Coincidence of cholinergic pauses, dopaminergic activation and depolarisation of spiny projection neurons drives synaptic plasticity in the striatum

Ventral tegmental area dopamine projections to the hippocampus trigger long-term potentiation and contextual learning

In most models of neuronal plasticity and memory, dopamine is thought to promote the long-term maintenance of Long-Term Potentiation (LTP) underlying memory processes, but not the initiation of plasticity or new information storage. Here, we used optogenetic manipulation of midbrain dopamine neurons in male DAT::Cre mice, and discovered that stimulating the Schaffer collaterals - the glutamatergic axons connecting CA3 and CA1 regions - of the dorsal hippocampus concomitantly with midbrain dopamine terminals within a 200 millisecond time-window triggers LTP at glutamatergic synapses. Moreover, we showed that the stimulation of this dopaminergic pathway facilitates contextual learning in awake behaving mice, while its inhibition hinders it. Thus, activation of midbrain dopamine can operate as a teaching signal that triggers NeoHebbian LTP and promotes supervised learning.

What Role Does Striatal Dopamine Play in Goal-directed Action?

Evidence suggests that dopamine activity provides a US-related prediction error for Pavlovian conditioning and the reinforcement signal supporting the acquisition of habits. However, its role in goal-directed action is less clear. There are currently few studies that have assessed dopamine release as animals acquire and perform self-paced instrumental actions. Here we briefly review the literature documenting the psychological, behavioral and neural bases of goal-directed actions in rats and mice, before turning to describe recent studies investigating the role of dopamine in instrumental learning and performance. Plasticity in dorsomedial striatum, a central node in the network supporting goal-directed action, clearly requires dopamine release, the timing of which, relative to cortical and thalamic inputs, determines the degree and form of that plasticity. Beyond this, bilateral release appears to reflect reward prediction errors as animals experience the consequences of an action. Such signals feedforward to update the value of the specific action associated with that outcome during subsequent performance, with dopamine release at the time of action reflecting the updated predicted action value. More recently, evidence has also emerged for a hemispherically lateralised signal associated with the action; dopamine release is greater in the hemisphere contralateral to the spatial target of the action. This effect emerges over the course of acquisition and appears to reflect the strength of the action-outcome association. Thus, during goal-directed action, dopamine release signals the action, the outcome and their association to shape the learning and performance processes necessary to support this form of behavioral control.

Acetylcholine demixes heterogeneous dopamine signals for learning and moving

Midbrain dopamine neurons promote reinforcement learning and movement vigor. A major outstanding question is how dopamine-recipient neurons in the striatum parse these heterogeneous signals. Here we characterized dopamine and acetylcholine release in the dorsomedial striatum (DMS) of rats performing a decision-making task. We found that dopamine acted as a reward prediction error (RPE), modulating behavior and DMS spiking on subsequent trials when coincident with pauses in cholinergic release. In contrast, at task events that elicited coincident bursts of acetylcholine and dopamine, dopamine preceded contralateral movements and predicted movement vigor without inducing plastic changes in DMS firing rates. Our findings provide a circuit-level mechanism by which cholinergic modulation allows the same dopamine signals to be used for either movement or learning depending on instantaneous behavioral context.

Dopamine and acetylcholine correlations in the nucleus accumbens depend on behavioral task states

Dopamine in the nucleus accumbens ramps up as animals approach desired goals. These ramps have received intense scrutiny because they seem to violate long-held hypotheses on dopamine function. Furthermore, it has been proposed that they are driven by local acetylcholine release, i.e., that they are mechanistically separate from dopamine signals related to reward prediction errors. Here, we tested this hypothesis by simultaneously recording accumbal dopamine and acetylcholine signals in rats executing a task involving motivated approach. Contrary to recent reports, we found that dopamine ramps were not coincidental with changes in acetylcholine. Instead, we found that acetylcholine could be positively, negatively, or uncorrelated with dopamine depending on whether the task phase was determined by a salient cue, reward prediction error, or active approach, respectively. Our results suggest that accumbal dopamine and acetylcholine are largely independent but may combine to engage different postsynaptic mechanisms depending on the behavioral task states.

