1
|
Rick AM, Beigi R. Maternal Immunizations: Past, Present, and Future. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2024; 67:605-619. [PMID: 38899806 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Maternal vaccines during pregnancy offer crucial protection against infections for both the pregnant person and their newborn. Vaccines against influenza, pertussis, coronavirus disease 2019, and respiratory syncytial virus are routinely recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to safeguard pregnant women and their infants from potentially severe complications. Administering these vaccines during pregnancy helps transfer protective antibodies from the mother to the baby, enhancing immunity during the vulnerable early months of life. Extensive research supports the safety and efficacy of maternal vaccines, with numerous studies demonstrating their protective benefits for both pregnant people and newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Marie Rick
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
| | - Richard Beigi
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
- UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McKeirnan K, Brand D, Giruzzi M, Vaitla K, Giruzzi N, Krebill-Prather R, Dang J. Evaluating Factors That Influence Influenza Vaccination Uptake among Pregnant People in a Medically Underserved Area in Washington State. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:768. [PMID: 39066406 PMCID: PMC11281722 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12070768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite substantial evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of influenza vaccines, only 38.6% of the adult United States population received an influenza vaccine during the 2023-2024 flu season. Vaccination rates are typically lower among U.S. minority groups, and in 2022, pregnant persons from U.S. minority racial and ethnic groups showed a decrease in influenza vaccine coverage. METHODS A survey was conducted with residents of Yakima County, Washington, which is home to one of the state's largest percentages of people who identify as Hispanic or Latino/a. The objective was to evaluate the uptake of influenza vaccine among pregnant persons. Surveys were sent to a random sample of 3000 residential mailing addresses. Of the 500 respondents, 244 (52.1%) reported that they had been pregnant, with those identifying as Hispanic or Latino/a constituting 23.8% of this total. Only 62 (26.2%) reported being immunized against influenza during pregnancy. Respondents who were immunized against influenza chose to be vaccinated to protect themselves from the flu (85.5%, n = 53); because a healthcare provider recommended getting vaccinated (85.5%, n = 53); to protect the baby from the flu (82.3%, n = 51); because it was available for free or low cost (62.9%, n = 39); and because vaccination was convenient (54.8%, n = 34). Qualitative evaluation identified that participants who were not vaccinated against influenza during pregnancy believed the vaccination was not needed, was not recommended by a healthcare provider, was difficult to access, they were against vaccination in general, or they were concerned about the safety and ingredients of the vaccine. CONCLUSION Barriers to vaccination identified in this study included vaccine distrust, lack of awareness, and concerns about vaccine efficacy and safety. Healthcare providers can help address these concerns by providing education and recommendations about the importance of influenza vaccination during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly McKeirnan
- Pharmacotherapy Department, Spokane Campus, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA;
| | - Damianne Brand
- Pharmacotherapy Department, Yakima Campus, Washington State University, Yakima, WA 98901, USA; (D.B.); (M.G.); (N.G.)
| | - Megan Giruzzi
- Pharmacotherapy Department, Yakima Campus, Washington State University, Yakima, WA 98901, USA; (D.B.); (M.G.); (N.G.)
| | - Kavya Vaitla
- Pharmacotherapy Department, Spokane Campus, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA;
| | - Nick Giruzzi
- Pharmacotherapy Department, Yakima Campus, Washington State University, Yakima, WA 98901, USA; (D.B.); (M.G.); (N.G.)
| | - Rose Krebill-Prather
- Social and Economic Sciences Research Center, Pullman Campus, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Creisher PS, Klein SL. Pathogenesis of viral infections during pregnancy. Clin Microbiol Rev 2024; 37:e0007323. [PMID: 38421182 PMCID: PMC11237665 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00073-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
SUMMARYViral infections during pregnancy are associated with significant adverse perinatal and fetal outcomes. Pregnancy is a unique immunologic and physiologic state, which can influence control of virus replication, severity of disease, and vertical transmission. The placenta is the organ of the maternal-fetal interface and provides defense against microbial infection while supporting the semi-allogeneic fetus via tolerogenic immune responses. Some viruses, such as cytomegalovirus, Zika virus, and rubella virus, can breach these defenses, directly infecting the fetus and having long-lasting consequences. Even without direct placental infection, other viruses, including respiratory viruses like influenza viruses and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, still cause placental damage and inflammation. Concentrations of progesterone and estrogens rise during pregnancy and contribute to immunological adaptations, placentation, and placental development and play a pivotal role in creating a tolerogenic environment at the maternal-fetal interface. Animal models, including mice, nonhuman primates, rabbits, and guinea pigs, are instrumental for mechanistic insights into the pathogenesis of viral infections during pregnancy and identification of targetable treatments to improve health outcomes of pregnant individuals and offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick S Creisher
- W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sabra L Klein
- W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kristinsdottir I, Haraldsson A, Thors V. Influenza vaccination in pregnant women in Iceland 2010-2020 and the burden of influenza in pregnant women and their infants. Vaccine 2024; 42:2051-2058. [PMID: 38413277 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Influenza vaccinations are recommended in pregnancy to protect both the pregnant woman and the unborn baby. The aim of this study was to assess the influenza vaccine uptake among pregnant women in Iceland in ten influenza seasons and to estimate the influenza disease burden on pregnant women and their infants. METHODS This was a retrospective, descriptive study on influenza vaccine uptake among pregnant women and the burden of influenza and influenza-like illness (ILI) among pregnant women and their infants in ten influenza seasons. All women attending a 20-week ultrasound at Landspitali University Hospital in Reykjavik in August-April each influenza season 2010-2020 were included in the study. Data on influenza vaccinations and influenza/ILI diagnoses was collected from central national databases. RESULTS The influenza vaccine uptake increased from 6.2 % in 2011-2012 to 37.5 % in 2019-2020. The incidence rate of influenza/ILI among pregnant women ranged from 5.5 to 22.1/1000 person-years. The estimated vaccine effectiveness in the ten influenza seasons was 34-100 %. The incidence rate of influenza/ILI among infants < 12 months of age was 0-13.4/1000 person-years. Influenza vaccinations in pregnancy are protective against influenza/ILI in pregnant women (IRR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.22-0.58), infants in the season of vaccination (IRR 0.40, 95 % CI 0.17-0.97) and probably for infants < 6 months of age (IRR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.22-1.21). CONCLUSIONS Influenza vaccine coverage in pregnancy is suboptimal. Influenza vaccinations in pregnancy provide significant protection against influenza/ILI for pregnant women and infants in the season of vaccination. Initiatives to improve maternal vaccination coverage are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Kristinsdottir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Iceland; Children's Hospital Iceland, Landspitali University Hospital, Iceland
| | - Asgeir Haraldsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Iceland; Children's Hospital Iceland, Landspitali University Hospital, Iceland
| | - Valtyr Thors
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Iceland; Children's Hospital Iceland, Landspitali University Hospital, Iceland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kortsmit K, Oduyebo T, Simeone RM, Kahn KE, Razzaghi H, Galang RR, Ellington S, Ruffo N, Barfield WD, Warner L, Cox S. Influenza and Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccination Coverage During Pregnancy: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2020. Public Health Rep 2024; 139:218-229. [PMID: 37386826 PMCID: PMC10851903 DOI: 10.1177/00333549231179252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Estimates of vaccination coverage during pregnancy and identification of disparities in vaccination coverage can inform vaccination campaigns and programs. We reported the prevalence of being offered or told to get the influenza vaccine by a health care provider (hereinafter, provider); influenza vaccination coverage during the 12 months before delivery; and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination coverage during pregnancy among women with a recent live birth in the United States. METHODS We analyzed 2020 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System from 42 US jurisdictions (n = 41 673). We estimated the overall prevalence of being offered or told to get the influenza vaccine by a provider and influenza vaccination coverage during the 12 months before delivery. We estimated Tdap vaccination coverage during pregnancy from 21 jurisdictions with available data (n = 22 020) by jurisdiction and select characteristics. RESULTS In 2020, 84.9% of women reported being offered or told to get the influenza vaccine, and 60.9% received it, ranging from 35.0% in Puerto Rico to 79.7% in Massachusetts. Influenza vaccination coverage was lower among women who were not offered or told to get the influenza vaccine (21.4%) than among women who were offered or told to get the vaccine (68.1%). Overall, 72.7% of women received the Tdap vaccine, ranging from 52.8% in Mississippi to 86.7% in New Hampshire. Influenza and Tdap vaccination coverage varied by all characteristics examined. CONCLUSIONS These results can inform vaccination programs and strategies to address disparities in vaccination coverage during pregnancy and may inform vaccination efforts for other infectious diseases among pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Kortsmit
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Titilope Oduyebo
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Regina M. Simeone
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Katherine E. Kahn
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Leidos, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Hilda Razzaghi
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Romeo R. Galang
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sascha Ellington
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Nan Ruffo
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Full Circle Computing, Inc, Exton, PA, USA
| | - Wanda D. Barfield
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lee Warner
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shanna Cox
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang Y, Fekadu G, You JH. Web-based intervention for improving influenza vaccination in pregnant women: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Pathog Glob Health 2024; 118:99-108. [PMID: 37846153 PMCID: PMC11141307 DOI: 10.1080/20477724.2023.2272109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
A website with vaccine information and interactive social media was reported to improve maternal influenza vaccine uptake. This study aimed to evaluate cost-effectiveness of a web-based intervention on influenza vaccine uptake among pregnant women from the perspective of US healthcare providers. A one-year decision-analytic model estimated outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of pregnant women with: (1) website with vaccine information and interactive social media (intervention group), and (2) usual care (usual care group). Primary measures included influenza infection, influenza-related hospitalization, mortality, direct medical cost, and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) loss. In base-case analysis, intervention group reduced cost (by USD28), infection (by 28 per 1,000 pregnant women), hospitalization (by 1.226 per 1,000 pregnant women), mortality (by 0.0036 per 1,000 pregnant women), and saved 0.000305 QALYs versus usual care group. Relative improvement of vaccine uptake by the intervention and number of pregnant women in the healthcare system were two influential factors identified in deterministic sensitivity analysis. The intervention was cost-effective in 99.5% of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations (at willingness-to-pay threshold 50,000 USD/QALY). A website with vaccine information and interactive social media to promote influenza vaccination for pregnant women appears to reduce direct medical costs and gain QALYs from the perspective of US healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingcheng Wang
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ginenus Fekadu
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Joyce H.S. You
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Pregnant and postpartum individuals are at significantly higher risk of serious complications related to seasonal and pandemic influenza infections compared with nonpregnant people. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommend that all adults receive an annual influenza vaccine and that individuals who are or will be pregnant during influenza season receive an inactivated or recombinant influenza vaccine as soon as it is available. Although the influenza vaccine significantly lowers the risk of severe disease, it will not prevent all infections. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric health care professionals should consider both influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection for pregnant individuals who present with symptoms of respiratory illness. Antiviral treatment should not be delayed while awaiting respiratory infection test results, and a patient's vaccination status should not affect the decision to treat. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care professionals can help reduce disparities in influenza vaccination rates as well as severe outcomes related to influenza infection by strongly recommending influenza vaccination to all patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wolfe DM, Fell D, Garritty C, Hamel C, Butler C, Hersi M, Ahmadzai N, Rice DB, Esmaeilisaraji L, Michaud A, Soobiah C, Ghassemi M, Khan PA, Sinilaite A, Skidmore B, Tricco AC, Moher D, Hutton B. Safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066182. [PMID: 37673449 PMCID: PMC10496691 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review to evaluate associations between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes and maternal non-obstetric serious adverse events (SAEs), taking into consideration confounding and temporal biases. METHODS Electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE ALL, Embase Classic+Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched to June 2021 for observational studies assessing associations between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and maternal non-obstetric SAEs and adverse birth outcomes, including preterm birth, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, small-for-gestational-age birth and congenital anomalies. Studies of live attenuated vaccines, single-arm cohort studies and abstract-only publications were excluded. Records were screened using a liberal accelerated approach initially, followed by a dual independent approach for full-text screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted, where two or more studies met methodological criteria for inclusion. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess evidence certainty. RESULTS Of 9443 records screened, 63 studies were included. Twenty-nine studies (24 cohort and 5 case-control) evaluated seasonal influenza vaccination (trivalent and/or quadrivalent) versus no vaccination and were the focus of our prioritised syntheses; 34 studies of pandemic vaccines (2009 A/H1N1 and others), combinations of pandemic and seasonal vaccines, and seasonal versus seasonal vaccines were also reviewed. Control for confounding and temporal biases was inconsistent across studies, limiting pooling of data. Meta-analyses for preterm birth, spontaneous abortion and small-for-gestational-age birth demonstrated no significant associations with seasonal influenza vaccination. Immortal time bias was observed in a sensitivity analysis of meta-analysing risk-based preterm birth data. In descriptive summaries for stillbirth, congenital anomalies and maternal non-obstetric SAEs, no significant association with increased risk was found in any studies. All evidence was of very low certainty. CONCLUSIONS Evidence of very low certainty suggests that seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy is not associated with adverse birth outcomes or maternal non-obstetric SAEs. Appropriate control of confounding and temporal biases in future studies would improve the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianna M Wolfe
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deshayne Fell
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chantelle Garritty
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Candyce Hamel
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Butler
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mona Hersi
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nadera Ahmadzai
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle B Rice
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Psychiatry, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Leila Esmaeilisaraji
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan Michaud
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlene Soobiah
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marco Ghassemi
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul A Khan
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Sinilaite
- Centre for Immunization Readiness, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea C Tricco
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Epidemiology Division & Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Moher
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Luo J, Zhang Z, Zhao S, Gao R. A Comparison of Etiology, Pathogenesis, Vaccinal and Antiviral Drug Development between Influenza and COVID-19. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24076369. [PMID: 37047339 PMCID: PMC10094131 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24076369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Influenza virus and coronavirus, two kinds of pathogens that exist widely in nature, are common emerging pathogens that cause respiratory tract infections in humans. In December 2019, a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 emerged, causing a severe respiratory infection named COVID-19 in humans, and raising a global pandemic which has persisted in the world for almost three years. Influenza virus, a seasonally circulating respiratory pathogen, has caused four global pandemics in humans since 1918 by the emergence of novel variants. Studies have shown that there are certain similarities in transmission mode and pathogenesis between influenza and COVID-19, and vaccination and antiviral drugs are considered to have positive roles as well as several limitations in the prevention and control of both diseases. Comparative understandings would be helpful to the prevention and control of these diseases. Here, we review the study progress in the etiology, pathogenesis, vaccine and antiviral drug development for the two diseases.
