Localization and hormonal stimulation of phosphorylation sites in the LNCaP-cell androgen receptor

Proline-Directed Androgen Receptor Phosphorylation

The androgen receptor (AR) has been identified for decades and mediates essential steroid functions. Like most of biological molecules, AR functional activities are modulated by post-translational modifications. This review is focused on the reported activities and significance of AR phosphorylation, with particular emphasis on proline-directed serine/threonine phosphorylation that occurs predominantly on the receptor. The marked enrichment of AR phosphorylation in the most diverse N-terminal domain suggests that targeting AR phosphorylation can be synergistic to antagonizing the C-terminal domain by clinical antiandrogens.

Regulation of the androgen receptor by post-translational modifications

The androgen receptor (AR) is a key molecule in prostate cancer and Kennedy's disease. Understanding the regulatory mechanisms of this steroid receptor is important in the development of potential therapies for these diseases. One layer of AR regulation is provided by post-translational modifications including phosphorylation, acetylation, sumoylation, ubiquitination and methylation. While these modifications have mostly been studied as individual events, it is becoming clear that these modifications can functionally interact with each other in a signalling pathway. In this review, the effects of all modifications are described with a focus on interplay between them and the functional consequences for the AR.

A novel mutation F826L in the human androgen receptor in partial androgen insensitivity syndrome; increased NH2-/COOH-terminal domain interaction and TIF2 co-activation

A novel mutation F826L located within the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the human androgen receptor (AR) was investigated. This mutation was found in a boy with severe penoscrotal hypospadias (classified as 46,XY DSD). The AR mutant F826L appeared to be indistinguishable from the wild-type AR, with respect to ligand binding affinity, transcriptional activation of MMTV-luciferase and ARE2-TATA-luciferase reporter genes, protein level in genital skin fibroblasts (GSFs), and sub-cellular distribution in transfected cells. However, an at least two-fold higher NH2-/COOH-terminal domain interaction was found in luciferase and GST pull-down assays. A two-fold increase was also observed for TIF2 (transcription intermediary factor 2) co-activation of the AR F826L COOH-terminal domain. This increase could not be explained by a higher stability of the mutant protein, which was within wild-type range. Repression of transactivation by the nuclear receptor co-repressor (N-CoR) was not affected by the AR F826L mutation. The observed properties of AR F826L would be in agreement with an increased activity rather than with a partial defective AR transcriptional activation. It is concluded that the penoscrotal hypospadias in the present case is caused by an as yet unknown mechanism, which still may involve the mutant AR.

Calmodulin-androgen receptor (AR) interaction: calcium-dependent, calpain-mediated breakdown of AR in LNCaP prostate cancer cells

Chemotherapy of prostate cancer targets androgen receptor (AR) by androgen ablation or antiandrogens, but unfortunately, it is not curative. Our attack on prostate cancer envisions the proteolytic elimination of AR, which requires a fuller understanding of AR turnover. We showed previously that calmodulin (CaM) binds to AR with important consequences for AR stability and function. To examine the involvement of Ca(2+)/CaM in the proteolytic breakdown of AR, we analyzed LNCaP cell extracts that bind to a CaM affinity column for the presence of low molecular weight forms of AR (intact AR size, approximately 114 kDa). Using an antibody directed against the NH(2)-terminal domain (ATD) of AR on Western blots, we identified approximately 76-kDa, approximately 50-kDa, and 34/31-kDa polypeptides in eluates of CaM affinity columns, suggesting the presence of CaM-binding sites within the 31/34-kDa ATD of AR. Under cell-free conditions in the presence of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, AR underwent Ca(2+)-dependent degradation. AR degradation was inhibited by N-acetyl-leu-leu-norleu, an inhibitor of thiol proteases, suggesting the involvement of calpain. In intact cells, AR breakdown was accelerated by raising intracellular Ca(2+) using calcimycin, and increased AR breakdown was reversed with the cell-permeable Ca(2+) chelator bis-(O-aminophenoxy)-ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid tetra-(acetoxymethyl)-ester. In CaM affinity chromatography studies, the Ca(2+)-dependent protease calpain was bound to and eluted from the CaM-agarose column along with AR. Caspase-3, which plays a role in AR turnover under stress conditions, did not bind to the CaM column and was present in the proenzyme form. Similarly, AR immunoprecipitates prepared from whole-cell extracts of exponentially growing LNCaP cells contained both calpain and calpastatin. Nuclear levels of calpain and calpastatin (its endogenous inhibitor) changed in a reciprocal fashion as synchronized LNCaP cells progressed from G(1) to S phase. These reciprocal changes correlated with changes in AR level, which increased in late G(1) phase and decreased as S phase progressed. Taken together, these observations suggest potential involvement of AR-bound CaM in calcium-controlled, calpain-mediated breakdown of AR in prostate cancer cells.

Androgen receptor phosphorylation and stabilization in prostate cancer by cyclin-dependent kinase 1

Androgen receptors (ARs) are phosphorylated at multiple sites in response to ligand binding, but the kinases mediating AR phosphorylation and the importance of these kinases in AR function have not been established. Here we show that cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) mediates AR phosphorylation at Ser-81 and increases AR protein expression, and that Cdk1 inhibitors decrease AR Ser-81 phosphorylation, protein expression, and transcriptional activity in prostate cancer (PCa) cells. The decline in AR protein expression mediated by the Cdk inhibitor roscovitine was prevented by proteosome inhibitors, indicating that Cdk1 stabilizes AR protein, although roscovitine also decreased AR message levels. Analysis of an S81A AR mutant demonstrated that this site is not required for transcriptional activity or Cdk1-mediated AR stabilization in transfected cells. The AR is active and seems to be stabilized by low levels of androgen in "androgen-independent" PCas that relapse subsequent to androgen-deprivation therapy. Significantly, the expression of cyclin B and Cdk1 was increased in these tumors, and treatment with roscovitine abrogated responses to low levels of androgen in the androgen-independent C4-2 PCa cell line. Taken together, these findings identify Cdk1 as a Ser-81 kinase and indicate that Cdk1 stabilizes AR protein by phosphorylation at a site(s) distinct from Ser-81. Moreover, these results indicate that increased Cdk1 activity is a mechanism for increasing AR expression and stability in response to low androgen levels in androgen-independent PCas, and that Cdk1 antagonists may enhance responses to androgen-deprivation therapy.

The Human PC346 Xenograft and Cell Line Panel: A Model System for Prostate Cancer Progression

OBJECTIVE

Prostate cancer (PC) model systems that reflect the different disease stages are essential for studying the development and progression of PC and for testing new treatment modalities. This review summarizes the establishment and characterization of the PC346 progression model and compares it to other available human PC cell lines and xenografts.

METHODS

The PC346 model was derived from the transurethral resection of a primary prostate tumor. Tumor samples were subcutaneously implanted into athymic mice, which resulted in the development of a series of xenografts from which in vitro cell cultures were established.

RESULTS

The PC346 panel includes sublines with hormone-response characteristics that range from androgen-sensitive to androgen-independent (AI) growth. In vivo and in vitro selection of androgen-sensitive lines under androgen-depleted conditions replicated the clinically relevant relapse phenomenon, and resulted in a series of modifications in the androgen-receptor (AR) pathway: AR mutation, overexpression, and downregulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The PC346 panel reproduces many biological characteristics of the different phases of clinical PC and the most common AR modifications observed in hormone-refractory tumors, being a valuable addition to the limited collection of available model systems.

