A Comparison of Prescribing Guideline-Advocated Treatment for Heart Failure at Discharge from Cardiology and Non-Cardiology Wards

BACKGROUND

Adherence to heart failure (HF) management guidelines is important to optimise clinical outcomes but can be variable in practice. This study compared prescribing guideline-advocated pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of HF between patients discharged from cardiology and non-cardiology wards.

METHOD

A retrospective audit of electronic medical records was undertaken of patients discharged from cardiology (n=100) or non-cardiology wards (n=100) of a tertiary hospital with a primary diagnosis of HF. Non-pharmacological management was quantified from documentation in medical records. Drug prescription was determined based on patients' discharge summaries. Comparisons between wards were conducted using Student's t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous data and chi square tests or Fisher's tests for categorical data. Binary logistic regression modelling was applied.

RESULTS

Patients discharged from non-cardiology wards were older and had a higher incidence of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, and renal insufficiency than those discharged from cardiology wards. The prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs)/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists at any dose (52% vs 80%; p<0.01, 25% vs 52%; p<0.01, respectively) were lower in non-cardiology than in cardiology wards, but there was no difference between wards for beta blockers. Referral to cardiac rehabilitation (4% vs 28%; p<0.01) before discharge was significantly lower in non-cardiology wards. Increased age was associated with less likelihood of the prescription of ACEIs/ARBs/ARNIs and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists at any dose and ≥50% target dose. Better renal function was a predictor for ACEIs/ARBs/ARNIs at any dose and ≥50% target dose. Discharge ward was not in itself an independent predictor of drug prescription at any dose or for any drug class.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescription rates with key components of pharmacological and non-pharmacological HF management were lower in non-cardiology than in cardiology wards. For pharmacological management, this appeared related to higher patient complexity rather than the ward. Quality improvement programs to strengthen adherence to guideline-advocated treatment is warranted to optimise care, especially for higher complexity admitted to a non-cardiology ward.

Patterns of beta-blocker use and dose optimization among ambulatory heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) attending public hospitals in Northeast Ethiopia: a multi-center cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based beta-blockers are essential in managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and are known to improve cardiovascular outcomes. Despite robust nascent guideline recommendations, studies indicate that beta-blockers are often underutilized or administered below target doses. This shivery issue is particularly relevant in Ethiopia, where comprehensive evaluations of beta-blocker utilization and dosing practices are limited. The Northeast region, specifically Dessie, remains underexplored in this context.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the appropriate usage trend and dose optimization of beta-blockers among HFrEF patients attending ambulatory clinics of Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (DCSH) and Boru Meda General Hospital (BMH), Dessie, Ethiopia, 2024 G.C.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, multi-center study was conducted from February 1 to July 30, 2024, involving 200 randomly selected adult patients with confirmed HFrEF (120 from DCSH and 80 from BMH), who had at least 6-month regular follow-up visits at their respective ambulatory clinics. The study rigorously followed the latest (2022) American Heart Association (AHA) guideline recommendation. Patient's medical records was reviewed to gather the necessary data. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with beta-blocker use. Statistical significance was declared at p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

Among the 200 patients, 88% were prescribed beta-blockers. About 15% of the patients were not receiving beta-blockers whereas they are indicated. Out of the total, 96.5% received guideline-recommended beta-blockers, with bisoprolol being the most common (65%), followed by metoprolol (29%) and carvedilol (3%). Only 13% of beta-blocker users were on optimal doses, with average daily doses of 27.9 mg for metoprolol succinate, 10.0 mg for carvedilol, and 4.8 mg for bisoprolol. Factors positively associated with beta-blocker use included Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor use (AOR: 15.48, 95% CI: 2.11-113.54, p = 0.007), and taking multiple medications (AOR: 7.12, 95% CI: 1.54-33.02, p = 0.012), while ingestion of secondary prevention agents (AOR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.98, p = 0.048) and male gender (AOR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.47, p = 0.005) were negatively associated. Baseline ejection fraction of 25-40% (AOR: 5.44, 95% CI: 1.09-27.12, P = 0.039) was a sole predictor for sub-optimal beta-blocker use.

CONCLUSION

Although most patients with HFrEF were prescribed evidence-based beta-blockers, only a limited number reached the optimal dosing levels. It is crucial to align clinical practice with the latest guidelines, prioritize ongoing research, and enhance educational efforts for both healthcare providers and patients. By doing so, it is possible to significantly improve the effective utilization of beta-blockers, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes in this region.

Guideline-directed medical therapy rates in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction in a diverse cohort

AIMS

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is recommended for all patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Despite this, little data exist describing GDMT use in diverse, real-world populations including the use of vasodilators, prescribed primarily to Black populations. We sought, among a diverse population of HFrEF patients, to determine (1) GDMT use rates and target dosing by medication class and (2) predictors of GDMT use and target dosing by medication class.

METHODS

We utilized electronic health records (EHRs) from Kaiser Permanente (KP) Mid-Atlantic States, a large integrated health system. Included patients had heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of ≤40% between 2015 and 2021. GDMT was defined by five medication classes-angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEis)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNis), beta-blockers (BBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and vasodilators (Black patients only). Proportions of patients on GDMT and target dose rates were examined. Logistic regression determined, within each class, predictors of medication use and being at ≥80% of the target dose.

RESULTS

A total of 3154 patients were included. Among the 93.8% on some form of GDMT, 82.8%, 81.4%, 23.5%, 3.6% and 13.4% were on ACEis/ARBs/ARNis, BBs, MRAs, SGLT2is and vasodilators (Black patients only), respectively. Among treated patients, 45.8%, 21.4%, 77.6%, 100% and 14.7% were treated at ≥80% of the target dose for ACEis/ARBs/ARNis, BBs, MRAs, SGLT2is and vasodilators, respectively. Overall, increasing age, higher EF, atrial fibrillation/flutter, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), prior stroke and dementia were associated with decreased odds of GDMT use. Conversely, higher body mass index (BMI), Black race, higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR), recent echo and cardiac defibrillator were associated with increased odds of GDMT use. Among treated, higher BMI, higher systolic blood pressure, haemoglobin A1C ≥ 6.5% and cardiac defibrillator were associated with higher odds of being at ≥80% of the target dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study using real-world data from a diverse health system demonstrated gaps in GDMT use among patients with HFrEF, specifically older patients with more comorbidities.

Heart Failure Mortality in Chronic Kidney Disease: The Fatal Crossover

BACKGROUND

Real-world mortality data regarding heart failure in patients with comorbid chronic kidney disease remains limited, especially following the advent of advanced heart failure therapies.

METHODS

Using the CDC WONDER database, we included patients ≥ 25 years old who died primarily from heart failure (2011-2020) with comorbid chronic kidney disease. We calculated age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 individuals. We determined the trends over time by estimating the annual percent change (APC) using the Joinpoint regression program.

RESULTS

There were 82,454 heart failure deaths with comorbid chronic kidney disease. The AAMR increased from 2.34 (95% CI, 2.28-2.41) in 2011 to 4.79 (95% CI, 4.71-4.88) in 2020. During the study period, Heart failure deaths among patients with comorbid chronic kidney disease increased by 149.0% compared to 59.9% in those without. Men had higher AAMR than women (3.92 [95% CI, 3.88-3.96] vs. 2.96 [95% CI, 2.93-2.99]). African American patients had the highest AAMR (5.85 [95% CI, 5.75-5.96]). The Midwest region had the highest AAMR (3.83 [95% CI, 3.78-3.89]). The AAMR was higher in the rural areas than in the urban regions (3.77 [95% CI, 3.71-3.83] vs. 3.23 [95% CI, 3.20-3.25]). Most patients died in hospices or nursing homes (29,000, 35.2%).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a significant increase in heart failure AAMR in patients with comorbid chronic kidney disease in recent eras. Further effort is needed to optimize cardioprotective agents for this population and to address demographic discrepancies at the policy level.

Medical Costs and Economic Impact of Hyperkalemia in a Cohort of Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background/Objectives: Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte disorder in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) have been shown to improve survival and decrease hospitalization rates, although they may increase the serum potassium levels. Hyperkalemia has significant clinical and economic implications, and is associated with increased healthcare resource utilization. The objective of the study was to analyze the management of hyperkalemia and the associated medical costs in a cohort of patients with HFrEF. Methods: An observational, longitudinal, retrospective, single-center retrospective study was conducted in patients with HFrEF who started follow-up in a heart failure unit between 2010 and 2021. Results: The study population consisted of 1181 patients followed-up on for 64.6 ± 38.8 months. During follow-up, 11,059 control visits were conducted, documenting 438 episodes of hyperkalemia in 262 patients (22.2%). Of the hyperkalemia episodes, 3.0% required assistance in the Emergency Department, 1.4% required hospitalization, and only 0.2% required admission to the Intensive Care Unit. No episode required renal replacement therapy. Reduction or withdrawal of RAASi was necessary in 69.9% of the hyperkalemia episodes. The total cost of the 438 hyperkalemia episodes was €89,178.82; the expense during the first year accounted for 48.8% of the total cost. Conclusions: Hyperkalemia is frequent in patients with HFrEF. It is often accompanied by a modification of treatment with RAASi. Hyperkalemia generates substantial costs in terms of healthcare resources and medical care, especially during the first year.