Collapse
|
10
|
Meghani M, Razzaghi H, Kahn KE, Hung MC, Srivastav A, Lu PJ, Ellington S, Zhou F, Weintraub E, Black CL, Singleton JA. Surveillance Systems for Monitoring Vaccination Coverage with Vaccines Recommended for Pregnant Women, United States. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2023; 32:260-270. [PMID: 36884385 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnant women* and their infants are at increased risk for serious influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19-related complications, including preterm birth, low-birth weight, and maternal and fetal death. The advisory committee on immunization practices recommends pregnant women receive tetanus-toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine during pregnancy, and influenza and COVID-19 vaccines before or during pregnancy. Vaccination coverage estimates and factors associated with maternal vaccination are measured by various surveillance systems. The objective of this report is to provide a detailed overview of the following surveillance systems that can be used to assess coverage of vaccines recommended for pregnant women: Internet panel survey, National Health Interview Survey, National Immunization Survey-Adult COVID Module, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, Vaccine Safety Datalink, and MarketScan. Influenza, Tdap, and COVID-19 vaccination coverage estimates vary by data source, and select estimates are presented. Each surveillance system differs in the population of pregnant women, time period, geographic area for which estimates can be obtained, how vaccination status is determined, and data collected regarding vaccine-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and barriers. Thus, multiple systems are useful for a more complete understanding of maternal vaccination. Ongoing surveillance from the various systems to obtain vaccination coverage and information regarding disparities and barriers related to vaccination are needed to guide program and policy improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehreen Meghani
- CDC Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Hilda Razzaghi
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Katherine E Kahn
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Leidos, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mei-Chuan Hung
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Leidos, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Anup Srivastav
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Leidos, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Peng-Jun Lu
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sascha Ellington
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Fangjun Zhou
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Eric Weintraub
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Carla L Black
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - James A Singleton
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Creisher PS, Seddu K, Mueller AL, Klein SL. Biological Sex and Pregnancy Affect Influenza Pathogenesis and Vaccination. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2023; 441:111-137. [PMID: 37695427 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-35139-6_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Males and females differ in the outcome of influenza A virus (IAV) infections, which depends significantly on age. During seasonal influenza epidemics, young children (< 5 years of age) and aged adults (65+ years of age) are at greatest risk for severe disease, and among these age groups, males tend to suffer a worse outcome from IAV infection than females. Following infection with pandemic strains of IAVs, females of reproductive ages (i.e., 15-49 years of age) experience a worse outcome than their male counterparts. Although females of reproductive ages experience worse outcomes from IAV infection, females typically have greater immune responses to influenza vaccination as compared with males. Among females of reproductive ages, pregnancy is one factor linked to an increased risk of severe outcome of influenza. Small animal models of influenza virus infection and vaccination illustrate that immune responses and repair of damaged tissue following IAV infection also differ between the sexes and impact the outcome of infection. There is growing evidence that sex steroid hormones, including estrogens, progesterone, and testosterone, directly impact immune responses during IAV infection and vaccination. Greater consideration of the combined effects of sex and age as biological variables in epidemiological, clinical, and animal studies of influenza pathogenesis is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick S Creisher
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kumba Seddu
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Alice L Mueller
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Sabra L Klein
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jones-Gray E, Robinson EJ, Kucharski AJ, Fox A, Sullivan SG. Does repeated influenza vaccination attenuate effectiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2023; 11:27-44. [PMID: 36152673 PMCID: PMC9780123 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00266-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza vaccines require annual readministration; however, several reports have suggested that repeated vaccination might attenuate the vaccine's effectiveness. We aimed to estimate the reduction in vaccine effectiveness associated with repeated influenza vaccination. METHODS In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL Complete databases for articles published from Jan 1, 2016, to June 13, 2022, and Web of Science for studies published from database inception to June 13, 2022. For studies published before Jan 1, 2016, we consulted published systematic reviews. Two reviewers (EJ-G and EJR) independently screened, extracted data using a data collection form, assessed studies' risk of bias using the Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and evaluated the weight of evidence by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). We included observational studies and randomised controlled trials that reported vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, influenza A(H3N2), or influenza B using four vaccination groups: current season; previous season; current and previous seasons; and neither season (reference). For each study, we calculated the absolute difference in vaccine effectiveness (ΔVE) for current season only and previous season only versus current and previous season vaccination to estimate attenuation associated with repeated vaccination. Pooled vaccine effectiveness and ∆VE were calculated by season, age group, and overall. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021260242. FINDINGS We identified 4979 publications, selected 681 for full review, and included 83 in the systematic review and 41 in meta-analyses. ΔVE for vaccination in both seasons compared with the current season was -9% (95% CI -16 to -1, I2=0%; low certainty) for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, -18% (-26 to -11, I2=7%; low certainty) for influenza A(H3N2), and -7% (-14 to 0, I2=0%; low certainty) for influenza B, indicating lower protection with consecutive vaccination. However, for all types, A subtypes and B lineages, vaccination in both seasons afforded better protection than not being vaccinated. INTERPRETATION Our estimates suggest that, although vaccination in the previous year attenuates vaccine effectiveness, vaccination in two consecutive years provides better protection than does no vaccination. The estimated effects of vaccination in the previous year are concerning and warrant additional investigation, but are not consistent or severe enough to support an alternative vaccination regimen at this time. FUNDING WHO and the US National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elenor Jones-Gray
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Robinson
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Adam J Kucharski
- Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases (CMMID), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Annette Fox
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sheena G Sullivan
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alcendor DJ, Matthews-Juarez P, Smoot D, Hildreth JEK, Tabatabai M, Wilus D, Brown KY, Juarez PD. The COVID-19 Vaccine and Pregnant Minority Women in the US: Implications for Improving Vaccine Confidence and Uptake. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:2122. [PMID: 36560532 PMCID: PMC9784552 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10122122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AGOG) recommends the FDA-approved Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and boosters for all eligible pregnant women in the US. However, COVID-19 vaccine confidence and uptake among pregnant minority women have been poor. While the underlying reasons are unclear, they are likely to be associated with myths and misinformation about the vaccines. Direct and indirect factors that deter minority mothers in the US from receiving the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines require further investigation. Here, we examine the historical perspectives on vaccinations during pregnancy. We will examine the following aspects: (1) the influenza and tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccinations during pregnancy; (2) the exclusion of pregnant and lactating women from COVID-19 vaccine trials; (3) COVID-19 vaccine safety during pregnancy, obstetric complications associated with symptomatic COVID-19 during pregnancy, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant minority women, and racial disparities experienced by pregnant minority women due to the COVID-19 pandemic as well as their potential impact on pregnancy care; and (4) strategies to improve COVID-19 vaccine confidence and uptake among pregnant minority women in the US. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among minority mothers can be mitigated by community engagement efforts that focus on COVID-19 vaccine education, awareness campaigns by trusted entities, and COVID-19-appropriate perinatal counseling aimed to improve COVID-19 vaccine confidence and uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald J. Alcendor
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Physiology, Center for AIDS Health Disparities Research, School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 Dr. D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd., Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| | - Patricia Matthews-Juarez
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd., Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| | - Duane Smoot
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd., Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| | - James E. K. Hildreth
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Physiology, Center for AIDS Health Disparities Research, School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 Dr. D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd., Nashville, TN 37208, USA
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd., Nashville, TN 37208, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd., Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| | - Mohammad Tabatabai
- School of Graduate Studies and Research, Meharry Medical College, 1005 D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd., Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| | - Derek Wilus
- School of Graduate Studies and Research, Meharry Medical College, 1005 D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd., Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| | - Katherine Y. Brown
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd., Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| | - Paul D. Juarez
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 D.B. Todd Jr. Blvd., Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ye B, Shu L, Pang Y, Guo Y, Guo Y, Zong K, Chen C, Zheng X, Zhang J, Liu M, Yuan X, Zhao Y, Zhang D, Wang D, Bao C, Zhang J, Chen L, Gao GF, Liu WJ. Repeated influenza vaccination induces similar immune protection as first-time vaccination but with differing immune responses. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2022; 17:e13060. [PMID: 36271687 PMCID: PMC9835420 DOI: 10.1111/irv.13060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent seasonal epidemics of influenza have been caused by human influenza A viruses of the H1N1 and H3N2 subtypes and influenza B viruses. Annual vaccination is recommended to prevent infection; however, how annual influenza vaccination influences vaccine effectiveness is largely unknown. METHODS To investigate the impact of repeated vaccination on immune and protective effect, we performed a prospective seroepidemiologic study. Participants with or without prior vaccination (2018-2019) were enrolled during the 2019-2020 influenza season. Inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4) was administered through the intramuscular route, and venous blood samples were collected regularly to test hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers. RESULTS The geometric mean titers and proportion with titers ≥40 against the influenza vaccine components peaked at 30 days post-vaccination. At Day 30, the geometric mean titer and proportion with titers ≥40 in participants who had been previously vaccinated were higher for H3N2 but similar for both B lineages (Victoria and Yamagata) as compared with participants vaccinated for the first time. As for H1N1, the geometric mean titer was lower in repeated vaccinated participants, but the proportion with titers ≥40 was consistent in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Repeated vaccination provides similar or enhanced protection as compared with single vaccination in first-time vaccinees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beiwei Ye
- NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and PreventionChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC)BeijingChina
| | - Liumei Shu
- Department of Health CareBeijing Daxing District HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Yuanyuan Pang
- Suzhou Municipal Center for Disease Control and PreventionSuzhouJiangsuChina
| | - Yaxin Guo
- NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and PreventionChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC)BeijingChina
| | - Yuanyuan Guo
- NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and PreventionChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC)BeijingChina,Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of MedicineShandong UniversityJinanShandongChina
| | - Kexin Zong
- NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and PreventionChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC)BeijingChina
| | - Cong Chen
- Changzhou Center for Disease Control and PreventionChangzhouJiangsuChina
| | - Xianzhi Zheng
- Changzhou Center for Disease Control and PreventionChangzhouJiangsuChina
| | - Jie Zhang
- NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and PreventionChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC)BeijingChina
| | - Maoshun Liu
- School of Laboratory Medicine and Life SciencesWenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhouZhejiangChina
| | - Xiaoju Yuan
- NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and PreventionChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC)BeijingChina
| | - Yingze Zhao
- NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and PreventionChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC)BeijingChina
| | - Danni Zhang
- NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and PreventionChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC)BeijingChina
| | - Dayan Wang
- NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and PreventionChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC)BeijingChina
| | - Changjun Bao
- Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and PreventionNanjingJiangsuChina
| | - Jun Zhang
- Suzhou Municipal Center for Disease Control and PreventionSuzhouJiangsuChina
| | - Liling Chen
- Suzhou Municipal Center for Disease Control and PreventionSuzhouJiangsuChina
| | - George F. Gao
- NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and PreventionChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC)BeijingChina,School of Laboratory Medicine and Life SciencesWenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhouZhejiangChina,CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogen Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of MicrobiologyChinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)BeijingChina,Research Unit of Adaptive Evolution and Control of Emerging VirusesChinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
| | - William J. Liu
- NHC Key Laboratory of Biosafety, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and PreventionChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC)BeijingChina,School of Laboratory Medicine and Life SciencesWenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhouZhejiangChina,Research Unit of Adaptive Evolution and Control of Emerging VirusesChinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Saleh OA, Halperin O. Influenza virus vaccine compliance among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic (pre-vaccine era) in Israel and future intention to uptake BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine 2022; 40:2099-2106. [PMID: 35193794 PMCID: PMC8843331 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The influenza virus vaccine, used worldwide as an annual preventive measure, is especially recommended for at-risk populations. Older adults and pregnant women are therefore offered the flu shot free of charge in Israel. The Israel Ministry of Health’s rationale for giving the influenza vaccine to pregnant women is to avoid serious complications that could harm both mother and foetus. In Israel, the winter of 2020/2021 was marked by a third surge of COVID-19, raising the risk of contracting the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the level of fear among the population. The influenza vaccine protects individuals from the flu and thus helps prevent an additional burden on medical centres treating COVID-19 patients. The aim of the present study was to assess compliance of pregnant and postpartum women to influenza vaccine uptake during winter 20/21 period. A survey questionnaire was distributed to examine factors predicting women’s attitudes toward the influenza vaccine. Questionnaire items based on the Heath Belief Model examined participants’ perceptions regarding influenza and the vaccine. The questionnaire also evaluated participants’ hypothetical willingness to get immunized with the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine upon its arrival in Israel. The results showed a higher prevalence of influenza vaccine uptake among Jewish women than Arab women, while level of trust in healthcare providers was stronger among Arab participants than among Jewish participants. The findings indicate that the pregnant and postpartum community needs better information dissemination and education regarding the importance of the influenza vaccine. Decisions regarding uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine upon future availability were found to be unrelated to influenza vaccine perceptions. The results call for raising public awareness regarding influenza immunization in addition to offering the vaccine at routine pregnancy follow-up appointments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ola Ali Saleh
- Yezreel Valley Academic College, Emek Yezreel 1930600, Israel.
| | - Ofra Halperin
- Yezreel Valley Academic College, Emek Yezreel 1930600, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Holstein R, Dawood FS, O'Halloran A, Cummings C, Ujamaa D, Daily Kirley P, Yousey-Hindes K, Fawcett E, Monroe ML, Kim S, Lynfield R, McMullen C, Muse A, Bennett NM, Billing LM, Sutton M, Thomas A, Talbot HK, Schaffner W, Risk I, Reed C, Garg S. Characteristics and Outcomes of Hospitalized Pregnant Women With Influenza, 2010 to 2019 : A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175:149-158. [PMID: 34958603 DOI: 10.7326/m21-3668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women may be at increased risk for severe influenza-associated outcomes. OBJECTIVE To describe characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized pregnant women with influenza. DESIGN Repeated cross-sectional study. SETTING The population-based U.S. Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network during the 2010-2011 through 2018-2019 influenza seasons. PATIENTS Pregnant women (aged 15 to 44 years) hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza identified through provider-initiated or facility-based testing practices. MEASUREMENTS Clinical characteristics, interventions, and in-hospital maternal and fetal outcomes were obtained through medical chart abstraction. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between influenza A subtype and severe maternal influenza-associated outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or in-hospital death. RESULTS Of 9652 women aged 15 to 44 years and hospitalized with influenza, 2690 (27.9%) were pregnant. Among the 2690 pregnant women, the median age was 28 years, 62% were in their third trimester, and 42% had at least 1 underlying condition. Overall, 32% were vaccinated against influenza and 88% received antiviral treatment. Five percent required ICU admission, 2% required mechanical ventilation, and 0.3% (n = 8) died. Pregnant women with influenza A H1N1 were more likely to have severe outcomes than those with influenza A H3N2 (adjusted risk ratio, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.3 to 2.8]). Most women (71%) were still pregnant at hospital discharge. Among 754 women who were no longer pregnant at discharge, 96% had a pregnancy resulting in live birth, and 3% experienced fetal loss. LIMITATION Maternal and fetal outcomes that occurred after hospital discharge were not captured. CONCLUSION Over 9 influenza seasons, one third of reproductive-aged women hospitalized with influenza were pregnant. Influenza A H1N1 was associated with more severe maternal outcomes. Pregnant women remain a high-priority target group for vaccination. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Holstein
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.H., F.S.D., A.O., C.C., C.R., S.G.)
| | - Fatimah S Dawood
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.H., F.S.D., A.O., C.C., C.R., S.G.)
| | - Alissa O'Halloran
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.H., F.S.D., A.O., C.C., C.R., S.G.)
| | - Charisse Cummings
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.H., F.S.D., A.O., C.C., C.R., S.G.)
| | - Dawud Ujamaa
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, and General Dynamics Information Technology, Falls Church, Virginia (D.U.)
| | - Pam Daily Kirley
- California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California (P.D.K.)
| | - Kimberly Yousey-Hindes
- Connecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut (K.Y.)
| | - Emily Fawcett
- Emerging Infections Program, Georgia Department of Health, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, and Foundation for Atlanta Veterans Education and Research, Decatur, Georgia (E.F.)
| | - Maya L Monroe
- Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, Maryland (M.L.M.)
| | - Sue Kim
- Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, Michigan (S.K.)
| | - Ruth Lynfield
- Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota (R.L.)
| | | | - Alison Muse
- New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York (A.M.)
| | - Nancy M Bennett
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York (N.M.B.)
| | | | | | - Ann Thomas
- Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon (M.S., A.T.)
| | - H Keipp Talbot
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee (H.K.T., W.S.)
| | - William Schaffner
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee (H.K.T., W.S.)
| | - Ilene Risk
- Salt Lake County Health Department, Salt Lake City, Utah (I.R.)
| | - Carrie Reed
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.H., F.S.D., A.O., C.C., C.R., S.G.)
