1
|
Merianos AL, Matt GE, Stone TM, Jandarov RA, Hoh E, Dodder NG, Quintana PJE, Lopez-Galvez N, Stone L, Mahabee-Gittens EM. Contamination of surfaces in children's homes with nicotine and the potent carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamine NNK. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2024; 34:727-734. [PMID: 38104233 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-023-00629-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) through secondhand and thirdhand smoke is a modifiable risk factor that contributes to childhood morbidity. Limited research has assessed surface TSE pollution in children's environments as a potential source of thirdhand smoke exposure, and none have examined levels of the tobacco-specific nitrosamine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) on surfaces. OBJECTIVE This study measured surface NNK and nicotine in children's homes and associations with sociodemographics and parent-reported TSE behaviors. We assessed correlations of surface NNK and nicotine with dust NNK, dust nicotine, and child cotinine. METHODS Home surface wipe NNK and nicotine data from 84 children who lived with smokers were analyzed. Tobit and simple linear regression analyses were conducted to assess associations of surface NNK and nicotine with child characteristics. Spearman's (ρ) correlations assessed the strength of associations between environmental markers and child cotinine. RESULTS Nearly half (48.8%) of children's home surfaces had detectable NNK and 100% had detectable nicotine. The respective geometric means (GMs) of surface NNK and nicotine loadings were 14.0 ng/m2 and 16.4 µg/m2. Surface NNK positively correlated with surface nicotine (ρ = 0.54, p < 0.001) and dust NNK (ρ = 0.30, p = 0.020). Surface nicotine positively correlated with dust NNK (ρ = 0.42, p < 0.001) and dust nicotine (ρ = 0.24, p = 0.041). Children with household incomes ≤$15,000 had higher surface NNK levels (GM = 18.7 ng/m2, p = 0.017) compared to children with household incomes >$15,000 (GM = 7.1 ng/m2). Children with no home smoking bans had higher surface NNK (GM = 18.1 ng/m2, p = 0.020) and surface nicotine (GM = 17.7 µg/m2, p = 0.019) levels compared to children with smoking bans (GM = 7.5 ng/m2, 4.8 µg/m2, respectively). IMPACT Although nicotine on surfaces is an established marker of thirdhand smoke pollution, other thirdhand smoke contaminants have not been measured on surfaces in the homes of children living with smokers. We provide evidence that the potent carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamine NNK was detectable on surfaces in nearly half of children's homes, and nicotine was detectable on all surfaces. Surface NNK was positively correlated with surface nicotine and dust NNK. Detectable surface NNK levels were found in homes with indoor smoking bans, indicating the role of NNK as a persistent thirdhand smoke pollutant accumulating on surfaces as well as in dust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley L Merianos
- University of Cincinnati, School of Human Services, PO Box 210068, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0068, USA.
| | - Georg E Matt
- Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182-4611, USA
| | - Timothy M Stone
- Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, 160 Panzeca Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0056, USA
| | - Roman A Jandarov
- Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, 160 Panzeca Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0056, USA
| | - Eunha Hoh
- San Diego State University, School of Public Health, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182-4162, USA
| | - Nathan G Dodder
- San Diego State University, School of Public Health, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182-4162, USA
| | - Penelope J E Quintana
- San Diego State University, School of Public Health, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182-4162, USA
| | - Nicolas Lopez-Galvez
- San Diego State University, School of Public Health, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182-4162, USA
| | - Lara Stone
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3026, USA
| | - E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3026, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dearfield CT, Ulfers M, Horn K, Bernat DH. Resident Support for the Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Rule in Public Housing: 2018-2022. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:102. [PMID: 38248565 PMCID: PMC10815862 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21010102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
This study examines support for the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) mandatory smoke-free rule up to four years post-rule among smokers and non-smokers. A repeated cross-sectional design was used where District of Columbia public housing residents aged 18+ (n = 529) completed surveys during three time points: July 2018 (pre-rule), November 2018-March 2020 (post-rule), and September 2020-December 2022 (post-rule + COVID-19). Full support for the rule was indicated by agreeing that smoking should not be allowed in all indoor locations and within 25 feet of buildings. Descriptive statistics showed significant differences in support across time for smokers (5.3%, 30.7%, and 22.5%, respectively) and similar support across time for nonsmokers (48.2%, 52.2%, and 40.0%, respectively). In unstratified regression analysis, pre-rule support was lower than when the rule was in effect (aOR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.25, 0.90), and tobacco users were less likely to support the rule (aOR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.23, 0.50). Stratified logistic regression results showed that pre-rule support was lower among smokers compared to post-rule support (aOR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.03, 0.59); support among nonsmokers did not vary by time. Findings overall indicate low support for the smoke-free rule up to 4 years post-implementation. Engaging residents with the rule and promoting health and well-being may further enhance policy effectiveness and acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig T. Dearfield
- Department of Epidemiology, The Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; (M.U.); (D.H.B.)
| | - Margaret Ulfers
- Department of Epidemiology, The Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; (M.U.); (D.H.B.)
| | - Kimberly Horn
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech-Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA;
| | - Debra H. Bernat
- Department of Epidemiology, The Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; (M.U.); (D.H.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hernandez D, Khan F, Albert D, Giovenco D, Branas C, Valeri L, Navas-Acien A. A randomized control trial to support smoke-free policy compliance in public housing. Trials 2023; 24:551. [PMID: 37608390 PMCID: PMC10463922 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07339-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoke-free housing policies in multiunit housing are increasingly widespread interventions to reduce smoking and secondhand smoke exposure. Little research has identified factors that impede compliance with smoke-free housing policies in low-income multiunit housing and test corresponding solutions. METHODS We are using an experimental design to test two compliance support interventions: (A) a "compliance through reduction (via relocation and reduction in personal smoking) and cessation" intervention targets households with smokers and involves support to shift smoking practices to areas beyond the apartment or building setting, reduce personal smoking, and deliver in-residence smoking cessation support services via trained peer educators and (B) a "compliance through resident endorsement" intervention involving voluntary adoption of smoke-free living environments through personal pledges, visible door markers, and/or via social media. We will compare randomly sampled participants in buildings that receive A or B or A plus B to the NYCHA standard approach. DISCUSSION This RCT addresses key gaps in knowledge and capitalizes on key scientific opportunities by (1) leveraging the federal mandate to ban smoking in a public housing system of more than sufficient size to conduct an adequately powered RCT; (2) expanding our understanding of smoke-free policy compliance beyond policy implementation by testing two novel treatments: (a) in-residence smoking cessation and (b) resident endorsement, while (3) addressing population and location-specific tobacco-related disparities. At the conclusion of the study, this RCT will have leveraged a monumental policy shift affecting nearly half a million NYC public housing residents, many of whom disproportionately experience chronic illness and are more likely to smoke and be exposed to secondhand smoke than other city residents. This first-ever RCT will test the effects of much-needed compliance strategies on resident smoking behavior and secondhand smoke exposure in multiunit housing. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials Registered, NCT05016505. Registered on August 23, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Hernandez
- Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA.