The transcriptional profile of iron deficiency in patients with heart failure: Heme-sparing and reduced immune processes

AIMS

Iron deficiency (ID) is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF) and associated with morbidity and poor prognosis, but pathophysiological mechanisms are unknown. We aimed to identify novel biological pathways affected by ID.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 881 patients with HF from the BIOSTAT-CHF cohort. ID was defined as a transferrin saturation <20%. Transcriptome profiling was performed in whole blood. Identified targets were validated in a human in vitro stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte ID model utilizing deferoxamine as iron chelator. ID was identified in 554 (62.9%) patients, and 89 differentially expressed genes between ID and non-ID were identified, of which 60 were up- and 29 were downregulated. Upregulated genes were overrepresented in pathways of erythrocyte development and homeostasis. Heme biosynthetic processes were confirmed as relatively upregulated in ID, while iron-sulfur cluster assembly was downregulated. Downregulated processes further included natural killer cell and lymphocyte mediated immunity. In agreement with patient data, cardiomyocyte iron depletion significantly induced the expression of two genes (SIAH2 and CLIC4), which could be normalized upon iron supplementation. Both SIAH2 and CLIC4 are associated with increased mortality in patients with HF (hazard ratio 2.40, 95% confidence interval 1.86-3.11, p < 0.001 hazard ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.53-2.07, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Iron deficiency is associated with the preservation of heme-related processes at the cost of iron-sulfur clusters. Immune processes are downregulated, uncovering another high energy demand system affected. SIAH2 and CLIC4 might be modifiable factors in the relation between ID and impaired prognosis.

Uptitration of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure - Insight From the REVIEW-HF Registry

BACKGROUND

Guideline-directed medical therapy has become an important component of heart failure (HF) therapy, with sacubitril/valsartan as one of the recommended drugs; however, the real-world prognostic implications of sacubitril/valsartan uptitration are unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with HF newly initiated on sacubitril/valsartan were registered in a retrospective multicenter study (REVIEW-HF). In all, 995 patients were divided into 3 groups according to the maximum dose achieved: high dose, sacubitril/valsartan 400 mg; intermediate dose, sacubitril/valsartan 200-<400 mg; and low dose, sacubitril/valsartan <200 mg. A total of 397 (39.9%) patients received high-dose sacubitril/valsartan; they had a significantly lower risk of mortality or HF hospitalization than patients in the low-dose (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.53; P<0.001) and intermediate-dose (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.94; P=0.03) groups. In the multivariable Cox regression model, higher systolic blood pressure and maintained geriatric nutritional risk index were significantly associated with a higher incidence of achieving a high dose of sacubitril/valsartan. Patients who did not receive high-dose sacubitril/valsartan experienced more hypotension during the follow-up period, whereas hyperkalemia, severe renal events, and angioedema did not differ across the achieved dose classifications.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who achieved sacubitril/valsartan uptitration had a better prognosis than those who did not. Before sacubitril/valsartan uptitration, patients need to monitor blood pressure closely to prevent worsening events.

Renin angiotensin system inhibitors and outcome in patients with takotsubo syndrome: A propensity score analysis of the GEIST registry

BACKGROUND

Few data are available on long-term drug therapy and its potential prognostic impact after Takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Aim of the study is to evaluate clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of TTS patients on Renin Angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi).

METHODS

TTS patients were enrolled in the international multicenter GEIST (GErman Italian Spanish Takotsubo) registry. Median follow-up was 31 (Interquartile range 12-56) months. Comparison of RASi treated vs. untreated patients was performed within the overall population and after 1:1 propensity score matching for age, sex, comorbidities, type of trigger and in-hospital complications.

REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04361994, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04361994 RESULTS: Of the 2453 TTS patients discharged alive, 1683 (68%) received RASi therapy. Patients with RASi were older (age 71 ± 11 vs 69 ± 13 years, P = .01), with higher prevalence of hypertension (74% vs 53%, P < .01) and diabetes (19% v s15%, P = .01), higher admission left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (41 ± 11% vs 39 ± 12%, P < .01) and lower rates of in-hospital complications (18.9% vs 29.6%, P < .01). At multivariable analysis, RASi therapy at discharge was independently associated with lower mortality (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.87, P < .01). Survival analysis showed that at long term, patients treated with RASi had lower mortality rates in the overall cohort (log-rank P = .001). However, this benefit was not found among patients treated with RASi in the matched cohort (log-rank P = .168). Potential survival benefit of RASi were present, both in the overall and matched cohort, in 2 subgroups: patients with admission LVEF ≤ 40% (HR 0.54 95% CI 0.38-0.78, P = .001; HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.95, P = .030) and diabetes (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.73, P = .002; HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.82, P = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term therapy with RASi after a TTS episode was not associated with lower mortality rates at propensity score analysis. However, potential survival benefit can be found among patients with admission LVEF ≤ 40% or diabetes.

The Efficacy and Safety of Patiromer for Heart Failure Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of patiromer, a novel potassium binder, in reducing the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure and optimizing their RAASi therapy.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analyses.

METHOD

The authors conducted a systematic search in Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy and safety of patiromer in heart failure patients from inception to 31 January 2023 and updated on 25 March 2023. The primary outcome was the association between the reduction of hyperkalemia and patiromer compared with placebo, and the secondary outcome was the association between optimization of RAASi therapy and patiromer.

RESULTS

A total of four randomized controlled trials (n = 1163) were included in the study. Patiromer was able to reduce the risk of hyperkalemia in heart failure patients by 44% (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.87; I2 = 61.9%), improve tolerance to target doses of MRA in patients with heart failure (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.30; I2 = 49.4%), and decrease the proportion of all-cause discontinuation of RAASi (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.98; I2 = 48.4%). However, patiromer therapy was associated with an increased risk of hypokalemia (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.12; I2 = 0%), while no other statistically significant adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

Patiromer appears to have a considerable effect on reducing the incidence of hyperkalemia in heart failure patients and on optimizing the therapy of RAASi in those patients.

Patiromer for Heart Failure Medication Optimization in Patients With Current or Past Hyperkalemia: DIAMOND Subanalysis

BACKGROUND

For heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), suboptimal use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis), including mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), due to hyperkalemia, may be improved by potassium binders.

OBJECTIVES

This prespecified analysis of the phase 3 DIAMOND (Patiromer for the Management of Hyperkalemia in Subjects Receiving RAASi Medications for the Treatment of Heart Failure) trial assessed the effect of patiromer in patients with HFrEF and either current or past hyperkalemia.

METHODS

Patients with HFrEF and current or past (within 1 year before enrollment) hyperkalemia (serum potassium [sK+] >5.0 mmol/L) entered a single-blind, run-in phase to optimize RAASis while receiving patiromer. They were subsequently randomized, double-blind, to continue patiromer or change to placebo.

RESULTS

Of the 1,038 patients who completed run-in, 354 (83.9%) of 422 with current hyperkalemia and 524 (85.1%) of 616 with past hyperkalemia achieved RAASi optimization and were randomized to treatment. During the double-blind phase, patiromer lowered sK+ levels compared with placebo in both the current and past hyperkalemia subgroups: difference in adjusted mean change from baseline: -0.12 (95% CI: -0.17 to -0.07) and -0.08 (95% CI: -0.12 to -0.05), respectively; Pinteraction = 0.166. Patiromer was more effective than placebo in maintaining MRA at target dose in patients with current vs past hyperkalemia (HR: 0.45 [95% CI: 0.26-0.76] vs HR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.54-1.32]; Pinteraction = 0.031). Adverse events were similar between subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of patiromer facilitates achieving target doses of RAASis in patients with HFrEF with either current or past hyperkalemia. For those with current hyperkalemia before RAASi optimization, use of patiromer may be more beneficial in helping to maintain sK+ control and achieve MRA target dose. (Patiromer for the Management of Hyperkalemia in Subjects Receiving RAASi Medications for the Treatment of Heart Failure [DIAMOND]; NCT03888066).

