Impact of empagliflozin on decongestion in acute heart failure: the EMPULSE trial

Heart Failure in Older Patients: An Update

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome with high incidence and prevalence and high morbidity and death rate, even in the short term, representing a serious public health issue, mainly in older people. It is a growing cause for hospital admission in this age group, being frequently associated with several comorbidities, further aggravating the disease's course. Moreover, older HF patients are usually affected by clinical conditions, like frailty, malnutrition, and cachexia, which significantly impact the overall management of HF and need to be properly identified and treated. Diagnosing and managing HF in older patients may be very complicated and challenging. Although specific data on treatment of both acute and chronic HF in older subjects are limited and mainly extrapolated from large-scale clinical trials, the standard pharmacological management may be considered well-tolerated and generally safe. In any case, a personalized and tailored approach is mandatory and is based on severity of comorbidities, overall status, and prognosis, above all in frailer and more comorbid subjects, due to the higher rate of drug interactions, side effects, and therapy discontinuation in this population. In this scenario, palliative care has become a fundamental part of HF management in the elderly in order to improve their care and the quality of life. Moreover, an increasing number of promising pharmacological options deserve further investigation in order to support clinicians in optimizing management of comorbid and frailer patients. In this work, we provide detailed and updated insight into clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic features of both acute and chronic HF in the older population.

The Role of SGLT2-Inhibitors Across All Stages of Heart Failure and Mechanisms of Early Clinical Benefit: From Prevention to Advanced Heart Failure

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), initially developed as antihyperglycemic agents, have revolutionized heart failure (HF) management, offering substantial benefits across all stages and phenotypes of the disease. Regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), these agents have proven efficacy in both chronic and acute HF presentations. This review explores SGLT2i applications spanning the HF continuum, from early stages (Stage A) in at-risk individuals to the mitigation of progression in advanced HF (Stage D). Evidence from numerous trials has shown that SGLT2i significantly lower rates of HF hospitalization, improve renal function, and decreases cardiovascular mortality, highlighting their multifaced mechanisms of action in HF care. This review also highlights the potential mechanisms by which SGLT2i exert their beneficial effects on the cardiovascular and renal systems, each contributing to early and sustained clinical improvements. However, the integration of SGLT2i into guideline-directed medical therapy poses practical challenges, including initiation timing, dosing, and monitoring, which are addressed to support effective treatment adaptation across patient populations. Ultimately, this review provides a comprehensive assessment of SGLT2i as a foundational therapy in HF, emphasizing their role as an intervention across multiple stages aimed at improving outcomes across the entire HF spectrum.

Navigating Cardiovascular Events in Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Complications and Risk Assessment Strategies

Cardiovascular complications following non-cardiac surgery pose a significant global concern, affecting millions of patients annually. These complications, ranging from asymptomatic troponin elevations to major adverse cardiac events, contribute to heightened morbidity, mortality, and health care expenditures. The underlying mechanisms involve oxygen supply-demand imbalances and acute coronary syndromes precipitated by perioperative stressors. High-risk surgeries, including vascular and major abdominal procedures, are particularly susceptible to these complications. Risk assessment tools and biomarkers, especially high-sensitivity cardiac troponins, play pivotal roles in prognostication. However, despite advances in perioperative care, optimal management strategies remain elusive, as underscored by conflicting guidelines regarding interventions such as β-blockers and statins. This review aims to consolidate current evidence on cardiovascular complications following non-cardiac surgery, evaluate the utility of biomarkers, and discuss international guidelines for risk mitigation. An enhanced understanding regarding the standardized approaches is imperative in mitigating these complications effectively. Further research is essential to refine risk prediction models, validate biomarker thresholds, and elucidate the efficacy of preventive measures. Addressing these challenges can eventually lead to improved patient outcomes and more efficient healthcare resource utilization worldwide.

Could SGLT2 inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with heart failure and significant valvular heart disease? Need for action

Delivering valvular intervention for all eligible patients with valvular heart disease (VHD) in a timely manner remains a challenge. Therefore, a high number of patients with heart failure (HF) and VHD receive pharmacotherapy while awaiting intervention or as destination therapy if they are deemed inoperable. The sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are recommended with a class I indication for patients with chronic HF throughout the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. However, all randomized trials of SGLT2i in HF patients have consistently excluded patients with significant VHD. Considering the proven benefit of SGLT2i for stable outpatients and acutely hospitalized patients with HF, SGLT2i could potentially be used for patients with HF secondary to significant VHD. This article highlights the unmet need to produce robust clinical evidence for the pharmacological management of patients with HF and significant VHD while summarizing the potential benefit from SGLT2i in the management of these patients.

Low blood pressure and the effect of empagliflozin in acute heart failure: An EMPULSE analysis

AIMS

Empagliflozin improves outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF). Patients with AHF and low blood pressure (BP) have poor prognosis. Whether empagliflozin is effective and safe in patients with AHF and low BP is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin (vs. placebo) in patients with low BP - either systolic BP (SBP) <110 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) <70 mmHg - at randomization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

EMPULSE included 530 patients with AHF followed for 90 days. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality, HF events, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score changes at 90 days tested using the win ratio (WR). Patients were required to have SBP ≥100 mmHg for randomization. A total of 131 (25%) patients had SBP <110 mmHg and 190 (36%) DBP <70 mmHg. In placebo, low BP was associated with more clinical and adverse events. Compared to placebo, BP changes with empagliflozin were of small magnitude (-2 to 2 mmHg), not reaching statistical significance. Patients presenting with low BP increased their BP, on average, throughout the 90-day follow-up, regardless of treatment group. Empagliflozin (vs. placebo) improved clinical outcomes regardless of BP at randomization, potentially with a larger magnitude of effect in patients presenting with low DBP at randomization: primary outcome WR = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.90, p = 0.0025; WR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.94-1.60 in DBP ≥70 mmHg and WR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.46-3.04 in DBP < 70 mmHg (interaction p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients admitted for AHF with low BP had a higher risk of clinical events. Empagliflozin did not lower BP more than placebo and was effective and safe irrespective of BP. Empagliflozin should be considered for the treatment of AHF patients even when presenting with low BP.

Worsening heart failure: progress, pitfalls, and perspectives

For most patients with chronic heart failure (HF), the clinical course of the disease includes periods of apparent clinical stability punctuated by episodes of clinical deterioration with worsening signs and symptoms, a condition referred to as worsening heart failure (WHF). Over time, episodes of WHF may become more frequent, and patients may enter a cycle of recurrent events associated with deterioration in their quality of life and functional capacity, hospitalizations, and ultimately death. WHF is apparently an old concept but seems to have acquired new boundaries in terms of definition and clinical and prognostic value due to the fast-paced evolution of the HF treatment landscape and the emergence of new drugs in this setting. As a result, the management of WHF is being reshaped. In the present paper, a group of HF experts gathered to discuss the concept, prevention, detection, and treatment of WHF.

