1
|
Tiruye T, Beckmann K. Communicating prostate cancer outcomes data to consumers A brief communication. Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00495-2. [PMID: 38876931 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To translate and communicate outcomes data for prostate cancer from a clinical registry data into a consumer-friendly resource. METHODS First, we analyzed real-world data from the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative (SA-PCCOC) registry for men diagnosed from 2008 to 2018 including clinical and functional outcomes following surgery, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, hormone therapy, active surveillance and watchful waiting. These outcomes included overall survival, cancer specific survival, biochemical recurrence, decline in functional outcomes, and transition to active treatment following active surveillance. Second, we translated outcomes into a summary text and pictographic format and present in one document that consumers found easy to understand and interpret. This "Prostate Cancer Outcomes Report Card" was developed in consultation with a consumer advisory group and further improved through exploratory interviews with people affected by prostate cancer, an online survey among the general public, and clinician feedback. RESULTS The 5-year prostate cancer-specific survival rate was 97%. There is a reasonably high chance of cancer returning within 5 years (17% after surgery and 14% after radiotherapy) while 1 in 3 men on active surveillance transitioned to other treatments within 5 years. Sexual function was negatively affected following all treatment types. Men with higher risk disease had a worse prognosis, a higher chance of recurrence and greater decline in physical function. Consumers required trustworthy, comprehensive, simple and up-to-date information collated in one place, and valued having access to this resource. Data on high survival rates were considered reassuring. There were high levels of unmet psychosocial and supportive care needs, especially in relation to mental health and sexual function. The report card was well received by patients and health care workers. CONCLUSIONS This relatively simple and easily understandable consumer-oriented outcome report serves to better inform men with prostate cancer and facilitate patient-provider communication and shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tenaw Tiruye
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; School of Public Health, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
| | - Kerri Beckmann
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mattes MD. Overview of Radiation Therapy in the Management of Localized and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11934-024-01217-5. [PMID: 38861238 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01217-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The goal is to describe the evolution of radiation therapy (RT) utilization in the management of localized and metastatic prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Long term data for a variety of hypofractionated definitive RT dose-fractionation schemes has matured, allowing patients and providers many standard-of-care options to choose from. Post-prostatectomy, adjuvant RT has largely been replaced by an early salvage approach. Multiparametric MRI and PSMA PET have enabled increasingly targeted RT delivery to the prostate and oligometastatic tumors. Areas of active investigation include determining the value of proton beam therapy and perirectal spacers, and optimally incorporate genomic tumor profiling and next generation hormonal therapies with RT in the curative setting. The use of radiation therapy to treat prostate cancer is rapidly evolving. In the coming years, there will be continued improvements in a variety of areas to enhance the value of RT in multidisciplinary prostate cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm D Mattes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Corsini C, Bergengren O, Carlsson S, Garmo H, Hjelm-Eriksson M, Fransson P, Kindblom J, Robinson D, Westerberg M, Stattin P, Carlsson SV. Patient-reported Side Effects 1 Year After Radical Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Register-based Nationwide Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:605-613. [PMID: 38233329 PMCID: PMC11102330 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on functional and psychological side effects following curative treatment for prostate cancer are lacking from large, contemporary, unselected, population-based cohorts. OBJECTIVE To assess urinary symptoms, bowel disturbances, erectile dysfunction (ED), and quality of life (QoL) 12 mo after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and radiotherapy (RT) using patient-reported outcome measures in the Swedish prostate cancer database. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a nationwide, population-based, cohort study in Sweden of men who underwent primary RARP or RT between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Absolute proportions and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression, with adjustment for clinical characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 2557 men underwent RARP and 1741 received RT. Men who underwent RT were older (69 vs 65 yr) and had more comorbidities at baseline. After RARP, 13% of men experienced incontinence, compared to 6% after RT. The frequency of urinary bother was similar, at 18% after RARP and 18% after RT. Urgency to defecate was reported by 14% of men after RARP and 34% after RT. At 1 yr, 73% of men had ED after RARP, and 77% after RT. High QoL was reported by 85% of men after RARP and 78% of men after RT. On multivariable regression analysis, RT was associated with lower risks of urinary incontinence (OR 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.33), urinary bother (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.95), and ED (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.46-0.65), but higher risk of bowel symptoms (OR 2.86, 95% CI 2.42-3.39). QoL was higher after RARP than after RT (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.12-1.61). CONCLUSIONS Short-term specific side effects after curative treatment for prostate cancer significantly differed between RARP and RT in this large and unselected cohort. Nevertheless, the risk of urinary bother was lower after RT, while higher QoL was common after RARP. PATIENT SUMMARY In our study of patients treated for prostate cancer, urinary bother and overall quality of life are comparable at 1 year after surgical removal of the prostate in comparison to radiotherapy, despite substantial differences in other side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Corsini
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Oskar Bergengren
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Stefan Carlsson
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Hans Garmo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Per Fransson
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Cancercentrum, Norrlands University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Jon Kindblom
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - David Robinson
- Department of Urology, Ryhov Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Marcus Westerberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Pär Stattin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Urological Cancers, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Le Guevelou J, Sargos P, Ferretti L, Supiot S, Pasquier D, Créhange G, Blanchard P, Hennequin C, Chapet O, Schick U, Baty M, Masson I, Ploussard G, De Crevoisier R, Latorzeff I. Sexual Structure Sparing for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:332-343. [PMID: 37640583 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Erectile dysfunction represents a major side effect of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment, negatively impacting men's quality of life. While radiation therapy (RT) advances have enabled the mitigation of both genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities, no significant improvement has been showed in sexual quality of life over time. OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this review was to assess sexual structures' dose-volume parameters associated with the onset of erectile dysfunction. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched the PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov until January 4, 2023. Studies reporting the impact of the dose delivered to sexual structures on sexual function or the feasibility of innovative sexual structure-sparing approaches were deemed eligible. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Sexual-sparing strategies have involved four sexual organs. The mean penile bulb doses exceeding 20 Gy are predictive of erectile dysfunction in modern PCa RT trial. Maintaining a D100% of ≤36 Gy on the internal pudendal arteries showed preservation of erectile function in 88% of patients at 5 yr. Neurovascular bundle sparing appears feasible with magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, yet its clinical impact remains unanswered. Doses delivered to the testicles during PCa RT usually remain <2 Gy and generate a decrease in testosterone levels ranging from -4.6% to -17%, unlikely to have any clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS Current data highlight the technical feasibility of sexual sparing for PCa RT. The proportion of erectile dysfunction attributable to the dose delivered to sexual structures is still largely unknown. While the ability to maintain sexual function over time is impacted by factors such as age or comorbidities, only selected patients are likely to benefit from sexual-sparing RT. PATIENT SUMMARY Technical advances in radiation therapy (RT) made it possible to significantly lower the dose delivered to sexual structures. While sexual function is known to decline with age, the preservation of sexual structures for prostate cancer RT is likely to be beneficial only in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Stephane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- CNRS, CRIStAL UMR 9189, Université de Lille & Centrale Lille, Lille, France
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, INSERM U1018 Oncostat, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Olivier Chapet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Ulrike Schick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Brest, France
| | - Manon Baty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Ingrid Masson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, Clinique La Croix-du-Sud, Quint-Fonsegrives, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matthew AG, McLeod D, Robinson JW, Walker L, Wassersug RJ, Elliott S, Guirguis S, Incze T, Trachtenberg L. Enhancing care: evaluating the impact of True North Sexual Health and Rehabilitation eTraining for healthcare providers working with prostate cancer patients and partners. Sex Med 2024; 12:qfae033. [PMID: 38883808 PMCID: PMC11176973 DOI: 10.1093/sexmed/qfae033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Educational programs that enhance healthcare providers' competence in managing the care of patients with sexual dysfunction following prostate cancer treatments are needed to facilitate comprehensive sexual health treatments for patients and their partners. Aim In this study we evaluated the impact of a real-world online sexual health educational intervention called the True North Sexual Health and Rehabilitation eTraining Program. This program is designed to increase healthcare providers' knowledge and self-efficacy in providing sexual healthcare to prostate cancer patients and their partners. Methods Healthcare providers were invited to join a 12-week virtual training program. Participants completed precourse surveys (n = 89), retrospective prepost surveys (n = 58), and a 3-month follow-up survey (subset n = 18) to assess retention of relevant outcomes. Additionally, a course satisfaction survey was administered to participants (n = 57) at the end of the course. Outcomes The main outcomes focused on participants' perceived knowledge and self-efficacy in conducting assessments and providing interventions for various relevant physical, functional, psychological, and relational domains of sexual dysfunction in prostate cancer patients and their partners. Results According to the retrospective analysis of post-then-pre-survey results, graduates perceived that their knowledge of and self-efficacy in providing sexual health counseling improved after completing the course. The 3-month follow-up survey indicated that the course graduate self-efficacy remained high 3 months after the course. Furthermore, the satisfaction survey indicated that a vast majority (98.2%) of participants were satisfied with the educational intervention. Clinical Implications This real-world sexual health educational intervention can increase self-efficacy and knowledge in healthcare providers who are supporting prostate cancer patients dealing with sexual dysfunction. Strengths and Limitations The use of a retrospective post-then-pre-survey helped to mitigate response shift bias while minimizing data gaps. However, it is important to note that this investigation was not a traditional research study and lacked a control group, thus limiting causal attributions. Conclusion The True North Sexual Health and Rehabilitation eTraining program acts as an accessible and effective resource for healthcare providers seeking specialized training in providing sexual healthcare for prostate cancer patients and their partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew G Matthew
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Deborah McLeod
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
| | - John W Robinson
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Lauren Walker
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Richard J Wassersug
- Cellular and Physiological Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Stacy Elliott
- BC Center for Sexual Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2K5, Canada
| | - Steven Guirguis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Taylor Incze
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada
| | - Lianne Trachtenberg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sibert NT, Soff J, La Ferla S, Quaranta M, Kremer A, Kowalski C. Transforming a Large-Scale Prostate Cancer Outcomes Dataset to the OMOP Common Data Model-Experiences from a Scientific Data Holder's Perspective. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2069. [PMID: 38893186 PMCID: PMC11171220 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
To enhance international and joint research collaborations in prostate cancer research, data from different sources should use a common data model (CDM) that enables researchers to share their analysis scripts and merge results. The OMOP CDM maintained by OHDSI is such a data model developed for a federated data analysis with partners from different institutions that want to jointly investigate research questions using clinical care data. The German Cancer Society as the scientific lead of the Prostate Cancer Outcomes (PCO) study gathers data from prostate cancer care including routine oncological care data and survey data (incl. patient-reported outcomes) and uses a common data specification (called OncoBox Research Prostate) for this purpose. To further enhance research collaborations outside the PCO study, the purpose of this article is to describe the process of transferring the PCO study data to the internationally well-established OMOP CDM. This process was carried out together with an IT company that specialised in supporting research institutions to transfer their data to OMOP CDM. Of n = 49,692 prostate cancer cases with 318 data fields each, n = 392 had to be excluded during the OMOPing process, and n = 247 of the data fields could be mapped to OMOP CDM. The resulting PostgreSQL database with OMOPed PCO study data is now ready to use within larger research collaborations such as the EU-funded EHDEN and OPTIMA consortium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Tabea Sibert
- Health Services Research Department, German Cancer Society, 14057 Berlin, Germany; (J.S.); (C.K.)
| | - Johannes Soff
- Health Services Research Department, German Cancer Society, 14057 Berlin, Germany; (J.S.); (C.K.)
| | - Sebastiano La Ferla
- ITTM SA, Esch-sur-Alzette, 4354 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg; (S.L.F.); (M.Q.); (A.K.)
| | - Maria Quaranta
- ITTM SA, Esch-sur-Alzette, 4354 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg; (S.L.F.); (M.Q.); (A.K.)
| | - Andreas Kremer
- ITTM SA, Esch-sur-Alzette, 4354 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg; (S.L.F.); (M.Q.); (A.K.)
