Interaction of 14-3-3 protein with regulator of G protein signaling 7 is dynamically regulated by tumor necrosis factor-alpha

RGS7 balances acetylation/de-acetylation of p65 to control chemotherapy-dependent cardiac inflammation

Cardiotoxicity remains a major limitation in the clinical utility of anthracycline chemotherapeutics. Regulator of G-protein Signaling 7 (RGS7) and inflammatory markers are up-regulated in the hearts of patients with a history of chemotherapy particularly those with reduced left-ventricular function. RGS7 knockdown in either the murine myocardium or isolated murine ventricular cardiac myocytes (VCM) or cultured human VCM provided marked protection against doxorubicin-dependent oxidative stress, NF-κB activation, inflammatory cytokine production, and cell death. In exploring possible mechanisms causally linking RGS7 to pro-inflammatory signaling cascades, we found that RGS7 forms a complex with acetylase Tip60 and deacetylase sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and controls the acetylation status of the p65 subunit of NF-κB. In VCM, the detrimental impact of RGS7 could be mitigated by inhibiting Tip60 or activating SIRT1, indicating that the ability of RGS7 to modulate cellular acetylation capacity is critical for its pro-inflammatory actions. Further, RGS7-driven, Tip60/SIRT1-dependent cytokines released from ventricular cardiac myocytes and transplanted onto cardiac fibroblasts increased oxidative stress, markers of transdifferentiation, and activity of extracellular matrix remodelers emphasizing the importance of the RGS7-Tip60-SIRT1 complex in paracrine signaling in the myocardium. Importantly, while RGS7 overexpression in heart resulted in sterile inflammation, fibrotic remodeling, and compromised left-ventricular function, activation of SIRT1 counteracted the detrimental impact of RGS7 in heart confirming that RGS7 increases acetylation of SIRT1 substrates and thereby drives cardiac dysfunction. Together, our data identify RGS7 as an amplifier of inflammatory signaling in heart and possible therapeutic target in chemotherapeutic drug-induced cardiotoxicity.

14-3-3γ binds regulator of G protein signaling 14 (RGS14) at distinct sites to inhibit the RGS14:Gαi-AlF4- signaling complex and RGS14 nuclear localization

Regulator of G protein signaling 14 (RGS14) is a multifunctional brain scaffolding protein that integrates G protein and Ras/ERK signaling pathways. It is also a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein. RGS14 binds active Gα_i/o via its RGS domain, Raf and active H-Ras-GTP via its R1 Ras-binding domain (RBD), and inactive Gα_i1/3 via its G protein regulatory (GPR) domain. RGS14 suppresses long-term potentiation (LTP) in the CA2 region of the hippocampus, thereby regulating hippocampally based learning and memory. The 14-3-3 family of proteins is necessary for hippocampal LTP and associative learning and memory. Here, we show direct interaction between RGS14 and 14-3-3γ at two distinct sties, one phosphorylation-independent and the other phosphorylation-dependent at Ser-218 that is markedly potentiated by signaling downstream of active H-Ras. Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), we show that the pSer-218-dependent RGS14/14-3-3γ interaction inhibits active Gα_i1-AlF₄^- binding to the RGS domain of RGS14 but has no effect on active H-Ras and inactive Gα_i1-GDP binding to RGS14. By contrast, the phosphorylation-independent binding of 14-3-3 has no effect on RGS14/Gα_i interactions but, instead, inhibits (directly or indirectly) RGS14 nuclear import and nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. Together, our findings describe a novel mechanism of negative regulation of RGS14 functions, specifically interactions with active Gα_i and nuclear import, while leaving the function of other RGS14 domains intact. Ongoing studies will further elucidate the physiological function of this interaction between RGS14 and 14-3-3γ, providing insight into the functions of both RGS14 and 14-3-3 in their roles in modulating synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus.

Predicted Functional Implications of Phosphorylation of Regulator of G Protein Signaling Protein in Plants

Heterotrimeric G proteins function in development, biotic, and abiotic stress responses, hormone signaling as well as sugar sensing. We previously proposed that discrimination of these various external signals in the G protein pathway is accomplished in plants by membrane-localized receptor-like kinases (RLKs) rather than G-protein-coupled receptors. Arabidopsis thaliana Regulator of G Signaling protein 1 (AtRGS1) modulates G protein activation and is phosphorylated by several RLKs and by WITH-NO-LYSINE kinases (WNKs). Here, a combination of in vitro kinase assays, mass spectrometry, and computational bioinformatics identified and functionally prioritized phosphorylation sites in AtRGS1. Phosphosites for two more RLKs (BRL3 and PEPR1) were identified and added to the AtRGS1 phosphorylation profile. Bioinformatics analyses revealed that RLKs and WNK kinases phosphorylate plant RGS proteins within regions that are conserved across eukaryotes and at a high frequency. Four phospho-sites among 14 identified are proximal to equivalent mammalian phosphosites that impact RGS function, including: pS437 and pT267 in GmRGS2, and pS339 and pS436 in AtRGS1. Based on these analyses, we propose that pS437 and pS436 regulate GmRGS2 and AtRGS1 protein interactions and/or localization, whereas pT267 is important for modulation of GmRGS2 GAP activity and localization. Moreover, pS339 most likely affects AtRGS1 activation.

Roles for Regulator of G Protein Signaling Proteins in Synaptic Signaling and Plasticity

The regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) family of proteins serves critical roles in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and heterotrimeric G protein signal transduction. RGS proteins are best understood as negative regulators of GPCR/G protein signaling. They achieve this by acting as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) for Gα subunits and accelerating the turnoff of G protein signaling. Many RGS proteins also bind additional signaling partners that either regulate their functions or enable them to regulate other important signaling events. At neuronal synapses, GPCRs, G proteins, and RGS proteins work in coordination to regulate key aspects of neurotransmitter release, synaptic transmission, and synaptic plasticity, which are necessary for central nervous system physiology and behavior. Accumulating evidence has revealed key roles for specific RGS proteins in multiple signaling pathways at neuronal synapses, regulating both pre- and postsynaptic signaling events and synaptic plasticity. Here, we review and highlight the current knowledge of specific RGS proteins (RGS2, RGS4, RGS7, RGS9-2, and RGS14) that have been clearly demonstrated to serve critical roles in modulating synaptic signaling and plasticity throughout the brain, and we consider their potential as future therapeutic targets.

