1
|
Wong AK, Klepstad P, Somogyi AA, Vogrin S, Rubio J, Le B, Philip J. Influence of COMT (rs4680) and OPRM1 (rs1799971) on Cancer Pain, Opioid Dose, and Adverse Effects. J Palliat Med 2024. [PMID: 39253879 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The influence of pharmacogenomics on opioid response, particularly with COMT (rs4680) and OPRM1 (rs1799971) variants, has been studied individually and in combination. However, most studies are in a noncancer context and not all their possible variant combinations have been examined. Objectives: This study examined COMT (rs4680) and OPRM1 (rs1799971), and their allele combinations, in advanced cancer to examine associations with pain scores, opioid dose, and adverse effects. Setting/Subjects: This multicenter prospective cohort study recruited patients receiving opioids for advanced cancer pain in Melbourne, Australia. Clinical data (demographics, opioids), validated instruments (pain and adverse effects), and blood (DNA) were collected. Descriptive analyses were used. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between clinical outcomes (opioid dose, pain, adverse effects) and genotypes of interest. Results: Fifty-four participants were recruited to the study. Those with COMT A allele required lower opioid doses [130 mg (interquartile range [IQR] 67.5,230) versus 180 mg (IQR 55,322.5), p = 0.047] and experienced greater adverse effects [sickness response aOR (adjusted odds ratio) 7.1 (95% CI 1.51,33.41), p = 0.01]. Those with the COMT GG/OPRM1 G allele combination required higher opioid doses [322.5 mg (IQR 264,360) versus 125 mg (65,225), (p = 0.04)]. Those with COMT AG/OPRM1 AA experienced higher average pain [aOR 1.55 (95% CI 1.03, 2.33), p = 0.04] and moderate-severe nausea [aOR 5.47 (95% CI 1.35, 22.21), p = 0.02] but reduced drowsiness [aOR 0.25 (95% CI 0.06, 1.02), p = 0.05]. Conclusions: Patients with cancer with the COMT alternate (A) allele have greater sickness response adverse effects, which may be responsible for the lower opioid doses observed. Significant results of two new COMT/OPRM1 genotype combinations are presented that have not previously been studied, with plausible phenotype descriptions suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron K Wong
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Pal Klepstad
- Department Intensive Care Medicine, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Andrew A Somogyi
- Discipline of Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sara Vogrin
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Justin Rubio
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brian Le
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Jennifer Philip
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
- St Vincent's Hospital, Palliative Care Service, Fitzroy, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wong AK, Klepstad P, Somogyi AA, Vogrin S, Le B, Philip J, Rubio JP. Effect of gene variants on opioid dose, pain and adverse effect outcomes in advanced cancer: an explorative study. Pharmacogenomics 2023; 24:901-913. [PMID: 38126330 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2023-0207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Associations between gene variants and opioid net effect are unclear. We conducted an exploratory pharmacogenetic analysis of 35 gene variants and opioid response in advanced cancer. Patients & methods: This multi-center prospective cohort study included clinical data, questionnaires (pain and adverse effects) and DNA (blood). Negative binomial regression and logistic regression were used. Results: Within 54 participants, eight statistically significant associations (p = 0.002-0.038) were observed between gene variants and opioid dose, pain scores or adverse effects, the majority being within the neuroimmune TLR4 pathway (IL1B [rs1143634], IL2 [rs2069762], IL6 [rs1800795], BDNF [rs6265]) and ARRB2 pathway (ARRB2 [rs3786047], DRD2 [rs6275]). Conclusion: Neuroimmune pathway genes may contribute to differences in opioid response in cancer and may be included in future similar studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron K Wong
- Peter MacCallum Cancer center, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne Eastern Hill Campus, Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia
| | - Pal Klepstad
- Department Intensive Care Medicine, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Andrew A Somogyi
- Professor of Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology, Discipline of Pharmacology, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia
| | - Sara Vogrin
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brian Le
- Peter MacCallum Cancer center, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia
| | - Jennifer Philip
- Peter MacCallum Cancer center, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne Eastern Hill Campus, Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia
- St Vincent's Hospital, Palliative Care Service Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia
| | - Justin P Rubio
- Principal Research Fellow Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health, 30 Royal Parade, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wong AK, Somogyi AA, Rubio J, Pham TD, Le B, Klepstad P, Philip J. Effectiveness of Opioid Switching in Advanced Cancer Pain: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3676. [PMID: 37509337 PMCID: PMC10378198 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Opioid switching is a common practice of substituting one opioid for another to improve analgesia or adverse effects; however, it has limited evidence. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of opioid switching in advanced cancer. This multi-center prospective cohort study recruited patients assessed to switch opioids (opioid switch group) or to continue ongoing opioid treatment (control group). Clinical data (demographics, opioids) and validated instruments (pain and adverse effects) were collected over two timepoints seven days apart. Descriptive analyses were utilized. Non-parametric tests were used to determine differences. Fifty-four participants were recruited (23 control group, 31 switch group). At the follow-up, opioid switching reduced pain (worst, average, and now) (p < 0.05), uncontrolled breakthrough pain (3-fold reduction, p = 0.008), and psychological distress (48% to 16%, p < 0.005). The switch group had a ≥25% reduction in the reported frequency of seven moderate-to-severe adverse effects (score ≥ 4), compared to a reduction in only one adverse effect in the control group. The control group experienced no significant pain differences at the follow-up. Opioid switching is effective at reducing pain, adverse effects, and psychological distress in a population with advanced cancer pain, to levels of satisfactory symptom control in most patients within 1 week.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron K Wong
- Department of Palliative Care, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3052, Australia
- Department of Palliative Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne 3050, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Australia
| | - Andrew A Somogyi
- Discipline of Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
| | - Justin Rubio
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health, Parkville 3050, Australia
| | - Tien Dung Pham
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Australia
| | - Brian Le
- Department of Palliative Care, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3052, Australia
- Department of Palliative Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne 3050, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Australia
| | - Pal Klepstad
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Jennifer Philip
- Department of Palliative Care, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3052, Australia
- Department of Palliative Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne 3050, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pergolizzi J, LeQuang JAK, Coluzzi F, Magnusson P, Lara-Solares A, Varrassi G. Considerations for Pain Assessments in Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review of the Latin American Perspective. Cureus 2023; 15:e40804. [PMID: 37489190 PMCID: PMC10363018 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer incidence in Latin America is lower than in Europe or the United States but morbidity and mortality rates are disproportionately high. A barrier to adequate pain control is inadequate pain assessment, which is a relatively easy and inexpensive metric. The objective of this narrative review is to describe pain assessment for cancer patients in Latin America. Cultural factors may influence pain perception, including contextualizing pain as noble or natural suffering and aspects of what is now called "spiritual pain." Unlike other painful conditions, cancer pain may be strongly associated with existential fear, psychosocial distress, anxiety, and spiritual concerns. Pain assessment allows not just quantification of pain intensity but may elucidate pain mechanisms involved or psychosocial aspects that may color the pain. Many current pain assessment instruments capture only pain intensity, which is but one aspect of the pain experience; some have expanded to include functional assessments, mental health status evaluations, and quality of life metrics. A quality-of-life assessment may be appropriate for cancer patients since chronic pain can severely impact function, which can in turn create a vicious cycle by exacerbating pain. The incidence of cancer in Latin America is expected to increase in the ensuing years. Better pain assessment and clinician education are needed to help manage pain in this large and growing patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Flaminia Coluzzi
- Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, ITA
| | | | - Argelia Lara-Solares
- Pain and Palliative Care, National Institute of Medical and Nutritional Sciences, Mexico City, MEX
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sulistio M, Ling N, Finkelstein T, Tee HJ, Gorelik A, Kissane D, Michael N. The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain in Patients with Bone Metastasis: a descriptive cohort study. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:305. [PMID: 37106261 PMCID: PMC10140090 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07711-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We describe the prevalence of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP) features in patients with bone metastasis and cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) and the relationship between ECS-CP features, pain intensity, and opioid consumption. METHODS We assessed ECS-CP features and recoded pain mechanisms and opioid use in adult patients with bone metastasis. Validated measures were used to assess pain intensity, incident pain, psychological distress, addictive behavior, and cognition. RESULTS Among 147 eligible patients, 95.2% completed the assessment. Mean participant age was 73.2 years, the majority female (52.1%) with breast cancer occurring most commonly (25.7%). One or more ECS-CP features were present in 96.4% and CIBP in 75.7% of patients. The median average and worst pain scores were 3 and 6, respectively. Neuropathic pain was the most prevalent pain mechanism (45.0%) and was associated with breakthrough pain frequency (p=0.014). Three-quarters had incident pain, which was strongly associated with a higher average and worst pain scores (3.5 and 7, p<0.001 for both), background oral morphine equivalent daily dose (26.7mg, p=0.005), and frequency of daily breakthrough analgesia (1.7 doses/day, p=0.007). Psychological distress (n=90, 64.3%) was associated with a significantly higher average pain score (4, p=0.009) and a slightly higher worst pain score (7, p=0.054). Addictive behaviour and cognitive dysfunction were relatively uncommon (18.6% and 12.9%, respectively). CONCLUSION There is a need to promote standardized assessment and classification of pain syndromes such as CIBP. The ECS-CP may allow us to consider CIBP in a systematic manner and develop personalized pain interventions appropriate to the pain profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered in ANZCTR ACTRN12622000853741 (16/06/2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merlina Sulistio
- Supportive, Psychosocial and Palliative Care Research Department, Cabrini Health, 181-183 Wattletree Rd, Mlavern, VIC, 3144, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Natalie Ling
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tara Finkelstein
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hoong Jiun Tee
- Supportive, Psychosocial and Palliative Care Research Department, Cabrini Health, 181-183 Wattletree Rd, Mlavern, VIC, 3144, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexandra Gorelik
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, VIC, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine (RMH), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Kissane
- Supportive, Psychosocial and Palliative Care Research Department, Cabrini Health, 181-183 Wattletree Rd, Mlavern, VIC, 3144, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sacred Heart Health Service, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natasha Michael
- Supportive, Psychosocial and Palliative Care Research Department, Cabrini Health, 181-183 Wattletree Rd, Mlavern, VIC, 3144, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Belayneh M, Fainsinger R, Nekolaichuk C, Muller V, Bouchard S, Downar J, Galloway L, Ghosh S, Hawley P, Herx L, Kmet A, Lawlor P. Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain: Comparison of Pain Classification Features and Pain Intensity across Diverse Palliative Care Settings in Canada. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:366-375. [PMID: 36282783 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The goal of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP) is to create an international classification system for cancer pain. Previous studies reinforce the need for standardized training to ensure consistency across assessors. There is no universally accepted classification for neuropathic pain. Objectives: Our primary objective was to describe the prevalence of ECS-CP features in a diverse sample of advanced cancer patients, using assessors with standardized training. The secondary objectives were to: (1) determine the prevalence of neuropathic pain using the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group (NeuPSIG) criteria and (2) examine the relationship between specific predictors: ECS-CP features, age, Palliative Performance Scale, Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD), setting, and pain intensity; and neuropathic pain. Methods: A total of 1050 adult patients with advanced cancer were recruited from 11 Canadian sites. A clinician completed the ECS-CP and NeuPSIG criteria, and collected additional information including demographics and pain intensity (now). All assessors received standardized training. Results: Of 1050 evaluable patients, 910 (87%) had cancer pain: nociceptive (n = 626; 68.8%); neuropathic (n = 227; 24.9%); incident (n = 329; 36.2%); psychological distress (n = 209; 23%); addictive behavior (n = 51; 5.6%); and normal cognition (n = 639; 70.2%). The frequencies of ECS-CP features and pain intensity scores varied across sites and settings, with more acute settings having higher frequencies of complex pain features. The overall frequency of neuropathic pain was 24.9%, ranging from 11% (hospices) to 34.2% (palliative outpatient clinic) across settings. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age <60 years, MEDD ≥19 mg, pain intensity ≥7/10, and incident pain were significant independent predictors of neuropathic pain (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The ECS-CP was able to detect salient pain features across settings. Furthermore, the frequencies of neuropathic pain utilizing the NeuPSIG criteria fits within the lower-end of literature estimates (13%-40%). Further research is warranted to validate the NeuPSIG criteria in cancer pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieos Belayneh
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robin Fainsinger
- Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cheryl Nekolaichuk
- Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Viki Muller
- Covenant Health, Palliative Institute, Network of Excellence in Seniors' Health and Wellness (NESHW), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sylvie Bouchard
- Department of Oncology, Montreal Institute for Palliative Care/Teresa Dellar Palliative Care Residence, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - James Downar
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lyle Galloway
- Division of Palliative Care, Departments of Oncology and Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Pippa Hawley
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Leonie Herx
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander Kmet
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada
| | - Peter Lawlor
