The role of genetically determined polymorphic drug metabolism in the beta-blockade produced by propafenone

The Effect of CYP2D6 Phenotypes on the Pharmacokinetics of Propafenone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Propafenone (PPF) is a class 1C antiarrhythmic agent mainly metabolized by cytochrome (CYP) 2D6, CYP1A2, and CYP3A4. Previous studies have shown that CYP2D6 polymorphism influences the pharmacokinetics (PK) of PPF. However, the small sample sizes of PK studies can lead to less precise estimates of the PK parameters. Thus, this meta-analysis was performed to merge all current PK studies of PPF to determine the effects of the CYP2D6 phenotype more accurately on the PPF PK profile. We searched electronic databases for published studies to investigate the association between the PPF PK and CYP2D6 phenotype. Four PK-related outcomes were included: area under the time–concentration curve (AUC), maximum concentration (Cmax), apparent clearance (CL/F), and half-life (t1/2). A total of five studies were included in this meta-analysis (n = 56). Analyses were performed to compare PK parameters between poor metabolizers (PMs) versus extensive metabolizers (EMs). PPF has a non-linear pharmacokinetics; therefore, analyses were performed according to dose (300 mg and 400 mg). At 300 mg, the AUC mean (95% CI), Cmax, and t1/2 of PPF in PMs were 15.9 (12.5–19.2) µg·h/mL, 1.10 (0.796–1.40) µg/mL, and 12.8 (11.3–14.3) h, respectively; these values were 2.4-, 11.2-, and 4.7-fold higher than those in the EM group, respectively. At 400 mg, a comparison was performed between S- and R-enantiomers. The CL/F was approximately 1.4-fold higher for the R-form compared with the S-form, which was a significant difference. This study demonstrated that CYP2D6 metabolizer status could significantly affect the PPF PK profile. Adjusting the dose of PPF according to CYP2D6 phenotype would help to avoid adverse effects and ensure treatment efficacy.

Influence of CYP2D6 Genetic Variation on Adverse Events with Propafenone in the Pediatric and Young Adult Population

Propafenone is an antiarrhythmic drug metabolized primarily by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). In adults, propafenone adverse events (AEs) are associated with CYP2D6 poor metabolizer status; however, pediatric data are lacking. Subjects were tested for 10 CYP2D6 allelic variants and copy number status, and activity scores assigned to each genotype. Seventy‐six individuals (median 0.3 [range 0–26] years old) were included. Propafenone AEs occurred in 29 (38%); 14 (18%) required drug discontinuation due to AE. The most common AEs were QRS (n = 10) and QTc (n = 6) prolongation. Those with AEs were older at the time of propafenone initiation (1.58 [0.13–9.92] vs. 0.20 [0.08–2.01] years old; p = 0.042). CYP2D6 activity scores were not associated with presence of an AE (odds ratio [OR] 0.48 [0.22–1.03]; p = 0.055) but with the total number of AE (β₁ = −0.31 [−0.60, −0.03]; p = 0.029), systemic AEs (OR 0.33 [0.13–0.88]; p = 0.022), and drug discontinuation for systemic AEs (OR 0.28 [0.09–0.83]; p = 0.017). Awareness of CYP2D6 activity score and patient age may aid in determining an individual's risk for an AE with propafenone administration.

Effect of Rythmol (propafenone HCl) administration during pregnancy in Wistar rats

Propafenone is a well-known Class 1C antiarrhythmic agent that has sodium channel blocking properties as well as the ability to block 13 other channels and a modest calcium antagonistic effect. Propafenone has a profound electrophysiologic effect on auxiliary atrioventricular circuits and in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia can obstruct conduction in the fast conducting pathway. Furthermore, propafenone is less likely than other Class 1C drugs to cause proarrhythmia. However, although this medicine can pass through the placenta, the effects during pregnancy remain unknown. Here, we investigated the potential teratogenic and genotoxic effects of Rythmol during rat development. Pregnant Wistar rats received 46.25 mg/kg body weight of propafenone daily by gavage from Gestation Day (GD) 5 to GD 19. At GD 20, the dams were dissected, and their fetuses were assessed via morphologic, skeletal, and histologic investigation. In addition, a comet assay was used to measure DNA impairment of fetal skull osteocytes and hepatic cells. The study showed that propafenone treatment of pregnant rats led to a marked decrease in gravid uterine weight, number of implants/litter, number of viable fetuses, and bodyweight of fetuses but a clear increase in placental weight and placental index in the treated group. Frequent morphologic abnormalities and severe ossification deficiency in the cranium bones were observed in the treatment group. Various histopathological changes were observed in the liver, kidney, and brain tissues of maternally treated fetuses. Similarly, propafenone induced DNA damage to examined samples. Thus, our study indicates that propafenone may be embryotoxic in humans.