Phosphorylation of androgen receptor isoforms

Phosphorylation of the human AR (androgen receptor) is directly correlated with the appearance of at least three AR isoforms on an SDS/polyacrylamide gel. However, it is still not clear to what extent phosphorylation is involved in the occurrence of isoforms, which sites are phosphorylated and what are the functions of these phosphosites. The human AR was expressed in COS-1 cells and AR phosphorylation was studied further by mutational analyses and by using reversed-phase HPLC and MS. The reversed-phase HPLC elution pattern of the three isoforms revealed that Ser-650 was phosphorylated constitutively. After de novo synthesis, only Ser-650 was phosphorylated in the smallest isoform of 110 kDa and both Ser-650 and Ser-94 were phosphorylated in the second isoform of 112 kDa. The hormone-induced 114 kDa isoform shows an overall increase in phosphorylation of all the isolated peptides. The activities of the Ser-Ala substitution mutant S650A (Ser-650-->Ala) was found to be identical with wild-type AR activation in four different cell lines and three different functional analyses, e.g. transactivation, N- and C-terminal-domain interaction and co-activation by transcriptional intermediary factor 2. This was also found for mutants S94A and S515A with respect to transactivation. However, the S515A mutation, which should eliminate phosphorylation of the potential mitogen-activated protein kinase site, Ser-515, resulted in an unphosphorylated form of the peptide containing Ser-650. This suggests that Ser-515 can modulate phosphorylation at another site. The present study shows that the AR isoform pattern from AR de novo synthesis is directly linked to differential phosphorylation of a distinct set of sites. After mutagenesis of these sites, no major change in functional activity of the AR was observed.

Differential modulation of androgen receptor transcriptional activity by the nuclear receptor co-repressor (N-CoR)

Antiandrogens are widely used agents in the treatment of prostate cancer, as inhibitors of AR (androgen receptor) action. Although the precise mechanism of antiandrogen action is not yet elucidated, recent studies indicate the involvement of nuclear receptor co-repressors. In the present study, the regulation of AR transcriptional activity by N-CoR (nuclear receptor co-repressor), in the presence of different ligands, has been investigated. Increasing levels of N-CoR differentially affected the transcriptional activity of AR occupied with either agonistic or antagonistic ligands. Small amounts of co-transfected N-CoR repressed CPA (cyproterone acetate)- and mifepristone (RU486)-mediated AR activity, but did not affect agonist (R1881)-induced AR activity. Larger amounts of co-transfected N-CoR repressed AR activity for all ligands, and converted the partial agonists CPA and RU486 into strong AR antagonists. In the presence of the agonist R1881, co-expression of the p160 co-activator TIF2 (transcriptional intermediary factor 2) relieved N-CoR repression up to control levels. However, in the presence of RU486 and CPA, TIF2 did not functionally compete with N-CoR, suggesting that antagonist-bound AR has a preference for N-CoR. The AR mutation T877A (Thr877-->Ala), which is frequently found in prostate cancer and affects the ligand-induced conformational change of the AR, considerably reduced the repressive action of N-CoR. The agonistic activities of CPA- and hydroxyflutamide-occupied T877A-AR were hardly affected by N-CoR, whereas TIF2 strongly enhanced their activities. These results indicate that lack of N-CoR action allows these antiandrogens to act as strong agonists on the mutant AR.

Suppression of androgen receptor-mediated transactivation and cell growth by the glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta in prostate cells

Androgens play important roles in the growth of normal prostate and prostate cancer via binding to the androgen receptor (AR). In addition to androgens, AR activity can also be modulated by selective growth factors and/or kinases. Here we report a new kinase signaling pathway by showing that AR transactivation was repressed by wild type glycogen synthase kinase 3beta (GSK3 beta) or constitutively active S9A-GSK3 beta in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the catalytically inactive kinase mutant GSK3 beta showed little effect on the AR transactivation. The suppression of AR transactivation by GSK3 beta was abolished by the GSK3 beta inhibitor lithium chloride. The in vitro kinase assay showed that GSK3 beta prefers to phosphorylate the amino terminus of AR that may lead to the suppression of activation function 1 activity located in the NH(2)-terminal region of AR. GSK3 beta interrupted the interaction between the NH(2) and COOH termini of AR, and overexpression of the constitutively active form of GSK3 beta, S9A-GSK3 beta, reduced the androgen-induced prostate cancer cell growth in stably transfected CWR22R cells. Together, our data demonstrated that GSK3 beta may function as a repressor to suppress AR-mediated transactivation and cell growth, which may provide a new strategy to modulate the AR-mediated prostate cancer growth.

The androgen receptor: structure, mutations, and antiandrogens

Androgens play a critical role not only in the physiological development of the prostate but also in the genesis of prostate cancer. The effects of androgen on the prostate gland and on the other tissues of the body are mediated by activation of the androgen receptor. The androgen receptor is a member of the superfamily of hormone receptors with a DNA-binding site, two zinc finger domains, and a hormone-binding site. Mutations in this receptor can be associated with loss of function or chronic endogeneous activation, depending upon the site of change. Androgens effect a conformal change in the structure of the androgen receptor associated with a change in protein phosphorylation. The androgen receptor can be activated by additional ligands affecting the hormone-binding site besides androgens. Activators and repressors of the androgen receptor modify this protein's function and are very delicately balanced such that disruptions of either function are associated with a disease state. Antiandrogens, which bind to the receptor and thus down-regulate the effects of endogeneous circulating androgens, remain the first line treatment for palliation of advanced prostate cancer. Mutations in the receptor are associated with a change in function of such compounds from antagonist to agonist in vitro. Newer evidence suggests there may be a role of intermittent androgen suppression rather than continuous suppression, perhaps by preventing overgrowth of hormone independent tumor cells. Future research focuses on the development of drugs directed at suppressing the androgen drive of the androgen sensitive clone of the tumor and making the nonsensitive subset more susceptible to cytotoxics.

The role of androgens and the androgen receptor in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the leading diagnosed malignancy in men in western countries. The relationship between androgens and the androgen receptor (AR) has been studied extensively in PCa. Plasma levels of androgens show variations between different populations, and in many cases this correlates with PCa susceptibility. Indeed, exposure of the fetus to higher androgen concentrations appears to be a risk factor for PCa. The AR is present in the majority of PCa, and its activation by androgens leads to different proliferative, apoptotic and angiogenic events. These events are in turn mediated by dysregulation of cyclin-dependent kinases, apoptotic factors and even mutations in the AR. Although androgen ablation has been the mainstay non-surgical treatment for this disease, most tumors will eventually become refractory to treatment. Different cellular mechanisms appear to be involved in the androgen-independent progression of PCa, including cytokine and growth factor-mediated activation of the AR as well as neuroendocrine differentiation. Thus, an understanding of the cellular mechanisms involved in androgen action may lead to better therapeutic targets for PCa.

