New insights into the pathophysiology and therapeutic targets of asthma and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis

Choosing the right biologic treatment for individual patients with severe asthma - Lessons learnt from Picasso

Severe asthma represents a true challenge for clinicians from two basic perspectives, i.e.: a rational assessment of the underlying endo/phenotype and the subsequent selection of the best fitted (personalized) and effective treatment. Even though asthma is a heterogeneous disease, in the majority of therapy-compliant patients, it is possible to achieve (almost) complete disease control or even remission through conventional and quite uniform step-based pharmacotherapy, even without phenotyping. However, the absence of deeper assessment of individual patients revealed its handicap to its fullest extent during the first years of the new millennium upon the launch of biological therapeutics for patients with the most severe forms of asthma. The introduction of differentially targeted biologics into clinical practice became a challenge in terms of understanding and recognizing the etiopathogenetic heterogeneity of the asthmatic inflammation, pheno/endotyping, and, consequently, to choose the right biologic for the right patient. The answers to the following three questions should lead to correct identification of the dominant pheno/endotype: Is it really (severe) asthma? Is it eosinophilic asthma? If eosinophilic, is it (predominantly) allergen-driven? The identification of the best achievable and relevant alliance between endotypes and phenotypes ("euphenotypes") should be based not only on the assessment of the actual clinical characteristics and laboratory biomarkers, but more importantly, on the evaluation of their development and changes over time. In the current paper, we present a pragmatic three-step approach to severe asthma diagnosis and management.

Real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in a European cohort of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CHRINOSOR)

BACKGROUND

Pivotal studies with dupilumab demonstrated clinically relevant improvements in nasal polyp score, symptom score, and quality-of-life score in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effectiveness of dupilumab in a large-scale CRSwNP cohort from 6 European tertiary-care centers.

METHODOLOGY

Nasal polyp score, Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 score, visual analog scale for total sinus symptoms, loss of smell, and nasal blockage, and Asthma Control Test (ACT) score were collected from hospital records and assessed at baseline and again at 24 and 52 weeks' treatment with dupilumab in CRSwNP patients. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated in relation to demographic and lifestyle factors, sinus surgery history, presence of comorbidities, and blood eosinophil counts (BEC). Treatment response was evaluated according to European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) 2021 criteria.

RESULTS

All patient outcomes improved at 24 and 52 weeks' treatment compared to baseline. Dupilumab showed effectiveness independent of age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, prior sinus surgery, presence of asthma, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease, allergy, or baseline BEC. A total of 92.5% and 94.4% showed an improvement in at least 1 EUFOREA criterion at 24 and 52 weeks, respectively; 54.4% and 68.2% met all 4 of the more stringent EUFOREA criteria at 24 and 52 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world evaluation of dupilumab effectiveness demonstrates a robust and sustained response in at least two thirds of patients at 52 weeks' treatment. Favorable treatment response was independent of the number of sinus surgery procedures, major comorbidities, or baseline systemic levels of type 2 inflammation.

Investigation and Characterization of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK Pathway and Other Signaling Pathways in Chronic Sinusitis with Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes of drug treatments and surgical interventions for chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNPs) are suboptimal, and the high recurrence rate remains a significant challenge in clinical practice. Targeted therapies such as biologics provide new perspectives and directions for treating CRSwNP.

SUMMARY

With the continuous investigation of signaling pathways, RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and other signaling pathways including Hippo, JAK-STAT, Wnt, TGF-β, PI3K, Notch, and NF-κB were confirmed to play an important role in the progression of CRSwNP. Among them, the abnormality of RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway is accompanied by the abnormality of this apoptotic component, which may provide new research directions for targeting the components of signaling pathways to mediate apoptosis.

KEY MESSAGES

Abnormalities in signaling pathways are particularly important in studying the pathogenesis and treatment of CRSwNP. Therefore, this review summarizes the ongoing investigation and characterization of RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and other signaling pathways in CRSwNP, which provides constructive ideas and directions for improving the treatment of CRSwNP.

[Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis : A retrospective analysis of therapeutic approaches in 463 patients]

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a multifactorial inflammatory disease, the treatment of which has undergone significant changes in recent years. In addition to surgical approaches, topical and systemic steroids, and adaptive acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) desensitization, three specific antibodies have complemented the therapeutic portfolio since 2019.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of all patients who presented as outpatients for the first time due to CRSwNP in 2007 and 2008 (collective A) and 2017 and 2018 (collective B) was performed, up to and including June 2023.

RESULTS

The clinical courses of 463 patients (mean age 49.1 years, range 5-82 years; 65.9% male) were included in the analysis. Conservative treatment with nasal corticosteroids started before initial presentation was more frequent in collective B (collective A 43.9% vs. collective B 72.2%). In 278 of the 463 patients (60%; A: 62%, B: 58%), at least one operation on the nasal sinuses had been performed after initial presentation; in 101 of these patients (36.3%) recurrent polyposis (within mean follow-up of 2.4 years) required further treatment. The indication for ASA provocation/desensitization was applied less frequently in collective B, also due to a high discontinuation rate (at least 38%) of the maintenance therapy. Of the total cohort, 16 patients (3.5%; A: n = 8, B: n = 8) were meanwhile switched to antibody therapy at recurrence.

CONCLUSION

A step-by-step guideline-orientated approach is recommended in the treatment of CRSwNP. Systemic antibodies as an add-on to nasal corticosteroids are a relatively new therapeutic option for treatment-refractory CRSwNP, which reduces the indication for ASA desensitization, which is associated with a relatively high incidence of side effects and poor compliance.

Biological treatments in childhood asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim is to update the information currently available for the use of biologics in severe asthma in children, in order to facilitate their prescription as far as possible.

RECENT FINDINGS

The appearance of biologics for the treatment of severe asthma has meant a revolutionary change in the therapeutic approach to this disease. Currently, five biologics have been approved for severe asthma in children and/or adolescents by the regulatory agencies: omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab and tezepelumab. But despite their positive results in terms of efficacy, there are still relevant points of debate that should induce caution when selecting the most appropriate biologic in a child with severe asthma. Indeed, safety is essential and, for several of the existing treatments, the availability of medium-term to long-term data in this regard is scarce.

SUMMARY

The use of biologics can facilitate the therapeutic paradigm shift from pleiotropic treatments to personalized medicine. However, the choice of the most appropriate biologics remains a pending issue. On the other hand, to the extent that several of the biologics have been available for a relatively short time, the most robust evidence in terms of efficacy and safety in children is that of omalizumab.

Tezepelumab improved chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in a Patient with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease

Introduction

Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) have more severe sinus disease than those without AERD. CRSwNP associated with type 2 inflammation and AERD can be difficult to control with standard medical therapy and sinus surgery.

Case study

74-year-old Japanese woman with chronic sinusitis since age 50 and asthma since age 60. At age 64, she began to experience asthma exacerbations and was started on short-term corticosteroid therapy with prednisolone. At age 70, she experienced urticaria, nasal congestion, and wheezing after taking an NSAID; based on an NSAID provocation test, we diagnosed the patient with AERD and CRSwNP. A diagnosis of severe eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis was also made based on the scoring system and algorithm used in the Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Results

Treatment with benralizumab (30 mg), formoterol-fluticasone combination via pressurized metered inhaler (1000 μg), and leukotriene receptor antagonist improved the asthma symptoms and exacerbations so the short-term prednisolone was stopped; however, nasal congestion and olfactory dysfunction (hyposmia) persisted, and peripheral blood eosinophil count (peak, 1500 cells/μL) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (peak, 42 ppb) became elevated. Swapping the benralizumab for monthly tezepelumab (210 mg) improved not only the asthma symptoms but also the nasal congestion, olfactory dysfunction, eosinophil count (<300 cells/μL), and fractional exhaled nitric oxide level [8ppb].

Conclusion

Changing from benralizumab to tezepelumab improved asthma symptoms, nasal obstruction, and olfactory dysfunction in elderly, female, Japanese patient with AERD and CRSwNP.

