Improving drug response prediction by integrating multiple data sources: matrix factorization, kernel and network-based approaches

DeepDRA: Drug repurposing using multi-omics data integration with autoencoders

Cancer treatment has become one of the biggest challenges in the world today. Different treatments are used against cancer; drug-based treatments have shown better results. On the other hand, designing new drugs for cancer is costly and time-consuming. Some computational methods, such as machine learning and deep learning, have been suggested to solve these challenges using drug repurposing. Despite the promise of classical machine-learning methods in repurposing cancer drugs and predicting responses, deep-learning methods performed better. This study aims to develop a deep-learning model that predicts cancer drug response based on multi-omics data, drug descriptors, and drug fingerprints and facilitates the repurposing of drugs based on those responses. To reduce multi-omics data's dimensionality, we use autoencoders. As a multi-task learning model, autoencoders are connected to MLPs. We extensively tested our model using three primary datasets: GDSC, CTRP, and CCLE to determine its efficacy. In multiple experiments, our model consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. Compared to state-of-the-art models, our model achieves an impressive AUPRC of 0.99. Furthermore, in a cross-dataset evaluation, where the model is trained on GDSC and tested on CCLE, it surpasses the performance of three previous works, achieving an AUPRC of 0.72. In conclusion, we presented a deep learning model that outperforms the current state-of-the-art regarding generalization. Using this model, we could assess drug responses and explore drug repurposing, leading to the discovery of novel cancer drugs. Our study highlights the potential for advanced deep learning to advance cancer therapeutic precision.

A comparative analysis of computational drug repurposing approaches: proposing a novel tensor-matrix-tensor factorization method

Efficient drug discovery relies on drug repurposing, an important and open research field. This work presents a novel factorization method and a practical comparison of different approaches for drug repurposing. First, we propose a novel tensor-matrix-tensor (TMT) formulation as a new data array method with a gradient-based factorization procedure. Additionally, this paper examines and contrasts four computational drug repurposing approaches-factorization-based methods, machine learning methods, deep learning methods, and graph neural networks-to fulfill the second purpose. We test the strategies on two datasets and assess each approach's performance, drawbacks, problems, and benefits based on results. The results demonstrate that deep learning techniques work better than other strategies and that their results might be more reliable. Ultimately, graph neural methods need to be in an inductive manner to have a reliable prediction.

Optimal fusion of genotype and drug embeddings in predicting cancer drug response

Predicting cancer drug response using both genomics and drug features has shown some success compared to using genomics features alone. However, there has been limited research done on how best to combine or fuse the two types of features. Using a visible neural network with two deep learning branches for genes and drug features as the base architecture, we experimented with different fusion functions and fusion points. Our experiments show that injecting multiplicative relationships between gene and drug latent features into the original concatenation-based architecture DrugCell significantly improved the overall predictive performance and outperformed other baseline models. We also show that different fusion methods respond differently to different fusion points, indicating that the relationship between drug features and different hierarchical biological level of gene features is optimally captured using different methods. Considering both predictive performance and runtime speed, tensor product partial is the best-performing fusion function to combine late-stage representations of drug and gene features to predict cancer drug response.

Optimized models and deep learning methods for drug response prediction in cancer treatments: a review

Recent advancements in deep learning (DL) have played a crucial role in aiding experts to develop personalized healthcare services, particularly in drug response prediction (DRP) for cancer patients. The DL's techniques contribution to this field is significant, and they have proven indispensable in the medical field. This review aims to analyze the diverse effectiveness of various DL models in making these predictions, drawing on research published from 2017 to 2023. We utilized the VOS-Viewer 1.6.18 software to create a word cloud from the titles and abstracts of the selected studies. This study offers insights into the focus areas within DL models used for drug response. The word cloud revealed a strong link between certain keywords and grouped themes, highlighting terms such as deep learning, machine learning, precision medicine, precision oncology, drug response prediction, and personalized medicine. In order to achieve an advance in DRP using DL, the researchers need to work on enhancing the models' generalizability and interoperability. It is also crucial to develop models that not only accurately represent various architectures but also simplify these architectures, balancing the complexity with the predictive capabilities. In the future, researchers should try to combine methods that make DL models easier to understand; this will make DRP reviews more open and help doctors trust the decisions made by DL models in cancer DRP.