| | - Christoph Kowalski
- Health Services Research Department, German Cancer Society, 14057 Berlin, Germany; (J.S.); (C.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alberti A, Nicoletti R, Castellani D, Yuan Y, Maggi M, Dibilio E, Resta GR, Makrides P, Sessa F, Sebastianelli A, Serni S, Gacci M, De Nunzio C, Teoh JYC, Campi R. Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Experience Measures After Active Surveillance Versus Radiation Therapy Versus Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Prospective Comparative Studies. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00138-X. [PMID: 38816298 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Current management options for localized prostate cancer (PCa) include radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT), and active surveillance (AS). Despite comparable oncological outcomes, there is still lack of evidence on their comparative effectiveness in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). We conducted a systematic review of studies comparing PROMs and PREMs after all recommended management options for localized PCa (RP, RT, AS). METHODS A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases in accordance with recommendations from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Office and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. All prospective clinical trials reporting PROMs and/or PREMs for comparisons of RP versus RT versus AS were included. A narrative synthesis was used to summarize the review findings. No quantitative synthesis was performed because of the heterogeneity and limitations of the studies available. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Our findings reveal that RP mostly affects urinary continence and sexual function, with better results for voiding symptoms in comparison to other treatments. RT was associated with greater impairment of bowel function and voiding symptoms. None of the treatments had a significant impact on mental or physical quality of life. Only a few studies reported PREMs, with a high rate of decision regret for all modalities (up to 23%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS All recommended treatments for localized PCa have an impact on PROMs and PREMs, but for different domains and with differing severity. We found significant heterogeneity in PROM collection, so standardization in real-world practice and clinical trials is warranted. Only a few studies have reported PREMs, highlighting an unmet need that should be explored in future studies. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed differences in patient reports of their outcomes and experiences after surgical prostate removal, radiotherapy, or active surveillance for prostate cancer. We found differences in the effects on urinary, bowel, and sexual functions among the treatments, but no difference for mental or physical quality of life. Our results can help doctors and prostate cancer patients in shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Alberti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Rossella Nicoletti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Yuhong Yuan
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Dibilio
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Raffaele Resta
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Pantelis Makrides
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Sessa
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Arcangelo Sebastianelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Gacci
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Jeremy Y C Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Petrelli F, Dottorini L, De Stefani A, Vavassori I, Luciani A. Localized prostate cancer in older patients: Radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy versus observation. J Geriatr Oncol 2024:101792. [PMID: 38802294 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study evaluates the effects of radical prostatectomy (RP) or irradiation on overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in older patients with localized prostate cancer (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a comprehensive literature review across PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception up to December 2023 to identify studies comparing the outcomes of surgery or radiotherapy (RT) versus observation in patients aged 65 and older with localized PC. We pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and PCSM using random-effects models. RESULTS Thirteen studies involving 284,066 patients were analyzed. Three were large randomized trials (RCTs) and 10 were retrospective studies. Overall survival with surgery was greater in observational studies (HR = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.59; P < 0.001) than in RCTs (HR = 0.84, 95%CI 0.72-0.98; P = 0.03). Data on PCSM from seven studies also indicated a significant benefit for RP in RCTs (HR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.3-0.73; P < 0.001) and observational studies (HR = 0.41, 95%CI 0.27-0.62; P < 0.001). Both analyses presented high heterogeneity (I2 = 90%, P < 0.001 and I2 = 65%, P = 0.01). An analysis of patients receiving RT indicated a significant, albeit smaller, OS (n = 7 studies) and PCSM (n = 5 studies) advantage (HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.59-0.79; P < 0.001; and HR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.44-0.82; P = 0.001) compared to observation (1 RCT and 8 observational studies). DISCUSSION The evidence suggests that patients with PC might consider opting for surgery as the main treatment option or, alternatively, for RT, as an alternative to observation, based on their individual medical history, life expectancy, and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fausto Petrelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Orest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Luciani
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Orest, Treviglio, BG, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tiruye T, Roder D, FitzGerald LM, O'Callaghan M, Moretti K, Caughey GE, Beckmann K. Impact of comorbidities on prostate cancer-specific mortality: A population-based cohort study. Prostate 2024. [PMID: 38798040 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
AIM To assess the impact of comorbidities on prostate cancer mortality. METHODS We studied 15,695 South Australian men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2003 and 2019 from state-wide administrative linked data sets. Comorbidity was measured 1-year before prostate cancer diagnosis using Rx-Risk, a medication-based comorbidity index. Flexible parametric competing risk regression was used to estimate the independent association between comorbidities and prostate cancer-specific mortality. Specific common comorbidities within Rx-Risk (cardiac disorders, diabetes, chronic airway diseases, depression and anxiety, thrombosis, and pain) were also assessed to determine their association with mortality. All models were adjusted for sociodemographic variables, tumor characteristics, and treatment type. RESULTS Prostate cancer-specific mortality was higher for patients with a Rx-Risk score ≥3 versus 0 (adjusted sub-hazard ratio (sHR) 1.34, 95% CI: 1.15-1.56). Lower comorbidity scores (Rx-Risk score 2 vs. 0 and Rx-Risk score 1 vs. 0) were not significantly associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality. Men who were using medications for cardiac disorders (sHR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.13-1.52), chronic airway disease (sHR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.44), depression and anxiety (sHR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02-1.35), and thrombosis (sHR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.04-1.42) were at increased risk of dying from prostate cancer compared with men not on those medications. Use of medications for diabetes and chronic pain were not associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality. All Rx-Risk score categories and the specific comorbidities were also associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION The findings showed that ≥3 comorbid conditions and specific comorbidities including cardiac disease, chronic airway disease, depression and anxiety, and thrombosis were associated with poor prostate cancer-specific survival. Appropriate management of these comorbidities may help to improve survival in prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tenaw Tiruye
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- School of Public Health, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia
| | - David Roder
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Liesel M FitzGerald
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - Michael O'Callaghan
- South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Adelaide, Australia
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia
| | - Kim Moretti
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Adelaide, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Gillian E Caughey
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kerri Beckmann
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mardani A, Farahani MA, Khachian A, Maleki M, Vaismoradi M. Qualitative exploration of sexual dysfunction and associated coping strategies among Iranian prostate cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:360. [PMID: 38753060 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08548-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our understanding of the experiences of prostate cancer survivors regarding their sexual life and related issues remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to explore sexual dysfunction and associated coping strategies among Iranian prostate cancer survivors. METHODS A qualitative study was undertaken. Participants were 15 Iranian prostate cancer survivors chosen using purposeful sampling. Data collection involved conducting in-depth semi-structured interviews, followed by the utilization of the conventional qualitative content analysis method for data analysis. RESULTS Three themes were developed: (a) suspension of sexual life-treatment for prostate cancer significantly impacted participants' sexual lives; (b) emotional resilience and psychological coping strategies-various psychological strategies were used to tackle sexual dysfunction; (c) efforts to regain sexual function-several strategies were applied to enhance sexual performance. CONCLUSION Our study findings provide insights into the experiences of prostate cancer survivors and subsequent shifts in their sexual dynamics and coping with the disease. Healthcare providers should actively identify patients' concerns and develop culturally tailored care strategies to address sexual challenges and improve coping among prostate cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas Mardani
- Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
| | - Mansoureh Ashghali Farahani
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alice Khachian
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Maryam Maleki
- Department of Pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
| | - Mojtaba Vaismoradi
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway
- Faculty of Science and Health, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xu J, Bock CH, Janisse J, Woo J, Cher ML, Ginsburg K, Yacoub R, Goodman M. Determinants of active surveillance uptake in a diverse population-based cohort of men with low-risk prostate cancer: The Treatment Options in Prostate Cancer Study (TOPCS). Cancer 2024; 130:1797-1806. [PMID: 38247317 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) is the preferred strategy for low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC); however, limited data on determinants of AS adoption exist, particularly among Black men. METHODS Black and White newly diagnosed (from January 2014 through June 2017) patients with LRPC ≤75 years of age were identified through metro-Detroit and Georgia population-based cancer registries and completed a survey evaluating factors influencing AS uptake. RESULTS Among 1688 study participants, 57% chose AS (51% of Black participants, 61% of White) over definitive treatment. In the unadjusted analysis, patient factors associated with initial AS uptake included older age, White race, and higher education. However, after adjusting for covariates, none of these factors was significant predictors of AS uptake. The strongest determinant of AS uptake was the AS recommendation by a urologist (adjusted prevalence ratio, 6.59, 95% CI, 4.84-8.97). Other factors associated with the decision to undergo AS included a shared patient-physician treatment decision, greater prostate cancer knowledge, and residence in metro-Detroit compared with Georgia. Conversely, men whose decision was strongly influenced by the desire to achieve "cure" or "live longer" with treatment and those who perceived their LRPC diagnosis as more serious were less likely to choose AS. CONCLUSIONS In this contemporary sample, the majority of patients with newly diagnosed LRPC chose AS. Although the input from their urologists was highly influential, several patient decisional and psychological factors were independently associated with AS uptake. These data shed new light on potentially modifiable factors that can help further increase AS uptake among patients with LRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinping Xu
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Cathryn H Bock
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - James Janisse
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Justin Woo
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael L Cher
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Kevin Ginsburg
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Rami Yacoub
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Michael Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Devlies W, Silversmit G, Ameye F, Dekuyper P, Quackels T, Roumeguère T, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Van Damme N, Claessens F, Everaerts W, Joniau S. Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated by Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with or Without Adjuvant Treatments. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00107-X. [PMID: 38755093 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is used frequently to treat prostate cancer; yet, prospective data on the quality of life and functional outcomes are lacking. OBJECTIVE To assess the quality of life and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy in different risk groups with or without adjuvant treatments. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Be-RALP database is a prospective multicentre database that covers 9235 RALP cases from 2009 until 2016. Of these 9235 patients, 2336 high-risk prostate cancer patients were matched with low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. INTERVENTION Patients were treated with RALP only or followed by radiotherapy and/or hormone treatment. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We used a mixed-model analysis to longitudinally analyse quality of life, urinary function, and erectile function between risk groups with or without additional treatments. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Risk group was not significant in predicting quality of life, erectile function, or urinary function after RALP. Postoperative treatment (hormone and/or radiotherapy treatment) was significant in predicting International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), sexual activity, and sexual functioning. CONCLUSIONS Risk group was not linked with clinically relevant declines in functional outcomes after RALP. The observed functional outcomes and quality of life are in favour of considering RALP for high-risk prostate cancer. Postoperative treatment resulted in lower erectile function measures without clinically relevant changes in quality of life and urinary functions. Hormone therapy seems to have the most prominent negative effects on these outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY This study investigated the quality of life, and urinary and erectile function in patients with aggressive and less aggressive prostate cancer after surgery only or in combination with hormones or radiation. We found that quality of life recovers completely, while erectile and urinary function recovers only partially after surgery. Aggressiveness of the disease had a minimal effect on the outcomes; yet, postoperative treatments lowered erectile function further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wout Devlies
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | - Filip Ameye
- Department of Urology, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Dekuyper
- Department of Urology, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thierry Quackels
- Department of Urology, Université Libre De Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Frank Claessens
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wouter Everaerts
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Peltier A, van Velthoven R, Baudewyns A, Assenmacher G, Lemort M, Lefebvre Y, Sirtaine N, Diamand R. Targeted microwave ablation for prostate cancer (FOSTINE1b): a prospective 'ablate-and-resect' study. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 38742416 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess histopathological outcomes, as well as feasibility and safety of targeted microwave ablation (TMA) via the Trinity® system (KOELIS, La Tronche, France). PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospective, single-institution, interventional Phase IIa study with an 'ablate-and-resect' design. In all, 11 patients diagnosed with localised prostate cancer (PCa) underwent TMA via the Trinity system under conscious sedation in an outpatient setting using a single transrectal TATO® 18-G antenna with different treatment regimens. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) were conducted at 7 days and 1 month after TMA, respectively. Nine patients received RARP, and two patients chose to withdraw their consent following TMA. These men chose an active surveillance protocol upon confirmation of a low-risk prostate cancer diagnosis. Functional outcomes and adverse events were evaluated at baseline and follow-up visits using validated questionnaires. Prostate volumetry and confirmation of necrosis were carried out through MRI and whole-mount histopathological examination. RESULTS The TMA was successfully executed, and all patients were discharged on the same day. No severe adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Grade ≥3) were reported at the 7-day and 1-month follow-up visits. Additionally, no declines were observed in urinary, sexual and ejaculation functional outcomes. T1-weighted MRI revealed clear and well-defined ablation zones. The RARP was executed without difficulty, particularly during the dissection of the posterior plane. As a result, no intraoperative complications were encountered. Histopathological assessment on surgical specimens confirmed the absence of viable cells, indicating complete necrosis of the ablative zone if a power intensity >10 W was used during TMA. Ablation zone volumetry revealed no notable distinctions between the three-dimensional segmentation of the virtual ablation zone at TMA (median volume: 2 mL) and MRI (median volume: 1.923 mL). Conversely, a significant reduction was noted in the surgical specimen (median volume: 0.221 mL). CONCLUSIONS Targeted microwave ablation via the Trinity system for localised PCa treatment proves to be a secure and feasible procedure, with complete necrosis evidence within the ablation zone on surgical specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Peltier
