Racial and ethnic differences in pharmacotherapy to prevent coronary artery disease and thrombotic events

Evaluation of the effect of 48 weeks of BIC/F/TAF and DRV/c/F/TAF on platelet function in the context of rapid ART start

INTRODUCTION

The BIC-T&T study aimed to determine the efficacy of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/F/TAF) and darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (DRV/c/F/TAF) at suppressing viral load in a two-arm, open-label, multi-centre, randomised trial under a UK test-and-treat setting. This sub-study aimed to evaluate potential off-target cardiovascular impact by examining ex vivo platelet function.

METHODS

Platelets were isolated by centrifugation of citrated blood from participants attending Chelsea and Westminster Hospital or St Mary's Hospital at Week 48 following enrolment. Platelet activation was assessed by real-time flow cytometry to examine integrin activation and granule release and platelet aggregation was evaluated by light transmission aggregometry. Statistical significance was determined by 2-way ANOVA with a Šidák's multiple comparisons post-test.

RESULTS

An analysis of 21 participants was performed at Week 48 (96% male and 48% white; mean (range) age was 37 (23-78) years). No difference between arms was observed in ADP-, collagen- or thrombin receptor activator for peptide (TRAP)-6-evoked platelet αIIbβ3 integrin activation, granule release or platelet aggregation in response to any of the agonists tested. Despite differences in the demographics between treatment arms, the presence of an unboosted integrase inhibitor or boosted protease inhibitor in a test-and-treat setting did not impact platelet function.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides no evidence of differences in downstream platelet responses between participants taking BIC/F/TAF compared to DRV/c/F/TAF following 48 wk of treatment. Further data are required to explore whether there are biologically significant off-target effects, including effects on platelets and other components of the cardiovascular system between these two test-and-treat regimens.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT04653194.

Racial and regional differences in efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardiorenal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors on multiple cardiorenal outcomes across different racial/ethnic groups and regions.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases in April 2024 for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Owing to inconsistencies in the reporting of the racial/ethnic and regional demographics, participants were grouped into three racial groups (Asian, Black, and White) and four regional (Asia, Central/South America, Europe, North America) groups. We compared the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors among these racial/ethnic and regional groups by calculating the ratio of hazard ratios (RHR). We evaluated the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), cardiovascular death, HHF, all-cause death, major adverse cardiac events, and cardiorenal composite outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 14 randomized placebo-controlled trials with 94,445 participants. Across the three racial/ethnic groups, SGLT2 inhibitors showed comparable efficacy. Compared with White patients, the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors on HHF was more pronounced in Black patients (RHR, 0.64; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.94), and a numerically lower risk was associated with Asian patients (RHR, 0.62; 95 % CI, 0.38-1.01). A consistent reduction in cardiovascular events with SGLT2 inhibitors was observed across all regions, while the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors on HHF was more pronounced in Asia than in other regions (RHR, 0.52; 95 % CI, 0.33-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitors showed generally consistent efficacy across various racial/ethnic and regional groups, with some differences noted in specific populations. Ensuring adequate representation of diverse populations in clinical trials would be key to addressing healthcare disparities.

Promoting Diversity through an Understanding of Barriers and Drivers for Inclusive Clinical Trials

IMPORTANCE

Racially and ethnically diverse, equitable representation among clinical trial participants is important for enhancing the drug development process and promoting equitable healthcare outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the barriers and drivers for inclusive clinical trials, focusing on the attitudes, perceptions, experiences, and challenges faced by underrepresented populations.

DESIGN

An online questionnaire was administered online from April to June 2023 and involved 12,017 respondents from 54 countries. This survey utilized a convenience sampling strategy. Statistical analysis was performed to compare responses among racial and ethnic groups.

SETTING

The study was conducted globally. Survey respondents were recruited through various patient recruitment organizations, patient advocacy groups, and contract research organizations.

RESPONDENTS

Adults 18 years or older who received an email or had online access were eligible to participate. Racial and ethnic composition included White (81%), Hispanic/Latino (15%), Black/African American (6%), Asian (6%), and other ethnicities.

EXPOSURE(S)

Respondents were asked about their perceptions, concerns and experiences related to clinical research access and participation.

MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S)

Key outcomes included barriers to clinical research participation, factors influencing trust in pharmaceutical companies and past experiences.

RESULTS

Barriers to clinical research participation varied among ethnic groups. Asian respondents cited concerns about time off work (22%) and time required to participate (19%) more frequently as compared to White respondents (7% and 7%, respectively; p < 0.05). Hispanics expressed higher concerns about time off work (15%) and receiving placebo (10%) as compared to Non-Hispanics (8% and 5%, respectively, p < 0.05). Black and Hispanic respondents placed higher importance on diversity in staff compared to White and non-Hispanic respondents (B: 32%; W: 12%; Hispanic: 22%; Non-Hispanic: 13% p < 0.05). Black, Asian, and Hispanic respondents reported higher levels of disruption in participation related to technology use (Black: 31%; Hispanic: 30%; Asian: 29%) and completing study requirements at home (Black: 32%; Hispanic: 30%; Asian: 26%) as compared to White (13%, 15%; p < 0.05%) and non-Hispanic respondents (14%, 17%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight the need to address barriers to diversity in clinical trials and improve trial experiences of underrepresented communities, facilitating design of more inclusive and patient-centered trials.

Effects of proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular outcomes in myocardial infarction patients treated with DAPT

BACKGROUND

A discrepancy exists between the European and American guideline recommendations for the routine use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

AIMS

This study aimed to determine the association between the co-prescription of PPIs and DAPT and the occurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding and ischaemic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

A search was conducted using a nationwide Korean claims database to identify patients with AMI undergoing PCI with DAPT. Patients were matched using a large-scale propensity score (PS) algorithm according to the co-prescription of PPIs. The primary efficacy endpoint was major gastrointestinal bleeding requiring transfusion with hospitalisation within 1 year. The primary safety endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, repeat revascularisation and ischaemic stroke within 1 year.

RESULTS

Among the total population, 30.0% of patients (n=35,566) received PPIs with DAPT after PCI for AMI. After PS matching, 35,560 pairs were generated. Compared to patients without PPIs, those on PPIs were associated with a significantly lower 1-year risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (0.7% vs 0.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.73). The 1-year risk of MACCE did not differ significantly between the groups with or without PPIs (13.4% vs 13.1%, HR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.94-1.02). The beneficial effects of PPIs on gastrointestinal bleeding, without increased risk of cardiovascular events, were observed consistently, regardless of P2Y12 inhibitor type, PPI type, or individual bleeding risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world data from a large study of East Asian patients with AMI undergoing PCI and maintaining DAPT, PPI use significantly reduced the risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding without increasing ischaemic events, irrespective of bleeding risk or type of P2Y12 inhibitor. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06241833).

Potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

BACKGROUND

Although potent P2Y12 inhibitors, such as ticagrelor and prasugrel, are standard treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), evidence for their efficacy and safety compared with clopidogrel is limited in patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock.