A performance evaluation of drug response prediction models for individual drugs

Drug response prediction is important to establish personalized medicine for cancer therapy. Model construction for predicting drug response (i.e., cell viability half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC₅₀]) of an individual drug by inputting pharmacogenomics in disease models remains critical. Machine learning (ML) has been predominantly applied for prediction, despite the advent of deep learning (DL). Moreover, whether DL or traditional ML models are superior for predicting cell viability IC_50s has to be established. Herein, we constructed ML and DL drug response prediction models for 24 individual drugs and compared the performance of the models by employing gene expression and mutation profiles of cancer cell lines as input. We observed no significant difference in drug response prediction performance between DL and ML models for 24 drugs [root mean squared error (RMSE) ranging from 0.284 to 3.563 for DL and from 0.274 to 2.697 for ML; R² ranging from -7.405 to 0.331 for DL and from -8.113 to 0.470 for ML]. Among the 24 individual drugs, the ridge model of panobinostat exhibited the best performance (R² 0.470 and RMSE 0.623). Thus, we selected the ridge model of panobinostat for further application of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Using XAI, we further identified important genomic features for panobinostat response prediction in the ridge model, suggesting the genomic features of 22 genes. Based on our findings, results for an individual drug employing both DL and ML models were comparable. Our study confirms the applicability of drug response prediction models for individual drugs.

Deep transfer learning for clinical decision-making based on high-throughput data: comprehensive survey with benchmark results

The rapid growth of omics-based data has revolutionized biomedical research and precision medicine, allowing machine learning models to be developed for cutting-edge performance. However, despite the wealth of high-throughput data available, the performance of these models is hindered by the lack of sufficient training data, particularly in clinical research (in vivo experiments). As a result, translating this knowledge into clinical practice, such as predicting drug responses, remains a challenging task. Transfer learning is a promising tool that bridges the gap between data domains by transferring knowledge from the source to the target domain. Researchers have proposed transfer learning to predict clinical outcomes by leveraging pre-clinical data (mouse, zebrafish), highlighting its vast potential. In this work, we present a comprehensive literature review of deep transfer learning methods for health informatics and clinical decision-making, focusing on high-throughput molecular data. Previous reviews mostly covered image-based transfer learning works, while we present a more detailed analysis of transfer learning papers. Furthermore, we evaluated original studies based on different evaluation settings across cross-validations, data splits and model architectures. The result shows that those transfer learning methods have great potential; high-throughput sequencing data and state-of-the-art deep learning models lead to significant insights and conclusions. Additionally, we explored various datasets in transfer learning papers with statistics and visualization.

DEDTI versus IEDTI: efficient and predictive models of drug-target interactions

Drug repurposing is an active area of research that aims to decrease the cost and time of drug development. Most of those efforts are primarily concerned with the prediction of drug-target interactions. Many evaluation models, from matrix factorization to more cutting-edge deep neural networks, have come to the scene to identify such relations. Some predictive models are devoted to the prediction's quality, and others are devoted to the efficiency of the predictive models, e.g., embedding generation. In this work, we propose new representations of drugs and targets useful for more prediction and analysis. Using these representations, we propose two inductive, deep network models of IEDTI and DEDTI for drug-target interaction prediction. Both of them use the accumulation of new representations. The IEDTI takes advantage of triplet and maps the input accumulated similarity features into meaningful embedding corresponding vectors. Then, it applies a deep predictive model to each drug-target pair to evaluate their interaction. The DEDTI directly uses the accumulated similarity feature vectors of drugs and targets and applies a predictive model on each pair to identify their interactions. We have done a comprehensive simulation on the DTINet dataset as well as gold standard datasets, and the results show that DEDTI outperforms IEDTI and the state-of-the-art models. In addition, we conduct a docking study on new predicted interactions between two drug-target pairs, and the results confirm acceptable drug-target binding affinity between both predicted pairs.

