Phe310 in transmembrane VI of the alpha1B-adrenergic receptor is a key switch residue involved in activation and catecholamine ring aromatic bonding

Activation of the α2B adrenoceptor by the sedative sympatholytic dexmedetomidine

The α₂ adrenergic receptors (α₂ARs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that respond to adrenaline and noradrenaline and couple to the Gi/o family of G proteins. α₂ARs play important roles in regulating the sympathetic nervous system. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α₂AR agonist used in post-operative patients as an anxiety-reducing, sedative medicine that decreases the requirement for opioids. As is typical for selective αAR agonists, dexmedetomidine consists of an imidazole ring and a substituted benzene moiety lacking polar groups, which is in contrast to βAR-selective agonists, which share an ethanolamine group and an aromatic system with polar, hydrogen-bonding substituents. To better understand the structural basis for the selectivity and efficacy of adrenergic agonists, we determined the structure of the α_2BAR in complex with dexmedetomidine and Go at a resolution of 2.9 Å by single-particle cryo-EM. The structure reveals the mechanism of α₂AR-selective activation and provides insights into Gi/o coupling specificity.

Aminergic GPCR-Ligand Interactions: A Chemical and Structural Map of Receptor Mutation Data

The aminergic family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) plays an important role in various diseases and represents a major drug discovery target class. Structure determination of all major aminergic subfamilies has enabled structure-based ligand design for these receptors. Site-directed mutagenesis data provides an invaluable complementary source of information for elucidating the structural determinants of binding of different ligand chemotypes. The current study provides a comparative analysis of 6692 mutation data points on 34 aminergic GPCR subtypes, covering the chemical space of 540 unique ligands from mutagenesis experiments and information from experimentally determined structures of 52 distinct aminergic receptor-ligand complexes. The integrated analysis enables detailed investigation of structural receptor-ligand interactions and assessment of the transferability of combined binding mode and mutation data across ligand chemotypes and receptor subtypes. An overview is provided of the possibilities and limitations of using mutation data to guide the design of novel aminergic receptor ligands.

Template selection and refinement considerations for modelling aminergic GPCR-ligand complexes

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important targets for development of drugs for the treatment of many diseases. However, crystal structures are available for only a small fraction of these membrane bound proteins. Accurate homology models will provide opportunities for effective drug design targeting GPCRs. Recently, several serotonin receptor crystal structures were solved and needed to be evaluated as potential templates. In the first part of this work different measures of similarity in template selection were explored and methods for homology modelling, docking and refinement of aminergic GPCR-ligand complexes were developed and evaluated by comparing models of the D₃-R/eticlopride complex with the crystal structure. Homology models of the three α₁ adrenergic receptor subtypes and of a serotonin receptor subtype were then constructed using these methods These models were evaluated by docking a range of antagonists into them.

Characterization of G protein coupling mediated by the conserved D134(3.49) of DRY motif, M241(6.34), and F251(6.44) residues on human CXCR1

•

Mutations in the DRY motif of CXCR1 abolish ligand binding and receptor activation.

•

Point mutations between TM6 and i3 loop result in constitutive activity of CXCR1.

•

Constitutive activity of mutant CXCR1 occurs via Gα15 signaling activation.

•

The highly conserved DRY motifs have distinct roles in CXCR1 and CXCR2.

CXCR1, a receptor for interleukin-8 (IL-8), plays an important role in defending against pathogen invasion during neutrophil-mediated innate immune response. Human CXCR1 is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with its characteristic seven transmembrane domains (TMs). Functional and structural analyses of several GPCRs have revealed that conserved residues on TM3 (including the highly conserved Asp-Arg-Tyr (DRY) motif) and TM6 near intracellular loops contain domains critical for G protein coupling as well as GPCR activation. The objective of this study was to elucidate the role of critical amino acid residues on TM3 near intracellular loop 2 (i2) and TM6 near intracellular loop 3 (i3), including S132^3.47 (Baldwin location), D134^3.49, M241^6.34, and F251^6.44, in G protein coupling and CXCR1 activation. The results demonstrate that mutations of D134^3.49 at DRY motif of CXCR1 (D134N and D134V) completely abolished the ligand binding and functional response of the receptor. Additionally, point mutations at positions 241 and 251 between TM6 and i3 loop generated mutant receptors with modest constitutive activity via Gα15 signaling activation. Our results show that D134^3.49 on the highly conserved DRY motif has a distinct role for CXCR1 compared to its homologues (CXCR2 and KSHV-GPCR) in G protein coupling and receptor activation. In addition, M241^6.34 and F251^6.44 along with our previously identified V247^6.40 on TM6 are spatially located in a “hot spot” likely essential for CXCR1 activation. Identification of these amino acid residues may be useful for elucidating mechanism of CXCR1 activation and designing specific antagonists for the treatment of CXCR1-mediated diseases.

An aspartate in the second extracellular loop of the α(1B) adrenoceptor regulates agonist binding

The extracellular loops of the adrenoceptors present a potential therapeutic target in the design of highly selective adrenergic drugs. These regions are less conserved than the orthosteric binding site but have to date not been implicated in activation of adrenoceptors. A previously generated homology model identified an extracellular residue, D191, as a potential regulator of agonist binding. We have generated mutants of the α1B adrenoceptor replacing the charged aspartate, D191, as well as a potential interaction partner, K331, with uncharged alanines to observe effects on ligand binding and receptor activation. Significant 4-6 fold reductions in affinity for the endogenous agonists, epinephrine and norepinephrine were observed for receptors with the D191A mutation in the second extracellular loop. While changes in EC50 were observed, operational analysis yielded no apparent change in receptor activation. Based on these findings, we suggest that D191, in the second extracellular loop of the α1B adrenoceptor, acts as a 'point of first contact' for the receptor's endogenous agonists. Implication of the non-conserved extracellular regions of the receptor in agonist binding makes it a potential target for the design of highly selective drugs.