Acute Heart Failure: Transitioning From Symptom-Based Care to Remission

During the past century, the characteristics of patients with heart failure (HF) and acute HF (AHF) have shifted from patients with severe pump failure due to rheumatic, hypertensive and ischemic heart disease to older and more obese patients with multiple severe comorbidities. The pathophysiology of AHF has shifted, in parallel, from that of advanced, end-stage pump failure caused by severe left ventricular dysfunction to age, obesity and comorbidity-related cardiovascular dysfunction combined with neurohormonal and inflammatory dysregulation or "inflammaging." With the advent of neurohormonal blockers leading to improved outcomes of patients with chronic HF, the focus of AHF therapy has also changed from care directed at early symptom improvement to therapies directed toward longer-term improvements in quality of life and outcomes. Studies conducted in the past 5 years suggest that the beneficial effects seen with the 4 pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy for HF, mostly comprising neurohormonal blockade, can be extended to AHF when these therapies are initiated and rapidly uptitrated during admission and after discharge. A recent pilot study, CORTAHF (Effect of Short-Term Prednisone Therapy on CRP Change in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Elevated Inflammatory Markers), has suggested that these benefits can be extended by treating patients with AHF and markers of inflammatory activation with anti-inflammatory therapies. Future studies should further examine whether combined anti-inflammatory therapy and neurohormonal blockade can lead to the reversal of disrupted underlying pathophysiology and remission in patients with AHF.

Screening and management of hospital hyperglycemia in non-critical patients: a position statement from the Brazilian Diabetes Society (SBD)

BACKGROUND

Hospital Hyperglycemia (HH) is linked to poorer outcomes, including higher mortality rates, increased ICU admissions, and extended hospital stays, and occurs in both people living with diabetes or not. The prevalence of HH in non-critical patients ranges from 22 to 46%. This panel reviewed the evidence and made recommendations for the best care for hospitalized hyperglycemic patients, with or without diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

The methodology was published previously and was defined by the internal institutional steering committee. The SBD Acute and Hospital Complications Department drafted the manuscript, selecting key clinical questions for a narrative review using MEDLINE via PubMed. The best available evidence was reviewed, including randomized clinical trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and high-quality observational studies related to Hospital Hyperglycemia.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The department members and external experts developed 23 recommendations for the management of patients with HH, including screening, initial interventions, treatment adjustments, and care for potential complications. Based on the best available evidence, our article provides safe and effective management strategies for both public and private healthcare settings.

Burst steroid therapy and quality of life in patients with acute heart failure: Insights from the CORTAHF trial

AIMS

Patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF) treated with a 7 day prednisone course in the CORTAHF pilot trial had a greater improvement in health-related quality of life (QoL) at Day 7 in both the overall population and in patients with baseline interleukin 6 > 13 pg/mL. This post-hoc analysis examines the specific QoL domains and the relationship between clinical signs of congestion and QoL.

METHODS

In the CORTAHF pilot trial, patients with AHF and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) > 20 mg/L were randomized 1:1 to once-daily oral 40 mg prednisone for 7 days plus usual care or usual care alone. Patients completed the EQ-5D-5L, including the EQ-VAS, at baseline and Days 7 and 31. We estimated baseline-adjusted treatment effects on each of the five QoL dimensions and evaluated the interaction between baseline EQ-VAS and treatment effect on hsCRP change at Day 7 (the primary endpoint). The correlation between changes in signs of congestion and EQ-VAS were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 100 randomized patients, the improvement in QoL at Day 7 was driven by significant effects on the EQ-5D-5L mobility [win odds 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.12] and usual activities (win odds 1.50, 95% CI 1.05-2.20) domains. The treatment effect on 7 day hsCRP change was independent of baseline EQ-VAS (interaction P = 0.13). Decongestion and EQ-VAS improvement were correlated (r = -0.528, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AHF and high hsCRP levels, 7 day burst steroid therapy improved QoL mostly by affecting the mobility and usual activities domains. QoL improvement was correlated with decongestion and may therefore not be a direct effect of steroid therapy, but mediated through improvement in HF symptoms and signs. Inflammatory activation was reduced by prednisone irrespective of baseline EQ-VAS.

Counteracting the Mechanisms of Heart Failure is the Most Effective Way to Decongest Patients while Improving Outcomes

Diuretic therapy is not associated with improved outcomes in heart failure and may cause significant side effects. Counteracting the core pathophysiological mechanisms of heart failure through neurohormonal blockade while reducing reliance on diuretics is potentially the most effective method of decongestion.

From Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome to Cardiovascular-Renal-Hepatic-Metabolic Syndrome: Proposing an Expanded Framework

Cardiometabolic diseases represent an escalating global health crisis, slowing or even reversing earlier declines in cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Traditionally, conditions such as obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), atherosclerotic CVD, heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) were managed in isolation. However, emerging evidence reveals that these disorders share overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment strategies. In 2023, the American Heart Association proposed the Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) syndrome, recognizing the interconnected roles of the heart, kidneys, and metabolic system. Yet, this model omits the liver-a critical organ impacted by metabolic dysfunction. MASLD, which can progress to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), is closely tied to insulin resistance and obesity, contributing directly to cardiovascular and renal impairment. Notably, MASLD is bidirectionally associated with the development and progression of CKM syndrome. As a result, we introduce an expanded framework-the Cardiovascular-Renal-Hepatic-Metabolic (CRHM) syndrome-to more comprehensively capture the broader inter-organ dynamics. We provide guidance for an integrated diagnostic approach aimed at halting progression to advanced stages and preventing further organ damage. In addition, we highlight advances in medical management that target shared pathophysiological pathways, offering benefits across multiple organ systems. Viewing these conditions as an integrated whole, rather than as discrete entities, and incorporating the liver into this framework fosters a more holistic management strategy and offers a promising path to addressing the cardiometabolic pandemic.