Leveraging multi-source to resolve inconsistency across pharmacogenomic datasets in drug sensitivity prediction

Pharmacogenomics datasets have been generated for various purposes, such as investigating different biomarkers. However, when studying the same cell line with the same drugs, differences in drug responses exist between studies. These variations arise from factors such as inter-tumoral heterogeneity, experimental standardization, and the complexity of cell subtypes. Consequently, drug response prediction suffers from limited generalizability. To address these challenges, we propose a computational model based on Federated Learning (FL) for drug response prediction. By leveraging three pharmacogenomics datasets (CCLE, GDSC2, and gCSI), we evaluate the performance of our model across diverse cell line-based databases. Our results demonstrate superior predictive performance compared to baseline methods and traditional FL approaches through various experimental tests. This study underscores the potential of employing FL to leverage multiple data sources, enabling the development of generalized models that account for inconsistencies among pharmacogenomics datasets. By addressing the limitations of low generalizability, our approach contributes to advancing drug response prediction in precision oncology.

DBGRU-SE: predicting drug-drug interactions based on double BiGRU and squeeze-and-excitation attention mechanism

The prediction of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is essential for the development and repositioning of new drugs. Meanwhile, they play a vital role in the fields of biopharmaceuticals, disease diagnosis and pharmacological treatment. This article proposes a new method called DBGRU-SE for predicting DDIs. Firstly, FP3 fingerprints, MACCS fingerprints, Pubchem fingerprints and 1D and 2D molecular descriptors are used to extract the feature information of the drugs. Secondly, Group Lasso is used to remove redundant features. Then, SMOTE-ENN is applied to balance the data to obtain the best feature vectors. Finally, the best feature vectors are fed into the classifier combining BiGRU and squeeze-and-excitation (SE) attention mechanisms to predict DDIs. After applying five-fold cross-validation, The ACC values of DBGRU-SE model on the two datasets are 97.51 and 94.98%, and the AUC are 99.60 and 98.85%, respectively. The results showed that DBGRU-SE had good predictive performance for drug-drug interactions.

CTDN (Convolutional Temporal Based Deep- Neural Network): An Improvised Stacked Hybrid Computational Approach for Anticancer Drug Response Prediction

The characterization of drug - metabolizing enzymes is a significant problem for customized therapy. It is important to choose the right drugs for cancer victims, and the ability to forecast how those drugs will react is usually based on the available information, genetic sequence, and structural properties. To the finest of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate optimization algorithms for selection of features and pharmacogenetics categorization using classification methods based on a successful evolutionary algorithm using datasets from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopaedia (CCLE) and Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC). The study proposes the uses of Firefly and Grey Wolf Optimization techniques for feature extraction, while comparing the traditional Machine Learning (ML), ensemble ML and Stacking Algorithm with the proposed Convolutional Temporal Deep Neural Network or CTDN. With the potential to increase efficiency from the suggested intelligible classifier model for a suggestive chemotherapeutic drugs response prediction, our study is important in particular for selecting an acceptable feature selection method. The comparison analysis demonstrates that the proposed model not only surpasses the prior state-of-the-art methods, but also uses Grey Wolf and Fire Fly Optimization to lessen multicollinearity and overfitting.

Drug-target interaction prediction based on protein features, using wrapper feature selection

Drug-target interaction prediction is a vital stage in drug development, involving lots of methods. Experimental methods that identify these relationships on the basis of clinical remedies are time-taking, costly, laborious, and complex introducing a lot of challenges. One group of new methods is called computational methods. The development of new computational methods which are more accurate can be preferable to experimental methods, in terms of total cost and time. In this paper, a new computational model to predict drug-target interaction (DTI), consisting of three phases, including feature extraction, feature selection, and classification is proposed. In feature extraction phase, different features such as EAAC, PSSM and etc. would be extracted from sequence of proteins and fingerprint features from drugs. These extracted features would then be combined. In the next step, one of the wrapper feature selection methods named IWSSR, due to the large amount of extracted data, is applied. The selected features are then given to rotation forest classification, to have a more efficient prediction. Actually, the innovation of our work is that we extract different features; and then select features by the use of IWSSR. The accuracy of the rotation forest classifier based on tenfold on the golden standard datasets (enzyme, ion channels, G-protein-coupled receptors, nuclear receptors) is as follows: 98.12, 98.07, 96.82, and 95.64. The results of experiments indicate that the proposed model has an acceptable rate in DTI prediction and is compatible with the proposed methods in other papers.

