1
|
Coulson-Gilmer C, Littler S, Barnes B, Brady R, Anagho H, Pillay N, Dey M, Macmorland W, Bronder D, Nelson L, Tighe A, Lin WH, Morgan R, Unwin R, Nielsen M, McGrail J, Taylor S. Intrinsic PARG inhibitor sensitivity is mimicked by TIMELESS haploinsufficiency and rescued by nucleoside supplementation. NAR Cancer 2024; 6:zcae030. [PMID: 39015544 PMCID: PMC11249981 DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcae030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
A subset of cancer cells are intrinsically sensitive to inhibitors targeting PARG, the poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase that degrades PAR chains. Sensitivity is accompanied by persistent DNA replication stress, and can be induced by inhibition of TIMELESS, a replisome accelerator. However, the nature of the vulnerability responsible for intrinsic sensitivity remains undetermined. To understand PARG activity dependency, we analysed Timeless model systems and intrinsically sensitive ovarian cancer cells. We show that nucleoside supplementation rescues all phenotypes associated with PARG inhibitor sensitivity, including replisome speed and fork stalling, S-phase completion and mitotic entry, proliferation dynamics and clonogenic potential. Importantly nucleoside supplementation restores PARG inhibitor resistance despite the continued presence of PAR chains, indicating that sensitivity does not correlate with PAR levels. In addition, we show that inhibition of thymidylate synthase, an enzyme required for dNTP homeostasis, induces PARG-dependency. Together, these observations suggest that PARG inhibitor sensitivity reflects an inability to control replisome speed and/or maintain helicase-polymerase coupling in response to nucleotide imbalances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Coulson-Gilmer
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Samantha Littler
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Bethany M Barnes
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Rosie M Brady
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Holda A Anagho
- Proteomics program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nisha Pillay
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Malini Dey
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - William Macmorland
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Daniel Bronder
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Louisa Nelson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Anthony Tighe
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Wei-Hsiang Lin
- Genome Editing Unit, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Michael Smith Building, Dover Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Robert D Morgan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Richard D Unwin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Michael L Nielsen
- Proteomics program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joanne C McGrail
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| | - Stephen S Taylor
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang H, Liu R, Zhang B, Huo H, Song Z. Advances in the Study of Circadian Genes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Integr Cancer Ther 2022; 21:15347354221096080. [PMID: 35575281 PMCID: PMC9121494 DOI: 10.1177/15347354221096080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Circadian genes regulate several physiological functions such as circadian rhythm
and metabolism and participate in the cytogenesis and progression of various
malignancies. The abnormal expression of these genes in non-small cell lung
cancer (NSCLC) is closely related to the clinicopathological features of NSCLC
and may promote or inhibit NSCLC progression. Circadian rhythm disorders and
clock gene abnormalities may increase the risk of lung cancer in some
populations. We collected 15 circadian genes in NSCLC, namely PER1,
PER2, PER3, TIMELESS, Cry1, Cry2, CLOCK, BMAL1/ARNTL-1, ARNTL2, NPAS2,
NR1D1(REV-ERB), DEC1, DEC2, RORα, and RORγ, and
determined their relationships with the clinicopathological features of patients
and the potential mechanisms promoting or inhibiting NSCLC progression. We also
summarized the studies on circadian rhythm disorders and circadian genes
associated with lung cancer risk. The present study aimed to provide theoretical
support for the future exploration of new therapeutic targets and for the
primary prevention of NSCLC from the perspective of circadian genes.
Interpretation of circadian rhythms in lung cancer could guide further lung
cancer mechanism research and drug development that could lead to more effective
treatments and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Zhang
- Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Renwang Liu
- Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Bo Zhang
- Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Huandong Huo
- Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Zuoqing Song
- Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grabarczyk DB. The Fork Protection Complex: A Regulatory Hub at the Head of the Replisome. Subcell Biochem 2022; 99:83-107. [PMID: 36151374 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-00793-4_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
As well as accurately duplicating DNA, the eukaryotic replisome performs a variety of other crucial tasks to maintain genomic stability. For example, organizational elements, like cohesin, must be transferred from the front of the fork to the new strands, and when there is replication stress, forks need to be protected and checkpoint signalling activated. The Tof1-Csm3 (or Timeless-Tipin in humans) Fork Protection Complex (FPC) ensures efficient replisome progression and is required for a range of replication-associated activities. Recent studies have begun to reveal the structure of this complex, and how it functions within the replisome to perform its diverse roles. The core of the FPC acts as a DNA grip on the front of the replisome to regulate fork progression. Other flexibly linked domains and motifs mediate interactions with proteins and specific DNA structures, enabling the FPC to act as a hub at the head of the replication fork.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel B Grabarczyk
- Rudolf Virchow Center for Integrative and Translational Bioimaging, Institute for Structural Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aricthota S, Haldar D. DDK/Hsk1 phosphorylates and targets fission yeast histone deacetylase Hst4 for degradation to stabilize stalled DNA replication forks. eLife 2021; 10:70787. [PMID: 34608864 PMCID: PMC8565929 DOI: 10.7554/elife.70787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In eukaryotes, paused replication forks are prone to collapse, which leads to genomic instability, a hallmark of cancer. Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK)/Hsk1Cdc7 is a conserved replication initiator kinase with conflicting roles in replication stress response. Here, we show that fission yeast DDK/Hsk1 phosphorylates sirtuin, Hst4 upon replication stress at C-terminal serine residues. Phosphorylation of Hst4 by DDK marks it for degradation via the ubiquitin ligase SCFpof3. Phosphorylation-defective hst4 mutant (4SA-hst4) displays defective recovery from replication stress, faulty fork restart, slow S-phase progression and decreased viability. The highly conserved fork protection complex (FPC) stabilizes stalled replication forks. We found that the recruitment of FPC components, Swi1 and Mcl1 to the chromatin is compromised in the 4SA-hst4 mutant, although whole cell levels increased. These defects are dependent upon H3K56ac and independent of intra S-phase checkpoint activation. Finally, we show conservation of H3K56ac-dependent regulation of Timeless, Tipin, and And-1 in human cells. We propose that degradation of Hst4 via DDK increases H3K56ac, changing the chromatin state in the vicinity of stalled forks facilitating recruitment and function of FPC. Overall, this study identified a crucial role of DDK and FPC in the regulation of replication stress response with implications in cancer therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalini Aricthota
- Laboratory of Chromatin Biology and Epigenetics, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad, India.,Graduate Studies, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Devyani Haldar
- Laboratory of Chromatin Biology and Epigenetics, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Técher H, Pasero P. The Replication Stress Response on a Narrow Path Between Genomic Instability and Inflammation. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 9:702584. [PMID: 34249949 PMCID: PMC8270677 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.702584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The genome of eukaryotic cells is particularly at risk during the S phase of the cell cycle, when megabases of chromosomal DNA are unwound to generate two identical copies of the genome. This daunting task is executed by thousands of micro-machines called replisomes, acting at fragile structures called replication forks. The correct execution of this replication program depends on the coordinated action of hundreds of different enzymes, from the licensing of replication origins to the termination of DNA replication. This review focuses on the mechanisms that ensure the completion of DNA replication under challenging conditions of endogenous or exogenous origin. It also covers new findings connecting the processing of stalled forks to the release of small DNA fragments into the cytoplasm, activating the cGAS-STING pathway. DNA damage and fork repair comes therefore at a price, which is the activation of an inflammatory response that has both positive and negative impacts on the fate of stressed cells. These new findings have broad implications for the etiology of interferonopathies and for cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hervé Técher
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Montpellier, France
| | - Philippe Pasero
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Westhorpe R, Keszthelyi A, Minchell NE, Jones D, Baxter J. Separable functions of Tof1/Timeless in intra-S-checkpoint signalling, replisome stability and DNA topological stress. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:12169-12187. [PMID: 33166393 PMCID: PMC7708041 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The highly conserved Tof1/Timeless proteins minimise replication stress and promote normal DNA replication. They are required to mediate the DNA replication checkpoint (DRC), the stable pausing of forks at protein fork blocks, the coupling of DNA helicase and polymerase functions during replication stress (RS) and the preferential resolution of DNA topological stress ahead of the fork. Here we demonstrate that the roles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Timeless protein Tof1 in DRC signalling and resolution of DNA topological stress require distinct N and C terminal regions of the protein, whereas the other functions of Tof1 are closely linked to the stable interaction between Tof1 and its constitutive binding partner Csm3/Tipin. By separating the role of Tof1 in DRC from fork stabilisation and coupling, we show that Tof1 has distinct activities in checkpoint activation and replisome stability to ensure the viable completion of DNA replication following replication stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Westhorpe
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, Science Park Road, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - Andrea Keszthelyi
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, Science Park Road, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - Nicola E Minchell
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, Science Park Road, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - David Jones
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, Science Park Road, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - Jonathan Baxter
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, Science Park Road, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grabarczyk DB. Crystal structure and interactions of the Tof1-Csm3 (Timeless-Tipin) fork protection complex. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:6996-7004. [PMID: 32469068 PMCID: PMC7337906 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The Tof1-Csm3 fork protection complex has a central role in the replisome-it promotes the progression of DNA replication forks and protects them when they stall, while also enabling cohesion establishment and checkpoint responses. Here, I present the crystal structure of the Tof1-Csm3 complex from Chaetomium thermophilum at 3.1 Å resolution. The structure reveals that both proteins together form an extended alpha helical repeat structure, which suggests a mechanical or scaffolding role for the complex. Expanding on this idea, I characterize a DNA interacting region and a cancer-associated Mrc1 binding site. This study provides the molecular basis for understanding the functions of the Tof1-Csm3 complex, its human orthologue the Timeless-Tipin complex and additionally the Drosophila circadian rhythm protein Timeless.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel B Grabarczyk