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roland van Velthoven
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arthur Baudewyns
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Grégoire Assenmacher
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marc Lemort
- Department of Radiology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yolene Lefebvre
- Department of Radiology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Sirtaine
- Department of Pathology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Romain Diamand
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute-Erasme Hospital, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gartrell BA, Phalguni A, Bajko P, Mundle SD, McCarthy SA, Brookman-May SD, De Solda F, Jain R, Yu Ko W, Ploussard G, Hadaschik B. Influential Factors Impacting Treatment Decision-making and Decision Regret in Patients with Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00106-8. [PMID: 38744587 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Treatment decision-making (TDM) for patients with localized (LPC) or locally advanced (LAPC) prostate cancer is complex, and post-treatment decision regret (DR) is common. The factors driving TDM or predicting DR remain understudied. OBJECTIVE Two systematic literature reviews were conducted to explore the factors associated with TDM and DR. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Three online databases, select congress proceedings, and gray literature were searched (September 2022). Publications on TDM and DR in LPC/LAPC were prioritized based on the following: 2012 onward, ≥100 patients, journal article, and quantitative data. The Preferred Reporting Items Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed. Influential factors were those with p < 0.05; for TDM, factors described as "a decision driver", "associated", "influential", or "significant" were also included. The key factors were determined by number of studies, consistency of evidence, and study quality. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Seventy-five publications (68 studies) reported TDM. Patient participation in TDM was reported in 34 publications; overall, patients preferred an active/shared role. Of 39 influential TDM factors, age, ethnicity, external factors (physician recommendation most common), and treatment characteristics/toxicity were key. Forty-nine publications reported DR. The proportion of patients experiencing DR varied by treatment type: 7-43% (active surveillance), 12-57% (radical prostatectomy), 1-49% (radiotherapy), 28-49% (androgen-deprivation therapy), and 21-47% (combination therapy). Of 42 significant DR factors, treatment toxicity (sexual/urinary/bowel dysfunction), patient role in TDM, and treatment type were key. CONCLUSIONS The key factors impacting TDM were physician recommendation, age, ethnicity, and treatment characteristics. Treatment toxicity and TDM approach were the key factors influencing DR. To help patients navigate factors influencing TDM and to limit DR, a shared, consensual TDM approach between patients, caregivers, and physicians is needed. PATIENT SUMMARY We looked at factors influencing treatment decision-making (TDM) and decision regret (DR) in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. The key factors influencing TDM were doctor's recommendation, patient age/ethnicity, and treatment side effects. A shared, consensual TDM approach between patients and doctors was found to limit DR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Gartrell
- Departments of Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
| | - Angaja Phalguni
- Evidence Synthesis, Genesis Research Group, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paulina Bajko
- Evidence Synthesis, Genesis Research Group, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Suneel D Mundle
- Global Medical Affairs, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Sharon A McCarthy
- Clinical Research Oncology, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Sabine D Brookman-May
- Clinical Research Oncology, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA; Ludwig-Maximilians-University, München, Germany
| | - Francesco De Solda
- Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Ruhee Jain
- Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Wellam Yu Ko
- University of British Columbia Men's Health Research Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Martin RM, Turner EL, Young GJ, Metcalfe C, Walsh EI, Lane JA, Sterne JAC, Noble S, Holding P, Ben-Shlomo Y, Williams NJ, Pashayan N, Bui MN, Albertsen PC, Seibert TM, Zietman AL, Oxley J, Adolfsson J, Mason MD, Davey Smith G, Neal DE, Hamdy FC, Donovan JL. Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and 15-Year Prostate Cancer Mortality: A Secondary Analysis of the CAP Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2024; 331:1460-1470. [PMID: 38581198 PMCID: PMC10999004 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.4011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
Importance The Cluster Randomized Trial of PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer (CAP) reported no effect of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening on prostate cancer mortality at a median 10-year follow-up (primary outcome), but the long-term effects of PSA screening on prostate cancer mortality remain unclear. Objective To evaluate the effect of a single invitation for PSA screening on prostate cancer-specific mortality at a median 15-year follow-up compared with no invitation for screening. Design, Setting, and Participants This secondary analysis of the CAP randomized clinical trial included men aged 50 to 69 years identified at 573 primary care practices in England and Wales. Primary care practices were randomized between September 25, 2001, and August 24, 2007, and men were enrolled between January 8, 2002, and January 20, 2009. Follow-up was completed on March 31, 2021. Intervention Men received a single invitation for a PSA screening test with subsequent diagnostic tests if the PSA level was 3.0 ng/mL or higher. The control group received standard practice (no invitation). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was reported previously. Of 8 prespecified secondary outcomes, results of 4 were reported previously. The 4 remaining prespecified secondary outcomes at 15-year follow-up were prostate cancer-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, and prostate cancer stage and Gleason grade at diagnosis. Results Of 415 357 eligible men (mean [SD] age, 59.0 [5.6] years), 98% were included in these analyses. Overall, 12 013 and 12 958 men with a prostate cancer diagnosis were in the intervention and control groups, respectively (15-year cumulative risk, 7.08% [95% CI, 6.95%-7.21%] and 6.94% [95% CI, 6.82%-7.06%], respectively). At a median 15-year follow-up, 1199 men in the intervention group (0.69% [95% CI, 0.65%-0.73%]) and 1451 men in the control group (0.78% [95% CI, 0.73%-0.82%]) died of prostate cancer (rate ratio [RR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85-0.99]; P = .03). Compared with the control, the PSA screening intervention increased detection of low-grade (Gleason score [GS] ≤6: 2.2% vs 1.6%; P < .001) and localized (T1/T2: 3.6% vs 3.1%; P < .001) disease but not intermediate (GS of 7), high-grade (GS ≥8), locally advanced (T3), or distally advanced (T4/N1/M1) tumors. There were 45 084 all-cause deaths in the intervention group (23.2% [95% CI, 23.0%-23.4%]) and 50 336 deaths in the control group (23.3% [95% CI, 23.1%-23.5%]) (RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.94-1.01]; P = .11). Eight of the prostate cancer deaths in the intervention group (0.7%) and 7 deaths in the control group (0.5%) were related to a diagnostic biopsy or prostate cancer treatment. Conclusions and Relevance In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, a single invitation for PSA screening compared with standard practice without routine screening reduced prostate cancer deaths at a median follow-up of 15 years. However, the absolute reduction in deaths was small. Trial Registration isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN92187251.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard M. Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Emma L. Turner
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Grace J. Young
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Eleanor I. Walsh
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - J. Athene Lane
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan A. C. Sterne
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Health Data Research UK South-West, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sian Noble
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Holding
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Yoav Ben-Shlomo
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi J. Williams
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mai Ngoc Bui
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter C. Albertsen
- Division of Urology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington
| | - Tyler M. Seibert
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Anthony L. Zietman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Adolfsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Malcolm D. Mason
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - George Davey Smith
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - David E. Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Freddie C. Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny L. Donovan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Qazi SU, Altaf Z, Zafar M, Tariq MA, Khalid A, Kaleem A, Saad E, Qazi S. Development of depression in patients using androgen deprivation therapy: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Prostate 2024; 84:525-538. [PMID: 38372065 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an effective treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Multiple studies have highlighted serious consequences this therapy poses to mental health, particularly depression. We aimed to review the incidence and association between ADT in men with PCa and the risk of depression. METHODS We systematically searched multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Scopus till August 2023 for studies that compared ADT versus control for treating PCa reporting depression as outcome. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models and results presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. RESULTS A total of 38 studies (17 retrospective studies, 16 prospective studies, two cross-sectional studies and two randomized trials) with 360,650 subjects met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The estimated pooled incidence of depression among ADT patients is 209.5 (95% CI = 122.3; 312.2) per 1000 patients. There is statistically significant relationship between ADT treatment and depression (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.28, 1.67; p = 0, I2 = 86.4%). The results remained consistent across various subgroups. No risk of publication bias was detected by funnel plot and Eggers's test (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION There is a higher risk of depression for men receiving ADT. Further studies evaluating optimal treatments for depression in men on ADT are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shurjeel Uddin Qazi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Zahabia Altaf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Mariam Zafar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Ali Tariq
- Department of Surgery, Dow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Areesha Khalid
- Department of Surgery, Dow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Aleesha Kaleem
- Department of Surgery, Dow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Emaan Saad
- Department of Surgery, Dow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sana Qazi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bhatt NR, Pavithran A, Ilie C, Smith L, Doherty R. Post-prostatectomy incontinence: a guideline of guidelines. BJU Int 2024; 133:513-523. [PMID: 38009420 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
AIM To provide a comprehensive review of guidelines from various professional organisations on the work-up and management of post-prostatectomy Incontinence (PPI). MATERIALS AND METHODS The following guidelines were included in this review: European Association of Urology (EAU 2023), American Urological Association/Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (AUA/SUFU 2019), International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI, 2018), the Canadian Urological Association (CUA, 2012) and the Urological Society of India (USI, 2018). RESULTS In general, the guidelines concur regarding the significance of conducting a comprehensive history and physical examination for patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI). However, there are variations among the guidelines concerning the recommended additional investigations. In cases of troublesome PPI, male slings are typically recommended for mild to moderate urinary incontinence (UI), while artificial urinary sphincters are preferred for moderate to severe UI, although the precise definition of this severity remains unclear. The guidelines provided by AUA/SUFU and the ICI have offered suggestions for managing complications or persistent/recurrent UI post-surgery, though some differences can be observed within these recommendations as well. CONCLUSION This is a first of its kind review encompassing Guidelines on PPI spanning over a decade. Although guidelines share overarching principles, nuanced variations persist, posing challenges for clinicians. This compilation consolidates and highlights both the similarities and differences among guidelines, providing a comprehensive overview of PPI diagnosis and management for practitioners. It is our expectation that as more evidence emerges in this and other areas of PPI management, the guidelines will converge and address crucial patient-centric aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cristian Ilie
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, Norwich, UK
| | - Lee Smith
- Centre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ruth Doherty
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mohamad O, Nicosia L, Mathier E, Riggenbach E, Zamboglou C, Aebersold DM, Alongi F, Shelan M. Focal brachytherapy as definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brachytherapy 2024; 23:309-320. [PMID: 38431441 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we describe the oncologic and toxicity outcomes of definitive focal brachytherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS A PROSPERO registered study (CRD42023410170) was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies between 2000 and 2022. Two authors independently performed the initial search. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) was defined as the primary endpoint for the meta-analysis. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were conducted to calculate effect size and quantify heterogeneity. We also describe the side effects and local recurrence patterns of focal brachytherapy. RESULTS Ten studies were identified and included 315 patients treated using focal brachytherapy as a definitive treatment. Mean (SD) age was 67.65 (7.9) years and mean (SD) PSA was 7.15 (2.7) ng/mL. Most patients (n = 236, 75%) underwent LDR Brachytherapy and 25% received HDR brachytherapy. Among the participants, 147 (46.5%) had a Gleason score ≤6, and 169 (53.5%) had a Gleason score ≥7. Only 11 (3.5%) patients received ADT. Overall, bRFS rate at median follow-up 4 years (Range: 1-6.42 years) was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82-95%). Acute Grade ≤ 2 GU and GI toxicities were reported in 22 (7%) and 11 (3.5%) patients, respectively. Late Grade ≤ 2 GU and GI toxicity were reported in 6 (2%) and 14 (4.4%) patients, respectively. One case of prostate hemorrhage due to improper foley removal was noted but otherwise no acute or late Grade 3 or higher GI or GU toxicity related to radiotherapy was reported. CONCLUSION Overall, definitive focal brachytherapy has a favorable toxicity profile. Oncologic outcomes are yet to mature. The evidence is limited by the small number of studies with low patients' number, across study heterogeneity, and possibility of publication bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osama Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Italy
| | - Etienne Mathier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Elena Riggenbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fillipo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Italy
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Duwe G, Boehm K, Becker G, Ruckes C, Sparwasser P, Haack M, Dotzauer R, Thomas A, Mager R, Tsaur I, Neumann CCM, Feick G, Carl G, Brandt MP, Haferkamp A, Höfner T. Individualized center-based analysis of urinary and sexual functional outcome after radical prostatectomy based on the prostate cancer outcome study: a post hoc pathway to patient outcome measurement analysis for quality improvement. World J Urol 2024; 42:236. [PMID: 38619659 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04950-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluate differences of patient-reported outcome measurements (PROM) based urinary continence and sexual function 12 months after radical prostatectomy (RPE) based on perioperative, surgical, and patient-specific characteristics in a large European academic urology center. MATERIALS AND METHODS All men enrolled in the Prostate Cancer Outcome Study (PCO) study who were treated with RPE between 2017 and 2021 completed EPIC-26 information surveys before and 12 months after RPE. Survey data were linked to clinical data of our institution. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the correlation between individual surgeons, patient characteristics, patient clinical data, and their urinary continence and sexual function. RESULTS In total, data of 429 men were analyzed: unstratified mean (SD) EPIC-26 domain score for urinary function decreased from 93.3 (0.7) to 60.4 (1.5) one year after RPE, respectively for sexual function from 64.95 (1.6) to 23.24 (1.1). Patients with preoperative adequate urinary function (EPIC-26 score > 80) reported significantly different mean urinary function scores between 53.35 (28.88) and 66.25 (25.15), p= 0.001, stratified by surgeons experience. On binary logistic regression analyses, only nerve sparing techniques (OR: 1,83, 95% CI: 1.01;3.21; p = 0.045) and low body mass index (OR: 0.91, CI: 0.85;0.99, p= 0.032) predicted adequate postoperative urinary function. CONCLUSIONS The results show how using provider-specific data from a larger cohort study enables to develop institution-specific analysis for functional outcomes after RPE. These models can be used for internal quality improvement as well as enhanced and provider-specific patient communication and shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Duwe
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Katharina Boehm