Heart failure with improved versus persistently reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: A comparison of the BIOSTAT-CHF (European) study with the ASIAN-HF registry

AIMS

We investigated the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used data from BIOSTAT-CHF including patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% at baseline who had LVEF re-assessed at 9 months. HFimpEF was defined as a LVEF >40% and a LVEF ≥10% increase from baseline at 9 months. We validated findings in the ASIAN-HF registry. The primary outcome was a composite of time to HF rehospitalization or all-cause mortality. In BIOSTAT-CHF, about 20% of patients developed HFimpEF, that was associated with a lower primary event rate of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.97, p = 0.040) and the composite endpoint (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.70, p < 0.001) compared with patients who remained in persistent HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The findings were similar in the ASIAN-HF (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.89, p = 0.024, and HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.17-0.48, p < 0.001). Five independently common predictors for HFimpEF in both BIOSTAT-CHF and ASIAN-HF were female sex, absence of ischaemic heart disease, higher LVEF, smaller left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameter at baseline. A predictive model combining only five predictors (absence of ischaemic heart disease and left bundle branch block, smaller left ventricular end-systolic and left atrial diameter, and higher platelet count) for HFimpEF in the BIOSTAT-CHF achieved an area under the curve of 0.772 and 0.688 in the ASIAN-HF (due to missing left atrial diameter and platelet count).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 20-30% of patients with HFrEF improved to HFimpEF within 1 year with better clinical outcomes. In addition, the predictive model with clinical predictors could more accurately predict HFimpEF in patients with HFrEF.

An Observational Study of Evidence-Based Therapies in Older Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights from a Dedicated Heart Failure Clinic

Background/Objectives: Despite significant advances in the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), data concerning older patients remain limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in older patients with HFrEF along with cardiac events and variation in clinical and echocardiographic parameters during follow-up in a heart failure (HF) clinic. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of patients with HFrEF aged ≥ 80 years who attended an HF clinic between March 2022 and February 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of the first episode of worsening HF or cardiovascular death. All-cause death was also recorded. Results: We included 110 patients (30.9% females; mean age 82.9 years). After a median follow-up of 25.5 months, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved (mean difference 12.5% (p < 0.001)). New York Heart Association class improved in 37% of patients, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels decreased (3091 (158-53354) to 1802 (145-19509), p < 0.001). The primary outcome occurred in 34 patients (30.9%). Patients without the primary outcome were more likely to receive sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) (23.5% versus 67.1%, p < 0.001) and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin-receptor blockers (67.6% versus 84.2%, p < 0.05). These patients also received a greater number of GDMT medications (2 (0-4) versus 3 (1-4), p < 0.01) and demonstrated a higher LVEF at the last visit (41.2 ± 10.2% versus 47.1 ± 9.4%, p < 0.05). Survival analysis demonstrated a significant association between LVEF recovery (hazard ratio (HR) 0.35, p < 0.01), treatment with two or more GDMT medications (HR 0.29, p < 0.01), vasodilator use (HR 0.36, p < 0.01), and SGLT2i prescription (HR 0.17, p < 0.001) and a reduced risk of the primary endpoint. Conclusions: The optimization of HF treatment is achievable in older patients and may be associated with a reduction in cardiac events.

Cardiorenal interactions in heart failure: insights from recent therapeutic advances

Heart failure is a syndrome that may develop when cardiovascular disease progresses or is insufficiently treated and associated with a poor quality of life, high mortality rates, and increased healthcare expenditures. Prevention and treatment of heart failure are therefore of utmost importance. New therapies in patients with cardiovascular disease have recently been shown to be effective in the prevention and sometimes treatment of heart failure, and additional research is underway. Specifically, in high-risk patients with either (a combination of) diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and/or heart failure, three specific drug classes [sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs), and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs)] have taken centre stage in therapeutic approach for these high cardiovascular risk patients. The commonality of these drugs is the finding that they improve cardiovascular and renal endpoints across the cardiorenal continuum and SGTL2i have already proved effective in all subtypes of heart failure, while we await data on non-steroidal MRA therapy in heart failure. The story may be different for GLP-1-RA in patients with established heart failure, but these drugs are effective in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. Taken together, these new therapies advance the treatment and improve the associated outcomes of patients with cardiorenal disease and diabetes, with similar characteristics and effectiveness in different conditions.

Regional Differences in the Epidemiology of Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) epidemiology, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes exhibit substantial regional variations, reflecting diverse etiologies and health system capacities. This review comprehensively analyses these variations, drawing on data from recent global registries and clinical trials. Our review indicates that ischemic and hypertensive heart diseases are prevalent globally but differ in dominance depending on the region. Notably, regions such as Africa and Latin America show higher instances of HF from hypertensive heart disease and Chagas cardiomyopathy, respectively. Moreover, disparities in age and comorbidity profiles across regions highlight younger populations with HF in lower-income countries compared to older populations in high-income regions. This review also highlights the global disparity in guideline-directed medical and device therapy, underscoring significant underuse in lower-income regions. These insights emphasize the need for targeted HF management strategies considering regional clinical and demographic characteristics to enhance global HF care and outcomes.

Digital tools in heart failure: addressing unmet needs

This Series paper provides an overview of digital tools in heart failure care, encompassing screening, early diagnosis, treatment initiation and optimisation, and monitoring, and the implications these tools could have for research. The current medical environment favours the implementation of digital tools in heart failure due to rapid advancements in technology and computing power, unprecedented global connectivity, and the paradigm shift towards digitisation. Despite available effective therapies for heart failure, substantial inadequacies in managing the condition have hindered improvements in patient outcomes, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. As digital health tools continue to evolve and exert a growing influence on both clinical care and research, establishing clinical frameworks and supportive ecosystems that enable their effective use on a global scale is crucial.

Cardiovascular and Renal Treatment in Heart Failure Patients With Hyperkalemia or High Risk of Hyperkalemia: Rationale and Design of the CARE-HK in HF Registry

BACKGROUND

Despite guideline recommendations, many patients with heart failure (HF) do not receive target dosages of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) in clinical practice due, in part, to concerns about hyperkalemia (HK).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This noninterventional, multinational, multicenter registry (NCT04864795; 111 sites in Europe and the USA) enrolled 2558 eligible adults with chronic HF (mostly with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]). Eligibility criteria included use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin-II receptor blocker/angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, being a candidate for or treatment with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and increased risk of HK (eg, current serum potassium > 5.0 mmol/L), history of HK in the previous 24 months, or estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2). Information on RAASi and other guideline-recommended therapies was collected retrospectively and prospectively (≥ 6 months). Patients were followed according to local clinical practice, without study-specific visits or interventions. The main objectives were to characterize RAASi treatment patterns compared with guideline recommendations, describe RAASi modifications following episodes of HK, and describe RAASi treatment in patients treated with patiromer. Baseline characteristics for the first 1000 patients are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

CARE-HK is a multinational prospective HF registry designed to report on the management and outcomes of patients with HF at high risk for HK in routine clinical practice.

Implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction in Belgium: a Delphi panel approach

BACKGROUND

The 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommended a shift from a traditional hierarchical treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) to a four-pillar medical therapy strategy intended for near-simultaneous initiation. However, practical guidance for implementation in clinical practice is lacking. To address this, a Delphi Panel of 12 Belgian heart failure experts aimed to obtain consensus on integrating guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in HFrEF patients in Belgian clinical practice, considering local specificities, including reimbursement criteria.

METHODS

A geographically representative sample of 12 Belgian cardiologists engaged in a three-round Delphi process, evolving from 20 open-ended questions to 39 statements. A qualitative analysis after the first round resulted in expert statements for the subsequent questionnaire, categorised into treatment for newly diagnosed and chronic HFrEF patients.

RESULTS

The Delphi consensus revealed four key findings: (i) Agreement on initiating the four medical cornerstones within 7-14 days of HFrEF diagnosis, prioritising initiation over individual class up-titration; (ii) Lack of consensus on a fixed sequence for initiation due to patient variability and national reimbursement criteria; (iii) Emphasis on treatment adjustment based on the patient's clinical presentation and comorbidities; (iv) Recognition of the crucial role of regular follow-up visits, allowing optimisation of medical therapy where appropriate.

CONCLUSION

This national Delphi consensus addresses clinical implementation of GDMT in HFrEF patients for Belgian cardiologists. The consensus highlights the importance of swift implementation of the four cornerstone medical therapies in newly diagnosed HFrEF patients, individualising treatment sequencing, and ensuring regular follow-up to optimise therapy.

