Seven non-contiguous intracellular residues of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor dictate the rate of agonist-induced internalization and its sensitivity to non-visual arrestins

Arrestin-dependent internalization of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors

The internalization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is an important mechanism regulating the signal strength and limiting the opportunity of receptor activation. Based on the importance of GPCRs, the detailed knowledge about the regulation of signal transduction is crucial. Here, current knowledge about the agonist-induced, arrestin-dependent internalization process of rhodopsin-like GPCRs is reviewed. Arrestins are conserved molecules that act as key players within the internalization process of many GPCRs. Based on highly conserved structural characteristics within the rhodopsin-like GPCRs, the identification of arrestin interaction sites in model systems can be compared and used for the investigation of internalization processes of other receptors. The increasing understanding of this essential regulation mechanism of receptors can be used for drug development targeting rhodopsin-like GPCRs. Here, we focus on the neuropeptide Y receptor family, as these receptors transmit various physiological processes such as food intake, energy homeostasis, and regulation of emotional behavior, and are further involved in pathophysiological processes like cancer, obesity and mood disorders. Hence, this receptor family represents an interesting target for the development of novel therapeutics requiring the understanding of the regulatory mechanisms influencing receptor mediated signaling.

Pharmacological Programming of Endosomal Signaling Activated by Small Molecule Ligands of the Follicle Stimulating Hormone Receptor

Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with pivotal roles in reproduction. One key mechanism dictating the signal activity of GPCRs is membrane trafficking. After binding its hormone FSH, FSHR undergoes internalization to very early endosomes (VEEs) for its acute signaling and sorting to a rapid recycling pathway. The VEE is a heterogeneous compartment containing the Adaptor Protein Phosphotyrosine Interacting with Pleckstrin homology Domain and Leucine Zipper 1 (APPL1) with distinct functions in regulating endosomal Gαs/cAMP signaling and rapid recycling. Low molecular weight (LMW) allosteric FSHR ligands were developed for use in assisted reproductive technology yet could also provide novel pharmacological tools to study FSHR. Given the critical nature of receptor internalization and endosomal signaling for FSHR activity, we assessed whether these compounds exhibit differential abilities to alter receptor endosomal trafficking and signaling within the VEE. Two chemically distinct LMW agonists (benzamide, termed B3 and thiazolidinone, termed T1) were employed. T1 was able to induce a greater level of cAMP than FSH and B3. As cAMP signaling drives gonadotrophin hormone receptor recycling, rapid exocytic events were evaluated at single event resolution. Strikingly, T1 was able to induce a 3-fold increase in recycling events compared to FSH and two-fold more compared to B3. As T1-induced internalization was only marginally greater, the dramatic increase in recycling and cAMP signaling may be due to additional mechanisms. All compounds exhibited a similar requirement for receptor internalization to increase cAMP and proportion of FSHR endosomes with active Gαs, suggesting regulation of cAMP signaling induced by T1 may be altered. APPL1 plays a central role for GPCRs targeted to the VEE, and indeed, loss of APPL1 inhibited FSH-induced recycling and increased endosomal cAMP signaling. While T1-induced FSHR recycling was APPL1-dependent, its elevated cAMP signaling was only partially increased following APPL1 knockdown. Unexpectedly, B3 altered the dependence of FSHR to APPL1 in an opposing manner, whereby its endosomal signaling was negatively regulated by APPL1, while B3-induced FSHR recycling was APPL1-independent. Overall, FSHR allosteric compounds have the potential to re-program FSHR activity via altering engagement with VEE machinery and also suggests that these two distinct functions of APPL1 can potentially be selected pharmacologically.

The C-terminal Phosphorylation Sites of eel Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor are Important Role in the Signal Transduction

The large extracellular domain of glycoprotein hormone receptors is a unique feature within the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) family. After interaction with the hormone, the receptor becomes coupled to Gs, which, in turn stimulates adenylyl cyclase and the production of cAMP. Potential phosphorylation sites exist in the C-terminal region of GPCRs. The experiments described herein represent attempts to determine the functions of the eel follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (eelFSHR). We constructed a mutant of eelFSHR, in which the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail was truncated at residue 614 (eelFSHR-t614). The eelFSHR-t614 lacked all potential phosphorylation sites present in the C-terminal region of eelFSHR. In order to obtain the eelFSHR ligand, we produced recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rec-eelFSHβ/α) in the CHO-suspension cells. The expression level was 2-3 times higher than that of the transient expression of eelFSH in attached CHO-K1 cells. The molecular weight of the rec-eelFSHβ/α protein was identified to be approximately 34 kDa. The cells expressing eelFSHR-t614 showed an increase in agonist-induced cAMP responsiveness. The maximal cAMP responses of cells expressing eelFSHR-t614 were lower than those of cells expressing eelFSHR-wild type (eelFSHR-WT). The EC₅₀ following C-terminal deletion in CHO-K1 cells was approximately 60.4% of that of eelFSHR-WT. The maximal response in eelFSHR-t614 cells was also drastically lower than that of eelFSHR-WT. We also found similar results in PathHunter Parental cells expressing β-arrestin. Thus, these data provide evidence that the truncation of the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail phosphorylation sites in the eelFSHR greatly decreased cAMP responsiveness and maximal response in both CHO-K1 cells and PathHunter Parental cells expressing β-arrestin.