| | - Farzana Khan
- Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
| | - David Albert
- Health Policy and Management, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
| | - Daniel Giovenco
- Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
| | - Charles Branas
- Epidemiology, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
| | - Linda Valeri
- Biostatistics, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
| | - Ana Navas-Acien
- Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Matt GE, Greiner L, Record RA, Wipfli H, Long J, Dodder NG, Hoh E, Lopez Galvez N, Novotny TE, Quintana PJE, Destaillats H, Tang X, Snijders AM, Mao JH, Hang B, Schick S, Jacob P, Talbot P, Mahabee-Gittens EM, Merianos AL, Northrup TF, Gundel L, Benowitz NL. Policy-relevant differences between secondhand and thirdhand smoke: strengthening protections from involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke pollutants. Tob Control 2023:tc-2023-057971. [PMID: 37263783 DOI: 10.1136/tc-2023-057971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Starting in the 1970s, individuals, businesses and the public have increasingly benefited from policies prohibiting smoking indoors, saving thousands of lives and billions of dollars in healthcare expenditures. Smokefree policies to protect against secondhand smoke exposure, however, do not fully protect the public from the persistent and toxic chemical residues from tobacco smoke (also known as thirdhand smoke) that linger in indoor environments for years after smoking stops. Nor do these policies address the economic costs that individuals, businesses and the public bear in their attempts to remediate this toxic residue. We discuss policy-relevant differences between secondhand smoke and thirdhand smoke exposure: persistent pollutant reservoirs, pollutant transport, routes of exposure, the time gap between initial cause and effect, and remediation and disposal. We examine four policy considerations to better protect the public from involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke pollutants from all sources. We call for (a) redefining smokefree as free of tobacco smoke pollutants from secondhand and thirdhand smoke; (b) eliminating exemptions to comprehensive smoking bans; (c) identifying indoor environments with significant thirdhand smoke reservoirs; and (d) remediating thirdhand smoke. We use the case of California as an example of how secondhand smoke-protective laws may be strengthened to encompass thirdhand smoke protections. The health risks and economic costs of thirdhand smoke require that smokefree policies, environmental protections, real estate and rental disclosure policies, tenant protections, and consumer protection laws be strengthened to ensure that the public is fully protected from and informed about the risks of thirdhand smoke exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg E Matt
- Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Lydia Greiner
- Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Rachael A Record
- School of Communication, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Heather Wipfli
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jamie Long
- Public Health Law Center, Mitchell Hamline School of Law, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA
| | - Nathan G Dodder
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Eunha Hoh
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Thomas E Novotny
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Hugo Destaillats
- Indoor Environment Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Xiaochen Tang
- Indoor Environment Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Antoine M Snijders
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Jian-Hua Mao
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Bo Hang
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Suzaynn Schick
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peyton Jacob
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Prue Talbot
- Department of Molecular, Cell, and Systems Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ashley L Merianos
- School of Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Thomas F Northrup
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lara Gundel
- Indoor Environment Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Neal L Benowitz
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Foster B, Ledgerwood DM, Struble CA, Fodor MC, Jordan P, Krishnan AC, Turner B, Pearson C, Twiner MJ, Levy PD. Public Housing Resident Perspectives on Smoking, Barriers for Smoking Cessation, and Changes in Smoking Mandates. INQUIRY: THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION, PROVISION, AND FINANCING 2022; 59:469580221092814. [PMID: 35403482 PMCID: PMC9006371 DOI: 10.1177/00469580221092814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Individuals from low-income groups report disproportionate rates of cigarette use, secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure with increased morbidity and mortality. Smoking bans in public housing have been enacted in attempt to reduce tobacco use and SHS exposure among lower income individuals. This study investigated the support needs of tobacco users living in two public housing complexes in Detroit, Michigan (USA), including their perspectives on smoking, resources and barriers for smoking cessation, and the impact of policy changes. Methods This is a mixed-methods study, using a qualitative focus groups approach and a short survey, public housing residents interview data was analyzed to explore themes related to smoking-related issues. Specifically, six themes were assessed across four focus groups: (1) Quitting Smoking, (2) Current Smoking Cessation Resources, (3) Legal Mandates, (4) Education and Perceptions of Smoking, (5) Community Needs and Barriers, and (6) Medical Experiences. Results There were 59 participants; the majority (39/42, 93%) of smokers reported at least one quit attempt. During the focus groups, several participants indicated a desire to quit smoking but reported barriers to smoking cessation, such as lack of access to medications, social triggers to continue smoking, and socioeconomic stressors. A number of suggestions were provided to improve smoking cessation resources, including support groups, graphic images of smoking-related diseased tissue, and better communication with health care providers. Conclusions These findings demonstrate smoking bans in two public housing complexes can be effective yet are dependent upon a complex set of issues, including numerous barriers to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Foster
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Integrative Biosciences Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - David M. Ledgerwood
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Cara A. Struble
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Marina C. Fodor
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Parada Jordan
- Office of Community Engaged Research, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Abhinav C. Krishnan
- Integrative Biosciences Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Physiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Beverly Turner