Looking for the ideal medication for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a narrative review

The main goals of the pharmacological treatment of Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are the reduction of mortality and the prevention of hospitalizations. However, other outcomes such as improvements in cardiac remodeling and clinical status, functional capacity and quality of life, should be taken into account. Also, given the significant inter-individual and intra-individual variability of HF, and the fact that patients usually present with comorbidities, an appropriate treatment for HFrEF should exert a clinical benefit in most patient profiles irrespective of their characteristics or the presence of comorbidities, while providing organ protection beyond the cardiovascular system. The aim of this narrative review is to determine which are the proven effects of the guideline-directed treatments for HFrEF on five key clinical outcomes: cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization due to HF, sudden death, reverse cardiac remodeling, renal protection and evidence in hospitalized patients. Publications that fulfilled the pre-established selection criteria were selected and reviewed. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, namely angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) show a benefit in terms of mortality and hospitalization rates. ARNI, BB, and MRA have demonstrated a significant positive effect on the incidence of sudden death. ARB, ARNI, BB and SGLT2i have been associated with clear benefits in reverse cardiac remodeling. Additionally, there is consistent evidence of renal protection from ARB, ARNI, and SGLT2i in renal protection and of benefits for hospitalized patients from ARNI and SGLT2i. In conclusion, the combination of drugs that gather most beneficial effects in HFrEF, beyond cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization, would be ideally pursued.

Are Hospital Admissions (Costs) and Mortality Rate Impacted by Guideline-driven Treatment of Heart Failure?: A Comparison between Participants in the "CorBene" CMP and Standard-care Patients on the Basis of Propensity Score Matching

Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common diagnoses on admission to hospital in Germany, and one which incurs high costs. Integrated care in case management programs (CMPs) aims to improve treatment quality in the sense of guideline-driven treatment, while reducing hospital admissions, hospital costs, and mortality. A total of 1,844 patient data records from 11 German statutory health insurance companies enrolled in the CMP (intervention group [IG]) were compared with 1,844 standard-care patients (control group) using propensity score matching. The two groups were assessed over three follow-up observation periods regarding the endpoints' treatment costs, hospitalization rate, indicators for treatment quality (diagnostics, physician contact), and mortality. The evaluation revealed no significant differences regarding overall costs. The IG incurred significantly higher outpatient costs, but the medication costs and inpatient costs were not significantly different. There were also no significant differences in the number of hospital admissions. Patients within the CMP had significantly more frequent contact with a cardiologist, and underwent echocardiographic examination significantly more frequently. Mortality during the first follow-up observation year was considerably more favorable for the IG. There are indications that treatment quality is improved in HF patients.

Clinical characteristics, treatment, trajectories and outcome of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in a national heart failure registry

BACKGROUND

Available data on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF) due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) derive mainly from tertiary care centres for cardiomyopathies or from drug trial sub-studies, which may entail a referral bias.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2021, we enrolled in a nationwide HF Registry 1886 DCM patients and 3899 with ischemic heart disease (IHD).

RESULTS

Patients with DCM were younger, more often female, had more commonly recent onset HF, left bundle branch block, and showed higher LV end-diastolic volume and lower LVEF than IHD. With respect to IHD, DCM patients received more often mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, renin angiotensin system inhibitors and betablockers, the latter more commonly at doses ≥50% of target, and triple guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) (adjusted OR 1.411, 95% CI 1.247-1.595, p < .0001). During one-year follow-up, 819 patients (14.2%) died or were hospitalized for HF [187 (9.9%) DCM, 632 (16.2%) IHD]; DCM was associated with lower risk of the combined end-point (adjusted HR 0.745, 95% CI 0.625- 0.888, p = .0011). Among the 1954 patients with 1-year echocardiograms available, 1483 had LVEF≤40% at baseline; of these,166 (30.6%) DCM and 165 (17.5%) IHD improved their LVEF to >40% (p < .0001). DCM aetiology was associated with higher likelihood of LVEF improvement (adjusted OR 1.722, 95% CI 1.328 -2.233, p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

DCM patients have a different clinical profile, greater uptake of GDMT and better outcomes than IHD subjects. A comprehensive management approach is needed to further address the risk of unfavorable outcomes in DCM.

The Inflammation-Fibrosis Combined Index: A Novel Marker for Predicting Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling and Prognosis in Patients with HFrEF

Background

Inflammation and cardiac fibrosis are important pathogenic drivers of heart failure. The fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) is associated with a higher degree of fibrosis. The systemic immune inflammation index (SII) is associated with a higher degree of systemic inflammation status. Previous studies have shown that they are associated with a poor prognosis for cardiovascular disease. We sought to investigate the value of FIB-4 combined with the SII as a novel inflammation-fibrosis combined index (IFCI) in predicting left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) and prognosis among reduced ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF) patients.

Methods

A total of 895 patients with HFrEF were continuously recruited. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to assess the abilities of inflammation-fibrosis indicators to predict LVRR. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to examine independent predictors of composite cardiac events and all-cause death.

Results

After six months of follow-up, 344 (38.4%) patients experienced LVRR. The IFCI had the largest area under the curve (0.835, P < 0.001). In multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analyses, FIB-4, SII, and IFCI were predictive of LVRR (P value < 0.05). The IFCI was associated with a 3.686-fold higher risk of non-LVRR (odds ratio [OR] = 3.686, P < 0.001). Moreover, an increased IFCI predicted a poor prognosis in HFrEF patients. The highest risk of composite cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.716, P < 0.001) was observed in the top IFCI-tertile group, and similar results were found regarding independent risk indicators of all-cause death.

Conclusion

In summary, this study indicated that increased IFCI at admission offers good predictability regarding non-LVRR and predicts the risk of all-cause mortality or composite cardiovascular events due to HFrEF patients and could be used as a novel marker.

Heart failure, the global pandemic: A call to action consensus statement from the global presidential conclave at the platinum jubilee conference of cardiological society of India 2023

Heart failure (HF) is emerging as a major public health problem both in high- and low - income countries. The mortality and morbidity due to HF is substantially higher in low-middle income countries (LMICs). Accessibility, availability and affordability issues affect the guideline directed therapy implementation in HF care in those countries. This call to action urges all those concerned to initiate preventive strategies as early as possible, so that we can reduce HF-related morbidity and mortality. The most important step is to have better prevention and treatment strategies for diseases such as hypertension, ischemic heart disease (IHD), type-2 diabetes, and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) which predispose to the development of HF. Setting up dedicated HF-clinics manned by HF Nurses, can help in streamlining HF care. Subsidized in-patient care, financial assistance for device therapy, use of generic medicines (including polypill strategy) will be helpful, along with the use of digital technologies.

Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Incident Cancer

BACKGROUND

It has been postulated that cancer hampers the delivery of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF). However, few data are available in this regard.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis from the HF Outpatient Clinic of the IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino in Genova, Italy. All HF patients evaluated between 2010 and 2019, with a left ventricular ejection fraction <50% and at least two visits ≥3 months apart with complete information about GDMT were included in the study. We assessed the prescription of GDMT-in particular, beta-blockers (BB), renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), and mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRA)-at the time of the last HF evaluation and compared it between patients with and without incidental cancer. For those with incidental cancer, we also evaluated modifications of GDMT comparing the HF evaluations before and after cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of 464 HF patients, 39 (8%) had incidental cancer. There were no statistical differences in GDMT between patients with and without incidental cancer at last evaluation. In the year following cancer diagnosis, of 33 patients with incidental cancer on BB, none stopped therapy, but two had a down-titration to a dosage <50%; of 27 patients on RASi, two patients stopped therapy and three had a down-titration to a dosage <50%; of 19 patients on MRA, four stopped therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although HF patients with incidental cancer may need to have GDMT down-titrated at the time of cancer diagnosis, this does not appear to significantly hinder the delivery of HF therapies during follow-up.

Heart failure management with β-blockers: can we do better?

Heart failure (HF) is associated with disabling symptoms, poor quality of life, and a poor prognosis with substantial excess mortality in the years following diagnosis. Overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system is a key feature of the pathophysiology of HF and is an important driver of the process of adverse remodelling of the left ventricular wall that contributes to cardiac failure. Drugs which suppress the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, including β-blockers, are foundation therapies for the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and despite a lack of specific outcomes trials, are also widely used by cardiologist in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Today, expert opinion has moved away from recommending that treatment for HF should be guided solely by the LVEF and interventions should rather address signs and symptoms of HF (e.g. oedema and tachycardia), the severity of HF, and concomitant conditions. β-blockers improve HF symptoms and functional status in HF and these agents have demonstrated improved survival, as well as a reduced risk of other important clinical outcomes such as hospitalisation for heart failure, in randomised, placebo-controlled outcomes trials. In HFpEF, β-blockers are anti-ischemic and lower blood pressure and heart rate. Moreover, β-blockers also reduce mortality in the setting of HF occurring alongside common comorbid conditions, such as diabetes, CKD (of any severity), and COPD. Higher doses of β-blockers are associated with better clinical outcomes in populations with HF, so that ensuring adequate titration of therapy to their maximal (or maximally tolerated) doses is important for ensuring optimal outcomes for people with HF. In principle, a patient with HF could have combined treatment with a β-blocker, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor/neprilysin inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and a SGLT2 inhibitor, according to tolerability.