Integration of GPCR Signaling and Sorting from Very Early Endosomes via Opposing APPL1 Mechanisms

Endocytic trafficking is a critical mechanism for cells to decode complex signaling pathways, including those activated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Heterogeneity in the endosomal network enables GPCR activity to be spatially restricted between early endosomes (EEs) and the recently discovered endosomal compartment, the very early endosome (VEE). However, the molecular machinery driving GPCR activity from the VEE is unknown. Using luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) as a prototype GPCR for this compartment, along with additional VEE-localized GPCRs, we identify a role for the adaptor protein APPL1 in rapid recycling and endosomal cAMP signaling without impacting the EE-localized β2-adrenergic receptor. LHR recycling is driven by receptor-mediated Gαs/cAMP signaling from the VEE and PKA-dependent phosphorylation of APPL1 at serine 410. Receptor/Gαs endosomal signaling is localized to microdomains of heterogeneous VEE populations and regulated by APPL1 phosphorylation. Our study uncovers a highly integrated inter-endosomal communication system enabling cells to tightly regulate spatially encoded signaling.

•

GPCRs that internalize to very early endosomes (VEEs) require APPL1 to recycle

•

Receptor recycling is driven by cAMP/PKA to phosphorylate serine 410 on APPL1

•

cAMP signaling from GPCRs, such as LHR, occurs from distinct VEE microdomains

•

APPL1 limits VEE cAMP signaling via opposing mechanisms required for GPCR sorting

Advances in Membrane Trafficking and Endosomal Signaling of G Protein-Coupled Receptors

The integration of GPCR signaling with membrane trafficking, as a single orchestrated system, is a theme increasingly evident with the growing reports of GPCR endosomal signaling. Once viewed as a mechanism to regulate cell surface heterotrimeric G protein signaling, the endocytic trafficking system is complex, highly compartmentalized, yet deeply interconnected with cell signaling. The organization of receptors into distinct plasma membrane signalosomes, biochemically distinct endosomal populations, endosomal microdomains, and its communication with distinct subcellular organelles such as the Golgi provides multiple unique signaling platforms that are critical for specifying receptor function physiologically and pathophysiologically. In this chapter I discuss our emerging understanding in the endocytic trafficking systems employed by GPCRs and their novel roles in spatial control of signaling. Given the extensive roles that GPCRs play in vivo, these evolving models are starting to provide mechanistic understanding of distinct diseases and provide novel therapeutic avenues that are proving to be viable targets.

The stem cell-expressed receptor Lgr5 possesses canonical and functionally active molecular determinants critical to β-arrestin-2 recruitment

Lgr5 is a membrane protein related to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR)s whose expression identifies stem cells in multiple tissues and is strongly correlated with cancer. Despite the recent identification of endogenous ligands for Lgr5, its mode of signaling remains enigmatic. The ability to couple to G proteins and βarrestins are classical molecular behaviors of GPCRs that have yet to be observed for Lgr5. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine if Lgr5 can engage a classical GPCR behavior and elucidate the molecular determinants of this process. Structural analysis of Lgr5 revealed several motifs consistent with its ability to recruit βarr2. Among them, a "SSS" serine cluster located at amino acid position 873-875 within the C-terminal tail (C-tail), is in a region consistent with other GPCRs that bind βarr2 with high-affinity. To test its functionality, a ligand-independent βarr2 translocation assay was implemented. We show that Lgr5 recruits βarr2 and that the "SSS" amino acids (873-875) are absolutely critical to this process. We also demonstrate that for full efficacy, this cluster requires other Lgr5 C-tail serines that were previously shown to be important for constitutive and βarr2 independent internalization of Lgr5. These data are proof of principle that a classical GPCR behavior can be manifested by Lgr5. The existence of alternative ligands or missing effectors of Lgr5 that scaffold this classical GPCR behavior and the downstream signaling pathways engaged should be considered. Characterizing Lgr5 signaling will be invaluable for assessing its role in tissue maintenance, repair, and disease.

Dynamic kisspeptin receptor trafficking modulates kisspeptin-mediated calcium signaling

Kisspeptin receptor (KISS1R) signaling plays a critical role in the regulation of reproduction. We investigated the role of kisspeptin-stimulated KISS1R internalization, recycling, and degradation in the modulation of KISS1R signaling. Kisspeptin stimulation of Chinese hamster ovary or GT1-7 cells expressing KISS1R resulted in a biphasic increase in intracellular Ca(2+) ([Ca(2+)]i), with a rapid acute increase followed by a more sustained second phase. In contrast, stimulation of the TRH receptor, another Gq/11-coupled receptor, resulted in a much smaller second-phase [Ca(2+)]i response. The KISS1R-mediated second-phase [Ca(2+)]i response was abolished by removal of kisspeptin from cell culture medium. Notably, the second-phase [Ca(2+)]i response was also inhibited by dynasore, brefeldin A, and phenylarsine oxide, which inhibit receptor internalization and recycling, suggesting that KISS1R trafficking contributes to the sustained [Ca(2+)]i response. We further demonstrated that KISS1R undergoes dynamic ligand-dependent and -independent recycling. We next investigated the fate of the internalized kisspeptin-KISS1R complex. Most internalized kisspeptin was released extracellularly in degraded form within 1 hour, suggesting rapid processing of the internalized kisspeptin-KISS1R complex. Using a biotinylation assay, we demonstrated that degradation of cell surface KISS1R was much slower than that of the internalized ligand, suggesting dissociated processing of the internalized kisspeptin-KISS1R complex. Taken together, our results suggest that the sustained calcium response to kisspeptin is dependent on the continued presence of extracellular ligand and is the result of dynamic KISS1R trafficking.

