Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III BRAF-Mutated Melanoma

Efficacy and safety of adjuvant systemic therapies in trial non-eligible resected stages III and IV melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy are now the standard of care for patients with resected stage IIIA-IV melanoma. However, little is known regarding its efficacy in real-world patients who were not represented in these landmark trials.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients with resected stage IIIA-IV melanoma who received adjuvant systemic therapy between January 1 2018 and December 31 2020, in two Canadian academic cancer. Primary outcome was the proportion of trial non-eligible patients in the real-world setting. Survival and safety analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

Of the total 113 patient, 99 (88%) were trial non-eligible patients. Most common reasons for trial non-eligible criteria was having no baseline CLND (72%), followed by outside of treatment window >12 weeks (30%), stage IIIA (14%), unknown primary (9%), stage IV (14%), and baseline AD on immunosuppressants (3%). There were no significant RFS (P = 0.731) or OS (P = 0.110) differences in the overall population of trial eligible vs. non-eligible. Safety profiles were similar between the trial eligible vs. non-eligible groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested a high proportion of real-world patients would have been deemed non-eligible for clinical trials. Regardless, adjuvant systemic therapy delivered similar survival and toxicity outcomes in both groups.

Management of In-transit Disease: Regional Therapies, Intralesional Therapies, and Systemic Therapy

In-transit (IT) melanoma represents a distinct, heterogeneous pattern of disease that arises as superficial tumors along the track between the primary site and the draining regional lymph node basin. Many therapies have been explored for treatment of this disease with the goal of maximizing delivery of the therapeutic agent to the tumor while minimizing systemic toxicities. These include regional chemotherapies, intralesional injections, checkpoint inhibitors, immunomodulators, and vaccines in various combinations or as monotherapy. Here, we review the general managemnt of patients with ITmelanoma, the range of currently available treatment options, and recommendations for specific therapies for individual patients.

Nodal Management in Melanoma: Is Nodal Staging Needed, What Is the Value, and What Is the Extent of Surgery?

Historical management of melanoma metastatic to draining nodal basins involved prophylactic lymphadenectomy, a morbid procedure without proven survival benefit. Over the last decade sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) became a key prognostic tool, identifying patients with clinically occult nodal metastases with minimal morbidity. More recently, with the approval of adjuvant therapies for high-risk melanomas, the role of SLNB in the treatment of melanoma has been questioned. However, no robust alternative prognostic tool exists. SLNB therefore remains a critical staging procedure, informing clinical decision making when weighing the risks and benefits of adjuvant treatment and surveillance.

Systemic Therapy for Melanoma: What Surgeons Need to Know

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies (BRAF/MEK inhibitors) have transformed the care of patients with stage IV melanoma, now with 5-year overall survival rates around 50%. Surgeons should be acquainted with these drugs, the multidisciplinary considerations of their use, and the unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs) they can cause. In this review, we discuss systemic therapies for cutaneous melanoma, including the biology of immune checkpoint inhibition, treatment indications, and toxicities. We also explain how these irAEs and other toxicities can impact surgical planning and perioperative management.

Neoadjuvant Therapy: Changes in the Management of Macroscopic Stage III/Resectable Stage IV Melanoma

Existing adjuvant therapies improve outcomes for resected stage III and IV melanoma patients but fail in almost half to prevent recurrence and death. Large, multi-institution, randomized studies firmly establish the superiority of neoadjuvant to adjuvant therapy alone. Checkpoint inhibition, either anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monotherapy or combination with CTLA-4/LAG-3 blockage, demonstrates more durable event-free survival compared to targeted or targeted/immunotherapy combination therapies. Novel combinations of intralesional immunotherapies and other agents aim to increase clinical efficacy and limit toxicity of therapies. Pathologic response to treatment remains as the best prognostic surrogate for clinical outcomes for patients.

Two cases of advanced melanoma with BRAF L597 mutation: Options for systemic treatment

The combination of BRAF and MEK kinase inhibitors is a well-established treatment for BRAF V600-mutated advanced melanoma. However, the efficacy of these therapies against less common BRAF mutations, such as BRAF L597, remains unclear. We report two cases of advanced melanoma harboring the BRAF L597 mutation. In the first case, a 77-year-old man with metastatic melanoma achieved complete remission following combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab. In the second case, a 50-year-old woman with metastatic melanoma exhibited resistance to multiple systemic therapies, including nivolumab, ipilimumab, and targeted therapy with encorafenib and binimetinib. These cases highlight the variable therapeutic responses in melanoma with the BRAF L597 mutation, suggesting that immune checkpoint inhibitors may be a viable first-line treatment, particularly for patients with a high tumor mutational burden. Further studies are needed to establish optimal treatment strategies for this rare mutation.

[Adjuvant treatment for melanoma]

BACKGROUND

Despite adequate treatment the probability of recurrence of malignant melanoma is high in patients with corresponding risk factors. Adjuvant treatment significantly reduces this risk; however, the choice of the appropriate adjuvant treatment can be difficult.

OBJECTIVES

This article presents the currently available adjuvant therapies (immune checkpoint inhibition with PD‑1 inhibitors and targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors) and a comparison of the effectiveness of treatment in stage III.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A literature search, a discussion of relevant approval studies and discussion of register data were carried out.

RESULTS

Although the available adjuvant therapies significantly reduce the risk of recurrence of malignant melanoma, approximately one quarter of the patients still experience recurrence within the first 2 years. Comparisons of clinical register data show that adjuvant targeted therapy for BRAF-mutated stage III melanoma is superior to PD‑1 inhibition. The final analysis of the COMBI-AD study, the approval trial of dabrafenib and trametinib, shows a survival benefit for melanomas with BRAFV600E mutations but not for BRAFV600K mutations compared to placebo .

CONCLUSION

New therapeutic approaches are urgently needed to further reduce the risk of recurrence of melanoma in the adjuvant setting. Therefore, suitable patients should be included in appropriate adjuvant clinical studies, if these are available at the respective sites.

Muscle atrophy and organ enlargement associated with quality of life during systemic therapy for melanoma: findings from an AI-based body composition analysis

INTRODUCTION

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is emerging as an endpoint, adjunct to survival, in cancer treatment. For this reason, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has developed standardized quality-of-life questionnaires to collect patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM), which so far have been widely used in clinical trials to evaluate the impact of new drugs on cancer patients. However, while these questionnaires comprehensively describe patient functions, little is known about their association with patient characteristics. This study aims to bridge this gap and investigate the association between patient body composition and HRQoL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort of melanoma patients treated with systemic therapy who completed HRQoL questionnaires and had regular imaging follow-ups was included. The primary endpoint was the association between n = 116 AI-measured longitudinal volumes of thoracic and abdominal organs, subcutaneous and visceral fat, skeleton and muscles (estimated by TotalSegmentator), and physical functioning (PF), role functioning (RF) and fatigue (FA) (estimated by the EORTC-QLQ-C30).

RESULTS

The n = 358 patients were included. Our findings show larger liver, spleen, and gallbladder volumes associated with decreased PF and RF and an increase in FA (p < 0.05). Furthermore, larger muscle volumes were associated with an increase in PF and RF and a decrease in FA (p < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Our findings show significant associations between AI-measured body and organ analysis and HRQoL in patients with melanoma on systemic treatment. Future research is needed to understand the underlying cause and determine the possible predictive ability of these imaging features.

KEY POINTS

Question Are changes in body composition associated with changes in HRQoL in melanoma patients undergoing systemic therapy? Findings AI-based body composition analysis shows that larger muscle volumes are linked to improved HRQoL, while organ enlargement is associated with a decline in it. Clinical relevance Our findings indicate new imaging biomarkers that can help monitor patients and evaluate treatment responses. These biomarkers link patient function to physical changes during treatment, offering insights for creating response evaluation criteria that also consider improvements in quality of life.

Economic Evaluation of Inguinal Versus Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Patients with Stage III Metastatic Melanoma to Groin Lymph Nodes: Evidence from the EAGLE FM Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

We compared health outcomes and costs of inguinal lymphadenectomy (IL) versus ilio-inguinal lymphadenectomy (I-IL) for removal of metastatic melanoma to lymph nodes of the groin in adults with stage III melanoma.

METHODS

A within-trial cost-utility analysis was performed alongside an international randomized trial (EAGLE-FM) with 36 months follow-up from a health system perspective. Healthcare costs were measured by using trial records, and effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Deterministic sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of changes in costs or quality of life on overall results. Statistical bootstrapping was employed to estimate confidence intervals around the cost-utility ratio.