The Effect of Using a Remote Patient Management Platform in Optimizing Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains underutilized in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, leading to morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

The Medly Titrate (Use of Telemonitoring to Facilitate Heart Failure Mediation Titration) study was an open-label, randomized controlled trial to determine whether remote medication titration for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was more effective than usual care (UC).

METHODS

In this study, 108 patients were randomized to remote GDMT titration through the Medly heart failure program (n = 56) vs UC (n = 52). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients completing GDMT titration at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included the number of clinic visits and time required to achieve titration, patient health outcomes, and health care utilization, including urgent clinic/emergency department visits and hospitalization.

RESULTS

At 6 months, GDMT titration was completed in 82.1% (95% CI: 71.2%-90.8%) of patients in the intervention arm vs 53.8% in UC (95% CI: 41.1%-67.7%; P = 0.001). Remote titration required fewer in-person (1.62 ± 1.09 vs 2.42 ± 1.65; P = 0.004) and virtual clinic visits (0.50 ± 1.08 vs 1.29 ± 1.86; P = 0.009) to complete titration. Median time to optimization was shorter with remote titration (3.42 months [Q1-Q3: 2.99-4.04 months] vs 5.47 months [Q1-Q3: 4.14-7.33 months]; P < 0.001). The number of urgent clinic/emergency department visits (incidence rate ratio of remote vs control groups: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.53-1.56]; P = 0.70) were similar between groups, with a reduction in all-cause hospitalization with remote titration (incidence rate ratio: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.31-0.97]; P = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Remote titration of GDMT in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was effective, safe, feasible, and increased the proportion of patients achieving target doses, in a shorter period of time with no excess adverse events compared with UC. (Use of Telemonitoring to Facilitate Heart Failure Mediation Titration [Medly Titrate]; NCT04205513).

Implementation of the Care Bundle for the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with/without Heart Failure

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often part of a more complex cardiopulmonary disease, especially in older patients. The differential diagnosis of the acute exacerbation of COPD and/or heart failure (HF) in emergency settings is challenging due to their frequent coexistence and symptom overlap. Both conditions have a detrimental impact on each other's prognosis, leading to increased mortality rates. The timely diagnosis and treatment of COPD and coexisting factors like left ventricular overload or HF in inpatient and outpatient care can improve prognosis, quality of life, and long-term outcomes, helping to avoid exacerbations and hospitalization, which increase future exacerbation risk. This work aims to address existing gaps, providing management recommendations for COPD with/without HF, particularly when both conditions coexist. During virtual meetings, a panel of experts (the authors) discussed and reached a consensus on the differential and paired diagnosis of COPD and HF, providing suggestions for risk stratification, accurate diagnosis, and appropriate therapy for inpatients and outpatients. They emphasize that when COPD and HF are concomitant, both conditions should receive adequate treatment and that recommended HF treatments are not contraindicated in COPD and have favorable effects. Accurate diagnosis and therapy is crucial for effective treatment, reducing hospital readmissions and associated costs. The management considerations discussed in this study can potentially be extended to address other cardiopulmonary challenges frequently encountered by COPD patients.

Influence of Weight and Body Size on the Pharmacokinetics of Heart Failure Pharmacotherapy: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a review of studies evaluating the influence of body size and weight (WT) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs recommended for heart failure (HF) treatment.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of the MEDLINE (1946 to April 2023) and EMBASE (1974 to April 2023) databases was conducted for articles that focused on the impact of WT or body size on the PK of drugs of interest used in HF patients.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Articles written in English or French related to the aim of our study were retained for analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 6493 articles, 20 were retained for analysis. Weight was associated with the clearance of digoxin, carvedilol, enalapril, and candesartan as well as the volume of distribution of eplerenone and bisoprolol. There was no documented direct impact of WT on the PK of furosemide, valsartan, and metoprolol, although these studies were limited or confounded by the small sample size, adjustment of PK factors by WT, or the use of the Cockroff-Gault equation for the evaluation of creatinine clearance, which includes WT.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review highlights and summarizes the available data on the importance of WT on the PK of HF treatment.

CONCLUSION

Considering the significant impact of WT on most HF drugs in this review, it may be important to further investigate it in the context of personalized therapy, particularly in patients presenting extreme WTs.

Guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction in Palestine: Retrospective clinical audit study

Objectives

To assess the characteristics of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), as well as the current application of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in Palestine.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study involved a population of heart failure (HF) patients who visited cardiology clinics at An-Najah National University Hospital and the National Hospital, Palestine. The primary outcome measures of interest were the proportions of patients prescribed guideline-based cardiovascular medications (GBCMs), such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and the corresponding optimized doses at ≥ 50 % of targets and the reasons underlying the non-prescription of GDMT.

Results

A total of 70.5%, 56.6%, and 88.6% of patients were on ACEIs/ARBs, MRAs, and β-blockers, respectively. Of all patients, 38.7% were on the triple GDMT regimen.

Conclusion

Less than half the patients received the triple combination treatment. Age, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease, and admission to the hospital for HF all had significant independent relationships with the reduced utilization and inadequate dosage of GDMT.

The cardioprotective potential of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2-inhibitors in breast cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2-inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve cardiovascular outcomes including reduction in risk of first hospitalisation for heart failure (HF), worsening HF and cardiovascular death regardless of HF or diabetes mellitus (DM) status. It is not known whether SGLT2i can prevent the development of incident HF or reduce the risk of HF in patients receiving trastuzumab with or without other concurrent anti-HER2 agent or sequential anthracycline for treatment of HER2 positive breast cancer. Patients with active malignancy or recent history of malignancy were excluded from participating in the main cardiovascular outcome trials involving SGLT2i.

AIM

A systematic review was performed to objectively assess published literature on the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2i in breast cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity.

METHODS

Systematic searches of Embase, Medline, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were performed. Titles and abstracts were screened separately by two cardio-oncologists (JHC, WTC). Full texts of potentially eligible records were then assessed separately by JHC and WTC before inclusion into review upon joint agreement.

RESULTS

479 records were identified from 3 databases (MEDLINE=51, EMBASE=408, CENTRAL=13) and 1 registry (Clinicaltrials.gov=7). 460 records were excluded based on title and abstract (including duplicates). 19 full text reports were assessed for eligibility and included in review (basic science/animal study paper 2, Clinicaltrials.gov randomised controlled trial submission 1 (currently recruiting), basic science/animal study conference abstract 5, case report 2, review 3, editorial comment 2, clinical guidelines 1, retrospective/registry-based conference abstract 3).

CONCLUSION

Cardiotoxicity is the most common dose-limiting toxicity associated with trastuzumab. Discontinuation of trastuzumab however, can lead to worse cancer outcomes. There have been case reports, registry-based, retrospective cohort-based and mechanistic studies suggesting the cardioprotective potential of SGLT2i in cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Based on these, there is now a call for randomised controlled trials to be performed in this patient cohort to advise guideline-directed therapy for CTRCD, which will in turn also provide detailed safety information and improve cancer and cardiovascular outcomes.

Blood pressure and intensive treatment up-titration after acute heart failure hospitalization: Insights from the STRONG-HF trial

AIMS

A high-intensity care (HIC) strategy with rapid guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) up-titration and close follow-up visits improved outcomes, compared to usual care (UC), in patients recently hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF). Hypotension is a major limitation to GDMT implementation. We aimed to assess the impact of baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) on the effects of HIC versus UC and the role of early SBP changes in STRONG-HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1075 patients hospitalized for AHF with SBP ≥100 mmHg were included in STRONG-HF. For the purpose of this post-hoc analysis, patients were stratified by tertiles of baseline SBP (<118, 118-128, and ≥129 mmHg) and, in the HIC arm, by tertiles of changes in SBP from the values measured before discharge to those measured at 1 week after discharge (≥2 mmHg increase, ≤7 mmHg decrease to <2 mmHg increase, and ≥8 mmHg decrease). The primary endpoint was 180-day heart failure rehospitalization or death. The effect of HIC versus UC on the primary endpoint was independent of baseline SBP evaluated as tertiles (pinteraction = 0.77) or as a continuous variable (pinteraction = 0.91). In the HIC arm, patients with increased, stable and decreased SBP at 1 week reached 83.5%, 76.2% and 75.3% of target doses of GDMT at day 90. The risk of the primary endpoint was not significantly different between patients with different SBP changes at 1 week (adjusted p = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

In STRONG-HF, the benefits of HIC versus UC were independent of baseline SBP. Rapid GDMT up-titration was performed also in patients with an early SBP drop, resulting in similar 180-day outcome as compared to patients with stable or increased SBP.