| | - Shikha Garg
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (R.H., F.S.D., A.O., C.C., C.R., S.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wesley MG, Tinoco Y, Patel A, Suntarratiwong P, Hunt D, Sinthuwattanawibool C, Soto G, Kittikraisak W, Das PK, Arriola CS, Hombroek D, Mott J, Kurhe K, Bhargav S, Prakash A, Florian R, Gonzales O, Cabrera S, Llajaruna E, Brummer T, Malek P, Saha S, Garg S, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Thompson MG, Dawood FS. Performance of Symptom-Based Case Definitions to Identify Influenza Virus Infection Among Pregnant Women in Middle-Income Countries: Findings From the Pregnancy and Influenza Multinational Epidemiologic (PRIME) Study. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73:e4321-e4328. [PMID: 33173947 PMCID: PMC10563868 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends case definitions for influenza surveillance that are also used in public health research, although their performance has not been assessed in many risk groups, including pregnant women in whom influenza may manifest differently. We evaluated the performance of symptom-based definitions to detect influenza in a cohort of pregnant women in India, Peru, and Thailand. METHODS In 2017 and 2018, we contacted 11 277 pregnant women twice weekly during the influenza season to identify illnesses with new or worsened cough, runny nose, sore throat, difficulty breathing, or myalgia and collected data on other symptoms and nasal swabs for influenza real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, and negative-predictive value of each symptom predictor, WHO respiratory illness case definitions, and a de novo definition derived from results of multivariable modeling. RESULTS Of 5444 eligible illness episodes among 3965 participants, 310 (6%) were positive for influenza. In a multivariable model, measured fever ≥38°C (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 4.6 [3.1-6.8]), myalgia (3.0 [2.2-4.0]), cough (2.7 [1.9-3.9]), and chills (1.6 [1.1-2.4]) were independently associated with influenza illness. A definition based on these 4 (measured fever, cough, chills, or myalgia) was 95% sensitive and 27% specific. The WHO influenza-like illness (ILI) definition was 16% sensitive and 98% specific. CONCLUSIONS The current WHO ILI case definition was highly specific but had low sensitivity. The intended use of case definitions should be considered when evaluating the tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith G Wesley
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Yeny Tinoco
- US Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Bellavista, Peru
| | - Archana Patel
- Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India
- Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi, India
| | - Piyarat Suntarratiwong
- Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Thailand Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | - Giselle Soto
- US Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Bellavista, Peru
| | - Wanitchaya Kittikraisak
- Thailand Ministry of Public Health-US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | | | - Carmen Sofia Arriola
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Joshua Mott
- Thailand Ministry of Public Health-US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Kunal Kurhe
- Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Siddhartha Saha
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Shikha Garg
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Mark G Thompson
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Fatimah S Dawood
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Baïssas T, Boisnard F, Cuesta Esteve I, Garcia Sánchez M, Jones CE, Rigoine de Fougerolles T, Tan L, Vitoux O, Klein C. Vaccination in pregnancy against pertussis and seasonal influenza: key learnings and components from high-performing vaccine programmes in three countries: the United Kingdom, the United States and Spain. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:2182. [PMID: 34844567 PMCID: PMC8628032 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12198-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis and seasonal influenza are responsible for significant maternal, neonatal, and infant morbidity and mortality, but vaccine coverage rates (VCR) for both pertussis (administered as a tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis [Tdap] vaccination) and seasonal influenza in pregnancy remain generally low. Only a small number of countries, including Spain, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US), have high Tdap and seasonal influenza VCRs in pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to identify the key factors that contributed to the high VCRs observed in these countries. METHODS The experience from both Tdap and seasonal influenza vaccination programmes during pregnancy were documented in Spain, the UK, and the US using a three-step approach. A literature review yielded 157 publications, and a further 117 documents were selected through desk research. A published five-pillar VCR framework for influenza was amended to evaluate the specific contributing factors leading to high Tdap and seasonal influenza VCRs among pregnant women. RESULTS The analysis identified components that contributed to higher VCR in pregnant women across three different healthcare systems in Spain, UK, and US. The combination of several key interventions in each country led to a rapid increase in VCR that reached near-optimal levels (i.e. 75% for seasonal influenza) within a few years. As well as inclusion in national immunisation programme and vaccine reimbursement, key components that were identified included the mobilisation of health authorities, prenatal care Healthcare Professionals (HCP) and scientific societies, the inclusion of vaccination in antenatal medical guidance, the provision of educational material to HCPs, and a strong disease awareness driven by recent pertussis outbreaks in each country. CONCLUSIONS Although there is no simple, universal solution to improving sub-optimal VCRs, the list of components identified in this study from three countries with high-performing Tdap and seasonal influenza vaccination programmes provides a basis for public health and medical stakeholders in other countries to define strategies to successfully implement national vaccination programmes for pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Christine E Jones
- Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences University of Southampton and NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Litjen Tan
- Immunisation Action Coalition, Saint Paul, MN, USA
| | | | - Christina Klein
- Sanofi Pasteur, 14, Espace Henry Vallée, 69007, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bansal A, Trieu MC, Mohn KGI, Cox RJ. Safety, Immunogenicity, Efficacy and Effectiveness of Inactivated Influenza Vaccines in Healthy Pregnant Women and Children Under 5 Years: An Evidence-Based Clinical Review. Front Immunol 2021; 12:744774. [PMID: 34691051 PMCID: PMC8526930 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.744774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Annual influenza vaccination is often recommended for pregnant women and young children to reduce the risk of severe influenza. However, most studies investigating the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy or effectiveness of influenza vaccines are conducted in healthy adults. In this evidence-based clinical review, we provide an update on the safety profile, immunogenicity, and efficacy/effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) in healthy pregnant women and children <5 years old. Six electronic databases were searched until May 27, 2021. We identified 3,731 articles, of which 93 met the eligibility criteria and were included. The IIVs were generally well tolerated in pregnant women and young children, with low frequencies of adverse events following IIV administration; however, continuous vaccine safety monitoring systems are necessary to detect rare adverse events. IIVs generated good antibody responses, and the seroprotection rates after IIVs were moderate to high in pregnant women (range = 65%-96%) and young children (range = 50%-100%), varying between the different influenza types/subtypes and seasons. Studies show vaccine efficacy/effectiveness values of 50%-70% in pregnant women and 20%-90% in young children against lab-confirmed influenza, although the efficacy/effectiveness depended on the study design, host factors, vaccine type, manufacturing practices, and the antigenic match/mismatch between the influenza vaccine strains and the circulating strains. Current evidence suggests that the benefits of IIVs far outweigh the potential risks and that IIVs should be recommended for pregnant women and young children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Bansal
- The Influenza Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Mai-Chi Trieu
- The Influenza Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kristin G I Mohn
- The Influenza Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rebecca Jane Cox
- The Influenza Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Microbiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Helse Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Arditi B, Wen T, Riley LE, D'Alton M, Sobhani NC, Friedman AM, Venkatesh KK. Associations of influenza, chronic comorbid conditions, and severe maternal morbidity among U.S. pregnant women with influenza at delivery hospitalization, 2000-2015. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021; 3:100445. [PMID: 34303850 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic comorbid conditions increase the risk of influenza-related morbidity. Whether this holds for pregnant women who are at high risk of complications from influenza remains to be determined. OBJECTIVES To determine whether chronic comorbid conditions are associated with an increased risk of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among pregnant women with an influenza diagnosis at delivery hospitalization. STUDY DESIGN We performed a cross-sectional analysis of delivery hospitalizations complicated by an influenza diagnosis using the National Inpatient Sample from 2000-2015. We assessed four prevalent chronic comorbid conditions associated with increased influenza-complications outside of pregnancy, obstructive lung disease (asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]), chronic hypertension, obesity, and pregestational diabetes, overall and individually. The primary outcome was SMM excluding transfusion as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and secondarily, specific SMM measures recognized as influenza-related complications, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), mechanical intubation and ventilation, and sepsis and shock. Multivariable survey-weighted log linear models were used, adjusting for patient, hospital, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS Of 62.7 million delivery hospitalizations, 0.2% (n=144,572) were complicated by an influenza diagnosis at delivery hospitalization (23 cases of influenza per 10,000 delivery hospitalizations), and 24.9% (n=36,054) with 1 or more chronic comorbid conditions, of which 77.4% included obstructive lung disease. Pregnant women with an influenza diagnosis at delivery hospitalization with a chronic comorbid condition had a slightly higher risk of SMM compared to those without (2.6% vs. 1.7%; adjusted risk ratio (aRR): 1.11; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.21), as well as ARDS (0.9% vs. 0.5%; aRR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.23, 1.64) and mechanical intubation and ventilation (0.2% vs. 0.1%; aRR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.37, 2.69), but a lower risk of sepsis and shock (0.2% vs. 0.3%; aRR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.73). Regarding specific conditions, obstructive lung disease was associated with an increased risk of SMM (adjusted risk ratio (aRR): 1.21; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.32), as well as ARDS (aRR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.32, 1.79) and mechanical intubation and ventilation (aRR: 2.80; 95% CI: 2.00, 3.91). Chronic hypertension was associated with an increased risk of ARDS (aRR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.49), but a lower risk of sepsis and shock (aRR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.85). Obesity was associated with a lower risk of SMM (aRR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.97). Pregestational diabetes was not associated with SMM. CONCLUSIONS Among women with a diagnosis of influenza at delivery hospitalization, chronic comorbid conditions may increase the risk of SMM, and in particular, those outcomes related to influenza. These results can inform efforts to increase influenza vaccination for pregnant women with chronic comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Arditi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Timothy Wen
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Laura E Riley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine
| | - Mary D'Alton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Nasim C Sobhani
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Alexander M Friedman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center
| | - Kartik K Venkatesh
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Regan AK, Munoz FM. Efficacy and safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy: realizing the potential of maternal influenza immunization. Expert Rev Vaccines 2021; 20:649-660. [PMID: 33832397 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1915138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Pregnant women are at higher risk of severe complications following influenza infection compared to the general population. Influenza vaccination during pregnancy can offer direct protection to pregnant women and passive immunity to infants up to 6 months of age via maternal antibodies. Pregnant women are a high priority group for influenza immunization.Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the basis for recommending influenza vaccine to pregnant women, current immunization policies, the evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of maternal vaccination, and future research needed. We conducted a search of PubMed for articles describing the safety or efficacy of influenza vaccines administered during pregnancy. Published articles from inception to 17 November 2020 were reviewed.Expert opinion: Experimental and observational evidence support the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of influenza immunization during pregnancy. These data support the continued provision of inactivated influenza vaccine to pregnant women, as recommended by global immunization policies. To achieve success with maternal influenza immunization programs, further work is needed to inform policy development in low- and middle-income settings and implementation and promotion in high-income settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette K Regan
