Deep Brain Stimulation in Epilepsy: A Role for Modulation of the Mammillothalamic Tract in Seizure Control?

Assessing short-term and long-term security and efficacy of anterior nucleus of the thalamus deep brain stimulation for treating drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is a widespread invasive procedure for treating drug-resistant epilepsy. Nonetheless, there is a persistent debate regarding the short-term and long-term efficacy and safety of ANT-DBS. Thus we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science for studies treating refractory epilepsy with ANT-DBS. Short-term analysis was considered for studies with a mean follow-up of 3 years or less. The following outcomes were assessed for data extraction: procedure responders and nonresponders, increased seizure frequency, complications, and procedure-related mortality. Of 650 studies, 25 fit our inclusion criteria, involving 427 patients. Previous surgical treatments have been reported in 214 patients (50.1%) and a median average baseline seizure frequency of 64.9 monthly seizures. In the short-term analysis, we observed a proportion of 67% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54%-79%) of responders and 33% (95% CI 21%-46%) of nonresponders. In addition, 4% (95% CI 0%-9%) of the patients presented increased seizure frequency. In the long-term analysis, we observed 72% (95% CI 66%-78%) responders and 27% (95% CI 21%-34%) nonresponders. Moreover, there was a 2% (95% CI 0%-5%) increase in seizure frequency. No procedure-related mortality was reported at any follow-up. ANT-DBS effectively treats refractory epilepsy, with lasting short-term and long-term benefits. It remains safe and efficient despite complications, showing no procedure-linked fatalities, high patient responsiveness, and minimal increased seizures. Consistent results over time and low morbidity/mortality rates emphasize its worth. Further research is necessary to diminish the discrepancy among results.

Neurostimulation treatments for epilepsy: Deep brain stimulation, responsive neurostimulation and vagus nerve stimulation

Epilepsy is a common and debilitating neurological disorder, and approximately one-third of affected individuals have ongoing seizures despite appropriate trials of two anti-seizure medications. This population with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) may benefit from neurostimulation approaches, such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). In some patient populations, these techniques are FDA-approved for treating DRE. VNS is used as adjuvant therapy for children and adults. Acting via the vagus afferent network, VNS modulates thalamocortical circuits, reducing seizures in approximately 50 ​% of patients. RNS uses an adaptive (closed-loop) system that records intracranial EEG patterns to activate the stimulation at the appropriate time, being particularly well-suited to treat seizures arising within eloquent cortex. For DBS, the most promising therapeutic targets are the anterior and centromedian nuclei of the thalamus, with anterior nucleus DBS being used for treating focal and secondarily generalized forms of DRE and centromedian nucleus DBS being applied for treating generalized epilepsies such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Here, we discuss the indications, advantages and limitations of VNS, DBS and RNS in treating DRE and summarize the spatial distribution of neuroimaging observations related to epilepsy and stimulation using NeuroQuery and NeuroSynth.

Epilepsy Networks and Their Surgical Relevance

Surgical epilepsy is a rapidly evolved field. As the understanding and concepts of epilepsy shift towards a network disorder, surgical outcomes may shed light on numerous components of these systems. This review documents the evolution of the understanding of epilepsy networks and examines the data generated by resective, ablative, neuromodulation, and invasive monitoring surgeries in epilepsy patients. As these network tools are better integrated into epilepsy practice, they may eventually inform surgical decisions and improve clinical outcomes.

Temporo-Parietal Extraventricular Approach for Deep Brain Stimulation Targeting the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus: Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is a common target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). However, the surgical approach to the ANT remains challenging because of its unique anatomy. This study aims to summarize our experience with the posterior temporo-parietal extraventricular (TPEV) approach targeting the ANT for DBS in DRE.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with DRE who underwent ANT-DBS using the TPEV approach between January 2011 and February 2021. Subjects with at least 6-month follow-up were eligible. The final lead position and number of active contacts targeting the anteroventral nucleus (AV) of the ANT were assessed using Lead-DBS. Mean seizure frequency reduction percentage and responder rate (≥50% decrease in seizure frequency) were determined.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (mean age: 32.9 years; 52% female patients) were included. The mean follow-up period was 27.6 months ± 13.9 (29, 16-36). The mean seizure frequency reduction percentage was 65% ± 26 (75, 50-82). Twenty-six of 31 participants (83%) were responders, P < .001. Two subjects (6%) were seizure-free for at least 6 months at the last evaluation. Antiepileptic drugs dose and/or number decreased in 17/31 subjects (55%). The success rate for placing at least 1 contact at AV was 87% (27/31 patients) bilaterally. The number of active contacts at the AV was significantly greater in the responder group, 3.1 ± 1.3 (3, 2-4) vs 1.8 ± 1.1 (2, 1-2.5); P = .041 with a positive correlation between the number of active contacts and seizure reduction percentage; r = 0.445, R 2 = 0.198, P = .012.

CONCLUSION

The TPEV trajectory is a safe and effective approach to target the ANT for DBS. Future studies are needed to compare the clinical outcomes and target accuracy with the standard approaches.

Abolition of seizures following Forel-H-tomy for drug-resistant epilepsy: A case report

A 62-year-old female experienced an extensive cerebral contusion in the left frontotemporal lobe due to an acute subdural hematoma at the age of 44 years. Six months after the injury, the patient developed epileptic seizures. The seizures were generalized with right cervical rotation and fencing posture. Despite prescriptions for four antiepileptic drugs, partial seizures occurred several times a month and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures once every 2 months. Video-electroencephalography showed epileptic discharges in the left frontal lobe. The patient was subsequently referred to our department for palliative surgery. The patient underwent a left Forel-H-tomy. The prescription of antiepileptic drugs was not changed, and the patient was seizure free for 1 year. Forel-H-tomy, a surgical procedure for intractable epilepsy, was pioneered by Dennosuke Jinnai. Despite its previously reported remarkable efficacy, Forel-H-tomy has not been performed for several decades. Nevertheless, it remains a potential alternative treatment option for drug-resistant epilepsy.

