1
|
Ingrao F, Ngabirano E, Rauw F, Dauphin G, Lambrecht B. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a multivalent herpesvirus vectored vaccine against H9N2 low pathogenic avian influenza in chicken. Vaccine 2024; 42:3410-3419. [PMID: 38641498 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
The application of recombinant herpesvirus of turkey, expressing the H9 hemagglutinin gene from low pathogenic avian influenza virus (LPAIV) H9N2 and the avian orthoavulavirus-1 (AOAV-1) (commonly known as Newcastle Disease virus (NDV)) fusion protein (F) as an rHVT-H9-F vaccine, is an alternative to currently used classical vaccines. This study investigated H9- and ND-specific humoral and mucosal responses, H9-specific cell-mediated immunity, and protection conferred by the rHVT-H9-F vaccine in specific pathogen-free (SPF) chickens. Vaccination elicited systemic NDV F- and AIV H9-specific antibody response but also local antibodies in eye wash fluid and oropharyngeal swabs. The ex vivo H9-specific stimulation of splenic and pulmonary T cells in the vaccinated group demonstrated the ability of vaccination to induce systemic and local cellular responses. The clinical protection against a challenge using a LPAIV H9N2 strain of the G1 lineage isolated in Morocco in 2016 was associated with a shorter duration of shedding along with reduced viral genome load in the upper respiratory tract and reduced cloacal shedding compared to unvaccinated controls.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Animals
- Influenza A Virus, H9N2 Subtype/immunology
- Influenza A Virus, H9N2 Subtype/genetics
- Chickens/immunology
- Influenza in Birds/prevention & control
- Influenza in Birds/immunology
- Influenza Vaccines/immunology
- Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Viral/immunology
- Antibodies, Viral/blood
- Virus Shedding/immunology
- Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms
- Newcastle disease virus/immunology
- Newcastle disease virus/genetics
- Poultry Diseases/prevention & control
- Poultry Diseases/immunology
- Poultry Diseases/virology
- Immunity, Cellular
- Herpesvirus 1, Meleagrid/immunology
- Herpesvirus 1, Meleagrid/genetics
- Vaccination/methods
- Immunity, Humoral
- Genetic Vectors/immunology
- Immunogenicity, Vaccine
- Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology
- Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage
- Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/immunology
- Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/genetics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Ingrao
- Service of Avian Virology and Immunology, Sciensano, 1180 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Eva Ngabirano
- Service of Avian Virology and Immunology, Sciensano, 1180 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Fabienne Rauw
- Service of Avian Virology and Immunology, Sciensano, 1180 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gwenaëlle Dauphin
- Ceva Santé Animale, 10 Avenue de la Ballastière, 33500 Libourne, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Walsh RE, Nix A, Ackaert C, Mazy A, Schockaert J, Pattyn S, Malherbe L. Preclinical immunogenicity risk assessment of biotherapeutics using CD4 T cell assays. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1406040. [PMID: 38863708 PMCID: PMC11165089 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1406040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
T-cell dependent antibody responses to biotherapeutics remain a challenge to the optimal clinical application of biotherapeutics because of their capacity to impair drug efficacy and their potential to cause safety issues. To minimize this clinical immunogenicity risk, preclinical assays measuring the capacity of biotherapeutics to elicit CD4 T cell response in vitro are commonly used. However, there is considerable variability in assay formats and a general poor understanding of their respective predictive value. In this study, we evaluated the performance of three different CD4 T cell proliferation assays in their capacity to predict clinical immunogenicity: a CD8 T cell depleted peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) assay and two co-culture-based assays between dendritic cells (DCs) and autologous CD4 T cells with or without restimulation with monocytes. A panel of 10 antibodies with a wide range of clinical immunogenicity was selected. The CD8 T cell depleted PBMC assay predicted the clinical immunogenicity in four of the eight highly immunogenic antibodies included in the panel. Similarly, five antibodies with high clinical immunogenicity triggered a response in the DC: CD4 T cell assay but the responses were of lower magnitude than the ones observed in the PBMC assay. Remarkably, three antibodies with high clinical immunogenicity did not trigger any response in either platform. The addition of a monocyte restimulation step to the DC: CD4 T cell assay did not further improve its predictive value. Overall, these results indicate that there are no CD4 T cell assay formats that can predict the clinical immunogenicity of all biotherapeutics and reinforce the need to combine results from various preclinical assays assessing antigen uptake and presentation to fully mitigate the immunogenicity risk of biotherapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin E. Walsh
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Angela Nix
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Chloé Ackaert
- ImmunXperts SA| Rue August Piccard 48, Gosselies, Belgium
| | - Aurélie Mazy
- ImmunXperts SA| Rue August Piccard 48, Gosselies, Belgium
| | | | - Sofie Pattyn
- ImmunXperts SA| Rue August Piccard 48, Gosselies, Belgium
| | - Laurent Malherbe
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kumar V, Barwal A, Sharma N, Mir DS, Kumar P, Kumar V. Therapeutic proteins: developments, progress, challenges, and future perspectives. 3 Biotech 2024; 14:112. [PMID: 38510462 PMCID: PMC10948735 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-024-03958-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Proteins are considered magic molecules due to their enormous applications in the health sector. Over the past few decades, therapeutic proteins have emerged as a promising treatment option for various diseases, particularly cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and others. The formulation of protein-based therapies is a major area of research, however, a few factors still hinder the large-scale production of these therapeutic products, such as stability, heterogenicity, immunogenicity, high cost of production, etc. This review provides comprehensive information on various sources and production of therapeutic proteins. The review also summarizes the challenges currently faced by scientists while developing protein-based therapeutics, along with possible solutions. It can be concluded that these proteins can be used in combination with small molecular drugs to give synergistic benefits in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vimal Kumar
- University Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab 140413 India
| | - Arti Barwal
- Department of Microbial Biotechnology, Panjab University, South Campus, Sector-25, Chandigarh, 160014 India
| | - Nitin Sharma
- Department of Biotechnology, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Mohali, Punjab 140307 India
| | - Danish Shafi Mir
- University Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab 140413 India
| | - Pradeep Kumar
- Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan, 173229 India
| | - Vikas Kumar
- University Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab 140413 India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barton J, Gaspariunas A, Galson JD, Leem J. Building Representation Learning Models for Antibody Comprehension. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2024; 16:a041462. [PMID: 38012013 PMCID: PMC10910360 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Antibodies are versatile proteins with both the capacity to bind a broad range of targets and a proven track record as some of the most successful therapeutics. However, the development of novel antibody therapeutics is a lengthy and costly process. It is challenging to predict the functional and biophysical properties of antibodies from their amino acid sequence alone, requiring numerous experiments for full characterization. Machine learning, specifically deep representation learning, has emerged as a family of methods that can complement wet lab approaches and accelerate the overall discovery and engineering process. Here, we review advances in antibody sequence representation learning, and how this has improved antibody structure prediction and facilitated antibody optimization. We discuss challenges in the development and implementation of such models, such as the lack of publicly available, well-curated antibody function data and highlight opportunities for improvement. These and future advances in machine learning for antibody sequences have the potential to increase the success rate in developing new therapeutics, resulting in broader access to transformative medicines and improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Barton