METHODS

Among 28,949 patients from the nationwide pooled registry of KAMIR-NIH and KAMIR-V, a total of 1482 patients (5.1%) with AMI and cardiogenic shock who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit vessel were selected. Primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE, a composite of cardiac death, MI, repeat revascularization and definite stent thrombosis) and major secondary outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 or greater bleeding at 2 years.

RESULTS

Among the study population, 537 patients (36.2%) received potent P2Y12 inhibitors and 945 patients (63.8%) received clopidogrel after index procedure. The risk of MACE was significantly lower in the potent P2Y12 inhibitors group than in the clopidogrel group (16.6% versus 24.7%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [95% CI 0.59-0.99]; P = 0.046). Regarding BARC type 2 or greater bleeding, there was no significant difference between the potent P2Y12 inhibitors group and the clopidogrel group (12.5% versus 10.7%; adjusted HR, 1.36 [95% CI 0.98-1.88]; P = 0.064). Significant interaction was observed in patients aged ≥ 75 years (interaction P = 0.021) or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO) use (interaction P = 0.015) for significantly increased risk of BARC type 2 or greater bleeding following the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock, the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors was associated with a lower risk of MACE compared with clopidogrel, without an increased risk of BARC type 2 or greater bleeding. The current data supports the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock, except in patients aged ≥ 75 years or receiving VA-ECMO support.

Lack of Racial Disparities in Cangrelor Therapy in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Cangrelor is an intravenous P2Y12 receptor antagonist that exerts rapid and potent antiplatelet effects. It is associated with a reduction in the indcidence of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

AIMS

The aim of our study was to investigate the racial disparities and their impact on outcomes among patients with ACS who were treated with cangrelor during PCI.

METHODS

We reviewed the data of patients with ACS who were treated with cangrelor during PCI at our center from 2018 to 2023 and divided between African American (AA) and Caucasian patients. The primary safety outcome was in-hospital thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding. The primary efficacy outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, MI, or stroke. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the primary outcomes after controlling for differences in baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

The study included 1181 patients who received cangrelor during PCI for ACS, including 616 AA and 565 Caucasian patients. AA patients were significantly younger (61 ± 13 vs. 64 ± 12 years; p < 0.001) and had higher rates of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis. There were no significant differences between AA and Caucasian patients regarding in-hospital TIMI major bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-1.88; p = 0.343) and in-hospital MACE (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 0.71-4.69; p = 0.212) after controlling for relevant baseline differences.

CONCLUSION

No racial disparities were observed with regard to the administration of cangrelor during PCI in patients presenting with ACS, and cangrelor was not associated with increased bleeding for AA patients as compared to Caucasian patients.

Demographic diversity in platelet function and response to antiplatelet therapy

Recent studies have highlighted the complexity of platelet biology, revealing their diverse roles beyond hemostasis. Pathological platelet activation is now recognized as a key contributor to thrombosis and inflammation that are both central to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Emerging research emphasizes the significant impact of demographic factors - such as age, sex, race, and ethnicity - on CVD risk and responses to antiplatelet therapies. These population-based differences, shaped by genetic and non-genetic factors, highlight the need for reevaluation of antiplatelet strategies. We address current knowledge and emphasize the pressing need for further research into platelet biology and cardiovascular outcomes across diverse populations. In this review we advocate for tailored therapeutic approaches in CVD based on the recent demographic-focused findings.

Lipid-lowering therapies and long-term stroke prevention in East Asians: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Stroke prevention is a pressing global health priority, with reducing elevated lipids recognized as a key strategy. East Asians, constituting more than 1.6 billion individuals and the largest racial group worldwide, are a key demographic in this effort. Yet, the effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapies for stroke prevention in this population remains uncertain.

AIMS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with at least 3 years of follow-up to evaluate the long-term impact of lipid-lowering therapies on stroke incidence in East Asians. We systematically searched four electronic databases up to 11 January 2024. The association was quantified using relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and between-study heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. In addition, we utilized the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool to assess the risk of bias in each included RCT and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.

RESULTS

This study incorporated data from nine large-scale RCTs involving 54,354 participants. Our findings of overall analyses revealed that lipid-lowering therapies did not significantly affect the long-term incidence of all strokes (9 RCTs; 54,354 participants; RR = 0.98 (95% CI = 0.87-1.10); P = 0.75), ischemic stroke (7 RCTs; 52,059 participants; RR = 0.91 (95% CI, = 0.79-1.04); P = 0.16), or hemorrhage stroke (7 RCTs; 52,059 participants; RR = 1.24 (95% CI = 0.97-1.59); P = 0.09) in East Asians. Notably, there was no evidence of heterogeneity or publication bias, and the quality of evidence assessed using GRADE methodologies was rated as high. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of our results, with no single study significantly affecting the overall findings. Furthermore, subgroup analyses consistently supported the conclusions, further bolstering the reliability of our study.

CONCLUSIONS

Lipid-lowering therapies did not demonstrate any beneficial effects on long-term stroke prevention among East Asians.

Comparative Effectiveness of Calcium-Channel Blockers, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Diuretics on Cardiovascular Events Likelihood in Hypertensive African-American and Non-Hispanic Caucasians: A Retrospective Study Across HCA Healthcare

BACKGROUND

Hypertension, a leading global risk factor for mortality and disability, disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minorities. Our study investigates the association between the type of prior antihypertensive medication use and the likelihood of cardiovascular events (CVE) and assesses whether the patient's race influences this relationship.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 14 836 hypertension cases aged ≥ 40 years was conducted using data from HCA Healthcare between 2017 and 2023. Logistic regression was employed to predict the likelihood of CVE and mortality at admission, adjusting for baseline comorbidities, with Race added as an effect modifier. Interaction analysis was performed among races based on antihypertensive medication types.

RESULTS

African American patients on ACE inhibitors (ACE) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were 1.7 times more likely to have cardiovascular events (CVE) compared to those on calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and 0.66 times as likely compared to diuretics. CCB users had a lower CVE risk than diuretic users. Among White patients, ACE/ARB users had a 1.18 times higher CVE risk than CCB users and 0.45 times lower compared to diuretics, while CCBs offered a 0.38 times lower risk than diuretics. Only ACE/ARB use showed significantly higher CVE odds for African Americans compared to White patients, with similar risks across racial groups for CCBs and diuretics.

CONCLUSION

Prior antihypertensive type significantly influenced CVE risk, with race as an effect modifier. CCB users had lower CVE odds than ACE/ARBs or diuretics, and ACE/ARBs showed reduced CVE likelihood compared to diuretics in both racial groups.