2024 update in heart failure

In the last years, major progress has occurred in heart failure (HF) management. The 2023 ESC focused update of the 2021 HF guidelines introduced new key recommendations based on the results of the last years of science. First, two drugs, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), are recommended for the prevention of HF in patients with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Second, SGLT2 inhibitors are now recommended for the treatment of HF across the entire left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum. The benefits of quadruple therapy in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are well established. Its rapid and early up-titration along with a close follow-up with frequent clinical and laboratory re-assessment after an episode of acute HF (the so-called 'high-intensity care' strategy) was associated with better outcomes in the STRONG-HF trial. Patients experiencing an episode of worsening HF might require a fifth drug, vericiguat. In the STEP-HFpEF-DM and STEP-HFpEF trials, semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly administered for 1 year decreased body weight and significantly improved quality of life and the 6 min walk distance in obese patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with or without a history of diabetes. Further data on safety and efficacy, including also hard endpoints, are needed to support the addition of acetazolamide or hydrochlorothiazide to a standard diuretic regimen in patients hospitalized due to acute HF. In the meantime, PUSH-AHF supported the use of natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy. Further options and most recent evidence for the treatment of HF, including specific drugs for cardiomyopathies (i.e., mavacamten in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and tafamidis in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis), device therapies, cardiac contractility modulation and percutaneous treatment of valvulopathies, with the recent finding from the TRILUMINATE Pivotal trial, are also reviewed in this article.

Randomized trial to assess worsening renal function by adding dapagliflozin for acute decompensated heart failure

AIMS

Dapagliflozin (DAPA), a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, has been shown to reduce cardiovascular mortality among patients with chronic heart failure. We aimed to evaluate the impact on a worsening renal function (WRF) by adding DAPA as compared to standard decongestive therapy with loop diuretics alone.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 114 consecutive acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 50%. The patients were prospectively randomized to be assigned either to DAPA group who received DAPA at a dose of 10 mg once daily within 24 h after admission or conventional therapy group (CON group) who received loop diuretics alone. All patients were adjusted by increasing or decreasing the loop diuretic by 10 mg to maintain a 1-2 mL/kg/h urine output. The primary endpoint was the incidence of WRF, which was defined as an increase in the serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL from baseline. The median age of the patients was 77 [interquartile range (IQR): 64, 85] years, 35% were female and the median LVEF was 33 [IQR: 28, 38] %. There was no significant difference in the incidence of WRF between the two groups (16.1%, n = 9 vs. 12.1%, n = 7, P value = 0.54). The total dose of loop diuretics through day 7 was lower in the DAPA group than CON group (184 ± 79.5 mg vs. 214 ± 66.5 mg, P value = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized prospective trial revealed the addition of DAPA within 24 h after admission reduced the diuretic dose without WRF.

Continuous risk monitoring and management of heart failure: Rationale and design of the ALLEVIATE-HF trial

AIMS

Early identification and management of worsening heart failure (HF) is necessary to prevent disease progression and hospitalizations. The ALLEVIATE-HF (Algorithm Using LINQ Sensors for Evaluation and Treatment of Heart Failure) trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicentre trial that aims to assess the safety and efficacy of using the Reveal LINQ™ insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) in patients with HF to continuously monitor and evaluate HF risk status and guide timely interventions.

METHODS

The ICM algorithm uses parameters derived from electrocardiogram (atrial fibrillation [AF], ventricular rate during AF, heart rate variability, and night heart rate), three-axis accelerometer (patient activity duration), and subcutaneous bioimpedance (fluid volume, respiration rate). The trial will enroll ~760 patients with New York Heart Association class II or III HF with recent hospitalization for HF or needing intravenous diuretics in the outpatient setting or elevated natriuretic peptide levels, who do not have an implanted cardiac implantable electronic device or haemodynamic monitor. Patients are randomized to an observation or an intervention arm, where the latter will receive an intervention pathway with remote nurses implementing individualized pro re nata (PRN or 'as needed') 4-day medication interventions for acute volume management upon high risk. After 13 months of randomized follow-up, all patients enter an unblinded prolonged follow-up phase with PRN interventions upon high risk. The primary hierarchical composite endpoint for the study includes cardiovascular death, HF events, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score, and 6-min walk test distance.

CONCLUSION

ALLEVIATE-HF will evaluate how ICM-based HF management can impact the outcomes of patients with HF regardless of ejection fraction.

Therapeutic novelties in acute heart failure and practical perspectives

Acute Heart Failure (AHF) is a leading cause of death and represents the most frequent cause of unplanned hospital admission in patients older than 65 years. Since the past decade, several randomized clinical trials have highlighted the importance and pivotal role of certain therapeutics, including decongestion by the combination of loop diuretics, the need for rapid goal-directed medical therapies implementation before discharge, risk stratification, and early follow-up after discharge therapies. Cardiogenic shock, defined as sustained hypotension with tissue hypoperfusion due to low cardiac output and congestion, is the most severe form of AHF and mainly occurs after acute myocardial infarction, which can progress to multiple organ failure. Although its prevalence is relatively low, cardiogenic shock complicates 12% of acute myocardial infarction. After a brief summary of the epidemiology of AHF and cardiogenic shock, followed by key pathophysiological points, we detailed current treatments in AHF and cardiogenic shock what every anaesthesiologist and intensivist needs to know, based on the latest guidelines and randomized clinical trials published in recent years.

Integrated Management of Cardiovascular-Renal-Hepatic-Metabolic Syndrome: Expanding Roles of SGLT2is, GLP-1RAs, and GIP/GLP-1RAs

Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic syndrome, introduced by the American Heart Association in 2023, represents a complex and interconnected spectrum of diseases driven by shared pathophysiological mechanisms. However, this framework notably excludes the liver-an organ fundamental to metabolic regulation. Building on this concept, Cardiovascular-Renal-Hepatic-Metabolic (CRHM) syndrome incorporates the liver's pivotal role in this interconnected disease spectrum, particularly through its involvement via metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Despite the increasing prevalence of CRHM syndrome, unified management strategies remain insufficiently explored. This review addresses the following critical question: How can novel anti-diabetic agents, including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), and dual gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1RA, offer an integrated approach to managing CRHM syndrome beyond the boundaries of traditional specialties? By synthesizing evidence from landmark clinical trials, we highlight the paradigm-shifting potential of these therapies. SGLT2is, such as dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, have emerged as cornerstone guideline-directed treatments for heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), providing benefits that extend beyond glycemic control and are independent of diabetes status. GLP-1RAs, e.g., semaglutide, have transformed obesity management by enabling weight reductions exceeding 15% and improving outcomes in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), diabetic CKD, HF, and MASLD. Additionally, tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1RA, enables unprecedented weight loss (>20%), reduces diabetes risk by over 90%, and improves outcomes in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), MASLD, and obstructive sleep apnea. By moving beyond the traditional organ-specific approach, we propose a unified framework that integrates these agents into holistic management strategies for CRHM syndrome. This paradigm shift moves away from fragmented, organ-centric management toward a more unified approach, fostering collaboration across specialties and marking progress in precision cardiometabolic medicine.