- Office of Community Engaged Research, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Michael J. Twiner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Integrative Biosciences Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Phillip D Levy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Integrative Biosciences Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wray JA, Sheehan BE, Rees VW, Cooper D, Morgan E, Plunk AD. A Qualitative Study of Unfairness and Distrust in Smoke-free Housing. Am J Health Behav 2021; 45:798-809. [PMID: 34702428 DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.45.5.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Whereas smoke-free housing (SFH) has the potential to protect residents from tobacco smoke, evidence suggests that SFH could lead to increased indoor smoking. In this study, we examine how perceptions of a residential smoking ban could be related to non-compliance. Methods: We conducted 8 focus group interviews of low-income housing residents living in Norfolk, Virginia (N=53). Interviews were semi-structured and based on a list of guided questions related to SFH compliance, developed in partnership with a standing community advisory board comprised of low-income housing residents. Results: Several themes emerged, including pervasive non-compliance, perceived unfairness and shame, barriers to compliance, and distrust of the housing authority. Smokers reported behavior primarily motivated by punishment avoidance, rather than out of any perceived obligation to comply with the ban. Conclusions: Results led us to consider Procedural Justice Theory as a conceptual framework, in which compliance is directly related to perceptions about the legitimacy of a rule or authority. When compliance is low due to a lack of perceived legitimacy, SFH should be adapted to promote changes in smoking behavior. We offer specific theory-supported adaptations to SFH focused on trust-building and improving perceived fairness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasilyn A. Wray
- Jasilyn A. Wray, Research Coordinator, Department of Pediatrics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States
| | - Brynn E. Sheehan
- Brynn E. Sheehan, Assistant Professor, Healthcare Analytics and Delivery Science Institute, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States
| | - Vaughan W. Rees
- Vaughan W. Rees, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Diane Cooper
- Diane Cooper, Community Advisory Board, Norfolk, VA, United States
| | - Emma Morgan
- Emma Morgan, Community Advisory Board, Norfolk, VA, United States
| | - Andrew D. Plunk
- Andrew D. Plunk, Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States;,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Proposal for smoke-free public housing: a systematic review of attitudes and preferences from residents of multi-unit housing. J Public Health Policy 2020; 41:496-514. [PMID: 32620837 DOI: 10.1057/s41271-020-00236-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
A policy proposal to ban public housing smoking indoors has received support, but it is unclear how certain affected groups, specifically smokers in housing units, perceive such a policy. To review the literature on attitudes and perceptions of housing unit tenants towards an indoor smoke-free housing policy, using various databases, we searched articles for attitudes towards smoking ban enforcement in housing units. We identified fourteen articles. Non-smokers heavily favored indoor policies and current smokers heavily opposed them. Current smokers represented a substantial minority in the reviewed articles, resulting in overall outcomes of the surveys driven by non-smokers. Studies investigating attitudes about housing smoking bans largely represent the views of non-smokers and lack data about barriers and concerns of tenants who do not support a smoke-free policy. Future studies should investigate if such a discrepancy impacts the efficacy of smoke-free housing policies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hafez AY, Gonzalez M, Kulik MC, Vijayaraghavan M, Glantz SA. Uneven Access to Smoke-Free Laws and Policies and Its Effect on Health Equity in the United States: 2000-2019. Am J Public Health 2019; 109:1568-1575. [PMID: 31536405 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2019.305289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Tobacco control measures have played an important role in the reduction of the cigarette smoking prevalence among US adults.However, although overall smoking prevalence has declined, it remains high among many subpopulations that are disproportionately burdened by tobacco use, resulting in tobacco-related health disparities. Slow diffusion of smoke-free laws to rural regions, particularly in the South and Southeast, and uneven adoption of voluntary policies in single-family homes and multiunit housing are key policy variables associated with the disproportionate burden of tobacco-related health disparities in these subpopulations.Developing policies that expand the reach of comprehensive smoke-free laws not only will facilitate the decline in smoking prevalence among subpopulations disproportionately burdened by tobacco use but will also decrease exposure to secondhand smoke and further reduce tobacco-caused health disparities in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Y Hafez
- Amy Y. Hafez and Stanton A. Glantz are with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco. Mariaelena Gonzalez is with the School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Arts, University of California, Merced. Margarete C. Kulik is with the Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock. Maya Vijayaraghavan is with the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Mariaelena Gonzalez
- Amy Y. Hafez and Stanton A. Glantz are with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco. Mariaelena Gonzalez is with the School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Arts, University of California, Merced. Margarete C. Kulik is with the Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock. Maya Vijayaraghavan is with the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Margarete C Kulik
- Amy Y. Hafez and Stanton A. Glantz are with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco. Mariaelena Gonzalez is with the School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Arts, University of California, Merced. Margarete C. Kulik is with the Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock. Maya Vijayaraghavan is with the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Maya Vijayaraghavan
- Amy Y. Hafez and Stanton A. Glantz are with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco. Mariaelena Gonzalez is with the School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Arts, University of California, Merced. Margarete C. Kulik is with the Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock. Maya Vijayaraghavan is with the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Stanton A Glantz
- Amy Y. Hafez and Stanton A. Glantz are with the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco. Mariaelena Gonzalez is with the School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Arts, University of California, Merced. Margarete C. Kulik is with the Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock. Maya Vijayaraghavan is with the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cardozo RA, Feinberg A, Tovar A, Vilcassim MJR, Shelley D, Elbel B, Kaplan S, Wyka K, Rule AM, Gordon T, Thorpe LE. A protocol for measuring the impact of a smoke-free housing policy on indoor tobacco smoke exposure. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:666. [PMID: 31146711 PMCID: PMC6543633 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7043-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco remains a leading cause of preventable death in the U.S., responsible for more than 440,000 deaths each year. Approximately 10% of these deaths are attributable to exposure of non-smokers to secondhand smoke (SHS). Residents living in public multi-unit housing (MUH) are at excess risk for SHS exposure compared to the general population. On November 30, 2016, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) passed a rule requiring all public housing agencies to implement smoke-free housing (SFH) policies in their housing developments by July 30, 2018. METHODS As part of a larger natural experiment study, we designed a protocol to evaluate indoor SHS levels before and after policy implementation through collection of repeat indoor air samples in non-smoking apartments and common areas of select high-rise NYCHA buildings subject to the HUD SFH rule, and also from socio-demographically matched private-sector high-rise control buildings not subject to the rule. A baseline telephone survey was conducted in all selected buildings to facilitate rapid recruitment into the longitudinal study and assess smoking prevalence, behaviors, and attitudes regarding the SFH policy prior to implementation. Data collection began in early 2018 and will continue through 2021. DISCUSSION The baseline survey was completed by 559 NYCHA residents and 471 comparison building residents (response rates, 35, and 32%, respectively). Smoking prevalence was comparable between study arms (15.7% among NYCHA residents and 15.2% among comparison residents). The majority of residents reported supporting a building-wide smoke-free policy (63.0 and 59.9%, respectively). We enrolled 157 NYCHA and 118 comparison non-smoking households into the longitudinal air monitoring study and performed air monitoring in common areas. Follow up surveys and air monitoring in participant households occur every 6 months for 2.5 years. Capitalizing on the opportunity of this federal policy rollout, the large and diverse public housing population in NYC, and robust municipal data sources, this study offers a unique opportunity to evaluate the policy's direct impacts on SHS exposure. Methods in this protocol can inform similar SFH policy evaluations elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Arce Cardozo
