The corepressor N-CoR and its variants RIP13a and RIP13Delta1 directly interact with the basal transcription factors TFIIB, TAFII32 and TAFII70

Melatonin inhibits osteoclastogenesis via RANKL/OPG suppression mediated by Rev-Erbα in osteoblasts

Diabetic osteoporosis is secondary osteoporosis and a serious complication of diabetes with a high incidence rate and poor prognosis. The specific mechanism of diabetic osteoporosis is unclear, and prevention and treatment options are limited. Recently, melatonin has been found to prevent and treat diabetic osteoporosis. Herein, we investigated the mechanism whereby melatonin inhibits osteoclastogenesis and identified a new target for osteoporosis treatment. We established an in vitro osteoblast–osteoclast co‐culture system as a diabetic osteoporosis model. Osteoclastogenesis was determined using tartrate‐resistant acid phosphatase staining and cathepsin K expression. Real‐time PCR was used to ascertain expression of microRNA mir‐882, targeting Rev‐Erbα. Western blotting was performed to detect the expression of Rev‐Erbα, receptor activator of NF‐kB ligand (RANKL), and osteoprotegerin (OPG), and ELISA was utilized to analyse the secreted form of RANKL. High glucose promoted osteoclastogenesis and elevated the RANKL/OPG ratio in osteoblasts, while melatonin reversed these effects. High glucose inhibited Rev‐Erbα expression, while melatonin promoted its expression. Conversely, high glucose promoted mir‐882 expression, while melatonin inhibited it. We infer that melatonin inhibits RANKL expression in osteoblasts via the mir‐882/Rev‐Erbα axis, thus inhibiting osteoclastogenesis. Our findings provide insights into diabetic osteoporosis and identify a new therapeutic target for osteoporosis.

Nuclear Receptor Coregulators in Hormone-Dependent Cancers

Nuclear receptors (NRs) function collectively as a transcriptional signaling network that mediates gene regulatory actions to either maintain cellular homeostasis in response to hormonal, dietary and other environmental factors, or act as orphan receptors with no known ligand. NR complexes are large and interact with multiple protein partners, collectively termed coregulators. Coregulators are essential for regulating NR activity and can dictate whether a target gene is activated or repressed by a variety of mechanisms including the regulation of chromatin accessibility. Altered expression of coregulators contributes to a variety of hormone-dependent cancers including breast and prostate cancers. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms by which coregulators interact with and modulate the activity of NRs provides opportunities to develop better prognostic and diagnostic approaches, as well as novel therapeutic targets. This review aims to gather and summarize recent studies, techniques and bioinformatics methods used to identify distorted NR coregulator interactions that contribute as cancer drivers in hormone-dependent cancers.

Estrogen signaling: An emanating therapeutic target for breast cancer treatment

Breast cancer, a most common malignancy in women, was known to be associated with steroid hormone estrogen. The discovery of estrogen receptor (ER) gave us not only a powerful predictive and prognostic marker, but also an efficient target for the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer with various estrogen ligands. ER consists of two subtypes i.e. ERα and ERβ, that are mostly G-protein-coupled receptors and activated by estrogen, specially 17β-estradiol. The activation is followed by translocation into the nucleus and binding with DNA to modulate activities of different genes. ERs can manage synthesis of RNA through genomic actions without directly binding to DNA. Receptors are tethered by protein-protein interactions to a transcription factor complex to communicate with DNA. Estrogens also exhibit nongenomic actions, a characteristic feature of steroid hormones, which are so rapid to be considered by the activation of RNA and translation. These are habitually related to stimulation of different protein kinase cascades. Majority of post-menopausal breast cancer is estrogen dependent, mostly potent biological estrogen (E2) for continuous growth and proliferation. Estrogen helps in regulating the differentiation and proliferation of normal breast epithelial cells. In this review we have investigated the important role of ER in development and progression of breast cancer, which is complicated by receptor's interaction with co-regulatory proteins, cross-talk with other signal transduction pathways and development of treatment strategies viz. selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), selective estrogen receptor down regulators (SERDs), aromatase and sulphatase inhibitors.

NCOR1-a new player on the field of T cell development

Nuclear receptor corepressor 1 (NCOR1) is a transcriptional corepressor that links chromatin-modifying enzymes with gene-specific transcription factors. Although identified more than 20 years ago as a corepressor of nuclear receptors, the role of NCOR1 in T cells remained only poorly understood. However, recent studies indicate that the survival of developing thymocytes is regulated by NCOR1, revealing an essential role for NCOR1 in the T cell lineage. In this review, we will briefly summarize basic facts about NCOR1 structure and functions. We will further summarize studies demonstrating an essential role for NCOR1 in controlling positive and negative selection of thymocytes during T cell development. Finally, we will discuss similarities and differences between the phenotypes of mice with a T cell-specific deletion of NCOR1 or histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3), because HDAC3 is the predominant member of the HDAC family that interacts with NCOR1 corepressor complexes. With this review we aim to introduce NCOR1 as a new player in the team of transcriptional coregulators that control T cell development and thus the generation of the peripheral T cell pool.

Genome-wide Analysis of RARβ Transcriptional Targets in Mouse Striatum Links Retinoic Acid Signaling with Huntington's Disease and Other Neurodegenerative Disorders

Retinoic acid (RA) signaling through retinoic acid receptors (RARs), known for its multiple developmental functions, emerged more recently as an important regulator of adult brain physiology. How RAR-mediated regulation is achieved is poorly known, partly due to the paucity of information on critical target genes in the brain. Also, it is not clear how reduced RA signaling may contribute to pathophysiology of diverse neuropsychiatric disorders. We report the first genome-wide analysis of RAR transcriptional targets in the brain. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing and transcriptomic analysis of RARβ-null mutant mice, we identified genomic targets of RARβ in the striatum. Characterization of RARβ transcriptional targets in the mouse striatum points to mechanisms through which RAR may control brain functions and display neuroprotective activity. Namely, our data indicate with statistical significance (FDR 0.1) a strong contribution of RARβ in controlling neurotransmission, energy metabolism, and transcription, with a particular involvement of G-protein coupled receptor (p = 5.0e^-5), cAMP (p = 4.5e^-4), and calcium signaling (p = 3.4e^-3). Many identified RARβ target genes related to these pathways have been implicated in Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's disease (HD), raising the possibility that compromised RA signaling in the striatum may be a mechanistic link explaining the similar affective and cognitive symptoms in these diseases. The RARβ transcriptional targets were particularly enriched for transcripts affected in HD. Using the R6/2 transgenic mouse model of HD, we show that partial sequestration of RARβ in huntingtin protein aggregates may account for reduced RA signaling reported in HD.

