1
|
Hanft-Robert S, Shongwe L, Cossie Q, Sithole P, Roos T, Mösko M, Swartz L. 'The doctor doesn't understand Xhosa and the service user doesn't understand English' - exploring the role of security guards acting as informal interpreters in psychiatric care in South Africa. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:1239. [PMID: 39407265 PMCID: PMC11481390 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11722-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Assigning qualified interpreters is considered one of the most effective approaches to facilitate communication in language-discordant encounters in mental healthcare. However, particularly in settings with fewer resources, they are not always available and informal practices are often used. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate informal interpreting practices in mental healthcare in South Africa, focusing on security guards (SGs) serving as interpreters. METHODS Guided interviews were conducted with SGs (n = 12) and mental healthcare providers (MHCPs) (n = 18) at a psychiatric hospital in South Africa. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS Despite recognizing that SGs serving as interpreters is not an ideal solution to overcome language barriers and could potentially jeopardize the quality of treatment and its outcomes, MHCPs reported relying heavily on them due to the underrepresentation of South Africa's linguistic diversity among them. Given the lack of formal interpreting services, the perceived racial, linguistic and socioeconomic similarities between SGs and some service users, as well as their immediate accessibility, were described as beneficial to providing a minimal level of care (e.g. obtaining information about service users' backgrounds, getting an understanding of their symptoms, psychoeducation, explaining treatment options). Drawbacks reported are SGs being pulled away from their actual duties, experiencing emotional distress, juggling multiple sometimes conflicting roles, and the risk of incorrect interpretation, which could compromise ethical standards of care. Additionally, the complexity of power became apparent: While SGs hold little institutional power within the mental healthcare system, they become powerful figures when serving as interpreters. CONCLUSION It can be assumed that MHCPs will resort to informal interpreting practices as long as effective alternatives are lacking. In doing so, risks such as reduced quality of care are accepted, and the consequences and effects on those serving as interpreters are neglected, which raises concerns from an ethical point of view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Hanft-Robert
- Department for Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Lindokuhle Shongwe
- Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Qhama Cossie
- Department of Health & Wellness, Valkenberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Philasande Sithole
- Department of Health & Wellness, Valkenberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Tessa Roos
- Department of Health & Wellness, Valkenberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Mike Mösko
- Department for Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Applied Human Sciences, Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Leslie Swartz
- Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sijbrandij M, Bass JK, Carswell K, Hamdani SU, Karyotaki E. Tipping the scales for global mental health: A summary of the Presidential Panel at the 39th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. J Trauma Stress 2024; 37:790-797. [PMID: 39018333 DOI: 10.1002/jts.23085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
In the past decade, there has been an increasing focus within scientific research on how to assist people affected by the negative consequences of trauma and crises around the globe. As many countries struggle with a lack of resources to deliver mental health interventions, scalable strategies have been developed to help more people in need. These scalable strategies were the theme of the 39th annual meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS). The presidential panel, chaired by Marit Sijbrandij during her ISTSS presidency, brought together a group of experts in the field of scalable interventions: Kenneth Carswell, Syed Usman Hamdani, Judy Bass, and Eirini Karyotaki. The panel highlighted the current state of the evidence on scalable interventions for adults and children and outlined important next steps for research and implementation. These recommendations include further improving the availability of, and evidence for, scalable interventions through increased training and sustained funding; conducting more studies in underrepresented samples, such as children and adolescents; and promoting open access availability of research findings worldwide. In this paper, we provide an overview of the topics discussed in the panel as well as the key takeaways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith K Bass
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kenneth Carswell
- Department of Mental Health, Brain Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Syed Usman Hamdani
- Global Institute of Human Development (GIHD), Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Acarturk C, Kurt G, İlkkurşun Z, de Graaff AM, Bryant R, Cuijpers P, Fuhr D, McDaid D, Park AL, Sijbrandij M, Ventevogel P, Uygun E. Effectiveness of group problem management plus in distressed Syrian refugees in Türkiye: a randomized controlled trial. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2024; 33:e43. [PMID: 39344836 PMCID: PMC11464952 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796024000453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS Despite high levels of psychological distress, mental health service use among Syrian refugees in urban settings is low. To address the mental healthcare gap, the World Health Organization developed group problem management plus (gPM+), a scalable psychological intervention delivered by non-specialist peer facilitators. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of gPM+ in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety among Syrian refugees in Istanbul, Türkiye. METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted among 368 distressed (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K10 > 15) adult Syrian refugees with impaired functioning (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0 > 16). Participants were recruited between August 2019 and September 2020 through a non-governmental organization providing services to refugees. Participants were randomly allocated to gPM+ and enhanced care as usual (gPM+/E-CAU) (184 participants) or E-CAU only (184 participants). Primary outcomes were symptoms of depression and anxiety (Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25)) at 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5; PCL-5), functional impairment (WHODAS 2.0), and self-identified problems (psychological outcome profiles). RESULTS Intent-to-treat analyses showed no significant effect of gPM+ on symptoms of anxiety, depression, PTSD and self-identified problems. Yet, there was a significant reduction in functional impairment in gPM+/E-CAU compared to E-CAU at 3-month follow-up (adjusted mean difference 1.66, 95 % CI 0.04, 3.27, p = 0.045, d = 0.19). Post-hoc subgroup analyses among participants with probable baseline depression or anxiety showed that there was a small but significant reduction in depression (adjusted mean difference -0.17, 95 % CI -0.32, -0.02, p = 0.028, d = 0.27) and anxiety (adjusted mean difference -0.21, 95 % CI -0.37, -0.05, p = 0.009, d = 0.30) symptoms comparing gPM+/E-CAU to E-CAU only at 1-week post assessment, but not at 3-month follow-up. There was a significant difference between conditions on functional impairment at 3-month follow-up, favouring gPM+/E-CAU condition (adjusted mean difference -1.98, 95 % CI -3.93, -0.02, p = 0.048, d = 0.26). CONCLUSION In this study in an urban setting in Türkiye, gPM+ did not alleviate symptoms of depression and anxiety among Syrian refugees experiencing psychological distress and daily living difficulties. However, participants with higher distress at baseline seemed to benefit from gPM+, but treatment gains disappeared in the long term. Current findings highlight the potential benefit of tailored psychosocial interventions for highly distressed refugees in volatile low-resource settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Acarturk
- Department of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - G. Kurt
- School of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Z. İlkkurşun
- Department of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - A. M. de Graaff
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. Bryant
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - P. Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - D. Fuhr
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- University of Bremen, Health Sciences, Bremen, Germany
| | - D. McDaid
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - A. L. Park
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - M. Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P. Ventevogel
- United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Public Health Section, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - E. Uygun
- Trauma and Disaster Mental Health, Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beuthin O, Shahid S, Yu LM, Bhui K. Feasibility and Acceptability Study of a Culturally Adapted Web-Based Intervention to Reduce Suicidal Ideation for Syrian Asylum Seekers and Refugees in the United Kingdom: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e56957. [PMID: 39222345 PMCID: PMC11406105 DOI: 10.2196/56957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The war in Syria has displaced over 6.8 million people, more than any other conflict since the Second World War. As a result, Syrian asylum seekers and refugees have experienced several life-changing events, resulting in high rates of anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and suicidal ideation (SI). To address the treatment gap and reduce the burden of help-seeking, a web-based intervention to reduce SI developed for general populations was culturally adapted for and with Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom. The study revealed the importance of understanding their lived experience with migration and the acculturative process in providing treatment for SI. This study will now assess the feasibility and acceptability of the culturally adapted intervention for this population. OBJECTIVE The first phase of the study will include recruiting participants and delivering the web-based intervention (1) to assess the feasibility of meeting recruitment goals and recruitment rates and (2) to assess the feasibility of outcome measures. The second phase of the study will include one-to-one semistructured interviews (1) to assess the suitability of the culturally adapted intervention in terms of recruitment and adherence rates and barriers and facilitators to engagement and (2) to assess the acceptability of the intervention in terms of its cultural relevance and appropriateness. METHODS This is a protocol for a single-group, noncontrolled, mixed methods feasibility and acceptability study of a culturally adapted web-based intervention to reduce SI for Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom. The study will assess the feasibility of recruitment goals, recruitment rates, adherence rates, and outcome measures using individual participant tracking forms, which will be analyzed quantitatively. The suitability and acceptability of the intervention will be assessed using one-to-one semistructured interviews with 12 participants who completed the intervention, which will be analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS Recruitment began in February 2024 and will run until 30 participants are recruited to the study or until the end of July 2024. Thus far, 19 participants have provided informed consent, 16 were eligible and enrolled, and 12 have completed a postintervention interview. No data have been analyzed. The study, including the write-up period, is expected to end in December 2024. CONCLUSIONS Despite experiencing several stressors related to forced displacement and high rates of mental health issues, access to treatment is still limited for Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom. To address the treatment gap and reduce the burden of help-seeking, a web-based intervention to reduce SI was culturally adapted in collaboration with Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom. This study will now assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and culturally appropriate recruitment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN ISRCTN11417025; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11417025. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/56957.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Beuthin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sadiya Shahid
- Department of Medieval and Modern Languages and Linguistics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ly-Mee Yu
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kamaldeep Bhui
- Department of Pyshciatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Burchert S, Alkneme MS, Alsaod A, Cuijpers P, Heim E, Hessling J, Hosny N, Sijbrandij M, van’t Hof E, Ventevogel P, Knaevelsrud C. Effects of a self-guided digital mental health self-help intervention for Syrian refugees in Egypt: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med 2024; 21:e1004460. [PMID: 39250521 PMCID: PMC11419380 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital mental health interventions for smartphones, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) Step-by-Step (SbS) program, are potentially scalable solutions to improve access to mental health and psychosocial support in refugee populations. Our study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of SbS as self-guided intervention with optional message-based contact-on-demand (COD) support on reducing psychological distress, functional impairment, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and self-identified problems in a sample of Syrian refugees residing in Egypt. METHODS AND FINDINGS We conducted a 2-arm pragmatic randomized controlled trial. A total of 538 Syrians residing in Egypt with elevated levels of psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; K10 > 15) and reduced psychosocial functioning (WHODAS 2.0 > 16) were randomized into SbS + CAU (N = 266) or CAU only (N = 272). Primary outcomes were psychological distress (Hopkins Symptom Checklist 25) and impaired functioning (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0) at 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were symptoms of PTSD (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 short form, PCL-5 short) and self-identified problems (Psychological Outcomes Profiles Scale, PSYCHLOPS). Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses showed significant but small effects of condition on psychological distress (mean difference: -0.15; 95% CI: -0.28, -0.02; p = .02) and functioning (mean difference: -2.04; 95% CI: -3.87, -0.22; p = .02) at 3-month follow-up. There were no significant differences between groups on symptoms of PTSD and self-identified problems. Remission rates did not differ between conditions on any of the outcomes. COD was used by 9.4% of participants for a median of 1 contact per person. The main limitations are high intervention dropout and low utilization of COD support. CONCLUSIONS The trial provides a real-world implementation case, showing small positive effects of a digital, potentially scalable and self-guided mental health intervention for Syrian refugees in Egypt in reducing psychological distress and improving overall functioning. Further user-centered adaptations are required to improve adherence and effectiveness while maintaining scalability. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Register for Clinical Studies DRKS00023505.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Burchert
- Department of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mhd Salem Alkneme
- Department of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ammar Alsaod
- Department of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Eva Heim
- Department of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jonas Hessling
- Department of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nadine Hosny
- Department of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Psychology, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo, Egypt
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter Ventevogel
- Public Health Section, Division of Resilience and Solutions, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christine Knaevelsrud
- Department of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bosqui T, Mayya A, Farah S, Shaito Z, Jordans MJD, Pedersen G, Betancourt TS, Carr A, Donnelly M, Brown FL. Parenting and family interventions in lower and middle-income countries for child and adolescent mental health: A systematic review. Compr Psychiatry 2024; 132:152483. [PMID: 38631272 DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the protective effect of nurturing caregivers and families for child and adolescent mental health, there is a need to review and synthesize research evidence regarding the effectiveness of parenting and family interventions in low and middle-income countries, including humanitarian settings. To advance practice, further understanding of the active ingredients of such interventions and implementation factors that lead to effectiveness are essential. METHOD This systematic review, an update from a previous review, included studies on any parenting or family intervention for children and adolescents aged 0-24, living in a low- or middle-income country, that quantitatively measured child or adolescent mental health outcomes. We searched Global Health, PubMed, PsychINFO, PILOTS and the Cochrane Library databases on the 9th July 2020, and updated on the 12th August 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted version of the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. We extracted data on: effectiveness outcomes, practice elements included in effective interventions, and implementation challenges and successes. MAIN FINDINGS We found a total of 80 studies (n = 18,193 participants) representing 64 different family or parenting interventions, 43 of which had evidence of effect for a child or adolescent mental health outcome. Only 3 studies found no effect on child, adolescent or caregiver outcomes. The most common practice elements delivered in effective interventions included caregiver psychoeducation, communication skills, and differential reinforcement. Key implementation strategies and lessons learned included non-specialist delivery, the engagement of fathers, and integrated or multi-sector care to holistically address family needs. PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS Despite a high level of heterogeneity, preliminary findings from the review are promising and support the use of parenting and family interventions to address the wider social ecology of children in low resource and humanitarian contexts. There are remaining gaps in understanding mechanisms of change and the empirical testing of different implementation models. Our findings have implications for better informing task sharing from specialist to non-specialist delivery, and from individual-focused to wider systemic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Bosqui
- Department of Psychology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
| | - Anas Mayya
- Department of Psychology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
| | - Sally Farah
- Department of Psychology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
| | - Zahraa Shaito
- Department of Psychology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
| | - Mark J D Jordans
- War Child Alliance, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Gloria Pedersen
- Division of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington D.C., United States
| | | | - Alan Carr
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
| | - Felicity L Brown
- War Child Alliance, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ali R, Brown FL, Stevenson K, Jordans M, Taha K, Amine ME, Steen F, Meksassi B, Elias J, Aoun M, Roberts B, Sijbrandij M, Cuijpers P, Akhtar A, Malik A, Woodward A, Fuhr DC. Implementing a Non-Specialist Delivered Psychological Intervention for Young Adolescents in a Protracted Refugee Setting: a Qualitative Process Evaluation in Lebanon. J Behav Health Serv Res 2024; 51:377-394. [PMID: 38087061 PMCID: PMC11180626 DOI: 10.1007/s11414-023-09870-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
There has been an increase in the evaluation and implementation of non-specialist delivered psychological interventions to address unmet mental health needs in humanitarian emergencies. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide important evidence about intervention impact, complementary qualitative process evaluations are essential to understand key implementation processes and inform future scaling up of the intervention. This study was conducted as part of an RCT of the Early Adolescents Skills for Emotions (EASE) psychological intervention for young adolescents with elevated psychological distress (predominantly with a Syrian refugee background) in Lebanon. Our aims were firstly to conduct a qualitative process evaluation to understand stakeholder experiences and perceived impact of the intervention and identify barriers and facilitators for implementation, and secondly to explore considerations for scaling up. Eleven key informant interviews and seven focus groups were conducted with 39 respondents including adolescent and caregiver participants, trainers, providers, outreach workers, and local stakeholders. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Respondents perceived the intervention to be highly needed and reported improvements in adolescent mental health and wellbeing. Key implementation factors that have potential to influence engagement, adherence, and perceived impact included the socio-economic situation of families, mental health stigma, coordination within and between sectors (particularly for scaling up), embedding the intervention within existing service pathways, having clear quality and accountability processes including training and supervision for non-specialists, and sustainable funding. Our findings provide important context for understanding effectiveness outcomes of the RCT and highlights factors that need to be considered when implementing a mental health intervention on a larger scale in a complex crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rayane Ali
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- War Child Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Felicity L Brown
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kerrie Stevenson
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Jordans
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karine Taha
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- War Child Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Mounif El Amine
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- War Child Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Frederik Steen
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bassel Meksassi
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- War Child Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Joseph Elias
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- War Child Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - May Aoun
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- War Child Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Bayard Roberts
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aemal Akhtar
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Aiysha Malik
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aniek Woodward
- KIT Royal Tropical Institute, KIT Health, Mauritskade 64, 1092 AD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Athena Institute, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daniela C Fuhr
- Leibniz Institute of Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany.
- Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reich H, Hegerl U, Rosenthal A, Allenhof C. Arabic-language digital interventions for depression in German routine health care are acceptable, but intervention adoption remains a challenge. Sci Rep 2024; 14:12097. [PMID: 38866810 PMCID: PMC11169486 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62196-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Migrants face many barriers to mental health care, such as different cultural concepts of distress, unfamiliar pathways to care, and language. Digital mental health interventions are effective and scalable in multi-language versions. However, their implementation into routine care is in its infancy. Here, we report on the Arabic- and German-language implementation of two digital interventions in Germany: The iFightDepression® website, providing information about depression to the public, and the iFightDepression® tool, offering guided self-management for depression. Our main goal is to gain empirical knowledge about the success of their implementation and provide evidence-based recommendations for improvement. Data for the current analyses stem from convenience samples, utilizing anonymized user logs of the iFightDepression® website and 15.307 user accounts in the iFightDepression® tool. We found that the acceptability (time on page, usage behavior) of both digital interventions was comparable between the two user groups. The website pervasiveness of the target populations was nine times lower among Arab migrants in Germany than Germans (89 vs. 834 unique page views/ 100,000 inhabitants), but the increase in views was superior and sustained over three years. The adoption of the tool was lower among Arabic than German users (conversion rate from invitation to completed registration: 30.8% vs. 59.0%, p < 0.001) and appropriateness was challenged as Arabic users reported higher depression severities upon first registration (p = 0.027). Our results show that the uptake of digital interventions for migrants requires facilitation and further tailoring to the needs of the target group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Reich
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, Depression Research Centre of the German Depression Foundation, University Hospital, Goethe University, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Str. 10, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
- German Depression Foundation, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Ulrich Hegerl
- German Depression Foundation, Leipzig, Germany
- Johann Christian Senckenberg Distinguished Professorship, Department for Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- European Alliance Against Depression e.V., Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
El-Ghitany EM, Ashour A, Elrewany E, Farghaly AG, Shata Z. Prevalence and predictors of depression, anxiety, and stress among refugees in Egypt. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 2024; 99:14. [PMID: 38842628 PMCID: PMC11156824 DOI: 10.1186/s42506-024-00158-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many Refugees show multiple distressing psychological and mental health problems associated with stressful and adverse conditions in host countries. Even though Egypt is one of the top five destination countries hosting refugees and asylum-seekers in the MENA region, there is a lack of studies investigating mental health problems among refugees in Egypt. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms among refugees living in Egypt. METHODS A total of 398 refugees aged 18 and above were interviewed from migrants'/refugees' community centers in Giza, Alexandria, Dakahlia, and Damietta governorates. A predesigned structured interview questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic and migration-related variables. The Arabic Version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) was used to assess the presence and severity of the three negative emotional states. RESULTS Nearly two-thirds of the participants were Syrian (66.4%). The majority resided in Alexandria and Giza governorates (75.9%), were females (73.4%), and were married (71.1%). The most reported migration difficulty was housing (41.5%). Anxiety symptoms were reported among 63.3% (95% CI: 58.59%- 68.05%) of sampled refugees, followed by depression (61.3%, 95% CI: 56.52%-66.10%), and stress symptoms (51.5%, 95% CI: 46.56%-56.36%). Results of regression analysis showed that; female gender predicted anxiety (aOR 2.419, 95% CI: 1.485-3.941, p < 0.001) and stress (aOR 2.053, 95% CI: 1.197-3.519, p = 0.009), while younger age groups (18-25 yr. and 26-50 yr.) compared to the older age group (51 yr. and older) predicted depression (aOR 4.529, 95% CI: 1.696-12.097, p = 0.003 and aOR 2.177, 95% CI: 1.270- 3.733, p = 0.005, respectively) and stress (aOR 4.334, 95% CI: 1.556-12.074, p = 0.005 and aOR 1.808, 95% CI: 1.023-3.193, p = 0.041, respectively). Residence in Alexandria, housing, and employment difficulties predicted anxiety (aOR 2.354, 95% CI: 1.420-3.902, p < 0.001, aOR 1.726, 95% CI: 1.073-2.778, p = 0.025, and aOR 3.044, 95% CI: 1.248-7.425, p = 0.014, respectively), depression (aOR 1.949, 95% CI: 1.163-3.266, p = 0.011, aOR 1.666, 95% CI: 1.036-2.681, p = 0.035, and aOR 3.216, 95% CI: 1.321-7.828, p = 0.010, respectively), and stress (aOR 2.450, 95% CI: 1.431-4.195, p < 0.001, aOR 1.911, 95% CI: 1.187-3.078, p = 0.008, and aOR 4.482, 95% CI: 1.867-10.760, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION Mental health problems are prevalent among the refugee population in Egypt that are compounded by the difficult post-migration socio-economic situation. Multisectoral attention towards refugees' mental health is urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Engy M El-Ghitany
- Department of Tropical Health, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Ayat Ashour
- Department of Family Health, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
| | - Ehab Elrewany
- Department of Tropical Health, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Azza G Farghaly
- Department of Tropical Health, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Zeinab Shata
- Department of Family Health, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Heim E, Burchert S, Shala M, Hoxha A, Kaufmann M, Cerga Pashoja A, Morina N, Schaub MP, Knaevelsrud C, Maercker A. Effect of Cultural Adaptation of a Smartphone-Based Self-Help Programme on Its Acceptability and Efficacy: Randomized Controlled Trial. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN EUROPE 2024; 6:e2743. [PMID: 39119053 PMCID: PMC11303917 DOI: 10.32872/cpe.2743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Research on cultural adaptation of psychological interventions indicates that a higher level of adaptation is associated with a higher effect size of the intervention. However, direct comparisons of different levels of adaptations are scarce. Aims This study used a smartphone-based self-help programme called Step-by-Step (Albanian: Hap-pas-Hapi) for the treatment of psychological distress among Albanian-speaking immigrants in Switzerland and Germany. Two levels of cultural adaptation (i.e., surface vs. deep structure adaptation) were compared. We hypothesised that the deep structure adaptation would enhance the acceptance and efficacy of the intervention. Method We conducted a two-arm, single-blind randomised controlled trial. Inclusion criteria were good command of the Albanian language, age above 18, and elevated psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale score above 15). Primary outcome measures were the total score of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist and the number of participants who completed at least three (out of five) sessions. Secondary outcomes were global functioning, well-being, post-traumatic stress, and self-defined problems. Results Two-hundred-twenty-two participants were included, of which 18 (8%) completed the post-assessments. The number of participants who completed the third session was equal in both conditions, with N = 5 (5%) and N = 6 (6%) respectively. Discussion Drop-out rates were high in both conditions, and no group difference was found regarding the acceptance of the intervention. The high drop-out rate stands in contrast with other trials testing Step-by-Step. Future research should examine cultural factors impacting recruitment strategies, as insights could help to reduce participant drop-out rates in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Heim
- Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Burchert
- Department of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mirëlinda Shala
- Department of Economics, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Anna Hoxha
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marco Kaufmann
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Arlinda Cerga Pashoja
- Faculty of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- St Marys University, Twickenham, London, United Kingdom
| | - Naser Morina
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael P. Schaub
- Swiss Research Institute for Public Health and Addiction, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christine Knaevelsrud
- Department of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Maercker
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Woodward A, Fuhr DC, Barry AS, Balabanova D, Sondorp E, Dieleman MA, Pratley P, Schoenberger SF, McKee M, Ilkkursun Z, Acarturk C, Burchert S, Knaevelsrud C, Brown FL, Steen F, Spaaij J, Morina N, de Graaff AM, Sijbrandij M, Cuijpers P, Bryant R, Akhtar A, Roberts B. Health system responsiveness to the mental health needs of Syrian refugees: mixed-methods rapid appraisals in eight host countries in Europe and the Middle East. OPEN RESEARCH EUROPE 2024; 3:14. [PMID: 39086733 PMCID: PMC11289593 DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.15293.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Background Syrian refugees have a high burden of mental health symptoms and face challenges in accessing mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS). This study assesses health system responsiveness (HSR) to the MHPSS needs of Syrian refugees, comparing countries in Europe and the Middle East to inform recommendations for strengthening MHPSS systems. Methods A mixed-methods rapid appraisal methodology guided by an adapted WHO Health System Framework was used to assess HSR in eight countries (Egypt, Germany, Jordan, Lebanon, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and Türkiye). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of primary and secondary data was used. Data collection and analysis were performed iteratively by multiple researchers. Country reports were used for comparative analysis and synthesis. Results We found numerous constraints in HSR: i) Too few appropriate mental health providers and services; ii) Travel-related barriers impeding access to services, widening rural-urban inequalities in the distribution of mental health workers; iii) Cultural, language, and knowledge-related barriers to timely care likely caused by insufficient numbers of culturally sensitive providers, costs of professional interpreters, somatic presentations of distress by Syrian refugees, limited mental health awareness, and stigma associated to mental illness; iv) High out-of-pocket costs for psychological treatment and transportation to services reducing affordability, particularly in middle-income countries; v) Long waiting times for specialist mental health services; vi) Information gaps on the mental health needs of refugees and responsiveness of MHPSS systems in all countries. Six recommendations are provided to address these issues. Conclusions All eight host countries struggle to provide responsive MHPSS to Syrian refugees. Strengthening the mental health workforce (in terms of quantity, quality, diversity, and distribution) is urgently needed to enable Syrian refugees to receive culturally appropriate and timely care and improve mental health outcomes. Increased financial investment in mental health and improved health information systems are crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniek Woodward
- KIT Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 1092 AD, The Netherlands
- Athena Institute, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela C. Fuhr
- Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, 28359, Germany
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, 28359, Germany
| | - Alexandra S. Barry
- KIT Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 1092 AD, The Netherlands
- NHS England, London, SE1 8UG, UK
| | - Dina Balabanova
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Egbert Sondorp
- KIT Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 1092 AD, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pierre Pratley
- KIT Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 1092 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Samantha F. Schoenberger
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Martin McKee
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Zeynep Ilkkursun
- Department of Psychology, Koc University, Sarıyer/İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Ceren Acarturk
- Department of Psychology, Koc University, Sarıyer/İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Sebastian Burchert
- Department of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, 14195, Germany
| | - Christine Knaevelsrud
- Department of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, 14195, Germany
| | - Felicity L. Brown
- Research and Development Department, War Child Holland, Amsterdam, 1098 LE, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1018 WV, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Steen
- Research and Development Department, War Child Holland, Amsterdam, 1098 LE, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1018 WV, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Spaaij
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
| | - Naser Morina
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
| | - Anne M. de Graaff
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
- Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Richard Bryant
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Aemal Akhtar
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Bayard Roberts
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - STRENGTHS consortium
- KIT Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 1092 AD, The Netherlands
- Athena Institute, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
- Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, 28359, Germany
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, 28359, Germany
- NHS England, London, SE1 8UG, UK
- Department of Psychology, Koc University, Sarıyer/İstanbul, Turkey
- Department of Education and Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, 14195, Germany
- Research and Development Department, War Child Holland, Amsterdam, 1098 LE, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1018 WV, The Netherlands
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
- Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hamid A, Williams ACDC, Albakri M, Scior K, Morgan S, Kayal H, Wilcockson M, Drouish Alkaja R, Alsayed S, Logie R, Farrand S, Abdul-Hamid W. Mental health and conflict: a pilot of an online eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) intervention for forcibly displaced Syrian women. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1295033. [PMID: 38873297 PMCID: PMC11173598 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1295033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The Syrian conflict has been ongoing since 2011. Practical and scalable solutions are urgently needed to meet an increase in need for specialised psychological support for post-traumatic stress disorder given limited availability of clinicians. Training forcibly displaced Syrians with a mental health background to remotely deliver specialised interventions increases the availability of evidence based psychological support. Little is known about the effectiveness of online therapy for forcibly displaced Syrian women provided by forcibly displaced Syrian women therapists. Purpose To pilot an evidence-based trauma therapy, Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR), carried out online by trained forcibly displaced Syrian women therapists for forcibly displaced Syrian women who require treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Methods 83 forcibly displaced Syrian women, living in Türkiye or inside Syria, with diagnosable PTSD, were offered up to 12 sessions of online EMDR over a period of 3 months. This was delivered by forcibly displaced Syrian women therapists who were trained in EMDR. Data were gathered, using Arabic versions, on PTSD symptoms using the Impact of Events Scale Revised, depression symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and anxiety symptoms using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment-7 at baseline, mid-point, and end of therapy. Results PTSD scores, depression scores and anxiety scores all significantly reduced over the course of treatment, with lower scores at midpoint than baseline and lower scores at end of treatment than at midpoint. Only one participant (1%) exceeded the cutoff point for PTSD, and 13 (16%) exceeded the cutoff points for anxiety and depression at the end of treatment. Conclusion In this pilot study up to 12 sessions of online EMDR were associated with reductions in PTSD, anxiety and depression symptoms in Syrian women affected by the Syrian conflict. The training of forcibly displaced Syrian mental health professionals to deliver online therapy is a relatively low cost, scalable, sustainable solution to ensure that those who are affected by the conflict can access specialised support. Further research is needed using a control group to confirm that the observed effects are due to EMDR treatment, as is research with post-treatment follow-up to ascertain that benefits are maintained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aseel Hamid
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda C. de C. Williams
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Katrina Scior
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Matthew Wilcockson
- Coventry University and Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Rouba Drouish Alkaja
- Trauma Aid UK, Somerset, United Kingdom
- Independent Psychologist, Gaziantep, Türkiye
| | - Sahbaa Alsayed
- Trauma Aid UK, Somerset, United Kingdom
- Independent Psychologist, Gaziantep, Türkiye
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