- Alchemab Therapeutics Ltd, London N1C 4AX, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jacob D Galson
- Alchemab Therapeutics Ltd, London N1C 4AX, United Kingdom
| | - Jinwoo Leem
- Alchemab Therapeutics Ltd, London N1C 4AX, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lteif M, Pallardy M, Turbica I. Antibodies internalization mechanisms by dendritic cells and their role in therapeutic antibody immunogenicity. Eur J Immunol 2024; 54:e2250340. [PMID: 37985174 DOI: 10.1002/eji.202250340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Internalization and processing by antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells (DCs) are critical steps for initiating a T-cell response to therapeutic antibodies. Consequences are the production of neutralizing antidrug antibodies altering the clinical response, the presence of immune complexes, and, in some rare cases, hypersensitivity reactions. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the knowledge of cellular uptake mechanisms of antibodies in DCs. The uptake of antibodies could be directly related to their immunogenicity by regulating the quantity of materials entering the DCs in relation to antibody structure. Here, we summarize the latest insights into cellular uptake mechanisms and pathways in DCs. We highlight the approaches to study endocytosis, the impact of endocytosis routes on T-cell response, and discuss the link between how DCs internalize therapeutic antibodies and the potential mechanisms that could give rise to immunogenicity. Understanding these processes could help in developing assays to evaluate the immunogenicity potential of biotherapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Lteif
- Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Inflammation, Microbiome and Immunosurveillance, Orsay, France
| | - Marc Pallardy
- Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Inflammation, Microbiome and Immunosurveillance, Orsay, France
| | - Isabelle Turbica
- Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Inflammation, Microbiome and Immunosurveillance, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gokemeijer J, Balasubramanian N, Ogasawara K, Grudzinska-Goebel J, Upreti VV, Mody H, Kasar S, Vepachedu VR, Xu W, Gupta S, Tarcsa E, Dodge R, Herr K, Yang TY, Tourdot S, Jawa V. An IQ Consortium Perspective on Best Practices for Bioanalytical and Immunogenicity Assessment Aspects of CAR-T and TCR-T Cellular Therapies Development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024; 115:188-200. [PMID: 37983584 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
CAR-T therapies have shown remarkable efficacy against hematological malignancies in the clinic over the last decade and new studies indicate that progress is being made to use these novel therapies to target solid tumors as well as treat autoimmune disease. Innovation in the field, including TCR-T, allogeneic or "off the shelf" CAR-T, and autoantigen/armored CAR-Ts are likely to increase the efficacy and applications of these therapies. The unique aspects of these cell-based therapeutics; patient-derived cells, intracellular expression, in vivo expansion, and phenotypic changes provide unique bioanalytical challenges to develop pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity assessments. The International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) Translational and ADME Sciences Leadership Group (TALG) has brought together a group of industry experts to discuss and consider these challenges. In this white paper, we present the IQ consortium perspective on the best practices and considerations for bioanalytical and immunogenicity aspects toward the optimal development of CAR-T and TCR-T cell therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochem Gokemeijer
- Discovery Biotherapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nanda Balasubramanian
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacometrics & Bioanalysis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ken Ogasawara
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacometrics & Bioanalysis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Vijay V Upreti
- Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Hardik Mody
- Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Siddha Kasar
- Oncology Precision & Translational Medicine, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Venkata R Vepachedu
- Bioanalytical Discovery & Development Sciences, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Weifeng Xu
- Preclinical Development, Bioanalytical, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Swati Gupta
- Development Biological Sciences, Immunology, AbbVie, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Edit Tarcsa
- Abbvie Bioresearch Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert Dodge
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA
| | - Kate Herr
- Bioanalytical Discovery & Development Sciences, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tong-Yuan Yang
- Bioanalytical Discovery & Development Sciences, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sophie Tourdot
- BioMedicine Design, Pfizer Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vibha Jawa
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacometrics & Bioanalysis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tourdot S, Baltrunkonis D, Denies S, Devanarayan V, Grudzinska-Goebel J, Kromminga A, Lotz GP, Malherbe L, Michaut L, Weldingh KN, Pedras-Vasconcelos JA, Salazar-Fontana LI, Spindeldreher S, Sauna Z, Snoeck V, Verthelyi D, Kramer D. Proceedings of the 14th European immunogenicity platform open symposium on immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. MAbs 2024; 16:2324801. [PMID: 38441119 PMCID: PMC10936655 DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2024.2324801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Biologics have revolutionized disease management in many therapeutic areas by addressing unmet medical needs and overcoming resistance to standard-of-care treatment in numerous patients. However, the development of unwanted immune responses directed against these drugs, humoral and/or cellular, can hinder their efficacy and have safety consequences with various degrees of severity. Health authorities ask that a thorough immunogenicity risk assessment be conducted during drug development to incorporate an appropriate monitoring and mitigation plan in clinical studies. With the rapid diversification and complexification of biologics, which today include modalities such as multi-domain antibodies, cell-based products, AAV delivery vectors, and nucleic acids, developers are faced with the challenge of establishing a risk assessment strategy sometimes in the absence of specific regulatory guidelines. The European Immunogenicity Platform (EIP) Open Symposium on Immunogenicity of Biopharmaceuticals and its one-day training course gives experts and newcomers across academia, industry, and regulatory agencies an opportunity to share experience and knowledge to overcome these challenges. Here, we report the discussions that took place at the EIP's 14th Symposium, held in April 2023. The topics covered included immunogenicity monitoring and clinical relevance, non-clinical immunogenicity risk assessment, regulatory aspects of immunogenicity assessment and reporting, and the challenges associated with new modalities, which were discussed in a dedicated session.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Tourdot
- Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc, Andover, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Baltrunkonis
- Research and Development, Clinical Pharmacology and Bioanalytics, Clinical Bioanalytics, Groton, CT, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Gregor P. Lotz
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Penzberg, Germany
| | - Laurent Malherbe
- Lilly Research Laboratories, a Division of Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Lydia Michaut
- Novartis Biomedical research, PK Sciences, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Karin N. Weldingh
- Department of Clinical Immunogenicity Analysis, Novo Nordisk A/S, Maaloev, Denmark
| | - Joao A. Pedras-Vasconcelos
- Division of Biotech Review and Research III, Office of Biotechnology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Zuben Sauna