Activation of p53 transcriptional activity by SMRT: a histone deacetylase 3-independent function of a transcriptional corepressor

The silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT) is an established histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3)-dependent transcriptional corepressor. Microarray analyses of MCF-7 cells transfected with control or SMRT small interfering RNA revealed SMRT regulation of genes involved in DNA damage responses, and the levels of the DNA damage marker γH2AX as well as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage were elevated in SMRT-depleted cells treated with doxorubicin. A number of these genes are established p53 targets. SMRT knockdown decreased the activity of two p53-dependent reporter genes as well as the expression of p53 target genes, such as CDKN1A (which encodes p21). SMRT bound directly to p53 and was recruited to p53 binding sites within the p21 promoter. Depletion of GPS2 and TBL1, components of the SMRT corepressor complex, but not histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) decreased p21-luciferase activity. p53 bound to the SMRT deacetylase activation domain (DAD), which mediates HDAC3 binding and activation, and HDAC3 could attenuate p53 binding to the DAD region of SMRT. Moreover, an HDAC3 binding-deficient SMRT DAD mutant coactivated p53 transcriptional activity. Collectively, these data highlight a biological role for SMRT in mediating DNA damage responses and suggest a model where p53 binding to the DAD limits HDAC3 interaction with this coregulator, thereby facilitating SMRT coactivation of p53-dependent gene expression.

Emerging roles of the corepressors NCoR1 and SMRT in homeostasis

Epigenetic regulation of gene expression is strongly influenced by the accessibility of nucleosomal DNA or the state of chromatin compaction. In this context, coregulators, including both coactivators and corepressors, are pivotal intermediates that bridge chromatin-modifying enzymes and transcription factors. NCoR1 (nuclear receptor corepressor) and SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor) are among the best-characterized corepressors from a molecular point of view. These coregulators have conserved orthologs in lower organisms, which underscores their functional importance. Here we summarize the results from recent in vivo studies that reveal the wide-ranging roles of NCoR1 and SMRT in developmental as well as homeostatic processes, including metabolism, inflammation, and circadian rhythms. We also discuss the potential implications of NCoR1 and SMRT regulation of pathways ranging from genomic stability and carcinogenesis to metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes.

Molecular antagonism between X-chromosome and autosome signals determines nematode sex

Sex is determined in Caenorhabditis elegans by the ratio of X chromosomes to the sets of autosomes, the X:A signal. A set of genes called X signal elements (XSEs) communicates X-chromosome dose by repressing the masculinizing sex determination switch gene xol-1 (XO lethal) in a dose-dependent manner. xol-1 is active in 1X:2A embryos (males) but repressed in 2X:2A embryos (hermaphrodites). Here we showed that the autosome dose is communicated by a set of autosomal signal elements (ASEs) that act in a cumulative, dose-dependent manner to counter XSEs by stimulating xol-1 transcription. We identified new ASEs and explored the biochemical basis by which ASEs antagonize XSEs to determine sex. Multiple antagonistic molecular interactions carried out on a single promoter explain how different X:A values elicit different sexual fates. XSEs (nuclear receptors and homeodomain proteins) and ASEs (T-box and zinc finger proteins) bind directly to several sites on xol-1 to counteract each other's activities and thereby regulate xol-1 transcription. Disrupting ASE- and XSE-binding sites in vivo recapitulated the misregulation of xol-1 transcription caused by disrupting cognate signal element genes. XSE- and ASE-binding sites are distinct and nonoverlapping, suggesting that direct competition for xol-1 binding is not how XSEs counter ASEs. Instead, XSEs likely antagonize ASEs by recruiting cofactors with reciprocal activities that induce opposite transcriptional states. Most ASE- and XSE-binding sites overlap xol-1's -1 nucleosome, which carries activating chromatin marks only when xol-1 is turned on. Coactivators and corepressors tethered by proteins similar to ASEs and XSEs are known to deposit and remove such marks. The concept of a sex signal comprising competing XSEs and ASEs arose as a theory for fruit flies a century ago. Ironically, while the recent work of others showed that the fly sex signal does not fit this simple paradigm, our work shows that the worm signal does.

Mediator CDK subunits are platforms for interactions with various chromatin regulatory complexes

The Mediator complex consists of more than 20 subunits. This is composed of four modules: head, middle, tail and CDK/Cyclin. Importantly, Mediator complex is known to play pivotal roles in transcriptional regulation, but its molecular mechanisms are still elusive. Many studies, including our own, have revealed that CDK8, a kinase subunit of the CDK/Cyclin module, is one of the key subunits involved in these roles. Additionally, we previously demonstrated that a novel CDK component, CDK19, played similar roles. It is assumed that various factors that directly affect transcriptional regulation target these two CDKs; thus, we conducted yeast two-hybrid screenings to isolate the CDK19-interacting proteins. From a screening of 40 million colonies, we obtained 287 clones that provided positive results encoded mRNAs, and it turned out that 59 clones of them encoded nuclear proteins. We checked the reading frames of the candidate clones and obtained three positive clones, all of which encoded the transcriptional cofactors, Brahma-related gene 1, B-cell CLL/lymphoma 6 and suppressor of zeste 12 homolog. Intriguingly, these three cofactors are also related to chromatin regulation. Further studies demonstrated that those could bind not only to CDK19 but also to CDK8. These results help elucidate the functional mechanism for the mutual regulations between transcription and chromatin.

SMRTε, a corepressor variant, interacts with a restricted subset of nuclear receptors, including the retinoic acid receptors α and β

The SMRT and NCoR corepressors bind to, and mediate transcriptional repression by, many nuclear receptors. Both SMRT and NCoR are expressed by alternative mRNA splicing, generating a series of structurally and functionally distinct corepressor "variants". We report that a splice variant of SMRT, SMRTε, recognizes a restricted subset of nuclear receptors. Unlike the other corepressor variants characterized, SMRTε possesses only a single receptor interaction domain (RID) and exhibits an unusual specificity for a subset of nuclear receptors that includes the retinoic acid receptors (RARs). The ability of the single RID in SMRTε to efficiently interact with RARs appears to be enhanced by a recently recognized β-strand/β-strand interaction between corepressor and receptor. We suggest that alternative mRNA splicing of corepressors can restrict their function to specific nuclear receptor partnerships, and we propose that this may serve to customize the transcriptional repression properties of different cell types for different biological purposes.

