1
|
Okoth L, Steege R, Ngunjiri A, Theobald S, Otiso L. Policy and practices shaping the delivery of health services to pregnant adolescents in informal urban settlements in Kenya. Health Policy Plan 2023; 38:ii25-ii35. [PMID: 37995266 PMCID: PMC10666924 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czad070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
In Kenya, the pregnancy rate of 15% among adolescents aged 15-19 years is alarmingly high. Adolescent girls living in informal urban settlements are exposed to rapid socio-economic transitions and multiple intersecting health risks and may be particularly disadvantaged in accessing sexual reproductive health services. Understanding vulnerabilities and service-seeking behaviours from different perspectives is important in order to support the development and implementation of progressive policies and services that meet adolescents' unique needs within urban informal settlements. This study explored policy makers, community health service providers' and community members' perceptions of access to, and delivery of, sexual reproductive health services for pregnant adolescents in one informal urban settlement in Nairobi. We employed qualitative methods with respondents throughout the health system, purposively sampled by gender and diversity of roles. We conducted focus group discussions with community members (n = 2 female-only; n = 2 male-only), key informant interviews with policy makers (n = 8), traditional birth attendants (n = 12), community health volunteers (CHVs) (n = 11), a nutritionist (n = 1), social workers (n = 2) and clinical officers (n = 2). We analysed the data using thematic analysis. Government policies and strategies on sexual and reproductive health for adolescents exist in Kenya and there are examples of innovative and inclusive practice within facilities. Key factors that support the provision of services to pregnant adolescents include devolved governance, and effective collaboration and partnerships, including with CHVs. However, inadequate financing and medical supplies, human resource shortages and stigmatizing attitudes from health providers and communities, mean that pregnant adolescents from informal urban settlements often miss out on critical services. The provision of quality, youth-friendly reproductive health services for this group requires policies and practice that seek to achieve reproductive justice through centring the needs and realities of pregnant adolescents, acknowledging the complex and intersecting social inequities they face.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rosie Steege
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- MARCH Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sally Theobald
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boone CE, Gertler PJ, Barasa GM, Gruber J, Kwan A. Can a private sector engagement intervention that prioritizes pro-poor strategies improve healthcare access and quality? A randomized field experiment in Kenya. Health Policy Plan 2023; 38:1006-1016. [PMID: 37602984 PMCID: PMC11020211 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czad076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Private sector engagement in health reform has been suggested to help reduce healthcare inequities in sub-Saharan Africa, where populations with the most need seek the least care. We study the effects of African Health Markets for Equity (AHME), a cluster randomized controlled trial carried out in Kenya from 2012 to 2020 at 199 private health clinics. AHME included four clinic-level interventions: social health insurance, social franchising, SafeCare quality-of-care certification programme and business support. This paper evaluates whether AHME increased the capacity of private health clinics to serve poor clients while maintaining or enhancing the quality of care provided. At endline, clinics that received AHME were 14.5 percentage points (pp) more likely to be empanelled with the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF), served 51% more NHIF clients and served more clients from the middle three quintiles of the wealth distribution compared to control clinics. Comparing individuals living in households near AHME treatment and control clinics (N = 8241), AHME led to a 6.7-pp increase in the probability of holding any health insurance on average. We did not find any additional effect of AHME on insurance holding among poor households. We measured quality of care using a standardized patient (SP) experiment (N = 596 SP-provider interactions) where recruited and trained SPs were randomized to present as either 'not poor', and able to afford all services provided, or 'poor' by telling the provider they could only afford ∼300 Kenyan Shillings (US$3) in fees. We found that poor SPs received lower levels of both correct and unnecessary services, and AHME did not affect this. More work must be done to ensure that clients of all wealth levels receive high-quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E Boone
- Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, 5807 S. Woodlawn Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Paul J Gertler
- Haas School of Business, University of California Berkeley, 2220 Piedmont Ave, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | | | - Joshua Gruber
- Center for Effective Global Action, University of California Berkeley, Giannini Hall, 251 Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Ada Kwan
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao Y, Mbuthia D, Munywoki J, Gathara D, Nicodemo C, Nzinga J, English M. Examining the absorption of post-internship medical officers into the public sector at county-level in devolved Kenya: a qualitative case study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:875. [PMID: 37596663 PMCID: PMC10439593 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09928-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND After Kenya's decentralization and constitutional changes in 2013, 47 devolved county governments are responsible for workforce planning and recruitment including for doctors/medical officers (MO). Data from the Ministry of Health suggested that less than half of these MOs are being absorbed by the public sector between 2015 and 2018. We aimed to examine how post-internship MOs are absorbed into the public sector at the county-level, as part of a broader project focusing on Kenya's human resources for health. METHODS We employed a qualitative case study design informed by a simplified health labour market framework. Data included interviews with 30 MOs who finished their internship after 2018, 10 consultants who have supervised MOs, and 51 county/sub-county-level managers who are involved in MOs' planning and recruitment. A thematic analysis approach was used to examine recruitment processes, outcomes as well as perceived demand and supply. RESULTS We found that Kenya has a large mismatch between supply and demand for MOs. An increasing number of medical schools are offering training in medicine while the demand for MOs in the county-level public sector has not been increasing at the same pace due to fiscal resource constraints and preference for other workforce cadres. The local Department of Health put in requests and participate in interviews but do not lead the recruitment process and respondents suggested that it can be subject to political interference and corruption. The imbalance of supply and demand is leading to unemployment, underemployment and migration of post-internship MOs with further impacts on MOs' wages and contract conditions, especially in the private sector. CONCLUSION The mismatched supply and demand of MO accompanied by problematic recruitment processes led to many MOs not being absorbed by the public sector and subsequent unemployment and underemployment. Although Kenya has ambitious workforce norms, it may need to take a more pragmatic approach and initiate constructive policy dialogue with stakeholders spanning the education, public and private health sectors to better align MO training, recruitment and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingxi Zhao
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, NDM Centre for Global Health Research, University of Oxford, S Parks Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SY, UK.
| | | | | | - David Gathara
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
- MARCH Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Catia Nicodemo
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Economics, Verona University, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Mike English
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, NDM Centre for Global Health Research, University of Oxford, S Parks Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SY, UK
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mumo E, Agutu NO, Moturi AK, Cherono A, Muchiri SK, Snow RW, Alegana VA. Geographic accessibility and hospital competition for emergency blood transfusion services in Bungoma, Western Kenya. Int J Health Geogr 2023; 22:6. [PMID: 36973723 PMCID: PMC10041813 DOI: 10.1186/s12942-023-00327-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Estimating accessibility gaps to essential health interventions helps to allocate and prioritize health resources. Access to blood transfusion represents an important emergency health requirement. Here, we develop geo-spatial models of accessibility and competition to blood transfusion services in Bungoma County, Western Kenya. METHODS Hospitals providing blood transfusion services in Bungoma were identified from an up-dated geo-coded facility database. AccessMod was used to define care-seeker's travel times to the nearest blood transfusion service. A spatial accessibility index for each enumeration area (EA) was defined using modelled travel time, population demand, and supply available at the hospital, assuming a uniform risk of emergency occurrence in the county. To identify populations marginalized from transfusion services, the number of people outside 1-h travel time and those residing in EAs with low accessibility indexes were computed at the sub-county level. Competition between the transfusing hospitals was estimated using a spatial competition index which provided a measure of the level of attractiveness of each hospital. To understand whether highly competitive facilities had better capacity for blood transfusion services, a correlation test between the computed competition metric and the blood units received and transfused at the hospital was done. RESULTS 15 hospitals in Bungoma county provide transfusion services, however these are unevenly distributed across the sub-counties. Average travel time to a blood transfusion centre in the county was 33 min and 5% of the population resided outside 1-h travel time. Based on the accessibility index, 38% of the EAs were classified to have low accessibility, representing 34% of the population, with one sub-county having the highest marginalized population. The computed competition index showed that hospitals in the urban areas had a spatial competitive advantage over those in rural areas. CONCLUSION The modelled spatial accessibility has provided an improved understanding of health care gaps essential for health planning. Hospital competition has been illustrated to have some degree of influence in provision of health services hence should be considered as a significant external factor impacting the delivery, and re-design of available services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eda Mumo
- Population Health Unit, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
- Department of Geomatic Engineering and Geospatial Information System (GEGIS), Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Nathan O. Agutu
- Department of Geomatic Engineering and Geospatial Information System (GEGIS), Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Angela K. Moturi
- Population Health Unit, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Anitah Cherono
- Population Health Unit, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Samuel K. Muchiri
- Population Health Unit, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Robert W. Snow
- Population Health Unit, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Victor A. Alegana
- Population Health Unit, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karuga R, Kok M, Mbindyo P, Otiso L, Macharia J, Broerse JEW, Dieleman M. How context influences the functionality of community-level health governance structures: A case study of community health committees in Kenya. Int J Health Plann Manage 2023; 38:702-722. [PMID: 36781772 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Community Health Committees (CHCs) are mechanisms through which communities participate in the governance and oversight of community health services. While there is renewed interest in strengthening community participation in the governance of community health services, there is limited evidence on how context influences community-level structures of governance and oversight. The objective of this study was to examine how contextual factors influence the functionality of CHCs in Kajiado, Migori, and Nairobi Counties in Kenya. Using a case study design, we explored the influence of context on CHCs using 18 focus group discussions with 110 community members (clients, CHC members, and community health volunteers [CHVs]) and interviews with 33 health professionals. Essential CHC functions such as 'leadership' and 'management' were weak, partly because Health professionals did not involve CHCs in developing health plans. Community Health Committees were active in the supervision of CHVs, reviewing their household reports, although they did not utilise these data for making decisions. Resource mobilisation and evaluation of health programs were affected by the lack of administrative and operational support, such as training. Despite having influential membership, CHCs could not provide leadership and management functions. Health system actors perceived the roles of CHCs as service providers rather than structures for governance and oversight. Insufficient awareness of CHC roles among health professionals, lack of training and operational support for community-based activities constrained CHCs' functionality and thus their role in community participation. While there are efforts to institutionalise community-level governance structures for health at sub-national level, there is a need to scale-up these efforts countrywide. We recommend that community-level governance structures be empowered, mandated, and provided with resources to take on the responsibility of overseeing community health services and exacting accountability from health providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robinson Karuga
- LVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.,Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maryse Kok
- KIT Royal Tropical Institute (Koninklijk Instituut voor de Tropen), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Mbindyo
- Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Juja, Kenya
| | | | - Judy Macharia
- Directorate of Preventive and Promotive Health, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jacqueline E W Broerse
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Dieleman
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,KIT Royal Tropical Institute (Koninklijk Instituut voor de Tropen), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tsofa B, Waweru E, Munywoki J, Soe K, Rodriguez DC, Koon AD. Political economy analysis of sub-national health sector planning and budgeting: A case study of three counties in Kenya. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 3:e0001401. [PMID: 36962920 PMCID: PMC10022076 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Devolution represented a concerted attempt to bring decision making closer to service delivery in Kenya, including within the health sector. This transformation created county governments with independent executive (responsible for implementing) and legislative (responsible for agenda-setting) arms. These new arrangements have undergone several growing pains that complicate management practices, such as planning and budgeting. Relatively little is known, however, about how these functions have evolved and varied sub-nationally. We conducted a problem-driven political economy analysis to better understand how these planning and budgeting processes are structured, enacted, and subject to change, in three counties. Key informant interviews (n = 32) were conducted with purposively selected participants in Garissa, Kisumu, and Turkana Counties; and national level in 2021, with participants drawn from a wide range of stakeholders involved in health sector planning and budgeting. We found that while devolution has greatly expanded participation in sub-national health management, it has also complicated and politicized decision-making. In this way, county governments now have the authority to allocate resources based on the preferences of their constituents, but at the expense of efficiency. Moreover, budgets are often not aligned with priority-setting processes and are frequently undermined by disbursements delays from national treasury, inconsistent supply chains, and administrative capacity constraints. In conclusion, while devolution has greatly transformed sub-national health management in Kenya with longer-term potential for greater accountability and health equity, short-to-medium term challenges persist in developing efficient systems for engaging a diverse array of stakeholders in planning and budgeting processes. Redressing management capacity challenges between and within counties is essential to ensure that the Kenya health system is responsive to local communities and aligned with the progressive aspirations of its universal health coverage movement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Tsofa
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme–KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research -Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
- Department of Public Health–Pwani University School of Health Sciences, Kilifi, Kenya
- * E-mail:
| | - Evelyn Waweru
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme–KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research -Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Joshua Munywoki
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme–KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research -Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Khaing Soe
- United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Kenya, Country Office, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Daniela C. Rodriguez
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Dept. of International Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Adam D. Koon
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Dept. of International Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Feldhaus I, Chatterjee S, Clarke-Deelder E, Brenzel L, Resch S, Bossert TJ. Examining decentralization and managerial decision making for child immunization program performance in India. Soc Sci Med 2023; 317:115457. [PMID: 36493499 PMCID: PMC9870749 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Despite widespread adoption of decentralization reforms, the impact of decentralization on health system attributes, such as access to health services, responsiveness to population health needs, and effectiveness in affecting health outcomes, remains unclear. This study examines how decision space, institutional capacities, and accountability mechanisms of the Intensified Mission Indradhanush (IMI) in India relate to measurable performance of the immunization program. Data on decision space and its related dimensions of institutional capacity and accountability were collected by conducting structured interviews with managers based in 24 districts, 61 blocks, and 279 subcenters. Two measures by which to assess performance were selected: (1) proportion reduction in the DTP3 coverage gap (i.e., effectiveness), and (2) total IMI doses delivered per incremental USD spent on program implementation (i.e., efficiency). Descriptive statistics on decision space, institutional capacity, and accountability for IMI managers were generated. Structural equation models (SEM) were specified to detect any potential associations between decision space dimensions and performance measures. The majority of districts and blocks indicated low levels of decision space. Institutional capacity and accountability were similar across areas. Increases in decision space were associated with less progress towards closing the immunization coverage gap in the IMI context. Initiatives to support health workers and managers based on their specific contextual challenges could further improve outcomes of the program. Similar to previous studies, results revealed strong associations between each of the three decentralization dimensions. Health systems should consider the impact that management structures have on the efficiency and effectiveness of health services delivery. Future research could provide greater evidence for directionality of direct and indirect effects, interaction effects, and/or mediators of relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Feldhaus
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Stephen Resch
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas J. Bossert
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mhazo AT, Maponga CC. Beyond political will: unpacking the drivers of (non) health reforms in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7:bmjgh-2022-010228. [PMID: 36455987 PMCID: PMC9717331 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lack of political will is frequently invoked as a rhetorical tool to explain the gap between commitment and action for health reforms in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, the concept remains vague, ill defined and risks being used as a scapegoat to actually examine what shapes reforms in a given context, and what to do about it. This study sought to go beyond the rhetoric of political will to gain a deeper understanding of what drives health reforms in SSA. METHODS We conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley (2005) to understand the drivers of health reforms in SSA. RESULTS We reviewed 84 published papers that focused on the politics of health reforms in SSA covering the period 2002-2022. Out of these, more than half of the papers covered aspects related to health financing, HIV/AIDS and maternal health with a dominant focus on policy agenda setting and formulation. We found that health reforms in SSA are influenced by six; often interconnected drivers namely (1) the distribution of costs and benefits arising from policy reforms; (2) the form and expression of power among actors; (3) the desire to win or stay in government; (4) political ideologies; (5) elite interests and (6) policy diffusion. CONCLUSION Political will is relevant but insufficient to drive health reform in SSA. A framework of differential reform politics that considers how the power and beliefs of policy elites is likely to shape policies within a given context can be useful in guiding future policy analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison T Mhazo
- Community Health Sciences Unit (CHSU), Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Joseph NK, Macharia PM, Okiro EA. Progress towards achieving child survival goals in Kenya after devolution: Geospatial analysis with scenario-based projections, 2015-2025. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 2:e0000686. [PMID: 36962627 PMCID: PMC10021401 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Subnational projections of under-5 mortality (U5M) have increasingly become an essential planning tool to support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agenda and strategies for improving child survival. To support child health policy, planning, and tracking child development goals in Kenya, we projected U5M at units of health decision making. County-specific annual U5M were estimated using a multivariable Bayesian space-time hierarchical model based on intervention coverage from four alternate intervention scale-up scenarios assuming 1) the highest subnational intervention coverage in 2014, 2) projected coverage based on the fastest county-specific rate of change observed in the period between 2003-2014 for each intervention, 3) the projected national coverage based on 2003-2014 trends and 4) the country-specific targets of intervention coverage relative to business as usual (BAU) scenario. We compared the percentage change in U5M based on the four scale-up scenarios relative to BAU and examined the likelihood of reaching SDG 3.2 target of at least 25 deaths/1,000 livebirths by 2022 and 2025. Projections based on 10 factors assuming BAU, showed marginal reductions in U5M across counties with all the counties except Mandera county not achieving the SDG 3.2 target by 2025. Further, substantial reductions in U5M would be achieved based on the various intervention scale-up scenarios, with 63.8% (30), 74.5% (35), 46.8% (22) and 61.7% (29) counties achieving SDG target for scenarios 1,2,3 and 4 respectively by 2025. Scenario 2 yielded the highest reductions of U5M with individual scale-up of access to improved water, recommended treatment of fever and accelerated HIV prevalence reduction showing considerable impact on U5M reduction (≥ 20%) relative to BAU. Our results indicate that sustaining an ambitious intervention scale-up strategy matching the fastest rate observed between 2003-2014 would substantially reduce U5M in Kenya. However, despite this ambitious scale-up scenario, 25% (12 of 47) of the Kenya's counties would still not achieve SDG 3.2 target by 2025.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noel K. Joseph
- Population Health Unit, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Peter M. Macharia
- Population Health Unit, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
- Centre for Health Informatics, Computing, and Statistics, Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Emelda A. Okiro
- Population Health Unit, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leaving No One Behind: A Photovoice Case Study on Vulnerability and Wellbeing of Children Heading Households in Two Informal Settlements in Nairobi. SOCIAL SCIENCES 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/socsci11070296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Children heading households (CHH) in urban informal settlements face specific vulnerabilities shaped by limitations on their opportunities and capabilities within the context of urban inequities, which affect their wellbeing. We implemented photovoice research with CHHs to explore the intersections between their vulnerabilities and the social and environmental context of Nairobi’s informal settlements. We enrolled and trained four CHHs living in two urban informal settlements—Korogocho and Viwandani—to utilise smartphones to take photos that reflected their experiences of marginalisation and what can be done to address their vulnerabilities. Further, we conducted in-depth interviews with eight more CHHs. We applied White’s wellbeing framework to analyse data. We observed intersections between the different dimensions of wellbeing, which caused the CHHs tremendous stress that affected their mental health, social interactions, school performance and attendance. Key experiences of marginalisation were lack of adequate food and nutrition, hazardous living conditions and stigma from peers due to the limited livelihood opportunities available to them. Despite the hardships, we documented resilience among CHH. Policy action is required to take action to intervene in the generational transfer of poverty, both to improve the life chances of CHHs who have inherited their parents’ marginalisation, and to prevent further transfer of vulnerabilities to their children. This calls for investing in CHHs’ capacity for sustaining livelihoods to support their current and future independence and wellbeing.