Effect of Genetic Variants on Rosuvastatin Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers: Involvement of ABCG2, SLCO1B1 and NAT2

Statins are the primary drugs used to prevent cardiovascular disease by inhibiting the HMG-CoA reductase, an enzyme crucial for the synthesis of LDL cholesterol in the liver. A significant number of patients experience adverse drug reactions (ADRs), particularly musculoskeletal problems, which can affect adherence to treatment. Recent clinical guidelines, such as those from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) in 2022, recommend adjusting rosuvastatin doses based on genetic variations in the ABCG2 and SLCO1B1 genes to minimize ADRs and improve treatment efficacy. Despite these adjustments, some patients still experience ADRs. So, we performed a candidate gene study to better understand the pharmacogenetics of rosuvastatin. This study included 119 healthy volunteers who participated in three bioequivalence trials of rosuvastatin alone or in combination with ezetimibe at the Clinical Trials Unit of the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (UECHUP). Participants were genotyped using a custom OpenArray from ThermoFisher that assessed 124 variants in 38 genes associated with drug metabolism and transport. No significant differences were observed according to sex or biogeographic origin. A significant increase in t1/2 (pmultivariate(pmv) = 0.013) was observed in the rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe trial compared with the rosuvastatin alone trials. Genetic analysis showed that decreased (DF) and poor function (PF) volunteers for the ABCG2 transporter had higher AUC∞/DW (adjusted dose/weight), AUC72h/DW and Cmax/DW compared to normal function (NF) volunteers (pmv< 0.001). DF and PF volunteers for SLCO1B1 showed an increase in AUC72h/DW (pmv = 0.020) compared to increased (IF) and NF individuals. Results for ABCG2 and SLCO1B1 were consistent with the existing literature. In addition, AUC∞/DW, AUC72h/DW and Cmax/DW were increased in intermediate (IA) and poor (PA) NAT2 acetylators (pmv = 0.001, pmv< 0.001, pmv< 0.001, respectively) compared to rapid acetylators (RA), which could be associated through a secondary pathway that was previously unknown.

Detailed Lipid Profiles and Lipid-related Residual Risk after 12-week 10 mg Rosuvastatin Treatment for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Objective We aimed to reveal detailed on-treatment lipid profiles, lipid-related surrogate markers, and factors predicting failure to achieve the guideline-recommended lipid management goal following guideline-recommended statin treatment in Japanese patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods Sixty AMI patients who underwent coronary intervention and had received rosuvastatin 10 mg/day since the start of their hospitalization were assessed for on-treatment lipid-related profiles, including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sd LDL-C), and lipoprotein (a), at the 12-week follow-up. Patients who failed to achieve the guideline-recommended lipid management at 12 weeks were defined as the "unachieved group." Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the predictors of inclusion in the unachieved group after high-dose statin treatment. Results Despite the use of high-dose rosuvastatin, 61.7% of the enrolled AMI patients were included in the unachieved group. In addition, the unachieved group had higher sd LDL-C and lipoprotein (a) levels than the achieved group. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that low baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and the absence of diabetes were predictors of inclusion in the unachieved group. Conclusion More than half of the Japanese AMI patients treated with rosuvastatin 10 mg/day did not achieve the guideline-recommended goal of lipid management and still had lipid-related residual risk at 12 weeks. Particular attention should be paid to patients with low baseline HDL-C levels and those without diabetes with regard to their on-treatment lipid profiles.

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic diversity and outcomes of patients with graft-versus-host disease: a CIBMTR analysis

ABSTRACT

Socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity have been associated with the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Certain aspects of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) management, such as the need for long-term care, prolonged immunosuppressive treatment, and close follow-up for complications, may exacerbate disparities. Adults (≥18 years) reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research who underwent a first allo-HCT for acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative neoplasm between 2008 and 2018 were included. End points for those developing GVHD included overall survival (OS), transplant-related mortality (TRM), and disease relapse. Models were adjusted for patient- and transplant-related variables. A 2-sided P value < .01 was considered significant. Among the 14 825 allo-HCT recipients, 6259 (42.2%) and 6675 (45.0%) patients developed acute GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), respectively. Among patients with aGVHD, non-Hispanic Black patients had increased TRM and overall mortality compared with non-Hispanic White patients; this association disappeared when severity of aGVHD was included in the model. Lower SES was associated with increased risk of disease relapse but not OS or TRM. In patients who developed cGVHD, race and ethnicity were not associated with OS, TRM, or disease relapse. However, the highest quartile of annual household income (≥$80 000) had improved OS and reduced TRM compared with the lowest quartile, after adjusting for race and ethnicity. In summary, race/ethnicity and SES are associated with outcomes after GVHD. Optimizing the health care resources available to low SES patients and strategies to minimize the risk of severe GVHD in non-Hispanic Black patients may improve long-term outcomes.

Aspirin-free strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome based on the subtypes of acute coronary syndrome and high bleeding risk: the STOPDAPT-3 trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

High bleeding risk (HBR) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subtypes are critical in determining bleeding and cardiovascular event risk after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 4476 ACS patients enrolled in the STOPDAPT-3, where the no-aspirin and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies after PCI were randomly compared, the pre-specified subgroup analyses were conducted based on HBR/non-HBR and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)/non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). The co-primary bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5, and the co-primary cardiovascular endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischaemic stroke at 1 month. Irrespective of the subgroups, the effect of no-aspirin compared with DAPT was not significant for the bleeding endpoint (HBR [N = 1803]: 7.27 and 7.91%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.28; non-HBR [N = 2673]: 3.40 and 3.65%, HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.62-1.39; Pinteraction = 0.94; STEMI [N = 2553]: 6.58 and 6.56%, HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.74-1.35; NSTE-ACS [N = 1923]: 2.94 and 3.64%, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.49-1.32; Pinteraction = 0.45), and for the cardiovascular endpoint (HBR: 7.87 and 5.75%, HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.97-1.99; non-HBR: 2.56 and 2.67%, HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.60-1.53; Pinteraction = 0.22; STEMI: 6.07 and 5.46%, HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.81-1.54; NSTE-ACS: 3.03 and 1.71%, HR 1.78, 95% CI 0.97-3.27; Pinteraction = 0.18).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, the no-aspirin strategy compared with the DAPT strategy failed to reduce major bleeding events irrespective of HBR and ACS subtypes. The numerical excess risk of the no-aspirin strategy relative to the DAPT strategy for cardiovascular events was observed in patients with HBR and in patients with NSTE-ACS.

Temporal Changes in Long-Term Outcomes of Venous Thromboembolism From the Warfarin Era to the Direct Oral Anticoagulant Era

BACKGROUND

There have been limited data on the changes in clinical outcomes after the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in real clinical practice. We evaluated the changes in management strategies and long-term outcomes from the warfarin era to the DOAC era.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared the 2 series of multicenter COMMAND VTE (Contemporary Management and Outcomes in Patients With Venous Thromboembolism) registries in Japan enrolling consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE: Registry 1: 3027 patients in the warfarin era (2010-2014) and Registry 2: 5197 patients in the DOAC era (2015-2020). The prevalence of DOAC use increased more in Registry 2 than in the Registry 1 (Registry 1: 2.6% versus Registry 2: 79%, P<0.001). The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE was significantly lower in Registry 2 than in Registry 1 (10.5% versus 9.5%, P=0.02), and the risk reduction of recurrent VTE in Registry 2 remained significant even after adjusting the confounders (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65-0.93]; P=0.005). The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the 2 registries (12.1% versus 13.7%, P=0.26), and the risk of major bleeding between the 2 registries was not significantly different even after adjusting the confounders (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.89-1.21]; P=0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Along with the shift from warfarin to DOACs, there was a lower risk of recurrent VTE in the DOAC era than in the warfarin era, whereas there was no apparent change in the risk of major bleeding, which might still be an unmet need even in the DOAC era.