Dietary sodium intake restriction in patients with heart failure: an overview of systematic reviews

This study aimed to identify, assess, and summarize systematic reviews on dietary sodium intake restrictions for patients with heart failure. Literature searches were conducted on Pubmed, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Wanfang Database up to January 2024. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed using the quality assessment tool from the Australian JBI Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (2016). The results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were synthesized and presented according to different outcome indicators. Nine systematic reviews were included in this study. The current evidence does not support the fact that dietary sodium intake restrictions for patients with heart failure have a positive impact on mortality rates, rehospitalization rates, and quality of life. Conversely, strict dietary sodium intake restrictions (≤ 2000 mg/day) may increase the risk of death, rehospitalization, and symptom exacerbation. Dietary sodium intake restriction may not have a positive impact on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. Nevertheless, more evidence is required to explore the differences in the impact of various levels of dietary sodium restriction on the outcomes and symptom management indicators of patients with heart failure.

Treatment strategies for diuretic resistance in patients with heart failure

Improving congestion with diuretic therapy is crucial in the treatment of heart failure (HF). However, despite the use of loop diuretics, diuresis may be inadequate and congestion persists, which is known as diuretic resistance. Diuretic resistance and residual congestion are associated with a higher risk of rehospitalization and mortality. Causes of diuretic resistance in HF include diuretic pharmacokinetic changes, renal hemodynamic perturbations, neurohumoral activations, renal tubular remodeling, and use of nephrotoxic drugs as well as patient comorbidities. Combination diuretic therapy (CDT) has been advocated for the treatment of diuretic resistance. Thiazides, acetazolamides, tolvaptan, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors are among the candidates, but none of these treatments has yet demonstrated significant diuretic efficacy or improved prognosis. At present, it is essential to identify and treat the causes of diuretic resistance in individual patients and to use CDT based on a better understanding of the characteristics of each drug to achieve adequate diuresis. Further research is needed to effectively assess and manage diuretic resistance and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Body Composition and Fluid Status in Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure

Background and Objectives: Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have emerged as integral therapeutic tools in the management of patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome. In addition to their well-documented effects on lowering glucose levels and cardiovascular- and reno-protective actions, SGLT-2 inhibitors, through a reduction in body weight (BW), generate changes in the body composition and volume status that have not been clearly studied. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, observational longitudinal cohort, single-center study analyzed and compared body composition and fluid status measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) from weeks 0 to 12 after the initiation of the cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program for coronary artery disease and heart failure in 59 patients who started treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2iG) and 112 patients without SGLT-2 inhibitors (non-SGLT-2iG). Results: Changes between the baseline and week 12 in the SGLT-2iG and non-SGLT-2iG were -0.3 L (p = 0.003) and -0.03 L (p = 0.82) in extracellular water (ECW) (p = 0.05), -0.39 L (p < 0.001) and -0.14 L (p = 0.33) in intracellular water (ICW) (p = 0.12), -0.69 (p < 0.001) and -0.16 (p = 0.52) in total body water (TBW) (p = 0.08), and -0.01 (p = 0.37) and -0.001 (p = 0.25) in the ECW/TBW ratio, respectively. After 3 months of exercise therapy in the CR program, patients in the SGLT-2iG showed a greater decrease than the non-SGLT-2iG in weight (-1.34 kg, p < 0.001 vs. -0.99, p = 0.02), body mass index (BMI) (-0.45 kg/m2, p < 0.001 vs. -0.38, p = 0.004), arm circumference (-0.57 cm, p = 0.008 vs. -0.12 cm, p = 0.21), waist circumference (-1.5 cm, p = 0.04 vs. -0.11 cm, p = 0.83), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-8.9 mmHg, p = 0.049 vs. -4.19, p = 0.08), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (-5.15, p = 0.03 vs. -2.85, p = 0.01). The bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) revealed a significant decrease in body fat mass (BFM) and visceral fat area, without a loss of lean body mass (LBM) or skeletal muscle mass in the SGLT-2iG. Conclusions: SGLT-2 inhibitors exert beneficial effects on body compartments and volume status. Although they induce modest weight loss, this appears to be mainly directed at ECW, BFM, and visceral fat, without a loss of LBM nor skeletal muscle mass, which could contribute to the observed CKM benefits.

Acute kidney injury in acute heart failure-when to worry and when not to worry?

Acute kidney injury is common in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. It is more common in patients with acute heart failure who suffer from chronic kidney disease. Worsening renal function is often defined as a rise in serum creatinine of more than 0.3 mg/dL (26.5 µmol/L) which, by definition, is acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 1. Perhaps the term AKI is more appropriate than worsening renal function as it is used universally by nephrologists, internists and other medical practitioners. In health, the heart and the kidney support each other to maintain the body's homeostasis. In disease, the heart and the kidney can adversely affect each other's function, causing further clinical deterioration. In patients presenting with acute heart failure and fluid overload, therapy with diuretics for decongestion often causes a rise in serum creatinine and AKI. However, in the longer term the decongestion improves survival and prevents hospital admissions despite rising serum creatinine and AKI. It is important to realize that renal venous congestion due to increased right-sided heart pressures in acute heart failure is a major cause of kidney dysfunction and hence decongestion therapy improves kidney function in the longer term. This review provides a perspective on the acceptable AKI with decongestion therapy, which is associated with improved survival, as opposed to AKI due to tubular injury related to sepsis or nephrotoxic drugs, which is associated with poor survival.

Impact of DPP-4 Inhibitors in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure: An In-Depth Review

The increasing prevalence of both type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure has underscored the urgent need for optimized therapeutic strategies that address the complex interplay between these conditions. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors have emerged as a popular class of glucose-lowering agents due to their favorable glycemic effects, safety profile, and potential cardiovascular benefits. However, the impact of DPP-4 inhibitors on heart failure outcomes in patients with diabetes remains contentious, with conflicting evidence from clinical trials and observational studies. This review critically examines current evidence on the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with coexisting diabetes and heart failure, focusing on pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy outcomes. We explore the physiological mechanisms by which DPP-4 inhibitors may influence heart failure risk, including modulation of inflammation, oxidative stress, and myocardial fibrosis. Clinical trials such as SAVOR-TIMI 53, EXAMINE, and TECOS are evaluated to provide a comprehensive analysis of DPP-4 inhibitors' effects on hospitalization for heart failure, mortality, and cardiovascular events in diabetic patients. While some trials suggest an increased risk of HF hospitalizations with specific DPP-4 inhibitors (e.g., saxagliptin), others report neutral effects, raising questions about the class effects versus individual drug characteristics within this group. Additionally, we address discrepancies in outcomes related to patient demographics, HF phenotype, and comorbid conditions that may influence DPP-4 inhibitors' risk-benefit profile. Comparative insights into alternative glucose-lowering therapies such as SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists are also provided, highlighting potential implications for treatment selection in this high-risk population. In summary, this review synthesizes available evidence on DPP-4 inhibitors' impact in diabetic patients with heart failure, aiming to guide clinicians in making informed therapeutic decisions. While DPP-4 inhibitors remain a viable option in diabetes management, caution is warranted in patients with advanced heart failure, and future research is essential to refine patient-specific guidelines.