Collapse
|
11
|
Worsley-Tonks KEL, Bender JB, Deem SL, Ferguson AW, Fèvre EM, Martins DJ, Muloi DM, Murray S, Mutinda M, Ogada D, Omondi GP, Prasad S, Wild H, Zimmerman DM, Hassell JM. Strengthening global health security by improving disease surveillance in remote rural areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Glob Health 2022; 10:e579-e584. [PMID: 35303467 PMCID: PMC8923676 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00031-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the need to strengthen national surveillance systems to protect a globally connected world. In low-income and middle-income countries, zoonotic disease surveillance has advanced considerably in the past two decades. However, surveillance efforts often prioritise urban and adjacent rural communities. Communities in remote rural areas have had far less support despite having routine exposure to zoonotic diseases due to frequent contact with domestic and wild animals, and restricted access to health care. Limited disease surveillance in remote rural areas is a crucial gap in global health security. Although this point has been made in the past, practical solutions on how to implement surveillance efficiently in these resource-limited and logistically challenging settings have yet to be discussed. We highlight why investing in disease surveillance in remote rural areas of low-income and middle-income countries will benefit the global community and review current approaches. Using semi-arid regions in Kenya as a case study, we provide a practical approach by which surveillance in remote rural areas can be strengthened and integrated into existing systems. This Viewpoint represents a transition from simply highlighting the need for a more holistic approach to disease surveillance to a solid plan for how this outcome might be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeff B Bender
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Sharon L Deem
- Institute for Conservation Medicine, Saint Louis Zoo, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Adam W Ferguson
- Gantz Family Collection Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Eric M Fèvre
- International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya; Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dino J Martins
- Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya; Department of Ecology and Evolution, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Dishon M Muloi
- International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya; Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Suzan Murray
- Global Health Program, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mathew Mutinda
- Veterinary Services Department, Kenya Wildlife Service, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Darcy Ogada
- The Peregrine Fund, Boise, ID, USA; National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - George P Omondi
- Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA; Ahadi Veterinary Resource Center, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Shailendra Prasad
- Center for Global Health and Social Responsibility, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Hannah Wild
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Dawn M Zimmerman
- Department of Clinical Studies, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Disease, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - James M Hassell
- Global Health Program, Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Disease, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bosire EN, Kamau LW, Bosire VK, Mendenhall E. Social risks, economic dynamics and the local politics of COVID-19 prevention in Eldoret town, Kenya. Glob Public Health 2021; 17:325-340. [PMID: 34962853 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2021.2020320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
A steady and consistent national and local government leadership is crucial in times of crisis. The trust in government - which can be so fragile - was strong in Eldoret town, a large municipal in western Kenya widely known for ethnic conflicts. In our interviews with 20 business people and 30 community members from Eldoret town, we found that the trust built early in the pandemic was broken due to individual leaders who eventually dismissed public health promotion and engaged in politics and corruption of funds for COVID-19 relief. When leadership was strong, locals in Eldoret town (and especially business owners) engaged in public health prevention measures for the greater good. But when leadership slipped, people complained and eventually ignored public health prevention measures at home, on the bus, and in businesses around town, causing the intensification of outbreaks. This was most common among those engaged in the formal economy as those in the informal economy were more likely to mistrust the government altogether. We show who falls through the cracks when government policy targets viral threats and suggest how local government and public health agencies might work to control COVID-19 infections while ensuring that all Eldoret residents are cared for.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edna N Bosire
- Center for Innovation in Global Health, Georgetown University Washington, DC, USA.,Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.,Brain and Mind Institute, Aga Khan University, East Africa.,SAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Violet K Bosire
- School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa.,School of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Eldoret, Eldoret, Kenya
| | - Emily Mendenhall
- SAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Roche SD, Odoyo J, Irungu E, Kwach B, Dollah A, Nyerere B, Peacock S, Morton JF, O'Malley G, Bukusi EA, Baeten JM, Mugwanya KK. A one-stop shop model for improved efficiency of pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery in public clinics in western Kenya: a mixed methods implementation science study. J Int AIDS Soc 2021; 24:e25845. [PMID: 34898032 PMCID: PMC8666585 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In public clinics in Kenya, separate, sequential delivery of the component services of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) (e.g. HIV testing, counselling, and dispensing) creates long wait times that hinder clients' ability and desire to access and continue PrEP. We conducted a mixed methods study in four public clinics in western Kenya to identify strategies for operationalizing a one-stop shop (OSS) model and evaluate whether this model could improve client wait time and care acceptability among clients and providers without negatively impacting uptake or continuation. METHODS From January 2020 through November 2020, we collected and analysed 47 time-and-motion observations using Mann-Whitney U tests, 29 provider and client interviews, 68 technical assistance reports, and clinic flow maps from intervention clinics. We used controlled interrupted time series (cITS) to compare trends in PrEP initiation and on-time returns from a 12-month pre-intervention period (January-December 2019) to an 8-month post-period (January-November 2020, excluding a 3-month COVID-19 wash-out period) at intervention and control clinics. RESULTS From the pre- to post-period, median client wait time at intervention clinics dropped significantly from 31 to 6 minutes (p = 0.02), while median provider contact time remained around 23 minutes (p = 0.4). Intervention clinics achieved efficiency gains by moving PrEP delivery to lower volume departments, moving steps closer together (e.g. relocating supplies; cross-training and task-shifting), and differentiating clients based on the subset of services needed. Clients and providers found the OSS model highly acceptable and additionally identified increased privacy, reduced stigma, and higher quality client-provider interactions as benefits of the model. From the pre- to post-period, average monthly initiations at intervention and control clinics increased by 6 and 2.3, respectively, and percent of expected follow-up visits occurring on time decreased by 18% and 26%, respectively; cITS analysis of PrEP initiations (n = 1227) and follow-up visits (n = 2696) revealed no significant difference between intervention and control clinics in terms of trends in PrEP initiation and on-time returns (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS An OSS model significantly improved client wait time and care acceptability without negatively impacting initiations or continuations, thus highlighting opportunities to improve the efficiency of PrEP delivery efficiency and client-centredness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Josephine Odoyo
- Centre for Microbiology ResearchKenya Medical Research InstituteNairobiKenya
| | | | - Benn Kwach
- Centre for Microbiology ResearchKenya Medical Research InstituteNairobiKenya
| | - Annabell Dollah
- Centre for Microbiology ResearchKenya Medical Research InstituteNairobiKenya
| | - Bernard Nyerere
- Centre for Microbiology ResearchKenya Medical Research InstituteNairobiKenya
| | - Sue Peacock
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | | | | | - Elizabeth A. Bukusi
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Centre for Microbiology ResearchKenya Medical Research InstituteNairobiKenya
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Jared M. Baeten
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of Medicine, University of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of WashingtonWashingtonSeattleUSA
- Gilead SciencesFoster CityCaliforniaUSA
| | - Kenneth K. Mugwanya
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of WashingtonWashingtonSeattleUSA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kairu A, Orangi S, Mbuthia B, Ondera J, Ravishankar N, Barasa E. Examining health facility financing in Kenya in the context of devolution. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1086. [PMID: 34645443 PMCID: PMC8515645 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07123-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background How health facilities are financed affects their performance and health system goals. We examined how health facilities in the public sector are financed in Kenya, within the context of a devolved health system. Methods We carried out a cross-sectional study in five purposely selected counties in Kenya, using a mixed methods approach. We collected data using document reviews and in-depth interviews (no = 20). In each county, we interviewed county department of health managers and health facility managers from two and one purposely selected public hospitals and health center respectively. We analyzed qualitive data using thematic analysis and conducted descriptive analysis of quantitative data. Results Planning and budgeting: Planning and budgeting processes by hospitals and health centers were not standardized across counties. Budgets were not transparent and credible, but rather were regarded as “wish lists” since they did not translate to actual resources. Sources of funds: Public hospitals relied on user fees, while health centers relied on donor funds as their main sources of funding. Funding flows: Hospitals in four of the five study counties had no financial autonomy. Health centers in all study counties had financial autonomy. Flow of funds to hospitals and health centers in all study counties was characterized by unpredictability of amounts and timing. Health facility expenditure: Staff salaries accounted for over 80% of health facility expenditure. This crowded out other expenditure and led to frequent stock outs of essential health commodities. Conclusion The national and county government should consider improving health facility financing in Kenya by 1) standardizing budgeting and planning processes, 2) transitioning public facility financing away from a reliance on user fees and donor funding 3) reforming public finance management laws and carry out political engagement to facilitate direct facility financing and financial autonomy of public hospitals, and 4) assess health facility resource needs to guide appropriate levels resource allocation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07123-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Kairu
- Health Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, P.O. Box 43640, - 00100, Lenana Road, Nairobi, Kenya.
| | - Stacey Orangi
- Health Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, P.O. Box 43640, - 00100, Lenana Road, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Joanne Ondera
- Independent Consultant, P.O. Box 102370-00101, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Edwine Barasa
- Health Economics Research Unit (HERU), KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Program, P.O. Box 43640, - 00100, Lenana Road, Nairobi, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Peter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3SY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Qiu M, Paina L, Rodríguez DC, Wilhelm JA, Eze-Ajoku E, Searle A, Zakumumpa H, Ssengooba F, MacKenzie C, Bennett S. Exploring perceived effects from loss of PEPFAR support for outreach in Kenya and Uganda. Global Health 2021; 17:80. [PMID: 34273988 PMCID: PMC8285775 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-021-00729-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction In 2015, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief undertook policy shifts to increase efficiencies in its programming, including transitioning HIV/AIDS funding away from low burden areas. We examine the impact of these changes on HIV outreach in Kenya and Uganda. Methods Qualitative data collection was conducted as a part of a broader mixed-methods evaluation. Two rounds of facility-level case studies and national-level interviews were conducted in Kenya and Uganda, with health facility, sub-national and central Ministry of Health staff, HIV clients, and implementing partners. Results In both countries, the loss of outreach support affected community-based HIV/AIDS education, testing, peer support, and defaulter tracing. Discussion Loss of external support for outreach raises concerns for countries’ ability to reach the 90–90-90 UNAIDS target, as key linkages between vulnerable communities and health systems can be adversely affected. Conclusion Development partners should consider how to mitigate potential consequences of transition policies to prevent negative effects at the community level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Qiu
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Ligia Paina
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniela C Rodríguez
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jess A Wilhelm
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ezinne Eze-Ajoku
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alexandra Searle
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Henry Zakumumpa
- Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | - Sara Bennett
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ssennyonjo A, Van Belle S, Titeca K, Criel B, Ssengooba F. Multisectoral action for health in low-income and middle-income settings: how can insights from social science theories inform intragovernmental coordination efforts? BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2020-004064. [PMID: 34039586 PMCID: PMC8160194 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
There is consensus in global health on the need for multisectoral action (MSA) to address many contemporary development challenges, but there is limited action. Examples of issues that require coordinated MSA include the determinants of health conditions such as nutrition (malnutrition and obesity) and chronic non-communicable diseases. Nutrition, tobacco control and such public health issues are regulated separately by health, trade and treasury ministries. Those issues need to be coordinated around the same ends to avoid conflicting policies. Despite the need for MSA, why do we see little progress? We investigate the obstacles to and opportunities for MSA by providing a government perspective. This paper draws on four theoretical perspectives, namely (1) the political economy perspective, (2) principal–agent theory, (3) resource dependence theory and (4) transaction cost economics theory. The theoretical framework provides complementary propositions to understand, anticipate and prepare for the emergence and structuring of coordination arrangements between government organisations at the same or different hierarchical levels. The research on MSA for health in low/middle-income countries needs to be interested in a multitheory approach that considers several theoretical perspectives and the contextual factors underlying coordination practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aloysius Ssennyonjo
- School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda .,Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.,Institute of Development Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sara Van Belle
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kristof Titeca
- Institute of Development Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Bart Criel
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Freddie Ssengooba