Mechanisms of the 14-3-3 protein function: regulation of protein function through conformational modulation

Many aspects of protein function regulation require specific protein-protein interactions to carry out the exact biochemical and cellular functions. The highly conserved members of the 14-3-3 protein family mediate such interactions and through binding to hundreds of other proteins provide multitude of regulatory functions, thus playing key roles in many cellular processes. The 14-3-3 protein binding can affect the function of the target protein in many ways including the modulation of its enzyme activity, its subcellular localization, its structure and stability, or its molecular interactions. In this minireview, we focus on mechanisms of the 14-3-3 protein-dependent regulation of three important 14-3-3 binding partners: yeast neutral trehalase Nth1, regulator of G-protein signaling 3 (RGS3), and phosducin.

Inhibition of glioma proliferation and migration by magnetic nanoparticle mediated JAM-2 silencing

Brain invasion is a biological hallmark of glioma that leads to its aggressiveness and prognosis.

Identification of the amino acids 300-600 of IRS-2 as 14-3-3 binding region with the importance of IGF-1/insulin-regulated phosphorylation of Ser-573

Phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-2 on tyrosine residues is a key event in IGF-1/insulin signaling and leads to activation of the PI 3-kinase and the Ras/MAPK pathway. Furthermore, phosphorylated serine/threonine residues on IRS-2 can induce 14-3-3 binding. In this study we searched IRS-2 for novel phosphorylation sites and investigated the interaction between IRS-2 and 14-3-3. Mass spectrometry identified a total of 24 serine/threonine residues on IRS-2 with 12 sites unique for IRS-2 while the other residues are conserved in IRS-1 and IRS-2. IGF-1 stimulation led to increased binding of 14-3-3 to IRS-2 in transfected HEK293 cells and this binding was prevented by inhibition of the PI 3-kinase pathway and an Akt/PKB inhibitor. Insulin-stimulated interaction between endogenous IRS-2 and 14-3-3 was observed in rat hepatoma cells and in mice liver after an acute insulin stimulus and refeeding. Using different IRS-2 fragments enabled localization of the IGF-1-dependent 14-3-3 binding region spanning amino acids 300–600. The 24 identified residues on IRS-2 included several 14-3-3 binding candidates in the region 300–600. Single alanine mutants of these candidates led to the identification of serine 573 as 14-3-3 binding site. A phospho-site specific antibody was generated to further characterize serine 573. IGF-1-dependent phosphorylation of serine 573 was reduced by inhibition of PI 3-kinase and Akt/PKB. A negative role of this phosphorylation site was implicated by the alanine mutant of serine 573 which led to enhanced phosphorylation of Akt/PKB in an IGF-1 time course experiment. To conclude, our data suggest a physiologically relevant role for IGF-1/insulin-dependent 14-3-3 binding to IRS-2 involving serine 573.

A finer tuning of G-protein signaling through regulated control of RGS proteins

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are GTPase-activating proteins (GAP) for various Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. Through this mechanism, RGS proteins regulate the magnitude and duration of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling and are often referred to as fine tuners of G-protein signaling. Increasing evidence suggests that RGS proteins themselves are regulated through multiple mechanisms, which may provide an even finer tuning of G-protein signaling and crosstalk between G-protein-coupled receptors and other signaling pathways. This review summarizes the current data on the control of RGS function through regulated expression, intracellular localization, and covalent modification of RGS proteins, as related to cell function and the pathogenesis of diseases.

Regulator of G-protein signaling 18 integrates activating and inhibitory signaling in platelets

Regulator of G-protein signaling 18 (RGS18) is a GTPase-activating protein for the G-α-q and G-α-i subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins that turns off signaling by G-protein coupled receptors. RGS18 is highly expressed in platelets. In the present study, we show that the 14-3-3γ protein binds to phosphorylated serines 49 and 218 of RGS18. Platelet activation by thrombin, thromboxane A2, or ADP stimulates the association of 14-3-3 and RGS18, probably by increasing the phosphorylation of serine 49. In contrast, treatment of platelets with prostacyclin and nitric oxide, which trigger inhibitory cyclic nucleotide signaling involving cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) and cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase I (PKGI), induces the phosphorylation of serine 216 of RGS18 and the detachment of 14-3-3. Serine 216 phosphorylation is able to block 14-3-3 binding to RGS18 even in the presence of thrombin, thromboxane A2, or ADP. 14-3-3–deficient RGS18 is more active compared with 14-3-3–bound RGS18, leading to a more pronounced inhibition of thrombin-induced release of calcium ions from intracellular stores. Therefore, PKA- and PKGI-mediated detachment of 14-3-3 activates RGS18 to block Gq-dependent calcium signaling. These findings indicate cross-talk between platelet activation and inhibition pathways at the level of RGS18 and Gq.

SUMO-SIM interactions regulate the activity of RGSZ2 proteins

The RGSZ2 gene, a regulator of G protein signaling, has been implicated in cognition, Alzheimer's disease, panic disorder, schizophrenia and several human cancers. This 210 amino acid protein is a GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) on Gαi/o/z subunits, binds to the N terminal of neural nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) negatively regulating the production of nitric oxide, and binds to the histidine triad nucleotide-binding protein 1 at the C terminus of different G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). We now describe a novel regulatory mechanism of RGS GAP function through the covalent incorporation of Small Ubiquitin-like MOdifiers (SUMO) into RGSZ2 RGS box (RH) and the SUMO non covalent binding with SUMO-interacting motifs (SIM): one upstream of the RH and a second within this region. The covalent attachment of SUMO does not affect RGSZ2 binding to GPCR-activated GαGTP subunits but abolishes its GAP activity. By contrast, non-covalent binding of SUMO with RH SIM impedes RGSZ2 from interacting with GαGTP subunits. Binding of SUMO to the RGSZ2 SIM that lies outside the RH does not affect GαGTP binding or GAP activity, but it could lead to regulatory interactions with sumoylated proteins. Thus, sumoylation and SUMO-SIM interactions constitute a new regulatory mechanism of RGS GAP function and therefore of GPCR cell signaling as well.