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Philip J, Wong A, Pasanen L, Somogyi AA, Rubio J, Klepstad P, Collins A, Gibbs P, Le B. Establishing a Longitudinal Opioid Pharmacogenomic Registry for Cancer Patients: Feasibility and Acceptability. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:411-417. [PMID: 36493378 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Individual genetic variation can affect both pain expression and opioid response. Large cohort datasets are required to validate evidence influencing genomic factors in opioid response. This study examined the feasibility of establishing an opioid pharmacogenomics registry for cancer patients containing longitudinal matched clinical, symptom, pharmacological, and genomic data, with an a priori feasibility target of 50 participants within 12 months. Methods: Consecutive patients with advanced cancer receiving opioids across five palliative care services were recruited. Clinical data (demographics, pain data, adverse effects, medications) and blood (DNA, RNA, pharmacokinetics) were collected over two time points. Patient and clinician qualitative interviews were conducted to assess acceptability. This study was approved by the SVHA Ethics Committee, Melbourne, Australia (HREC 252/18). Results: Enrollment for the registry was deemed feasible. Fifty-eight participants were recruited (median age 63.7, 45% female, 83% complete data), with the most frequent diagnosis being lung cancer (n = 18, 33%) and oxycodone the most frequently prescribed opioid (n = 30, 52%). Qualitative data indicated positive engagement from both patients and clinicians. Conclusion: Establishing a longitudinal opioid pharmacogenomic registry in patients with cancer receiving palliative care is feasible and readily acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Philip
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aaron Wong
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leeanne Pasanen
- Palliative Care Service, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew A Somogyi
- Discipline of Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Justin Rubio
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Pal Klepstad
- Department Intensive Care Medicine, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anna Collins
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter Eliza Hall Institute, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brian Le
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abasseri M, Hoque S, Slavica Kochovska BA, Caldwell K, Sheahan L, Zekry A. Barriers to palliative care in hepatocellular carcinoma: A review of the literature. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023. [PMID: 36634200 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a deadly and burdensome form of liver cancer with an increasing global prevalence. Its course is unpredictable as it frequently occurs in the context of underlying end-stage liver disease, and the associated symptoms and adverse effects of treatment cause severe suffering for patients. Palliative care (PC) is a medical specialty that addresses the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of patients and their carers in the context of life-limiting illness. In other cancers, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated that the early introduction of PC at diagnosis improves patient and carer outcomes. Despite this, the integration of palliative care at the diagnosis of HCC remains suboptimal, as patients usually receive PC only at the very terminal phase of their disease, even when diagnosed early. Significant barriers to the uptake of palliative care in the treatment algorithm of hepatocellular carcinoma fall under four main themes: data limitations, disease, clinician, and patient factors. Barriers relating to data limitations mainly encapsulated the risk of bias inherent in published work in the field of PC. Clinician-reported barriers related to negative attitudes towards PC and a lack of time for PC discussions. Barriers related to the disease align with prognostic uncertainty due to the unpredictable course of HCC. Significantly, there exists a paucity of evidence exploring patient-perceived barriers to timely PC implementation in HCC. Given that patients are often the underrepresented stakeholder in the delivery of PC, future research should explore the patient perspective in adequately designed qualitative studies as the first step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Abasseri
- School of Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shakira Hoque
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - B A Slavica Kochovska
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kim Caldwell
- Palliative Medicine, Calvary Hospital Kogarah, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Linda Sheahan
- Clinical Ethics Service, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,UNSW Medicine & Health, St George and Sutherland Clinical Campus.,Palliative Medicine Department, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amany Zekry
- School of Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,UNSW Medicine & Health, St George and Sutherland Clinical Campus
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sørensen J, Sjøgren P, Stine C, Sørensen TV, Heinecke K, Larsen H, Eidemak I, Kurita GP. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and palliative-care clinician reported outcomes (ClinROs) mutually improve pain and other symptoms assessment of hospitalized cancer-patients. Scand J Pain 2022; 22:569-577. [PMID: 35179007 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with malignant diseases are known to have a high symptom burden including pain, and insufficient treatment of pain in this population has been frequently documented. To promote the integration of specialized palliative care and hematology and oncology, this study investigated disease, treatment, and comorbidity related symptoms as well as functional capacity and health-related quality of life (HQoL) by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and clinician-reported outcome measures (ClinROs) among inpatients in a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS This cross-sectional study was carried out in a large comprehensive cancer centre of both oncological and hematological inpatients. It combined the use of PROMs and ClinROs. RESULTS A high symptom burden was reported with fatigue and appetite loss as the most frequent symptoms, and role function being the most impaired function. Further, a low HQoL score was associated with a high number of symptoms/impairments. More than half of all patients reported pain in the last 24 h. Out of 95 patients with average pain >0 in the last 24 h, 71% were treated with opioids and 24% were treated with adjuvant analgesic (AA) defined as antiepileptics, antidepressants and prednisolone. Out of 57 patients with average pain >0 in the last 24 h and possible neuropathic pain, 33% were treated with AAs. A high odds ratio for moderate/severe pain in patients with possible neuropathic pain mechanisms was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS This study did not only emphasize the need for systematic use of PROMs to identify symptoms and needs for inpatients, but also displayed why PROMs supported by ClinROs are a prerequisite to deliver truly individualized and high-quality patient-centered care. This study calls for continuous training of health care professionals to deliver high-quality treatment of pain. Further, it contributes to the growing recognition, that palliative care and standard care must be integrated to strengthen patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Sørensen
- Department of Oncology, Section of Palliative Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per Sjøgren
- Department of Oncology, Section of Palliative Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Clemmensen Stine
- Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Section of Palliative Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tanja Vibeke Sørensen
- Department of Oncology, Section of Palliative Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Katja Heinecke
- Department of Oncology, Section of Palliative Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Larsen
- Department of Oncology, Section of Palliative Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Inge Eidemak
- Department of Oncology, Section of Palliative Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Geana Paula Kurita