Pre-asthma: a useful concept? A EUFOREA paper. Part 2-late onset eosinophilic asthma

The concept of pre-diabetes has led to provision of measures to reduce disease progression through identification of subjects at risk of diabetes. We previously considered the idea of pre-asthma in relation to allergic asthma and considered that, in addition to the need to improve population health via multiple measures, including reduction of exposure to allergens and pollutants and avoidance of obesity, there are several possible specific means to reduce asthma development in those most at risk (pre- asthma). The most obvious is allergen immunotherapy (AIT), which when given for allergic rhinitis (AR) has reasonable evidence to support asthma prevention in children (2) but also needs further study as primary prevention. In this second paper we explore the possibilities for similar actions in late onset eosinophilic asthma.

EUFOREA/EPOS2020 statement on the clinical considerations for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps care

Following the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) treatment algorithm for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), patients suffering from severe uncontrolled CRSwNP are recommended to receive oral corticosteroids, (revision) sinus surgery, systemic biologicals and/or aspirin treatment after desensitization (ATAD). Given the major differences in indications, outcomes, practical considerations, risks and costs of these key pillars of treatment, there is a growing need to define criteria for each treatment option and list the clinically relevant and major considerations for them. This EUFOREA document therefore provides an expert panel overview of the expected outcomes, specific considerations and (contra)indications of the five major treatment arms of severe uncontrolled CRSwNP: oral corticosteroids, primary and revision sinus surgery, biological treatment and ATAD. This overview of treatment considerations is needed to allow physicians and patients to consider the different options in the context of providing optimal and personalized care for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP. In conclusion, the five major treatment options for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP have intrinsic advantages, specific indications and considerations that are of importance to the patient, the physician and the society. This EUFOREA statement supports the unmet need to define criteria for the indication of every treatment pillar of CRSwNP.

Deep immune profiling of chronic rhinosinusitis in allergic and non-allergic cohorts using mass cytometry

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a persistent nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa inflammation comprising two phenotypes, namely CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and without (CRSsNP). CRSwNP can be associated with asthma and hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in a syndrome known as NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD). Furthermore, CRS frequently intertwines with respiratory allergies. This study investigated levels of 33 different nasal and serum cytokines and phenotypic characteristics of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) within cohorts of CRS patients (n = 24), additionally examining the influence of comorbid respiratory allergies by mass cytometry. N-ERD patients showed heightened type 2 nasal cytokine levels. Mass cytometry revealed increased activated naive B cell levels in CRSwNP and N-ERD, while resting naive B cells were higher in CRSsNP. Th2a cell levels were significantly elevated in allergic subjects, but not in CRS groups. In conclusion, there are distinct immunological features in PBMCs of CRS phenotypes and allergy.

Brazilian guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps ‒ 2024 update

INTRODUCTION

Biologics targeting type 2 inflammation have revolutionized the way we treat patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). Particularly in severe and difficult-to-control cases, these drugs have provided a new reality for these patients, allowing for the effective and safe treatment of extensive diseases that were not completely managed with the typical strategy of surgery and topical medications.

OBJECTIVES

The experience achieved with the approval of these medications by ANVISA for use in CRSwNP and the knowledge obtained regarding outcomes, adverse effects, and the ideal patient profile prompted the update of the previously published guideline, with a detailed review of the most recent scientific literature, the personal experiences of experts, and the adaptation to the reality of the Brazilian healthcare system, both public and private.

RESULTS

We proposed a new eligibility criterion for biologics in patients with CRSwNP based on four pillars of indication: the impact of the disease on the patient's life, whether in the presence of specific symptoms or in overall quality of life; the extent of sinonasal disease; the presence of type 2 comorbidities, considering other associated diseases that may also benefit from anti-T2 biologics, and the presence of biomarkers to define type 2 inflammation, especially those associated with worse disease prognoses.

CONCLUSIONS

This innovative and pioneering method has two major advantages. First, it ensures a comprehensive evaluation of patients; second, it is flexible, as advancements in our understanding of the disease and changes in cost-effectiveness can be addressed by simply adjusting the required score for indication, without the need to modify the entire evaluation scheme.