- Division of hemostasis, Office of Plasma Protein Therapeutics; Office of Therapeutic Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Veerle Snoeck
- Translational Biomarkers and Bioanalysis, UCB Biopharma SRL, Braine-l’Alleud, Belgium
| | - Daniela Verthelyi
- Division of Biologics Research and Review III; Ofrfice of Biotechnology Products; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Kramer
- Global Scientific Advisor Immunogenicity, Translational Medicine & Early Development, Sanofi Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Di Ianni A, Fraone T, Balestra P, Cowan K, Riccardi Sirtori F, Barbero L. Assessing MAPPs assay as a tool to predict the immunogenicity potential of protein therapeutics. Life Sci Alliance 2024; 7:e202302095. [PMID: 37833075 PMCID: PMC10576005 DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202302095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
MHC-II-associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs) is a mass spectrometry-based (MS) method to identify naturally presented MHC-II-associated peptides that could elicit CD4+T cell activation. MAPPs assay is considered one of the assays that better characterize the safety of biotherapeutics by driving the selection of the best candidates concerning their immunogenicity risk. However, there is little knowledge about the impact of bead material on the recovery of MHC-II MS-eluted ligands in MAPPs assays. Here, we firstly describe a robust MAPPs protocol by implementing streptavidin magnetic beads for the isolation of these peptides instead of commonly used NHS-activated beads. Moreover, we assessed the impact of the cell medium used for cell cultures on the morphology and recovery of the in vitro-generated APCs, and its potential implications in the amount of MHC-II isolated peptides. We also described an example of a MAPPs assay application to investigate drug-induced immunogenicity of two bispecific antibodies and compared them with monospecific trastuzumab IgG1 control. This work highlighted the importance of MAPPs in the preclinical in vitro strategy to mitigate the immunogenicity risk of biotherapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Di Ianni
- https://ror.org/048tbm396 Molecular Biotechnology Center, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- NBE-DMPK Innovative BioAnalytics, Merck Serono RBM S.p.A., An Affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Tiziana Fraone
- NBE-DMPK Innovative BioAnalytics, Merck Serono RBM S.p.A., An Affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Piercesare Balestra
- NBE-DMPK Innovative BioAnalytics, Merck Serono RBM S.p.A., An Affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Kyra Cowan
- New Biological Entities, Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (NBE-DMPK), Research and Development, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Federico Riccardi Sirtori
- NBE-DMPK Innovative BioAnalytics, Merck Serono RBM S.p.A., An Affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Luca Barbero
- NBE-DMPK Innovative BioAnalytics, Merck Serono RBM S.p.A., An Affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sun R, Qian MG, Zhang X. T and B cell epitope analysis for the immunogenicity evaluation and mitigation of antibody-based therapeutics. MAbs 2024; 16:2324836. [PMID: 38512798 PMCID: PMC10962608 DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2024.2324836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The surge in the clinical use of therapeutic antibodies has reshaped the landscape of pharmaceutical therapy for many diseases, including rare and challenging conditions. However, the administration of exogenous biologics could potentially trigger unwanted immune responses such as generation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Real-world experiences have illuminated the clear correlation between the ADA occurrence and unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes as well as immune-related adverse events. By retrospectively examining research involving immunogenicity analysis, we noticed the growing emphasis on elucidating the immunogenic epitope profiles of antibody-based therapeutics aiming for mechanistic understanding the immunogenicity generation and, ideally, mitigating the risks. As such, we have comprehensively summarized here the progress in both experimental and computational methodologies for the characterization of T and B cell epitopes of therapeutics. Furthermore, the successful practice of epitope-driven deimmunization of biotherapeutics is exceptionally highlighted in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruoxuan Sun
- Global Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics & Modeling, Preclinical & Translational Sciences, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Mark G. Qian
- Global Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics & Modeling, Preclinical & Translational Sciences, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Xiaobin Zhang
- Global Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics & Modeling, Preclinical & Translational Sciences, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tsai WTK, Li Y, Yin Z, Tran P, Phung Q, Zhou Z, Peng K, Qin D, Tam S, Spiess C, Brumm J, Wong M, Ye Z, Wu P, Cohen S, Carter PJ. Nonclinical immunogenicity risk assessment for knobs-into-holes bispecific IgG 1 antibodies. MAbs 2024; 16:2362789. [PMID: 38845069 PMCID: PMC11164226 DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2024.2362789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Bispecific antibodies, including bispecific IgG, are emerging as an important new class of antibody therapeutics. As a result, we, as well as others, have developed engineering strategies designed to facilitate the efficient production of bispecific IgG for clinical development. For example, we have extensively used knobs-into-holes (KIH) mutations to facilitate the heterodimerization of antibody heavy chains and more recently Fab mutations to promote cognate heavy/light chain pairing for efficient in vivo assembly of bispecific IgG in single host cells. A panel of related monospecific and bispecific IgG1 antibodies was constructed and assessed for immunogenicity risk by comparison with benchmark antibodies with known low (Avastin and Herceptin) or high (bococizumab and ATR-107) clinical incidence of anti-drug antibodies. Assay methods used include dendritic cell internalization, T cell proliferation, and T cell epitope identification by in silico prediction and MHC-associated peptide proteomics. Data from each method were considered independently and then together for an overall integrated immunogenicity risk assessment. In toto, these data suggest that the KIH mutations and in vitro assembly of half antibodies do not represent a major risk for immunogenicity of bispecific IgG1, nor do the Fab mutations used for efficient in vivo assembly of bispecifics in single host cells. Comparable or slightly higher immunogenicity risk assessment data were obtained for research-grade preparations of trastuzumab and bevacizumab versus Herceptin and Avastin, respectively. These data provide experimental support for the common practice of using research-grade preparations of IgG1 as surrogates for immunogenicity risk assessment of their corresponding pharmaceutical counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Ting K. Tsai
- Department of Antibody Engineering, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yinyin Li
- Department of Biochemical and Cellular Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Zhaojun Yin
- Department of Bioanalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter Tran
- Department of Bioanalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Qui Phung
- Department of Microchemistry, Proteomics and Lipidomics, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Zhenru Zhou
- Department of Microchemistry, Proteomics and Lipidomics, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kun Peng
- Department of Bioanalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dan Qin
- Department of Biochemical and Cellular Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sien Tam
- Department of Biochemical and Cellular Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christoph Spiess
- Department of Antibody Engineering, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jochen Brumm
- Department of Nonclinical Biostatistics, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Manda Wong
- Department of Structural Biology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Zhengmao Ye
- Department of Biochemical and Cellular Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Patrick Wu
- Department of Bioanalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sivan Cohen
- Department of Bioanalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Paul J. Carter