Pharmacokinetic determinants for the right dose of antiarrhythmic drugs

INTRODUCTION

Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) show a narrow therapeutic range and marked intersubject variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), which may lead to inappropriate dosing and drug toxicity.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of the present review is to describe PK properties of AADs, discussing the main changes in different clinical scenarios, such as the elderly and patients with obese, chronic kidney, liver, and cardiac disease, in order to guide their right prescription in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

There are few data about PK properties of AADs in a special population or challenging clinical setting. The use and dose of AADs is commonly based on physicians' clinical experience observing the clinical effects rather than being personalized on the individual patients PK profiles. More and updated studies are needed to validate a patient centered approach in the pharmacological treatment of arrhythmias based on patients' clinical features, including pharmacogenomics, and AAD pharmacokinetics.

Propafenone Poisoning of a Female Adolescent After a Suicide Attempt

Propafenone is an antiarrhythmic agent for the management of ventricular and supraventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. Propafenone poisoning is rare but may be life-threatening due to drug-induced arrhythmias. Electrocardiographic changes in PR, QRS, and QT intervals have been recorded. We present a case of a 15-year-old female adolescent who developed arrhythmias and convulsions due to propafenone intoxication, in an attempt to commit suicide. The outcome of the case was a full recovery from the arrhythmias and the seizures. The aim of this article is to highlight the possibility of a lethal intoxication by a common antiarrhythmic drug. Our case aims to present our therapeutic strategy that relies mainly on close monitoring of patients and cardiac output support.

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Rhythm Control in Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and affects over 33 million people worldwide. AF is associated with stroke and systemic thromboembolism, unpleasant symptoms and reduced quality of life, heart failure, and increased mortality, and treatment of AF and its complications are associated with significant cost. Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) can suppress AF, allowing long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm, and have the potential to relieve symptoms and reverse or prevent adverse effects associated with AF. However, large randomized controlled studies evaluating use of AADs have not demonstrated a clear benefit to maintaining sinus rhythm, and AADs often have significant limitations, including a modest rate of overall success at maintaining sinus rhythm, frequent side effects, and potentially life-threatening toxicities. Although some of the currently available AADs have been available for almost 100 years, better tolerated and more efficacious AADs have recently been developed both for long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm and for chemical cardioversion of AF to sinus rhythm. Advances in automated AF detection with cardiac implantable electronic devices have suggested that AADs might be useful for suppressing AF to allow safe discontinuation of anticoagulation in select patients who are in sinus rhythm for prolonged periods of time. AADs may also have synergistic effects with catheter ablation of AF. This review summarizes the pharmacology and clinical use of currently available AADs for treatment of AF and discusses novel AADs and future directions for rhythm control in AF.

The Clinical Significance of the Pharmacogenetics of Cardiovascular Medications

Inter-individual variability in the response to numerous drugs can be traced to a number of sources. One source of variability in drug response is the variability associated with the metabolic capacity of an individual. The component of metabolic capacity that will be the focus of this article is that determined by heredity. Pharmacogenetics is frequently referred to as the study of the effects of heredity on the disposition and response to medications. This article will review the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic significance of pharmacogenetics as it pertains to a select number of cardiovascular agents. The enzyme systems responsible for drug metabolism discussed in this article will be limited to the P-450IID6 and N-acetylation pathways. Given the extensive use of cardiovascular agents in clinical practice that are affected by this genetic polymorphism, it is important for the practicing pharmacist to be aware of this phenomenon and its implications. Hopefully, the knowledge gained from this article will help practicing pharmacists to appreciate the clinical significance of polymorphic drug metabolism and provide a basis for the application of this knowledge to a variety of practice settings.

