1
|
Marino JL, Peate M, McNeil R, Orme LM, McCarthy MC, Glackin A, Sawyer SM. Experiences of Family and Partner Support in Fertility Decision-Making Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: A National Australian Study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:180-188. [PMID: 37339458 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To understand how adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer experience family and partner involvement in fertility preservation (FP) decision-making. Methods: As part of a nationally representative Australian cross-sectional study of 15-25-year olds with cancer, 196 participants (mean age 19.9 [standard deviation 3.2] years at diagnosis; 51% male) were surveyed regarding FP decision-making. Results: One hundred sixty-one (83%) participants reported discussion of potential effects of cancer and its treatment on fertility, of whom 57 (35%) did not undertake FP (51% of females; 19% of males). Parental involvement (mothers 62%, fathers 45%) in decision-making was considered helpful, including for 73% of 20-25-year olds with partners. Sisters and brothers were involved less often, yet rated helpful in 48% and 41% of cases, respectively. Older participants were more likely than younger ones to have involved partners (47% vs. 22%, p = 0.001) and less likely to have involved mothers (56% vs. 71%, p = 0.04) or fathers (39% vs. 55%, p = 0.04). Conclusion: This is the first quantitative study to explore family and partner involvement in AYA FP decision-making in both females and males in a nationally representative sample. Parents are important resources who commonly assist AYAs with these complex decisions. Although many AYAs will be the main decision-makers when it comes to FP, particularly as AYAs mature, these data suggest that resources and support should be available for and inclusive of parents, partners, and siblings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Marino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Robyn McNeil
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Lisa M Orme
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- ONTrac at Peter Mac, Victorian Youth Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Maria C McCarthy
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Aoife Glackin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Susan M Sawyer
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Glackin A, Marino JL, Peate M, McNeil R, Orme LM, McCarthy MC, Sawyer SM. Experiences of Oncofertility Decision-Making and Care in a National Sample of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients and Parents. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:170-179. [PMID: 37535814 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Cancer and its treatments are known to compromise fertility in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). The emotional burden of possible infertility is reduced in those who receive supportive oncofertility care. In legal minors, provision of health care must consider the legal context and desire that AYAs have for autonomous decision-making, together with their competence to make health decisions. This has important implications for how oncofertility discussions may, or may not, involve parents. The aim of this study was to explore oncofertility decision-making and care experiences in a national Australian sample of AYA cancer patients and their parents. Methods: AYAs aged 15-25 years and parents were recruited from 17 cancer care sites and CanTeen Australia as part of a national AYA cancer care study. The cross-sectional survey included open-ended questions regarding oncofertility care experiences. We used reflexive thematic analysis to identify themes. Results: Data were available for 99 AYAs and 111 parents. Four themes were identified: emotional care needs; parent-AYA dynamics including AYA autonomy and agency; decision-making considerations including values and practicalities; and reflections on oncofertility care and follow-up. Both AYAs and parents placed importance on AYA autonomy in fertility decision-making, but many AYAs appreciated the role of parents in providing support and guidance throughout the process. Conclusion: Health care professionals are encouraged to autonomously engage AYAs around fertility decision-making, while concurrently offering opportunities that promote parental support. Better psychological support and follow-up oncofertility care are also needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoife Glackin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer L Marino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robyn McNeil
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa M Orme
- ONTrac at Peter Mac, Victorian Youth Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria C McCarthy
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan M Sawyer
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moerdler S, DuVall AS, Hayes-Lattin B, Grimes A, Prasad PK, Molina JC, Monga V, Freyer DR, Roth ME. Gaps in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Education in Oncology Fellowship Training. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:97-104. [PMID: 37477884 PMCID: PMC11071107 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15-39 years) with cancer experience disparities in care and outcomes compared with older/younger patients. AYAs receive care from medical and pediatric oncologists, however, little is known about the extent of training fellows receive. This needs assessment evaluating current AYA oncology (AYA-O) education in pediatric and medical oncology fellowship programs to identify knowledge gaps for curricular development. Methods: An anonymous, cross-sectional, web-based survey developed by pediatric and medical oncologists was sent to medical (n = 178) and pediatric (n = 119) hematology/oncology program directors (PDs) at 251 sites in the United States. PDs were asked to participate and distribute the survey to their fellows. Survey questions addressed current AYA curriculum, provider comfort, and priorities for future AYA educational content. Results: Participants from 69/251 programs responded (program response rate = 27%), including 51 PDs (32 pediatric, 19 medical oncology) and 58 fellows (33 pediatric, 25 medical oncology). Eighty-five percent of PDs (44/51) reported lacking formal AYA curricula. Of these, 80% (35/44) offer some topic-specific lectures, while 20% (9/44) provide little/no education for any topics. For nearly all topics, at least 45% of combined respondents reported little/no education. Respondents believe AYA topics are important for inclusion in future curricula. The most important topics for inclusion reported were oncofertility (82%), survivorship (78%), and communication (77%). Conclusions: There are large and actionable gaps in AYA-O education during fellowship training. Efforts are underway to develop AYA-O curriculum to provide both medical and pediatric oncology fellows with the knowledge and skills required to provide optimal AYA care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Moerdler
- Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Adam S. DuVall
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Brandon Hayes-Lattin
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Allison Grimes
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Pinki K. Prasad
- Hematology and Oncology Section, Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health, Children's Hospital of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - John C. Molina
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Varun Monga
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - David R. Freyer
- Department of Pediatrics and Population and Public Health Sciences, Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michael E. Roth
- Department of Pediatrics Patient Care, Division of Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kayiira A, Xiong S, Zaake D, Balagadde JK, Gomez-Lobo V, Wabinga H, Ghebre R. Shared Decision-Making About Future Fertility in Childhood Cancer Survivorship: Perspectives of Parents in Uganda. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12:718-726. [PMID: 36787466 PMCID: PMC10611960 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite a plethora of literature on barriers to addressing future fertility in childhood cancer survivors, the data are not representative of limited middle-income settings. Unique and context-specific factors may influence addressing future fertility care among childhood cancer survivors in Uganda. This study aimed to explore the experiences, attitudes, and perceptions of parents on their interactions with health providers about future fertility, as part of their child's cancer survivorship. Methods: Using grounded theory, semistructured interviews were conducted with parents of children diagnosed with cancer, <18 years of age, and not in the induction or consolidation phases of treatment. Transcripts were thematically analyzed. Results: A total of 20 participants were interviewed, with the majority identifying as female (n = 18). The global theme that arose was the importance of shared decision-making, and the key themes encompassing this were as follows: (1) importance of accurate information, (2) respect of autonomy, and (3) engagement and psychosocial support. Conclusion: In Uganda, parents of children with cancer value a multifaceted approach to satisfactory decision-making within the context of oncofertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Kayiira
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Uganda Martyrs University School of Medicine, Kampala, Uganda
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Mulago Specialized Women's and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Serena Xiong
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Daniel Zaake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Uganda Martyrs University School of Medicine, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Veronica Gomez-Lobo
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Henry Wabinga
- Department of Pathology, Kampala Cancer Registry, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Rahel Ghebre