Structural basis for the 14-3-3 protein-dependent inhibition of the regulator of G protein signaling 3 (RGS3) function

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins function as GTPase-activating proteins for the α-subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins. The function of certain RGS proteins is negatively regulated by 14-3-3 proteins, a family of highly conserved regulatory molecules expressed in all eukaryotes. In this study, we provide a structural mechanism for 14-3-3-dependent inhibition of RGS3-Gα interaction. We have used small angle x-ray scattering, hydrogen/deuterium exchange kinetics, and Förster resonance energy transfer measurements to determine the low-resolution solution structure of the 14-3-3ζ·RGS3 complex. The structure shows the RGS domain of RGS3 bound to the 14-3-3ζ dimer in an as-yet-unrecognized manner interacting with less conserved regions on the outer surface of the 14-3-3 dimer outside its central channel. Our results suggest that the 14-3-3 protein binding affects the structure of the Gα interaction portion of RGS3 as well as sterically blocks the interaction between the RGS domain and the Gα subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins.

Regulator of G protein signaling proteins as drug targets: current state and future possibilities

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins have emerged in the past two decades as novel drug targets in many areas of research. Their importance in regulating signaling via G protein-coupled receptors has become evident as numerous studies have been published on the structure and function of RGS proteins. A number of genetic models have also been developed, demonstrating the potential clinical importance of RGS proteins in various disease states, including central nervous system disorders, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and several types of cancer. Apart from their classical mechanism of action as GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), RGS proteins can also serve other noncanonical functions. This opens up a new approach to targeting RGS proteins in drug discovery as the view on the function of these proteins is constantly evolving. This chapter summarizes the latest development in RGS protein drug discovery with special emphasis on noncanonical functions and regulatory mechanisms of RGS protein expression. As more reports are being published on this group of proteins, it is becoming clear that modulation of GAP activity might not be the only way to therapeutically target RGS proteins.

A conserved protein interaction interface on the type 5 G protein beta subunit controls proteolytic stability and activity of R7 family regulator of G protein signaling proteins

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins of the R7 subfamily limit signaling by neurotransmitters in the brain and by light in the retina. They form obligate complexes with the Gβ5 protein that are subject to proteolysis to control their abundance and alter signaling. The mechanisms that regulate this proteolysis, however, remain unclear. We used genetic screens to find mutations in Gβ5 that selectively destabilize one of the R7 RGS proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans. These mutations cluster at the binding interface between Gβ5 and the N terminus of R7 RGS proteins. Equivalent mutations within mammalian Gβ5 allowed the interface to still bind the N-terminal DEP domain of R7 RGS proteins, and mutant Gβ5-R7 RGS complexes initially formed in cells but were then rapidly degraded by proteolysis. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest the mutations weaken the Gβ5-DEP interface, thus promoting dynamic opening of the complex to expose determinants of proteolysis known to exist on the DEP domain. We propose that conformational rearrangements at the Gβ5-DEP interface are key to controlling the stability of R7 RGS protein complexes.

Activation of the JAK-STAT pathway by olanzapine is necessary for desensitization of serotonin2A receptor-stimulated phospholipase C signaling in rat frontal cortex but not serotonin2A receptor-stimulated hormone release

Chronic treatment with olanzapine causes desensitization of serotonin 2A receptor signaling. The purpose of the current study was to further understand the mechanisms underlying this desensitization response of serotonin 2A receptor signaling in vivo. We report that desensitization of serotonin 2A receptor stimulated-phospholipase C activity in rat frontal cortex induced by olanzapine is dependent on the activation of the JAK-STAT pathway. Olanzapine treatment for 7 days significantly increased the levels of the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS7) protein, RGS7 mRNA levels, and activation of JAK2 in rat frontal cortex. Pre-treatment with a JAK2 inhibitor AG490, significantly attenuated the olanzapine-induced reductions in serotonin 2A receptor-stimulated phospholipase C activity and prevented the olanzapine-induced increases in RGS7 mRNA and protein levels. In contrast, inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathway with AG490 did not reverse the olanzapine-induced desensitization of the serotonin 2A receptor pathway in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus mediating increases in plasma hormone levels. AG490 dose-dependently inhibited serotonin 2A receptor-stimulated oxytocin and corticosterone release. These results suggest that the olanzapine-induced increase in RGS7 expression is mediated by the activation of JAK-STAT and is necessary for olanzapine-induced desensitization of serotonin 2A receptor-stimulated phospholipase C activity in the frontal cortex but not serotonin 2A receptor-stimulated hormone release.

Structure, function, and localization of Gβ5-RGS complexes

Members of the R7 subfamily of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins (RGS6, 7, 9, and 11) exist as heterodimers with the G protein beta subunit Gβ5. These protein complexes are only found in neurons and are defined by the presence of three domains: DEP/DHEX, Gβ5/GGL, and RGS. This article summarizes published work in the following areas: (1) the functional significance of structural organization of Gβ5-R7 complexes, (2) regional distribution of Gβ5-R7 in the nervous system and regulation of R7 family expression, (3) subcellular localization of Gβ5-R7 complexes, and (4) novel binding partners of Gβ5-R7 proteins. The review points out some contradictions between observations made by different research groups and highlights the importance of using alternative experimental approaches to obtain conclusive information about Gβ5-R7 function in vivo.