Clinical Pearls in Using Antiarrhythmic Drugs in the Outpatient Setting

A role for oral antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) remains in clinical practice for patients with atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in spite of advances in nonpharmacologic therapy. Pharmacists play a vital role in the appropriate use of AAD dosing, administration, adverse effects, interactions, and monitoring. Pharmacists who are involved in providing care to patients with cardiac arrhythmias must remain updated regarding the efficacy and safety of the most commonly used AADs. This review will address key issues for appropriate initiation and maintenance of commonly selected Vaughan-Williams Class Ic and III agents in the outpatient setting.

Pharmacokinetics of propafenone hydrochloride sustained-release capsules in male beagle dogs

This paper describes the development and validation of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric assay for propafenone and its application to a pharmacokinetic study of propafenone administered as a new propafenone hydrochloride sustained-release capsule (SR-test), as an instant-release tablet (IR-reference) and as the market leader sustained-release capsule (Rythmol, SR-reference) in male beagle dogs (n=8). In Study A comparing SR-test with IR-reference in a crossover design T max and t 1/2 of propafenone for SR-test were significantly higher than those for IR-reference while C max and AUC were lower demonstrating the sustained release properties of the new formulation. In Study B comparing SR-test with SR-reference the observed C max and AUC of propafenone for SR-test (124.5±140.0 ng/mL and 612.0±699.2 ng·h/mL, respectively) were higher than for SR-reference (78.52±72.92 ng/mL and 423.6±431.6 ng·h/mL, respectively) although the differences were not significant. Overall, the new formulation has as good if not better sustained release characteristics to the market leader formulation.

Cardiovascular pharmacogenomics: the future of cardiovascular therapeutics?

Responses to drug therapy vary from benefit to no effect to adverse effects which can be serious or occasionally fatal. Increasing evidence supports the idea that genetic variants can play a major role in this spectrum of responses. Well-studied examples in cardiovascular therapeutics include predictors of steady-state warfarin dosage, predictors of reduced efficacy among patients receiving clopidogrel for drug eluting stents, and predictors of some serious adverse drug effects. This review summarizes contemporary approaches to identifying and validating genetic predictors of variability in response to drug treatment. Approaches to incorporating this new knowledge into clinical care, and the barriers to this concept, are addressed.

How Does Genetics Influence the Efficacy and Safety of Antiarrhythmic Drugs?

Recent progress in genomic sequencing has begun to elucidate the basic mechanisms for several adverse responses, as well as the clinical efficacy, for antiarrhythmic drugs. DNA variants in drug metabolizing enzymes have been implicated in excessive drug accumulation, and genetic variability in drug targets can identify individuals at increased risk for serious side effects, in particular proarrhythmia. It is hoped that future advances in the area of genomic medicine will lead to more individually tailored or personalized pharmacologic therapy in the management of cardiac arrhythmias.

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy of Supraventricular Tachycardia

Pharmacologic therapy is commonly used for the acute treatment and termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and continues to be an important long-term option for some patients. Drug choice depends on the correct diagnosis of the arrhythmia and an understanding of its mechanism. Pharmacologic agents commonly used in the acute and chronic treatment of SVT are reviewed along with their effect on the various types of SVT. Drugs that are well tolerated with minimal side effects are preferred over agents with perhaps more efficacy but higher risk of toxicity.

Polymorphism of human cytochrome P450 enzymes and its clinical impact

Pharmacogenetics is the study of how interindividual variations in the DNA sequence of specific genes affect drug response. This article highlights current pharmacogenetic knowledge on important human drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450s (CYPs) to understand the large interindividual variability in drug clearance and responses in clinical practice. The human CYP superfamily contains 57 functional genes and 58 pseudogenes, with members of the 1, 2, and 3 families playing an important role in the metabolism of therapeutic drugs, other xenobiotics, and some endogenous compounds. Polymorphisms in the CYP family may have had the most impact on the fate of therapeutic drugs. CYP2D6, 2C19, and 2C9 polymorphisms account for the most frequent variations in phase I metabolism of drugs, since almost 80% of drugs in use today are metabolized by these enzymes. Approximately 5-14% of Caucasians, 0-5% Africans, and 0-1% of Asians lack CYP2D6 activity, and these individuals are known as poor metabolizers. CYP2C9 is another clinically significant enzyme that demonstrates multiple genetic variants with a potentially functional impact on the efficacy and adverse effects of drugs that are mainly eliminated by this enzyme. Studies into the CYP2C9 polymorphism have highlighted the importance of the CYP2C9*2 and *3 alleles. Extensive polymorphism also occurs in other CYP genes, such as CYP1A1, 2A6, 2A13, 2C8, 3A4, and 3A5. Since several of these CYPs (e.g., CYP1A1 and 1A2) play a role in the bioactivation of many procarcinogens, polymorphisms of these enzymes may contribute to the variable susceptibility to carcinogenesis. The distribution of the common variant alleles of CYP genes varies among different ethnic populations. Pharmacogenetics has the potential to achieve optimal quality use of medicines, and to improve the efficacy and safety of both prospective and currently available drugs. Further studies are warranted to explore the gene-dose, gene-concentration, and gene-response relationships for these important drug-metabolizing CYPs.