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nahata L, Anazodo A, Cherven B, Logan S, Meacham LR, Meade CD, Zarnegar-Lumley S, Quinn GP. Optimizing health literacy to facilitate reproductive health decision-making in adolescent and young adults with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70 Suppl 5:e28476. [PMID: 32633029 PMCID: PMC7785658 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Despite being considered "standard of care" by many organizations, fertility and reproductive health communications and counseling practices remain inconsistent for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) newly diagnosed with cancer and during survivorship. One factor known to affect how information is provided and received in the medical setting is health literacy. Providers should consider health literacy to optimize reproductive health communication with AYAs as they cope with their diagnosis, understand what it means for their future, process information about treatment options, learn about their potential harmful effects on fertility, make quick decisions about fertility preservation, and navigate a future family planning course. Thus, the objectives of this manuscript are to (a) summarize literature on reproductive health literacy; (b) describe health literacy frameworks; (c) examine ways to assess health literacy; and (d) identify ways to enhance clinician-patient communication in the AYA oncofertility setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leena Nahata
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
- Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- School of Women and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brooke Cherven
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Shanna Logan
- School of Women and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lillian R. Meacham
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Cathy D. Meade
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Division of Population Science, Health Outcomes & Behavior
| | - Sara Zarnegar-Lumley
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kayiira A, Neda John J, Zaake D, Xiong S, Kambugu Balagadde J, Gomez-Lobo V, Wabinga H, Ghebre R. Understanding Fertility Attitudes and Outcomes Among Survivors of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancers in a Low-Resource Setting: A Registry-Based Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview Survey. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12:520-528. [PMID: 36579945 PMCID: PMC10457622 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To establish the extent of self-reported reproductive failure associated with cancer treatment, and attitudes toward fertility among adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors in Uganda. Methods: A registry-based computer-assisted telephone interview survey was conducted in Uganda. The survey population were survivors of childhood, adolescent and early adulthood cancers diagnosed between 2007 and 2018. The survey explored fertility outcomes, experiences of oncofertility and fertility attitudes of AYA cancer survivors. Results: Thirty-four (female = 14 and male = 20) interviews were completed. Survivors were 18-35 years of age. The median age at cancer diagnosis was 23.5 for females and 17.5 for males. Kaposi's sarcoma contributed to 44% of primary cancer diagnoses. All the survivors had received chemotherapy alone or in combination with other modalities and 79% of survivors had not received satisfactory information about future fertility before cancer treatment. Twenty one percent of males and 46% females met the criteria for infertility and 60% of these had met this criterion after their cancer diagnosis. Eighty two percent wanted to raise a biologically related child. Forty seven percent would be dissatisfied with their lives if they were unable to have a child or additional children. Conclusion: AYA cancer survivors in this low-resource setting reported reproductive failure, despite a strong fertility desire. Information and counseling provided on therapy-related problems before cancer treatment was insufficient and reinforces the need to build capacity for oncofertility resources within the region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Kayiira
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uganda Martyrs University School of Medicine, Kampala, Uganda
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Mulago Specialized Women's and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Daniel Zaake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uganda Martyrs University School of Medicine, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Serena Xiong
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis. Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Veronica Gomez-Lobo
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Henry Wabinga
- Kampala Cancer Registry, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Rahel Ghebre
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhu F, Liu C, Qi J, Bian Y, Pang L, Lu Q. Psychometric properties of the Fertility Intention Scale among breast cancer patients of childbearing age in mainland China. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2022; 9:100100. [PMID: 35860605 PMCID: PMC9289818 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective There are no valid assessment instruments assessing fertility intention among breast cancer survivors in mainland China. Therefore, this study aims to examine the psychometric properties of the Taiwanese version of the Fertility Intention Scale (FIS) among female patients with breast cancer of childbearing age in mainland China. Methods Two hundred and sixty-four female patients with breast cancer of childbearing age were recruited from two tertiary hospitals in Tianjin and Baoding, of which 32 patients completed the survey twice. Confirmatory factor analysis was adopted to assess construct validity. Correlations between the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer scale and FIS scores were calculated using Spearman correlation for convergent validity. The known-group validity of the FIS was verified using Mann–Whitney U test to compare the FIS scores between patients with or without the intention to conceive. Moreover, reliabilities were examined using Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient. Results Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit to previous factor structures (χ2/df = 3.19, root mean square error of approximation = 0.091, comparative fitting index = 0.980, Tucker–Lewis index = 0.975), and no FIS item was dropped. The FIS scores were weak negatively correlated with the Reproductive Concerns After Cancer scale scores (r = –0.172, P < 0.01). The convergent validity of FIS was not satisfactory. Differences were noted between patients with or without the intention to conceive (50.62 ± 6.35 vs. 45.98 ± 7.19, P < 0.01). The FIS showed acceptable known-group validity. The internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.824) and the test-retest reliability (r = 0.863, P < 0.01) of the FIS were also acceptable. Conclusions Overall, the FIS provides a comprehensive evaluation of the fertility intention among patients with breast cancer of childbearing age in mainland China. However, the convergent validity was not satisfactory; thus, further revision and validation may be required in the future.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pitch N, Stefaniuk S, MacMillan M, Catsburg J, Gupta AA, Vora T. Looking Back to Move Forward: Lessons Learned from a Successful, Sustainable, Replicable Model of Adolescent and Young Adult Program of a Tertiary Cancer Care Center. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2022; 11:181-188. [PMID: 35007440 PMCID: PMC9057888 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM) established the adolescent and young adult (AYA) oncology program in 2014 to address the unique needs of AYA by delivering targeted, evidence-based care through a multidisciplinary team. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent a consultation with the PM AYA program from 2014 to 2020. The association between the health domain concerns reported and age at consultation, cancer diagnoses, and time since diagnosis was analyzed using chi-square test of independence in SPSS. Results: In our cohort of 1128 AYA, the median age at assessment was 28.2 years. The most common diagnoses were lymphoma (n = 251, 22.2%), leukemia (n = 207, 18.4%), and breast cancer (n = 162, 14.4%). The most common concerns reported were related to fertility (n = 882, 78.2%) and work/school (n = 472, 41.8%). Fertility concerns were most common in 25–34 age group (443/540, 82.0%) and work-/school-related concerns were highest in 18–24 age group (191/355, 53.8%). Diagnoses significantly affect majority of concerns reported. Fertility concerns were most common in AYA consulted near diagnosis, while body image-, exercise-, and diet-related concerns were more frequently reported, while on active treatments. Conclusions: Supporting fertility concerns remains the cornerstone of any successful AYA program. Work-/school-related concerns deserve more elucidation and attention. We identified important patterns in the health-related concerns of AYA, especially as they relate to age, diagnoses, and time since diagnosis. This insight will guide us for improving patient-centered care delivery to AYA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Pitch
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Stephanie Stefaniuk
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Meghan MacMillan
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Jennifer Catsburg
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Abha A Gupta
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tushar Vora
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gorman JR, Drizin JH, Smith E, Flores-Sanchez Y, Harvey SM. Patient-Centered Communication to Address Young Adult Breast Cancer Survivors' Reproductive and Sexual Health Concerns. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2021; 36:1743-1758. [PMID: 32703034 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1794550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Women faced with a diagnosis of breast cancer as young adults commonly experience negative effects of cancer and cancer treatment on their reproductive and sexual health (RSH) that are inadequately addressed by their healthcare providers (HCPs). The objectives of this study were to 1) identify approaches to improving RSH communication from YA breast cancer survivors' perspectives, 2) identify facilitators and barriers to the approaches identified, and 3) identify specific strategies to improve patient-centered RSH communication. We conducted individual telephone interviews with 29 women who were diagnosed with breast cancer under age 40 years. We used a grounded theory approach to identify themes, and explored how the themes related to the PCC framework to elucidate specific strategies for improving communication. Three main themes emerged: 1) Normalizing and integrating assessment of RSH concerns; 2) HCP conveying genuine caring and investment; and 3) Improving accessibility of comprehensive RSH services after cancer. Results revealed concrete strategies for improving patient-centered RSH communication at the patient-provider and health system levels. These included reminding patients that RSH concerns are common, routinely asking about RSH, using active listening, and connecting patients to HCP who can address their RSH concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica R Gorman