- Department of Oncology, Section of Palliative Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology and Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Siemens W, Boehlke C, Bennett MI, Offner K, Becker G, Gaertner J. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for advanced cancer pain inpatients in specialist palliative care-a blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot cross-over trial. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:5323-5333. [PMID: 32128614 PMCID: PMC7547037 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05370-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a treatment option for cancer pain, but the evidence is inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TENS. METHODS A blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot cross-over trial (NCT02655289) was conducted on an inpatient specialist palliative care ward. We included adult inpatients with cancer pain ≥ 3 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Intensity-modulated high TENS (IMT) was compared with placebo TENS (PBT). Patients used both modes according to their preferred application scheme during 24 h with a 24-h washout phase. The primary outcome was change in average pain intensity on the NRS during the preceding 24 h. Responders were patients with at least a "slight improvement." RESULTS Of 632 patients screened, 25 were randomized (sequence IMT-PBT = 13 and PBT-IMT = 12). Finally, 11 patients in IMT-PBT and 9 in PBT-IMT completed the study (N = 20). The primary outcome did not differ between groups (IMT minus PBT: - 0.2, 95% confidence interval - 0.9 to 0.6). However, responder rates were higher in IMT (17/20 [85%] vs. 10/20 [50%], p = 0.0428). Two patients experienced an uncomfortable feeling caused by the current, one after IMT and one after PBT. Seven patients (35%) desired a TENS prescription. Women and patients with incident pain were most likely to benefit from TENS. CONCLUSION TENS was safe, but IMT was unlikely to offer more analgesic effects than PBT. Even though many patients desired a TENS prescription, 50% still reported at least "slight pain relief" from PBT. Differences for gender and incident pain aspects demand future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waldemar Siemens
- Clinic for Palliative Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Christopher Boehlke
- Clinic for Palliative Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael I Bennett
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences (LIHS), School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Klaus Offner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gerhild Becker
- Clinic for Palliative Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jan Gaertner
- Center for Palliative Care Hildegard, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hadzibegovic S, Sikorski P, Potthoff SK, Springer J, Lena A, Anker MS. Clinical problems of patients with cachexia due to chronic illness: a congress report. ESC Heart Fail 2020; 7:3414-3420. [PMID: 33012131 PMCID: PMC7754899 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Hadzibegovic
- Division of Cardiology and Metabolism, Department of Cardiology, Charité - Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF), Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Sikorski
- Division of Cardiology and Metabolism, Department of Cardiology, Charité - Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF), Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Berlin, Germany
| | - Sophia K Potthoff
- Division of Cardiology and Metabolism, Department of Cardiology, Charité - Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF), Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Berlin, Germany
| | - Jochen Springer
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Berlin, Germany
| | - Alessia Lena
- Division of Cardiology and Metabolism, Department of Cardiology, Charité - Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF), Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus S Anker
- Division of Cardiology and Metabolism, Department of Cardiology, Charité - Campus Virchow Klinikum (CVK), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF), Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hawley P, Fyles G, Jefferys SG. Subcutaneous Lidocaine for Cancer-Related Pain. J Palliat Med 2020; 23:1357-1364. [DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Philippa Hawley
- Pain and Symptom Management/Palliative Care Department, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Interdepartmental Division of Departments of Medicine, Family Practice, and Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gillian Fyles
- Division of Palliative Care, Interdepartmental Division of Departments of Medicine, Family Practice, and Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Pain and Symptom Management/Palliative Care Program, BC Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stephen G. Jefferys
- Pain and Symptom Management/Palliative Care Program, BC Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
- Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia-Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lau J, Flamer D, Murphy-Kane P. Interventional anesthesia and palliative care collaboration to manage cancer pain: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth 2020; 67:235-246. [PMID: 31571119 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-019-01482-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Pain is a common symptom associated with advanced cancer. An estimated 66.4% of people with advanced cancer experience pain from their disease or treatment. Pain management is an essential component of palliative care. Opioids and adjuvant therapies are the mainstay of cancer pain management. Nevertheless, a proportion of patients may experience complex pain that is not responsive to conventional analgesia. Interventional analgesia procedures may be appropriate and necessary to manage complex, cancer-related pain. This narrative review uses a theoretical case to highlight core principles of palliative care and interventional anesthesia, and the importance of collaborative, interdisciplinary care. An overview and discussion of pragmatic considerations of peripheral nervous system interventional analgesic procedures and neuraxial analgesia infusions are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Lau
- Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Acute Palliative Care Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - David Flamer
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patricia Murphy-Kane
- Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Acute Palliative Care Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Nursing, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Reis-Pina P, Sabri E, Birkett NJ, Barbosa A, Lawlor PG. Cancer-Related Pain: A Longitudinal Study of Time to Stable Pain Control and Its Clinicodemographic Predictors. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 58:812-823.e2. [PMID: 31252066 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Multidimensional assessment is pivotal in managing cancer-related pain. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to determine time to stable pain control (SPC) and identify its baseline clinicodemographic predictors in patients with cancer pain. METHODS This is a prospective longitudinal study of patients attending a cancer pain clinic. Scheduled clinic attendances and weekly investigator-led phone calls enabled monitoring of patients' daily pain diary, opioid use, and other analgesic interventions. Baseline clinicodemographic variables were examined in survival analyses, which included the construction of accelerated failure time models with time ratios [TRs, (95% CIs)], based on time to SPC (pain intensity ≤3 and <3 breakthrough opioid doses over three consecutive days) for variable categories. RESULTS Of 319 participants, 22 died before achieving SPC and were censored in the survival analysis. The median survival time (95% CI) to SPC was 22 (19-25) days. In multivariable analysis, compared to their respective reference categories, female sex (P = 0.001), substance abuse (P < 0.001), a neuropathic pain component (P < 0.001), and use of ≥1 adjuvant analgesic (P = 0.022) each had TRs > 1 (1.03-2.54), whereas soft tissue pain (P < 0.001) had a TR = 0.71 (0.62-0.82), reflecting longer and shorter time to SPC, respectively. CONCLUSION SPC is achievable for most patients with cancer pain. Recognition of strong predictors of time to SPC, such as substance abuse, a neuropathic pain component, soft tissue pain, and current use of adjuvant analgesia, may help to triage care services based on therapeutic need and guide analgesic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Reis-Pina
- Palliative Care Unit, Casa de Saúde da Idanha, Sintra, Portugal; Formerly Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Elham Sabri
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicholas J Birkett
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Antonio Barbosa
- Department of Psychiatry, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Centre of Bioethics & Palliative Care Studies Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Peter G Lawlor
- Bruyère Research Institute, Bruyère Continuing Care, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada; Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee JT, Sanderson CR, Xuan W, Agar M. Lidocaine for Cancer Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Palliat Med 2019; 22:326-334. [PMID: 30614748 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica T. Lee
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
- Concord Centre for Palliative Care, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Wei Xuan
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Meera Agar
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