RESULTS

Among 98 trial participants (IL n = 50, I-IL n = 48), with no pelvic or distant disease clinically or on PET/CT imaging, the mean life years saved for those randomized to IL showed a small but nonsignificant increase of 0.05 years compared with those in the I-IL group (2.56 vs. 2.51 years, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.78 to 0.87). The mean difference in QALYs gained showed a small but nonsignificant increase of 0.04 QALYs (1.95 vs. 1.91, 95% CI -0.49 to 0.57). The mean hospital stay among IL patients was 6.16 days, 1.24 days shorter than I-IL patients (7.40 days) at 36 months follow-up. Mean per-patient healthcare costs of IL surgery were AU$6938 lower than for I-IL surgery ($26,555 vs. $33,493, 95% CI -$24,360 to $10,484). Inguinal lymphadenectomy was slightly more effective and slightly less expensive) over I-IL; a finding supported by 81% of bootstrapped estimates and upheld across sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that less extensive IL surgery might be the preferred surgical strategy for metastatic melanoma to the groin when PET/CT imaging shows no pelvic disease. This surgery is likely to improve quality-adjusted survival and may reduce healthcare costs; however, the differences noted in EAGLE-FM were limited by a small sample size and were not statistically significant.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02166788; anzctr.org.au ACTRN12614000721606.

Melanoma and Merkel Cell Carcinoma Clinical Trial Status

In the last decade, the management of melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma has changed dramatically following the results of landmark clinical trials in surgical and medical management. This review will provide a brief background for the clinical surgical oncologist as to how certain trials are conducted and designated by regulatory bodies. Additionally, we will herein review the landscape of ongoing multicenter interventional trials for cutaneous melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant Therapy in Melanoma: Current Evidence and Future Directions of Investigation

Neoadjuvant therapy for advance-stage melanoma has had increasing momentum over the past decade owing to several landmark clinical trials. Neoadjuvant therapy has now been shown to confer multiple advantages over adjuvant therapy, including more robust antitumor immunity, improved prognostication, and ability to personalize surgical and medical therapy based on therapeutic response. Neoadjuvant therapy has led to a major shift in clinical and surgical practice for melanoma, and future trials will give further insight into improving patient outcomes.

Recommendations of perioperative systemic therapies considering age or comorbidities in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and quality of cited evidence

IMPORTANCE

Perioperative therapy for cancer is offered to reduce the recurrence and improve overall long-term outcomes. Age and comorbidities of patients can influence the effectiveness and/or safety of perioperative therapy. It is important that key national guidelines, such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, reflect the benefit of perioperative therapy for key subpopulations of patients. However, this has not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perioperative treatment guidance, with regards to age and comorbidities, reported in the NCCN guidelines DESIGN SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: NCCN age and comorbidity in perioperative treatment guidelines.

INTERVENTION

Age and Comorbidities MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The existence of age or comorbidity-specific guidelines for perioperative therapy, the presence of literature support for these specific guidelines, and where they exist.

RESULTS

Only 2 of the 10 cancer types studied had specific guidelines on perioperative therapy based on age, and 4/10 had guidelines on perioperative therapy considering patients' comorbidities. 5 of the 10 cancer guidelines and 4/10 had vague advice on consideration of age and comorbidities respectively. A total of 30 recommendations made across the guidelines studied. Studies that are cited to support these recommendations were often pooled analyses of RCTs or subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (33%).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This study shows the lack of age and comorbidity-specific guidelines for many cancer types in the NCCN guidelines. In addition, several of these recommendations, where they exist, are also not supported by strong evidence such as RCTs. There is a need for more comprehensive guidelines that make recommendations accounting for patient-intrinsic factors.

Is One Year Enough? Extended Adjuvant Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib for Chinese Patients With Resected Stage III Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Pathogenic BRAF mutations drive constitutive MAPK pathway activation in melanoma, and targeted therapies with dabrafenib plus trametinib have improved outcomes in the adjuvant setting. However, the optimal duration of adjuvant therapy remains unclear. This retrospective study examined whether extending dabrafenib plus trametinib beyond 1 year offers additional clinical benefit in Chinese patients with resected Stage III melanoma.

METHODS

Medical records from six centers were reviewed for adults with BRAF V600E/K-positive, completely resected Stage III melanoma who received at least 12 months of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib. Patients were divided into a 1-year therapy group and a more-than-1-year therapy group. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was the primary end point; adverse events were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 122 patients included, 77 received more than 1 year of adjuvant therapy. The more-than-1-year group experienced significantly better RFS (log-rank p = 0.04), and longer therapy independently reduced recurrence risk in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.42; p = 0.035). Adverse event profiles did not differ between groups, and toxicity-related treatment modifications occurred primarily within the first year.

CONCLUSIONS

Extending dabrafenib plus trametinib beyond 1 year may provide improved RFS without increasing toxicity. Further prospective trials are warranted to confirm the impact on overall survival and identify optimal patient subsets for prolonged therapy.

Critical evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in pT1b and pT2a melanoma patients: A nationwide population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) aims to stage patients. According to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) staging manual, patients with pT1b or pT2a melanoma can be eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy, however, only if they have a sentinel node (SN) tumour burden > 1 mm. This study aims to determine the percentage of patients with pT1b or pT2a that will become eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy following SLNB.

METHODS

A nationwide, population-based study was conducted using data from the Dutch Pathology Databank. Patients diagnosed with pT1b and pT2a melanoma between 2002 and 2023 were included. The primary endpoint was the number of SNs with a tumour burden > 1 mm.

RESULTS

We identified 36,606 patients of who 16,042 underwent SLNB. SN positivity was 5 % for patients with pT1b melanoma, and 11 % for pT2a melanoma. A tumour burden > 1 mm was found in 1.5 % and 4.1 %, translating to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 69 for pT1b and 25 for pT2a.

CONCLUSION

This nationwide study demonstrated a low incidence of positive SNs and minimal likelihood of significant clinical outcomes following SLNB. Given the high NNT to be eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy, SLNB may no longer be justified for pT1b melanoma. For patients with pT2a melanoma, SLNB should be considered carefully, balancing limited clinical benefits against potential risks.

Clinical validation of droplet digital PCR assays in detecting BRAFV600-mutant circulating tumour DNA as a prognostic biomarker in patients with resected stage III melanoma receiving adjuvant therapy (COMBI-AD): a biomarker analysis from a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Cell-free, circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is an established measure of minimal residual disease; however, it is not utilised in melanoma management. We investigated whether ctDNA measurements could predict survival outcomes during adjuvant targeted therapy or placebo treatment in stage III melanoma, thereby identifying patients at high risk and low risk of recurrence.

METHODS

Analytically validated mutation-specific droplet digital PCR assays were used to measure BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K ctDNA in patients aged 18 years or older who were enrolled in the COMBI-AD trial, which was a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study of oral dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus oral trametinib (2 mg once daily) combination therapy versus two matched placebos in resected BRAFV600-mutant stage III melanoma. Patients were screened for enrolment between Jan 31, 2013, and Dec 11, 2014, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and were randomly assigned (1:1) to the two treatment groups. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival, and the results from final analysis have been previously published and will not be described here. Biomarker analysis was a prespecified exploratory endpoint and performed in the intention-to-treat population. We compared associations between survival outcomes and baseline (post-resection) ctDNA copies per mL, tumour mutational burden and interferon gamma (IFNG) gene expression. In a subset of patients, ctDNA quantities during follow-up or at recurrence were measured. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01682083, and has been completed.

FINDINGS

Baseline plasma samples were available for 597 of 870 patients (331 male patients and 266 female patients) and samples for assessing the ctDNA positivity rate at landmark follow-up timepoints of 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after treatment initiation were available for 94 of 870 patients. Additionally, samples were available from 118 of 870 patients within a 2-month timeframe before or after clinical or radiographic recurrence. Median follow-up for the biomarker analyses was 60 months (IQR 39-66) in the combination therapy group and 58 months (21-66) for the placebo group. ctDNA was detectable in 79 (13%) of 597 baseline samples. ctDNA positivity rate and mutant copies per mL plasma were significantly higher in patients with higher disease substages. As a binary variable, ctDNA detection was associated with worse recurrence-free survival (placebo group: median 3·71 months [95% CI 2·39-6·89] vs 24·41 months [17·28-43·13]; hazard ratio [HR] 2·91 [95% CI 1·99-4·25], p<0·0001); combination therapy group: median 16·59 months [95% CI 12·02-26·80] vs 68·11 months [50·36-not reached]; HR 2·98 [1·95-4·54], p<0·0001) and overall survival (placebo group: median 33·90 months [13·96-not reached] vs not reached; HR 3·35 [2·01-5·55], p<0·0001); combination therapy group: median 40·31 months [24·90-not reached] vs not reached; HR 4·27 [2·50-7·27], p<0·0001) in the placebo group and combination therapy groups. Baseline ctDNA was more strongly associated with survival outcomes than IFNG gene expression or tumour mutational burden. Patients with adverse longitudinal ctDNA kinetics (molecular relapse or persistently positive) had markedly shorter median recurrence-free survival (8·31 months [95% CI 5·39-12·20] and 5·32 months [2·79-not reached], respectively) compared with patients with favourable kinetics (ie, undetectable after positive baseline result: 19·25 months [16·39-not reached]; and durable undetectable: not reached [38·44-not reached], p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

Droplet digital PCR measurements of ctDNA to assess minimal residual disease before adjuvant targeted therapy and during follow-up can identify patients at high risk of early recurrence. Additional studies using ctDNA measurements to guide therapeutic interventions might lead to improvements in the management of resected stage III melanoma.