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav-Carus, TU Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gerrit Becker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christian Ruckes
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials Mainz, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Sparwasser
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maximilian Haack
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Robert Dotzauer
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Anita Thomas
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Rene Mager
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christopher C M Neumann
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Günther Feick
- Federal Association of German Prostate Cancer Patient Support Groups, Thomas-Mann Strasse 40, 55311, Bonn, Germany
| | - Günter Carl
- Federal Association of German Prostate Cancer Patient Support Groups, Thomas-Mann Strasse 40, 55311, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maximilian Peter Brandt
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Höfner
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Fadingerstrasse 1, 4020, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Manenti G, Perretta T, Nezzo M, Fraioli FR, Carreri B, Gigliotti PE, Micillo A, Malizia A, Di Giovanni D, Ryan CP, Garaci FG. Transperineal Laser Ablation (TPLA) Treatment of Focal Low-Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1404. [PMID: 38611082 PMCID: PMC11011049 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: This interventional pilot study aimed to evaluate the short-term (3 years) efficacy of focal laser ablation (FLA) in treating the index lesion of low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer, along with assessing the safety of the procedure (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04045756). Methods: Forty patients aged between 46 and 86 with histologically proven organ-confined prostate cancer and low-to-intermediate progression risk were included. FLA was performed under percutaneous fusion magnetic resonance/ultrasound guidance in a Day Hospital setting under local anesthesia. Patients underwent regular clinical and functional assessments through the international index of erectile function (IIEF-5) and the International Prostatism Symptom Score (IPSS), PSA measurements, post-procedure MRI scans, and biopsies at 36 months or if positive findings were detected earlier. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess trends in PSA levels and cavity dimensions over time. Results: Forty patients were initially included, with fifteen lost to follow-up. At 36 months, a mean PSA reduction of 60% was observed, and 80% of MRI scans showed no signs of in-field clinically significant residual/recurrent cancer. Biopsies at 36 months revealed no malignant findings in 20 patients. No deterioration in sexual function or urinary symptoms was recorded. Conclusions: FLA appears to be safe, feasible, and effective in the index lesion treatment of low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with a high rate of tumor eradication and preservation of quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gugliemo Manenti
- Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Perretta
- Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Nezzo
- Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Romeo Fraioli
- Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Beatrice Carreri
- Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Elda Gigliotti
- Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Micillo
- Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Malizia
- Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Di Giovanni
- Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata Engineering Macro Area, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Colleen Patricia Ryan
- Laboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Giuseppe Garaci
- Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Vanneste BG, Skouteris B, Pinheiro LC, Voncken R, Van Limbergen EJ, Lutgens L, Fonteyne V, Praet CV, Lumen N, Sheu R, Stock R, Stone NN. A unified strategy to focal brachytherapy incorporating transperineal biopsy, image fusion, and real-time implantation with and without rectal spacer simulated in prostate phantoms. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2024; 16:139-149. [PMID: 38808209 PMCID: PMC11129653 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2024.139280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To develop an approach to the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer using one platform for fusion biopsy, followed by focal gland ablation utilizing permanent prostate brachytherapy with and without a rectal spacer. Material and methods Prostate phantoms containing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) regions of interest (ROI) underwent fusion biopsy, followed by image co-registration of positive sites to a treatment planning brachytherapy program. A partial hemi-ablation and both posterior lobes using a Mick applicator and linked stranded seeds were simulated. Dummy sources were modeled as iodine-125 (125I) with a prescribed dose of at least 210 Gy to gross tumor (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV), as defined by mpMRI visible ROI and surrounding negative biopsy sites. Computer tomograms (CT) were performed post-implant prior to and after rectal spacer insertion. Different prostate and rectal constraints were compared with and without the spacer. Results The intra-operative focal volumes of CTV ranged from 6.2 to 14.9 cc (mean, 11.3 cc), and the ratio of focal volume/whole prostate volume ranged between 0.19 and 0.42 (mean, 0.31). The intra- and post-operative mean focal D90 of GTV, CTV, and for the entire prostate gland was 265 Gy and 235 Gy, 214 Gy and 213 Gy, and 66.1 Gy and 57 Gy, respectively. On average, 13 mm separation was achieved between the prostate and the rectum (range, 12-14 mm) on post-operative CT. The mean doses in Gy to 2 cc of the rectum (D2cc) without spacer vs. with spacer were 39.8 Gy vs. 32.6 Gy, respectively. Conclusions Doses above 200 Gy and the implantation of seeds in clinically significant region for focal therapy in phantoms are feasible. All rectal dosimetric parameters improved for the spacer implants, as compared with the non-spacer implants. Further validation of this concept is warranted in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben G.L. Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | - Robert Voncken
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Evert J. Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ludy Lutgens
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Charles Van Praet
- Department of Urology, ERN Accredited Center, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Urology, ERN Accredited Center, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Rendi Sheu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY, United States
| | - Richard Stock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY, United States
| | - Nelson N. Stone
- Department of Urology and Radiation Oncology, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Roberts NA, Esler R, Pearce A, Wyld D, Smith M, Woollett K, Mazariego C, Roberts MJ. Exploring Unmet Needs in Prostate Cancer Care: A Cross-sectional Descriptive Study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 62:36-42. [PMID: 38585211 PMCID: PMC10998272 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Prostate cancer, the most common cancer among men worldwide, has significant impact on quality of life. Supportive care needs for those affected by prostate cancer are not well understood. This study aims to describe patient-reported unmet needs and explore supportive care priorities of men treated for prostate cancer. Methods A cross-sectional survey was distributed to all men who had accessed prostate cancer services (including surgical, radiation, and medical oncology treatment modalities) at a tertiary hospital. The survey included qualitative questions exploring patient experience and a validated patient-reported outcome measure (Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form 34). Clinical information was collected. Analyses included, descriptive statistics, multivariate logistic regression models and qualitative analyses using a framework method. Key findings and limitations A total of 162 participants provided survey data. Domains about information, self-management, and sexual function were the highest ranked items with unmet needs. A qualitative analysis also identified "relationships", "information", and "the value of hindsight" constructs. Participants who identified three or more unmet needs expressed treatment regret (odds ratio 5.92, 1.98-22.23, p = 0.01). Conclusions and clinical implications Understanding the unmet needs of patients may better inform supportive care interventions that address what is important to patients. Importantly, participants valued relationships. There may be opportunities to better meet the needs of patients by improving access to information and self-management resources, particularly around sexuality. Further research is warranted. Patient summary Prostate cancer and its treatment impacts are not well understood. Prioritisation of relationships and improving access to information and self-management resources are important. Further attention to prostate cancer supportive care in clinical practice is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha A. Roberts
- Centre for Clinical Research, Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Rachel Esler
- Department of Urology, Cancer Care Services, Surgery and Peri-operative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Adam Pearce
- Department of Urology, Cancer Care Services, Surgery and Peri-operative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - David Wyld
- Centre for Clinical Research, Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Urology, Cancer Care Services, Surgery and Peri-operative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Michael Smith
- Department of Urology, Cancer Care Services, Surgery and Peri-operative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
| | - Kaylene Woollett
- Department of Urology, Cancer Care Services, Surgery and Peri-operative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Carolyn Mazariego
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Kings Cross, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew J. Roberts
- Centre for Clinical Research, Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Urology, Cancer Care Services, Surgery and Peri-operative Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Marvaso G, Corrao G, Repetti I, Lorubbio C, Bellerba F, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, Zerini D, Alessi S, Luzzago S, Mistretta FA, Fodor C, Cambria R, Cattani F, Ceci F, Musi G, De Cobelli O, Zilli T, Gandini S, Orecchia R, Petralia G, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Extreme-hypofractionated RT with concomitant boost to the DIL in PCa: a 5-year update on oncological and patient-reported outcomes for the phase II trial "GIVE ME FIVE". World J Urol 2024; 42:169. [PMID: 38492078 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04876-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM The present work reports updated oncological results and patients-reported outcomes at 5 years of phase II trial "Short-term high precision RT for early prostate cancer with SIB to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) for patients with early-stage PCa". METHODS Data from patients enrolled within AIRC IG-13218 (NCT01913717) trial were analyzed. Clinical and GU/GI toxicity assessment and PSA measurements were performed every 3 months for at least 2 years after RT end. QoL of enrolled patients was assessed by IPSS, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-PR25, and IIEF-5. Patients' score changes were calculated at the end of RT and at 1, 12, and 60 months after RT. RESULTS A total of 65 patients were included. At a median follow-up of 5 years, OS resulted 86%. Biochemical and clinical progression-free survival at 5 years were 95%. The median PSA at baseline was 6.07 ng/ml, while at last follow-up resulted 0.25 ng/ml. IPSS showed a statistically significant variation in urinary function from baseline (p = 0.002), with the most relevant deterioration 1 month after RT, with a recovery toward baseline at 12 months (p ≤ 0.0001). A numerical improvement in QoL according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 has been reported although not statistically significant. No change in sexual activity was recorded after RT. CONCLUSIONS The study confirms that extreme hypofractionation with a DIL boost is safe and effective, with no severe effects on the QoL. The increasing dose to the DIL does not worsen the RT toxicity, thus opening the possibility of an even more escalated treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Repetti
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Lorubbio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Bellerba
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Zerini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sarah Alessi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Alessandro Mistretta
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Cambria
- Medical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Medical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Neilsen BK, Ma TM, Akingbemi WO, Neylon J, Casado MC, Sharma S, Sheng K, Ruan D, Low DA, Yang Y, Valle LF, Steinberg ML, Lamb JM, Cao M, Kishan AU. Impact of Interfractional Bladder and Trigone Displacement and Deformation on Radiation Exposure and Subsequent Acute Genitourinary Toxicity: A Post Hoc Analysis of Patients Treated with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in a Phase 3 Randomized Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:986-997. [PMID: 37871887 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Emerging data suggest that trigone dosimetry may be more associated with poststereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) urinary toxicity than whole bladder dosimetry. We quantify the dosimetric effect of interfractional displacement and deformation of the whole bladder and trigone during prostate SBRT using on-board, pretreatment 0.35T magnetic resonance images (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS Seventy-seven patients treated with MRI-guided prostate SBRT (40 Gy/5 fractions) on the MRI arm of a phase 3 single-center randomized trial were included. Bladder and trigone structures were contoured on images obtained from a 0.35T simulation MRI and 5 on-board pretreatment MRIs. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) scores and changes in volume between simulation and daily treatments were calculated. Dosimetric parameters including Dmax, D0.03 cc, Dmean, V40 Gy, V39 Gy, V38 Gy, and V20 Gy for the bladder and trigone for the simulation and daily treatments were collected. Both physician-scored (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03 scale) as well as patient-reported (International Prostate Symptom Scores and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 scores) acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS The average treatment bladder volume was about 30% smaller than the simulation bladder volume; however, the trigone volume remained fairly consistent despite being positively correlated with total bladder volume. Overall, the trigone accounted for <2% of the bladder volume. Median DSC for the bladder was 0.79, whereas the median DSC of the trigone was only 0.33. No statistically significant associations between our selected bladder and trigonal dosimetric parameters and grade ≥2 GU toxicity were identified, although numerically, patients with GU toxicity (grade ≥2) had higher intermediate doses to the bladder (V20 Gy and Dmean) and larger volumes exposed to higher doses in the trigone (V40 Gy, V39 Gy, and V38 Gy). CONCLUSIONS The trigone exhibits little volume change, but considerable interfractional displacement/deformation. As a result, the relative volume of the trigone receiving high doses during prostate SBRT varies substantially between fractions, which could influence GU toxicity and may not be predicted by radiation planning dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth K Neilsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Jack Neylon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Maria C Casado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sahil Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Luca F Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - James M Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Potosky AL, Ahn J, Xia Y, Lin L, Chen RC, Graves KD, Pan W, Fall-Dickson JM, Keegan THM, Paddock LE, Wu XC, Shrestha A, Reeve BB. Demographic and Clinical Factors Associated With Health-Related Quality-of-Life Profiles Among Prostate Cancer Survivors. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2400076. [PMID: 38466917 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to describe the prevalence and predictors of symptom and function clusters related to physical, emotional, and social components of general health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a population-based sample of prostate cancer (PCa) survivors. METHODS Participants (N = 1,162) completed a baseline survey at a median of 9 months after diagnosis to ascertain the co-occurrence of eight symptom and functional domains that are common across all cancers and not treatment-specific. We used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify subgroup profiles of survivors with low, moderate, or high HRQOL levels. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to identify clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with survivors' membership in the low versus moderate or high HRQOL profile. RESULTS The LPA identified 16% of survivors who were categorized in the low HRQOL profile at baseline, indicative of the highest symptom burden and lowest functioning. Factors related to survivors' membership in the low versus higher HRQOL profile groups included less than age 65 years at diagnosis, identifying as non-Hispanic Black race, not working, being a former versus never smoker, systemic therapy, less companionship, more comorbidities, lower health care financial well-being, or less spirituality. Several factors remained associated with remaining in the low versus higher HRQOL profiles on the follow-up survey (n = 699), including younger age, Black race, comorbidity, and lower financial and spiritual well-being. CONCLUSION About one of six PCa survivors experienced elevated physical and psychosocial symptoms that were independent of local curative therapy, but with younger age, race, comorbidity, and lower financial and spiritual well-being as stable risk factors for poor HRQOL over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnold L Potosky
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Yi Xia
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Li Lin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Center for Health Measurement, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | - Kristi D Graves
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Wei Pan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Jane M Fall-Dickson
- Georgetown University School of Nursing, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
- Daniel K. Inouye School of Nursing, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