- Rudolf Virchow Center for Experimental Biomedicine, Institute for Structural Biology, University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Basbous J, Aze A, Chaloin L, Lebdy R, Hodroj D, Ribeyre C, Larroque M, Shepard C, Kim B, Pruvost A, Moreaux J, Maiorano D, Mechali M, Constantinou A. Dihydropyrimidinase protects from DNA replication stress caused by cytotoxic metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:1886-1904. [PMID: 31853544 PMCID: PMC7038975 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Imbalance in the level of the pyrimidine degradation products dihydrouracil and dihydrothymine is associated with cellular transformation and cancer progression. Dihydropyrimidines are degraded by dihydropyrimidinase (DHP), a zinc metalloenzyme that is upregulated in solid tumors but not in the corresponding normal tissues. How dihydropyrimidine metabolites affect cellular phenotypes remains elusive. Here we show that the accumulation of dihydropyrimidines induces the formation of DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) and causes DNA replication and transcriptional stress. We used Xenopus egg extracts to recapitulate DNA replication invitro. We found that dihydropyrimidines interfere directly with the replication of both plasmid and chromosomal DNA. Furthermore, we show that the plant flavonoid dihydromyricetin inhibits human DHP activity. Cellular exposure to dihydromyricetin triggered DPCs-dependent DNA replication stress in cancer cells. This study defines dihydropyrimidines as potentially cytotoxic metabolites that may offer an opportunity for therapeutic-targeting of DHP activity in solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihane Basbous
- Institute of Human Genetics (IGH), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Antoine Aze
- Institute of Human Genetics (IGH), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Laurent Chaloin
- Institut de Recherche en Infectiologie de Montpellier, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Rana Lebdy
- Institute of Human Genetics (IGH), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Dana Hodroj
- Institute of Human Genetics (IGH), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.,Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), 31037 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| | - Cyril Ribeyre
- Institute of Human Genetics (IGH), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Marion Larroque
- Institute of Human Genetics (IGH), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.,Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM),34298 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Caitlin Shepard
- School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Baek Kim
- School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Alain Pruvost
- Service de Pharmacologie et Immunoanalyse (SPI), Plateforme SMArt-MS, CEA, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
| | - Jérôme Moreaux
- Institute of Human Genetics (IGH), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Domenico Maiorano
- Institute of Human Genetics (IGH), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Marcel Mechali
- Institute of Human Genetics (IGH), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Angelos Constantinou
- Institute of Human Genetics (IGH), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Physiological and Pathological Roles of RAD52 at DNA Replication Forks. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12020402. [PMID: 32050645 PMCID: PMC7072239 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding basic molecular mechanisms underlying the biology of cancer cells is of outmost importance for identification of novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers for patient stratification and better therapy selection. One of these mechanisms, the response to replication stress, fuels cancer genomic instability. It is also an Achille’s heel of cancer. Thus, identification of pathways used by the cancer cells to respond to replication-stress may assist in the identification of new biomarkers and discovery of new therapeutic targets. Alternative mechanisms that act at perturbed DNA replication forks and involve fork degradation by nucleases emerged as crucial for sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapeutics agents inducing replication stress. Despite its important role in homologous recombination and recombinational repair of DNA double strand breaks in lower eukaryotes, RAD52 protein has been considered dispensable in human cells and the full range of its cellular functions remained unclear. Very recently, however, human RAD52 emerged as an important player in multiple aspects of replication fork metabolism under physiological and pathological conditions. In this review, we describe recent advances on RAD52’s key functions at stalled or collapsed DNA replication forks, in particular, the unexpected role of RAD52 as a gatekeeper, which prevents unscheduled processing of DNA. Last, we will discuss how these functions can be exploited using specific inhibitors in targeted therapy or for an informed therapy selection.
Collapse
|
10
|
Byrne BM, Oakley GG. Replication protein A, the laxative that keeps DNA regular: The importance of RPA phosphorylation in maintaining genome stability. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2018; 86:112-120. [PMID: 29665433 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The eukaryotic ssDNA-binding protein, Replication protein A (RPA), was first discovered almost three decades ago. Since then, much progress has been made to elucidate the critical roles for RPA in DNA metabolic pathways that help promote genomic stability. The canonical RPA heterotrimer (RPA1-3) is an essential coordinator of DNA metabolism that interacts with ssDNA and numerous protein partners to coordinate its roles in DNA replication, repair, recombination and telomere maintenance. An alternative form of RPA, termed aRPA, is formed by a complex of RPA4 with RPA1 and RPA3. aRPA is expressed differentially in cells compared to canonical RPA and has been shown to inhibit canonical RPA function while allowing for regular maintenance of cell viability. Interestingly, while aRPA is defective in DNA replication and cell cycle progression, it was shown to play a supporting role in nucleotide excision repair and recombination. The binding domains of canonical RPA interact with a growing number of partners involved in numerous genome maintenance processes. The protein interactions of the RPA-ssDNA complex are not only governed by competition between the binding proteins but also by post-translation modifications such as phosphorylation. Phosphorylation of RPA2 is an important post-translational modification of the RPA complex, and is essential for directing context-specific functions of the RPA complex in the DNA damage response. Due to the importance of RPA in cellular metabolism, it was identified as an appealing target for chemotherapeutic drug development that could be used in future cancer treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan M Byrne
- University of Nebraska Medical Center Department of Oral Biology, Lincoln NE, USA.
| | - Gregory G Oakley
- University of Nebraska Medical Center Department of Oral Biology, Lincoln NE, USA; Eppley Cancer Center, Omaha NE, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kottemann MC, Conti BA, Lach FP, Smogorzewska A. Removal of RTF2 from Stalled Replisomes Promotes Maintenance of Genome Integrity. Mol Cell 2017; 69:24-35.e5. [PMID: 29290612 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2017] [Revised: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The protection and efficient restart of stalled replication forks is critical for the maintenance of genome integrity. Here, we identify a regulatory pathway that promotes stalled forks recovery from replication stress. We show that the mammalian replisome component C20orf43/RTF2 (homologous to S. pombe Rtf2) must be removed for fork restart to be optimal. We further show that the proteasomal shuttle proteins DDI1 and DDI2 are required for RTF2 removal from stalled forks. Persistence of RTF2 at stalled forks results in fork restart defects, hyperactivation of the DNA damage signal, accumulation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), sensitivity to replication drugs, and chromosome instability. These results establish that RTF2 removal is a key determinant for the ability of cells to manage replication stress and maintain genome integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly C Kottemann
- Laboratory of Genome Maintenance, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Brooke A Conti
- Laboratory of Genome Maintenance, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Francis P Lach
- Laboratory of Genome Maintenance, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Agata Smogorzewska
- Laboratory of Genome Maintenance, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chastain M, Zhou Q, Shiva O, Fadri-Moskwik M, Whitmore L, Jia P, Dai X, Huang C, Ye P, Chai W. Human CST Facilitates Genome-wide RAD51 Recruitment to GC-Rich Repetitive Sequences in Response to Replication Stress. Cell Rep 2017; 16:1300-1314. [PMID: 27487043 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2015] [Revised: 05/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The telomeric CTC1/STN1/TEN1 (CST) complex has been implicated in promoting replication recovery under replication stress at genomic regions, yet its precise role is unclear. Here, we report that STN1 is enriched at GC-rich repetitive sequences genome-wide in response to hydroxyurea (HU)-induced replication stress. STN1 deficiency exacerbates the fragility of these sequences under replication stress, resulting in chromosome fragmentation. We find that upon fork stalling, CST proteins form distinct nuclear foci that colocalize with RAD51. Furthermore, replication stress induces physical association of CST with RAD51 in an ATR-dependent manner. Strikingly, CST deficiency diminishes HU-induced RAD51 foci formation and reduces RAD51 recruitment to telomeres and non-telomeric GC-rich fragile sequences. Collectively, our findings establish that CST promotes RAD51 recruitment to GC-rich repetitive sequences in response to replication stress to facilitate replication restart, thereby providing insights into the mechanism underlying genome stability maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Chastain
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA
| | - Qing Zhou
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA
| | - Olga Shiva
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA
| | - Maria Fadri-Moskwik
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA
| | - Leanne Whitmore
- School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
| | - Pingping Jia
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA
| | - Xueyu Dai
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA
| | - Chenhui Huang
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA
| | - Ping Ye
- Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute, 1000 E 23rd Street, Suite 370, Sioux Falls, SD 57105, USA; Department of Pharmacy Practice, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA
| | - Weihang Chai
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Holzer S, Degliesposti G, Kilkenny ML, Maslen SL, Matak-Vinkovíc D, Skehel M, Pellegrini L. Crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of human Timeless and its interaction with Tipin. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:5555-5563. [PMID: 28334766 PMCID: PMC5605233 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Human Timeless is involved in replication fork stabilization, S-phase checkpoint activation and establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. In the cell, Timeless forms a constitutive heterodimeric complex with Tipin. Here we present the 1.85 Å crystal structure of a large N-terminal segment of human Timeless, spanning amino acids 1-463, and we show that this region of human Timeless harbours a partial binding site for Tipin. Furthermore, we identify minimal regions of the two proteins that are required for the formation of a stable Timeless-Tipin complex and provide evidence that the Timeless-Tipin interaction is based on a composite binding interface comprising different domains of Timeless.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro Holzer