- School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Flor M Munoz
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Erazo CE, Erazo CV, Grijalva MJ, Moncayo AL. Knowledge, attitudes and practices on influenza vaccination during pregnancy in Quito, Ecuador. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:72. [PMID: 33413252 PMCID: PMC7791889 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-10061-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent infection and severe outcomes caused by influenza viruses in pregnant women and their children. In Ecuador, the coverage of seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnant women is low. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of pregnant women toward influenza vaccination in Quito-Ecuador. Methods A cross-sectional study enrolled 842 women who delivered at three main public gynecological-obstetric units of the Metropolitan District of Quito. A questionnaire regarding demographics, antenatal care, risk conditions and knowledge, attitudes and practices related to influenza vaccination was administered. We examined factors associated with vaccination using log-binomial regression models. Results A low vaccination rate (36.6%) against influenza was observed among pregnant women. The factors associated with vaccination included the recommendations from health providers (adjusted PR: 15.84; CI 95% 9.62–26.10), belief in the safety of the influenza vaccine (adjusted PR: 1.53; CI 95% 1.03–2.37) and antenatal care (adjusted PR: 1.21; CI 95% 1.01–1.47). The most common reasons for not vaccinating included the lack of recommendation from health care providers (73.9%) and lack of access to vaccine (9.0%). Conclusions Health educational programs aimed at pregnant women and antenatal care providers have the most potential to increase influenza vaccination rates. Further studies are needed to understand the barriers of health care providers regarding influenza vaccination in Ecuador. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-10061-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos E Erazo
- Centro de Investigación para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Apartado, 1701-2184, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Carlos V Erazo
- Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Apartado, 1701-2184, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Mario J Grijalva
- Centro de Investigación para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Apartado, 1701-2184, Quito, Ecuador.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Infectious and Tropical Disease Institute, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701, USA
| | - Ana L Moncayo
- Centro de Investigación para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Apartado, 1701-2184, Quito, Ecuador.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abu-Raya B, Maertens K. Protection of the Newborn Through Vaccination in Pregnancy. Neoreviews 2021; 22:e25-e39. [PMID: 33386312 DOI: 10.1542/neo.22-1-e25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Newborns and infants are at risk for severe infections with some pathogens (eg, Bordetella pertussis, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, group B Streptococcus) during early life. To decrease this window of high susceptibility to some infections during early life and protect young infants, vaccination in pregnancy against some vaccine-preventable diseases (eg, influenza, pertussis, tetanus) has been recommended in an increasing number of countries with notable success. In addition, recent advances have been made in developing vaccines for pregnant women with the aim of reducing the respiratory syncytial virus and group B Streptococcus burden in infancy. In this article, we review the vaccines currently recommended during pregnancy and their benefits to newborns and infants. We also discuss progress made in the development of other vaccines that are expected to be evaluated in pregnant women in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Vaccine Evaluation Center, British Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zerbo O, Ray GT, Zhang L, Goddard K, Fireman B, Adams A, Omer S, Kulldorff M, Klein NP. Individual and Neighborhood Factors Associated With Failure to Vaccinate Against Influenza During Pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 2020; 189:1379-1388. [PMID: 32735018 PMCID: PMC7604527 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaa165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Uptake of influenza vaccine among pregnant women remains low. We investigated whether unvaccinated pregnant women were clustered geographically and determined factors associated with failure to vaccinate using spatial and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Pregnant women who were members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California in 2015 or 2016 were included in the study. More than half (53%) of the 77,607 included pregnant women were unvaccinated. Spatial analysis identified 5 clusters with a high prevalence of unvaccinated pregnant women. The proportion of unvaccinated women ranged from 57% to 75% within clusters as compared with 51% outside clusters. In covariate-adjusted analyses, residence in a cluster was associated with a 41% increase in the odds of being unvaccinated (odds ratio (OR) = 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36, 1.46). The odds of being unvaccinated were greater for Black women (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.49, 1.69), Hispanic women (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.25), women with subsidized health insurance (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.24), women with fewer than 5 prenatal-care visits (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.60, 2.16), and neighborhoods with a high deprivation index (fourth quartile vs. first: OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.21). In conclusion, unvaccinated pregnant women were clustered geographically and by key sociodemographic factors. These findings suggest that interventions to increase influenza vaccine coverage among pregnant women are needed, particularly in vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ousseny Zerbo
- Correspondence to Dr. Ousseny Zerbo, Kaiser Permanente Northern California Vaccine Study Center, 1 Kaiser Plaza, 16th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612 (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Otieno NA, Nyawanda B, Otiato F, Adero M, Wairimu WN, Atito R, Wilson AD, Gonzalez-Casanova I, Malik FA, Verani JR, Widdowson MA, Omer SB, Chaves SS. Knowledge and attitudes towards influenza and influenza vaccination among pregnant women in Kenya. Vaccine 2020; 38:6832-6838. [PMID: 32893035 PMCID: PMC7526973 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza vaccination during pregnancy benefits mothers and children. Kenya and other low- and middle-income countries have no official influenza vaccination policies to date but are moving towards issuing such policies. Understanding determinants of influenza vaccine uptake during pregnancy in these settings is important to inform policy decisions and vaccination rollout. METHODS We interviewed a convenience sample of women at antenatal care facilities in four counties (Nairobi, Mombasa, Marsabit, Siaya) in Kenya. We described knowledge and attitudes regarding influenza vaccination and assessed factors associated with willingness to receive influenza vaccine. RESULTS We enrolled 507 pregnant women, median age was 26 years (range 15-43). Almost half (n = 240) had primary or no education. Overall, 369 (72.8%) women had heard of influenza. Among those, 288 (78.1%) believed that a pregnant woman would be protected if vaccinated, 252 (68.3%) thought it was safe to receive a vaccine while pregnant, and 223 (60.4%) believed a baby would be protected if mother was vaccinated. If given opportunity, 309 (83.7%) pregnant women were willing to receive the vaccine. Factors associated with willingness to receive influenza vaccine were mothers' belief in protective effect (OR 3.87; 95% CI 1.56, 9.59) and safety (OR 5.32; 95% CI 2.35, 12.01) of influenza vaccines during pregnancy. CONCLUSION Approximately one third of pregnant women interviewed had never heard of influenza. Willingness to receive influenza vaccine was high among women who had heard about influenza. If the Kenyan government recommends influenza vaccine for pregnant women, mitigation of safety concerns and education on the benefits of vaccination could be the most effective strategies to improve vaccine acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy A Otieno
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
| | - Bryan Nyawanda
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Fredrick Otiato
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Maxwel Adero
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Winnie N Wairimu
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Raphael Atito
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Andrew D Wilson
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ines Gonzalez-Casanova
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Fauzia A Malik
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jennifer R Verani
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Global Health Protection, Kenya
| | - Marc-Alain Widdowson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Global Health Protection, Kenya
| | - Saad B Omer
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sandra S Chaves
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Howe AS, Pointon L, Gauld N, Paynter J, Willing E, Turner N. Pertussis and influenza immunisation coverage of pregnant women in New Zealand. Vaccine 2020; 38:6766-6776. [PMID: 32868133 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunisation is an important public health policy and measuring coverage is imperative to identify gaps and monitor trends. New Zealand (NZ), like many countries, does not routinely publish coverage of immunisations given during pregnancy. Therefore, this study examined pregnancy immunisation coverage of all pregnant NZ women between 2013 and 2018, and what factors affected uptake. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of pregnant women who delivered between 2013 and 2018 was undertaken using administrative datasets. Maternity and immunisation data were linked to determine coverage of pertussis and influenza vaccinations in pregnancy. Generalised estimating equations were used to estimate the odds of receiving a vaccination during pregnancy. RESULTS From 2013 to 2018 data were available for 323,622 pregnant women, of whom 21.7% received maternal influenza immunisations and 25.7% maternal pertussis immunisations. Coverage for both vaccines increased over time, pertussis increased from 10.2% to 43.6% and influenza from 11.2% to 30.8%. The odds of being vaccinated, with either vaccine, during pregnancy increased with increasing age and decreasing deprivation. Compared to NZ European or Other women, Māori and Pacific women had lower odds of receiving a maternal pertussis (OR:0.55, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.57; OR:0.60, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.62, respectively) and influenza (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.71; OR:0.90, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.94, respectively) immunisations during pregnancy. Women were also more likely to be vaccinated against pertussis if they received antenatal care from a General Practitioner or Obstetrician compared to a Midwife. A similar pattern was seen for influenza vaccination. CONCLUSION Gaps in maternal coverage for pertussis and influenza exist and work is needed to reduce immunisation inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna S Howe
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Leah Pointon
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Natalie Gauld
- Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand; School of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Janine Paynter
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Esther Willing
- Kōhatu - Centre for Hauora Māori, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand.
| | - Nikki Turner
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand; Immunisation Advisory Centre, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Thompson MG, Kwong JC, Regan AK, Katz MA, Drews SJ, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Klein NP, Chung H, Effler PV, Feldman BS, Simmonds K, Wyant BE, Dawood FS, Jackson ML, Fell DB, Levy A, Barda N, Svenson LW, Fink RV, Ball SW, Naleway A. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Preventing Influenza-associated Hospitalizations During Pregnancy: A Multi-country Retrospective Test Negative Design Study, 2010-2016. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 68:1444-1453. [PMID: 30307490 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, no study has examined influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations during pregnancy. METHODS The Pregnancy Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (PREVENT) consisted of public health or healthcare systems with integrated laboratory, medical, and vaccination records in Australia, Canada (Alberta and Ontario), Israel, and the United States (California, Oregon, and Washington). Sites identified pregnant women aged 18 through 50 years whose pregnancies overlapped with local influenza seasons from 2010 through 2016. Administrative data were used to identify hospitalizations with acute respiratory or febrile illness (ARFI) and clinician-ordered real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing for influenza viruses. Overall IVE was estimated using the test-negative design and adjusting for site, season, season timing, and high-risk medical conditions. RESULTS Among 19450 hospitalizations with an ARFI discharge diagnosis (across 25 site-specific study seasons), only 1030 (6%) of the pregnant women were tested for influenza viruses by rRT-PCR. Approximately half of these women had pneumonia or influenza discharge diagnoses (54%). Influenza A or B virus infections were detected in 598/1030 (58%) of the ARFI hospitalizations with influenza testing. Across sites and seasons, 13% of rRT-PCR-confirmed influenza-positive pregnant women were vaccinated compared with 22% of influenza-negative pregnant women; the adjusted overall IVE was 40% (95% confidence interval = 12%-59%) against influenza-associated hospitalization during pregnancy. CONCLUSION Between 2010 and 2016, influenza vaccines offered moderate protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations during pregnancy, which may further inform the benefits of maternal influenza vaccination programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G Thompson