| | - Theresa H M Keegan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California-Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Lisa E Paddock
- Rutgers School of Public Health and Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public Health, Louisiana Tumor Registry, New Orleans, LA
| | - Anshu Shrestha
- Public Health Institute, Cancer Registry of Greater California, Sacramento, CA
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Center for Health Measurement, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Miyazawa Y, Koike H, Oka D, Kawamura H, Kubo N, Miyasaka Y, Onishi M, Syuto T, Sekine Y, Matsui H, Ohno T, Suzuki K. Comparison of sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and carbon-ion radiotherapy for Japanese prostate cancer patients using propensity score matching. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:300. [PMID: 38443871 PMCID: PMC10916055 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12062-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality of life of patients is an important consideration when selecting treatments for localized prostate cancer (PCa). We retrospectively compared sexual function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) using propensity score matching. METHODS In total, 127 Japanese PCa patients treated with RARP and 190 treated with CIRT monotherapy were evaluated. We evaluated the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) score before treatment and 12 and 24 months after treatment. After propensity score matching, data from 101 patients from each group were analyzed. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gunma University Hospital (no. IRB2020-050, 1839). RESULTS After propensity score matching, the mean EPIC sexual function summary scores in the RARP and CIRT groups were 46.4 and 48.2, respectively. At 12 and 24 months after treatment, these scores were 27.9 (39.9% decrease) and 28.2 (39.2% decrease) in the RARP group and 41.4 (14.1% decrease) and 41.6 (13.7% decrease) in the CIRT group, respectively. Both groups demonstrated significantly decreased scores after 12 and 24 months of treatment compared to before treatment (all p < 0.05). At 12 and 24 months, the sexual function summary score was significantly higher in the CIRT group than in the RARP group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS There was a smaller decrease in the EPIC sexual function score in the CIRT group than in the RARP group. These results provide useful information for treatment decision-making of Japanese PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiyuki Miyazawa
- Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine & Gunma University Hospital, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, 3718511, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
| | - Hidekazu Koike
- Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine & Gunma University Hospital, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, 3718511, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | | | - Hidemasa Kawamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Nobuteru Kubo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Yuhei Miyasaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Masahiro Onishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | | | - Yoshitaka Sekine
- Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine & Gunma University Hospital, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, 3718511, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Matsui
- Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine & Gunma University Hospital, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, 3718511, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine & Gunma University Hospital, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, 3718511, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sun J, Tian T, Wang N, Jing X, Qiu L, Cui H, Liu Z, Liu J, Yan L, Li D. Pretreatment level of serum sialic acid predicts both qualitative and quantitative bone metastases of prostate cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 15:1338420. [PMID: 38384968 PMCID: PMC10880016 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1338420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Recently, serum sialic acid (SA) has emerged as a distinct prognostic marker for prostate cancer (PCa) and bone metastases, warranting differential treatment and prognosis for low-volume (LVD) and high-volume disease (HVD). In clinical settings, evaluating bone metastases can prove advantageous. Objectives We aimed to establish the correlation between SA and both bone metastasis and HVD in newly diagnosed PCa patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1202 patients who received a new diagnosis of PCa between November 2014 and February 2021. We compared pretreatment SA levels across multiple groups and investigated the associations between SA levels and the clinical parameters of patients. Additionally, we compared the differences between HVD and LVD. We utilized several statistical methods, including the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and logistic regression. Results The results indicate that SA may serve as a predictor of bone metastasis in patients with HVD. ROC curve analysis revealed a cut-off value of 56.15 mg/dL with an area under the curve of 0.767 (95% CI: 0.703-0.832, P < 0.001) for bone metastasis versus without bone metastasis and a cut-off value of 65.80 mg/dL with an area under the curve of 0.766 (95% CI: 0.644-0.888, P = 0.003) for HVD versus LVD. Notably, PCa patients with bone metastases exhibited significantly higher SA levels than those without bone metastases, and HVD patients had higher SA levels than LVD patients. In comparison to the non-metastatic and LVD cohorts, the cohort with HVD exhibited higher levels of alkaline phosphatase (AKP) (median, 122.00 U/L), fibrinogen (FIB) (median, 3.63 g/L), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (median, 215.70 ng/mL), as well as higher Gleason scores (> 7). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that an SA level of > 56.15 mg/dL was independently associated with the presence of bone metastases in PCa patients (OR = 2.966, P = 0.018), while an SA level of > 65.80 mg/dL was independently associated with HVD (OR = 1.194, P = 0.048). Conclusion The pretreatment serum SA level is positively correlated with the presence of bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingtao Sun
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Tian Tian
- Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Naiqiang Wang
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xuehui Jing
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Department of Urology, Yucheng People’s Hospital, Dezhou, China
| | - Laiyuan Qiu
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Haochen Cui
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Zhao Liu
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jikai Liu
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Lei Yan
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Dawei Li
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vinod SK, Merie R, Harden S. Quality of Decision Making in Radiation Oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024:S0936-6555(24)00067-0. [PMID: 38342658 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
High-quality decision making in radiation oncology requires the careful consideration of multiple factors. In addition to the evidence-based indications for curative or palliative radiotherapy, this article explores how, in routine clinical practice, we also need to account for many other factors when making high-quality decisions. Foremost are patient-related factors, including preference, and the complex interplay between age, frailty and comorbidities, especially with an ageing cancer population. Whilst clinical practice guidelines inform our decisions, we need to account for their applicability in different patient groups and different resource settings. With particular reference to curative-intent radiotherapy, we explore decisions regarding dose fractionation schedules, use of newer radiotherapy technologies and multimodality treatment considerations that contribute to personalised patient-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Vinod
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, Australia; South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - R Merie
- Icon Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia
| | - S Harden
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kelmendi N, Nilsson M, Taloyan M, Sundberg K, Langius-Eklöf A, Craftman ÅG. Preferences for Tailored Support - Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Experiences Regarding Symptoms and Self-Management Strategies During the First Year After Curatively Intended Prostate Cancer Treatment. Patient Prefer Adherence 2024; 18:275-288. [PMID: 38333642 PMCID: PMC10850763 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s440689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose There is an increase in the number of men undergoing screening for prostate cancer, and advancements in treatments, which implies current knowledge about symptoms and self-management. This study aims to explore experiences of symptom distress, and self-management strategies during the first year after curatively intended treatment for prostate cancer, as identified by patients and health care professionals. Methods A qualitative design was used, including data triangulation from individual interviews with patients (n =17) and one focus group interview with healthcare professionals (n =5). Thematic analysis was used. Results The two main themes were identified: living with the consequences of treatment and navigating a new situation. Living with the consequences of treatment illustrated how losing control of bodily functions such as bladder, bowel, and sexual functions interfered with daily life. A stigma around the disease was described, and a life living in an unfamiliar body challenged ideas of masculinity. The first months after treatment ended was a distressing period related to the abruption in frequent contact with healthcare providers, and concerns about the future. The second theme, navigating a new situation, illustrates that self-management strategies varied, due to individual factors as did the need for tailored information and support provided from healthcare professionals and family, which was highly valued. Information and support were described as complex topics and healthcare professionals emphasized the need for appropriate education for staff to provide proper support to men after ended treatment. Conclusion Lingering symptoms and concerns were evident during the first year after treatment. Self-management strategies varied, and timely and tailored information and support during the first year were considered highly valued, important, and preferred by patients. Our results indicate that support should be offered immediately after curatively intended treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazmije Kelmendi
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Academic Primary Health Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marie Nilsson
- Academic Primary Health Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marina Taloyan
- Academic Primary Health Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kay Sundberg
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann Langius-Eklöf
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Åsa G Craftman
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sanchez-Salas R, Tourinho-Barbosa R, Sivaraman A, Borges RC, Candela L, Cathala N, Mombet A, Marra G, Sanchez LR, Boumezrag CB, Lanz C, Macek P, Korkes F, Cathelineau X. Assessing the efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training and duloxetine on urinary continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: A randomized clinical trial. Prostate 2024; 84:158-165. [PMID: 37904330 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary incontinence (UI) can negatively impact quality of life (QoL) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and duloxetine are used to manage post-RARP UI, but their efficacy remains uncertain. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of PFMT and duloxetine in promoting urinary continence recovery (UCR) after RARP. METHODS A randomized controlled trial involving patients with urine leakage after RARP from May 2015 to February 2018. Patients were randomized into 1 of 4 arms: (1) PFMT-biofeedback, (2) duloxetine, (3) combined PFMT-biofeedback and duloxetine, (4) control arm. PFMT consisted of pelvic muscle exercises conducted with electromyographic feedback weekly, for 3 months. Oral duloxetine was administered at bedtime for 3 months. The primary outcome was prevalence of continence at 6 months, defined as using ≤1 security pad. Urinary symptoms and QoL were assessed by using a visual analogue scale, and validated questionnaires. RESULTS From the 240 patients included in the trial, 89% of patients completed 1 year of follow-up. Treatment compliance was observed in 88% (92/105) of patients receiving duloxetine, and in 97% (104/107) of patients scheduled to PFMT-biofeedback sessions. In the control group 96% of patients had achieved continence at 6 months, compared with 90% (p = 0.3) in the PMFT-biofeedback, 73% (p = 0.008) in the duloxetine, and 69% (p = 0.003) in the combined treatment arm. At 6 months, QoL was classified as uncomfortable or worse in 17% of patients in the control group, compared with 44% (p = 0.01), 45% (p = 0.008), and 34% (p = 0.07), respectively. Complete preservation of neurovascular bundles (NVB) (OR: 2.95; p = 0.048) was the only perioperative intervention found to improve early UCR. CONCLUSIONS PFMT-biofeedback and duloxetine demonstrated limited impact in improving UCR after RP. Diligent NVB preservation, along with preoperative patient and disease characteristics, are the primary determinants for early UCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Rafael Tourinho-Barbosa
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
- Department of Urology, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (ABC Medical School), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Arjun Sivaraman
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Rafael Castilho Borges
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
- Department of Urology, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (ABC Medical School), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luigi Candela
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Cathala
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Annick Mombet
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Lara Rodriguez Sanchez
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Chahrazad Bey Boumezrag
- Department of Research, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Camille Lanz
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Petr Macek
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Fernando Korkes
- Department of Urology, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (ABC Medical School), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Xavier Cathelineau
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Maggio A, Rancati T, Gatti M, Cante D, Avuzzi B, Bianconi C, Badenchini F, Farina B, Ferrari P, Giandini T, Girelli G, Landoni V, Magli A, Moretti E, Petrucci E, Salmoiraghi P, Sanguineti G, Villa E, Waskiewicz JM, Guarneri A, Valdagni R, Fiorino C, Cozzarini C. Quality of Life Longitudinal Evaluation in Prostate Cancer Patients from Radiotherapy Start to 5 Years after IMRT-IGRT. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:839-848. [PMID: 38392056 PMCID: PMC10887595 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31020062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to study the evolution of quality of life (QoL) in the first 5 years following Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) and to determine possible associations with clinical/treatment data. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients were enrolled in a prospective multicentre observational trial in 2010-2014 and treated with conventional (74-80 Gy, 1.8-2 Gy/fr) or moderately hypofractionated IMRT (65-75.2 Gy, 2.2-2.7 Gy/fr). QoL was evaluated by means of EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, at radiation therapy (RT) end, and every 6 months up to 5 years after IMRT end. Fourteen QoL dimensions were investigated separately. The longitudinal evaluation of QoL was analysed by means of Analysis of variances (ANOVA) for multiple measures. RESULTS A total of 391 patients with complete sets of questionnaires across 5 years were available. The longitudinal analysis showed a trend toward the significant worsening of QoL at RT end for global health, physical and role functioning, fatigue, appetite loss, diarrhoea, and pain. QoL worsening was recovered within 6 months from RT end, with the only exception being physical functioning. Based on ANOVA, the most impaired time point was RT end. QoL dimension analysis at this time indicated that acute Grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity significantly impacted global health, physical and role functioning, fatigue, appetite loss, diarrhoea, and pain. Acute Grade ≥ 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity resulted in lower role functioning and higher pain. Prophylactic lymph-nodal irradiation (WPRT) resulted in significantly lower QoL for global health, fatigue, appetite loss, and diarrhoea; lower pain with the use of neoadjuvant/concomitant hormonal therapy; and lower fatigue with the use of an anti-androgen. CONCLUSIONS In this prospective, longitudinal, observational study, high radiation IMRT doses delivered for PCa led to a temporary worsening of QoL, which tended to be completely resolved at six months. Such transient worsening was mostly associated with acute GI/GU toxicity, WPRT, and higher prescription doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Maggio
- Istituto di Candiolo-FPO, IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (M.G.); (A.G.)
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy; (T.R.); (B.A.); (F.B.); (T.G.); (R.V.)
| | - Marco Gatti
- Istituto di Candiolo-FPO, IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (M.G.); (A.G.)
| | - Domenico Cante
- Ospedale di Ivrea, A.S.L. TO4, 10015 Ivrea, Italy; (D.C.); (E.P.)
| | - Barbara Avuzzi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy; (T.R.); (B.A.); (F.B.); (T.G.); (R.V.)
| | - Cinzia Bianconi
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milano, Italy; (C.B.); (C.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Fabio Badenchini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy; (T.R.); (B.A.); (F.B.); (T.G.); (R.V.)
| | - Bruno Farina
- Ospedale degli Infermi, 13875 Biella, Italy; (B.F.); (G.G.)
| | - Paolo Ferrari
- Comprensorio Sanitario di Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; (P.F.); (J.M.W.)
| | - Tommaso Giandini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy; (T.R.); (B.A.); (F.B.); (T.G.); (R.V.)
| | | | - Valeria Landoni
- IRCCS Istituto Tumori Regina Elena, 00144 Roma, Italy; (V.L.); (G.S.)
| | | | | | - Edoardo Petrucci
- Ospedale di Ivrea, A.S.L. TO4, 10015 Ivrea, Italy; (D.C.); (E.P.)
| | | | | | - Elisa Villa
- Cliniche Gavazzeni-Humanitas, 24121 Bergamo, Italy; (P.S.); (E.V.)
| | | | - Alessia Guarneri
- Istituto di Candiolo-FPO, IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (M.G.); (A.G.)