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, 97331, OR, USA
| | - Julia H Drizin
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, 97331, OR, USA
| | - Ellie Smith
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, 97331, OR, USA
| | | | - S Marie Harvey
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, 97331, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Barnbrock A, Salzmann-Manrique E, Sänger N, Fiegel H, Ochsendorf F, Klingebiel T, Bader P, Jarisch A. How can fertility counseling be implemented for every newly diagnosed pediatric patient facing gonadotoxic treatment?-A single-center experience. Ann Hematol 2021; 100:2831-2841. [PMID: 34536088 PMCID: PMC8510917 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-021-04648-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Since the survival rates of pediatric patients undergoing cancer treatment or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have increased rapidly in recent decades, the late effects of treatment are now an important focus of patient care. Access to fertility preservation (FP) procedures as well as their financing differs considerably across Europe. However, some countries in Europe have recently changed the legal basis for financing FP procedures; therefore, the implementation of structures is mandatory to give patients access to FP. In this prospective cohort study, we characterized the process for establishing pediatric fertility counseling, including the development of an in-house standard procedure for recommendations regarding FP with potentially gonadotoxic treatment and valuating data from all FP counseling sessions. All data concerning patient characteristics (pubertal status, disease group) and recommendation of FP measures were prospectively collected and adoption of FP measures analyzed. Prior to the establishment of a structured process for FP in our pediatric oncology and stem cell transplantation center, there was no standardized FP counseling. We demonstrate that with the establishment of an inhouse standard procedure, it is possible to give consistent yet individualized FP counseling to approximately 90% of our patients facing gonadotoxic treatment, counseling over 200 patients between 2017 and 2019. This pilot study could potentially be adapted in other pediatric hematology, oncology, and stem cell transplantation centers to allow a more standardized handling of FP counseling for all patients facing gonadotoxic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke Barnbrock
- Division for Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Department for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. .,Division for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
| | - Emilia Salzmann-Manrique
- Division for Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Department for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Nicole Sänger
- Division for Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Department for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Henning Fiegel
- Division for Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, Department for Surgery, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Falk Ochsendorf
- Division for Andrology, Department for Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Thomas Klingebiel
- Division for Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Department for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,Division for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Peter Bader
- Division for Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Department for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Andrea Jarisch
- Division for Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Department for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Salsman JM, Yanez B, Snyder MA, Avina AR, Clayman ML, Smith KN, Purnell K, Victorson D. Attitudes and practices about fertility preservation discussions among young adults with cancer treated at a comprehensive cancer center: patient and oncologist perspectives. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:5945-5955. [PMID: 33763727 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06158-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adults (YAs, ages 18-39) diagnosed with cancer face multiple challenges that affect their health-related quality of life, including the potential for cancer-related infertility. Providing information about the risk of infertility and options to maintain fertility is critical for YAs who are newly diagnosed. However, barriers to effective communication exist for oncologists and their patients. The purpose of this study was to interview medical oncologists and YAs from the same cancer center to examine attitudes and practices about fertility preservation. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical oncologists (N=12) and YAs within 2 years post-treatment (N=24), representing the most common cancers affecting YAs. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using qualitative methodologies with the analysis software NVivo 10. RESULTS Twelve oncologists (50% female, 67% <50 years) and 24 YAs (67% female, M=29 years) completed interviews. Common themes across oncologist and YA interviews were the roles of cancer type or stage and patient interest or parity in influencing the decision. The most important factor for YAs was to receive accurate, in-depth information. Unique themes for oncologists focused on clinical aspects of their patient's disease. For YAs, they shared about the emotional impact of cancer-related infertility and desire for support from trusted others. CONCLUSIONS Results provide a better understanding of the attitudes and practices about fertility preservation discussions among YAs. Given the common factors affecting fertility preservation decisions, models of shared decision-making may be ideal for YAs and oncologists. Future interventions should explore tailored applications of this approach for YAs newly diagnosed with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Salsman
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine & the Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
| | - Betina Yanez
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- The Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mallory A Snyder
- Office of Research and National Laboratories, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alexis R Avina
- San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Marla L Clayman
- General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kristin N Smith
- The Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Center for Fertility and Reproductive Medicine, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - David Victorson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- The Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hawkey A, Ussher JM, Perz J, Parton C. Talking but not always understanding: couple communication about infertility concerns after cancer. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:161. [PMID: 33468106 PMCID: PMC7816453 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10188-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer related infertility can have an impact on couple relationships, with evidence that couple communication facilitates coping. However, little is known about the ways in which couples communicate about cancer-related fertility concerns. The aim of this article is to examine couple communication about fertility concerns in the context of cancer, and the perceived quality of such communication from the perspective of cancer survivors and their partners. METHODS Eight-hundred and seventy-eight cancer survivors (693 women, 185 men) and 144 partners (82 women, 62 men), across a range of tumour types and age groups, completed a survey which examined cancer related fertility concerns. Seventy-eight survivors (61 women and 17 men), and 26 partners (13 women and 13 men), participated in semi-structured interviews, in order to examine the subjective experience of fertility concerns in-depth. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interviews and open ended survey questions. Valid percentages for single items from the relationships subscale of the Fertility Preservation Inventory (FPI) related to qualitative themes, identified frequency of responses. RESULTS The major theme was 'talking but not always understanding". 89.6% of cancer survivors and partners (95.1%) reported working well together handling fertility questions (FPI), but agreed that communication could be improved (65.9% survivors; 65% partners). Open and honest couple communication was associated with feelings of support, understanding and relationship growth, including perception of partner comfort (79.2% survivors, 81.6% partners). However, 32% survivors and 31.1% partners concealed fertility concerns to avoid upsetting their partner, or reported that their partner doesn't understand their fertility concerns (survivors 25.5%, partners 14.6%), with 14.1% of cancer survivors and 19.4% partners reporting fear of relationship breakdown because of fertility issues. Fear of rejection when forming new relationships, and concerns about how to talk to future partners, was reported by non-partnered individuals. CONCLUSION Health-care professionals should include partners of cancer survivors in fertility discussions. Couple interventions developed in general psycho-oncology should be extended to the domain of fertility, in order to facilitate effective couple communication. Communication in future relationships needs to be addressed for single people and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) who have fertility concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Hawkey
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751, Australia
| | - Jane M Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751, Australia.