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jeffrey C Kwong
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences.,Public Health Ontario.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto.,University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Annette K Regan
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth.,Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Mark A Katz
- Chief Physician's Office, Clalit Health Services, Clalit Research Institute, Tel Aviv.,School of Public Health, Medical School for International Health, Ben Gurion University, Bersheva, Israel.,University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor
| | - Steven J Drews
- University of Alberta.,ProvLab Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Nicola P Klein
- Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | | | - Paul V Effler
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Becca S Feldman
- Chief Physician's Office, Clalit Health Services, Clalit Research Institute, Tel Aviv
| | - Kimberley Simmonds
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary.,Alberta Health, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Fatimah S Dawood
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Michael L Jackson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Deshayne B Fell
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa.,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Avram Levy
- Department of Microbiology, QEII Medical Centre, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Noam Barda
- Chief Physician's Office, Clalit Health Services, Clalit Research Institute, Tel Aviv
| | - Lawrence W Svenson
- Alberta Health, Edmonton, Canada.,Division of Preventive Medicine.,School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton.,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Allison Naleway
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abu-Raya B, Maertens K, Edwards KM, Omer SB, Englund JA, Flanagan KL, Snape MD, Amirthalingam G, Leuridan E, Damme PV, Papaevangelou V, Launay O, Dagan R, Campins M, Cavaliere AF, Frusca T, Guidi S, O'Ryan M, Heininger U, Tan T, Alsuwaidi AR, Safadi MA, Vilca LM, Wanlapakorn N, Madhi SA, Giles ML, Prymula R, Ladhani S, Martinón-Torres F, Tan L, Michelin L, Scambia G, Principi N, Esposito S. Global Perspectives on Immunization During Pregnancy and Priorities for Future Research and Development: An International Consensus Statement. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1282. [PMID: 32670282 PMCID: PMC7326941 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunization during pregnancy has been recommended in an increasing number of countries. The aim of this strategy is to protect pregnant women and infants from severe infectious disease, morbidity and mortality and is currently limited to tetanus, inactivated influenza, and pertussis-containing vaccines. There have been recent advancements in the development of vaccines designed primarily for use in pregnant women (respiratory syncytial virus and group B Streptococcus vaccines). Although there is increasing evidence to support vaccination in pregnancy, important gaps in knowledge still exist and need to be addressed by future studies. This collaborative consensus paper provides a review of the current literature on immunization during pregnancy and highlights the gaps in knowledge and a consensus of priorities for future research initiatives, in order to optimize protection for both the mother and the infant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kathryn M. Edwards
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Saad B. Omer
- Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Janet A. Englund
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Katie L. Flanagan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
- School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew D. Snape
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vana Papaevangelou
- Third Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital ATTIKON, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Odile Launay
- Université de Paris, Inserm, CIC 1417, F-CRIN I REIVAC, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Ron Dagan
- The Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Magda Campins
- Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Franca Cavaliere
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Frusca
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sofia Guidi
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Miguel O'Ryan
- Microbiology and Mycology Program, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Associate Researcher, Millennium Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ulrich Heininger
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tina Tan
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Ahmed R. Alsuwaidi
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Marco. A. Safadi
- Department of Pediatrics, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luz M. Vilca
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buzzi Hospital - ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nasamon Wanlapakorn
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Shabir A. Madhi
- Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Michelle L. Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roman Prymula
- School of Medicine Hradec Kralove, Institute of Social Medicine, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czechia
| | - Shamez Ladhani
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Federico Martinón-Torres
- Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Litjen Tan
- Immunization Action Coalition, St. Paul, MN, United States
| | - Lessandra Michelin
- Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology Division, Health Sciences Post Graduation Program, University of Caxias Do Sul, Caxias Do Sul, Brazil
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Susanna Esposito
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pediatric Clinic, Pietro Barilla Children's Hospital, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dawood FS, Garg S, Fink RV, Russell ML, Regan AK, Katz MA, Booth S, Chung H, Klein NP, Kwong JC, Levy A, Naleway A, Riesel D, Thompson MG, Wyant BE, Fell DB. Epidemiology and Clinical Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Acute Respiratory or Febrile Illness and Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza Among Pregnant Women During Six Influenza Seasons, 2010-2016. J Infect Dis 2020; 221:1703-1712. [PMID: 31875916 PMCID: PMC10563870 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women are at increased risk of seasonal influenza hospitalizations, but data about the epidemiology of severe influenza among pregnant women remain largely limited to pandemics. METHODS To describe the epidemiology of hospitalizations for acute respiratory infection or febrile illness (ARFI) and influenza-associated ARFI among pregnant women, administrative and electronic health record data were analyzed from retrospective cohorts of pregnant women hospitalized with ARFI who had testing for influenza viruses by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in Australia, Canada, Israel, and the United States during 2010-2016. RESULTS Of 18 048 ARFI-coded hospitalizations, 1064 (6%) included RT-PCR testing for influenza viruses, 614 (58%) of which were influenza positive. Of 614 influenza-positive ARFI hospitalizations, 35% were in women with low socioeconomic status, 20% with underlying conditions, and 67% in their third trimesters. The median length of influenza-positive hospitalizations was 2 days (interquartile range, 1-4), 18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-21%) resulted in delivery, 10% (95% CI, 8%-12%) included a pneumonia diagnosis, 5% (95% CI, 3%-6%) required intensive care, 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%) included a sepsis diagnosis, and <1% (95% CI, 0%-1%) resulted in respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS Our findings characterize seasonal influenza hospitalizations among pregnant women and can inform assessments of the public health and economic impact of seasonal influenza on pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatimah S. Dawood
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Shikha Garg
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | - Annette K. Regan
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Mark A. Katz
- Clalit Health Services, Clalit Research Institute, Tel Aviv, Israel
- School of Public Health, Medical School for International Health, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Stephanie Booth
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Nicola P. Klein
- Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey C. Kwong
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Avram Levy
- PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Allison Naleway
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Dan Riesel
- Clalit Health Services, Clalit Research Institute, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mark G. Thompson
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Deshayne B. Fell
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Regan AK, Feldman BS, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Naleway AL, Williams J, Wyant BE, Simmonds K, Effler PV, Booth S, Ball SW, Katz MA, Fink RV, Thompson MG, Chung H, Kwong JC, Fell DB. An international cohort study of birth outcomes associated with hospitalized acute respiratory infection during pregnancy. J Infect 2020; 81:48-56. [PMID: 32325131 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Findings during the 2009 pandemic suggest severe maternal infection with pandemic influenza had adverse perinatal health consequences. Limited data exist evaluating the perinatal health effects of severe seasonal influenza and non-influenza infections during pregnancy. METHODS A retrospective cohort of pregnant women from Australia, Canada, Israel, and the United States was established using birth records to identify pregnancies and birth outcomes and hospital and laboratory testing records to identify influenza and non-influenza associated acute respiratory or febrile illness (ARFI) hospitalizations. ARFI hospitalized women were matched to non-hospitalized women (1:4) by country and season of conception. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate the relative risk (aRR) of preterm birth (PTB), small-for-gestational-age (SGA), and low birthweight (LBW) birth, adjusting for pre-existing medical conditions, maternal age, and parity. RESULTS 950 pregnant women hospitalized with an ARFI were matched with 3,800 non-hospitalized pregnant women. Compared to non-hospitalized women, risk of PTB was greater among women hospitalized with influenza-associated ARFI (aRR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.15-2.15) and non-influenza ARFI (aRR: 2.78; 95% CI: 2.12-3.65). Similar results were observed for LBW; there were no associations with SGA birth. CONCLUSIONS ARFI hospitalization during pregnancy was associated with increased risk of PTB and LBW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette K Regan
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, 212 Adriance Lab Rd, 1266 TAMU, College Station TX 77843-1266, United States; School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines & Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Becca S Feldman
- Clalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | | | - Allison L Naleway
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Jennifer Williams
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Kim Simmonds
- Alberta Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Paul V Effler
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Western Australia Department of Health, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Stephanie Booth
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Sarah W Ball
- Abt Associates Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Mark A Katz
- Clalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Ramat Gan, Israel; Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel; University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | | | - Mark G Thompson
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | | | - Deshayne B Fell
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Castilla J, Portillo ME, Casado I, Pozo F, Navascués A, Adelantado M, Gómez Ibáñez C, Ezpeleta C, Martínez-Baz I. Effectiveness of the current and prior influenza vaccinations in Northern Spain, 2018–2019. Vaccine 2020; 38:1925-1932. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
32
|
Chua H, Feng S, Lewnard JA, Sullivan SG, Blyth CC, Lipsitch M, Cowling BJ. The Use of Test-negative Controls to Monitor Vaccine Effectiveness: A Systematic Review of Methodology. Epidemiology 2020; 31:43-64. [PMID: 31609860 PMCID: PMC6888869 DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The test-negative design is an increasingly popular approach for estimating vaccine effectiveness (VE) due to its efficiency. This review aims to examine published test-negative design studies of VE and to explore similarities and differences in methodological choices for different diseases and vaccines. METHODS We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science, and Medline, for studies reporting the effectiveness of any vaccines using a test-negative design. We screened titles and abstracts and reviewed full texts to identify relevant articles. We created a standardized form for each included article to extract information on the pathogen of interest, vaccine(s) being evaluated, study setting, clinical case definition, choices of cases and controls, and statistical approaches used to estimate VE. RESULTS We identified a total of 348 articles, including studies on VE against influenza virus (n = 253), rotavirus (n = 48), pneumococcus (n = 24), and nine other pathogens. Clinical case definitions used to enroll patients were similar by pathogens of interest but the sets of symptoms that defined them varied substantially. Controls could be those testing negative for the pathogen of interest, those testing positive for nonvaccine type of the pathogen of interest, or a subset of those testing positive for alternative pathogens. Most studies controlled for age, calendar time, and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS Our review highlights similarities and differences in the application of the test-negative design that deserve further examination. If vaccination reduces disease severity in breakthrough infections, particular care must be taken in interpreting vaccine effectiveness estimates from test-negative design studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiying Chua