Brain vascularization in deep brain stimulation surgeries: epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, and obsessive-compulsive disorder

BACKGROUND

In our experience, we encountered more blood vessels during deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgeries in epilepsy. In this study, we have quantified and compared the cerebral vascularization in epilepsy, Parkinson's disease (PD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

METHODS

A retrospective observational study in 15 epilepsy and 15 PD patients was performed. The amount, location, and size of blood vessels within 5 millimeters (mm) of all DBS electrode trajectories (N.=120) for both targets (anterior nucleus of the thalamus: ANT and subthalamic nucleus: STN) in both patient groups were quantified and compared on a Medtronic workstation (Dublin, Ireland). Additionally, blood vessels in the trajectories (N.=120) of another group of 15 PD (STN) and 15 OCD (ventral capsule-ventral striatum [VC-VS]) patients were quantified and compared (trajectories N.=120), also to the first group. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 27.0 (descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, Mann Whitney U Test, ANOVA Test and post-hoc Tukey Test). A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Our results showed a significant greater amount of cerebral blood vessels in epilepsy patients (10 SD±4) compared to PD (PD1 6 SD±1 and PD2 5 SD±3) and OCD (5 SD±1) with P<0.0001. Also, all other subanalyses showed more vascularization in the epilepsy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the brain of epilepsy patients seems to be more vascularized compared to PD and OCD patients. This can make the surgical planning for DBS more challenging, and the use of multiple trajectories limited.

Initial case series of a novel sensing deep brain stimulation device in drug-resistant epilepsy and consistent identification of alpha/beta oscillatory activity: A feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

Here, we report a retrospective, single-center experience with a novel deep brain stimulation (DBS) device capable of chronic local field potential (LFP) recording in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and explore potential electrophysiological biomarkers that may aid DBS programming and outcome tracking.

METHODS

Five patients with DRE underwent thalamic DBS, targeting either the bilateral anterior (n = 3) or centromedian (n = 2) nuclei. Postoperative electrode lead localizations were visualized in Lead-DBS software. Local field potentials recorded over 12-18 months were tracked, and changes in power were associated with patient events, medication changes, and stimulation. We utilized a combination of lead localization, in-clinic broadband LFP recordings, real-time LFP response to stimulation, and chronic recordings to guide DBS programming.

RESULTS

Four patients (80%) experienced a >50% reduction in seizure frequency, whereas one patient had no significant reduction. Peaks in the alpha and/or beta frequency range were observed in the thalamic LFPs of each patient. Stimulation suppressed these LFP peaks in a dose-dependent manner. Chronic timeline data identified changes in LFP amplitude associated with stimulation, seizure occurrences, and medication changes. We also noticed a circadian pattern of LFP amplitudes in all patients. Button-presses during seizure events via a mobile application served as a digital seizure diary and were associated with elevations in LFP power.

SIGNIFICANCE

We describe an initial cohort of patients with DRE utilizing a novel sensing DBS device to characterize potential LFP biomarkers of epilepsy that may be associated with seizure control after DBS in DRE. We also present a new workflow utilizing the Percept device that may optimize DBS programming using real-time and chronic LFP recording.

Mapping Lesion-Related Epilepsy to a Human Brain Network

Importance

It remains unclear why lesions in some locations cause epilepsy while others do not. Identifying the brain regions or networks associated with epilepsy by mapping these lesions could inform prognosis and guide interventions.

Objective

To assess whether lesion locations associated with epilepsy map to specific brain regions and networks.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This case-control study used lesion location and lesion network mapping to identify the brain regions and networks associated with epilepsy in a discovery data set of patients with poststroke epilepsy and control patients with stroke. Patients with stroke lesions and epilepsy (n = 76) or no epilepsy (n = 625) were included. Generalizability to other lesion types was assessed using 4 independent cohorts as validation data sets. The total numbers of patients across all datasets (both discovery and validation datasets) were 347 with epilepsy and 1126 without. Therapeutic relevance was assessed using deep brain stimulation sites that improve seizure control. Data were analyzed from September 2018 through December 2022. All shared patient data were analyzed and included; no patients were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Epilepsy or no epilepsy.

Results

Lesion locations from 76 patients with poststroke epilepsy (39 [51%] male; mean [SD] age, 61.0 [14.6] years; mean [SD] follow-up, 6.7 [2.0] years) and 625 control patients with stroke (366 [59%] male; mean [SD] age, 62.0 [14.1] years; follow-up range, 3-12 months) were included in the discovery data set. Lesions associated with epilepsy occurred in multiple heterogenous locations spanning different lobes and vascular territories. However, these same lesion locations were part of a specific brain network defined by functional connectivity to the basal ganglia and cerebellum. Findings were validated in 4 independent cohorts including 772 patients with brain lesions (271 [35%] with epilepsy; 515 [67%] male; median [IQR] age, 60 [50-70] years; follow-up range, 3-35 years). Lesion connectivity to this brain network was associated with increased risk of epilepsy after stroke (odds ratio [OR], 2.82; 95% CI, 2.02-4.10; P < .001) and across different lesion types (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.23-3.69; P < .001). Deep brain stimulation site connectivity to this same network was associated with improved seizure control (r, 0.63; P < .001) in 30 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (21 [70%] male; median [IQR] age, 39 [32-46] years; median [IQR] follow-up, 24 [16-30] months).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings in this study indicate that lesion-related epilepsy mapped to a human brain network, which could help identify patients at risk of epilepsy after a brain lesion and guide brain stimulation therapies.

Functional connectomic profile correlates with effective anterior thalamic stimulation for refractory epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS) is an effective treatment for refractory epilepsy; however, seizure outcome varies among individuals. Identifying a reliable noninvasive biomarker to predict good responders would be helpful.

OBJECTIVES

To test whether the functional connectivity between the ANT-DBS sites and the seizure foci correlates with effective seizure control in refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

We performed a proof-of-concept pilot study of patients with focal refractory epilepsy receiving ANT-DBS. Using normative human connectome data derived from 1000 healthy participants, we investigated whether intrinsic functional connectivity between the seizure foci and the DBS site was associated with seizure outcome. We repeated this analysis controlling for the extent of seizure foci, distance between the seizure foci and DBS site, and using functional connectivity of the ANT instead of the DBS site to test the contribution of variance in DBS sites.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with two or more seizure foci were included. Greater functional connectivity between the seizure foci and the DBS site correlated with more favorable outcome. The degree of functional connectivity accounted for significant variance in clinical outcomes (DBS site: |r| = 0.773, p < 0.001 vs ANT-atlas: |r| = 0.715, p = 0.001), which remained significant when controlling for the extent of the seizure foci (|r| = 0.773, p < 0.001) and the distance between the seizure foci and DBS site (|r| = 0.777, p < 0.001). Significant correlations were independent of variance in the DBS sites (|r| = 0.148, p = 0.57).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that functional connectomic profile is a potential reliable non-invasive biomarker to predict ANT-DBS outcomes. Accordingly, the identification of ANT responders could decrease the surgical risk for patients who may not benefit and optimize the cost-effective allocation of health care resources.