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy; (T.R.); (B.A.); (F.B.); (T.G.); (R.V.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorino
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milano, Italy; (C.B.); (C.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Cesare Cozzarini
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milano, Italy; (C.B.); (C.F.); (C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pan H, Wang J, Shi W, Xu Z, Zhu E. Quantified treatment effect at the individual level is more indicative for personalized radical prostatectomy recommendation: implications for prostate cancer treatment using deep learning. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:67. [PMID: 38302801 PMCID: PMC10834597 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05602-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are potential uncertainties and overtreatment existing in radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) patients, thus identifying optimal candidates is quite important. PURPOSE This study aims to establish a novel causal inference deep learning (DL) model to discern whether a patient can benefit more from RP and to identify heterogeneity in treatment responses among PCa patients. METHODS We introduce the Self-Normalizing Balanced individual treatment effect for survival data (SNB). Six models were trained to make individualized treatment recommendations for PCa patients. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to avoid treatment selection bias. RESULTS 35,236 patients were included. Patients whose actual treatment was consistent with SNB recommendations had better survival outcomes than those who were inconsistent (multivariate hazard ratio (HR): 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64-0.92; IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.77, 95% CI, 0.61-0.95; risk difference (RD): 3.80, 95% CI, 2.48-5.11; IPTW-adjusted RD: 2.17, 95% CI, 0.92-3.35; the difference in restricted mean survival time (dRMST): 3.81, 95% CI, 2.66-4.85; IPTW-adjusted dRMST: 3.23, 95% CI, 2.06-4.45). Keeping other covariates unchanged, patients with 1 ng/mL increase in PSA levels received RP caused 1.77 months increase in the time to 90% mortality, and the similar results could be found in age, Gleason score, tumor size, TNM stages, and metastasis status. CONCLUSIONS Our highly interpretable and reliable DL model (SNB) may identify patients with PCa who could benefit from RP, outperforming other models and clinical guidelines. Additionally, the DL-based treatment guidelines obtained can provide priori evidence for subsequent studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiqing Pan
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiayi Wang
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weizhong Shi
- Shanghai Hospital Development Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ziqin Xu
- Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - Enzhao Zhu
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lindsay D, Schofield P, Nabukalu D, Roberts MJ, Yaxley J, Quinn S, Richards N, Frydenberg M, Gardiner R, Lawrentschuk N, Juraskova I, Murphy DG, Gordon LG. The impact of management option on out-of-pocket costs and perceived financial burden among men with localised prostate cancer in Australia within 6 months of diagnosis. AUST HEALTH REV 2024; 48:172-181. [PMID: 38342484 DOI: 10.1071/ah23231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to quantify the out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and perceived financial burden among Australian men with localised prostate cancer in the first 6 months after diagnosis, by primary management option. Methods This cost-analysis quantified OOP costs using administrative claims data and self-reported survey data. Financial burden was assessed using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) tool. Participants were recruited into a randomised control trial from public or private treatment centres in Victoria and Queensland. Generalised linear models were used to predict OOP costs and COST-FACIT scores. Results Median total OOP costs within 6 months of diagnosis for 256 Australian patients with localised prostate cancer was A$1172 (A$343-2548). Up to 50% of the sample reported A$0 costs for most medical services. Compared with those managed with active surveillance, men having active treatment had 6.4 (95% CI: 3.2-12.7) times greater total OOP costs. Management option, higher Gleason score at diagnosis and having multiple comorbidities were significant predictors of higher OOP costs. Overall high scores on the COST-FACIT indicated low levels of financial burden for the entire sample. Conclusion Largely attributable to being managed with active surveillance, Australian men diagnosed with localised prostate cancer reported relatively low OOP costs and financial burden in the first 6 months post-diagnosis. Together with clinical outcomes, clinicians can use this up to date evidence on costs and perceived financial burdens to assist localised prostate cancer patients and their families make informed decisions about their preferred management option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lindsay
- Health Economics, Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia; and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Doreen Nabukalu
- Health Economics, Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
| | - Matthew J Roberts
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia; and Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Qld, Australia
| | - John Yaxley
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia; and Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Qld, Australia; and Wesley Urology Clinic, Wesley Hospital, Qld, Australia
| | - Stephen Quinn
- Department of Health Science and Biostatistics, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Natalie Richards
- Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Urology, Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Vic., Australia; and Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Robert Gardiner
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia; and Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Qld, Australia; and Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- EJ Whitten Foundation Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Louisa G Gordon
- Health Economics, Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia; and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia; and School of Nursing and Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL. Reply to Bernardo Rocco and Maria Chiara Sighinolfi's Letter to the Editor re: Freddie C. Hamdy, Jenny L. Donovan, J. Athene Lane, et al. Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2023;388:1547-58. Eur Urol 2024; 85:e41-e42. [PMID: 37659961 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Jenny L Donovan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Wallis CJD, Penson DF, Huang LC, Zhao Z, Conwill R, Talwar R, Morgans AK, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, Wu XC, Paddock LE, Stroup A, O’Neil BB, Koyama T, Hoffman KE, Barocas DA. Functional Outcomes After Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment. JAMA 2024; 331:302-317. [PMID: 38261043 PMCID: PMC10807259 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.26491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Importance Adverse outcomes associated with treatments for localized prostate cancer remain unclear. Objective To compare rates of adverse functional outcomes between specific treatments for localized prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants An observational cohort study using data from 5 US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program registries. Participants were treated for localized prostate cancer between 2011 and 2012. At baseline, 1877 had favorable-prognosis prostate cancer (defined as cT1-cT2bN0M0, prostate-specific antigen level <20 ng/mL, and grade group 1-2) and 568 had unfavorable-prognosis prostate cancer (defined as cT2cN0M0, prostate-specific antigen level of 20-50 ng/mL, or grade group 3-5). Follow-up data were collected by questionnaire through February 1, 2022. Exposures Radical prostatectomy (n = 1043), external beam radiotherapy (n = 359), brachytherapy (n = 96), or active surveillance (n = 379) for favorable-prognosis disease and radical prostatectomy (n = 362) or external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy (n = 206) for unfavorable-prognosis disease. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes were patient-reported sexual, urinary, bowel, and hormone function measured using the 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (range, 0-100; 100 = best). Associations of specific therapies with each outcome were estimated and compared at 10 years after treatment, adjusting for corresponding baseline scores, and patient and tumor characteristics. Minimum clinically important differences were 10 to 12 for sexual function, 6 to 9 for urinary incontinence, 5 to 7 for urinary irritation, and 4 to 6 for bowel and hormone function. Results A total of 2445 patients with localized prostate cancer (median age, 64 years; 14% Black, 8% Hispanic) were included and followed up for a median of 9.5 years. Among 1877 patients with favorable prognosis, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence (adjusted mean difference, -12.1 [95% CI, -16.2 to -8.0]), but not worse sexual function (adjusted mean difference, -7.2 [95% CI, -12.3 to -2.0]), compared with active surveillance. Among 568 patients with unfavorable prognosis, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence (adjusted mean difference, -26.6 [95% CI, -35.0 to -18.2]), but not worse sexual function (adjusted mean difference, -1.4 [95% CI, -11.1 to 8.3), compared with external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy. Among patients with unfavorable prognosis, external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with worse bowel (adjusted mean difference, -4.9 [95% CI, -9.2 to -0.7]) and hormone (adjusted mean difference, -4.9 [95% CI, -9.5 to -0.3]) function compared with radical prostatectomy. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients treated for localized prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence but not worse sexual function at 10-year follow-up compared with radiotherapy or surveillance among people with more favorable prognosis and compared with radiotherapy for those with unfavorable prognosis. Among men with unfavorable-prognosis disease, external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with worse bowel and hormone function at 10-year follow-up compared with radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christopher J. D. Wallis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David F. Penson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Nashville
| | - Li-Ching Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Zhiguo Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Ralph Conwill
- Office of Patient and Community Education, Patient Advocacy Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Ruchika Talwar
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Alicia K. Morgans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ann S. Hamilton
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, Louisiana State University New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans
| | - Lisa E. Paddock
- Cancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Antoinette Stroup
- Cancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
- Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Brock B. O’Neil
- Department of Urology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City
| | - Tatsuki Koyama
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Karen E. Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston
| | - Daniel A. Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Maruo M, Goto Y, Miyazaki K, Inoue A, Kurokawa K, Enomoto A, Tanaka S, Katsura S, Sugawara S, Fuse M, Chiba K, Imamura Y, Sakamoto S, Nagata M, Ichikawa T. Novel nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with endopelvic fascia preservation and long-term outcomes for a single surgeon. Sci Rep 2024; 14:926. [PMID: 38195985 PMCID: PMC10776665 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51598-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Although novel techniques for avoiding incontinence during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy have been developed, long-term oncological outcomes are unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term oncological outcomes and functional outcomes of novel nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with endopelvic fascia preservation for a single surgeon. Data from 100 patients who underwent structure-preserving prostatectomies performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. The median console time was 123 min. Bilateral nerve-sparing was performed in 43% of patients underwent, and 57% underwent unilateral nerve-sparing surgery. Most patients (96%) reached complete pad-zero urinary continence by one year after surgery. Satisfactory erectile function was achieved in 97% of patients who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing surgery, and 80% of patients who underwent unilateral nerve-sparing surgery. The surgical margin was positive for 25% of patients, and the biochemical recurrence-free rate at 5 years was 77%. The cancer-specific survival rate was 100% during the median follow-up period of 4.5 years. Clavien-Dindo grade III complications occurred in 1% of cases. The outcomes for novel nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with endopelvic fascia preservation were similar to previously reported oncological outcomes, with satisfactory functional outcomes. This operative method may be useful for patients who are eligible for nerve-sparing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masafumi Maruo
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Urology, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yusuke Goto
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chiba, Japan.
| | | | - Atsushi Inoue
- Department of Urology, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Koichiro Kurokawa
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chiba, Japan
| | - Akiko Enomoto
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satoki Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sota Katsura
- Department of Urology, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Sho Sugawara
- Department of Urology, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Miki Fuse
- Department of Urology, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazuto Chiba
- Department of Urology, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yusuke Imamura
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shinichi Sakamoto
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chiba, Japan
| | - Maki Nagata
- Department of Urology, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Ichikawa
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Noda M, Taguchi S, Shiraishi K, Fujimura T, Naito A, Kawai T, Kamei J, Akiyama Y, Yamada Y, Sato Y, Yamada D, Nakagawa T, Yamashita H, Nakagawa K, Abe O, Fukuhara H, Kume H. Six-year outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-023-02192-5. [PMID: 38180494 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02192-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy are the leading respective techniques of prostatectomy and radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, almost no study has directly compared their outcomes; none have compared mortality outcomes. METHODS We compared 6‑year outcomes of RARP (n = 500) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT, a rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy, n = 360) in patients with cT1-4N0M0 prostate cancer. We assessed oncological outcomes, namely overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), radiological recurrence-free survival (rRFS), and biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), using propensity score matching (PSM). We also assessed treatment-related complication outcomes of prostatectomy and radiotherapy. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 79 months (> 6 years). PSM generated a matched cohort of 260 patients (130 per treatment group). In the matched cohort, RARP and VMAT showed equivalent results for OS, CSS, and rRFS: both achieved excellent 6‑year outcomes for OS (> 96%), CSS (> 98%), and rRFS (> 91%). VMAT had significantly longer bRFS than RARP, albeit based on different definitions of biochemical recurrence. Regarding complication outcomes, patients who underwent RARP had minimal (2.6%) severe perioperative complications and achieved excellent continence recovery (91.6 and 68.8% of the patients achieved ≤ 1 pad/day and pad-free, respectively). Patients who underwent VMAT had an acceptable rate (20.0%) of grade ≥ 2 genitourinary complications and a very low rate (4.4%) of grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal complications. CONCLUSION On the basis of PSM after a 6-year follow-up, RARP and VMAT showed equivalent and excellent oncological outcomes, as well as acceptable complication profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michio Noda
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoru Taguchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kenshiro Shiraishi
- Department of Radiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Akihiro Naito
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taketo Kawai
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Kamei
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Akiyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuta Yamada
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sato
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Yamada
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tohru Nakagawa
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideomi Yamashita
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichi Nakagawa
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Abe
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fukuhara
- Department of Urology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wang F, Liu C, Vidal I, Mana-Ay M, Voter AF, Solnes LB, Ross AE, Gafita A, Schaeffer EM, Bivalacqua TJ, Pienta KJ, Pomper MG, Lodge MA, Song DY, Oldan JD, Allaf ME, De Marzo AM, Sheikhbahaei S, Gorin MA, Rowe SP. Comparison of Multiple Segmentation Methods for Volumetric Delineation of Primary Prostate Cancer with Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:87-93. [PMID: 38050147 PMCID: PMC10755517 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the accuracy of intraprostatic tumor volume measurements on prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT made with various segmentation methods. An accurate understanding of tumor volumes versus segmentation techniques is critical for therapy planning, such as radiation dose volume determination and response assessment. Methods: Twenty-five men with clinically localized, high-risk prostate cancer were imaged with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT before radical prostatectomy. The tumor volumes and tumor-to-prostate ratios (TPRs) of dominant intraprostatic foci of uptake were determined using semiautomatic segmentation (applying SUVmax percentage [SUV%] thresholds of SUV30%-SUV70%), adaptive segmentation (using adaptive segmentation percentage [A%] thresholds of A30%-A70%), and manual contouring. The histopathologic tumor volume (TV-Histo) served as the reference standard. The significance of differences between TV-Histo and PET-based tumor volume were assessed using the paired-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to establish the strength of the association between TV-Histo and PET-derived tumor volume. Results: Median TV-Histo was 2.03 cm3 (interquartile ratio [IQR], 1.16-3.36 cm3), and median TPR was 10.16%. The adaptive method with an A40% threshold most closely determined the tumor volume, with a median difference of +0.19 (IQR, -0.71 to +2.01) and a median relative difference of +7.6%. The paired-sample Wilcoxon test showed no significant difference in PET-derived tumor volume and TV-Histo using A40%, A50%, SUV40%, and SUV50% threshold segmentation algorithms (P > 0.05). For both threshold-based segmentation methods, use of higher thresholds (e.g., SUV60% or SUV70% and A50%-A70%) resulted in underestimation of tumor volumes, and use of lower thresholds (e.g., SUV30% or SUV40% and A30%) resulted in overestimation of tumor volumes relative to TV-Histo and TPR. Manual segmentation overestimated the tumor volume, with a median difference of +2.49 (IQR, 0.42-4.11) and a median relative difference of +130%. Conclusion: Segmentation of intraprostatic tumor volume and TPR with an adaptive segmentation approach most closely approximates TV-Histo. This information might be used to guide the primary treatment of men with clinically localized, high-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicia Wang