Orthosteric binding of ρ-Da1a, a natural peptide of snake venom interacting selectively with the α1A-adrenoceptor

ρ-Da1a is a three-finger fold toxin from green mamba venom that is highly selective for the α_1A-adrenoceptor. This toxin has atypical pharmacological properties, including incomplete inhibition of ³H-prazosin or ¹²⁵I-HEAT binding and insurmountable antagonist action. We aimed to clarify its mode of action at the α_1A-adrenoceptor. The affinity (pKi 9.26) and selectivity of ρ-Da1a for the α_1A-adrenoceptor were confirmed by comparing binding to human adrenoceptors expressed in eukaryotic cells. Equilibrium and kinetic binding experiments were used to demonstrate that ρ-Da1a, prazosin and HEAT compete at the α_1A-adrenoceptor. ρ-Da1a did not affect the dissociation kinetics of ³H-prazosin or ¹²⁵I-HEAT, and the IC₅₀ of ρ-Da1a, determined by competition experiments, increased linearly with the concentration of radioligands used, while the residual binding by ρ-Da1a remained stable. The effect of ρ-Da1a on agonist-stimulated Ca²⁺ release was insurmountable in the presence of phenethylamine- or imidazoline-type agonists. Ten mutations in the orthosteric binding pocket of the α_1A-adrenoceptor were evaluated for alterations in ρ-Da1a affinity. The D106^3.32A and the S188^5.42A/S192^5.46A receptor mutations reduced toxin affinity moderately (6 and 7.6 times, respectively), while the F86^2.64A, F288^6.51A and F312^7.39A mutations diminished it dramatically by 18- to 93-fold. In addition, residue F86^2.64 was identified as a key interaction point for ¹²⁵I-HEAT, as the variant F86^2.64A induced a 23-fold reduction in HEAT affinity. Unlike the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor toxin MT7, ρ-Da1a interacts with the human α_1A-adrenoceptor orthosteric pocket and shares receptor interaction points with antagonist (F86^2.64, F288^6.51 and F312^7.39) and agonist (F288^6.51 and F312^7.39) ligands. Its selectivity for the α_1A-adrenoceptor may result, at least partly, from its interaction with the residue F86^2.64, which appears to be important also for HEAT binding.

Conopeptide ρ-TIA defines a new allosteric site on the extracellular surface of the α1B-adrenoceptor

The G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily is an important drug target that includes over 1000 membrane receptors that functionally couple extracellular stimuli to intracellular effectors. Despite the potential of extracellular surface (ECS) residues in GPCRs to interact with subtype-specific allosteric modulators, few ECS pharmacophores for class A receptors have been identified. Using the turkey β(1)-adrenergic receptor crystal structure, we modeled the α(1B)-adrenoceptor (α(1B)-AR) to help identify the allosteric site for ρ-conopeptide TIA, an inverse agonist at this receptor. Combining mutational radioligand binding and inositol 1-phosphate signaling studies, together with molecular docking simulations using a refined NMR structure of ρ-TIA, we identified 14 residues on the ECS of the α(1B)-AR that influenced ρ-TIA binding. Double mutant cycle analysis and docking confirmed that ρ-TIA binding was dominated by a salt bridge and cation-π between Arg-4-ρ-TIA and Asp-327 and Phe-330, respectively, and a T-stacking-π interaction between Trp-3-ρ-TIA and Phe-330. Water-bridging hydrogen bonds between Asn-2-ρ-TIA and Val-197, Trp-3-ρ-TIA and Ser-318, and the positively charged N terminus and Glu-186, were also identified. These interactions reveal that peptide binding to the ECS on transmembrane helix 6 (TMH6) and TMH7 at the base of extracellular loop 3 (ECL3) is sufficient to allosterically inhibit agonist signaling at a GPCR. The ligand-accessible ECS residues identified provide the first view of an allosteric inhibitor pharmacophore for α(1)-adrenoceptors and mechanistic insight and a new set of structural constraints for the design of allosteric antagonists at related GPCRs.

Structural requirements of bitter taste receptor activation

An important question in taste research is how 25 receptors of the human TAS2R family detect thousands of structurally diverse compounds. An answer to this question may arise from the observation that TAS2Rs in general are broadly tuned to interact with numerous substances. Ultimately, interaction with chemically diverse agonists requires architectures of binding pockets tailored to combine flexibility with selectivity. The present study determines the structure of hTAS2R binding pockets. We focused on a subfamily of closely related hTAS2Rs exhibiting pronounced amino acid sequence identities but unique agonist activation spectra. The generation of chimeric and mutant receptors followed by calcium imaging analyses identified receptor regions and amino acid residues critical for activation of hTAS2R46, -R43, and -R31. We found that the carboxyl-terminal regions of the investigated receptors are crucial for agonist selectivity. Intriguingly, exchanging two residues located in transmembrane domain seven between hTAS2R46, activated by strychnine, and hTAS2R31, activated by aristolochic acid, was sufficient to invert agonist selectivity. Further mutagenesis revealed additional positions involved in agonist interaction. The transfer of functionally relevant amino acids identified in hTAS2R46 to the corresponding positions of hTAS2R43 and -R31 resulted in pharmacological properties indistinguishable from the parental hTAS2R46. In silico modeling of hTAS2R46 allowed us to visualize the putative mode of interaction between agonists and hTAS2Rs. Detailed structure-function analyses of hTAS2Rs may ultimately pave the way for the development of specific antagonists urgently needed for more sophisticated analyses of human bitter taste perception.