[Physicians' Adherence to Clinical Guidelines on the Chronic Heart Failure Diagnosis and Treatment: Changes Over 2 Years of the Document's Existence]

AIM

To study how physicians' commitment to the basic provisions of clinical guidelines (CGs) for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) has changed over the two years of the document existence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An anonymous survey was performed for 263 physicians (204 cardiologists, 46 internists and 13 other specialists) who were trained in advanced training programs in 2022. The questionnaire included questions regarding self-assessment of the respondents' professional knowledge, their attitude to the role of CGs in everyday practice and ideas about methods for treatment of CHF.

RESULTS

Respondents gave 60.6 % correct answers to questions related to the treatment of CHF. More than 70% correct answers were given by 42.7% of cardiologists and 17.4% of internists. Compared to 2020, the proportion of cardiologists who gave more than 70 % correct answers increased significantly (p<0.05). CGs were considered mandatory by 26.2% and important or sometimes useful by 71.5% of respondents. Cardiologists considered CGs mandatory more frequently than internists (29.9 and 15.2 %, respectively; p=0.04). The mean number of correct answers was greater in the subgroup of respondents who considered CGs mandatory (p<0.001). More than 70% correct answers were given by only 43.8% of cardiologists, who considered themselves fully informed and able to advise colleagues on complex issues of diagnosis and treatment of CHF, and 40.6% of physicians who considered their knowledge acceptable for managing patients with CHF.

CONCLUSION

The majority of physician consider CGs an important methodological document but only a little more than 25 % are aware that CGs are mandatory. Cardiologists are better informed than internists about the principal provisions of National Clinical Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of CHF, but the average level of physician knowledge remains low.

Targeted ablation of the left middle cervical ganglion prevents ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac injury induced by AMI

Cardiac sympathetic overactivation is a critical driver in the progression of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The left middle cervical ganglion (LMCG) is an important extracardiac sympathetic ganglion. However, the regulatory effects of LMCG on AMI have not yet been fully documented. In the present study, we detected that the LMCG was innervated by abundant sympathetic components and exerted an excitatory effect on the cardiac sympathetic nervous system in response to stimulation. In canine models of AMI, targeted ablation of LMCG reduced the sympathetic indexes of heart rate variability and serum norepinephrine, resulting in suppressed cardiac sympathetic activity. Moreover, LMCG ablation could improve ventricular electrophysiological stability, evidenced by the prolonged ventricular effective refractory period, elevated action potential duration, increased ventricular fibrillation threshold, and enhanced connexin43 expression, consequently showing antiarrhythmic effects. Additionally, compared with the control group, myocardial infarction size, circulating cardiac troponin I, and myocardial apoptosis were significantly reduced, accompanied by preserved cardiac function in canines subjected to LMCG ablation. Finally, we performed the left stellate ganglion (LSG) ablation and compared its effects with LMCG destruction. The results indicated that LMCG ablation prevented ventricular electrophysiological instability, cardiac sympathetic activation, and AMI-induced ventricular arrhythmias with similar efficiency as LSG denervation. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that LMCG ablation suppressed cardiac sympathetic activity, stabilized ventricular electrophysiological properties and mitigated cardiomyocyte death, resultantly preventing ischemia-induced ventricular arrhythmias, myocardial injury, and cardiac dysfunction. Neuromodulation therapy targeting LMCG represented a promising strategy for the treatment of AMI.

Guideline-directed medical therapy in severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: An analysis from the HELP-HF registry

AIM

Persistent symptoms despite guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and poor tolerance of GDMT are hallmarks of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, real-world data on GDMT use, dose, and prognostic implications are lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 699 consecutive patients with HFrEF and at least one 'I NEED HELP' marker for advanced HF enrolled in a multicentre registry. Beta-blockers (BB) were administered to 574 (82%) patients, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ACEi/ARB/ARNI) were administered to 381 (55%) patients and 416 (60%) received mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). Overall, ≥50% of target doses were reached in 41%, 22%, and 56% of the patients on BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI and MRA, respectively. Hypotension, bradycardia, kidney dysfunction and hyperkalaemia were the main causes of underprescription and/or underdosing, but up to a half of the patients did not receive target doses for unknown causes (51%, 41%, and 55% for BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI and MRA, respectively). The proportions of patients receiving BB and ACEi/ARB/ARNI were lower among those fulfilling the 2018 HFA-ESC criteria for advanced HF. Treatment with BB and ACEi/ARB/ARNI were associated with a lower risk of death or HF hospitalizations (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.84, and HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.95, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large, real-world, contemporary cohort of patients with severe HFrEF, with at least one marker for advanced HF, prescription and uptitration of GDMT remained limited. A significant proportion of patients were undertreated due to unknown reasons suggesting a potential role of clinical inertia either by the prescribing healthcare professional or by the patient. Treatment with BB and ACEi/ARB/ARNI was associated with lower mortality/morbidity.

Urinary Marker Profiles in Heart Failure with Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Recent data suggest different causes of renal dysfunction between heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) versus preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We therefore studied a wide range of urinary markers reflecting different nephron segments in heart failure patients.

METHODS

In 2070, in chronic heart failure patients, we measured several established and upcoming urinary markers reflecting different nephron segments.

RESULTS

Mean age was 70 ± 12 years, 74% was male and 81% (n = 1677) had HFrEF. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in patients with HFpEF (56 ± 23 versus 63 ± 23 ml/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.001). Patients with HFpEF had significantly higher values of NGAL (58.1 [24.0-124.8] versus 28.1 [14.6-66.9] μg/gCr, P < 0.001) and KIM-1 (2.28 [1.49-4.37] versus 1.79 [0.85-3.49] μg/gCr, P = 0.001). These differences were more pronounced in patients with an eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73m2.

CONCLUSIONS

HFpEF patients showed more evidence of tubular damage and/or dysfunction compared with HFrEF patients, in particular when glomerular function was preserved.

Application of eligibility criteria from DAPA-HF, EMPEROR-Reduced, and PARADIGM-HF trials to a population with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction at a specialized cardiology Clinic in Medellin, Colombia: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The evidence supporting pharmacological heart failure treatment relies on randomized clinical trials with stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria.

OBJECTIVES

Assess the eligibility of outpatients with chronic heart failure for the trials DAPA-HF, EMPEROR-reduced, and PARADIGM-HF, while exploring potential differences among study populations.

METHODS

By reviewing medical records, we determined the eligibility rate for each study and evaluated the incidence of heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause mortality during this period.

RESULTS

A total of 446 patients were included in the cohort. Approximately 75% would be ineligible for the trials, mainly because of their comorbidities. Ineligible patients had a higher all-cause mortality, but a similar incidence of hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 1 in 4 patients from a heart failure clinic in Medellin, Colombia would meet the eligibility criteria for the DAPA-HF, EMPEROR-reduced, and PARADIGM-HF trials. These findings highlight the need to complement randomized clinical trials with real-world data.

The effect of kidney function on guideline-directed medical therapy implementation and prognosis in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Kidney dysfunction (KD) is a main limiting factor of applying guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and reaching the recommended target doses (TD) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to assess the success of optimization, long-term applicability, and adherence of neurohormonal antagonist triple therapy (TT:RASi [ACEi/ARB/ARNI] + βB + MRA) according to the KD after a HF hospitalization and to investigate its impact on prognosis.

METHODS

The data of 247 real-world, consecutive patients were analyzed who were hospitalized in 2019-2021 for HFrEF and then were followed-up for 1 year. The application and the ratio of reached TD of TT at hospital discharge and at 1 year were assessed comparing KD categories (eGFR: ≥90, 60-89, 45-59, 30-44, <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). Moreover, 1-year all-cause mortality and rehospitalization rates in KD subgroups were investigated.

RESULTS

Majority of the patients received TT at hospital discharge (77%) and at 1 year (73%). More severe KD led to a lower application ratio (p < .05) of TT (92%, 88%, 80%, 73%, 31%) at discharge and at 1 year (81%, 76%, 76%, 68%, 40%). Patients with more severe KD were less likely (p < .05) to receive TD of MRA (81%, 68%, 78%, 61%, 52%) at discharge and a RASi (53%, 49%, 45%, 21%, 27%) at 1 year. One-year all-cause mortality (14%, 15%, 16%, 33%, 48%, p < .001), the ratio of all-cause rehospitalizations (30%, 35%, 40%, 43%, 52%, p = .028), and rehospitalizations for HF (8%, 13%, 18%, 20%, 38%, p = .001) were significantly higher in more severe KD categories.