- School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rodríguez DC, Mohan D, Mackenzie C, Wilhelm J, Eze-Ajoku E, Omondi E, Qiu M, Bennett S. Effects of transition on HIV and non-HIV services and health systems in Kenya: a mixed methods evaluation of donor transition. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:457. [PMID: 33985482 PMCID: PMC8117613 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06451-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In 2015 the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) initiated its Geographic Prioritization (GP) process whereby it prioritized high burden areas within countries, with the goal of more rapidly achieving the UNAIDS 90–90-90 targets. In Kenya, PEPFAR designated over 400 health facilities in Northeastern Kenya to be transitioned to government support (known as central support (CS)). Methods We conducted a mixed methods evaluation exploring the effect of GP on health systems, and HIV and non-HIV service delivery in CS facilities. Quantitative data from a facility survey and health service delivery data were gathered and combined with data from two rounds of interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted at national and sub-national level to document the design and implementation of GP. The survey included 230 health facilities across 10 counties, and 59 interviews and 22 FGDs were conducted with government officials, health facility providers, patients, and civil society. Results We found that PEPFAR moved quickly from announcing the GP to implementation. Despite extensive conversations between the US government and the Government of Kenya, there was little consultation with sub-national actors even though the country had recently undergone a major devolution process. Survey and qualitative data identified a number of effects from GP, including discontinuation of certain services, declines in quality and access to HIV care, loss of training and financial incentives for health workers, and disruption of laboratory testing. Despite these reports, service coverage had not been greatly affected; however, clinician strikes in the post-transition period were potential confounders. Conclusions This study found similar effects to earlier research on transition and provides additional insights about internal country transitions, particularly in decentralized contexts. Aside from a need for longer planning periods and better communication and coordination, we raise concerns about transitions driven by epidemiological criteria without adaptation to the local context and their implication for priority-setting and HIV investments at the local level. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06451-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela C Rodríguez
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 Wolfe Street, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| | - Diwakar Mohan
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 Wolfe Street, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | | | - Jess Wilhelm
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 Wolfe Street, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Ezinne Eze-Ajoku
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 Wolfe Street, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | | | - Mary Qiu
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 Wolfe Street, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Sara Bennett
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 Wolfe Street, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hussein S, Otiso L, Kimani M, Olago A, Wanyungu J, Kavoo D, Njiraini R, Kimanzi S, Karuga R. Institutionalizing Community Health Services in Kenya: A Policy and Practice Journey. GLOBAL HEALTH: SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2021; 9:S25-S31. [PMID: 33727318 PMCID: PMC7971377 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-20-00430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The process of institutionalizing community health services in Kenya required strong leadership by the Ministry of Health, effective coordination and support of stakeholders, and alignment of community health with the political priorities at the national and decentralized government levels to facilitate adequate prioritization and financing of the community health strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rose Njiraini
- Kenya Country Office, United Nations Children's Fund, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Sila Kimanzi
- U.S. Agency for International Development, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kumar MB, Madan JJ, Auguste P, Taegtmeyer M, Otiso L, Ochieng CB, Muturi N, Mgamb E, Barasa E. Cost-effectiveness of community health systems strengthening: quality improvement interventions at community level to realise maternal and child health gains in Kenya. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:e002452. [PMID: 33658302 PMCID: PMC7931757 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Improvements in maternal and infant health outcomes are policy priorities in Kenya. Achieving these outcomes depends on early identification of pregnancy and quality of primary healthcare. Quality improvement interventions have been shown to contribute to increases in identification, referral and follow-up of pregnant women by community health workers. In this study, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using quality improvement at community level to reduce maternal and infant mortality in Kenya. METHODS We estimated the cost-effectiveness of quality improvement compared with standard of care treatment for antenatal and delivering mothers using a decision tree model and taking a health system perspective. We used both process (antenatal initiation in first trimester and skilled delivery) and health outcomes (maternal and infant deaths averted, as well as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)) as our effectiveness measures and actual implementation costs, discounting costs only. We conducted deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS We found that the community quality improvement intervention was more cost-effective compared with standard community healthcare, with incremental cost per DALY averted of $249 under the deterministic analysis and 76% likelihood of cost-effectiveness under the probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a standard threshold. The deterministic estimate of incremental cost per additional skilled delivery was US$10, per additional early antenatal care presentation US$155, per maternal death averted US$5654 and per infant death averted US$37 536 (2017 dollars). CONCLUSIONS This analysis shows that the community quality improvement intervention was cost-effective compared with the standard community healthcare in Kenya due to improvements in antenatal care uptake and skilled delivery. It is likely that quality improvement interventions are a good investment and may also yield benefits in other health areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Bruce Kumar
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
- MARCH Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jason J Madan
- University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
| | - Peter Auguste
- University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
| | - Miriam Taegtmeyer
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
- Tropical Infectious Diseases Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Nelly Muturi
- Research and Strategic Information, LVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Elizabeth Mgamb
- Department of Health, Migori County Government, Migori, Kenya
| | - Edwine Barasa
- Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ochola EA, Karanja DMS, Elliott SJ. The impact of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) on health and wellbeing in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): A case study of Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021; 15:e0009131. [PMID: 33571200 PMCID: PMC7904142 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) remain endemic to many regions of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) left behind by socioeconomic progress. As such, these diseases are markers of extreme poverty and inequity that are propagated by the political, economic, social, and cultural systems that affect health and wellbeing. As countries embrace and work towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the needs of such vulnerable populations need to be addressed in local and global arenas. The research uses primary qualitative data collected from five NTD endemic counties of Kenya: interviews key informants (n = 21) involved in NTD implementation programs and focus groups (n = 5) of affected individuals. Informed by theories of political ecology of health, the research focuses on post-devolution Kenya and identifies the political, economic, social, and cultural factors that propagate NTDs and their effects on health and wellbeing. Our findings indicate that structural factors such as competing political interests, health worker strikes, inadequate budgetary allocations, economic opportunity, marginalization, illiteracy, entrenched cultural norms and practices, poor access to water, sanitation and housing, all serve to propagate NTD transmission and subsequently affect the health and wellbeing of populations. As such, we recommend that post-devolution Kenya ensures local political, economic and socio-cultural structures are equitable, sensitive and responsive to the needs of all people. We also propose poverty alleviation through capacity building and empowerment as a means of tackling NTDs for sustained economic opportunity and productivity at the local and national level. Wellbeing is currently seen as an avenue that shapes, happiness, productivity, environmental awareness, social inclusion, and justice; however, most countries presently adopting wellbeing measures are in the global north. Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) significantly compromise populations’ health and well-being in the global south, causing undesirable effects on the personal, social, and economic capabilities of communities living in endemic regions. As countries work towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), it is paramount that countries in the global south adopt wellbeing measures and, in doing so, capture the lived experiences of individuals experiencing inequities, particularly as these are shaped by NTDs. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), political and economic power manifests across different scales, determining human-environmental interaction, distribution of resources, and the transmission of infectious agents. This paper uses a political ecology of health approach to identify the political, economic, social and cultural factors that contribute to NTDs, which are among the world’s greatest global health problems. The vast majority of people bearing the burden of NTDs reside in low-income countries. Surprisingly, as the economies of the low-income countries improve to middle-income status, NTDs continue to thrive among sub-populations of low socioeconomic status because of the unequal distribution of economic gains. As a result, NTDs are found in environments characterized by poverty and income inequality, and other inequalities in access to health services, housing, safe water, and sanitation. This paper uses political ecology of health in the primarily biomedical field of NTDs to demonstrate that inequities are embedded within the broad political, socio-cultural, and economic systems that exacerbate NTD infection. The study recommends that NTD endemic countries in SSA formulate policies that enhance equity through capacity building and empowerment enhance population wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A. Ochola
- Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Diana M. S. Karanja
- Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Susan J. Elliott
- Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kagwanja N, Waithaka D, Nzinga J, Tsofa B, Boga M, Leli H, Mataza C, Gilson L, Molyneux S, Barasa E. Shocks, stress and everyday health system resilience: experiences from the Kenyan coast. Health Policy Plan 2020; 35:522-535. [PMID: 32101609 PMCID: PMC7225571 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Health systems are faced with a wide variety of challenges. As complex adaptive systems, they respond differently and sometimes in unexpected ways to these challenges. We set out to examine the challenges experienced by the health system at a sub-national level in Kenya, a country that has recently undergone rapid devolution, using an 'everyday resilience' lens. We focussed on chronic stressors, rather than acute shocks in examining the responses and organizational capacities underpinning those responses, with a view to contributing to the understanding of health system resilience. We drew on learning and experiences gained through working with managers using a learning site approach over the years. We also collected in-depth qualitative data through informal observations, reflective meetings and in-depth interviews with middle-level managers (sub-county and hospital) and peripheral facility managers (n = 29). We analysed the data using a framework approach. Health managers reported a wide range of health system stressors related to resource scarcity, lack of clarity in roles and political interference, reduced autonomy and human resource management. The health managers adopted absorptive, adaptive and transformative strategies but with mixed effects on system functioning. Everyday resilience seemed to emerge from strategies enacted by managers drawing on a varying combination of organizational capacities depending on the stressor and context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Kagwanja
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Health Systems and Ethics Research Unit, Bofa Road, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Dennis Waithaka
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Health Systems and Ethics Research Unit, Bofa Road, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Jacinta Nzinga
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Health Systems and Ethics Research Unit, Bofa Road, Kilifi, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Benjamin Tsofa
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Health Systems and Ethics Research Unit, Bofa Road, Kilifi, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mwanamvua Boga
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Health Systems and Ethics Research Unit, Bofa Road, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Hassan Leli
- Kilifi County Department of Health, P.O BOX 9-80108, Bofa Road, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Christine Mataza
- Kilifi County Department of Health, P.O BOX 9-80108, Bofa Road, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Lucy Gilson
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Health Systems and Ethics Research Unit, Bofa Road, Kilifi, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Edwine Barasa
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Health Systems and Ethics Research Unit, Bofa Road, Kilifi, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Owino L, Wangong’u A, Were N, Maleche A. The missing link in Kenya's universal health coverage experiment: a preventive and promotive approach to SRHR. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2020; 28:1851347. [PMID: 33393897 PMCID: PMC7887766 DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1851347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper explores the universal health coverage (UHC) roll-out process in Kenya through the lens of its potential to progressively realise the constitutional promise of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in Kenya. We argue that SRHR requires significant attention to be paid to preventive and promotive approaches to health and that this requires interrogation of barriers around access to information, norms, and legal and policy frameworks. We then unpack the UHC process in Kenya, its genesis, development and eventual roll-out, focusing on the essential benefits package and its components. We argue that a process of democratic priority-setting cognisant of equity, non-discrimination and transparency will better deliver on an essential benefits package for access to SRHR that is legitimate and acceptable. As a result, we submit that Kenya's UHC process fails to take cognisance of the weight placed on sexual and reproductive health in our Constitution and fails to address historical inequities around accessing health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Owino
- Health, Governance and Accountability Advocate, Kenya Legal and Ethical Issues Network on HIV and AIDS (KELIN), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Annette Wangong’u
- Health Governance Consultant, Initiative for Strategic Litigation in Africa, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Nerima Were
- Acting Deputy Executive Director, KELIN, Nairobi, Kenya; Tutorial Fellow, University of Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Allan Maleche
- Executive Director, KELIN, Nairobi, Kenya; Member of the UNAIDS Human Rights Reference Group
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