Alternative mRNA splicing of corepressors generates variants that play opposing roles in adipocyte differentiation

The SMRT and NCoR corepressors partner with, and help mediate repression by, a wide variety of nuclear receptors and non-receptor transcription factors. Both SMRT and NCoR are expressed by alternative mRNA splicing, resulting in the production of a series of interrelated corepressor variants that differ in their tissue distribution and in their biochemical properties. We report here that different corepressor splice variants can exert opposing transcriptional and biological effects during adipocyte differentiation. Most notably, the NCoRω splice variant inhibits, whereas the NCoRδ splice variant promotes, adipogenesis. Furthermore, the ratio of NCoRω to NCoRδ decreases during adipogenic differentiation. We propose that this alteration in corepressor splicing helps convert the cellular transcriptional program from one that maintains the pre-adipocyte in an undifferentiated state to a new transcriptional context that promotes differentiation and helps establish the proper physiology of the mature adipocyte.

Transcription factors, chromatin and cancer

Transcription factors, chromatin and chromatin-modifying enzymes are key components in a complex network through which the genome interacts with its environment. For many transcription factors, binding motifs are found adjacent to the promoter regions of a large proportion of genes, requiring mechanisms that confer binding specificity in any given cell type. These include association of the factor with other proteins and packaging of DNA, as chromatin, at the binding sequence so as to inhibit or facilitate binding. Recent evidence suggests that specific post-translational modifications of the histones packaging promoter DNA can help guide transcription factors to selected sites. The enzymes that put such modifications in place are dependent on metabolic components (e.g. acetyl CoA, S-adenosyl methionine) and susceptible to inhibition or activation by environmental factors. Local patterns of histone modification can be altered or maintained through direct interaction between the transcription factor and histone modifying enzymes. The functional consequences of transcription factor binding are also dependent on protein modifying enzymes, particularly those that alter lysine methylation at selected residues. Remarkably, the role of these enzymes is not limited to promoter-proximal events, but can be linked to changes in the intranuclear location of target genes. In this review we describe results that begin to define how transcription factors, chromatin and environmental variables interact and how these interactions are subverted in cancer. We focus on the nuclear receptor family of transcription factors, where binding of ligands such as steroid hormones and dietary derived factors provides an extra level of environmental input.

Characterization and expression of a human KCTD1 gene containing the BTB domain, which mediates transcriptional repression and homomeric interactions

We identified potassium channel tetramerization domain-containing 1 (KCTD1) gene in a human brain cDNA library. Here, we report that the KCTD1 gene contains seven exons, encoding 257 amino acid residues with a predicted molecular mass of 29.4 kDa. Sequence alignments showed KCTD1 protein contains an N-terminal broad-complex, tramtrack, and bric-a-brac (BTB) domain. Northern blot analysis revealed that KCTD1 is expressed in the mammary gland, kidney, brain, and ovary compared to other tissues. Further, the subcellular localization results showed that KCTD1 is localized in the nuclei of HeLa and HBL100 cells. Reporter gene assays in HEK293FT and NIH3T3 cells further indicated that KCTD1 acts as a potent transcriptional repressor and inhibits the transcriptional activity via its BTB domain, though KCTD1 transcriptional repression is unaffected by the HDAC inhibitors, trichostatin A, and sodium butyrate. Finally, we found that the BTB domain of KCTD1 mediates homomeric protein-protein interactions by co-immunoprecipitation and GST pull-down assays. These data present the first characterization of human KCTD1 and suggest that KCTD1 is a nuclear protein that functions as a transcriptional repressor and mediates protein-protein interactions through a BTB domain.

Chromatin crosstalk in development and disease: lessons from REST

Protein complexes that contain chromatin-modifying enzymes have an important role in regulating gene expression. Recent studies have shown that a single transcription factor, the repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor (REST), can act as a hub for the recruitment of multiple chromatin-modifying enzymes, uncovering interdependencies among individual enzymes that affect gene regulation. Research into the function of REST and its corepressors has provided novel insight into how chromatin-modifying proteins cooperate, and how alterations in this function cause disease. These mechanisms will be relevant to the combinatorial functioning of modular transcriptional regulators that work together to regulate a common promoter; they should also identify targets for potential therapies for a range of human diseases.

Estrogen-induced and TAFII30-mediated gene repression by direct recruitment of the estrogen receptor and co-repressors to the core promoter and its reversal by tamoxifen

Estradiol (E2) acts through the estrogen receptor (ER) to downregulate many genes, and tamoxifen (Tam) largely reverses this repression but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Repression of the folate receptor (FR)-alpha P4 core promoter by ER is enhanced by E2 and reversed by Tam. This effect was unaffected by inhibition of new protein synthesis and required the E/F and the DNA-binding domains of ER without direct binding of ER to DNA. The repression by E2/ER was not specific for either Sp1 or TATA elements but was loosely selective for the initiator and flanking sequence. Insertion of a response element or a relatively strong Sp1 cluster to recruit ER upstream of the core promoters caused a switch to activation by E2/ER that was inhibited by Tam. In nuclear extracts, association of ER with a biotinylated core promoter fragment was promoted by E2 but Tam blocked this effect. Repression/de-repression of the P4 promoter and endogenous FR-alpha expression by E2/Tam required SMRT and/or NCoR. ER associated with the chromosomal P4 promoter and SMRT and NCoR associated with it in an ER-dependent manner; these associations were favored by E2 but disrupted by Tam, in the short term, without changes in ER expression. TAFII30 was required for optimal P4 promoter activity and for the repressive association of ER. E2 may thus maintain a low transcriptional status of genes by favoring direct TAFII30-dependent association of ER with the core promoter in a co-repressor complex containing SMRT and/or NCoR; this repression is overridden in target genes containing an upstream element that strongly recruits ER. In addition to suppressing the activation of classical E2 target genes, Tam may upregulate genes by passively dissociating the ER co-repressor complex.

Corepressor MMTR/DMAP1 is involved in both histone deacetylase 1- and TFIIH-mediated transcriptional repression

A transcription corepressor, MAT1-mediated transcriptional repressor (MMTR), was found in mouse embryonic stem cell lines. MMTR orthologs (DMAP1) are found in a wide variety of life forms from yeasts to humans. MMTR down-regulation in differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells in vitro resulted in activation of many unrelated genes, suggesting its role as a general transcriptional repressor. In luciferase reporter assays, the transcriptional repression activity resided at amino acids 221 to 468. Histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) interacts with MMTR both in vitro and in vivo and also interacts with MMTR in the nucleus. Interestingly, MMTR activity was only partially rescued by competition with dominant-negative HDAC1(H141A) or by treatment with an HDAC inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA). To identify the protein responsible for HDAC1-independent MMTR activity, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screen with the full-length MMTR coding sequence as bait and found MAT1. MAT1 is an assembly/targeting factor for cyclin-dependent kinase-activating kinase which constitutes a subcomplex of TFIIH. The coiled-coil domain in the middle of MAT1 was confirmed to interact with the C-terminal half of MMTR, and the MMTR-mediated transcriptional repression activity was completely restored by MAT1 in the presence of TSA. Moreover, intact MMTR was required to inhibit phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain in the RNA polymerase II largest subunit by TFIIH kinase in vitro. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that MMTR is part of the basic cellular machinery for a wide range of transcriptional regulation via interaction with TFIIH and HDAC.