- Sydney South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Discipline of Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang N, Dong Y, Zhao L, Zhao H, Li W, Cui J. Factors associated with optimal pain management in advanced cancer patients. Curr Probl Cancer 2019; 43:77-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
17
|
Fainsinger RL, Nekolaichuk C, Muller V. Assessing and Classifying Cancer Pain: Can We Develop An Internationally Accepted Common Language? J Palliat Care 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/082585971403000406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robin L. Fainsinger
- Covenant Health Palliative Institute, 416 St. Marguerite Health Services Centre, 1090 Youville Drive West, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6L 0A3; and Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cheryl Nekolaichuk
- Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; and Covenant Health Palliative Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Covenant Health Palliative Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Viki Muller
- Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; and Covenant Health Palliative Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Covenant Health Palliative Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Habberstad R, Frøseth TCS, Aass N, Abramova T, Baas T, Mørkeset ST, Caraceni A, Laird B, Boland JW, Rossi R, Garcia-Alonso E, Stensheim H, Loge JH, Hjermstad MJ, Bjerkeset E, Bye A, Lund JÅ, Solheim TS, Vagnildhaug OM, Brunelli C, Damås JK, Mollnes TE, Kaasa S, Klepstad P. The Palliative Radiotherapy and Inflammation Study (PRAIS) - protocol for a longitudinal observational multicenter study on patients with cancer induced bone pain. BMC Palliat Care 2018; 17:110. [PMID: 30266081 PMCID: PMC6162927 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-018-0362-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation therapy (RT) results in pain relief for about 6 of 10 patients with cancer induced bone pain (CIBP) caused by bone metastases. The high number of non-responders, the long median time from RT to pain response and the risk of adverse effects, makes it important to determine predictors of treatment response. Clinical features such as cancer type, performance status and pain intensity, and biomarkers for osteoclast activity are proposed as predictors of response to RT. However, results are inconsistent and there is a need for better predictors of RT response. A similar argument can be stated for the development of cachexia; there are currently no predictors that can identify patients who will develop cachexia later in the cancer disease trajectory. Experimental and preclinical studies show that pain, depression and cachexia are related to inflammation. However, it is not known if inflammatory biomarkers can predict CIBP, depression or development of cachexia. METHODS This multicenter, multinational longitudinal observational study will include 600 adult patients receiving RT for CIBP. Demographic data, clinical variables, osteoclast and inflammatory biomarkers will be assessed before start of RT, and 3, 8, 16, 24 and 52 weeks after last course of RT. The primary aim of the study is to identify potential predictors for pain relief from RT. Secondary aims are to explore potential predictors for development of cachexia, the longitudinal relationship between pain intensity and depression, and if inflammatory biomarkers are associated with changes in pain intensity, cachexia and depression during one-year follow up. DISCUSSION The immediate clinical implication of the PRAIS study is to identify potential predictive factors for a RT response on CIBP, and thereby reduce non-efficacious RT. Patient benefits are fewer hospital visits, reduced risk of adverse effects and more individualized pain treatment. The long-term clinical implication of the PRAIS study is to improve the knowledge about inflammation in relation to CIBP, cachexia and depression and potentially identify associations and mechanisms that can be targeted for treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02107664 , date of registration April 8, 2014 (retrospectively registered). TRIAL SPONSOR The European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Faculty of medicine and Health Sciences, Trondheim, N-7491, Norway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ragnhild Habberstad
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology and St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Trude Camilla Salvesen Frøseth
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology and St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Nina Aass
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- University of Oslo and Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tatiana Abramova
- Department Oncology, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Theo Baas
- Department Oncology, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Siri Tessem Mørkeset
- Department Oncology, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Augusto Caraceni
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Barry Laird
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jason W Boland
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Romina Rossi
- Palliative Care Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Elena Garcia-Alonso
- Radiation Oncology Department Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRB, Lleida, Spain
| | - Hanne Stensheim
- University of Oslo and Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Populationbased Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jon Håvard Loge
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- University of Oslo and Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Jensen Hjermstad
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ellen Bjerkeset
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Asta Bye
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jo-Åsmund Lund
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology and St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department Oncology, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology and St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ola Magne Vagnildhaug
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology and St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Cinzia Brunelli
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Jan Kristian Damås
- Centre of Molecular Inflammation Research, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tom Eirik Mollnes
- KG Jebsen Inflammation Research Center, Department of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Laboratory, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway
- KG Jebsen Thrombosis Research and Expertise Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Stein Kaasa
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- University of Oslo and Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål Klepstad
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Which factors can aid clinicians to identify a risk of pain during the following month in patients with bone metastases? A longitudinal analyses. Support Care Cancer 2018; 27:1335-1343. [PMID: 30105665 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4405-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Explore clinical factors associated with higher pain intensity and future pain in patients with bone metastases to identify patients who can benefit from closer follow-up or pain-modifying interventions. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of 606 patients with bone metastases included in a multicenter longitudinal study. The dependent variables were "average pain" and "worst pain" in the last 24 h (0-10 NRS). Twenty independent variables with potential association to pain intensity were selected based on previous literature. Cross-sectional analyses were performed with multiple linear regression to explore factors associated with pain intensity at baseline. Longitudinal data were analyzed with a generalized equation models to explore current factors associated with pain intensity at the next visit in 1 month. RESULTS Current pain intensity (p < 0.001), sleep disturbances (p 0.01 and 0.006), drowsiness (p 0.003 and 0.033) and male gender (p 0.045 and 0.001) were associated with higher average and worst pain intensity in 1 month. In addition, breakthrough pain was related to higher worst pain intensity (p 0.003) in 1 month. The same variables were also associated with higher average pain intensity at baseline. CONCLUSION Higher current pain intensity, sleep disturbances, drowsiness, male gender, and breakthrough pain are factors associated with higher pain intensity in patients with bone metastases at the next follow-up in 1 month. These factors should be assessed in clinical practice and may aid clinicians in identifying patients that can benefit from closer follow-up or interventions to prevent lack of future pain control. TRIAL REGISTRATION IN CLINICALTRIALS.GOV : NCT01362816.