van der Elst EM, Mudza R, Onguso JM, Kiirika L, Kombo B, Jahangir N, Graham SM, Operario D, Sanders EJ. A more responsive, multi-pronged strategy is needed to strengthen HIV healthcare for men who have sex with men in a decentralized health system: qualitative insights of a case study in the Kenyan coast. J Int AIDS Soc 2020; 23 Suppl 6:e25597. [PMID: 33000906 PMCID: PMC7527756 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION HIV healthcare services for men who have sex with men (MSM) in Kenya have not been openly provided because of persistent stigma and lack of healthcare capacity within Kenya's decentralized health sector. Building on an evaluation of a developed online MSM sensitivity training programme offered to East and South African healthcare providers, this study assessed views and responses to strengthen HIV healthcare services for MSM in Kenya. METHODS The study was conducted between January and July 2017 in Kilifi County, coastal Kenya. Seventeen policymakers participated in an in-depth interview and 59 stakeholders, who were purposively selected from three key groups (i.e. healthcare providers, implementing partners and members of MSM-led community-based organizations) took part in eight focus group discussions. Discussions aimed to understand gaps in service provision to MSM from different perspectives, to identify potential misconceptions, and to explore opportunities to improve MSM HIV healthcare services. Interviews and focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants' responses revealed that all key groups navigated diverse challenges related to MSM HIV health services. Specific challenges included priority-setting by county government staff; preparedness of leadership and management on MSM HIV issues at the facility level; data reporting at the implementation level and advocacy for MSM health equity. Strong power inequities were observed between policy leadership, healthcare providers and MSM, with MSM feeling blamed for their sexual orientation. MSM agency, as expressed in their actions to access HIV services, was significantly constrained by county context, but can potentially be improved by political will, professional support and a human rights approach. CONCLUSIONS To strengthen HIV healthcare for MSM within a decentralized Kenyan health system, a more responsive, multi-pronged strategy adaptable and relevant to MSM's healthcare needs is required. Continued engagement with policy leadership, collaboration with health facilities, and partnerships with different community stakeholders are critical to improve HIV healthcare services for MSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise M van der Elst
- Kenya Medical Research Institute‐Wellcome Trust Research ProgrammeKilifiKenya
- Department of Global HealthAcademic Medical CentreUniversity of Amsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Rita Mudza
- Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and TechnologyNairobiKenya
| | - Justus M Onguso
- Institute for Biotechnology ResearchJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and TechnologyNairobiKenya
| | - Leonard Kiirika
- Department of Horticulture and Food SecuritySchool of Agriculture and Environmental SciencesJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and TechnologyNairobiKenya
| | - Bernadette Kombo
- Kenya Medical Research Institute‐Wellcome Trust Research ProgrammeKilifiKenya
| | | | - Susan M Graham
- Departments of MedicineGlobal Health, and EpidemiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWAUSA
| | - Don Operario
- Department of Behavioral and Social SciencesSchool of Public HealthBrown UniversityProvidenceRIUSA
| | - Eduard J Sanders
- Kenya Medical Research Institute‐Wellcome Trust Research ProgrammeKilifiKenya
- Department of Global HealthAcademic Medical CentreUniversity of Amsterdamthe Netherlands
- Nuffield Department of MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Galgallo DA, Lio I, Kochi A, Mutiga Cce DK, Ransom J. Pediatric Tuberculosis and a Unique Method of Case Finding and Default Prevention: The Case of Baby 'Lucky', Moyale Sub-County, Kenya, 2019. J Trop Pediatr 2020; 66:553-555. [PMID: 32025727 DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fmaa005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
We report the case of a 9-month-old male infant diagnosed in the field with extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Use of innovative global positioning system tracking of pregnant pastoralist women allowed staff to find the mother, locate the infant and enroll the infant in care and treatment. Due to this innovative intervention of case finding and tracking, the infant was prevented from defaulting and completed his anti-TB regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dahabo Adi Galgallo
- Maternal and Neonatal Health, Integrated Maternal Mobile Health Project, Moyale Sub-County, Kenya.,Maternal and Child Health, Moyale Sub-County Health Department, Moyale Town, Kenya.,Kenya Ministry of Health, Field Epidemiology & Laboratory Training Program, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Ibrahim Lio
- Maternal and Child Health, Moyale Sub-County Health Department, Moyale Town, Kenya
| | - Adano Kochi
- Maternal and Child Health, Moyale Sub-County Health Department, Moyale Town, Kenya
| | | | - James Ransom
- Maternal and Neonatal Health, Integrated Maternal Mobile Health Project, Moyale Sub-County, Kenya.,Kenya Ministry of Health, Field Epidemiology & Laboratory Training Program, Nairobi, Kenya.,Research & Evaluation, Piret Partners Consulting, Washington, DC 20003, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Munywoki J, Kagwanja N, Chuma J, Nzinga J, Barasa E, Tsofa B. Tracking health sector priority setting processes and outcomes for human resources for health, five-years after political devolution: a county-level case study in Kenya. Int J Equity Health 2020; 19:165. [PMID: 32958000 PMCID: PMC7507677 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-01284-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health sector priority setting in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) entails balancing between a high demand and low supply of scarce resources. Human Resources for Health (HRH) consume the largest allocation of health sector resources in LMICs. Health sector decentralization continues to be promoted for its perceived ability to improve efficiency, relevance and participation in health sector priority setting. Following the 2013 devolution in Kenya, both health service delivery and human resource management were decentralized to county level. Little is known about priority setting practices and outcomes of HRH within decentralized health systems in LMICs. Our study sought to examine if and how the Kenyan devolution has improved health sector priority setting practices and outcomes for HRH. METHODS We used a mixed methods case study design to examine health sector priority setting practices and outcomes at county level in Kenya. We used three sources of data. First, we reviewed all relevant national and county level policy and guidelines documents relating to HRH management. We then accessed and reviewed county records of HRH recruitment and distribution between 2013 and 2018. We finally conducted eight key informant interviews with various stakeholder involved in HRH priority setting within our study county. RESULTS We found that HRH numbers in the county increased by almost two-fold since devolution. The county had two forms of HRH recruitment: one led by the County Public Services Board as outlined by policy and guidelines and a parallel, politically-driven recruitment done directly by the County Department of Health. Though there were clear guidelines on HRH recruitment, there were no similar guidelines on allocation and distribution of HRH. Since devolution, the county has preferentially staffed higher level hospitals over primary care facilities. Additionally, there has been local county level innovations to address some HRH management challenges, including recruiting doctors and other highly specialized staff on fixed term contract as opposed to permanent basis; and implementation of local incentives to attract and retain HRH to remote areas within the county. CONCLUSION Devolution has significantly increased county level decision-space for HRH priority setting in Kenya. However, HRH management and accountability challenges still exist at the county level. There is need for interventions to strengthen county level HRH management capacity and accountability mechanisms beyond additional resources allocation. This will boost the realization of the country's efforts for promoting service delivery equity as a key goal - both for the devolution and the country's quest towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Munywoki
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya.
- Department of Public Health, School of Human and Health Sciences, Pwani University, Kilifi, Kenya.
| | - Nancy Kagwanja
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Jane Chuma
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
- The World Bank Group, Kenya Country Office, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jacinta Nzinga
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Edwine Barasa
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Benjamin Tsofa
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, Kilifi, Kenya.
- Department of Public Health, School of Human and Health Sciences, Pwani University, Kilifi, Kenya.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kumar MB, Taegtmeyer M, Madan J, Ndima S, Chikaphupha K, Kea A, Barasa E. How do decision-makers use evidence in community health policy and financing decisions? A qualitative study and conceptual framework in four African countries. Health Policy Plan 2020; 35:799-809. [PMID: 32516361 PMCID: PMC7487332 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Various investments could help countries deliver on the universal health coverage (UHC) goals set by the global community; community health is a pillar of many national strategies towards UHC. Yet despite resource mobilization towards this end, little is known about the potential costs and value of these investments, as well as how evidence on the same would be used in related decisions. This qualitative study was conducted to understand the use of evidence in policy and financing decisions for large-scale community health programmes in low- and middle-income countries. Through key informant interviews with 43 respondents in countries with community health embedded in national UHC strategies (Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique) and at global institutions, we investigated evidence use in community health financing and policy decision-making, as well as evidentiary needs related to community health data for decision-making. We found that evidence use is limited at all levels, in part due to a perceived lack of high-quality, relevant evidence. This perception stems from two main areas: first, desire for local evidence that reflects the context, and second, much existing economic evidence does not deal with what decision-makers value when it comes to community health systems-i.e. coverage and (to a lesser extent) quality. Beyond the evidence gap, there is limited capacity to assess and use the evidence. Elected officials also face political challenges to disinvestment as well as structural obstacles to evidence use, including the outsized influence of donor priorities. Evaluation data must to speak to decision-maker interests and constraints more directly, alongside financiers of community health providing explicit guidance and support on the role of evidence use in decision-making, empowering national decision-makers. Improved data quality, increased relevance of evidence and capacity for evidence use can drive improved efficiency of financing and evidence-based policymaking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Bruce Kumar
- Community Health Systems Group, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
- MARCH Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Miriam Taegtmeyer
- Community Health Systems Group, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
- Tropical Infectious Disease Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jason Madan
- Centre for Health Economics at Warwick, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Sozinho Ndima
- Community Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, University Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | - Aschenaki Kea
- School of Public and Environmental Health, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
- Center for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Edwine Barasa
- Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Noory B, Hassanain SA, Lindskog BV, Elsony A, Bjune GA. Exploring the consequences of decentralization: has privatization of health services been the perceived effect of decentralization in Khartoum locality, Sudan? BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:669. [PMID: 32690003 PMCID: PMC7370464 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05511-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The health system of Sudan has experienced several forms of decentralization, as well as, a radical reform. Authority and governance of secondary and tertiary health facilities have been shifted from federal to state levels. Moreover, the provision of health care services have been moved from large federal tertiary level hospitals such as Khartoum Teaching Hospital (KTH) and Jafaar Ibnoaf Hospital (JIH), located in the center of Khartoum, to smaller district secondary hospitals like Ibrahim Malik (IBMH), which is located in the southern part of Khartoum. Exploring stakeholders’ perceptions on this decentralisation implementation and its relevant consequences is vital in building an empirical benchmark for the improvement of health systems. Methods This study utilised a qualitative design which is comprised of in-depth interviews and qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach. The study was conducted between July and December 2015, and aimed at understanding the personal experiences and perceptions of stakeholders towards decentralisation enforcement and the implications on public health services, with a particular focus on the Khartoum locality. It involved community members residing in the Khartoum Locality, specifically in catchments area where hospital decentralisation was implemented, as well as, affiliated health workers and policymakers. Results The major finding suggested that privatisation of health services occurred after decentralisation. The study participants also highlighted that scrutiny and reduction of budgets allocated to health services led to an instantaneous enforcement of cost recovery user fee. Devolving KTH Khartoum Teaching and Jafar Ibnoaf Hospitals into peripherals with less. Capacity, was considered to be a plan to weaken public health services and outsource services to private sector. Another theme that was highlighted in hospitals included the profit-making aspect of the governmental sector in the form of drug supplying and profit-making retail. Conclusions A change in health services after the enforcement of decentralisation was illustrated. Moreover, the incapacitation of public health systems and empowerment of the privatisation concept was the prevailing perception among stakeholders. Having contextualised in-depth studies and policy analysis in line with the global liberalisation and adjustment programmes is crucial for any health sector reform in Sudan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bandar Noory
- The Epidemiological Laboratory, Khartoum, Sudan. .,International Community Health, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | - Asma Elsony
- The Epidemiological Laboratory, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Gunnar Aksel Bjune
- Department of Community Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Adoyo MA. Landscape analysis of healthcare policy: the instrumental role of governance in HIV/AIDS services integration framework. Pan Afr Med J 2020; 36:27. [PMID: 32774604 PMCID: PMC7388594 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.27.22795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Low and middle-income countries HIV/AIDS interventions are yet to achieve the desired levels of health outcome due to lack of effectiveness and efficiency in programming, a challenge associated with resource limitations, fragmented services, complexities in population and disease characteristics including political landscape. The objective of this study was to establish the instrumental role of governance in the implementation of HIV/AIDS services integration policy framework, with focus on organization structure, participation in decision making, collaboration, stakeholder engagement, political commitment as study variables. Methods Using a mixed method design, a total number of 30 health workers, 5 county AIDS services coordinators (CASCOs), 8 sub-CASCOs and 3 representatives of inter coordinating committee were interviewed in compliance with ethical protocols. Multi-stage sampling techniques was used to select counties in Kenya, health institutions and respondents. Quantitative and qualitative data was generated by administering semi structured questionnaire and key informant interview guide. Results Generated from excel sheet and NVivo software indicate that organization structures existed and clarity and ease of work varied across the different levels of care. Collaboration efforts, however varied, created synergy in policy framework implementation and political commitment complemented the various leadership actions for successful implementation of integration policy framework. Conclusion Governance role is indispensable in the implementation of health policy framework. Policy makers need accurate epidemiological and demographic information to implement contextualized policy framework necessary for sustained improvement in health outcomes.