Pharmacological management of heart failure: a patient-centred approach

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure (HF) is a global health challenge that requires a multidisciplinary approach. Despite recent advances in pharmacological and interventional therapy, morbidity and mortality in these patients remain high. For this reason, and because of its interplay with other cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases, HF represents a major area of research, with new trials being published every year and international guidelines constantly updated.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the current status and possible future developments in HF pharmacotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The treatment of HF has made significant advances in recent years, and the current recommendations are based on large outcome trials. This has led to significant reductions in both mortality and morbidity, but the death rate remains unacceptably high. In this context, a patient-centered approach that considers comorbidities and specific clinical scenarios when dosing HF medication is essential. Prevention of hospital admissions for cardiac decompensation is of utmost importance in patients with HF as is the enablement of activities of daily living, an endpoint which has only recently been incorporated into major HF trials.

Inferior vena CAVA and lung ultraSound-guided therapy in acute heart failure: A randomized pilot study (CAVAL US-AHF study)

BACKGROUND

The optimal assessment of systemic and lung decongestion during acute heart failure is not clearly defined. We evaluated whether inferior vena cava (IVC) and pulmonary ultrasound (CAVAL US) guided therapy is superior to standard care in reducing subclinical congestion at discharge in patients with AHF.

METHODS

CAVAL US-AHF was an investigator-initiated, single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. A daily quantitative ultrasound protocol using the 8-zone method was used and treatment was adjusted according to an algorithm. The primary endpoint was the presence of more than 5 B-lines and/or an increase in IVC diameter and collapsibility at discharge. And secondary endpoint exploratory outcome was the composite of readmission for HF, unplanned visit for worsening HF or death at 90 days RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomized to CAVAL US (n = 30) or control (n = 30). The primary endpoint was achieved in 4 patients (13.3%) in the CAVAL US group and 20 patients (66.6%) in the control group (P < .001). A significant reduction in HF readmission, unplanned visit for worsening HF or death at 90 days was seen in the CAVAL US group (13.3% vs 36.7%; log rank P = .038). Other endpoints such as NT-proBNP reduction at discharge showed a nonstatistically significant reduction in the CAVAL US group (48% IQR 27-67 vs 37% -3-59; P = .09). Safety outcomes were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

IVC and lung ultrasound-guided therapy in AHF patients significantly reduced subclinical congestion at discharge. CAVAL US-AHF provides preliminary evidence for the potential use of a simple technique to guide decongestive therapy during hospitalization for AHF, which may reduce the composite outcome at 90 days.

Contemporary treatment options in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitutes approximately half of the heart failure population, with its prevalence markedly increasing with older age and the presence of cardio-metabolic comorbidities. Although HFpEF is associated with a high symptom- and mortality burden, historically there have been few evidence-based treatment options for patients with HFpEF. Recent randomized clinical trials have expanded evidence on pharmacological treatment options, introducing new agents for managing HFpEF. Given the complex clinical phenotype with pathophysiological heterogeneity and evolving diagnostic standards, the evidence-based management of HFpEF remains challenging for clinicians. This review summarizes the latest evidence from contemporary randomized clinical trials and recent guideline recommendations to provide guidance for the treatment of patients with HFpEF.

Spot urine sodium-to-creatinine ratio surpasses sodium in identifying poor diuretic response in acute heart failure

AIMS

We aim to identify the most accurate marker for early prediction of poor diuretic response in acute heart failure (AHF) patients with signs of congestion requiring intravenous diuretic treatment.

METHODS

In this single-centre, prospective observational study, AHF patients with signs of congestion received a standardized intravenous furosemide dose (1 mg/kg of body weight; 40 mg in bolus and remaining dose in 2 h continuous infusion). Subsequently, we assessed spot urine composition at 2 h post-administration, comparing it with total urine output at 6 h. Various potential urine markers were analysed for predicting urine output using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression models. We investigated guideline-recommended markers, including spot urine sodium (UNa+) and its cut-off, and introduced the UNa+/UCr (urine creatinine concentration) ratio adjusting UNa+ for urine dilution.

RESULTS

Out of 111 patients (85% males, 66.4 ± 13.9 years old, NTproBNP 7290 [4493-14 582] pg/ml), there were 18 (16%) with a poor diuretic response (cumulative urine output <600 ml during the first 6 h). The mean 6 h cumulative diuresis in patients with poor and good diuretic response was 406 ± 142 and 2114 ± 1164 ml, respectively, P < 0.005. After an initial evaluation of several potential biomarkers, only UNa+, UCr and UNa+/UCr were selected as candidates with the highest predictive value. The cut-off for UNa+ adjusted for urine dilution: UNa+/UCr ratio <0.167 mmol/mg × 10-1 was determined by ROC analysis with the highest area under the curve (95% confidence interval): 0.956 (0.915-0.997), P < 0.001. When compared with the guideline-recommended cut-off (UNa+ <50 mmol/L as a reference, specificity-0.97; sensitivity-0.83), the odds ratio (OR) for UNa+/UCreat to identify a poor diuretic response was 2.5 times greater, regardless of kidney function (OR for estimated glomerular filtration rate in the logistic regression model was 0.978 [0.945-1.013, P = 0.222]).

CONCLUSIONS

The UNa+/UCr ratio in a spot urine sample 2 h after intravenous diuretic administration is a simple, highly predictive marker for the identification of AHF patients with poor diuretic response, surpassing guidelines-recommended markers like UNa+.