- Department of Antibody Engineering, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jarvi NL, Balu-Iyer SV. A mechanistic marker-based screening tool to predict clinical immunogenicity of biologics. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2023; 3:174. [PMID: 38066254 PMCID: PMC10709359 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-023-00413-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of therapeutic proteins are undermined by immunogenicity driven by anti-drug antibodies. Immunogenicity risk assessment is critically necessary during drug development, but current methods lack predictive power and mechanistic insight into antigen uptake and processing leading to immune response. A key mechanistic step in T-cell-dependent immune responses is the migration of mature dendritic cells to T-cell areas of lymphoid compartments, and this phenomenon is most pronounced in the immune response toward subcutaneously delivered proteins. METHODS The migratory potential of monocyte-derived dendritic cells is proposed to be a mechanistic marker for immunogenicity screening. Following exposure to therapeutic protein in vitro, dendritic cells are analyzed for changes in activation markers (CD40 and IL-12) in combination with levels of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 to represent migratory potential. Then a transwell assay captures the intensity of dendritic cell migration in the presence of a gradient of therapeutic protein and chemokine ligands. RESULTS Here, we show that an increased ability of the therapeutic protein to induce dendritic cell migration along a gradient of chemokine CCL21 and CXCL12 predicts higher immunogenic potential. Expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 on human monocyte-derived dendritic cells, in combination with activation markers CD40 and IL-12, strongly correlates with clinical anti-drug antibody incidence. CONCLUSIONS Mechanistic understanding of processes driving immunogenicity led to the development of a predictive tool for immunogenicity risk assessment of therapeutic proteins. These predictive markers could be adapted for immunogenicity screening of other biological modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole L Jarvi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA
| | - Sathy V Balu-Iyer
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Penny HL, Hainline K, Theoharis N, Wu B, Brandl C, Webhofer C, McComb M, Wittemer-Rump S, Koca G, Stienen S, Bargou RC, Hummel HD, Loidl W, Grüllich C, Eggert T, Tran B, Mytych DT. Characterization and root cause analysis of immunogenicity to pasotuxizumab (AMG 212), a prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeting bispecific T-cell engager therapy. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1261070. [PMID: 37942314 PMCID: PMC10628759 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1261070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction In oncology, anti-drug antibody (ADA) development that significantly curtails response durability has not historically risen to a level of concern. The relevance and attention ascribed to ADAs in oncology clinical studies have therefore been limited, and the extant literature on this subject scarce. In recent years, T cell engagers have gained preeminence within the prolific field of cancer immunotherapy. These drugs whose mode of action is expected to potently stimulate anti-tumor immunity, may potentially induce ADAs as an unintended corollary due to an overall augmentation of the immune response. ADA formation is therefore emerging as an important determinant in the successful clinical development of such biologics. Methods Here we describe the immunogenicity and its impact observed to pasotuxizumab (AMG 212), a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting bispecific T cell engager (BiTE®) molecule in NCT01723475, a first-in-human (FIH), multicenter, dose-escalation study in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To explain the disparity in ADA incidence observed between the SC and CIV arms of the study, we interrogated other patient and product-specific factors that may have explained the difference beyond the route of administration. Results Treatment-emergent ADAs (TE-ADA) developed in all subjects treated with at least 1 cycle of AMG 212 in the subcutaneous (SC) arm. These ADAs were neutralizing and resulted in profound exposure loss that was associated with contemporaneous reversal of initial Prostate Surface Antigen (PSA) responses, curtailing durability of PSA response in patients. Pivoting from SC to a continuous intravenous (CIV) administration route remarkably yielded no subjects developing ADA to AMG 212. Through a series of stepwise functional assays, our investigation revealed that alongside a more historically immunogenic route of administration, non-tolerant T cell epitopes within the AMG 212 amino acid sequence were likely driving the high-titer, sustained ADA response observed in the SC arm. Discussion These mechanistic insights into the AMG 212 ADA response underscore the importance of performing preclinical immunogenicity risk evaluation as well as advocate for continuous iteration to better our biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kelly Hainline
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, United States
| | | | - Bin Wu
- Department of Biologics, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, United States
| | - Christian Brandl
- Department of Translational Safety & Bioanalytical Sciences, Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Webhofer
- Department of Process Development, Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - Mason McComb
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, United States
| | - Sabine Wittemer-Rump
- Bayer AG, Research and Development Oncology (RED Onc), Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gökben Koca
- Bayer AG, Research and Development Oncology (RED Onc), Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sabine Stienen
- Department of Early Development (Oncology), Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - Ralf C. Bargou
- Translational Oncology/Early Clinical Trial Unit (ECTU), Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
| | - Horst-Dieter Hummel
- Translational Oncology/Early Clinical Trial Unit (ECTU), Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Loidl
- Department of Urology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Linz, Austria
| | - Carsten Grüllich
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Eggert
- Department of Early Development (Oncology), Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, United States
| | - Ben Tran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Daniel T. Mytych
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hartman K, Steiner G, Siegel M, Looney CM, Hickling TP, Bray-French K, Springer S, Marban-Doran C, Ducret A. Expanding the MAPPs Assay to Accommodate MHC-II Pan Receptors for Improved Predictability of Potential T Cell Epitopes. BIOLOGY 2023; 12:1265. [PMID: 37759665 PMCID: PMC10525474 DOI: 10.3390/biology12091265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
A critical step in the immunogenicity cascade is attributed to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) II presentation triggering T cell immune responses. The liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II-associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs) assay is implemented during preclinical risk assessments to identify biotherapeutic-derived T cell epitopes. Although studies indicate that HLA-DP and HLA-DQ alleles are linked to immunogenicity, most MAPPs studies are restricted to using HLA-DR as the dominant HLA II genotype due to the lack of well-characterized immunoprecipitating antibodies. Here, we address this issue by testing various commercially available clones of MHC-II pan (CR3/43, WR18, and Tü39), HLA-DP (B7/21), and HLA-DQ (SPV-L3 and 1a3) antibodies in the MAPPs assay, and characterizing identified peptides according to binding specificity. Our results reveal that HLA II receptor-precipitating reagents with similar reported specificities differ based on clonality and that MHC-II pan antibodies do not entirely exhibit pan-specific tendencies. Since no individual antibody clone is able to recover the complete HLA II peptide repertoire, we recommend a mixed strategy of clones L243, WR18, and SPV-L3 in a single immunoprecipitation step for more robust compound-specific peptide detection. Ultimately, our optimized MAPPs strategy improves the predictability and additional identification of T cell epitopes in immunogenicity risk assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Hartman
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland (C.M.L.)