| | - Janette Perz
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751, Australia
| | - Chloe Parton
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hawkey AJ, Ussher JM, Perz J, Parton C, Patterson P, Bateson D, Hobbs K, Kirsten L. The impact of cancer-related fertility concerns on current and future couple relationships: People with cancer and partner perspectives. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2020; 30:e13348. [PMID: 33084134 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine how cancer-related fertility concerns impact on couple relationships from the perspectives of people with cancer (PWC) and partners of people with cancer. METHODS A qualitative research design was used, drawing data from open-ended responses to a survey and in-depth individual interviews. Eight hundred and seventy-eight PWC (693 women, 185 men) and 144 partners (82 women, 62 men), across a range of tumour types and age groups, completed a survey, and 78 PWC (61 women and 17 men) and 26 partners (13 women and 13 men), participated in semi-structured interviews. RESULTS Thematic analysis identified that many PWC and partners experience a 'double burden', manifested by cancer-related fertility concerns creating relational stress, changes to couple sexual intimacy and feelings of inadequacy when forming new relationships. However, many participants adopted strategies to facilitate coping with infertility or fertility concerns. This included acceptance of infertility and privileging of survival, focusing on relationship growth, optimism and nurturing in other ways. CONCLUSION Cancer-related fertility concerns can have a significant impact on couple relationships. Psychological support from clinicians may facilitate couple coping, as well as help to address concerns about future relationships for un-partnered people with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra J Hawkey
- Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane M Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - Janette Perz
- Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - Chloe Parton
- Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Kim Hobbs
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Laura Kirsten
- Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Korte E, Schilling R, Balcerek M, Campbell H, Dirksen U, Herrmann G, Kepakova K, Kepak T, Klco-Brosius S, Kruseova J, Kunstreich M, Lackner H, Langer T, Panasiuk A, Stefanowicz J, Strauß G, Ranft A, Byrne J, Goldbeck L, Borgmann-Staudt A. Fertility education for adolescent cancer patients: Gaps in current clinical practice in Europe. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2020; 29:e13279. [PMID: 32567091 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As adolescent cancer patients may suffer from infertility following treatment, fertility counselling is essential. Our aim was to explore the current situation in four European countries in terms of (I) education about the risk for infertility, (II) counselling on fertility preservation, (III) patients' knowledge on fertility, (IV) sufficiency of information and (V) uptake of cryopreservation. METHODS In total, 113 patients (13-20 years) at 11 study centres completed a self-report questionnaire three and six months after cancer diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS As many as 80.2% of participants reported having received education about the risk for infertility prior to treatment, 73.2% recalled counselling on fertility preservation. Only 52.3% stated they felt sufficiently informed to make a decision. Inability to recall counselling on fertility preservation (OR = 0.03, CI: 0.00-0.47) and female gender (OR = 0.11, CI: 0.03-0.48) was associated with lower use of cryopreservation, whereas older age was associated with higher use. CONCLUSION Fertility counselling was available to a relatively high proportion of patients, and it did influence the utilisation of cryopreservation. However, many patients did not feel sufficiently informed. Further improvement is needed to enable adolescent cancer patients to make an informed decision on fertility preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Korte
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph Schilling
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Magdalena Balcerek
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health, BIH, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Uta Dirksen
- University Hospital Essen Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Research Centre (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gloria Herrmann
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Katerina Kepakova
- University Hospital Brno & International Clinical Research Center (FNUSA-ICRC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Kepak
- University Hospital Brno & International Clinical Research Center (FNUSA-ICRC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Marina Kunstreich
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Haematology and Immunology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Herwig Lackner
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Thorsten Langer
- Paediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Joanna Stefanowicz
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Gabriele Strauß
- Helios Kliniken Berlin-Buch, Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Andreas Ranft
- University Hospital Essen Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Research Centre (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Lutz Goldbeck
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Anja Borgmann-Staudt
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Norton W, Wright E. Barriers and Facilitators to Fertility-Related Discussions with Teenagers and Young Adults with Cancer: Nurses' Experiences. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020; 9:481-489. [PMID: 32155354 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Improvements in cancer survival rates for teenagers and young adults (TYAs) have resulted in quality-of-life issues into survivorship becoming increasingly important. However, infertility is a potential late side effect of cancer treatment, which can negatively impact on quality of life. Advances in assisted reproductive technologies have resulted in increasingly effective fertility preservation (FP) options. Purpose: This study aimed to explore nurses' experiences of undertaking fertility-related discussions with TYAs with cancer aged 13-24 years. Methods: An interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach was used. Eleven purposively selected nurses working on a specialist TYA cancer unit participated in semistructured interviews. Data were analyzed using IPA. Results: Parents/family were experienced as self-appointed informal gatekeepers who were perceived to hold the power to control nurses' access to communicate with young people about fertility issues. Nurses adopted a supportive role, which was enhanced by the positive nature of their relationship with the TYA. Uncertainty was expressed over whether the TYA had been fully informed of their infertility risk and potential FP options. Conclusions: Nurses should manage parental involvement sensitively if TYAs are to make informed decisions regarding their future reproductive health. There is a need for clear role delineation in fertility discussions to ensure that TYAs are provided with the opportunity to discuss infertility risk and be referred to a specialist before initiating cancer treatment. Nurses should cultivate the primacy of the nurse-TYA relationship to improve fertility care. Further research into the factors that TYAs may consider beneficial within the nurse-patient relationship is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Norton
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The Leicester School of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine Wright
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The Leicester School of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Perez GK, Salsman JM, Fladeboe K, Kirchhoff AC, Park ER, Rosenberg AR. Taboo Topics in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology: Strategies for Managing Challenging but Important Conversations Central to Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivorship. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2020; 40:1-15. [PMID: 32324424 PMCID: PMC7328818 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_279787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
Research on adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer has flourished over the past decade, underscoring the unique medical and psychosocial needs of this vulnerable group. A cancer diagnosis during adolescence and young adulthood intersects with the developmental trajectory of AYAs, derailing critical physical, social, and emotional development. AYAs face these abrupt life changes needing age-appropriate information and resources to offset these challenges. Greater attention is needed to address AYA-specific concerns on reproductive and sexual health, financial security and independence, emotional well-being, social support, and end-of-life care. If these unique needs are unaddressed, this can adversely affect AYAs' health care engagement and overall quality of life, increasing their risk for cancer-related morbidity and early mortality. In particular, health care decisions made during treatment have important implications for AYA patients' future health. Oncology clinicians are well positioned to address AYA patients' concerns by anticipating and addressing the challenges this age group is likely to face. In this paper, we explore several core topics that affect AYAs' quality of life and that can be challenging to address. Starting from the moment of diagnosis, through cancer treatment and post-treatment survivorship, and into end of life, each section highlights critical developmental-centric life domains that are affected by the cancer experience. Specifically, we discuss resources, tools, and strategies to navigate these challenging conversations. Taking a risk-reduction approach that invites two-way communication and facilitates referral to age-appropriate resources would help destigmatize these experiences and, in turn, would support the provision of compassionate and effective age-concordant care to this vulnerable group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giselle K. Perez
- Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - John M. Salsman
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Kaitlyn Fladeboe
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Anne C. Kirchhoff
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Elyse R. Park
- Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Abby R. Rosenberg
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Exploring patient and provider perspectives on the intersection between fertility, genetics, and family building. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:4833-4845. [PMID: 31982959 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05315-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients have distinct medical and psychosocial needs and fertility is a key concern. Early age of onset is a risk factor for hereditary cancer and AYAs are more likely to experience reduced fertility. This has implications for future family building decisions and fertility preservation (FP) and genetic testing/counseling (GT/GC) education. METHODS Patients diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 18 and 39 and health care providers (HCPs) who treat AYA cancer patients were recruited from a single institution. Qualitative interviews explored AYA patients' and HCPs' concerns regarding their experiences discussing genetics and FP. RESULTS The majority of patients (n = 17) were female (59%), and the majority of HCPs (n = 18) were male (67%). Overall, participants had differing perceptions of FP and GT/GC-related information provided during the clinical visit. Patients indicated initiating the conversation about FP and did not recall HCPs discussing GT/GC with them. HCPs indicated patients were often overwhelmed with too much information and comprehension of this discussion is limited. HCPs also felt patients' emotions/beliefs determined their information-seeking behavior specific to FP and GT/GC. Participants felt educational materials should be developed and delivered in a video format depicting a patient-provider interaction or patient testimonial. CONCLUSION AYA patients are often overwhelmed by a cancer diagnosis; the complexity/volume of information regarding FP and GT/GC may hinder understanding and decision-making about family building. Educational materials that help patients understand what questions to ask HCPs about FP and GT/GC should be developed to improve knowledge, psychosocial well-being, and future family building decisions.