Deep brain stimulation of thalamus for epilepsy

Neuromodulation (neurostimulation) is a relatively new and rapidly growing treatment for refractory epilepsy. Three varieties are approved in the US: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). This article reviews thalamic DBS for epilepsy. Among many thalamic sub-nuclei, DBS for epilepsy has been targeted to the anterior nucleus (ANT), centromedian nucleus (CM), dorsomedial nucleus (DM) and pulvinar (PULV). Only ANT is FDA-approved, based upon a controlled clinical trial. Bilateral stimulation of ANT reduced seizures by 40.5% at three months in the controlled phase (p = .038) and 75% by 5 years in the uncontrolled phase. Side effects related to paresthesias, acute hemorrhage, infection, occasional increased seizures, and usually transient effects on mood and memory. Efficacy was best documented for focal onset seizures in temporal or frontal lobe. CM stimulation may be useful for generalized or multifocal seizures and PULV for posterior limbic seizures. Mechanisms of DBS for epilepsy are largely unknown, but animal work points to changes in receptors, channels, neurotransmitters, synapses, network connectivity and neurogenesis. Personalization of therapies, in terms of connectivity of the seizure onset zone to the thalamic sub- nucleus and individual characteristics of the seizures, might lead to improved efficacy. Many questions remain about DBS, including the best candidates for different types of neuromodulation, the best targets, the best stimulation parameters, how to minimize side effects and how to deliver current noninvasively. Despite the questions, neuromodulation provides useful new opportunities to treat people with refractory seizures not responding to medicines and not amenable to resective surgery.

Neuro-stimulation in focal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Different neurostimulation modalities are available to treat drug-resistant focal epilepsy when surgery is not an option including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Head-to-head comparisons of efficacy do not exist between them nor are likely to be available in the future. We performed a meta-analysis on VNS, RNS, and DBS outcomes to compare seizure reduction efficacy for focal epilepsy.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature for reported seizure outcomes following implantation with VNS, RNS, and DBS in focal-onset seizures and performed a meta-analysis. Prospective or retrospective clinical studies were included.

RESULTS

Sufficient data were available at years one (n = 642, two (n = 480), and three (n = 385) for comparing the three modalities with each other. Seizure reduction for the devices at years one, two, and three respectively were: RNS: 66.3%, 56.0%, 68.4%; DBS- 58.4%, 57.5%, 63.8%; VNS 32.9%, 44.4%, 53.5%. Seizure reduction at year one was greater for RNS (p < 0.01) and DBS (p < 0.01) compared to VNS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate the seizure reduction efficacy of RNS is similar to DBS, and both had greater seizure reductions compared to VNS in the first-year post-implantation, with the differences diminishing with longer-term follow-up.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results help guide neuromodulation treatment in eligible patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Medial Pulvinar Stimulation in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Literature Review and a Hypothesis Based on Neuroanatomical Findings

While bilateral stimulation of the anterior thalamic nuclei remains the only approved deep brain stimulation (DBS) option for focal epilepsy, two additional thalamic targets have been proposed. Earlier work indicated the potential of centromedian thalamic nucleus stimulation with recent findings highlighting the medial pulvinar nucleus. The latter has been shown to exhibit electrophysiological and imaging alterations in patients with partial status epilepticus and temporal lobe epilepsy. On this basis, recent studies have begun assessing the feasibility and efficacy of pulvinar stimulation, with encouraging results on the reduction of seizure frequency and severity. Building on existing neuroanatomical knowledge, indicating that the medial pulvinar is connected to the temporal lobe via the temporopulvinar bundle of Arnold, we hypothesize that this is one of the routes through which medial pulvinar stimulation affects temporal lobe structures. We suggest that further anatomic, imaging, and electrophysiologic studies are warranted to deepen our understanding of the subject and guide future clinical applications.

Deep brain stimulation of thalamic nuclei for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: Are we confident with the precise surgical target?

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic nuclei for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) has been investigated for decades. In recent years, DBS targeting the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) was approved by CE and FDA for the treatment of focal-onset DRE in light of the results from the multicentric randomized controlled SANTE trial. However, stereotactic targeting of thalamic nuclei is not straightforward because of the low contrast definition among thalamic nuclei on the current MRI sequences. When the FGATIR sequence is added to the preoperative MRI protocol, the mammillothalamic tract can be identified and used as a visible landmark to directly target ANT. According to the current evidence, the trans-ventricular trajectory allows the placement of stimulating contact into the nucleus more frequently than the trans-cortical trajectory. Another thalamic nucleus whose stimulation for the treatment of generalized DRE is receiving increasing attention is the centromedian nucleus (CM). CM-DBS seems to be particularly efficacious in patients suffering from Lennox-Gastault syndrome (LGS) and the recent monocentric randomized controlled ESTEL trial also described a beneficial "sweet-spot". However, CM targeting is still based on indirect stereotactic coordinates, since acquisition times and post-processing techniques of the actual MRI sequences are not applicable in clinical practice. Moreover, the results of the ESTEL trial await confirmation from similar studies accounting for epileptic syndromes other than LGS. Therefore, novel neuroimaging approaches are advisable to improve the surgical targeting of CM and potentially tailor the stimulation based on the patient's specific epileptic phenotype.

Thalamocortical coherence and causality in different sleep stages using deep brain stimulation recordings

Previous research has shown an interplay between the thalamus and cerebral cortex during NREM sleep in humans, however the directionality of the thalamocortical synchronization is as yet unknown. In this study thalamocortical connectivity during different NREM sleep stages using sleep scalp electroencephalograms and local field potentials from the left and right anterior thalamus was measured in three epilepsy patients implanted with deep brain stimulation electrodes. Connectivity was assessed as debiased weighted phase lag index and granger causality between the thalamus and cortex for the NREM sleep stages N1, N2 and N3. Results showed connectivity was most prominently directed from cortex to thalamus. Moreover, connectivity varied in strength between the different sleep stages, but barely in direction or frequency. These results imply relatively stable thalamocortical connectivity during NREM sleep directed from the cortex to the thalamus.