Assessing the Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Diuretic Therapy in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Heart failure remains a significant clinical challenge due to the difficulty in managing refractory fluid overload. Combination diuretic strategies, involving various combinations, such as metolazone and furosemide, have been proposed to improve diuresis and patient outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapies. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science identified 61 articles, of which seven randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Data on mortality, hospital readmission rates, symptom improvement, electrolyte imbalances, renal function, and adverse events were extracted and analysed. The risk of bias was assessed using the established guidelines. The analysis revealed that combination diuretic therapies significantly reduced body weight (P=0.001) but did not significantly impact mortality (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.90-1.09) or hospital readmission rates (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.98-1.12) compared to placebo. Adverse effects, particularly electrolyte imbalances, such as hypo and hypernatraemia and hypokalaemia, and renal function deterioration were noted in the combined diuretic group. In contrast, serious adverse events were observed more in the placebo group. The mean difference of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score was 2.43 (95% CI: 0.95-3.92). The risk ratio for hospital readmission was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98-1.12), which was statistically non-significant. We used fixed-effect models for most variables due to less heterogeneity between the studies, and the corresponding I2 values were <50% for most variables. Funnel plots indicated minimal publication bias, although some heterogeneity was observed. Comparisons with other studies in the literature, such as the DAPA-HF and EVEREST trials, supported these findings but also highlighted the need for individualised treatment approaches. Combination diuretic therapies effectively manage fluid overload and reduce body weight in patients with heart failure but do not significantly affect mortality or hospital readmission rates. The potential for adverse events, particularly electrolyte imbalances and renal function deterioration, underscores the need for careful monitoring and personalised treatment plans. Future research should focus on optimising diuretic combinations and dosing strategies to enhance their safety and efficacy. These findings align with the current guidelines emphasising individualised treatment in heart failure management and highlight the importance of integrating combination diuretics into a comprehensive care plan to improve patient outcomes.

Decongestion in acute heart failure: Is it time to change diuretic-centred paradigm?

Congestion is a common cause of clinical deterioration and the most common clinical presentation at admission in acute heart failure (HF). Therefore, finding effective and sustainable ways to alleviate congestion has become a crucial goal for treating HF patients. Congestion is a result of complex underlying pathophysiology; therefore, it is not a direct cause of the disease but its consequence. Any therapy that directly promotes sodium/water removal only, thus targeting only clinical symptoms, neither modifies the natural course of the disease nor improves prognosis. This review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current decongestive therapies and propose a new (not diuretic-centred) paradigm of long-term congestion management in HF that attempts to correct the underlying pathophysiology, thus improving congestion, preventing its development, and favourably altering the natural course of the disease rather than merely treating its symptoms.

The Effects of Burst Steroid Therapy on Short-term Decongestion in Acute Heart Failure Patients With Pro-inflammatory Activation: A Post Hoc Analysis of the CORTAHF Randomized, Open-label, Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND

The effect of steroids on congestion in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is not known.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with AHF, NT-proBNP levels > 1500 pg/mL and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels > 20 mg/L were randomized to once-daily oral 40 mg prednisone for 7 days or usual care. In this post hoc analysis, congestion score was calculated on the basis of orthopnea, edema and rales (0 reflecting lack of congestion, and 9 maximal congestion) at each time point. Among 100 eligible patients randomized, those assigned to prednisone had a greater improvement in congestion score at day 31 (win odds for the prednisone group compared to usual care at day 31 was 1.77 (95% CI 1.17-2.84; P = 0.0066) in all patients and 2.41 (95% CI 1.37-5.05; P = 0.0016) in patients with IL-6 > 13 pg/mL at baseline. In patients with congestion scores ≥ 7 at baseline, the effects of prednisone therapy on the EQ-5D visual analog scale score were 4.30 (95% CI 0.77-7.83) points at day 7 and 5.40 (0.51-10.29) points at day 31, accompanied by lower heart rate and respiratory rate and higher oxygen saturation compared to usual care.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AHF and inflammatory activation, 7-day steroid therapy was associated with reduction in signs of congestion up to day 31. These results need confirmation in larger studies examining potential effects of steroids on congestion, diuresis, fluid redistribution and vascular permeability as well as clinical effects in AHF.

Role of dietary sodium restriction in chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dietary sodium restriction remains a guidelines-approved lifestyle recommendation for chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. However, its efficacy in clinical outcome improvement is dubious.

OBJECTIVE

The study evaluated whether dietary sodium restriction in CHF reduces clinical events.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the following databases: Academic Search Ultimate, ERIC, Health Source Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane Library (trials) to find studies analysing the impact of sodium restriction in the adult CHF population. Both observational and interventional studies were included. Exclusion criteria included i.e.: sodium consumption assessment based only on natriuresis, in-hospital interventions or mixed interventions-e.g. sodium and fluid restriction in one arm only. The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed for the endpoints reported in at least 3 papers. Analyses were conducted in Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4.1.

RESULTS

Initially, we screened 9175 articles. Backward snowballing revealed 1050 additional articles. Eventually, 9 papers were evaluated in the meta-analysis. All-cause mortality, HF-related hospitalizations and the composite of mortality and hospitalisation were reported in 8, 6 and 3 articles, respectively. Sodium restriction was associated with a higher risk of the composite endpoint (OR 4.12 [95% CI 1.23-13.82]) and did not significantly affect the all-cause mortality (OR 1.38 [95% CI 0.76-2.49]) or HF hospitalisation (OR 1.63 [95% CI 0.69-3.88]).

CONCLUSIONS

In a meta-analysis, sodium restriction in CHF patients worsened the prognosis in terms of a composite of mortality and hospitalizations and did not influence all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisation rate.

High-intensity care for GDMT titration

Heart failure (HF) is a systemic disease associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, increased risk of hospitalizations, and low quality of life. Therefore, effective, systemic treatment strategies are necessary to mitigate these risks. In this manuscript, we emphasize the concept of high-intensity care to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in HF patients. The document highlights the importance of achieving optimal recommended doses of GDMT medications, including beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors to improve patient outcomes, achieve effective, sustainable decongestion, and improve patient quality of life. The document also discusses potential obstacles to GDMT optimization, such as clinical inertia, physiological limitations, comorbidities, non-adherence, and frailty. Lastly, it also attempts to provide possible future scenarios of high-intensive care that could improve patient outcomes.

Sotagliflozin: Efficacy, Safety, and Potential Therapeutic Applications in Heart Failure

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety evidence of sotagliflozin, the first approved dual inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 1 and SGLT2, in heart failure (HF) management.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of studies published between January 2012 and September 2023 were identified using PubMed, MEDLINE, and clinicaltrials.gov with search terms of "sotagliflozin," "Inpefa," or "LX4211."

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All available studies in English were considered. Studies were included if they investigated drug pharmacology, efficacy, or safety information.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Two phase 3 trials of sotagliflozin, SOLOIST-WHF and SCORED, evaluated sotagliflozin compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). SOLOIST-WHF reported a statistically decreased rate of cardiovascular and HF events with sotagliflozin (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52-0.85), while SCORED found a statistically significant decrease in incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients in the sotagliflozin group (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.63-0.88).