Deep learning methods for drug response prediction in cancer: Predominant and emerging trends

Cancer claims millions of lives yearly worldwide. While many therapies have been made available in recent years, by in large cancer remains unsolved. Exploiting computational predictive models to study and treat cancer holds great promise in improving drug development and personalized design of treatment plans, ultimately suppressing tumors, alleviating suffering, and prolonging lives of patients. A wave of recent papers demonstrates promising results in predicting cancer response to drug treatments while utilizing deep learning methods. These papers investigate diverse data representations, neural network architectures, learning methodologies, and evaluations schemes. However, deciphering promising predominant and emerging trends is difficult due to the variety of explored methods and lack of standardized framework for comparing drug response prediction models. To obtain a comprehensive landscape of deep learning methods, we conducted an extensive search and analysis of deep learning models that predict the response to single drug treatments. A total of 61 deep learning-based models have been curated, and summary plots were generated. Based on the analysis, observable patterns and prevalence of methods have been revealed. This review allows to better understand the current state of the field and identify major challenges and promising solution paths.

A systematic assessment of deep learning methods for drug response prediction: from in vitro to clinical applications

Drug response prediction is an important problem in personalized cancer therapy. Among various newly developed models, significant improvement in prediction performance has been reported using deep learning methods. However, systematic comparisons of deep learning methods, especially of the transferability from preclinical models to clinical cohorts, are currently lacking. To provide a more rigorous assessment, the performance of six representative deep learning methods for drug response prediction using nine evaluation metrics, including the overall prediction accuracy, predictability of each drug, potential associated factors and transferability to clinical cohorts, in multiple application scenarios was benchmarked. Most methods show promising prediction within cell line datasets, and TGSA, with its lower time cost and better performance, is recommended. Although the performance metrics decrease when applying models trained on cell lines to patients, a certain amount of power to distinguish clinical response on some drugs can be maintained using CRDNN and TGSA. With these assessments, we provide a guidance for researchers to choose appropriate methods, as well as insights into future directions for the development of more effective methods in clinical scenarios.

DRPreter: Interpretable Anticancer Drug Response Prediction Using Knowledge-Guided Graph Neural Networks and Transformer

Some of the recent studies on drug sensitivity prediction have applied graph neural networks to leverage prior knowledge on the drug structure or gene network, and other studies have focused on the interpretability of the model to delineate the mechanism governing the drug response. However, it is crucial to make a prediction model that is both knowledge-guided and interpretable, so that the prediction accuracy is improved and practical use of the model can be enhanced. We propose an interpretable model called DRPreter (drug response predictor and interpreter) that predicts the anticancer drug response. DRPreter learns cell line and drug information with graph neural networks; the cell-line graph is further divided into multiple subgraphs with domain knowledge on biological pathways. A type-aware transformer in DRPreter helps detect relationships between pathways and a drug, highlighting important pathways that are involved in the drug response. Extensive experiments on the GDSC (Genomics of Drug Sensitivity and Cancer) dataset demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art graph-based models for drug response prediction. In addition, DRPreter detected putative key genes and pathways for specific drug-cell-line pairs with supporting evidence in the literature, implying that our model can help interpret the mechanism of action of the drug.

CREAMMIST: an integrative probabilistic database for cancer drug response prediction

Extensive in vitro cancer drug screening datasets have enabled scientists to identify biomarkers and develop machine learning models for predicting drug sensitivity. While most advancements have focused on omics profiles, cancer drug sensitivity scores precalculated by the original sources are often used as-is, without consideration for variabilities between studies. It is well-known that significant inconsistencies exist between the drug sensitivity scores across datasets due to differences in experimental setups and preprocessing methods used to obtain the sensitivity scores. As a result, many studies opt to focus only on a single dataset, leading to underutilization of available data and a limited interpretation of cancer pharmacogenomics analysis. To overcome these caveats, we have developed CREAMMIST (https://creammist.mtms.dev), an integrative database that enables users to obtain an integrative dose-response curve, to capture uncertainty (or high certainty when multiple datasets well align) across five widely used cancer cell-line drug-response datasets. We utilized the Bayesian framework to systematically integrate all available dose-response values across datasets (>14 millions dose-response data points). CREAMMIST provides easy-to-use statistics derived from the integrative dose-response curves for various downstream analyses such as identifying biomarkers, selecting drug concentrations for experiments, and training robust machine learning models.