Differences in quality of anticoagulation care delivery according to ethnoracial group in the United States: A scoping review

Anticoagulation therapy is standard for conditions like atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and valvular heart disease, yet it is unclear if there are ethnoracial disparities in its quality and delivery in the United States. For this scoping review, electronic databases were searched for publications between January 1, 2011 - March 30, 2022. Eligible studies included all study designs, any setting within the United States, patients prescribed anticoagulation for any indication, outcomes reported for ≥ 2 distinct ethnoracial groups. The following four research questions were explored: Do ethnoracial differences exist in 1) access to guideline-based anticoagulation therapy, 2) quality of anticoagulation therapy management, 3) clinical outcomes related to anticoagulation care, 4) humanistic/educational outcomes related to anticoagulation therapy. A total of 5374 studies were screened, 570 studies received full-text review, and 96 studies were analyzed. The largest mapped focus was patients' access to guideline-based anticoagulation therapy (88/96 articles, 91.7%). Seventy-eight articles made statistical outcomes comparisons among ethnoracial groups. Across all four research questions, 79 articles demonstrated favorable outcomes for White patients compared to non-White patients, 38 articles showed no difference between White and non-White groups, and 8 favored non-White groups (the total exceeds the 78 articles with statistical outcomes as many articles reported multiple outcomes). Disparities disadvantaging non-White patients were most pronounced in access to guideline-based anticoagulation therapy (43/66 articles analyzed) and quality of anticoagulation management (19/21 articles analyzed). Although treatment guidelines do not differentiate anticoagulant therapy by ethnoracial group, this scoping review found consistently favorable outcomes for White patients over non-White patients in the domains of access to anticoagulation therapy for guideline-based indications and quality of anticoagulation therapy management. No differences among groups were noted in clinical outcomes, and very few studies assessed humanistic or educational outcomes.

What Is the Appropriate Antibiotic Administration During Tooth Extractions in Patients Receiving High-Dose Denosumab?

PURPOSE

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) occasionally occurs following tooth extractions in cancer patients receiving denosumab (Dmab). However, there are currently no established guidelines for perioperative antibiotic administration during tooth extraction in these patients. The primary objective was to develop guidelines for the dose and frequency of antibiotics during tooth extraction by investigating the correlation between the current status of antibiotic administration and the development of MRONJ.

METHODS

This study included 68 cancer patients receiving high-dose Dmab who had tooth extractions between 2012 and 2022 at 10 hospitals. The relationship between the way of perioperative antibiotic administration and the development of MRONJ was analyzed. A P-value < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There was considerable variability across hospitals and surgeons regarding the type, dosage, and duration of antibiotic administration. Amoxicillin (AMPC) was the most commonly used antibiotic. Focusing exclusively on teeth extracted under AMPC administration, MRONJ developed in 21 out of 123 teeth (17.0%). No significant relationship was found between the development of MRONJ and the dosage or duration of perioperative AMPC administration.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative antibiotic administration alone may not be sufficient to prevent MRONJ. Therefore, a single preoperative dose is likely adequate for effective and appropriate AMPC administration.　.

Intensive Versus Moderate Statin-Based Therapies in Patients With Mild Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Statins are widely used for treating patients with ischemic stroke at risk of secondary cerebrovascular events. It is unknown whether Asian populations benefit from more intensive statin-based therapy for stroke recurrence. Therefore, in the present study we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of high-dose and moderate-dose statins for patients who had experienced mild ischemic stroke during the acute period.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicenter prospective study included patients with mild ischemic stroke who presented within 72 hours of symptom onset. The outcomes of patients in the high-intensity and moderate-intensity statin treatment groups were compared, with the main efficacy outcome being stroke recurrence and the primary safety end point being intracranial hemorrhage. The propensity score matching method was employed to control for imbalances in baseline variables. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate group differences. In total, the data of 2950 patients were analyzed at 3 months, and the data of 2764 patients were analyzed at 12 months due to loss to follow-up. According to the multivariable Cox analyses adjusted for potential confounders, stroke recurrence occurred similarly in the high-intensity statin and moderate-intensity statin groups (3 months: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.12 [95% CI, 0.85-1.49]; P=0.424; 12 months: adjusted HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.86-1.34]; P=0.519). High-intensity statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (3 months: adjusted HR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.00-3.25]; P=0.048; 12 months: adjusted HR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.10-3.16]; P=0.021). The results from the propensity score-matched analyses were consistent with those from the Cox proportional hazards analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with moderate-intensity statin therapy, high-dose statin therapy may not decrease the risk of mild, noncardiogenic ischemic stroke recurrence but may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage.

REGISTRATION

URL: www.chictr.org.cn/. Unique Identifier: ChiCTR1900025214.

P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor for Antiaggregant Therapies: From Molecular Pathway to Clinical Application

Platelets play a significant role in hemostasis, forming plugs at sites of vascular injury to limit blood loss. However, if platelet activation is not controlled, it can lead to thrombotic events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke. To prevent this, antiplatelet agents are used in clinical settings to limit platelet activation in patients at risk of arterial thrombotic events. However, their use can be associated with a significant risk of bleeding. An enhanced comprehension of platelet signaling mechanisms should facilitate the identification of safer targets for antiplatelet therapy. Over the past decade, our comprehension of the breadth and intricacy of signaling pathways that orchestrate platelet activation has expanded exponentially. Several recent studies have provided further insight into the regulation of platelet signaling events and identified novel targets against which to develop novel antiplatelet agents. Antiplatelet drugs are essential in managing atherothrombotic vascular disease. The current antiplatelet therapy in clinical practice is limited in terms of safety and efficacy. Novel compounds have been developed in response to patient variability and resistance to aspirin and/or clopidogrel. Recent studies based on randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews have definitively demonstrated the role of antiplatelet therapy in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. Antiplatelet therapy is the recommended course of action for patients with established atherosclerosis. These studies compared monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor versus aspirin for secondary prevention. However, in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, it is still unclear whether the efficacy of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy depends on the type of P2Y12 inhibitor. This paper focuses on the advanced-stage evaluation of several promising antiplatelet drugs.