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
| | | | - Mairi L Kilkenny
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
| | - Sarah L Maslen
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
| | | | - Mark Skehel
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
| | - Luca Pellegrini
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kolinjivadi AM, Sannino V, De Antoni A, Zadorozhny K, Kilkenny M, Técher H, Baldi G, Shen R, Ciccia A, Pellegrini L, Krejci L, Costanzo V. Smarcal1-Mediated Fork Reversal Triggers Mre11-Dependent Degradation of Nascent DNA in the Absence of Brca2 and Stable Rad51 Nucleofilaments. Mol Cell 2017; 67:867-881.e7. [PMID: 28757209 PMCID: PMC5594205 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 283] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Revised: 05/14/2017] [Accepted: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Brca2 deficiency causes Mre11-dependent degradation of nascent DNA at stalled forks, leading to cell lethality. To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying this process, we isolated Xenopus laevis Brca2. We demonstrated that Brca2 protein prevents single-stranded DNA gap accumulation at replication fork junctions and behind them by promoting Rad51 binding to replicating DNA. Without Brca2, forks with persistent gaps are converted by Smarcal1 into reversed forks, triggering extensive Mre11-dependent nascent DNA degradation. Stable Rad51 nucleofilaments, but not RPA or Rad51T131P mutant proteins, directly prevent Mre11-dependent DNA degradation. Mre11 inhibition instead promotes reversed fork accumulation in the absence of Brca2. Rad51 directly interacts with the Pol α N-terminal domain, promoting Pol α and δ binding to stalled replication forks. This interaction likely promotes replication fork restart and gap avoidance. These results indicate that Brca2 and Rad51 prevent formation of abnormal DNA replication intermediates, whose processing by Smarcal1 and Mre11 predisposes to genome instability. Brca2 promotes Rad51 binding to replicating DNA, preventing fork gaps Stable Rad51 nucleofilaments directly protect DNA from Mre11-dependent degradation Smarcal1-dependent fork reversal triggers extensive Mre11-dependent DNA degradation Rad51 directly interacts with Pol α, promoting its function at stalled forks
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arun Mouli Kolinjivadi
- DNA Metabolism Laboratory, IFOM, FIRC Institute for Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Sannino
- DNA Metabolism Laboratory, IFOM, FIRC Institute for Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy
| | - Anna De Antoni
- DNA Metabolism Laboratory, IFOM, FIRC Institute for Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy
| | - Karina Zadorozhny
- Department of Biology, Masaryk University, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic
| | - Mairi Kilkenny
- Department of Biochemistry, Tennis Court Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
| | - Hervé Técher
- DNA Metabolism Laboratory, IFOM, FIRC Institute for Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Baldi
- DNA Metabolism Laboratory, IFOM, FIRC Institute for Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy
| | - Rong Shen
- Department of Biochemistry, Tennis Court Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
| | - Alberto Ciccia
- Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Luca Pellegrini
- Department of Biochemistry, Tennis Court Road, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK.
| | - Lumir Krejci
- Department of Biology, Masaryk University, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic; National Centre for Biomolecular Research, Masaryk University, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic; International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno 656 91, Czech Republic.
| | - Vincenzo Costanzo
- DNA Metabolism Laboratory, IFOM, FIRC Institute for Molecular Oncology, 20139 Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hoogenboom WS, Klein Douwel D, Knipscheer P. Xenopus egg extract: A powerful tool to study genome maintenance mechanisms. Dev Biol 2017; 428:300-309. [PMID: 28427716 DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.03.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2017] [Revised: 03/29/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
DNA repair pathways are crucial to maintain the integrity of our genome and prevent genetic diseases such as cancer. There are many different types of DNA damage and specific DNA repair mechanisms have evolved to deal with these lesions. In addition to these repair pathways there is an extensive signaling network that regulates processes important for repair, such as cell cycle control and transcription. Despite extensive research, DNA damage repair and signaling are not fully understood. In vitro systems such as the Xenopus egg extract system, have played, and still play, an important role in deciphering the molecular details of these processes. Xenopus laevis egg extracts contain all factors required to efficiently perform DNA repair outside a cell, using mechanisms conserved in humans. These extracts have been used to study several genome maintenance pathways, including mismatch repair, non-homologous end joining, ICL repair, DNA damage checkpoint activation, and replication fork stability. Here we describe how the Xenopus egg extract system, in combination with specifically designed DNA templates, contributed to our detailed understanding of these pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter S Hoogenboom
- Hubrecht Institute - KNAW, University Medical Center Utrecht & Cancer GenomiCs Netherlands, The Netherlands
| | - Daisy Klein Douwel
- Hubrecht Institute - KNAW, University Medical Center Utrecht & Cancer GenomiCs Netherlands, The Netherlands
| | - Puck Knipscheer
- Hubrecht Institute - KNAW, University Medical Center Utrecht & Cancer GenomiCs Netherlands, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
S-phase checkpoint regulations that preserve replication and chromosome integrity upon dNTP depletion. Cell Mol Life Sci 2017; 74:2361-2380. [PMID: 28220209 PMCID: PMC5487892 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-017-2474-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2016] [Revised: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication stress, an important source of genomic instability, arises upon different types of DNA replication perturbations, including those that stall replication fork progression. Inhibitors of the cellular pool of deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) slow down DNA synthesis throughout the genome. Following depletion of dNTPs, the highly conserved replication checkpoint kinase pathway, also known as the S-phase checkpoint, preserves the functionality and structure of stalled DNA replication forks and prevents chromosome fragmentation. The underlying mechanisms involve pathways extrinsic to replication forks, such as those involving regulation of the ribonucleotide reductase activity, the temporal program of origin firing, and cell cycle transitions. In addition, the S-phase checkpoint modulates the function of replisome components to promote replication integrity. This review summarizes the various functions of the replication checkpoint in promoting replication fork stability and genome integrity in the face of replication stress caused by dNTP depletion.
Collapse
|
17
|
Gadaleta MC, Das MM, Tanizawa H, Chang YT, Noma KI, Nakamura TM, Noguchi E. Swi1Timeless Prevents Repeat Instability at Fission Yeast Telomeres. PLoS Genet 2016; 12:e1005943. [PMID: 26990647 PMCID: PMC4798670 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic instability associated with DNA replication stress is linked to cancer and genetic pathologies in humans. If not properly regulated, replication stress, such as fork stalling and collapse, can be induced at natural replication impediments present throughout the genome. The fork protection complex (FPC) is thought to play a critical role in stabilizing stalled replication forks at several known replication barriers including eukaryotic rDNA genes and the fission yeast mating-type locus. However, little is known about the role of the FPC at other natural impediments including telomeres. Telomeres are considered to be difficult to replicate due to the presence of repetitive GT-rich sequences and telomere-binding proteins. However, the regulatory mechanism that ensures telomere replication is not fully understood. Here, we report the role of the fission yeast Swi1Timeless, a subunit of the FPC, in telomere replication. Loss of Swi1 causes telomere shortening in a telomerase-independent manner. Our epistasis analyses suggest that heterochromatin and telomere-binding proteins are not major impediments for telomere replication in the absence of Swi1. Instead, repetitive DNA sequences impair telomere integrity in swi1Δ mutant cells, leading to the loss of repeat DNA. In the absence of Swi1, telomere shortening is accompanied with an increased recruitment of Rad52 recombinase and more frequent amplification of telomere/subtelomeres, reminiscent of tumor cells that utilize the alternative lengthening of telomeres pathway (ALT) to maintain telomeres. These results suggest that Swi1 ensures telomere replication by suppressing recombination and repeat instability at telomeres. Our studies may also be relevant in understanding the potential role of Swi1Timeless in regulation of telomere stability in cancer cells. In every round of the cell cycle, cells must accurately replicate their full genetic information. This process is highly regulated, as defects during DNA replication cause genomic instability, leading to various genetic disorders including cancers. To thwart these problems, cells carry an array of complex mechanisms to deal with various obstacles found across the genome that can hamper DNA replication and cause DNA damage. Understanding how these mechanisms are regulated and orchestrated is of paramount importance in the field. In this report, we describe how Swi1, a Timeless-related protein in fission yeast, regulates efficient replication of telomeres, which are considered to be difficult to replicate due to the presence of repetitive DNA and telomere-binding proteins. We show that Swi1 prevents telomere damage and maintains telomere length by protecting integrity of telomeric repeats. Swi1-mediated telomere maintenance is independent of telomerase activity, and loss of Swi1 causes hyper-activation of recombination-based telomere maintenance, which generates heterogeneous telomeres. Similar telomerase-independent and recombination-dependent mechanism is utilized by approximately 15% of human cancers, linking telomere replication defects with cancer development. Thus, our study may be relevant in understanding the role of telomere replication defects in the development of cancers in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana C. Gadaleta
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Mukund M. Das
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Hideki Tanizawa
- Gene Expression and Regulation Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Ya-Ting Chang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Ken-ichi Noma
- Gene Expression and Regulation Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Toru M. Nakamura
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Eishi Noguchi