Collapse
|
20
|
Canal-Sotelo J, Trujillano-Cabello J, Larkin P, Arraràs-Torrelles N, González-Rubió R, Rocaspana-Garcia M, Barallat-Gimeno E. Prevalence and characteristics of breakthrough cancer pain in an outpatient clinic in a Catalan teaching hospital: incorporation of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer pain into the diagnostic algorithm. BMC Palliat Care 2018; 17:81. [PMID: 29807537 PMCID: PMC5971419 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-018-0336-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is defined according to its principal characteristics: high intensity, short time interval between onset and peak intensity, short duration, potential recurrence over 24 h and non-responsiveness to standard analgesic regimes. The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP) is a classification tool that evaluates different dimensions of pain. The aim of this study was to measure prevalence and the main characteristics of BTcP in a sample of advanced cancer patients and to explore the complexity observed when ECS-CP is incorporated into BTcP diagnostics algorithm. METHODS Descriptive prevalence study (Retrospective chart review). Davies' algorithm was used to identify BTcP and ECS-CP was used to recognize appropriate dimensions of pain. The study was conducted in a sample of advanced cancer patients attending hospital outpatient clinic in Lleida, Spain. 277 patients were included from 01/01/2014 to 31/12/2015. No direct contact was made with participants. The following information was extracted from the palliative care outpatient clinic database: age, gender, civil status, cognitive impairment status, functional performance status and variables related to tumour. Only BTcP cases were included. RESULTS Prevalence of BTcP was 39.34% (63.9% men). Mean of age was 68.2 years. Main diagnosis was lung cancer (n = 154; 31.6%). Metastases were diagnosed in 83% of the sample. 138 patients (49.8%) were diagnosed with 1 type of BTcP and 139 (50.2%) were diagnosed with more than one type of BTcP. In total, 488 different types of BTcP were recorded (mean 1.75 ± 0, 9), 244 of these types (50%) presented a component of neuropathic pain. Addictive behaviour, measured through CAGE test, was present in 29.2% (N = 81) of the patients and psychological distress was present in 40.8% (n = 113). CONCLUSIONS Prevalence of BTcP (39.34%) is similar to the one reflected in the existing literature. Study results indicate that the routine use of ECS-CP in a clinical setting allows us to detect more than one type of BTcP as well as additional complexity associated with pain (neuropathic, addictive behavior and psychological distress).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaume Canal-Sotelo
- Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, UFISS GSS, Alcalde Rovira Roure, 80, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| | | | - Philip Larkin
- University College Dublin, School of Nursing and Midwifery and health Systems Health Sciences, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Mariona Rocaspana-Garcia
- Faculty of Nursing and Phisiotherapy, Universitat de Lleida, Montserrat Roig 2, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| | - Eva Barallat-Gimeno
- Faculty of Nursing and Phisiotherapy, Universitat de Lleida, Montserrat Roig 2, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lawlor PG, Lawlor NA, Reis-Pina P. The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain: a tool with potential for an evolving role in cancer pain assessment and management. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/23809000.2018.1467211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Lawlor
- Bruyère Research Institute, Bruyère Continuing Care, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Niamh A Lawlor
- Ottawa Hospital Cancer Program, The Ottawa Hospital (NAL), Ottawa, Canada
| | - Paulo Reis-Pina
- Palliative Care Unit, Casa de Saúde da Idanha, Sintra, Portugal
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Are M, McIntyre A, Reddy S. Global disparities in cancer pain management and palliative care. J Surg Oncol 2017; 115:637-641. [PMID: 28230243 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Palliative care and pain management constitute an integral part of the multi-disciplinary approach to treating patients with cancer. There are major disparities in the global presence of sustainable palliative care models and universal availability of effective pain medications, especially in low and middle income countries with the highest predicted future burden of cancer. Active intervention is needed to improve the availability of palliative care and effective pain control worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhuri Are
- Divison of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Amanda McIntyre
- College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Suresh Reddy
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mercadante S, Marchetti P, Cuomo A, Caraceni A, Mediati RD, Mammucari M, Natoli S, Lazzari M, Dauri M, Airoldi M, Azzarello G, Bandera M, Blasi L, Cartenì G, Chiurazzi B, Costanzo BVP, Degiovanni D, Fusco F, Guardamagna V, Iaffaioli V, Liguori S, Lorusso V, Mameli S, Mattioli R, Mazzei T, Melotti RM, Menardo V, Miotti D, Moroso S, De Santis S, Orsetti R, Papa A, Ricci S, Sabato AF, Scelzi E, Sofia M, Tonini G, Aielli F, Valle A. Breakthrough Cancer Pain: Preliminary Data of The Italian Oncologic Pain Multisetting Multicentric Survey (IOPS-MS). Adv Ther 2017; 34:120-135. [PMID: 27873235 PMCID: PMC5216057 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0440-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Introduction An ongoing national multicenter survey [Italian Oncologic Pain multiSetting Multicentric Survey (IOPS-MS)] is evaluating the characteristics of breakthrough cancer pain (BTP) in different clinical settings. Preliminary data from the first 1500 cancer patients with BTP enrolled in this study are presented here. Methods Thirty-two clinical centers are involved in the survey. A diagnosis of BTP was performed by a standard algorithm. Epidemiological data, Karnofsky index, stage of disease, presence and sites of metastases, ongoing oncologic treatment, and characteristics of background pain and BTP and their treatments were