The R7 RGS protein family: multi-subunit regulators of neuronal G protein signaling

G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathways mediate the transmission of signals from the extracellular environment to the generation of cellular responses, a process that is critically important for neurons and neurotransmitter action. The ability to promptly respond to rapidly changing stimulation requires timely inactivation of G proteins, a process controlled by a family of specialized proteins known as regulators of G protein signaling (RGS). The R7 group of RGS proteins (R7 RGS) has received special attention due to their pivotal roles in the regulation of a range of crucial neuronal processes such as vision, motor control, reward behavior, and nociception in mammals. Four proteins in this group, RGS6, RGS7, RGS9, and RGS11, share a common molecular organization of three modules: (i) the catalytic RGS domain, (ii) a GGL domain that recruits G beta(5), an outlying member of the G protein beta subunit family, and (iii) a DEP/DHEX domain that mediates interactions with the membrane anchor proteins R7BP and R9AP. As heterotrimeric complexes, R7 RGS proteins not only associate with and regulate a number of G protein signaling pathway components, but have also been found to form complexes with proteins that are not traditionally associated with G protein signaling. This review summarizes our current understanding of the biology of the R7 RGS complexes including their structure/functional organization, protein-protein interactions, and physiological roles.

Gbeta5-RGS complexes co-localize with mGluR6 in retinal ON-bipolar cells

The time course of G-protein-coupled responses is largely determined by the kinetics of GTP hydrolysis by the G protein alpha subunit, which is accelerated by interaction with regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins. Light responses of ON-bipolar cells of the vertebrate retina require rapid inactivation of the G protein Galphao, which is activated in the dark by metabotropic glutamate receptor, mGluR6, in their dendritic tips. It is not yet known, however, which RGS protein(s) might be responsible for rapid inactivation kinetics. By immunofluorescence and co-immunoprecipitation, we have identified complexes of the Galphao-selective RGS proteins RGS7 and RGS11, with their obligate binding partner, Gbeta5, that are localized to the dendritic tips of murine rod and cone ON-bipolar cells, along with mGluR6. Experiments using pre- and post-synaptic markers, and a dissociated bipolar cell preparation, clearly identified the location of these complexes as the ON-bipolar cell dendritic tips and not the adjacent photoreceptor terminals or horizontal cell dendrites. In mice lacking mGluR6, the distribution of RGS11, RGS7 and Gbeta5 shifts away from the dendritic tips, implying a functional relationship with mGluR6. The precise co-localization of Gbeta5-RGS7 and Gbeta5-RGS11 with mGluR6, and the dependence of localization on the presence of mGluR6, suggests that Gbeta5-RGS7 and Gbeta5-RGS11 function specifically in the mGluR6 signal transduction pathway, where they may stimulate the GTPase activity of Galphao, thus accelerating the ON-bipolar cell light response, in a manner analogous to the acceleration of photoreceptor light responses by the Gbeta5-RGS9-1 complex.

A role of RGS proteins in drug addiction

The diverse family of Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are widely distributed proteins with multiple functions, including GAP activity for heterotrimeric G protein alpha subunits. Three members of the RGS family, RGS9-2, RGS4 and RGSz, have been shown to play an essential modulatory role in psychostimulant and opiate drug actions. Interestingly, these proteins show distinct structure, distribution pattern and cellular localization. In addition, each of these proteins is differentially regulated by drugs of abuse in particular brain networks and appears to modulate distinct signal transduction events. The striatal enriched RGS9 plays a prominent role in opiate and psychostimulant drug reward; RGS4 appears to modulate opiate dependence via actions in the locus coeruleus, whereas RGSz modulates analgesia via activation of the PKC pathway.

Live cell analysis of G protein beta5 complex formation, function, and targeting

The G protein beta(5) subunit differs from other beta subunits in having divergent sequence and subcellular localization patterns. Although beta(5)gamma(2) modulates effectors, beta(5) associates with R7 family regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins when purified from tissues. To investigate beta(5) complex formation in vivo, we used multicolor bimolecular fluorescence complementation in human embryonic kidney 293 cells to compare the abilities of 7 gamma subunits and RGS7 to compete for interaction with beta(5). Among the gamma subunits, beta(5) interacted preferentially with gamma(2), followed by gamma(7), and efficacy of phospholipase C-beta2 activation correlated with amount of beta(5)gamma complex formation. beta(5) also slightly preferred gamma(2) over RGS7. In the presence of coexpressed R7 family binding protein (R7BP), beta(5) interacted similarly with gamma(2) and RGS7. Moreover, gamma(2) interacted preferentially with beta(1) rather than beta(5). These results suggest that multiple coexpressed proteins influence beta(5) complex formation. Fluorescent beta(5)gamma(2) labeled discrete intracellular structures including the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus, whereas beta(5)RGS7 stained the cytoplasm diffusely. Coexpression of alpha(o) targeted both beta(5) complexes to the plasma membrane, and alpha(q) also targeted beta(5)gamma(2) to the plasma membrane. The constitutively activated alpha(o) mutant, alpha(o)R179C, produced greater targeting of beta(5)RGS7 and less of beta(5)gamma(2) than did alpha(o). These results suggest that alpha(o) may cycle between interactions with beta(5)gamma(2) or other betagamma complexes when inactive, and beta(5)RGS7 when active. Moreover, the ability of beta(5)gamma(2) to be targeted to the plasma membrane by alpha subunits suggests that functional beta(5)gamma(2) complexes can form in intact cells and mediate signaling by G protein-coupled receptors.