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bai G, Smolka MB, Schimenti JC. Chronic DNA Replication Stress Reduces Replicative Lifespan of Cells by TRP53-Dependent, microRNA-Assisted MCM2-7 Downregulation. PLoS Genet 2016; 12:e1005787. [PMID: 26765334 PMCID: PMC4713100 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2015] [Accepted: 12/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Circumstances that compromise efficient DNA replication, such as disruptions to replication fork progression, cause a state known as DNA replication stress (RS). Whereas normally proliferating cells experience low levels of RS, excessive RS from intrinsic or extrinsic sources can trigger cell cycle arrest and senescence. Here, we report that a key driver of RS-induced senescence is active downregulation of the Minichromosome Maintenance 2–7 (MCM2-7) factors that are essential for replication origin licensing and which constitute the replicative helicase core. Proliferating cells produce high levels of MCM2-7 that enable formation of dormant origins that can be activated in response to acute, experimentally-induced RS. However, little is known about how physiological RS levels impact MCM2-7 regulation. We found that chronic exposure of primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) to either genetically-encoded or environmentally-induced RS triggered gradual MCM2-7 repression, followed by inhibition of replication and senescence that could be accelerated by MCM hemizygosity. The MCM2-7 reduction in response to RS is TRP53-dependent, and involves a group of Trp53-dependent miRNAs, including the miR-34 family, that repress MCM expression in replication-stressed cells before they undergo terminal cell cycle arrest. miR-34 ablation partially rescued MCM2-7 downregulation and genomic instability in mice with endogenous RS. Together, these data demonstrate that active MCM2-7 repression is a physiologically important mechanism for RS-induced cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance on an organismal level. Duplication of the genome by DNA replication is essential for cell proliferation. DNA replication is initiated from many sites (“origins”) along chromosomes that are bound by replication licensing proteins, including MCM2-7. They are also core components of the replication helicase complex that unwinds double stranded DNA to expose single stranded DNA that is the template for DNA polymerase. Eukaryotic DNA replication machinery faces many challenges to duplicate the complex and massive genome. Circumstances that inhibit progression of the replication machinery cause “replication stress” (RS). Cells can counteract RS by utilizing “dormant” or “backup” origins. Abundant MCM2-7 expression sufficiently licenses dormant origins, but reducing MCMs compromises cellular responses to RS. We show that MCM2-7 expression is downregulated in cells experiencing chronic RS, and this depends on the TRP53 tumor suppressor and microRNAs it regulates. Extended RS eventually reduces MCMs to a point that terminal cell cycle arrest occurs. We propose that this mechanism is a crucial protection against neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gongshi Bai
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Marcus B. Smolka
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
- Weill Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
- Center for Vertebrate Genomics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - John C. Schimenti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
- Center for Vertebrate Genomics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Calì F, Bharti SK, Di Perna R, Brosh RM, Pisani FM. Tim/Timeless, a member of the replication fork protection complex, operates with the Warsaw breakage syndrome DNA helicase DDX11 in the same fork recovery pathway. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 44:705-17. [PMID: 26503245 PMCID: PMC4737141 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
We present evidence that Tim establishes a physical and functional interaction with DDX11, a super-family 2 iron-sulfur cluster DNA helicase genetically linked to the chromosomal instability disorder Warsaw breakage syndrome. Tim stimulates DDX11 unwinding activity on forked DNA substrates up to 10-fold and on bimolecular anti-parallel G-quadruplex DNA structures and three-stranded D-loop approximately 4–5-fold. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed that Tim enhances DDX11 binding to DNA, suggesting that the observed stimulation derives from an improved ability of DDX11 to interact with the nucleic acid substrate. Surface plasmon resonance measurements indicate that DDX11 directly interacts with Tim. DNA fiber track assays with HeLa cells exposed to hydroxyurea demonstrated that Tim or DDX11 depletion significantly reduced replication fork progression compared to control cells; whereas no additive effect was observed by co-depletion of both proteins. Moreover, Tim and DDX11 are epistatic in promoting efficient resumption of stalled DNA replication forks in hydroxyurea-treated cells. This is consistent with the finding that association of the two endogenous proteins in the cell extract chromatin fraction is considerably increased following hydroxyurea exposure. Overall, our studies provide evidence that Tim and DDX11 physically and functionally interact and act in concert to preserve replication fork progression in perturbed conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Calì
- Istituto di Biochimica delle Proteine, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Pietro Castellino, 111. 80131 - Napoli, Italy
| | - Sanjay Kumar Bharti
- Laboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, NIH Biomedical Research Center, 251 Bayview Blvd, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
| | - Roberta Di Perna
- Istituto di Biochimica delle Proteine, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Pietro Castellino, 111. 80131 - Napoli, Italy
| | - Robert M Brosh
- Laboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, NIH Biomedical Research Center, 251 Bayview Blvd, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
| | - Francesca M Pisani
- Istituto di Biochimica delle Proteine, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Pietro Castellino, 111. 80131 - Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Xie S, Mortusewicz O, Ma HT, Herr P, Poon RYC, Poon RRY, Helleday T, Qian C. Timeless Interacts with PARP-1 to Promote Homologous Recombination Repair. Mol Cell 2015; 60:163-76. [PMID: 26344098 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2015] [Revised: 05/01/2015] [Accepted: 07/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Human Timeless helps stabilize replication forks during normal DNA replication and plays a critical role in activation of the S phase checkpoint and proper establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. However, it remains elusive whether Timeless is involved in the repair of damaged DNA. Here, we identify that Timeless physically interacts with PARP-1 independent of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. We present high-resolution crystal structures of Timeless PAB (PARP-1-binding domain) in free form and in complex with PARP-1 catalytic domain. Interestingly, Timeless PAB domain specifically recognizes PARP-1, but not PARP-2 or PARP-3. Timeless-PARP-1 interaction does not interfere with PARP-1 enzymatic activity. We demonstrate that rapid and transient accumulation of Timeless at laser-induced DNA damage sites requires PARP-1, but not poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and that Timeless is co-trapped with PARP-1 at DNA lesions upon PARP inhibition. Furthermore, we show that Timeless and PARP-1 interaction is required for efficient homologous recombination repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si Xie
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Oliver Mortusewicz
- Science for Life Laboratory, Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 21 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hoi Tang Ma
- Division of Life Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
| | - Patrick Herr
- Science for Life Laboratory, Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 21 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Randy Y C Poon
- Division of Life Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
| | - Randy R Y Poon
- Division of Life Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
| | - Thomas Helleday
- Science for Life Laboratory, Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 21 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Chengmin Qian
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ryu H, Yoshida MM, Sridharan V, Kumagai A, Dunphy WG, Dasso M, Azuma Y. SUMOylation of the C-terminal domain of DNA topoisomerase IIα regulates the centromeric localization of Claspin. Cell Cycle 2015; 14:2777-84. [PMID: 26131587 PMCID: PMC4614044 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1066537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2015] [Revised: 06/17/2015] [Accepted: 06/23/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA topoisomerase II (TopoII) regulates DNA topology by its strand passaging reaction, which is required for genome maintenance by resolving tangled genomic DNA. In addition, TopoII contributes to the structural integrity of mitotic chromosomes and to the activation of cell cycle checkpoints in mitosis. Post-translational modification of TopoII is one of the key mechanisms by which its broad functions are regulated during mitosis. SUMOylation of TopoII is conserved in eukaryotes and plays a critical role in chromosome segregation. Using Xenopus laevis egg extract, we demonstrated previously that TopoIIα is modified by SUMO on mitotic chromosomes and that its activity is modulated via SUMOylation of its lysine at 660. However, both biochemical and genetic analyses indicated that TopoII has multiple SUMOylation sites in addition to Lys660, and the functions of the other SUMOylation sites were not clearly determined. In this study, we identified the SUMOylation sites on the C-terminal domain (CTD) of TopoIIα. CTD SUMOylation did not affect TopoIIα activity, indicating that its function is distinct from that of Lys660 SUMOylation. We found that CTD SUMOylation promotes protein binding and that Claspin, a well-established cell cycle checkpoint mediator, is one of the SUMOylation-dependent binding proteins. Claspin harbors 2 SUMO-interacting motifs (SIMs), and its robust association to mitotic chromosomes requires both the SIMs and TopoIIα-CTD SUMOylation. Claspin localizes to the mitotic centromeres depending on mitotic SUMOylation, suggesting that TopoIIα-CTD SUMOylation regulates the centromeric localization of Claspin. Our findings provide a novel mechanistic insight regarding how TopoIIα-CTD SUMOylation contributes to mitotic centromere activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunju Ryu
- Department of Molecular Biosciences; University of Kansas; Lawrence, KS USA
- Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Development; NICHD, National Institutes of Health; Bethesda, MD USA
- Current affiliation: Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Johns Hopkins University; Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Makoto M Yoshida
- Department of Molecular Biosciences; University of Kansas; Lawrence, KS USA
| | - Vinidhra Sridharan
- Department of Molecular Biosciences; University of Kansas; Lawrence, KS USA
| | - Akiko Kumagai
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena, CA USA
| | - William G Dunphy
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering; California Institute of Technology; Pasadena, CA USA
| | - Mary Dasso
- Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Development; NICHD, National Institutes of Health; Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Yoshiaki Azuma
- Department of Molecular Biosciences; University of Kansas; Lawrence, KS USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hao J, de Renty C, Li Y, Xiao H, Kemp MG, Han Z, DePamphilis ML, Zhu W. And-1 coordinates with Claspin for efficient Chk1 activation in response to replication stress. EMBO J 2015; 34:2096-110. [PMID: 26082189 DOI: 10.15252/embj.201488016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2014] [Accepted: 05/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The replisome is important for DNA replication checkpoint activation, but how specific components of the replisome coordinate with ATR to activate Chk1 in human cells remains largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that And-1, a replisome component, acts together with ATR to activate Chk1. And-1 is phosphorylated at T826 by ATR following replication stress, and this phosphorylation is required for And-1 to accumulate at the damage sites, where And-1 promotes the interaction between Claspin and Chk1, thereby stimulating efficient Chk1 activation by ATR. Significantly, And-1 binds directly to ssDNA and facilitates the association of Claspin with ssDNA. Furthermore, And-1 associates with replication forks and is required for the recovery of stalled forks. These studies establish a novel ATR-And-1 axis as an important regulator for efficient Chk1 activation and reveal a novel mechanism of how the replisome regulates the replication checkpoint and genomic stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Hao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University Medical School, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Yongming Li
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University Medical School, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Haijie Xiao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University Medical School, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Michael G Kemp
- Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, USA
| | - Zhiyong Han