FUNDING

Novartis.

Monoclonal antibodies as adjuvant therapies for resected melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Systemic adjuvant therapy is indicated in patients with high-risk, resected melanoma to reduce recurrence risk and potentially improve survival rates. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) target immune checkpoints and have made significant advances as systemic adjuvant therapies.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the main clinical trials that tested adjuvant mAbs in resected high-risk melanoma, including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1); in addition to newer immunotherapies being tested in the adjuvant setting, including anti-lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3). We also briefly discuss targeted therapies as an alternative choice. Moreover, we highlight the pros and cons of using mAbs in the adjuvant setting, the reported adverse events (AEs), and the quality of life impact. Finally, we report data related to biomarker studies tested in the context of these clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to significantly improve relapse-free survival (RFS) as adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma. The long-term impact on overall survival (OS) was demonstrated in two trials that tested ipilimumab as compared to placebo (EORTC18071) and interferon-α (ECOG-ACRIN E1609). Furthermore, emerging data with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy utilizing ICIs have demonstrated improved outcomes in the management of locoregionally advanced disease when compared to upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy alone.

BRAF Targeting Across Solid Tumors: Molecular Aspects and Clinical Applications

BRAF mutations are critical drivers in cancers such as melanoma, colorectal cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer. The most common mutation, BRAF V600E, is a key therapeutic target. Targeted treatments with BRAF and MEK inhibitors have significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in melanoma patients. However, in cancers like metastatic colorectal cancer, BRAF mutations are associated with poor outcomes due to aggressive disease behavior and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Despite progress, resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors remains a major challenge, often driven by secondary mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, activation of alternative pathways such as phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks)/protein kinase B (AKT), or changes in the tumor microenvironment. These challenges have motivated ongoing research into combining BRAF inhibitors with immunotherapies to enhance and prolong treatment effectiveness. Future research must also account for the role of the cancer's tissue of origin, as the biological context significantly influences response to targeted therapies, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of tumor biology, micro-environment, and genetics.

LIN28B-mediated PI3K/AKT pathway activation promotes metastasis in colorectal cancer models

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer death because of metastatic spread. LIN28B is overexpressed in 30% of CRCs and promotes metastasis, yet its mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we genetically modified CRC cell lines to overexpress LIN28B, resulting in enhanced PI3K/AKT pathway activation and liver metastasis in mice. We developed genetically modified mouse models with constitutively active Pik3ca that form intestinal tumors progressing to liver metastases with an intact immune system, addressing the limitations of previous Pik3ca-mutant models, including long tumor latency, mixed histology, and lack of distant metastases. The PI3Kα-specific inhibitor alpelisib reduced migration and invasion in vitro and metastasis in vivo. We present a comprehensive analysis of vertical inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway in CRC using the FDA-approved drugs alpelisib and capivasertib (an AKT inhibitor) in combination with LY2584702 (a ribosomal protein S6 kinase inhibitor) in CRC cell lines and mouse- and patient-derived organoids. Tissue microarrays from patients with CRC verified that LIN28B and PI3K/AKT pathway activation correlate with CRC progression. These findings highlight the critical role of the LIN28B-mediated PI3K/AKT pathway in CRC metastasis, the therapeutic potential of targeted inhibition, and the promise of patient-derived organoids in precision medicine in metastatic CRC.

Adjuvant BRAF/MEK versus anti-PD-1 in BRAF-mutant melanoma: a propensity score matched survival analysis

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEK) and anti-PD-1 therapy have become the standard care in resected stage III/IV melanoma. A head-to-head clinical trial comparison is lacking.

METHODS

All stage III BRAF-mutant melanoma patients who received adjuvant BRAF/MEK or anti-PD-1 (2018-2022) were included from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare 1- and 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), and toxicity rates.

FINDINGS

Among 952 patients (226 BRAF/MEK and 726 anti-PD-1), BRAF/MEK-treated patients had lower disease stages (16·4% versus 9·9% stage IIIA; p < 0·01) and more often comorbidities (75·2% versus 63·4%; p < 0·01). Median follow-up was 29 months. PSM created two similar groups of 223 patients. RFS, DMFS, and OS were not significantly different before and after PSM. Two-year RFS was 62% (95% CI 55-71) for BRAF/MEK and 65% (95% CI 58-72) for anti-PD-1; 2-year DMFS was 81% (95% CI 74-87) versus 81% (95% CI 75-86); 2-year OS was 86% (95% CI 81-92) versus 89% (95% CI 85-94), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was reported in 11·7% (BRAF/MEK) and 13·4% (anti-PD-1).

CONCLUSION

After PSM, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between adjuvant anti-PD-1 and BRAF/MEK-treated patients with stage III BRAF-mutant melanoma.

Longitudinal Analysis Reveals Dynamic Changes in Histopathologic Features in Responders to Neoadjuvant Treatment in a Stage III BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Cohort

Despite advances in systemic therapies, cutaneous melanoma remains a highly deadly disease. Patients with high-risk stage III melanoma have a significant likelihood of recurrence following surgery. Although adjuvant immunotherapy has been the standard of care, recent evidence demonstrates that neoadjuvant immunotherapy is more effective for higher-risk stage III patients, showing superior survival outcomes compared with adjuvant immunotherapy. This has led to an immediate paradigm shift in clinical practice toward neoadjuvant therapy for this cohort. The NeoTrio clinical trial assessed the efficacy of sequential or combination BRAF-targeted therapy with anti-programmed cell death-1 in the neoadjuvant setting. However, research on longitudinal histopathologic changes during this treatment period remains limited. Analysis of hematoxylin and eosin slides from 60 patients across 4 matched neoadjuvant timepoints revealed dynamic changes in a number of treatment response features. Females achieved significantly higher rates of major pathologic response (P = .002) and displayed higher levels of inflammatory fibrosis (P = .04) and hyalinized fibrosis (P = .01). The presence of tertiary lymphoid structures (P = .013) and plasma cells (P = .02) at resection was significantly associated with response. Combination scoring of histopathologic features (composite score and the immune-related pathologic response [irPR] score) was significantly associated with response early during the neoadjuvant period (composite score at week 2 on-treatment, P = .03; high irPR score at week 2 on-treatment, P = .01). A high irPR score at week 2 on-treatment was also found to be significantly associated with a lower chance of recurrence at this early neoadjuvant timepoint (P = .02). Other features associated with a lower likelihood of recurrence included increased hyalinized fibrosis (P = .015) and the presence of extensive lymphocyte density score (P = .01), tertiary lymphoid structures (P = .03), and plasma cells (P = .01). This study deepens our understanding of treatment response markers and their dynamic changes during neoadjuvant therapy. It underscores the significance of these features, particularly given their early emergence and strong associations with response and recurrence.