recorded. Background pain and BTP intensity were measured. Patients were also questioned about BTP predictability, BTP onset (≤10 or >10 min), BTP duration, background and BTP medications and their doses, time to meaningful pain relief after BTP medication, and satisfaction with BTP medication. The occurrence of adverse reactions was also assessed, as well as mucosal toxicity. Results Background pain was well controlled with opioid treatment (numerical rating scale 3.0 ± 1.1). Patients reported 2.5 ± 1.6 BTP episodes/day with a mean intensity of 7.5 ± 1.4 and duration of 43 ± 40 min; 977 patients (65.1%) reported non-predictable BTP, and 1076 patients (71.7%) reported a rapid onset of BTP (≤10 min). Higher patient satisfaction was reported by patients treated with fast onset opioids. Conclusions These preliminary data underline that the standard algorithm used is a valid tool for a proper diagnosis of BTP in cancer patients. Moreover, rapid relief of pain is crucial for patients’ satisfaction. The final IOPS-MS data are necessary to understand relationships between BTP characteristics and other clinical variables in oncologic patients. Funding Molteni Farmaceutici, Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Mercadante
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care and Pain Relief and Supportive Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo 312, 90146, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Medical Oncology, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Arturo Cuomo
- Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, and Pain Therapy Department, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS Foundation Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Augusto Caraceni
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Institute IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Silvia Natoli
- Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Department of Emergency, Admission and Critical Area, Policlinic of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Marzia Lazzari
- Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Department of Emergency, Admission and Critical Area, Policlinic of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Dauri
- Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Department of Emergency, Admission and Critical Area, Policlinic of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Airoldi
- 2nd Medical Oncology Division, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Azzarello
- Medical Specialties Department, Oncology and Oncologic Hematology, ASL 13 Mirano, Venice, Italy
| | - Mauro Bandera
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Livio Blasi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ARNAS Ospedale Civico, Di Cristina, Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Flavio Fusco
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Primary and Community Care, ASL3 Genovese, Genoa, Italy
| | - Vittorio Guardamagna
- Palliative Care and Pain Therapy Unit, European Oncology Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Iaffaioli
- Abdominal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS Foundation Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Simeone Liguori
- Palliative Care and Pain Therapy Unit, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Vito Lorusso
- Medical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Research Centre "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Sergio Mameli
- Pain Therapy Unit, "A. Businco" Hospital, ASL 8, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Teresita Mazzei
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Rita Maria Melotti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Danilo Miotti
- Palliative Care Unit, Salvatore Maugeri-IRCCS Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefano Moroso
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Stefano De Santis
- Palliative Care and Oncologic Pain Service, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Remo Orsetti
- Pain Medicine Unit, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfonso Papa
- Pain Relief, A.O. Dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Sergio Ricci
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, S. Chiara University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fabrizio Sabato
- Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Department of Emergency, Admission and Critical Area, Policlinic of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Elvira Scelzi
- Medical Oncology, Castelfranco Veneto Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | - Michele Sofia
- Department of Palliative Care with Hospice and Pain Therapy Unit, "G.Salvini" Hospital, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Aielli
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
An open-label pilot study of oral vitamin C as an opioid-sparing agent in patients with chronic pain secondary to cancer. Support Care Cancer 2016; 25:341-343. [PMID: 27815713 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3472-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of oral Vitamin C as an opioid-sparing agent when used in conjunction with opioids and standard adjuvant therapy in the management of chronic cancer pain. METHODS An open-label pilot study of patients ≥18 years of age with chronic pain secondary to cancer and/or its treatment and a Brief Pain Inventory average pain score of ≥3/10. In addition to opioid analgesia, patients received 1 g of vitamin C twice daily over 3 days (total daily dose of 2 g). Patients' usual medications, including breakthrough medications, were continued throughout the study period. The primary endpoint was total daily opioid use during vitamin C administration compared with that immediately prior to study. RESULTS Thirty-four patients were enrolled in the study. Seven failed to complete the trial. Across the 17 evaluable patients, the median daily opioid consumption was 360 mg oral morphine equivalents (OME) on the days prior to vitamin C and 390 mg when administered with vitamin C. CONCLUSION This study failed to demonstrate any clinically significant benefit from vitamin C in conjunction with opioids in cancer-related pain and does not provide support for embarking on a larger randomised trial to determine efficacy.