A disproportionality analysis of adverse events caused by GnRHas from the FAERS and JADER databases

Background

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHas) play a significant role in addressing gynecological diseases, central precocious puberty, and cancer. However, ensuring the safety of GnRHas in real-world applications requires continuous vigilance. In light of this, we undertook a disproportionality analysis focused on adverse events (AEs) associated with GnRHas using data from both the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER). We evaluated GnRHas-associated AEs and characterized the clinical priority of unlisted AEs caused by each GnRHa from the different databases.

Methods

In the disproportionality analysis, we applied two adjusted algorithms to identify signals related to GnRHas in the FAERS and JADER databases from 2004 to 2023. Additionally, we utilized the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 9.4) to examine potential and high-aROR (adjusted reporting odds ratio) signals associated with GnRHas. We performed clinical priority assessment for suspicious PTs and an analysis of serious/non-serious outcomes. We also gathered information on the onset times of AEs linked with GnRHas from both databases.

Results

From January 2004 to September 2023, FAERS and JADER recorded a total of 50,360,413 and 1,440,200 AEs, respectively. Employing two algorithms, the suspicious preferred terms (PTs) related to leuprolide (Leu) were 562 potential PTs (44 unlisted in specifications), followed by goserelin (Gos) with 189 PTs (28 unlisted), triptorelin (Tri) with 172 PTs (28 unlisted), and Leu-JADER with 85 PTs (10 unlisted). At the same PT level, the differences in GnRHas between the two databases were observed, such as cardiac failure, diabetes mellitus, liver disorder, dementia, suicidal ideation, interstitial lung disease, urinary disorders, and hypertensive crisis. In an analysis of serious vs. non-serious outcomes, a total of 43 AEs of Leu were more likely to be reported as serious AEs with p < 0.05 (such as asthenia, urinary retention, diabetes mellitus, interstitial lung disease, gait disturbance, and so on), following by Tri (6 AEs), and Gos (4 AEs). Based on the clinical priority score, 41 PTs of Leu, 26 PTs of Tri, 24 PTs of Gos, and 8 PTs of Leu-JADER were graded as weak. There were 3 PTs of Leu, 2 PTs of Tri, 4 PTs of Gos, and 2 PTs of Leu-JADER that were graded as moderate. Notably, in the assessment of the relevant evidence, 2 PTs (loss of libido and urinary tract toxicity caused by Leu), 1 PT (electrolyte imbalance caused by Tri), and 2 PTs (anorexia and suicidal ideation caused by Gos) showed a strong level of evidence with "++." The differences in the signal strength of the same PTs from two databases were also worth noting. Moreover, the median onset time for GnRHas (Leu, Tri, and Gos) was 23 days (0, 298), 22 days (0, 181), and 217 days (29, 706), respectively, as median (Q1, Q3).

Conclusion

An examination of two databases revealed suspicious AEs associated with GnRHas. Our study found potential new AE signals of GnRHas and supported continuous clinical monitoring, pharmacovigilance, regional differences, and further studies of GnRHas.

Race and ethnicity reporting and representation in hemophilia clinical trials

ABSTRACT

Racial and ethnic representativeness in clinical trials is crucial to mitigate disparities in outcomes; however, diversity among hemophilia trials is unknown. The aim of this study is to examine the reporting and representation of race and ethnicity in trials of people with hemophilia (PwH). In this cross-sectional study, the ClinicalTrials.gov database was queried in April 2023 for interventional clinical trials involving PwH between 2007 and 2022. The distribution of participants (observed) was compared with expected proportions based on US Hemophilia Treatment Center (HTC) and country-specific census data with observed-to-expected ratios (OERs). Of 129 trials included, 94.6% were industry sponsored, with a mean of 62 participants and mean age of 26.8 years. Overall, 52.0% (n = 66) of trials reported data on race and ethnicity, increasing from 13.9% in 2007-2012 to 22.5% in 2013-2016 to 100% in 2017-2022 (P = .001). Among these 66 trials, 65.8%, 22.8%, 5.1%, 3.9% of participants were White, Asian, Hispanic, and Black, respectively. OERs were 10% to 20% lower for White participants vs US HTC, and US, UK, and Canadian census populations and ∼75% lower for Black or Hispanic participants when compared with US HTC and US census population. OERs for Asian participants were 1.6 to 3 times higher than Canada, US, and UK census populations. The reporting of race and ethnicity in hemophilia trials has drastically improved; however, Black and Hispanic PwH remain especially underrepresented. To address these disparities, stakeholders across the clinical trial enterprise need to implement strategies to ensure equitable participation.

One-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation - The REIWA Region-Wide Registry

BACKGROUND

The safety and feasibility of using 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12inhibitor monotherapy for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with thin-strut biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) in daily clinical practice remain uncertain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The REIWA region-wide registry is a prospective study conducted in 1 PCI center and 9 local hospitals in northern Japan. A total of 1,202 patients who successfully underwent final PCI using BP-DES (Synergy: n=400; Ultimaster: n=401; Orsiro: n=401), were enrolled in the registry, and received 1-month DAPT followed by P2Y12inhibitor (prasugrel 3.75 mg/day or clopidogrel 75 mg/day) monotherapy. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular and bleeding events at 12 months, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis (ST), ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major or minor bleeding. Based on the results of a previous study, we set the performance goal at 5.0%. Over the 1-year follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 3.08% of patients, which was lower than the predefined performance goal (Pnon-inferiority<0.0001). Notably, definite ST occurred in only 1 patient (0.08%) within 1 year (at 258 days). No differences were observed in the primary endpoint between stent types.

CONCLUSIONS

The REIWA region-wide registry suggests that 1-month DAPT followed by P2Y12inhibitor monotherapy is safe and feasible for Japanese patients with BP-DES.

Is CYP2C Haplotype Relevant for Efficacy and Bleeding Risk in Clopidogrel-Treated Patients?

A recently discovered haplotype-CYP2C:TG-determines the ultrarapid metabolism of several CYP2C19 substrates. The platelet inhibitor clopidogrel requires CYP2C19-mediated activation: the risk of ischemic events is increased in patients with a poor (PM) or intermediate (IM) CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype (vs. normal, NM; rapid, RM; or ultrarapid, UM). We investigated whether the CYP2C:TG haplotype affected efficacy/bleeding risk in clopidogrel-treated patients. Adults (n = 283) treated with clopidogrel over 3-6 months were classified by CYP2C19 phenotype based on the CYP2C19*2*17 genotype, and based on the CYP2C19/CYP2C cluster genotype, and regarding carriage of the CYP2:TG haplotype, and were balanced on a number of covariates across the levels of phenotypes/haplotype carriage. Overall, 45 (15.9%) patients experienced ischemic events, and 49 (17.3%) experienced bleedings. By either classification, the incidence of ischemic events was similarly numerically higher in PM/IM patients (21.6%, 21.8%, respectively) than in mutually similar NM, RM, and UM patients (13.2-14.8%), whereas the incidence of bleeding events was numerically lower (13.1% vs. 16.6-20.5%). The incidence of ischemic events was similar in CYP2C:TG carries and non-carries (14.1% vs. 16.1%), whereas the incidence of bleedings appeared mildly lower in the former (14.9% vs. 20.1%). We observed no signal to suggest a major effect of the CYP2C19/CYP2C cluster genotype or CYP2C:TG haplotype on the clinical efficacy/safety of clopidogrel.