James LE, García Mejía N, Botero-García JF, Rattner M. Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a community-based group psychosocial support model for conflict survivors in Colombia: An assessment of in-person and remote intervention modalities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Glob Ment Health (Camb) 2024; 11:e61. [PMID: 38774886 PMCID: PMC11106545 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2024.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Community-based psychosocial support (CB-PSS) interventions utilizing task sharing and varied (in-person, remote) modalities are essential strategies to meet mental health needs, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, knowledge gaps remain regarding feasibility and effectiveness. Methods This study assesses feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a CB-PSS intervention for conflict-affected adults in Colombia through parallel randomized controlled trials, one delivered in-person (n = 165) and the other remotely (n = 103), implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and national protests. Interventions were facilitated by nonspecialist community members and consisted of eight problem-solving and expressive group sessions. Findings Attendance was moderate and fidelity was high in both modalities. Participants in both modalities reported high levels of satisfaction, with in-person participants reporting increased comfort expressing emotions and more positive experiences with research protocols. Symptoms of depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder improved among in-person participants, but there were no significant changes for remote participants in comparison to waitlist controls. Implications This CB-PSS intervention appears feasible and acceptable in both in-person and remote modalities and associated with reduction in some forms of distress when conducted in-person but not when conducted remotely. Methodological limitations and potential explanations and areas for future research are discussed, drawing from related studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah E. James
- Heartland Alliance International, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Nicolás García Mejía
- Department of Psychology, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogota, Colombia
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Michel Rattner
- Department of Psychology, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogota, Colombia
- Department of Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Miller-Suchet L, Camargo N, Sangraula M, Castellar D, Diaz J, Meriño V, Chamorro Coneo AM, Chávez D, Venegas M, Cristobal M, Bonz AG, Ramirez C, Trejos Herrera AM, Ventevogel P, Brown AD, Schojan M, Greene MC. Comparing Mediators and Moderators of Mental Health Outcomes from the Implementation of Group Problem Management Plus (PM+) among Venezuelan Refugees and Migrants and Colombian Returnees in Northern Colombia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:527. [PMID: 38791742 PMCID: PMC11121033 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21050527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Colombia hosts the largest number of refugees and migrants fleeing the humanitarian emergency in Venezuela, many of whom experience high levels of displacement-related trauma and adversity. Yet, Colombian mental health services do not meet the needs of this population. Scalable, task-sharing interventions, such as Group Problem Management Plus (Group PM+), have the potential to bridge this gap by utilizing lay workers to provide the intervention. However, the current literature lacks a comprehensive understanding of how and for whom Group PM+ is most effective. This mixed methods study utilized data from a randomized effectiveness-implementation trial to examine the mediators and moderators of Group PM+ on mental health outcomes. One hundred twenty-eight migrant and refugee women in northern Colombia participated in Group PM+ delivered by trained community members. Patterns in moderation effects showed that participants in more stable, less marginalized positions improved the most. Results from linear regression models showed that Group PM+-related skill acquisition was not a significant mediator of the association between session attendance and mental health outcomes. Participants and facilitators reported additional possible mediators and community-level moderators that warrant future research. Further studies are needed to examine mediators and moderators contributing to the effectiveness of task-shared, scalable, psychological interventions in diverse contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Miller-Suchet
- Program on Forced Migration and Health, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA;
- HIAS, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA; (M.C.); (A.G.B.); (M.S.)
| | - Natalia Camargo
- Department of Psychology, Universidad del Norte, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia; (N.C.); (J.D.); (A.M.C.C.); (A.M.T.H.)
| | - Manaswi Sangraula
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA;
| | | | - Jennifer Diaz
- Department of Psychology, Universidad del Norte, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia; (N.C.); (J.D.); (A.M.C.C.); (A.M.T.H.)
| | - Valeria Meriño
- Department of Psychology, Universidad del Norte, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia; (N.C.); (J.D.); (A.M.C.C.); (A.M.T.H.)
| | - Ana Maria Chamorro Coneo
- Department of Psychology, Universidad del Norte, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia; (N.C.); (J.D.); (A.M.C.C.); (A.M.T.H.)
| | | | | | - Maria Cristobal
- HIAS, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA; (M.C.); (A.G.B.); (M.S.)
| | - Annie G. Bonz
- HIAS, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA; (M.C.); (A.G.B.); (M.S.)
| | | | - Ana Maria Trejos Herrera
- Department of Psychology, Universidad del Norte, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia; (N.C.); (J.D.); (A.M.C.C.); (A.M.T.H.)
| | - Peter Ventevogel
- Public Health Section, Division of Resilience and Solutions, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Adam D. Brown
- Trauma and Global Mental Health Laboratory, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY 10011, USA;
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Matthew Schojan
- HIAS, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA; (M.C.); (A.G.B.); (M.S.)
| | - M. Claire Greene
- Program on Forced Migration and Health, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mwangala PN, Makandi M, Kerubo A, Nyongesa MK, Abubakar A. A scoping review of the literature on the application and usefulness of the Problem Management Plus (PM+) intervention around the world. BJPsych Open 2024; 10:e91. [PMID: 38650067 PMCID: PMC11060090 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the high rates of common mental disorders and limited resources, task-shifting psychosocial interventions are needed to provide adequate care. One such intervention developed by the World Health Organization is Problem Management Plus (PM+). AIMS This review maps the evidence regarding the extent of application and usefulness of the PM+ intervention, i.e. adaptability, feasibility, effectiveness and scalability, since it was introduced in 2016. METHOD We conducted a scoping review of seven literature databases and grey literature from January 2015 to February 2024, to identify peer-reviewed and grey literature on PM+ around the world. RESULTS Out of 6739 potential records, 42 met the inclusion criteria. About 60% of the included studies were from low- and middle-income countries. Findings from pilot/feasibility trials demonstrated that PM+ is feasible, acceptable and safe. Results from definitive randomised controlled trials at short-term follow-up also suggested that PM+ is effective, with overall moderate-to-large effect sizes, in improving symptoms of common mental health problems. Although PM+ was more effective in reducing symptoms of common mental disorders, it was found to be costlier compared to usual care in the only study that evaluated its cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that PM+, in its individual and group formats, can be adapted and effectively delivered by trained helpers to target a wide range of common mental health concerns. More effectiveness and implementation evidence is required to understand the long-term impact of PM+, its cost-effectiveness and scalability, and moderators of treatment outcomes such as gender and delivery formats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick N. Mwangala
- Institute for Human Development, Aga Khan University, Kenya; Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kilifi, Kenya; and School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
| | | | - Anita Kerubo
- Institute for Human Development, Aga Khan University, Kenya
| | | | - Amina Abubakar
- Institute for Human Development, Aga Khan University, Kenya; Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kilifi, Kenya; and Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lowe MX, Kettner H, Jolly DRP, Carhart-Harris RL, Jackson H. Long-term benefits to psychological health and well-being after ceremonial use of Ayahuasca in Middle Eastern and North African immigrants and refugees. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1279887. [PMID: 38666090 PMCID: PMC11044680 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1279887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Refugees and immigrants can experience complex stressors from the process of immigration that can have lasting and severe long-term mental health consequences. Experiences after ayahuasca ingestion are shown to produce positive effects on psychological wellbeing and mental health, including anecdotal reports of improved symptoms of trauma and related disorders. However, data on the longitudinal health impact of naturalistic ayahuasca use in Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) immigrant and refugee populations is limited. Aims The current longitudinal online survey study was conducted to gather prospective data on ceremonial ayahuasca use in a group (N = 15) of primarily female MENA immigrants and refugees and to provide further insight into the patterns and outcomes surrounding that use. The study sought to assess self-reported changes in physical and mental health, well-being, and psychological functioning, examine relationships between aspects of individual mindset (e.g., psychedelic preparedness) prior to ayahuasca use and observed outcomes during (e.g., subjective drug effects) and afterwards (i.e., persisting effects), characterize risks and negative experiences, and describe trauma exposure and personal history. Results/Outcomes Our findings revealed ceremonial use of ayahuasca is associated with significant improvements in mental health, well-being, and psychological functioning, including reductions in depression, anxiety, and shame, and increases in cognitive reappraisal and self-compassion. Most participants reported no lasting adverse effects and experienced notable positive behavioral changes persisting months after ingestion. Conclusion/Interpretation While preliminary, results suggest naturalistic ayahuasca use might hold therapeutic potential for MENA populations exposed to trauma prior to and during the process of migration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hannes Kettner
- Psychedelics Division, Neuroscape, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Robin L. Carhart-Harris
- Psychedelics Division, Neuroscape, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Surkan PJ, Rayes D, Bertuzzi L, Figueiredo N, Melchior M, Tortelli A. A qualitative evaluation of the use of Problem Management Plus (PM+) among Arabic-speaking migrants with psychological distress in France - The APEX study. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2024; 15:2325243. [PMID: 38501438 PMCID: PMC10953778 DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2325243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACTBackground: Feasibility studies with non-French speaking migrants in France are needed to inform appropriate adaptation of psychosocial intervention procedures.Objective: To test the WHO Problem Management Plus (PM+) intervention protocol for Arabic-speaking migrants in the Paris metropolitan region.Methods: Between 2019 and 2021 we recruited participants from three accommodation centres receiving asylum seekers or migrants experiencing social and economic difficulties. Participants experiencing psychological distress underwent five PM + sessions with trained helpers. Feasibility was evaluated through 15 interviews with 8 participants, 4 helpers, and 3 study supervisors. Interview topics covered PM + implementation in general and for each component. We also sought to understand problems with delivery and gathered suggestions for improvement. Data were analysed thematically using a deductive approach.Results: We found implementation of PM + to be feasible, with predominantly positive reactions from participants, helpers and study staff. All intervention components were considered beneficial, with breathing exercises considered easy to implement and often sustained. Selection of problems and strategies to address them were described as challenging to execute. Psychosocial support from and rapport with helpers and the use of the native language were considered key strengths of the programme. However, we observed the need for complementary or higher intensity psychological support in some cases. Findings also highlighted the importance of addressing distress among non-specialist helpers delivering PM + . Finally, local guidance to social resources were suggested to be added in the protocol.Conclusion: PM + was well-liked and feasible, with cultural adjustments and increased access to community resources for migrants needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. J. Surkan
- Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Department of International Health Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Institut d’Etudes Avancées de Paris, Paris, France
| | - D. Rayes
- Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Department of International Health Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - L. Bertuzzi
- INSERM, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique: IPLESP, Paris, France
| | - N. Figueiredo
- INSERM, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique: IPLESP, Paris, France
| | - M. Melchior
- INSERM, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique: IPLESP, Paris, France
| | - A. Tortelli
- INSERM, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique: IPLESP, Paris, France
- GHU Paris, Psychiatrie & Neurosciences – Pôle Psychiatrie Précarité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schoenberger SF, Schönenberg K, Fuhr DC, Nesterko Y, Glaesmer H, Sondorp E, Woodward A, Sijbrandij M, Cuijpers P, Massazza A, McKee M, Roberts B. Mental healthcare access among resettled Syrian refugees in Leipzig, Germany. Glob Ment Health (Camb) 2024; 11:e25. [PMID: 38572249 PMCID: PMC10988152 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2024.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Our aim was to examine mental health needs and access to mental healthcare services among Syrian refugees in the city of Leipzig, Germany. We conducted a cross-sectional survey with Syrian refugee adults in Leipzig, Germany in 2021/2022. Outcomes included PTSD (PCL-5), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7) and somatic symptom (SSS-8). Descriptive, regression and effect modification analyses assessed associations between selected predictor variables and mental health service access. The sampling strategy means findings are applicable only to Syrian refugees in Leipzig. Of the 513 respondents, 18.3% had moderate/severe anxiety symptoms, 28.7% had moderate/severe depression symptoms, and 25.3% had PTSD symptoms. A total of 52.8% reported past year mental health problems, and 48.9% of those participants sought care for these problems. The most common reasons for not accessing mental healthcare services were wanting to handle the problem themselves and uncertainty about where to access services. Adjusted Poisson regression models (n = 259) found significant associations between current mental health symptoms and mental healthcare service access (RR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.02-2.15, p = 0.041) but significance levels were not reached between somatization and trust in physicians with mental healthcare service access. Syrian refugees in Leipzig likely experience high unmet mental health needs. Community-based interventions for refugee mental health and de-stigmatization activities are needed to address these unmet needs in Leipzig.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha F. Schoenberger
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kim Schönenberg
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daniela C. Fuhr
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Research Group Implementation Research and Mental Health, Leibniz Institute of Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany
- Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Yuriy Nesterko
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Research Department, Center ÜBERLEBEN, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heide Glaesmer
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Egbert Sondorp
- Department of Global Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aniek Woodward
- Department of Global Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Massazza
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Martin McKee
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Bayard Roberts
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
de Graaff AM, Cuijpers P, Boschloo L, Elsawy M, Hunaidy S, Seedat S, Witteveen AB, Huizink AC, Sijbrandij M. The associations of hair cortisol and DHEA with posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in refugees. Compr Psychiatry 2024; 129:152438. [PMID: 38104462 DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exposure to traumatic events, ongoing adversity, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are associated with altered activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, but findings are mixed. This may be explained in part by heterogeneity in PTSD symptom profiles. AIM The aim of this study was to investigate the complex relationships between the number of traumatic events and post-displacement stressors, individual symptoms of PTSD, and HPA-axis hormones cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in refugees. METHODS Adult (18+ years) Syrian refugees with increased levels of distress participating in a randomized controlled trial completed baseline measures to assess traumatic events (trauma checklist), post-displacement stressors (Post-Migration Living Difficulties checklist), symptoms of PTSD (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5; PCL-5), and provided a hair sample for additional stress hormone analyses. We used R-packages qgraph and bootnet to perform network analysis on the number of traumatic events and post-displacement stressors, individual symptoms of PTSD, and HPA-axis hormones cortisol and DHEA. The final network model was corrected for depression severity. RESULTS 115 (53% male, M age = 36.9, SD = 12.7) of 206 participants provided a hair sample. A higher number of traumatic events was directly associated with three symptoms of the PTSD cluster arousal and reactivity, i.e., sleep disturbance, hypervigilance and physiological reactivity, and with three other PTSD symptoms, namely flashbacks, avoidance of reminders, and self-destructive behavior. A higher number of post-displacement stressors was associated with four symptoms of the PTSD cluster cognition and mood, i.e., trauma-related amnesia, negative beliefs, blaming of self/others, and detachment, as well as with intrusive thoughts, sleep disturbance, hypervigilance, and exaggerated startle response. The number of traumatic events and post-displacement stressors were not associated with cortisol or DHEA. Cortisol was positively associated with two symptoms of the PTSD cluster cognition and mood, i.e., negative beliefs and negative trauma-related emotions, and negatively associated with avoidance of reminders. DHEA was positively associated with restricted affect and with three symptoms of the PTSD symptom cluster arousal and reactivity, i.e., irritability/anger, sleep disturbance, and self-destructive behavior, and negatively associated with avoidance of thoughts. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that exposure to traumatic events and post-displacement stressors is not related to cortisol and DHEA, but that cortisol and DHEA are differentially related to individual symptoms of PTSD. While lower levels of both cortisol and DHEA were associated with increased avoidance, higher levels of cortisol were mostly associated with symptoms of the PTSD cluster cognition and mood and higher levels of DHEA were mostly associated with symptoms of the PTSD cluster arousal and reactivity. These findings contribute to explaining the variability of findings in the literature on HPA-axis activity in PTSD. ETHICS The study was approved by the Research Ethics Review Committee at VU Medical Center, the Netherlands (Protocol ID: NL61361.029.17, 7 September 2017) and prospectively registered online (https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6665).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne M de Graaff
