Allostatic load: a framework to understand breast cancer outcomes in Black women

See Me, Hear Me: Racial Discrimination Among Women Seeking Breast Cancer Care

Discrimination can contribute to worse health outcomes, but its prevalence in breast cancer is not well studied. We aimed to understand how women with stage I-III breast cancer faced discrimination in health care and everyday settings through a cross-sectional survey. 296 women, 178 (60%) Non-Hispanic White (NHW), 76 (26%) Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and 42 (14%) Hispanic participated. NHB women reported significantly more discrimination in everyday life compared to NHW women (score 20.1 vs 16.1, p<.001) and Hispanic women (score 20.1 vs 16.0, p<.001). In the health care setting, NHB had statistically more frequent reports of being ignored (23.7% vs. 5.6%), treated with less respect (21.1% vs. 7.3%), and treated with less courtesy (18.7% vs. 6.2%; all P=<.001) when compared to NHW women. NHB women experience a higher degree of discrimination both inside and outside of health care. Further research to understand discrimination on breast cancer outcomes is warranted.

Retrospective operationalization of allostatic load in patients with cancer: A systematic review

Allostatic load (AL) has been shown to impact cancer outcomes. At present, no gold standard exists surrounding AL computation. As such, a systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies that retrospectively calculated AL in patients with cancer. The following variables were collected for each study: AL calculation method, including the biomarkers used and their cutoff values, number of biosystems represented, definition of high AL, and the use of proxy biomarkers. Thirteen articles were included for full-text review. The number of biomarkers used in the calculation of AL varied considerably, ranging from 6 to 16. Considerable variability was also observed in terms of utilized biomarkers and biosystem representation. This lack of standardization complicates retrospective AL calculation among patients with cancer. Nonetheless, determining AL in patients with cancer presents an important step in the optimization of patient care and outcomes.

Assessing the Correlation between Allostatic Load and False-Positive Image-Guided Breast Biopsies

Background: Allostatic load (AL) is the accumulation of physiological dysregulation attributed to repeated activation of the stress response over a lifetime. We assessed the utility of AL as a prognostic measure for high-risk benign breast biopsy pathology results. Method: Eligible patients were women 18 years or older, with a false-positive outpatient breast biopsy between January and December 2022 at a tertiary academic health center. AL was calculated using 12 variables representing four physiological systems: cardiovascular (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein); metabolic (body mass index, albumin, and hemoglobin A1C); renal (creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate); and immune (white blood cell count). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between AL before biopsy and breast biopsy outcomes controlling for patients' sociodemographics. Results: In total, 170 women were included (mean age, 54.1 ± 12.9 years): 89.4% had benign and 10.6% had high-risk pathologies (radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion, atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia, flat epithelial atypia, intraductal papilloma, or lobular carcinoma in-situ). A total of 56.5% were White, 24.7% Asian, and 17.1% other races. A total of 32.5% identified as Hispanic. The mean breast cancer risk score using the Tyrer-Cuzick model was 11.9 ± 7.0. In multivariable analysis, with every one unit increase in AL, the probability of high-risk pathology increased by 37% (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.03, 1.81; p = 0.03). No significant association was seen between high-risk pathology and age, ethnicity, breast cancer risk, or area deprivation index. Conclusion: Our findings support that increased AL, a biological marker of stress, is associated with high-risk pathology among patients with false-positive breast biopsy results.

A Public Health Emergency: Breast Cancer Among Black Communities in the United States

While Black people have a similar incidence of breast cancer compared to White people, they have a 40% increased death rate. Black people are more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive subtypes such as triple-negative breast cancer. However, despite biological factors, systemic racism and social determinants of health create delays in care and barriers to treatment. While genetic testing holds incredible promise for Black people, uptake remains low and results may be challenging to interpret. There is a need for more robust, multidisciplinary, and antiracist interventions to reverse breast cancer-related racial disparities.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and breast cancer mortality in racially and ethnically diverse participants of the Northern California Breast Cancer Family Registry

Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (sTIL) enrichment in pretreatment breast tumors has been associated with superior response to neoadjuvant treatment and survival. In a population-based cohort, we studied sTIL-survival associations by race and ethnicity. We assessed associations of continuous sTIL scores and sTIL-enriched breast cancers (defined as percent lymphocytic infiltration of tumor stroma or cell nests at cutoffs of 30%, 50%, and 70%) with clinical and epidemiologic characteristics and conducted multivariable survival analyses. Although we identified no difference in sTIL score by race and ethnicity, higher continuous sTIL score was associated with lower breast cancer-specific mortality only among non-Hispanic White and Asian American but not African American and Hispanic women. This finding suggests that complex factors influence treatment response and survival, given that sTIL enrichment was not associated with a survival advantage among women from minoritized groups, who more often experience health disparities. Further study of patient selection for sTIL-guided treatment strategies is warranted.

Challenges Experienced by Black Women with Breast Cancer During Active Treatment: Relationship to Treatment Adherence

BACKGROUND

Although rates of death from breast cancer have declined in the USA for both Black and White women since 1990, mortality rates for Black women remain strikingly higher - 40% higher compared to White women (American Cancer Society 1). The barriers and challenges that may be triggering unfavorable treatment-related outcomes and diminished treatment adherence among Black women are not well understood.

METHODS

We recruited 25 Black women with breast cancer who were to receive surgery and chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Through weekly electronic surveys, we assessed types and severity of challenges across various life domains. Because the participants rarely missed treatments or appointments, we examined the impact of severity of weekly challenges on thoughts of skipping treatment or appointment with their cancer care team using a mixed-effects location scale model.

RESULTS

Both a higher average severity of challenges and a higher deviation of severity reported across weeks were associated with increased thoughts on skipping treatment or appointment. The correlation between the random location and scale effects was positive; thus, those women that reported more thoughts on skipping a dose of medicine or appointment were also more unpredictable with respect to the severity of challenges reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Black women with breast cancer are impacted by familial, social, work-related, and medical care factors, and these may in turn affect adherence to treatment. Providers are encouraged to actively screen and communicate with patients regarding life challenges and to build networks of support within the medical care team and social community that can help patients successfully complete treatment as planned.

Association of persistent poverty and U.S. News and World Report hospital rankings among patients undergoing major surgery

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the association of persistent poverty on patient outcomes relative to US News World Report (USNWR) rankings among individuals undergoing common major surgical procedures.

METHODS

Medicare beneficiaries who underwent AAA repair, CABG, colectomy, or lung resection were identified. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between care at USNWR hospitals, county-level duration of poverty (never-high poverty (NHP); intermittent high poverty (IHP): persistent-poverty (PP)) and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Among 916,164 beneficiaries, individuals residing in PP neighborhoods who received surgical care at ranked hospitals had lower risk-adjusted 30-day mortality (5.89% vs 8.89%; p ​< ​0.001). On multivariable analysis, 30-day mortality was lower at ranked hospitals across all poverty categories with greatest decrease among patients from PP regions (NHP: OR-0.91, 95%CI0.87-0.95; IHP: OR-0.78, 95%CI0.69-0.88; PP: OR-0.69, 95%CI0.57-0.83; p ​< ​0.001).

CONCLUSION

Receipt of surgical care at top-ranked hospitals was associated with improvement in postoperative mortality, especially among patients residing in persistent poverty..

Association between allostatic load and breast cancer risk: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Allostatic load (AL) reflects the collective load of chronic stress during lifetime. Previous studies have shown that higher AL is associated with poor clinical outcomes among breast cancer patients. However, the relationship between AL and breast cancer risk is still unclear.

METHODS

To fill the gap, we analyzed the association between AL and the development of breast cancer in 181,455 women identified from the UK Biobank.