| | - Guido Steiner
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland (C.M.L.)
| | - Michel Siegel
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland (C.M.L.)
| | - Cary M. Looney
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland (C.M.L.)
| | - Timothy P. Hickling
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland (C.M.L.)
| | - Katharine Bray-French
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland (C.M.L.)
| | - Sebastian Springer
- School of Science, Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Constructor University, Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
| | - Céline Marban-Doran
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland (C.M.L.)
| | - Axel Ducret
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland (C.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Di Ianni A, Barbero L, Fraone T, Cowan K, Sirtori FR. Preclinical risk assessment strategy to mitigate the T-cell dependent immunogenicity of protein biotherapeutics: State of the art, challenges and future perspectives. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2023; 234:115500. [PMID: 37311374 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Protein therapeutics hold a prominent role and have brought significant diversity in efficacious medicinal products. Not just monoclonal antibodies and different antibody formats (pegylated antigen-binding fragments, bispecifics, antibody-drug conjugates, single chain variable fragments, nanobodies, dia-, tria- and tetrabodies), but also purified blood products, growth factors, recombinant cytokines, enzyme replacement factors, fusion proteins are all good instances of therapeutic proteins that have been developed in the past decades and approved for their value in oncology, immune-oncology, and autoimmune diseases discovery programs. Although there was an ingrained belief that fully humanized proteins were expected to have limited immunogenicity, adverse effects associated with immune responses to biological therapies raised some concern in biotech companies. Consequently, drug developers are designing strategies to assess potential immune responses to protein therapeutics during both the preclinical and clinical phases of development. Despite the many factors that can contribute to protein immunogenicity, T cell- (thymus-) dependent (Td) immunogenicity seems to play a crucial role in the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to biologics. A broad range of methodologies to predict and rationally assess Td immune responses to protein drugs has been developed. This review aims to briefly summarize the preclinical immunogenicity risk assessment strategy to mitigate the risk of potential immunogenic candidates coming towards clinical phases, discussing the advantages and limitations of these technologies, and suggesting a rational approach for assessing and mitigating Td immunogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Di Ianni
- University of Turin, Molecular Biotechnology Center, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; NBE-DMPK Innovative BioAnalytics, Merck Serono RBM S.p.A., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Via Ribes 1, 10010 Colleretto Giacosa (TO), Italy
| | - Luca Barbero
- NBE-DMPK Innovative BioAnalytics, Merck Serono RBM S.p.A., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Via Ribes 1, 10010 Colleretto Giacosa (TO), Italy
| | - Tiziana Fraone
- NBE-DMPK Innovative BioAnalytics, Merck Serono RBM S.p.A., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Via Ribes 1, 10010 Colleretto Giacosa (TO), Italy
| | - Kyra Cowan
- New Biological Entities, Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (NBE-DMPK), Research and Development, Merck KGaA, Frankfurterstrasse 250, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Federico Riccardi Sirtori
- NBE-DMPK Innovative BioAnalytics, Merck Serono RBM S.p.A., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Via Ribes 1, 10010 Colleretto Giacosa (TO), Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pan L, Mora J, Walravens K, Wagner L, Hopper S, Loo L, Bettoun D, Bond S, Dessy F, Downing S, Garofolo F, Gupta S, Henderson N, Irwin C, Ishii-Watabe A, Kar S, Jawa V, Joseph J, Malvaux L, Marshall JC, McDevitt J, Mohapatra S, Seitzer J, Smith J, Solstad T, Sugimoto H, Tounekti O, Wu B, Wu Y, Xu Y, Xu J, Yamamoto T, Yang L, Torri A, Kirshner S, Maxfield K, Vasconcelos JP, Abhari MR, Verthelyi D, Brodsky E, Carrasco-Triguero M, Kamerud J, Andisik M, Baltrukonis D, Bivi N, Cludts I, Coble K, Gorovits B, Gunn GR, Gupta S, Millner AH, Joyce A, Kubiak RJ, Kumar S, Liao K, Manangeeswaran M, Partridge M, Pine S, Poetzl J, Rajadhyaksha M, Rasamoelisolo M, Richards S, Song Y, Swanson S, Thacker S, Wadhwa M, Wolf A, Zhang L, Zhou L. 2022 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: FDA Draft Guidance on Immunogenicity Information in Prescription Drug Labeling, LNP & Viral Vectors Therapeutics/Vaccines Immunogenicity, Prolongation Effect, ADA Affinity, Risk-based Approaches, NGS, qPCR, ddPCR Assays ( Part 3 - Recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell Therapy, Vaccines Immunogenicity & Technologies; Immunogenicity & Risk Assessment of Biotherapeutics and Novel Modalities; NAb Assays Integrated Approach). Bioanalysis 2023; 15:773-814. [PMID: 37526071 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2023-0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The 2022 16th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB) took place in Atlanta, GA, USA on September 26-30, 2022. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 16th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on ICH M10 BMV final guideline (focused on this guideline training, interpretation, adoption and transition); mass spectrometry innovation (focused on novel technologies, novel modalities, and novel challenges); and flow cytometry bioanalysis (rising of the 3rd most common/important technology in bioanalytical labs) were the special features of the 16th edition. As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2022 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2022 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 3) covers the recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity. Part 1 (Mass Spectrometry and ICH M10) and Part 2 (LBA, Biomarkers/CDx and Cytometry) are published in volume 15 of Bioanalysis, issues 16 and 15 (2023), respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Vibha Jawa
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yuan Song
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gokemeijer J, Wen Y, Jawa V, Mitra-Kaushik S, Chung S, Goggins A, Kumar S, Lamberth K, Liao K, Lill J, Phung Q, Walsh R, Roberts BJ, Swanson M, Singh I, Tourdot S, Kroenke MA, Rup B, Goletz TJ, Gupta S, Malherbe L, Pattijn S. Survey Outcome on Immunogenicity Risk Assessment Tools for Biotherapeutics: an Insight into Consensus on Methods, Application, and Utility in Drug Development. AAPS J 2023; 25:55. [PMID: 37266912 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-023-00820-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
A survey conducted by the Therapeutic Product Immunogenicity (TPI) community within the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) posed questions to the participants on their immunogenicity risk assessment strategies prior to clinical development. The survey was conducted in 2 phases spanning 5 years, and queried information about in silico algorithms and in vitro assay formats for immunogenicity risk assessments and how the data were used to inform early developability effort in discovery, chemistry, manufacturing and control (CMC), and non-clinical stages of development. The key findings representing the trends from a majority of the participants included the use of high throughput in silico algorithms, human immune cell-based assays, and proteomics based outputs, as well as specialized assays when therapeutic mechanism of action could impact risk assessment. Additional insights into the CMC-related risks could also be gathered with the same tools to inform future process development and de-risk critical quality attributes with uncertain and unknown risks. The use of the outputs beyond supporting early development activities was also noted with participants utilizing the risk assessments to drive their clinical strategy and streamline bioanalysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochem Gokemeijer