Collapse
|
18
|
Lautz TB, Harris CJ, Laronda MM, Erickson LL, Rowell EE. A fertility preservation toolkit for pediatric surgeons caring for children with cancer. Semin Pediatr Surg 2019; 28:150861. [PMID: 31931969 DOI: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2019.150861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Survival for children with cancer has improved significantly in recent decades, prompting an increasing emphasis on minimizing late effects of therapy, including infertility and premature gonadal insufficiency. The time interval after diagnosis and before therapy initiation can be stressful and overwhelming for patients and their families coming to terms with the implications of the diagnosis, but is also the optimal time to address oncofertility options. Pediatric surgeons are often an integral part of the care team for these patients during this vulnerable time period and play a key role in advocating for and performing oncofertility procedures. Children with cancer have both non-experimental and experimental fertility preservation options available depending on their pubertal status and a risk assessment performed based on their anticipated therapy. This review provides an oncofertility toolkit for pediatric surgeons to perform a risk assessment, counsel families on fertility preservation options, and establish an oncofertility program tailored to the resources available at their institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy B Lautz
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 East Chicago Avenue Box 63, Chicago, IL, United States.
| | - Courtney J Harris
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 East Chicago Avenue Box 63, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Monica M Laronda
- Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Laura L Erickson
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 East Chicago Avenue Box 63, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Erin E Rowell
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 East Chicago Avenue Box 63, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Close AG, Dreyzin A, Miller KD, Seynnaeve BKN, Rapkin LB. Adolescent and young adult oncology-past, present, and future. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69:485-496. [PMID: 31594027 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
There are nearly 70,000 new cancer diagnoses made annually in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in the United States. Historically, AYA patients with cancer, aged 15 to 39 years, have not shown the same improved survival as older or younger cohorts. This article reviews the contemporary cancer incidence and survival data through 2015 for the AYA patient population based on the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry program and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data through 2016 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics are also described. Encouragingly, absolute and relative increases in 5-year survival for AYA cancers have paralleled those of childhood cancers since the year 2000. There has been increasing attention to these vulnerable patients and improved partnerships and collaboration between adult and pediatric oncology; however, obstacles to the care of this population still occur at multiple levels. These vulnerabilities fall into 3 significant categories: research efforts and trial enrollment directed toward AYA malignancies, access to care and insurance coverage, and AYA-specific psychosocial support. It is critical for providers and health care delivery systems to recognize that the AYA population remains vulnerable to provider and societal complacency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison G Close
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexandra Dreyzin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Brittani K N Seynnaeve
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Louis B Rapkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Corkum KS, Rhee DS, Wafford QE, Demeestere I, Dasgupta R, Baertschiger R, Malek MM, Aldrink JH, Heaton TE, Weil BR, Madonna MB, Lautz TB. Fertility and hormone preservation and restoration for female children and adolescents receiving gonadotoxic cancer treatments: A systematic review. J Pediatr Surg 2019; 54:2200-2209. [PMID: 30773394 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2018] [Revised: 12/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic review by the American Pediatric Surgical Cancer Committee was to summarize evidence from the current medical literature regarding fertility restoration and hormone replacement for female children and adolescents treated with gonadotoxic treatments. METHODS Using PRISMA guidelines, questions were addressed by searching Medline, Cochrane, Embase Central and National clearing house databases using relevant search terms. Eligible studies included those that addressed ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), oocyte harvest, ovarian transposition, and ovarian tissue auto-transplantation for females under the age of 20. Four reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Study outcomes were summarized in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS Two thousand two hundred seventy-six studies were identified by database search and manual review and 2185 were eliminated based on defined exclusion criteria. Ninety-one studies served as the basis for the systematic review. There were 1019 patients who underwent OTC with ages ranging from 0.4 to 20.4 years old, with 298 under the age of 13. Twenty patients aged 13-20 years old underwent successful oocyte harvest. Thirty-seven children underwent ovarian transposition as a means of fertility preservation. Eighteen patients underwent auto-transplantation of thawed ovarian cortical tissue that was harvested before the age of 21 years resulting in 10 live births. CONCLUSIONS Clinically accepted and experimental fertility preservation options such as OTC, oocyte cryopreservation, and ovarian transposition are available to females aged 20 years and younger who are at risk for premature ovarian insufficiency and infertility due to gonadotoxic treatments. There is a large cohort of pediatric-aged patients, with a wide variety of diagnoses and treatments, who have undergone fertility preservation. Currently, fertility and hormone restoration experience for patients who were 20- years of age or younger at the time of fertility preservation remains limited. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine S Corkum
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Daniel S Rhee
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Q Eileen Wafford
- Galter Health Sciences Library, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Research Laboratory in Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles, (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Reto Baertschiger
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Marcus M Malek
- Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer H Aldrink
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Todd E Heaton
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brent R Weil
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Timothy B Lautz
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fidler MM, Frobisher C, Hawkins MM, Nathan PC. Challenges and opportunities in the care of survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27668. [PMID: 30815985 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer are an understudied group. Much of what is known about long-term outcomes after AYA cancer has been derived from cohorts of childhood cancer survivors, which seldom include patients at the older end of the AYA age spectrum. In general, AYA cancer survivors have a lower risk for premature mortality, subsequent primary neoplasms and chronic health conditions than childhood cancer survivors. However, AYA cancer survivors are vulnerable to psychosocial challenges, concerns about fertility and relationships and financial toxicity. No single model is optimal for the care of these survivors, but it is generally agreed that all survivors require a survivor care plan that promotes their adherence to evidence-based surveillance guidelines. There is a need to create survivor cohorts that include the full range of AYA ages and diagnoses to be able to address the many pressing questions that remain unanswered in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda M Fidler
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Control Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | - Clare Frobisher
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Michael M Hawkins
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Paul C Nathan
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ussher JM, Perz J. Infertility‐related distress following cancer for women and men: A mixed method study. Psychooncology 2019; 28:607-614. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2018] [Revised: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M. Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine Western Sydney University Penrith Australia
| | - Janette Perz
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine Western Sydney University Penrith Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Parton C, Ussher JM, Perz J. Hope, burden or risk: a discourse analytic study of the construction and experience of fertility preservation in the context of cancer. Psychol Health 2019; 34:456-477. [DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1543764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Parton
- Western Sydney University, Translational Health Research Institute, Campbelltown Campus, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jane M. Ussher
- Western Sydney University, Translational Health Research Institute, Campbelltown Campus, Sydney, Australia
| | - Janette Perz
- Western Sydney University, Translational Health Research Institute, Campbelltown Campus, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cancer and fertility: optimizing communication between patients and healthcare providers. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2019; 13:53-58. [PMID: 30625120 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article reviews the status of guidelines and recommendations for communication between patients with cancer and healthcare providers (HCPs) concerning fertility issues. RECENT FINDINGS The timing, the type of information provided, and the openness of HCPs can all affect how patients with cancer perceive discussions regarding fertility concerns and preservation. In addition, whether such discussions occur is associated with intrinsic factors, such as age and sex of the patients as well as HCP's knowledge level. It has also been found that the patients have different needs for information regarding fertility preservation and preferences for types of communication strategies regarding the impact of their disease and treatments on options for family planning. SUMMARY Although discussions about fertility concerns in the context of cancer between physicians and patients are occurring more frequently, there are inconsistent findings regarding satisfaction with these discussions. Recent research has found that the timing, type of information given, and level of openness of the HCP can impact how patients perceive communications regarding the risks of cancer treatment on fertility preservation options and future family planning. Age, sex, and HCP's knowledge of fertility risks and fertility preservation services are also notable factors associated with whether and how extensively discussions about fertility take place. More women than men report having a fertility discussion with an HCP. However, men are more likely to report satisfaction with the fertility discussion than women.