Neural Collective Matrix Factorization for integrated analysis of heterogeneous biomedical data

MOTIVATION

In many biomedical studies, there arises the need to integrate data from multiple directly or indirectly related sources. Collective matrix factorization (CMF) and its variants are models designed to collectively learn from arbitrary collections of matrices. The latent factors learnt are rich integrative representations that can be used in downstream tasks, such as clustering or relation prediction with standard machine-learning models. Previous CMF-based methods have numerous modeling limitations. They do not adequately capture complex non-linear interactions and do not explicitly model varying sparsity and noise levels in the inputs, and some cannot model inputs with multiple datatypes. These inadequacies limit their use on many biomedical datasets.

RESULTS

To address these limitations, we develop Neural Collective Matrix Factorization (NCMF), the first fully neural approach to CMF. We evaluate NCMF on relation prediction tasks of gene-disease association prediction and adverse drug event prediction, using multiple datasets. In each case, data are obtained from heterogeneous publicly available databases and used to learn representations to build predictive models. NCMF is found to outperform previous CMF-based methods and several state-of-the-art graph embedding methods for representation learning in our experiments. Our experiments illustrate the versatility and efficacy of NCMF in representation learning for seamless integration of heterogeneous data.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

https://github.com/ajayago/NCMF_bioinformatics.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

On modeling and utilizing chemical compound information with deep learning technologies: A task-oriented approach

A large number of chemical compounds are available in databases such as PubChem and ZINC. However, currently known compounds, though large, represent only a fraction of possible compounds, which is known as chemical space. Many of these compounds in the databases are annotated with properties and assay data that can be used for drug discovery efforts. For this goal, a number of machine learning algorithms have been developed and recent deep learning technologies can be effectively used to navigate chemical space, especially for unknown chemical compounds, in terms of drug-related tasks. In this article, we survey how deep learning technologies can model and utilize chemical compound information in a task-oriented way by exploiting annotated properties and assay data in the chemical compounds databases. We first compile what kind of tasks are trying to be accomplished by machine learning methods. Then, we survey deep learning technologies to show their modeling power and current applications for accomplishing drug related tasks. Next, we survey deep learning techniques to address the insufficiency issue of annotated data for more effective navigation of chemical space. Chemical compound information alone may not be powerful enough for drug related tasks, thus we survey what kind of information, such as assay and gene expression data, can be used to improve the prediction power of deep learning models. Finally, we conclude this survey with four important newly developed technologies that are yet to be fully incorporated into computational analysis of chemical information.

DIVERSE: Bayesian Data IntegratiVE Learning for Precise Drug ResponSE Prediction

Detecting predictive biomarkers from multi-omics data is important for precision medicine, to improve diagnostics of complex diseases and for better treatments. This needs substantial experimental efforts that are made difficult by the heterogeneity of cell lines and huge cost. An effective solution is to build a computational model over the diverse omics data, including genomic, molecular, and environmental information. However, choosing informative and reliable data sources from among the different types of data is a challenging problem. We propose DIVERSE, a framework of Bayesian importance-weighted tri- and bi-matrix factorization(DIVERSE3 or DIVERSE2) to predict drug responses from data of cell lines, drugs, and gene interactions. DIVERSE integrates the data sources systematically, in a step-wise manner, examining the importance of each added data set in turn. More specifically, we sequentially integrate five different data sets, which have not all been combined in earlier bioinformatic methods for predicting drug responses. Empirical experiments show that DIVERSE clearly outperformed five other methods including three state-of-the-art approaches, under cross-validation, particularly in out-of-matrix prediction, which is closer to the setting of real use cases and more challenging than simpler in-matrix prediction. Additionally, case studies for discovering new drugs further confirmed the performance advantage of DIVERSE.

From single-omics to interactomics: How can ligand-induced perturbations modulate single-cell phenotypes?