Evidence for a role for the group I metabotropic glutamate receptor in the inhibitory effect of tumor necrosis factor-α on long-term potentiation

Pro-inflammatory cytokines are known to be elevated in several neuropathological states that are associated with learning and memory. We have previously demonstrated in our laboratory that the inhibition of long-term potentiation (LTP) in the dentate gyrus region of the rat hippocampus, by tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, represents a biphasic response, an early phase dependent on p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation and a later phase, possible dependent on protein synthesis. Many of the factors involved in the early modulation of LTP by TNF-alpha have yet to be elucidated. This study investigated if metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are functionally linked to the inhibitory effect of TNF-alpha on LTP in the rat dentate gyrus in vitro. We report that the impairment of early-LTP by TNF-alpha is significantly attenuated by prior application of the group I/II mGluR antagonist MCPG and more specifically the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP. Since TNF-alpha is now known to cause transient increases in intracellular Ca(2+) levels from ryanodine-sensitive stores, we explored the possibility that disruption of intracellular Ca(2+) homeostasis could be involved. Ryanodine was found to significantly reverse the inhibition of LTP by TNF-alpha. From these studies we propose that the TNF-alpha inhibition of LTP is dependent upon the activation of TNFR1 and mGlu5-receptors. Importantly this study provides the first proof of the involvement of ryanodine-sensitive intracellular Ca(2+) stores in TNF-alpha mediated inhibition of LTP.

How regulators of G protein signaling achieve selective regulation

The regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) are a family of cellular proteins that play an essential regulatory role in G protein-mediated signal transduction. There are multiple RGS subfamilies consisting of over 20 different RGS proteins. They are basically the guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-accelerating proteins that specifically interact with G protein alpha subunits. RGS proteins display remarkable selectivity and specificity in their regulation of receptors, ion channels, and other G protein-mediated physiological events. The molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying such selectivity are complex and cooperate at many different levels. Recent research data have provided strong evidence that the spatiotemporal-specific expression of RGS proteins and their target components, as well as the specific protein-protein recognition and interaction through their characteristic structural domains and functional motifs, are determinants for RGS selectivity and specificity. Other molecular mechanisms, such as alternative splicing and scaffold proteins, also significantly contribute to RGS selectivity. To pursue a thorough understanding of the mechanisms of RGS selective regulation will be of great significance for the advancement of our knowledge of molecular and cellular signal transduction.

A role for 14-3-3 in insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation through its interaction with the RabGAP AS160

Translocation of the insulin-regulated glucose transporter GLUT4 to the cell surface is dependent on the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. The RabGAP (Rab GTPase-activating protein) AS160 (Akt substrate of 160 kDa) is a direct substrate of Akt and plays an essential role in the regulation of GLUT4 trafficking. We have used liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry to identify several 14-3-3 isoforms as AS160-interacting proteins. 14-3-3 proteins interact with AS160 in an insulin- and Akt-dependent manner via an Akt phosphorylation site, Thr-642. This correlates with the dominant negative effect of both the AS160(T642A) and the AS160(4P) mutants on insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation. Introduction of a constitutive 14-3-3 binding site into AS160(4P) restored 14-3-3 binding without disrupting AS160-IRAP (insulin-responsive amino peptidase) interaction and reversed the inhibitory effect of AS160(4P) on GLUT4 translocation. These data show that the insulin-dependent association of 14-3-3 with AS160 plays an important role in GLUT4 trafficking in adipocytes.

Mammalian RGS proteins: Multifunctional regulators of cellular signalling

Regulators of G-protein signalling (RGS) proteins are a large and diverse family initially identified as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) of heterotrimeric G-protein Galpha-subunits. At least some can also influence Galpha activity through either effector antagonism or by acting as guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs). As our understanding of RGS protein structure and function has developed, so has the realisation that they play roles beyond G-protein regulation. Such diversity of function is enabled by the variety of RGS protein structure and their ability to interact with other cellular molecules including phospholipids, receptors, effectors and scaffolds. The activity, sub-cellular distribution and expression levels of RGS proteins are dynamically regulated, providing a layer of complexity that has yet to be fully elucidated.

Modulation of subfamily B/R4 RGS protein function by 14-3-3 proteins

Regulator of G protein signalling (RGS) proteins are primarily known for their ability to act as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) and thus attenuate G protein function within G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling pathways. However, RGS proteins have been found to interact with additional binding partners, and this has introduced more complexity to our understanding of their potential role in vivo. Here, we identify a novel interaction between RGS proteins (RGS4, RGS5, RGS16) and the multifunctional protein 14-3-3. Two isoforms, 14-3-3beta and 14-3-3epsilon, directly interact with all three purified RGS proteins and data from in vitro steady state GTP hydrolysis assays show that 14-3-3 inhibits the GTPase activity of RGS4 and RGS16, but has limited effects on RGS5 under comparable conditions. Moreover in a competitive pull-down experiment, 14-3-3epsilon competes with Galphao for RGS4, but not for RGS5. This mechanism is further reinforced in living cells, where 14-3-3epsilon sequesters RGS4 in the cytoplasm and impedes its recruitment to the plasma membrane by Galpha protein. Thus, 14-3-3 might act as a molecular chelator, preventing RGS proteins from interacting with Galpha, and ultimately prolonging the signal transduction pathway. In conclusion, our findings suggest that 14-3-3 proteins may indirectly promote GPCR signalling via their inhibitory effects on RGS GAP function.

Proteomic identification of alterations in metabolic enzymes and signaling proteins in hypokalemic nephropathy