RESULTS

During the follow-up from 2006 to 2020, 5,701 women were diagnosed with incident breast cancer. Significantly higher AL was observed among incident breast cancer cases than all study participants (mean: 2.77 vs. 2.63, P < 0.01). Univariate Cox regression analysis indicated the risk of breast cancer was increased by 5% per one AL unit increase (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04, 1.07). In multivariate analyses, after adjusting demographics, family history of breast cancer, reproductive factors, socioeconomic status, lifestyle factors, and breast cancer polygenic risk score (PRS), the significant association remained (HR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.03, 1.07). The significant relationship was further confirmed in the categorical analysis. Compared with women in the low AL group (AL: 0 ~ 2), those in the high AL group (AL: 3 ~ 11) had a 1.17-fold increased risk of breast cancer (HR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.11, 1.24). Finally, in the stratified analysis, joint effects on the risk of breast cancer were observed between the AL and selected known breast cancer risk factors, including age, family history of breast cancer, PRS, income, physical activity, and alcohol consumption.

CONCLUSION

In summary, those findings have demonstrated that higher AL was associated with an increased breast cancer risk in women. This association is likely independent of known breast cancer risk factors. Thus, the AL could be a valuable biomarker to help breast cancer risk prediction and stratification.

Association of Race/Ethnicity, Persistent Poverty, and Opioid Access Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer Near the End of Life

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDoH) can impact access to healthcare. We sought to assess the association between persistent poverty (PP), race/ethnicity, and opioid access among patients with gastrointestinal cancer near the end-of-life (EOL).

METHODS

SEER-Medicare patients with gastric, liver, pancreatic, biliary, colon, and rectal cancer were identified between 2008 and 2016 near EOL, defined as 30 days before death or hospice enrolment. Data were linked with county-level poverty from the American Community Survey and the US Department of Agriculture (2000-2015). Counties were categorized as never high-poverty (NHP), intermittent high-poverty (IHP) and persistent poverty (PP). Trends in opioid prescription fills and daily dosages (morphine milligram equivalents per day) were examined.

RESULTS

Among 48,631 Medicare beneficiaries (liver: n = 6551, 13.5%; pancreas: n = 13,559, 27.9%; gastric: n = 5486, 1.3%; colorectal: n = 23,035, 47.4%), there was a steady decrease in opioid prescriptions near EOL. Black, Asian, Hispanic, and other racial groups had markedly decreased odds of filling an opioid prescription near EOL (Black: OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.90; Asian: OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.94; Hispanic: OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.95; Other: OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.93; all p < 0.05). Even after filling an opioid prescription, this subset of patients received lower daily doses versus White patients (Black: -16.5 percentage points, 95% CI -21.2 to -11.6; Asian: -11.9 percentage points, 95% CI -18.5 to -4.9; Hispanic: -19.1 percentage points, 95%CI -23.5 to -14.6; all p < 0.05). The disparity in opioid access and average daily doses among was attenuated in IHP/PP areas for Asian, Hispanic, and other racial groups, yet exacerbated among Black patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Race/ethnicity-based disparities in EOL pain management persist with SDoH-based variations in EOL opioid use. In particular, PP impacted EOL opioid access and utilization.

Oncologic anthropology: Global variations in breast cancer risk, biology, and outcome

The global breast cancer burden is growing. Of 19.3 million new cancers diagnosed in 2020, 2.26 million were breast, surpassing lung as the most commonly diagnosed worldwide. Breast cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide, and the leading cause of death in females. Incidence and mortality rates are projected to rise disproportionately in low and middle-income countries, a consequence of socioeconomic factors and differences in tumor biology related to genetic ancestry.

Epigenetic Profiles of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers of African American and White Females

Importance

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype and appears to have disproportionately higher incidence and worse outcomes among younger African American females.

Objective

To investigate whether epigenetic differences exist in TNBCs of younger African American females that may explain clinical disparities seen in this patient group.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study used clinical, demographic, DNA methylation (HumanMethylation450; Illumina), and gene expression (RNA sequencing) data for US patient populations from publicly available data repositories (The Cancer Genome Atlas [TCGA], 2006-2012, and Gene Expression Omnibus [GEO], 2004-2013) accessed on April 13, 2021. White and African American females with TNBC identified in TCGA (69 patients) and a validation cohort of 210 African American patients from GEO (GSE142102) were included. Patients without available race or age data were excluded. Data were analyzed from September 2022 through April 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

DNA methylation and gene expression profiles of TNBC tumors by race (self-reported) and age were assessed. Age was considered a dichotomous variable using age 50 years as the cutoff (younger [<50 years] vs older [≥50 years]).