Expression and function of G-protein-coupled receptorsin the male reproductive tract

This review focuses on the expression and function of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), α1-adrenoceptors and relaxin receptors in the male reproductive tract. The localization and differential expression of mAChR and α1-adrenoceptor subtypes in specific compartments of the efferent ductules, epididymis, vas deferens, seminal vesicle and prostate of various species indicate a role for these receptors in the modulation of luminal fluid composition and smooth muscle contraction, including effects on male fertility. Furthermore, the activation of mAChRs induces transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the Sertoli cell proliferation. The relaxin receptors are present in the testis, RXFP1 in elongated spermatids and Sertoli cells from rat, and RXFP2 in Leydig and germ cells from rat and human, suggesting a role for these receptors in the spermatogenic process. The localization of both receptors in the apical portion of epithelial cells and smooth muscle layers of the vas deferens suggests an involvement of these receptors in the contraction and regulation of secretion.

Discovery of novel chemotypes to a G-protein-coupled receptor through ligand-steered homology modeling and structure-based virtual screening

Melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCH-R1) is a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and a target for the development of therapeutics for obesity. The structure-based development of MCH-R1 and other GPCR antagonists is hampered by the lack of an available experimentally determined atomic structure. A ligand-steered homology modeling approach has been developed (where information about existing ligands is used explicitly to shape and optimize the binding site) followed by docking-based virtual screening. Top scoring compounds identified virtually were tested experimentally in an MCH-R1 competitive binding assay, and six novel chemotypes as low micromolar affinity antagonist "hits" were identified. This success rate is more than a 10-fold improvement over random high-throughput screening, which supports our ligand-steered method. Clearly, the ligand-steered homology modeling method reduces the uncertainty of structure modeling for difficult targets like GPCRs.

Constitutive activity and inverse agonism at the α1adrenoceptors

Mutations of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) can increase their constitutive (agonist-independent) activity. Some of these mutations have been artificially introduced by site-directed mutagenesis, others occur spontaneously in human diseases. The alpha(1B)adrenoceptor was the first GPCR in which point mutations were shown to trigger receptor activation. This article briefly summarizes some of the findings reported in the last several years on constitutive activity of the alpha(1)adrenoceptor subtypes, the location where mutations have been found in the receptors, the spontaneous activity of native receptors in recombinant as well as physiological systems. In addition, it will highlight how the analysis of the pharmacological and molecular properties of the constitutively active adrenoceptor mutants provided an important contribution to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the mechanism of receptor activation and inverse agonism.

Molecular interaction of serotonin 5-HT2A receptor residues Phe339(6.51) and Phe340(6.52) with superpotent N-benzyl phenethylamine agonists

Experiments were conducted to examine the molecular basis for the high affinity and potency of a new class of 5-HT(2A) receptor agonists, N-benzyl phenethylamines. Competition binding assays at several serotonin receptors confirmed that an N-arylmethyl substitution was necessary for affinity increases up to 300-fold over simple N-alkyl homologs, as well as enhanced selectivity for 5-HT(2A) versus 5-HT(2C) and 5-HT(1A) receptors. PI hydrolysis functional assays confirmed that these N-benzyl phenethylamines are potent and highly efficacious agonists at the rat 5-HT(2A) receptor. Virtual docking of these compounds into a human 5-HT(2A) receptor homology model indicated that the N-benzyl moiety might be interacting with Phe339((6.51)), whereas the phenethylamine portion was likely to be interacting with Phe340((6.52)). Experiments in h5-HT(2A) receptors with Phe339((6.51))L and Phe340((6.52))L mutations seem to support this hypothesis. Dramatic detrimental effects on affinity, potency, and intrinsic activity were observed with the Phe339((6.51))L mutation for all N-benzyl analogs, whereas most N-unsubstituted phenethylamines and traditional agonists were only weakly affected, if at all. Consistent with other published studies, the Phe340((6.52))L mutation detrimentally affected affinity, potency, and intrinsic activity of nearly all compounds tested, although a strong change in intrinsic activity was not seen with most N-aryl analogs. These data further validate the topology of our h5-HT(2A) receptor homology model. It is noteworthy that this study is the first to identify a hitherto unrecognized role for residue 6.51 in agonist activation of a serotonin G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), whereas most previous reports have suggested a varied and sometimes contradictory role in homologous GPCRs.

Structure-function of alpha1-adrenergic receptors

The Easson-Stedman hypothesis provided the rationale for the first studies of drug design for the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor. Through chemical modifications of the catecholamine core structure, the need was established for a protonated amine, a beta-hydroxyl on a chiral center, and an aromatic ring with substitutions capable of hydrogen bonding. After the receptors were cloned and three alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor subtypes were discovered, drug design became focused on the analysis of receptor structure and new interactions were uncovered. It became clear that alpha(1)- and beta-adrenergic receptors did not share stringent homology in the ligand-binding pocket but this difference has allowed for more selective drug design. Novel discoveries on allosterism and agonist trafficking may be used in the future design of therapeutics with fewer side effects. This review will explore past and current knowledge of the structure-function of the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor subtypes.