- From the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Shuo Feng
- From the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Joseph A Lewnard
- Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
| | - Sheena G Sullivan
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Royal Melbourne Hospital, and Doherty Department, University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher C Blyth
- Division of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Marc Lipsitch
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Benjamin J Cowling
- From the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Quach THT, Mallis NA, Cordero JF. Influenza Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness in Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Matern Child Health J 2019; 24:229-240. [DOI: 10.1007/s10995-019-02844-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
34
|
Buchy P, Badur S, Kassianos G, Preiss S, Tam JS. Vaccinating pregnant women against influenza needs to be a priority for all countries: An expert commentary. Int J Infect Dis 2019; 92:1-12. [PMID: 31863875 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2012, the World Health Organization recommended influenza vaccination for all pregnant women worldwide and the prioritisation of pregnant women in national influenza vaccination programmes. Nevertheless, vaccination rates in pregnant women often remain much lower than national targets. OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and risks associated with influenza infection and vaccination during pregnancy, and to consider obstacles that work against influenza vaccine uptake during pregnancy. RESULTS There is strong evidence that maternal and foetal outcomes can be compromised if women develop influenza infections during pregnancy. Influenza vaccines have been administered to millions of pregnant women and have demonstrated benefits in terms of disease prevention in mothers and their infants. There is a consensus amongst several recommending authorities that influenza vaccines may be safely administered during all stages of pregnancy. Healthcare professionals are recognised as the most important influencers of vaccine uptake, being well placed to recommend vaccination and directly address safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS Despite data supporting the value of influenza vaccination during pregnancy, vaccine uptake remains low globally. Low uptake appears to be largely due to ineffective communication with pregnant women about the risks and benefits of influenza vaccination. A graphical abstract is available online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Selim Badur
- GSK, Büyükdere Caddesi No:173 1. Levent Plaza B Blok, 34394 Istanbul, Turkey
| | - George Kassianos
- President of the British Global & Travel Health Association, Chairman of RAISE Pan- European Committee on Influenza, National Immunisation Lead Royal College of General Practitioners, United Kingdom, Board Director of the European Working Group on Influenza
| | | | - John S Tam
- Chairman of the Asia Pacific Alliance for the control of influenza (APACI); Adjunct Professor, Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 11 Yuk Choi Rd, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yakut N, Soysal S, Soysal A, Bakir M. Knowledge and acceptance of influenza and pertussis vaccinations among pregnant women of low socioeconomic status in Turkey. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019; 16:1101-1108. [PMID: 31687874 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1689082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Pregnant women and infants are at relatively high risk for influenza- and pertussis-related morbidity and mortality. Vaccination is the most important prevention strategy for both diseases. We evaluated knowledge and acceptance of influenza and pertussis vaccinations among pregnant women. We performed a cross-sectional survey of 465 pregnant women receiving prenatal care at the obstetric outpatient clinic in a tertiary medical center in Turkey between November 2015 and May 2016. We used a questionnaire investigating the knowledge of pertussis and influenza to evaluate potential influences on the acceptance or rejection of pertussis or influenza vaccinations. The acceptance rates of pertussis and influenza vaccinations were 11.2% and 19.8%, respectively. Maternal age, education level, employment status, number of gestations, and gestational age did not affect the rate of acceptance of these vaccinations. On the other hand, pregnant women who had a history of vaccination during their adolescence and in previous pregnancies were significantly more likely to accept pertussis vaccination. Knowledge about the risks of pertussis and influenza diseases for pregnant women and their children has a significant effect on vaccination acceptance. Even in low socioeconomic status groups, a recommendation for vaccinations by the primary obstetrician was significantly predictive of acceptance of both pertussis and influenza vaccination. This study revealed that the acceptance rates of pertussis and influenza vaccination among pregnant women are very low in Turkey. Healthcare worker recommendations and increased awareness about pertussis and influenza morbidity and mortality in pregnant women and infants are essential to improve the rates of vaccination acceptance during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nurhayat Yakut
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Marmara University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sunullah Soysal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marmara University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Soysal
- Clinics of Pediatrics, Atasehir Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Bakir
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Marmara University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Regan AK, Håberg SE, Fell DB. Current Perspectives on Maternal Influenza Immunization. CURRENT TROPICAL MEDICINE REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40475-019-00188-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
37
|
Zhang L, van der Hoek W, Krafft T, Pilot E, Asten LV, Lin G, Wu S, Duan W, Yang P, Wang Q. Influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates against influenza A(H3N2) and A(H1N1) pdm09 among children during school-based outbreaks in the 2016-2017 season in Beijing, China. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019; 16:816-822. [PMID: 31596661 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1677438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Since 2007, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) has been provided free-of-charge to primary, middle school and high school students in Beijing. However, there have been few school-based studies on influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE). In this report, we estimated influenza VE against laboratory-confirmed influenza illness among school children in Beijing, China during the 2016-2017 influenza season.Methods: The VE of 2016-2017 TIV against laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection among school-age children was assessed through a case-control design. Conditional logistic regression was conducted on matched case-control sets to estimate VE. The effect of prior vaccination on current VE was also examined.Results: All 176 samples tested positive for influenza A virus with the positive rate of 55.5%. The average coverage rate of 2016-2017 TIV among students across the 37 schools was 30.6%. The fully adjusted VE of 2016-2017 TIV against laboratory-confirmed influenza was 69% (95% CI: 51 to 81): 60% (95% CI: -15 to 86) for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and 73% (95% CI: 52 to 84) for influenza A(H3N2). The overall VE for receipt of 2015-2016 vaccination only, 2016-2017 vaccination only, and vaccinations in both seasons was 46% (95% CI: -5 to 72), 77% (95% CI: 58 to 87), and 57% (95%CI: 17 to 78), respectively.Conclusions: Our study during school outbreaks found that VE of 2016-2017 TIV was moderate against influenza A(H3N2) as well as A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Zhang
- Institute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.,Beijing Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Wim van der Hoek
- Centre for Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Krafft
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Pilot
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Liselotte van Asten
- Centre for Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ge Lin
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | - Shuangsheng Wu
- Institute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.,Beijing Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Duan
- Institute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.,Beijing Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Yang
- Institute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.,Beijing Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.,School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Quanyi Wang
- Institute for Infectious Disease and Endemic Disease Control, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China.,Beijing Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mølgaard-Nielsen D, Fischer TK, Krause TG, Hviid A. Effectiveness of maternal immunization with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women and their infants. J Intern Med 2019; 286:469-480. [PMID: 31259452 DOI: 10.1111/joim.12947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In randomized trials, it has been found that maternal influenza vaccination reduces influenza infections in both women and their infants. However, these trials have been performed in low-resource settings, and evidence from high-resource settings is limited. METHODS Nested within a register-based cohort of all women giving birth in Denmark between 2010 and 2016 (n = 357 810 births), we conducted two case-control studies using a test-negative design of all pregnant women and their infants, respectively, tested for influenza virus with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Influenza virus-positive cases were matched (1:1) with influenza virus-negative controls for calendar time and (gestational or infant) age at testing. The effectiveness of maternal immunization with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine was estimated from the odds ratios of vaccination among cases versus controls using logistic regression with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS Among 313 pregnant women positive for influenza virus, 16 (5.1%) were vaccinated; by comparison, 34 (10.9%) pregnant women were vaccinated among 313 matched influenza virus-negative controls. The effectiveness of vaccination against laboratory-confirmed influenza infection in pregnant women was 63.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 29.1 to 81.6]. Among 460 infants positive for influenza virus, 23 (5.0%) were offspring of women vaccinated during pregnancy; by comparison, 52 (11.3%) infants were the offspring of women vaccinated during pregnancy among 460 matched influenza virus-negative controls. The effectiveness of maternal vaccination against laboratory-confirmed influenza infection in infants younger than 6 months of age was 56.8% (95% CI, 25.0 to 75.1). CONCLUSIONS Seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccination in pregnancy was associated with a statistically significant reduced risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza infections in pregnant women and their infants in a high-resource setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Mølgaard-Nielsen
- From the, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T K Fischer
- Department of Virus and Microbiological Special diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - T G Krause
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A Hviid
- From the, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 753: Assessment and Treatment of Pregnant Women With Suspected or Confirmed Influenza. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 132:e169-e173. [PMID: 30247362 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Pregnant and postpartum women are at high risk of serious complications of seasonal and pandemic influenza infection. Pregnancy itself is a high-risk condition, making the potential adverse effects of influenza particularly serious in pregnant women. If a pregnant woman has other underlying health conditions, the risk of adverse effects from influenza is even greater. Antiviral treatment is necessary for all pregnant women with suspected or confirmed influenza, regardless of vaccination status. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care providers should promptly recognize the symptoms of influenza, adequately assess severity, and readily prescribe safe and effective antiviral therapy for pregnant women with suspected or confirmed influenza. Over-the-phone treatment for low-risk patients is preferred to help reduce the spread of disease among other pregnant patients in the office. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care providers should treat pregnant women with suspected or confirmed influenza with antiviral medications presumptively based on clinical evaluation, regardless of vaccination status or laboratory test results. Pregnant women with suspected or confirmed influenza infection should receive antiviral treatment with oseltamivir or zanamivir based on the current resistance patterns. Treatment within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms is ideal but treatment should not be withheld if the ideal window is missed. Because of the high potential for morbidity and mortality for pregnant and postpartum patients, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advises that postexposure antiviral chemoprophylaxis can be considered for pregnant women and women who are up to 2 weeks postpartum (including after pregnancy loss) who have had close contact with infectious individuals.