Results

A total of 69 female patients (34 African American [49.3%] and 35 White [50.7%]; mean [SD; range] age, 55.7 [11.6; 29-82] years) with TNBC were included in the DNA methylation analysis; these patients and 210 patients in the validation cohort were included in the gene expression analysis (279 patients). There were 1115 differentially methylated sites among younger African American females. The DNA methylation landscape on TNBC tumors in this population had increased odds of enrichment of hormone (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.67; P = .003), muscle (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.36; P < .001), and proliferation (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 2.71 to 3.64; P < .001) pathways vs other groups (older African American females and all White females). Alterations in regulators of these molecular features in TNBCs of younger African American females were identified involving hormone modulation (downregulation of androgen receptor: fold change [FC] = -2.93; 95% CI, -4.76 to -2.11; P < .001) and upregulation of estrogen-related receptor α (FC = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.38; P = .002), muscle metabolism (upregulation of FOXC1: FC = 1.33; 95% CI, 0.62 to 2.03; P < .001), and proliferation mediators (upregulation of NOTCH1: FC = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.19; P = .004 and MYC (FC = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.18 to 1.45; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that TNBC of younger African American females may represent a distinct epigenetic entity and offer novel insight into molecular alterations associated with TNBCs of this population. Understanding these epigenetic differences may lead to the development of more effective therapies for younger African American females, who have the highest incidence and worst outcomes from TNBC of any patient group.

Addressing Inequalities in Breast Cancer Care Delivery

Breast cancer treatment, timeliness of care, and clinical outcomes are inferior for patients of Black race and Hispanic ethnicity, and the origin of these inequities is multifactorial. Owing to aggregate reporting of data in the United States for patients of Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander ancestry, disparities within and across these groups are difficult to appreciate. In large part due to low prevalence, male breast cancer remains understudied, and treatment algorithms are primarily extrapolated from research conducted in female patients.

Outcomes in breast cancer-does ethnicity matter?

Ethnic or racial differences in breast cancer (BC) survival outcomes have been reported, but current data are largely restricted to comparisons between African Americans and non-Hispanic whites. Most analyses have traditionally been based on self-reported race which may not always be accurate, or are oversimplified in their classification. With increasing globalization, quantification of the genetic ancestry from genomic data may offer a solution to infer the complex makeup from admixture of races. Focusing on the larger and the latest studies, we will discuss recent findings on the differing host and tumor biology that may be driving these disparities, in addition to the extrinsic environmental or lifestyle factors. Socioeconomic disparities with lower cancer literacy may lead to late presentation, poorer adherence to treatment, and other lifestyle factors such as unhealthy diet, obesity, and inadequate physical activity. These hardships may also result in greater allostatic load, which is in turn associated with aggressive BC features in disadvantaged populations. Epigenetic reprogramming may mediate the effects of the environment or lifestyle factors on gene expression, with ensuing differences in BC characteristics and outcome. There is increasing evidence that germline genetics can influence somatic gene alterations or expression, as well as modulate the tumor or immune microenvironment. Although the precise mechanisms remain elusive, this may account for the varying distribution of different BC subtypes across ethnicities. These gaps in our knowledge highlight the need to interrogate the multiomics landscape of BC in diverse populations, ideally in large-scale collaborative settings with standardized methodology for the comparisons to be statistically robust. Together with improving BC awareness and access to good quality health care, a holistic approach with insights of the biological underpinnings is much needed to eradicate ethnic disparities in BC outcomes.

Examining racial differences in treatment and survival among patients with Paget's disease of the breast

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate racial differences in treatment (ie, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) and survival among patients with Paget's disease of the breast in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result program.