Novel human alpha1a-adrenoceptor single nucleotide polymorphisms alter receptor pharmacology and biological function

We identified nine naturally-occurring human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the alpha(1a)-adrenoceptor (alpha(1a)AR) coding region, seven of which result in amino acid change. Utilizing rat-1 fibroblasts stably expressing wild type alpha(1a)AR or each SNP at both high and low levels, we investigated the effect of these SNPs on receptor function. Compared with wild type, two SNPs (R166K, V311I) cause a decrease in binding affinity for agonists norepinephrine, epinephrine, and phenylephrine, and also shift the dose-response curve for norepinephrine stimulation of inositol phosphate (IP) production to the right (reduced potency) without altering maximal IP activity. In addition, SNP V311I and I200S display altered antagonist binding. Interestingly, a receptor with SNP G247R (located in the third intracellular loop) displays increased maximal receptor IP activity and stimulates cell growth. The increased receptor signaling for alpha(1a)AR G247R is not mediated by altered ligand binding or a deficiency in agonist-mediated desensitization, but appears to be related to enhanced receptor-G protein coupling. In conclusion, four naturally-occurring human alpha(1a)AR SNPs induce altered receptor pharmacology and/or biological activity. This finding has potentially important implications in many areas of medicine and can be used to guide alpha(1a)AR SNP choice for future clinical studies.

Toward the active conformations of rhodopsin and the beta2-adrenergic receptor

Using sets of experimental distance restraints, which characterize active or inactive receptor conformations, and the X-ray crystal structure of the inactive form of bovine rhodopsin as a starting point, we have constructed models of both the active and inactive forms of rhodopsin and the beta2-adrenergic G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). The distance restraints were obtained from published data for site-directed crosslinking, engineered zinc binding, site-directed spin-labeling, IR spectroscopy, and cysteine accessibility studies conducted on class A GPCRs. Molecular dynamics simulations in the presence of either "active" or "inactive" restraints were used to generate two distinguishable receptor models. The process for generating the inactive and active models was validated by the hit rates, yields, and enrichment factors determined for the selection of antagonists in the inactive model and for the selection of agonists in the active model from a set of nonadrenergic GPCR drug-like ligands in a virtual screen using ligand docking software. The simulation results provide new insights into the relationships observed between selected biochemical data, the crystal structure of rhodopsin, and the structural rearrangements that occur during activation.

Identification of Amino Acid Residues That Direct Differential Ligand Selectivity of Mammalian and Nonmammalian V1a Type Receptors for Arginine Vasopressin and Vasotocin

Arginine vasotocin (VT) is the ortholog in all nonmammalian vertebrates of arginine vasopressin (AVP) in mammals. We have previously cloned an amphibian V1atype vasotocin receptor (VT1R) that exhibited higher sensitivity for VT than AVP, while the mammalian V1a type receptor (V1aR) responded better to AVP than VT. In the present study, we identified the amino acid residues that confer differential ligand selectivity for AVP and VT between rat V1aR and bullfrog VT1R (bfVT1R). A chimeric rat V1aR having transmembrane domain (TMD) VI to the carboxyl-terminal tail (C-tail) of bfVT1R showed a reverse ligand preference for AVP and VT, whereas a chimeric VT1R with TMD VI to the C-tail of rat V1aR showed a great increase in sensitivity for AVP. A single mutation (Ile(315(6.53)) to Thr) in TMD VI of V1aR increased the sensitivity for VT, while a single mutation (Phe(313(6.51)) to Tyr or Pro(334(7.33)) to Thr) reduced sensitivity toward AVP. Interestingly the triple mutation (Phe(313(6.51)) to Tyr, Ile(6.53) to Thr, and Pro(7.33) to Thr) of V1aR increased sensitivity to VT but greatly reduced sensitivity to AVP, behaving like bfVT1R. Further, like V1aR, a double mutant (Tyr(306(6.51)) to Phe and Thr(327(7.33)) to Pro) of bfVT1R showed an increased sensitivity to AVP. These results suggest that Phe/Tyr(6.51), Ile/Thr(6.53), and Pro/Thr(7.33) are responsible for the differential ligand selectivity between rat V1aR and bfVT1R. This information regarding the molecular interaction of VT/AVP with their receptors may have important implications for the development of novel AVP analogs.

Structural features of the inactive and active states of the melanin-concentrating hormone receptors: Insights from molecular simulations

Comparative molecular dynamics simulations of both subtypes 1 and 2 of the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor (MCHR1 and MCHR2, respectively) in their free and hormone-bound forms have been carried out. The hormone has been used in its full-length and truncated forms, as well as in 16 mutated forms. Moreover, MCHR1 has been simulated in complex with T-226296, a novel orally active and selective antagonist. The comparative analysis of an extended number of receptor configurations suggests that the differences between inactive (i.e., free and antagonist-bound) and active (i.e., agonist-bound) states of MCHRs involve the receptor portions close to the E/DRY and NPxxY motifs, with prominence to the cytosolic extensions of helices 2, 3, 6, and 7. In fact, the active forms of these receptors share the release of selected intramolecular interactions found in the inactive forms, such as that between R3.50 of the E/DRY motif and D2.40, and that between Y7.53 of the NPxxY motif and F7.60. Another feature of the active forms of both MCHRs is the approach of "helix 8" to the cytosolic extension of helix 3. These features of the active forms are concurrent with the opening of a cleft at the cytosolic end of the helix bundle. For both MCHRs, the agonist-induced chemical information transfer from the extracellular to the cytosolic domains is mediated by a cluster of aromatic amino acids in helix 6, following the ligand interaction with selected amino acids in the extracellular half of the receptor.