Role of microRNA-136-3p on the expression of luteinizing hormone-human chorionic gonadotropin receptor mRNA in rat ovaries

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs that interact with mRNAs and trigger either translation repression or RNA cleavage of target genes. In this study, we investigated whether miRNA was involved in down-regulation of the luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) in rat ovaries. An miRNA microarray was used to analyze the overall miRNA expression profile of rat ovaries in association with the down-regulation of LHR mRNA. We found that 23 miRNAs were highly expressed during this period. Combining these results with data from a bioinformatics database, clustering analysis led us to focus on miR-136-3p for further analysis. In both in vivo and in vitro studies, miR-136-3p expression levels were increased at 6 h after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration, concurrent with down-regulation of LHR mRNA. Moreover, transfection of cultured granulosa cells with miR-136-3p resulted in a significant decrease in LHR mRNA levels in comparison with those of cells transfected with negative control. In contrast, transfection with a miR-136-3p inhibitor increased LHR mRNA levels. Finally, cotransfection of granulosa cells with a miR-136-3p inhibitor and a reporter vector containing the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) of LHR mRNA and Renilla luciferase coding sequence revealed that miR-136-3p bound directly to the 3'-UTR of LHR mRNA. These data demonstrated that miR-136-3p participated in the down-regulation of LHR mRNA by binding directly to LHR mRNA.

Computational modelling of bovine ovarian follicle development

Background

The development of ovarian follicles hinges on the timely exposure to the appropriate combination of hormones. Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) are both produced in the pituitary gland and are transported via the blood circulation to the thecal layer surrounding the follicle. From there both hormones are transported into the follicle by diffusion. FSH-receptors are expressed mainly in the granulosa while LH-receptors are expressed in a gradient with highest expression in the theca. How this spatial organization is achieved is not known. Equally it is not understood whether LH and FSH trigger distinct signalling programs or whether the distinct spatial localization of their G-protein coupled receptors is sufficient to convey their distinct biological function.

Results

We have developed a data-based computational model of the spatio-temporal signalling processes within the follicle and (i) predict that FSH and LH form a gradient inside the follicle, (ii) show that the spatial distribution of FSH- and LH-receptors can arise from the well known regulatory interactions, and (iii) find that the differential activity of FSH and LH may well result from the distinct spatial localisation of their receptors, even when both receptors respond with the same intracellular signalling cascade to their ligand.

Conclusion

The model integrates the large amount of published data into a consistent framework that can now be used to better understand how observed defects translate into failed follicle maturation.

The role of Rab5a GTPase in endocytosis and post-endocytic trafficking of the hCG-human luteinizing hormone receptor complex

This study examined the role of Rab5a GTPase in regulating hCG-induced internalization and trafficking of the hCG-LH receptor complex in transfected 293T cells. Coexpression of wild-type Rab5a (WT) or constitutively active Rab5a (Q79L) with LHR significantly increased hCG-induced LHR internalization. Conversely, coexpression of dominant negative Rab5a (S34N) with LHR reduced internalization. Confocal microscopy showed LHR colocalizing with Rab5a (WT) and Rab5a (Q79L) in punctuate structures. Coexpression of Rab5a (WT) and Rab5a (Q79L) with LHR significantly increased colocalization of LHR in early endosomes. Conversely, dominant negative Rab5a (S34N) decreased this colocalization. While Rab5a stimulated internalization of LHR, it significantly decreased LHR recycling to the cell surface and increased degradation. Dominant negative Rab5a (S34N) increased LHR recycling and decreased degradation. These results suggest that Rab5a plays a role in LHR trafficking by facilitating internalization and fusion to early endosomes, increasing the degradation of internalized receptor resulting in a reduction in LHR recycling.

β-Arrestin-mediated receptor trafficking and signal transduction

β-Arrestins function as endocytic adaptors and mediate trafficking of a variety of cell-surface receptors, including seven-transmembrane receptors (7TMRs). In the case of 7TMRs, β-arrestins carry out these tasks while simultaneously inhibiting upstream G-protein-dependent signaling and promoting alternate downstream signaling pathways. The mechanisms by which β-arrestins interact with a continuously expanding ensemble of protein partners and perform their multiple functions including trafficking and signaling are currently being uncovered. Molecular changes at the level of protein conformation as well as post-translational modifications of β-arrestins probably form the basis for their dynamic interactions during receptor trafficking and signaling. It is becoming increasingly evident that β-arrestins, originally discovered as 7TMR adaptor proteins, indeed have much broader and more versatile roles in maintaining cellular homeostasis. In this review paper, we assess the traditional and novel functions of β-arrestins and discuss the molecular attributes that might facilitate multiple interactions in regulating cell signaling and receptor trafficking.

Arrestin-3 is essential for the activation of Fyn by the luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) in MA-10 cells

Recent studies showed that Fyn is a mediator of the LHR-induced activation of the ERK1/2 cascade in MA-10 cells. Since the LHR is a G protein-coupled receptor and the Src family of kinases can be activated by some Galpha subunits and by the non-visual arrestins we investigated the role of these signaling molecules in the LHR-provoked activation of Fyn. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that target two Galpha subunits that participate in LHR signaling (Galpha(s) and Galpha(11)) and one that targets arrestin-3 were co-transfected with the hLHR in MA-10 cells. We then determined the effects of these siRNAs on the LHR-provoked activation of Fyn, the phosphorylation of FAK (a prominent Fyn substrate) and the release of EGF-like growth factors (a Fyn-mediated process). Expression of the siRNA against Galpha(s) decreased the level of Galpha(s) and LHR-stimulated cAMP production by approximately 50% but did not affect LHR-stimulated Fyn activation or FAK phosphorylation. Likewise, expression of the siRNA against Galpha(11) decreased the level of Galpha(11) and LHR-stimulated inositol phosphate production by approximately 50% but did not affect LHR-stimulated Fyn activation or FAK phosphorylation. Expression of the siRNA against arrestin-3 decreased the level of arrestin-3 and the rate of internalization of hCG by approximately 50% and it also inhibited the LHR-provoked stimulation of Fyn, the phosphorylation of FAK and the release of EGF-like growth factors. These results show that, in MA-10 cells, the hLHR activates Fyn through an arrestin-3-dependent pathway and that this pathway is a mediator of the hLHR-provoked release of EGF-like growth factors.