Towards network-guided neuromodulation for epilepsy

Epilepsy is well-recognized as a disorder of brain networks. There is a growing body of research to identify critical nodes within dynamic epileptic networks with the aim to target therapies that halt the onset and propagation of seizures. In parallel, intracranial neuromodulation, including deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation, are well-established and expanding as therapies to reduce seizures in adults with focal-onset epilepsy; and there is emerging evidence for their efficacy in children and generalized-onset seizure disorders. The convergence of these advancing fields is driving an era of 'network-guided neuromodulation' for epilepsy. In this review, we distil the current literature on network mechanisms underlying neurostimulation for epilepsy. We discuss the modulation of key 'propagation points' in the epileptogenic network, focusing primarily on thalamic nuclei targeted in current clinical practice. These include (i) the anterior nucleus of thalamus, now a clinically approved and targeted site for open loop stimulation, and increasingly targeted for responsive neurostimulation; and (ii) the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus, a target for both deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation in generalized-onset epilepsies. We discuss briefly the networks associated with other emerging neuromodulation targets, such as the pulvinar of the thalamus, piriform cortex, septal area, subthalamic nucleus, cerebellum and others. We report synergistic findings garnered from multiple modalities of investigation that have revealed structural and functional networks associated with these propagation points - including scalp and invasive EEG, and diffusion and functional MRI. We also report on intracranial recordings from implanted devices which provide us data on the dynamic networks we are aiming to modulate. Finally, we review the continuing evolution of network-guided neuromodulation for epilepsy to accelerate progress towards two translational goals: (i) to use pre-surgical network analyses to determine patient candidacy for neurostimulation for epilepsy by providing network biomarkers that predict efficacy; and (ii) to deliver precise, personalized and effective antiepileptic stimulation to prevent and arrest seizure propagation through mapping and modulation of each patients' individual epileptogenic networks.

Practical considerations in epilepsy neurostimulation

Neuromodulation is a key therapeutic tool for clinicians managing patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Multiple devices are available with long-term follow-up and real-world experience. The aim of this review is to give a practical summary of available neuromodulation techniques to guide the selection of modalities, focusing on patient selection for devices, common approaches and techniques for initiation of programming, and outpatient management issues. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (DBS-ANT), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) are all supported by randomized controlled trials that show safety and a significant impact on seizure reduction, as well as a suggestion of reduction in the risk of sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Significant seizure reductions are observed after 3 months for DBS, RNS, and VNS in randomized controlled trials, and efficacy appears to improve with time out to 7 to 10 years of follow-up for all modalities, albeit in uncontrolled follow-up or retrospective studies. A significant number of patients experience seizure-free intervals of 6 months or more with all three modalities. Number and location of epileptogenic foci are important factors affecting efficacy, and together with comorbidities such as severe mood or sleep disorders, may influence the choice of modality. Programming has evolved-DBS is typically initiated at lower current/voltage than used in the pivotal trial, whereas target charge density is lower with RNS, however generalizable optimal parameters are yet to be defined. Noninvasive brain stimulation is an emerging stimulation modality, although it is currently not used widely. In summary, clinical practice has evolved from those established in pivotal trials. Guidance is now available for clinicians who wish to expand their approach, and choice of neuromodulation technique may be tailored to individual patients based on their epilepsy characteristics, risk tolerance, and preferences.

In vivo probabilistic atlas of white matter tracts of the human subthalamic area combining track density imaging and optimized diffusion tractography

The human subthalamic area is a region of high anatomical complexity, tightly packed with tiny fiber bundles. Some of them, including the pallidothalamic, cerebello-thalamic, and mammillothalamic tracts, are relevant targets in functional neurosurgery for various brain diseases. Diffusion-weighted imaging-based tractography has been suggested as a useful tool to map white matter pathways in the human brain in vivo and non-invasively, though the reconstruction of these specific fiber bundles is challenging due to their small dimensions and complex anatomy. To the best of our knowledge, a population-based, in vivo probabilistic atlas of subthalamic white matter tracts is still missing. In the present work, we devised an optimized tractography protocol for reproducible reconstruction of the tracts of subthalamic area in a large data sample from the Human Connectome Project repository. First, we leveraged the super-resolution properties and high anatomical detail provided by short tracks track-density imaging (stTDI) to identify the white matter bundles of the subthalamic area on a group-level template. Tracts identification on the stTDI template was also aided by visualization of histological sections of human specimens. Then, we employed this anatomical information to drive tractography at the subject-level, optimizing tracking parameters to maximize between-subject and within-subject similarities as well as anatomical accuracy. Finally, we gathered subject level tracts reconstructed with optimized tractography into a large-scale, normative population atlas. We suggest that this atlas could be useful in both clinical anatomy and functional neurosurgery settings, to improve our understanding of the complex morphology of this important brain region.

Spatiotemporal patterns of sleep spindle activity in human anterior thalamus and cortex

Sleep spindles (8 - 16 Hz) are transient electrophysiological events during non-rapid eye movement sleep. While sleep spindles are routinely observed in the cortex using scalp electroencephalography (EEG), recordings of their thalamic counterparts have not been widely studied in humans. Based on a few existing studies, it has been hypothesized that spindles occur as largely local phenomena. We investigated intra-thalamic and thalamocortical spindle co-occurrence, which may underlie thalamocortical communication. We obtained scalp EEG and thalamic recordings from 7 patients that received bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes to the anterior thalamus for the treatment of drug resistant focal epilepsy. Spindles were categorized into subtypes based on their main frequency (i.e., slow (10±2 Hz) or fast (14±2 Hz)) and their level of thalamic involvement (spanning one channel, or spreading uni- or bilaterally within the thalamus). For the first time, we contrasted observed spindle patterns with permuted data to estimate random spindle co-occurrence. We found that multichannel spindle patterns were systematically coordinated at the thalamic and thalamocortical level. Importantly, distinct topographical patterns of thalamocortical spindle overlap were associated with slow and fast subtypes of spindles. These observations provide further evidence for coordinated spindle activity in thalamocortical networks.

Clinical outcome of imaging-based programming for anterior thalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation

OBJECTIVE

The authors hypothesized that the proximity of deep brain stimulator contacts to the anterior thalamic nucleus-mammillothalamic tract (ANT-MMT) junction determines responsiveness to treatment with ANT deep brain stimulation (DBS) in drug-resistant epilepsy and conducted this study to test that hypothesis.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated patients who had undergone ANT DBS electrode implantation and whose devices were programmed to stimulate nearest the ANT-MMT junction based on direct MRI visualization. The proximity of the active electrode to the ANT and the ANT-MMT junction was compared between responders (≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency) and nonresponders. Linear regression was performed to assess the percentage of seizure reduction and distance to both the ANT and the ANT-MMT junction.