Hypokalemic nephropathy caused by prolonged K(+) deficiency is associated with metabolic alkalosis, polydipsia, polyuria, growth retardation, hypertension, and progressive tubulointerstitial injury. Its pathophysiology, however, remains unclear. We performed gel-based, differential proteomics analysis of kidneys from BALB/c mice fed with high-normal-K(+) (HNK), low-normal-K(+) (LNK), or K(+)-depleted diet for 8 wk (n = 6 in each group). Plasma K(+) levels were 4.62 +/- 0.35, 4.46 +/- 0.23, and 1.51 +/- 0.21 mmol/L for HNK, LNK, and KD mice, respectively (p < 0.0001; KD vs. others). With comparable amounts of food intake, the KD mice drank significantly more water than the other two groups and had polyuria. Additionally, the KD mice had growth retardation, metabolic alkalosis, markedly enlarged kidneys, renal tubular dilation, intratubular deposition of amorphous and laminated hyaline materials, and tubular atrophy. A total of 33 renal proteins were differentially expressed between the KD mice and others, whereas only eight proteins were differentially expressed between the HNK and LNK groups, as determined by quantitative intensity analysis and ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc multiple comparisons. Using MALDI-MS and/or quadrupole-TOF MS/MS, 30 altered proteins induced by K(+)-depletion were identified as metabolic enzymes (e.g., carbonic anhydrase II, aldose reductase, glutathione S-transferase GT41A, etc.), signaling proteins (14-3-3 epsilon, 14-3-3 zeta, and cofilin 1), and cytoskeletal proteins (gamma-actin and tropomyosin). Some of these altered proteins, particularly metabolic enzymes and signaling proteins, have been demonstrated to be involved in metabolic alkalosis, polyuria, and renal tubular injury. Our findings may lead to a new road map for research on hypokalemic nephropathy and to better understanding of the pathophysiology of this medical disease when the functional and physiological significances of these altered proteins are defined.

Bidirectional communication between the brain and the immune system: implications for physiological sleep and disorders with disrupted sleep

This review describes mechanisms of immune-to-brain and brain-to-immune signaling involved in mediating physiological sleep and altered sleep with disease. The central nervous system (CNS) modulates immune function by signaling target cells of the immune system through autonomic and neuroendocrine pathways. Neurotransmitters and hormones produced and released by these pathways interact with immune cells to alter immune functions, including cytokine production. Cytokines produced by cells of the immune and nervous systems regulate sleep. Cytokines released by immune cells, particularly interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, signal neuroendocrine, autonomic, limbic and cortical areas of the CNS to affect neural activity and modify behaviors (including sleep), hormone release and autonomic function. In this manner, immune cells function as a sense organ, informing the CNS of peripheral events related to infection and injury. Equally important, homeostatic mechanisms, involving all levels of the neuroaxis, are needed, not only to turn off the immune response after a pathogen is cleared or tissue repair is completed, but also to restore and regulate natural diurnal fluctuations in cytokine production and sleep. The immune system's ability to affect behavior has important implications for understanding normal and pathological sleep. Sleep disorders are commonly associated with chronic inflammatory diseases and chronic age- or stress-related disorders. The best studied are rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndromes. This article reviews our current understanding of neuroimmune interactions in normal sleep and sleep deprivation, and the influence of these interactions on selected disorders characterized by pathological sleep.

Psychostimulants, madness, memory... and RGS proteins?

The ingestion of psychostimulant drugs by humans imparts a profound sense of alertness and well-being. However, repeated use of these drugs in some individuals will induce a physiological state of dependence, characterized by compulsive behavior directed toward the acquisition and ingestion of the drug, at the expense of customary social obligations. Drugs of abuse and many other types of experiences share the ability to alter the morphology and density of neuronal dendrites and spines. Dopaminergic modulation of corticostriatal synaptic plasticity is necessary for these morphological changes. Changes in the density of dendritic spines on striatal neurons may underlie the development of this pathological pattern of drug-seeking behavior. Identifying proteins that regulate dopaminergic signaling are of value. A family of proteins, the regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, which regulate signaling from G protein-coupled receptors, such as dopamine and glutamate, may be important in this regard. By regulating corticostriatal synaptic plasticity, RGS proteins can influence presynaptic activity, neurotransmitter release, and postsynaptic depolarization and thereby play a key role in the development of this plasticity. Pharmacological agents that modify RGS activity in humans could be efficacious in ameliorating the dependence on psychostimulant drugs.

A Key Serine for the GTPase-Activating Protein Function of Regulator of G Protein Signaling Proteins Is Not a General Target for 14-3-3 Interactions

Mammalian regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are highly conserved within the RGS domain. Of amino acids that are universal, a serine residue at the C terminus of this domain has been described as the binding site in RGS7 for 14-3-3 proteins. However, studies with the related RGS3 indicate that the site of interaction is not within the RGS domain. We confirm that the interaction of RGS3 with 14-3-3tau and 14-3-3zeta requires Ser264 and not the RGS domain and show both that mutation of the conserved RGS domain serine, Ser496 in RGS3, to either alanine or aspartate does not prevent binding of 14-3-3 proteins and that 14-3-3 proteins do not inhibit GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity against receptor-activated Galpha(o1). However, mutation of Ser496 does directly impair the action of RGS3 as a GAP against receptor-activated Galpha(o1). We mutated the equivalent serine residue in the family B/R4 RGS proteins RGS1 and RGS16. Using two distinct assay formats, conversion to aspartate virtually abolished GAP activity, whereas conversion to alanine decreased potency 20-fold. Neither alteration modulated interactions with 14-3-3tau or 14-3-3zeta, but the 14-3-3 proteins did not modulate the GAP activity of the wild-type or mutant RGS proteins. Although interactions between 14-3-3 proteins and many RGS proteins can be observed, this does not involve this conserved serine and does not inherently modify GAP function.

Multi-tasking RGS proteins in the heart: the next therapeutic target?

Regulator of G-protein-signaling (RGS) proteins play a key role in the regulation of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. The characteristic hallmark of RGS proteins is a conserved approximately 120-aa RGS region that confers on these proteins the ability to serve as GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for G(alpha) proteins. Most RGS proteins can serve as GAPs for multiple isoforms of G(alpha) and therefore have the potential to influence many cellular signaling pathways. However, RGS proteins can be highly regulated and can demonstrate extreme specificity for a particular signaling pathway. RGS proteins can be regulated by altering their GAP activity or subcellular localization; such regulation is achieved by phosphorylation, palmitoylation, and interaction with protein and lipid-binding partners. Many RGS proteins have GAP-independent functions that influence GPCR and non-GPCR-mediated signaling, such as effector regulation or action as an effector. Hence, RGS proteins should be considered multifunctional signaling regulators. GPCR-mediated signaling is critical for normal function in the cardiovascular system and is currently the primary target for the pharmacological treatment of disease. Alterations in RGS protein levels, in particular RGS2 and RGS4, produce cardiovascular phenotypes. Thus, because of the importance of GPCR-signaling pathways and the profound influence of RGS proteins on these pathways, RGS proteins are regulators of cardiovascular physiology and potentially novel drug targets as well.