Impact of Society Guidelines on Trends in Use of Newer P2Y12 Inhibitors for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, major society guidelines have recommended the use of newer P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel for those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. It is unclear what impact these recommendations had on clinical practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All percutaneous coronary intervention procedures (n=534 210) for acute coronary syndrome in England and Wales (April 1, 2010, to March 31, 2022) were retrospectively analyzed, stratified by choice of preprocedural P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and prasugrel). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine odds ratios of receipt of ticagrelor and prasugrel (versus clopidogrel) over time, and predictors of their receipt. Overall, there was a significant increase in receipt of newer P2Y12 inhibitors from 2010 to 2020 (2022 versus 2010: ticagrelor odds ratio, 8.12 [95% CI, 7.67-8.60]; prasugrel odds ratio, 6.14 [95% CI, 5.53-6.81]), more so in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction than non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome indication. The most significant increase in odds of receipt of prasugrel was observed between 2020 and 2022 (P<0.001), following a decline/plateau in its use in earlier years (2011-2019). In contrast, the odds of receipt of ticagrelor significantly increased in earlier years (2012-2017, Ptrend<0.001), after which the trend was stable (Ptrend=0.093).

CONCLUSIONS

Over a 13-year-period, there has been a significant increase in use of newer P2Y12 inhibitors, although uptake of prasugrel use remained significantly lower than ticagrelor. Earlier society guidelines (pre-2017) were associated with the highest rates of ticagrelor use for non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction cases while the ISAR-REACT 5 (Prospective, Randomized Trial of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial and later society guidelines were associated with higher prasugrel use, mainly for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction indication.

Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis

Importance

Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it remains unclear whether the treatment efficacy of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) depends on the type of P2Y12 inhibitor.

Objective

To assess the risks and benefits of ticagrelor monotherapy or clopidogrel monotherapy compared with standard DAPT after PCI.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, Embase, TCTMD, and the European Society of Cardiology website were searched from inception to September 10, 2023, without language restriction.

Study Selection

Included studies were randomized clinical trials comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with DAPT on adjudicated end points in patients without indication to oral anticoagulation undergoing PCI.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Patient-level data provided by each trial were synthesized into a pooled dataset and analyzed using a 1-step mixed-effects model. The study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Individual Participant Data.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary objective was to determine noninferiority of ticagrelor or clopidogrel monotherapy vs DAPT on the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke in the per-protocol analysis with a 1.15 margin for the hazard ratio (HR). Key secondary end points were major bleeding and net adverse clinical events (NACE), including the primary end point and major bleeding.

Results

Analyses included 6 randomized trials including 25 960 patients undergoing PCI, of whom 24 394 patients (12 403 patients receiving DAPT; 8292 patients receiving ticagrelor monotherapy; 3654 patients receiving clopidogrel monotherapy; 45 patients receiving prasugrel monotherapy) were retained in the per-protocol analysis. Trials of ticagrelor monotherapy were conducted in Asia, Europe, and North America; trials of clopidogrel monotherapy were all conducted in Asia. Ticagrelor was noninferior to DAPT for the primary end point (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.06; P for noninferiority = .004), but clopidogrel was not noninferior (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.01-1.87; P for noninferiority > .99), with this finding driven by noncardiovascular death. The risk of major bleeding was lower with both ticagrelor (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.36-0.62; P < .001) and clopidogrel monotherapy (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.81; P = .006; P for interaction = 0.88). NACE were lower with ticagrelor (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.86, P < .001) but not with clopidogrel monotherapy (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78-1.28; P = .99; P for interaction = .04).

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that ticagrelor monotherapy was noninferior to DAPT for all-cause death, MI, or stroke and superior for major bleeding and NACE. Clopidogrel monotherapy was similarly associated with reduced bleeding but was not noninferior to DAPT for all-cause death, MI, or stroke, largely because of risk observed in 1 trial that exclusively included East Asian patients and a hazard that was driven by an excess of noncardiovascular death.

Comparing the Real-World and Clinical Trial Bleeding Rates Associated with Oral Anticoagulation Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation

Background The prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) involves the use of oral anticoagulation, commonly in the form of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). However, it comes with an increased risk of bleeding, and therefore, counselling patients on their individual risks is important. Although the majority of patients initiated on DOACs have been represented within the clinical trials, some cohorts are under-represented in whom clinicians cannot practice evidence-based medicine. Methods Utilising the pooled clinical trial (CT) data sourced from Medidata Enterprise Data Store, five recent open-label industry-sponsored AF trials were compared with real-world data (RWD) sourced from the HealthVerity™ Marketplace with the occurrence of bleeding events as the primary outcome of interest. Results A total of 64,421 patients were included in the analysis, with 3207 patients from the clinical DOAC trials and 61,214 patients from the RWD cohort. Overall, the patients from the RWD cohort had more co-morbidities, were older (72.2 ± 11.9 vs. 65.3 ± 10.7 years old, p < 0.001), had higher mean CHA2DS2VASc (3.98 ± 1.9 vs. 2.87 ± 1.73, p < 0.001), and HAD-BLED scores (2.13 ± 1.02 vs. 1/04 ± 0.93, p < 0.001) when compared to the trial data. When comparing the incidence of the first major bleed at 12 months post-treatment initiation, rates in the RWD cohort were significantly higher (10.69 vs. 18.97 per 100 person-years). The impact of co-morbidities such as age, CHA2DS2VASc, and HAD-BLED scores was similar in both cohorts; however, there was an under-representation of older females and more co-morbid patients within the clinical trial cohort. Conclusions DOAC-treated patients have a higher bleeding incidence rate in the RWD cohort than in clinical trials. This can be explained by the older patient age group with more complex medical h istories and higher HAS-BLED scores. The under-representation of higher-risk patients and lower proportion of females within clinical trials should be addressed to better translate clinical trial data into real-world clinical practice.

Correlation between Metabolic Parameters and Warfarin Dose in Patients with Heart Valve Replacement of Different Genotypes

Background

Warfarin has become the first choice for anticoagulation in patients who need lifelong anticoagulation due to its clinical efficacy and low price. However, the anticoagulant effect of warfarin is affected by many drugs, foods, etc. accompanied by a high risk of bleeding and embolism. The Vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1) and Cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) genotypic variation can influence the therapeutic dose of warfarin. However, it is not clear whether there is a correlation between warfarin dose and liver function, kidney function and metabolic markers such as uric acid (UA) in patients with different genotypes. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study to evaluate the factors affecting warfarin dose and to establish a dose conversion model for warfarin patients undergoing heart valve replacement.