METHODS

Women >18 years old diagnosed with localized or regional Paget's disease between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result program were included. The cohort was divided into Black and White patients. Univariable analysis compared the groups. Using propensity score matching, Black and White patients were nearest matched (1:2) on age at diagnosis; Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result summary stage; surgery; chemotherapy; and year of diagnosis. The log-rank test evaluated the matched sample's overall survival and disease-specific survival.

RESULTS

Of the 1,181 patients, the racial distribution was 1,049 (88.8%) White and 132 (11.2%) Black. A higher percentage of Black women were Medicaid insured (Black 25.8% vs White 11.1%), lived in neighborhoods with low socioeconomic status (Black 53.0% vs White 25.4%), and had regional disease than White women (Black 41.7% vs White 29%). There were no racial differences in receipt of radiation therapy (P = .90), breast surgery (P = .23), or axillary surgery (P = .25). Black patients were more likely to receive chemotherapy (Black 34.8% vs White 26.3% P = .038). In the propensity matched cohort, Black patients had a worse overall survival (P < .005) and disease-specific survival (P = .05) than White patients.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients with Paget's disease, despite differences in sociodemographic factors, there were no disparities in locoregional treatment. However, on matched analysis, Black patients had a worse overall survival and disease-specific survival than their White counterparts.

Race and socioeconomic status interact with HPV to influence survival disparities in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is associated with a favorable prognosis, yet patients of color and low socioeconomic status (SES) continue to experience inferior outcomes. We aim to understand how the emergence of HPV has impacted race and SES survival disparities in OPSCC.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 18,362 OPSCC cases from 2010 to 2017 was assembled using the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database. Cox proportional regression and Fine and Gray regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) adjusting for race, SES, age, subsite, stage, and treatment.

RESULTS

Black patients had lower overall survival than patients of other races in HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.53 and HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.39, respectively). Higher SES was associated with improved survival in all patients. Race had a diminished association with survival among high SES patients. Low SES Black patients had considerably worse survival than low SES patients of other races.

CONCLUSION

Race and SES interact variably across cohorts. High SES was protective of the negative effects of race, although there remains a disparity in outcomes among Black and non-Black patients, even in high SES populations. The persistence of survival disparities suggests that the HPV epidemic has not improved outcomes equally across all demographic groups.

Bearing allostatic load: insights into a more equitable future within cardio-oncology

Chronic stress is often regarded as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality; however, the mechanistic link between stress and various disease states has not yet been fully characterized. We explore the concept of allostatic load, a measurement of the physiological burden of chronic stress, as well as its potential role in disease pathogenesis as it relates to cardiovascular disease, cancer, and health-related disparities. Building from this framework, we then posit the potential implications of allostatic load on patient care and research in cardio-oncology. We identify allostatic load as a potential clinically actionable tool to improve health equity in cardio-oncology.

Risk of Presenting with Poor-Prognosis Metastatic Cancer in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Population-Based Study

Having metastatic disease at diagnosis poses the great risk of death among AYAs with cancer from all sociodemographic subgroups. This “landscape” study utilized United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data from 2000−2016 to identify subgroups of AYAs at highest risk for presenting with metastases across twelve cancer sites having a poor-prognosis (5-year survival <50% with metastases). Adjusted odds ratios for risk of metastatic disease presentation were compared for AYAs in aggregate and by sociodemographic subgroup (race/ethnicity, sex, socioeconomic status [SES]). In general, AYAs who were male, racial/ethnic minorities, or low SES were at consistently greatest risk of metastases. Strikingly, having metastatic melanoma was independently associated with multiple AYA sociodemographic subgroups, including males (aOR 3.11 [95% CI 2.64−3.66]), non-Hispanic Blacks (4.04 [2.32−7.04]), Asian Pacific Islanders (2.99 [1.75−5.12]), Hispanics (2.37 [1.85−3.04]), and low SES (2.30 [1.89−2.80]). Non-Hispanic Blacks were more likely to present with metastatic cancer in all sites, except for bone, rhabdomyosarcoma, and stomach. Low SES AYAs are more likely to present with metastatic melanoma, bone tumors, soft tissue sarcomas, breast, cervical, lung, and stomach carcinomas. Building on these results, future cancer-specific studies should investigate the connection between sociodemographic risk factors and biological drivers of metastases. This line of research has potential to inform targeted public health and screening efforts to facilitate risk reduction and earlier detection of these deadly diseases.