Androgen receptor (AR) coregulators: an overview

The biological action of androgens is mediated through the androgen receptor (AR). Androgen-bound AR functions as a transcription factor to regulate genes involved in an array of physiological processes, most notably male sexual differentiation and maturation, and the maintenance of spermatogenesis. The transcriptional activity of AR is affected by coregulators that influence a number of functional properties of AR, including ligand selectivity and DNA binding capacity. As the promoter of target genes, coregulators participate in DNA modification, either directly through modification of histones or indirectly by the recruitment of chromatin-modifying complexes, as well as functioning in the recruitment of the basal transcriptional machinery. Aberrant coregulator activity due to mutation or altered expression levels may be a contributing factor in the progression of diseases related to AR activity, such as prostate cancer. AR demonstrates distinct differences in its interaction with coregulators from other steroid receptors due to differences in the functional interaction between AR domains, possibly resulting in alterations in the dynamic interactions between coregulator complexes.

Regions of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) promoter confer androgen-independent expression of PSA in prostate cancer cells

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is expressed primarily by both normal prostate epithelium and the vast majority of prostate cancers. Increases in serum PSA during endocrine therapy are generally considered as evidence for prostate cancer recurrence or progression to androgen independence. The mechanisms by which PSA up-regulation occurs in androgen-refractory prostate cancer cells are unknown. In this study, by using LNCaP and its lineage-derived androgen-independent PSA-producing subline, C4-2, we identified two cis-elements within the 5.8-kilobase pair PSA promoter that are essential for the androgen-independent activity of PSA promoter in prostate cancer cells. First, a previously reported 440-bp androgen-responsive element enhancer core (AREc) was found to be important for the high basal PSA promoter activity in C4-2 cells. Both mutation analysis and supershift experiments demonstrated that androgen receptor (AR) binds to the AREs within the AREc and activate the basal PSA promoter activity in C4-2 cells under androgen-deprived conditions. Second, a 150-bp pN/H region was demonstrated to be a strong AR-independent positive-regulatory element of the PSA promoter in both LNCaP and C4-2 cells. Through DNase I footprinting and linker scan mutagenesis, a 17-bp RI site was identified as the key cis-element within the pN/H region. Data from electrophoretic mobility shift analysis and UV cross-linking experiments further indicated that a 45-kDa (p45) cell-specific transcription factor associates with RI in prostate cancer cells and may be responsible for driving the PSA promoter activity independent of androgen and AR. Furthermore, by juxtaposing AREc and pN/H, we produced a chimeric PSA promoter (supra-PSA) that exhibits 2-3-fold higher activity than the wild type PSA promoter in both LNCaP and C4-2 cells.

Synthesis and phosphorylation of androgen receptor of the mouse brain cortex and their regulation by sex steroids during aging

To examine the synthesis and phosphorylation of androgen receptor (AR) and their regulation by sex steroids, adult (24 weeks) and old (65 weeks) male and female mice were gonadectomized and administered with testosterone and estradiol. AR amount, synthesis and phosphorylation were measured in the brain cortex by immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation using antibody raised against rat AR transactivation domain (TAD) which was expressed in E. coli as a fusion protein. We found that the amount of AR was high in adult and declined in old mice of both sexes. Administration of testosterone and estradiol significantly down-regulated the level of AR in old male and adult female. Similarly, the rate of AR synthesis also declined with age. Exogenous treatment of gonadectomized mice with testosterone and estradiol reduced the extent of synthesis significantly in all groups except in old female. No sex-dependent variation was noticed either in the level or synthesis of AR. In contrast, the extent of phosphorylation was higher in old mice of both sexes as compared to their adult counterparts. Testosterone and estradiol supplementation resulted in remarkable increase in AR phosphorylation in all groups. Thus it is evident from our findings that the amount and synthesis of AR decrease but phosphorylation of AR increases in the brain cortex with advancing age of mice and they are regulated by testosterone and estradiol in age- and sex-specific manner.

Cooperative assembly of androgen receptor into a nucleoprotein complex that regulates the prostate-specific antigen enhancer

Prostate cancer is characterized by elevated serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). PSA gene expression is controlled by an androgen-responsive transcriptional enhancer. Our study suggests that formation of a nucleoprotein complex, encompassing 170 base pairs of enhancer DNA, mediates androgen-responsive PSA enhancer activity. The complex is assembled by cooperative binding of androgen receptor to at least four tandem, nonconsensus androgen response elements (AREs). Systematic mutagenesis of the AREs demonstrated that they act synergistically to stimulate androgen receptor-responsive gene expression. We discuss a mechanism whereby a combination of high androgen receptor levels in the prostate and low affinity AREs contribute to the cell type specificity and activity of the enhancer.

Androgen-independent induction of prostate-specific antigen gene expression via cross-talk between the androgen receptor and protein kinase A signal transduction pathways

Transcription of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) gene escapes regulation by androgens in advanced prostate cancer. To determine the molecular mechanism(s) of androgen-independent regulation of the PSA gene, the possibility that the androgen receptor (AR) is activated in the absence of androgen by stimulation of protein kinase A (PKA) was investigated. Activation of PKA by forskolin resulted in elevated expression of the PSA gene in androgen-depleted LNCaP cells, an effect that was blocked by the antiandrogen, bicalutamide. Further evidence that induction of PSA gene expression was dependent on AR was obtained from experiments using PC3 cells devoid of AR. Neither PSA, PB, nor ARR3 androgen-responsive reporters could be induced by activation of PKA in the absence of transfected AR. In addition, when nuclear AR from forskolin-treated LNCaP cells was incubated with oligonucleotides encoding an androgen response element of the PSA promoter and examined by electromobility shift assay, an increase in AR-androgen response element complex formation was observed. Lastly, cotransfection of an expression vector for a chimeric protein encoding the amino-terminal domain of the human AR linked to Gal4 and a 5xGal4UAS reporter gene construct resulted in activation of the amino-terminal domain of the AR by stimulation of PKA activity. These results demonstrate androgen-independent induction of PSA gene expression in prostate cancer cells by an AR-dependent pathway.

Functional interactions of the AF-2 activation domain core region of the human androgen receptor with the amino-terminal domain and with the transcriptional coactivator TIF2 (transcriptional intermediary factor2)

Previous studies in yeast and mammalian cells showed a functional interaction between the amino-terminal domain and the carboxy-terminal, ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the human androgen receptor (AR). In the present study, the AR subdomains involved in this in vivo interaction were determined in more detail. Cotransfection experiments in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and two-hybrid experiments in yeast revealed that two regions in the NH2-terminal domain are involved in the functional interaction with the LBD: an interacting domain at the very NH2 terminus, located between amino acid residues 3 and 36, and a second domain, essential for transactivation, located between residues 370 and 494. Substitution of glutamic acid by glutamine at position 888 (E888Q) in the AF-2 activation domain (AD) core region in the LBD, markedly decreased the interaction with the NH2-terminal domain. This mutation neither influenced hormone binding nor LBD homodimerization, suggesting a role of the AF-2 AD core region in the functional interaction between the NH2-terminal domain and the LBD. The AF-2 AD core region was also involved in the interaction with the coactivator TIF2 (transcriptional intermediary factor 2), as the E888Q mutation decreased the stimulatory effect of TIF2 on AR AF-2 activity. Cotransfection of TIF2 and the AR NH2-terminal domain expression vectors did not result in synergy between both factors in the induction of AR AF-2 activity. TIF2 highly induced AR AF-2 activity on a complex promoter [mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)], but it was hardly active on a minimal promoter (GRE-TATA). In contrast, the AR NH2-terminal domain induced AR AF-2 activity on both promoter constructs. These data indicate that both the AR NH2-terminal domain and the coactivator TIF2 functionally interact, either directly or indirectly, with the AF-2 AD core region in the AR-LBD, but the level of transcriptional response induced by TIF2 depends on the promoter context.