Collapse
|
29
|
Ayah R, Ong'ech J, Mbugua EM, Kosgei RC, Waller K, Gathara D. Responding to maternal, neonatal and child health equipment needs in Kenya: a model for an innovation ecosystem leveraging on collaborations and partnerships. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 6:85-91. [PMID: 32685187 PMCID: PMC7361008 DOI: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Background Up to 70% of medical devices in low-income and middle-income countries are partially or completely non-functional, impairing service provision and patient outcomes. In Sub-Saharan Africa, medical devices not designed for local conditions, lack of well-trained biomedical engineers and diverse donated equipment have led to poor maintenance and non-repair. The Maker Project’s aim was to test the effectiveness of an innovative partnership ecosystem network, the ‘Maker Hub’, in reducing gaps in the supply of essential medical devices for maternal, newborn and child health. This paper describes the first phase of the project, the building of the Maker Hub. Methods Key activities in setting up the Maker Hub—a collaborative partnership between the University of Nairobi (UoN) and the Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), catalysed by Concern Worldwide Kenya—are described using a product development partnership approach. Using a health systems approach, a needs assessment identified a medical equipment shortlist. Design thinking with a capacity building component was used by the UoN (innovators, public health specialists, engineers) working closely and with KNH nurses, physicians and biomedical engineers to develop the prototypes. Results To date, four medical device prototypes have been developed. Two have been evaluated by the National Bureau of Standards and one has undergone clinical testing. Conclusions We have demonstrated an innovative partnership ecosystem that has developed medical devices that have undergone national standards evaluation and clinical testing, a first in Sub-Saharan Africa. Promoting a robust innovation ecosystem for medical equipment requires investment in building trust in the innovation ecosystem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Ayah
- Science and Technology Park and School of Public Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - John Ong'ech
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Rose Chepchumba Kosgei
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Liwanag HJ, Wyss K. Who should decide for local health services? A mixed methods study of preferences for decision-making in the decentralized Philippine health system. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:305. [PMID: 32293432 PMCID: PMC7158124 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05174-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Philippines decentralized government health services through devolution to local governments in 1992. Over the years, opinions varied on the impact of devolved governance to decision-making for local health services. The objective of this study was to analyze decision-makers’ perspectives on who should be making decisions for local health services and on their preferred structure of health service governance should they be able to change the situation. Methods We employed a mixed methods approach that included an online survey in one region and in-depth interviews with purposively-selected decision-makers in the Philippine health system. Study participants were asked about their perspectives on decision-making in the functions of planning, health financing, resource management, human resources for health, health service delivery, and data management and monitoring. Analysis of survey results through visualization of data on charts was complemented by the themes that emerged from the qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews based on the Framework Method. Results We received 24 online survey responses and interviewed 27 other decision-makers. Survey respondents expressed a preference to shift decision-making away from the local politician in favor of the local health officer in five functions. Most survey participants also preferred re-centralization. Analysis of the interviews suggested that the preferences expressed were likely driven by an expectation that re-centralization would provide a solution to the perceived politicization in decision-making and the reliance of local governments on central support. Conclusions Rather than re-centralize the health system, one policy option for consideration for the Philippines would be to maintain devolution but with a revitalized role for the central level to maintain oversight over local governments and regulate their decision-making for the functions. Decentralization, whether in the Philippines or elsewhere, must not only transfer decision-making responsibility to local levels but also ensure that those granted with the decision space could perform decision-making with adequate capacities and could grasp the importance of health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harvy Joy Liwanag
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland. .,Balik Scientist Program, Department of Science and Technology Philippine Council for Health Research and Development (DOST PCHRD), Metro Manila, Philippines. .,Ateneo de Manila University School of Medicine and Public Health, Metro Manila, Philippines.
| | - Kaspar Wyss
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Oraro-Lawrence T, Wyss K. Policy levers and priority-setting in universal health coverage: a qualitative analysis of healthcare financing agenda setting in Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:182. [PMID: 32143629 PMCID: PMC7059333 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-5041-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Competing priorities in health systems necessitate difficult choices on which health actions and investments to fund: decisions that are complex, value-based, and highly political. In light of the centrality of universal health coverage (UHC) in driving current health policy, we sought to examine the value interests that influence agenda setting in the country's health financing space. Given the plurality of Kenya's health policy levers, we aimed to examine how the perspectives of stakeholders involved in policy decision-making and implementation shape discussions on health financing within the UHC framework. METHODS A series of in-depth key informant interviews were conducted at national and county level (n = 13) between April and May 2018. Final thematic analysis using the Framework Method was conducted to identify similarities and differences amongst stakeholders on the challenges hindering Kenya's achievement of UHC in terms of its the optimisation of health service coverage; expansion of the population that benefits from essential healthcare services; and the minimisation of out-of-pocket costs associated with health-seeking behaviour. RESULTS Our findings indicate that the perceived lack of strategic leadership from Kenya's national government has led to a lack of agreement on stakeholders' interpretation of what is to be understood by UHC, its contextual values and priorities. We observe material differences between and within policy networks on the country's priorities for population coverage, healthcare service provision, and cost-sharing under the UHC dispensation. In spite of this, we note that progressive universalism is considered as the preferred approach towards UHC in Kenya, with most interviewees prioritising an equity-based approach that prioritises better access to healthcare services and financial risk protection. However, the conflicting priorities of key stakeholders risk derailing progress towards the expansion of access to health services and financial risk protection. CONCLUSIONS This study adds to existing knowledge of UHC in Kenya by contextualising the competing and evolving priorities that should be taken into consideration as the country strategises over its UHC process. We suggest that clear policy action is required from national government and county governments in order to develop a logical and consistent approach towards UHC in Kenya.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Oraro-Lawrence
- Swiss Center for International Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box 4002, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kaspar Wyss
- Swiss Center for International Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box 4002, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Omondi AJ, Ochieng OG, Eliud K, Yoos A, Kavilo MR. Assessment of Integrated Disease Surveillance Data Uptake in Community Health Systems within Nairobi County, Kenya. East Afr Health Res J 2020; 4:194-199. [PMID: 34308238 PMCID: PMC8279160 DOI: 10.24248/eahrj.v4i2.644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Kenya has since independence struggled to restructure its health system to provide services to its entire population especially in outbreak responses. The last decade has seen the country witness disease outbreaks across the country i.e. Rift Valley fever in June 2018, and Chikungunya and Dengue fever in Mombasa in February 2018. This exposed the country's lack of preparedness in handling outbreaks at grass root level. Outbreak incidences tend to prevail at community level before a public health action is established, with the situation becoming dire in the lower tier health facilities. Objective The purpose of the study was to assess the uptake of Integrated Disease Surveillance Response (IDSR) health data and utilisation at community level health systems in the six sub counties within Nairobi County of Kenya. Methodology The study used cross-sectional descriptive research design on a target population of 1840 community health workers. The study used Yamane formula to calculate the sample size of 371 respondents, selected using stratified sampling and simple random sampling methods. The logistic regression model was used to assess the benefits of Integrated Data Surveillance and Response data in health facilities across Nairobi County. Data was collected using questionnaires, analysis done using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences, and findings presented in form of tables and bar graphs. Results The study had 315 questionnaires were duly filled and returned, representing 85% response rate. The findings showed that 268(85%) Healthcare Workers lacked training on using disease surveillance data; 236(75%) cited lack of tools for disease surveillance in facilities, while 173(55%)cited lack of timely IDSR data as hindrance to IDSR data uptake. The regression findings showed that training of healthcare workers on IDSR, installation of disease surveillance system tools, and timely collection and dissemination of surveillance data increases the likelihood of IDSR data uptake in community health facilities. Conclusion The study concluded that IDSR system tools should be installed in community health facilities across the six sub counties in Nairobi County. Training should be emphasised to ensure all health care workers have the required skills to use the IDSR data. There is need to ensure IDSR data is collected and disseminated on time to make it available for interpretation and use by health care workers in their respective facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athanasio Japheth Omondi
- Department of Health Management and Informatics, School of Public Health, Kenyatta University.,Improving Public Health Management for Action (IMPACT).,Ministry of Health Kenya.,Training Programs in Epidemiology and Public Health Interventions Network (TEPHINET) (Consultant)
| | - Otieno George Ochieng
- Department of Health Management and Informatics, School of Public Health, Kenyatta University
| | | | - Alison Yoos
- Improving Public Health Management for Action (IMPACT).,Training Programs in Epidemiology and Public Health Interventions Network (TEPHINET) (Consultant)
| | - Muli Rafael Kavilo
- Nairobi City County, Department of Integrated Disease Surveillance Nairobi City
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sparkes SP, Kutzin J, Earle AJ. Financing Common Goods for Health: A Country Agenda. Health Syst Reform 2019; 5:322-333. [DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2019.1659126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P. Sparkes
- Department of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Joseph Kutzin
- Department of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra J. Earle
- Department of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Falzon LC, Alumasa L, Amanya F, Kang'ethe E, Kariuki S, Momanyi K, Muinde P, Murungi MK, Njoroge SM, Ogendo A, Ogola J, Rushton J, Woolhouse MEJ, Fèvre EM. One Health in Action: Operational Aspects of an Integrated Surveillance System for Zoonoses in Western Kenya. Front Vet Sci 2019; 6:252. [PMID: 31417918 PMCID: PMC6684786 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Surveillance of diseases in Kenya and elsewhere in East Africa is currently carried out by both human and animal health sectors. However, a recent evaluation highlighted the lack of integration between these sectors, leading to disease under-reporting and inefficiencies. This project aimed to develop an integrated and cost-effective surveillance and reporting system for 15 zoonotic diseases piloted in the counties of Bungoma, Busia, and Kakamega in western Kenya. Specifically, in this paper we describe the operational aspects of such a surveillance system. Interviews were carried out with key informants, and this was followed by field visits to identify sentinel sites and liaise with relevant stakeholders. Based on this information, a sampling strategy comprising 12 sentinel sites, 4 in each county, was developed. Each sentinel site comprised of a livestock market, 1-2 neighboring slaughter houses/slabs, and a hospital in the vicinity; each of the 12 sites, comprising 12 × 3 = 36 sampling locations, was visited every 4 weeks for 20 cycles. At each site, animal or patient sampling included a clinical examination and collection of blood, feces, and nasal swabs; in slaughtered animals, mesenteric lymph nodes, hydatid cysts, and flukes were also collected. At the end of each field visit, data on staff involved and challenges encountered were recorded, while biological samples were processed and tested for 15 zoonotic diseases in the field laboratory in Busia, Kenya. Public engagement sessions were held at each sentinel site to share preliminary results and provide feedback to both stakeholders and study participants. A livestock market visit lasted just over 3 h, and the most common challenge was the frequent refusals of animal owners to participate in the study. At the slaughterhouses, visits lasted just under 4 h, and challenges included poorly engaged meat inspectors or slaughter processes that were too quick for sampling. Finally, the hospital visits lasted around 4 h, and the most frequent challenges included low patients turn-out, frequent staff turn-over leading to poor institutional memory, and difficulty in obtaining patient stool samples. Our experiences have highlighted the importance of engaging with local stakeholders in the field, while also providing timely feedback through public engagement sessions, to ensure on-going compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C. Falzon
- Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Lorren Alumasa
- International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Erastus Kang'ethe
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Kelvin Momanyi
- International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Patrick Muinde
- International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | | | - Allan Ogendo
- Veterinary Department, Busia County Government, Busia, Kenya
| | - Joseph Ogola
- Veterinary Department, Bungoma County Government, Bungoma, Kenya
| | - Jonathan Rushton
- Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Mark E. J. Woolhouse
- Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution and Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Eric M. Fèvre
- Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kumar MB, Madan JJ, Achieng MM, Limato R, Ndima S, Kea AZ, Chikaphupha KR, Barasa E, Taegtmeyer M. Is quality affordable for community health systems? Costs of integrating quality improvement into close-to-community health programmes in five low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4:e001390. [PMID: 31354971 PMCID: PMC6626522 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Countries aspiring to universal health coverage view close-to-community (CTC) providers as a low-cost means of increasing coverage. However, due to lack of coordination and unreliable funding, the quality of large-scale CTC healthcare provision is highly variable and routine data about service quality are not trustworthy. Quality improvement (QI) approaches are a means of addressing these issues, yet neither the costs nor the budget impact of integrating QI approaches into CTC programme costs have been assessed. Methods This paper examines the costs and budget impact of integrating QI into existing CTC health programmes in five countries (Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique) between 2015 and 2017. The intervention involved: (1) QI team formation; (2) Phased training interspersed with supportive supervision; which resulted in (3) QI teams independently collecting and analysing data to conduct QI interventions. Project costs were collected using an ingredients approach from a health systems perspective. Based on project costs, costs of local adoption of the intervention were modelled under three implementation scenarios. Results Annualised economic unit costs ranged from $62 in Mozambique to $254 in Ethiopia per CTC provider supervised, driven by the context, type of community health model and the intensity of the intervention. The budget impact of Ministry-led QI for community health is estimated at 0.53% or less of the general government expenditure on health in all countries (and below 0.03% in three of the five countries). Conclusion CTC provision is a key component of healthcare delivery in many settings, so QI has huge potential impact. The impact is difficult to establish conclusively, but as a first step we have provided evidence to assess affordability of QI for community health. Further research is needed to assess whether QI can achieve the level of benefits that would justify the required investment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Bruce Kumar
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.,Center for Humanitarian Emergencies, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jason J Madan
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Ralalicia Limato
- Eijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Sozinho Ndima
- Community Health Department, University of Eduardo Mondlane, Faculty of Medicine, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Aschenaki Z Kea
- School of Public and Environmental Health, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Kingsley Rex Chikaphupha
- Health Systems & HIV/AIDS Dept, Research for Equity and Community Health (REACH) Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Edwine Barasa
- Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Miriam Taegtmeyer
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Karuga RN, Mireku M, Muturi N, McCollum R, Vallieres F, Kumar M, Taegtmeyer M, Otiso L. Supportive supervision of close-to-community providers of health care: Findings from action research conducted in two counties in Kenya. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0216444. [PMID: 31141509 PMCID: PMC6541245 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Close-to-community (CTC) providers of health care are a crucial workforce for delivery of high-quality and universal health coverage. There is limited evidence on the effect of training supervisors of this cadre in supportive supervision. Our study aimed to demonstrate the effects of a training intervention on the approach to and frequency of supervision of CTC providers of health care. Methods We conducted a context analysis in 2013 in two Kenyan counties to assess factors that influenced delivery of community health services. Supervision was identified a priority factor that needed to be addressed to improve community health services. Supervision was inadequate due to lack of supervisor capacity in supportive approaches and lack of supervision guidelines. We designed a six-day training intervention and trained 48 purposively selected CTC supervisors on the educative, administrative and supportive components of supportive supervision, problem solving and advocacy and provided them with checklists to guide supervision sessions. We administered quantitative questionnaires to supervisors to assess changes in supervision frequency before and after the training and then explored perspectives on the intervention with community health volunteers (CHVs) and their supervisors using qualitative in-depth interviews. Results Six months after the intervention, we observed that supervisors had shifted the supervision approach from being controlling and administrative to coaching, mentorship and problem solving. Changes in the frequency of supervision were found in Kitui only, whereby significant decreases in group supervision were met with increases in accompanied home visit supervision. Supervisors and CHVs reported the intervention was helpful and it responded to capacity gaps in supervision of CHVs. Conclusion Our intervention responded to capacity gaps in supervision and contributed to enhanced supervision capacity among supervisors. Supervisors found the curriculum acceptable and useful in improving supervision skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maryline Mireku
- LVCT Health, Department of Research and Strategic Information, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Nelly Muturi
- LVCT Health, Department of Research and Strategic Information, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Rosalind McCollum
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Frederique Vallieres
- Centre for Global Health, School of Psychology, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Meghan Kumar
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Miriam Taegtmeyer
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Lilian Otiso
- LVCT Health, Department of Research and Strategic Information, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
McCollum R, Taegtmeyer M, Otiso L, Mireku M, Muturi N, Martineau T, Theobald S. Healthcare equity analysis: applying the Tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in Kenya. Int J Equity Health 2019; 18:65. [PMID: 31064355 PMCID: PMC6505258 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-019-0967-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Universal health coverage (UHC) is growing as a national political priority, within the context of recently devolved decision-making processes in Kenya. Increasingly voices within these discussions are highlighting the need for actions towards UHC to focus on quality of services, as well as improving coverage through expansion of national health insurance fund (NHIF) enrolment. Improving health equity is one of the most frequently described objectives for devolution of health services. Previous studies, however, highlight the complexity and unpredictability of devolution processes, potentially contributing to widening rather than reducing disparities. Our study applied Tanahashi’s equity model (according to availability, accessibility, acceptability, contact with and quality) to review perceived equity of health services by actors across the health system and at community level, following changes to the priority-setting process at sub-national levels post devolution in Kenya. Methods We carried out a qualitative study between March 2015 and April 2016, involving 269 key informant and in-depth interviews from different levels of the health system in ten counties and 14 focus group discussions with community members in two of these counties. Qualitative data were analysed using the framework approach. Results Our findings reveal that devolution in Kenya has focused on improving the supply side of health services, by expanding the availability, geographic and financial accessibility of health services across many counties. However, there has been limited emphasis and investment in promoting the demand side, including restricted efforts to promote acceptability or use of services. Respondents perceived that the quality of health services has typically been neglected within priority-setting to date. Conclusions If Kenya is to achieve universal health coverage for all citizens, then county governments must address all aspects of equity, including quality. Through application of the Tanahashi framework, we find that community health services can play a crucial role towards achieving health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind McCollum
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Miriam Taegtmeyer
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | | | - Tim Martineau
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sally Theobald
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rockers PC, Laing RO, Ashigbie PG, Onyango MA, Mukiira CK, Wirtz VJ. Effect of Novartis Access on availability and price of non-communicable disease medicines in Kenya: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH 2019; 7:e492-e502. [PMID: 30799142 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30563-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Novartis Access is a Novartis programme that offers a portfolio of non-communicable disease medicines at a wholesale price of US$1 per treatment per month in low-income and middle-income countries. We evaluated the effect of Novartis Access in Kenya, the first country to receive the programme. METHODS We did a cluster-randomised controlled trial in eight counties in Kenya. Counties (clusters) were randomly assigned to the intervention or the control group with a covariate-constrained randomisation procedure that maximised balance on a set of demographic and health variables. In intervention counties, public and non-profit health facilities were allowed to purchase Novartis Access medicines from the Mission for Essential Drugs and Supplies (MEDS). Data were collected from all facilities served by MEDS and a sample of households in study counties. Households were eligible if they had at least one adult patient who had been diagnosed and prescribed medicines for one of the non-communicable diseases targeted by the programme: hypertension, heart failure, dyslipidaemia, type 2 diabetes, asthma, or breast cancer. Primary outcomes were availability and price of portfolio medicines at health facilities, irrespective of brand; and availability of medicines at patient households. Impacts were estimated with intention-to-treat analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02773095). FINDINGS On March 8, 2016, we randomly assigned eight clusters to intervention (four clusters; 74 health facilities; 342 patients) or control (four clusters; 63 health facilities; 297 patients). 69 intervention and 58 control health facilities, and 306 intervention and 265 control patients were evaluated after a 15 month intervention period (last visit February 28, 2018). Novartis Access significantly increased the availability of amlodipine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2·84, 95% CI 1·10 to 7·37; p=0·031) and metformin (aOR 4·78, 95% CI 1·44 to 15·86; p=0·011) at health facilities, but did not affect the availability of portfolio medicines overall (adjusted β [aβ] 0·05, 95% CI -0·01 to 0·10; p=0·096) or their price (aβ 0·48, 95% CI -1·12 to 0·72; p=0·500). The programme did not affect medicine availability at patient households (aOR 0·83, 95% CI 0·44 to 1·57; p=0·569). INTERPRETATION Novartis Access had little effect in its first year in Kenya. Access programmes operate within complex health systems and reducing the wholesale price of medicines might not always or immediately translate to improved patient access. The evidence generated by this study will inform Novartis's efforts to improve their programme going forward. The study also contributes to the public evidence base on strategies for improving access to medicines globally. FUNDING Sandoz International (a subsidiary of Novartis International).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C Rockers
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Richard O Laing
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Paul G Ashigbie
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Monica A Onyango
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carol K Mukiira
- Department of Demography and Population Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Veronika J Wirtz
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