Efficacy of adjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIA cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition (AJCC v8) stage IIIA melanoma have been underrepresented in clinical trials of adjuvant drug therapy. The benefit of adjuvant targeted therapy and immunotherapy in this population is unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicentre, retrospective study, patients with stage IIIA melanoma (AJCC v8) who received adjuvant pembrolizumab or nivolumab [anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)], BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy dabrafenib + trametinib (TT) or no adjuvant treatment [observation (OBS)] were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and toxicity rates were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 628 patients from 34 centres across Australia, Europe and the United States were identified-256 in anti-PD-1, 80 in TT and 292 in OBS. The median follow-up was 2.6 years (interquartile range 1.6-3.4 years). The presence of some key poor prognostic variables was significantly higher in anti-PD-1 compared with OBS. The 2-year RFS was 79.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 74.1% to 84.8%] for anti-PD-1, 98.6% (95% CI 96.0% to 100%) for TT and 84.3% (95% CI 79.9% to 89.0%) for OBS. The 2-year DMFS was 88.4% (95% CI 84.3% to 92.8%) in anti-PD-1, 100% in TT and 91.1% (95% CI 87.7% to 94.7%) in OBS. Higher Breslow thickness and higher mitotic rate were associated with higher risk of recurrence in anti-PD-1 and OBS (P < 0.05). Rates of ≥grade 3 toxicities were 10.9% with anti-PD-1 and 17.5% with TT; discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 13.3% and 21.2%, respectively. Rates of unresolved toxicity at last follow-up were 26.9% in the anti-PD-1 group and 12.5% in the TT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Stage IIIA melanoma has a modest risk of recurrence. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 did not significantly improve RFS or DMFS compared with OBS alone. Adjuvant TT appears promising over anti-PD-1 or OBS. Outcomes after adjuvant therapy in this population needs further study in larger datasets with longer follow-up or prospective randomised trials.

Cutaneous melanoma

Cutaneous melanoma is a common cancer in Australia and New Zealand, Europe, and North America, and its incidence is still increasing in many regions. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure (for example, through excessive sunlight exposure) remains the primary risk factor for melanoma; however, public awareness campaigns have led to a marked reduction in mortality. In addition to genetic damage from UV radiation, specific genetic alterations have been linked to melanoma. The stage of the tumour at the time of diagnosis is of greater importance for melanoma prognosis than in almost any other cancer. Context-dependent genetic mutations that attenuate tumour-suppressive mechanisms or activate growth-promoting signalling pathways are crucial factors in the development of cutaneous melanoma. In addition to external factors such as UV radiation, the tumour microenvironment can contribute to melanoma progression, invasion and metastasis. Cutaneous melanoma treatment has improved considerably over the past decade with the discovery and development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and therapy targeting BRAF and MEK. Over the next decade, several priorities are likely to influence melanoma research and management, including the continued advance of precision medicine methods to identify the most suitable patients for the most effective treatment, with the aim of improving clinical outcomes.

Melanoma neoadjuvant treatment: review and update of recent trials

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is emerging as an effective approach for resectable stage III/IV melanoma, showing improvements in disease response and survival outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes findings from neoadjuvant treatment trials in melanoma patients. Using the PubMed search engine and including the keywords 'neoadjuvant,' 'immunotherapy,' and 'melanoma,' we selected 18 trials that showed efficacy in patients with melanoma, mainly testing checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination. Across all trials examined, treatments showed objective disease responses, which frequently translated into improved disease-free survival.

EXPERT OPINION

Additional phase III studies comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies are needed to establish the optimal standard of care. The variety of regimens and dosing schedules investigated highlights the need for further research to determine the most appropriate treatments in this clinical setting. Advances in the study of biomarkers that can identify specific subgroups of patients will guide future research in this field.

Combined Omipalisib and MAPK Inhibition Suppress PDAC Growth

Background: Oncogenic KRAS mutations are nearly ubiquitous in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), yet therapeutic attempts to target KRAS, as well as downstream MAPK pathway effectors, have shown limited clinical success. While KRAS canonically drives MAPK signaling via RAF-MEK-ERK, it is also known to play a role in PI3K-AKT signaling. Methods: Our therapeutic study targeted the PI3K pathway with the drug Omipalisib (p110α/β/δ/γ and mTORC1/2 inhibitor) in combination with two different MAPK pathway inhibitors: Trametinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor) or SHP099-HCL (SHP099; SHP2 inhibitor). Western blot analysis demonstrated that the application of Trametinib or SHP099 alone selectively blocked ERK phosphorylation (pERK) but failed to suppress phosphorylated AKT (pAKT). Conversely, Omipalisib alone successfully inhibited pAKT but failed to suppress pERK. Therefore, we hypothesized that a combination therapeutic comprised of Omipalisib with either Trametinib or SHP099 would inhibit two prominent mitogenic pathways, MAPK and PI3K-AKT, and effectively suppress PDAC growth. Results: In vitro studies demonstrated that, in several cell lines, both Omipalisib/Trametinib and Omipalisib/SHP099 combination therapeutic strategies were more effective than treatment with each drug individually at reducing proliferation, colony formation, and cell migration compared to vehicle controls. In vivo oral administration of combined Omipalisib/Trametinib treatment was significantly more effective than Omipalisib/SHP099 in reducing implanted tumor growth, and the Omipalisib/Trametinib treatment more effectively reduced tumor progression and prolonged survival in an aggressive genetically engineered mouse model of PDAC than either Omipalisib or Trametinib alone. Conclusions: Altogether, our data support a rationale for a dual treatment strategy targeting both PI3K and MAPK pathways in pancreatic cancers.

Completion of nodal dissection in cutaneous melanoma with metastatic sentinel nodes: Prognostic impact in a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

In primary cutaneous melanoma (CM) with metastatic sentinel lymph node(s) (SLNB), treatment strategies may include completing a regional lymph node dissection (CLND). The prognostic benefit of this therapeutic approach remains a topic of debate. This retrospective, population-based cohort study explores the prognostic impact of CLND in a real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

This study analysed 280 incident cases of AJCC stage III CM with metastatic SLNB, as recorded by the Veneto population-based Regional Cancer Registry in 2015, 2017, and 2019. The overall survival and CM-specific survival rates were compared between patients who underwent CLND and those who did not. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and Fine-Gray models for competing risks tested the relationship between lymphadenectomy and overall and CM-specific survival.

RESULTS

Among CM patients with metastatic SLNB, 199/280 (71.1%) proceeded with CLND. When compared to those who did not receive treatment, CLND did not demonstrate significant advantages in terms of overall survival and CM-specific survival rates. The cost analysis found no significant differences in treatment choice (estimated costs: €23,695.71 for the treated group and €25,003.55 for the untreated group [p = 0.69]).

CONCLUSIONS

The present real-world data support omitting CLND in stage III CM with histologically documented sentinel nodal metastasis.

Estimating Long-Term Survivorship Rates Among Patients With Resected Stage III/IV Melanoma: Analyses From CheckMate 238 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 18071 Trials

PURPOSE

Standard-of-care treatments for patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma include the immuno-oncology (IO) agents nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI). This study used mixture cure models (MCMs) to estimate cure rates among patients treated with NIVO or IPI in the phase III CheckMate 238 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02388906) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 18071 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00636168) trials, and to assess the impact of use of adjuvant immunotherapy on cure rates versus watchful waiting.

METHODS

MCMs were applied to patient-level recurrence-free survival data from CheckMate 238 and EORTC 18071. Cured patients were assumed to experience no disease recurrence and mortality risks similar to the general population. Uncured patients were at risk of disease recurrence and all-cause death. The survival trend of the cured patients was estimated using life expectancy data for a general population with the same baseline demographic characteristics. A regression model assessed the odds ratios (ORs) of cure across key subgroups on the basis of baseline characteristics of the study populations.

RESULTS

In CheckMate 238, estimated cure rates were 48.3% (95% CI, 41.8 to 54.9) with NIVO and 38.2% (95% CI, 32.7 to 44.1) with IPI. In EORTC 18071, estimated cure rates were 38.0% (95% CI, 32.1 to 44.2) with IPI and 29.2% (95% CI, 24.4 to 34.6) with placebo. In the indirect comparison of the two trials, the odds of cure were significantly higher with NIVO than with placebo (OR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.49 to 3.65]).

CONCLUSION

Analyses involving two large phase III trials investigating adjuvant IO treatment for resected melanoma demonstrate higher cure rates for both NIVO and IPI than placebo, with NIVO providing the highest cure rate. Similar cure rates were estimated for patients treated with IPI in both trials, despite staging and dosing differences.