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University Medical School, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Wenge Zhu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University Medical School, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kotsantis P, Jones RM, Higgs MR, Petermann E. Cancer therapy and replication stress: forks on the road to perdition. Adv Clin Chem 2015; 69:91-138. [PMID: 25934360 DOI: 10.1016/bs.acc.2014.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Deregulated DNA replication occurs in cancer where it contributes to genomic instability. This process is a target of cytotoxic therapies. Chemotherapies exploit high DNA replication in cancer cells by modifying the DNA template or by inhibiting vital enzymatic activities that lead to slowing or stalling replication fork progression. Stalled replication forks can be converted into toxic DNA double-strand breaks resulting in cell death, i.e., replication stress. While likely crucial for many cancer treatments, replication stress is poorly understood due to its complexity. While we still know relatively little about the role of replication stress in cancer therapy, technical advances in recent years have shed new light on the effect that cancer therapeutics have on replication forks and the molecular mechanisms that lead from obstructed fork progression to cell death. This chapter will give an overview of our current understanding of replication stress in the context of cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Kotsantis
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca M Jones
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Martin R Higgs
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Eva Petermann
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Maréchal A, Zou L. RPA-coated single-stranded DNA as a platform for post-translational modifications in the DNA damage response. Cell Res 2014; 25:9-23. [PMID: 25403473 DOI: 10.1038/cr.2014.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 340] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The Replication Protein A (RPA) complex is an essential regulator of eukaryotic DNA metabolism. RPA avidly binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) through multiple oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding folds and coordinates the recruitment and exchange of genome maintenance factors to regulate DNA replication, recombination and repair. The RPA-ssDNA platform also constitutes a key physiological signal which activates the master ATR kinase to protect and repair stalled or collapsed replication forks during replication stress. In recent years, the RPA complex has emerged as a key target and an important regulator of post-translational modifications in response to DNA damage, which is critical for its genome guardian functions. Phosphorylation and SUMOylation of the RPA complex, and more recently RPA-regulated ubiquitination, have all been shown to control specific aspects of DNA damage signaling and repair by modulating the interactions between RPA and its partners. Here, we review our current understanding of the critical functions of the RPA-ssDNA platform in the maintenance of genome stability and its regulation through an elaborate network of covalent modifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Maréchal
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Lee Zou
- 1] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA [2] Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Witosch J, Wolf E, Mizuno N. Architecture and ssDNA interaction of the Timeless-Tipin-RPA complex. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:12912-27. [PMID: 25348395 PMCID: PMC4227788 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The Timeless-Tipin (Tim-Tipin) complex, also referred to as the fork protection complex, is involved in coordination of DNA replication. Tim-Tipin is suggested to be recruited to replication forks via Replication Protein A (RPA) but details of the interaction are unknown. Here, using cryo-EM and biochemical methods, we characterized complex formation of Tim-Tipin, RPA and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Tim-Tipin and RPA form a 258 kDa complex with a 1:1:1 stoichiometry. The cryo-EM 3D reconstruction revealed a globular architecture of the Tim-Tipin-RPA complex with a ring-like and a U-shaped domain covered by a RPA lid. Interestingly, RPA in the complex adopts a horse shoe-like shape resembling its conformation in the presence of long ssDNA (>30 nucleotides). Furthermore, the recruitment of the Tim-Tipin-RPA complex to ssDNA is modulated by the RPA conformation and requires RPA to be in the more compact 30 nt ssDNA binding mode. The dynamic formation and disruption of the Tim-Tipin-RPA-ssDNA complex implicates the RPA-based recruitment of Tim-Tipin to the replication fork.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Witosch
- Department of Structural Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
| | - Eva Wolf
- Department of Structural Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany Department of Physiological Chemistry and Center For Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM), Butenandt Institute, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Butenandtstrasse 5, 81377 Munich, Germany Institut für allgemeine Botanik, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Johannes-von-Müller-Weg 6, 55128 Mainz, Germany and Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany
| | - Naoko Mizuno
- Department of Structural Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
González Besteiro MA, Gottifredi V. The fork and the kinase: a DNA replication tale from a CHK1 perspective. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH 2014; 763:168-80. [PMID: 25795119 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2014.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2014] [Revised: 10/07/2014] [Accepted: 10/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Replication fork progression is being continuously hampered by exogenously introduced and naturally occurring DNA lesions and other physical obstacles. Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) is activated at replication forks that encounter damaged DNA. Subsequently, Chk1 inhibits the initiation of new replication factories and stimulates the firing of dormant origins (those in the vicinity of stalled forks). Chk1 also avoids fork collapse into DSBs (double strand breaks) and promotes fork elongation. At the molecular level, the current model considers stalled forks as the site of Chk1 activation and the nucleoplasm as the location where Chk1 phosphorylates target proteins. This model certainly serves to explain how Chk1 modulates origin firing, but how Chk1 controls the fate of stalled forks is less clear. Interestingly, recent reports demonstrating that Chk1 phosphorylates chromatin-bound proteins and even holds kinase-independent functions might shed light on how Chk1 contributes to the elongation of damaged DNA. Indeed, such findings have unveiled a puzzling connection between Chk1 and DNA lesion bypass, which might be central to promoting fork elongation and checkpoint attenuation. In summary, Chk1 is a multifaceted and versatile signaling factor that acts at ongoing forks and replication origins to determine the extent and quality of the cellular response to replication stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina A González Besteiro
- Cell Cycle and Genomic Stability Laboratory, Fundación Instituto Leloir, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Vanesa Gottifredi
- Cell Cycle and Genomic Stability Laboratory, Fundación Instituto Leloir, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Long DT, Joukov V, Budzowska M, Walter JC. BRCA1 promotes unloading of the CMG helicase from a stalled DNA replication fork. Mol Cell 2014; 56:174-85. [PMID: 25219499 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2014] [Revised: 06/30/2014] [Accepted: 08/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The tumor suppressor protein BRCA1 promotes homologous recombination (HR), a high-fidelity mechanism to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that arise during normal replication and in response to DNA-damaging agents. Recent genetic experiments indicate that BRCA1 also performs an HR-independent function during the repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs). Here we show that BRCA1 is required to unload the CMG helicase complex from chromatin after replication forks collide with an ICL. Eviction of the stalled helicase allows leading strands to be extended toward the ICL, followed by endonucleolytic processing of the crosslink, lesion bypass, and DSB repair. Our results identify BRCA1-dependent helicase unloading as a critical, early event in ICL repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Long
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Vladimir Joukov
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Magda Budzowska
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Johannes C Walter
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yan S, Sorrell M, Berman Z. Functional interplay between ATM/ATR-mediated DNA damage response and DNA repair pathways in oxidative stress. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71:3951-67. [PMID: 24947324 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-014-1666-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2014] [Revised: 06/03/2014] [Accepted: 06/05/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
To maintain genome stability, cells have evolved various DNA repair pathways to deal with oxidative DNA damage. DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, including ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 checkpoints, are also activated in oxidative stress to coordinate DNA repair, cell cycle progression, transcription, apoptosis, and senescence. Several studies demonstrate that DDR pathways can regulate DNA repair pathways. On the other hand, accumulating evidence suggests that DNA repair pathways may modulate DDR pathway activation as well. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of how various DNA repair and DDR pathways are activated in response to oxidative DNA damage primarily from studies in eukaryotes. In particular, we analyze the functional interplay between DNA repair and DDR pathways in oxidative stress. A better understanding of cellular response to oxidative stress may provide novel avenues of treating human diseases, such as cancer and neurodegenerative disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan Yan
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Errico A, Aze A, Costanzo V. Mta2 promotes Tipin-dependent maintenance of replication fork integrity. Cell Cycle 2014; 13:2120-8. [PMID: 24830473 PMCID: PMC4111703 DOI: 10.4161/cc.29157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2014] [Accepted: 05/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Orderly progression of S phase requires the action of replisome-associated Tipin and Tim1 proteins, whose molecular function is poorly understood. Here, we show that Tipin deficiency leads to the accumulation of aberrant replication intermediates known as reversed forks. We identified Mta2, a subunit of the NuRD chromatin remodeler complex, as a novel Tipin binding partner and mediator of its function. Mta2 is required for Tipin-dependent Polymerase α binding to replicating chromatin, and this function is essential to prevent the accumulation of reversed forks. Given the role of the Mta2-NuRD complex in the maintenance of heterochromatin, which is usually associated with hard-to-replicate DNA sequences, we tested the role of Tipin in the replication of such regions. Using a novel assay we developed to monitor replication of specific genomic loci in Xenopus laevis egg extract we demonstrated that Tipin is directly required for efficient replication of vertebrate centromeric DNA. Overall these results suggest that Mta2 and Tipin cooperate to maintain replication fork integrity, especially on regions that are intrinsically difficult to duplicate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Errico
- Genome Stability Laboratory; London Research Institute; South Mimms, UK; 2The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology (IFOM) Foundation; Milan, Italy
| | - Antoine Aze
- Genome Stability Laboratory; London Research Institute; South Mimms, UK; 2The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology (IFOM) Foundation; Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Costanzo
- Genome Stability Laboratory; London Research Institute; South Mimms, UK; 2The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology (IFOM) Foundation; Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
STAT3 interrupts ATR-Chk1 signaling to allow oncovirus-mediated cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:4946-51. [PMID: 24639502 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1400683111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