Mesolimbic dopamine encodes reward prediction errors independent of learning rates

Biological accounts of reinforcement learning posit that dopamine encodes reward prediction errors (RPEs), which are multiplied by a learning rate to update state or action values. These values are thought to be represented in synaptic weights in the striatum, and updated by dopamine-dependent plasticity, suggesting that dopamine release might reflect the product of the learning rate and RPE. Here, we leveraged the fact that animals learn faster in volatile environments to characterize dopamine encoding of learning rates. We trained rats on a task with semi-observable states offering different rewards, and rats adjusted how quickly they initiated trials across states using RPEs. Computational modeling and behavioral analyses showed that learning rates were higher following state transitions, and scaled with trial-by-trial changes in beliefs about hidden states, approximating normative Bayesian strategies. Notably, dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens encoded RPEs independent of learning rates, suggesting that dopamine-independent mechanisms instantiate dynamic learning rates.

Role of Posterior Medial Thalamus in the Modulation of Striatal Circuitry and Choice Behavior

The posterior medial (POm) thalamus is heavily interconnected with sensory and motor circuitry and is likely involved in behavioral modulation and sensorimotor integration. POm provides axonal projections to the dorsal striatum, a hotspot of sensorimotor processing, yet the role of POm-striatal projections has remained undetermined. Using optogenetics with slice electrophysiology, we found that POm provides robust synaptic input to direct and indirect pathway striatal spiny projection neurons (D1- and D2-SPNs, respectively) and parvalbumin-expressing fast spiking interneurons (PVs). During the performance of a whisker-based tactile discrimination task, POm-striatal projections displayed learning-related activation correlating with anticipatory, but not reward-related, pupil dilation. Inhibition of POm-striatal axons across learning caused slower reaction times and an increase in the number of training sessions for expert performance. Our data indicate that POm-striatal inputs provide a behaviorally relevant arousal-related signal, which may prime striatal circuitry for efficient integration of subsequent choice-related inputs.

A transdiagnostic and translational framework for delineating the neuronal mechanisms of compulsive exercise in anorexia nervosa

OBJECTIVE

The development of novel treatments for anorexia nervosa (AN) requires a detailed understanding of the biological underpinnings of specific, commonly occurring symptoms, including compulsive exercise. There is considerable bio-behavioral overlap between AN and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), therefore it is plausible that similar mechanisms underlie compulsive behavior in both populations. While the association between these conditions is widely acknowledged, defining the shared mechanisms for compulsive behavior in AN and OCD requires a novel approach.

METHODS

We present an argument that a better understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms that underpin compulsive exercise in AN can be achieved in two critical ways. First, by applying a framework of the neuronal control of OCD to exercise behavior in AN, and second, by taking better advantage of the activity-based anorexia (ABA) rodent model to directly test this framework in the context of feeding pathology.

RESULTS

A cross-disciplinary approach that spans preclinical, neuroimaging, and clinical research as well as compulsive neurocircuitry and behavior can advance our understanding of when, why, and how compulsive exercise develops in the context of AN and provide targets for novel treatment strategies.

DISCUSSION

In this article, we (i) link the expression of compulsive behavior in AN and OCD via a transition between goal-directed and habitual behavior, (ii) present disrupted cortico-striatal circuitry as a key substrate for the development of compulsive behavior in both conditions, and (iii) highlight the utility of the ABA rodent model to better understand the mechanisms of compulsive behavior relevant to AN.

PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE

Individuals with AN who exercise compulsively are at risk of worse health outcomes and have poorer responses to standard treatments. However, when, why, and how compulsive exercise develops in AN remains inadequately understood. Identifying whether the neural circuitry underlying compulsive behavior in OCD also controls hyperactivity in the activity-based anorexia model will aid in the development of novel eating disorder treatment strategies for this high-risk population.