RESULTS

Four (57.1%) of 7 patients had ≥ 50% reduction in seizures. All 4 responders had at least one contact within 1 mm of the ANT-MMT junction, whereas the 3 patients with < 50% seizure improvement did not have a contact within 1 mm of the ANT-MMT junction. Additionally, the 4 responders demonstrated contact positioning closer to the ANT-MMT junction than the 3 nonresponders (mean distance from MMT: 0.7 mm on the left and 0.6 mm on the right in responders vs 3.0 mm on the left and 2.3 mm on the right in nonresponders). However, proximity of the electrode contact to any point in the ANT nucleus did not correlate with seizure reduction. Greater seizure improvement was correlated with a contact position closer to the ANT-MMT junction (R2 = 0.62, p = 0.04). Seizure improvement was not significantly correlated with proximity of the contact to any ANT border (R2 = 0.24, p = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Obtained using a combination of direct visualization and targeted programming of the ANT-MMT junction, data in this study support the hypothesis that proximity to the ANT alone does not correlate with seizure reduction in ANT DBS, whereas proximity to the ANT-MMT junction does. These findings support the importance of direct targeting in ANT DBS, as well as imaging-informed programming. Additionally, the authors provide supportive evidence for future prospective trials using ANT-MMT junction for direct surgical targeting.

Neuromodulation in drug-resistant epilepsy: A review of current knowledge

Nearly 1% of the global population suffers from epilepsy. Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) affects one-third of epileptic patients who are unable to treat their condition with existing drugs. For the treatment of DRE, neuromodulation offers a lot of potential. The background, mechanism, indication, application, efficacy, and safety of each technique are briefly described in this narrative review, with an emphasis on three approved neuromodulation therapies: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS), and closed-loop responsive neurostimulation (RNS). Neuromodulatory approaches involving direct or induced electrical currents have been developed to lessen seizure frequency and duration in patients with DRE since the notion of electrical stimulation as a therapy for neurologic diseases originated in the early nineteenth century. Although few people have attained total seizure independence for more than 12 months using these treatments, more than half have benefitted from a 50% drop in seizure frequency over time. Although promising outcomes in adults and children with DRE have been achieved, challenges such as heterogeneity among epilepsy types and etiologies, optimization of stimulation parameters, a lack of biomarkers to predict response to neuromodulation therapies, high-level evidence to aid decision-making, and direct comparisons between neuromodulatory approaches remain. To solve these existing gaps, authorize new kinds of neuromodulation, and develop personalized closed-loop treatments, further research is needed. Finally, both invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation seems to be safe. Implantation-related adverse events for invasive stimulation primarily include infection and pain at the implant site. Intracranial hemorrhage is a frequent adverse event for DBS and RNS. Other stimulation-specific side-effects are mild with non-invasive stimulation.

Brain Connectomics

A central tenet of modern neuroscience is the conceptualization of the brain as a collection of complex networks or circuits with a shift away from traditional "localizationist" theories. Connectomics seeks to unravel these brain networks and their role in the pathophysiology of neurologic diseases. This article discusses the science of connectomics with the examples of its potential role in clinical medicine and neuromodulation in multiple disorders, such as essential tremor, Parkinson's disease, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and epilepsy.

Thalamic neuromodulation for epilepsy: A clinical perspective

Thalamic neuromodulation can be an effective therapeutic option for select patients with medically refractory epilepsy. However, successful outcome depends on several factors, beginning with appropriate patient and thalamic target selection. Among thalamic targets, the anterior (ANT) and centromedian (CeM) nuclei have the greatest clinical evidence for efficacy. However, the place of thalamic neuromodulation in the treatment armamentarium for intractable seizures is at the tail end of a long list of options. It's relative efficacy, if any, in relation to other treatment modalities however, can be inferred. As we will discuss, considerable work remains to be done in optimal targeting of thalamic nuclei, appropriate to the epilepsy syndrome and seizure type of the individual patient, which may change our current understanding of the place of thalamic neuromodulation on a range of treatment modality efficacies. Currently, it appears that ANT DBS is most efficacious for limbic epilepsies whereas CM, for generalized, multifocal (especially frontotemporal) epilepsies. Based on controlled studies, the efficacy of ANT and CeM DBS is roughly in line with other neuromodulatory therapies (i.e. RNS, VNS) when assessed within the cohort of patients for which the therapy is indicated. Much improvement is needed to render thalamic DBS more efficacious, and use of optimal targeting strategies, especially direct targeting, can positively affect outcomes. Thalamic neuromodulation is still in its infancy; however, clinical advances in this therapy are being realized.

Evidence supporting deep brain stimulation of the medial septum in the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy

Electrical brain stimulation has become an essential treatment option for more than one third of epilepsy patients who are resistant to pharmacological therapy and are not candidates for surgical resection. However, currently approved stimulation paradigms achieve only moderate success, on average providing approximately 75% reduction in seizure frequency and extended periods of seizure freedom in nearly 20% of patients. Outcomes from electrical stimulation may be improved through the identification of novel anatomical targets, particularly those with significant anatomical and functional connectivity to the epileptogenic zone. Multiple studies have investigated the medial septal nucleus (i.e., medial septum) as such a target for the treatment of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. The medial septum is a small midline nucleus that provides a critical functional role in modulating the hippocampal theta rhythm, a 4-7-Hz electrophysiological oscillation mechanistically associated with memory and higher order cognition in both rodents and humans. Elevated theta oscillations are thought to represent a seizure-resistant network activity state, suggesting that electrical neuromodulation of the medial septum and restoration of theta-rhythmic physiology may not only reduce seizure frequency, but also restore cognitive comorbidities associated with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Here, we review the anatomical and physiological function of the septohippocampal network, evidence for seizure-resistant effects of the theta rhythm, and the results of stimulation experiments across both rodent and human studies, to argue that deep brain stimulation of the medial septum holds potential to provide an effective neuromodulation treatment for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. We conclude by discussing the considerations necessary for further evaluating this treatment paradigm with a clinical trial.

ASSFN Position Statement on Deep Brain Stimulation for Medication-Refractory Epilepsy

Neuromodulation has taken a foothold in the landscape of surgical treatment for medically refractory epilepsies and offers additional surgical treatment options for patients who are not candidates for resective/ablative surgery. Approximately one third of patients with epilepsy suffer with medication-refractory epilepsy. A persistent underuse of epilepsy surgery exists. Neuromodulation treatments including deep brain stimulation (DBS) expand the surgical options for patients with epilepsy and provide options for patients who are not candidates for resective surgery. DBS of the bilateral anterior nucleus of the thalamus is an Food and Drug Administration-approved, safe, and efficacious treatment option for patients with refractory focal epilepsy. The purpose of this consensus position statement is to summarize evidence, provide recommendations, and identify indications and populations for future investigation in DBS for epilepsy. The recommendations of the American Society of Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgeons are based on several randomized and blinded clinical trials with high-quality data to support the use of DBS to the anterior nucleus of the thalamus for the treatment of refractory focal-onset seizures.