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 USA
| | - Alexis Feinberg
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 USA
| | - Albert Tovar
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 USA
| | - M. J. Ruzmyn Vilcassim
- Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 341 East 25th Street, New York, NY 10010 USA
| | - Donna Shelley
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 USA
| | - Brian Elbel
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 USA
| | - Sue Kaplan
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 USA
| | - Katarzyna Wyka
- Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY 10027 USA
| | - Ana M. Rule
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
| | - Terry Gordon
- Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 341 East 25th Street, New York, NY 10010 USA
| | - Lorna E. Thorpe
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kegler MC, Lea J, Lebow-Skelley E, Lefevre AM, Diggs P, Haard�rfer R. Implementation and enforcement of smoke-free policies in public housing. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH 2019; 34:234-246. [PMID: 30624678 PMCID: PMC7526794 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyy053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Smoke-free policies such as those required by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development have the potential to reduce persistent income-related disparities in secondhand smoke exposure. To understand the implementation and enforcement process, as well as barriers and facilitators to compliance and enforcement, we conducted semi-structured interviews (n=37) with representatives from 23 Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) with some level of smoking restriction in place, along with residents from 14 of these PHAs, from January to August 2016. Residents were typically notified of the new policy through group meetings, new resident orientations and/or one-on-one discussions during lease renewal or annual recertification. Timing of implementation varied, with advanced notice of 6 months or a year most common. Enforcement typically involved a series of verbal and/or written warnings, followed by written notice of lease violation, and eventual notice of lease termination and/or eviction. Challenges in enforcement were generally classified as monitoring difficulties or legal concerns. Characterizing current practices (e.g. advance notice, clear communication of escalating consequences, cessation support and concrete evidence of violation) from early adopters sets the stage for identifying best practices and helps to ensure successful and fair implementation of smoke-free policies in subsidized housing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle C Kegler
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jaimie Lea
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Erin Lebow-Skelley
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Adrienne M Lefevre
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Pam Diggs
- Youth Empowered Solutions, 4021 Carya Dr., Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Regine Haard�rfer
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
NGUYEN V, DO D, DO T, DAO T, KIM B, PHAN T, DOAN T, LUONG N, NGUYEN T, HOANG V, PHAM T, NGUYEN T. Smoke-free environment policy in Vietnam: what did people see and how did they react when they visited various public places? JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 2019; 60:E36-E42. [PMID: 31041409 PMCID: PMC6477555 DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.1.942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Since Vietnam has signed WHO framework on tobacco control (FCTC) in 2003 and has issued tobacco control law in 2013, there has been little research concerning about what impacts smoke-free regulations have had on public compliance. The objective of this study was to assess public exposure to secondhand smoke and reaction toward smoke-free policy regulations in Vietnam and the associated factor. Methods Using the design of GATS (Global Adult Tobacco Survey), a nationally representative sample of 8,996 adults were approached for data collection. Logistic regression was used to examine the associated factor. Results The study revealed that the prevalence of respondents exposed to secondhand smoke was much higher in bars/café/tea shops (90.07%) and restaurants (81.81%) than in any other public places, universities (36.70%), government buildings (31.12%), public transport (20.04%), healthcare facilities (17.85%) and schools (15.84%). 13.23% of respondents saw smokers violate smoke-free regulations. Among those who saw them violate smoke-free regulations, just one-third cautioned them to stop smoking. Strikingly, a higher rate of cautioning smokers to stop smoking was observed among the older, married, and better educated respondents. Respondents who were married, better educated and in lower economic status were more likely to remind smokers to stop smoking. Conclusions The study has called for strengthening two of the six MPOWER (Monitor, Protect, Offer, Warn, Enforce and Raise) components of the tobacco free initiative introduced by WHO, Monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies and Protecting people from tobacco smoke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V.H. NGUYEN
- Department of Health Management and Organization, Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Vietnam
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, USA
- Nguyen Van Huy, Department of Health Management and Organization, Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, 01 Ton That Tung Str, Dong Da Dist, Hanoi, Vietnam; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, USA - Tel. +84 917363919 - E-mail: or
| | - D.A. DO
- Department of International Cooperation, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - T.T.H. DO
- National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Vietnam
| | - T.M.A. DAO
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, USA
| | - B.G. KIM
- Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Vietnam
| | - T.H. PHAN
- Vietnam Steering Committee on Smoking and Health (VINACOSH), Hanoi, Ministry of Health, Vietnam
| | - T.H. DOAN
- Vietnam Steering Committee on Smoking and Health (VINACOSH), Hanoi, Ministry of Health, Vietnam
| | - N.K. LUONG
- Medical Services Administration, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | - V.M. HOANG
- Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Petersen AB, Stewart HC, Walters J, Vijayaraghavan M. Smoking Policy Change Within Permanent Supportive Housing. J Community Health 2019; 43:312-320. [PMID: 28884243 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-017-0423-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Smoke-free policies effectively reduce secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among non-smokers, and reduce consumption, encourage quit attempts, and minimize relapse to smoking among smokers. Such policies are uncommon in permanent supportive housing (PSH) for formerly homeless individuals. In this study, we collaborated with a PSH provider in San Diego, California to assess a smoke-free policy that restricted indoor smoking. Between August and November 2015, residents completed a pre-policy questionnaire on attitudes toward smoke-free policies and exposure to secondhand smoke, and then 7-9 months after policy implementation residents were re-surveyed. At follow-up, there was a 59.7% reduction in indoor smoking. The proportion of residents who identified as current smokers reduced by 13% (95% CI: -38, 10.2). The proportion of residents who reported never smelling SHS indoors (apartment 24.2%, 95% CI: 4.2, 44.1; shared areas 17.2%, 95% CI: 1.7, 32.7); in outdoor areas next to the living unit (porches or patio 56.7%, 95% CI: 40.7, 72.8); and in other outdoor areas (parking lot 28.6%, 95% CI: 8.3, 48.9) was lower post-policy compared with pre-policy. Overall, resident support increased by 18.7%; however, the greatest increase in support occurred among current smokers (from 14.8 to 37.5%). Fewer current smokers reported that the policy would enable cessation at post-policy compared to pre-policy. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of implementing smoke-free policies in PSH for formerly homeless adults. However, policy alone appears insufficient to trigger change in smoking behavior, highlighting the need for additional cessation resources to facilitate quitting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jon Walters
- Housing Innovation Partners, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Maya Vijayaraghavan
- Division of General Internal Medicine/Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, Box 1364, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anthony J, Goldman R, Rees VW, Frounfelker RL, Davine J, Keske RR, Brooks DR, Geller AC. Qualitative Assessment of Smoke-Free Policy Implementation in Low-Income Housing: Enhancing Resident Compliance. Am J Health Promot 2019; 33:107-117. [PMID: 29772910 PMCID: PMC10623451 DOI: 10.1177/0890117118776090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE As public housing agencies and other low-income housing providers adopt smoke-free policies, data are needed to inform implementation approaches that support compliance. DESIGN Focused ethnography used including qualitative interviews with staff, focus groups with residents, and property observations. SETTING Four low-income housing properties in Massachusetts, 12 months postpolicy adoption. PARTICIPANTS Individual interviews (n = 17) with property staff (managers, resident service coordinators, maintenance, security, and administrators) and focus groups with resident smokers (n = 28) and nonsmokers (n = 47). MEASURES Informed by the social-ecological model: intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, and community factors relating to compliance were assessed. ANALYSIS Utilized MAXQDA in a theory-driven immersion/crystallization analytic process with cycles of raw data examination and pattern identification until no new themes emerged. RESULTS Self-reported secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) was reduced but not eliminated. Challenges included relying on ambivalent maintenance staff and residents to report violations, staff serving as both enforcers and smoking cessation counsellors, and inability to enforce on nights and weekends. Erroneous knowledge of the policy, perception that SHSe is not harmful to neighbors, as well as believing that smokers were losing their autonomy and being unfairly singled out when other resident violations were being unaddressed, hindered policy acceptance among resident smokers. The greatest challenge to compliance was the lack of allowable outdoor smoking areas that may have reduced the burden of the policy on smokers. CONCLUSION Smoke-free policy implementation to support compliance could be enhanced with information about SHSe for smokers and nonsmokers, cessation support from external community partners, discussion forums for maintenance staff, resident inclusion in decision-making, and framing the policy as part of a broader wellness initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodi Anthony
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roberta Goldman
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vaughan W. Rees
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rochelle L. Frounfelker
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica Davine
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robyn R. Keske
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel R. Brooks
- Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alan C. Geller
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jiang N, Thorpe L, Kaplan S, Shelley D. Perceptions about the Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Housing Policy among Residents Living in Public Housing in New York City. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 15:ijerph15102062. [PMID: 30241291 PMCID: PMC6210957 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Revised: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background: To assess residents’ attitudes towards the United States (U.S.) Department of Housing and Urban Development’s new smoke-free public housing policy, perceptions about barriers to policy implementation, and suggestions for optimizing implementation. Methods: In 2017, we conducted 10 focus groups among 91 residents (smokers and nonsmokers) living in New York City public housing. Results: Smokers and nonsmokers expressed skepticism about the public housing authority’s capacity to enforce the policy due to widespread violations of the current smoke-free policy in common areas and pervasive use of marijuana in buildings. Most believed that resident engagement in the roll-out and providing smoking cessation services was important for compliance. Resident expressed concerns about evictions and worried that other building priorities (i.e., repairs, drug use) would be ignored with the focus now on smoke-free housing. Conclusions: Resident-endorsed strategies to optimize implementation effectiveness include improving the access to cessation services, ongoing resident engagement, education and communication to address misconceptions and concerns about enforcement, and placing smoke-free homes in a larger public housing authority healthy housing agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Jiang
- Department of Population Health, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | - Lorna Thorpe
- Department of Population Health, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | - Sue Kaplan
- Department of Population Health, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | - Donna Shelley
- Department of Population Health, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hollar TL, Cook N, Quinn D, Phillips T, DeLucca M. Smoke-Free Multi-unit Housing Policies Show Promise in Reducing Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Racially and Ethnically Diverse, Low-Income Seniors. J Immigr Minor Health 2018; 19:1281-1289. [PMID: 27189486 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-016-0430-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure is a public health issue for residents of multi-unit housing (MUH) properties. We evaluated the impact of smoke-free policy implementation on reported SHS exposure among racially, ethnically diverse seniors living in low-income MUH properties. In Spring 2013 and Summer 2014, we surveyed residents (n = 960) at 15 MUH properties in Broward and Miami-Dade Counties, Florida. The percentage of residents reporting SHS exposure within their apartments from elsewhere in or around their building decreased from 31.1 %, before policy implementation, to 23.6 % at follow-up (p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis of non-smoking residents after policy implementation, residents who reported having one or more comorbidities were two times more likely to report SHS exposure (aOR 2.23, 95 % CI 1.12-4.40). Considering the vulnerability of low-income seniors to SHS exposure, our findings are relevant to residents, property owners/managers, and public health professionals making decisions about smoke-free policies for MUH properties in which seniors reside.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Lucas Hollar
- Master of Public Health Program, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, 3200 South University Drive, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33328, USA.