In Vivo Whole-Cell Recording from the Mouse Brain

Measuring the membrane potential dynamics of neurons offers a comprehensive understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms that form their spiking activity, thus playing a crucial role in unraveling the mechanistic processes governing brain function. Techniques for intracellular recordings of membrane potentials pioneered in the 1940s have witnessed significant advancements since their inception. Among these, whole-cell patch-clamp recording has emerged as a leading method for measuring neuronal membrane potentials due to its high stability and broad applicability ranging from cultured cells to brain slices and even behaving animals. This chapter provides a detailed protocol to acquire stable whole-cell recordings from neurons in the cerebral cortex of awake, head-restrained mice. Significant enhancements to our protocol include implanting a metal head-post using adhesive resin cement and preparing a recording pipette with a long shank for targeting deeper brain regions. This protocol, once implemented, enables whole-cell recordings up to 2.5 mM beneath the cortical surface.

Distributed dopaminergic signaling in the basal ganglia and its relationship to motor disability in Parkinson's disease

The degeneration of mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons that innervate the basal ganglia is responsible for the cardinal motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). It has been thought that loss of dopaminergic signaling in one basal ganglia region - the striatum - was solely responsible for the network pathophysiology causing PD motor symptoms. While our understanding of dopamine (DA)'s role in modulating striatal circuitry has deepened in recent years, it also has become clear that it acts in other regions of the basal ganglia to influence movement. Underscoring this point, examination of a new progressive mouse model of PD shows that striatal dopamine DA depletion alone is not sufficient to induce parkinsonism and that restoration of extra-striatal DA signaling attenuates parkinsonian motor deficits once they appear. This review summarizes recent advances in the effort to understand basal ganglia circuitry, its modulation by DA, and how its dysfunction drives PD motor symptoms.

The Integration of Top-down and Bottom-up Inputs to the Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons

BACKGROUND

Cholinergic interneurons (ChIs) are important for learning and memory. They exhibit a multiphasic excitation-pause-rebound response to reward or sensory cues indicating a reward, believed to gate dopamine-dependent learning. Although ChIs receive extensive top-down inputs from the cortex and bottom-up inputs from the thalamus and midbrain, it is unclear which inputs are involved in the development of ChI multiphasic activity.

METHODS

We used a single-unit recording of putative ChIs (pChIs) in response to cortical and visual stimulation to investigate how top-down and bottom-up inputs regulate the firing pattern of ChIs.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that cortical stimulation strongly regulates pChIs, with the maximum firing rate occurring at the peak of the inverted local field potential (iLFP), reflecting maximum cortical stimulation. Pauses in pChIs occurred during the descending phase of iLFP, indicating withdrawal of excitatory cortical input. Visual stimulation induced long pauses in pChIs, but it is unlikely that bottom- up inputs alone induce pauses in behaving animals. Also, the firing pattern of ChIs triggered by visual stimulation did not correlate with the iLFP as it did after cortical stimulation. Top-down and bottom-up inputs independently regulate the firing pattern of ChIs with similar efficacy but notably produce a well-defined pause in ChI firing.

CONCLUSION

This study provides in vivo evidence that the multiphasic ChI response may require both top-down and bottom-up inputs. The findings suggest that the firing pattern of ChIs correlated to the iLFP might be a useful tool for estimating the degree of contribution of top-down and bottom-up inputs in regulating the firing activity of ChIs.