Collapse
|
25
|
Keim-Malpass J, Fitzhugh HS, Smith LP, Smith RP, Erickson J, Douvas MG, Thomas T, Petroni G, Duska L. What is the Role of the Oncology Nurse in Fertility Preservation Counseling and Education for Young Patients? JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2018; 33:1301-1305. [PMID: 28667545 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1247-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Oncology nurses are uniquely positioned to offer fertility preservation counseling and education for cancer patients of reproductive age, yet there is a dearth of research that focuses on current practice and perceptions of nursing role. In 2013, the American Society of Clinical Oncology extended the duties of fertility preservation counseling among patients of reproductive age undergoing cancer treatment to include registered nurses and other allied health professionals as active partners in the counseling and education process. This study used a cross-sectional descriptive survey to assess current practices, role perceptions, and barriers to fertility preservation counseling among registered nurses working in an academic care setting with outpatient and inpatient services. There were significant gaps in current practices and perceptions of roles regarding fertility preservation counseling. Many nurses expressed the perception that fertility preservation counseling was important, but it was outside the scope of their practice to perform this education. This preliminary work defined need for an interdisciplinary fertility preservation team, communication surrounding educational practice norms, and designated oncofertility navigator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Keim-Malpass
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, P.O. Box 800782, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
| | - Hannah S Fitzhugh
- University of Virginia Emily Couric Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Laura P Smith
- University of Virginia Emily Couric Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Reproductive Medicine and Surgery Center of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ryan P Smith
- University of Virginia Emily Couric Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Division of Urology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jeanne Erickson
- University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee College of Nursing, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Mike G Douvas
- University of Virginia Emily Couric Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Hematology-Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Tanya Thomas
- University of Virginia Emily Couric Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- University of Virginia Health System Acute Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Gina Petroni
- University of Virginia Emily Couric Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Linda Duska
- University of Virginia Emily Couric Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Gynecologic Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Young K, Shliakhtsitsava K, Natarajan L, Myers E, Dietz AC, Gorman JR, Martínez ME, Whitcomb BW, Su HI. Fertility counseling before cancer treatment and subsequent reproductive concerns among female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Cancer 2018; 125:980-989. [PMID: 30489638 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 10/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fertility counseling before cancer treatment has been advocated by clinical guidelines, though little is known about its long-term impact on the unique reproductive concerns of female adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. The goal of this study was to measure the association between fertility counseling by fertility specialists before cancer treatment and subsequent reproductive concerns. METHOD A cross-sectional analysis was performed among 747 AYA survivors aged 18-40 years who had been recruited from cancer registries and physician and advocacy group referrals between 2015 and 2017. Participants self-reported information on past fertility counseling at cancer diagnosis, cancer type and treatment, and current reproductive concerns, as measured using the multidimensional Reproductive Concerns After Cancer scale. Multivariable log-binomial regression models tested associations between fertility counseling and reproductive concerns. RESULTS The mean age of the cohort was 33.0 years (standard deviation, 5.1 years), and the mean period since diagnosis was 7.7 years (standard deviation, 5.0 years). Seventy-three percent of participants were white, and 24% were Hispanic. Fertility counseling was reported by 19% of survivors; moderate to high overall reproductive concerns were reported by 44% of participants. In adjusted analysis, fertility counseling was significantly associated with moderate to high reproductive concerns (risk ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.45) and not modified by exposure to fertility-threatening treatments (Pinteraction = .23). CONCLUSION A large proportion of AYA cancer survivors across cancer types and treatment exposures reported moderate to high reproductive concerns, suggesting that there is a need to address these cancer-specific reproductive health concerns after treatment. Higher concerns, even with counseling, suggests the need to improve the quality of fertility counseling throughout the cancer continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Young
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Ksenya Shliakhtsitsava
- Department of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Loki Natarajan
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Emily Myers
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Andrew C Dietz
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Jessica R Gorman
- School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon
| | - María Elena Martínez
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Brian W Whitcomb
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts
| | - H Irene Su
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Benedict C, McLeggon JA, Thom B, Kelvin JF, Landwehr M, Watson S, Ford JS. "Creating a family after battling cancer is exhausting and maddening": Exploring real-world experiences of young adult cancer survivors seeking financial assistance for family building after treatment. Psychooncology 2018; 27:2829-2839. [PMID: 30238545 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Revised: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Young adult (YA) cancer survivors who received gonadotoxic therapy are at risk for impaired fertility and/or childbearing difficulties. This study explored the experiences and financial concerns of survivors pursuing family building through assisted reproductive technology (ART) and adoption. METHODS Retrospective study of data collected from grant applications for financial assistance with family building. Grounded theory methodology using an inductive data-driven approach guided qualitative data analysis. RESULTS Participants (N = 46) averaged 32 years old (SD = 3.4) were primarily female (81%) and married/partnered (83%). Four main themes were identified representing the (1) emotional experiences and (2) financial barriers to family building after cancer, (3) perceived impact on partners, and (4) disrupted life trajectory. Negative emotions were pervasive but were balanced with hope and optimism that parenthood would be achieved. Still, the combination of high ART/adoption costs, the financial impact of cancer, and limited sources for support caused extreme financial stress. Further, in the face of these high costs, many survivors reported worry and guilt about burdening partners, particularly as couples failed to meet personal and societal expectations for parenthood timelines. CONCLUSION After cancer, YAs face numerous psychosocial and financial difficulties in their pursuits of family building when ART/adoption is needed to achieve parenthood. Survivors interested in future children may benefit from follow-up fertility counseling post-treatment including discussion of ART options, surrogacy, and adoption, as appropriate, and potential barriers. Planning for the financial cost and burden in particular may help to avoid or mitigate financial stress later on.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.,Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Jody-Ann McLeggon
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Bridgette Thom
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer S Ford
- Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Barlevy D, Wangmo T, Ash S, Elger BS, Ravitsky V. Oncofertility Decision Making: Findings from Israeli Adolescents and Parents. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018; 8:74-83. [PMID: 30153089 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To date, few studies qualitatively investigate adolescent oncofertility decision making. This qualitative study seeks to understand the experiences of adolescents and parents in making oncofertility decisions within the pronatalist context of Israeli society. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Israel with adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 years who were in remission for at least 2 months and had been offered fertility preservation (FP) of sperm, ova, or ovary cryopreservation, and their parents, separately. Transcripts were thematically analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-five interviews were conducted-16 with adolescents and 19 with parents-representing 20 cases of FP decision making. Adolescents and parents do not necessarily view decision making in the same way. Both parties mention a variety of factors in and justifications for FP decisions. Although most participants imagine the adolescent will use cryopreserved biological materials only if s/he experiences reproductive difficulties, nearly all participants do not recall having discussed what to do with these materials in the case of death. Many adolescents and parents feel comfortable waiting to take further action regarding adolescent fertility until the topic has greater relevance to the adolescent's life. Satisfaction with FP decision making is nearly unanimous, regardless of whether FP was pursued. CONCLUSION As in other cultural contexts, Israeli adolescents and parents demonstrate multifaceted decision making with respect to oncofertility. A significant finding from this study suggests that health professionals shy from discussing posthumous planning of cryopreserved materials with adolescent cancer patients and their parents. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether this is a uniquely Israeli phenomenon, the cause for it, and how to overcome it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorit Barlevy
- 1 Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tenzin Wangmo
- 1 Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Shifra Ash
- 2 Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tiqva, Israel
| | - Bernice S Elger
- 1 Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- 3 Bioethics Program, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wright E, Norton W, Geary M. Nurses' experiences of undertaking fertility-related discussions with teenagers and young adults with cancer: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. J Adv Nurs 2018; 74:2860-2870. [PMID: 30019433 DOI: 10.1111/jan.13804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to explore and interpret nurses' experiences, feelings and associated meanings attached to undertaking fertility-related discussions with teenagers and young adults with cancer. The study also aims to advance an understanding of factors which facilitate or hinder such discussions, to progress clinical practice. BACKGROUND Improved cancer treatments have increased survival rates for many teenagers and young adults. However, as a side-effect of treatment, infertility may result. International and UK studies suggest this patient population may not be provided with adequate opportunities to discuss this important issue. Little is known about nurses' experiences of undertaking fertility-related discussions. DESIGN Qualitative Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis. METHODS Eleven semistructured interviews were conducted between February and May 2016 with purposively selected nurses working in a Teenage Cancer Trust Unit in a UK hospital. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis. FINDINGS Nurses experienced a perceived lack of knowledge resulting in avoidance of raising fertility issues. Nurses expressed a specific need for more knowledge and education which was viewed as an essential prerequisite to their participation in discussions. The limited time frame for female patients to preserve fertility prior to commencement of treatment was felt to inhibit both fertility-related discussion and fertility preservation. CONCLUSION Ongoing education and support for nurses may ensure teenage and young adult cancer patients' reproductive needs are met. Nurses need to consider ways to ensure female patients benefit from improved information regarding infertility risks and preservation options to support their reproductive needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Wright