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands.
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands; Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Strada Mihail Kogălniceanu 1, Cluj-Napoca 400347, Romania
| | - Lynn Boschloo
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, Utrecht 3584 CS, the Netherlands
| | - Mariam Elsawy
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands
| | - Sam Hunaidy
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands
| | - Soraya Seedat
- SAMRC Genomics of Brain Disorders Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Clinical Building, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town 7505, South Africa
| | - Anke B Witteveen
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands
| | - Anja C Huizink
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Boettcher J, Heinrich M, Boettche M, Burchert S, Glaesmer H, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E, Heeke C, Hernek M, Knaevelsrud C, Konnopka A, Muntendorf L, Nilles H, Nohr L, Pohl S, Paskuy S, Reinhardt I, Sierau S, Stammel N, Wirz C, Renneberg B, Wagner B. Internet-based transdiagnostic treatment for emotional disorders in Arabic- and Farsi-speaking refugees: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2024; 25:13. [PMID: 38167060 PMCID: PMC10759366 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07845-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refugee populations have an increased risk for mental disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorders. Comorbidity is common. At the same time, refugees face multiple barriers to accessing mental health treatment. Only a minority of them receive adequate help. The planned trial evaluates a low-threshold, transdiagnostic Internet-based treatment. The trial aims at establishing its efficacy and cost-effectiveness compared with no treatment. METHODS N = 131 treatment-seeking Arabic- or Farsi-speaking patients, meeting diagnostic criteria for a depressive, anxiety, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder will be randomized to either the intervention or the waitlist control group. The intervention group receives an Internet-based treatment with weekly written guidance provided by Arabic- or Farsi-speaking professionals. The treatment is based on the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA), is tailored to the individual patient, and takes 6-16 weeks. The control group will wait for 3 months and then receive the Internet-based treatment. DISCUSSION The planned trial will result in an estimate of the efficacy of a low-threshold and scalable treatment option for the most common mental disorders in refugees. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Registry for Clinical Trials DRKS00024154. Registered on February 1, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Boettcher
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Manuel Heinrich
- Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maria Boettche
- Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Burchert
- Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heide Glaesmer
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Carina Heeke
- Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martina Hernek
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapie, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Konnopka
- Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Louisa Muntendorf
- Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hannah Nilles
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura Nohr
- Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffi Pohl
- Methods and Evaluation/Quality Assurance, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sophia Paskuy
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabelle Reinhardt
- Section of Healthcare Research, LVR-Institute for Research and Education, Cologne, Germany
| | - Susan Sierau
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nadine Stammel
- Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christina Wirz
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapie, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Babette Renneberg
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapie, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Birgit Wagner
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kılıç C, Kaya E, Karadağ Ö, Üner S. Barriers To Accessing Mental Health Services Among Syrian Refugees: A Mixed-Method Study. TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI = TURKISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 2024; 35:87-94. [PMID: 38842150 PMCID: PMC11164071 DOI: 10.5080/u27044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although Syrian refugees have high rates of mental health problems due to war trauma, little is known on their degree of need for and contact with mental health services. Using a population sample of Syrian refugees living in Ankara, we assessed the perceived need for and contact with mental health services, as well as the barriers to access these services. METHOD This was a cross-sectional mixed-method study of 420 Syrian refugees living in Ankara city center, using face to face interviews administered at the respondents' home by trained, Arabic-speaking interviewers. PTSD and depression were assessed using Harvard Trauma Questionnaire and Beck Depression Inventory, respectively. RESULTS Of all the refugees in our sample, 14,8% (N=62) stated that they felt the need for mental healthcare since arriving in Turkey. The actual number contacting any mental health service was very low (1,4%, N=6). The most important barriers to accessing mental health services were reported by the respondents to be language problems and lack of information on available mental health services. Service providers and policymakers also reported similar topics as the most important barriers: low awareness about mental health problems, daily living difficulties, and language and cultural barriers. Multivariate analyses revealed that presence of medical or mental disorders and female gender predicted the perceived need for contacting services. CONCLUSION Our results show that, although refugees report high rates of mental health problems, the perceived need for and actual contact with services are very low. To address this treatment gap, and to provide adequate care for refugees with mental health problems, common barriers (language and awareness) should be identified and dealt with.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cengiz Kılıç
- Prof., Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry
- Prof., Lokman Hekim University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Heath, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Edip Kaya
- Stress Assessment and Research Center, Ankara
| | - Özge Karadağ
- Assoc. Prof., Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Disability Care and Rehabilitation, Ağrı
| | - Sarp Üner
- Assoc. Prof., Columbia University, Department of Center for Sustainable Development, The Earth Institute, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Reinhardt I, Schmidt L, Reske D, Zielasek J, Braun G, Böttche M, Boettcher J, Burchert S, Glaesmer H, Knaevelsrud C, Konnopka A, Muntendorf L, Nohr L, Paskuy S, Renneberg B, Sierau S, Stammel N, Wagner B, Wirz T, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E. Blended-ALMAMAR app for inpatient mental health care for refugees: study protocol for a multicenter implementation study within the I-REACH consortium (Internet based REfugee mentAl healtH Care). BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1409. [PMID: 38093271 PMCID: PMC10720094 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10403-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refugees are at high risk for developing mental illnesses. Due to language and cultural barriers, there is need for specifically adapted therapeutic procedures for refugees in inpatient mental health care settings. Internet-based applications in refugee mother tongues have the potential to improve the outcomes of mental health care for this vulnerable population. The key research question of the present implementation study is whether the newly developed "blended ALMAMAR" app for Arabic and Farsi speaking refugees in Germany is used and accepted by patients and professionals in routine inpatient mental health care (blended care). METHODS We present the design of an observational, prospective multicenter implementation study in eight psychiatric hospitals. We plan to recruit 100 Farsi or Arabic speaking refugees receiving in-patient treatment due to depression, anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder or substance use disorders. These patients will get access to the "blended ALMAMAR" app during their inpatient stay in a blended-care approach. We will assess the usage (e.g., duration and frequency of use of the app) as well as subjective acceptability and usability of the intervention. To identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with "blended ALMAMAR" usage, we will also perform clinical and questionnaire assessments. DISCUSSION The newly developed "blended ALMAMAR" app may help to close communication gaps for the hard-to reach and vulnerable group of refugees in inpatient mental health care. It is the first blended-care intervention that addresses severely mentally ill refugees in an inpatient psychiatric setting in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on November 11, 2021 (DRKS00025972) and adapted on November 14, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Reinhardt
- LVR-Institute for Research and Education - Section Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Laura Schmidt
- LVR-Institute for Research and Education - Section Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Reske
- LVR-Institute for Research and Education - Section Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jürgen Zielasek
- LVR-Institute for Research and Education - Section Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany
- Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Gracia Braun
- LVR-Institute for Research and Education - Section Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maria Böttche
- Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johanna Boettcher
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Burchert
- Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heide Glaesmer
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christine Knaevelsrud
- Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Konnopka
- Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Louisa Muntendorf
- Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura Nohr
- Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sophia Paskuy
- Medical School Berlin, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Babette Renneberg
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susan Sierau
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nadine Stammel
- Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Birgit Wagner
- Medical School Berlin, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tina Wirz
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Spaaij J, de Graaff AM, Akhtar A, Kiselev N, McDaid D, Moergeli H, Pfaltz MC, Schick M, Schnyder U, Bryant RA, Cuijpers P, Sijbrandij M, Morina N. The effect of a low-level psychological intervention (PM+) on post-migration living difficulties - Results from two studies in Switzerland and in the Netherlands. Compr Psychiatry 2023; 127:152421. [PMID: 37708580 DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS OF THE STUDY After arriving in host countries, most refugees are confronted with numerous post-migration stressors (e.g., separation from family, discrimination, and employment difficulties). Post-migration living difficulties (PMLDs) significantly contribute to the development and persistence of mental disorders. Effective treatment approaches focusing on reducing post-migration stress are urgently needed. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of a brief psychological intervention, Problem Management Plus (PM+), on PMLDs among Syrian refugees in two European countries. METHODS We merged data from two single-blind feasibility trials with Syrian refugees experiencing elevated levels of psychological distress and impaired functioning in Switzerland (N = 59) and the Netherlands (N = 60). Participants were randomised to receive either five sessions of PM+ or an enhanced care-as-usual control condition. PMLDs were assessed at baseline and 3 months after the intervention. To estimate treatment effect on PMLD, linear mixed model analysis was performed. RESULTS Three months after the intervention, participants in the PM+ condition reported significantly fewer PMLDs compared to the control condition. Further analyses at item-level showed that interpersonal and family related PMLDs, such as "worries about family back home" significantly improved over time in the PM+ condition. CONCLUSIONS This exploratory study suggests that brief psychological interventions have the potential to reduce PMLDs in refugees and asylum seekers. The reduction of post-migration stress in turn may subsequently lead to an overall reduction in psychological distress. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS BASEC Nr. 2017-0117 (Swiss trial) and NL61361.029.17, 7 September 2017 (Dutch trial).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Spaaij
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anne M de Graaff
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aemal Akhtar
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | - Nikolai Kiselev
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; PluSport, Umbrella Organization of Swiss Disabled Sports, Volketswil, Switzerland; Swiss Research Institute of Public Health and Addiction (ISGF), University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David McDaid
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hanspeter Moergeli
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Monique C Pfaltz
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Mid Sweden University, Department of Psychology and Social Work, Östersund, Sweden
| | - Matthis Schick
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Richard A Bryant
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Naser Morina
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jordans MJD, Brown FL, Kane J, Taha K, Steen F, Ali R, Elias J, Meksassi B, Aoun M, Greene CM, Malik A, Akhtar A, van Ommeren M, Sijbrandij M, Bryant R. Evaluation of the Early Adolescent Skills for Emotions (EASE) intervention in Lebanon: A randomized controlled trial. Compr Psychiatry 2023; 127:152424. [PMID: 37748283 PMCID: PMC11214135 DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need for scalable evidence-based psychological interventions for young adolescents experiencing high levels of psychological distress in humanitarian settings and low- and middle-income countries. Poor mental health during adolescence presents a serious public health concern as it is a known predictor of persistent mental disorders in adulthood. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a new group-based intervention developed by the World Health Organization (Early Adolescent Skills for Emotions; EASE), implemented by non-specialists, to reduce young adolescents' psychological distress among mostly Syrian refugees in Lebanon. METHODS We conducted a two-arm, single-blind, individually randomized group treatment trial. Adolescents aged 10 to 14 years who screened positive for psychological distress using the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC) were randomly allocated to EASE or enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU) (1:1.6). ETAU consisted of a single scripted psycho-education home-visit session with the adolescent and their caregivers. EASE consists of seven group sessions with adolescents and three sessions with caregivers. The primary outcome was adolescent-reported psychological distress as measured with the PSC (internalizing, externalizing, and attentional symptoms). Secondary outcomes included depression, posttraumatic stress, well-being, functioning, and caregivers' parenting and distress. All outcomes were assessed at baseline, endline, and 3 months (primary time point) and 12 months follow-up. RESULTS Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and other adversities in Lebanon at the time of this research, the study was prematurely terminated, resulting in an under-powered trial sample (n = 198 enrolled compared to n = 445 targeted). We screened 604 children for eligibility. The 198 enrolled adolescents were assigned to EASE (n = 80) and ETAU (n = 118), with retention rates between 76.1 and 88.4% across all timepoints. Intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated no between-group differences on any of the outcome measures between the EASE and ETAU. We did observe a significant improvement on the primary outcome equally in the EASE and ETAU groups (-0.90, 95% CI: -3.6, 1.8; p = .52), - a trend that was sustained at three months follow-up. Sub-group analyses, for those with higher depression symptoms at baseline, showed ETAU outperformed EASE on reducing depression symptoms (difference in mean change = 2.7, 95% CI: 0.1, 5.3; p = .04; d = 0.59) and internalizing problems (difference in mean change 1.0, 95% CI: 0.08, 1.9; p = .03; d = 0.56) . CONCLUSION No conclusions can be drawn about the comparative effectiveness of the intervention given that the sample was underpowered as a result of early termination. Both EASE and single session psycho-education home visits resulted in meaningful improvements in reducing psychological distress. We did not identify any indications in the data suggesting that EASE was more effective than a single session family intervention in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and other crises in Lebanon. Fully powered research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of EASE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J D Jordans
- War Child, Research and Development Department, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Felicity L Brown
- War Child, Research and Development Department, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Jeremy Kane
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, USA.