Treatment of rats during pubertal development with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin alters both signaling kinase activities and epidermal growth factor receptor binding in the testis and the motility and acrosomal reaction of sperm

Different doses of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) (0.1, 1, 5, and 10 micrograms/kg body wt) were administered i.p. to 21-day-old male Sprague-Dawley rats. Control animals received the same volume of the vehicle (acetone:corn oil, 1:19). Body weight and daily food intake were recorded during the 90-day time course of the study. Random samples of five rats were sacrificed at 34, 49, 62, and 90 days of age. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in whole testis was measured, as were the activities of c-Src kinase, protein tyrosine kinase (PTK), mitogen-activated protein 2 kinase (MAP2K also termed as Erk2), protein kinase A (PKA), and protein kinase C (PKC). Testicular tissue from 90-day-old rats was evaluated for histopathology, and sperm numbers in whole testis were counted to estimate daily sperm production. The motility of sperm in the vas deferens and caudal segments of the epididymis of 90-day-old rats was measured by computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the function of the sperm was tested by assessment of acrosome reactions. A dose of 10 micrograms/kg resulted in testicular atrophy and histopathologic examination revealed a decrease in the diameter of the seminiferous tubules. Sertoli cell nuclei were clearly seen, but the spermatogonial population was totally absent. Lower doses of TCDD did not affect testicular histology, but doses as low as 1 microgram/kg significantly decreased testicular sperm numbers and affected some sperm functions (motility parameters and acrosome reactions) in 90-day-old rats. Significant decreases in EGFR were found in 34-day-old rats and this effect on EGFR was sustained until the end of the experiment (90 days). Although TCDD significantly increased c-Src kinase activity in immature and mature rats, opposite effects of TCDD on activities of PTK, PKA, and PKC were found in 34-day-old rats vs 49-, 62-, and 90-day-old rats. When 10 micrograms TCDD/kg was administered to 21-day-old rat, 24-h after c-Src kinase inhibitor geldanamycin, there was no testicular atrophy and no change in the daily sperm production was found. These findings provide evidence for involvement of Src kinase signaling and EGFR in the mechanism by which TCDD disrupts testicular development and subsequently affects testis function.

Expression of prostatic factors measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in human papillomavirus type 18 deoxyribonucleic acid immortalized prostate cell lines

OBJECTIVES

To investigate expression of the prostatic markers prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSM), and the androgen receptor (AR) after human papillomavirus (HPV) type 18 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) transfection and subsequent immortalization of human prostate epithelial cells.

METHODS

Recently, two human prostate epithelial cell lines were established by HPV transformation: PZ-HPV-7, derived from normal peripheral zone (PZ) tissue, and CA-HPV-10, derived from high Gleason grade adenocarcinoma. Expression of PSA was studied by the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), because in preliminary studies using immunocytochemistry and Northern blotting, no PSA expression was found. PSM was analyzed by RT-PCR and nested RT-PCR. These analyses included primary human prostate cell strains. Furthermore, androgen-supplemented methylthiazol tetrazolium (MTT) growth assays were performed and expression of AR was studied by immunocytochemistry. Prostate carcinoma cell lines LNCaP and PC-346C were included as positive controls and breast carcinoma cell line MCF-7 as a negative control.

RESULTS

Both cell lines exhibited low levels of RNA for PSA and PSM in comparison with cell lines LNCaP and PC-346C. AR expression by immunocytochemistry was negative using monoclonal antibody F39.4 and polyclonal antibody SP-197. In an androgen-supplemented environment, growth rates of both HPV immortalized cell lines were not stimulated in contrast to LNCaP.

CONCLUSIONS

RNA transcripts of PSA and PSM were detected by RT-PCR in HPV immortalized prostate epithelial cell lines PZ-HPV-7 and CA-HPV-10. The expression of prostate-specific markers may further validate the utility of this stepwise transformation model of human prostate carcinogenesis.

Physiology and pathophysiology of androgen action

Knowledge of the physiology of male sexual differentiation and the clinical presentation of androgen insensitivity syndromes (AIS) has led to an increasing understanding of the mechanisms of androgen action. Androgens induce their specific response via the androgen receptor (AR), which in turn regulates the transcription of androgen-responsive target genes. The androgen-dependent development of male genital structures and the induction of the normal male phenotype depends on the presence of an intact AR. Structural alterations leading to malfunction of the AR are associated with variable inhibition of virilization despite normal or even supranormal serum levels of androgens. The mapping, cloning and sequencing of the AR gene have facilitated new insights into the study of androgen action. Functional investigation of the normal and the mutant AR in vivo as well as in vitro has led to the characterization of the distinct molecular steps involved in the normal androgen action pathways that are inhibited in the androgen insensitivity syndrome.

Androgenic induction of prostate-specific antigen gene is repressed by protein-protein interaction between the androgen receptor and AP-1/c-Jun in the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP

In exploring the possible mechanisms of androgen independence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) gene expression, we investigated the effect of elevating AP-1 by both 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA) treatment and transfection of the c-Jun expression vector in LNCaP cells. Transcription of PSA is initiated when ligand-activated androgen receptor (AR) binds to a region in the PSA promoter that contains an androgen-responsive element (ARE). It was found that TPA inhibited androgen-induced PSA gene expression by a mechanism that did not alter nuclear levels of AR protein. Overexpression of AP-1 (jun and fos proteins) also inhibited androgen-induced PSA promoter activity. These observations were apparently related to the disruption of AR.ARE complexes as demonstrated by the results of electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Specifically, c-Jun inhibited the formation of AR.ARE complexes and conversely that AR-glutathione S-transferase proteins inhibited the formation of c-Jun.TPA-responsive element (TRE) complexes. Consistent with the inhibitory effect of both proteins, anti-c-Jun antibody blocked the inhibition of AR.ARE complex formation by c-Jun. A similar, but less marked, effect was obtained when anti-AR antibody was used to prevent AR inhibition of c-Jun.TRE complex formation. These findings together with results obtained from co-immunoprecipitation experiments strongly suggest that mutual repression of DNA binding activity is due to direct interaction between the two proteins and that the degree of repression may be determined by the ratio of AR to c-Jun. The mechanism of repression studied in mutant analysis experiments yielded evidence of an interaction between the DNA- and ligand-binding domains of AR and the leucine zipper region of c-Jun. Thus, the AR is similar to other nuclear receptors in its ability to interact with AP-1. This association provides a link between AP-1 and AR signal transduction pathways and may play a role in the regulation of the androgen-responsive PSA gene.

Localization of functional domains in the androgen receptor

Functional domains of the androgen receptor (AR) have been localized through a combination of studies on naturally occurring AR gene mutations, in vitro mutagenesis studies and comparison with the structure of other members of the steroid/nuclear receptor superfamily. Two activation domains exist within the amino-terminal domain, and a ligand-dependent activation domain is present in the ligand binding domain. The poly(Gln) stretch within the amino-terminal domain may inhibit the transactivation function of the receptor. Different ligands or binding to different promoters may recruit the use of different activation domains, which may provide promoter-specific effects of receptor action. Co-activator proteins that modulate or enhance AR action have been identified, many of which interact with the ligand binding domain of the AR. Tissue-specific expression of such co-activators, and promoter-specific protein interactions, may also help control the specificity of androgen action. Target Ser residues for phosphorylation have been identified, which may be the site of action for cross-talk from protein kinase signalling pathways. However, the role of phosphorylation in AR function in general is still unclear. It is now clear that interactions occur between receptor domains, modulating functions including ligand dissociation, dimerization and transactivation. By studying the functional domains of the AR, and how they control receptor function in response to different activation signals, we are beginning to understand the mechanisms controlling the specificity of receptor action.