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON TO EXISTING AGENTS

While approval of sotagliflozin expands treatment options for patients with HF, the SGLT2 inhibitors, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, have more data supporting their use in HF, additional risk reduction benefits in patients with CKD, and approval for use in T2DM. Landmark trials of sotagliflozin required a previous diagnosis of T2DM, despite the broader approved indication. Where sotagliflozin will be adopted into the treatment of HF is unclear due to the evidence and benefits of already established SGLT2 inhibitors and the need for comparison with SGLT2 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Given the limitations of currently available evidence, including difficulty in fully interpreting the trial results due to changes in primary endpoints, not adjudicating the events, and not reaching the original power calculations, more investigation is warranted to determine the benefit of sotagliflozin compared with SGLT2 inhibitors.

Time from admission to randomization and the effect of empagliflozin in acute heart failure: A post-hoc analysis from EMPULSE

AIMS

Patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (HF) could be enrolled in EMPULSE (NCT04157751) upon haemodynamic stabilization and between 24 h and 5 days after hospital admission. The timing of treatment initiation may influence the efficacy and safety of drugs such as empagliflozin. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient characteristics, clinical events, and treatment effects according to time from admission to randomization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The EMPULSE population was dichotomized by median time from hospital admission to randomization (1-2 days vs. 3-5 days). The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite endpoint of time to all-cause death, number of HF events, time to first HF event, and a ≥5-point difference in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score change from baseline after 90 days, analysed using the win ratio (WR) method. Patients randomized later (3-5 days, average time 3.9 days; n = 312) had a higher risk of experiencing clinical events than patients randomized earlier (1-2 days, average time 1.7 days; n = 215). The treatment effect favoured empagliflozin versus placebo in patients randomized later (3-5 days: WR 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-2.25) but was attenuated in patients randomized earlier (1-2 days: WR 1.04, 95% CI 0.74-1.44) (interaction p = 0.029). A similar pattern was observed for the composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death and all-cause hospitalizations (interaction p < 0.1 for both). The reduction of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels was more pronounced with empagliflozin among patients randomized later than in patients randomized earlier (interaction p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients hospitalized for acute HF enrolled in EMPULSE, those randomized later after hospital admission (3-5 days) experienced greater clinical benefit with empagliflozin than those randomized earlier (1-2 days). These findings should be confirmed in future studies before clinical application.

From Hospital to Home: Evidence-Based Care for Worsening Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization in older adults. Patients are at high risk of readmission and death following hospitalization for HF. There is no standard approach of health care delivery during the hospital-to-home transition period, leaving missed opportunities in care optimization. In this review, we discuss contemporary randomized clinical trials that tested decongestion strategies, disease-modifying therapies, and health care services that inform the care of patients with worsening HF. We provide evidence-informed recommendations for optimizing therapies and improving outcomes during and following hospitalization for HF. These include adequate decongestion with loop diuretics and select sequential nephron blockade strategies based on early evaluation of diuretic response; initiation of disease-modifying pharmacotherapies prior to hospital discharge with close follow-up and optimization after discharge; cardiac rehabilitation; and transitional or palliative care referral post-hospitalization. Evidence-based implementation strategies to facilitate broad uptake include digital health tools and algorithm-driven optimization of pharmacotherapies.

Potential use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors during acute illness: a systematic review based on COVID-19

OBJECTIVE

SGLT-2i are increasingly recognized for their benefits in patients with cardiometabolic risk factors. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests potential applications in acute illnesses, including COVID-19. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of SGLT-2i in patients facing acute illness, particularly focusing on SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, medRxiv, Research Square, and Google Scholar identified 22 studies meeting inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently.

RESULTS

Out of the 22 studies included in the review, six reported reduced mortality in DM-2 patients taking SGLT-2i, while two found a decreased risk of hospitalization. Moreover, one study demonstrated a lower in-hospital mortality rate in DM-2 patients under combined therapy of metformin plus SGLT-2i. However, three studies showed a neutral effect on the risk of hospitalization. No increased risk of developing COVID-19 was associated with SGLT-2i use in DM-2 patients. Prior use of SGLT-2i was not associated with ICU admission and need for MV. The risk of acute kidney injury showed variability, with inconsistent evidence regarding diabetic ketoacidosis.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review reveals mixed findings on the efficacy of SGLT-2i use in COVID-19 patients with cardiometabolic risk factors. While some studies suggest potential benefits in reducing mortality and hospitalizations, others report inconclusive results. Further research is needed to clarify optimal usage and mitigate associated risks, emphasizing caution in clinical interpretation.

Combinational Diuretics in Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diuretics are the cornerstone therapy for acute heart failure (HF) and congestion. Patients chronically exposed to loop diuretics may develop diuretic resistance as a consequence of nephron remodelling, and the combination of diuretics will be necessary to improve diuretic response and achieve decongestion. This review integrates data from recent research and offers a practical approach to current pharmacologic therapies to manage congestion in HF with a focus on combinational therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Until recently, combined diuretic treatment was based on observational studies and expert opinion. Recent evidence from clinical trials has shown that combined diuretic treatment can be started earlier without escalating the doses of loop diuretics with an adequate safety profile. Diuretic combination is a promising strategy for overcoming diuretic resistance in HF. Further studies aiming to get more insights into the pathophysiology of diuretic resistance and large clinical trials confirming the safety and efficacy over standard diuretics regimens are warranted.

Effects of Rapid Uptitration of Neurohormonal Blockade on Effective, Sustainable Decongestion and Outcomes in STRONG-HF

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive uptitration of neurohormonal blockade targets fundamental mechanisms underlying development of congestion and may be an additional approach for decongestion after acute heart failure (AHF).

OBJECTIVES

This hypothesis was tested in the STRONG-HF (Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, Helped by N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Testing of Heart Failure Therapies) trial.

METHODS

In STRONG-HF, patients with AHF were randomized to the high-intensity care (HIC) arm with fast up-titration of neurohormonal blockade or to usual care (UC). Successful decongestion was defined as an absence of peripheral edema, pulmonary rales, and jugular venous pressure <6 cm.

RESULTS

At baseline, the same proportion of patients in both arms had successful decongestion (HIC 48% vs UC 46%; P = 0.52). At day 90, higher proportion of patients in the HIC arm (75%) experienced successful decongestion vs the UC arm (68%) (P = 0.0001). Each separate component of the congestion score was significantly better in the HIC arm (all, P < 0.05). Additional markers of decongestion also favored the HIC: weight reduction (adjusted mean difference: -1.36 kg; 95% CI: -1.92 to -0.79 kg), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level, and lower orthopnea severity (all, P < 0.001). More effective decongestion was achieved despite a lower mean daily dose of loop diuretics at day 90 in the HIC arm. Among patients with successful decongestion at baseline, those in the HIC arm had a significantly better chance of sustaining decongestion at day 90. Successful decongestion in all subjects was associated with a lower risk of 180-day HF readmission or all-cause death (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.27-0.59; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In STRONG-HF, intensive uptitration of neurohormonal blockade was associated with more efficient and sustained decongestion at day 90 and a lower risk of the primary endpoint.