Kinetics of ?-funaltrexamine binding to wild-type and mutant ?-opioid receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells

The two-stage reaction whereby the antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) binds covalently to micro opioid receptors makes it a highly discriminating probe into the tertiary structure of the receptor's recognition pocket. To obtain a quantitative measure of how well this pocket is preserved in a mutated form of the receptor, in which His-297 is substituted with glutamine, we employed [3H]-beta-FNA to evaluate the kinetic rate constants for both the reversible as well as the irreversible stages of its binding to wild-type and mutant H297Q micro receptors stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The expression levels of the wild-type and mutant H297Q receptors were matched by exploiting the variation in receptor density as a function of plating day and by raising the expression level by pretreatment with naloxone. We found that all of the kinetic rate constants for [3H]-beta-FNA were diminished by about one-half at the mutant H297Q micro receptors with respect to wild-type receptors. By comparison, the association rate constant of [3H]-naloxone likewise decreased by one-half; however, the dissociation rate constant increased 5-fold at the mutant H297Q receptor. We conclude that the mutation has had only minor influence on the recognition site and that the function of position 297 is more likely as a link in the transduction chain.

Alpha(1) adrenoceptor subtype selectivity. 3D-QSAR models for a new class of alpha(1) adrenoceptor antagonists derived from the novel antipsychotic sertindole

Receptor-binding affinities for the alpha(1) adrenoceptor subtypes alpha(1a), alpha(1b) and alpha(1d) for a series of 39 alpha(1) adrenoceptor antagonists derived from the antipsychotic sertindole are reported. The SAR of the compounds with respect to affinity for the alpha(1a), alpha(1b) and alpha(1d) adrenoceptor subtypes as well as affinity obtained by an alpha(1) assay (rat brain membranes) were investigated using a 3D-QSAR approach based on the GRID/GOLPE methodology. Good statistics (r(2)=0.91-0.96; q(2)=0.65-0.73) were obtained with the combination of the water (OH2) and methyl (C3) probes. The combination of steric repulsion and electrostatic attractions explain the affinities of the included molecules. The adrenergic alpha(1a) receptor seems to be more tolerant to large substituents in the area between the indole 5- and 6-positions compared to the adrenergic alpha(1b) and alpha(1d) receptor subtypes. There seems to be minor differences in the position of areas in the alpha(1b) receptor compared to alpha(1a) and alpha(1d) receptors where electrostatic interaction between the molecules and the receptor (OH2 probe) contribute to increased affinity. These observations may be used in the design of new subtype selective compounds. In addition, the model based on biological data from an alpha(1) assay (rat brain membranes) resembles the model for the alpha(1b) adrenoceptor subtype.

Activation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor may involve a W6 48/F3 36 rotamer toggle switch

The cannabinoid CB1 receptor, a member of the Rhodopsin (Rho) family of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), exhibits high levels of constitutive activity. In contrast, Rho exhibits an exquisite lack of constitutive activity. In Rho, W6.48(265) on transmembrane helix 6 (TMH6) is flanked by aromatic residues at positions i-4 (F6.44) and i + 3 (Y6.51), while in CB1 the residues i-4 and i + 3 to W6.48 are leucines (L6.44 and L6.51). Based upon spectroscopic evidence, W6.48 has been proposed to undergo a rotamer switch (chi1 g+ -->trans) upon activation of Rho. In the work reported here, the biased Monte Carlo method, Conformational Memories (CM) was used to test the hypothesis that the high constitutive activity exhibited by CB1 may be due, in part, to the lack of aromatic residues i-4 and i + 3 from W6.48. In this work, the W6.48 rotamer shift (chi1 g+ -->trans) was used as the criterion for activation. Conformational Memories (CM) calculations on WT CB1 TMH6 and L6.44F and L6.51Y mutant TMH6s revealed that an aromatic residue at 6.44 tends to disfavor the W6.48 chi1 g+ -->trans transition and an aromatic residue at 6.51 would require a concomitant movement of the Y6.51 chi1 from trans-->g+ when the W6.48 chi1 undergoes a g+ -->trans shift. In contrast, CM calculations on WT CB1 TMH6 revealed that the presence of leucines at 6.44 and 6.51 provide W6.48 with greater conformational mobility, with a W6.48 transchi1 preferred. Conformational Memories calculations also revealed that the W6.48 chi1 g+ -->trans transition in WT CB1 TMH6 is correlated with the degree of kinking in TMH6. The average proline kink angles for TMH6 were higher for helices with a W6.48 g+ chi1 than for those with a W6.48 transchi1. These results are consistent with experimental evidence that TMH6 straightens during activation. Transmembrane helix (TMH) bundle models of the inactive (R) and active (R*) states of CB1 were then probed for interactions that may constrain W6.48 in the inactive state of CB1. These studies revealed that F3.36 (transchi1) helps to constrain W6.48 in a g+ chi1 in the inactive (R) state of CB1. In the R* state, these studies suggest that F3.36 must assume a g+ chi1 in order to allow W6.48 to shift to a transchi1. These results suggest that the W6.48/F3.36 interaction may act as the 'toggle switch' for CB1 activation, with W6.48 chi1 g+/F3.36 chi1 trans representing the inactive (R) and W6.48 chi1 trans/F3.36 chi1 g+ representing the active (R*) state of CB1.