Optimal targeting of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus for epilepsy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) has been shown to be an effective therapeutic option for select patients with limbic epilepsy. However, the optimal target and electrode position for this indication remains undefined. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to quantify the association between active contact location and outcomes across all published series of ANT DBS.

METHODS

A literature search using PRISMA criteria was performed to identify all studies that reported both active contact locations and outcomes of DBS in the ANT for epilepsy. Patient, disease, treatment, and outcome data were extracted for statistical analysis. Contact locations of responders (defined as ≥ 50% seizure reduction at last follow-up) versus nonresponders to DBS were analyzed on a common reference frame. Centers of mass, weighted by clinical response, were computed for the contacts in each cohort.

RESULTS

From 555 studies that were screened for review, a total of 7 studies comprising 162 patients met criteria for inclusion and were analyzed. Across the cohort, the mean duration of epilepsy was 23 years and the mean pre-DBS seizure frequency was 56 seizures per month. DBS electrodes were implanted using direct targeting in 5 studies (n = 62, 38% of patient cohort) via a transventricular electrode trajectory in 4 studies (n = 123, 76%). At the mean follow-up duration of 2.3 years, 56% of patients were considered responders. Active contacts of responders were 1.6 mm anterior (95% CI 1.5-1.6 mm, p < 0.001) compared to those of nonresponders and were adjacent to the mammillothalamic tract (MTT).

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate targeting of the ANT is crucial to successful DBS outcomes in epilepsy. These findings suggest that stimulation within the ANT subregions adjacent to the MTT improves outcomes.

Optimization of fast gray matter acquisition T1 inversion recovery (FGATIR) on 7T MRI for deep brain stimulation targeting

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an increasingly utilized treatment for multiple neurological disorders. Continued improvements in DBS outcome are, in part, related to increasing ability to directly visualize stimulation targets by MRI. However, it is challenging to image DBS targets with conventional MRI techniques due to limited contrast. Fast Gray Matter Acquisition T1 Inversion Recovery (FGATIR) is a commonly used MRI sequence that improves visualization of several key DBS targets by suppressing white matter (WM) signal to better reveal deep-brain gray matter (GM) structures. Due to increased signal level at high field strength, application of FGATIR on 7T MRI may allow higher spatial resolution and better DBS targeting accuracy. However, successful utilization of FGATIR requires meticulous sequence optimization involving multiple parameters to maximize GM signal while suppressing WM. This is further complicated by the transmit RF field (B1+) inhomogeneity on 7T, which can cause severe contrast degradation. In this work, we introduce a systematic approach to optimize FGATIR and to improve visualization of thalamic DBS targets on 7T. FGATIR optimization is cast into a constrained optimization problem whose objective function and constraints are designed to maximize the GM-WM contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) while accounting for B1+ inhomogeneity. This approach allows a systematic search for optimal parameters across the multi-dimensional parametric space while limiting the negative effect of B1+ variation. Bloch equation simulations were performed to solve the proposed optimization problem and to compare the sequence derived from this method against the sequence optimized without considering B1+ inhomogeneity. The results showed that this approach can improve GM-WM CNR in the presence of B1+ inhomogeneity, especially in some high relative B1+ areas where several key thalamic DBS targets are located. Additionally, in vivo images were acquired on a clinical 7T MRI to further validate this approach. Severe contrast degradation in the thalamus was observed when B1+ effect was not considered in sequence optimization, while the proposed approach yielded improved image contrast in the thalamus with key DBS targets well-defined. These results demonstrated that the proposed method allowed optimization of FGATIR on 7T to better visualize thalamic DBS targets, which may lead to improved DBS targeting accuracy as well as treatment outcome.

Deep brain stimulation targets in epilepsy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of anterior and centromedian thalamic nuclei and hippocampus

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neuromodulatory treatment used in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The primary goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to describe recent advancements in the field of DBS for epilepsy, to compare the results of published trials, and to clarify the clinical utility of DBS in DRE. A systematic literature search was performed by two independent authors. Forty-four articles were included in the meta-analysis (23 for anterior thalamic nucleus [ANT], 8 for centromedian thalamic nucleus [CMT], and 13 for hippocampus) with a total of 527 patients. The mean seizure reduction after stimulation of the ANT, CMT, and hippocampus in our meta-analysis was 60.8%, 73.4%, and 67.8%, respectively. DBS is an effective and safe therapy in patients with DRE. Based on the results of randomized controlled trials and larger clinical series, the best evidence exists for DBS of the anterior thalamic nucleus. Further randomized trials are required to clarify the role of CMT and hippocampal stimulation. Our analysis suggests more efficient deep brain stimulation of ANT for focal seizures, wider use of CMT for generalized seizures, and hippocampal DBS for temporal lobe seizures. Factors associated with clinical outcome after DBS for epilepsy are electrode location, stimulation parameters, type of epilepsy, and longer time of stimulation. Recent advancements in anatomical targeting, functional neuroimaging, responsive neurostimulation, and sensing of local field potentials could potentially lead to improved outcomes after DBS for epilepsy and reduced sudden, unexpected death of patients with epilepsy. Biomarkers are needed for successful patient selection, targeting of electrodes and optimization of stimulation parameters.

Neuromodulation for Refractory Epilepsy

Three neuromodulation therapies, all using implanted device and electrodes, have been approved to treat adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, namely, the vagus nerve stimulation in 1995, deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS) in 2018 (2010 in Europe), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in 2014. Indications for VNS have more recently extended to children down to age of 4. Limited or anecdotal data are available in other epilepsy syndromes and refractory/super-refractory status epilepticus. Overall, neuromodulation therapies are palliative, with only a minority of patients achieving long-term seizure freedom, justifying favoring such treatments in patients who are not good candidates for curative epilepsy surgery. About half of patients implanted with VNS, ANT-DBS, and RNS have 50% or greater reduction in seizures, with long-term data suggesting increased efficacy over time. Besides their impact on seizure frequency, neuromodulation therapies are associated with various benefits and drawbacks in comparison to antiseizure drugs. Yet, we lack high-level evidence to best position each neuromodulation therapy in the treatment pathways of persons with difficult-to-treat epilepsy.