Collapse
|
40
|
Kaoiean S, Kittikraisak W, Suntarattiwong P, Ditsungnoen D, Phadungkiatwatana P, Srisantiroj N, Asavapiriyanont S, Chotpitayasunondh T, Dawood FS, Lindblade KA. Predictors for influenza vaccination among Thai pregnant woman: The role of physicians in increasing vaccine uptake. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2019; 13:582-592. [PMID: 31419068 PMCID: PMC6800306 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Physician recommendation and attitudes and beliefs of pregnant women toward influenza and vaccination may influence vaccine uptake during pregnancy. We examined how physician recommendation and health beliefs of pregnant women may jointly affect influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Methods Thai pregnant women aged ≥18 years and >13 gestational weeks attending antenatal care (ANC) clinics, and ANC physicians were recruited during May‐August 2015. Women and physicians, linked using unique identifiers, provided data on demographic, health and work history, knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs toward influenza and vaccination, based on Health Belief Model constructs. Physicians also provided data on their practices in recommending influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Prevalence ratios for the association between knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of pregnant women, physician recommendation and documented receipt of vaccination within 30 days of the visit were calculated. Results Among 610 women, the median age was 27 years; 266 (44%) and 344 (56%) were in the second and third trimesters, respectively. Twenty‐one (3%) had pre‐existing conditions. Of 60 physicians with the median years of practice of 5; 17 (28%) reported frequently/usually/always recommending influenza vaccine to their pregnant patients, while 43 (72%) reported never/rarely/sometimes recommending the vaccine. Controlling for the pregnant women's knowledge and beliefs, pregnant women whose physician recommended influenza vaccination were 2.3 times (95% confidence interval 1.4‐3.8) more likely to get vaccinated. Conclusions In this study, physician recommendation was the only significant factor associated with influenza vaccine uptake among Thai pregnant women. Understanding physicians’ motivation/barrier to recommending influenza vaccination to pregnant women may increase coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surasak Kaoiean
- Rajavithi Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wanitchaya Kittikraisak
- Influenza Program, Thailand Ministry of Public Health - U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Piyarat Suntarattiwong
- Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Darunee Ditsungnoen
- Influenza Program, Thailand Ministry of Public Health - U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | | | | | | | - Tawee Chotpitayasunondh
- Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Fatimah S Dawood
- Influenza Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kim A Lindblade
- Influenza Program, Thailand Ministry of Public Health - U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand.,Influenza Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Influenza vaccination is an essential element of prepregnancy, prenatal, and postpartum care because influenza can result in serious illness, including a higher chance of progressing to pneumonia, when it occurs during the antepartum or postpartum period. In addition to hospitalization, pregnant women with influenza are at increased risk of intensive care unit admission and adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend that all adults receive an annual influenza vaccine and that women who are or will be pregnant during influenza season receive an inactivated influenza vaccine as soon as it is available. In the United States, the influenza season typically occurs from October to May. Ideally, an influenza vaccination should be given before the end of October, but vaccination throughout the influenza season is encouraged to ensure protection during the period of circulation. Any of the licensed, recommended, age-appropriate, inactivated influenza vaccines can be given safely during any trimester. Therefore, it is critically important that obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care providers recommend and advocate for the influenza vaccine. Obstetrician-gynecologists are encouraged to stock and administer the influenza vaccine to their pregnant patients in their offices, and should get the influenza vaccine themselves every season. If the influenza vaccine cannot be offered in a practice, obstetrician-gynecologists and obstetric care providers should refer patients to another health care provider, pharmacy, or community vaccination center. This updated Committee Opinion includes more recent data on the safety and efficacy of influenza vaccination during pregnancy and recommendations for treatment and postexposure chemoprophylaxis.
Collapse
|
42
|
Gilbert PB, Fong Y, Juraska M, Carpp LN, Monto AS, Martin ET, Petrie JG. HAI and NAI titer correlates of inactivated and live attenuated influenza vaccine efficacy. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19:453. [PMID: 31117986 PMCID: PMC6530189 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4049-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and neuraminidase inhibition (NAI) titers are generally associated with reduced influenza risk. While repeated influenza vaccination reduces seroresponse, vaccine effectiveness is not always reduced. METHODS During the 2007-2008 influenza season, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (FLUVACS) evaluated the efficacies of live-attenuated (LAIV) and inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) among healthy adults aged 18-49 in Michigan; IIV vaccine efficacy (VE) and LAIV VE against influenza disease were estimated at 68% and 36%. Using the principal stratification/VE moderation framework, we analyzed data from this trial to assess how each VE varied by HAI or NAI responses to vaccination observed for vaccinated individuals and predicted counterfactually for placebo recipients. We also assessed how each VE varied with pre-vaccination/baseline variables including HAI titer, NAI titer, and vaccination history. RESULTS IIV VE appeared to increase with Day 30 post-vaccination HAI titer, albeit not significantly (p=0.20 and estimated VE 14.4%, 70.5%, and 85.5% at titer below the assay lower quantification limit, 512, and 4096 (maximum)). Moreover, IIV VE increased significantly with Day 30 post-vaccination NAI titer (p=0.040), with estimated VE zero at titer 10 and 92.2% at highest titer 640. There was no evidence that fold-change in post-vaccination HAI or NAI titer associated with IIV VE (p=0.76, 0.38). For LAIV, there was no evidence that VE associated with post-vaccination or fold-rise HAI or NAI titers (p-values >0.40). For IIV, VE increased with increasing baseline NAI titer in those previously vaccinated, but VE decreased with increasing baseline NAI titer in those previously unvaccinated. In contrast, for LAIV, VE did not depend on previous vaccination or baseline HAI or NAI titer. CONCLUSIONS Future efficacy trials should measure baseline and post-vaccination antibody titers in both vaccine and control/placebo recipients, enabling analyses to better elucidate correlates of vaccine- and natural-protection. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00538512. October 1, 2007.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter B Gilbert
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., Seattle, 98109, USA. .,Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific St., Seattle, 98195, USA.
| | - Youyi Fong
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., Seattle, 98109, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific St., Seattle, 98195, USA
| | - Michal Juraska
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., Seattle, 98109, USA
| | - Lindsay N Carpp
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., Seattle, 98109, USA
| | - Arnold S Monto
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, 48109, USA
| | - Emily T Martin
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, 48109, USA
| | - Joshua G Petrie
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Thompson MG, Li DK, Naleway AL, Ferber JR, Henninger ML, Shifflett P, Sokolow LZ, Odouli R, Kauffman TL, Fink RV, Bulkley J, Cragan JD, Bozeman S. Factors associated with recruitment, surveillance participation, and retention in an observational study of pregnant women and influenza. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:161. [PMID: 31068160 PMCID: PMC6507168 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2280-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This report describes the results of recruitment efforts and the subsequent participation of pregnant women in study activities in a 2010–2012 observational study focused on influenza illness and vaccination in California and Oregon, USA. Methods Socio-demographic and health characteristics extracted from electronic medical records were compared among pregnant women who enrolled in the study, refused to participate, or were never reached for study invitation. These characteristics plus additional self-reported information were compared between women who enrolled in two study tracks: a prospective cohort vs. women enrolled following an acute respiratory illness (ARI) medical encounter. The characteristics of women who participated in weekly ARI surveillance (cohort enrollees, year one) and a 6-month follow-up interview (all enrollees) were also examined. Results In year one, we reached 51% (6938/13,655) of the potential participants we tried to contact by telephone, and 20% (1374/6938) of the women we invited agreed to join the prospective cohort. Women with chronic medical conditions, pregnancy complications, and medical encounters for ARI (prior to pregnancy or during the study period) were more likely to be reached for recruitment and more likely to enroll in the cohort. Twenty percent of cohort enrollees never started weekly surveillance reports; among those who did, reports were completed for 55% of the surveillance weeks. Receipt of the influenza vaccine was higher among women who joined the cohort (76%) than those who refused (56%) or were never reached (54%). In contrast, vaccine uptake among medical enrollees in year one (54%; 53/98) and two (52%; 79/151) was similar to other pregnant women in those years. Study site, white race, non-Hispanic ethnicity, and not having a child aged < 13 years at home were most consistently associated with joining as a cohort or medical enrollee and completing study activities after joining. Conclusions We observed systematic differences in socio-demographic and health characteristics across different levels of participant engagement and between cohort and medical enrollees. More methodological research and innovation in conducting prospective observational studies in this population are needed, especially when extended participant engagement and ongoing surveillance are required. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2280-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G Thompson
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - De-Kun Li
- Division of Research, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA, USA.,Department of Health Research and Policy, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Allison L Naleway
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jeannette R Ferber
- Division of Research, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Leslie Z Sokolow
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA.,Battelle Memorial Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Roxana Odouli
- Division of Research, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Joanna Bulkley
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Janet D Cragan
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Arnold LD, Luong L, Rebmann T, Chang JJ. Racial disparities in U.S. maternal influenza vaccine uptake: Results from analysis of Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data, 2012-2015. Vaccine 2019; 37:2520-2526. [PMID: 30928172 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women are at increased risk of hospitalization, serious complications, poor pregnancy outcomes, and mortality from influenza. Prior research suggests that there are racial/ethnic disparities in vaccination coverage and that a healthcare provider vaccination recommendation is associated with significantly higher vaccine uptake than without such a recommendation. The purpose of this study is to examine racial/ethnic disparities in healthcare providers' recommendations for pregnant women to receive the influenza vaccine and in vaccine uptake. METHODS This cross-sectional population-based study analyzed data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) during 2012-2015 (n = 130161). Both healthcare provider recommendation and vaccine uptake were assessed dichotomously. Logistic regression was conducted to ascertain adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, controlling for maternal age, marital status, education, prenatal care utilization, and smoking status. RESULTS Influenza vaccine uptake during pregnancy ranged from 39.1% among non-Hispanic (NH) Black women to 55.4% among NH Asian women. In the adjusted analysis, NH Black and NH Asian women had 19% (95% CI 0.75-0.86) and 34% (95% CI 0.61-0.72) decreased odds of receiving a provider recommendation for influenza vaccine during pregnancy, respectively, compared to NH White women. For influenza vaccine uptake, NH Black women were 30% less likely (95% CI 0.65-0.74) to receive influenza vaccine during pregnancy compared to NH White women. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that there are racial/ethnic disparities in healthcare provider recommendation and influenza vaccine uptake among pregnant women in the United States. Targeted efforts toward providers and interventions focusing on pregnant women may be warranted to reduce the disparity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren D Arnold
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette Ave, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.