Effects of androgen on brain and pituitary androgen receptors and LH secretion of male guinea pigs

To study the tissue-specific control of androgen receptors by circulating androgens, guinea pigs were castrated or castrated and treated with crystalline testosterone propionate. Levels of serum androgens and LH were measured and brain and peripheral tissues were collected for determination of androgen receptor levels under differing androgen states. We found that circulating androgen levels changed rapidly following castration or treatment with exogenous androgen. LH secretion was coupled to circulating androgens; high levels of androgen quickly suppressed LH secretion, whereas LH levels did not rise significantly above intact levels until 7 days following castration. Androgen receptor levels were effected by circulating androgens. Cytosolic androgen receptors (ARc) increased significantly in the preoptic area (POA), septum, anterior pituitary, prostate and seminal vesicle following castration, whereas nuclear androgen receptors (ARn) decreased significantly in the POA, septum, medial basal hypothalamus (MBH), amygdala, parietal cortex, pituitary, prostate and seminal vesicle. Exogenous androgens, which increased serum steroid levels significantly above that in intact animals, decreased ARc below control levels in MBH, amygdala, pituitary and seminal vesicle. High circulating androgens increased ARn above intact levels in the MBH, pituitary and prostate. It thus appears that circulating androgens regulate LH secretion and have profound, but tissue-specific effects on androgen receptors in the guinea pig.

Steroid hormone receptors and their regulation by phosphorylation

The steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors encompasses not only the receptors for steroids, thyroid hormone, retinoids and vitamin D, but also a large number of proteins whose functions and/or ligands are unknown and which are thus termed orphan receptors. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of phosphorylation in receptor function. Although most of the phosphorylation sites are serine and threonine residues, a few of the family members are also phosphorylated on tyrosine. Those steroid receptor family members that are bound to heat-shock proteins in the absence of ligand typically are basally phosphorylated and exhibit increases in phosphorylation upon ligand binding. Most of these sites contain Ser-Pro motifs, and there is evidence that cyclin-dependent kinases and MAP kinases (mitogen-activated protein kinases) phosphorylate subsets of these sites. In contrast, phosphorylation sites identified thus far in members of the family that bind to DNA in the absence of hormone typically do not contain Ser-Pro motifs and are frequently casein kinase II or protein kinase A sites. Phosphorylation has been implicated in DNA binding, transcriptional activation and stability of the receptors. The finding that some of the steroid receptor family members can be activated in the absence of ligand by growth factors or neurotransmitters that modulate kinase and/or phosphatase pathways underscores the role of phosphorylation in receptor function. Hence this family of transcription factors integrates signals from ligands as well as from signal transduction pathways, resulting in alterations in mRNA and protein expression that are unique to the complex signals received.

Transcriptional activation and transient expression of the human androgen receptor

A series of cDNAs containing deletions within the open-reading frame of the human androgen receptor (AR) were constructed and transiently expressed in CV1 cells to investigate the effects of these alterations on the level of expression of the protein and on its capacity to activate a model reporter gene (MMTV-luciferase). The levels of AR expression were assayed using immunoblots made using an antibody directed at an epitope (amino acids 1-21) preserved in all of the deletions. Treatment of the transfected cells with androgen increased the level of normal or mutant AR approximately five-fold in all constructs in which the hormone-binding domain was intact. This finding indicates that an intact hormone-binding domain is necessary and sufficient for the androgen-dependent increase in AR levels. Contraction of expansion or the glutamine repeat or deletion of the glycine repeat in the amino terminus diminished the capacity of the mutant ARs to activate the MMTV luciferase gene. The presence of a large-scale deletion within the amino terminus (amino acid residues 96-483), abolished receptor function, and two smaller deletions (bounded by residues 80-93 and 245-485) within the amino terminus substantially impaired receptor function. As previously described, deletion of the hormone-binding domain (amino acids 708-917) resulted in a constitutively active receptor. Unexpectedly, the large-scale deletion within the amino terminus (amino acids 96-483), in combination with deletion of the carboxy terminus also produced a constitutively active receptor that was almost as active as ligand-activated normal AR. None of the alterations in AR function could be explained by changes in the level of AR expression and the function of some mutant receptors was even more defective when the relative levels of mutant ARs expressed was considered. These findings imply that interaction of the sequences within the amino- and carboxy-terminal portions of the AR, or proteins that interact with these segments, is critical for regulation of transcription by the AR.

Role of phosphorylation on DNA binding and transcriptional functions of human progesterone receptors

To study the function of human progesterone receptor (hPR) phosphorylation, we have tested four sets of serine to alanine substitution mutants: 10 serine clusters, located in regions common to both hPR isoforms (the M-series mutants) were mutated in A-receptors and B-receptors; 6 serine clusters located in the B-upstream segment (BUS; the B-series mutants) were mutated individually and collectively and cloned into B-receptors and into BUS-DBD-NLS, a constitutive transactivator, in which the AF3 function of BUS is fused to the DNA binding domain (DBD) and nuclear localization signal (NLS) of hPR. Transcription by most of the M-series mutants resembles that of wild-type A- or B-receptors. Mutation of 3 sites, Ser190 at the N terminus of A-receptors, a cluster of serines just upstream of the DBD, or Ser676 in the hinge region, inhibits transcription by 20-50% depending on cell or promoter context. These sites lie outside the AF1 activation function. M-series mutants are substrates for a hormone-dependent phosphorylation step, and they all bind well to DNA. Progressive mutation of the B-series clusters leads to the gradual dephosphorylation of BUS, but only the 6-site mutant, involving 10 serine residues, is completely dephosphorylated. These data suggest that in BUS alternate serines are phosphorylated or dephosphorylated at any time. However, even when BUS is completely dephosphorylated, both BUS-DBD-NLS and full-length B-receptors remain strong transactivators. Mutant B-receptors also do not acquire the dominant negative properties of A-receptors, and they retain the ability to activate transcription in synergy with 8-Br-cAMP and antiprogestins. We conclude that phosphorylation has subtle effects on the complex transcriptional repertoire that distinguishes the two hPR isoforms and does not influence transactivation mediated by AF1 or AF3, but subserves other functions.