Relapse-free survival with adjuvant dabrafenib/trametinib therapy after relapse on a prior adjuvant CPI in BRAF V600-mutated stage III/IV melanoma

BACKGROUND

In BRAF-mutated high-risk melanoma, targeted therapy (BRAF/MEK inhibitors) and checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy have durable benefits as first-line (1L) adjuvant therapy. Based on differing action mechanisms of BRAF/MEK inhibitors and CPI immunotherapies, there is interest in evaluating the activity of 2L adjuvant targeted therapy in decreasing the risk of subsequent recurrence after repeat resection following relapse on/after 1L adjuvant CPI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review of BRAF V600-mutated resected stage III/IV melanoma patients in the United States, Australia, and The Netherlands who received 1L adjuvant CPI immunotherapy, relapsed locoregionally/distantly, were again resected to no evidence of disease, and received dabrafenib/trametinib (dab/tram) as 2L adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) from initiation of 2L adjuvant dab/tram (RFS-2), analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included (median age 50 years, 63% male, 87% stage III, median follow-up 19 months from 2L dab/tram initiation). Median dab/tram duration was 10.1 months (range: 1 day-22.7 months), with half discontinuing due to progression or adverse events. Median (95% CI) RFS-2 was 18.9 (14.9-28.1) months, with 91%, 81%, and 58% remaining relapse-free at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Most patients remained distant metastasis-free at 6, 12, and 18 months (97%, 85%, and 71%, respectively). Two patients were deceased at the last follow-up, with 97% alive at 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 80% of patients remained relapse- and metastasis-free at 12 months after 2L dab/tram initiation, with only 2 deaths observed. Dab/tram appears to have activity in the 2L adjuvant setting, although more follow-up is required.

PTPN23-dependent activation of PI3KC2α is a therapeutic vulnerability of BRAF-mutant cancers

BRAF mutations drive initiation and progression of various tumors. While BRAF inhibitors are effective in BRAF-mutant melanoma patients, intrinsic or acquired resistance to these therapies is common. Here, we identify non-receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase 23 (PTPN23) as an alternative effective target in BRAF-mutant cancer cells. Silencing PTPN23 selectively kills BRAF-mutant melanoma cells but not those with wild-type BRAF. Mechanistically, PTPN23, a catalytically inactive phosphatase, intriguingly induces WNK3-mediated phosphorylation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase class II alpha (PI3KC2α) at serine 329, enhancing its catalytic activity. This activation promotes production of PI(3,4)P2 and subsequent AKT2 activation at endosomes to support cell survival. Genetic or pharmacological targeting of the PTPN23-PI3KC2α-AKT2 signaling axis, alone or in combination with BRAF inhibitors, effectively inhibits the growth of BRAF-mutant melanoma and other cancers in vitro and in vivo. We also demonstrate that melanocyte-specific knockout of PTPN23 significantly inhibits BRAFV600E-driven melanomagenesis. Altogether, our findings demonstrate that targeting PTPN23/PI3KC2α offers a new and viable therapeutic strategy for BRAF-mutant cancers.

Survival Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Exenteration for Pelvic Mucosal Melanomas: Retrospective Single Institution Australian Study

BACKGROUND

Pelvic mucosal melanomas, including anorectal and urogenital melanomas, are rare and aggressive, with a median overall survival of up to 20 months. Pelvic mucosal melanomas behave differently from their cutaneous counterparts and present late with locoregional disease, making pelvic exenteration its only curative surgical option.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes after pelvic exenteration in pelvic mucosal melanomas at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series from a prospectively collected pelvic exenteration database from October 1994 to November 2023.

SETTING

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (quaternary institution), Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

PATIENTS

Seven patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for pelvic mucosal melanoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival, disease-free survival, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Of the 7 patients, most were women (n = 5; 71.4%) and had a median age of 65 years (range, 36-79). Five patients (71.4%) underwent pelvic exenteration for primary pelvic mucosal melanoma, 3 of which were anorectal and 2 vaginal melanomas. Two patients (28.6%) had recurrent anorectal melanoma and received neoadjuvant radiotherapy after an initial wide local excision. Three patients (42.9%) required total pelvic exenteration, whereas 2 required a central pelvic exenteration (28.6%). The remaining procedures included central and lateral pelvic exenteration and anterior, central, and lateral pelvic exenteration. The median length of hospital stay was 19.7 days. Five patients had postoperative complications with 1 major complication (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa). At the completion of the study, there were 4 mortalities. Mean survival was 23.6 months (range, 2-100) with a recurrence rate of 83%. The median time to recurrence was 3 months, despite 6 patients (85.7%) having R0 resections. Distant recurrence, specifically to bone, the lungs, and the liver, was most common.

LIMITATIONS

Small study cohort due to rarity of disease, limiting generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic exenteration for pelvic mucosal melanoma appears to help control local disease as recurrence is most commonly distant or regional. See Video Abstract .

RESULTADOS DE SUPERVIVENCIA EN PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A EXENTERACIN PLVICA POR MELANOMAS DE LA MUCOSA PLVICA ESTUDIO RETROSPECTIVO AUSTRALIANO DE UNA SOLA INSTITUCIN

ANTECEDENTES:Los melanomas de la mucosa pélvica (MM), incluidos los melanomas anorrectales y urogenitales, son raros y agresivos, con una supervivencia global media de hasta 20 meses. Los melanomas de la mucosa pélvica se comportan de manera diferente a sus contrapartes cutáneas y se presentan tardíamente con enfermedad locoregional, lo que hace que la exenteración pélvica (EP) sea su única opción quirúrgica curativa.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar los resultados de supervivencia tras la exenteración pélvica en melanomas de la mucosa pélvica en el Royal Prince Alfred Hospital.DISEÑO:Serie de casos retrospectivos de una base de datos de exenteración pélvica recopilada prospectivamente desde octubre de 1994 hasta noviembre de 2023.ESCENARIO:Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (institución cuaternaria), Camperdown, Nueva Gales del Sur, Australia.PACIENTES:Siete pacientes sometidos a exenteración pélvica por melanoma de la mucosa pélvica.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Supervivencia general, supervivencia libre de enfermedad y tasas de complicaciones.RESULTADOS:De los siete pacientes, la mayoría fueron mujeres (n = 5, 71,4%) y tenían una edad media de 65 años (rango 36-79). Cinco pacientes (71,4%) fueron sometidos a una exenteración pélvica por melanoma primario de la mucosa pélvica; tres de los cuales eran melanomas anorrectales y dos vaginales. Dos pacientes (28,6%) tuvieron melanoma anorrectal recurrente y recibieron radioterapia neoadyuvante después de una escisión local amplia inicial.Tres pacientes (42,9%) requirieron una exenteración pélvica total, mientras que dos requirieron una exenteración pélvica central (28,6%). Los procedimientos restantes fueron una exenteración pélvica central y lateral; junto con una exenteración pélvica anterior, central y lateral. La duración media de la estancia hospitalaria fue de 19,7 días. Cinco pacientes tuvieron complicaciones postoperatorias con una complicación mayor (Clavien-Dindo IIIa). Al finalizar el estudio, hubo cuatro muertes. La supervivencia media fue de 23,6 meses (rango 2-100) con una tasa de recurrencia del 83%. El tiempo medio hasta la recurrencia fue de tres meses, a pesar de que seis pacientes (85,7%) tuvieron resecciones R0. La recurrencia distante, es decir, en hueso, pulmón e hígado fueron la más comúnes.LIMITACIONES:Cohorte de estudio pequeña debido a la rareza de la enfermedad, lo que limita la generalización.CONCLUSIÓN:La exenteración pélvica para el melanoma de la mucosa pélvica parece ayudar a controlar la enfermedad local, ya que la recurrencia es más comúnmente distante o regional. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto ).

Is there still a place for lymph node dissection for stage III melanoma since the approval of adjuvant therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to explore the evolving management strategies for stage III melanoma, focusing on the comparative effectiveness of traditional surgical approaches like complete lymph node dissection (CLND) versus modern adjuvant therapies. It also examines the latest evidence on the efficacy, risks, and complications of these strategies, emphasizing the role of shared decision-making between patients and clinicians.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent clinical trials and meta-analyses, including the MSLT-II and DeCOG-SLT studies, have demonstrated that CLND may not significantly improve survival outcomes in melanoma patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)-positive status. Instead, a shift towards observation combined with adjuvant therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies (for BRAF-mutant melanoma) has been observed. These approaches have been associated with similar or improved recurrence-free survival rates and reduced treatment-related complications. However, challenges remain in establishing standardized protocols for adjuvant therapy use.

SUMMARY

The management of stage III melanoma is rapidly transitioning from routine CLND towards a more individualized approach that incorporates active surveillance and adjuvant therapies based on tumor biology and patient-specific factors. Multidisciplinary discussions are essential to guide treatment decisions, and further research is required to develop clear, evidence-based protocols.

Challenges and opportunities of predicting overall survival benefit from improvements to recurrence-free survival in stage II/III melanoma: a correlation meta-analysis

Background

We evaluated the association between treatment effects on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying resected stage II/III melanoma.