| | - Karine Taha
- War Child, Lebanon Country Office, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Frederik Steen
- War Child, Research and Development Department, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Rayane Ali
- War Child, Lebanon Country Office, Beirut, Lebanon.
| | - Joseph Elias
- War Child, Lebanon Country Office, Beirut, Lebanon.
| | | | - May Aoun
- War Child, Lebanon Country Office, Beirut, Lebanon.
| | - Claire M Greene
- Program on Forced Migration and Health, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, USA.
| | | | - Aemal Akhtar
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Australia.
| | | | - Marit Sijbrandij
- VU University, Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Richard Bryant
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jain R, Stone GS, Gartland MG. Medical Care for Newly Arrived Displaced Persons. NEJM EVIDENCE 2023; 2:EVIDra2200286. [PMID: 38320529 DOI: 10.1056/evidra2200286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Medical Care for Displaced PersonsThe United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees reports that more than 100 million people have been forcibly displaced from their homes due to persecution, conflict, violence, and human rights violations. Displacement has profound health impacts. Here, Jain and colleagues review medical care for newly displaced persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radhika Jain
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis
| | - Geren S Stone
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Matthew G Gartland
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Purgato M, Prina E, Ceccarelli C, Cadorin C, Abdulmalik JO, Amaddeo F, Arcari L, Churchill R, Jordans MJ, Lund C, Papola D, Uphoff E, van Ginneken N, Tol WA, Barbui C. Primary-level and community worker interventions for the prevention of mental disorders and the promotion of well-being in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 10:CD014722. [PMID: 37873968 PMCID: PMC10594594 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014722.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a significant research gap in the field of universal, selective, and indicated prevention interventions for mental health promotion and the prevention of mental disorders. Barriers to closing the research gap include scarcity of skilled human resources, large inequities in resource distribution and utilization, and stigma. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of delivery by primary workers of interventions for the promotion of mental health and universal prevention, and for the selective and indicated prevention of mental disorders or symptoms of mental illness in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To examine the impact of intervention delivery by primary workers on resource use and costs. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus, PsycInfo, WHO ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 29 November 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of primary-level and/or community health worker interventions for promoting mental health and/or preventing mental disorders versus any control conditions in adults and children in LMICs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Standardized mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) were used for continuous outcomes, and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data, using a random-effects model. We analyzed data at 0 to 1, 1 to 6, and 7 to 24 months post-intervention. For SMDs, 0.20 to 0.49 represented small, 0.50 to 0.79 moderate, and ≥ 0.80 large clinical effects. We evaluated the risk of bias (RoB) using Cochrane RoB2. MAIN RESULTS Description of studies We identified 113 studies with 32,992 participants (97 RCTs, 19,570 participants in meta-analyses) for inclusion. Nineteen RCTs were conducted in low-income countries, 27 in low-middle-income countries, 2 in middle-income countries, 58 in upper-middle-income countries and 7 in mixed settings. Eighty-three RCTs included adults and 30 RCTs included children. Cadres of primary-level workers employed primary care health workers (38 studies), community workers (71 studies), both (2 studies), and not reported (2 studies). Interventions were universal prevention/promotion in 22 studies, selective in 36, and indicated prevention in 55 RCTs. Risk of bias The most common concerns over risk of bias were performance bias, attrition bias, and reporting bias. Intervention effects 'Probably', 'may', or 'uncertain' indicates 'moderate-', 'low-', or 'very low-'certainty evidence. *Certainty of the evidence (using GRADE) was assessed at 0 to 1 month post-intervention as specified in the review protocol. In the abstract, we did not report results for outcomes for which evidence was missing or very uncertain. Adults Promotion/universal prevention, compared to usual care: - probably slightly reduced anxiety symptoms (MD -0.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.27 to -0.01; 1 trial, 158 participants) - may slightly reduce distress/PTSD symptoms (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.41 to -0.08; 4 trials, 722 participants) Selective prevention, compared to usual care: - probably slightly reduced depressive symptoms (SMD -0.69, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.30; 4 trials, 223 participants) Indicated prevention, compared to usual care: - may reduce adverse events (1 trial, 547 participants) - probably slightly reduced functional impairment (SMD -0.12, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.15; 4 trials, 663 participants) Children Promotion/universal prevention, compared to usual care: - may improve the quality of life (SMD -0.25, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.11; 2 trials, 803 participants) - may reduce adverse events (1 trial, 694 participants) - may slightly reduce depressive symptoms (MD -3.04, 95% CI -6 to -0.08; 1 trial, 160 participants) - may slightly reduce anxiety symptoms (MD -2.27, 95% CI -3.13 to -1.41; 1 trial, 183 participants) Selective prevention, compared to usual care: - probably slightly reduced depressive symptoms (SMD 0, 95% CI -0.16 to -0.15; 2 trials, 638 participants) - may slightly reduce anxiety symptoms (MD 4.50, 95% CI -12.05 to 21.05; 1 trial, 28 participants) - probably slightly reduced distress/PTSD symptoms (MD -2.14, 95% CI -3.77 to -0.51; 1 trial, 159 participants) Indicated prevention, compared to usual care: - decreased slightly functional impairment (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.10; 2 trials, 448 participants) - decreased slightly depressive symptoms (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.04; 4 trials, 771 participants) - may slightly reduce distress/PTSD symptoms (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -1.28 to 1.76; 2 trials, 448 participants). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The evidence indicated that prevention interventions delivered through primary workers - a form of task-shifting - may improve mental health outcomes. Certainty in the evidence was influenced by the risk of bias and by substantial levels of heterogeneity. A supportive network of infrastructure and research would enhance and reinforce this delivery modality across LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Purgato
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Eleonora Prina
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Caterina Ceccarelli
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Camilla Cadorin
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Amaddeo
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Rachel Churchill
- Cochrane Common Mental Disorders, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Jd Jordans
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Crick Lund
- King's Global Health Institute, Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Davide Papola
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Eleonora Uphoff
- Cochrane Common Mental Disorders, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Nadja van Ginneken
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Wietse Anton Tol
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Corrado Barbui
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Cochrane Global Mental Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mootz JJ, Fennig M, Giusto A, Mumey A, Greene CM, Wainberg ML. Interventions addressing family violence and mental illness or substance use in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Glob Ment Health (Camb) 2023; 10:e71. [PMID: 38024805 PMCID: PMC10643256 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2023.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Most family violence research has been conducted in high-income countries, although family violence rates are higher in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and outcomes more severe. Given the strong associations of family violence with substance use and mental illness, the aim of this systematic review was to examine interventions that targeted familial violence and at least one other condition of substance use or mental illness to determine effective treatments in LMICs. We conducted a systematic review of interventions that addressed family violence and mental illness or substance use. A committee of three researchers independently screened titles and abstracts and conducted full-text eligibility assessments. Two researchers conducted a risk of bias assessment. Data were extracted using a structured spreadsheet and narratively synthesized. Our search identified 29 articles produced from 19 studies conducted in 13 LMICs. Most (n = 15) studies randomized to study condition. Lack of blinding was the most common threat. The external validity of studies was generally poor. Fourteen studies had a primary intervention target of family violence, mental health, substance use, economic improvement, or HIV. None of the studies showed improvements in all intervention areas. Child maltreatment was less likely to be addressed than intimate partner violence (IPV). Targeted interventions for substance and mental health mostly improved primary outcomes, although they were less effective in reducing IPV. Evidence-based treatments must be rigorously evaluated before innovations in implementation can occur. Interventions overwhelmingly addressed IPV victimization and should consider how to work with couples and include men and children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J. Mootz
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, USA
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
| | - Molly Fennig
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
| | - Ali Giusto
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, USA
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
| | - Audrey Mumey
- Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - Claire M. Greene
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - Milton L. Wainberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, USA
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Değer MS, Sezerol MA, Atak M. Rational Drug and Antibiotic Use Status, E-Health Literacy in Syrian Immigrants and Related Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1531. [PMID: 37887232 PMCID: PMC10604171 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12101531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Rational drug use is a pivotal concept linked with morbidity and mortality. Immigration plays a significant role as a determinant affecting individuals' health-related attitudes, behaviors, and the pursuit of health services. Within this context, the study was initiated to assess the factors influencing health literacy and rational drug use among Syrian immigrants in Istanbul. A cross-sectional study was undertaken on 542 Syrian adults utilizing a three-part questionnaire encompassing sociodemographics, rational drug use, and the e-health literacy scale (eHEALS). With an average age of 39.19 ± 13.10 years, a majority of participants believed medications should solely be doctor-prescribed (97%) and opposed keeping antibiotics at home (93.7%). Yet, 62.5% thought excessive herbal medicine use was harmless. The mean eHEALS score stood at 20.57 ± 7.26, and factors like age, marital status, income, and duration of stay in Turkey influenced e-health literacy. Associations were seen between low e-health literacy and being female, being older, having a lower education level, and regular medication use. Syrian immigrants displayed proper knowledge concerning antibiotics yet exhibited gaps in their understanding of general drug usage, treatment adherence, and herbal medicines. Approximately 80.3% had limited health literacy, pointing to the need for targeted interventions for enhanced health and societal assimilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Sait Değer
- Department of Public Health, Medical Faculty, Hitit University, Corum 19030, Türkiye;
| | - Mehmet Akif Sezerol
- Epidemiology Program, Institute of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34810, Türkiye;
- Sultanbeyli District Health Directorate, Istanbul 34935, Türkiye
- Health Management Program, Graduate Education Institute, Maltepe University, Istanbul 34857, Türkiye
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34810, Türkiye
| | - Muhammed Atak
- Department of Public Health, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34093, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schäfer SK, Thomas LM, Lindner S, Lieb K. World Health Organization's low-intensity psychosocial interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of Problem Management Plus and Step-by-Step. World Psychiatry 2023; 22:449-462. [PMID: 37713578 PMCID: PMC10503931 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Many societies have been recently exposed to humanitarian and health emergencies, which have resulted in a large number of people experiencing significant distress and being at risk to develop mental disorders such as depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. The World Health Organization has released a series of scalable psychosocial interventions for people impaired by distress in communities exposed to adversities. Prominent among these is a low-intensity transdiagnostic psychosocial intervention, Problem Management Plus (PM+), and its digital adaptation Step-by-Step (SbS). This systematic review is the first to summarize the available evidence on the effects of PM+ and SbS. Up to March 8, 2023, five databases were searched for randomized controlled trials examining the effects of PM+ or SbS on distress indicators (i.e., general distress; anxiety, depressive or post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms; functional impairment, self-identified problems) and positive mental health outcomes (i.e., well-being, quality of life, social support/relationships). We performed random-effects multilevel meta-analyses on standardized mean differences (SMDs) at post-intervention and short-term follow-up assessments. Our search yielded 23 eligible studies, including 5,298 participants. We found a small to medium favorable effect on distress indicators (SMD=-0.45, 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.34) and a small beneficial effect on positive mental health outcomes (SMD=0.31, 95% CI: 0.14-0.47), which both remained significant at follow-up assessment and were robust in sensitivity analyses. However, our analyses pointed to substantial between-study heterogeneity, which was only partially explained by moderators, and the certainty of evidence was very low across all outcomes. These results provide evidence for the effectiveness of PM+ and SbS in reducing distress indicators and promoting positive mental health in populations exposed to adversities, but a larger high-quality evidence base is needed, as well as research on participant-level moderators of the effects of these interventions, their suitability for stepped-care programs, and their cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah K Schäfer
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Psychodiagnostics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Lea M Thomas
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
| | - Saskia Lindner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Klaus Lieb
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Frankova I, Klymchuck V, Nickerson A, Sijbrandij M, Amstadter AB. A summary of the 38th Annual International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies Presidential Panel: How the traumatic stress community can assist individuals affected by the war in Ukraine. J Trauma Stress 2023; 36:682-690. [PMID: 37339112 DOI: 10.1002/jts.22945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
As the premier global traumatic stress society, the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS) has an important role to play in educating and raising awareness about the consequences of traumatic events, such as the war in Ukraine. On November 12, 2022, during its 38th annual meeting, the ISTSS hosted an invited Presidential Panel, chaired by Ananda Amstadter during her term as ISTSS President, that brought together trauma experts Peter Ventevogel, Marit Sijbrandij, Vitalii Klymchuck, Iryna Frankova, and Angela Nickerson to highlight how traumatic stress professionals can assist individuals affected by the war in Ukraine. The present paper summarizes the key points from the panel and discusses future challenges anticipated for people affected by the war.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iryna Frankova
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Vitalii Klymchuck
- Mental Health for Ukraine Project, Lviv, Ukraine
- Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Angela Nickerson
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ananda B Amstadter
- Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Al-Shatanawi TN, Khader Y, ALSalamat H, Al Hadid L, Jarboua A, Amarneh B, Alkouri O, Alfaqih MA, Alrabadi N. Identifying psychosocial problems, needs, and coping mechanisms of adolescent Syrian refugees in Jordan. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1184098. [PMID: 37426088 PMCID: PMC10325618 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1184098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Refugees who have fled war zones are at a heightened risk of psychosocial problems that can impact their ability to function in day-to-day life and place a significant burden on the family structure. This study aimed to assess the psychosocial problems and needs and coping mechanisms of Adolescent Syrian refugees in Jordan. Methods Between October and December 2018, we conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with a sample of key and individual informants. Our sample included 20 primary healthcare professionals, 20 schoolteachers, 20 Syrian parents, and 20 adolescents aged 12-17 years. All interviews were transcribed verbatim, and we utilized thematic analysis to group, categorize, and analyze the original Arabic language transcripts. To ensure thorough analysis, we adopted a bottom-up inductive approach that covered the six-phase iterative process proposed by Braun and Clarke. Results The main psychosocial problems encountered by Syrian adolescents included stress, depression, loneliness, lack of a sense of security, isolation, aggressiveness, fear of war, and family disintegration. Almost all schoolteachers reported that they observed that Jordanian adolescents are more settled, self-confident, and financially stable relative to their Syrian peers. The Jordanian government and community were praised for their support, including education, recreational centers, health services, and awareness campaigns. Going to school, praying and reading the Holy Quran, listening to music, and talking to friends and engaging with them were reported as the main coping mechanisms. The majority of respondents said that more services are still needed for adolescents, including more places for entertainment, psychosocial support and psychological counseling, medical care, job creation, and providing health insurance. Conclusion Syrian refugees are aware of the psychological aspects of their situation, but they are not always able to access clinic-based humanitarian assistance for mental health and psychosocial support. Stakeholders must interact with refugees to learn about their needs and develop services that are appropriate for their culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tariq N. Al-Shatanawi
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, Jordan
| | - Yousef Khader
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Husam ALSalamat
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, Jordan
- Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Alaa Jarboua
- Department of Legal Medicine, Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Basil Amarneh
- Department of Community and Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Osama Alkouri
- Faculty of Nursing, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Mahmoud A. Alfaqih
- Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain
| | - Nasr Alrabadi
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Spaaij J, Fuhr DC, Akhtar A, Casanova L, Klein T, Schick M, Weilenmann S, Roberts B, Morina N. Scaling-up problem management plus for refugees in Switzerland - a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:488. [PMID: 37189160 PMCID: PMC10186708 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09491-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refugees are at an increased risk of developing symptoms of mental disorders but face various structural and socio-cultural barriers to accessing mental health care. The SPIRIT project (Scaling-up Psychological Interventions in Refugees In SwiTzerland) seeks to promote the resilience of refugees and improve their access to mental health care. For this purpose, Problem Management Plus (PM+), an evidence-based low-intensity psychological intervention delivered by trained non-specialist "helpers", is being scaled-up in Switzerland. OBJECTIVE To identify factors influencing the process of the large-scale implementation of PM + for refugees in Switzerland and to develop recommendations to guide the implementation process. METHODS 22 semi-structured interviews were conducted with key informants (Syrian refugees who previously participated in PM+, PM + helpers, health professionals working with refugees and decision-makers from the migration, integration, social, and health sectors). The data were analyzed using thematic analysis, combining an inductive and deductive approach. RESULTS The data revealed three major themes, which might have an impact for the longer-term implementation of PM + in Switzerland. First, preconditions for successful integration in the health system prior to scaling-up such as sustainable funding or the introduction of a stepped care approach. Second, the requirements for the PM + intervention supporting scale-up such as quality control during PM + delivery, PM + modality, time and setting when PM + is offered or the views on task sharing. Third, the perceived benefits of scaling-up PM + in Switzerland. CONCLUSIONS Our results have shown that PM + must be scaled-up within a stepped care approach, including a functioning triage system and sustainable funding. Rather than selecting one modality or setting, it seemed preferable to offer a variety of formats and settings to achieve maximum reach and benefits. A successful scale-up of PM + in Switzerland might have various benefits. Communicating them to policy-makers and health providers, might enhance their acceptability of the intervention and their willingness to adopt PM + in regulatory structure and promote it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Spaaij
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Culmannstrasse 8, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland.
| | - Daniela C Fuhr
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany
- Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Aemal Akhtar
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Luisa Casanova
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Culmannstrasse 8, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Klein
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Culmannstrasse 8, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Matthis Schick
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Culmannstrasse 8, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Sonja Weilenmann
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Culmannstrasse 8, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Bayard Roberts
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Naser Morina
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Culmannstrasse 8, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Woodward A, Sondorp E, Barry AS, Dieleman MA, Fuhr DC, Broerse JEW, Akhtar A, Awwad M, Bawaneh A, Bryant R, Sijbrandij M, Cuijpers P, Roberts B. Scaling up task-sharing psychological interventions for refugees in Jordan: a qualitative study on the potential barriers and facilitators. Health Policy Plan 2023; 38:310-320. [PMID: 36631951 PMCID: PMC10019561 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czad003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Training nonspecialists in providing evidence-based psychological interventions (i.e. task-sharing) can effectively increase community access to psychological support. However, task-sharing interventions for this purpose are rarely used at scale. The aim of this study was to examine the factors influencing the potential for scaling up (i.e. scalability) of a task-sharing psychological intervention called Problem Management Plus (PM+) for Syrian refugees in Jordan. Semi-structured individual (n = 17) and group interviews (n = 20) were conducted with stakeholders knowledgeable about PM+ and the mental health system for Syrian refugees in Jordan. Using 'system innovation perspective', this study conceptualized the context as landscape developments, and systemic considerations were divided into culture (shared ways of thinking) and structure (ways of organizing). Political momentum was identified as a landscape trend likely facilitating scaling up, while predicted reductions in financial aid was regarded as a constraint. In terms of culture, the medicalized approach to mental health, stigma and gender were reported barriers for scaling up PM+. Using non-stigmatizing language and offering different modalities, childcare options and sessions outside of working hours were suggestions to reduce stigma, accommodate individual preferences and increase the demand for PM+. In relation to structure, the feasibility of scaling up PM+ largely depends on the ability to overcome legal barriers, limitations in human and financial resources and organizational challenges. We recommend sustainable funding to be made available for staff, training, supervision, infrastructure, coordination, expansion and evaluation of 'actual' scaling up of PM+. Future research may examine the local feasibility of various funding, training and supervision models. Lessons learned from actual scaling up of PM+ and similar task-sharing approaches need to be widely shared.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniek Woodward
- *Corresponding author. KIT Royal Tropical Institute, KIT Health, Mauritskade 64, Amsterdam 1092 AD, The Netherlands. E-mail:
| | - Egbert Sondorp
- KIT Royal Tropical Institute, KIT Health, Mauritskade 64, Amsterdam 1092 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra S Barry
- KIT Royal Tropical Institute, KIT Health, Mauritskade 64, Amsterdam 1092 AD, The Netherlands
- NHS England, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8UG, UK
| | - Marjolein A Dieleman
- KIT Royal Tropical Institute, KIT Health, Mauritskade 64, Amsterdam 1092 AD, The Netherlands
- Athena Institute, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela C Fuhr
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Achterstraße 30, Bremen 28359, Germany
- University of Bremen, Health Sciences, Bibliothekstrasse 1, Bremen 28359, Germany
| | - Jacqueline E W Broerse
- Athena Institute, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - Aemal Akhtar
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, Solna 171 77, Sweden
| | - Manar Awwad
- International Medical Corps, Al Shareef Abd Al Hameed Sharaf St 9, Amman, Jordan
| | - Ahmad Bawaneh
- International Medical Corps, Al Shareef Abd Al Hameed Sharaf St 9, Amman, Jordan
| | - Richard Bryant
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands
- International Institute for Psychotherapy, Babeș-Bolyai University, 37 Republicii Street, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
McDaid D, Park AL. Making an economic argument for investment in global mental health: The case of conflict-affected refugees and displaced people. Glob Ment Health (Camb) 2023; 10:e10. [PMID: 37854391 PMCID: PMC10579650 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2023.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Mental health expenditure accounts for just 2.1% of total domestic governmental health expenditure per capita. There is an economic, as well as moral, imperative to invest more in mental health given the long-term adverse impacts of mental disorders. This paper focuses on how economic evidence can be used to support the case for action on global mental health, focusing on refugees and people displaced due to conflict. Refugees present almost unique challenges as some policy makers may be reluctant to divert scarce resources away from the domestic population to these population groups. A rapid systematic scoping review was also undertaken to identify economic evaluations of mental health-related interventions for refugees and displaced people and to look at how this evidence base can be strengthened. Only 11 economic evaluations focused on the mental health of refugees, asylum seekers and other displaced people were identified. All but two of these intervention studies potentially could be cost-effective, but only five studies reported cost per quality-adjusted life year gained, a metric allowing the economic case for investment in refugee mental health to be compared with any other health-focused intervention. There is a need for more consistent collection of data on quality of life and the longer-term impacts of intervention. The perspective adopted in economic evaluations may also need broadening to include intersectoral benefits beyond health, as well as identifying complementary benefits to host communities. More use can be also made of modelling, drawing on existing evidence on the effectiveness and resource requirements of interventions delivered in comparable settings to expand the current evidence base. The budgetary impact of any proposed strategy should be considered; modelling could also be used to look at how implementation might be adapted to contain costs and take account of local contextual factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David McDaid
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - A-La Park
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Atrooz F, Aljararwah SM, Chen TA, Khabour OF, Salim S. Understanding Mental Health Status of Syrian Refugee and Jordanian Women: Novel Insights from a Comparative Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:2976. [PMID: 36833672 PMCID: PMC9959545 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20042976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: War and displacement are well-known predictors of negative mental health outcomes among affected populations. This is especially relevant for refugees of war, particularly women, who often repress their mental health needs due to family responsibilities, social stigma, and/or cultural pressures. In this study, we compared the mental health status of urban Syrian refugee women (n = 139) with local Jordanian women (n = 160). (2) Methods: Psychometrically validated Afghan Symptom Checklist (ASC), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Self-Report Questionnaire (SRQ) examined psychological distress, perceived stress, and mental health, respectively. (3) Results: According to independent t-tests, Syrian refugee women scored higher than Jordanian women on the ASC [mean score (SD): 60.79 (16.67) vs. 53.71 (17.80), p < 0.001], PSS [mean score (SD): 31.59 (8.45) vs. 26.94 (7.37), p < 0.001], and SRQ [mean score (SD): 11.82 (4.30) vs. 10.21 (4.72), p = 0.002]. Interestingly, both Syrian refugee and Jordanian women scored higher than the clinical cutoff in the SRQ. Regression analyses indicated that more educated women were less likely to score high on the SRQ (β = -0.143, p = 0.019), particularly in the anxiety and somatic symptoms subscale (β = -0.133, p = 0.021), and were less likely to exhibit symptoms of ruminative sadness (β = -0.138, p = 0.027). Employed women were more likely to exhibit high coping ability than unemployed women (β = 0.144, p = 0.012). (4) Conclusions: Syrian refugee women scored higher than Jordanian women in all used mental health scales. Access to mental health services and enhancing educational opportunities would help mitigate perceived stress and may enhance stress-coping abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatin Atrooz
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | - Sally Mohammad Aljararwah
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan
| | - Tzuan A. Chen
- Department of Psychological Health and Learning Sciences, College of Education, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
- Health Research Institute, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | - Omar F. Khabour
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan
| | - Samina Salim
- Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Thabet A, Ghandi S, Barker EK, Rutherford G, Malekinejad M. Interventions to enhance psychological resilience in forcibly displaced children: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8:bmjgh-2021-007320. [PMID: 36731918 PMCID: PMC9896216 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children represent nearly 40% of forcibly displaced populations and are subject to stressors that affect well-being. Little is known about the effects of interventions to enhance psychological resilience in these children, outside clinical settings. METHODS We conducted a systematic review, following Cochrane methods. Eligible studies tested resilience-enhancing interventions outside clinical settings in forcibly displaced children/adolescents. We included longitudinal quantitative studies with comparator conditions irrespective of geographical scope or language. We searched articles published between January 2010 and April 2020 in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO and the WHO's Global Index Medicus. To standardise effect sizes across the different reported outcomes, we transformed reported mean differences to standardised mean differences using Hedge's g statistic with associated 95% CI. We pooled data for meta-analysis where appropriate. We used Cochrane tools to assess study risk of bias and used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to determine evidence quality for meta-analysed outcomes. RESULTS Searches yielded 4829 results. Twenty-three studies met inclusion criteria. Studies reported 18 outcomes measured by 48 different scales; only 1 study explicitly measured resilience. Eight studies were randomised controlled trials; the rest were non-randomised pre-post studies. Interventions were diverse and typically implemented in group settings. Studies reported significant improvement in outcomes pertinent to behavioural problems, coping mechanisms and general well-being but not to caregiver support or psychiatric symptoms. In meta-analysis, resilience was improved (gav=0.194, 95% CI 0.018 to 0.369), but anxiety symptoms and quality of life were not (gav=-0.326, 95% CI -0.782 to 0.131 and gav=0.325, 95% CI -0.027 to 0.678, respectively). Risk of bias varied. Quality of evidence for most graded outcomes was very low. CONCLUSIONS The multiplicity of study designs, intervention types, outcomes and measures incumbered quantifying intervention effectiveness. Future resilience research in this population should use rigorous methods and follow reporting guidelines. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020177069.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aya Thabet
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sonia Ghandi
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Erin K Barker
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Geroge Rutherford
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mohsen Malekinejad
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