[The correlation between preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and postoperative recurrence of chronic rhinosinusitis]

Objective:Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio （NLR） and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio （PLR） play important roles in the poor prognosis of different inflammatory and neoplastic diseases, but their effects on postoperative recurrence of chronic rhinosinusitis（CRS） are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between preoperative NLR and PLR and the risk of postoperative recurrence in CRS. Methods:Clinical data were collected from patients with CRS who underwent initial functional endoscopic sinus surgery from October 2018 to February 2022 at our institution. Follow-up was until February 2023, and the study endpoint was defined as patient postoperative recurrence or follow-up time up to date. The optimal preoperative NLR and PLR threshold values were obtained based on subject work curve analysis, and they were divided into high and low level subgroups, respectively, and the clinical characteristics and postoperative recurrence rates of patients were compared between groups; patients were divided into non-recurrent CRS and recurrent CRS according to their postoperative recurrence, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves and logistic regression analysis were performed to explore the correlation between NLR and PLR and CRS The correlation between NLR and PLR and postoperative recurrence was investigated by Kaplan-Meier survival curve and logistic regression analysis. Results:A total of 630 patients with CRS were included, including 382 and 140 patients with high NLR and high PLR, respectively. The postoperative recurrence rates of CRS patients in the high NLR and high PLR groups were significantly higher than those in the low NLR and low PLR groups（P<0.05）. The recurrent CRS had higher NLR and PLR levels and higher proportion of high NLR and high PLR than the non-recurrent CRS（P<0.05）, and similarly the duration of recurrent CRS and the rate of allergic rhinitis with recurrence were significantly higher than the non-recurrent CRS（P<0.05）. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that postoperative CRS was significantly higher in the high NLR and high PLR groups compared with the low NLR and low PLR groups. recurrence was significantly higher（P<0.05）. In addition, logistic regression analysis showed that high NLR, high PLR, disease duration, and combined allergic rhinitis were significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative recurrence of CRS（P<0.05）. Conclusion:Both high preoperative NLR and high PLR are independent risk factors for postoperative recurrence of CRS, and they are expected to be new indicators for postoperative prognostic assessment and risk stratification of CRS patients. In addition, disease duration and comorbid allergic rhinitis were significantly associated with the risk of postoperative recurrence of CRS.

Eosinophils-from cradle to grave: An EAACI task force paper on new molecular insights and clinical functions of eosinophils and the clinical effects of targeted eosinophil depletion

Over the past years, eosinophils have become a focus of scientific interest, especially in the context of their recently uncovered functions (e.g. antiviral, anti-inflammatory, regulatory). These versatile cells display both beneficial and detrimental activities under various physiological and pathological conditions. Eosinophils are involved in the pathogenesis of many diseases which can be classified into primary (clonal) and secondary (reactive) disorders and idiopathic (hyper)eosinophilic syndromes. Depending on the biological specimen, the eosinophil count in different body compartments may serve as a biomarker reflecting the underlying pathophysiology and/or activity of distinct diseases and as a therapy-driving (predictive) and monitoring tool. Personalized selection of an appropriate therapeutic strategy directly or indirectly targeting the increased number and/or activity of eosinophils should be based on the understanding of eosinophil homeostasis including their interactions with other immune and non-immune cells within different body compartments. Hence, restoring as well as maintaining homeostasis within an individual's eosinophil pool is a goal of both specific and non-specific eosinophil-targeting therapies. Despite the overall favourable safety profile of the currently available anti-eosinophil biologics, the effect of eosinophil depletion should be monitored from the perspective of possible unwanted consequences.

Developments in the Management of Severe Asthma in Children and Adolescents: Focus on Dupilumab and Tezepelumab

Severe asthma in children and adolescents exerts a substantial health, financial, and societal burden. Severe asthma is a heterogeneous condition with multiple clinical phenotypes and underlying inflammatory patterns that might be different in individual patients. Various add-on treatments have been developed to treat severe asthma, including monoclonal antibodies (biologics) targeting inflammatory mediators. Biologics that are currently approved to treat children (≥ 6 years of age) or adolescents (≥ 12 years of age) with severe asthma include: anti-immunoglobulin E (omalizumab), anti-interleukin (IL)-5 (mepolizumab), anti-IL5 receptor (benralizumab), anti-IL4/IL13 receptor (dupilumab), and antithymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) (tezepelumab). However, access to these targeted treatments varies across countries and relies on few and crude indicators. There is a need for better treatment stratification to guide which children might benefit from these treatments. In this narrative review we will assess the most recent developments in the treatment of severe pediatric asthma, as well as potential biomarkers to assess treatment efficacy for this patient population.