| | - Nicole Cook
- Master of Public Health Program, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, 3200 South University Drive, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33328, USA
| | - David Quinn
- Area Health Education Center, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Teina Phillips
- Broward Regional Health Planning Council, Hollywood, FL, USA
| | - Michael DeLucca
- Broward Regional Health Planning Council, Hollywood, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gentzke AS, Hyland A, Kiviniemi M, Travers MJ. Attitudes and experiences with secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies among subsidised and market-rate multiunit housing residents living in six diverse communities in the USA. Tob Control 2018; 27:194-202. [PMID: 28302920 PMCID: PMC5844180 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2016] [Revised: 01/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given that higher smoking rates persist among lower socioeconomic populations, multiunit housing (MUH) environments may result in higher secondhand smoke (SHS) exposures among subsidised MUH residents. This cross-sectional assessment compares experiences with SHS and smoke-free policies among subsidised and market-rate MUH residents living in six US communities. METHODS MUH residents (n=1565) were surveyed regarding their smoke-free rules (home and building), SHS exposures and preferences towards smoke-free policies. Binary logistic regression identified predictors of each outcome, focusing on differences by subsidised housing status (subsidised vs market rate). RESULTS Among residents enforcing smoke-free home rules (76%, overall), 50% reported SHS incursions into their unit. Only 23% reported living in a smoke-free building; 56% of those living in smoking-allowable buildings reported preferences towards smoke-free building policies. Among market-rate housing residents, smoke-free home (OR=4.18) and building (OR=2.26) rules were significantly higher when children were present. Smoke-free building rules reduced the odds of SHS incursions among market-rate housing residents (OR=0.50), but no association was observed among subsidised housing residents. Non-smoking subsidised housing residents exhibited stronger preferences for smoke-free policies compared with those in market-rate housing. DISCUSSION Smoke-free home rules may not protect MUH residents from SHS exposures, particularly in subsidised MUH. Although strong preferences towards smoke-free policies were present overall, subsidised MUH residents may have fewer alternative smoke-free housing options available. Therefore, all publicly funded housing should be smoke free to protect these vulnerable populations. However, continued efforts to encourage privately owned MUH operators to adopt smoke-free policies are also necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea S. Gentzke
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Buffalo, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, State University of New York at Buffalo. Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Hyland
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Marc Kiviniemi
- Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, State University of New York at Buffalo. Buffalo, NY USA
| | - Mark J. Travers
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schmidt LM, Reidmohr AA, Helgerson SD, Harwell TS. Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Smoke-Free Policy Support Among Public Housing Authority Residents in Rural and Tribal Settings. J Community Health 2018; 41:1116-1121. [PMID: 27197971 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-016-0204-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Previous research has shown that multi-unit housing (MUH) residents are at risk of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, which can transfer between units. The purpose of this study was to determine SHS exposure and examine attitudes towards smoking policies among public housing authority (PHA) residents in rural and tribal settings. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 895 adult tenants (41 % response rate) living in PHA multiunit buildings in Montana in 2013. Our primary outcome was tenant support of smoke-free policies; our secondary outcome was exacerbation of child asthma symptoms due to SHS exposure. In 2014, we used multiple logistic regression models to test associations between independent variables and outcomes of interest. The majority (80.6 %) of respondents supported having a smoke-free policy in their building, with support being significantly higher among nonsmokers [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.2, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.5-11.6] and among residents living with children (aOR 2.9, 95 % CI 1.3-6.2). Tribal residents were as likely to support smoke-free policies as non-tribal residents (aOR 1.4; 95 % CI 0.5-4.0). Over half (56.5 %) of respondents reported SHS exposure in their home; residents in a building with no smoke-free policy in place were significantly more likely to report exposure (aOR 3.5, 95 % CI 2.2-5.5). SHS exposure was not significantly associated with asthma symptoms. There is a significant reduction in exposure to SHS in facilities with smoke-free policies and there is strong support for such policies by both tribal and non-tribal MUH residents. Opportunities exist for smoke-free policy initiatives in rural and tribal settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Schmidt
- Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, 1400 Broadway Street, Helena, MT, 59620, USA.
| | - Alison A Reidmohr
- Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, 1400 Broadway Street, Helena, MT, 59620, USA
| | - Steven D Helgerson
- Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, 1400 Broadway Street, Helena, MT, 59620, USA
| | - Todd S Harwell
- Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, 1400 Broadway Street, Helena, MT, 59620, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schmidt AM, Kowitt SD, Myers AE, Goldstein AO. Attitudes towards Potential New Tobacco Control Regulations among U.S. Adults. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 15:E72. [PMID: 29303963 PMCID: PMC5800171 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15010072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2017] [Revised: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 12/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Favorable attitudes towards tobacco control policies can facilitate their implementation and success. We examined attitudes toward four potential U.S. Federal tobacco regulations (banning menthol from cigarettes, reducing nicotine levels in cigarettes, banning candy and fruit flavored electronic cigarettes, and banning candy and fruit flavored little cigars and cigarillos) and associations with individual and state variables. A nationally representative phone survey of 4337 adults assessed attitudes toward potential policies. Weighted logistic regression was used to assess relationships between attitudes and demographic factors, smoking behavior, beliefs about the government (knowledge, trust, and credibility), exposure to tobacco control campaigns, and state variables from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) System. Most respondents supported three out of four policies. Respondents that were female, non-white, Latino, living below the poverty line, had less than high school education, were of older age, did not smoke, had higher trust in government, and were exposed to national tobacco control campaigns had higher odds of expressing favorable attitudes toward potential new tobacco regulations than did their counterparts. No state-level effects were found. While differences in attitudes were observed by individual demographic characteristics, behaviors, and beliefs, a majority of participants supported most of the potential new tobacco regulations surveyed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison M Schmidt
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Sarah D Kowitt
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Allison E Myers
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
- Counter Tools, Carrboro, NC 27510, USA.