Collapse
|
25
|
The impact of a simplified documentation method for the Edmonton classification system for cancer pain (ECS-CP) on clinician utilization. Support Care Cancer 2016; 25:575-580. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3440-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/02/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
26
|
Abstract
There has been a paradigm shift in medicine away from tradition, anecdote and theoretical reasoning from the basic sciences towards evidence-based medicine (EBM). In palliative care however, statistically significant benefits may be marginal and may not be related to clinical meaningfulness. The typical treatment vs. placebo comparison necessitated by ‘gold standard’ randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not necessarily applicable. The complex multimorbidity of end of life care involves considerations of the patient’s physical, psychological, social and spiritual needs. In addition, the field of palliative care covers a heterogeneous group of chronic and incurable diseases no longer limited to cancer. Adequate sample sizes can be difficult to achieve, reducing the power of studies and high attrition rates can result in inadequate follow up periods. This review uses examples of the management of cancer-related fatigue and death rattle (noisy breathing) to demonstrate the current state of EBM in palliative care. The future of EBM in palliative care needs to be as diverse as the patients who ultimately derive benefit. Non-RCT methodologies of equivalent quality, validity and size conducted by collaborative research networks using a ‘mixed methods approach’ are likely to pose the correct clinical questions and derive evidence-based yet clinically relevant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Visser
- 1 Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK ; 2 Sir Michael Sobell House, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Gina Hadley
- 1 Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK ; 2 Sir Michael Sobell House, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Bee Wee
- 1 Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK ; 2 Sir Michael Sobell House, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Harrison-Blount M, Cullen M, Nester CJ, Williams AE. An action research approach to facilitating the adoption of a foot health assessment tool in India. J Foot Ankle Res 2015; 8:52. [PMID: 26388945 PMCID: PMC4574208 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-015-0108-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 09/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background India has a diabetes population that is growing and alongside this, the incidence of limb threatening foot problems is increasing. Foot health care provision does not yet meet this demand. In one locality in India, clinicians had an unstructured approach to foot health assessments resulting in poor adoption of evidence based guidelines from the West and a persistence of serious foot complications. There was the perception that existing assessment tools did not take into account the local cultural, organizational and professional needs and there was a lack of ownership of any potential solution to the problem. Therefore, the aim of this work was to facilitate the ownership and development of a foot health assessment tool for use in the Indian context. In order to achieve this an action research approach was chosen. Methods Participants were facilitated through the action and implementation phases of the action research cycle by the researchers. The action phase included generating a list of potential items for inclusion in the tool from a review of the literature to provide an evidence based foundation for the foot health assessment tool. A modified Delphi method was used to further refine the contents of the tool. Members of the Delphi Panel (n = 8) were experts in their field of medicine and experts in delivering health care within services in India. Results The outcome of the study was the adoption of a locally developed foot health assessment tool (Salford Indian Foot Health Assessment Tool, SIFT). It contains thirteen sections, which reflect the risk factors identified for assessing foot health agreed by the participants to fit the Indian context. The SIFT is supported with evidence based guidelines from the West and a training program was delivered by the researchers in order to support its implementation into clinical practice. Conclusion An action research approach has facilitated the development and implementation of a locally created and owned foot health assessment tool. This in turn has resulted in the integration of evidence-based guidelines from the West with consideration to local cultural, organizational and professional needs and ultimately the needs of their patients. Further work is underway evaluating the outcomes of the SIFT in practice. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0108-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Harrison-Blount
- School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Social Care, University of Salford, Frederick Road, Salford, M6 6PU UK
| | - Michelle Cullen
- School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Social Care, University of Salford, Frederick Road, Salford, M6 6PU UK
| | - Christopher J Nester
- School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Social Care, University of Salford, Frederick Road, Salford, M6 6PU UK
| | - Anita E Williams
- School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Social Care, University of Salford, Frederick Road, Salford, M6 6PU UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bovero A, Leombruni P, Miniotti M, Rocca G, Torta R. Spirituality, quality of life, psychological adjustment in terminal cancer patients in hospice. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2015. [PMID: 26215314 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to show the different components of spirituality in the last few weeks of life for advanced cancer patients admitted to hospice and to evaluate quality of life (QoL), pain, anxiety, depression and psychological adjustment to cancer. One hundred and fifteen patients were interviewed with a series of rating scales: the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-Being Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Visual Analogue Scale for pain, the Brief Coping Orientation to Problem Experienced and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale - General Measure. Workers and single patients with higher education level showed a worse QoL. Moreover, anxiety and pain were negatively associated with QoL, while spirituality and 'Instrumental Support' coping style were positively associated with QoL. In the Italian sample, it was observed that when patients are close to death, faith is a more important component of spirituality than meaning/peace. This study confirms that QoL could be related to physical and psychological symptoms, and this reiterates the importance of faith in end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bovero
- Clinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - P Leombruni
- Clinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - M Miniotti
- Clinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
| | - G Rocca
- Psychiatric Section, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - R Torta
- Clinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Adequate cancer pain assessment using valid and reliable tools is essential for proper cancer pain management. Because cancer pain can be a complex construct, assessment of its many domains should be conducted using multidimensional tools. Furthermore, there is a need to develop a standard, consensus classification system for prognosis of cancer pain. RECENT FINDINGS Unidimensional tools for assessing cancer pain are useful for measuring cancer pain intensity. Other domains and symptoms of the cancer pain experience are assessed using a variety of multidimensional tools. There is a lack of agreement on a standard assessment tool or a standard classification system for cancer pain, although research continues to be undertaken to develop such resources for clinical and research purposes. SUMMARY Many pain and symptom assessment tools exist for use in the cancer patient, including the Brief Pain Inventory, the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, among others. Recent literature reveals the move toward translating these and other tools to electronic applications. Further study is also underway to create a standard, prognostic classification system for cancer pain.
Collapse
|
30
|
Granan LP, Jacobsen HB, Reme SE, Stubhaug A, Hansson P, Breivik H, Ljoså TM. Tverrfaglig utdanning for bedre smertebehandling. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2015; 135:1114-5. [DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.0498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
31
|
Hui D, Bruera E. A personalized approach to assessing and managing pain in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:1640-6. [PMID: 24799495 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.52.2508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Pain is one of the most common and distressing symptoms in patients with cancer. In this review, we discuss an evidence-based approach to personalized pain assessment and management. Recent insights into the pain expression pathway have led to a paradigm shift in pain management, allowing clinicians to deliver personalized treatments tailored to the individual's needs. Personalized pain management begins with systematic screening, followed by comprehensive pain assessment. Impeccable characterization of pain informs its etiology and the mechanism to guide treatment choices. Identification of modulators of pain expression such as psychological distress, alcoholism, substance use, and delirium allow clinicians to further tailor treatment recommendations. Documentation of a personalized pain goal provides an individualized response criterion. A multidimensional treatment plan is then formulated targeting the pain mechanism, etiologic factors, and modulators. Finally, longitudinal monitoring customized to the individual's needs allows clinicians to improve adherence and, ultimately, to optimize pain control over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hui
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Macdonell K. Clinician's Commentary on Tatham et al.(1.). Physiother Can 2014; 65:331-2. [PMID: 24396159 DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2012-06-cc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Macdonell
- Registered Physiotherapist, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Nekolaichuk C, Fainsinger RL, Lawlor P. Challenges of Conducting Research on Cancer Pain Classification: How Do We Make Sense of the Outcomes? J Palliat Med 2013; 16:1323-5. [DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Nekolaichuk
- Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Robin L. Fainsinger
- Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Peter Lawlor
- Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Elisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Palliative Care Unit, Bruyère Continuing Care, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|