Methods

We studied 343 patients with a mechanical heart valve replacement, compared the doses of warfarin in patients with different warfarin-related genotypes (CYP2C9 and VKORC1), and analyzed the correlation between liver function, kidney function, UA and other metabolic markers and warfarin dose in patients with different genotypes following heart valve replacement.

Results

Genotype analysis showed that 72.01% of patients had CYP2C9*1/*1 and VKORC1 mutant AA genotypes. Univariate regression analysis revealed that the warfarin maintenance dose was significantly correlated with gender, age, body surface area (BSA), UA and genotype. There was no correlation with liver or kidney function. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that BSA, genotype and UA were the independent factors influencing warfarin dose.

Conclusions

There is a significant correlation between UA content and warfarin dose in patients with heart valve replacement genotypes CYP2C9*1/*1/VKORC1(GA+GG), CYP2C9*1/*1/VKORC1AA and CYP2C9*1/*1/VKORC1AA.

The Impact of CYP2C19 Genotype on the Platelet Reactivity Index (PRI) among Chronic Coronary Syndromes (CCS) Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): Affectability of Rapid Genetic Testing

BACKGROUND

In the Asian population, the presence of the CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) allele is a known genetic variation. This allele is associated with a reduced capacity to metabolize clopidogrel into its active forms through the CYP2C19 enzyme, resulting in diminished platelet inhibition and an elevated risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Regulatory authorities have recommended an alternative P2Y12 inhibitor, ticagrelor, for individuals carrying the LOF allele. Consequently, this study seeks to assess the impact of the CYP2C19 genotype on the Platelet reactivity index (PRI) using a rapid genetic testing approach in Asian patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

This prospective study employed a parallel design, single-center design, and randomized approach. Genotyping for the CYP2C19*2 and *3 polymorphisms was conducted using the Nested Allele-Specific Multiplex PCR (NASM-PCR) technique. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria underwent genotyping for CYP2C19 polymorphisms. Following PCI, patients were randomly assigned to receive either ticagrelor or clopidogrel. PRI assessments were performed four hours after loading dose administration. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05516784.

RESULTS

Among the 94 patients recruited for the study, 40 (42.55%) were identified as carriers of the LOF allele for CYP2C19*2 and *3 (*1/*2, *2/*2, *1/*3). Out of the 84 patients evaluated for PRI (44 receiving clopidogrel and 40 receiving ticagrelor), 21 (47.7%) of the clopidogrel group and 39 (97.5%) of the ticagrelor group exhibited a favorable response to antiplatelet therapy (PRI < 50). Patients treated with ticagrelor demonstrated superior antiplatelet responses compared to those receiving clopidogrel, regardless of LOF carrier status (P = 0.005 and < 0.001 for non-LOF and LOF carriers, respectively).

CONCLUSION

NASM-PCR as a rapid genetic test holds promise for personalizing antiplatelet therapy in Asian CCS patients.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Low Body Weight Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) agents are established as the anticoagulation strategy of choice for a variety of clinical risks. Despite this, uncertainty still exists with regard to their efficacy and safety for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in some patient populations; most notably those with low body weight (LBW) (<60 kg or body mass index [BMI] <18 kg/m2). Currently, there is a paucity of trial and non-trial data to support a prescriptive recommendation for their use in these patient cohorts. We have carried out a pooled systematic review of the most up to date published data of patients stabilized on various DOAC analogs with the view to ascertaining the exact matrices of their efficacy and safety in these cohorts of patients.

METHODS

We initially carried out a comprehensive search of databases from inception to June 2023 for eligible studies exploring the efficacy and safety of various analogs of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation who had low body weight. Databases accessed include PubMed, EMBASE, the Science Citation Index, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness. We carried out a weighted comparison of derived pooled odd ratios (with their corresponding confidence intervals) of mortality outcomes between various DOACs using the random effects model.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (n = 165,205 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. DOAC analogs were associated with increased stroke-related events, composite outcome, and mortality in low body weight patients compared to non-low body weight patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.92), (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.29-1.86), (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.87-4.58), respectively. There was no significant difference in the safety outcome (major bleeding events) between the DOAC analogs (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.93-1.52).

DISCUSSION

In this meta-analytical review comprising both real-world and randomized controlled studies, the use of DOAC analogs in low body weight patients (body weight of <60 kg or BMI<18 kg/m2) with atrial fibrillation was associated with increased risks of stroke-related events, composite outcomes, and mortality compared to non-low body weight cohorts patients. At the same time, there was no significant difference in terms of major bleeding events. This finding has provided the first resolution of pervading uncertainty surrounding the use of DOAC analogs in these patient cohorts and suggests the need for follow-up confirmatory systematic studies in this group of patients.

Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events Comparing East Asians With Westerners: A Meta-Analysis

Background

East Asians have shown different risk profiles for both thrombophilia and bleeding than Western counterparts.

Objectives

The authors sought to evaluate the effect of low-dose aspirin for primary prevention between these populations.

Methods

We searched randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for intervention with low-dose aspirin (≤100 mg once daily) in participants without symptomatic cardiovascular disease until December 31, 2021. The number of events between the arms was extracted for analysis. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs) were analyzed in each population. Outcomes included a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage and major gastrointestinal bleeding).

Results

Two RCTs included 17,003 East Asians, and 9 RCTs had 117,467 Western participants. Aspirin treatment showed a similar effect in reducing the MACE rate (RR of East Asians: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.71-1.05; RR of Westerners: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85-0.95) (Pinteraction = 0.721). In contrast, the risk of major bleeding during aspirin vs control was greater in the East Asian population (RR: 2.48; 95% CI: 1.86-3.30) compared with the Western population (RR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.26-1.66) (Pinteraction = 0.001), which was driven by more frequent gastrointestinal bleeding (RR of East Asians: 3.29; 95% CI: 2.26-4.80 vs RR of Westerners: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.29-1.88) (Pinteraction < 0.001). The net RDs (RD of MACE plus RD of major bleeding) were 8.04 and 0.72 per 1,000 persons in East Asian and Western participants, indicating 124 and 1,389 of the net number needed to harm, respectively.

Conclusions

Low-dose aspirin for primary prevention in East Asians must be cautiously prescribed because of the increased risk of major bleeding relative to Western counterparts.

Racial Disparities and Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients Above 65 Years in America: A Systematic Review

This systematic review aims to examine the racial disparities and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in patients above 65 years in America. The review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines 2020 and includes a comprehensive search strategy, study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. The search strategy identified 10 relevant articles that were included in the review. The findings indicate that racial disparities exist in access to PCI, door-to-balloon (DTB) time, procedure utilization, and outcomes among elderly patients. African American and Hispanic patients were found to experience longer door-to-balloon time and lower rates of PCI utilization compared to White patients. Moreover, racial and ethnic minorities had worse clinical outcomes, including higher mortality rates and increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. The review also highlights the impact of Medicaid expansion on reducing disparities in access, treatment, and outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, limitations in data availability and representation of racial and ethnic minorities in clinical trials were identified. The discussion section provides a robust analysis of the findings, exploring potential underlying factors contributing to the observed disparities. The review concludes that addressing racial disparities in PCI outcomes among elderly patients is crucial for achieving equitable healthcare delivery and improving cardiovascular health outcomes in America.