The ontogeny of drug metabolism enzymes and implications for adverse drug events

Profound changes in drug metabolizing enzyme (DME) expression occurs during development that impacts the risk of adverse drug events in the fetus and child. A review of our current knowledge suggests individual hepatic DME ontogeny can be categorized into one of three groups. Some enzymes, e.g., CYP3A7, are expressed at their highest level during the first trimester and either remain at high concentrations or decrease during gestation, but are silenced or expressed at low levels within one to two years after birth. SULT1A1 is an example of the second group of DME. These enzymes are expressed at relatively constant levels throughout gestation and minimal changes are observed postnatally. ADH1C is typical of the third DME group that are not expressed or are expressed at low levels in the fetus, usually during the second or third trimester. Substantial increases in enzyme levels are observed within the first one to two years after birth. Combined with our knowledge of other physiological factors during early life stages, knowledge regarding DME ontogeny has permitted the development of robust physiological based pharmacokinetic models and an improved capability to predict drug disposition in pediatric patients. This review will provide an overview of DME developmental expression patterns and discuss some implications of the data with regards to drug therapy. Common themes emerging from our current knowledge also will be discussed. Finally, the review will highlight gaps in knowledge that will be important to advance this field.

Pharmacogenetics, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and clinical practice

The application of pharmacogenetics holds great promise for individualized therapy. However, it has little clinical reality at present, despite many claims. The main problem is that the evidence base supporting genetic testing before therapy is weak. The pharmacology of the drugs subject to inherited variability in metabolism is often complex. Few have simple or single pathways of elimination. Some have active metabolites or enantiomers with different activities and pathways of elimination. Drug dosing is likely to be influenced only if the aggregate molar activity of all active moieties at the site of action is predictably affected by genotype or phenotype. Variation in drug concentration must be significant enough to provide "signal" over and above normal variation, and there must be a genuine concentration-effect relationship. The therapeutic index of the drug will also influence test utility. After considering all of these factors, the benefits of prospective testing need to be weighed against the costs and against other endpoints of effect. It is not surprising that few drugs satisfy these requirements. Drugs (and enzymes) for which there is a reasonable evidence base supporting genotyping or phenotyping include suxamethonium/mivacurium (butyrylcholinesterase), and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine methyltransferase). Drugs for which there is a potential case for prospective testing include warfarin (CYP2C9), perhexiline (CYP2D6), and perhaps the proton pump inhibitors (CYP2C19). No other drugs have an evidence base that is sufficient to justify prospective testing at present, although some warrant further evaluation. In this review we summarize the current evidence base for pharmacogenetics in relation to drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Pharmacogenetics of antiarrhythmic therapy

Individuals vary widely in their responses to therapy with most drugs. Indeed, responses to antiarrhythmic drugs are so highly variable that study of the underlying mechanisms has elucidated important lessons for understanding variable responses to drug therapy in general. Variability in drug response may reflect variability in the relationship between a drug dose and the concentrations of the drug and metabolite(s) at relevant target sites; this is termed pharmacokinetic variability. Another mechanism is that individuals vary in their response to identical exposures to a drug (pharmacodynamic variability). In this case, there may be variability in the target molecule(s) with which a drug interacts or, more generally, in the broad biological context in which the drug-target interaction occurs. Variants (polymorphisms and mutations) in the genes that encode proteins that are important for pharmacokinetics or for pharmacodynamics have now been described as important contributors to variable drug actions, including proarrhythmia, and these are described in this review. However, the translation of pharmacogenetics into clinical practice has been slow. To this end, the creation of large, well-characterised DNA databases and appropriate control groups, as well as large prospective trials to evaluate the impact of genetic variation on drug therapy, may hasten the impact of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in terms of delivering personalised drug therapy and to avoid therapeutic failure and serious side effects.