Methods

Hazard ratios (HRs) of RFS and OS were obtained from a literature review. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis (BRMA) and weighted linear regression (WLR) models estimated correlations [95% confidence interval (CI)] between HRRFS and HROS. Slopes and intercepts of surrogacy equations were estimated. Surrogate threshold effect was derived from WLR for various sample sizes. Validity and predictive performance of WLR were assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation. Sensitivity analyses evaluated impact of RCTs violating proportional hazards assumption, publication year, treatments' mechanism of action, and cancer stage.

Results

Across 30 RCTs, treatments included interferon-α (n = 17), other immunotherapy-containing regimens (n = 10), immune checkpoint inhibitors (n = 3), and targeted therapies (n = 2). BRMA (0.68, 95% CI 0.45-0.82) and WLR (0.71, 95% CI 0.42-0.87) estimated moderate correlation between HRRFS and HROS. Surrogate threshold effect was 0.66/0.68 for studies with 800/1000 patients. Slope coefficients were statistically significant in both models (95% CI 0.09-0.61 BRMA; 95% CI 0.41-0.92 WLR). The 95% prediction intervals around the HROS predicted by WLR accurately contained 29/31 (93.5%) of observed HROS. Across sensitivity analyses correlations ranged between 0.69 and 0.84 (BRMA) and 0.55 and 0.77 (WLR).

Conclusions

Statistically meaningful correlation between HRRFS and HROS can assist earlier predictions of OS benefit from improvements in RFS for RCTs in resected stage II/III melanoma and provide insights for the earlier evaluation of emerging therapies. Primary model predictions should be approached with caution as nearly half of the evidence base comprised interferon-α trials.

Real-life evidence of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma in Spain: the BECARE (GEM-2002) trial

Purpose

Combined BRAF/MEK inhibition with encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in phase III clinical trials, and is the standard of care for advanced/metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. However, real-life evidence is limited, particularly in patients pre-treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

Patients and methods

BECARE GEM 2002 was a retrospective, non-interventional study aimed at investigating the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of EB in patients with unresectable or metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma conducted at 21 sites in Spain. The primary objective of this study was to characterise the population of patients receiving EB and assess the efficacy and tolerability of EB in real life. The study included patients treated according to standard clinical practice with EB as the 1st line or 2nd line after progression to ICI for an unresectable or metastatic stage. Patients who previously received treatment with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor, other than as adjuvants, that ended ≥ 6 m before EB were not eligible.

Results

From September 2021 to March 2023, 117 patients were included; 89 (76.1%) and 28 (23.9%) patients received EB as 1st line and 2nd line, respectively. The median follow-up was 13.8 months (95% CI: 12.0-17.4). In patients with EB as 1st line treatment, ORR and median PFS were 75% and 12 months (95% CI: 9.4-18.6), respectively. In patients with EB as 2nd line treatment after ICI, ORR and median PFS were 77.8% and 12.5 months (95% CI: 6.6-NA), respectively. In patients with brain metastasis ORR and median PFS were 70.8% and 6.3 months (95% CI: 6.1-10.3). Treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥3 were reported in 17 (14.5%) patients; transaminitis (9.4%) and diarrhoea (2.6%) were the most frequent adverse events.

Conclusion

In this real-world study, EB treatment demonstrated effectiveness and a consistent safety profile in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma treated according to standard clinical practice, including in those with prior ICI treatment and of brain metastasis; therefore, EB is a feasible treatment option for unresectable and metastatic melanoma.Clinical trial identification: REec: 0004-2021-OBS.

Clinical trial identification

REec: 0004-2021-OBS.

Incidence and Management of Retinopathy and Uveitis in Patients Receiving BRAF/MEK Inhibitor Therapy

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical features of ocular adverse events in patients receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 65 patients were treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (dabrafenib/trametinib or encorafenib/binimetinib).

RESULTS

Of the 65 patients, 28 had malignant melanoma and 37 had non-melanoma malignancies. Bilateral MEK-associated retinopathy was observed in nine cases; none experienced vision loss due to MEK-associated retinopathy. Uveitis was diagnosed in four patients (6.1%), three of whom presented with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH)-like uveitis. All VKH-like uveitis cases were observed in patients with melanoma and their incidences were significantly higher in these patients than in those without melanoma (p = .04). Treatment with corticosteroids resulted in either resolution or control of symptoms in all cases of VKH-like uveitis, enabling continuation of BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy.

CONCLUSION

VKH-like uveitis was found to be significantly more frequent in patients with melanoma than in those with other malignancies.

Prognostic factors and outcomes of adjuvant and first-line metastatic treatments in melanoma a Turkish oncology group study

Management of melanoma has changed significantly with the discovery of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Our aim in the study is to determine which treatment alternatives, specifically dabrafenib plus trametinib and ICIs, are effective in adjuvant therapy and which treatment is effective as first-line metastatic therapy. This retrospective, multicenter study included 120 patients diagnosed with stage IIIB-IIID melanoma receiving both adjuvant and first-line metastatic treatment between 2007 and 2023. Data on clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment regimens and outcomes were collected. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Patients treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib as adjuvant therapy had the longest relapse-free survival (RFS) (median: 8.3 months), followed by those treated with interferon (4.1 months) and nivolumab (1.9 months) (p = 0.002). Metastatically, the highest ORR was observed in patients treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib (54.5%), followed by ICI (52.0%) and chemotherapy (33.3%). Similarly, DCR was superior for dabrafenib plus trametinib (86.3%) compared to ICI (70.8%) and chemotherapy (66.6%). Median PFS was 9.7 months (95% CI 7.2-12.2 months) in the whole group. This was 14.3 months (95% CI 9.6-19.0 months) with ICI, 10.3 months (95% CI 4.2-16.4 months) with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and 6.3 months (95% CI 4.7-7.9 months) with chemotherapy, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Dabrafenib plus trametinib showed the longest median OS (53.5 months) in metastatic patients and was significantly better than chemotherapy (33.6 months) (p < 0.001). BRAF V600E mutation, RFS > 6 months, ORR are all independent factors for OS prognosis. In our study, dabrafenib plus trametinib combination was more effective in adjuvant treatment of melanoma, while immunotherapy was more effective in metastatic first-line treatment.

A comparison of real-world data on adjuvant treatment in patients with stage III BRAF V600 mutated melanoma - Results of systematic literature research

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, PD-1-based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies (TT) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors transformed melanoma treatment. Both are widely used in the adjuvant setting. However, for patients with a BRAF V600 mutation, the optimal adjuvant therapy remains unclear due to the lack of head-to-head comparison studies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of real-world data on adjuvant therapy in stage III melanoma to determine the best option for patients with BRAF V600 mutations. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for TT and ICI using Digitizelt software.

RESULTS

Nine publications with 3625 patients were included. TT showed better relapse-free survival (RFS) at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months than ICI. A similar trend was observed for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), with no apparent difference in overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Real-world data suggest that adjuvant TT may be associated with better RFS and DMFS in stage III BRAF V600-mutated melanoma compared to ICI.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2024

A unique collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on cutaneous melanoma diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. Cutaneous melanomas are excised with one to two-centimeter safety margins. For a correct stage classification and treatment decision, a sentinel lymph node biopsy shall be offered in patients with tumor thickness ≥ 1.0 mm or ≥ 0.8 mm with additional histological risk factors, although there is as yet no clear survival benefit for this approach. Therapeutic decisions should be primarily made by an interdisciplinary oncology team ("Tumor Board"). Adjuvant therapies can be proposed in completely resected stage IIB-IV. In stage II only PD-1 inhibitors are approved. In stage III anti-PD-1 therapy or dabrafenib plus trametinib for patients with BRAFV600 mutated melanoma can be discussed. In resected stage IV, nivolumab can be offered, as well as ipilimumab and nivolumab, in selected, high-risk patients. In patients with clinically detected macroscopic, resectable disease, neoadjuvant therapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed complete surgical resection and adjuvant therapy according to pathological response and BRAF status can be offered. Neoadjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab followed by complete surgical resection and adjuvant pembrolizumab is also recommended. For patients with disease recurrence after (neo) adjuvant therapy, further treatment should consider the type of (neo) adjuvant therapy received as well as the time of recurrence, i.e., on or off therapy. In patients with irresectable stage III/IV disease systemic treatment is always indicated. For first line treatment PD-1 antibodies alone or in combination with CTLA-4 or LAG-3 antibodies shall be considered. In stage IV melanoma with a BRAFV600 mutation, first-line therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be offered as an alternative to immunotherapy, in selected cases. In patients with primary resistance to immunotherapy and harboring a BRAFV600 mutation, this therapy shall be offered as second line. Other second line therapies include therapy with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors not used in first line. This guideline is valid until the end of 2026.