Cells suffer from perturbations by different stimuli, which, consequently, rise to individual alterations in their profile and function that may end up affecting the tissue as a whole. This is no different if we consider the effect of a therapeutic agent on a biological system. As cells are exposed to external ligands their profile can change at different single-omics levels. Detecting how these changes take place through different sequencing technologies is key to a better understanding of the effects of therapeutic agents. Single-cell RNA-sequencing stands out as one of the most common approaches for cell profiling and perturbation analysis. As a result, single-cell transcriptomics data can be integrated with other omics data sources, such as proteomics and epigenomics data, to clarify the perturbation effects and mechanism at the cell level. Appropriate computational tools are key to process and integrate the available information. This chapter focuses on the recent advances on ligand-induced perturbation and single-cell omics computational tools and algorithms, their current limitations, and how the deluge of data can be used to improve the current process of drug research and development.

Prediction of clinical trial enrollment rates

Clinical trials represent a critical milestone of translational and clinical sciences. However, poor recruitment to clinical trials has been a long standing problem affecting institutions all over the world. One way to reduce the cost incurred by insufficient enrollment is to minimize initiating trials that are most likely to fall short of their enrollment goal. Hence, the ability to predict which proposed trials will meet enrollment goals prior to the start of the trial is highly beneficial. In the current study, we leveraged a data set extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov that consists of 46,724 U.S. based clinical trials from 1990 to 2020. We constructed 4,636 candidate predictors based on data collected by ClinicalTrials.gov and external sources for enrollment rate prediction using various state-of-the-art machine learning methods. Taking advantage of a nested time series cross-validation design, our models resulted in good predictive performance that is generalizable to future data and stable over time. Moreover, information content analysis revealed the study design related features to be the most informative feature type regarding enrollment. Compared to the performance of models built with all features, the performance of models built with study design related features is only marginally worse (AUC = 0.78 ± 0.03 vs. AUC = 0.76 ± 0.02). The results presented can form the basis for data-driven decision support systems to assess whether proposed clinical trials would likely meet their enrollment goal.

A cross-study analysis of drug response prediction in cancer cell lines

To enable personalized cancer treatment, machine learning models have been developed to predict drug response as a function of tumor and drug features. However, most algorithm development efforts have relied on cross-validation within a single study to assess model accuracy. While an essential first step, cross-validation within a biological data set typically provides an overly optimistic estimate of the prediction performance on independent test sets. To provide a more rigorous assessment of model generalizability between different studies, we use machine learning to analyze five publicly available cell line-based data sets: National Cancer Institute 60, ancer Therapeutics Response Portal (CTRP), Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer, Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia and Genentech Cell Line Screening Initiative (gCSI). Based on observed experimental variability across studies, we explore estimates of prediction upper bounds. We report performance results of a variety of machine learning models, with a multitasking deep neural network achieving the best cross-study generalizability. By multiple measures, models trained on CTRP yield the most accurate predictions on the remaining testing data, and gCSI is the most predictable among the cell line data sets included in this study. With these experiments and further simulations on partial data, two lessons emerge: (1) differences in viability assays can limit model generalizability across studies and (2) drug diversity, more than tumor diversity, is crucial for raising model generalizability in preclinical screening.

An overview of machine learning methods for monotherapy drug response prediction

For an increasing number of preclinical samples, both detailed molecular profiles and their responses to various drugs are becoming available. Efforts to understand, and predict, drug responses in a data-driven manner have led to a proliferation of machine learning (ML) methods, with the longer term ambition of predicting clinical drug responses. Here, we provide a uniquely wide and deep systematic review of the rapidly evolving literature on monotherapy drug response prediction, with a systematic characterization and classification that comprises more than 70 ML methods in 13 subclasses, their input and output data types, modes of evaluation, and code and software availability. ML experts are provided with a fundamental understanding of the biological problem, and how ML methods are configured for it. Biologists and biomedical researchers are introduced to the basic principles of applicable ML methods, and their application to the problem of drug response prediction. We also provide systematic overviews of commonly used data sources used for training and evaluation methods.