- De Montfort University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Leicester, UK
| | - Wendy Norton
- De Montfort University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Leicester, UK
| | - Martyn Geary
- De Montfort University, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Skaczkowski G, White V, Thompson K, Bibby H, Coory M, Orme LM, Conyers R, Phillips MB, Osborn M, Harrup R, Anazodo A. Factors influencing the provision of fertility counseling and impact on quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 2018; 36:484-502. [DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1443986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Skaczkowski
- center for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victoria White
- center for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Thompson
- Peter MacCallum Cancer center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Bibby
- center for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Coory
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa M. Orme
- Peter MacCallum Cancer center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rachel Conyers
- Peter MacCallum Cancer center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer center, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Michael Osborn
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Johnson AC, Mays D, Rehberg K, Shad A, Tercyak KP. Knowledge and Beliefs About Oncofertility and Associations with Quality of Life Among Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Pediatric Cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018; 7:424-429. [PMID: 29672191 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors experience fertility and childrearing challenges in adulthood, but there is limited evidence on awareness, beliefs, and concerns about oncofertility in this population, needs for supportive resources, and associations with quality of life (QoL). METHODS Participants were 69 AYAs aged 12-25 who were diagnosed with cancer at age 18 years or younger and ≥1 year cancer free, recruited from childhood cancer clinical records and support organizations. Participants completed self-report assessment of oncofertility knowledge and beliefs, information needs, and measures of QoL. Analyses examined associations between oncofertility-related variables and QoL. RESULTS Knowledge and beliefs about oncofertility options were considerably low in the sample, and participants reported unmet oncofertility resource needs. In multivariable analyses, QoL was associated with beliefs valuing the importance of fertility in childhood cancer (β = 0.87, p = 0.01) and lower information needs (β = -1.19, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS Infertility is a well-documented effect of childhood cancer treatment. Our findings indicate that clinical providers are a preferred source of information for AYA patients, and there is a need to address oncofertility concerns and challenges in this group. Research is needed to examine barriers to addressing fertility issues in childhood cancer treatment and ways to promote dialogue between providers and patients and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea C Johnson
- 1 Department of Prevention and Community Health, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health , Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Darren Mays
- 2 Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center , Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Kathryn Rehberg
- 2 Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center , Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Aziza Shad
- 3 Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, The Herman & Walter Samuelson Children's Hospital at Sinai, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kenneth P Tercyak
- 2 Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center , Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ussher JM, Perz J. Threat of biographical disruption: the gendered construction and experience of infertility following cancer for women and men. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:250. [PMID: 29506492 PMCID: PMC5836444 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4172-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infertility is a major concern for people with cancer and their partners. There have been calls for further research on the gendered nature of psychosocial, emotional and identity concomitants of fertility post-cancer across women and men. METHOD The gendered construction and experience of infertility following cancer was examined through a survey of 693 women and 185 men, and in-depth one-to-one interviews with a subsample of survey respondents, 61 women and 17 men, purposively selected across cancer types and age groups. Thematic decomposition was used to examine the open ended survey responses and interviews. The chi square test for independence was used to test for group differences between women and men on closed survey items. RESULTS In the thematic decomposition, infertility was identified as providing a 'Threat of Biographical Disruption' which impacted on life course and identity, for both women and men. Subthemes identified were: 'Parenthood as central to adulthood'; 'Infertility as a threat to gender identity'; ' Unknown fertility status and delayed parenthood'; 'Feelings of loss and grief'; 'Absence of understanding and support'; 'Benefit finding and renegotiation of identity'. In the closed survey items, the majority of women and men agreed that they had always 'wanted to be a parent' and that 'parenthood was a more important life goal than a satisfying career'. 'It is hard to feel like a true adult until you have a child' and impact upon 'my feelings about myself as a man or a woman' was reported by both women and men, with significantly more women reporting 'I feel empty because of fertility issues'. Many participants agreed they 'could visualise a happy life without a child' and there is 'freedom without children'. Significantly more men than women reported that they had not discussed fertility with a health care professional. CONCLUSION The fear of infertility following cancer, or knowledge of compromised fertility, can have negative effects on identity and psychological wellbeing for both women and men, serving to create biographical disruption. Support from family, partners and health care professionals can facilitate renegotiation of identity and coping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M. Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751 Australia
| | - Janette Perz
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lehmann V, Nahata L, Ferrante AC, Hansen-Moore JA, Yeager ND, Klosky JL, Gerhardt CA. Fertility-Related Perceptions and Impact on Romantic Relationships Among Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018; 7:409-414. [PMID: 29466084 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To present an overview of fertility-related perceptions and describe the perceived negative/positive impact of (potential) infertility on romantic relationships among childhood cancer survivors. METHODS Male and female long-term childhood cancer survivors (N = 92) aged 22-43 and 7-37 years postdiagnosis, completed an online survey about fertility-related perceptions (i.e., knowledge, beliefs, uncertainty, concern, and attitudes toward testing) and romantic relationships. Potential differences based on sociodemographic/cancer-specific factors were tested. RESULTS Most survivors (82.4%, n = 75) knew about infertility risk due to childhood cancer treatment. Seventy percent (n = 65) reported being told they were personally at risk, but less than one-third believed it (29.2%, n = 19/65). Half of survivors (48.9%, n = 45) never underwent fertility testing and were unaware of their fertility status. Fertility-related uncertainty and concerns were more common among survivors without children and those who desired (additional) children (d's > 0.5). Among survivors without biological children (n = 52), partnered survivors felt more uncertain about their fertility than singles (d = 0.8). Ten survivors (10.9%) reported a negative impact of infertility on romantic relationships, 6 (6.5%) reported a positive impact, and 7 (7.6%) reported both (e.g., pressure on relationship, fights, break-ups, being closer, and open partner communication). CONCLUSIONS Fertility-related perceptions varied among survivors, but the majority never underwent fertility testing. Uncertainty or concerns differed by current circumstances (e.g., wanting children and relationship status). Providers should routinely discuss potential infertility and offer testing throughout survivorship. A negative impact on romantic relationships may seem small, but should be considered for survivors who desire children and may discover they are infertile in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicky Lehmann
- 1 Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, Ohio.,2 Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Leena Nahata
- 1 Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, Ohio.,3 Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University , Columbus, Ohio
| | - Amanda C Ferrante
- 1 Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jennifer A Hansen-Moore
- 3 Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University , Columbus, Ohio.,4 Division of Pediatric Psychology and Neuropsychology, Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, Ohio
| | - Nicholas D Yeager
- 3 Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University , Columbus, Ohio.,5 Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, Ohio
| | - James L Klosky
- 2 Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Cynthia A Gerhardt
- 1 Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, Ohio.,3 Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University , Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bradford NK, Walker R, Henney R, Inglis P, Chan RJ. Improvements in Clinical Practice for Fertility Preservation Among Young Cancer Patients: Results from Bundled Interventions. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018; 7:37-45. [DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie K. Bradford
- Queensland Youth Cancer Service, Children's Health Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Nursing and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Roderick Walker
- Queensland Youth Cancer Service, Children's Health Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Oncology Services Group, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Oncology Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Roslyn Henney
- Queensland Youth Cancer Service, Children's Health Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Po Inglis
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Raymond J. Chan