A constitutively active mutant of the human lutropin receptor (hLHR-L457R) escapes lysosomal targeting and degradation

Using biochemical and imaging approaches, we examined the postendocytotic fate of the complex formed by human choriogonadotropin (hCG) and a constitutively active mutant of the human lutropin receptor (hLHR-L457R) found in a boy with precocious puberty and Leydig cell hyperplasia. After internalization, some of the complex formed by the hLHR-wild type (hLHR-wt) and hCG recycles to the cell surface, and some is found in lysosomes where the hormone is degraded. In contrast, the complex formed by the hLHR-L457R and hCG is not routed to the lysosomes, most of it is recycled to the cell surface and hormone degradation is barely detectable. For both, hLHR-wt and -L457R, there is an hCG-induced loss of cell surface receptors that accompanies internalization but this loss cannot be prevented by leupeptin. The removal of recycling motifs of the hLHR by truncation of the C-terminal tail at residue 682 greatly enhances the lysosomal accumulation of the hormone-receptor complexes formed by the hLHR-wt or the L457R mutant, the degradation of the internalized hormone, and the loss of cell surface receptors. The degradation of the hormone internalized by these mutants as well as the loss of cell surface receptors is largely prevented by leupeptin. These results highlight a previously unrecognized complexity in the postendocytotic trafficking of the hLHR and document a clear difference between the properties of the constitutively active mutant and the agonist-activated hLHR-wt. This lack of lysosomal degradation of the L457R mutant could contribute to its constitutive activity by prolonging the duration of signaling.

Soluble mimics of the cytoplasmic face of the human V1-vascular vasopressin receptor bind arrestin2 and calmodulin

Signal transduction by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is mediated by interactions between intracellular proteins and exposed motifs on the cytoplasmic face of these receptors. Arrestins bind to GPCRs and modulate receptor function either by interfering with heterotrimeric G protein signaling or by serving as signaling adaptors themselves. Calmodulin interacts with GPCRs triggering a calcium response. We have studied the interaction of arrestin2 and calmodulin with intracellular elements of the human V1-vascular vasopressin receptor (hV1R). For this purpose, we designed, expressed, and purified soluble fusion proteins with the maltose-binding protein (MBP) from Escherichia coli that mimic the intracellular surface of the hV1R. These MBP fusion proteins bind arrestin2 and calmodulin with affinities in the micromolar range. A different series of soluble receptor analogs, named vasopressin receptor 1 elements on a soluble scaffold (V1ROSS) proteins, consist of the third intracellular loop and/or the C-terminal segment of the hV1R receptor juxtaposed on the surface of the MBP. V1ROSS proteins bind calmodulin and a truncated, phosphorylation-independent form of arrestin2 more tightly than the corresponding linear fusion proteins. Thus, embedding receptor loops within the three-dimensional structure of the MBP yields a better representation of the active conformation of these receptor loops than linear receptor peptides fused onto the C terminus of the MBP. V1ROSS proteins provide a valuable tool to study receptor interactions because they are more amenable to structural analysis than the native membrane receptor. These findings set the stage for the detailed structural analysis of these protein-protein interactions that are important for understanding the mechanism of signaling.

The structural basis of arrestin-mediated regulation of G-protein-coupled receptors

The 4 mammalian arrestins serve as almost universal regulators of the largest known family of signaling proteins, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Arrestins terminate receptor interactions with G proteins, redirect the signaling to a variety of alternative pathways, and orchestrate receptor internalization and subsequent intracellular trafficking. The elucidation of the structural basis and fine molecular mechanisms of the arrestin-receptor interaction paved the way to the targeted manipulation of this interaction from both sides to produce very stable or extremely transient complexes that helped to understand the regulation of many biologically important processes initiated by active GPCRs. The elucidation of the structural basis of arrestin interactions with numerous non-receptor-binding partners is long overdue. It will allow the construction of fully functional arrestins in which the ability to interact with individual partners is specifically disrupted or enhanced by targeted mutagenesis. These "custom-designed" arrestin mutants will be valuable tools in defining the role of various interactions in the intricate interplay of multiple signaling pathways in the living cell. The identification of arrestin-binding sites for various signaling molecules will also set the stage for designing molecular tools for therapeutic intervention that may prove useful in numerous disorders associated with congenital or acquired disregulation of GPCR signaling.

Dopamine D1 receptor interaction with arrestin3 in neostriatal neurons

Dopamine D1 receptor interactions with arrestins have been characterized using heterologously expressed D1 receptor and arrestins. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interaction of the endogenous D1 receptor with endogenous arrestin2 and 3 in neostriatal neurons. Endogenous arrestin2 and 3 in striatal homogenates bound to the C-terminus of the D1 receptor in a glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pulldown assay, with arrestin3 binding more strongly. The D1 C-terminus and, to a lesser extent, the third cytoplasmic loop also bound purified arrestin2 and 3. In neostriatal neurons, 2, 5, and 20 min agonist treatment increased the colocalization of the D1 receptor and arrestin3 immunoreactivity without altering the colocalization of the D1 receptor and arrestin2. Further, agonist treatment for 5 and 20 min caused translocation of arrestin3, but not arrestin2, to the membrane. The binding of arrestin3, but not arrestin2, to the D1 receptor was increased as assessed by coimmunoprecipitation after agonist treatment for 5 and 20 min. Agonist treatment of neurons induced D1 receptor internalization (35-45%) that was maximal within 2-5 min, a time-course similar to that of the increase in colocalization of the D1 receptor with arrestin3. These data indicate that the D1 receptor preferentially interacts with arrestin3 in neostriatal neurons.