Biologics in severe asthma: A pragmatic approach for choosing the right treatment for the right patient

The development of monoclonal antibody therapies targeting specific components of the pathways relevant to asthma pathophysiology has revolutionized treatment of severe asthma both in adults and children and helped to further unravel the heterogeneity of this disease. However, the availability of multiple agents, often with overlapping eligibility criteria, creates a need for pragmatic guidance for specialists undertaking care of patients with severe asthma. In this review, we provide an overview of the data supporting the clinical efficacy of biologics in distinct asthma phenotypes/endotypes. We also focus on the role of biomarkers and treatable traits, including comorbidities, in the choice of asthma biologics, highlight which treatments have been demonstrated to be steroid sparing in corticosteroid dependent asthma, and provide practical guidance that can drive shared decision making on treatment choice with patients. In addition, we summarize what is known to date regarding long-term safety of these drugs, and lastly, discuss future directions in biologics research.

Exhaled Nitric Oxide as Biomarker of Type 2 Diseases

Nitric oxide (NO) is a short-lived gas molecule which has been studied for its role as a signaling molecule in the vasculature and later, in a broader view, as a cellular messenger in many other biological processes such as immunity and inflammation, cell survival, apoptosis, and aging. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a convenient, easy-to-obtain, and non-invasive method for assessing active, mainly Th2-driven, airway inflammation, which is sensitive to treatment with standard anti-inflammatory therapy. Consequently, FeNO serves as a valued tool to aid the diagnosis and monitoring of several asthma phenotypes. More recently, FeNO has been evaluated in several other respiratory and/or immunological conditions, including allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with/without nasal polyps, atopic dermatitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, and food allergy. In this review, we aim to provide an extensive overview of the current state of knowledge about FeNO as a biomarker in type 2 inflammation, outlining past and recent data on the application of its measurement in patients affected by a broad variety of atopic/allergic disorders.

EUFOREA summit in Brussels 2023: inspiring the future of allergy & respiratory care

In March 2023, the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airways diseases (EUFOREA) organized its bi-annual Summit in Brussels with expert panel members of EUFOREA, representatives of the EUFOREA patient advisory board, and the EUFOREA board and management teams. Its aim was to define the research, educational and advocacy initiatives to be developed by EUFOREA over the next 2 years until the 10th anniversary in 2025. EUFOREA is an international non-for-profit organization forming an alliance of all stakeholders dedicated to reducing the prevalence and burden of chronic allergic and respiratory diseases via research, education, and advocacy. Based on its medical scientific core competency, EUFOREA offers an evidence-supported platform to introduce innovation and education in healthcare leading to optimal patient care, bridging the gap between latest scientific evidence and daily practice. Aligned with the mission of improving health care, the expert panels of asthma, allergic rhinitis (AR), chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) & European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS), allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and paediatrics have proposed and elaborated a variety of activities that correspond to major unmet needs in the allergy and respiratory field. The current report provides a concise overview of the achievements, ambitions, and action plan of EUFOREA for the future, allowing all stakeholders in the allergy and respiratory field to be up-dated and inspired to join forces in Europe and beyond.

A EUFOREA comment on a lost comorbidity of asthma

"Epidemiology of comorbidities and their association with asthma control" (Tomisa, G., Horváth, A., Sánta, B. et al. Epidemiology of comorbidities and their association with asthma control. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 17, 95 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-021-00598-3 ) is an interesting paper reflecting data collection from more than 12,000 asthmatic patients in Hungary regarding their condition and associated comorbidities. We found it valuable that the paper provides an overview of asthma comorbidities not usually considered in similar reports. Nevertheless, we believe that chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with or without nasal polyps (CRSwNP or CRSsNP) should have been listed due to its high incidence and prevalence, its association with asthma which is also endorsed in both GINA and EPOS, as well as in several peer-reviewed scientific papers, and to reflect the role of this comorbidity in poor control and a most severe presentation of asthma for the patient. Consequently, several targeted therapies (especially monoclonal antibodies) used for several years in severe forms of asthma are now indicated also for the effective treatment of nasal polyps.