Acetylcholine waves and dopamine release in the striatum

Striatal dopamine encodes reward, with recent work showing that dopamine release occurs in spatiotemporal waves. However, the mechanism of dopamine waves is unknown. Here we report that acetylcholine release in mouse striatum also exhibits wave activity, and that the spatial scale of striatal dopamine release is extended by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Based on these findings, and on our demonstration that single cholinergic interneurons can induce dopamine release, we hypothesized that the local reciprocal interaction between cholinergic interneurons and dopamine axons suffices to drive endogenous traveling waves. We show that the morphological and physiological properties of cholinergic interneuron - dopamine axon interactions can be modeled as a reaction-diffusion system that gives rise to traveling waves. Analytically-tractable versions of the model show that the structure and the nature of propagation of acetylcholine and dopamine traveling waves depend on their coupling, and that traveling waves can give rise to empirically observed correlations between these signals. Thus, our study provides evidence for striatal acetylcholine waves in vivo, and proposes a testable theoretical framework that predicts that the observed dopamine and acetylcholine waves are strongly coupled phenomena.

Electrophysiological insights into deep brain stimulation of the network disorder dystonia

Deep brain stimulation (DBS), a treatment for modulating the abnormal central neuronal circuitry, has become the standard of care nowadays and is sometimes the only option to reduce symptoms of movement disorders such as dystonia. However, on the one hand, there are still open questions regarding the pathomechanisms of dystonia and, on the other hand, the mechanisms of DBS on neuronal circuitry. That lack of knowledge limits the therapeutic effect and makes it hard to predict the outcome of DBS for individual dystonia patients. Finding electrophysiological biomarkers seems to be a promising option to enable adapted individualised DBS treatment. However, biomarker search studies cannot be conducted on patients on a large scale and experimental approaches with animal models of dystonia are needed. In this review, physiological findings of deep brain stimulation studies in humans and animal models of dystonia are summarised and the current pathophysiological concepts of dystonia are discussed.

Intrinsic dopamine and acetylcholine dynamics in the striatum of mice

External rewards such as food and money are potent modifiers of behaviour1,2. Pioneering studies established that these salient sensory stimuli briefly interrupt the tonic discharge of neurons that produce the neuromodulators dopamine (DA) and acetylcholine (ACh): midbrain DA neurons (DANs) fire a burst of action potentials that broadly elevates DA in the striatum3,4 at the same time that striatal cholinergic interneurons (CINs) produce a characteristic pause in firing5,6. These phasic responses are thought to create unique, temporally limited conditions that motivate action and promote learning7-11. However, the dynamics of DA and ACh outside explicitly rewarded situations remain poorly understood. Here we show that extracellular DA and ACh levels fluctuate spontaneously and periodically at a frequency of approximately 2 Hz in the dorsal striatum of mice and maintain the same temporal relationship relative to one another as that evoked by reward. We show that this neuromodulatory coordination does not arise from direct interactions between DA and ACh within the striatum. Instead, we provide evidence that periodic fluctuations in striatal DA are inherited from midbrain DANs, while striatal ACh transients are driven by glutamatergic inputs, which act to locally synchronize the spiking of CINs. Together, our findings show that striatal neuromodulatory dynamics are autonomously organized by distributed extra-striatal afferents. The dominance of intrinsic rhythms in DA and ACh offers new insights for explaining how reward-associated neural dynamics emerge and how the brain motivates action and promotes learning from within.

Sensory Reinforced Corticostriatal Plasticity

BACKGROUND

Regional changes in corticostriatal transmission induced by phasic dopaminergic signals are an essential feature of the neural network responsible for instrumental reinforcement during discovery of an action. However, the timing of signals that are thought to contribute to the induction of corticostriatal plasticity is difficult to reconcile within the framework of behavioural reinforcement learning, because the reinforcer is normally delayed relative to the selection and execution of causally-related actions.

OBJECTIVE

While recent studies have started to address the relevance of delayed reinforcement signals and their impact on corticostriatal processing, our objective was to establish a model in which a sensory reinforcer triggers appropriately delayed reinforcement signals relayed to the striatum via intact neuronal pathways and to investigate the effects on corticostriatal plasticity.