DNA damage response (DDR) is a signaling network that senses DNA damage and activates response pathways to coordinate cell-cycle progression and DNA repair. Thus, DDR is critical for maintenance of genome stability, and presents a powerful defense against tumorigenesis. Therefore, to drive cell-proliferation and transformation, viral and cellular oncogenes need to circumvent DDR-induced cell-cycle checkpoints. Unlike in hereditary cancers, mechanisms that attenuate DDR and disrupt cell-cycle checkpoints in sporadic cancers are not well understood. Using Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) as a source of oncogenes, we have previously shown that EBV-driven cell proliferation requires the cellular transcription factor STAT3. EBV infection is rapidly followed by activation and increased expression of STAT3, which mediates relaxation of the intra-S phase cell-cycle checkpoint; this facilitates viral oncogene-driven cell proliferation. We now show that replication stress-associated DNA damage, which results from EBV infection, is detected by DDR. However, signaling downstream of ATR is impaired by STAT3, leading to relaxation of the intra-S phase checkpoint. We find that STAT3 interrupts ATR-to-Chk1 signaling by promoting loss of Claspin, a protein that assists ATR to phosphorylate Chk1. This loss of Claspin which ultimately facilitates cell proliferation is mediated by caspase 7, a protein that typically promotes cell death. Our findings demonstrate how STAT3, which is constitutively active in many human cancers, suppresses DDR, fundamental to tumorigenesis. This newly recognized role for STAT3 in attenuation of DDR, discovered in the context of EBV infection, is of broad interest as the biology of cell proliferation is central to both health and disease.
Collapse
|
31
|
Hosono Y, Abe T, Higuchi M, Kajii K, Sakuraba S, Tada S, Enomoto T, Seki M. Tipin functions in the protection against topoisomerase I inhibitor. J Biol Chem 2014; 289:11374-11384. [PMID: 24573676 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m113.531707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The replication fork temporarily stalls when encountering an obstacle on the DNA, and replication resumes after the barrier is removed. Simultaneously, activation of the replication checkpoint delays the progression of S phase and inhibits late origin firing. Camptothecin (CPT), a topoisomerase I (Top1) inhibitor, acts as a DNA replication barrier by inducing the covalent retention of Top1 on DNA. The Timeless-Tipin complex, a component of the replication fork machinery, plays a role in replication checkpoint activation and stabilization of the replication fork. However, the role of the Timeless-Tipin complex in overcoming the CPT-induced replication block remains elusive. Here, we generated viable TIPIN gene knock-out (KO) DT40 cells showing delayed S phase progression and increased cell death. TIPIN KO cells were hypersensitive to CPT. However, homologous recombination and replication checkpoint were activated normally, whereas DNA synthesis activity was markedly decreased in CPT-treated TIPIN KO cells. Proteasome-dependent degradation of chromatin-bound Top1 was induced in TIPIN KO cells upon CPT treatment, and pretreatment with aphidicolin, a DNA polymerase inhibitor, suppressed both CPT sensitivity and Top1 degradation. Taken together, our data indicate that replication forks formed without Tipin may collide at a high rate with Top1 retained on DNA by CPT treatment, leading to CPT hypersensitivity and Top1 degradation in TIPIN KO cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshifumi Hosono
- Molecular Cell Biology Laboratory, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba 6-3, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
| | - Takuya Abe
- Instituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare (IFOM), Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (FIRC) Institute for Molecular Oncology Foundation, IFOM-Istituto Europeo di Oncologia Campus, Via Adamello 16, 20139 Milan, Italy
| | - Masato Higuchi
- Molecular Cell Biology Laboratory, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba 6-3, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
| | - Kosa Kajii
- Department of Biochemistry, Tohoku Pharmaceutical University, 4-4-1 Komatsushima, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 981-8558, Japan
| | - Shuichi Sakuraba
- Molecular Cell Biology Laboratory, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba 6-3, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
| | - Shusuke Tada
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Teikyo Heisei University, 4-21-2 Nakano, Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164-8530, Japan, and
| | - Takemi Enomoto
- Molecular Cell Biology Laboratory, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Musashino University, 1-1-20 Shinmachi, Nishitokyo-shi, Tokyo 202-8585, Japan
| | - Masayuki Seki
- Department of Biochemistry, Tohoku Pharmaceutical University, 4-4-1 Komatsushima, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 981-8558, Japan,.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Interplay between the cell cycle and double-strand break response in mammalian cells. Methods Mol Biol 2014; 1170:41-59. [PMID: 24906308 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0888-2_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The cell cycle is intimately associated with the ability of cells to sense and respond to and repair DNA damage. Understanding how cell cycle progression, particularly DNA replication and cell division, are regulated and how DNA damage can affect these processes has been the subject of intense research. Recent evidence suggests that the repair of DNA damage is regulated by the cell cycle, and that cell cycle factors are closely associated with repair factors and participate in cellular decisions regarding how to respond to and repair damage. Precise regulation of cell cycle progression in the presence of DNA damage is essential to maintain genomic stability and avoid the accumulation of chromosomal aberrations that can promote tumor formation. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of how mammalian cells induce cell cycle checkpoints in response to DNA double-strand breaks. In addition, we discuss how cell cycle factors modulate DNA repair pathways to facilitate proper repair of DNA lesions.
Collapse
|
33
|
Aze A, Zhou JC, Costa A, Costanzo V. DNA replication and homologous recombination factors: acting together to maintain genome stability. Chromosoma 2013; 122:401-13. [PMID: 23584157 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-013-0411-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2012] [Revised: 03/27/2013] [Accepted: 03/27/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Genome duplication requires the coordinated action of multiple proteins to ensure a fast replication with high fidelity. These factors form a complex called the Replisome, which is assembled onto the DNA duplex to promote its unwinding and to catalyze the polymerization of two new strands. Key constituents of the Replisome are the Cdc45-Mcm2-7-GINS helicase and the And1-Claspin-Tipin-Tim1 complex, which coordinate DNA unwinding with polymerase alpha-, delta-, and epsilon- dependent DNA polymerization. These factors encounter numerous obstacles, such as endogenous DNA lesions leading to template breakage and complex structures arising from intrinsic features of specific DNA sequences. To overcome these roadblocks, homologous recombination DNA repair factors, such as Rad51 and the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex, are required to ensure complete and faithful replication. Consistent with this notion, many of the genes involved in this process result in lethal phenotypes when inactivated in organisms with complex and large genomes. Here, we summarize the architectural and functional properties of the Replisome and propose a unified view of DNA replication and repair processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Aze
- Clare Hall Laboratories, London Research Institute, South Mimms, Herts, EN63LD, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sirbu BM, Cortez D. DNA damage response: three levels of DNA repair regulation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013; 5:a012724. [PMID: 23813586 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 181] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Genome integrity is challenged by DNA damage from both endogenous and environmental sources. This damage must be repaired to allow both RNA and DNA polymerases to accurately read and duplicate the information in the genome. Multiple repair enzymes scan the DNA for problems, remove the offending damage, and restore the DNA duplex. These repair mechanisms are regulated by DNA damage response kinases including DNA-PKcs, ATM, and ATR that are activated at DNA lesions. These kinases improve the efficiency of DNA repair by phosphorylating repair proteins to modify their activities, by initiating a complex series of changes in the local chromatin structure near the damage site, and by altering the overall cellular environment to make it more conducive to repair. In this review, we focus on these three levels of regulation to illustrate how the DNA damage kinases promote efficient repair to maintain genome integrity and prevent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca M Sirbu
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37027, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Aria V, De Felice M, Di Perna R, Uno S, Masai H, Syväoja JE, van Loon B, Hübscher U, Pisani FM. The human Tim-Tipin complex interacts directly with DNA polymerase epsilon and stimulates its synthetic activity. J Biol Chem 2013; 288:12742-52. [PMID: 23511638 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m112.398073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The Tim-Tipin complex plays an important role in the S phase checkpoint and replication fork stability in metazoans, but the molecular mechanism underlying its biological function is poorly understood. Here, we present evidence that the recombinant human Tim-Tipin complex (and Tim alone) markedly enhances the synthetic activity of DNA polymerase ε. In contrast, no significant effect on the synthetic ability of human DNA polymerase α and δ by Tim-Tipin was observed. Surface plasmon resonance measurements and co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that recombinant DNA polymerase ε directly interacts with either Tim or Tipin. In addition, the results of DNA band shift assays suggest that the Tim-Tipin complex (or Tim alone) is able to associate with DNA polymerase ε bound to a 40-/80-mer DNA ligand. Our results are discussed in view of the molecular dynamics at the human DNA replication fork.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Aria
- Istituto di Biochimica delle Proteine, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via P. Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Human Tim-Tipin complex affects the biochemical properties of the replicative DNA helicase and DNA polymerases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110:2523-7. [PMID: 23359676 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222494110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Tim (Timeless) and Tipin (Tim-interacting protein) form a stable heterodimeric complex that influences checkpoint responses and replication fork progression. We report that the Tim-Tipin complex interacts with essential replication fork proteins and affects their biochemical properties. The Tim-Tipin complex, reconstituted and purified using the baculovirus expression system, interacts directly with Mcm complexes and inhibits the single-stranded DNA-dependent ATPase activities of the Mcm2-7 and Mcm4/6/7 complexes, the DNA unwinding activity of the Mcm4/6/7 complex, and the DNA unwinding and ATPase activity of Cdc45-Mcm2-7-GINS complex, the presumed replicative DNA helicase in eukaryotes. Although stable interactions between Tim-Tipin and DNA polymerases (pols) were not observed in immunoprecipitation experiments with purified proteins, Tim was shown to interact with DNA pols α, δ, and ε in cells. Furthermore, the Tim-Tipin complex significantly stimulated the pol activities of DNA pols α, δ, and ε in vitro. The effects of Tim-Tipin on the catalytic activities of the Mcm complexes and DNA pols are mediated by the Tim protein alone, and distinct regions of the Tim protein are responsible for the inhibition of Mcm complex activities and stimulation of DNA pols. These results suggest that the Tim-Tipin complex might play a role in coupling DNA unwinding and DNA synthesis by directly affecting the catalytic activities of replication fork proteins.
