never heard of PRS, 10 % of respondents have had a patient/family bring PRS to them and 4% have generated PRS for patients. Though 25% stated they would request PRS if a patient/caregiver asked, 35% indicated that nothing would prompt them to request PRS. Most respondents (54%) believed psychiatric PRS are currently at least slightly useful and 87% believed they will be so in 5 years. More than 70% indicated they would take action in response to a child with a top fifth percentile psychiatric PRS but no diagnosis: 48% would increase monitoring of symptoms, 42% would evaluate for current symptoms, and 4% would prescribe medications. Yet, most respondents were concerned that high-PRS results could lead to overtreatment and negatively impact patients' emotional well-being. Findings indicate emerging use of psychiatric PRS within child and adolescent psychiatry in the US. It is critical to examine the ethical and clinical challenges that PRS may generate and begin efforts to promote their informed and responsible use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Brent J. Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Takahiro Soda
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Laura N. Torgerson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Jehannine Austin
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eric A. Storch
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lencz T, Sabatello M, Docherty A, Peterson RE, Soda T, Austin J, Bierut L, Crepaz-Keay D, Curtis D, Degenhardt F, Huckins L, Lazaro-Munoz G, Mattheisen M, Meiser B, Peay H, Rietschel M, Walss-Bass C, Davis LK. Concerns about the use of polygenic embryo screening for psychiatric and cognitive traits. Lancet Psychiatry 2022; 9:838-844. [PMID: 35931093 PMCID: PMC9930635 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00157-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Private companies have begun offering services to allow parents undergoing in-vitro fertilisation to screen embryos for genetic risk of complex diseases, including psychiatric disorders. This procedure, called polygenic embryo screening, raises several difficult scientific and ethical issues, as discussed in this Personal View. Polygenic embryo screening depends on the statistical properties of polygenic risk scores, which are complex and not well studied in the context of this proposed clinical application. The clinical, social, and ethical implications of polygenic embryo screening have barely been discussed among relevant stakeholders. To our knowledge, the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics is the first professional biomedical organisation to issue a statement regarding polygenic embryo screening. For the reasons discussed in this Personal View, the Society urges caution and calls for additional research and oversight on the use of polygenic embryo screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd Lencz
- Divison of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Division of Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital Division of Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA; Institute for Behavioral Science, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.
| | - Maya Sabatello
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Docherty
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Roseann E Peterson
- Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Takahiro Soda
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jehannine Austin
- Departments of Psychiatry and Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Laura Bierut
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - David Curtis
- UCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Franziska Degenhardt
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Laura Huckins
- Departments of Psychiatry and Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Manuel Mattheisen
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie Medical School, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| | - Holly Peay
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Marcella Rietschel
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Consuelo Walss-Bass
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lea K Davis
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Herzig AF, Clerget-Darpoux F, Génin E. The False Dawn of Polygenic Risk Scores for Human Disease Prediction. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12081266. [PMID: 36013215 PMCID: PMC9409868 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are being constructed for many diseases and are presented today as a promising avenue in the field of human genetics. These scores aim at predicting the risk of developing a disease by leveraging the many genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted during the two last decades. Important investments are being made to improve score estimates by increasing GWAS sample sizes, by developing more sophisticated methods, and by proposing different corrections for potential biases. PRSs have entered the market with direct-to-consumer companies proposing to compute them from saliva samples and even recently to help parents select the healthiest embryos. In this paper, we recall how PRSs arose and question the credit they are given by revisiting underlying assumptions in light of the history of human genetics and by comparing them with estimated breeding values (EBVs) used for selection in livestock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony F. Herzig
- Inserm, Université de Brest, EFS, CHU Brest, UMR 1078, GGB, F-29200 Brest, France;
| | - Françoise Clerget-Darpoux
- Université Paris Cité, Inserm, Institut Imagine, Laboratoire Embryologie et Génétique des Malformations, F-75015 Paris, France
- Correspondence: (F.C.-D.); (E.G.)