Preferential Interaction between the dopamine D2 receptor and Arrestin2 in neostriatal neurons

Dopamine D2 receptor interactions with arrestins and arrestin-dependent internalization have been characterized using heterologously expressed D2 receptor and arrestins. The purpose of this study was to investigate D2 receptor interaction with endogenous arrestins. Arrestin2 and arrestin3 in striatal homogenates bound to the third cytoplasmic loop of the D2 receptor, and purified arrestin2 and arrestin3 bound to the second and third loops and C terminus of the D2 receptor, in a glutathione S-transferase pull-down assay. In NS20Y neuroblastoma cells expressing an enhanced green-fluorescent protein-tagged D2 receptor (D2-EGFP), 2-h D2 agonist stimulation enhanced the colocalization of D2-EGFP with endogenous arrestin2 and arrestin3. These results suggest that the D2 receptor has the intrinsic ability to bind both nonvisual arrestins. Agonist treatment of D2-EGFP NS20Y cells induced D2 receptor internalization (36-46%) that was maximal within 20 min, but that was prevented by small interfering RNA-induced depletion of arrestin2 and arrestin3. In neostriatal neurons, 2-h agonist treatment selectively increased the colocalization of the endogenous D2 receptor with arrestin2, whereas receptor colocalization with arrestin3 was reduced. Agonist stimulation caused translocation of arrestin2, but not arrestin3, to the membrane in neurons and selectively enhanced the coimmunoprecipitation of the D2 receptor and arrestin2. All three measures of receptor/arrestin interaction (colocalization, translocation, and coprecipitation) demonstrated selective agonist-induced interaction between the D2 receptor and arrestin2 in neurons.

GIPC binds to the human lutropin receptor (hLHR) through an unusual PDZ domain binding motif, and it regulates the sorting of the internalized human choriogonadotropin and the density of cell surface hLHR

By using a yeast two-hybrid screen we identified GIPC (GAIP-interacting protein C terminus), a protein with a type I PDZ domain as a novel human lutropin receptor (hLHR) binding partner. Pull-down and immunoprecipitation assays confirmed this interaction and showed that it is dependent on the PDZ domain of GIPC and the C-terminal tetrapeptide of the hLHR. To characterize the functional consequences of the GIPC-hLHR interaction, we used a small interfering RNA against GIPC to generate a clonal cell line that is deficient in GIPC. Studies with this cell line reveal that GIPC is partially responsible for the recycling of the hormone that is internalized by the hLHR and also for maintaining a relatively constant level of hLHR at the cell surface during hormone internalization.

Induction of pro-angiogenic signaling by a synthetic peptide derived from the second intracellular loop of S1P3 (EDG3)

The G-protein-coupled receptors of the endothelial differentiation gene (EDG) family mediate pro-angiogenic activities, such as endothelial cell proliferation, chemotaxis, and vessel morphogenesis. We synthesized and tested the effects of a 9-amino acid peptide (KRX-725), derived from the second intracellular loop of S1P3 (EDG3). KRX-725 mimics the effects of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), the natural ligand of S1P3, by triggering a Gi-dependent MEK-ERK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase) signal transduction pathway. Using aortic rings as an ex vivo model of angiogenesis, vascular sprouting was assessed in the presence of KRX-725 or S1P. KRX-725 induced extensive and dense vascular sprouts, which contain an elaborated organization of endothelial and smooth muscle layers, including lumen formation. When KRX-725 or S1P was combined with proangiogenic factors, such as basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), stem cell factor, or vascular endothelial growth factor, the effect was synergistic, leading to further enhancement of vascular sprouting. KRX-725 also initiated neovascularization in a mouse corneal pocket assay in vivo and showed synergism with bFGF. The specificity of KRX-725 was demonstrated via peptide-induced receptor internalization of S1P3 but not S1P1. The ability of a short peptide to stimulate extensive angiogenesis and to synergize with pro-angiogenic factors suggests that KRX-725 may serve as a useful agent in treating pathologic conditions such as peripheral vascular disease, cardiac ischemia, or tissue grafts.

The association of arrestin-3 with the follitropin receptor depends on receptor activation and phosphorylation

We have recently shown that the binding of arrestin-3 to the lutropin receptor (LHR) is dependent mostly on receptor activation rather than on phosphorylation. The experiments presented here were designed to test the involvement of these two events in the association of arrestin-3 with the closely related follitropin receptor (FSHR). Activation of the FSHR leads to the phosphorylation of residues in the first and third intracellular loops. Mutation of the phosphorylation sites in the third intracellular loop of the rat (r) FSHR partially reduces phosphorylation but has no effect on arrestin-3 association. Mutation of the phosphorylation sites in the first intracellular loop abolishes phosphorylation and arrestin-3 association. Dominant-negative mutants of G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRKs) 2 and 6 inhibit rFSHR phosphorylation to the same extent but only the dominant-negative mutant of GRK2 inhibits arrestin-3 association. Two mutations of the rFSHR (D389N and Y530F) that impair activation and abolish phosphorylation also impair arrestin-3 binding. GRK2 restores the phosphorylation of both mutants but it restores arrestin-3 association only to the D389N mutant. We conclude that, in contrast to the data obtained with the LHR, the association of arrestin-3 with the FSHR is dependent on receptor phosphorylation. The phosphorylation of the third intracellular loop residues is not needed for arrestin-3 association, however.

The nature of the arrestin x receptor complex determines the ultimate fate of the internalized receptor

The vast majority of G protein-coupled receptors are desensitized by a uniform two-step mechanism: phosphorylation of an active receptor followed by arrestin binding. The arrestin x receptor complex is then internalized. Internalized receptor can be recycled back to the plasma membrane (resensitization) or targeted to lysosomes for degradation (down-regulation). The intracellular compartment where this choice is made and the molecular mechanisms involved are largely unknown. Here we used two arrestin2 mutants that bind with high affinity to phosphorylated and unphosphorylated agonist-activated beta 2-adrenergic receptor to manipulate the receptor-arrestin interface. We found that mutants support rapid internalization of beta 2-adrenergic receptor similar to wild type arrestin2. At the same time, phosphorylation-independent arrestin2 mutants facilitate receptor recycling and sharply reduce the rate of receptor loss, effectively protecting beta 2-adrenergic receptor from down-regulation even after very long (up to 24 h) agonist exposure. Phosphorylation-independent arrestin2 mutants dramatically reduce receptor phosphorylation in response to an agonist both in vitro and in cells. Interestingly, co-expression of high levels of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase restores receptor down-regulation in the presence of mutants to the levels observed with wild type arrestin2. Our data suggest that unphosphorylated receptor internalized in complex with mutant arrestins recycles faster than phosphoreceptor and is less likely to get degraded. Thus, targeted manipulation of the characteristics of an arrestin protein that binds to a G protein-coupled receptors can dramatically change receptor trafficking and its ultimate fate in a cell.