Association of Allostatic Load With Overall Mortality Among Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Importance

Adverse social determinants of health (SDHs) (eg, poverty) are associated with poor oncologic outcomes among patients with lung cancer. However, no studies have evaluated biological correlates of adverse SDHs, operationalized as allostatic load (AL), with mortality due to lung cancer.

Objective

To examine the association among AL, SDHs, and mortality among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study of an observational cohort was performed at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center with data accrued from June 1, 2017, to August 31, 2019. Patients with metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC enrolled at diagnosis into a prospective observational cohort study were included in the present analysis if they had all the biomarkers to calculate an AL score (N = 143). Follow-up was completed on August 31, 2021, and data were analyzed from July 1 to September 30, 2021.

Exposures

Social determinants of health.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall mortality and AL.

Results

A total of 143 patients met the study criteria with a median age of 63 (IQR, 55-71) years (89 men [62.2%] and 54 women [37.8%]). In terms of race and ethnicity, 1 patient (0.7%) was Asian, 7 (4.9%) were Black, 117 (81.8%) were White, 17 (11.9%) were of multiple races, and 1 (0.7%) was of other race or ethnicity. The mean (SD) AL was 2.90 (1.37). Elevated AL covaried with lower educational level (r = -0.26; P = .002), male sex (r = 0.19; P = .02), limited mobility (r = 0.19; P = .04), worsening self-care (r = 0.30; P < .001), problems engaging in usual activities (r = 0.21; P = .01), depressive symptoms (r = 0.23; P = .005), and a high number of stressful life events (r = 0.30; P < .001). Multivariable analysis found only increasing difficulty with mobility (r = 0.37 [95% CI, 0.13-0.60]; P = .002) and male sex (r = 0.63 [95% CI, 0.19-1.08]; P = .005) associated with higher AL. On adjusted analysis, elevated AL (hazard ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.16-1.79]; P = .001) and low educational level (hazard ratio, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.03-4.34]; P = .04) were associated with worse overall mortality.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that higher AL was associated with adverse SDHs and worse overall mortality among patients with advanced NSCLC. These results provide a framework for replication and further studies of AL as a biological correlate for SDH and future prognostic marker.

Enhancing the Trajectories of Cancer Health Disparities Research: Improving Clinical Applications of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

In order to accurately detect and prevent racial disparities, self-reported race (SRR) and ethnicity remain valuable tools; however, inaccurate capture of patient identity and broad aggregation of minoritized race groups present challenges for data interpretation. Also, although SRR is a proxy for shared social/cultural experience, it is not an accurate representation of shared endogenous factors. Biological investigations into cancer disparities, particularly those involving genetic features, should be framed in the context of genetic background or ancestry, as these are heritable aspects of population health. In reality, both genetics and environment work in concert to influence cancer risk and clinical outcomes. The best opportunity to define actionable means for reducing health disparities is in rigorous and comprehensive generation of rich data sets that characterize environmental, biological, and genetic components of disparate disease burden. To translate this pivotal disparities research into clinical tools and improved policies, we describe a diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) framework, which will increase participation from diverse backgrounds, reexamine previous research with a rigorous evaluation of appropriate SRR groupings, and engage community leaders to ensure that future research addresses the needs of communities at increased risk. On this path forward, we may finally end cancer disparities.

Assessment of Racial Disparity in Survival Outcomes for Early Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer After Adjusting for Insurance Status and Neighborhood Deprivation: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Racial disparities in survival outcomes among Black women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer have been reported. However, the association between individual-level and neighborhood-level social determinants of health on such disparities has not been well studied.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between race and clinical outcomes (ie, relapse-free interval and overall survival) adjusting for individual insurance coverage and neighborhood deprivation index (NDI), measured using zip code of residence, in women with breast cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a post hoc analysis of 9719 women with breast cancer in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment, a randomized clinical trial conducted from April 7, 2006, to October 6, 2010. All participants received a diagnosis of hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer. The present data analysis was conducted from April 1 to October 22, 2021.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A multivariate model was developed to evaluate the association between race and relapse-free interval and overall survival adjusting for insurance and NDI level at study entry, early discontinuation of endocrine therapy 4 years after initiation, and clinicopathologic characteristics of cancer. Median follow-up for clinical outcomes was 96 months.