Proarrhythmia

The concept that antiarrhythmic drugs can exacerbate the cardiac rhythm disturbance being treated, or generate entirely new clinical arrhythmia syndromes, is not new. Abnormal cardiac rhythms due to digitalis or quinidine have been recognized for decades. This phenomenon, termed "proarrhythmia," was generally viewed as a clinical curiosity, since it was thought to be rare and unpredictable. However, the past 20 years have seen the recognition that proarrhythmia is more common than previously appreciated in certain populations, and can in fact lead to substantially increased mortality during long-term antiarrhythmic therapy. These findings, in turn, have moved proarrhythmia from a clinical curiosity to the centerpiece of antiarrhythmic drug pharmacology in at least two important respects. First, clinicians now select antiarrhythmic drug therapy in a particular patient not simply to maximize efficacy, but very frequently to minimize the likelihood of proarrhythmia. Second, avoiding proarrhythmia has become a key element of contemporary new antiarrhythmic drug development. Further, recognition of the magnitude of the problem has led to important advances in understanding basic mechanisms. While the phenomenon of proarrhythmia remains unpredictable in an individual patient, it can no longer be viewed as "idiosyncratic." Rather, gradations of risk can be assigned based on the current understanding of mechanisms, and these will doubtless improve with ongoing research at the genetic, molecular, cellular, whole heart, and clinical levels.

Cardiac Na+ channels as therapeutic targets for antiarrhythmic agents

There are many factors that influence drug block of voltage-gated Na+ channels (VGSC). Pharmacological agents vary in conformation, charge, and affinity. Different drugs have variable affinities to VGSC isoforms, and drug efficacy is affected by implicit tissue properties such as resting potential, action potential morphology, and action potential frequency. The presence of polymorphisms and mutations in the drug target can also influence drug outcomes. While VGSCs have been therapeutic targets in the management of cardiac arrhythmias, their potential has been largely overshadowed by toxic side effects. Nonetheless, many VGSC blockers exhibit inherent voltage- and use-dependent properties of channel block that have recently proven useful for the diagnosis and treatment of genetic arrhythmias that arise from defects in Na+ channels and can underlie idiopathic clinical syndromes. These defective channels suggest themselves as prime targets of disease and perhaps even mutation specific pharmacological interventions.

Pharmacogenetic aspects of drug-induced torsade de pointes: potential tool for improving clinical drug development and prescribing

Drug-induced torsade de pointes (TdP) has proved to be a significant iatro-genic cause of morbidity and mortality and a major reason for the withdrawal of a number of drugs from the market in recent times. Enzymes that metabolise many of these drugs and the potassium channels that are responsible for cardiac repolarisation display genetic polymorphisms. Anecdotal reports have suggested that in many cases of drug-induced TdP, there may be a concealed genetic defect of either these enzymes or the potassium channels, giving rise to either high plasma drug concentrations or diminished cardiac repolarisation reserve, respectively. The presence of either of these genetic defects may predispose a patient to TdP, a potentially fatal adverse reaction, even at therapeutic dosages of QT-prolonging drugs and in the absence of other risk factors. Advances in pharmacogenetics of drug metabolising enzymes and pharmacological targets, together with the prospects of rapid and inexpensive genotyping procedures, promise to individualise and improve the benefit/risk ratio of therapy with drugs that have the potential to cause TdP. The qualitative and the quantitative contributions of these genetic defects in clinical cases of TdP are unclear because not all of the patients with TdP are routinely genotyped and some relevant genetic mutations still remain to be discovered. There are regulatory guidelines that recommend strategies aimed at uncovering the risk of TdP associated with new chemical entities during their development. There are also a number of guidelines that recommend integrating pharmacogenetics in this process. This paper proposes a strategy for integrating pharmacogenetics into drug development programmes to optimise association studies correlating genetic traits and endpoints of clinical interest, namely failure of efficacy or development of repolarisation abnormalities. Until pharmacogenetics is carefully integrated into all phases of development of QT-prolonging drugs and large-scale studies are undertaken during their post-marketing use to determine the genetic components involved in induction of TdP, routine genotyping of patients remains unrealistic. Even without this pharmacogenetic data, the clinical risk of TdP can already be greatly minimised. Clinically, a substantial proportion of cases of TdP are due to the use of either high or usual dosages of drugs with potential to cause TdP in the presence of factors that inhibit drug metabolism. Therefore, choosing the lowest effective dose and identifying patients with these non-genetic risk factors are important means of minimising the risk of TdP. In view of the common secondary pharmacology shared by these drugs, a standard set of contraindications and warnings have evolved over the last decade. These include factors responsible for pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic drug interactions. Among the latter, the more important ones are bradycardia, electrolyte imbalance, cardiac disease and co-administration of two or more QT-prolonging drugs. In principle, if large scale prospective studies can demonstrate a substantial genetic component, pharmacogenetically driven prescribing ought to reduce the risk further. However, any potential benefits of pharmacogenetics will be squandered without any reduction in the clinical risk of TdP if physicians do not follow prescribing and monitoring recommendations.