Actions of TNF-alpha on glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the central nervous system

Increasing attention is being paid to the role of inflammatory and immune molecules in the modulation of central nervous system (CNS) function. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine, the receptors for which are expressed on neurones and glial cells throughout the CNS. Through the action of its two receptors, it has a broad range of actions on neurones which may be either neuroprotective or neurotoxic. It plays a facilitatory role in glutamate excitotoxicity, both directly and indirectly by inhibiting glial glutamate transporters on astrocytes. Additionally, TNF-alpha has direct effects on glutamate transmission, for example increasing expression of AMPA receptors on synapses. TNF-alpha also plays a role in synaptic plasticity, inhibiting long-term potentiation (LTP), a process dependent on p38 mitogen activated kinase (p38 MAP) kinase. In the following review we look at these and other effects of TNF-alpha in the CNS.

Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate and Ca2+/calmodulin competitively bind to the regulators of G-protein-signalling (RGS) domain of RGS4 and reciprocally regulate its action

RGS (regulators of G-protein signalling) are a diverse group of proteins, which accelerate intrinsic GTP hydrolysis on heterotrimeric G-protein a subunits. They are involved in the control of a physiological behaviour known as 'relaxation' of G-protein-gated K+ channels in cardiac myocytes. The GTPase-accelerating activity of cardiac RGS proteins, such as RGS4, is inhibited by PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 (phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate) and this inhibition is cancelled by Ca2+/calmodulin (CaM) formed during membrane depolarization. G-protein-gated K+ channel activity decreases on depolarization owing to the facilitation of GTPase-activating protein activity by RGS proteins and vice versa on hyperpolarization. The molecular mechanism responsible for this reciprocal control of RGS action by PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and Ca2+/CaM, however, has not been fully elucidated. Using lipid-protein co-sedimentation assay and surface plasmon resonance measurements, we show in the present study that the control of the GTPase-accelerating activity of the RGS4 protein is achieved through the competitive binding of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and Ca2+/CaM within its RGS domain. Competitive binding occurs exclusively within the RGS domain and involves a cluster of positively charged residues located on the surface opposite to the Ga interaction site. In the RGS proteins conserving these residues, the reciprocal regulation by PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and Ca2+/CaM may be important for their physiological regulation of G-protein signalling.

Physiological actions of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are a family of proteins, which accelerate GTPase-activity intrinsic to the alpha subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins and play crucial roles in the physiological control of G-protein signaling. If RGS proteins were active unrestrictedly, they would completely suppress various G-protein-mediated cell signaling as has been shown in the over-expression experiments of various RGS proteins. Thus, physiologically the modes of RGS-action should be under some regulation. The regulation can be achieved through the control of either the protein function and/or the subcellular localization. Examples for the former are as follows: (i) Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP(3)) inhibits RGS-action, which can be recovered by Ca(2+)/calmodulin. This underlies a voltage-dependent "relaxation" behavior of G-protein-gated K(+) channels. (ii) A modulatory protein, 14-3-3, binds to the RGS proteins phosphorylated by PKA and inhibits their actions. For the latter mechanism, additional regulatory modules, such as PDZ, PX, and G-protein gamma subunit-like (GGL) domains, identified in several RGS proteins may be responsible: (i) PDZ domain of RGS12 interacts with a G-protein-coupled chemokine receptor, CXCR2, and thus facilitates its GAP action on CXCR2-mediated G-protein signals. (ii) RGS9 forms a complex with a type of G-protein beta-subunit (Gbeta5) via its GGL domain, which facilitates the GAP function of RGS9. Both types of regulations synergistically control the mode of action of RGS proteins in the physiological conditions, which contributes to fine tunings of G-protein signalings.

Assays of Nuclear Localization of R7/Gβ5 Complexes

Heterodimeric complexes between individual members of the R7 subfamily of regulators of G-protein signaling proteins and the Gbeta5 isoform of the heterotrimeric G-protein beta subunit family are strongly expressed in the cell nucleus in neurons and brain, as well as in the cytoplasm and plasma membrane. Native and recombinant Gbeta5 and/or R7 expression have been studied in model systems like rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells where their nuclear localization can be studied by fluorescence microscopy and/or subcellular fractionation. Nucleic acid counterstains chosen for compatibility with the fluorescent tags on secondary antibodies can facilitate the assay of R7/Gbeta5 nuclear localization by epifluorescence or confocal laser microscopy. Subcellular fractionation allows isolation of a purified nuclear fraction that can be probed for the presence of Gbeta5 and/or R7 subunits by immunoblots or immunoprecipitation and compared to other subcellular fractions. While the function of nuclear R7/Gbeta5 complexes is unknown, comparison with the properties of other RGS proteins that localize to the cell nucleus may suggest modes of action. Models are offered in which the reversible post-translational modification of R7/Gbeta5 complexes regulates their nuclear localization and signaling activity, whether the target of such signaling activity is in the nucleus, at the plasma membrane, or both.