From molecular action to physiological outputs: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are nuclear receptors at the crossroads of key cellular functions

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) compose a family of three nuclear receptors which act as lipid sensors to modulate gene expression. As such, PPARs are implicated in major metabolic and inflammatory regulations with far-reaching medical consequences, as well as in important processes controlling cellular fate. Throughout this review, we focus on the cellular functions of these receptors. The molecular mechanisms through which PPARs regulate transcription are thoroughly addressed with particular emphasis on the latest results on corepressor and coactivator action. Their implication in cellular metabolism and in the control of the balance between cell proliferation, differentiation and survival is then reviewed. Finally, we discuss how the integration of various intra-cellular signaling pathways allows PPARs to participate to whole-body homeostasis by mediating regulatory crosstalks between organs.

Corepressors: custom tailoring and alterations while you wait

A diverse cadre of metazoan transcription factors mediate repression by recruiting protein complexes containing the SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor) or N-CoR (nuclear receptor corepressor) corepressors. SMRT and N-CoR nucleate the assembly of still larger corepressor complexes that perform the specific molecular incantations necessary to confer transcriptional repression. Although SMRT and N-CoR are paralogs and possess similar molecular architectures and mechanistic strategies, they nonetheless exhibit distinct molecular and biological properties. It is now clear that the functions of both SMRT and N-CoR are further diversified through alternative mRNA splicing, yielding a series of corepressor protein variants that participate in distinctive transcription factor partnerships and display distinguishable repression properties. This review will discuss what is known about the structure and actions of SMRT, N-CoR, and their splicing variants, and how alternative splicing may allow the functions of these corepressors to be adapted and tailored to different cells and to different developmental stages.

SMRT has tissue-specific isoform profiles that include a form containing one CoRNR box

SMRT acts as a corepressor for a range of transcription factors. The amino-terminal part of the protein includes domains that mainly mediate transcriptional repression whilst the carboxy-terminal part includes domains that interact with nuclear receptors using up to three motifs called CoRNR boxes. The region of the SMRT primary transcript encoding the interaction domains is subject to alternative splicing that varies the inclusion of the third CoRNR box. The profile in mice includes an abundant, novel SMRT isoform that possesses just one CoRNR box. Mouse tissues therefore express SMRT isoforms containing one, two or three CoRNR boxes. In frogs, the SMRT isoform profile is tissue-specific. The mouse also shows distinct profiles generated by differential expression levels of the SMRT transcript isoforms. The formation of multiple SMRT isoforms and their tissue-specific regulation indicates a mechanism, whereby cells can define the repertoire of transcription factors regulated by SMRT.

Inhibition of the 26S proteasome blocks progesterone receptor-dependent transcription through failed recruitment of RNA polymerase II

In the present study, we investigated the involvement of protein degradation via the 26S proteasome during progesterone receptor (PR)-mediated transcription in T-47D cells containing a stably integrated MMTV-CAT reporter construct (CAT0 cells). Progesterone induced CAT and HSD11beta2 transcription while co-treatment with the proteasome inhibitor, MG132, blocked PR-induced transcription in a time-dependent fashion. MG132 treatment also inhibited transcription of beta-actin and cyclophilin, but not two proteasome subunit genes, PSMA1 and PSMC1, indicating that proteasome inhibition affects a subset of RNA polymerase II (RNAP(II))-regulated genes. Progesterone-mediated recruitment of RNAP(II) was blocked by MG132 treatment at time points later than 1 h that was not dependent on the continued presence of PR, associated cofactors, and components of the general transcription machinery, supporting the concept that proteasome-mediated degradation is needed for continued transcription. Surprisingly, progesterone-mediated acetylation of histone H4 was inhibited by MG132 with the concomitant recruitment of HDAC3, NCoR, and SMRT. We demonstrate that the steady-state protein levels of SMRT and NCoR are higher in the presence of MG132 in CAT0 cells, consistent with other reports that SMRT and NCoR are targets of the 26S proteasome. However, inhibition of histone deacetylation by trichostatin A (TSA) treatment or SMRT/NCoR knockdown by siRNA did not restore MG132-inhibited progesterone-dependent transcription. Therefore, events other than histone deacetylation and stability of SMRT and NCoR must also play a role in inhibition of PR-mediated transcription.

Nuclear hormone receptor co-repressors

Gene silencing is an essential transcriptional regulatory process. Co-repressors mediate gene repression through their recruitment by DNA bound transcriptional silencer proteins. Co-repressors repress gene expression through several mechanisms, mostly investigated on the level of chromatin. Lack or aberrant gene silencing is associated with many defects both on cellular and organismic level. Several human diseases are based on dysregulated co-repressor binding to transcriptional silencers indicating that co-repressor recruitment and the strength of gene silencing must be under strict control. In line with that gene silencing is important for animal development, cellular proliferation and transformation. Co-repressors play also a major role in the treatment of hormone-dependent growing cancers, such as for breast and prostate cancer therapy. The molecular basis of anti-hormone therapy lies in the recruitment of co-repressors to the estrogen or androgen receptors, respectively, which leads to their inactivation and to inhibition of cancer growth. The molecular mechanisms of selected topics are summarized here.

Alternative mRNA splicing of SMRT creates functional diversity by generating corepressor isoforms with different affinities for different nuclear receptors

Many eukaryotic transcription factors are bimodal in their regulatory properties and can both repress and activate expression of their target genes. These divergent transcriptional properties are conferred through recruitment of auxiliary proteins, denoted coactivators and corepressors. Repression plays a particularly critical role in the functions of the nuclear receptors, a large family of ligand-regulated transcription factors involved in metazoan development, differentiation, reproduction, and homeostasis. The SMRT corepressor interacts directly with nuclear receptors and serves, in turn, as a platform for the assembly of a larger corepressor complex. We report here that SMRT is expressed in cells by alternative mRNA splicing to yield two distinct variants or isoforms. We designate these isoforms SMRTalpha and SMRTtau and demonstrate that these isoforms have significantly different affinities for different nuclear receptors. These isoforms are evolutionarily conserved and are expressed in a tissue-specific manner. Our results suggest that differential mRNA splicing serves to customize corepressor function in different cells, allowing the transcriptional properties of nuclear receptors to be adapted to different contexts.