| | - Lan Luong
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette Ave, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.
| | - Terri Rebmann
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette Ave, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.
| | - Jen Jen Chang
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette Ave, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Petrie JG, Monto AS. Untangling the Effects of Prior Vaccination on Subsequent Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness. J Infect Dis 2019; 215:841-843. [PMID: 28453852 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jix056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua G Petrie
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Arnold S Monto
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
BECHINI A, MOSCADELLI A, PIERALLI F, SARTOR G, SERAVALLI V, PANATTO D, AMICIZIA D, BONANNI P, BOCCALINI S. Impact assessment of an education course on vaccinations in a population of pregnant women: a pilot study. JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 2019; 60:E5-E11. [PMID: 31041404 PMCID: PMC6477562 DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.1.1093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although the benefits of vaccinations have been extensively demonstrated, vaccination coverage remains unsatisfactory as result of many people's poor knowledge and negative perception of vaccination.We evaluated the impact of an education course on vaccinations in a population of pregnant women. METHODS A total of 214 pregnant women were invited to participate in this project, which was undertaken at the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of Careggi University Hospital in Florence (Italy). Anonymous questionnaires were administered to women before and after the intervention.A descriptive and statistical analysis was carried out in order to compare the responses obtained before and after the intervention. RESULTS Adherence to the initiative was good (98%): initially, the respondents were not hostile to vaccinations, though many (43%) were poorly or insufficiently informed. The educational intervention had a positive impact. After the intervention, the number of women who rated their level of knowledge of vaccinations as poor or insufficient had decreased by 30% and the number of "hesitant" respondents had decreased with respect to all aspects of the study, especially the decision to be vaccinated during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Hesitancy stems from a lack of accurate information. Healthcare professionals need to improve their communication skills. Appropriate education during pregnancy, when women are more receptive, may have a highly positive impact. These observations need to be considered in the planning of courses to prepare pregnant women for delivery also in other maternal-foetal centres in Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. BECHINI
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Italy
| | - A. MOSCADELLI
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Italy
| | - F. PIERALLI
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Italy
| | - G. SARTOR
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Italy
| | - V. SERAVALLI
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Italy
| | - D. PANATTO
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - D. AMICIZIA
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - P. BONANNI
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Italy
| | - S. BOCCALINI
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Primary Prenatal Care: Screening, Prevention, and Treatment of Viral Infections. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2019; 61:95-105. [PMID: 29319592 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Prenatal care providers are responsible for a basic understanding of the viral contagions that place women and fetal well-being at risk during pregnancy. This article reviews the evidence-based routine prenatal screening guidelines for previously unrecognized maternal infection, counseling toward risk reduction, recommended maternal immunizations, and the management of maternal and fetal complications of some viral exposures and infections.
Collapse
|
48
|
Sullivan SG, Price OH, Regan AK. Burden, effectiveness and safety of influenza vaccines in elderly, paediatric and pregnant populations. Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother 2019; 7:2515135519826481. [PMID: 30793097 PMCID: PMC6376509 DOI: 10.1177/2515135519826481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccination is the most practical means available for preventing influenza. Influenza vaccines require frequent updates to keep pace with antigenic drift of the virus, and the effectiveness, and sometimes the safety, of the vaccine can therefore vary from season to season. Three key populations that the World Health Organization recommends should be prioritized for influenza vaccination are pregnant women, children younger than 5 years of age and the elderly. This review discusses the burden of influenza and the safety and effectiveness profile of influenza vaccines recommended for these groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheena G. Sullivan
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, 792 Elizabeth St, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Olivia H. Price
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Annette K. Regan
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States; School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, and Wesfamers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Naleway AL, Ball S, Kwong JC, Wyant BE, Katz MA, Regan AK, Russell ML, Klein NP, Chung H, Simmonds KA, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Feldman BS, Levy A, Fell DB, Drews SJ, Garg S, Effler P, Barda N, Irving SA, Shifflett P, Jackson ML, Thompson MG. Estimating Vaccine Effectiveness Against Hospitalized Influenza During Pregnancy: Multicountry Protocol for a Retrospective Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8:e11333. [PMID: 30664495 PMCID: PMC6360380 DOI: 10.2196/11333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although pregnant women are believed to have elevated risks of severe influenza infection and are targeted for influenza vaccination, no study to date has examined influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations during pregnancy, primarily because this outcome poses many methodological challenges. Objective The Pregnancy Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (PREVENT) was formed in 2016 as an international collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Abt Associates; and study sites in Australia, Canada, Israel, and the United States. The primary goal of this collaboration is to estimate IVE in preventing acute respiratory or febrile illness (ARFI) hospitalizations associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection during pregnancy. Secondary aims include (1) describing the incidence, clinical course, and severity of influenza-associated ARFI hospitalization during pregnancy; (2) comparing the characteristics of ARFI-hospitalized pregnant women who were tested for influenza with those who were not tested; (3) describing influenza vaccination coverage in pregnant women; and (4) comparing birth outcomes among women with laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalization versus other noninfluenza ARFI hospitalizations. Methods For an initial assessment of IVE, sites identified a retrospective cohort of pregnant women aged from 18 to 50 years whose pregnancies overlapped with local influenza seasons from 2010 to 2016. Pregnancies were defined as those that ended in a live birth or stillbirth of at least 20 weeks gestation. The analytic sample for the primary IVE analysis was restricted to pregnant women who were hospitalized for ARFI during site-specific influenza seasons and clinically tested for influenza virus infection using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Results We identified approximately 2 million women whose pregnancies overlapped with influenza seasons; 550,344 had at least one hospitalization during this time. After restricting to women who were hospitalized for ARFI and tested for influenza, the IVE analytic sample included 1005 women. Conclusions In addition to addressing the primary question about the effectiveness of influenza vaccination, PREVENT data will address other important knowledge gaps including understanding the incidence, clinical course, and severity of influenza-related hospitalizations during pregnancy. The data infrastructure and international partnerships created for these analyses may be useful and informative for future influenza studies. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/11333
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison L Naleway
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Sarah Ball
- Abt Associates, Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | | | - Mark A Katz
- Chief Physician's Office, Clalit Health Services, Clalit Research Institute, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Annette K Regan
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Nicola P Klein
- Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Becca S Feldman
- Chief Physician's Office, Clalit Health Services, Clalit Research Institute, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Avram Levy
- PathWest Laboratory Medicine Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Deshayne B Fell
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Steven J Drews
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Shikha Garg
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Paul Effler
- Western Australia Department of Health, Perth, Australia
| | - Noam Barda
- Chief Physician's Office, Clalit Health Services, Clalit Research Institute, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Stephanie A Irving
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, United States
| | | | - Michael L Jackson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Mark G Thompson
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ramsay LC, Buchan SA, Stirling RG, Cowling BJ, Feng S, Kwong JC, Warshawsky BF. The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2019; 17:9. [PMID: 30626399 PMCID: PMC6327561 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1239-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conflicting results regarding the impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) may cause confusion regarding the benefits of receiving the current season's vaccine. METHODS We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from database inception to August 17, 2016, for observational studies published in English that reported VE against laboratory-confirmed influenza for the following four vaccination groups: current season only, prior season only, both seasons, and neither season. We pooled differences in VE (∆VE) between vaccination groups by influenza season and type/subtype using a random-effects model. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42016037241). RESULTS We identified 3435 unique articles, reviewed the full text of 634, and included 20 for meta-analysis. Compared to prior season vaccination only, vaccination in both seasons was associated with greater protection against influenza H1N1 (∆VE = 25%; 95% CI 14%, 35%) and B (∆VE = 18%; 95% CI 3%, 33%), but not H3N2 (∆VE = 7%; 95% CI - 7%, 21%). Compared to no vaccination for either season, individuals who received the current season's vaccine had greater protection against H1N1 (∆VE = 62%; 95% CI 51%, 70%), H3N2 (∆VE = 45%; 95% CI 35%, 53%), and B (∆VE = 64%; 95% CI 57%, 71%). We observed no differences in VE between vaccination in both seasons and the current season only for H1N1 (∆VE = 3%; 95% CI - 8%, 13%), but less protection against influenza H3N2 (∆VE = - 20%; 95% CI - 36%, - 4%), and B (∆VE = - 11%; 95% CI - 20%, - 2%). CONCLUSIONS Our results support current season vaccination regardless of prior season vaccination because VE for vaccination in the current season only is higher compared to no vaccination in either season for all types/subtypes, and for H1N1 and influenza B, vaccination in both seasons provides better VE than vaccination in the prior season only. Although VE was lower against H3N2 and B for individuals vaccinated in both seasons compared to those vaccinated in the current season only, it should be noted that past vaccination history cannot be altered and this comparison disregards susceptibility to influenza during the prior season among those vaccinated in the current season only. In addition, our results for H3N2 were particularly influenced by the 2014-2015 influenza season and the impact of repeated vaccination for all types/subtypes may vary from season to season. It is important that future VE studies include vaccination history over multiple seasons to evaluate repeated vaccination in more detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C. Ramsay
- Public Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1V2 Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7 Canada
| | - Sarah A. Buchan
- Public Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1V2 Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7 Canada
| | - Robert G. Stirling
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7 Canada
- Public Health Agency of Canada, 130 Colonnade Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9 Canada
| | - Benjamin J. Cowling
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - Shuo Feng
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jeffrey C. Kwong
- Public Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1V2 Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7 Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Veterans Hill Trail, 2075 Bayview Avenue G1 06, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5 Canada
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7 Canada
- University Health Network, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8 Canada
| | - Bryna F. Warshawsky
- Public Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1V2 Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, Ontario N6A 3K7 Canada
| |
Collapse
|