Predicting patient response with models trained on cell lines and patient-derived xenografts by nonlinear transfer learning

Preclinical models have been the workhorse of cancer research, producing massive amounts of drug response data. Unfortunately, translating response biomarkers derived from these datasets to human tumors has proven to be particularly challenging. To address this challenge, we developed TRANSACT, a computational framework that builds a consensus space to capture biological processes common to preclinical models and human tumors and exploits this space to construct drug response predictors that robustly transfer from preclinical models to human tumors. TRANSACT performs favorably compared to four competing approaches, including two deep learning approaches, on a set of 23 drug prediction challenges on The Cancer Genome Atlas and 226 metastatic tumors from the Hartwig Medical Foundation. We demonstrate that response predictions deliver a robust performance for a number of therapies of high clinical importance: platinum-based chemotherapies, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel. In contrast to other approaches, we demonstrate the interpretability of the TRANSACT predictors by correctly identifying known biomarkers of targeted therapies, and we propose potential mechanisms that mediate the resistance to two chemotherapeutic agents.

Machine learning approaches for drug combination therapies

Drug combination therapy is a promising strategy to treat complex diseases such as cancer and infectious diseases. However, current knowledge of drug combination therapies, especially in cancer patients, is limited because of adverse drug effects, toxicity and cell line heterogeneity. Screening new drug combinations requires substantial efforts since considering all possible combinations between drugs is infeasible and expensive. Therefore, building computational approaches, particularly machine learning methods, could provide an effective strategy to overcome drug resistance and improve therapeutic efficacy. In this review, we group the state-of-the-art machine learning approaches to analyze personalized drug combination therapies into three categories and discuss each method in each category. We also present a short description of relevant databases used as a benchmark in drug combination therapies and provide a list of well-known, publicly available interactive data analysis portals. We highlight the importance of data integration on the identification of drug combinations. Finally, we address the advantages of combining multiple data sources on drug combination analysis by showing an experimental comparison.

Comparative analysis of molecular fingerprints in prediction of drug combination effects

Application of machine and deep learning methods in drug discovery and cancer research has gained a considerable amount of attention in the past years. As the field grows, it becomes crucial to systematically evaluate the performance of novel computational solutions in relation to established techniques. To this end, we compare rule-based and data-driven molecular representations in prediction of drug combination sensitivity and drug synergy scores using standardized results of 14 high-throughput screening studies, comprising 64 200 unique combinations of 4153 molecules tested in 112 cancer cell lines. We evaluate the clustering performance of molecular representations and quantify their similarity by adapting the Centered Kernel Alignment metric. Our work demonstrates that to identify an optimal molecular representation type, it is necessary to supplement quantitative benchmark results with qualitative considerations, such as model interpretability and robustness, which may vary between and throughout preclinical drug development projects.

Computational approaches leveraging integrated connections of multi-omic data toward clinical applications

In line with the advances in high-throughput technologies, multiple omic datasets have accumulated to study biological systems and diseases coherently. No single omics data type is capable of fully representing cellular activity. The complexity of the biological processes arises from the interactions between omic entities such as genes, proteins, and metabolites. Therefore, multi-omic data integration is crucial but challenging. The impact of the molecular alterations in multi-omic data is not local in the neighborhood of the altered gene or protein; rather, the impact diffuses in the network and changes the functionality of multiple signaling pathways and regulation of the gene expression. Additionally, multi-omic data is high-dimensional and has background noise. Several integrative approaches have been developed to accurately interpret the multi-omic datasets, including machine learning, network-based methods, and their combination. In this review, we overview the most recent integrative approaches and tools with a focus on network-based methods. We then discuss these approaches according to their specific applications, from disease-network and biomarker identification to patient stratification, drug discovery, and repurposing.

Representation of molecules for drug response prediction

The rapid development of machine learning and deep learning algorithms in the recent decade has spurred an outburst of their applications in many research fields. In the chemistry domain, machine learning has been widely used to aid in drug screening, drug toxicity prediction, quantitative structure-activity relationship prediction, anti-cancer synergy score prediction, etc. This review is dedicated to the application of machine learning in drug response prediction. Specifically, we focus on molecular representations, which is a crucial element to the success of drug response prediction and other chemistry-related prediction tasks. We introduce three types of commonly used molecular representation methods, together with their implementation and application examples. This review will serve as a brief introduction of the broad field of molecular representations.

oncoPredict: an R package for predicting in vivo or cancer patient drug response and biomarkers from cell line screening data

Cell line drug screening datasets can be utilized for a range of different drug discovery applications from drug biomarker discovery to building translational models of drug response. Previously, we described three separate methodologies to (1) correct for general levels of drug sensitivity to enable drug-specific biomarker discovery, (2) predict clinical drug response in patients and (3) associate these predictions with clinical features to perform in vivo drug biomarker discovery. Here, we unite and update these methodologies into one R package (oncoPredict) to facilitate the development and adoption of these tools. This new OncoPredict R package can be applied to various in vitro and in vivo contexts for drug and biomarker discovery.