A model for constitutive lutropin receptor activation based on molecular simulation and engineered mutations in transmembrane helices 6 and 7

Many naturally occurring and engineered mutations lead to constitutive activation of the G protein-coupled lutropin receptor (LHR), some of which also result in reduced ligand responsiveness. To elucidate the nature of interhelical interactions in this heptahelical receptor and changes thereof accompanying activation, we have utilized site-directed mutagenesis on transmembrane helices 6 and 7 of rat LHR to prepare and characterize a number of single, double, and triple mutants. The potent constitutively activating mutants, D556(6.44)H and D556(6.44)Q, were combined with weaker activating mutants, N593(7.45)R and N597(7.49)Q, and the loss-of-responsiveness mutant, N593(7.45)A. The engineered mutants have also been simulated using a new receptor model based on the crystal structure of rhodopsin. The results suggest that constitutive LHR activation by mutations at Asp-556(6.44) is triggered by the breakage or weakening of the interaction found in the wild type receptor between Asp-556(6.44) and Asn-593(7.45). Whereas this perturbation is unique to the activating mutations at Asp-556(6.44), common features to all of the most active LHR mutants are the breakage of the charge-reinforced H-bonding interaction between Arg-442(3.50) and Asp-542(6.30) and the increase in solvent accessibility of the cytosolic extensions of helices 3 and 6, which probably participate in the receptor-G protein interface. Asn-593(7.45) and Asn-597(7.49) also seem to be necessary for the high constitutive activities of D556(6.44)H and D556(6.44)Q and for full ligand responsiveness. The new theoretical model provides a foundation for further experimental work on the molecular mechanism(s) of receptor activation.

Molecular modeling and site-specific mutagenesis of the histamine-binding site of the histamine H4 receptor

The histamine H4 receptor is a novel G-protein-coupled receptor with a unique pharmacological profile. The distribution of H4 mRNA suggests that it may play a role in the regulation of immune function, particularly with respect to allergy and asthma. To define the histamine-binding site of this receptor, molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis were used to predict and alter amino acids residing in the histamine-binding pocket. The effects of these alterations on histamine binding and receptor activation were then assessed. Our results indicate that Asp94 (3.32) in transmembrane region (TM) 3 and Glu182 (5.46) in TM5 are critically involved in histamine binding. Asp94 probably serves as a counter-anion to the cationic amino group of histamine, whereas Glu182 (5.46) interacts with the N(tau) nitrogen atom of the histamine imidazole ring via an ion pair. In contrast, Thr178 (5.42) and Ser179 (5.43) in TM5 are not significantly involved in either histamine binding or receptor activation. These results resemble those for the analogous residues in the H1 histamine receptor but contrast with findings regarding the H2 histamine receptor. Our results also demonstrate that Asn147 (4.57) in TM4 and Ser320 (6.52) in TM6 play a role in receptor activation but are not involved in histamine binding. Taken together, these data indicate that although histamine seems to bind to the H4 receptor in a fashion similar to that predicted for the other histamine receptor subtypes, there are also important differences that can probably be exploited for the discovery of novel H4-selective compounds.

Mutagenesis and modelling of the alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor highlight the role of the helix 3/helix 6 interface in receptor activation

Computer simulations on a new model of the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor based on the crystal structure of rhodopsin have been combined with experimental mutagenesis to investigate the role of residues in the cytosolic half of helix 6 in receptor activation. Our results support the hypothesis that a salt bridge between the highly conserved arginine (R143(3.50)) of the E/DRY motif of helix 3 and a conserved glutamate (E289(6.30)) on helix 6 constrains the alpha1b-AR in the inactive state. In fact, mutations of E289(6.30) that weakened the R143(3.50)-E289(6.30) interaction constitutively activated the receptor. The functional effect of mutating other amino acids on helix 6 (F286(6.27), A292(6.33), L296(6.37), V299(6.40,) V300(6.41), and F303(6.44)) correlates with the extent of their interaction with helix 3 and in particular with R143(3.50) of the E/DRY sequence.

Seven-transmembrane receptors: crystals clarify

The X-ray structure of the photoreceptor rhodopsin has provided the first atomic-resolution structure of a seven-transmembrane (7-TM) G-protein-coupled receptor. This has provided an improved template for interpreting the huge body of structure--activity, mutagenesis and affinity labelling data available for related 7-TM receptors, such as muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Ligand contacts, and the intramolecular interactions that stabilize the ground state structure, can be identified with some degree of confidence. We now have a firm basis for attempts to predict the structure of the receptor--G-protein complex, and understand the mechanism by which the agonist--receptor complex activates the G protein.