de Graaff AM, Cuijpers P, Twisk JWR, Kieft B, Hunaidy S, Elsawy M, Gorgis N, Bouman TK, Lommen MJJ, Acarturk C, Bryant R, Burchert S, Dawson KS, Fuhr DC, Hansen P, Jordans M, Knaevelsrud C, McDaid D, Morina N, Moergeli H, Park AL, Roberts B, Ventevogel P, Wiedemann N, Woodward A, Sijbrandij M. Peer-provided psychological intervention for Syrian refugees: results of a randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of Problem Management Plus. BMJ MENTAL HEALTH 2023; 26:e300637. [PMID: 36789918 PMCID: PMC10035776 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2022-300637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The mental health burden among refugees in high-income countries (HICs) is high, whereas access to mental healthcare can be limited. OBJECTIVE To examine the effectiveness of a peer-provided psychological intervention (Problem Management Plus; PM+) in reducing symptoms of common mental disorders (CMDs) among Syrian refugees in the Netherlands. METHODS We conducted a single-blind, randomised controlled trial among adult Syrian refugees recruited in March 2019-December 2021 (No. NTR7552). Individuals with psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) >15) and functional impairment (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) >16) were allocated to PM+ in addition to care as usual (PM+/CAU) or CAU only. Participants were reassessed at 1-week and 3-month follow-up. Primary outcome was depression/anxiety combined (Hopkins Symptom Checklist; HSCL-25) at 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included depression (HSCL-25), anxiety (HSCL-25), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition; PCL-5), impairment (WHODAS 2.0) and self-identified problems (PSYCHLOPS; Psychological Outcomes Profiles). Primary analysis was intention-to-treat. FINDINGS Participants (n=206; mean age=37 years, 62% men) were randomised into PM+/CAU (n=103) or CAU (n=103). At 3-month follow-up, PM+/CAU had greater reductions on depression/anxiety relative to CAU (mean difference -0.25; 95% CI -0.385 to -0.122; p=0.0001, Cohen's d=0.41). PM+/CAU also showed greater reductions on depression (p=0.0002, Cohen's d=0.42), anxiety (p=0.001, Cohen's d=0.27), PTSD symptoms (p=0.0005, Cohen's d=0.39) and self-identified problems (p=0.03, Cohen's d=0.26), but not on impairment (p=0.084, Cohen's d=0.21). CONCLUSIONS PM+ effectively reduces symptoms of CMDs among Syrian refugees. A strength was high retention at follow-up. Generalisability is limited by predominantly including refugees with a resident permit. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Peer-provided psychological interventions should be considered for scale-up in HICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne M de Graaff
- Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
- International Institute for Psychotherapy, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Jos W R Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara Kieft
- ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sam Hunaidy
- Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Mariam Elsawy
- Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Noer Gorgis
- i-Psy, Parnassia Groep, The Hague, South Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Theo K Bouman
- Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Miriam J J Lommen
- Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ceren Acarturk
- Department of Psychology, Koc Universitesi, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Richard Bryant
- School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sebastian Burchert
- Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katie S Dawson
- School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniela C Fuhr
- Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Pernille Hansen
- Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mark Jordans
- Research and Development Department, War Child Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | - David McDaid
- Department of Health Policy, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Naser Morina
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hanspeter Moergeli
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - A-La Park
- Department of Health Policy, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Bayard Roberts
- Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Nana Wiedemann
- Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Aniek Woodward
- KIT Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Understanding mental health from the perception of Middle Eastern refugee women: A critical systematic review. SSM - MENTAL HEALTH 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
39
|
Twelve-month follow-up of a randomised clinical trial of a brief group psychological intervention for common mental disorders in Syrian refugees in Jordan. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2022; 31:e81. [PMID: 36377410 PMCID: PMC9677446 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796022000658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS There is increasing evidence that brief psychological interventions delivered by lay providers can reduce common mental disorders in the short-term. This study evaluates the longer-term impact of a brief, lay provider delivered group psychological intervention (Group Problem Management Plus; gPM+) on the mental health of refugees and their children's mental health. METHODS This single-blind, parallel, controlled trial randomised 410 adult Syrians in Azraq Refugee Camp in Jordan who screened positive for distress and impaired functioning to either five sessions of gPM+ or enhanced usual care (EUC). Primary outcomes were scores on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25; depression and anxiety scales) assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months Secondary outcomes included disability, posttraumatic stress, personally identified problems, prolonged grief, prodromal psychotic symptoms, parenting behaviour and children's mental health. RESULTS Between 15 October 2019 and 2 March 2020, 204 participants were assigned to gPM + and 206 to EUC, and 307 (74.9%) were retained at 12 months. Intent-to-treat analyses indicated that although participants in gPM + had greater reductions in depression at 3 months, at 12 months there were no significant differences between treatment arms on depression (mean difference -0.9, 95% CI -3.2 to 1.3; p = 0.39) or anxiety (mean difference -1.7, 95% CI -4.8 to -1.3; p = 0.06). There were no significant differences between conditions for secondary outcomes except that participants in gPM + had greater increases in positive parenting. CONCLUSIONS The short-term benefits of a brief, psychological programme delivered by lay providers may not be sustained over longer time periods, and there is a need for sustainable programmes that can prolong benefits gained through gPM + .
Collapse
|
40
|
Woodward A, de Graaff AM, Dieleman MA, Roberts B, Fuhr DC, Broerse JE, Sijbrandij M, Cuijpers P, Ventevogel P, Gerretsen B, Sondorp E. Scalability of a task-sharing psychological intervention for refugees: A qualitative study in the Netherlands. SSM - MENTAL HEALTH 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
41
|
Tee S, Üzar-Özçetin YS, Trenoweth S. Achieving culturally competent mental health care: A mixed-methods study drawing on the perspectives of UK nursing students. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2022; 58:1267-1280. [PMID: 34378792 DOI: 10.1111/ppc.12926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to examine the degree of cross-cultural competency among UK mental health student nurses, and the care delivery challenges arising from their internalized cultural assumptions. DESIGN AND METHODS This study adopted a mixed-methods design. Participants were final-year nursing students in the United Kingdom. FINDINGS The results revealed participants had a moderate level of cultural awareness and competency but highlighted many challenges to providing cross-cultural care arising from the meanings, enablers, and values they attributed to culturally competent mental health care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS As cultural competency is considered an essential characteristic of effective nursing care, greater attention should be paid to how student nurses assimilate cultural awareness to develop confidence in their day-to-day practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Tee
- The Business School, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK
| | | | - Steve Trenoweth
- BU iWell Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kurt G, Ventevogel P, Ekhtiari M, Ilkkursun Z, Erşahin M, Akbiyik N, Acarturk C. Estimated prevalence rates and risk factors for common mental health problems among Syrian and Afghan refugees in Türkiye. BJPsych Open 2022; 8:e167. [PMID: 36106400 PMCID: PMC9534906 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2022.573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Türkiye hosts 4 million refugees and asylum seekers, with Syrians and Afghans being among the largest refugee groups in country. There are limited comparative data on the conflict- and displacement-related experiences of these groups and the relation with mental health status. AIMS To assess the mental health status of Syrians and Afghans in Türkiye, identify risk factors and explore to what extent differences in mental health conditions are related to potentially traumatic events and post-displacement stressors. METHOD Two parallel online survey studies were conducted between April and June 2021 among 798 Syrians and 785 Afghans in Türkiye. Data were collected on sociodemographic characteristics, traumatic events (Harvard Trauma Questionnaire), post-displacement stressors (Post-Migration Living Difficulties Checklist), symptoms of depression and anxiety (Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5, short form). RESULTS For Syrian and Afghan participants respectively, estimated prevalence rates were: 41.1% and 50.3% for depression; 39.6% and 41% for anxiety; and 41.6% and 46.5% for PTSD. In both groups, significant predictors were female gender, exposure to potentially traumatic events, and structural and socioeconomic post-displacement stressors. Additional risk factors were older age for Afghans and higher education for Syrians. CONCLUSIONS Self-reported symptoms of common mental health problems are highly prevalent among Syrian and Afghan refugees and associated with a wide range of risk factors. After controlling for conflict- and displacement-related experiences, Afghans reported higher anxiety symptoms than Syrians, which is likely related to their legal status in Türkiye.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulsah Kurt
- Department of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Peter Ventevogel
- Public Health Section, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maryam Ekhtiari
- Department of Sociology and International Relations, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | | | - Merve Erşahin
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nuriye Akbiyik
- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Italy
| | - Ceren Acarturk
- Department of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Böge K, Karnouk C, Hoell A, Tschorn M, Kamp-Becker I, Padberg F, Übleis A, Hasan A, Falkai P, Salize HJ, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Banaschewski T, Schneider F, Habel U, Plener P, Hahn E, Wiechers M, Strupf M, Jobst A, Millenet S, Hoehne E, Sukale T, Dinauer R, Schuster M, Mehran N, Kaiser F, Bröcheler S, Lieb K, Heinz A, Rapp M, Bajbouj M. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for the treatment of depressive symptoms in refugees and asylum seekers: A multi-centred randomized controlled trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2022; 19:100413. [PMID: 35694653 PMCID: PMC9184853 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Current evidence points towards a high prevalence of psychological distress in refugee populations, contrasting with a scarcity of resources and amplified by linguistic, institutional, financial, and cultural barriers. The objective of the study is to investigate the overall effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a Stepped Care and Collaborative Model (SCCM) at reducing depressive symptoms in refugees, compared with the overall routine care practices within Germany's mental healthcare system (treatment-as-usual, TAU). Methods A multicentre, clinician-blinded, randomised, controlled trial was conducted across seven university sites in Germany. Asylum seekers and refugees with relevant depressive symptoms with a Patient Health Questionnaires score of ≥ 5 and a Refugee Health Screener score of ≥ 12. Participants were randomly allocated to one of two treatment arms (SCCM or TAU) for an intervention period of three months between April 2018 and March 2020. In the SCCM, participants were allocated to interventions tailored to their symptom severity, including watchful waiting, peer-to-peer- or smartphone intervention, psychological group therapies or mental health expert treatment. The primary endpoint was defined as the change in depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9) after 12 weeks. The secondary outcome was the change in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from baseline to post-intervention. Findings The intention-to-treat sample included 584 participants who were randomized to the SCCM (n= 294) or TAU (n=290). Using a mixed-effects general linear model with time, and the interaction of time by randomisation group as fixed effects and study site as random effect, we found significant effects for time (p < .001) and time by group interaction (p < .05) for intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. Estimated marginal means of the PHQ-9 scores after 12 weeks were significantly lower in SCCM than in TAU (for intention-to-treat: PHQ-9 mean difference at T1 1.30, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.48, p < .001; Cohen's d=.23; baseline-adjusted PHQ-9 mean difference at T1 0.57, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.74, p < .001). Cost-effectiveness and net monetary benefit analyses provided evidence of cost-effectiveness for the primary outcome and quality-adjusted life years. Robustness of results were confirmed by sensitivity analyses. Interpretation The SSCM resulted in a more effective and cost-effective reduction of depressive symptoms compared with TAU. Findings suggest a suitable model to provide mental health services in circumstances where resources are limited, particularly in the context of forced migration and pandemics. Funding This project is funded by the Innovationsfond and German Ministry of Health [grant number 01VSF16061]. The present trial is registered under Clinical-Trials.gov under the registration number: NCT03109028. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03109028
Collapse
|
44
|
Dominguez-Rodriguez A, De La Rosa-Gómez A. A Perspective on How User-Centered Design Could Improve the Impact of Self-Applied Psychological Interventions in Low- or Middle-Income Countries in Latin America. Front Digit Health 2022; 4:866155. [PMID: 35721795 PMCID: PMC9201073 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.866155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Global technological progress has generated alternatives for psychological assistance, both for the evaluation and for the treatment of different emotional disorders. Evidence suggests that Internet-based treatments are effective for the treatment of anxiety and depression disorders. However, in Latin America online treatments are still scarce compared to developed countries and have similar problems as developed countries, such as high dropout rate. One possible solution to help decrease the dropout rate is to design and develop online interventions based on the needs and characteristics of the users. The user-centered design (UCD) is a fundamental concept to develop successful online interventions. The objective of this article is to provide a perspective overview on how UCD could improve the impact of self-applied psychological interventions in low- or middle-income countries in Latin America; however this proposal can also be applied in low- and middle-income countries in other regions of the world. The literature on UCD has demonstrated its efficacy when properly applied in online interventions; however, it is not common to see how this methodology has been applied in research in online interventions, and regarding Latin America, this is even more scarce with a very limited number of articles implementing the principles of UCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anabel De La Rosa-Gómez
- Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
- *Correspondence: Anabel De La Rosa-Gómez
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tay AK, Carlsson J. Psychosocial treatment outcomes of common mental disorders vary widely in persons in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises and refugees in high-income countries. BJPsych Open 2022; 8:e100. [PMID: 35642349 PMCID: PMC9230631 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2022.73] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This commentary discusses methodological and contextual factors that might account for variations in psychosocial treatment outcomes found in persons in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises and refugees. Factors discussed are related to cultural adaptations, content and intensity of treatment, population characteristics and factors related to research design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin Kuowei Tay
- Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jessica Carlsson