Molecular basis of androgen insensitivity

Male sexual differentiation and development proceed under direct control of androgens. Androgen action is mediated by the intracellular androgen receptor, which belongs to the superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. In the X-linked androgen insensitivity syndrome, defects in the androgen receptor gene have prevented the normal development of both internal and external male structures in 46, XY individuals. The complete form of androgen insensitivity syndrome is characterized by 46, XY karyotype, external female phenotype, intra-abdominal testes, absence of uterus and ovaries, blindly ending vagina, and gynecomastia. There is also a group of disorders of androgen action that result from partial impairment of androgen receptor function. Clinical indications can be abnormal sexual development of individuals with a predominant male phenotype with severe hypospadias and micropenis or of individuals with a predominantly female phenotype with cliteromegaly, ambiguous genitalia, and gynecomastia. Complete or gross deletions of the androgen receptor gene have not been frequently found in persons with the complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, whereas point mutations at several different sites in exons 2-8 encoding the DNA- and androgen-binding domain have been reported in both partial and complete forms of androgen insensitivity, with a relatively high number of mutations in two clusters in exons 5 and 7. The number of mutations in exon 1 is extremely low, and no mutations have been reported in the hinge region, located between the DNA-binding domain and the ligand-binding domain. The X-linked condition of spinal and bulbar muscle atrophy (Kennedy's disease) is characterized by a progressive motor neuron degeneration associated with signs of androgen insensitivity and infertility. The molecular cause of spinal and bulbar muscle atrophy is an expanded length (> 40 residues) of one of the polyglutamine stretches in the N-terminal domain of the androgen receptor.

Two androgen response regions cooperate in steroid hormone regulated activity of the prostate-specific antigen promoter

Transcription of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) gene is androgen regulated. The PSA promoter contains at position -170 the sequence AGAACAgcaAGTGCT, which is closely related to the ARE (androgen response element) consensus sequence GGTACAnnnTGTTCT. This sequence is a high affinity androgen receptor (AR) binding site and acts as a functional ARE in transfected LNCaP cells. A 35-base pair segment starting at -400 (ARR: androgen response region; GTGGTGCAGGGATCAGGGAGTCTCACAATCTCCTG) cooperates with the ARE in androgen induction of the PSA promoter. A construct with three ARR copies linked to a minimal PSA promoter showed a strong (104-fold) androgen induced activity. The ARR was also able to confer androgen responsiveness to a minimal thymidine kinase promoter. Both AR binding and transcriptional activity resided in a 20-base pair ARR subfragment: CAGGGATCAGGGAGTCTCAC (2S). Mutational analysis indicated that the sequence GGATCAgggAGTCTC in the 2S fragment is a functionally active, low affinity AR binding site. Like AR, the glucocorticoid receptor was able to stimulate PSA promoter activity. Both the ARE and ARR are involved in dexamethasone regulation of the PSA promoter. Both the AR and glucocorticoid receptor were 20-100-fold more active on ARR-PSA and ARR-thymidine kinase promoter constructs in LNCaP cells than in other cell types (COS, HeLa, Hep3B, and T47D cells), indicating (prostate) cell specificity.

Two types of anti-progestins have distinct effects on site-specific phosphorylation of human progesterone receptor

Human progesterone receptor (PR) is phosphorylated on multiple serine residues; three sites (Ser102, Ser294, and Ser345) are inducible by hormone agonist, while at least six others are basally phosphorylated and exhibit a general increase in response to hormone. In this study we have used high performance liquid chromatography phosphopeptide mapping and manual peptide sequencing to investigate how two different progestin antagonists, RU486 and ZK98299, affect site-specific phosphorylation of PR isolated from T47D breast cancer cells. As compared to the progestin agonist R5020, RU486 stimulated a similar increase in overall incorporation of [32P]phosphate per PR molecule (2.5-2.6-fold for PR-A and 2.1-fold for PR-B), and at the site-specific level, RU486 stimulated both the basal and inducible sites to the same extent as R5020. In contrast, ZK98299 produced only a minimal increase in overall phosphorylation (1.2-fold for PR-A and 1.1-fold for PR-B) which was due to a reduced stimulation of the basal sites and failure to induce any of the three hormone-dependent sites. No inappropriate phosphorylation sites were detected in response to either RU486 or ZK98299. In cotreatment studies, ZK98299 blocked the increase in overall phosphorylation of PR induced by R5020, demonstrating that the failure of this antagonist to stimulate specific phosphorylation sites is not due to an inefficient interaction with PR in the intact cell. These results indicate that the biological effects of RU486 are not mediated by an alternation in the phosphorylation state of PR, whereas failure to promote phosphorylation of certain sites may contribute to the antagonist action of ZK98299. Additionally these results support the concept of two mechanistic classes of anti-progestins that affect PR differently in vivo.

Ligand-induced conformational alterations of the androgen receptor analyzed by limited trypsinization. Studies on the mechanism of antiandrogen action

Limited proteolysis of in vitro produced human androgen receptor was used to probe the different conformations of the receptor after binding of androgens and several antiandrogens. The results provide evidence for five different conformations of the receptor, as detected by the formation of proteolysis resisting fragments: 1) an initial conformation of the unoccupied receptor not resisting proteolytic attack; and receptor conformations characterized by 2) a 35-kDa proteolysis resisting fragment spanning the ligand binding domain and part of the hinge region, obtained with most antagonists, and in an initial step after agonist binding; 3) a 29-kDa proteolysis resisting fragment spanning the ligand binding domain, obtained in the presence of agonists after an activation process; 4 and 5) 30- and 25-kDa fragments, derived from 2 and 3, but missing part of the C terminus, obtained with RU486 (RU486 has antiandrogenic properties, besides its effects as an antiprogestagen/antiglucocorticoid). Concomitantly with the change from 2 to 3 (and of 4 to 5 for RU486), dissociation of the 8 S complex of receptor with associated proteins occurred. With a mutant receptor (LNCaP cell mutation in C-terminal region), some antagonists activated transcription analogous to agonists, and induced the activated receptor conformation 3. A mutant lacking the C-terminal 12 amino acids bound RU486 but not androgens, and formed with RU486 conformation 5. These data imply that, after the initial rapid binding of ligand, androgens induce a conformational change of the receptor, a process that also involves release of associated proteins. RU486 induces an inappropriate conformation of the C-terminal end, similar as found for its effect on the progesterone receptor. In contrast, the other antiandrogens act at a different step in the mechanism of action: they do not induce an abnormal conformation, but act earlier and prevent a conformation change by stabilizing a complex with associated proteins.

Androgen receptor dysfunction in human androgen insensitivity

The androgen insensitivity syndromes comprise a spectrum of phenotypic abnormalities in male sex differentiation and development that result from target tissue resistance to androgen action due to molecular lesions in the X-chromosome-linked androgen receptor gene. The androgen receptor, like other members of the superfamily of steroid receptors, is characterized by the presence of three structural domains that function in transcriptional activation, DNA binding, and steroid binding, respectively. Missense mutations in the androgen receptor gene causing amino acid substitutions are the most common molecular lesions among affected subjects; deletions, mRNA splice site alterations, and nonsense mutations occur less frequently. Because of the large number and diverse array of these naturally occurring mutations and their associated clinical phenotypes, there is a great opportunity for understanding the structure-function relationships of the androgen receptor from in vitro and in vivo expression of the mutant receptors in various cell types.

Synergism between androgens and protein kinase-C on androgen-regulated gene expression

Androgen (R1881) induced transcriptional activity of the human androgen receptor, stably expressed in CHO cells, can be stimulated an extra 2-fold by the addition of the protein kinase C activator, 4 beta-phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA). This extra stimulation is not observed when the protein kinase A activator bromoadenosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate (8-BrcAMP) is used. The transcriptional activity was measured using a reporter plasmid containing the MMTV-promoter, coupled to the luciferase gene. The effect of PMA on R1881-induced transcription was not due to a higher expression level of the androgen receptor. Also, no extra phosphorylation of the androgen receptor could be measured after incubation with PMA. When GRE-tk-LUC and PSA-LUC reporters were used, the synergistic effect of PMA could not be observed. The findings on the composite MMTV-LTR promoter can be explained by either a direct synergistic interaction between occupied AP-1 like responsive elements and the androgen receptor or via an unknown transcription factor activated by the PKC pathway and interacting with the androgen receptor.