Identification of a transferable two-amino-acid motif (GT) present in the C-terminal tail of the human lutropin receptor that redirects internalized G protein-coupled receptors from a degradation to a recycling pathway

Although highly homologous in amino acid sequence, the agonist-receptor complexes formed by the human lutropin receptor (hLHR) and rat (r) LHR follow different intracellular routes. The agonist-rLHR complex is routed mostly to a lysosomal degradation pathway whereas a substantial portion of the agonist-hLHR complex is routed to a recycling pathway. In a previous study, we showed that grafting a five-residue sequence (GTALL) present in the C-terminal tail of the hLHR into the equivalent position of the rLHR redirects a substantial portion of the internalized agonist-rLHR complex to a recycling pathway. Using a number of mutations of the GTALL motif, we now show that only the first two residues (GT) of this motif are necessary and sufficient to induce recycling of the internalized agonist-rLHR complex. Phosphoamino acid analysis and mutations of the GT motif show that phosphorylation of the threonine residue is not necessary for recycling. Lastly, we show that addition of portions of the C-terminal tail of the hLHR that include the GT motif to the C-terminal tails of the rat follitropin or murine delta-opioid receptors promotes the post-endocytotic recycling of these G protein-coupled receptors.We conclude that the GT motif present in the C-terminal tail of the hLHR is a transferable motif that promotes the postendocytotic recycling of several G protein-coupled receptors and that the GT-induced recycling does not require the phosphorylation of the threonine residue.

Selective ligand-induced stabilization of active and desensitized parathyroid hormone type 1 receptor conformations

For many G protein-coupled receptors, agonist-induced activation is followed by desensitization, internalization, and resensitization. In most cases, these processes are dependent upon interaction of agonist-occupied receptor with cytoplasmic beta-arrestins. The ligand-induced intramolecular rearrangements of the receptor responsible for the desensitized versus active conformational states, which dictate both the pharmacological properties of ligands and the biological activity of G protein-coupled receptors, have not been fully elucidated. Here, we identify specific interactions between parathyroid hormone (PTH)-related protein and the human PTH type 1 receptor (PTH1Rc) and the related receptor conformational changes that lead to beta-arrestin-2-mediated desensitization. PTH-related protein analogs modified at position 1 induced selective stabilization of the active G protein-coupled state of the receptor, resulting in lack of beta-arrestin-2 recruitment to the cell membrane, sustained cAMP signaling, and absence of ligand-receptor complex internalization. Mechanistically, the ligands modified at position 1, interacting with the extracellular end of helix VI of PTH1Rc, produced a translocation of transmembrane helices V and VI that differed from that induced by the cognate agonist, resulting in significantly different conformations of the third intracellular loop. These results show how specific interactions between PTH1Rc and its ligands may stabilize distinct conformational states, representing either the active G protein-coupled or a desensitized beta-arrestin-coupled receptor state. In addition, they establish that sustained biological activity of PTH1Rc may be induced by appropriately designed agonist ligands.

Correlation between basal signaling and internalization of thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptors: evidence for involvement of similar receptor conformations

Previous studies have shown that rat thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptor type 2 exhibits higher basal signaling activity and internalizes more rapidly upon agonist binding than rat TRH receptor type 1. The mouse TRH receptor type 2 (mR2) was recently cloned and, similar to its rat homolog, shows a higher basal signaling activity than mR1. Taking advantage of the high degree of sequence homology between mR1 and mR2, we used chimeras/mutants of these receptors to gain insight into the properties of the receptors that influence internalization and basal signaling. Chimeric receptors that have the mR1 extracellular and transmembrane domains with the carboxyl terminus and intracellular loops of mR2 (R1/R2-tail; R1/R2-I3,tail; R1/R2-I2,3,tail; R1/R2-I1,2,3,tail) exhibited internalization rates and basal activities that were similar to that of mR1. In contrast, a chimeric receptor with the extracellular and transmembrane domains of mR2 and the carboxyl terminus of mR1 exhibited the more rapid internalization rate and higher basal signaling activity characteristic of mR2. We showed previously that mutation of a highly conserved tryptophan to alanine caused mR1 to exhibit a high basal signaling activity and rapid internalization rate. In contrast, mutation of this tryptophan to alanine in mR2 decreased the rate of internalization and inhibited basal signaling activity. The rates of receptor internalization did not correlate with the binding affinities, coupling efficiencies, or potencies of the receptors. Thus, we observed that receptors with more rapid internalization rates showed relatively higher basal signaling activities, whereas receptors with lower basal signaling activities showed slower internalization rates. These data suggest that similar receptor conformations are required for productive coupling to signaling G proteins and to proteins involved in internalization.