METHODS

We measured corticostriatal plasticity with electrophysiological recordings using a light flash as a natural sensory reinforcer, and pharmacological manipulations were applied in an in vivo anesthetized rat model preparation.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that the spiking of striatal neurons evoked by single-pulse stimulation of the motor cortex can be potentiated by a natural sensory reinforcer, operating through intact afferent pathways, with signal timing approximating that required for behavioural reinforcement. The pharmacological blockade of dopamine receptors attenuated the observed potentiation of corticostriatal neurotransmission.

CONCLUSION

This novel in vivo model of corticostriatal plasticity offers a behaviourally relevant framework to address the physiological, anatomical, cellular, and molecular bases of instrumental reinforcement learning.

Compartment-specific dendritic information processing in striatal cholinergic interneurons is reconfigured by peptide neuromodulation

Cholinergic interneurons are central hubs of the striatal neuronal network, controlling information processing in a behavioral-state-dependent manner. It remains unknown, however, how such state transitions influence the integrative properties of these neurons. To address this, we made simultaneous somato-dendritic recordings from identified rodent cholinergic interneurons, revealing that action potentials are initiated at dendritic sites because of a dendritic axonal origin. Functionally, this anatomical arrangement ensured that the action potential initiation threshold was lowest at axon-bearing dendritic sites, a privilege efficacy powerfully accentuated at the hyperpolarized membrane potentials achieved in cholinergic interneurons following salient behavioral stimuli. Experimental analysis revealed the voltage-dependent attenuation of the efficacy of non-axon-bearing dendritic excitatory input was mediated by the recruitment of dendritic potassium channels, a regulatory mechanism that, in turn, was controlled by the pharmacological activation of neurokinin receptors. Together, these results indicate that the neuropeptide microenvironment dynamically controls state- and compartment-dependent dendritic information processing in striatal cholinergic interneurons.

Unraveling the dynamics of dopamine release and its actions on target cells

The neuromodulator dopamine (DA) is essential for regulating learning, motivation, and movement. Despite its importance, however, the mechanisms by which DA influences the activity of target cells to alter behavior remain poorly understood. In this review, we describe recent methodological advances that are helping to overcome challenges that have historically hindered the field. We discuss how the employment of these methods is shedding light on the complex dynamics of extracellular DA in the brain, as well as how DA signaling alters the electrical, biochemical, and population activity of target neurons in vivo. These developments are generating novel hypotheses about the mechanisms through which DA release modifies behavior.

Adaptive control of synaptic plasticity integrates micro- and macroscopic network function

Synaptic plasticity configures interactions between neurons and is therefore likely to be a primary driver of behavioral learning and development. How this microscopic-macroscopic interaction occurs is poorly understood, as researchers frequently examine models within particular ranges of abstraction and scale. Computational neuroscience and machine learning models offer theoretically powerful analyses of plasticity in neural networks, but results are often siloed and only coarsely linked to biology. In this review, we examine connections between these areas, asking how network computations change as a function of diverse features of plasticity and vice versa. We review how plasticity can be controlled at synapses by calcium dynamics and neuromodulatory signals, the manifestation of these changes in networks, and their impacts in specialized circuits. We conclude that metaplasticity-defined broadly as the adaptive control of plasticity-forges connections across scales by governing what groups of synapses can and can't learn about, when, and to what ends. The metaplasticity we discuss acts by co-opting Hebbian mechanisms, shifting network properties, and routing activity within and across brain systems. Asking how these operations can go awry should also be useful for understanding pathology, which we address in the context of autism, schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease.