CONCLUSIONS

KD unfavorably affects the application of TT in HFrEF, however poorer mortality and rehospitalization rates among them highlight the role of the conscious implementation and up-titration of GDMT.

Optimization of Evidence-Based Heart Failure Medications After an Acute Heart Failure Admission: A Secondary Analysis of the STRONG-HF Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, Helped by N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Testing of Heart Failure Therapies (STRONG-HF) trial strived for rapid uptitration aiming to reach 100% optimal doses of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) within 2 weeks after discharge from an acute heart failure (AHF) admission.

Objective

To assess the association between degree of GDMT doses achieved in high-intensity care and outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a post hoc secondary analysis of the STRONG-HF randomized clinical trial, conducted from May 2018 to September 2022. Included in the study were patients with AHF who were not treated with optimal doses of GDMT before and after discharge from an AHF admission. Data were analyzed from January to October 2023.

Interventions

The mean percentage of the doses of 3 classes of HF medications (renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, β-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) relative to their optimal doses was computed. Patients were classified into 3 dose categories: low (<50%), medium (≥50% to <90%), and high (≥90%). Dose and dose group were included as a time-dependent covariate in Cox regression models, which were used to test whether outcomes differed by dose.

Main Outcome Measures

Post hoc secondary analyses of postdischarge 180-day HF readmission or death and 90-day change in quality of life.

Results

A total of 515 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.7 [13.4] years; 311 male [60.4%]) assigned high-intensity care were included in this analysis. At 2 weeks, 39 patients (7.6%) achieved low doses, 254 patients (49.3%) achieved medium doses, and 222 patients (43.1%) achieved high doses. Patients with lower blood pressure and more congestion were less likely to be uptitrated to optimal GDMT doses at week 2. As a continuous time-dependent covariate, an increase of 10% in the average percentage optimal dose was associated with a reduction in 180-day HF readmission or all-cause death (primary end point: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.98; P = .01) and a decrease in 180-day all-cause mortality (aHR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95; P = .007). Quality of life at 90 days, measured by the EQ-5D visual analog scale, improved more in patients treated with higher doses of GDMT (mean difference, 0.10; 95% CI, -4.88 to 5.07 and 3.13; 95% CI, -1.98 to 8.24 points in the medium- and high-dose groups relative to the low-dose group, respectively; P = .07). Adverse events to day 90 occurred less frequently in participants with HIC who were prescribed higher GDMT doses at week 2.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this post hoc analysis of the STRONG-HF randomized clinical trial show that, among patients randomly assigned to high-intensity care, achieving higher doses of HF GDMT 2 weeks after discharge was feasible and safe in most patients.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03412201.

[Acute heart failure with altered ejection fraction : Electrocardiographic signs with mortality at the Abidjan cardiology institute]

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure with impaired ejection fraction (HFIEF) represents the end-stage of most cardiac diseases, and is responsible for a high mortality rate. In order to identify patients at risk, numerous clinical and paraclinical prognostic factors have been proposed. The electrocardiogram (ECG), easy to perform and inexpensive, retains a powerful role in the prognostic evaluation of heart failure patients. The aim was to evaluate ECG signs associated with mortality in a retrospective cohort of patients with ICFEA.

METHODOLOGY

The study was observational and analytical based on retrospective data collected from patients benefiting from a primary hospitalization for ICFEA at the Abidjan Heart Institute from January 2018 to July 2020.

RESULTS

Of the 370 patients included, 197 had died by August 1, 2020, representing an overall mortality of 53%. Mortality progressed gradually up to one year, then remained unchanged up to 30 months. In multivariate Cox regression including ECG variables only, the presence of intra-ventricular conduction disorders (OR: 1.80; 95% CI [1.01-3.25]), microvoltage (OR: 1.82; 95% CI [1.05-16]), and pathological Q waves (OR: 1.70; 95% CI [1.02-2.83]), were significantly associated with overall mortality. When ECG variables and clinical, paraclinical and therapeutic demographic variables were included, only the presence of pathological Q waves (OR:1.74; 95% CI [1.01-3.01]) persisted as a risk factor for mortality. Hypertension and treatment of heart failure, in particular ACEI/ARII, beta-blockers and ARM, were protective factors. The presence of Q waves was associated with a significant reduction in survival, based on curves obtained using the Kaplan-Meier model.

CONCLUSION

ICFEA is responsible for high mortality, mainly in the year following the 1st hospitalization for cardiac decompensation. The presence of pathological Q waves is the only electrocardiographic sign that remains statistically associated with a poor prognosis, after adjustment.

Bridging gaps and optimizing implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure

Despite robust scientific evidence and strong guideline recommendations, there remain significant gaps in initiation and dose titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) among eligible patients. Reasons surrounding these gaps are multifactorial, and largely attributed to patient, healthcare professionals, and institutional challenges. Concurrently, HF remains a predominant cause of mortality and hospitalization, emphasizing the critical need for improved delivery of therapy to patients in routine clinical practice. To optimize GDMT, various implementation strategies have emerged in the recent decade such as in-hospital rapid initiation of GDMT, improving patient adherence, addressing clinical inertia, improving affordability, engagement in quality improvement registries, multidisciplinary clinics, and EHR-integrated interventions. This review highlights the current use and barriers to optimal utilization of GDMT, and proposes novel strategies aimed at improving GDMT in HF.

2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC

Document Reviewers: Rudolf A. de Boer (CPG Review Co-ordinator) (Netherlands), P. Christian Schulze (CPG Review Co-ordinator) (Germany), Elena Arbelo (Spain), Jozef Bartunek (Belgium), Johann Bauersachs (Germany), Michael A. Borger (Germany), Sergio Buccheri (Sweden), Elisabetta Cerbai (Italy), Erwan Donal (France), Frank Edelmann (Germany), Gloria Färber (Germany), Bettina Heidecker (Germany), Borja Ibanez (Spain), Stefan James (Sweden), Lars Køber (Denmark), Konstantinos C. Koskinas (Switzerland), Josep Masip (Spain), John William McEvoy (Ireland), Robert Mentz (United States of America), Borislava Mihaylova (United Kingdom), Jacob Eifer Møller (Denmark), Wilfried Mullens (Belgium), Lis Neubeck (United Kingdom), Jens Cosedis Nielsen (Denmark), Agnes A. Pasquet (Belgium), Piotr Ponikowski (Poland), Eva Prescott (Denmark), Amina Rakisheva (Kazakhstan), Bianca Rocca (Italy), Xavier Rossello (Spain), Leyla Elif Sade (United States of America/Türkiye), Hannah Schaubroeck (Belgium), Elena Tessitore (Switzerland), Mariya Tokmakova (Bulgaria), Peter van der Meer (Netherlands), Isabelle C. Van Gelder (Netherlands), Mattias Van Heetvelde (Belgium), Christiaan Vrints (Belgium), Matthias Wilhelm (Switzerland), Adam Witkowski (Poland), and Katja Zeppenfeld (Netherlands) All experts involved in the development of this Focused Update have submitted declarations of interest. These have been compiled in a report and simultaneously published in a supplementary document to the Focused Update. The report is also available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/guidelines See the European Heart Journal online for supplementary documents that include evidence tables.

Impact of adherence to guideline-directed therapy on risk of death in HF patients across an ejection fraction spectrum

AIMS

How different degrees of adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) affect mortality risk in patients with heart failure (HF) in a real-world clinical setting is poorly understood. This study sought to investigate how different levels of adherence to GDMT were associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with HF across a spectrum of left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) in a real-world clinical setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 64 610 HF patients with no missing value of LVEF from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry were included in the study. Patients were divided according to different LVEFs (<30%, 30-39%, 40-49%, and≥50%) and stratified by an adherence score (good, moderate, or poor) according to the triple, double, and single one usage of GDMT: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The outcome is time to all-cause mortality. The mean age of the whole cohort was 73.9 ± 12.1 years, and the proportion of patients in LVEF < 30%, 30-39%, 40-49%, and≥50% groups was 27.6%, 26.9%, 22.1%, and 23.3%, respectively. Patients with LVEF < 30% had the highest mortality rate, almost 20% higher than those with LVEF ≥ 50% {hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.80 [0.71-0.90], P < 0.001}. After treatment of GDMT with good adherence, patients with LVEF < 30% had similar mortality to those with LVEF ≥ 50% [HR (95% CI): 0.97 (0.86-1.10), P = 0.664]. However, the percentage of moderate or poor GDMT was alarmingly high, with good adherence only in 20% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Good adherence to GDMT works best in patients with LVEF < 50%, whereas moderate adherence to GDMT varies in efficacy depending on the components of the drug combinations.