Predicting tumor response to drugs based on gene-expression biomarkers of sensitivity learned from cancer cell lines

Background

Human cancer cell line profiling and drug sensitivity studies provide valuable information about the therapeutic potential of drugs and their possible mechanisms of action. The goal of those studies is to translate the findings from in vitro studies of cancer cell lines into in vivo therapeutic relevance and, eventually, patients’ care. Tremendous progress has been made.

Results

In this work, we built predictive models for 453 drugs using data on gene expression and drug sensitivity (IC₅₀) from cancer cell lines. We identified many known drug-gene interactions and uncovered several potentially novel drug-gene associations. Importantly, we further applied these predictive models to ~ 17,000 bulk RNA-seq samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database to predict drug sensitivity for both normal and tumor tissues. We created a web site for users to visualize and download our predicted data (https://manticore.niehs.nih.gov/cancerRxTissue). Using trametinib as an example, we showed that our approach can faithfully recapitulate the known tumor specificity of the drug.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that our approach can predict drugs that 1) are tumor-type specific; 2) elicit higher sensitivity from tumor compared to corresponding normal tissue; 3) elicit differential sensitivity across breast cancer subtypes. If validated, our prediction could have relevance for preclinical drug testing and in phase I clinical design.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-021-07581-7.

AITL: Adversarial Inductive Transfer Learning with input and output space adaptation for pharmacogenomics

Motivation

The goal of pharmacogenomics is to predict drug response in patients using their single- or multi-omics data. A major challenge is that clinical data (i.e. patients) with drug response outcome is very limited, creating a need for transfer learning to bridge the gap between large pre-clinical pharmacogenomics datasets (e.g. cancer cell lines), as a source domain, and clinical datasets as a target domain. Two major discrepancies exist between pre-clinical and clinical datasets: (i) in the input space, the gene expression data due to difference in the basic biology, and (ii) in the output space, the different measures of the drug response. Therefore, training a computational model on cell lines and testing it on patients violates the i.i.d assumption that train and test data are from the same distribution.

Results

We propose Adversarial Inductive Transfer Learning (AITL), a deep neural network method for addressing discrepancies in input and output space between the pre-clinical and clinical datasets. AITL takes gene expression of patients and cell lines as the input, employs adversarial domain adaptation and multi-task learning to address these discrepancies, and predicts the drug response as the output. To the best of our knowledge, AITL is the first adversarial inductive transfer learning method to address both input and output discrepancies. Experimental results indicate that AITL outperforms state-of-the-art pharmacogenomics and transfer learning baselines and may guide precision oncology more accurately.

Availability and implementation

https://github.com/hosseinshn/AITL.

Supplementary information

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Leveraging multi-way interactions for systematic prediction of pre-clinical drug combination effects

We present comboFM, a machine learning framework for predicting the responses of drug combinations in pre-clinical studies, such as those based on cell lines or patient-derived cells. comboFM models the cell context-specific drug interactions through higher-order tensors, and efficiently learns latent factors of the tensor using powerful factorization machines. The approach enables comboFM to leverage information from previous experiments performed on similar drugs and cells when predicting responses of new combinations in so far untested cells; thereby, it achieves highly accurate predictions despite sparsely populated data tensors. We demonstrate high predictive performance of comboFM in various prediction scenarios using data from cancer cell line pharmacogenomic screens. Subsequent experimental validation of a set of previously untested drug combinations further supports the practical and robust applicability of comboFM. For instance, we confirm a novel synergy between anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor crizotinib and proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in lymphoma cells. Overall, our results demonstrate that comboFM provides an effective means for systematic pre-screening of drug combinations to support precision oncology applications.

Combinatorial treatments have become a standard of care for various complex diseases including cancers. Here, the authors show that combinatorial responses of two anticancer drugs can be accurately predicted using factorization machines trained on large-scale pharmacogenomic data for guiding precision oncology studies.