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Chen Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Igor Vidal
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Andrew F Voter
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lilja B Solnes
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Brady Urological Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ashley E Ross
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Andrei Gafita
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Edward M Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Trinity J Bivalacqua
- Division of Urology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth J Pienta
- Brady Urological Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Martin G Pomper
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Brady Urological Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Martin A Lodge
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel Y Song
- Brady Urological Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Science, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Center, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jorge D Oldan
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and
| | - Mohamad E Allaf
- Brady Urological Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Angelo M De Marzo
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Brady Urological Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sara Sheikhbahaei
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael A Gorin
- Milton and Carroll Petrie Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Tae BS, Ahn ST, Yoo JW, Song MS, Choi H, Bae JH, Park JY. Is There a Difference in the Incidence of Depression between Radiation and Surgical Treatments in Patients with Prostate Cancer? World J Mens Health 2024; 42:237-244. [PMID: 38171378 PMCID: PMC10782121 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with cancer have a high risk of depression. However, a few studies have assessed differences in the incidence of depression among patients with prostate cancer (PC) based on whether they received radiotherapy (RTx) or surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Sharing Service database regarding the entire Korean adult population with PC (n=210,924) between 2007 and 2017. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of depression associated with treatment were estimated using propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. RESULTS Our final cohort comprised 9,456 patients with PC; of which, 8,050 men underwent surgery. During a mean follow-up duration of 7.1 years, 503 (5.3%) patients were newly diagnosed with depression. A significant difference in the incidence of depression was noted between the RTx and surgery groups (RTx vs. surgery: 5.55% vs. 5.28%; p=0.011) in the unmatched cohort. In the matched cohort, older age (≥70 years, HR: 1.596, p<0.001) and poor Charlson comorbidity index scores (HR: 1.232, p=0.039) were correlated with the risk of depression. In addition, the adjusted HR for depression in the surgery group was 0.843 (p=0.221) compared with that in the RTx group. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that no significant difference in the cumulative probability of persistent depression was detected between the RTx and surgery groups in matched cohort (p=0.3386). CONCLUSIONS In this nationwide population-based study, no significant differences in the risk of depression were observed between the surgical and RTx groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bum Sik Tae
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Sun Tae Ahn
- Department of Urology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Wan Yoo
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Min Sung Song
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Hoon Choi
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Bae
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Jae Young Park
- Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Clinckaert A, Schreurs L, Wouters L, Everaerts W, De Cock D. "Keep It Short and Simple": Perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals on the use of a mobile health app in the care for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:150-158. [PMID: 38179015 PMCID: PMC10764175 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer generally have good long-term survival rates. However, late recurrences can occur and require lifelong follow-up. Objective This research aims to investigate different stakeholders' perceptions on the use of mobile health (mHealth) applications for prostate cancer follow-up after radical prostatectomy. Methods A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted to explore stakeholders' perceptions of an mHealth application for follow-up after radical prostatectomy. Urologists, nurses, and patients treated with radical prostatectomy were interviewed, and data were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis according to Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. Recommended features for an ideal mHealth application were grouped according to the Persuasive Systems Design model. Results and Limitations A total of 30 stakeholders, consisting of nurse specialists (n = 7), urologists (n = 8), and patients (n = 15), were interviewed. Expected benefits and barriers were mentioned and grouped in five overarching themes: healthcare optimisation, disease management, app compliance, legal and organisational requirements, and patient-mHealth interaction. Stakeholders provided a multitude of suggestions for an ideal mHealth app. Yet, not all types of stakeholders were interviewed, and patient selection limited generalisability of findings. Conclusions Stakeholders indicate that an mHealth app in the care for post-prostatectomy patients can improve patient care and promote disease management but consider app compliance as a major challenge. Patient Summary We interviewed patients, nurses, and urologists about using an mHealth application for follow-up after radical prostatectomy. The participants agreed that an mHealth app could improve care optimisation and disease management, but some concerns and barriers were expressed. This resulted in a list of recommended features for an ideal app.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andries Clinckaert
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Cellular and Molecular MedicineKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Lucas Schreurs
- Department of Public Health, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Research GroupVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
| | - Lars Wouters
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Wouter Everaerts
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Cellular and Molecular MedicineKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Diederik De Cock
- Department of Public Health, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Research GroupVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fernandez AM, Jones CP, Patel HV, Ghaffar U, Hakam N, Li KD, Nabavizadeh B, Breyer BN. Real-World Complications of the SpaceOAR Hydrogel Spacer: A Review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database. Urology 2024; 183:157-162. [PMID: 37774851 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize adverse events related to use of the perirectal spacing agent SpaceOAR, we examined the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. METHODS The MAUDE database was queried for "SpaceOAR" and "Augmenix" from June 2015 (when SpaceOAR was approved by the Food and Drug Administration) to October 2022. Reports were reviewed for adverse events (AEs), operative procedures performed because of the AE, and changes to the radiation plan. AEs were categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. RESULTS Six hundred fifty-four reports were reviewed. Eighty-four were excluded and 4 reports reviewed 2 separate cases of SpaceOAR administration. Five hundred seventy-four cases were ultimately included. Three deaths were reported (0.5% of all AEs). One point six percent of cases represented CTCAE grade 4 injuries (life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated), 15.9% grade 3 (severe but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization), 24.2% grade 2 (moderate; local/noninvasive intervention), and 57% of events were CTCAE grade 1 (mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms). Bowel diversion occurred in 29 cases (9%). CONCLUSION Both asymptomatic (n = 311) and debilitating (n = 12) complications of SpaceOAR hydrogel use were identified. Death, gel embolization, anaphylaxis, rectal ulcerations, and infections requiring bowel or urinary diversions were among the complications reviewed. Providers should consider these potential complications before perirectal spacer administration and during patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian M Fernandez
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Charles P Jones
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Hiren V Patel
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Umar Ghaffar
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nizar Hakam
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kevin D Li
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Behnam Nabavizadeh
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Benjamin N Breyer
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zamora V, Garin O, Suárez JF, Gutiérrez C, Guedea F, Cabrera P, Castells M, Herruzo I, Fumadó L, Samper P, Ferrer C, Regis L, Pont À, Ferrer M. Comparative effectiveness of new treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer through patient-reported outcome measures. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 44:100694. [PMID: 38021091 PMCID: PMC10663757 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose There is scarce comparative effectiveness research on the new treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer. We aim to compare through Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) the impact of active surveillance, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and real-time brachytherapy, considering side effects (incontinence, irritative/obstructive urinary symptoms, sexual dysfunction and bowel symptoms) and physical and mental health. Materials and Methods Prospective cohort of men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer (age 50-75y, T1-T2, and low risk including Gleason 3 + 4 in T1c) from 18 Spanish hospitals, followed up to 24 months. Treatment decisions were jointly made by patients and physicians (n = 572). The Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36v2) were administered through telephone interviews before and three, six, 12, and 24 months after treatment. To account for correlation among repeated measures, generalized estimating equation models were constructed. All analyses were performed with propensity score weights to solve treatment selection bias. Results The PROMs completion rate at 24 months was 95.0 %. Active surveillance entails the fewest side effects, but with significant sexual (0.4 standard deviations [SD], p < 0.001) and physical health deterioration (0.5 SD, p < 0.001); and moderate mental health improvement (0.4 SD, p = 0.001) at 24 months. Compared with active surveillance, RARP presented greater urinary incontinence (p = 0.030), and IMRT and real-time brachytherapy worse bowel symptoms (p = 0.027 and p = 0.007) at 24 months. Conclusions Most side effects of the new treatment modalities seem to be limited to short-term deteriorations, except for moderate-large urinary incontinence in patients who had undergone RARP and moderate bowel deterioration in patients treated with IMRT or with real-time brachytherapy. Furthermore, patients under active surveillance, IMRT, and real-time brachytherapy showed a moderate improvement in mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Víctor Zamora
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Olatz Garin
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Francisco Suárez
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Gutiérrez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Guedea
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Cabrera
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Manuel Castells
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ismael Herruzo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain
| | - Lluis Fumadó
- Urology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pilar Samper
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain
| | - Carlos Ferrer
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
| | - Lucas Regis
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Àngels Pont
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain
| | - Montse Ferrer
- Health Services Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Nitta M, Tazawa M, Takahashi K, Naruse J, Oda K, Kano T, Uchida T, Umemoto T, Ogawa T, Kawamura Y, Hasegawa M, Shoji S, Miyajima A. Variations in predictors for urinary continence recovery at different time periods following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 2024; 17:e13243. [PMID: 37740401 DOI: 10.1111/ases.13243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Urinary dysfunctions are common sequelae following prostatectomy. This study aimed to discover factors that can predict urinary continence recovery at various time periods after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of data of 419 consecutive patients. Only patients followed up for ≥1 year were enrolled. An answer of "zero pad per day" in the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary assessment (question 5) denoted continence. Possible predictors of urinary continence recovery were evaluated at 3, 3-6, and 6-12 months after the operation. RESULTS Continence rates at 3, 6, and 12 months after RARP were 12.9%, 21.2%, and 40.2%, respectively. The proportions of patients using 0-1 pad were 54.2%, 75.7%, and 83.1% at 3, 6, and 12 months after RARP, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that a membranous urethral length (MUL) ≥11 mm was significantly associated with urinary continence recovery both within 3 months (odds ratio: 0.367, P = .003) and 3-6 months (odds ratio: 0.354, P = .001) after RARP. The analysis also revealed that, in patients with urinary continence at 6 months, a large prostate volume (odds ratio: 1.973, P = .044) and a high body mass index (odds ratio: 2.874, P = .027) were negative predictors of urinary continence recovery within 6-12 months. CONCLUSION A longer MUL was linked to urinary continence recovery within 6 months following RARP, whereas a large prostate volume and a high body mass index were adverse predictors of urinary continence recovery beyond 6 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Nitta
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Moeko Tazawa
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kumpei Takahashi
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Jun Naruse
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazuya Oda
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Kano
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takato Uchida
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Umemoto
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takahiro Ogawa
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Kawamura
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masanori Hasegawa
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Sunao Shoji
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Akira Miyajima
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tiruye T, O'Callaghan M, Ettridge K, Moretti K, Jay A, Higgs B, Santoro K, Kichenadasse G, Beckmann K. Clinical and functional outcomes for risk-appropriate treatments for prostate cancer. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:109-120. [PMID: 38179028 PMCID: PMC10764171 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To describe real-world clinical and functional outcomes in an Australian cohort of men with localised prostate cancer according to treatment type and risk category. Subjects and methods Men diagnosed from 2008 to 2018 who were enrolled in South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative registry-a multi-institutional prospective clinical registry-were studied. The main outcome measures were overall survival, cancer-specific survival, decline in functional outcomes, biochemical recurrence and transition to active treatment following active surveillance. Multivariable adjusted models were applied to estimate outcomes. Results Of the 8513 eligible men, majority of men (46%) underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by external beam radiation therapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy (EBRT +/- ADT) in 22% of the cohort. Five-year overall survival was above 91%, and 5-year prostate cancer-specific survival was above 97% in the low- and intermediate-risk categories across all treatments. Five-year prostate cancer-specific survival in the active surveillance group was 100%. About 37% of men with high-risk disease treated with RP and 17% of men treated with EBRT +/- ADT experienced biochemical recurrence within 5 years of treatment. Of men on active surveillance, 15% of those with low risk and 20% with intermediate risk converted to active treatment within 2 years. The decline in urinary continence and sexual function 12 months after treatment was greatest among men who underwent RP while the decline in bowel function was greatest for men who received EBRT +/- ADT. Conclusion This contemporary real-world evidence on risk-appropriate treatment outcomes helps inform treatment decision-making for clinicians and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tenaw Tiruye
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
- Public Health DepartmentDebre Markos UniversityDebre MarkosEthiopia
| | - Michael O'Callaghan
- South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes CollaborativeAdelaideAustralia
- Flinders Health and Medical Research InstituteFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
- Discipline of MedicineUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
- Flinders Medical CentreBedford ParkAustralia
| | - Kerry Ettridge
- Health Policy CentreSouth Australian Health and Medical Research InstituteAdelaideAustralia
- School of Public HealthUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
| | - Kim Moretti
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
- South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes CollaborativeAdelaideAustralia
- Discipline of SurgeryUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
| | - Alex Jay
- Flinders Medical CentreBedford ParkAustralia
| | - Braden Higgs
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideAustralia
| | - Kerry Santoro
- Southern Adelaide Local Health NetworkAdelaideAustralia
| | - Ganessan Kichenadasse
- Flinders Health and Medical Research InstituteFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
- Flinders Medical CentreBedford ParkAustralia
| | - Kerri Beckmann
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zheng Z, Shi KS, Kamal A, Howard DH, Horný M, Richards TB, Ekwueme DU, Yabroff KR. Health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors with metastatic disease and non-metastatic disease and men without a cancer history in the USA. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01509-8. [PMID: 38102521 PMCID: PMC11180215 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01509-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have comprehensively compared health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between metastatic prostate cancer survivors, survivors with non-metastatic disease, and men without a cancer history. METHODS We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) data linkage to identify men aged ≥ 65 years enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. Prostate cancer survivors were diagnosed between 1988 and 2017 and completed MHOS surveys between 1998 and 2019. We analyzed data from 752 metastatic prostate cancer survivors (1040 survey records), 19,583 localized or regional prostate cancer survivors (non-metastatic; 30,121 survey records), and 784,305 men aged ≥ 65 years without a cancer history in the same SEER regions (1.15 million survey records). We used clustered linear regressions to compare HRQoL measures at the person-level using the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) T-scores for general health and physical and mental component summaries. RESULTS Compared to men without a cancer history, prostate cancer survivors were older, more likely to be married, and had higher socioeconomic status. Compared to men without a cancer history, metastatic prostate cancer survivors reported lower general health (T-score differences [95% confidence interval]: - 6.26, [- 7.14, - 5.38], p < .001), physical health (- 4.33, [- 5.18, - 3.48], p < .001), and mental health (- 2.64, [- 3.40, - 1.88], p < .001) component summaries. Results were similar for other VR-12 T-scores. In contrast, non-metastatic prostate cancer survivors reported similar VR-12 T-scores as men without a cancer history. Further analyses comparing metastatic and non-metastatic prostate cancer survivors support these findings. CONCLUSION Interventions to improve health-related quality of life for men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer merit additional investigation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Interventions to improve health-related quality of life for metastatic prostate cancer survivors merit additional investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Arif Kamal