The treatment with sGC stimulator improves survival of hypertensive rats in response to volume-overload induced by aorto-caval fistula

Heart failure (HF) has been declared as global pandemic and current therapies are still ineffective, especially in patients that develop concurrent cardio-renal syndrome. Considerable attention has been focused on the nitric oxide (NO)/soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC)/cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of sGC stimulator (BAY41-8543) with the same mode of action as vericiguat, for the treatment of heart failure (HF) with cardio-renal syndrome. As a model, we chose heterozygous Ren-2 transgenic rats (TGR), with high-output heart failure, induced by aorto-caval fistula (ACF). The rats were subjected into three experimental protocols to evaluate short-term effects of the treatment, impact on blood pressure, and finally the long-term survival lasting 210 days. As control groups, we used hypertensive sham TGR and normotensive sham HanSD rats. We have shown that the sGC stimulator effectively increased the survival of rats with HF in comparison to untreated animals. After 60 days of sGC stimulator treatment, the survival was still 50% compared to 8% in the untreated rats. One-week treatment with sGC stimulator increased the excretion of cGMP in ACF TGR (109 ± 28 nnmol/12 h), but the ACE inhibitor decreased it (-63 ± 21 nnmol/12 h). Moreover, sGC stimulator caused a decrease in SBP, but this effect was only temporary (day 0: 117 ± 3; day 2: 108 ± 1; day 14: 124 ± 2 mmHg). These results support the concept that sGC stimulators might represent a valuable class of drugs to battle heart failure especially with cardio-renal syndrome, but further studies are necessary.

Pharmacotherapy considerations with finerenone in the treatment of chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE

This review provides an overview of the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D), how the novel treatment class of nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) fits within the treatment landscape, and how pharmacists can contribute to the multidisciplinary care of patients with CKD associated with T2D.

SUMMARY

Optimizing pharmacotherapy for patients with CKD associated with T2D is critical to prevent or slow progression to end-stage kidney disease and reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events. However, many patients with CKD receive suboptimal treatment, in part because of the high complexity of care required, a lack of disease recognition among providers and patients, and a failure to utilize new kidney-protective therapies. Finerenone is the first nonsteroidal, selective MRA to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of adult patients with CKD associated with T2D. Clinical trials have demonstrated that finerenone significantly reduces the risk of cardiorenal disease progression vs placebo and has a reduced risk of hyperkalemia compared to traditional steroidal MRAs. Initiation of finerenone should follow evaluation of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum potassium levels. Consideration of potential drug-drug interactions, follow-up monitoring of potassium levels, and coordination of changes in pharmacotherapy across the patient care team are also important.

CONCLUSION

Finerenone is a valuable addition to the treatment landscape for CKD associated with T2D. Through their expertise in -medication -management, transitions of care, and patient education, clinical pharmacists are well positioned to ensure patients receive safe and effective -treatment.

Optimization of GDMT for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: can physiological and biological barriers explain the gaps in adherence to heart failure guidelines?

Heart failure is a growing epidemic with high mortality rates and recurrent hospital admissions that creates a burden on affected individuals, their caregivers and the whole healthcare system. Throughout the years, many randomized trials have established the effectiveness of several pharmacological therapies and electrophysiological devices to reduce hospitalizations and improve quality of life and survival, mostly for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). These studies led to the publication of national societies' recommendations to guide clinicians in the management of HFrEF. Yet, many reports have shown significant care gaps in adherence to these recommendations in clinical practice, highlighting suboptimal use and/or dosing of evidence-based therapies. Adherence to guidelines has been shown to be associated with the best prognosis in HFrEF, with patients presenting with intolerances or contraindications having the highest risk of events; however, it remains unclear whether this association is causal or merely a marker of more advanced disease. Furthermore, individual characteristics may limit the possibility of reaching the targeted dosage of specific agents. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of clinicians' adherence to heart failure guidelines in a specialized real-life setting, particularly regarding use and optimization of guideline-derived medical therapies, as well as the implementation of more recent agents such as sacubitril/valsartan and SGLT2 inhibitors. We seek potential explanations for suboptimal treatment and its impact on patient outcomes.

Beta-blocker management in patients admitted for acute heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a review and expert consensus opinion

The role of the beta-adrenergic signaling pathway in heart failure (HF) is pivotal. Early blockade of this pathway with beta-blocker (BB) therapy is recommended as the first-line medication for patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Conversely, in patients with severe acute HF (AHF), including those with resolved cardiogenic shock (CS), BB initiation can be hazardous. There are very few data on the management of BB in these situations. The present expert consensus aims to review all published data on the use of BB in patients with severe decompensated AHF, with or without hemodynamic compromise, and proposes an expert-recommended practical algorithm for the prescription and monitoring of BB therapy in critical settings.

New Challenges in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Managing Worsening Events

Patients with an established diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are prone to experience episodes of worsening symptoms and signs despite continued therapy, termed "worsening heart failure" (WHF). Despite guideline-directed medical therapy, worsening of chronic heart failure accounts for almost 50% of all hospital admissions for HF, and patients experiencing WHF carry a substantially higher risk of death and hospitalization than patients with "stable" HF. New drugs are emerging as arrows in the quiver for clinicians to address the residual risk of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular deaths in patients with WHF. This question-and-answer-based review will discuss the emerging definition of WHF in light of the recent clinical consensus released by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the new therapeutic approaches to treat WHF and then move on to their timing and safety concerns (i.e., renal profile).

Practical patient care appraisals with use of new potassium binders in heart failure and chronic kidney diseases

Hyperkalaemia is a life-threatening condition leading to significant morbidity and mortality. It is common in heart failure and in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients due to the diseases themselves, which often coexist, the high co-presence of diabetes, the fluctuations in renal function, and the use of some drugs [i.e. renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors]. Hyperkalaemia limits their administration or uptitration, thus impacting on mortality. New K + binders, namely patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS-9), are an intriguing option to manage hyperkalaemia in heart failure and/or CKD patients, both to reduce its fatal effects and to let clinicians uptitrate RAAS inhibition. Even if their real impact on strong outcomes is still to be determined, we hereby provide a practical approach to favour their use in routine clinical practice in order to gain the correct confidence and provide an additive tool to heart failure and CKD patients' wellbeing. New trials are welcome to fill the gap in knowledge.

[The effect of kidney function on the optimization of medical therapy and on mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction]

INTRODUCTION

Renal dysfunction is a main limiting factor of applying and up-titrating guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

OBJECTIVE

Our retrospective monocentric observational study aimed to analyse the application ratio of combined neurohormonal antagonist therapy (RASi: ACEI/ARB/ARNI + βB + MRA) and 12-month all-cause mortality differences in terms of renal dysfunction among HFrEF patients hospitalized for heart failure.

METHOD

We retrospectively analysed the cohort of consecutive HFrEF patients, hospitalized at the Heart Failure Unit of our tertiary cardiological centre in 2019-2021. The application ratio of discharge triple therapy (TT) in five groups established on admission eGFR parameters, representing severity of renal dysfunction (eGFR≥90, eGFR = 60-89, eGFR = 45-59, eGFR = 30-44, eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73 m2) was investigated with chi-square test, while 12-month mortality differences were analysed with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

257 patients were included. Median eGFR was 57 (39-75) ml/min/1.73 m2, 54% of patients had eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m2. The proportion of patients in eGFR≥90, 60-89, 45-59, 30-44, <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 subgroups was 12%, 34%, 18%, 21%, 15%, respectively. 2% of patients were on dialysis. Even though the application rate of TT was notably high (77%) in the total cohort, more severe renal dysfunction led to a significantly lower implementation rate of TT (94%, 86%, 91%, 70%, 34%; p<0.0001): the application rate of RASi (100%, 98%, 96%, 89%, 50%, p<0.0001), βB (94%, 88%, 96%, 79%, 68%; p = 0.003) and MRA therapy (97%, 99%, 98%, 94%, 82%; p = 0.001) differed significantly. 12-month all-cause mortality was 23% in the whole cohort. Mortality rates were higher in more severe renal dysfunction (3%, 15%, 22%, 31%, 46%; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Even though the proportion of patients on TT in the whole cohort was remarkably high, renal dysfunction led to a significantly lower application ratio of TT, associating with worse survival. Our results highlight that despite renal dysfunction the application of HFrEF cornerstone pharmacotherapy is essential. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(35): 1387-1396.