| | - Emmanuelle Génin
- Inserm, Université de Brest, EFS, CHU Brest, UMR 1078, GGB, F-29200 Brest, France;
- Correspondence: (F.C.-D.); (E.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Polyakov A, Amor DJ, Savulescu J, Gyngell C, Georgiou EX, Ross V, Mizrachi Y, Rozen G. Polygenic risk score for embryo selection—not ready for prime time. Hum Reprod 2022; 37:2229-2236. [PMID: 35852518 PMCID: PMC9527452 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Numerous chronic diseases have a substantial hereditary component. Recent advances in human genetics have allowed the extent of this to be quantified via genome-wide association studies, producing polygenic risk scores (PRS), which can then be applied to individuals to estimate their risk of developing a disease in question. This technology has recently been applied to embryo selection in the setting of IVF and preimplantation genetic testing, with limited data to support its utility. Furthermore, there are concerns that the inherent limitations of PRS makes it ill-suited for use as a screening test in this setting. There are also serious ethical and moral questions associated with this technology that are yet to be addressed. We conclude that further research and ethical reflection are required before embryo selection based on PRS is offered to patients outside of the research setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Polyakov
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Reproductive Biology Unit, The Royal Women’s Hospital , Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne IVF , East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David J Amor
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute , Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, Royal Children’s Hospital, University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ektoras X Georgiou
- Reproductive Biology Unit, The Royal Women’s Hospital , Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Vanessa Ross
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Reproductive Biology Unit, The Royal Women’s Hospital , Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne IVF , East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Yossi Mizrachi
- Reproductive Biology Unit, The Royal Women’s Hospital , Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Genia Rozen
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Reproductive Biology Unit, The Royal Women’s Hospital , Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne IVF , East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pereira S, Carmi S, Altarescu G, Austin J, Barlevy D, Hershlag A, Juengst E, Kostick-Quenet K, Kovanci E, Lathi RB, Mukherjee M, Van den Veyver I, Zuk O, Lázaro-Muñoz G, Lencz T. Polygenic embryo screening: four clinical considerations warrant further attention. Hum Reprod 2022; 37:1375-1378. [PMID: 35604365 PMCID: PMC9247413 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in developing polygenic scores have made it possible to screen embryos for common, complex conditions and traits. Polygenic embryo screening (PES) is currently offered commercially, and though there has been much recent media and academic coverage, reproductive specialists' points of view have not yet been prominent in these discussions. We convened a roundtable of multidisciplinary experts, including reproductive specialists to discuss PES and its implications. In this Opinion, we describe four clinically relevant issues associated with the use of PES that have not yet been discussed in the literature and warrant consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS420, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - S Carmi
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - G Altarescu
- Preimplantation Genetic Unit and lysosomal Clinic, Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - J Austin
- Departments of Psychiatry and Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - D Barlevy
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS420, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - A Hershlag
- Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - E Juengst
- Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - K Kostick-Quenet
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS420, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - E Kovanci
- Houston Assisted Reproductive Technologies (HART) Fertility Clinic, The Woodlands, TX, USA
| | - R B Lathi
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - M Mukherjee
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS420, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Sociology, University of Califorinia, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - I Van den Veyver
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - O Zuk
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - G Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - T Lencz
- Departments of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Siermann M, Tšuiko O, Vermeesch JR, Raivio T, Borry P. A review of normative documents on preimplantation genetic testing: Recommendations for PGT-P. Genet Med 2022; 24:1165-1175. [PMID: 35341652 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Recently, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for polygenic conditions (PGT-P) has been introduced commercially. In view of the lack of specific guidance on this development, we analyzed normative documents on PGT for monogenic conditions (PGT-M) to understand what we can learn from these documents for recommendations for PGT-P. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of normative guidelines and recommendations on PGT-M. The aim was to understand what the current consensus and disagreements are on ethical acceptability of PGT-M and how this compares with PGT-P. RESULTS We analyzed 38 documents by advisory committees at the national, European, and global level. In total, 2 themes were identified, which included the following: (1) what PGT is considered appropriate for and (2) who can make decisions regarding the use of PGT. Many aspects of PGT-M documents apply to PGT-P as well. Additional factors such as the fact that PGT-P screens for risk indications of multiple polygenic conditions increase ethical difficulties regarding severity, risk, autonomy, and informed decision-making. CONCLUSION On the basis of PGT-M normative documents, we conclude that ethical acceptability for PGT-P is limited. Our findings present various factors that have to be considered for the development of guidelines and the appropriateness of PGT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Siermann
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Reproductive Genetics Unit, Center of Human Genetics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Taneli Raivio