The biology of human lymphoid malignancies revealed by gene expression profiling

Gene expression profiling provides a quantitative molecular framework for the study of human lymphomas. This genomic technology has revealed that existing diagnostic categories are comprised of multiple molecularly and clinically distinct diseases. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), for example, consists of three gene expression subgroups, termed germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) DLBCL, activated B-cell-like (ABC) DLBCL, and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL). These DLBCL subgroups arise from different stages of normal B-cell differentiation, utilize distinct oncogenic mechanisms, and differ in their ability to be cured by chemotherapy. Key regulatory factors and their target genes are differentially expressed among these subgroups, including BCL-6, Blimp-1, and XBP1. ABC DLBCL and PMBL depend upon constitutive activation of the NF-kappaB pathway for their survival but GCB DLBCL does not, demonstrating that this pathway is a potential therapeutic target for certain DLBCL subgroups. In DLBCL, mantle cell lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma, gene expression profiling has also been used to create gene expression-based models of survival, which have identified the biological characteristics of the tumors that influence their clinical behavior. In mantle cell lymphoma, the length of survival following diagnosis is primarily influenced by the tumor proliferation rate, which can be quantitatively measured by a proliferation gene expression "signature." Based on this accurate measure, the proliferation rate can now be viewed as an integration of several oncogenic lesions that each increase progression from the G1 to the S phase of the cell cycle. In DLBCL and follicular lymphoma, gene expression profiling has revealed that the molecular characteristics of non-malignant tumor-infiltrating immune cells have a major influence on the length of survival. The implications of these insights for the diagnosis and treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphomas are discussed.

Sin3: a flexible regulator of global gene expression and genome stability

SIN3 was first identified genetically as a global regulator of transcription. Sin3 is a large protein composed mainly of protein-interaction domains, whose function is to provide structural support for a heterogeneous Sin3/histone deacetylase (HDAC) complex. The core Sin3/HDAC complex is conserved from yeast to man and consists of eight proteins. In addition to HDACs, Sin3 can sequester other enzymatic functions, including nucleosome remodeling, DNA methylation, N-acetylglucoseamine transferase activity, and histone methylation. Since the Sin3/HDAC complex lacks any DNA-binding activity, it must be targeted to gene promoters by interacting with DNA-binding proteins. Although most research on Sin3 has focused on its role as a corepressor, mounting evidence suggests that Sin3 can also positively regulate transcription. Furthermore, Sin3 is key to the propagation of epigenetically silenced domains and is required for centromere function. Thus, Sin3 provides a platform to deliver multiple combinations modifications to the chromatin, using both sequence-specific and sequence-independent mechanisms.

SMRT and N-CoR corepressors are regulated by distinct kinase signaling pathways

N-CoR and SMRT are corepressor paralogs that partner with and mediate transcriptional repression by a wide variety of metazoan transcription factors, including nuclear hormone receptors. Although encoded by distinct genetic loci, N-CoR and SMRT share substantial sequence interrelatedness, form analogous assemblies with histone deacetylases and auxiliary factors, can interact with overlapping sets of transcription factor partners, and exert overlapping functions in cells. SMRT is subject to negative regulation by MAPK signaling pathways operating downstream of growth factor and stress signaling pathways. We report here that whereas activation of MEKK1 leads to phosphorylation of SMRT, its dissociation from its transcription factor partners in vivo and in vitro, and its redistribution from the cell nucleus to a cytoplasmic compartment, N-CoR is refractory to all these forms of regulation. In contrast to this MAPK cascade, other signal transduction pathways operating downstream of growth factor/cytokine receptors appear able to affect both corepressor paralogs. Our results indicate that SMRT and N-CoR are embedded in distinct regulatory networks and that the two corepressors interpret growth factor, cytokine, differentiation, and prosurvival signals differently.

Plant class B HSFs inhibit transcription and exhibit affinity for TFIIB and TBP

Plant heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) are capable of transcriptional activation (class A HSFs) or both, activation and repression (class B HSFs). However, the details of mechanism still remain unclear. It is likely, that the regulation occurs through interactions of HSFs with general transcription factors (GTFs), as has been described for numerous other transcription factors. Here, we show that class A HSFs may activate transcription through direct contacts with TATA-binding protein (TBP). Class A HSFs can also interact weakly with TFIIB. Conversely, class B HSFs inhibit promoter activity through an active mechanism of repression that involves the C-terminal regulatory region (CTR) of class B HSFs. Deletion analysis revealed two sites in the CTR of soybean GmHSFB1 potentially involved in protein-protein interactions with GTFs: one is the repressor domain (RD) located in the N-terminal half of the CTR, and the other is a TFIIB binding domain (BD) that shows affinity for TFIIB and is located C-terminally from the RD. A Gal4 DNA binding domain-RD fusion repressed activity of LexA-activators, while Gal4-BD proteins synergistically activated strong and weak transcriptional activators. In vitro binding studies were consistent with this pattern of activity since the BD region alone interacted strongly with TFIIB, and the presence of RD had an inhibitory effect on TFIIB binding and transcriptional activation.

The role of corepressors in transcriptional regulation by nuclear hormone receptors

Nuclear receptors (also known as nuclear hormone receptors) are hormone-regulated transcription factors that control many important physiological and developmental processes in animals and humans. Defects in receptor function result in disease. The diverse biological roles of these receptors reflect their surprisingly versatile transcriptional properties, with many receptors possessing the ability to both repress and activate target gene expression. These bipolar transcriptional properties are mediated through the interactions of the receptors with two distinct classes of auxiliary proteins: corepressors and coactivators. This review focuses on how corepressors work together with nuclear receptors to repress gene transcription in the normal organism and on the aberrations in this process that lead to neoplasia and endocrine disorders. The actions of coactivators and the contributions of the same corepressors to the functions of nonreceptor transcription factors are also touched on.

Structure-function analysis of the estrogen receptor alpha corepressor scaffold attachment factor-B1: identification of a potent transcriptional repression domain

Scaffold attachment factor-B1 (SAFB1) is a nuclear matrix protein that has been proposed to couple chromatin structure, transcription, and RNA processing. We have previously shown that SAFB1 can repress estrogen receptor (ERalpha)-mediated transactivation. Here we present a structure-function study showing that transactivation is mediated via an intrinsic and transferable C-terminal repression domain (RD). A similar C-terminal RD was found in the family member SAFB2. Removal of the RD from SAFB1 resulted in a dominant-negative SAFB1 protein that increased ligand-dependent and -independent ERalpha activity. SAFB1RD-mediated repression was partly blocked by histone deacetylase inhibitors; however, no histone deacetylase inhibitors were identified in a yeast two-hybrid screen using the RD as bait. Instead, SAFB1RD was found to interact with TAFII68, a member of the basal transcription machinery. We propose a model in which SAFB1 represses ERalpha activity via indirect association with histone deacetylation and interaction with the basal transcription machinery.