Adjuvant Systemic Immunotherapies for Resected Stage III Melanoma: A Single-Centre Retrospective Clinical Practice Review

Melanoma poses significant challenges due to its resistance to conventional therapies and increasing incidence rates. Stage III melanoma, characterised by regional lymph node involvement, has a high risk of recurrence despite surgical resection. Adjuvant immunotherapy, particularly using the PD-1 inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab, has shown promising results in improving recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in Stage III melanoma patients. This retrospective analysis examined the effects of adjuvant pembrolizumab or nivolumab on patients with Stage III melanoma treated in a tertiary oncology centre. Of the 110 patients, 95 received pembrolizumab and 15 received nivolumab. The pembrolizumab completion rate was 62.1%, with 31.2% discontinuing due to disease progression or adverse effects. The nivolumab completion rate was lower at 40%, with 60% discontinuing due to toxicity or disease progression. Grade 3 or higher toxicities were observed in 17% of pembrolizumab and 53.3% of nivolumab patients. Disease progression occurred in 27.4% of pembrolizumab and 26.7% of nivolumab patients. Pembrolizumab showed a 12-month RFS of 78.9% and 24-month RFS of 77.6%, with an OS of 97.9% at 12 months. Nivolumab exhibited a 12-month RFS of 86.7% and 24-month RFS of 80%. RFS rates varied by disease stage and mutation status. Adjuvant pembrolizumab and nivolumab both demonstrate efficacy in improving RFS and OS in Stage III melanoma patients. Pembrolizumab has higher completion rates and fewer toxicities compared to nivolumab. Further studies are warranted to explore long-term outcomes and optimise treatment strategies.

A comprehensive review of targeting RAF kinase in cancer

RAF kinases, particularly the BRAF isoform, play a crucial role in the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, regulating key cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Dysregulation of this pathway often caused by mutations in the BRAF gene or alterations in upstream regulators like Ras and receptor tyrosine kinases contributes significantly to cancer development. Mutations, such as BRAF-V600E, are present in a variety of malignancies, with the highest prevalence in melanoma. Targeted therapies against RAF kinases have achieved substantial success, especially in BRAF-V600E-mutant melanomas, where inhibitors like vemurafenib and dabrafenib have demonstrated remarkable efficacy, leading to improved patient outcomes. These inhibitors have also shown clinical benefits in cancers such as thyroid and colorectal carcinoma, although to a lesser extent. Despite these successes, therapeutic resistance remains a major hurdle. Resistance mechanisms, including RAF dimerization, feedback reactivation of the MAPK pathway, and paradoxical activation of ERK signaling, often lead to diminished efficacy over time, resulting in disease progression or even secondary malignancies. In response, current research is focusing on novel therapeutic strategies, including combination therapies that target multiple components of the pathway simultaneously, such as MEK inhibitors used in tandem with RAF inhibitors. Additionally, next-generation RAF inhibitors are being developed to address resistance and enhance therapeutic specificity. This review discusses the clinical advancements in RAF-targeted therapies, with a focus on ongoing efforts to overcome therapeutic resistance and enhance outcomes for cancer patients. It also underscores the persistent challenges in effectively targeting RAF kinase in oncology.

Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Multigene Panel Sequencing in Advanced Melanoma: A Population-Level Real-World Target Trial Emulation

PURPOSE

Targeted therapy and immunotherapy promise improved survival in patients with advanced melanoma, yet the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multigene panel sequencing compared with single-gene BRAF testing to guide therapeutic decisions is unknown.

METHODS

Our population-based quasi-experimental retrospective target trial emulation used comprehensive patient-level data for 364 British Columbia, Canada, adults with an advanced melanoma diagnosis receiving multigene panel sequencing or single-gene BRAF testing between September 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. We 1:1 matched multigene panel patients to controls using genetic algorithm-based matching. Outcomes included 3-year overall survival (OS) and health care costs (2021 Canadian dollars [CAD]) with incremental net monetary benefit for life-years gained (LYG). Outcomes were analyzed using inverse probability of censoring weighted linear regression for the intention-to-treat (ITT) effect. The per-protocol (PP) effect estimation also included stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights. We then used Weibull regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

We matched 147 multigene panel patients to controls, achieving balance for all covariates. After matching, ITT incremental costs were $19,447 CAD (95% CI, -$18,516 to $76,006) and incremental LYG were 0.22 (95% CI, -0.05 to 0.49). We found uncertainty in differences on OS using Kaplan-Meier (P = .11) and Weibull regression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.03]) in the ITT. PP incremental costs were $36,367 CAD (95% CI, -$6,653 to $120,216]) and incremental LYG were 0.56 (95% CI, 0.39 to 1.24), with corresponding differences in OS using Kaplan-Meier (P = .02) and Weibull regression (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.87]). The probability of multigene panels being cost-effective at $100,000/LYG CAD was 55% for ITT and 65% for PP.

CONCLUSION

The cost-effectiveness of multigene panels was evenly poised at higher thresholds, even when accounting for treatment initiation. Health systems reimbursing multigene panels and expensive therapies may be confronted with a value tradeoff, in which there may be improved survival albeit with a modest change in cost-effectiveness.

DCLRE1B as a novel prognostic biomarker associated with immune infiltration: a pancancer analysis

The DNA cross-link repair 1B (DCLRE1B) gene is involved in repairing cross-links between DNA strands, including those associated with Hoyeraal-Hreidarsson syndrome and congenital dyskeratosis. However, its role in tumours is not well understood. DCLRE1B expression profiles were examined in tumour tissues and normal tissues using TCGA, GTEx, and TARGET datasets. Additionally, we performed experiments with clinical melanoma samples to verify DCLRE1B expression patterns. We also performed pancancer analyses to investigate the diverse roles of DCLRE1B in the biological functions of various cancers. DCLRE1B exhibited distinct expression patterns and played crucial prognostic roles in most tumours. In particular, high expression of DCLRE1B in melanoma was significantly correlated with a poor prognosis and increased malignancy. DCLRE1B was also found to be associated with the immune landscape and various immune biomarkers and regulators. Furthermore, our analysis identified potential small molecules that could target DCLRE1B in different cancer types. The DCLRE1B gene may be involved in the development and occurrence of a variety of cancers. Additionally, DCLRE1B affects various tumour types not only by mediating DNA repair but also by shaping the differential immune microenvironment. In conclusion, our research offers fresh perspectives on the diagnosis and treatment of different types of cancers.

Melanoma's New Frontier: Exploring the Latest Advances in Blood-Based Biomarkers for Melanoma

Melanoma is one of the most malignant cancers, and the global incidence of cutaneous melanoma is increasing. While melanomas are highly prone to metastasize if diagnosed late, early detection and treatment significantly reduce the risk of mortality. Identifying patients at higher risk of metastasis, who might benefit from early adjuvant therapies, is particularly important, especially with the advent of new melanoma treatments. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop additional prognostic biomarkers for melanoma to improve early stratification of patients and accurately identify high-risk subgroups, ultimately enabling more effective personalized treatments. Recent advances in melanoma therapy, including targeted treatments and immunotherapy, have underscored the importance of biomarkers in determining prognosis and predicting treatment response. The clinical application of these markers holds the potential for significant advancements in melanoma management. Various tumor-derived genetic, proteomic, and cellular components are continuously released into the bloodstream of cancer patients. These molecules, including circulating tumor DNA and RNA, proteins, tumor cells, and immune cells, are emerging as practical and precise liquid biomarkers for cancer. In the current era of effective molecular-targeted therapies and immunotherapies, there is an urgent need to integrate these circulating biomarkers into clinical practice to facilitate personalized treatment. This review highlights recent discoveries in circulating melanoma biomarkers, explores the challenges and potentials of emerging technologies for liquid biomarker discovery, and discusses future directions in melanoma biomarker research.