- Bristol Myers Squibb, 100 Binney Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02143, USA.
| | - Yi Wen
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46285, USA
| | - Vibha Jawa
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, New Jersey, 08540, USA
| | | | - Shan Chung
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080, USA
| | - Alan Goggins
- Merck & Co., Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080, USA
| | - Seema Kumar
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, (A Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Billerica, Massachusetts, 01826, USA
| | | | - Karen Liao
- Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania, 19486, USA
| | - Jennie Lill
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080, USA
| | - Qui Phung
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, 94080, USA
| | - Robin Walsh
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46285, USA
| | | | - Michael Swanson
- Janssen R&D LLC., 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, Pennsylvania, 19477, USA
| | | | - Sophie Tourdot
- BioMedicine Design, Pfizer Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, 01810, USA
| | - Mark A Kroenke
- Clinical Immunology, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California, 91320, USA
| | - Bonita Rup
- Bonnie Rup Consulting, LLC, 42 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, Massachusetts, 02116, USA
| | | | | | - Laurent Malherbe
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46285, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhou Y, Li J, Wu W, Chen Y, Cheng H, Li M, Sun Y, Yang J, Peng D, Xue Q, Ma H. Immunogenicity evaluation of viral peptides via nonspecific interactions between anti-peptide IgYs and non-cognate peptides. Int Immunol 2023; 35:243-253. [PMID: 36591893 DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxac068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunogenicity can be evaluated by detecting antibodies (Abs) induced by an antigen. Presently deployed assays, however, do not consider the negative impacts of Ab poly-specificity, which is well established at the monoclonal antibody level. Here, we studied antibody poly-specificity at the serum level (i.e. nonspecific Ab-probe interactions, NSIs), and ended up establishing a new platform for viral peptide immunogenicity evaluation. We first selected three peptides of high, medium and low immunogenicity, using a 'vaccine serum response rate'-based approach (i.e. the gold standard). These three peptides (Pi) in the bovine serum albumin-Pi form were used to immunize chickens, resulting in longitudinal serum samples for screening with a non-cognate peptide library. The signal intensity of Ab-peptide specific binding and 'NSI count' was used to evaluate the viral peptides' immunogenicity. Only the NSI count agreed with the gold standard. The NSI count also provides more informative data on antibody production than the aggregated signal intensity by whole-protein-based indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxi Zhou
- Division of Nanobiomedicine, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Jingzhi Li
- Division of Nanobiomedicine, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Wenya Wu
- Division of Nanobiomedicine, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Yanfei Chen
- China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Hu Cheng
- Division of Nanobiomedicine, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Mengyu Li
- Division of Nanobiomedicine, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Yiyue Sun
- Division of Nanobiomedicine, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Jiao Yang
- Division of Nanobiomedicine, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Daxin Peng
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
| | - Qinghong Xue
- China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Hongwei Ma
- Division of Nanobiomedicine, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215123, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Du J, Yang Y, Zhu L, Wang S, Yu C, Liu C, Long C, Chen B, Xu G, Zou L, Wang L. Method validation of a bridging immunoassay in combination with acid-dissociation and bead treatment for detection of anti-drug antibody. Heliyon 2023; 9:e13999. [PMID: 36915535 PMCID: PMC10006523 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Anti-drug antibody (ADA) positivity is correlated with disease relapse risk when treated with monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics. ADA evaluation can assist with interpreting pharmacokinetic, pharmacological, and toxicology results. Here, we established an ADA assay based on two steps of acid dissociation combined with a bridging immunoassay to provide a comprehensive validation strategy. The three-tiered sample analysis process included screening, confirmation, and titration assays using therapeutic HLX26 (targeting lymphocyte activation gene-3 [LAG-3]) as an example. The cut points were determined by testing 50 individual normal human serum samples, including screening cut point (SCP) (SNR: 1.08), confirmatory cut point (CCP) (% inhibition: 12.65), and titration cut point (TCP) (sample-to-noise ratio [SNR]: 1.17). The assay sensitivity, low positive control (LPC), and high positive control (HPC) titer acceptable range were also set up as 33.0 ng/mL, 41.0 ng/mL, and 320-1280, respectively. After full validation, both the intra-assay and inter-assay precision testing passed with coefficient of variations (CVs) < 20%. The assay enabled excellent drug tolerance up to 768.0 μg/mL at the HPC level and 291.0 μg/mL at the LPC level, while the tolerance of target interference was up to 74.0 ng/mL of soluble LAG3. Moreover, no false-positive results were observed in the presence of 5% hemolyzed serum samples and 150 mg/dL of triglyceride in the serum samples, no hook effect was observed, and the stability performed normally under room temperature for 24 h, 2-8 °C for 7 d, and six freeze/thaw cycles. In summary, this ADA assay is feasible and could be used for evaluating the immunogenicity of HLX26 in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jialiang Du
- Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Health for Research on Quality and Standardization of Biotech Products, Division of Monoclonal Antibody Products, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China
| | - Yalan Yang
- Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Health for Research on Quality and Standardization of Biotech Products, Division of Monoclonal Antibody Products, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China
| | | | - Shaoyi Wang
- Shanghai Henlius Biotech Inc, Shanghai, China
| | - Chuanfei Yu
- Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Health for Research on Quality and Standardization of Biotech Products, Division of Monoclonal Antibody Products, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China
| | - Chunyu Liu
- Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Health for Research on Quality and Standardization of Biotech Products, Division of Monoclonal Antibody Products, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China
| | - Caifeng Long
- Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Health for Research on Quality and Standardization of Biotech Products, Division of Monoclonal Antibody Products, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China
| | - Baowen Chen
- Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Health for Research on Quality and Standardization of Biotech Products, Division of Monoclonal Antibody Products, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China
| | - Gangling Xu
- Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Health for Research on Quality and Standardization of Biotech Products, Division of Monoclonal Antibody Products, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China
| | - Linglong Zou
- Shanghai Henlius Biotech Inc, Shanghai, China
- Corresponding author. 5155# GUANGFULIN Road, Shanghai Henlius Biotech Inc, Shanghai, 201616, China.