Collapse
|
37
|
Roseaulin LC, Noguchi C, Martinez E, Ziegler MA, Toda T, Noguchi E. Coordinated degradation of replisome components ensures genome stability upon replication stress in the absence of the replication fork protection complex. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003213. [PMID: 23349636 PMCID: PMC3547854 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2011] [Accepted: 11/15/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The stabilization of the replisome complex is essential in order to achieve highly processive DNA replication and preserve genomic integrity. Conversely, it would also be advantageous for the cell to abrogate replisome functions to prevent inappropriate replication when fork progression is adversely perturbed. However, such mechanisms remain elusive. Here we report that replicative DNA polymerases and helicases, the major components of the replisome, are degraded in concert in the absence of Swi1, a subunit of the replication fork protection complex. In sharp contrast, ORC and PCNA, which are also required for DNA replication, were stably maintained. We demonstrate that this degradation of DNA polymerases and helicases is dependent on the ubiquitin-proteasome system, in which the SCF(Pof3) ubiquitin ligase is involved. Consistently, we show that Pof3 interacts with DNA polymerase ε. Remarkably, forced accumulation of replisome components leads to abnormal DNA replication and mitotic catastrophes in the absence of Swi1. Swi1 is known to prevent fork collapse at natural replication block sites throughout the genome. Therefore, our results suggest that the cell elicits a program to degrade replisomes upon replication stress in the absence of Swi1. We also suggest that this program prevents inappropriate duplication of the genome, which in turn contributes to the preservation of genomic integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C. Roseaulin
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Chiaki Noguchi
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Esteban Martinez
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Melissa A. Ziegler
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Takashi Toda
- Laboratory of Cell Regulation, Cancer Research UK, London Research Institute, Lincoln's Inn Field Laboratories, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eishi Noguchi
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
The eukaryotic cell replicates its chromosomal DNA with almost absolute fidelity in the course of every cell cycle. This accomplishment is remarkable considering that the conditions for DNA replication are rarely ideal. The replication machinery encounters a variety of obstacles on the chromosome, including damaged template DNA. In addition, a number of chromosome regions are considered to be difficult to replicate owing to DNA secondary structures and DNA binding proteins required for various transactions on the chromosome. Under these conditions, replication forks stall or break, posing grave threats to genomic integrity. How does the cell combat such stressful conditions during DNA replication? The replication fork protection complex (FPC) may help answer this question. Recent studies have demonstrated that the FPC is required for the smooth passage of replication forks at difficult-to-replicate genomic regions and plays a critical role in coordinating multiple genome maintenance processes at the replication fork.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam R. Leman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Drexel University College of Medicine; Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Eishi Noguchi
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Drexel University College of Medicine; Philadelphia, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Noguchi C, Rapp JB, Skorobogatko YV, Bailey LD, Noguchi E. Swi1 associates with chromatin through the DDT domain and recruits Swi3 to preserve genomic integrity. PLoS One 2012; 7:e43988. [PMID: 22952839 PMCID: PMC3431386 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2012] [Accepted: 07/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Swi1 and Swi3 form the replication fork protection complex and play critical roles in proper activation of the replication checkpoint and stabilization of replication forks in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. However, the mechanisms by which the Swi1-Swi3 complex regulates these processes are not well understood. Here, we report functional analyses of the Swi1-Swi3 complex in fission yeast. Swi1 possesses the DDT domain, a putative DNA binding domain found in a variety of chromatin remodeling factors. Consistently, the DDT domain-containing region of Swi1 interacts with DNA in vitro, and mutations in the DDT domain eliminate the association of Swi1 with chromatin in S. pombe cells. DDT domain mutations also render cells highly sensitive to S-phase stressing agents and induce strong accumulation of Rad22-DNA repair foci, indicating that the DDT domain is involved in the activity of the Swi1-Swi3 complex. Interestingly, DDT domain mutations also abolish Swi1's ability to interact with Swi3 in cells. Furthermore, we show that Swi1 is required for efficient chromatin association of Swi3 and that the Swi1 C-terminal domain directly interacts with Swi3. These results indicate that Swi1 associates with chromatin through its DDT domain and recruits Swi3 to function together as the replication fork protection complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiaki Noguchi
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Jordan B. Rapp
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Yuliya V. Skorobogatko
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Lauren D. Bailey
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Eishi Noguchi
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Leman AR, Dheekollu J, Deng Z, Lee SW, Das MM, Lieberman PM, Noguchi E. Timeless preserves telomere length by promoting efficient DNA replication through human telomeres. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:2337-47. [PMID: 22672906 PMCID: PMC3383593 DOI: 10.4161/cc.20810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
A variety of telomere protection programs are utilized to preserve telomere structure. However, the complex nature of telomere maintenance remains elusive. The Timeless protein associates with the replication fork and is thought to support efficient progression of the replication fork through natural impediments, including replication fork block sites. However, the mechanism by which Timeless regulates such genomic regions is not understood. Here, we report the role of Timeless in telomere length maintenance. We demonstrate that Timeless depletion leads to telomere shortening in human cells. This length maintenance is independent of telomerase, and Timeless depletion causes increased levels of DNA damage, leading to telomere aberrations. We also show that Timeless is associated with Shelterin components TRF1 and TRF2. Timeless depletion slows telomere replication in vitro, and Timeless-depleted cells fail to maintain TRF1-mediated accumulation of replisome components at telomeric regions. Furthermore, telomere replication undergoes a dramatic delay in Timeless-depleted cells. These results suggest that Timeless functions together with TRF1 to prevent fork collapse at telomere repeat DNA and ensure stable maintenance of telomere length and integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam R. Leman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Drexel University College of Medicine; Philadelphia, PA USA
| | | | - Zhong Deng
- The Wistar Institute; Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Seung Woo Lee
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Drexel University College of Medicine; Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Mukund M. Das
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Drexel University College of Medicine; Philadelphia, PA USA
| | | | - Eishi Noguchi
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Drexel University College of Medicine; Philadelphia, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Prevention and repair of DNA damage is essential for maintenance of genomic stability and cell survival. DNA replication during S-phase can be a source of DNA damage if endogenous or exogenous stresses impair the progression of replication forks. It has become increasingly clear that DNA-damage-response pathways do not only respond to the presence of damaged DNA, but also modulate DNA replication dynamics to prevent DNA damage formation during S-phase. Such observations may help explain the developmental defects or cancer predisposition caused by mutations in DNA-damage-response genes. The present review focuses on molecular mechanisms by which DNA-damage-response pathways control and promote replication dynamics in vertebrate cells. In particular, DNA damage pathways contribute to proper replication by regulating replication initiation, stabilizing transiently stalled forks, promoting replication restart and facilitating fork movement on difficult-to-replicate templates. If replication fork progression fails to be rescued, this may lead to DNA damage and genomic instability via nuclease processing of aberrant fork structures or incomplete sister chromatid separation during mitosis.