Fusicoccin signaling reveals 14-3-3 protein function as a novel step in left-right patterning during amphibian embryogenesis

To gain insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the control of morphogenetic signals by H+ flux during embryogenesis, we tested Fusicoccin-A (FC), a compound produced by the fungus Fusicoccum amygdali Del. In plant cells, FC complexes with 14-3-3 proteins to activate H+ pumping across the plasma membrane. It has long been thought that FC acts on higher plants only; here, we show that exposing frog embryos to FC during early development specifically results in randomization of the asymmetry of the left-right (LR) axis (heterotaxia). Biochemical and molecular-genetic evidence is presented that 14-3-3-family proteins are an obligate component of Xenopus FC receptors and that perturbation of 14-3-3 protein function results in heterotaxia. The subcellular localization of 14-3-3 mRNAs and proteins reveals novel cytoplasmic destinations, and a left-right asymmetry at the first cell division. Using gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments, we show that 14-3-3E protein is likely to be an endogenous and extremely early aspect of LR patterning. These data highlight a striking conservation of signaling pathways across kingdoms, suggest common mechanisms of polarity establishment between C. elegans and vertebrate embryos, and uncover a novel entry point into the pathway of left-right asymmetry determination.

In through the out door: nuclear localization of the regulators of G protein signaling

The regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) are an extraordinary class of diverse multifunctional signaling proteins best known for their potent capacity to down-regulate the activity of Galpha subunits at the plasma membrane. In certain circumstances, some RGS proteins undergo translocation to the nucleus or plasma membrane from the cytoplasm. Translocation demonstrates a potentially dynamic alternative mechanism for Galpha subunit or effector regulation. The nuclear localization of the regulators of G protein signaling proteins further suggests these proteins possess even greater functional heterogeneity than that envisioned previously, as regulators of transcription and cell cycle control.

Palmitoylation regulates regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) 16 function. II. Palmitoylation of a cysteine residue in the RGS box is critical for RGS16 GTPase accelerating activity and regulation of Gi-coupled signalling

Palmitoylation is a reversible post-translational modification used by cells to regulate protein activity. The regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins RGS4 and RGS16 share conserved cysteine (Cys) residues that undergo palmitoylation. In the accompanying article (Hiol, A., Davey, P. C., Osterhout, J. L., Waheed, A. A., Fischer, E. R., Chen, C. K., Milligan, G., Druey, K. M., and Jones, T. L. Z. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 19301-19308), we determined that mutation of NH2-terminal cysteine residues in RGS16 (Cys-2 and Cys-12) reduced GTPase accelerating (GAP) activity toward a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT1A)/G alpha o1 receptor fusion protein in cell membranes. NH2-terminal acylation also permitted palmitoylation of a cysteine residue in the RGS box of RGS16 (Cys-98). Here we investigated the role of internal palmitoylation in RGS16 localization and GAP activity. Mutation of RGS16 Cys-98 or RGS4 Cys-95 to alanine reduced GAP activity on the 5-HT1A/G alpha o1 fusion protein and regulation of adenylyl cyclase inhibition. The C98A mutation had no effect on RGS16 localization or GAP activity toward purified G-protein alpha subunits. Enzymatic palmitoylation of RGS16 resulted in internal palmitoylation on residue Cys-98. Palmitoylated RGS16 or RGS4 WT but not C98A or C95A preincubated with membranes expressing 5-HT1a/G alpha o1 displayed increased GAP activity over time. These results suggest that palmitoylation of a Cys residue in the RGS box is critical for RGS16 and RGS4 GAP activity and their ability to regulate Gi-coupled signaling in mammalian cells.

Src-mediated RGS16 tyrosine phosphorylation promotes RGS16 stability

The amplitude of signaling evoked by stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors may be controlled in part by the GTPase accelerating activity of the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. In turn, subcellular targeting, protein-protein interactions, or post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation may shape RGS activity and specificity. We found previously that RGS16 undergoes tyrosine phosphorylation on conserved tyrosine residues in the RGS box. Phosphorylation on Tyr(168) was mediated by the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We show here that endogenous RGS16 is phosphorylated after epidermal growth factor stimulation of MCF-7 cells. In addition, p60-Src or Lyn kinase phosphorylated recombinant RGS16 in vitro, and RGS16 underwent phosphorylation in the presence of constitutively active Src (Y529F) in EGFR(-) CHO-K1 cells. Blockade of endogenous Src activity by selective inhibitors attenuated RGS16 phosphorylation induced by pervanadate or receptor stimulation. Furthermore, the rate of RGS16 degradation was reduced in cells expressing active Src or treated with pervanadate or a G protein-coupled receptor ligand (CXCL12). Induction of RGS16 tyrosine phosphorylation was associated with increased RGS16 protein levels and enhanced GAP activity in cell membranes. These results suggest that Src mediates RGS16 tyrosine phosphorylation, which may promote RGS16 stability.

Phosphorylation of RGS14 by protein kinase A potentiates its activity toward G alpha i

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) modulate Galpha-directed signals because of the GTPase activating protein (GAP) activity of their conserved RGS domain. RGS14 and RGS12 are unique among RGS proteins in that they also regulate Galpha(i) signals because of the guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) activity of a GoLoco motif near their carboxy-termini. Little is known about cellular regulation of RGS proteins, although several are phosphorylated in response to G-protein directed signals. Here we show for the first time the phosphorylation of native and recombinant RGS14 in host cells. Direct stimulation of adenylyl cyclase or introduction of dibutyryl-cAMP induces phosphorylation of RGS14 in cells. This phosphorylation occurs through activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) since phosphate incorporation is completely blocked by a selective inhibitor of PKA but only partially or not at all blocked by inhibitors of other G-protein regulated kinases. We show that purified PKA phosphorylates two specific sites on recombinant RGS14, one of which, threonine 494 (Thr494), is immediately adjacent to the GoLoco motif. Because of this proximity, we focused on the possible effects of PKA phosphorylation on the GDI activity of RGS14. We found that mimicking phosphorylation on Thr494 enhanced the GDI activity of RGS14 toward Galpha(i) nearly 3-fold, with no associated effect on the GAP activity toward either Galpha(i) or Galpha(o). These findings implicate cAMP-induced phosphorylation as an important modulator of RGS14 function since phosphorylation could enhance RGS14 binding to Galpha(i)-GDP, thereby limiting Galpha(i) interactions with downstream effector(s) and/or enhancing Gbetagamma-dependent signals.