Genetic polymorphisms, drugs, and proarrhythmia

Humans vary widely in their response to drug therapy. This may reflect variability in the relationship between a drug dose and the concentrations of drug and metabolite(s) at relevant target sites; this is termed pharmacokinetic variability. Another mechanism is that individuals vary in their response to identical exposures to drug (pharmacodynamic variability). In this case, there may be variability in the target molecule(s) with which a drug interacts, or more generally in the broad biologic context in which the drug-target interaction occurs; for example, ischemia, electrolyte disturbances, or hypertrophy can all modulate drug effects. Variants in the genes encoding proteins important for pharmacokinetics or for pharmacodynamics have now been described as important contributors to variable drug actions, including proarrhythmia, and are described here. These increasingly well-recognized examples have two important implications; first, it may be possible to develop drugs devoid of heretofore-unexplained adverse effects and, second, it may become possible to preselect drug for individual patients based on specific genetic factors.

Pharmacogenetics of cytochrome p4502D6: genetic background and clinical implication

Interindividual differences in the pharmacokinetics of a number of drugs are often due to hereditary polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Most important is cytochrome p4502D6 (CYP2D6), also known as debrisoquine/sparteine hydroxylase. It catalyzes hydroxylation or demethylation of more than 20% of drugs metabolized in the human liver, such as neuroleptics, antidepressants, some beta-blockers and many others like codeine. About 7%-10% of Caucasians lack any CYP2D6 activity due to deletions and frame-shift or splice-site mutations of the gene. About 1%-3% of Middle-Europeans, but up to 29% of Ethiopians display gene duplications, leading to elevated so-called ultrarapid metabolization rates. Meanwhile there is now a much better understanding of the genetic background of poor, intermediate, extensive and ultrarapid metabolizers, enabling a more precise DNA genotyping-based prediction of plasma levels. Since there is evidence that deteriorated drug elimination partly accounts for drug side-effects, CYP2D6 genotyping could contribute to an individualized and therefore optimized drug therapy.

Pharmacogenomics in cardiovascular diseases

Considerable heterogeneity exists in the way individuals respond to medications, in terms of both efficacy and safety. Inherited differences in the absorption, metabolism, excretion, and target for drug therapy have important effects on drug efficacy and safety. Pharmacogenomics aims to discover new therapeutic targets and understand genetic polymorphisms that determine the safety and efficacy of medications. The goal of pharmaco-genomics is customization of drug therapy with administration of a medication in an optimum dose that will be safe and effective with reduction in morbidity and mortality.

Pharmacogenomics: the inherited basis for interindividual differences in drug response

It is well recognized that most medications exhibit wide interpatient variability in their efficacy and toxicity. For many medications, these interindividual differences are due in part to polymorphisms in genes encoding drug metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, and/or drug targets (e.g., receptors, enzymes). Pharmacogenomics is a burgeoning field aimed at elucidating the genetic basis for differences in drug efficacy and toxicity, and it uses genome-wide approaches to identify the network of genes that govern an individual's response to drug therapy. For some genetic polymorphisms (e.g., thiopurine S-methyltransferase), monogenic traits have a marked effect on pharmacokinetics (e.g., drug metabolism), such that individuals who inherit an enzyme deficiency must be treated with markedly different doses of the affected medications (e.g., 5%-10% of the standard thiopurine dose). Likewise, polymorphisms in drug targets (e.g., beta adrenergic receptor) can alter the sensitivity of patients to treatment (e.g., beta-agonists), changing the pharmacodynamics of drug response. Recognizing that most drug effects are determined by the interplay of several gene products that govern the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications, pharmacogenomics research aims to elucidate these polygenic determinants of drug effects. The ultimate goal is to provide new strategies for optimizing drug therapy based on each patient's genetic determinants of drug efficacy and toxicity. This chapter provides an overview of the current pharmacogenomics literature and offers insights for the potential impact of this field on the safe and effective use of medications.