Continuous cholinergic-dopaminergic updating in the nucleus accumbens underlies approaches to reward-predicting cues

The ability to learn Pavlovian associations from environmental cues predicting positive outcomes is critical for survival, motivating adaptive behaviours. This cued-motivated behaviour depends on the nucleus accumbens (NAc). NAc output activity mediated by spiny projecting neurons (SPNs) is regulated by dopamine, but also by cholinergic interneurons (CINs), which can release acetylcholine and glutamate via the activity of the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) or the vesicular glutamate transporter (VGLUT3), respectively. Here we investigated behavioural and neurochemical changes in mice performing a touchscreen Pavlovian approach task by recording dopamine, acetylcholine, and calcium dynamics from D1- and D2-SPNs using fibre photometry in control, VAChT or VGLUT3 mutant mice to understand how these signals cooperate in the service of approach behaviours toward reward-predicting cues. We reveal that NAc acetylcholine-dopaminergic signalling is continuously updated to regulate striatal output underlying the acquisition of Pavlovian approach learning toward reward-predicting cues.

Developmental regulation of thalamus-driven pauses in striatal cholinergic interneurons

In response to salient sensory cues, the tonically active striatal cholinergic interneuron (ChI) exhibits a characteristic synchronized "pause" thought to facilitate learning and the execution of motivated behavior. We report that thalamostriatal-driven ChI pauses are enhanced in ex vivo brain slices from infantile (P10) mice, with decreasing expression in preadolescent (P28) and adult (P100) mice concurrent with waning excitatory input to ChIs. Our data are consistent with previous reports that the adult ChI pause is dependent on dopamine signaling, but we find that the robust pausing at P10 is dopamine independent. Instead, elevated expression of the noninactivating delayed rectifier Kv7.2/3 current promotes pausing in infantile ChIs. Because this current decreases over development, a parallel increase in Ih further attenuates pause expression. These findings demonstrate that cell intrinsic and circuit mechanisms of ChI pause expression are developmentally determined and may underlie changes in learning properties as the nervous system matures.

Synaptic Plasticity Is Predicted by Spatiotemporal Firing Rate Patterns and Robust to In Vivo-like Variability

Synaptic plasticity, the experience-induced change in connections between neurons, underlies learning and memory in the brain. Most of our understanding of synaptic plasticity derives from in vitro experiments with precisely repeated stimulus patterns; however, neurons exhibit significant variability in vivo during repeated experiences. Further, the spatial pattern of synaptic inputs to the dendritic tree influences synaptic plasticity, yet is not considered in most synaptic plasticity rules. Here, we investigate how spatiotemporal synaptic input patterns produce plasticity with in vivo-like conditions using a data-driven computational model with a plasticity rule based on calcium dynamics. Using in vivo spike train recordings as inputs to different size clusters of spines, we show that plasticity is strongly robust to trial-to-trial variability of spike timing. In addition, we derive general synaptic plasticity rules describing how spatiotemporal patterns of synaptic inputs control the magnitude and direction of plasticity. Synapses that strongly potentiated have greater firing rates and calcium concentration later in the trial, whereas strongly depressing synapses have hiring firing rates early in the trial. The neighboring synaptic activity influences the direction and magnitude of synaptic plasticity, with small clusters of spines producing the greatest increase in synaptic strength. Together, our results reveal that calcium dynamics can unify diverse plasticity rules and reveal how spatiotemporal firing rate patterns control synaptic plasticity.

Etiopathogenic Models of Psychosis Spectrum Illnesses Must Resolve Four Key Features

Etiopathogenic models for psychosis spectrum illnesses are converging on a number of key processes, such as the influence of specific genes on the synthesis of proteins important in synaptic functioning, alterations in how neurons respond to synaptic inputs and engage in synaptic pruning, and microcircuit dysfunction that leads to more global cortical information processing vulnerabilities. Disruptions in prefrontal operations then accumulate and propagate over time, interacting with environmental factors, developmental processes, and homeostatic mechanisms, eventually resulting in symptoms of psychosis and disability. However, there are 4 key features of psychosis spectrum illnesses that are of primary clinical relevance but have been difficult to assimilate into a single model and have thus far received little direct attention: 1) the bidirectionality of the causal influences for the emergence of psychosis, 2) the catastrophic clinical threshold seen in first episodes of psychosis and why it is irreversible in some individuals, 3) observed biotypes that are neurophysiologically distinct but clinically both convergent and divergent, and 4) a reconciliation of the role of striatal dopaminergic dysfunction with models of prefrontal cortical state instability. In this selective review, we briefly describe these 4 hallmark features and we argue that theoretically driven computational perspectives making use of both algorithmic and neurophysiologic models are needed to reduce this complexity and variability of psychosis spectrum illnesses in a principled manner.

Phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A): Regulator of Dopamine Agonist-Induced Gene Expression in the Striatum

Dopamine and other neurotransmitters have the potential to induce neuroplasticity in the striatum via gene regulation. Dopamine receptor-mediated gene regulation relies on second messenger cascades that involve cyclic nucleotides to relay signaling from the synapse to the nucleus. Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) catalyze cyclic nucleotides and thus potently control cyclic nucleotide signaling. We investigated the role of the most abundant striatal PDE, PDE10A, in striatal gene regulation by assessing the effects of PDE10A inhibition (by a selective PDE10A inhibitor, TP-10) on gene regulation and by comparing the basal expression of PDE10A mRNA throughout the striatum with gene induction by dopamine agonists in the intact or dopamine-depleted striatum. Our findings show that PDE10A expression is most abundant in the sensorimotor striatum, intermediate in the associative striatum and lower in the limbic striatum. The inhibition of PDE10A produced pronounced increases in gene expression that were directly related to levels of local PDE10A expression. Moreover, the gene expression induced by L-DOPA after dopamine depletion (by 6-OHDA), or by psychostimulants (cocaine, methylphenidate) in the intact striatum, was also positively correlated with the levels of local PDE10A expression. This relationship was found for gene markers of both D1 receptor- and D2 receptor-expressing striatal projection neurons. Collectively, these results indicate that PDE10A, a vital part of the dopamine receptor-associated second messenger machinery, is tightly linked to drug-induced gene regulation in the striatum. PDE10A may thus serve as a potential target for modifying drug-induced gene regulation and related neuroplasticity.

A tonic nicotinic brake controls spike timing in striatal spiny projection neurons

Striatal spiny projection neurons (SPNs) transform convergent excitatory corticostriatal inputs into an inhibitory signal that shapes basal ganglia output. This process is fine-tuned by striatal GABAergic interneurons (GINs), which receive overlapping cortical inputs and mediate rapid corticostriatal feedforward inhibition of SPNs. Adding another level of control, cholinergic interneurons (CINs), which are also vigorously activated by corticostriatal excitation, can disynaptically inhibit SPNs by activating α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) on various GINs. Measurements of this disynaptic inhibitory pathway, however, indicate that it is too slow to compete with direct GIN-mediated feedforward inhibition. Moreover, functional nAChRs are also present on populations of GINs that respond only weakly to phasic activation of CINs, such as parvalbumin-positive fast-spiking interneurons (PV-FSIs), making the overall role of nAChRs in shaping striatal synaptic integration unclear. Using acute striatal slices from mice we show that upon synchronous optogenetic activation of corticostriatal projections blockade of α4β2 nAChRs shortened SPN spike latencies and increased postsynaptic depolarizations. The nAChR-dependent inhibition was mediated by downstream GABA release, and data suggest that the GABA source was not limited to GINs that respond strongly to phasic CIN activation. In particular, the observed decrease in spike latency caused by nAChR blockade was associated with a diminished frequency of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents in SPNs, a parallel hyperpolarization of PV-FSIs, and was occluded by pharmacologically preventing cortical activation of PV-FSIs. Taken together, we describe a role for tonic (as opposed to phasic) activation of nAChRs in striatal function. We conclude that tonic activation of nAChRs by CINs maintains a GABAergic brake on cortically-driven striatal output by ‘priming’ feedforward inhibition, a process that may shape SPN spike timing, striatal processing, and synaptic plasticity.