Identification of two transcription activation units in the N-terminal domain of the human androgen receptor

To locate in detail the regions in the human androgen receptor (AR) involved in transcription activation, a series of N-terminal deletions was introduced in the wild type AR and in a constitutively active AR. The different constructs were tested for their capacity to activate transcription. Almost the entire N-terminal domain (residues 1-485) was necessary for full wild type AR activity when cotransfected with the (GRE)2tkCAT reporter in HeLa cells. In contrast, a smaller part of the N-terminal domain (amino acids 360-528) was sufficient for the constitutively active AR to induce transcription of the same (GRE)2tkCAT reporter in HeLa cells. This demonstrates the capacity of the AR to use different regions in the N-terminal domain as transcription activation units (TAUs). To obtain additional information of AR N-terminal TAUs, the GAL4 DNA binding domain was linked to either the entire or parts of the AR N-terminal domain and cotransfected with the (UAS)2tkCAT reporter in HeLa cells. The results confirmed that the first 485 amino acid residues accommodate a transcription activation function. When the chimeric AR-GAL4 constructs were tested on a different reporter ((UAS)5E1bCAT), a small shift in position of the TAU, responsible for full transcription activation, was observed. The data presented show that the size and location of the active TAU in the human AR is variable, being dependent on the promoter context and the presence or absence of the ligand binding domain.

Triiodothyronine modulates growth, secretory function and androgen receptor concentration in the prostatic carcinoma cell line LNCaP

There is increasing evidence that the course of prostatic carcinoma is determined by a complex interplay between genetic events, paracrine interactions, and hormonal and dietary factors. These latter factors include several ligands of the nuclear receptor family such as androgens, vitamin D3 and retinoids. To test whether thyroid hormones also influence the growth and differentiated function of prostatic carcinoma cells, LNCaP cells were treated with or without triiodothyronine (T3) in the absence or in the presence of other regulatory factors. Exposure of LNCaP cells to T3 for 6 days in the absence of androgens caused a dose-dependent increase in [3H]-thymidine incorporation with a maximal stimulation of 2.5-fold at 10(-9) M T3. Secretion of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was also stimulated 2-3-fold. The observed effects may well be mediated by a nuclear T3 receptor as evidenced by displaceable T3 binding studies. Combined treatment of LNCaP cells with androgens and T3 revealed intriguing interactions between these two pathways. Below and up to 10(-10) M of the synthetic androgen R1881, the concentration that evokes optimal proliferative responses, T3 stimulated [3H] thymidine incorporation. At higher concentrations of androgens, T3 displayed antiproliferative effects. No androgen-dependent effects on T3 receptor levels were observed. Conversely, T3 increased androgen receptor levels up to twofold. Androgen as well as T3 stimulation of proliferation was abolished by high concentrations of the retinoid 9-cis-retinoic acid. These data add T3 to the list of factors that influence growth and differentiation of prostatic tumor cells and contribute to our understanding of the intricate pathways that ultimately determine the course of prostatic carcinoma.

Domains of the human androgen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor involved in binding to the nuclear matrix

Steroid receptors have been reported to bind to the nuclear matrix. The nuclear matrix is operationally defined as the residual nuclear structure that remains after extraction of most of the chromatin and all soluble and loosely bound components. To obtain insight in the molecular mechanism of the interaction of steroid receptors with the nuclear matrix, we studied the binding of several deletion mutants of the human androgen receptor (hAR) and the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR) to the nuclear matrix. Receptor binding was tested for two different nuclear matrix preparations: complete matrices, in which most matrix proteins are retained during the isolation procedure, and depleted matrices, which consist of only a subset of these proteins. The results show that the C-terminal domain of the hAR binds tightly to both depleted and complete matrices. In addition, at least one other domain of the hAR binds to complete matrices but not to depleted matrices. In contrast to the hAR, the hGR binds only to complete matrices. For this interaction both the DNA-binding domain and the C-terminal domain of the hGR are required, whereas the N-terminal domain is not. We conclude that specific protein domains of the hAR and the hGR are involved in binding to the nuclear matrix. In addition, our results indicate that the hAR and the hGR are attached to the nuclear matrix through different molecular interactions.

Changes in the abundance of androgen receptor isotypes: effects of ligand treatment, glutamine-stretch variation, and mutation of putative phosphorylation sites

The SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) migration pattern of wild-type and mutated human androgen receptors (ARs) expressed in COS-1 cells was analyzed. In the absence of hormone, the wild-type AR migrated as a closely spaced 110-112 kDa doublet. Alkaline phosphatase treatment resulted in a single 110 kDa band showing that the 112 kDa upshift reflects receptors phosphorylation. Deletion of the N-terminal amino acids 46-101 or 100-142 resulted in mutant ARs migrating as single protein bands. Three consensus phosphorylation sites in this region were substituted, and the resulting mutated proteins were analyzed. Two Ser-Pro-directed kinase consensus sites at positions Ser-80 and Ser-93 were both necessary for the AR 112 kDa upshift. Substitution of the putative casein kinase II Ser-118 site had no effect on the AR migration pattern. Surprisingly, deletion of the glutamine repeat, located directly N-terminal of the Ser-Pro sites, resulted also in an AR single form. Lengthening of the glutamine repeat caused an increase in the spacing between the two isotypes of the doublet, showing that the number of glutamine residues determines the extent of the upshift. Hormone treatment induced an extra isotype with an apparent molecular mass of 114 kDa, resulting in a 110-112-114 kDa AR triplet. The hormone-induced upshift was dependent on the Ser-80 consensus phosphorylation site. Mutations in the DNA binding domain caused a different distribution of receptor protein over the three AR isotypes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Phosphorylation sites in ligand-induced and ligand-independent activation of the progesterone receptor

Steroid hormone receptors are phosphoproteins that undergo hyperphosphorylation upon binding of hormone. The mechanism and the role of this reaction remain poorly understood. Two-dimensional analysis of ligand-free progesterone receptor (PR) tryptic digests showed the existence of seven main phosphopeptides. Incubation of the cells with the progestin R5020 led to a global increase in the levels of PR phosphorylation. However, the same phosphopeptides were seen, and their levels of labeling relative to each other were unchanged. A similar result was observed after incubation of cells with the antiprogestin RU486. The antiprogestin ZK98299 demonstrated only half of the activity of RU486 in terms of receptor hyperphosphorylation, but the same phosphopeptides, proportionally labeled to the same extent, were observed by chromatography electrophoresis. Ligand-induced DNA binding did not play a role in receptor hyperphosphorylation since the mutant delta 547-592, which is devoid of the first zinc finger region, exhibited the same phosphopeptides, labeled to the same extent, as did wild-type receptor after incubation of cells with hormone. These results suggest that the same kinase(s) act in vivo on ligand-free and on agonist or antagonist-bound progesterone receptor. Binding of different ligands produces different conformational changes in the ligand binding domain of the receptor which enhance, to varying extents, affinity of the receptor for the kinase(s). The DNA binding region also plays a role in the interaction with the kinase(s), although binding to DNA per se is not necessary for the hyperphosphorylation of the receptor to take place.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Steroid hormone receptors: activators of gene transcription