The genetic basis of variability in drug responses

It is almost axiomatic that patients vary widely in their beneficial responses to drug therapy, and serious and apparently unpredictable adverse drug reactions continue to be a major public health problem. Here, we discuss the concept that genetic variants might determine much of this variability in drug response, and propose an algorithm to enable further evaluation of the benefits and pitfalls of this enticing possibility.

Candidate gene approach for pharmacogenetic studies

Genetic diversity in the form of single nucleotide DNA polymorphisms (SNPs) contributes to variable disease susceptibility and drug response. The candidate gene approach has been widely used to identify the genetic basis for pharmacogenetic traits and becomes increasingly more powerful with the recent advances in genomic technologies. High-throughput sequencing and SNP genotyping technologies allow the study of thousands of candidate genes and the identification of those involved in drug efficacy and toxicity. Expression-based genomic technologies such as DNA microarrays and proteomics also facilitate the understanding of important biological and pharmacological pathways, thus identifying more candidate genes for SNP studies. Candidate gene-based pharmacogenetic studies will lead to improved drug development, improved clinical trial design and therapeutics tailored to individual genotypes.

Classification and pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs

Despite the emergence of several forms of nonpharmacologic therapy for cardiac arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic drugs continue to play an important role in the management of patients with this common clinical problem. The key to the proper use of antiarrhythmic drugs is a thorough knowledge of their mode of action and pharmacology. The pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs is particularly important because patients with cardiac arrhythmias frequently have multiorgan disease, which may influence the metabolism and elimination of antiarrhythmic drugs. The accumulation of toxic amounts of these agents can lead to dire effects including, but not limited to, ventricular proarrhythmia and malignant bradycardia. The goals of pharmacologic therapy of cardiac arrhythmia are to provide the maximum benefit in terms of arrhythmia suppression while maintaining patient safety. To accomplish these goals, a knowledge of the pharmacology of several antiarrhythmic drugs is mandatory.

Pharmacogenetic diagnostics of cytochrome P450 polymorphisms in clinical drug development and in drug treatment

The current use and future perspectives of molecular genetic characterisation of cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP) for drug development and drug treatment are summarised. CYP genes are highly polymorphic and the enzymes play a key role in the elimination of the majority of drugs from the human body. Frequent variants of some enzymes, CYP2A6, 2C9, 2C19 and 2D6, should be analysed in participants of clinical trials whenever these enzymes may play a role. It is suggested that a CYP genotype certificate is handed out to the volunteers or patients to avoid replicate analyses, and to allow that this information is available for future research and also for treatment with eventually needed drugs. Guidelines on what CYP alleles have to be analysed in drug development, as well as on analytical validation and CYP genotype data handling will be required. Treatment with several drugs may be improved by prior genotyping. The concepts and problems of CYP genotype-based clinical dose recommendations are presented and illustrated for selected drugs. The requirement for prospective trials on the medical and economic benefits of routine CYP genotyping is emphasised. Specific operationally defined recommendations dependent on genotype are a prerequisite for such studies and this review presents tentative CYP genotype-based dose recommendations systematically calculated from published data. Because of the multiplicity of factors involved, these doses will not be the optimal doses for each given individual, but should be more adequate than doses generally recommended for an average total population. Those CYP alleles and polymorphically metabolised drugs which are currently most interesting in drug development and drug treatment are reviewed, and more complete information is available from websites cited in this article.

Effects of the antifungal agents on oxidative drug metabolism: clinical relevance