- American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David H Howard
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michal Horný
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Baas DJH, Reitsma J, van Gerwen L, Vleghaar J, Gehlen JMLG, Ziedses des Plantes CMP, van Basten JPA, van den Bergh RCN, Bruins HM, Collette ERP, Hoekstra RJ, Knipscheer BC, van Leeuwen PJ, Luijendijk-de Bruin D, van Roermund JGH, Sedelaar JPM, Speel TGW, Stomps SP, Wijburg CJ, Wijn RPWF, de Jong IJ, Somford DM. Validation of Claims Data for Absorbing Pads as a Measure for Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy, a National Cross-Sectional Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5740. [PMID: 38136286 PMCID: PMC10742264 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of healthcare insurance claims data for urinary incontinence (UI) pads has the potential to serve as an objective measure for assessing post-radical prostatectomy UI rates, but its validity for this purpose has not been established. The aim of this study is to correlate claims data with Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for UI pad use. Patients who underwent RP in the Netherlands between September 2019 and February 2020 were included. Incontinence was defined as the daily use of ≥1 pad(s). Claims data for UI pads at 12-15 months after RP were extracted from a nationwide healthcare insurance database in the Netherlands. Participating hospitals provided PROMS data. In total, 1624 patients underwent RP. Corresponding data of 845 patients was provided by nine participating hospitals, of which 416 patients were matched with complete PROMs data. Claims data and PROMs showed 31% and 45% post-RP UI (≥1 pads). UI according to claims data compared with PROMs had a sensitivity of 62%, specificity of 96%, PPV of 92%, NPV of 75% and accuracy of 81%. The agreement between both methods was moderate (κ = 0.60). Claims data for pads moderately align with PROMs in assessing post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence and could be considered as a conservative quality indicator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diederik J. H. Baas
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Reitsma
- Zorgverzekeraars Nederland, 3700 AM Zeist, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jaron Vleghaar
- Vektis Intelligence, Vektis, 3700 AS Zeist, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jean Paul A. van Basten
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - H. Max Bruins
- Department of Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, 6419 PC Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Robert J. Hoekstra
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ben C. Knipscheer
- Department of Urology, Treant Zorggroep, 7824 AA Emmen, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joep G. H. van Roermund
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J. P. Michiel Sedelaar
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tommy G. W. Speel
- Department of Urology, Leeuwarden Medical Center, 8934 AD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia P. Stomps
- Department of Urology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, 7609 PP Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Carl J. Wijburg
- Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Rob P. W. F. Wijn
- Department of Urology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 5223 GZ Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Igle Jan de Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M. Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Peyrottes A, Rouprêt M, Fiard G, Fromont G, Barret E, Brureau L, Créhange G, Gauthé M, Baboudjian M, Renard-Penna R, Roubaud G, Rozet F, Sargos P, Ruffion A, Mathieu R, Beauval JB, De La Taille A, Ploussard G, Dariane C. [Early detection of prostate cancer: Towards a new paradigm?]. Prog Urol 2023; 33:956-965. [PMID: 37805291 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a public health issue. The diagnostic strategy for PCa is well codified and assessed by digital rectal examination, PSA testing and multiparametric MRI, which may or may not lead to prostate biopsies. The formal benefit of organized PCa screening, studied more than 10 years ago at an international scale and for all incomers, is not demonstrated. However, diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have evolved since the pivotal studies. The contribution of MRI and targeted biopsies, the widespread use of active surveillance for unsignificant PCa, the improvement of surgical techniques and radiotherapy… have allowed a better selection of patients and strengthened the interest for an individualized approach, reducing the risk of overtreatment. Aiming to enhance coverage and access to screening for the population, the European Commission recently promoted the evaluation of an organized PCa screening strategy, including MRI. The lack of screening programs has become detrimental to the population and must shift towards an early detection policy adapted to the risk of each individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Peyrottes
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, membre junior, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP Centre, Université de Paris, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.
| | - M Rouprêt
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne university, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, urology, Pitié-Salpétrière hospital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - G Fiard
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of urology, Grenoble Alpes university hospital, université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| | - G Fromont
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of pathology, CHRU, 37000 Tours, France
| | - E Barret
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of urology, institut mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - L Brureau
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of urology, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, university of Antilles, university of Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), UMR S 1085, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe
| | - G Créhange
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of radiotherapy, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - M Gauthé
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sintep nuclear medicine, 38100 Grenoble, France
| | - M Baboudjian
- Department of urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - R Renard-Penna
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne university, AP-HP, radiology, Pitie-Salpétrière hospital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - G Roubaud
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of medical oncology, institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - F Rozet
- Sorbonne university, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, urology, Pitié-Salpétrière hospital, 75013 Paris, France; Department of urology, institut mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - P Sargos
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of radiotherapy, institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - A Ruffion
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - R Mathieu
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of urology, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - J-B Beauval
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - A De La Taille
- Department of urology, university hospital Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - G Ploussard
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - C Dariane
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP Centre, Université de Paris, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Deivasigamani S, Kotamarti S, Rastinehad AR, Salas RS, de la Rosette JJMCH, Lepor H, Pinto P, Ahmed HU, Gill I, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Emberton M, Lawrentschuk N, Wysock J, Feller JF, Crouzet S, Kumar M P, Seguier D, Adams ES, Michael Z, Abreu A, Jack Tay K, Ward JF, Shinohara K, Katz AE, Villers A, Chin JL, Stricker PD, Baco E, Macek P, Ahmad AE, Chiu PKF, Crawford ED, Rogers CG, Futterer JJ, Rais-Bahrami S, Robertson CN, Hadaschik B, Marra G, Valerio M, Chong KT, Kasivisvanathan V, Tan WP, Lomas D, Walz J, Guimaraes GC, Mertziotis NI, Becher E, Finelli A, Kasraeian A, Lebastchi AH, Vora A, Rosen MA, Bakir B, Arcot R, Yee S, Netsch C, Meng X, de Reijke TM, Tan YG, Regusci S, Benjamin TGR, Olivares R, Noureldin M, Bianco FJ, Sivaraman A, Kim FJ, Given RW, Dason S, Sheetz TJ, Shoji S, Schulman A, Royce P, Shah TT, Scionti S, Salomon G, Laguna P, Tourinho-Barbosa R, Aminsharifi A, Cathelineau X, Gontero P, Stabile A, Grummet J, Ledbetter L, Graton M, Stephen Jones J, Polascik TJ. Primary Whole-gland Ablation for the Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Focal Therapy Society Best Practice Statement. Eur Urol 2023; 84:547-560. [PMID: 37419773 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Whole-gland ablation is a feasible and effective minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Previous systematic reviews supported evidence for favorable functional outcomes, but oncological outcomes were inconclusive owing to limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the real-world data on the mid- to long-term oncological and functional outcomes of whole-gland cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with clinically localized PCa, and to provide expert recommendations and commentary on these findings. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library publications through February 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. As endpoints, baseline clinical characteristics, and oncological and functional outcomes were assessed. To estimate the pooled prevalence of oncological, functional, and toxicity outcomes, and to quantify and explain the heterogeneity, random-effect meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-nine studies were identified, including 14 on cryoablation and 15 on HIFU with a median follow-up of 72 mo. Most of the studies were retrospective (n = 23), with IDEAL (idea, development, exploration, assessment, and long-term study) stage 2b (n = 20) being most common. Biochemical recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival rates at 10 yr were 58%, 96%, 63%, 71-79%, and 84%, respectively. Erectile function was preserved in 37% of cases, and overall pad-free continence was achieved in 96% of cases, with a 1-yr rate of 97.4-98.8%. The rates of stricture, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, rectourethral fistula, and sepsis were observed to be 11%, 9.5%, 8%, 0.7%, and 0.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The mid- to long-term real-world data, and the safety profiles of cryoablation and HIFU are sound to support and be offered as primary treatment for appropriate patients with localized PCa. When compared with other existing treatment modalities for PCa, these ablative therapies provide nearly equivalent intermediate- to long-term oncological and toxicity outcomes, as well as excellent pad-free continence rates in the primary setting. This real-world clinical evidence provides long-term oncological and functional outcomes that enhance shared decision-making when balancing risks and expected outcomes that reflect patient preferences and values. PATIENT SUMMARY Cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound are minimally invasive treatments available to selectively treat localized prostate cancer, considering their nearly comparable intermediate- to long term cancer control and preservation of urinary continence to other radical treatments in the primary setting. However, a well-informed decision should be made based on one's values and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Srinath Kotamarti
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Herbert Lepor
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Urology, Imperial College London & Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Inderbir Gill
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James Wysock
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Denis Seguier
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Urology, University Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Eric S Adams
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zoe Michael
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andre Abreu
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - John F Ward
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katsuto Shinohara
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Aaron E Katz
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnauld Villers
- Department of Urology, University Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
| | - Joseph L Chin
- Department of Urology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Eduard Baco
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Petr Macek
- Department of Urology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Ardalan E Ahmad
- Department of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter K F Chiu
- Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - E David Crawford
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Craig G Rogers
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jurgen J Futterer
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cary N Robertson
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, The University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Service of Urology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Wei Phin Tan
- Department of Urology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Derek Lomas
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Amir H Lebastchi
- Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anup Vora
- Chesapeake Urology, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Mark A Rosen
- Department of Urology, Sutter Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Baris Bakir
- Department of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Rohit Arcot
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Urology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Samuel Yee
- Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Theo M de Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yu Guang Tan
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Stefano Regusci
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Swiss International Prostate Centelenor, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Ruben Olivares
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Fernando J Bianco
- Urological Research Network, Urologist Specialist Group, Miami Lakes, FL, USA
| | - Arjun Sivaraman
- Division of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Fernando J Kim
- Division of Urology, Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Shawn Dason
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Tyler J Sheetz
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sunao Shoji
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ariel Schulman
- Department of Urology, Maimonides Health Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Royce
- Division of Urology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Division of Urology, Imperial College London & Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Georg Salomon
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Clinic Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Alireza Aminsharifi
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, The University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology/Division of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeremy Grummet
- Division of Urology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Leila Ledbetter
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Margaret Graton
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Thomas J Polascik
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ma TM, Kishan AU. "Targeted microwave ablation: another way to kick the can(cer) down the road?". Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:635-636. [PMID: 36220855 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00603-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Zamora V, Garin O, Suárez JF, Jové J, Castells M, Ferrer F, Gutiérrez C, Guedea F, Boladeras A, Fumadó L, Roselló A, Pastor J, Samper P, Pont À, Ferrer M. Psychometric validation of the Spanish version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26. World J Urol 2023; 41:3511-3518. [PMID: 37947846 PMCID: PMC10693511 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04691-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Spanish version of the Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite (EPIC) with 26 items. METHODS Multicentric longitudinal study of patients diagnosed with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (any T, any N, M0) treated with active surveillance, surgery, external radiotherapy, or brachytherapy. The EPIC-50 was administered initially to the cohort (n = 324 patients), until it was replaced in November 2019 by the EPIC-26 (n = 543), in both groups before treatment and 12 months after. We assessed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficient, criterion validity with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and responsiveness by testing a priori hypotheses on deterioration effect size (ES). RESULTS The CFA confirmed the five-domain structure of the EPIC-26 proposed by the original instrument (comparative fit index = 0.95). The agreement between EPIC-50 (gold standard) and EPIC-26 domains was excellent (ICC > 0.90). Cronbach's alpha was > 0.7 in almost all domains, and the floor effect was near zero, although ceiling effect was higher than 50% in urinary incontinence and bowel domains. Hypothesized changes between before and 12 months after treatment were confirmed: ES > 0.8 in both urinary incontinence and sexual domains among patients who underwent surgery; and ES ranging 0.44-0.48 for bowel and sexual domains in patients treated with external radiotherapy. CONCLUSION The Spanish version of the EPIC-26 has demonstrated adequate metric properties, similar to those of the original version, with acceptable goodness-of-fit indices, good criterion validity, reliability, and responsiveness to detect changes after radical prostatectomy or external radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Víctor Zamora
- Health Services Research Group, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona Biomedical Research Park, Office 144. Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
| | - Olatz Garin
- Health Services Research Group, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona Biomedical Research Park, Office 144. Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain.
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - José Francisco Suárez
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Josep Jové
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Badalona, Spain
| | - Manuel Castells
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Ferran Ferrer
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Cristina Gutiérrez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Ferran Guedea
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Ana Boladeras
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Lluis Fumadó
- Urology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alvar Roselló
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Girona, Spain
| | - Jorge Pastor
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASCIRES GRUPO BIOMÉDICO, Valencia, Spain
| | - Pilar Samper
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain
| | - Àngels Pont
- Health Services Research Group, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona Biomedical Research Park, Office 144. Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
| | - Montse Ferrer
- Health Services Research Group, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona Biomedical Research Park, Office 144. Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain.
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|