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kumar A, Im K, Banjevic M, Ng PC, Tunstall T, Garcia G, Galhardo L, Sun J, Schaedel ON, Levy B, Hongo D, Kijacic D, Kiehl M, Tran ND, Klatsky PC, Rabinowitz M. Whole-genome risk prediction of common diseases in human preimplantation embryos. Nat Med 2022; 28:513-516. [PMID: 35314819 PMCID: PMC8938270 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01735-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of in-vitro-fertilized embryos has been proposed as a method to reduce transmission of common disease; however, more comprehensive embryo genetic assessment, combining the effects of common variants and rare variants, remains unavailable. Here, we used a combination of molecular and statistical techniques to reliably infer inherited genome sequence in 110 embryos and model susceptibility across 12 common conditions. We observed a genotype accuracy of 99.0–99.4% at sites relevant to polygenic risk scoring in cases from day-5 embryo biopsies and 97.2–99.1% in cases from day-3 embryo biopsies. Combining rare variants with polygenic risk score (PRS) magnifies predicted differences across sibling embryos. For example, in a couple with a pathogenic BRCA1 variant, we predicted a 15-fold difference in odds ratio (OR) across siblings when combining versus a 4.5-fold or 3-fold difference with BRCA1 or PRS alone. Our findings may inform the discussion of utility and implementation of genome-based PGT in clinical practice. A computational approach combining whole-genome sequencing of parental genomes and genotyping of preimplantation embryos allows accurate prediction of the inherited genomes of embryos and calculation of polygenic risk scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kate Im
- MyOme, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brynn Levy
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Nam D Tran
- Spring Fertility, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
Barlevy D, Lencz T, Carmi S, Kostick-Quenet KM, Mukherjee M, Pereira S, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Capacities and Limitations of Using Polygenic Risk Scores for Reproductive Decision Making. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2022; 22:42-45. [PMID: 35089838 PMCID: PMC9730933 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.2013983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Dorit Barlevy
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Todd Lencz
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
| | - Shai Carmi
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
| | | | - Meghna Mukherjee
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine
- University of California Berkeley
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Siermann M, Claesen Z, Pasquier L, Raivio T, Tšuiko O, Vermeesch JR, Borry P. A systematic review of the views of healthcare professionals on the scope of preimplantation genetic testing. J Community Genet 2022; 13:1-11. [PMID: 35028914 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00573-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) involves testing embryos created through in vitro fertilization for the presence of hereditary genetic disorders and chromosome abnormalities. PGT for monogenic conditions (PGT-M) is generally performed for childhood-onset, lethal disorders, but is increasingly accepted for certain adult-onset conditions, conditions with available treatment options or conditions with lower penetrance. Furthermore, the development of PGT for polygenic conditions (PGT-P) makes ethical questions regarding PGT indications imperative. A systematic review was therefore performed to gather and analyse studies on the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the appropriate scope of PGT, with the aim of getting insights into the concerns about the scope of PGT now and in the near future. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Twelve qualitative articles were included. The main themes extracted were the scope of PGT and decision-making about PGT. Defining 'a serious genetic condition' was seen as complex, but severity, high penetrance and absence of treatability and patients' experience were seen as relevant indications to determine the appropriateness of PGT. In navigating the decision-making processes with patients, professionals experienced friction between setting limits and respecting patients' autonomy. Such friction and ethical dilemmas around seriousness, informed decision-making and preventative medicine show that while expanding the list of possible PGT indications and the development of PGT-P could augment patients' reproductive autonomy, it could also lead to an increased reproductive 'burden' for patients. These insights are crucial for establishing guidelines that help healthcare professionals navigate ethical tensions associated with PGT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Siermann
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Zoë Claesen
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laurent Pasquier
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Taneli Raivio
- Department of Physiology, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lencz T, Backenroth D, Granot-Hershkovitz E, Green A, Gettler K, Cho JH, Weissbrod O, Zuk O, Carmi S. Utility of polygenic embryo screening for disease depends on the selection strategy. eLife 2021; 10:e64716. [PMID: 34635206 PMCID: PMC8510582 DOI: 10.7554/elife.64716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been offered since 2019 to screen in vitro fertilization embryos for genetic liability to adult diseases, despite a lack of comprehensive modeling of expected outcomes. Here we predict, based on the liability threshold model, the expected reduction in complex disease risk following polygenic embryo screening for a single disease. A strong determinant of the potential utility of such screening is the selection strategy, a factor that has not been previously studied. When only embryos with a very high PRS are excluded, the achieved risk reduction is minimal. In contrast, selecting the embryo with the lowest PRS can lead to substantial relative risk reductions, given a sufficient number of viable embryos. We systematically examine the impact of several factors on the utility of screening, including: variance explained by the PRS, number of embryos, disease prevalence, parental PRSs, and parental disease status. We consider both relative and absolute risk reductions, as well as population-averaged and per-couple risk reductions, and also examine the risk of pleiotropic effects. Finally, we confirm our theoretical predictions by simulating 'virtual' couples and offspring based on real genomes from schizophrenia and Crohn's disease case-control studies. We discuss the assumptions and limitations of our model, as well as the potential emerging ethical concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd Lencz