Pharmacology of nuclear receptor-coregulator recognition

The nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily comprises approximately 50 members that are responsible for regulating a number of physiologic processes in humans, including metabolism, homeostasis, and reproduction. Included in the superfamily are the receptors for steroids, lipophilic vitamins, bile acids, retinoids, and various fatty acids. NRs exert their action as transcription factors that directly bind to the promoters of target genes and regulate their rate of transcription. To modulate transcription, however, NRs must recruit a number of accessory coregulators known as corepressors and coactivators. These coregulators harbor a variety of activities, such as the ability to modify chromatin structure, interact with basal transcriptional machinery, and modify RNA splicing. Recent studies have revealed that the pharmacological characteristics of various NR ligands are regulated by their ability to modulate the coregulator interaction profile of an NR.

Corepressor requirement and thyroid hormone receptor function during Xenopus development

The biologic role of hormonal activation of nuclear receptors is well established. Only recently, however, has the biologic significance of repression begun to be appreciated. Amphibian metamorphosis is marked by dramatic thyroid hormone induced changes, including de novo morphogenesis, tissue remodeling, and organ resorption through programmed cell death. These changes involve cascades of gene regulation initiated by 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine (T(3)). T(3) functions by regulating gene expression through thyroid hormone receptor (TR). TRs are DNA-binding transcription factors that belong to the steroid hormone receptor superfamily. In the absence of a ligand, TRs can repress gene expression by recruiting corepressor complexes, whereas liganded TRs recruit coactivator complexes for gene activation. Corepressor and coactivator complexes induce chromatin remodeling to mediate TR regulation of transcription. The mechanisms of TR action permit a dual function for TRs during development. In premetamorphic tadpoles, when TRs are expressed and T(3) levels are barely detectable, unliganded TRs repress transcription through corepressor recruitment. This TR-mediated repression of target genes is critical for proper larval development, allowing tadpole growth and acquisition of metamorphic competence. In contrast, during metamorphosis, endogenous T(3) causes TRs to activate gene expression, leading to tadpole transformation. Several results also support a role for corepressors during metamorphosis. Corepressor targeted functions, however, are still speculative but may again involve TRs. The requirement of active gene repression at different stages during amphibian development establishes an important biologic role for corepressors.

Gene silencing by the thyroid hormone receptor

The thyroid hormone receptors (TR) are able to bind DNA and to repress transcription in the absence of thyroid hormone. This repression function is an important feature of TRs as aberrant silencing can lead to severe diseases and developmental abnormalities. TR utilizes different mechanisms to achieve repression of target genes including the recruitment of cofactors called corepressors and interference with the basal transcriptional machinery. Recent studies have revealed an important role of chromatin in TR silencing involving different histone modifications and the responsible enzymes. Furthermore, the transcriptional properties of TR depend on the type of the TR DNA-binding elements. This review will focus on the molecular basis of gene silencing by TR and diseases caused by aberrant functioning.

Retinoid receptors and their coregulators

Retinoids regulate gene transcription by binding to the nuclear receptors, the retinoic acid (RA) receptors (RARs), and the retinoid X receptors (RXRs). RARs and RXRs are ligand-activated transcription factors for the regulation of RA-responsive genes. The actions of RARs and RXRs on gene transcription require a highly coordinated interaction with a large number of coactivators and corepressors. This review focuses on our current understanding of these coregulators known to act in concert with RARs and RXRs. The mechanisms of action of these coregulators are beginning to be uncovered and include the modification of chromatin and the recruitment of basal transcription factors. Challenges remain to understand the specificity of action of RARs and RXRs and the formation of specific transcription complexes consisting of the receptors, coregulators, and other unknown factors.

DAX1 and its network partners: exploring complexity in development

DAX1 encoded by NR0B1, when mutated, is responsible for X-linked adrenal hypoplasia congenita (AHC). AHC is due to failure of the adrenal cortex to develop normally and is fatal if untreated. When duplicated, this gene is associated with an XY sex-reversed phenotype. DAX1 expression is present during development of the steroidogenic hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-gonadal (HPAG) axis and persists into adult life. Despite recognition of the crucial role for DAX1, its function remains largely undefined. The phenotypes of patients and animal models are complex and not always in agreement. Investigations using cell lines have proved difficult to interpret, possibly reflecting cell line choices and their limited characterization. We will review the efforts of our group and others to identify appropriate cell lines for optimizing ex vivo analysis of NR0B1 function throughout development. We will examine the role of DAX1 and its network partners in development of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal/gonadal axis (HPAG) using a variety of different types of investigations, including those in model organisms. This network analysis will help us to understand normal and abnormal development of the HPAG. In addition, these studies permit identification of candidate genes for human inborn errors of HPAG development.

Identification of novel co-repressor molecules for Interferon Regulatory Factor-2

We have identified two novel proteins that interact specifically with the C-terminal repression domain of Interferon Regulatory Factor-2 (IRF-2). These proteins, which we term IRF-2 binding proteins 1 and 2 (IRF-2BP1 and IRF-2BP2, the latter having two splicing isoforms, A and B), are nuclear proteins, and have the properties of IRF-2-dependent transcriptional co-repressors that can inhibit both enhancer-activated and basal transcription in a manner that is not dependent upon histone deacetylation. IRF-2BP1 and IRF-2BP2A/B contain an N-terminal zinc finger and a C-terminal RING finger domain of the C3HC4 subclass, but show no homology to other known transcriptional regulators; they therefore define a new family of co- repressor proteins. An alternatively spliced form of IRF-2 that lacks two amino acids (valines 177 and 178) in the central portion of the protein (IRF-2[S]) cannot bind to these co-repressors and cannot mediate repression despite having the same C- terminal repression domain as IRF-2, suggesting that the relative conformation of the DNA binding domain and the C-terminal region of IRF-2 is crucial for transcriptional repression.

N-CoR-HDAC corepressor complexes: roles in transcriptional regulation by nuclear hormone receptors

Many nuclear hormone receptors (NHRs) actively repress the expression of their primary response genes through the recruitment of transcriptional corepressor complexes to regulated promoters. N-CoR and the highly related SMRT were originally isolated and characterized by their ability to interact exclusivelywith the unliganded forms of NHRs and confer transcriptional repression. Recently, both the N-CoR and SMRT corepressors have been found to exist in vivo in multiple, distinct macromolecular complexes. While these corepressor complexes differ in overall composition, a general theme is that they contain histone deacetylase enzymatic activity. Several of these complexes contain additional transcriptional corepressor proteins with functional ties to chromatin structure. Together, these data suggest that modulation of chromatin structure plays a central role in N-CoR mediated transcriptional repression from unliganded NHRs.