This article reviews the metabolic pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with the systemic antifungal agents: the azoles ketoconazole, miconazole, itraconazole and fluconazole, the allylamine terbinafine and the sulfonamide sulfamethoxazole. The majority of these interactions are metabolic and are caused by inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated hepatic and/or small intestinal metabolism of coadministered drugs. Human liver microsomal studies in vitro, clinical case reports and controlled pharmacokinetic interaction studies in patients or healthy volunteers are reviewed. A brief overview of the CYP system and the contrasting effects of the antifungal agents on the different human drug-metabolising CYP isoforms is followed by discussion of the role of P-glycoprotein in presystemic extraction and the modulation of its function by the antifungal agents. Methods used for in vitro drug interaction studies and in vitro-in vivo scaling are then discussed, with specific emphasis on the azole antifungals. Ketoconazole and itraconazole are potent inhibitors of the major drug-metabolising CYP isoform in humans, CYP3A4. Coadministration of these drugs with CYP3A substrates such as cyclosporin, tacrolimus, alprazolam, triazolam, midazolam, nifedipine, felodipine, simvastatin, lovastatin, vincristine, terfenadine or astemizole can result in clinically significant drug interactions, some of which can be life-threatening. The interactions of ketoconazole with cyclosporin and tacrolimus have been applied for therapeutic purposes to allow a lower dosage and cost of the immunosuppressant and a reduced risk of fungal infections. The potency of fluconazole as a CYP3A4 inhibitor is much lower. Thus, clinical interactions of CYP3A substrates with this azole derivative are of lesser magnitude, and are generally observed only with fluconazole dosages of > or =200 mg/day. Fluconazole, miconazole and sulfamethoxazole are potent inhibitors of CYP2C9. Coadministration of phenytoin, warfarin, sulfamethoxazole and losartan with fluconazole results in clinically significant drug interactions. Fluconazole is a potent inhibitor of CYP2C19 in vitro, although the clinical significance of this has not been investigated. No clinically significant drug interactions have been predicted or documented between the azoles and drugs that are primarily metabolised by CYP1A2, 2D6 or 2E1. Terbinafine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6 and may cause clinically significant interactions with coadministered substrates of this isoform, such as nortriptyline, desipramine, perphenazine, metoprolol, encainide and propafenone. On the basis of the existing in vitro and in vivo data, drug interactions of terbinafine with substrates of other CYP isoforms are unlikely.

Dissolution and in vivo evidence of differences in reference products: impact on development of generic drugs

The WHO List of International Comparator Pharmaceutical Products (CPP) For Equivalence Assessment of Interchangeable Multi-Source (Generic) Products will address an important issue in developing new generic drugs because it will identify the 'correct' reference product. This list will reduce unnecessary clinical studies in jurisdictions requiring new generics to be compared with brand products sold locally. Eventually, by employing the CPP, there will be a world-wide standard for brand and generic drugs, assuring the same level of quality internationally. The strategy of a single global reference is meritorious, but there are several hurdles to overcome. Most important is that the same brand may differ in dissolution and/or bioavailability in various jurisdictions, including some drugs with a narrow therapeutic index like phenytoin. Several examples are provided in this manuscript. This issue of regional differences has relevance, not only to the WHO list, but also to the matter of how safety and efficacy was established for that product in the first place. Normally, phase III clinical studies are conducted on a product manufactured in a single site, set to one standard. If the product differs in bioavailability in different jurisdictions, one is left with the question: 'which product has remained true to the original formulation?' Alternatively, if safety and efficacy is maintained with all formulations, then one is faced with the question: 'are the criteria currently employed for bioequivalence unnecessarily restrictive?'

Mechanisms underlying variability in response to drug therapy: implications for amiodarone use

Drug disposition can be described by the traditional processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. A contemporary view of these processes includes the concept that they are determined by the regulated activity of specific gene products. Such a view is an important step to an increased understanding of interindividual variability in drug disposition and in response to drug therapy. In addition, molecular mechanisms underlying common drug interactions are now being elucidated. Despite this new knowledge, little is understood about the molecular mechanisms determining the unusual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of amiodarone. These unusual characteristics include incomplete bioavailability, distribution to multiple tissue sites, extreme lipophilicity, biotransformation to an active metabolite, and very slow elimination of both parent drug and active metabolite. The drug also produces a range of important pharmacologic effects, including antiadrenergic effects that are apparent early during therapy, changes in cardiac repolarization that take longer to develop, and important extracardiac actions, including side effects and drug interactions. As a consequence of these pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic complexities, individualization of dose during long-term therapy with amiodarone has not been systematically explored.

Pharmacogenomics: translating functional genomics into rational therapeutics

Genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes, transporters, receptors, and other drug targets have been linked to interindividual differences in the efficacy and toxicity of many medications. Pharmacogenomic studies are rapidly elucidating the inherited nature of these differences in drug disposition and effects, thereby enhancing drug discovery and providing a stronger scientific basis for optimizing drug therapy on the basis of each patient's genetic constitution.