Aspartic acid 564 in the third cytoplasmic loop of the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor is crucial for phosphorylation-independent interaction with arrestin2

Arrestin2 binding to the active but unphosphorylated luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LH/CG R) in ovarian follicles is triggered by activation of ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6) and leads to uncoupling of this receptor from cAMP signaling. We sought to determine how arrestin2 binds to LH/CG R, if binding is of high affinity, and if the receptor also binds arrestin3. Desensitization of intact LH/CG R was equally sensitive to ectopic constructs of arrestin2 that bind other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) either in a phosphorylation-independent or -dependent manner. Intact LH/CG R was not desensitized by ectopic arrestin3 constructs. Surface plasmon resonance studies showed that arrestin2 bound a synthetic third intracellular (3i) LH/CG R loop peptide with picomolar affinity; arrestin3 bound with millimolar affinity. To determine whether Asp-564 in the 3i loop mimicked the phosphorylated residue of other GPCRs, human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells were transfected with wild-type (WT) and D564G LH/CG R. An agonist-stimulated ARF6-dependent arrestin2 undocking pathway to drive desensitization of WT receptor was recapitulated in HEK cell membranes, and ectopic arrestin2 promoted desensitization of WT LH/CG R. However, D564G LH/CG R in HEK cells was not desensitized, and synthetic 3i D564G peptide did not bind arrestin2. Synthetic 3i loop peptides containing D564E, D564V, or D564N also did not bind arrestin2. We conclude that the ARF6-mediated mechanism to release a pool of membrane-delimited arrestin to bind GPCRs may be a widespread mechanism to deliver arrestin to GPCRs for receptor desensitization. Unlike other GPCRs that additionally require receptor phosphorylation, LH/CG R activation is sufficient to expose a conformation in which Asp-564 in the 3i loop confers high affinity binding selectively to arrestin2.

The lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor, a 2002 perspective

Reproduction cannot take place without the proper functioning of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHR). When the LHR does not work properly, ovulation does not occur in females and Leydig cells do not develop normally in the male. Also, because the LHR is essential for sustaining the elevated levels of progesterone needed to maintain pregnancy during the first trimester, disruptions in the functions of the LHR during pregnancy have catastrophic consequences. As such, a full understanding of the biology of the LHR is essential to the survival of our species. In this review we summarize our current knowledge of the structure, functions, and regulation of this important receptor.

Internalization determinants of the parathyroid hormone receptor differentially regulate beta-arrestin/receptor association

beta-Arrestins have been implicated in regulating internalization of the parathyroid hormone receptor (PTHR), but the structural features in the receptor required for this effect are unknown. In the present study performed in HEK-293 cells, we demonstrated that different topological domains of PTHR are implicated in agonist-dependent receptor internalization; truncation of the cytoplasmic tail (PTHR-TR), selective mutations of the cytoplasmic tail to remove the sites of parathyroid hormone (PTH)-stimulated phosphorylation (PTHR-PD), and mutations in the third transmembrane helix (N289A) or in the third cytoplasmic loop (K382A) resulted in a 30-60% reduction in (125)I-PTH-related protein internalization. To better define the role of these internalization determinants, we have tested the ability of these mutant PTHRs to associate with beta-arrestins by using three different methodological approaches: 1) ability of overexpression of beta-arrestins to restore the internalization of (125)I-PTH-related protein for the mutant PTHRs; 2) visualization of PTH-mediated trafficking of beta-arrestin1 and -2 fused to the green fluorescent protein with receptors by confocal microscopy; 3) quantification of beta-arrestin1-green fluorescent protein translocation by Western blot. Our data reveal that the receptor' cytoplasmic tail contains determinants of beta-arrestin interaction that are distinct from the phosphorylation sites and are sufficient for transient association of beta-arrestin2, but stable association requires receptor phosphorylation. Determinants in the receptor's core (Asn-289 and Lys-382) appear to regulate internalization of the receptor/beta-arrestin complex toward early endocytic endosomes during the initial step of endocytosis.

MA-10 cells transfected with the human lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor (hLHR): a novel experimental paradigm to study the functional properties of the hLHR

MA-10 cells are a clonal strain of mouse Leydig tumor cells that retain many of the properties of Leydig cells including expression of the endogenous lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHR) and the ability to respond to LH/CG with increased steroidogenesis. Recently we noted a dramatic decrease in expression of the endogenous LHR. Although we do not have an explanation for this decline, we took advantage of it to devise a method that allows for the expression of the recombinant human LHR (hLHR) in a Leydig cell model that is now practically devoid of endogenous LHR. We show that the recombinant hLHR can be expressed at variable densities in MA-10 cells and that it can stimulate cAMP and steroid synthesis as well as activate the inositol phosphate and MAPK cascades. We also show that two naturally occurring mutants of the hLHR associated with Leydig cell hyperplasia and one mutant associated with Leydig cell adenomas are constitutively active when assayed for activation of cAMP, inositol phosphate, progesterone, and MAPK. Our ability to express the hLHR in MA-10 cells (now practically devoid of endogenous LHR) provides a novel paradigm to study the cellular and molecular basis of the functions of the LHR in Leydig cells.

The association of arrestin-3 with the human lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor depends mostly on receptor activation rather than on receptor phosphorylation

Although the involvement of the nonvisual arrestins in the agonist-induced internalization of the human lutropin receptor (hLHR) has been documented previously with the use of dominant-negative mutants, a physical association of the nonvisual arrestins with the hLHR in intact cells has not been established. In the studies presented herein, we used a cross-linking/coimmunoprecipitation/immunoblotting approach as well as confocal microscopy to document the association of the hLHR with the nonvisual arrestins in co-transfected 293 cells. We also used this approach to examine the relative importance of receptor activation and receptor phosphorylation in the formation of this complex. Using hLHR mutants that impair phosphorylation, activation, or both, we show that the formation of the hLHR-nonvisual arrestin complex depends mostly on the agonist-induced activation of the hLHR rather than on the phosphorylation of the hLHR. These results stand in contrast to those obtained with several other G protein-coupled receptors (i.e. the beta2-adrenergic receptor, the m2 muscarinic receptor, rhodopsin, and the type 1A angiotensin receptor) where arrestin binding depends mostly on receptor phosphorylation rather than on receptor activation. We have also examined the association of the nonvisual arrestins with naturally occurring gain-of-function mutations of the hLHR found in boys with Leydig cell hyperplasia or Leydig cell adenomas. Our results show that these mutants associate with the nonvisual arrestins in an agonist-independent fashion.