| | - Lan Wang
- Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Health for Research on Quality and Standardization of Biotech Products, Division of Monoclonal Antibody Products, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China
- Corresponding author. Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Health for Research on Quality and Standardization of Biotech Products, Division of Monoclonal Antibody Products, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, 31# HUATUO Road, Beijing, 102629, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kurtzhals P, Østergaard S, Nishimura E, Kjeldsen T. Derivatization with fatty acids in peptide and protein drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2023; 22:59-80. [PMID: 36002588 DOI: 10.1038/s41573-022-00529-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Peptides and proteins are widely used to treat a range of medical conditions; however, they often have to be injected and their effects are short-lived. These shortcomings of the native structure can be addressed by molecular engineering, but this is a complex undertaking. A molecular engineering technology initially applied to insulin - and which has now been successfully applied to several biopharmaceuticals - entails the derivatization of peptides and proteins with fatty acids. Various protraction mechanisms are enabled by the specific characteristics and positions of the attached fatty acid. Furthermore, the technology can ensure a long half-life following oral administration of peptide drugs, can alter the distribution of peptides and may hold potential for tissue targeting. Due to the inherent safety and well-defined chemical nature of the fatty acids, this technology provides a versatile approach to peptide and protein drug discovery.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ewaisha R, Anderson KS. Immunogenicity of CRISPR therapeutics-Critical considerations for clinical translation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1138596. [PMID: 36873375 PMCID: PMC9978118 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1138596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
CRISPR offers new hope for many patients and promises to transform the way we think of future therapies. Ensuring safety of CRISPR therapeutics is a top priority for clinical translation and specific recommendations have been recently released by the FDA. Rapid progress in the preclinical and clinical development of CRISPR therapeutics leverages years of experience with gene therapy successes and failures. Adverse events due to immunogenicity have been a major setback that has impacted the field of gene therapy. As several in vivo CRISPR clinical trials make progress, the challenge of immunogenicity remains a significant roadblock to the clinical availability and utility of CRISPR therapeutics. In this review, we examine what is currently known about the immunogenicity of CRISPR therapeutics and discuss several considerations to mitigate immunogenicity for the design of safe and clinically translatable CRISPR therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radwa Ewaisha
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Pharmacy, Newgiza University, Newgiza, Egypt
| | - Karen S Anderson
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Siegel M, Steiner G, Franssen LC, Carratu F, Herron J, Hartman K, Looney CM, Ducret A, Bray-French K, Rohr O, Hickling TP, Smith N, Marban-Doran C. Validation of a Dendritic Cell and CD4+ T Cell Restimulation Assay Contributing to the Immunogenicity Risk Evaluation of Biotherapeutics. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14122672. [PMID: 36559166 PMCID: PMC9781343 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunogenicity, defined as the ability to provoke an immune response, can be either wanted (i.e., vaccines) or unwanted. The latter refers to an immune response to protein or peptide therapeutics, characterized by the production of anti-drug antibodies, which may affect the efficacy and/or the safety profiles of these drugs. Consequently, evaluation of the risk of immunogenicity early in the development of biotherapeutics is of critical importance for defining their efficacy and safety profiles. Here, we describe and validate a fit-for-purpose FluoroSpot-based in vitro assay for the evaluation of drug-specific T cell responses. A panel of 24 biotherapeutics with a wide range of clinical anti-drug antibody response rates were tested in this assay. We demonstrated that using suitable cutoffs and donor cohort sizes, this assay could identify most of the compounds with high clinical immunogenicity rates (71% and 78% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively) while we characterized the main sources of assay variability. Overall, these data indicate that the dendritic cell and CD4+ T cell restimulation assay published herein could be a valuable tool to assess the risk of drug-specific T cell responses and contribute to the selection of clinical candidates in early development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Siegel
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Guido Steiner
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Linnea C. Franssen
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Francesca Carratu
- Lonza Biologics, Chesterford Research Park, Saffron Walden CB10 1XL, UK
| | - James Herron
- Lonza Biologics, Chesterford Research Park, Saffron Walden CB10 1XL, UK
| | - Katharina Hartman
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Cary M. Looney
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Axel Ducret
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Katharine Bray-French
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Rohr
- UR 7292, IUT Louis Pasteur, Université de Strasbourg, 67300 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Timothy P. Hickling
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Noel Smith
- Lonza Biologics, Chesterford Research Park, Saffron Walden CB10 1XL, UK
| | - Céline Marban-Doran
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Designing antibodies as therapeutics. Cell 2022; 185:2789-2805. [PMID: 35868279 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Antibody therapeutics are a large and rapidly expanding drug class providing major health benefits. We provide a snapshot of current antibody therapeutics including their formats, common targets, therapeutic areas, and routes of administration. Our focus is on selected emerging directions in antibody design where progress may provide a broad benefit. These topics include enhancing antibodies for cancer, antibody delivery to organs such as the brain, gastrointestinal tract, and lungs, plus antibody developability challenges including immunogenicity risk assessment and mitigation and subcutaneous delivery. Machine learning has the potential, albeit as yet largely unrealized, for a transformative future impact on antibody discovery and engineering.