Neuromodulation in epilepsy: state-of-the-art approved therapies

Three neuromodulation therapies have been appropriately tested and approved in refractory focal epilepsies: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS), and closed-loop responsive neurostimulation of the epileptogenic zone or zones. These therapies are primarily palliative. Only a few individuals have achieved complete freedom from seizures for more than 12 months with these therapies, whereas more than half have benefited from long-term reduction in seizure frequency of more than 50%. Implantation-related adverse events primarily include infection and pain at the implant site. Intracranial haemorrhage is a frequent adverse event for ANT-DBS and responsive neurostimulation. Other stimulation-specific side-effects are observed with VNS and ANT-DBS. Biomarkers to predict response to neuromodulation therapies are not available, and high-level evidence to aid decision making about when and for whom these therapies should be preferred over other antiepileptic treatments is scant. Future studies are thus needed to address these shortfalls in knowledge, approve other forms of neuromodulation, and develop personalised closed-loop therapies with embedded machine learning. Until then, neuromodulation could be considered for individuals with intractable seizures, ideally after the possibility of curative surgical treatment has been carefully assessed and ruled out or judged less appropriate.

Experience and consensus on stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for epilepsy

Deep brain stimulation of the anterior nuclei of thalamus (ANT-DBS) is effective for reduction of seizures, but little evidence is available to guide practitioners in the practical use of this therapy. In an attempt to fill this gap, a questionnaire with 37 questions was circulated to 578 clinicians who were either engaged in clinical trials of or known users of DBS for epilepsy, with responses from 141, of whom 58.2% were epileptologists and 28.4% neurosurgeons. Multiple regions of the world were represented. The survey found that the best candidates for DBS were considered those with temporal or frontal seizures, refractory to at least two medicines. Motivations for renewing therapy upon battery depletion were reduced convulsive, impaired awareness, and severe seizures and improved quality of life. Targeting of leads mainly was by magnetic resonance imaging, sometimes with intraoperative imaging or microelectrode recording. The majority used transventricular approaches. Stimulation parameters mostly imitated the SANTE study parameters, except for initial stimulation amplitudes in the 2-3-V or -mA range, versus 5 V in the SANTE study. Stimulation intensity was most often increased or reduced, respectively, for lack of efficacy or side effects, but changes in active contacts, cycle time, and pulse duration were also employed. Mood or memory problems or paresthesias were the side effects most responsible for adjustments. Off-label sites stimulated included centromedian thalamus, hippocampus, neocortex, and a few others. Several physicians used DBS in conjunction with vagus nerve stimulation or responsive neurostimulation, although our study did not track efficacy for combined use. Experienced users varied more from published parameters than did inexperienced users. In conclusion, surveys of experts can provide Class IV evidence for the most prevalent practical use of ANT-DBS. We present a flowchart for one protocol combining common practices. Controlled comparisons will be needed to choose the best approach.

Acute Brain Activation Patterns of High- Versus Low-Frequency Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus During Deep Brain Stimulation for Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is an increasingly utilized treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. To date, the effect of high-frequency stimulation (HFS) vs low-frequency stimulation (LFS) in ANT DBS is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To assess differences in the acute effect of LFS vs HFS in ANT DBS utilizing blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

METHODS

In this prospective study of 5 patients with ANT DBS for epilepsy, BOLD activation and deactivation were modeled for 145-Hz and 30-Hz ANT stimulation using an fMRI block design. Data were analyzed with a general linear model and combined via 2-stage mixed-effects analysis. Z-score difference maps were nonparametrically thresholded using cluster threshold of z > 3.1 and a (corrected) cluster significance threshold of P = .05.

RESULTS

HFS produced significantly greater activation within multiple regions, in particular the limbic and default mode network (DMN). LFS produced minimal activation and failed to produce significant activation within these same networks. HFS produced widespread cortical and subcortical deactivation sparing most of the limbic and DMN regions. Meanwhile, LFS produced deactivation in most DMN and limbic structures.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that HFS and LFS produce substantial variability in both local and downstream network effects. In particular, largely opposing effects were identified within the limbic network and DMN. These findings may serve as a mechanistic basis for understanding the potential of HFS vs LFS in various epilepsy syndromes.

Effects of anterior thalamic nuclei stimulation on hippocampal activity: Chronic recording in a patient with drug-resistant focal epilepsy

•

Devices for RNS and thalamic DBS were implanted in a single person with epilepsy.

•

RNS electrocorticography enabled characterization of acute and chronic DBS effects.

•

DBS caused acute, phasic, frequency-dependent responses in hippocampus and cortex.

•

DBS modulated functional connectivity and suppressed epileptiform activity over time.

•

Chronic electrocorticography elucidates progressive effects of thalamic stimulation.

Implanted neurostimulation devices are gaining traction as palliative treatment options for certain forms of drug-resistant epilepsy, but clinical utility of these devices is hindered by incomplete mechanistic understanding of their therapeutic effects. Approved devices for anterior thalamic nuclei deep brain stimulation (ANT DBS) are thought to work at a network level, but limited sensing capability precludes characterization of neurophysiological effects outside the thalamus. Here, we describe a patient with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy who was implanted with a responsive neurostimulation device (RNS System), involving hippocampal and ipsilateral temporal neocortical leads, and subsequently received ANT DBS. Over 1.5 years, RNS System electrocorticography enabled multiscale characterization of neurophysiological effects of thalamic stimulation. In brain regions sampled by the RNS System, ANT DBS produced acute, phasic, frequency-dependent responses, including suppression of hippocampal low frequency local field potentials. ANT DBS modulated functional connectivity between hippocampus and neocortex. Finally, ANT DBS progressively suppressed hippocampal epileptiform activity in relation to the extent of hippocampal theta suppression, which informs stimulation parameter selection for ANT DBS. Taken together, this unique clinical scenario, involving hippocampal recordings of unprecedented chronicity alongside ANT DBS, sheds light on the therapeutic mechanism of thalamic stimulation and highlights capabilities needed in next-generation devices.

Brain stimulation and brain lesions converge on common causal circuits in neuropsychiatric disease

Damage to specific brain circuits can cause specific neuropsychiatric symptoms. Therapeutic stimulation to these same circuits may modulate these symptoms. To determine if these circuits converge, we studied depression severity after brain lesions (n=461, five datasets), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) (n=151, four datasets), and deep brain stimulation (DBS) (n=101, five datasets). Lesions and stimulation sites most associated with depression severity were connected to a similar brain circuit across all 14 datasets (p<0.001). Circuits derived from lesions, DBS, and TMS were similar (p<0.0005), as were circuits derived from patients with major depression versus other diagnoses (p<0.001). Connectivity to this circuit predicted out-of-sample antidepressant efficacy of TMS and DBS sites (p<0.0001). In an independent analysis, 29 lesions and 95 stimulation sites converged on a distinct circuit for motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (p<0.05). We conclude that lesions, TMS, and DBS converge on common brain circuitry that may represent improved neurostimulation targets for depression and other disorders.