- Competence Centre for Transcultural Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre Ballerup, Mental Health Services of the Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark; and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Knefel M, Kantor V, Weindl D, Schiess-Jokanovic J, Nicholson AA, Verginer L, Schäfer I, Lueger-Schuster B. A brief transdiagnostic psychological intervention for Afghan asylum seekers and refugees in Austria: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2022; 13:2068911. [PMID: 35957634 PMCID: PMC9359165 DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2068911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Afghan refugees often face hardship and traumatic experiences before, during, and after migration and frequently suffer from mental health burdens. Evidence based psychological treatments for refugees mostly focus on symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), however, refugees often suffer from a variety of general health problems as well as depression and anxiety. We thus aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a transdiagnostic psychological intervention. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of an adapted version of Problem Management Plus (aPM+) delivered by mental health professionals to adult Afghan refugees and asylum seekers. Methods We randomly allocated 88 Afghan refugees either to aPM+ in addition to treatment as usual (aPM+/TAU) or TAU alone. APM+ comprises of six weekly 90-minute individual sessions including strategies of stress management, problem solving, behavioural activation, strengthening social support and either anger regulation or increasing self-efficacy. The primary outcome was general health (GHQ-28) post intervention. Secondary outcome measures included distress by PMLD, Complex PTSD symptoms, quality of life, self-identified problems, and integration. Results Attrition was high: 42% of the randomized participants did not participate in the post-treatment assessment. A repeated measures per-protocol (completers only) ANCOVA evidenced a significant group × timepoint interaction for GHQ total scores [F(1, 47) = 14.80, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.24]. Post-hoc analyses showed significantly lower symptoms in the aPM+/TAU arm (n = 26) as compared to the TAU arm (n = 25) for the GHQ total scores (dz = 1.04). Most secondary outcomes significantly improved in the aPM+/TAU arm, but not in the TAU arm. Conclusion APM+ was effective in reducing general health problems in Afghan refugees and might be considered as a first-line intervention. High drop-out rate limit the interpretations of our results, where future investigations should focus on possibilities to reduce these rates.Trial registration: Uniform Trial Number identifier: U1111-1226-3285. HIGHLIGHTS Refugees' mental health can be strengthened with a brief psychological intervention that also focuses on skills in the context of post-migration stressors.High drop-out rates are a major challenge for future research and delivery of psychological interventions as part of health care systems to refugees and asylum seekers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Knefel
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Viktoria Kantor
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dina Weindl
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Andrew A. Nicholson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Lucia Verginer
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ingo Schäfer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pinto JV, Hunt C, O'Toole B. Advancing PTSD Diagnosis and the Treatment of Trauma in Humanitarian Emergencies via Mobile Health: Protocol for a Proof-of-Concept Non-Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e38223. [PMID: 35596546 PMCID: PMC9244657 DOI: 10.2196/38223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decentralized health systems in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) impacted by humanitarian crises lack resources and a qualified workforce to attend to the overwhelming demand for mental health care in emergencies. Innovative approaches that are safe, cost-effective, and scalable are needed to address the burden of traumatic stress brought by emergencies. High mobile phone ownership rates combined with the precision of neural, cognitive, and biometric measures of trauma and its feasible integration with Artificial Intelligence (AI) makes digital application (app) interventions a promising pathway to promote precision diagnosis and high-impact care. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study are to advance methods for the objective diagnosis and treatment of trauma in emergencies across LMICs by examining (i) neural, cognitive, and biometric markers and (ii) the efficacy of the eResilience App, a neuroscience-informed mobile health mental health app intervention, via changes in clinical symptomatology, cognitive performance, and brain activity. METHODS Trauma-exposed African refugees residing in Australia were selected for this study. A research software version of the eResilience App with advanced monitoring capabilities was designed for the trial. Participants completed the eResilience App at home during a seven-day period. Clinical, cognitive, and electrophysiological data were collected during baseline and post-test to examine biomarkers of trauma and the efficacy of the proposed digital intervention for the treatment of trauma and its potential outcomes including depression, anxiety, physical symptoms, self-harm, substance misuse, and cognitive impairment. In addition, biofeedback, wellbeing, and subjective stress data points were collected via the app during the treatment week, followed by clinical interviews at 1, 3, 6 and 12-months post-intervention. RESULTS Data collection was conducted between 2018 and 2020. A total n=100 participants exposed to war were screened, n= 75 were enrolled and assigned to a trauma-exposed control (n=38) or Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) condition (n=37), and n= 70 completed all baseline, treatment, and post-test assessments. A total n=62 of the n=70 who completed the intervention opted to enrol in the 3, 6 and 12-month follow-ups. Data collection is complete, and results are being prepared for publication. If proven efficacious, this proof-of-concept clinical trial will inform fully powered randomized clinical trials in LMICs to further develop AI-powered, app-based diagnostic and prognostic features, and determine the app's cross-cultural efficacy for the treatment of trauma in emergency settings. CONCLUSIONS This protocol provides researchers with a comprehensive background of the study rationale, a detailed guideline for replication studies interested in examining the feasibility and the efficacy of the eResilience App across varied demographics, and a robust framework for investigations of low-cost objective diagnostic markers in mental health interventions. Methodological limitations and suggestions are also provided. CLINICALTRIAL Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12616001205426. Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1180-0347.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janaina Videira Pinto
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney, 94 Mallett St, Sydney, AU.,Sync Body-Brain Health, Currimundi, AU
| | - Caroline Hunt
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, the University of Sydney, Sydney, AU
| | - Brian O'Toole
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney, 94 Mallett St, Sydney, AU
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Grasser LR. Addressing Mental Health Concerns in Refugees and Displaced Populations: Is Enough Being Done? Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2022; 15:909-922. [PMID: 35573980 PMCID: PMC9094640 DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s270233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
There are over 82.4 million forcibly displaced people worldwide, about a quarter of whom are resettling as refugees. In the wake of the global refugee crisis spurred by conflict, religious and political persecution, human rights violations, and climate disasters, a mental health has crisis followed. Not only does trauma experienced in home countries and as part of forced migration affect mental health, so too do post-migration traumatic events, discrimination, lack of access to quality and affordable healthcare and housing, and acculturation. To address mental health concerns in refugees and displaced populations, collective action is needed not only from health care providers but also from mental health researchers, funders, journals, resettlement agencies, government entities, and humanitarian organizations. The present review highlights the work of numerous scholars and organizations with the goal of understanding the mental health concerns of forcibly displaced persons within and across ecological systems. The present review seeks to bring attention to the experiences of forcibly displaced persons, summarize the growing body of research understanding the acute and chronic effects of forced displacement and possible interventions, and give a call to action for all members of the global community at every level to engage in joint efforts to improve mental health in refugees and displaced persons. Notably, there is a need for more interventions at the familial and community level that serve not only as treatment but also as prevention. Smartphone-based interventions, mind-body modalities, and interventions delivered by lay and non-clinician community members hold promise. Numerous strides could be made in refugee mental health and treatment when funding agencies include these goals in their research priorities. Despite the challenges they have faced, persons who resettle as refugees are incredibly resilient and deserve to be afforded every right, opportunity, dignity, and respect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lana Ruvolo Grasser
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Liem A, Pakingan KA, Garabiles MR, Sit HF, Burchert S, Lam AIF, Hall BJ. Evaluating the Implementation of a Mental Health App for Overseas Filipino Workers in Macao China: A Mixed-Methods Study of Stakeholders' Perspectives. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:836156. [PMID: 35592383 PMCID: PMC9113052 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.836156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) is one of the largest communities of international migrant workers. They face systemic barriers to fulfilling their health needs. The COVID-19 pandemic worsened this condition and provided a context to evaluate the utility of a digital mental health intervention delivered within a stepped-care model to address OFW mental health. Using an implementation science framework, this study aimed to evaluate stakeholders' perspectives on the implementation of Kumusta Kabayan, a mobile phone-based mental health app, for OFWs in Macao. Methods A mixed-methods convergent design was used by conducting two parallel steps, including quantitative and qualitative measures. The quantitative data was collected from Filipino team members and local non-governmental organization (NGO) staff members (N = 12). The qualitative data were gathered from interviews with OFWs in Macao who used the app (N = 25; 80% females, 76% domestic workers). Results From the online survey, the staff members of the local partner NGO and the Filipino team members strongly perceived that their organization could adapt Kumusta Kabayan to their program and generally evaluated that Kumusta Kabayan achieved its goal and was received well by OFWs. In the interviews, the OFW app users shared their experiences in using Kumusta Kabayan, which was thematically organized into six aspects of the participants' experience: (1) promotional channel and expectation; (2) when to use the app and in what language; (3) lessons learnt; (4) memorable aspects; (5) key facilitators and barriers; and (6) suggestions. Conclusion Kumusta Kabayan was well accepted and shows potential to be integrated into the existing support services for OFWs in Macao. This app has the promise of being scaled-up for OFWs in other countries by collaborating with local and overseas stakeholders. Lessons learnt from this evaluation could also be implemented in wider digital mental health services in different settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrian Liem
- Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
| | | | - Melissa R. Garabiles
- Department of Psychology, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
- Scalabrini Migration Center, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Hao Fong Sit
- Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Sebastian Burchert
- Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Agnes I. F. Lam
- Department of Communication, University of Macau, Macau, Macau SAR, China
- Centre for Macau Studies, University of Macau, Macau, Macau SAR, China
| | - Brian J. Hall
- Center for Global Health Equity, NYU Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
de Graaff AM, Cuijpers P, Acarturk C, Akhtar A, Alkneme MS, Aoun M, Awwad M, Bawaneh AY, Brown FL, Bryant R, Burchert S, Carswell K, Drogendijk A, Engels M, Fuhr DC, Hansen P, van 't Hof E, Giardinelli L, Hemmo M, Hessling JM, Ilkkursun Z, Jordans MJD, Kiselev N, Knaevelsrud C, Kurt G, Martinmäki S, McDaid D, Morina N, Naser H, Park AL, Pfaltz MC, Roberts B, Schick M, Schnyder U, Spaaij J, Steen F, Taha K, Uygun E, Ventevogel P, Whitney C, Witteveen AB, Sijbrandij M. Scalable psychological interventions for Syrian refugees in Europe and the Middle East: STRENGTHS study protocol for a prospective individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058101. [PMID: 35443961 PMCID: PMC9021771 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The World Health Organization's (WHO) scalable psychological interventions, such as Problem Management Plus (PM+) and Step-by-Step (SbS) are designed to be cost-effective non-specialist delivered interventions to reduce symptoms of common mental disorders, such as anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The STRENGTHS consortium aims to evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation of the individual format of PM+ and its group version (gPM+), as well as of the digital SbS intervention among Syrian refugees in seven countries in Europe and the Middle East. This is a study protocol for a prospective individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis to evaluate (1) overall effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and (2) treatment moderators of PM+, gPM+ and SbS with Syrian refugees. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Five pilot randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and seven fully powered RCTs conducted within STRENGTHS will be combined into one IPD meta-analytic dataset. The RCTs include Syrian refugees of 18 years and above with elevated psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10>15)) and impaired daily functioning (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0>16)). Participants are randomised into the intervention or care as usual control group, and complete follow-up assessments at 1-week, 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Primary outcomes are symptoms of depression and anxiety (25-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist). Secondary outcomes include daily functioning (WHODAS 2.0), PTSD symptoms (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5) and self-identified problems (PSYCHLOPS). We will conduct a one-stage IPD meta-analysis using linear mixed models. Quality of evidence will be assessed using the GRADE approach, and the economic evaluation approach will be assessed using the CHEC-list. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Local ethical approval has been obtained for each RCT. This IPD meta-analysis does not require ethical approval. The results of this study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne M de Graaff
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ceren Acarturk
- Department of Psychology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Aemal Akhtar
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mhd Salem Alkneme
- Division of Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universitat Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - May Aoun
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manar Awwad
- Technical Unit, International Medical Corps, London, UK
| | | | - Felicity L Brown
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Bryant
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sebastian Burchert
- Division of Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universitat Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kenneth Carswell
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | | | - Michelle Engels
- International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniela C Fuhr
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Pernille Hansen
- International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Edith van 't Hof
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | | | - Mahmoud Hemmo
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jonas M Hessling
- Division of Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universitat Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Mark J D Jordans
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nikolai Kiselev
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christine Knaevelsrud
- Division of Clinical-Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universitat Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gülsah Kurt
- Department of Psychology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Saara Martinmäki
- ARQ International, ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David McDaid
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Naser Morina
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hadeel Naser
- Technical Unit, International Medical Corps, London, UK
| | - A-La Park
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Monique C Pfaltz
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
| | - Bayard Roberts
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Matthis Schick
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ulrich Schnyder
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Julia Spaaij
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Frederik Steen
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karine Taha
- Research and Development Department, War Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ersin Uygun
- Trauma and Disaster Mental Health Master Programme, Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Peter Ventevogel
- Public Health, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Anke B Witteveen
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marit Sijbrandij
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|