- Departments of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/NorthwellHempsteadUnited States
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital Division of Northwell HealthGlen OaksUnited States
- Institute for Behavioral Science, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical ResearchManhassetUnited States
| | - Daniel Backenroth
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Einat Granot-Hershkovitz
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Adam Green
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Kyle Gettler
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUnited States
| | - Judy H Cho
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUnited States
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUnited States
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUnited States
| | - Omer Weissbrod
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonUnited States
| | - Or Zuk
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Shai Carmi
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
A theoretical framework predicts that using polygenic screening to select embryos against traits that depend on many genes has few benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Fletcher
- Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- Center for Demography of Health and Aging, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
| | - Yuchang Wu
- Center for Demography of Health and Aging, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
| | - Qiongshi Lu
- Center for Demography of Health and Aging, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pagnaer T, Siermann M, Borry P, Tšuiko O. Polygenic risk scoring of human embryos: a qualitative study of media coverage. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:125. [PMID: 34537037 PMCID: PMC8449454 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00694-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) technologies enable embryo genotyping across the whole genome. This has led to the development of polygenic risk scoring of human embryos (PGT-P). Recent implementation of PGT-P, including screening for intelligence, has been extensively covered by media reports, raising major controversy. Considering the increasing demand for assisted reproduction, we evaluated how information about PGT-P is communicated in press media and explored the diversity of ethical themes present in the public debate. METHODS LexisNexis Academic database and Google News were searched to identify articles about polygenic embryo screening. This led to 535 news articles. 59 original articles met the inclusion criteria. Inductive content analysis was used to analyse these articles. RESULTS 8.8% of articles gave embryo polygenic scoring a positive portrayal, while 36.8% expressed a negative attitude. 54.4% were neutral, mostly highlighting limited practical value of the technology in in vitro fertilization settings. We identified five main ethical themes that are also present in academic literature and the broader debate on reproductive technologies: a slippery slope towards designer babies, well-being of the child and parents, impact on society, deliberate choice and societal readiness. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of embryo polygenic profiling engenders a need for specific recommendations. Current media analysis discloses important ethical themes to consider when creating future guidelines for PGT-P.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiny Pagnaer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maria Siermann
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olga Tšuiko
- Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Department of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Vandenberg O, Martiny D, Rochas O, van Belkum A, Kozlakidis Z. Considerations for diagnostic COVID-19 tests. Nat Rev Microbiol 2021; 19:171-183. [PMID: 33057203 PMCID: PMC7556561 DOI: 10.1038/s41579-020-00461-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 447] [Impact Index Per Article: 149.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
During the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, design, development, validation, verification and implementation of diagnostic tests were actively addressed by a large number of diagnostic test manufacturers. Hundreds of molecular tests and immunoassays were rapidly developed, albeit many still await clinical validation and formal approval. In this Review, we summarize the crucial role of diagnostic tests during the first global wave of COVID-19. We explore the technical and implementation problems encountered during this early phase in the pandemic, and try to define future directions for the progressive and better use of (syndromic) diagnostics during a possible resurgence of COVID-19 in future global waves or regional outbreaks. Continuous global improvement in diagnostic test preparedness is essential for more rapid detection of patients, possibly at the point of care, and for optimized prevention and treatment, in both industrialized countries and low-resource settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Vandenberg
- Innovation and Business Development Unit, Laboratoire Hospitalier Universtaire de Bruxelles - Universitair Laboratorium Brussel, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
- Center for Environmental Health and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
- Division of Infection and Immunity, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Delphine Martiny
- Department of Microbiology, Laboratoire Hospitalier Universtaire de Bruxelles - Universitair Laboratorium Brussel, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivier Rochas
- Strategic Intelligence, Corporate Business Development, bioMérieux, Chemin de L'Orme, France
| | - Alex van Belkum
- Open Innovation and Partnerships, bioMérieux, La Balme Les Grottes, France.
| | - Zisis Kozlakidis
- Laboratory Services and Biobank Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kostick KM, Blumenthal-Barby JS. Avoiding "toxic knowledge": the importance of framing personalized risk information in clinical decision-making. Per Med 2021; 18:91-95. [PMID: 33616460 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2020-0174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin M Kostick
- Center for Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - J S Blumenthal-Barby
- Center for Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|