The alpha1b-adrenergic receptor subtype: molecular properties and physiological implications

The aim of this review is to summarize some of the main findings from our laboratory as well as from others concerning the biochemical, molecular, and functional properties of the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor. Experimental and computational mutagenesis of the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor have been instrumental in elucidating some of the molecular mechanisms underlying receptor activation and receptor coupling to Gq. The knockout mouse model lacking the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor has highlighted the potential implication of this receptor subtype in variety of functions including the regulation of blood pressure, glucose homeostasis, and the rewarding response to drugs of abuse.

Control of conformational equilibria in the human B2 bradykinin receptor. Modeling of nonpeptidic ligand action and comparison to the rhodopsin structure

A prototypic study of the molecular mechanisms of activation or inactivation of peptide hormone G protein-coupled receptors was carried out on the human B2 bradykinin receptor. A detailed pharmacological analysis of receptor mutants possessing either increased constitutive activity or impaired activation or ligand recognition allowed us to propose key residues participating in intramolecular interaction networks stabilizing receptor inactive or active conformations: Asn(113) and Tyr(115) (TM III), Trp(256) and Phe(259) (TM VI), Tyr(295) (TM VII) which are homologous of the rhodopsin residues Gly(120), Glu(122), Trp(265), Tyr(268), and Lys(296), respectively. An essential experimental finding was the spatial proximity between Asn(113), which is the cornerstone of inactive conformations, and Trp(256) which plays a subtle role in controlling the balance between active and inactive conformations. Molecular modeling and mutagenesis data showed that Trp(256) and Tyr(295) constitute, together with Gln(288), receptor contact points with original nonpeptidic ligands. It provided an explanation for the ligand inverse agonist behavior on the WT receptor, with underlying restricted motions of TMs III, VI, and VII, and its agonist behavior on the Ala(113) and Phe(256) constitutively activated mutants. These data on the B2 receptor emphasize that conformational equilibria are controlled in a coordinated fashion by key residues which are located at strategic positions for several G protein-coupled receptors. They are discussed in comparison with the recently determined rhodopsin crystallographic structure.

Computational model of the complex between GR113808 and the 5-HT4 receptor guided by site-directed mutagenesis and the crystal structure of rhodopsin

A computational model of the transmembrane domain of the human 5-HT4 receptorcomplexed with the GR113808 antagonist was constructed from the crystal structure of rhodopsin and the putative residues of the ligand-binding site, experimentally determined by site-directed mutagenesis. The recognition mode of GR113808 consist of: (i) the ionic interaction between the protonated amine and Asp3.32; (ii) the hydrogen bond between the carbonylic oxygen and Ser5.43; (iii) the hydrogen bond between the ether oxygen and Asn6.55; (iv) the hydrogen bond between the C-H groups adjacent to the protonated piperidine nitrogen and the pi electrons of Phe6.51; and (v) the pi-sigma aromatic-aromatic interaction between the indole ring and Phe6.52. This computational model offers structural indications about the role of Asp3.32, Ser5.43, Phe6.51, Phe6.52, and Asn6.55 in the experimental binding affinities. Asp3.32Asn mutation does not affect the binding of GR113808 because the loss of binding affinity from an ion pair to a charged hydrogen bond is compensated by the larger energetical penalty of Asp to disrupt its side chain environment in the ligand-free form, and the larger interaction between Phe6.51 and the piperidine ring of the ligand in the mutant receptor. In the Phe6.52Val mutant the indole ring of the ligand replaces the interaction with Phe6.52 by a similarly intense interaction with Tyr5.38, with no significant effect in the binding of GR113808. The mutation of Asn6.55 to Leu replaces the hydrogen bond of the ether oxygen of the ligand from Asn6.55 to Cys5.42, with a decrease of binding affinity that approximately equals the free energy difference between the SH...O and NH...O hydrogen bonds. Because these residues are also present in the other members of the neurotransmitter family of G protein-coupled receptors, these findings will also serve for our understanding of the binding of related ligands to their cognate receptors.

Phe-308 and Phe-312 in transmembrane domain 7 are major sites of alpha 1-adrenergic receptor antagonist binding. Imidazoline agonists bind like antagonists

Although agonist binding in adrenergic receptors is fairly well understood and involves residues located in transmembrane domains 3 through 6, there are few residues reported that are involved in antagonist binding. In fact, a major docking site for antagonists has never been reported in any G-protein coupled receptor. It has been speculated that antagonist binding is quite diverse depending upon the chemical structure of the antagonist, which can be quite different from agonists. We now report the identification of two phenylalanine residues in transmembrane domain 7 of the alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor (Phe-312 and Phe-308) that are a major site of antagonist affinity. Mutation of either Phe-308 or Phe-312 resulted in significant losses of affinity (4-1200-fold) for the antagonists prazosin, WB4101, BMY7378, (+) niguldipine, and 5-methylurapidil, with no changes in affinity for phenethylamine-type agonists such as epinephrine, methoxamine, or phenylephrine. Interestingly, both residues are involved in the binding of all imidazoline-type agonists such as oxymetazoline, cirazoline, and clonidine, confirming previous evidence that this class of ligand binds differently than phenethylamine-type agonists and may be more antagonist-like, which may explain their partial agonist properties. In modeling these interactions with previous mutagenesis studies and using the current backbone structure of rhodopsin, we conclude that antagonist binding is docked higher in the pocket closer to the extracellular surface than agonist binding and appears skewed toward transmembrane domain 7.