Association between genetic predisposition and disease burden of stroke in China: a genetic epidemiological study

Background

Stroke ranks second worldwide and first in China as a leading cause of death and disability. It has a polygenic architecture and is influenced by environmental and lifestyle factors. However, it remains unknown as to whether and how much the genetic predisposition of stroke is associated with disease burden.

Methods

Allele frequency from the whole genome sequencing data in the Chinese Millionome Database of 141,418 individuals and trait-specific polygenic risk score models were applied to estimate the provincial genetic predisposition to stroke, stroke-related risk factors and stroke-related drug response. Disease burden including mortality, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), years of life lost(YLLs), years lived with disability (YLDs) and prevalence in China was collected from the Global Burden Disease study. The association between stroke genetic predisposition and the epidemiological burden was assessed and then quantified in both regression-based models and machine learning-based models at a provincial resolution.

Findings

Among the 30 administrative divisions in China, the genetic predisposition of stroke was characterized by a north-higher-than-south gradient (p < 0.0001). Genetic predisposition to stroke, blood pressure, body mass index, and alcohol use were strongly intercorrelated (rho >0.6; p < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction for each comparison). Genetic risk imposed an independent effect of approximately 1-6% on mortality, DALYs and YLLs.

Interpretation

The distribution pattern of stroke genetic predisposition is different at a macroscopic level, and it subtly but significantly impacts the epidemiological burden. Further research is warranted to identify the detailed aetiology and potential translation into public health measures.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Z191100006619106), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CAMS-I2M, 2023-I2M-1-001), the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-GSP-GG-17), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32000398, 32171441 to X.J.), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (2017A030306026 to X.J.), and National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2502402).

Efficacy of Warfarin Therapy Guided by Pharmacogenetics: A Real-world Investigation Among Han Taiwanese

PURPOSE

The anticoagulation activity of warfarin in populations with CYP2C9, VKORC1, and CYP4F2 variants differs between individuals and is correlated with poor international normalized ratio (INR) control. Pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin dosing has been successfully developed for patients with genetic variations in recent years. However, few real-world data have been used to investigate the INR and warfarin dosage and the time to target INR. This study examined the largest collection of genetic and clinical real-world data related to warfarin to provide further evidence supporting the benefits of pharmacogenetics in clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrieved a total of 69,610 INR-warfarin records after the index date from 2,613 patients in the China Medical University Hospital database between January 2003 and December 2019. Each INR reading was obtained from the latest laboratory data after the hospital visit date. Patients with a history of malignant neoplasms or pregnancy before the index date were excluded, as were patients without data on INR measurements after the fifth day of prescription, genetic information, or gender variables. The primary outcomes were the INR and warfarin dosage during days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84 after prescription. The secondary outcome was the time required to reach the INR ranges of 1.5 to 3.0 and >4.0.

FINDINGS

A total of 59,643 INR-warfarin records from 2188 patients were retrieved. The average INR was higher for homozygous carriers of the minor allele at CYP2C9 and VKORC1 during the first 7 days (1.83 [1.03] [CYP2C9*1] and 2.46 [1.44] [CYP2C9*3], P < 0.001; 1.39 [0.36] [rs9923231 G/G], 1.55 [0.79] [rs9923231 G/A], and 1.96 [1.13] [rs9923231 A/A], P < 0.001) than for the wild-type allele. These patients with variants required lower warfarin doses than those with the wild-type allele during the first 28 days. CYP4F2 variant patients seemed to require higher doses of warfarin than those in the wild-type group; however, no significant difference in the average INR was observed (1.95 [1.14] [homozygous V433 carriers], 1.78 [0.98] [heterozygous V433M carriers], and 1.66 [0.91] [homozygous M433 carriers], P = 0.016).

IMPLICATIONS

Our study indicates that genetic variants in the Han population may enhance warfarin responsiveness, which holds clinical relevance. An increased warfarin dosage was not linked to a shorter time to therapeutic INR between CYP4F2 variant patients and those with a wild-type allele. Assessing CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genetic polymorphisms before initiating warfarin treatment in real-world practice is essential for potentially vulnerable patients and is likely to optimize therapeutic dosing.

Perspectives and Future Directions of Anticoagulant Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease Patients

Antiplatelet agents are routinely used to treat patients with chronic atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Treatment with the addition of a low dose of rivaroxaban as dual-pathway inhibition (DPI) decreases ischaemic events at the expense of increased bleeding. At present, the balance between thrombotic and bleeding risks must be carefully weighed up when considering DPI. However, with the introduction of activated coagulation factor XI inhibitors, which have fewer bleeding effects, the use of DPI in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases could be extended.

Negative findings but positive contributions in cardiovascular research

Researchers have always concluded that results that do not support the hypothesis as unimportant, unworthy, or simply not good enough for publication. However, negative findings are essential for the progress of science and its self-correcting nature. We also believe in the importance and indispensability of negative results. Therefore, in this review, we discussed the factors contributing to the publication bias of negative results and the problems to assess the factuality and validity of negative results. Moreover, we emphasized the importance of reporting negative results in cardiovascular research, including treatments, and suggest that the negative results could clarify previously controversial topics in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and prompt the translation of research on precision cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment.

P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy is a feasible alternative treatment for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the modern era. Clinical trials have shown that it could lower the risk of bleeding complications without increased ischemic events as compared to standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, the efficacy and safety of this novel approach among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are controversial because they have a much higher risk for recurrent ischemic events. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this novel approach among patients with ACS. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with 12-month DAPT in ACS patients who underwent PCI with stent implantation. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other three websites were searched for data from the earliest report to July 2022. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke. The primary safety outcome was major or minor bleeding events. The secondary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of major bleeding and adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Five randomized controlled trials with a total of 21,034 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The quantitative analysis showed a significant reduction in major or minor bleeding events in patients treated with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy as compared with standard DAPT(OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.46-0.75, p < 0.0001) without increasing the risk of MACCE (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.86-1.13, p = 0.82). The NACE was favorable in the patients treated with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73-0.93, p = 0.002). Of note, the overall clinical benefit of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was quite different between ticagrelor and clopidogrel. The incidence of NACE was significantly lower in ticagrelor monotherapy as compared with DAPT (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.91), but not in clopidogrel monotherapy (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.79-1.63). Both clopidogrel and ticagrelor monotherapy showed a similar reduction in bleeding complications (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.22-0.94; OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44-0.83, respectively). Although statistically insignificant, the incidence of MACCE was numerically higher in clopidogrel monotherapy as compared with standard DAPT (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.99-2.28, p = 0.06). Based on these findings, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with ticagrelor would be a better choice of medical treatment for ACS patients after PCI with stent implantation in the current era.