Empagliflozin combined with sacubitril/valsartan in hypertensive patients with heart failure: a retrospective study of efficacy and effect on blood pressure variability and cardiac function

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of empagliflozin combined with sacubitril/valsartan in treating hypertensive patients with heart failure (HF), focusing on its effects on blood pressure variability (BPV) and cardiac function.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 101 patients with hypertension and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction treated at Baoji High-Tech Hospital from October 2021 to October 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: an observation group (n=51), treated with both empagliflozin and sacubitril/valsartan, and a control group (n=50), treated with sacubitril/valsartan alone. We compared the therapeutic effects, BPV (including 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic and diastolic BPV), cardiac function indicators, levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) before and after treatment, and the incidence of adverse reactions between the groups. Independent risk factors affecting treatment efficacy were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was significantly higher than in the control group (P<0.05). Both groups showed reductions in daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic BPV after treatment, with the observation group displaying more pronounced improvements (all P<0.05). Enhancements in cardiac ultrasound measurements, NT-proBNP levels, and cTnI levels were more significant in the observation group compared to the control group post-treatment (both P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions during treatment between the two groups (P>0.05). Age and comorbid diabetes were identified as independent risk factors for poor prognosis, while treatment with empagliflozin combined with sacubitril/valsartan was a protective factor.

CONCLUSION

Empagliflozin combined with sacubitril/valsartan significantly enhances treatment efficacy in hypertensive patients with heart failure, effectively improves cardiac function and BPV, and demonstrates good safety.

Update on evidence-based clinical application of sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors: Insight to uncommon cardiovascular disease scenarios in diabetes

In this paper, we concentrate on updating the clinical research on sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLTis) for patients with type 2 diabetes who have heart failure with a preserved injection fraction, acute heart failure, atrial fibrillation, primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease/cardiovascular disease, and acute myocardial infarction. We searched the data of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses of SGLTis in patients with diabetes from PubMed between January 1, 2020 and April 6, 2024 for our review. According to our review, certain SGLTis (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, and tofogliflozin), but not sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 inhibitor (SGLT1i), exhibit relatively superior clinical safety and effectiveness for treating the abovementioned diseases. Proper utilization of SGLTis in these patients can foster clinical improvement and offer an alternative medication option. However, clinical trials involving SGLTis for certain diseases have relatively small sample sizes, brief intervention durations, and conclusions based on weak evidence, necessitating additional data. These findings are significant and valuable for providing a more comprehensive reference and new possibilities for the clinical utilization and scientific exploration of SGLTis.

The contemporary role of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) in the management of heart failure: State-of-the-art review

Novel therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), etc. The purpose of this review is to determine the effects of ARNI and SGLT2i in heart failure (HF), compare the impact of SGLT2i with ARNI, and finally evaluate the current data regarding the combination of these two drugs in HF. Various trials on the respective medications have shown some significant reduction in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) death. The combination of these drugs has shown more CV benefits than monotherapy. There is emerging data about these two drugs in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). At present, there are less head-to-head comparison trials of these two drugs. This review provides insights on the current evidence, comparative efficacy, and combination therapy of ARNI and SGLT2i in managing HF, focussing on HFrEF and HFpEF.

Effectiveness of remote pulmonary artery pressure estimating in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis

Heart failure (HF) poses a significant challenge, often leading to frequent hospitalizations and compromised quality of life. Continuous pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) monitoring offers a surrogate for congestion status in ambulatory HF care. This meta-analysis examines the efficacy of PAP monitoring devices (CardioMEMS and Chronicle) in preventing adverse outcomes in HF patients, addressing gaps in prior randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Five RCTs (2572 participants) were systematically reviewed. PAP monitoring significantly reduced HF-related hospitalizations (RR 0.72 [95% CI 0.6-0.87], p = 0.0006) and HF events (RR 0.86 [95% CI 0.75-0.99], p = 0.03), with no impact on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality. Subgroup analyses highlighted the significance of CardioMEMS and blinded studies. Meta-regression indicated a correlation between prolonged follow-up and increased reduction in HF hospitalizations. The risk of bias was generally high, with evidence certainty ranging from low to moderate. PAP monitoring devices exhibit promise in diminishing HF hospitalizations and events, especially in CardioMEMS and blinded studies. However, their influence on mortality remains inconclusive. Further research, considering diverse patient populations and intervention strategies with extended follow-up, is crucial for elucidating the optimal role of PAP monitoring in HF management.

Hypoglycemic Drugs in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure: A Narrative Review

Over the last few years, given the increase in the incidence and prevalence of both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF), it became crucial to develop guidelines for the optimal preventive and treatment strategies for individuals facing these coexisting conditions. In patients aged over 65, HF hospitalization stands out as the predominant reason for hospital admissions, with their prognosis being associated with the presence or absence of T2DM. Historically, certain classes of glucose-lowering drugs, such as thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone), raised concerns due to an observed increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular (CV)-related mortality. In response to these concerns, regulatory agencies started requiring CV outcome trials for all novel antidiabetic agents [i.e., dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitors), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is)] with the aim to assess the CV safety of these drugs beyond glycemic control. This narrative review aims to address the current knowledge about the impact of glucose-lowering agents used in T2DM on HF prevention, prognosis, and outcome.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors improve cardiovascular outcomes post-acute coronary syndrome complicated by acute heart failure

Background

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a risk factor for heart failure (HF). Therefore, we aimed to assess the cardioprotective role of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors post-ACS in patients with acute HF (AHF) and diabetes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study employing propensity score matching. This study involved patients with diabetes admitted with ACS complicated by AHF, defined as either new clinical HF requiring diuretics during the index admission or having an ejection fraction (EF) of <40%. The study population was divided into two groups; (1) SGLT2 inhibitor users and (2) SGLT2 inhibitor non-users. The Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to evaluate the outcomes.

Results

A total of 465 patients (93% male; mean age, 55 ± 10 years) were included in this study. Using a 1 : 1 propensity score matching, 78 patients were included per arm with an absolute standardized difference of <0.1 for all baseline characteristics. The use of SGLT2 inhibitors resulted in lower composite outcomes of ACS, HF hospitalization, and all-cause mortality at 1 month and 12 months [1 month: 2.6% vs. 11.5%, HR = 0.20 (0.04-0.94), p = 0.041; 12 months: 14.1% vs. 23.1%, HR = 0.46 (0.22-0.99), p = 0.046].

Conclusion

The findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors may confer cardioprotective effects in ACS-induced AHF, thereby widening the spectrum for indications of SGLT2 inhibitors.