Non-alpha-helical elements modulate polytopic membrane protein architecture

In "all alpha-fold" transmembrane proteins, including ion channels, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), bacterial rhodopsins and photosynthetic reaction centers, relatively long alpha-helices, straight, curved or kinked, pack into compact elliptical or circular domains. Using both existing and newly developed tools to analyze transmembrane segments of all available membrane protein three-dimensional structures, including that very recently elucidated for the GPCR, rhodopsin, we report here the finding of frequent non-alpha-helical components, i.e. 3(10)-helices ("tight turns"), pi-helices ("wide turns") and intrahelical kinks (often due to residues other than proline). Often, diverse helical types and kinks concatenate over long segments and produce complex inclinations of helical axis, and/or diverse frame shifts in the "canonical", alpha-helical side-chain pattern. Marked differences in transmembrane architecture exist even between seemingly structurally related proteins, such as bacteriorhodopsin and rhodopsin. Deconvolution of these non-canonical features into their composite elements is essential for understanding the pleiotropy of polytopic protein structure and function, and must be considered in developing valid macromolecular models.

Dominant-negative activity of an alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor signal-inactivating point mutation

alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors (alpha(1)-ARs) are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily and activate inositol phosphate (IP) turnover. We show that glycine and asparagine mutations of Phe303 in transmembrane segment VI (TMVI) of the alpha(1B)-AR, a highly conserved residue in GPCRs, although increasing agonist affinity, abolish agonist-activated IP signalling. Co-expression of the Phe303 mutants also inhibited (-)epinephrine-stimulated IP signalling by wild-type alpha(1B)-AR and other G(q)-coupled receptors, as well as IP signalling mediated by AlF(4)(-) stimulation of both wild-type G(q alpha) and a constitutively active mutant. The inability of the Phe303 mutants to signal is due to induction of a receptor conformation that dissociates G-protein binding from activation. As a result, the Phe303 mutants sequester G(q alpha) and stoichiometrically inhibit Gq signalling in a dominant-negative manner. We further show that both the enhanced basal and agonist-stimulated IP-signalling activity of the constitutively active alpha(1B)-AR mutants, C128F and A293E, are inhibited in the double mutants, C128F/F303G and A293E/F303G. Phe303, therefore, appears to be critically involved in coupling TMVI alpha-helical movement, a key step in receptor activation, to activation of the cognate G-protein.

GTP binding and signaling by Gh/transglutaminase II involves distinct residues in a unique GTP-binding pocket

G(h) is a dual function protein. It has receptor signaling activity that requires GTP binding and Ca(2+)-activated transglutaminase (TGase) activity that is inhibited by GTP binding. G(h) shows no homology with other GTP-binding proteins, and its GTP-binding site has not been defined. Based on sequence analysis of [alpha-(32)P]GTP-photolabeled and proteolytically released internal peptide fragments, we report localization of GTP binding to a 15-residue segment ((159)YVLTQQGFIYQGSVK(173)) of the G(h) core domain. This was confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis; a G(h)/fXIIIA chimera (in which residues 162-179 of G(h) were substituted with the equivalent but nonhomologous region of the non-GTP-binding TGase factor XIIIA) and a G(h) point mutant, S171E, retained TGase activity but failed to bind and hydrolyze GTP and did not support alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor signaling. Slight impairment of GTP binding (1.5-fold) and hydrolysis (10-fold) in the absence of altered TGase activity did not affect signaling by the mutant K173N. However, greater impairment of GTP binding (6-fold) and hydrolysis (50-fold) abolished signaling by the mutant K173L. Mutant S171C exhibited enhanced GTP binding and signaling. Thus, residues Ser(171) and Lys(173) are critical for both GTP binding and signaling but not TGase activity. Mutagenesis of residues N-terminal to Gly(170) impaired both GTP binding and TGase activity. From computer modeling of G(h), it is evident that the GTP-binding region identified here is distinct from, but interacts with, the TGase active site. Together with structural considerations of G(h) versus other GTP-binding proteins, these findings indicate that G(h) has a unique GTP-binding pocket and provide for the first time a mechanism for GTP-mediated regulation of the TGase activity of G(h).

Novel aromatic residues in transmembrane domains IV and V involved in agonist binding at alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptors

We examined the role that aromatic residues located in the transmembrane helices of the alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor play in promoting antagonist binding. Since alpha(1)-antagonists display low affinity binding at beta(2)-adrenergic receptors, two phenylalanine residues, Phe-163 and Phe-187, of the alpha(1a)-AR were mutated to the corresponding beta(2)-residue. Neither F163Q nor F187A mutations of the alpha(1a) had any effect on the affinity of the alpha(1)-antagonists. However, the affinity of the endogenous agonist epinephrine was reduced 12.5- and 8-fold by the F163Q and F187A mutations, respectively. An additive loss in affinity (150-fold) for epinephrine was observed at an alpha(1a) containing both mutations. The loss of agonist affinity scenario could be reversed by a gain of affinity with mutation of the corresponding residues in the beta(2) to the phenylalanine residues in the alpha(1a). We propose that both Phe-163 and Phe-187 are involved in independent aromatic interactions with the catechol ring of agonists. The potency but not the efficacy of epinephrine in stimulating phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis was reduced 35-fold at the F163Q/F187A alpha(1a) relative to the wild type receptor. Therefore, Phe-163 and Phe-187 represent novel binding contacts in the agonist binding pocket of the alpha(1a)-AR, but are not involved directly in receptor activation.