Crystal structure of beta-arrestin at 1.9 A: possible mechanism of receptor binding and membrane Translocation

BACKGROUND

Arrestins are responsible for the desensitization of many sequence-divergent G protein-coupled receptors. They compete with G proteins for binding to activated phosphorylated receptors, initiate receptor internalization, and activate additional signaling pathways.

RESULTS

In order to understand the structural basis for receptor binding and arrestin's function as an adaptor molecule, we determined the X-ray crystal structure of two truncated forms of bovine beta-arrestin in its cytosolic inactive state to 1.9 A. Mutational analysis and chimera studies identify the regions in beta-arrestin responsible for receptor binding specificity. beta-arrestin demonstrates high structural homology with the previously solved visual arrestin. All key structural elements responsible for arrestin's mechanism of activation are conserved.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on structural analysis and mutagenesis data, we propose a previously unappreciated part in beta-arrestin's mode of action by which a cationic amphipathic helix may function as a reversible membrane anchor. This novel activation mechanism would facilitate the formation of a high-affinity complex between beta-arrestin and an activated receptor regardless of its specific subtype. Like the interaction between beta-arrestin's polar core and the phosphorylated receptor, such a general activation mechanism would contribute to beta-arrestin's versatility as a regulator of many receptors.

Identification of two distinct structural motifs that, when added to the C-terminal tail of the rat LH receptor, redirect the internalized hormone-receptor complex from a degradation to a recycling pathway

We show that most of the internalized rat LH receptor is routed to a lysosomal degradation pathway whereas a substantial portion of the human LH receptor is routed to a recycling pathway. Chimeras of these two receptors identified a linear amino acid sequence (GTALL) present near the C terminus of the human LH receptor that, when grafted onto the rat LH receptor, redirects most of the rat LH receptor to a recycling pathway. Removal of the GTALL sequence from the human LH receptor failed to affect its routing, however. The GTALL sequence shows homology with the C-terminal tetrapeptide (DSLL) of the beta2-adrenergic receptor, a motif that has been reported to mediate the recycling of the internalized beta2-adrenergic receptor by binding to ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein-50. Addition of the DSLL tetrapeptide to the C terminus of the rat LH receptor also redirects most of the internalized rat LH receptor to a recycling pathway but, like the recycling of the human LH receptor, this rerouting is not mediated by ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein-50. We conclude that most of the internalized rat LH receptor is degraded because its C-terminal tail lacks motifs that promote recycling and that two distinct, but homologous, motifs (DSLL at the C terminus or GTALL near the C terminus) can reroute the internalized rat LH receptor to a recycling pathway that is independent of ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein-50.

Mutations of the second extracellular loop of the human lutropin receptor emphasize the importance of receptor activation and de-emphasize the importance of receptor phosphorylation in agonist-induced internalization

Alanine scanning mutagenesis of the second extracellular loop of the human lutropin receptor (hLHR) showed that mutation of most of the residues present in this region either enhance or impair the internalization of agonist. A more complete analysis of four mutants, two that enhanced internalization (F515A and T521A) and two that impaired internalization (S512A and V519A), showed that the two mutants that impaired internalization also show a decrease in the sensitivity for agonist-induced cAMP accumulation, whereas the two mutants that enhanced internalization show an increase in the sensitivity for agonist-induced cAMP accumulation. None of these mutants had an effect on the agonist-induced phosphorylation of the hLHR, however. We conclude that, in contrast to the prevailing view of the relative importance of receptor phosphorylation in the internalization of G protein-coupled receptors, the phosphorylation of the hLHR is less important than the agonist-induced activation of the hLHR in the process of internalization.

Multiple distant amino acid residues present in the serpentine region of the follitropin receptor modulate the rate of agonist-induced internalization

The amino acid sequences of the human (h) and rat (r) follitropin receptors (FSHR) are approximately 89% identical, but the half-time of internalization of agonist mediated by the rFSHR is approximately 3 times faster than that of the hFSHR. Chimeras of the hFSHR and the rFSHR showed that this difference in rate is dictated mostly by the serpentine domain. Further analysis identified six residues, two non-contiguous residues in the transmembrane helix 4 (Leu/Thr in the rFSHR and Met/Ile in the hFSHR), three non-contiguous residues in the third intracellular loop (Thr/Thr/Lys in the rFSHR and Ile/Asn/Arg in the hFSHR), and one in transmembrane helix 7 (Tyr in the rFSHR and His in the hFSHR) that are fully responsible for the difference in the rates of internalization of the hFSHR and the rFSHR.

The C-terminal tail of the rat lutropin/choriogonadotropin (CG) receptor independently modulates human (h)CG-induced internalization of the cell surface receptor and the lysosomal targeting of the internalized hCG-receptor complex

The analysis of 21 progressive truncations of the C-terminal tail of the rat LH/CG receptor (rLHR) revealed the presence of a region delineated by residues 628-649 that, when removed, enhanced the degradation of the internalized human (h)CG. The analysis of these truncations also revealed the presence of a region delineated by residues 624-631 that, when removed, enhanced the rate of internalization of hCG. Since there is little overlap between these two regions, we conclude that the structural features of the rLHR that mediate internalization and degradation of the internalized hormone are different. Detailed analyses of cells expressing a truncation at Y637 (designated rLHR-t637) showed that the enhanced degradation of hCG observed in the these cells is due to an increase in the rate of transfer of the internalized hCG-rLHR complex from the endosomes to the lysosomes rather than to the enhanced dissociation of the hCG-rLHR complex in the lysosomes.