| | - Adam O Goldstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
- Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Teloniatis SI, Tzortzi A, Evangelopoulou V, Behrakis P. Relation between individual factors and support for smoking bans in bars in Greece: A cross-sectional study of the 2013 Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS). Tob Prev Cessat 2017; 3:118. [PMID: 32432193 PMCID: PMC7232813 DOI: 10.18332/tpc/74705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Revised: 04/17/2017] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Smoking rates among the general population and among youth are decreasing in Greece. Low compliance with smoke-free legislation in indoor places in Greece renders non-smokers exposed to secondhand smoke, especially when frequenting bars. The aim of the current study was to identify the factors related to support for smoking bans in bars in Greece. METHODS A cross-sectional secondary data analysis was conducted on the 2013 Greek Global Adult Tobacco Survey. Multivariate regression was used to analyze individual factors and their relation to support for the smoking ban in bars. The total sample was nationally representative of the Greek population and included 3961 residents over the age of 15 with 2061 supporting a ban in bars. RESULTS Overall, 50.5% (95% CI: 46.5-54.4) of Greeks supported the smoking ban in bars. Among them, 1,832 (74.9%, 95% CI=70.1-79.1) were non-smokers and 229 (13.7%, 95% CI=10.6-17.5) were smokers. Age over 65 years was significantly related to increased support for the smoking ban in bars compared to those aged 15-24 years (p<0.05). Belief that secondhand smoke causes lung cancer was significantly related (p<0.001) to having increased support for the ban. Increased knowledge of smoking-related harm was significantly related to increased support for the ban in bars (p<0.001). Male non-smokers were significantly less likely to support the ban in bars than females (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Increasing knowledge and awareness of smoking-related harm will enhance smoking ban support and compliance, improving tobacco prevention and cessation, especially among the youth and young adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Tzortzi
- George D. Behrakis Research Laboratory, Hellenic Cancer Society, Athens, Greece.,Institute of Public Health, The American College of Greece, Athens, Greece
| | - Vaso Evangelopoulou
- George D. Behrakis Research Laboratory, Hellenic Cancer Society, Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Behrakis
- Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Institute of Public Health, The American College of Greece, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Helms VE, King BA, Ashley PJ. Cigarette smoking and adverse health outcomes among adults receiving federal housing assistance. Prev Med 2017; 99:171-177. [PMID: 28192095 PMCID: PMC5508864 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Revised: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Cigarette smoking is higher among low-income adults and individuals who reside in federally assisted housing are particularly susceptible to the adverse effects of smoking and secondhand smoke exposure. This study assessed smoking-related behaviors and health outcomes among U.S. adults who received federal housing assistance during 2006-2012. National Health Interview Survey data linked with administrative data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development were analyzed; 5218 HUD-assisted adults were assessed. Demographic characteristics associated with smoking, including frequency and consumption, were assessed among adult cigarette smokers. Fourteen adverse health outcomes were examined among cigarette smoking and nonsmoking adults. One-third (33.6%) of HUD-assisted adults were current cigarette smokers. Smoking prevalence was highest among adults aged 25-44 (42.5%), non-Hispanic whites (39.5%), and adults who resided in households with children (37.5%). Half attempted to quit in the past year; 82.1% were daily smokers; and, 35.8% of daily smokers reported smoking 20+ cigarettes a day. Multivariable analyses revealed that compared to nonsmokers, cigarette smokers had increased likelihood of reporting fair or poor health (95% CI: 1.04-1.52), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CI: 1.87-3.06), disability (CI: 1.25-1.83), asthma (CI: 1.02-1.55), serious psychological distress (CI: 1.39-2.52), >1 emergency room visit in the past year (CI: 1.09-1.56), and ≥10 work loss days in the past year (CI: 1.15-3.06). Adults who receive housing assistance represent an at-risk population for adverse health outcomes associated with smoking and secondhand smoke. Housing assistance programs provide a valuable platform for the implementation of evidence-based tobacco prevention and control measures, including smokefree policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica E Helms
- Office of Research, Evaluation, and Monitoring, Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC, United States.
| | - Brian A King
- Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Peter J Ashley
- Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jenssen BP, Wilson KM. Tobacco Control and Treatment for the Pediatric Clinician: Practice, Policy, and Research Updates. Acad Pediatr 2017; 17:233-242. [PMID: 28069410 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Revised: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, and exposure to tobacco smoke harms children from conception forward. There is no safe level of tobacco exposure. Although overall smoking rates have declined, the advent of new products, such as electronic cigarettes, threatens to perpetuate nicotine addiction without clear health benefits. In addition to reviewing traditional and new tobacco products, we discuss the unique role that pediatricians should play in tobacco treatment and control efforts. New policies and technologies can empower pediatric clinicians and pediatric health care systems to help parent smokers quit, and new policies outside of the health care setting might help prevent smoking initiation as well as improve cessation treatments. Future research is needed to continue to study the consequences of tobacco use exposure as well as the best ways to help patients and parents stop tobacco use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian P Jenssen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and PolicyLab, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
| | - Karen M Wilson
- Division of General Pediatrics, Kravis Children's Hospital at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vijayaraghavan M, Schroeder SA, Kushel M. The effectiveness of tobacco control policies on vulnerable populations in the USA: a review. Postgrad Med J 2016; 92:670-676. [DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-133193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2016] [Revised: 06/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
23
|
Farley SM, Schroth KRJ, Curtis CJ, Angell S. Evidence of Support for Smoke-Free Public Housing Among New York City Residents. Public Health Rep 2016; 131:2-3. [PMID: 26843660 DOI: 10.1177/003335491613100102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sonia Angell
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Forden CL, Carrillo AM. Smoking and attitudes toward smoking policy at a University in Egypt. J Ethn Subst Abuse 2015; 15:329-345. [PMID: 26643975 DOI: 10.1080/15332640.2015.1066288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
To assess smoking behavior, knowledge of smoking harm, and attitudes toward campus smoking policy at an Egyptian university, an online survey of students, staff, and faculty was conducted (N = 992). The smoking prevalence of 38% among men was in line with Egypt's national average, but the smoking prevalence among women of 20% was much higher than the national average. Smoking status influenced beliefs about smoking harm and attitudes toward smoking policy, with nonsmokers having stronger beliefs about the harm of smoking and showing stronger support for smoking regulations than smokers. Smokers were more knowledgeable about smoking policy than were nonsmokers and differed slightly in their preferences for smoking policy enforcement strategies. These findings contribute to our understanding of how to tailor college smoking policy and programs to an Egyptian context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carie L Forden
- a Department of Sociology , Anthropology and Egyptology , Cairo , Egypt
| | - Amy M Carrillo
- b Department of Psychology , William Jessup University , Rocklin , California