Emerging paradigm: Molecularly targeted therapy with Dabrafenib and Trametinib in recurring pediatric gliomas with BRAF mutations: A narrative review

Gliomas are tumors arising in the central nervous system, frequently associated with Class I mutations and BRAF fusions. These mutations are adverse prognostic factors in juvenile gliomas, leading to high rates of recurrence and poor response to current treatments. The blood-brain barrier and the heterogeneity of gliomas complicate the development of a single treatment strategy for all cases. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapies, particularly Dabrafenib and Trametinib, in pediatric gliomas with BRAF V600 mutations and discusses their potential in improving clinical outcomes. A review of recent clinical trials was conducted to assess the impact of targeted therapies, especially the combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib, on glioma treatment outcomes. Additional therapies are also explored. Combination therapy with Dabrafenib, a BRAF kinase inhibitor, and Trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, has shown significant improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival for pediatric patients with BRAF V600-mutant gliomas. Recent clinical data from 2023 demonstrated enhanced tumor control, reduced relapse rates, and improved safety profiles compared to conventional therapies. Dabrafenib and Trametinib offer a promising targeted therapy for juvenile gliomas with BRAF V600 mutations, with better survival outcomes and manageable safety profiles. However, challenges remain in managing side effects such as fever, headache, lethargy, and rash. Further research into resistance mechanisms and long-term effects is necessary to optimize treatment strategies. Other therapies, such as everolimus and Selumetinib, also show potential and warrant further investigation.

Retrospective-Prospective Observational Study of Italian Patients Treated in Melanoma Adjuvant Cohort MAP-MADAM (Maximing ADjuvAnt MAP): Interim Analysis

Background/Objective: Dabrafenib and trametinib (D + T) have been approved for the treatment of stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E V600K mutations in an adjuvant setting, based on the results from the COMBI-AD trial. To provide early access to this combination therapy prior to its commercial availability in Italy, a Managed Access Program (MAP) was run in Italy from June 2018 to December 2019. Methods: The MADAM (Maximing ADjuvAnt MAP) study is an Italian retrospective-prospective observational study that included patients who received at least one dose of D + T through the MAP. The primary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: This interim analysis presents findings after the first 24 months of follow-up. A total of 310 patients were included in the study; 240 completed the 12-month treatment with D + T, while 70 discontinued the combination. RFS rates were 93.2% at 12 months and 80.2% at 24 months. The median RFS was not reached for the overall population or any subgroups. Similarly, the median OS was not reached, with OS rates of 96.4% at 12 months and 92.5% at 24 months. Conclusions: D + T achieved an RFS benefit, with effects sustained beyond the treatment period, indicating positive outcomes in this patient population.

Self-delivering RNAi immunotherapeutic PH-762 silences PD-1 to generate local and abscopal antitumor efficacy

Objective

Immunotherapeutic inhibition of PD-1 by systemically administered monoclonal antibodies is widely used in cancer treatment, but it may cause severe immune-related adverse events (irSAEs). Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibition before surgery has shown promise in reducing recurrence by stimulating durable antitumor immunity. Local intratumoral (IT) immunotherapy is a potential strategy to minimize irSAEs, but antibodies have limited tumor penetration, making them less suitable for this approach. Therapeutic self-delivering RNAi (INTASYL) is an emerging modality well-suited for neoadjuvant immunotherapy. This study presents preclinical proof-of-concept for PH-762, an INTASYL designed to silence PD-1, currently in clinical development for advanced cutaneous malignancies (ClinicalTrials.gov#NCT06014086).

Methods and analysis

PH-762 pharmacology was characterized in vitro, and in vivo antitumor efficacy was evaluated using a murine analogue (mPH-762) in syngeneic tumor models with varying PD-1 responsiveness. Bilateral Hepa1-6 models assessed abscopal effects of local treatment. Ex vivo analyses explored mechanisms of direct and abscopal efficacy.

Results

PH-762 was rapidly internalized by human T cells, silencing PD-1 mRNA and decreasing PD-1 surface protein, enhancing TCR-stimulated IFN-γ and CXCL10 secretion. In vivo, IT mPH-762 provided robust antitumor efficacy, local and lymphatic biodistribution, and was well tolerated. Ex vivo analyses revealed that IT mPH-762 depleted PD-1 protein, promoted leukocyte and T cell infiltration, and correlated with tumor control. IT mPH-762 also demonstrated efficacy against untreated distal tumors (abscopal effect) by priming systemic antitumor immunity.

Conclusion

These data support PH-762 as a promising candidate for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in clinical studies.

Braf-Mutant Melanomas: Biology and Therapy

The incidence of melanoma, the most lethal form of skin cancer, has increased mainly due to ultraviolet exposure. The molecular characterization of melanomas has shown a high mutational burden led to the identification of some recurrent genetic alterations. BRAF gene is mutated in 40-50% of melanomas and its role in melanoma development is paramount. BRAF mutations confer constitutive activation of MAPK signalling. The large majority (about 90%) of BRAF mutations occur at amino acid 600; the majority are BRAFV600E mutations and less frequently BRAFv600K, V600D and V600M. The introduction of drugs that directly target BRAF-mutant protein (BRAF inhibitors) and of agents that stimulate immune response through targeting of immune check inhibitor consistently improved the survival of melanoma BRAFV600-mutant patients with unresectable/metastatic disease. In parallel, studies in melanoma stage II-III patients with resectable disease have shown that adjuvant therapy with ICIs and/or targeted therapy improves PFS and RFS, but not OS compared to placebo; however, neoadjuvant therapy plus adjuvant therapy improved therapeutic response compared to adjuvant therapy alone.

Current status of precision oncology in adult glioblastoma

The concept of precision oncology, the application of targeted drugs based on comprehensive molecular profiling, has revolutionized treatment strategies in oncology. This review summarizes the current status of precision oncology in glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults with a median survival below 2 years. Targeted treatments without prior target verification have consistently failed. Patients with BRAF V600E-mutated GBM benefit from BRAF/MEK-inhibition, whereas targeting EGFR alterations was unsuccessful due to poor tumor penetration, tumor cell heterogeneity, and pathway redundancies. Systematic screening for actionable molecular alterations resulted in low rates (< 10%) of targeted treatments. Efficacy was observed in one-third and currently appears to be limited to BRAF-, VEGFR-, and mTOR-directed treatments. Advancing precision oncology for GBM requires consideration of pathways instead of single alterations, new trial concepts enabling rapid and adaptive drug evaluation, a focus on drugs with sufficient bioavailability in the CNS, and the extension of target discovery and validation to the tumor microenvironment, tumor cell networks, and their interaction with immune cells and neurons.

The impact of statins on melanoma survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Statin use may decrease recurrence and improve survival in patients with melanoma. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we examine the current body of literature concerning the use of statins as an adjunctive therapy in melanoma, Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PubMed were systematically searched from inception through to April 2023. Studies were included if they compared patients with melanoma receiving and not receiving statin therapy concurrently with their oncologic treatment in terms of long-term oncologic outcomes. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). Meta-analyses was performed with DerSimonian and Laird random effects. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I and GRADE was used to assess certainty of evidence. From 952 citations, eight non-randomized studies were identified. Included studies were conducted between 2007 and 2022. Random effects meta-analysis of adjusted hazard ratios from three studies suggested an improvement in 5-year OS with statin use with wide 95% confidence intervals (CIs) crossing the line of no effect (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI: 0.73-1.04, P  = 0.12, I2  = 95%, very-low certainty). Outcome reporting was heterogeneous across all other oncologic outcomes such that pooling of data was not possible. Risk of bias was serious for seven studies and moderate for one study. This systematic review of studies evaluating the impact of statin use on survival in patients with melanoma found a 13% reduction in risk of death at 5 years from diagnosis - a point estimate suggesting benefit. However, the wide 95% CIs and resultant type II error risk create significant uncertainty.

Real-world evidence on efficacy and toxicity of targeted therapy in older melanoma patients treated in a tertiary-hospital setting

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer. The median age at diagnosis is 66. While most patients are treated with immunotherapy, the use of targeted therapy is a valid alternative for patients whose tumors harbor a BRAF or c-KIT driver mutation. These agents, while effective, come with a variety of side effects which limit their use, especially in older patients. We sought to assess the efficacy and toxicity of these agents in older melanoma patients. Melanoma patients over 65 treated with BRAF/MEK or c-KIT inhibitors were retrospectively identified, and their data were analyzed for treatment efficacy and toxicity. All data were compared using the Chi-square test for categorical comparisons and the Kruskal-Wallis method for median comparisons. One hundred and sixteen patients were identified. One hundred and six patients were treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The assessed response rate (RR) was 83% and was comparable across different subgroups, including advanced line patients and those with a more aggressive disease. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 15.7 months. Twenty-seven percent experienced grade 3-4 toxicity leading to a 24% treatment discontinuation rate. Another 10 patients were treated with the c-KIT inhibitor imatinib, for whom the assessed RR was 55%. The median PFS was 4.3 months, and the median OS was 22.6 months. Forty percent needed dose reductions, yet none had to stop treatment due to adverse effects. The use of targeted therapy in older patients is effective yet challenging due to toxicity. Deploying mitigation strategies can help maximizing their usefulness.