Over the past three decades, a great deal of evidence has accumulated in favor of the hypothesis that steroid hormones act via regulation of gene expression. The action is mediated by specific nuclear receptor proteins, which belong to a superfamily of ligand-modulated transcription factors that regulate homeostasis, reproduction, development and differentiation. This family includes receptors for steroid hormones, thyroid hormones, hormonal forms of vitamin A and D, peroxisomal activators, and ecdysone. Molecular cloning and structure/function analyses have revealed that all members of the steroid/thyroid hormone/retinoic acid receptor family have a similar functional domain structure: a variable N-terminal region, which is involved in modulation of gene expression; a short well-conserved DNA-binding domain, which is crucial for recognition of specific DNA sequences and for receptor dimerization; and a partially conserved C-terminal ligand-binding domain, which is important for hormone binding and also for receptor dimerization and transactivation. In contrast to other members of the receptor superfamily steroid hormone receptors form transient complexes with several heat shock proteins. This interaction promotes proper folding and stability of the receptor molecule. Hormone binding induces a conformational change in the receptor molecule and simultaneously a dissociation of all heat shock proteins, which results in DNA-binding of the hormone-receptor complex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Steroid hormone receptor phosphorylation: is there a physiological role?

All members of the steroid hormone receptor family are phosphoproteins. Additional phosphorylation occurs in the presence of hormone. This hormone-induced phosphorylation, which is 2- to 7-fold more than the basal phosphorylation, is a rapid process. All steroid receptors are phosphorylated at more than one single site. Most phosphorylation sites are located in the N-terminal domain, and phosphorylation occurs mainly on serine residues. Phosphorylation on threonine residues occurs in only a few cases. Phosphorylation on tyrosine residues has been found only for the estrogen receptor. Six different protein kinases are possibly involved in steroid receptor phosphorylation (estrogen receptor kinase; protein kinase A; protein kinase C; casein kinase II; DNA-dependent kinase; Ser-Pro kinases). Steroid receptor phosphorylation has been directly implicated in: activation of hormone binding, nuclear import of steroid receptors, modulation of binding to hormone response elements, and consequently in transcription activation.

Androgen insensitivity syndrome

In a relatively short period of time, understanding of the fundamental causes of androgen insensitivity syndromes has improved dramatically. This has been brought about by the combination of several disciplines, including endocrinology, genetics, developmental and molecular biology. Mutations can be identified in the androgen receptor gene in suspected cases of AIS, and their functional consequences examined in various in-vitro systems. This information can then be correlated with the clinical presentation of the patient, and is beginning to provide an explanation for the highly variable clinical presentation of AIS. It is to be hoped that this information will also help to predict the likely outcome of androgen therapy in infants with PAIS and an intersex phenotype. More speculatively, functional studies may also lead to novel strategies for the treatment of patients. This would then be of enormous benefit to both patient and parents. Furthermore, the identification of a mutation allows precise information for genetic counselling of families affected by AIS. However, many questions still remain to challenge clinicians and scientists alike. These include the risk of testicular malignancy in patients with AIS and currently there is no worldwide consensus on the stage at which testes should be removed from patients reared as female. There are also significant challenges in patient counselling. Although there is greater understanding of the molecular defects that cause AIS, there are several examples of patients with a similar degree of receptor dysfunction, or even the same mutation, but whose phenotypes are widely different. Other factors must therefore contribute to the clinical presentation of AIS, although these have not been identified. Finally, there are the mutations in patients with Kennedy's disease. The consequences of the mutations are unexplained and are a clear indication that there is still a great deal to discover about the function and biology of androgen receptors.

Molecular mechanisms of androgen action

Androgens directly regulate a vast number of physiological events. These direct androgen effects are mediated by a nuclear receptor that exhibits four major functions or activities: steroid binding, DNA binding, transactivation, and nuclear localization. The SBD consists of a hydrophobic pocket of amino acids that exhibits high-affinity, androgen-specific binding. Based on studies of mutant AR, it appears that a number of different amino acids contribute to the steroid binding characteristics of the AR. The DNA binding domain confers sequence-specific binding to structures called androgen-responsive elements. The specificity of steroid binding and DNA binding provides a crucial basis for androgen-specific regulation of target genes. The nuclear localization signal shares homology with known nuclear localization signals and, coupled with the presence of androgens, is responsible for localizing the AR to the nucleus. The transactivation functions reside mostly in the NH2 terminus but the responsible domains are as yet poorly defined. Though the different domains can act as independent moieties, one domain can clearly alter the behavior of another domain. For instance, the SBD appears to inhibit the transactivating functions until steroid is bound and the amino terminus prevents DNA binding activity until steroid is bound. The relative ease of introducing mutations with polymerase chain reaction technology will facilitate further delineation of critical amino acids and domains responsible for the various activities of the AR. The recent cloning and characterization of AR promoters revealed that the AR genes are driven by a TATA-less promoter characteristics of housekeeping genes. Analysis of transcription rates, mRNA levels, and protein levels indicates that androgens and pkA and pkC pathways modulate expression of AR mRNA and protein. This indicates that the same signal pathways that interact to regulate androgen target genes also regulate the levels of AR in the target tissues. Surprisingly few androgen-regulated genes have been well characterized for the mechanisms by which androgen regulates the gene. The C(3), Slp, probasin, PSA, and hKLK2 genes have provided examples where androgens regulate transcription. Posttranscriptional regulation by androgens has been demonstrated for the SVP1, 2, 3, and 4 and AR genes. The mechanisms underlying posttranscriptional regulation are poorly defined but substantial progress has been made in defining the critical elements that mediate transcriptional effects of androgens. Transcriptional effects are mediated through binding of androgen-AR complexes to specific DNA sequences called AREs. Simple AREs such as those found in C(3) and kallikrein genes tend to be permissive in that GR and PR can also act through the same element.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

In vitro translation of androgen receptor cRNA results in an activated androgen receptor protein

Translation of androgen receptor (AR) cRNA in a reticulocyte lysate and subsequent analysis of the translation products by SDS/PAGE showed a protein with an apparent molecular mass of 108 kDa. Scatchard-plot analysis revealed a single binding component with high affinity for R1881 (Kd = 0.3 nM). All AR molecules synthesized specifically bound steroid. No evidence for AR phosphorylation during in vitro synthesis was found. When AR was labelled with [3H]R1881 and analysed on sucrose-density gradients, a complex of approx. 6 S was observed. The complex was shifted to a higher sedimentation coefficient after incubation with a monoclonal AR antibody directed against an epitope in the DNA-binding domain. In the presence as well as the absence of hormone, AR molecules were able to bind to DNA-cellulose without an activation step. Gel retardation assays revealed that the AR forms complexes with a DNA element containing glucocorticoid-responsive element/androgen-responsive element sequences. Receptor-DNA interactions were stabilized by different polyclonal antibodies directed against either the N- or C-terminal part of the AR and were abolished by an antibody directed against the DNA-binding domain of the receptor. In conclusion, translation of AR cRNA in vitro yields an activated AR protein which binds steroid with high affinity. It is proposed that AR antibodies enhance AR-DNA binding by stabilizing AR dimers when bound to DNA.