- School of Nursing and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ussher JM, Parton C, Perz J. Need for information, honesty and respect: patient perspectives on health care professionals communication about cancer and fertility. Reprod Health 2018; 15:2. [PMID: 29304873 PMCID: PMC5756327 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-017-0441-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals affected by cancer report a need for information about fertility from health care professionals (HCPs), in order to inform decision making and alleviate anxiety. However, there is evidence that many health professionals do not engage in such discussions. METHOD A mixed method design was used to examine the construction and subjective experience of communication with health professionals about fertility in the context of cancer, from the perspective of patients. A survey was completed by 693 women and 185 men, across a range of cancer tumour types and age groups, and in-depth one-to-one interviews conducted with a purposively selected subsample of survey respondents, 61 women and 17 men. The chi square test for independence was used to test for group differences between women and men on closed survey items. Thematic analysis was used to examine the open ended survey responses and interviews. RESULTS Significantly more women (57%, n = 373) than men (46%, n = 80) (X2(2517) = 6.54, p = .011) reported that they had discussed fertility with a HCP since diagnosis of cancer. Satisfaction with the discussion was reported by 65% (n = 242) of women and 69% (n = 54) (ns) of men. This discussion was reported to have been initiated by the patient or their partner in 44% (n = 165) of women and 47% (n = 37) (ns) of men. In the interviews and open ended surveys three themes were identified: Feeling heard and informed about fertility after cancer: Positive experiences of HCP communication; "I was never given full disclosure": HCP silence or reticence about discussing fertility after cancer, including the sub-theme "Their primary concern is getting me cancer free": Constructions of absence of fertility communication by HCPs; and Confusion and lack of compassion: Unsatisfactory information provision about fertility and cancer. CONCLUSION Discussion with a HCP about fertility concerns, and satisfaction with the discussion, was associated with reports of lower patient distress, greater knowledge and understanding of the consequences of cancer on fertility, involvement in the decision making process about fertility preservation, and satisfaction with health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M. Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751 Australia
| | - Chloe Parton
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751 Australia
| | - Janette Perz
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, 2751 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Klosky JL, Flynn JS, Lehmann V, Russell KM, Wang F, Hardin RN, Eddinger JR, Zhang H, Schenck LAM, Schover LR. Parental influences on sperm banking attempts among adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer. Fertil Steril 2017; 108:1043-1049. [PMID: 29202957 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2017] [Revised: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 08/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the influence of parental sociodemographic, communication, and psychological factors on sperm collection attempts among at-risk adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer. DESIGN Prospective, single group, observational study design. SETTING Pediatric oncology centers. PATIENT(S) Parents (N = 144) of 122 newly diagnosed adolescent males at increased risk for infertility secondary to cancer therapy. INTERVENTION(S) Survey-based assessment of parent factors associated with adolescent collection attempts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Attempt of manual collection of sperm. RESULT(S) Parental recommendation to bank sperm (odds ratio [OR] 3.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-11.76) and perceived self-efficacy to facilitate banking (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.02-1.41) were associated with an increased likelihood of making a collection attempt. CONCLUSION(S) Parental recommendation to bank is a critical influence for sperm banking among adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer. These findings highlight the importance of effective communication between parents, patients, and health-care teams when discussing preservation options. Parent perceptions of their ability to facilitate sperm banking at the time of diagnosis should also be targeted in future interventions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01152268.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Klosky
- Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
| | - Jessica S Flynn
- Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Vicky Lehmann
- Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Kathryn M Russell
- Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Fang Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Robin N Hardin
- Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jasmine R Eddinger
- Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Hui Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Lauren A-M Schenck
- Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Leslie R Schover
- Department of Behavioral Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Logan S, Perz J, Ussher J, Peate M, Anazodo A. A systematic review of patient oncofertility support needs in reproductive cancer patients aged 14 to 45 years of age. Psychooncology 2017; 27:401-409. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Revised: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Logan
- School of Women and Children's Health; Faculty of Medicine, UNSW; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - J. Perz
- Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine; Western Sydney University; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - J.M. Ussher
- Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine; Western Sydney University; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - M. Peate
- Psychosocial Health and Wellbeing (emPoWeR) Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital; University of Melbourne; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - A. Anazodo
- School of Women and Children's Health; Faculty of Medicine, UNSW; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Sydney Children's Hospital; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Prince of Wales Hospital; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hanselin MR, Roybal DL, Leininger TB. Ethics and Oncofertility: A Call for Religious Sensitivity. J Oncol Pract 2017; 13:e582-e589. [DOI: 10.1200/jop.2016.020487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
For patients of reproductive age, treating cancer may come at the price of infertility. Literature regarding fertility preservation recommendations in this population has increased significantly, but this literature too often overlooks or insufficiently considers the relevance of religious preferences. Similarly, practice guidelines do not address the role of religion in the oncofertility discussion. The acceptance of oncofertility practices varies significantly among Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. A patient’s faith-based spirituality or secular morality may enhance his or her interpretation of the meaning of illness and should be incorporated into the informed-consent process. In this article, we describe the role of religious sensitivity in oncofertility care and argue for its importance in such care. We briefly summarize the views and moral reasoning about oncofertility in a few religions commonly encountered in many patient populations today. We recommend that clinicians discuss fertility options early in the decision process and, when relevant, incorporate the patient’s moral and religious preferences into the treatment plan. We encourage providers to be prepared to offer resources to patients who desire moral and spiritual guidance about fertility preservation options. Hospital chaplains should be able to provide such resources.
Collapse
|
39
|
Barlevy D, Elger BS, Wangmo T, Ravitsky V. Adolescent oncofertility discussions: Recommendations from a systematic literature review. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2017; 8:106-115. [PMID: 28949840 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1305006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing cancer incidence and survivorship rates have made late-term effects, such as effects on fertility, a salient issue for adolescent cancer patients. While various barriers make it difficult for health care professionals to discuss oncofertility with adolescents and their parents, there are numerous reasons to hold such discussions, based on professional obligations and the ethical principles of respect for autonomy and beneficence. This systematic literature review presents and critically examines recommendations for adolescent oncofertility discussions. METHODS Conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, this systematic literature review includes English, French, and German articles published up until December 31, 2014. Articles were sought via a combination of search terms in four databases. RESULTS Eighty of 96 articles included in this review address recommendations for improving adolescent oncofertility discussions. These recommendations deal with how, when, what, and with whom professionals ought to have these discussions, as well as various systemic barriers and ways to address them. CONCLUSIONS Based upon the principles of beneficence, respect for autonomy, and justice, we endorse several recommendations for oncofertility discussions with adolescents and their parents, including having a specific professional on the health care team initiate these discussions with all newly diagnosed patients; regularly doing so before, during, and after treatment; allowing adolescents to decide for themselves whom they wish to include in such discussions; employing various forms of communication; obtaining both adolescent assent and parental consent for fertility preservation (FP) procedures, especially at each stage (e.g., procurement and use); properly educating and training professionals to discuss oncofertility; promoting interdisciplinary collaboration; creating and implementing guidelines and policies; and ensuring equity of access to FP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorit Barlevy
- a Institute for Biomedical Ethics , University of Basel
| | | | - Tenzin Wangmo
- a Institute for Biomedical Ethics , University of Basel
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- b Bioethics Program, School of Public Health , University of Montreal
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Benedict C, Thom B, Teplinsky E, Carleton J, Kelvin JF. Family-building After Breast Cancer: Considering the Effect on Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy. Clin Breast Cancer 2016; 17:165-170. [PMID: 28087390 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Revised: 12/02/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) is a longstanding problem in breast cancer (BC) survivorship care, particularly among younger women. Younger patients have reported lower ET initiation rates and greater rates of early discontinuation and are considered an "at risk" group for nonadherence. For women who hope to have children in the future, concerns about premature menopause and the implications of postponing childbearing for the 5 to 10 years of ET are widespread. Preliminary evidence suggests that prioritizing fertility, along with concerns about side effects, leads to ET noninitiation and early discontinuation. Clinical efforts to improve adherence might need to consider patients' family-building goals during the course of treatment and to appropriately counsel patients according to their priorities and family-building intentions. Educational materials about family building after cancer are still not consistently available or provided. Helping patients to access trusted informational resources and decision support tools, in conjunction with medical counseling, will promote informed decisions regarding ET adherence and pregnancy that are medically appropriate. Such shared patient-provider decision-making about ET adherence and pregnancy could help to maximize patient autonomy by incorporating their values, preferences, and priorities into decisions, using providers' medical expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- Department of Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY.
| | - Bridgette Thom
- Survivorship Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Eleonora Teplinsky
- Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Monter Cancer Center, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Jane Carleton
- Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Monter Cancer Center, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Joanne F Kelvin
- Survivorship Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|