Collapse
|
42
|
Altered replication in human cells promotes DMPK (CTG)(n) · (CAG)(n) repeat instability. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32:1618-32. [PMID: 22354993 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.06727-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is associated with expansion of (CTG)(n) · (CAG)(n) trinucleotide repeats (TNRs) in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of the DMPK gene. Replication origins are cis-acting elements that potentiate TNR instability; therefore, we mapped replication initiation sites and prereplication complex protein binding within the ~10-kb DMPK/SIX5 locus in non-DM1 and DM1 cells. Two origins, IS(DMPK) and IS(SIX5), flanked the (CTG)(n) · (CAG)(n) TNRs in control cells and in DM1 cells. Orc2 and Mcm4 bound near each of the replication initiation sites, but a dramatic change in (CTG)(n) · (CAG)(n) replication polarity was not correlated with TNR expansion. To test whether (CTG)(n) · (CAG)(n) TNRs are cis-acting elements of instability in human cells, model cell lines were created by integration of cassettes containing the c-myc replication origin and (CTG)(n) · (CAG)(n) TNRs in HeLa cells. Replication forks were slowed by (CTG)(n) · (CAG)(n) TNRs in a length-dependent manner independent of replication polarity, implying that expanded (CTG)(n) · (CAG)(n) TNRs lead to replication stress. Consistent with this prediction, TNR instability increased in the HeLa model cells and DM1 cells upon small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of the fork stabilization protein Claspin, Timeless, or Tipin. These results suggest that aberrant DNA replication and TNR instability are linked in DM1 cells.
Collapse
|
43
|
Errico A, Costanzo V. Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2012; 47:222-35. [DOI: 10.3109/10409238.2012.655374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
44
|
Yilmaz S, Sancar A, Kemp MG. Multiple ATR-Chk1 pathway proteins preferentially associate with checkpoint-inducing DNA substrates. PLoS One 2011; 6:e22986. [PMID: 21829571 PMCID: PMC3146532 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2011] [Accepted: 07/08/2011] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The ATR-Chk1 DNA damage checkpoint pathway is a critical regulator of the cellular response to DNA damage and replication stress in human cells. The variety of environmental, chemotherapeutic, and carcinogenic agents that activate this signal transduction pathway do so primarily through the formation of bulky adducts in DNA and subsequent effects on DNA replication fork progression. Because there are many protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions proposed to be involved in activation and/or maintenance of ATR-Chk1 signaling in vivo, we systematically analyzed the association of a number of ATR-Chk1 pathway proteins with relevant checkpoint-inducing DNA structures in vitro. These DNA substrates included single-stranded DNA, branched DNA, and bulky adduct-containing DNA. We found that many checkpoint proteins show a preference for single-stranded, branched, and bulky adduct-containing DNA in comparison to undamaged, double-stranded DNA. We additionally found that the association of checkpoint proteins with bulky DNA damage relative to undamaged DNA was strongly influenced by the ionic strength of the binding reaction. Interestingly, among the checkpoint proteins analyzed the checkpoint mediator proteins Tipin and Claspin showed the greatest differential affinity for checkpoint-inducing DNA structures. We conclude that the association and accumulation of multiple checkpoint proteins with DNA structures indicative of DNA damage and replication stress likely contribute to optimal ATR-Chk1 DNA damage checkpoint responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seçil Yilmaz
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Aziz Sancar
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Michael G. Kemp
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Uno S, Masai H. Efficient expression and purification of human replication fork-stabilizing factor, Claspin, from mammalian cells: DNA-binding activity and novel protein interactions. Genes Cells 2011; 16:842-56. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2011.01535.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
46
|
Abstract
Claspin is a mediator of the ATR-dependent DNA replication checkpoint in human cells and also promotes DNA replication fork progression and stability. Though Claspin has been shown to bind DNA and co-immunoprecipitate with other replication fork-associated proteins, the specific protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions that are important for Claspin function are not known. We therefore purified several domains of human Claspin and then tested for direct interactions of these fragments with several replication fork-associated proteins and with DNA. Our data show that the N terminus of Claspin binds to the replicative helicase co-factor Cdc45, the Timeless protein and a branched, replication fork-like DNA structure. In contrast, the C terminus of Claspin associates with DNA polymerase epsilon and Rad17-Replication Factor C (RFC). We conclude that multiple protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions may be important for Claspin function during DNA replication and DNA replication checkpoint signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozdemirhan Serçin
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dheekollu J, Wiedmer A, Hayden J, Speicher D, Gotter AL, Yen T, Lieberman PM. Timeless links replication termination to mitotic kinase activation. PLoS One 2011; 6:e19596. [PMID: 21573113 PMCID: PMC3089618 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2011] [Accepted: 04/01/2011] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The mechanisms that coordinate the termination of DNA replication with progression through mitosis are not completely understood. The human Timeless protein (Tim) associates with S phase replication checkpoint proteins Claspin and Tipin, and plays an important role in maintaining replication fork stability at physical barriers, like centromeres, telomeres and ribosomal DNA repeats, as well as at termination sites. We show here that human Tim can be isolated in a complex with mitotic entry kinases CDK1, Auroras A and B, and Polo-like kinase (Plk1). Plk1 bound Tim directly and colocalized with Tim at a subset of mitotic structures in M phase. Tim depletion caused multiple mitotic defects, including the loss of sister-chromatid cohesion, loss of mitotic spindle architecture, and a failure to exit mitosis. Tim depletion caused a delay in mitotic kinase activity in vivo and in vitro, as well as a reduction in global histone H3 S10 phosphorylation during G2/M phase. Tim was also required for the recruitment of Plk1 to centromeric DNA and formation of catenated DNA structures at human centromere alpha satellite repeats. Taken together, these findings suggest that Tim coordinates mitotic kinase activation with termination of DNA replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayaraju Dheekollu
- The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Andreas Wiedmer
- The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - James Hayden
- The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - David Speicher
- The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Anthony L. Gotter
- Merk Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Tim Yen
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Paul M. Lieberman
- The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mrc1 marks early-firing origins and coordinates timing and efficiency of initiation in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2011; 31:2380-91. [PMID: 21518960 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.01239-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
How early- and late-firing origins are selected on eukaryotic chromosomes is largely unknown. Here, we show that Mrc1, a conserved factor required for stabilization of stalled replication forks, selectively binds to the early-firing origins in a manner independent of Cdc45 and Hsk1 kinase in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In mrc1Δ cells (and in swi1Δ cells to some extent), efficiency of firing is stimulated, and its timing is advanced selectively at those origins that are normally bound by Mrc1. In contrast, the late or inefficient origins which are not bound by Mrc1 are not activated in mrc1Δ cells. The enhanced firing and precocious Cdc45 loading at Mrc1-bound early-firing origins are not observed in a checkpoint mutant of mrc1, suggesting that non-checkpoint function is involved in maintaining the normal program of early-firing origins. We propose that prefiring binding of Mrc1 is an important marker of early-firing origins which are precociously activated by the absence of this protein.
Collapse
|
49
|
The replisome pausing factor Timeless is required for episomal maintenance of latent Epstein-Barr virus. J Virol 2011; 85:5853-63. [PMID: 21490103 DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02425-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genome is maintained as an extrachromosomal episome during latent infection of B lymphocytes. Episomal maintenance is conferred by the interaction of the EBV-encoded nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) with a tandem array of high-affinity binding sites, referred to as the family of repeats (FR), located within the viral origin of plasmid replication (OriP). How this nucleoprotein array confers episomal maintenance is not completely understood. Previous studies have shown that DNA replication forks pause and terminate with high frequency at OriP. We now show that cellular DNA replication fork pausing and protection factors Timeless (Tim) and Tipin (Timeless-interacting protein) accumulate at OriP during S phase of the cell cycle. Depletion of Tim inhibits OriP-dependent DNA replication and causes a complete loss of the closed-circular form of EBV episomes in latently infected B lymphocytes. Tim depletion also led to the accumulation of double-strand breaks at the OriP region. These findings demonstrate that Tim is essential for sustaining the episomal forms of EBV DNA in latently infected cells and suggest that DNA replication fork protection is integrally linked to the mechanism of plasmid maintenance.
Collapse
|
50
|
Gosnell JA, Christensen TW. Drosophila Ctf4 is essential for efficient DNA replication and normal cell cycle progression. BMC Mol Biol 2011; 12:13. [PMID: 21470422 PMCID: PMC3082215 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2199-12-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2011] [Accepted: 04/06/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proper coordination of the functions at the DNA replication fork is vital to the normal functioning of a cell. Specifically the precise coordination of helicase and polymerase activity is crucial for efficient passage though S phase. The Ctf4 protein has been shown to be a central member of the replication fork and links the replicative MCM helicase and DNA polymerase α primase. In addition, it has been implicated as a member of a complex that promotes replication fork stability, the Fork Protection Complex (FPC), and as being important for sister chromatid cohesion. As such, understanding the role of Ctf4 within the context of a multicellular organism will be integral to our understanding of its potential role in developmental and disease processes. RESULTS We find that Drosophila Ctf4 is a conserved protein that interacts with members of the GINS complex, Mcm2, and Polymerase α primase. Using in vivo RNAi knockdown of CTF4 in Drosophila we show that Ctf4 is required for viability, S phase progression, sister chromatid cohesion, endoreplication, and coping with replication stress. CONCLUSIONS Ctf4 remains a central player in DNA replication. Our findings are consistent with what has been previously reported for CTF4 function in yeast, Xenopus extracts, and human tissue culture. We show that Ctf4 function is conserved and that Drosophila can be effectively used as a model to further probe the precise function of Ctf4 as a member of the replication fork and possible roles in development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin A Gosnell
- Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|