Analysis of Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Targeting in the Stimulation of Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus for Epilepsy Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is an effective therapy for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Best practices for surgical targeting of the ANT can be refined as new information becomes available regarding effective stimulation sites.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a retrospective analysis of the relationship between outcomes (seizure reduction during year 1) and DBS lead locations in subjects from the SANTÉ pivotal trial (Stimulation of ANT for Epilepsy) based upon recent clinical findings.

METHODS

Postoperative images from SANTÉ subjects (n = 101) were evaluated with respect to lead trajectory relative to defined anatomic landmarks. A qualitative scoring system was used to rate each lead placement for proximity to an identified target region above the junction of the mammillothalamic tract with the ANT. Each subject was assigned a bilateral lead placement score, and these scores were then compared to clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Approximately 70% of subjects had “good” bilateral lead placements based upon location with respect to the defined target. These subjects had a much higher probability of being a clinical responder (>50% seizure reduction) than those with scores reflecting suboptimal lead placements (43.5% vs 21.9%, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Consistent with experience from more established DBS indications, our findings and other recent reports suggest that there may be specific sites within the ANT that are associated with superior clinical outcomes. It will be important to continue to evaluate these relationships and the evolution of other clinical practices (eg, programming) to further optimize this therapy.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been used in the treatment of motor diseases with remarkable safety and efficacy, which abet the interest of its application in the management of other neurologic and psychiatric disorders such as epilepsy. Experimental data demonstrated that electric current could modulate distinct brain circuits and decrease the neuronal hypersynchronization seen in epileptic activity. The ability to carefully choose the most suitable anatomical target as well as to define the most reasonable stimulation parameters is highly dependable on the comprehension of the underlying mechanisms of action, which remain unclear. This review aimed to explore the relevant clinical data regarding the use of DBS in the treatment of refractory epilepsy.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy

Background and Introduction

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been increasingly used in the treatment of refractory epilepsy with remarkable safety. Experimental data demonstrated that electric current could modulate distinct brain circuits and decrease neuronal hypersynchronization seen in epileptic activity. The ability to carefully choose the most suitable anatomical target and precisely implant the lead is of extreme importance for satisfactory outcomes.

Objective

This video aimed to explore the targeting of the three most relevant nuclei in the treatment of refractory epilepsy.

Technique

Through a step-by-step approach, this video describes the surgical planning for DBS implantation in the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT), the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus (CM), and the hippocampus (HIP).

Conclusion

Each of the discussed targets has its own pearls and pitfalls that should be considered for an adequate lead placement. Accurate planning of the surgical procedure is essential for achieving optimal results.

Potential surgical therapies for drug-resistant focal epilepsy

Drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE), defined by failure of two antiepileptic drugs, affects 30% of epileptic patients. Epilepsy surgeries are alternative options for this population. Preoperative evaluation is critical to include potential candidates, and to choose the most appropriate procedure to maximize efficacy and simultaneously minimize side effects. Traditional procedures involve open skull surgeries and epileptic focus resection. Alternatively, neuromodulation surgeries use peripheral nerve or deep brain stimulation to reduce the activities of epileptogenic focus. With the advanced improvement of laser-induced thermal therapy (LITT) technique and its utilization in neurosurgery, magnetic resonance-guided LITT (MRgLITT) emerges as a minimal invasive approach for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. In the present review, we first introduce drug-resistant focal epilepsy and summarize the indications, pros and cons of traditional surgical procedures and neuromodulation procedures. And then, focusing on MRgLITT, we thoroughly discuss its history, its technical details, its safety issues, and current evidence on its clinical applications. A case report on MRgLITT is also included to illustrate the preoperational evaluation. We believe that MRgLITT is a promising approach in selected patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, although large prospective studies are required to evaluate its efficacy and side effects, as well as to implement a standardized protocol for its application.

Probabilistic Mapping of Deep Brain Stimulation: Insights from 15 Years of Therapy

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) depends on precise delivery of electrical current to target tissues. However, the specific brain structures responsible for best outcome are still debated. We applied probabilistic stimulation mapping to a retrospective, multidisorder DBS dataset assembled over 15 years at our institution (n_total = 482 patients; n_{Parkinson disease} = 303; n_dystonia = 64; n_tremor = 39; n_{treatment-resistant depression/anorexia nervosa} = 76) to identify the neuroanatomical substrates of optimal clinical response. Using high-resolution structural magnetic resonance imaging and activation volume modeling, probabilistic stimulation maps (PSMs) that delineated areas of above-mean and below-mean response for each patient cohort were generated and defined in terms of their relationships with surrounding anatomical structures. Our results show that overlap between PSMs and individual patients' activation volumes can serve as a guide to predict clinical outcomes, but that this is not the sole determinant of response. In the future, individualized models that incorporate advancements in mapping techniques with patient-specific clinical variables will likely contribute to the optimization of DBS target selection and improved outcomes for patients. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:426-443.

Contributions of Imaging to Neuromodulatory Treatment of Drug-Refractory Epilepsy

Epilepsy affects about 1% of the world's population, and up to 30% of all patients will ultimately not achieve freedom from seizures with anticonvulsive medication alone. While surgical resection of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) -identifiable lesion remains the first-line treatment option for drug-refractory epilepsy, surgery cannot be offered to all. Neuromodulatory therapy targeting "seizures" instead of "epilepsy" has emerged as a valuable treatment option for these patients, including invasive procedures such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS) and peripheral approaches such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). The purpose of this review is to provide in-depth information on current concepts and evidence on network-level aspects of drug-refractory epilepsy. We reviewed the current evidence gained from studies utilizing advanced imaging methodology, with a specific focus on their contributions to neuromodulatory therapy.

Neuroimaging Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation: Review of Indications, Anatomy, and Brain Connectomics

Deep brain stimulation is an established therapy for multiple brain disorders, with rapidly expanding potential indications. Neuroimaging has advanced the field of deep brain stimulation through improvements in delineation of anatomy, and, more recently, application of brain connectomics. Older lesion-derived, localizationist theories of these conditions have evolved to newer, network-based "circuitopathies," aided by the ability to directly assess these brain circuits in vivo through the use of advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as diffusion tractography and fMRI. In this review, we use a combination of ultra-high-field MR imaging and diffusion tractography to highlight relevant anatomy for the currently approved indications for deep brain stimulation in the United States: essential tremor, Parkinson disease, drug-resistant epilepsy, dystonia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. We also review the literature regarding the use of fMRI and diffusion tractography in understanding the role of deep brain stimulation in these disorders, as well as their potential use in both surgical targeting and device programming.