Collapse
|
23
|
Pre-Clinical In-Vitro Studies on Parameters Governing Immune Complex Formation. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14061254. [PMID: 35745826 PMCID: PMC9227392 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The success of biotherapeutics is often challenged by the undesirable events of immunogenicity in patients, characterized by the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). Under specific conditions, the ADAs recognizing the biotherapeutic can trigger the formation of immune complexes (ICs), followed by cascades of subsequent effects on various cell types. Hereby, the connection between the characteristics of ICs and their downstream impact is still not well understood. Factors governing the formation of ICs and the characteristics of these IC species were assessed systematically in vitro. Classic analytical methodologies such as SEC-MALS and SV-AUC, and the state-of-the-art technology mass photometry were applied for the characterization. The study demonstrates a clear interplay between (1) the absolute concentration of the involved components, (2) their molar ratios, (3) structural features of the biologic, (4) and of its endogenous target. This surrogate study design and the associated analytical tool-box is readily applicable to most biotherapeutics and provides valuable insights into mechanisms of IC formation prior to FIH studies. The applicability is versatile—from the detection of candidates with immunogenicity risks during developability assessment to evaluation of the impact of degraded or post-translationally modified biotherapeutics on the formation of ICs.
Collapse
|
24
|
Lotz GP, Benstein K, Bloem K, Buddiger H, Calonder C, Elm S, Fernandez E, Goodman J, Gorovits B, Grudzinska-Goebel J, Janssen M, Jawa V, Kramer D, Luo L, Malisauskas M, Michaut L, Schäfer M, Spindeldreher S, Ullmann M, Nana Weldingh K, Kromminga A, Snoeck V. When to Extend Monitoring of Anti-drug Antibodies for High-risk Biotherapeutics in Clinical Trials: an Opinion from the European Immunogenicity Platform. AAPS J 2022; 24:68. [PMID: 35554731 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-022-00712-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The determination of a tailored anti-drug antibody (ADA) testing strategy is based on the immunogenicity risk assessment to allow a correlation of ADAs with changes to pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety. The clinical impact of ADA formation refines the immunogenicity risk assessment and defines appropriate risk mitigation strategies. Health agencies request for high-risk biotherapeutics to extend ADA monitoring for patients that developed an ADA response to the drug until ADAs return to baseline levels. However, there is no common understanding in which cases an extension of ADA follow-up sampling beyond the end of study (EOS) defined in the clinical study protocol is required. Here, the Immunogenicity Strategy Working Group of the European Immunogenicity Platform (EIP) provides recommendations on requirements for an extension of ADA follow-up sampling in clinical studies where there is a high risk of serious consequences from ADAs. The importance of ADA evaluation during a treatment-free period is recognized but the decision whether to extend ADA monitoring at a predefined EOS should be based on evaluation of ADA data in the context of corresponding clinical signals. If the clinical data set shows that safety consequences are minor, mitigated, or resolved, further ADA monitoring may not be required despite potentially detectable ADAs above baseline. Extended ADA monitoring should be centered on individual patient benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor P Lotz
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
| | - Karin Benstein
- Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Industriepark Hoechst, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Karien Bloem
- Biologics Lab, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harm Buddiger
- Genmab B.V., Uppsalalaan 15, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Elena Fernandez
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Joanne Goodman
- Integrated Bioanalysis, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, AstraZeneca, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Vibha Jawa
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Biotherapeutics and Bioanalysis Non-Clinical Development, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Daniel Kramer
- Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Industriepark Hoechst, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Linlin Luo
- Regulated BA, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | | - Martin Schäfer
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Arno Kromminga
- Kromminga Consulting, Hamburg, Germany.,Institute for Immunology, Kiel, Germany
| | - Veerle Snoeck
- UCB Biopharma SRL, Translational Biomarkers and Bioanalysis, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhou Y, Penny HL, Kroenke MA, Bautista B, Hainline K, Chea LS, Parnes J, Mytych DT. Immunogenicity assessment of bispecific antibody-based immunotherapy in oncology. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2021-004225. [PMID: 35444060 PMCID: PMC9024276 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
With increasing numbers of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and multispecific products entering the clinic, recent data highlight immunogenicity as an emerging challenge in the development of such novel biologics. This review focuses on the immunogenicity risk assessment (IgRA) of BsAb-based immunotherapies for cancer, highlighting several risk factors that need to be considered. These include the novel scaffolds consisting of bioengineered sequences, the potentially synergistic immunomodulating mechanisms of action (MOAs) from different domains of the BsAb, as well as several other product-related and patient-related factors. In addition, the clinical relevance of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against selected BsAbs developed as anticancer agents is reviewed and the advances in our knowledge of tools and strategies for immunogenicity prediction, monitoring, and mitigation are discussed. It is critical to implement a drug-specific IgRA during the early development stage to guide ADA monitoring and risk management strategies. This IgRA may include a combination of several assessment tools to identify drug-specific risks as well as a proactive risk mitigation approach for candidate or format selection during the preclinical stage. The IgRA is an on-going process throughout clinical development. IgRA during the clinical stage may bridge the gap between preclinical immunogenicity prediction and clinical immunogenicity, and retrospectively guide optimization efforts for next-generation BsAbs. This iterative process throughout development may improve the reliability of the IgRA and enable the implementation of effective risk mitigation strategies, laying the foundation for improved clinical success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanchen Zhou
- Clinical Immunology, Amgen Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Mark A Kroenke
- Clinical Immunology, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| | - Bianca Bautista
- Clinical Immunology, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| | - Kelly Hainline
- Clinical Immunology, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| | - Lynette S Chea
- Clinical Immunology, Amgen Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jane Parnes
- Early Development, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| | - Daniel T Mytych
- Clinical Immunology, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|