Isotype-restricted corepressor recruitment: a constitutively closed helix 12 conformation in retinoic acid receptors beta and gamma interferes with corepressor recruitment and prevents transcriptional repression

Retinoic acid receptors (RARs) are ligand-regulated transcription factors that play multiple roles in vertebrate development and differentiation. RARs as a class are capable of both repressing and activating target gene expression. Transcriptional repression is mediated through the recruitment of corepressor proteins such as SMRT. Notably, vertebrates encode three major forms of RARs, alpha, beta, and gamma, and these distinct RAR isotypes differ in the ability to recruit a corepressor. RAR alpha strongly interacts with SMRT and can repress target gene transcription, whereas RAR beta and -gamma interact with SMRT only weakly and fail to repress. We report here the use of a genetic suppressor approach, based on a yeast two-hybrid interaction assay using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, for the isolation of RAR beta mutants that have gained the RAR alpha-like corepressor phenotype, i.e., a strong interaction with SMRT and the ability to repress gene expression in vertebrate cells. Analysis of these gain-of-function mutants indicates that the different corepressor interaction properties of RAR alpha, -beta and -gamma are determined by a gating mechanism through which amino acid differences in the helix 3 region of these receptors influence the position of the receptor C-terminal helix 12 domain. As a consequence, the RAR beta and RAR gamma receptors appear to adopt a constitutively closed helix 12 conformation in the absence of hormone that may approximate the conformation of RAR alpha when bound to hormone agonist. This closed helix 12 conformation in RAR beta and RAR gamma blocks corepressor binding, prevents repression, and permits significant levels of target gene activation even in the absence of hormone. We refer to this phenomenon as a "gate-latch" model of corepressor regulation.

Retinoic acid receptors beta and gamma do not repress, but instead activate target gene transcription in both the absence and presence of hormone ligand

Retinoic acid receptors (RARs) are important mediators of retinoid signaling in morphogenesis, development, and cell differentiation. Three major isotypes of RARs, denoted alpha, beta, and gamma, have been identified, each encoded by a distinct genetic locus. Although RARalpha, RARbeta, and RARgamma share many structural and functional features, these three isotypes are known to play unique, as well as overlapping, roles in physiology and development. We report here that the three RAR isotypes display different transcriptional properties in the absence of hormone ligand; under these conditions, RARalpha is a strong repressor of target gene expression, whereas both RARbeta and RARgamma fail to repress and instead are able to mediate substantial levels of hormone-independent transcriptional activation. These differing transcriptional properties appear to reflect the differing abilities of the three RAR isotypes to interact with the SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor) corepressor protein: RARalpha binds to SMRT strongly both in vitro and in vivo, whereas RARbeta and RARgamma interact only weakly with SMRT. The ability to repress or to activate transcription in the absence of hormone maps predominantly to isotype-specific differences in the sequence of helix 3 within the hormone binding domain of the RARs, and the transcriptional properties of one isotype can be exchanged with that of another by exchanging portions of helix 3. The different transcriptional properties of RARalpha, RARbeta, and RARgamma in the absence of hormone contribute to the distinctive biological functions of these proteins and provide a rationale for the strong conservation of the three distinct isotypes during the vertebrate evolutionary radiation.

The thyroid hormone receptor and the insulator protein CTCF: two different factors with overlapping functions

Thyroid hormones and thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) confer a fundamental regulation of critical genes involved in metabolism, differentiation, and development. A similar role is attributed to the highly conserved zinc-finger factor CTCF. Furthermore, a potential role in tumour suppression has been attributed to CTCF. In addition to promoter regulation, CTCF has also been shown to be involved in chromatin insulation or enhancer blocking. In several cases, binding sites for TR and for CTCF have been found next to each other. Functionally, these sites mediate synergistic repression or induction dependent on the type of binding site and on the presence or absence of thyroid hormone. Here we discuss functional similarities between TR and CTCF and their roles within these composite elements.

Genetic network identification by high density, multiplexed reversed transcriptional (HD-MRT) analysis in steroidogenic axis model cell lines

Transcriptional network analysis in steroidogenic axis cell lines requires an understanding of cellular network composition and complexity. Previous studies have shown that absence of transcriptional network components in a cell line compromises that cell line's functional capacity for transcriptional regulation. Our goal was to analyze qualitatively steroidogenic axis-derived cell lines' expression of a putative transcriptional network involved in human and mouse development. To pursue this analysis we used Northern blots and a high density-multiplexed reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (HD-MRT-PCR) approach. Our results revealed that, while some members of this putative network were universally expressed, only a minority of the non-constitutive targeted transcripts were present in any single line. Based on our data and previously published results for contextual expression of these transcription factors, a model was constructed possessing the topology suggestive of a scale-free network: certain network members were highly connected nodes and would represent critical sites of vulnerability. The importance of these highly connected nodes for network function is supported by the severe phenotypes exhibited by human patients and animal models when these genes are mutated. We conclude that knowledge of network composition in specific cell lines is essential for their use as models to investigate functional interactions within selected subnetworks.

The silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors can interact with the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor but fails to repress Ah receptor-dependent gene expression

Exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related chemicals causes a variety of tissue- and species-specific biological and toxicological effects, most of which are mediated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). The AhR complex is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that binds to its specific DNA recognition site as a dimer with the AhR nuclear translocator (ARNT) and activates gene transcription. Here, we have examined the ability of a nuclear corepressor, the silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT), to interact with and modulate AhR-dependent gene expression. Using glutathione S-transferase (GST) "pull-down" binding assays, we have mapped a major interaction between these factors to the silencing domain of SMRT and the PAS B ligand binding domain of AhR, and this interaction is unaffected by the addition of an AhR ligand. Association of SMRT with the AhR:ARNT:DNA complex was not detected by GST pull-down or gel retardation assays. Transient cotransfections of mammalian cells (Hepa1c1c7, MCF-7, and BG-1) with SMRT and a TCDD-inducible luciferase reporter containing the dioxin-responsive domain from the mouse CYP1A1 regulatory region revealed that SMRT does not repress, but enhances, AhR signaling. However, when a reporter containing a human CYP1A1 upstream region was cotransfected with SMRT into human MCF-7 cells, AhR-driven reporter activity was decreased by half, suggesting that SMRT acts on the human CYP1A1 promoter via a factor other than the AhR in MCF-7 cells. Furthermore, the interaction between SMRT and the AhR may have implications in pathways other than the AhR signaling pathway.