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cook NJ, Hollar L, Chavez S, Quinn DL, Phillips T, DeLucca M, Corrales L. Support for smoke-free multi-unit housing policies among racially and ethnically diverse, low-income seniors in South Florida. J Cross Cult Gerontol 2015; 29:405-15. [PMID: 25349018 PMCID: PMC4228194 DOI: 10.1007/s10823-014-9247-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Previous studies have gauged support for implementing smoke-free multi-unit housing (MUH) policies in the United States, but none have specifically examined attitudes among racially and ethnically diverse elders living in low-income MUH. We surveyed a convenience sample of elders 62 years of age and older (n = 807) across 24 low-income housing properties in Broward County, Florida in order to assess residents' smoking behaviors, exposure to second-hand smoke, and support for smoke-free policies. The study sample was ethnically and racially diverse with Hispanics comprising more than 61 % of the population, and 22 % identifying as Black or other races. Although close to 22 % of the sample were former smokers, only 9 % of residents reported being current smokers. The majority of residents surveyed supported no-smoking policies: 75 % support no-smoking policies for individual units; 77 % supported no-smoking policies in common areas; and, 68 % supported no-smoking policies in outdoor areas. Over 29 % of residents surveyed reported being exposed to secondhand smoke entering their units from elsewhere in their building. Residents who reported having a home smoking rule were more than twice as likely to support an indoor policy compared to residents who allowed smoking anywhere in their home (OR = 2.36; 95%CI 1.25-4.43; p ≤ 0.01), and nonsmoking residents were nearly three times as likely to support an indoor policy compared to smokers (OR = 2.89; 95%CI 1.44-5.79; p ≤ 0.01). Support for an indoor policy was not modified by age, gender, ethnicity or race. . This study demonstrates that elders living in low-income MUH properties overwhelmingly supported the implementation of smoke-free policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole J Cook
- Master of Public Health Program, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, 3200 South University Drive, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33328, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Snyder K, Vick JH, King BA. Smoke-free multiunit housing: a review of the scientific literature. Tob Control 2015; 25:9-20. [PMID: 25566811 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2014] [Accepted: 12/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Multiunit housing (MUH) residents are susceptible to secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, which can transfer between living units. This review summarises existing scientific literature relevant to smoke-free MUH, discusses knowledge gaps and provides recommendations for future research to inform public health action. DATA SOURCES We conducted a systematic search of peer-reviewed articles using three databases: EBSCOhost CINAHL, PubMed and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION Article titles, abstracts and text were reviewed to ascertain three inclusion criteria: (1) English language; (2) conducted in the USA; (3) reported on baseline data, development, implementation or evaluation of smoke-free MUH. DATA EXTRACTION We used a multistep process to identify eligible articles: (1) two reviewers separately evaluated article titles; (2) two reviewers separately evaluated abstracts and (3) one reviewer read each article and determined inclusion eligibility. DATA SYNTHESIS We identified and included 35 articles published during 2001-2014, grouped based on broad themes: MUH resident (n=16); MUH operator (n=6); environmental monitoring and biomarkers (n=9); economic (n=2); legal (n=3); and implementation process and policy impact (n=8). Studies with multiple themes were included in all relevant groups. CONCLUSIONS Existing literature has focused on self-reported, cross-sectional studies of MUH residents and operators; some studies of environmental markers, biomarkers and economic indicators have also been conducted. Future research on smoke-free MUH policy compliance and enforcement, and on the impact of these policies on smoking behaviours and health outcomes, could further inform public health planning, policy and practice. Despite these gaps, the current literature provides sufficient evidence for action to eliminate SHS exposure in MUH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Snyder
- Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Janice Hassett Vick
- Public Health and Survey Research Division, ICF International, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brian A King
- Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kolar SK, Rogers BG, Hooper MW. Support for indoor bans on electronic cigarettes among current and former smokers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2014; 11:12174-89. [PMID: 25429684 PMCID: PMC4276608 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph111212174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2014] [Revised: 11/18/2014] [Accepted: 11/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is increasing in the U.S. Although marketed as a safer alternative for cigarettes, initial evidence suggests that e-cigarettes may pose a secondhand exposure risk. The current study explored the prevalence and correlates of support for e-cigarette bans. METHODS A sample of 265 current/former smokers completed a cross-sectional telephone survey from June-September 2014; 45% Black, 31% White, 21% Hispanic. Items assessed support for home and workplace bans for cigarettes and e-cigarettes and associated risk perceptions. RESULTS Most participants were aware of e-cigarettes (99%). RESULTS demonstrated less support for complete e-cigarette bans in homes and workplaces compared to cigarettes. Support for complete e-cigarette bans was strongest among older, higher income, married respondents, and former smokers. Complete e-cigarette bans were most strongly endorsed when perceptions of addictiveness and health risks were high. While both e-cigarette lifetime and never-users strongly supported cigarette smoking bans, endorsement for e-cigarette bans varied by lifetime use and intentions to use e-cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS Support for indoor e-cigarette bans is relatively low among individuals with a smoking history. Support for e-cigarette bans may change as evidence regarding their use emerges. These findings have implications for public health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie K Kolar
- Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA.
| | - Brooke G Rogers
- Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA.
| | - Monica Webb Hooper
- Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wilson KM, Torok M, McMillen R, Tanski S, Klein JD, Winickoff JP. Tobacco smoke incursions in multiunit housing. Am J Public Health 2014; 104:1445-53. [PMID: 24922124 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2014.301878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to describe the prevalence of secondhand tobacco smoke incursions reported by multiunit housing (MUH) residents, pinpoint factors associated with exposure, and determine whether smoke-free building policy was associated with prevalence of reported tobacco smoke incursions. METHODS Data are from a 2011 nationally representative dual-frame survey (random-digit-dial and Internet panels) of US adults aged 18 years and older. Individuals who lived in MUH and who reported no smoking in their homes for the past 3 months, whether or not they reported being smokers themselves, were included in this study. Incursions were defined as smelling tobacco smoke in their building or unit. RESULTS Of 562 respondents, 29.5% reported smoke incursions in their buildings. Of these, 16% reported incursions in their own unit, 36.2% of which occurred at least weekly. Government-subsidized housing and partial smoke-free policies were associated with a higher likelihood of reporting smoke incursions. CONCLUSIONS Many residents of multiunit housing are exposed to tobacco smoke in their units and buildings. Partial smoke-free policies do not appear to protect residents and might increase the likelihood of incursions in residents' individual units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Wilson
- Karen M. Wilson is with the Section of Hospital Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver. Michelle Torok is with the Children's Outcomes Research Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine. Robert McMillen is with the Department of Psychology and Social Science Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State. Susanne Tanski is with the Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH. Jonathan D. Klein is with the American Academy of Pediatrics Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, Elk Grove Village, IL. Jonathan P. Winickoff is with the Division of General Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Support for No-Smoking Policies Among Residents of Public Multiunit Housing Differs by Smoking Status. J Community Health 2013; 38:1074-80. [DOI: 10.1007/s10900-013-9716-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|