RESULTS

A total of 9719 women (4.2% [n = 405] Asian; 7.1% [n = 693] Black; 84.3% [n = 8189] White; 4.4% [n = 403] others/not specified) were included; 9.1% of included women [n = 889] were Hispanic or Latino. Median (SD) age was 56 (9.2) years. In multivariate models, Black race compared with White race was associated with statistically significant shorter relapse-free interval (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.05-1.84; P = .02) and overall survival (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.99; P = .009), adjusting for insurance and NDI level at study entry and other factors. Although uninsured status was not associated with clinical outcomes, patients with Medicare (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.68; P = .04) and Medicaid (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.01-2.05; P = .05) had shorter overall survival compared with those with private insurance. Participants living in neighborhoods in the highest NDI quartile experienced shorter overall survival compared with those in the lowest quartile (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.77; P = .04), regardless of self-identified race.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial suggest that Black women with breast cancer have significantly shorter relapse-free interval and overall survival compared with White women. Early discontinuation of endocrine therapy, clinicopathologic characteristics, insurance coverage, and NDI do not fully explain the observed disparity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00310180.

The Role of Safety-Net Hospitals in Reducing Disparities in Breast Cancer Care

Advances in breast cancer screening and systemic therapies have been credited with profound improvements in breast cancer outcomes; indeed, 5-year relative survival rate approaches 91% in the USA (U.S. National Institutes of Health NCI. SEER Training Modules, Breast). While breast cancer mortality has been declining, oncologic outcomes have not improved equally among all races and ethnicities. Many factors have been implicated in breast cancer disparities; chief among them is limited access to care which contributes to lower rates of timely screening mammography and, once diagnosed with breast cancer, lower rates of receipt of guideline concordant care (Wu, Lund, Kimmick GG et al. in J Clin Oncol 30(2):142-150, 2012). Hospitals with a safety-net mission, such as the essential hospitals, historically have been dedicated to providing high-quality care to all populations and have eagerly embraced the role of caring for the most vulnerable and working to eliminate health disparities. In this article, we review landmark articles that have evaluated the role safety-net hospitals have played in providing equitable breast cancer care including to those patients who face significant social and economic challenges.

Examining educational attainment and allostatic load in non-Hispanic Black women

Background

Research suggests that non-Hispanic Black (henceforth, Black) women and people with lower educational attainment have higher levels of allostatic load (AL). This study sought to determine the association between educational attainment and AL among a large sample of Black women.

Methods

We analyzed data among 4177 Black women from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey years 1999–2018. AL score was defined as the total for abnormal measures of eight biomarkers. We further categorized participants with AL score greater than or equal to 4 as having high AL. We calculated mean estimates of total allostatic load scores using generalized linear models. We performed modified Poisson Regression models with robust variance estimation to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) of high allostatic load and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by educational attainment.

Results

Black women with a college degree or higher had the lowest prevalence of high allostatic load (31.8% vs. 42.7%, 36.3%, 36.6%), and age adjusted mean allostatic load scores (mean = 1.90 vs. mean = 2.34, mean = 1.99, mean = 2.05) when compared to Black women with less than a high school diploma, high school diploma or GED, and some college or associates degree respectively. Even after accounting for age, poverty-to-income ratio, smoking, congestive heart failure, and heart attack, Black college graduates had an 14.3% lower prevalence of high allostatic load (PR = 0.857, 95% CI 0.839–0.876) when compared to Black women with lower educational attainment.

Conclusions

Black women with a baccalaureate degree or higher educational attainment had lower allostatic load compared to Black women with less than a high school education. This finding further confirms higher education is a social determinant of health. Future research should explore differences in AL by more granular degree types.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-01641-0.