Ikaros-CtIP interactions do not require C-terminal binding protein and participate in a deacetylase-independent mode of repression

Ikaros and Aiolos are Kruppel zinc finger proteins that play key roles in hemo-lymphoid development and homeostasis. We have previously shown that they can repress transcription through the recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs). Here, we provide the first functional evidence that these proteins can also repress gene function in a manner that does not require deacetylase activity. This functionality can be attributed in part to Ikaros interactions with the HDAC-independent corepressor, C-terminal binding protein (CtBP). However, mutations that block Ikaros-CtBP interactions do not abolish Ikaros's repression activity, implicating the involvement of additional corepressors. Consistent with this expectation, we show that Ikaros can interact with a CtBP-interacting protein (CtIP), which has also been linked to a deacetylase-independent strategy of repression. Despite being a CtBP interactor, CtIP's association with Ikaros does not require CtBP but instead relies upon its Rb interaction domain. Significantly, Ikaros can interact with Rb, which itself can repress gene function in a deacetylase-independent manner. A mutation in Ikaros that abrogates CtIP interactions significantly reduces repression, and a double mutation that prevents interaction with both CtIP and CtBP even further alleviates repression. Finally, we show that CtIP and CtBP can interact with the general transcription factors, TATA binding protein and transcription factor IIB, which suggests a possible mechanism for their deacetylase-independent mode of repression.

Androgen receptor (AR) coregulators: an overview

The biological action of androgens is mediated through the androgen receptor (AR). Androgen-bound AR functions as a transcription factor to regulate genes involved in an array of physiological processes, most notably male sexual differentiation and maturation, and the maintenance of spermatogenesis. The transcriptional activity of AR is affected by coregulators that influence a number of functional properties of AR, including ligand selectivity and DNA binding capacity. As the promoter of target genes, coregulators participate in DNA modification, either directly through modification of histones or indirectly by the recruitment of chromatin-modifying complexes, as well as functioning in the recruitment of the basal transcriptional machinery. Aberrant coregulator activity due to mutation or altered expression levels may be a contributing factor in the progression of diseases related to AR activity, such as prostate cancer. AR demonstrates distinct differences in its interaction with coregulators from other steroid receptors due to differences in the functional interaction between AR domains, possibly resulting in alterations in the dynamic interactions between coregulator complexes.

Sp3 represses gene expression via the titration of promoter-specific transcription factors

We have determined previously that Sp3 encodes three distinct gene products as follows: a full-length protein (Sp3) that is an activator of transcription and two isoforms (M1 and M2) derived via internal translational initiation that function as transcriptional repressors. To identify amino acids and functions required for transcriptional repression, we employed PCR-directed mutagenesis to create a panel of mutated M2 proteins. Biochemical and functional analyses of these mutated proteins indicate that functions encoded by the M2 carboxyl terminus, such as DNA binding activity and the capacity to form multimeric complexes, are not required or sufficient for transcriptional repression. Instead, a 93-amino acid portion of the trans-activation domain was shown to be the minimal portion of M2 required to block Sp-dependent gene expression. Transcriptional analysis of three Sp-dependent promoters showed that mutations sustained by many M2 proteins result in promoter-specific effects. Regions of M2 required for physical interactions with five TATA box-associated factors (TAF(II)s) were mapped, and mutations that disrupt the interaction of M2 with two of these proteins, TAF(II)70 and TAF(II)40, were identified. We conclude that Sp3- mediated transcriptional repression is due, at least in part, to competition for promoter-specific transcription factors.

Precipitous release of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 and histone deacetylase 1 from the methylated human multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) on activation

Overexpression of the human multidrug resistance gene 1 (MDR1) is a negative prognostic factor in leukemia. Despite intense efforts to characterize the gene at the molecular level, little is known about the genetic events that switch on gene expression in P-glycoprotein-negative cells. Recent studies have shown that the transcriptional competence of MDR1 is often closely associated with DNA methylation. Chromatin remodeling and modification targeted by the recognition of methylated DNA provide a dominant mechanism for transcriptional repression. Consistent with this epigenetic model, interference with DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase activity alone or in combination can reactivate silent genes. In the present study, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation to monitor the molecular events involved in the activation and repression of MDR1. Inhibitors of DNA methyltransferase (5-azacytidine [5aC]) and histone deacetylase (trichostatin A [TSA]) were used to examine gene transcription, promoter methylation status, and the chromatin determinants associated with the MDR1 promoter. We have established that methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2) is involved in methylation-dependent silencing of human MDR1 in cells that lack the known transcriptional repressors MBD2 and MBD3. In the repressed state the MDR1 promoter is methylated and assembled into chromatin enriched with MeCP2 and deacetylated histone. TSA induced significant acetylation of histones H3 and H4 but did not activate transcription. 5aC induced DNA demethylation, leading to the release of MeCP2, promoter acetylation, and partial relief of repression. MDR1 expression was significantly increased following combined 5aC and TSA treatments. Inhibition of histone deacetylase is not an overriding mechanism in the reactivation of methylated MDR1. Our results provide us with a clearer understanding of the molecular mechanism necessary for repression of MDR1.

Single-tube gene-specific expression analysis by high primer density multiplex reverse transcription

Molecular genetics is rapidly moving from simple identification of a gene of interest to characterization of gene products as components in complex networks. Critical tools for gene product analysis require a rapid method for evaluation of contextual expression. Here, we describe a robust, high primer density, single-tube, multiplex reverse transcription (HD-MRT) technique. This approach is capable of analyzing for the presence of numerous transcripts when polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is subsequently employed for individual gene-specific sequence amplification (HD-MRT-PCR). This assay substantially increases the total number of different cDNAs for amplification beyond previously published techniques. Our approach simultaneously eliminates RNA quality control issues for samples run in parallel while improving efficiency in the use of time and materials. This assay is designed for broad applicability and accessibility, employs modifications of commercially available components, and allows more than 25 independently selected gene-specific primers to be used simultaneously. Our protocol allows multiplexed primers to behave similarly to uniplex RT reactions, while avoiding potential interference between gene-specific and/or nonspecific primers during annealing and reverse transcription. Expression of putatively networked homologous transcripts was analyzed in multiple cell lines and tissues from mouse and human to validate the technique.

Estrogen receptor and breast cancer

Breast cancer, the most common malignancy in women, was already known to be associated with the steroid hormone estrogen more than a century ago. The discovery of the estrogen receptor (ER) provided us not only with a powerful predictive and prognostic marker, but also an efficient target for the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer with antiestrogens. In this paper we will sketch the important role of ER in the development, progression, and treatment of the disease, which is complicated by the receptor's interaction with co-regulatory proteins, its cross-talk with other signal transduction pathways, and its involvement in the development of antiestrogen resistance.