McCollum R, Taegtmeyer M, Otiso L, Tolhurst R, Mireku M, Martineau T, Karuga R, Theobald S. Applying an intersectionality lens to examine health for vulnerable individuals following devolution in Kenya. Int J Equity Health 2019; 18:24. [PMID: 30700299 PMCID: PMC6352384 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-019-0917-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Power imbalances are a key driver of avoidable, unfair and unjust differences in health. Devolution shifts the balance of power in health systems. Intersectionality approaches can provide a 'lens' for analysing how power relations contribute to complex and multiple forms of health advantage and disadvantage. These approaches have not to date been widely used to analyse health systems reforms. While the stated objectives of devolution often include improved equity, efficiency and community participation, past evidence demonstrates that that there is a need to create space and capacity for people to transform existing power relations these within specific contexts. METHODS We carried out a qualitative study between March 2015 and April 2016, involving 269 key informant and in-depth interviews from across the health system in ten counties, 14 focus group discussions with community members in two of these counties and photovoice participatory research with nine young people. We adopted an intersectionality lens to reveal how power relations intersect to produce vulnerabilities for specific groups in specific contexts, and to identify examples of the tacit knowledge about these vulnerabilities held by priority-setting stakeholders, in the wake of the introduction of devolution reforms in Kenya. RESULTS Our study identified a range of ways in which longstanding social forces and discriminations limit the power and agency individuals can exercise, but are mediated by their unique circumstances at a given point in their life. These are the social determinants of health, influencing an individual's exposure to risk of ill health from their living environment, their work, or their social context, including social norms relating to their gender, age, geographical residence or socio-economic status. While a range of policy measures have been introduced to encourage participation by typically 'unheard voices', devolution processes have yet to adequately challenge the social norms, and intersecting power relations which contribute to discrimination and marginalisation. CONCLUSIONS If key actors in devolved decision-making structures are to ensure progress towards universal health coverage, there is need for intersectoral policy action to address social determinants, promote equity and identify ways to challenge and shift power imbalances in priority-setting processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind McCollum
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | - Miriam Taegtmeyer
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Rachel Tolhurst
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Tim Martineau
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Sally Theobald
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Liwanag HJ, Wyss K. Optimising decentralisation for the health sector by exploring the synergy of decision space, capacity and accountability: insights from the Philippines. Health Res Policy Syst 2019; 17:4. [PMID: 30630469 PMCID: PMC6327786 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0402-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies on decentralisation have used the 'decision space' approach to assess the breadth of space made available to decision-makers at lower levels of the health system. However, in order to better understand how decentralisation becomes effective for the health sector, analysis should go beyond assessing decision space and include the dimensions of capacity and accountability. Building on Bossert's earlier work on the synergy of these dimensions, we analysed decision-making in the Philippines where governmental health services have been devolved to local governments since 1992. METHODS Using a qualitative research design, we interviewed 27 key decision-makers at different levels of the Philippine health system and representing various local settings. We explored their perspectives on decision space, capacities and accountability in the health sector functions of planning, financing and budget allocation, programme implementation and service delivery, management of facilities, equipment and supplies, health workforce management, and data monitoring and utilisation. Analysis followed the Framework Method. RESULTS Across all functions, decision space for local decision-makers was assessed to be moderate or narrow despite 25 years of devolution. To improve decision-making in these functions, adjustments in local capacities should include, at the individual level, skills for strategic planning, management, priority-setting, evidence-informed policy-making and innovation in service delivery. At institutional levels, these desired capacities should include having a multi-stakeholder approach, generating revenues from local sources, partnering with the private sector and facilitating cooperation between local health facilities. On the other hand, adjustments in accountability should focus on the various mechanisms that can be enforced by the central level, not only to build the desired capacities and augment the inadequacies at local levels, but also to incentivise success and regulate failure by the local governments in performing the functions transferred to them. CONCLUSION To optimise decentralisation for the health sector, widening decision spaces for local decision-makers must be accompanied by the corresponding adjustments in capacities and accountability for promoting good decision-making at lower levels in the decentralised functions. Analysing the health system through the lens of this synergy is useful for exploring concrete policy adjustments in the Philippines as well as in other settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harvy Joy Liwanag
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
- Ateneo de Manila University School of Medicine and Public Health, Metro Manila, Philippines.
| | - Kaspar Wyss
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
McCollum R, Taegtmeyer M, Otiso L, Muturi N, Barasa E, Molyneux S, Martineau T, Theobald S. "Sometimes it is difficult for us to stand up and change this": an analysis of power within priority-setting for health following devolution in Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:906. [PMID: 30486867 PMCID: PMC6264027 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3706-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practices of power lie at the heart of policy processes. In both devolution and priority-setting, actors seek to exert power through influence and control over material, human, intellectual and financial resources. Priority-setting arises as a consequence of the needs and demand exceeding the resources available, requiring some means of choosing between competing demands. This paper examines the use of power within priority-setting processes for healthcare resources at sub-national level, following devolution in Kenya. METHODS We interviewed 14 national level key informants and 255 purposively selected respondents from across the health system in ten counties. These qualitative data were supplemented by 14 focus group discussions (FGD) involving 146 community members in two counties. We conducted a power analysis using Gaventa's power cube and Veneklasen's expressions of power to interpret our findings. RESULTS We found Kenya's transition towards devolution is transforming the former centralised balance of power, leading to greater ability for influence at the county level, reduced power at national and sub-county (district) levels, and limited change at community level. Within these changing power structures, politicians are felt to play a greater role in priority-setting for health. The interfaces and tensions between politicians, health service providers and the community has at times been felt to undermine health related technical priorities. Underlying social structures and discriminatory practices generally continue unchanged, leading to the continued exclusion of the most vulnerable from priority-setting processes. CONCLUSIONS Power analysis of priority-setting at county level after devolution in Kenya highlights the need for stronger institutional structures, processes and norms to reduce the power imbalances between decision-making actors and to enable community participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind McCollum
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Miriam Taegtmeyer
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Edwine Barasa
- Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O. Box 43640-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- KEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research - Coast, and Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tim Martineau
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sally Theobald
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Achoki T, Miller-Petrie MK, Glenn SD, Kalra N, Lesego A, Gathecha GK, Alam U, Kiarie HW, Maina IW, Adetifa IMO, Barsosio HC, Degfie TT, Keiyoro PN, Kiirithio DN, Kinfu Y, Kinyoki DK, Kisia JM, Krish VS, Lagat AK, Mooney MD, Moturi WN, Newton CRJ, Ngunjiri JW, Nixon MR, Soti DO, Van De Vijver S, Yonga G, Hay SI, Murray CJL, Naghavi M. Health disparities across the counties of Kenya and implications for policy makers, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH 2018; 7:e81-e95. [PMID: 30482677 PMCID: PMC6293072 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30472-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2016 provided comprehensive estimates of health loss globally. Decision makers in Kenya can use GBD subnational data to target health interventions and address county-level variation in the burden of disease. Methods We used GBD 2016 estimates of life expectancy at birth, healthy life expectancy, all-cause and cause-specific mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, disability-adjusted life-years, and risk factors to analyse health by age and sex at the national and county levels in Kenya from 1990 to 2016. Findings The national all-cause mortality rate decreased from 850·3 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 829·8–871·1) deaths per 100 000 in 1990 to 579·0 (562·1–596·0) deaths per 100 000 in 2016. Under-5 mortality declined from 95·4 (95% UI 90·1–101·3) deaths per 1000 livebirths in 1990 to 43·4 (36·9–51·2) deaths per 1000 livebirths in 2016, and maternal mortality fell from 315·7 (242·9–399·4) deaths per 100 000 in 1990 to 257·6 (195·1–335·3) deaths per 100 000 in 2016, with steeper declines after 2006 and heterogeneously across counties. Life expectancy at birth increased by 5·4 (95% UI 3·7–7·2) years, with higher gains in females than males in all but ten counties. Unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing, unsafe sex, and malnutrition were the leading national risk factors in 2016. Interpretation Health outcomes have improved in Kenya since 2006. The burden of communicable diseases decreased but continues to predominate the total disease burden in 2016, whereas the non-communicable disease burden increased. Health gains varied strikingly across counties, indicating targeted approaches for health policy are necessary. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Achoki
- Sloan Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Molly K Miller-Petrie
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Scott D Glenn
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nikhila Kalra
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Abaleng Lesego
- Strategic Information and Learning, University of Research Company, Gaborone, Botswana
| | | | - Uzma Alam
- International Center for Humanitarian Affairs, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Isabella Wanjiku Maina
- Policy, Planning, and Healthcare Financing Department, Nairobi, Kenya; Institute of Tropical Medicine, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Ifedayo M O Adetifa
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Epidemiology and Demography Department, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Hellen C Barsosio
- Malaria Branch, Kilifi, Kenya; Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | | | - Yohannes Kinfu
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Damaris K Kinyoki
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - James M Kisia
- East Africa Center, Humanitarian Leadership Academy, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Varsha Sarah Krish
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Abraham K Lagat
- Department of Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI-Wellcome Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Meghan D Mooney
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Charles Richard James Newton
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)-Wellcome Trust Collaborative Programme, Kilifi, Kenya; Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Molly R Nixon
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David O Soti
- Eastern Africa Regional Collaborating Centre, African Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Gerald Yonga
- School of Medicine, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Simon I Hay
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Christopher J L Murray
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mohsen Naghavi
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
McCollum R, Limato R, Otiso L, Theobald S, Taegtmeyer M. Health system governance following devolution: comparing experiences of decentralisation in Kenya and Indonesia. BMJ Glob Health 2018; 3:e000939. [PMID: 30294460 PMCID: PMC6169670 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Devolution reforms in Indonesia and Kenya have brought extensive changes to governance structures and mechanisms for financing and delivering healthcare. Community health approaches can contribute towards attaining many of devolution's objectives, including community participation, responsiveness, accountability and improved equity. We set out to examine governance in two countries at different stages in the devolution journey: Indonesia at 15 years postdevolution and Kenya at 3 years. METHODS We collected qualitative data across multiple levels of the health system in one district in Indonesia and ten counties in Kenya, through 80 interviews and six focus group discussions (FGD) in Indonesia and 269 interviews and 14 FGDs in Kenya. Qualitative data were digitally recorded, transcribed and coded before thematic framework analysis. Common themes between contexts were identified inductively and deductively, and similarities and differences critically analysed during an inter-country analysis workshop. RESULTS Following devolution both Indonesia and Kenya experienced similar challenges ensuring good governance for health. Devolution reforms transformed power relationships, increasing responsibilities at subnational levels and introducing opportunities for citizen participation. In both contexts, the impact of these mechanisms has been undermined by insufficiently clear guidance; failure to address pre-existing negative contextual norms and practices varied decision-maker values, limited priority-setting capacity and limited genuine community accountability. As a consequence, priorities in both contexts are too often placed on curative rather than preventive health services. CONCLUSION We recommend consideration of increased intersectoral actions that address social determinants of health, challenge negative norms and practices and place emphasis on community-based primary health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind McCollum
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Sally Theobald
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Miriam Taegtmeyer
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|